XML 95 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Supplemental Information About The Credit Quality Of Financing Receivables And Allowance For Losses On
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Credit Quality Financing Receivables [Abstract]  
Supplemental Information About Credit Quality Of Financing Receivables And Allowance For Losses On Financing Receivables

12. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE CREDIT QUALITY OF FINANCING RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOSSES ON FINANCING RECEIVABLES

We provide further detailed information about the credit quality of our Commercial, Real Estate and Consumer financing receivables portfolios. For each portfolio, we describe the characteristics of the financing receivables and provide information about collateral, payment performance, credit quality indicators, and impairment. We manage these portfolios using delinquency and nonearning data as key performance indicators. The categories used within this section such as impaired loans, troubled debt restructuring (TDR) and nonaccrual financing receivables are defined by the authoritative guidance and we base our categorization on the related scope and definitions contained in the related standards. The categories of nonearning and delinquent are defined by us and are used in our process for managing our financing receivables. Definitions of these categories are provided in Note 1 in our 2012 consolidated financial statements.

COMMERCIAL

 

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Losses

The following table provides further information about general and specific reserves related to Commercial financing receivables.

       Financing receivables 
       March 31, December 31, 
(In millions)      2013 2012 
             
CLL            
    Americas      $72,318 $72,517 
    Europe       35,435  37,035 
    Asia       10,158  11,401 
    Other       534  605 
Total CLL       118,445  121,558 
             
Energy Financial Services       4,734  4,851 
             
GECAS       10,557  10,915 
             
Other       456  486 
             
Total Commercial financing receivables, before allowance for losses    $134,192 $137,810 
             
Non-impaired financing receivables      $129,345 $132,741 
General reserves       563  554 
             
Impaired loans       4,847  5,069 
Specific reserves       430  487 
             

Past Due Financing Receivables

The following table displays payment performance of Commercial financing receivables.

  March 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
  Over 30 days  Over 90 days  Over 30 days  Over 90 days 
  past due  past due  past due  past due 
             
CLL            
    Americas 1.1% 0.6% 1.1% 0.5%
    Europe 3.9  2.2  3.7  2.1 
    Asia 0.8  0.4  0.9  0.6 
    Other 0.0  0.0  0.1  0.0 
Total CLL 1.9  1.0  1.9  1.0 
             
Energy Financial Services 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 
             
GECAS 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 
             
Other 1.6  1.3  2.8  2.8 
             
Total 1.7  0.9  1.7  0.9 
             

Nonaccrual Financing Receivables

The following table provides further information about Commercial financing receivables that are classified as nonaccrual. Of our $3,900 million and $4,166 million of nonaccrual financing receivables at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, $2,310 million and $2,647 million are currently paying in accordance with their contractual terms, respectively.

 Nonaccrual financing Nonearning financing 
 receivables receivables 
 March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)2013 2012 2013 2012 
             
CLL            
    Americas$1,896 $1,951 $1,401 $1,333 
    Europe 1,573  1,740  1,122  1,299 
    Asia 408  395  170  193 
    Other 9  52  9  52 
Total CLL 3,886  4,138  2,702  2,877 
             
Energy Financial Services 0  0  0  0 
             
GECAS 0  3  0  0 
             
Other 14  25  13  13 
Total$3,900 $4,166 $2,715 $2,890 
             
Allowance for losses percentage 25.5% 25.0% 36.6% 36.0%
             

Impaired Loans

The following table provides information about loans classified as impaired and specific reserves related to Commercial.

 With no specific allowance With a specific allowance
  Recorded Unpaid Average  Recorded Unpaid   Average
 investment principal investment in investment principal Associated investment in
(In millions)in loans balance loans in loans balance allowance loans
                     
March 31, 2013                    
                     
CLL                    
    Americas$2,363 $2,798 $2,425 $610 $751 $173 $584
    Europe 1,058  1,879  1,094  551  911  236  597
    Asia 158  167  110  82  84  17  95
    Other 0  0  0  9  13  3  31
Total CLL 3,579  4,844  3,629  1,252  1,759  429  1,307
Energy Financial Services 0  0  0  0  0  0  0
GECAS 0  0  0  0  0  0  2
Other 9  20  13  7  9  1  7
Total$3,588 $4,864 $3,642 $1,259 $1,768 $430 $1,316
                     

December 31, 2012                    
                     
CLL                    
    Americas$2,487 $2,927 $2,535 $557 $681 $178 $987
    Europe 1,131  1,901  1,009  643  978  278  805
    Asia 62  64  62  109  120  23  134
    Other 0  0  43  52  68  6  16
Total CLL 3,680  4,892  3,649  1,361  1,847  485  1,942
Energy Financial Services 0  0  2  0  0  0  7
GECAS 0  0  17  3  3  0  5
Other 17  28  26  8  8  2  40
Total$3,697 $4,920 $3,694 $1,372 $1,858 $487 $1,994
                     

We recognized $53 million, $253 million and $57 million of interest income, including $16 million, $92 million and $23 million on a cash basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, the year ended December 31, 2012 and the three months ended March 31, 2012, respectively, principally in our CLL Americas business. The total average investment in impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 was $4,958 million and $5,688 million, respectively.

