XML 39 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Feb. 28, 2016
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]  
Schedule of components of goodwill and other intangible assets [Table Text Block]
In MillionsFeb. 28, 2016May 31, 2015
Goodwill$8,692.4$8,874.9
Other intangible assets:
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Brands and other indefinite-lived intangibles4,119.54,262.1
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Franchise agreements, customer relationships, and other finite-lived intangibles533.7544.0
Less accumulated amortization(143.4)(129.1)
Intangible assets subject to amortization, net390.3414.9
Other intangible assets4,509.84,677.0
Total$13,202.2$13,551.9
Schedule of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill [Table Text Block]
In MillionsU.S. RetailInternationalConvenience Stores and FoodserviceJoint VenturesTotal
Balance as of May 31, 2015$6,419.0$1,133.3$921.1$401.5$8,874.9
Acquisitions54.128.6--82.7
Divestiture(180.2)(4.3)--(184.5)
Other activity, primarily foreign
currency translation-(78.7)-(2.0)(80.7)
Balance as of Feb. 28, 2016$6,292.9$1,078.9$921.1$399.5$8,692.4
Schedule of changes in the carrying amount of other intangible assets [Table Text Block]
In MillionsU.S. RetailInternationalJoint VenturesTotal
Balance as of May 31, 2015$3,311.9$1,301.5$63.6$4,677.0
Acquisitions23.17.0-30.1
Divestiture(119.4)--(119.4)
Other activity, primarily foreign currency translation(2.8)(75.7)0.6(77.9)
Balance as of Feb. 28, 2016$3,212.8$1,232.8$64.2$4,509.8
Schedule of at-risk brand assets [Table Text Block]

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we changed the date of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessment from the first day of the third quarter to the first day of the second quarter to more closely align with the timing of our annual long-range planning process. As of our fiscal 2016 assessment date, there was no impairment of any of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets as their related fair values were substantially in excess of the carrying values, except for the Mountain High and Uncle Toby’s brand assets. The excess fair value above the carrying value of these brand assets is as follows:

In MillionsCarrying ValueExcess Fair Value Above Carrying Value
Mountain High$35.420%
Uncle Toby's$52.211%