XML 91 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Supplemental Information About The Credit Quality Of Financing Receivables And Allowance For Losses On
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Credit Quality Financing Receivables [Abstract]  
Supplemental Information About Credit Quality Of Financing Receivables And Allowance For Losses On Financing Receivables

12. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE CREDIT QUALITY OF FINANCING RECEIVABLES AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOSSES ON FINANCING RECEIVABLES

We provide further detailed information about the credit quality of our Commercial, Real Estate and Consumer financing receivables portfolios. For each portfolio, we describe the characteristics of the financing receivables and provide information about collateral, payment performance, credit quality indicators, and impairment. We manage these portfolios using delinquency and nonearning data as key performance indicators. The categories used within this section such as impaired loans, troubled debt restructuring (TDR) and nonaccrual financing receivables are defined by the authoritative guidance and we base our categorization on the related scope and definitions contained in the related standards. The categories of nonearning and delinquent are defined by us and are used in our process for managing our financing receivables. Definitions of these categories are provided in Note 1 in our 2011 consolidated financial statements.

COMMERCIAL

 

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Losses

The following table provides further information about general and specific reserves related to Commercial financing receivables.

       Financing receivables 
       June 30, December 31, 
(In millions)      2012 2011 
             
CLL            
    Americas      $77,241 $80,505 
    Europe       34,722  36,899 
    Asia       11,313  11,635 
    Other       711  436 
Total CLL       123,987  129,475 
             
Energy Financial Services       5,159  5,912 
             
GECAS       12,046  11,901 
             
Other       587  1,282 
             
Total Commercial financing receivables, before allowance for losses    $141,779 $148,570 
             
Non-impaired financing receivables      $135,899 $142,908 
General reserves       650  718 
             
Impaired loans       5,880  5,662 
Specific reserves       640  812 
             

Past Due Financing Receivables

The following table displays payment performance of Commercial financing receivables.

  June 30, 2012  December 31, 2011 
  Over 30 days  Over 90 days  Over 30 days  Over 90 days 
  past due  past due  past due  past due 
             
CLL            
    Americas 1.1% 0.6% 1.3% 0.8%
    Europe 4.0  2.3  3.8  2.1 
    Asia 1.1  0.8  1.3  1.0 
    Other 0.0  0.0  2.0  0.1 
Total CLL 1.9  1.1  2.0  1.2 
             
Energy Financial Services 0.0  0.0  0.3  0.3 
             
GECAS 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 
             
Other 3.8  3.8  3.7  3.5 
             
Total 1.7  1.0  1.8  1.1 
             

Nonaccrual Financing Receivables

The following table provides further information about Commercial financing receivables that are classified as nonaccrual. Of our $5,234 million and $4,718 million of nonaccrual financing receivables at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, $1,761 million and $1,227 million, respectively, are currently paying in accordance with their contractual terms.

 Nonaccrual financing Nonearning financing 
 receivables receivables 
 June 30, December 31, June 30, December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)2012 2011 2012 2011 
             
CLL            
    Americas$2,559 $2,417 $1,739 $1,862 
    Europe 1,790  1,599  1,390  1,167 
    Asia 381  428  232  269 
    Other 62  68  9  11 
Total CLL 4,792  4,512  3,370  3,309 
             
Energy Financial Services 52  22  2  22 
             
GECAS 344  69  56  55 
             
Other 46  115  22  65 
Total$5,234 $4,718 $3,450 $3,451 
             
Allowance for losses percentage 24.6% 32.4% 37.4% 44.3%
             

Impaired Loans

The following table provides information about loans classified as impaired and specific reserves related to Commercial.