 

Impaired loans classified as TDRs in our CLL business were $3,717 million and $3,872 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and were primarily attributable to CLL Americas ($2,564 million and $2,577 million, respectively). For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we modified $412 million of loans classified as TDRs, primarily in CLL Americas ($236 million) and CLL EMEA ($99 million). Changes to these loans primarily included extensions, interest only payment periods, debt to equity exchange and forbearance or other actions, which are in addition to, or sometimes in lieu of, fees and rate increases. Of our $2,555 million and $2,384 million of modifications classified as TDRs in the twelve months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, $43 million and $108 million have subsequently experienced a payment default in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Credit Quality Indicators

Substantially all of our Commercial financing receivables portfolio is secured lending and we assess the overall quality of the portfolio based on the potential risk of loss measure. The metric incorporates both the borrower's credit quality along with any related collateral protection.

 

Our internal risk ratings process is an important source of information in determining our allowance for losses and represents a comprehensive, statistically validated approach to evaluate risk in our financing receivables portfolios. In deriving our internal risk ratings, we stratify our Commercial portfolios into 21 categories of default risk and/or six categories of loss given default to group into three categories: A, B and C. Our process starts by developing an internal risk rating for our borrowers, which are based upon our proprietary models using data derived from borrower financial statements, agency ratings, payment history information, equity prices and other commercial borrower characteristics. We then evaluate the potential risk of loss for the specific lending transaction in the event of borrower default, which takes into account such factors as applicable collateral value, historical loss and recovery rates for similar transactions, and our collection capabilities. Our internal risk ratings process and the models we use are subject to regular monitoring and validation controls. The frequency of rating updates is set by our credit risk policy, which requires annual Risk Committee approval. The models are updated on a regular basis and statistically validated annually, or more frequently as circumstances warrant.

 

The table below summarizes our Commercial financing receivables by risk category. As described above, financing receivables are assigned one of 21 risk ratings based on our process and then these are grouped by similar characteristics into three categories in the table below. Category A is characterized by either high credit quality borrowers or transactions with significant collateral coverage, which substantially reduces or eliminates the risk of loss in the event of borrower default. Category B is characterized by borrowers with weaker credit quality than those in Category A, or transactions with moderately strong collateral coverage, which minimizes but may not fully mitigate the risk of loss in the event of default. Category C is characterized by borrowers with higher levels of default risk relative to our overall portfolio or transactions where collateral coverage may not fully mitigate a loss in the event of default.

 Secured
(In millions)A B C Total
            
March 31, 2013           
            
CLL           
    Americas$68,586 $1,616 $2,116 $72,318
    Europe 32,230  1,144  1,209  34,583
    Asia 9,737  54  209  10,000
    Other 137  33  9  179
Total CLL 110,690  2,847  3,543  117,080
            
Energy Financial Services 4,603  0  0  4,603
            
GECAS 10,344  66  147  10,557
            
Other 456  0  0  456
Total$126,093 $2,913 $3,690 $132,696

December 31, 2012           
            
CLL           
    Americas$68,360 $1,775 $2,382 $72,517
    Europe 33,754  1,188  1,256  36,198
    Asia 10,732  117  372  11,221
    Other 161  0  94  255
Total CLL 113,007  3,080  4,104  120,191
            
Energy Financial Services 4,725  0  0  4,725
            
GECAS 10,681  223  11  10,915
            
Other 486  0  0  486
Total$128,899 $3,303 $4,115 $136,317
            
            

For our secured financing receivables portfolio, our collateral position and ability to work out problem accounts mitigates our losses. Our asset managers have deep industry expertise that enables us to identify the optimum approach to default situations. We price risk premiums for weaker credits at origination, closely monitor changes in creditworthiness through our risk ratings and watch list process, and are engaged early with deteriorating credits to minimize economic loss. Secured financing receivables within risk Category C are predominantly in our CLL businesses and are primarily composed of senior term lending facilities and factoring programs secured by various asset types including inventory, accounts receivable, cash, equipment and related business facilities as well as franchise finance activities secured by underlying equipment.

