-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, DAy6+yONbzml/FVcacOSjbG8rceYS/r82LFVg9IMIj3TSYbzsUvG3tq5G0kWCxw6 jASR3LGu5QCRpx3I9MzLbA== 0000950152-97-001832.txt : 19970314 0000950152-97-001832.hdr.sgml : 19970314 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950152-97-001832 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: DEF 14A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19970417 FILED AS OF DATE: 19970313 SROS: AMEX FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: GORMAN RUPP CO CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000042682 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PUMPS & PUMPING EQUIPMENT [3561] IRS NUMBER: 340253990 STATE OF INCORPORATION: OH FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: DEF 14A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-06747 FILM NUMBER: 97555785 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 305 BOWMAN ST STREET 2: PO BOX 1217 CITY: MANSFIELD STATE: OH ZIP: 44901 BUSINESS PHONE: 4197551011 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 305 BOWMAN STREET STREET 2: P.O. BOX 1217 CITY: MANSFIELD STATE: OH ZIP: 44901 DEF 14A 1 THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY DEFINITIVE PROXY 1 ================================================================================ SCHEDULE 14A (RULE 14a) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. ) Filed by the Registrant [X] Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] Check the appropriate box: [ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2)) [X] Definitive Proxy Statement [ ] Definitive Additional Materials [ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.240.14a-12
THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY (NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) ROBERT E. KIRKENDALL, SECRETARY AND ASSISTANT TREASURER (NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): [X] No fee required. [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: ================================================================================ 2 THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY MANSFIELD, OHIO ------------------------ NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ------------------------ The Annual Meeting of the shareholders of The Gorman-Rupp Company will be held at the Company's Training Center, 270 West 6th Street, Mansfield, Ohio, on Thursday, April 17, 1997 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, for the purpose of considering and acting upon: 1. A proposal to fix the number of Directors of the Company at seven and to elect seven Directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected; 2. A proposal to ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent public accountants for the Company during the year ending December 31, 1997; 3. A shareholder proposal set forth in this Proxy Statement which is opposed by the Board of Directors; and 4. Such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Holders of Common Shares of record at the close of business on March 3, 1997 are the only shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting. PLEASE PROMPTLY EXECUTE THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE (WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES), REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING. By Order of the Board of Directors ROBERT E. KIRKENDALL Secretary and Assistant Treasurer March 13, 1997 3 PROXY STATEMENT MARCH 13, 1997 SOLICITATION AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES This Proxy Statement is furnished to shareholders of The Gorman-Rupp Company in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of the shareholders to be held at the Company's Training Center, 270 West 6th Street, Mansfield, Ohio, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, April 17, 1997. Holders of Common Shares of record at the close of business on March 3, 1997 are the only shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting. A shareholder, without affecting any vote previously taken, may revoke his proxy by the execution and delivery to the Company of a later proxy with respect to the same shares, or by giving notice to the Company in writing or in open meeting. The presence at the Meeting of the person appointing a proxy does not in and of itself revoke the appointment. OUTSTANDING SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS As of March 3, 1997, the record date for the determination of persons entitled to vote at the Meeting, there were 8,618,383 Common Shares outstanding. Each Common Share is entitled to one vote. The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is 305 Bowman Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44903. This Proxy Statement and accompanying proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about March 13, 1997. If notice in writing is given by any shareholder to the President, a Vice President or the Secretary of the Company, not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for the holding of the Meeting, that such shareholder desires that the voting for the election of Directors be cumulative, and if announcement of the giving of such notice is made upon the convening of the Meeting by the Chairman or Secretary or by or on behalf of the shareholder giving such notice, each shareholder shall have the right to cumulate such voting power as he possesses at such election. Under cumulative voting, a shareholder controls voting power equal to the number of votes which he otherwise would have been entitled to cast multiplied by the number of Directors to be elected. All of such votes may be cast for a single nominee or may be distributed among any two or more nominees as he may desire. If cumulative voting is invoked, and unless contrary instructions are given by a shareholder who signs a proxy, all votes represented by such proxy will be divided evenly among the candidates nominated by the Board of Directors, except that if so voting should for any 3 4 reason not be effective to elect all of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement, then such votes will be cast so as to maximize the number of the Board of Directors' nominees elected to the Board. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL NO. 1) All Directors will be elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. It is intended that proxies received will be voted in favor of fixing the number of Directors at seven and for the election of the nominees named below. Each of the nominees is presently a Director of the Company. Dr. Lake and Mr. Watson have been selected as nominees at the request of the Rupp family interests. Mr. Jeffrey S. Gorman is the son of Mr. James C. Gorman. In the event that any of the nominees should become unavailable, which the Board of Directors does not anticipate, it is intended that the proxies will be voted in favor of fixing the number of Directors at a lesser number or for a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board of Directors, in the discretion of the persons appointed as proxy holders. The proxies may be voted cumulatively for less than the entire number of nominees if any situation arises which, in the opinion of the proxy holders, makes such action necessary or desirable. Based upon information received from the respective nominees as of February 1, 1997, the following information is furnished with respect to each person nominated for election as a Director.