 With no specific allowance With a specific allowance
  Recorded Unpaid Average  Recorded Unpaid   Average
 investment principal investment in investment principal Associated investment in
(In millions)in loans balance loans in loans balance allowance loans
                     
June 30, 2012                    
                     
CLL                    
    Americas$2,782 $3,016 $2,495 $985 $1,165 $275 $1,160
    Europe 911  1,430  942  879  1,133  323  822
    Asia 49  49  66  143  157  31  145
    Other 53  56  56  9  13  1  6
Total CLL 3,795  4,551  3,559  2,016  2,468  630  2,133
Energy Financial Services 2  2  3  0  0  0  12
GECAS 0  0  14  21  21  1  7
Other 18  18  33  28  31  9  57
Total$3,815 $4,571 $3,609 $2,065 $2,520 $640 $2,209
                     

December 31, 2011                    
                     
CLL                    
    Americas$2,136 $2,219 $2,128 $1,367 $1,415 $425 $1,468
    Europe 936  1,060  1,001  730  717  263  602
    Asia 85  83  94  156  128  84  214
    Other 54  58  13  11  11  2  5
Total CLL 3,211  3,420  3,236  2,264  2,271  774  2,289
Energy Financial Services 4  4  20  18  18  9  87
GECAS 28  28  59  0  0  0  11
Other 62  63  67  75  75  29  97
Total$3,305 $3,515 $3,382 $2,357 $2,364 $812 $2,484
                     

We recognized $115 million, $193 million and $85 million of interest income, including $49 million, $59 million and $25 million on a cash basis, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, the year ended December 31, 2011 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, principally in our CLL Americas business. The total average investment in impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was $5,818 million and $5,866 million, respectively.

 

Impaired loans classified as TDRs in our CLL business were $4,319 million and $3,642 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and were primarily attributable to CLL Americas ($3,098 million and $2,746 million, respectively). For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we modified $1,800 million of loans classified as TDRs, primarily in CLL Americas ($1,157 million) and CLL EMEA ($532 million). Changes to these loans primarily included debt to equity exchange, extensions, interest only payment periods and forbearance or other actions, which are in addition to, or sometimes in lieu of, fees and rate increases. Of our $2,796 million of modifications classified as TDRs in the last twelve months, $96 million have subsequently experienced a payment default in the last six months.

Credit Quality Indicators

Substantially all of our Commercial financing receivables portfolio is secured lending and we assess the overall quality of the portfolio based on the potential risk of loss measure. The metric incorporates both the borrower's credit quality along with any related collateral protection.

 

Our internal risk ratings process is an important source of information in determining our allowance for losses and represents a comprehensive, statistically validated approach to evaluate risk in our financing receivables portfolios. In deriving our internal risk ratings, we stratify our Commercial portfolios into twenty-one categories of default risk and/or six categories of loss given default to group into three categories: A, B and C. Our process starts by developing an internal risk rating for our borrowers, which are based upon our proprietary models using data derived from borrower financial statements, agency ratings, payment history information, equity prices and other commercial borrower characteristics. We then evaluate the potential risk of loss for the specific lending transaction in the event of borrower default, which takes into account such factors as applicable collateral value, historical loss and recovery rates for similar transactions, and our collection capabilities. Our internal risk ratings process and the models we use are subject to regular monitoring and validation controls. The frequency of rating updates is set by our credit risk policy, which requires annual Audit Committee approval. The models are updated on a regular basis and statistically validated annually, or more frequently as circumstances warrant.

 

The table below summarizes our Commercial financing receivables by risk category. As described above, financing receivables are assigned one of twenty-one risk ratings based on our process and then these are grouped by similar characteristics into three categories in the table below. Category A is characterized by either high credit quality borrowers or transactions with significant collateral coverage which substantially reduces or eliminates the risk of loss in the event of borrower default. Category B is characterized by borrowers with weaker credit quality than those in Category A, or transactions with moderately strong collateral coverage which minimizes but may not fully mitigate the risk of loss in the event of default. Category C is characterized by borrowers with higher levels of default risk relative to our overall portfolio or transactions where collateral coverage may not fully mitigate a loss in the event of default.