 

Loans within Category C are reviewed and monitored regularly, and classified as impaired when it is probable that they will not pay in accordance with contractual terms. Our internal risk rating process identifies credits warranting closer monitoring; and as such, these loans are not necessarily classified as nonearning or impaired.

 

Our unsecured Commercial financing receivables portfolio is primarily attributable to our Interbanca S.p.A. and GE Sanyo Credit acquisitions in Europe and Asia, respectively. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these financing receivables included $490 million and $458 million rated A, $620 million and $583 million rated B, and $386 million and $452 million rated C, respectively.

REAL ESTATE

 

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Losses

The following table provides further information about general and specific reserves related to Real Estate financing receivables.

       Financing receivables 
        March 31,  December 31, 
(In millions)       2013  2012 
             
Real Estate financing receivables, before allowance for losses    $19,733 $20,946 
             
Non-impaired financing receivables      $14,478 $15,253 
General reserves       107  132 
             
Impaired loans       5,255  5,693 
Specific reserves       158  188 
             

Past Due Financing Receivables

The following table displays payment performance of Real Estate financing receivables.

  March 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
  Over 30 days Over 90 days  Over 30 days Over 90 days 
  past due past due  past due past due 
             
Real Estate 2.2% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2%

Nonaccrual Financing Receivables

The following table provides further information about Real Estate financing receivables that are classified as nonaccrual. Of our $4,417 million and $4,885 million of nonaccrual financing receivables at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, $3,997 million and $4,461 million are currently paying in accordance with their contractual terms, respectively.

 Nonaccrual financing Nonearning financing 
 receivables receivables 
 March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)2013 2012 2013 2012 
             
Real Estate$4,417 $4,885 $456 $444 
             
Allowance for losses percentage 6.0% 6.6% 58.1% 72.1%
             

Impaired Loans

The following table provides information about loans classified as impaired and specific reserves related to Real Estate.

 With no specific allowance With a specific allowance
 Recorded Unpaid Average Recorded Unpaid   Average
 investment principal investment investment principal Associated investment
(In millions)in loans balance in loans in loans balance allowance in loans
                     
March 31, 2013                    
                     
Real Estate$3,186 $3,577 $3,338 $2,069 $2,462 $158 $2,136
                     

December 31, 2012                    
                     
Real Estate$3,491 $3,712 $3,773 $2,202 $2,807 $188 $3,752

We recognized $57 million, $329 million and $90 million of interest income, including $44 million, $237 million and $68 million on a cash basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, the year ended December 31, 2012 and the three months ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The total average investment in impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 was $5,474 million and $7,525 million, respectively.

 

Real Estate TDRs decreased from $5,146 million at December 31, 2012 to $4,837 million at March 31, 2013, primarily driven by resolution of TDRs through paydowns and the impact of currency exchange partially offset by extensions of loans scheduled to mature during 2013, some of which were classified as TDRs upon modification. We deem loan modifications to be TDRs when we have granted a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty and we do not receive adequate compensation in the form of an effective interest rate that is at current market rates of interest given the risk characteristics of the loan or other consideration that compensates us for the value of the concession. The limited liquidity and higher return requirements in the real estate market for loans with higher loan-to-value (LTV) ratios has typically resulted in the conclusion that the modified terms are not at current market rates of interest, even if the modified loans are expected to be fully recoverable. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we modified $327 million of loans classified as TDRs. Changes to these loans primarily included maturity extensions, principal payment acceleration, changes to collateral or covenant terms and cash sweeps, which are in addition to, or sometimes in lieu of, fees and rate increases. Of our $3,611 million and $3,107 million of modifications classified as TDRs in the twelve months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, $174 million and $183 million have subsequently experienced a payment default in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Credit Quality Indicators

Due to the primarily non-recourse nature of our Debt portfolio, loan-to-value ratios provide the best indicators of the credit quality of the portfolio.

 Loan-to-value ratio
 March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 Less than 80% to Greater than Less than 80% to Greater than
(In millions)80% 95% 95% 80% 95% 95%
                  
Debt$13,177 $2,336 $3,085 $13,570 $2,572 $3,604
                  

By contrast, the credit quality of the owner occupied/credit tenant portfolio is primarily influenced by the strength of the borrower's general credit quality, which is reflected in our internal risk rating process, consistent with the process we use for our Commercial portfolio. As of March 31, 2013, the internal risk rating of A, B and C for our owner occupied/credit tenant portfolio approximated $697 million, $228 million and $210 million, respectively, as compared to the December 31, 2012, ratings of $956 million, $25 million and $219 million, respectively.