SHARES OWNED DIRECTOR BENEFICIALLY PERCENT OF NAME, AGE AND CONTINUOUSLY AT FEB. 1, OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(1) SINCE 1997(2) SHARES - ----------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- James C. Gorman 1946 708,531(3) 8.22% Chairman of the Company. Chief Executive Officer (1968-1996). Age: 72 William A. Calhoun 1969 3,824 * Retired. Formerly Senior Partner; Calhoun, Kademenous & Heichel Co., L.P.A.; Mansfield, Ohio (attorneys). Age: 82
4 5
SHARES OWNED DIRECTOR BENEFICIALLY PERCENT OF NAME, AGE AND CONTINUOUSLY AT FEB. 1, OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(1) SINCE 1997(2) SHARES - ----------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Jeffrey S. Gorman 1989 387,185(4) 4.49% Senior Vice President of the Company; General Manager of the Company's Mansfield Division. Vice President (1991-1996). Age: 44 Thomas E. Hoaglin 1993(5) 2,250(6) * Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Banc One Ohio Corporation (Columbus, Ohio). President and Chief Operating Officer, Bank One, Texas, N.A. (Dallas, Texas). Age: 47 Dr. Peter B. Lake 1975 10,141(7) * President, SRI Quality System Registrar, Inc. (Wexford, Penn- sylvania). Program Director, Steel Industry Supplier Audit Process (1991-1992); American Iron and Steel Institute (Wexford, Pennsylvania). Age: 54 John A. Walter 1989 14,676(8) * President (since 1989) and Chief Executive Officer (since 1996) of the Company. Chief Operating Officer (1993-1996). Age: 63
5 6
SHARES OWNED DIRECTOR BENEFICIALLY PERCENT OF NAME, AGE AND CONTINUOUSLY AT FEB. 1, OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(1) SINCE 1997(2) SHARES - ----------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- James R. Watson 1989 13,099(9) * Owner of Print's Appeal and of Sartus Inc.; Mansfield, Ohio (Digital Printing and Design; Seminars) Age: 49
- --------------- * Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares. (1) Except as otherwise indicated, there has been no change in occupation during the past five years. (2) Reported in accordance with the beneficial ownership rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if he has or shares voting power or investment power in respect of such security. Accordingly, the amounts shown in the table do not purport to represent beneficial ownership for any purpose other than compliance with the Commission's reporting requirements. Voting power or investment power with respect to shares reflected in the table are not shared with others except as otherwise indicated. (3) Includes 202,508 shares owned by Mr. Gorman's wife and 73,810 shares held in a trust of which Mr. Gorman is a co-trustee. Mr. Gorman has a beneficial interest in 54,472 of the shares held in the trust, considers that he shares the voting and investment power with respect to all of the foregoing shares, but otherwise disclaims any beneficial interest therein. The amount shown in the table excludes 814,845 shares beneficially owned by members of Mr. Gorman's immediate family and 230,892 shares held in trusts of which he and members of his family have beneficial interests. (54,472 of these trust shares are the same shares described above.) Mr. Gorman disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the shares referred to in this note (3). (4) Includes 21,390 shares owned by Mr. Gorman's wife and 74,988 shares owned by his minor children. Mr. Gorman considers that he shares the voting and investment power with respect to all of the foregoing shares, but otherwise disclaims any beneficial interest therein. The amount shown in the table excludes 38,281 shares held in a trust in which Mr. Gorman has a beneficial interest. Mr. Gorman disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the shares referred to in this note (4). 