 Secured
(In millions)A B C Total
            
June 30, 2012           
            
CLL           
    Americas$72,168 $1,630 $3,443 $77,241
    Europe 31,392  1,067  1,105  33,564
    Asia 10,525  167  439  11,131
    Other 330  0  31  361
Total CLL 114,415  2,864  5,018  122,297
            
Energy Financial Services 4,878  113  49  5,040
            
GECAS 11,470  236  340  12,046
            
Other 587  0  0  587
Total$131,350 $3,213 $5,407 $139,970

December 31, 2011           
            
CLL           
    Americas$73,103 $2,816 $4,586 $80,505
    Europe 33,481  1,080  1,002  35,563
    Asia 10,644  116  685  11,445
    Other 345  0  91  436
Total CLL 117,573  4,012  6,364  127,949
            
Energy Financial Services 5,727  24  18  5,769
            
GECAS 10,881  970  50  11,901
            
Other 1,282  0  0  1,282
Total$135,463 $5,006 $6,432 $146,901
            

For our secured financing receivables portfolio, our collateral position and ability to work out problem accounts mitigates our losses. Our asset managers have deep industry expertise that enables us to identify the optimum approach to default situations. We price risk premiums for weaker credits at origination, closely monitor changes in creditworthiness through our risk ratings and watch list process, and are engaged early with deteriorating credits to minimize economic loss. Secured financing receivables within risk Category C are predominantly in our CLL businesses and are primarily composed of senior term lending facilities and factoring programs secured by various asset types including inventory, accounts receivable, cash, equipment and related business facilities as well as franchise finance activities secured by underlying equipment.

 

Loans within Category C are reviewed and monitored regularly, and classified as impaired when it is probable that they will not pay in accordance with contractual terms. Our internal risk rating process identifies credits warranting closer monitoring; and as such, these loans are not necessarily classified as nonearning or impaired.

 

Our unsecured Commercial financing receivables portfolio is primarily attributable to our Interbanca S.p.A. and GE Sanyo Credit acquisitions in Europe and Asia, respectively. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, these financing receivables included $320 million and $325 million rated A, $947 million and $748 million rated B, and $542 million and $596 million rated C, respectively.

REAL ESTATE

 

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Losses

The following table provides further information about general and specific reserves related to Real Estate financing receivables.

       Financing receivables 
        June 30,  December 31, 
(In millions)       2012  2011 
             
Debt      $22,409 $24,501 
Business Properties       5,301  8,248 
             
Total Real Estate financing receivables, before allowance for losses    $27,710 $32,749 
             
Non-impaired financing receivables      $20,244 $24,002 
General reserves       226  267 
             
Impaired loans       7,466  8,747 
Specific reserves       561  822 
             

Past Due Financing Receivables

The following table displays payment performance of Real Estate financing receivables.

  June 30, 2012  December 31, 2011 
  Over 30 days Over 90 days  Over 30 days Over 90 days 
  past due past due  past due past due 
             
Debt 2.3% 1.9% 2.4% 2.3%
Business Properties 4.7  4.3  3.9  3.0 
Total 2.8  2.3  2.8  2.5 

Nonaccrual Financing Receivables

The following table provides further information about Real Estate financing receivables that are classified as nonaccrual. Of our $5,380 million and $6,949 million of nonaccrual financing receivables at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, $4,581 million and $6,061 million, respectively, are currently paying in accordance with their contractual terms.

 Nonaccrual financing Nonearning financing 
 receivables receivables 
 June 30, December 31, June 30, December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)2012 2011 2012 2011 
             
Debt$4,900 $6,351 $403 $541 
Business Properties 480  598  227  249 
Total$5,380 $6,949 $630 $790 
             
Allowance for losses percentage 14.6% 15.7% 124.9% 137.8%
             

Impaired Loans

The following table provides information about loans classified as impaired and specific reserves related to Real Estate.