 

Within Real Estate-Debt, these financing receivables are primarily concentrated in our North American and European Lending platforms and are secured by various property types. A substantial majority of the Real Estate-Debt financing receivables with loan-to-value ratios greater than 95% are paying in accordance with contractual terms. Substantially all of these loans and the majority of our owner occupied/credit tenant financing receivables included in Category C are impaired loans which are subject to the specific reserve evaluation process described in Note 1 in our 2012 consolidated financial statements. The ultimate recoverability of impaired loans is driven by collection strategies that do not necessarily depend on the sale of the underlying collateral and include full or partial repayments through third-party refinancing and restructurings.

CONSUMER

At March 31, 2013, our U.S. consumer financing receivables included private-label credit card and sales financing for approximately 54 million customers across the U.S. with no metropolitan area accounting for more than 6% of the portfolio. Of the total U.S. consumer financing receivables, approximately 65% relate to credit card loans, which are often subject to profit and loss sharing arrangements with the retailer (which are recorded in revenues), and the remaining 35% are sales finance receivables, which provide financing to customers in areas such as electronics, recreation, medical and home improvement.

 

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Losses

The following table provides further information about general and specific reserves related to Consumer financing receivables.

       Financing receivables 
       March 31, December 31, 
(In millions)      2013 2012 
             
Non-U.S. residential mortgages      $31,689 $33,451 
Non-U.S. installment and revolving credit       18,050  18,546 
U.S. installment and revolving credit       48,523  50,853 
Non-U.S. auto       3,937  4,260 
Other       7,559  8,070 
Total Consumer financing receivables, before allowance for losses    $109,758 $115,180 
             
Non-impaired financing receivables      $106,556 $111,960 
General reserves       3,399  2,950 
             
Impaired loans       3,202  3,220 
Specific reserves       702  674 
             
             

Past Due Financing Receivables

The following table displays payment performance of Consumer financing receivables.

  March 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
  Over 30 days  Over 90 days  Over 30 days  Over 90 days 
  past due  past due(a)  past due  past due(a) 
             
Non-U.S. residential mortgages 11.2% 7.6% 12.0% 7.5%
Non-U.S. installment and revolving credit 4.1  1.2  3.9  1.1 
U.S. installment and revolving credit 4.2  1.9  4.6  2.0 
Non-U.S. auto 3.2  0.5  3.1  0.5 
Other 2.9  1.7  2.8  1.7 
Total 6.1  3.4  6.5  3.4 
             
             

  • Included $18 million and $24 million of loans at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which are over 90 days past due and accruing interest, mainly representing accretion on loans acquired at a discount.

 

Nonaccrual Financing Receivables

The following table provides further information about Consumer financing receivables that are classified as nonaccrual.

 Nonaccrual financing Nonearning financing 
 receivables receivables 
 March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)2013 2012 2013 2012 
             
Non-U.S. residential mortgages$2,489 $2,600 $2,452 $2,569 
Non-U.S. installment and revolving credit 231  224  231  224 
U.S. installment and revolving credit 931  1,026  931  1,026 
Non-U.S. auto 23  24  23  24 
Other 398  427  342  351 
Total$4,072 $4,301 $3,979 $4,194 
             
Allowance for losses percentage 100.7% 84.3% 103.1% 86.4%
             

Impaired Loans

The vast majority of our Consumer nonaccrual financing receivables are smaller balance homogeneous loans evaluated collectively, by portfolio, for impairment and therefore are outside the scope of the disclosure requirement for impaired loans. Accordingly, impaired loans in our Consumer business represent restructured smaller balance homogeneous loans meeting the definition of a TDR, and are therefore subject to the disclosure requirement for impaired loans, and commercial loans in our Consumer–Other portfolio. The recorded investment of these impaired loans totaled $3,202 million (with an unpaid principal balance of $3,262 million) and comprised $92 million with no specific allowance, primarily all in our ConsumerOther portfolio, and $3,110 million with a specific allowance of $702 million at March 31, 2013. The impaired loans with a specific allowance included $314 million with a specific allowance of $75 million in our Consumer–Other portfolio and $2,796 million with a specific allowance of $627 million across the remaining Consumer business and had an unpaid principal balance and average investment of $3,139 million and $3,112 million, respectively, at March 31, 2013. We recognized $58 million, $169 million and $43 million of interest income, including $1 million, $5 million and $4 million on a cash basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, the year ended December 31, 2012 and the three months ended March 31, 2012, respectively, principally in our Consumer-U.S. installment and revolving credit portfolios. The total average investment in impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 was $3,211 million and $3,056 million, respectively.