6 7 (5) Mr. Hoaglin also served as a Director of the Company from 1986 to 1989. (6) Includes 900 shares as to which Mrs. Hoaglin shares voting and investment power. (7) Includes 4,200 shares owned by Mrs. Lake as to which Dr. Lake shares voting and investment power. (8) Includes 7,560 shares as to which Mrs. Walter shares voting and investment power. (9) Includes 630 shares owned by Mr. Watson's wife as to which Mr. Watson shares voting and investment power. The amount shown in the table excludes 789 shares owned by Mr. Watson's adult son. Mr. Watson disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the shares referred to in this note (9). BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND DIRECTORS' COMMITTEES During 1996, a total of ten regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors and a total of six meetings of all standing Directors' Committees were held. All Directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by the Board of Directors and of the total number of meetings held by the respective committees on which they served. The Board of Directors has four committees: (1) an Audit Committee, whose present members are Peter B. Lake (Chairman), William A. Calhoun and James R. Watson; (2) a Salary Committee, whose present members are Thomas E. Hoaglin (Chairman), Peter B. Lake and James C. Gorman; (3) a Pension Committee, whose present members are James R. Watson (Chairman), Peter B. Lake and William A. Calhoun; and (4) a Nominating Committee, whose present members are William A. Calhoun (Chairman), Thomas E. Hoaglin and John A. Walter. The Audit Committee held two meetings in 1996. Its principal functions included reviewing the arrangement and scope of the audit, considering comments made by the independent accountants with respect to the need to improve internal controls, considering corrective action taken by management, reviewing internal accounting procedures and controls with the Company's financial and accounting staff, and reviewing non-audit services provided by the independent accountants. The Salary Committee held one meeting during 1996. Its principal function was to determine the salaries of the elected officers of the Company, subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The Pension Committee held two meetings in 1996. Its principal function was to monitor and assist in the investment of the assets connected with the Company's pension plan. 7 8 The Nominating Committee held one meeting during 1996. Its principal function was to identify, evaluate and recommend individuals for nomination as new members of the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee has adopted procedures by which to consider suggestions from shareholders for Director nominees. Any shareholder wishing to propose a candidate should deliver a typewritten or legible hand written communication to the Company's Corporate Secretary. The submission should provide detailed business and personal biographical data about the candidate, and include a brief analysis explaining why the individual is well-qualified to become a Director nominee. All recommendations will be acknowledged by the Corporate Secretary and promptly referred to the Nominating Committee for evaluation. Each of the Directors, excepting any who are also officers, received a fee for each of the Board of Directors meetings attended. The fee was $1,500 for meetings held in the first quarter, and $1,750 for meetings held during the balance of 1996. No fees were paid, however, for attendance at committee meetings. SHAREHOLDINGS BY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*
SHARED VOTING SHARES OWNED AND NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION BENEFICIALLY INVESTMENT POWER - ----------------------------------- ------------ ---------------- Kenneth E. Dudley 1,624 1,624 Treasurer Robert E. Kirkendall 6,452 -0- Secretary and Assistant Treasurer
- --------------- *The table sets forth information received from the executive officers as of February 1, 1997, and all amounts represent less than 1% of the outstanding shares. The shareholdings of Messrs. J. C. Gorman, J. S. Gorman and J. A. Walter are included under the caption "Election of Directors". PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS The following table sets forth information pertaining to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Shares as of February 1, 1997 by James C. Gorman and as of December 31, 1996 by each other person known to the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the outstanding Common Shares. 8 9