 With no specific allowance With a specific allowance
 Recorded Unpaid Average Recorded Unpaid   Average
 investment principal investment investment principal Associated investment
(In millions)in loans balance in loans in loans balance allowance in loans
                     
June 30, 2012                    
                     
Debt$3,587 $3,631 $3,632 $3,408 $3,804 $475 $3,961
Business Properties 161  161  198  310  310  86  360
Total$3,748 $3,792 $3,830 $3,718 $4,114 $561 $4,321
                     

December 31, 2011                    
                     
Debt$3,558 $3,614 $3,568 $4,560 $4,652 $717 $5,435
Business Properties 232  232  215  397  397  105  460
Total$3,790 $3,846 $3,783 $4,957 $5,049 $822 $5,895

We recognized $183 million, $399 million and $206 million of interest income, including $129 million, $339 million and $201 million on a cash basis, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, the year ended December 31, 2011 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, principally in our Real Estate-Debt portfolio. The total average investment in impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was $8,151 million and $9,678 million, respectively.

 

Real Estate TDRs decreased from $7,006 million at December 31, 2011 to $6,330 million at June 30, 2012, primarily driven by resolution of TDRs through paydowns, restructurings and foreclosures, partially offset by extensions of loans scheduled to mature during 2012, some of which were classified as TDRs upon modification. We deem loan modifications to be TDRs when we have granted a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty and we do not receive adequate compensation in the form of an effective interest rate that is at current market rates of interest given the risk characteristics of the loan or other consideration that compensates us for the value of the concession. The limited liquidity and higher return requirements in the real estate market for loans with higher loan-to-value (LTV) ratios has typically resulted in the conclusion that the modified terms are not at current market rates of interest, even if the modified loans are expected to be fully recoverable. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we modified $2,269 million of loans classified as TDRs, substantially all in our Debt portfolio. Changes to these loans primarily included maturity extensions, principal payment acceleration, changes to collateral or covenant terms and cash sweeps, which are in addition to, or sometimes in lieu of, fees and rate increases. Of our $4,454 million of modifications classified as TDRs in the last twelve months, $407 million have subsequently experienced a payment default in the last six months.

 

Credit Quality Indicators

Due to the primarily non-recourse nature of our Debt portfolio, loan-to-value ratios provide the best indicators of the credit quality of the portfolio. By contrast, the credit quality of the Business Properties portfolio is primarily influenced by the strength of the borrower's general credit quality, which is reflected in our internal risk rating process, consistent with the process we use for our Commercial portfolio.

 Loan-to-value ratio
 June 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
 Less than 80% to Greater than Less than 80% to Greater than
(In millions)80% 95% 95% 80% 95% 95%
                  
Debt$14,349 $3,787 $4,273 $14,454 $4,593 $5,454
                  
 Internal Risk Rating
 June 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
(In millions)A B C A B C
                  
Business Properties$4,861 $84 $356 $7,628 $110 $510

Within Real Estate-Debt, these financing receivables are primarily concentrated in our North American and European Lending platforms and are secured by various property types. A substantial majority of the Real Estate-Debt financing receivables with loan-to-value ratios greater than 95% are paying in accordance with contractual terms. Substantially all of these loans and substantially all of the Real Estate-Business Properties financing receivables included in Category C are impaired loans which are subject to the specific reserve evaluation process described in Note 1 in our 2011 consolidated financial statements. The ultimate recoverability of impaired loans is driven by collection strategies that do not necessarily depend on the sale of the underlying collateral and include full or partial repayments through third-party refinancing and restructurings.

CONSUMER

At June 30, 2012, our U.S. consumer financing receivables included private-label credit card and sales financing for approximately 52 million customers across the U.S. with no metropolitan area accounting for more than 6% of the portfolio. Of the total U.S. consumer financing receivables, approximately 64% relate to credit card loans, which are often subject to profit and loss sharing arrangements with the retailer (which are recorded in revenues), and the remaining 36% are sales finance receivables, which provide financing to customers in areas such as electronics, recreation, medical and home improvement.

 

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Losses

The following table provides further information about general and specific reserves related to Consumer financing receivables.

