FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

As of June 30, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:



	Fair Value Measurements Using
As of June 30, 2016:	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient (NAV)		Total
	(in millions)
Southern Company
Assets:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	36	$	—	$	—	$	36
Interest rate derivatives	—		27		—		—		27
Nuclear decommissioning trusts^(a)	642		917		—		18		1,577
Cash equivalents	1,014		—		—		—		1,014
Other investments	9		—		1		—		10
Total	$	1,665	$	980	$	1	$	18	$	2,664
Liabilities:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	110	$	—	$	—	$	110
Interest rate derivatives	—		7		—		—		7
Foreign currency derivatives	—		38		—		—		38
Total	$	—	$	155	$	—	$	—	$	155

Alabama Power
Assets:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	10	$	—	$	—	$	10
Nuclear decommissioning trusts^(b)
Domestic equity	363		67		—		—		430
Foreign equity	46		47		—		—		93
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities	—		24		—		—		24
Corporate bonds	21		142		—		—		163
Mortgage and asset backed securities	—		22		—		—		22
Private Equity	—		—		—		18		18
Other	—		8		—		—		8
Cash equivalents	210		—		—		—		210
Total	$	640	$	320	$	—	$	18	$	978
Liabilities:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22



	Fair Value Measurements Using
As of June 30, 2016:	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient (NAV)		Total
	(in millions)
Georgia Power
Assets:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	15	$	—	$	—	$	15
Interest rate derivatives	—		14		—		—		14
Nuclear decommissioning trusts^{(b) (c)}
Domestic equity	187		1		—		—		188
Foreign equity	—		116		—		—		116
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities	—		109		—		—		109
Municipal bonds	—		57		—		—		57
Corporate bonds	—		159		—		—		159
Mortgage and asset backed securities	—		159		—		—		159
Other	25		6		—		—		31
Cash equivalents	90		—		—		—		90
Total	$	302	$	636	$	—	$	—	$	938
Liabilities:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	5

Gulf Power
Assets:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2
Cash equivalents	20		—		—		—		20
Total	$	20	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	22
Liabilities:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	55	$	—	$	—	$	55
Interest rate derivatives	—		7		—		—		7
Total	$	—	$	62	$	—	$	—	$	62

Mississippi Power
Assets:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	1
Cash equivalents	102		—		—		—		102
Total	$	102	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	103
Liabilities:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	23	$	—	$	—	$	23



	Fair Value Measurements Using
As of June 30, 2016:	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient (NAV)		Total
	(in millions)

Southern Power
Assets:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	8	$	—	$	—	$	8
Cash equivalents	449		—		—		—		449
Total	$	449	$	8	$	—	$	—	$	457
Liabilities:
Energy-related derivatives	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	5
Foreign currency derivatives	—		38		—		—		38
Total	$	—	$	43	$	—	$	—	$	43


(a)	For additional detail, see the nuclear decommissioning trusts sections for Alabama Power and Georgia Power in this table.


(b)	Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, payables related to pending investment purchases, and currencies.


(c)	Includes the investment securities pledged to creditors and collateral received and excludes payables related to the securities lending program. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $46 million of the fair market value of Georgia Power's nuclear decommissioning trust funds' securities were on loan to creditors under the funds' managers' securities lending program.

Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power continue to elect the option to fair value investment securities held in the nuclear decommissioning trust funds. The fair value of the funds at Southern Company, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the funds' expenses, increased by $28 million and $48 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and decreased by $1 million and increased by $31 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Alabama Power recorded an increase in fair value of $29 million and $40 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and $5 million and $19 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 as a change in regulatory liabilities related to its AROs. Georgia Power recorded a decrease in fair value of $1 million and an increase of $8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and a decrease in fair value of $6 million and an increase in fair value of $12 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 as a change in its regulatory asset related to its AROs.

Valuation Methodologies

The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of interest rate derivatives reflect the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The fair value of cross-currency swaps reflect the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the market's expectation of future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, and discount rates. The interest rate derivatives and cross-currency swaps are categorized as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See Note (H) for additional information on how these derivatives are used.

The NRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds for future decommissioning. For fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts, external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined at the end of each business day through the net asset value, which is established by obtaining the underlying securities' individual prices from the primary pricing source. A market price secured from the primary source vendor is then evaluated by management in its valuation of the assets within the trusts. As a general approach, fixed income market pricing vendors gather market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, observed market movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotes and other market information, including live trading levels and pricing analysts' judgments, are also obtained when available. See Note 1 to the financial statements of Southern Company, Alabama Power, and Georgia Power under "Nuclear Decommissioning" in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for additional information.

"Other investments" include investments that are not traded in the open market. The fair value of these investments have been determined based on market factors including comparable multiples and the expectations regarding cash flows and business plan executions.

As of June 30, 2016, the fair value measurements of private equity investments held in the nuclear decommissioning trust that are calculated at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient, as well as the nature and risks of those investments, were as follows:



As of June 30, 2016:	Fair Value		Unfunded Commitments		Redemption Frequency	Redemption Notice Period
	(in millions)
Southern Company	$	18	$	28	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Alabama Power	$	18	$	28	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Private equity funds include a fund-of-funds that invests in high-quality private equity funds across several market sectors, a fund that invests in real estate assets, and a fund that acquires companies to create resale value. Private equity funds do not have redemption rights. Distributions from these funds will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated. Liquidations are expected to occur at various times over the next ten years.

As of June 30, 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:



	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:
Southern Company	$	37,953	$	40,992
Alabama Power	$	7,090	$	7,940
Georgia Power	$	10,603	$	11,881
Gulf Power	$	1,182	$	1,275
Mississippi Power	$	2,983	$	2,967
Southern Power	$	4,332	$	4,523

The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the registrants.