NUMBER PERCENT OF OF SHARES OUTSTANDING NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE OF OWNERSHIP OWNED SHARES - -------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ----------- James C. Gorman Sole voting and investment power 432,213 5.01% 305 Bowman Street Shared voting and investment power 276,318 3.21% Mansfield, Ohio 44903 --------- ----------- TOTAL 708,531 8.22% Banc One Corporation As trustee with sole voting power 459,819 5.34% 100 East Broad Street As trustee with sole investment power 375,108 4.35% Columbus, Ohio As trustee with shared voting power -0- -- 43271-0251 As trustee with shared investment 84,711 .98% power --------- ----------- TOTAL 459,819(1) 5.34% Pioneering Management As investment adviser with sole 513,457 5.96% Corporation voting power 60 State Street As investment adviser with sole 7,000 .08% Boston, Massachusetts investment power 02114 As investment adviser with shared -0- -- voting power As investment adviser with shared 506,457 5.88% investment power --------- ----------- TOTAL 513,457(1) 5.96% All Directors and 1,153,576(2) 13.39% Executive Officers as a group (10 persons)
- --------------- (1) This figure represents the aggregate amount of Common Shares beneficially owned. Of the aggregate amount, however, some shares are subject to sole voting power but shared or no investment power, and some shares are subject to sole investment power but shared or no voting power. Consequently, the sum of this column does not equal the aggregate amount shown. (2) Includes 393,166 shares as to which voting and investment power are shared. 9 10 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION There is shown below information concerning the annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 of those persons who were, at December 31, 1996, (i) the chief executive officer and (ii) the other four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (the "Named Officers"): SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION -------------------- ANNUAL COMPENSATION(1)(2) STOCK LONG-TERM ------------------------------------- OPTIONS/ INCENTIVE ALL OTHER NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OTHER SARS PAYOUTS COMPENSATION ---- -------- ------- ------ --------- ---------- --------------- John A. Walter............... 1996 $168,167 $79,000 $2,829 -0- -0- -0- President and Chief 1995 153,000 76,500 2,412 -0- -0- -0- Executive Officer 1994 148,000 79,000 2,171 -0- -0- -0- James C. Gorman.............. 1996 160,000 40,000 957 -0- -0- -0- Chairman 1995 160,000 41,500 963 -0- -0- -0- 1994 159,333 43,000 966 -0- -0- -0- Jeffrey S. Gorman............ 1996 122,000 58,000 2,623 -0- -0- -0- Senior Vice President; General 1995 114,000 58,000 2,677 -0- -0- -0- Manager, Mansfield Division 1994 108,333 52,500 1,994 -0- -0- -0- Kenneth E. Dudley............ 1996 95,000 27,400 2,414 -0- -0- -0- Treasurer 1995 92,000 26,500 2,090 -0- -0- -0- 1994 88,333 27,500 1,798 -0- -0- -0- Robert E. Kirkendall......... 1996 84,500 21,700 2,026 -0- -0- -0- Secretary and 1995 80,667 21,000 1,697 -0- -0- -0- Assistant Treasurer 1994 77,667 21,500 1,380 -0- -0- -0-