       Financing receivables 
       June 30, December 31, 
(In millions)      2012 2011 
             
Non-U.S. residential mortgages      $33,826 $35,550 
Non-U.S. installment and revolving credit       17,960  18,544 
U.S. installment and revolving credit       45,531  46,689 
Non-U.S. auto       4,740  5,691 
Other       7,643  7,244 
Total Consumer financing receivables, before allowance for losses    $109,700 $113,718 
             
Non-impaired financing receivables      $106,697 $110,825 
General reserves       2,503  2,891 
             
Impaired loans       3,003  2,893 
Specific reserves       625  680 
             
             

Past Due Financing Receivables

The following table displays payment performance of Consumer financing receivables.

  June 30, 2012  December 31, 2011 
  Over 30 days  Over 90 days  Over 30 days  Over 90 days 
  past due  past due(a)  past due  past due(a) 
             
Non-U.S. residential mortgages 12.5% 7.9% 12.3% 7.9%
Non-U.S. installment and revolving credit 4.3  1.2  4.1  1.2 
U.S. installment and revolving credit 4.3  1.8  5.0  2.2 
Non-U.S. auto 3.2  0.5  3.1  0.5 
Other 3.6  2.0  3.5  2.0 
Total 6.7  3.5  6.9  3.7 
             
             

  • Included $36 million and $45 million of loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, which are over 90 days past due and accruing interest, mainly representing accretion on loans acquired at a discount.

 

Nonaccrual Financing Receivables

The following table provides further information about Consumer financing receivables that are classified as nonaccrual.

 Nonaccrual financing Nonearning financing 
 receivables receivables 
 June 30, December 31, June 30, December 31, 
(Dollars in millions)2012 2011 2012 2011 
             
Non-U.S. residential mortgages$2,853 $2,995 $2,720 $2,870 
Non-U.S. installment and revolving credit 244  321  243  263 
U.S. installment and revolving credit 773  990  773  990 
Non-U.S. auto 27  43  28  43 
Other 476  487  380  419 
Total$4,373 $4,836 $4,144 $4,585 
             
Allowance for losses percentage 71.5% 73.8% 75.5% 77.9%
             

Impaired Loans

The vast majority of our Consumer nonaccrual financing receivables are smaller balance homogeneous loans evaluated collectively, by portfolio, for impairment and therefore are outside the scope of the disclosure requirement for impaired loans. Accordingly, impaired loans in our Consumer business represent restructured smaller balance homogeneous loans meeting the definition of a TDR, and are therefore subject to the disclosure requirement for impaired loans, and commercial loans in our Consumer–Other portfolio. The recorded investment of these impaired loans totaled $3,003 million (with an unpaid principal balance of $3,384 million) and comprised $106 million with no specific allowance, primarily all in our ConsumerOther portfolio, and $2,897 million with a specific allowance of $625 million at June 30, 2012. The impaired loans with a specific allowance included $303 million with a specific allowance of $98 million in our Consumer–Other portfolio and $2,594 million with a specific allowance of $527 million across the remaining Consumer business and had an unpaid principal balance and average investment of $3,241 million and $2,876 million, respectively, at June 30, 2012. We recognized $76 million, $141 million and $54 million of interest income, including $3 million, $15 million and $2 million on a cash basis, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, the year ended December 31, 2011 and the six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, principally in our Consumer-U.S. installment and revolving credit portfolios. The total average investment in impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was $2,971 million and $2,623 million, respectively.

 

Impaired loans classified as TDRs in our Consumer business were $2,859 million and $2,723 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. We utilize certain loan modification programs for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties in our Consumer loan portfolio. These loan modification programs primarily include interest rate reductions and payment deferrals in excess of three months, which were not part of the terms of the original contract, and are primarily concentrated in our non-U.S. residential mortgage and U.S. credit card portfolios. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we modified $913 million of consumer loans for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties, which are classified as TDRs, and included $623 million of non-U.S. consumer loans, primarily residential mortgages, credit cards and personal loans and $290 million of U.S. consumer loans, primarily credit cards. We expect borrowers whose loans have been modified under these programs to continue to be able to meet their contractual obligations upon the conclusion of the modification. Of our $2,106 million of modifications classified as TDRs in the last twelve months, $352 million have subsequently experienced a payment default in the last six months, primarily in our installment and revolving credit portfolios.

