XML 44 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Effective Tax Rate and Unrecognized Tax Benefits
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Effective Tax Rate and Unrecognized Tax Benefits [Abstract]  
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND UNRECOGNISED TAX BENEFITS
  (G)   EFFECTIVE TAX RATE AND UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS
      Effective Tax Rate
 
      See Note 5 to the financial statements of each registrant in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for information on the effective income tax rate.
 
      Southern Company
 
      Southern Company’s effective tax rate was 35.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 31.8% for the corresponding period in 2010. Southern Company’s effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate primarily due to its employee stock dividend deduction and non-taxable AFUDC equity. Southern Company’s effective tax rate increased primarily due to no production activities deduction and no Georgia state income tax credits for activity through Georgia ports available to Southern Company for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the production activities deduction and additional Georgia state income tax credits recognized as of June 30, 2010.
 
      Alabama Power
 
      Alabama Power’s effective tax rate was 38.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 36.9% for the corresponding period in 2010. The increase was not material.
 
      Georgia Power
 
      Georgia Power’s effective tax rate was 34.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 30.1% for the corresponding period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to the impact of Georgia state income tax credits discussed above under “Southern Company” and a decrease in non-taxable AFUDC equity.
 
      Gulf Power
 
      Gulf Power’s effective tax rate was 35.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 36.2% for the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease was not material.
 
      Mississippi Power
 
      Mississippi Power’s effective tax rate was 32.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 37.6% for the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in non-taxable AFUDC equity.
 
      Southern Power
 
      Southern Power’s effective tax rate was 35.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 26.7% for the corresponding period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to the impact of a decrease in investment tax credits and no production activities deduction, combined with significantly higher net income.
      Unrecognized Tax Benefits
 
      Changes during 2011 for unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
                                                 
    Southern   Alabama   Georgia   Gulf   Mississippi   Southern
    Company   Power   Power   Power   Power   Power
 
    (in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010
  $ 296     $ 43     $ 237     $ 4     $ 4     $ 2  
Tax positions from current periods
    43       4       7             1        
Tax positions from prior periods
    (67 )           (67 )                  
Reductions due to settlements
    (112 )           (112 )                  
Reductions due to expired statute of limitations
                                   
 
Balance as of June 30, 2011
  $ 160     $ 47     $ 65     $ 4     $ 5     $ 2  
 
      The tax positions from current periods relate primarily to the MC Asset Recovery litigation settlement refund claim, the tax accounting method change for repairs, and other miscellaneous uncertain tax positions. See Note 5 to the financial statements of Southern Company in Item 8 of the Form 10-K under “Effective Tax Rate” for additional information. The tax positions decrease from prior periods and reductions due to settlements primarily relate to the settlement of the Georgia state tax credit litigation on June 10, 2011. See Note (B) under “Income Tax Matters — Georgia State Income Tax Credits” herein for additional information.
 
      The impact on the effective tax rate, if recognized, is as follows:
                                 
                    As of
    As of June 30, 2011   December 31, 2010
    Georgia   Other   Southern   Southern
    Power   Registrants   Company   Company
 
    (in millions
Tax positions impacting the effective tax rate
  $ 26     $ 12     $ 73     $ 217  
Tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate
    39       47       87       79  
 
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits
  $ 65     $ 59     $ 160     $ 296  
 
      The tax positions impacting the effective tax rate primarily relate to the production activities deduction tax position, the MC Asset Recovery litigation settlement refund claim and other miscellaneous tax positions. See Note 5 to the financial statements of Southern Company in Item 8 of the Form 10-K under “Effective Tax Rate” for additional information. The tax positions not impacting the effective tax rate relate to the timing difference associated with the tax accounting method change for repairs. These amounts are presented on a gross basis without considering the related federal or state income tax impact.
 
      Accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
                         
    Georgia   Other   Southern
    Power   Registrants   Company
 
    (in millions)
Interest accrued as of December 31, 2010
  $ 27     $ 2     $ 29  
Interest reclassified due to settlements
    (24 )           (24 )
Interest accrued during the period
    3       2       5  
 
Balance as of June 30, 2011
  $ 6     $ 4     $ 10  
 
      All of the registrants classify interest on tax uncertainties as interest expense. The interest reclassified due to settlements is primarily associated with the Georgia state tax credit litigation settled on June 10, 2011. See Note (B) under “Income Tax Matters — Georgia State Income Tax Credits” herein for additional information.
 
      None of the registrants accrued any penalties on uncertain tax positions.
      It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits associated with a majority of Southern Company’s unrecognized tax positions will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months. The resolution of the tax accounting method change for repairs, as well as the conclusion or settlement of state audits, could also impact the balances significantly. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot be determined.
      Tax Method of Accounting for Repairs
      Southern Company submitted a change in the tax accounting method for repair costs associated with its subsidiaries’ generation, transmission, and distribution systems with the filing of the 2009 federal income tax return in September 2010. The new tax method resulted in net positive cash flow in 2010 of approximately $141 million for Alabama Power, $133 million for Georgia Power, $8 million for Gulf Power, $5 million for Mississippi Power, $6 million for Southern Power, and $297 million for Southern Company on a consolidated basis. Although IRS approval of this change is considered automatic, the amount claimed is subject to review because the IRS will be issuing final guidance on this matter. Currently, the IRS is working with the utility industry in an effort to resolve this matter in a consistent manner for all utilities. Due to uncertainty concerning the ultimate resolution of this matter, an unrecognized tax benefit has been recorded for the change in the tax accounting method for repair costs. The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.