- --------------- (1) The Company sponsors The Gorman-Rupp Company Individual Profit Sharing Retirement Plan ("401(k) Plan"). Substantially all the employees of the Company, including the executive officers and the employees of Patterson Pump Company (a wholly owned subsidiary), are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. Each participant in the 401(k) Plan may make before-tax contributions to the Plan of up to 10% of compensation, but not in excess of the maximum annual amount permitted by the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum annual amount for 1997 is $9,500. Before-tax contributions made to the 401(k) Plan qualify for deferred tax treatment under Section 401(k) of the Code. The Company makes matching contributions on a monthly basis for each participant who is an employee on the last day of the month equal to 20% of the first 2% of the participant's before-tax contributions made 10 11 during the month and 10% of the next 4% of the participant's before-tax contributions made during the month. The participant's before-tax contributions and the Company's matching contributions are nonforfeitable, but are subject to special nondiscrimination tests imposed by the Code. If the tests are not satisfied, contributions by or for highly compensated employees are reduced. Each participant (or the beneficiary of a deceased participant) receives the full amount allocated to a participant's account upon any termination of the participant's employment. During 1996, a total of $1,307,050, consisting of both participant before-tax contributions and Company matching contributions, was allocated to participants' accounts under the 401(k) Plan, including an aggregate amount of $40,965 to the accounts of the executive officers which is included in the compensation shown in the table. The amounts allocated during 1996 to the accounts of the executive officers named in the table are as follows: Mr. Walter ($10,473); Mr. J. C. Gorman ($4,858); Mr. J. S. Gorman ($10,445); Mr. Dudley ($10,239); and Mr. Kirkendall ($4,949). (2) The pension plan in which the Company's executive officers participate is a defined benefit plan covering substantially all employees of the Company and Patterson Pump Company; and the amounts of contributions or accruals applicable to the individual participants therein cannot be readily calculated. The aggregate contributions made to such plan for the benefit of the Company's executive officers amount to approximately 3% of the total contributions made on behalf of all participants covered by the plan. In general, a participant's monthly benefit under the pension plan is determined by multiplying 1.1% of his final average monthly compensation by the number of his credited years and months of service. A participant's final average monthly compensation is one-twelfth of the average annual compensation of the participant for the last 10 years of the participant's employment with the Company (or Patterson Pump Company) or, if less than 10, for his actual years of such employment. The compensation covered by the pension plan for 1996 is identical to the compensation set forth in the table, except that the plan does not cover profit-sharing bonuses or amounts labeled "other" in the table received by any executive officer, as well as, effective as of November 1, 1994, any compensation in excess of $150,000. However, compensation covered by the pension plan does include any before-tax contributions made by the participant to the 401(k) Plan. The benefit amounts applicable to each individual participant are not subject to any deduction for Social Security benefits or other offset amounts. 11 12 As of November 1, 1996, the executive officers had the following number of credited full years of service under the Company's pension plan: Mr. Walter-36; Mr. J.C. Gorman-47; Mr. J.S. Gorman-18; Mr. Dudley-40; and Mr. Kirkendall-18. As of November 1, 1996, the estimated annual benefits payable at age 65 upon retirement to Messrs. Walter, Gorman, Gorman, Dudley and Kirkendall are $52,885, $79,943, $19,077, $35,496 and $13,771, respectively. Mr. J.C. Gorman is age 72 and is active as an officer of the Company. As required by law because he is over age 70 1/2, he receives payments from the pension plan. Those payments totaled $73,224 in 1996. PENSION AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS The following table shows the estimated annual benefits under the Company's pension plan which would have been payable to employees in various compensation classifications upon retirement in 1996 at age 65 after selected periods of service.