Credit Quality Indicators

Our Consumer financing receivables portfolio comprises both secured and unsecured lending. Secured financing receivables comprise residential loans and lending to small and medium-sized enterprises predominantly secured by auto and equipment, inventory finance, and cash flow loans. Unsecured financing receivables include private-label credit card financing. A substantial majority of these cards are not for general use and are limited to the products and services sold by the retailer. The private label portfolio is diverse with no metropolitan area accounting for more than 5% of the related portfolio.

Non-U.S. residential mortgages

For our secured non-U.S. residential mortgage book, we assess the overall credit quality of the portfolio through loan-to-value ratios (the ratio of the outstanding debt on a property to the value of that property at origination). In the event of default and repossession of the underlying collateral, we have the ability to remarket and sell the properties to eliminate or mitigate the potential risk of loss. The table below provides additional information about our non-U.S. residential mortgages based on loan-to-value ratios.

 Loan-to-value ratio
 June 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
 80% or Greater than Greater than 80% or Greater than Greater than
(In millions)less 80% to 90% 90% less 80% to 90% 90%
                  
Non-U.S. residential mortgages$18,861 $5,815 $9,150 $19,834 $6,087 $9,629

The majority of these financing receivables are in our U.K. and France portfolios and have re-indexed loan-to-value ratios of 84% and 57%, respectively. We have third-party mortgage insurance for approximately 64% of the balance of Consumer non-U.S. residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 90% at June 30, 2012. Such loans were primarily originated in the U.K., Poland and France.

Installment and Revolving Credit

For our unsecured lending products, including the non-U.S. and U.S. installment and revolving credit and non-U.S. auto portfolios, we assess overall credit quality using internal and external credit scores. Our internal credit scores imply a probability of default which we consistently translate into three approximate credit bureau equivalent credit score categories, including (a) 681 or higher, which are considered the strongest credits; (b) 615 to 680, considered moderate credit risk; and (c) 614 or less, which are considered weaker credits.

 Internal ratings translated to approximate credit bureau equivalent score
 June 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
 681 or 615 to 614 or 681 or 615 to 614 or
(In millions)higher 680 less higher 680 less
                  
Non-U.S. installment and                 
    revolving credit$9,966 $4,505 $3,489 $9,913 $4,838 $3,793
U.S. installment and                 
    revolving credit 29,824  8,607  7,100  28,918  9,398  8,373
Non-U.S. auto 3,429  802  509  3,927  1,092  672

Of those financing receivable accounts with credit bureau equivalent scores of 614 or less at June 30, 2012, 95% relate to installment and revolving credit accounts. These smaller balance accounts have an average outstanding balance less than one thousand U.S. dollars and are primarily concentrated in our retail card and sales finance receivables in the U.S. (which are often subject to profit and loss sharing arrangements), and closed-end loans outside the U.S., which minimizes the potential for loss in the event of default. For lower credit scores, we adequately price for the incremental risk at origination and monitor credit migration through our risk ratings process. We continuously adjust our credit line underwriting management and collection strategies based on customer behavior and risk profile changes.

 

Consumer – Other

Secured lending in ConsumerOther comprises loans to small and medium-sized enterprises predominantly secured by auto and equipment, inventory finance and cash flow loans. We develop our internal risk ratings for this portfolio in a manner consistent with the process used to develop our Commercial credit quality indicators, described above. We use the borrower's credit quality and underlying collateral strength to determine the potential risk of loss from these activities.

 

At June 30, 2012, Consumer – Other financing receivables of $6,203 million, $576 million and $864 million were rated A, B, and C, respectively. At December 31, 2011, Consumer – Other financing receivables of $5,580 million, $757 million and $907 million were rated A, B, and C, respectively.