 

Impaired loans classified as TDRs in our Consumer business were $3,053 million and $3,053 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. We utilize certain loan modification programs for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties in our Consumer loan portfolio. These loan modification programs primarily include interest rate reductions and payment deferrals in excess of three months, which were not part of the terms of the original contract, and are primarily concentrated in our non-U.S. residential mortgage and U.S. credit card portfolios. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we modified $400 million of consumer loans for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties, which are classified as TDRs, and included $234 million of non-U.S. consumer loans, primarily residential mortgages, credit cards and personal loans and $166 million of U.S. consumer loans, primarily credit cards. We expect borrowers whose loans have been modified under these programs to continue to be able to meet their contractual obligations upon the conclusion of the modification. Of our $1,653 million and $2,073 million of modifications classified as TDRs in the twelve months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, $100 million and $168 million have subsequently experienced a payment default in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Credit Quality Indicators

Our Consumer financing receivables portfolio comprises both secured and unsecured lending. Secured financing receivables comprise residential loans and lending to small and medium-sized enterprises predominantly secured by auto and equipment, inventory finance, and cash flow loans. Unsecured financing receivables include private-label credit card financing. A substantial majority of these cards are not for general use and are limited to the products and services sold by the retailer. The private label portfolio is diverse with no metropolitan area accounting for more than 5% of the related portfolio.

Non-U.S. residential mortgages

For our secured non-U.S. residential mortgage book, we assess the overall credit quality of the portfolio through loan-to-value ratios (the ratio of the outstanding debt on a property to the value of that property at origination). In the event of default and repossession of the underlying collateral, we have the ability to remarket and sell the properties to eliminate or mitigate the potential risk of loss. The table below provides additional information about our non-U.S. residential mortgages based on loan-to-value ratios.

 Loan-to-value ratio
 March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 80% or Greater than Greater than 80% or Greater than Greater than
(In millions)less 80% to 90% 90% less 80% to 90% 90%
                  
Non-U.S. residential mortgages$17,722 $5,343 $8,624 $18,613 $5,739 $9,099

The majority of these financing receivables are in our U.K. and France portfolios and have re-indexed loan-to-value ratios of 82% and 56%, respectively. We have third-party mortgage insurance for about 30% of the balance of Consumer non-U.S. residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 90% at March 31, 2013. Such loans were primarily originated in Poland, France and the U.K.

Installment and Revolving Credit

For our unsecured lending products, including the non-U.S. and U.S. installment and revolving credit and non-U.S. auto portfolios, we assess overall credit quality using internal and external credit scores. Our internal credit scores imply a probability of default, which we consistently translate into three approximate credit bureau equivalent credit score categories, including (a) 681 or higher, which are considered the strongest credits; (b) 615 to 680, considered moderate credit risk; and (c) 614 or less, which are considered weaker credits.

 Internal ratings translated to approximate credit bureau equivalent score
 March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 681 or 615 to 614 or 681 or 615 to 614 or
(In millions)higher 680 less higher 680 less
                  
Non-U.S. installment and                 
    revolving credit$10,393 $4,247 $3,410 $10,493 $4,496 $3,557
U.S. installment and                 
    revolving credit 31,132  9,638  7,753  33,204  9,753  7,896
Non-U.S. auto 2,947  588  402  3,141  666  453

Of those financing receivable accounts with credit bureau equivalent scores of 614 or less at March 31, 2013, 97% relate to installment and revolving credit accounts. These smaller balance accounts have an average outstanding balance less than one thousand U.S. dollars and are primarily concentrated in our retail card and sales finance receivables in the U.S. (which are often subject to profit and loss sharing arrangements), and closed-end loans outside the U.S., which minimizes the potential for loss in the event of default. For lower credit scores, we adequately price for the incremental risk at origination and monitor credit migration through our risk ratings process. We continuously adjust our credit line underwriting management and collection strategies based on customer behavior and risk profile changes.

 

Consumer – Other

Secured lending in ConsumerOther comprises loans to small and medium-sized enterprises predominantly secured by auto and equipment, inventory finance and cash flow loans. We develop our internal risk ratings for this portfolio in a manner consistent with the process used to develop our Commercial credit quality indicators, described above. We use the borrower's credit quality and underlying collateral strength to determine the potential risk of loss from these activities.

 

At March 31, 2013, Consumer – Other financing receivables of $6,398 million, $438 million and $723 million were rated A, B, and C, respectively. At December 31, 2012, Consumer – Other financing receivables of $6,873 million, $451 million and $746 million were rated A, B, and C, respectively.