FINAL AVERAGE ANNUAL PAY AT AGE 65* 10 YEARS 20 YEARS 30 YEARS 40 YEARS - ------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- $ 25,000 $ 2,750 $ 5,500 $ 8,250 $ 11,000 50,000 5,500 11,000 16,500 22,000 75,000 8,250 16,500 24,750 33,000 100,000 11,000 22,000 33,000 44,000 125,000 13,750 27,500 41,250 55,000 150,000 16,500 33,000 49,500 66,000
- --------------- *Effective as of November 1, 1994, compensation in excess of $150,000 is not taken into account under the pension plan. 12 13 SALARY COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Under the supervision of the Salary Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company has developed compensation policies which seek to enhance the profitability of the Company, and thus shareholder value, by aligning closely the financial interests of the Company's senior managers with those of its shareholders. In addition to these goals, annual base salaries are generally set somewhat below competitive levels so that the Company relies to a large degree on annual incentive compensation to retain corporate officers and other key employees of outstanding abilities and to motivate them to perform to the full extent of their abilities. The incentive compensation is closely tied to corporate, business unit and individual performance in a manner that encourages a long and continuing focus on building profitability and shareholder value. Based on evaluation of these factors, the Committee believes that the senior management of the Company is dedicated to achieving improvements in long-term financial performance and that the compensation policies the Committee administers has contributed to achieving this management focus. Compensation for each of the Named Officers, as well as other senior executives, consists of a base salary and annual incentive compensation or profit sharing. The base salaries are fixed at levels somewhat below the competitive amounts paid to senior managers with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at other companies engaged in the same or similar businesses as the Company. The annual incentive compensation is more closely tied to the Company's success in achieving significant financial and non-financial performance goals. The Committee considers the total compensation of each of the Named Officers and the other senior executives in establishing the elements of compensation. In the early part of each fiscal year, the Committee reviews with the Chief Executive Officer and approves, with modifications considered appropriate, an annual salary for the Company's senior executives (other than the Chief Executive Officer). Salaries are developed under the ultimate direction of the Chief Executive Officer based upon industry and national surveys and performance judgments as to the past and expected future contributions of the individual senior executives. The Committee independently reviews and fixes the base salary of the Chief Executive Officer based on similar competitive compensation data and the Committee's assessment of his past performance and its expectation as to his future contributions in leading the Company and its businesses. At the beginning of each year, performance objectives for purposes of determining annual profit sharing are established for each business unit based upon operating earnings. At the end of each year, performance against these objectives is determined by an arithmetic calculation. In determining the profit sharing in 1996 for other eligible employees, including the Named Officers, 13 14 the Committee reviews with the Chief Executive Officer executive management's recommendations based on individual performance. The results of these evaluations are considered by the Salary Committee and the Board of Directors when determining the amounts to be awarded as profit sharing (which appear as "Bonus" in the Summary Compensation Table on page 11). The Committee believes that its past awards of performance have successfully focused the Company's senior management on building continued profitability and shareholder value. The foregoing report has been furnished by members of the Salary Committee. /s/ DR. PETER B. LAKE /s/ THOMAS E. HOAGLIN /s/ JAMES C. GORMAN - ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------- Dr. Peter B. Lake Thomas E. Hoaglin James C. Gorman Chairman
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company's Common Shares against the cumulative total return of the American Stock Exchange Market Value Index and a Peer Group Index for the period of five fiscal years commencing January 1, 1992 and ending December 31, 1996. The issuers in the Peer Group Index were selected on a line-of-business basis by reference to SIC Code 3561--Pumps and Pumping Equipment. The Peer Group Index is composed of the following issuers: Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp., BW/IP Holdings Inc., Camco International Inc., Dresser Industries, Inc., Duriron Company Inc., Goulds Pumps Inc., Graco Inc., Haskel International, Inc., Idex Corp., IMO Industries, Inc., Met-Pro Corp., Robbins & Myers Inc., Roper Industries Inc. and Sundstrand Corp., in addition to the Company. 14 15 COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN AMONG THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY, AMEX MARKET INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX
MEASUREMENT PERIOD THE AMEX PEER (FISCAL YEAR GORMAN- MARKET GROUP COVERED) RUPP CO. INDEX INDEX 1991 100.00 100.00 100.00 1992 159.05 101.37 103.57 1993 145.81 120.44 124.01 1994 154.73 106.39 116.88 1995 138.80 137.13 149.88 1996 126.75 144.70 183.64
- ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON JAN. 1, 1992 - ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED - FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31, 1996 15 16 APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (PROPOSAL NO. 2) A proposal will be presented at the Meeting to ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent public accountants for the Company during the year ending December 31, 1997. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. Although such ratification is not required by law, the Board of Directors believes that shareholders should be given this opportunity to express their views on the subject. While not binding on the Board of Directors, the failure of the shareholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent public accountants would be considered by the Directors in determining whether to continue the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP. THE DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2 TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL (PROPOSAL NO. 3) Two of the Company's shareholders (who are husband and wife) have submitted the following Proposal and supporting statement for consideration and vote of the shareholders at the Meeting. The Board of Directors and the Company accept no responsibility for the Proposal or the supporting statement. The names and addresses of the proponents, and the number of Common Shares held by them, will be furnished by the Company to any person, orally or in writing as requested, promptly upon the receipt of any oral or written request therefor. The Proposal is identical to the proposal that these same two shareholders submitted for consideration and vote at the 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In 1996, the Directors recommended a vote against the Proposal, and shareholders in fact cast 96% of the total vote against the Proposal. The Board of Directors again recommends a vote against the Proposal for the reasons stated following the Proposal and supporting statement. 16 17 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT It is requested that the Board of Directors of The Gorman-Rupp Company ("GRC") adopt the following proposal: To assure dedication to the best interests of GRC and to enhance the value of GRC shares by causing GRC executives and top management to be concerned shareholders through the implementation of: A reasonable, progressive stock purchase program for management, so that all officers and top managers of GRC will hold at least two and one-half (2 1/2) times their annual salary in GRC shares, within five (5) years of the program's inception, also applying to later appointments to the category of officers or top management from date of appointment. This minimum amount to be held throughout employment tenure with GRC. This proposal was submitted to the shareholders at last year's meeting and received sufficient support to receive consideration again in the current proxy. The change in leadership of Gorman-Rupp that we predicted last year has begun. In the interim, the shareholders have experienced a negative total annual return. The stock, which has been as high as $20.25 in recent years, has declined over 30%. The Board of Directors and the Officers have been unable to reverse this trend, which has hurt employees as well as the other shareholders. Our proposal is viable, has been adopted in similar form by many other companies, and calls for Management to recognize that we have not had "another good year" as they so often predict. Indeed, as of October 1, 1996, shareholders suffered a negative total return for the previous 12 months (-6.3%) and for 36 months (-7.6%). These are not good years or good returns. We have made many suggestions to Management to align their interests with those of shareholders as have been adopted by C.P.C. International, Ford Motor Co., J.C. Penney, Sunbeam and others who reward management the same way shareholders are: by increasing capital value. These suggestions have been dismissed. The small dividend increases have been viewed as "gimmicks" by the financial community which has ignored them. Let Management truly align their financial interests with those of the shareholders by tying the growth of their personal fortunes to that of the Company. We believe we will see dramatic results and urge a favorable vote. Only then will Management be forced to address the needs of shareholders. 17 18 RECOMMENDATION AND STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSAL. The Proposal, being identical to the one submitted in 1996, sets forth all of the same disadvantages and impracticalities for the Company that caused the shareholders to vote overwhelmingly against it last year. Furthermore, the proponents' supporting statement, while not identical, contains comparable rhetoric that tries to legitimize a vague, poorly conceived and indefensible Proposal. As a consequence, the Directors will justify their ongoing opposition to the Proposal with certain of their expressions made last year, and will also address the issue of shareholders' return on investment alluded to by the proponents. Although the Proposal is unclear regarding its implementation, it attempts to change the Company's basic compensation system so that "all officers and top managers" must divert a percentage of their annual cash salaries into the Company's Common Shares, until stated minimums are reached and maintained. This inflexible approach fails to consider the many differences among each officer's or manager's personal financial and family situation. As a consequence, the Directors believe that the Proposal would place an unnecessary financial burden on many officers and managers and may cause some to seek employment outside of the Company. Contrary to the proponent's assertions, the Company's current compensation policies for top management motivate these individuals to be responsible and accountable for the Company's performance. As stated elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the annual base salaries of top management are generally set below competitive levels. Therefore, the Company relies to a large degree on annual incentive compensation to retain its key employees, and these individuals are rewarded for results that maximize the shareholders' interests. In addition, the Company has long sponsored plans that encourage the ownership of the Company's Common Shares. The Company presently makes the purchase of its Common Shares available (in some cases with Company cash contributions, and in all cases without brokers' fees or commissions) under an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, a 401(k) Plan and a Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The Board of Directors continues to consider various management programs to provide other ways to make Common Shares available to key employees, consistent with the shareholders' interests. Currently, all of the Company's officers are shareholders and participate in one or more of the foregoing plans. A purchase of 100 of the Company's Common Shares in 1968 (the year in which Gorman-Rupp became a public company) would have grown to 762 Common Shares as of February 13, 1997 through stock splits and stock dividends, and generated $6,331.63 in cash dividends. The total return to a shareholder over 29 years would have produced an annual average of 20.7% (12.3% from price appreciation and 8.4% from dividends). A similar purchase in 1987 would have yielded 18 19 15.9% (10.1% from price appreciation and 5.8% from dividends), and 100 Common Shares purchased in 1992 would have resulted in a total annual average growth of 8.7% (4.8% from price appreciation and 3.9% from dividends). On October 24, 1996, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $.14 per share. This represented an increase of 7.7% per share from the previous dividend and the 187th consecutive quarterly dividend paid by the Company and the 24th consecutive year of increased dividend payments. Over the last ten years, the average annual payment of cash dividends to shareholders has been 50% of the Company's earnings. The Board of Directors does not consider such returns "gimmicks." VOTE REQUIRED The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the Common Shares entitled to vote at the Meeting is required to approve the Proposal. However, because the Proposal is precatory rather than mandatory, requesting, rather than mandating action, its approval is not binding on the Company. While not binding, the Board of Directors will nevertheless consider the views of the shareholders. THE DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL NO. 3. GENERAL INFORMATION The Company's 1996 annual report to shareholders, including financial statements, is being mailed concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all shareholders of the Company. The cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone or telecopy by a few officers or regular employees of the Company. No separate compensation will be paid for the solicitation of proxies, although the Company may reimburse brokers and other persons holding Common Shares in their names or in the names of nominees for their expenses in sending proxy material to the beneficial owners of such Common Shares. Any proposal by a shareholder intended to be presented at the 1998 annual meeting of shareholders must be received by the Company for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy of the Company relating to such meeting on or before November 14, 1997. 19 20 OTHER BUSINESS Financial and other reports will be submitted to the Meeting, but it is not intended that any action will be taken in respect thereof. The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement which might be brought before the Meeting for action, but if any such other matters should arise, it is intended that the persons appointed as proxy holders will vote or act thereon in accordance with their own judgment. You are urged to date, sign and return your proxy promptly. For your convenience, enclosed is a self-addressed return envelope requiring no postage if mailed in the United States. By Order of the Board of Directors ROBERT E. KIRKENDALL Secretary and Assistant Treasurer March 13, 1997 20 21
THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF 305 Bowman Street - Mansfield, Ohio 44903 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS -----------------------------------------
The undersigned hereby appoints John A. Walter, Robert E. Kirkendall and Jeffrey S. Gorman as Proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote all of The Gorman-Rupp Company Common Shares held of record on March 3, 1997 by the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of the shareholders to be held on April 17, 1997, or at any adjournment thereof, as follows: NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 1. DIRECTORS: 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS WITHHOLD JAMES C. GORMAN Fixing the number of Directors at 7 and electing AUTHORITY WILLIAM A. CALHOUN all nominees listed (except as marked to the contrary below) to vote for all JEFFREY S. GORMAN (INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority FOR nominees listed THOMAS E. HOAGLIN to vote for any individual nominee, write his name below.) [ ] [ ] DR. PETER B. LAKE JOHN A. WALTER JAMES R. WATSON ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 2. 2. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP as FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN independent public accountants [ ] [ ] [ ]
(Continue, sign and date on other side) (Continued from other side) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL NO. 3. 3. APPROVAL OF THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN [ ] [ ] [ ] 4. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the PROXY Meeting. COMMON WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER; IF NO SHARES DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2, AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 3. Please sign exactly as your name appears below. If signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ please give full title as such; and if signing for a corporation, please give your title. When shares are in the names of more than one person, each should sign. Date: __________________________ , 1997 --------------------------------------------- [ ] Please check this box if you plan to attend the Meeting. --------------------------------------------- Signature of Shareholder(s)
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----