XML 81 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments

NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table provides information about assets and liabilities not carried at fair value. The table excludes finance leases and non-financial assets and liabilities. Substantially all of the assets discussed below are considered to be Level 3. The vast majority of our liabilities’ fair value can be determined based on significant observable inputs and thus considered Level 2. Few of the instruments are actively traded and their fair values must often be determined using financial models. Realization of the fair value of these instruments depends upon market forces beyond our control, including marketplace liquidity.

September 30, 2015December 31, 2014
Assets (liabilities)Assets (liabilities)
NotionalCarryingEstimatedNotionalCarryingEstimated
(In millions)amountamount (net)fair valueamountamount (net)fair value
Assets
    Loans$(a)$78,775$85,107$(a)$115,889$120,067
    Other commercial mortgages(a)1,3921,520(a)1,4271,508
    Loans held for sale(a)22,65123,039(a)778799
  Other financial instruments(b)(a)161195(a)122136
Liabilities
   Borrowings and bank deposits(c)(d)(e)(a)(271,944)(283,092)(a)(317,674)(333,956)
   Investment contract benefits(a)(2,821)(3,327)(a)(2,970)(3,565)
    Guaranteed investment contracts(a)(179)(193)(a)(1,000)(1,031)
    Insurance - credit life(f) - --1,843 (90)(77)

(a) These financial instruments do not have notional amounts.

(b) Principally comprises cost method investments.

(c) See Note 6.

(d) Fair values exclude interest rate and currency derivatives designated as hedges of borrowings. Had they been included, the fair value of borrowings at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 would have been reduced by $4,710 million and $5,020 million, respectively.

(e) Included $1,994 million and $2,888 million of accrued interest in estimated fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(f) Net of reinsurance of none and $964 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

NOTIONAL AMOUNTS OF LOAN COMMITMENTS
(In millions)September 30, 2015December 31, 2014
Ordinary course of business lending commitments(a)$804$1,214
Unused revolving credit lines(b)
   Commercial2,0542,908
   Consumer – principally credit cards321,710306,188

(a) Excluded investment commitments of $579 million and $818 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(b) Excluded amounts related to inventory financing arrangements, which may be withdrawn at our option, of $39 million and $47 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Securities Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Arrangements

Our issuances of securities repurchase agreements are insignificant and are limited to activities at certain of our foreign banks primarily for purposes of liquidity management. At September 30, 2015, we were party to repurchase agreements totaling $132 million, which were reported in short-term borrowings on the financial statements. No repurchase agreements were accounted for as off-book financing and we do not engage in securities lending transactions.

We also enter into reverse securities repurchase agreements, primarily for short-term investment with maturities of 90 days or less. At September 30, 2015, we were party to reverse repurchase agreements totaling $10.0 billion, which were reported in cash and equivalents on the financial statements. Under these reverse securities repurchase agreements, we typically lend available cash at a specified rate of interest and hold U.S. or highly-rated European government securities as collateral during the term of the agreement. Collateral value is in excess of amounts loaned under the agreements.

Derivatives and Hedging

As a matter of policy, we use derivatives for risk management purposes and we do not use derivatives for speculative purposes. A key risk management objective for our financial services businesses is to mitigate interest rate and currency risk by seeking to ensure that the characteristics of the debt match the assets they are funding. If the form (fixed versus floating) and currency denomination of the debt we issue do not match the related assets, we typically execute derivatives to adjust the nature and tenor of funding to meet this objective within pre-defined limits. The determination of whether we enter into a derivative transaction or issue debt directly to achieve this objective depends on a number of factors, including market related factors that affect the type of debt we can issue.

The notional amounts of derivative contracts represent the basis upon which interest and other payments are calculated and are reported gross, except for offsetting foreign currency forward contracts that are executed in order to manage our currency risk of net investment in foreign subsidiaries. Of the outstanding notional amount of $250,000 million, approximately 99% or $247,000 million is associated with reducing or eliminating the interest rate, currency or market risk between financial assets and liabilities in our financial services businesses. The instruments used in these activities are designated as hedges when practicable. When we are not able to apply hedge accounting, or when the derivative and the hedged item are both recorded in earnings concurrently, the derivatives are deemed economic hedges and hedge accounting is not applied. This most frequently occurs when we hedge a recognized foreign currency transaction (e.g., a receivable or payable) with a derivative. Since the effects of changes in exchange rates are reflected concurrently in earnings for both the derivative and the transaction, the economic hedge does not require hedge accounting.

FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES
September 30, 2015December 31, 2014
(In millions)AssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
Derivatives accounted for as hedges
Interest rate contracts$5,579$53$5,859$461
   Currency exchange contracts1,3821,2342,435779
   Other contracts----
6,9611,2878,2941,240
Derivatives not accounted for as hedges
Interest rate contracts1446111168
Currency exchange contracts3833,0335952,910
Other contracts44889
5713,1027142,987
Gross derivatives recognized in statement of
   financial position
   Gross derivatives7,5324,3899,0084,227
   Gross accrued interest97891,392(24)
8,5104,39810,4004,203
Amounts offset in statement of financial position
   Netting adjustments(a)(3,481)(3,483)(3,695)(3,710)
   Cash collateral(b)(2,844)(895)(3,683)(461)
(6,325)(4,378)(7,378)(4,171)
Net derivatives recognized in statement of
   financial position
Net derivatives2,185203,02232
Amounts not offset in statement of
   financial position
   Securities held as collateral(c)(1,510)-(3,003)-
Net amount$675$20$19$32

Derivatives are classified in the captions “Other assets” and “Other liabilities” and the related accrued interest is classified in “Other receivables” and “Other liabilities” in our financial statements.

  • The netting of derivative receivables and payables is permitted when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. Amounts include fair value adjustments related to our own and counterparty non-performance risk. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the cumulative adjustment for non-performance risk was a gain (loss) of $2 million and $15 million, respectively.
  • Excluded excess cash collateral received and posted of $53 million and $66 million at September 30, 2015, respectively, and $58 million and $211 million at December 31, 2014, respectively.
  • Excluded excess securities collateral received of $34 million and $385 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

 

FAIR VALUE HEDGES

We use interest rate and currency exchange derivatives to hedge the fair value effects of interest rate and currency exchange rate changes on local and non-functional currency denominated fixed-rate debt. For relationships designated as fair value hedges, changes in fair value of the derivatives are recorded in earnings within interest along with offsetting adjustments to the carrying amount of the hedged debt.

EARNINGS EFFECTS OF FAIR VALUE HEDGING RELATIONSHIPS
Three months ended September 30
20152014
Gain (loss)Gain (loss)Gain (loss)Gain (loss)
on hedgingon hedgedon hedgingon hedged
(In millions)derivativesitemsderivativesitems
Interest rate contracts$1,391$(1,387)$341$(350)
Currency exchange contracts(6)5(8)8

Fair value hedges resulted in $3 million and $(9) million of ineffectiveness in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In both the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were insignificant amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness.

EARNINGS EFFECTS OF FAIR VALUE HEDGING RELATIONSHIPS
Nine months ended September 30
20152014
Gain (loss)Gain (loss)Gain (loss)Gain (loss)
on hedgingon hedgedon hedgingon hedged
(In millions)derivativesitemsderivativesitems
Interest rate contracts$514$(594)$2,056$(2,129)
Currency exchange contracts(6)4(11)10

Fair value hedges resulted in $(82) million and $(74) million of ineffectiveness in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In both the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were insignificant amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness.

 

CASH FLOW HEDGES

We use interest rate, currency exchange and commodity derivatives to reduce the variability of expected future cash flows associated with variable rate borrowings and commercial purchase and sale transactions, including commodities. For derivatives that are designated in a cash flow hedging relationship, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported as a component of AOCI and reclassified into earnings contemporaneously and in the same caption with the earnings effects of the hedged transaction.

Gain (loss) reclassified
Gain (loss) recognized in AOCIfrom AOCI into earnings
for the three months ended September 30for the three months ended September 30
(In millions)2015201420152014
Interest rate contracts$10$9$(39)$(53)
Currency exchange contracts(136)(302)(75)(377)
Total(a)$(126)$(293)$(113)$(430)

(a) Gain (loss) is recorded in revenues from services and interest when reclassified to earnings.

Gain (loss) reclassified
Gain (loss) recognized in AOCIfrom AOCI into earnings
for the nine months ended September 30for the nine months ended September 30
(In millions)2015201420152014
Interest rate contracts$-$-$(100)$(182)
Currency exchange contracts(794)(267)(600)(387)
Total(a)$(794)$(267)$(699)$(569)

(a) Gain (loss) is recorded in revenues from services and interest when reclassified to earnings.

The total pre-tax amount in AOCI related to cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions was a $213 million loss at September 30, 2015. We expect to transfer $189 million to earnings as an expense in the next 12 months contemporaneously with the earnings effects of the related forecasted transactions. In both the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized insignificant gains and losses related to hedged forecasted transactions and firm commitments that did not occur by the end of the originally specified period. At September 30, 2015 and 2014, the maximum term of derivative instruments that hedge forecasted transactions was 17 years and 18 years, respectively. See Note 8 for additional information about reclassifications out of AOCI.

 

For cash flow hedges, the amount of ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship and amount of the changes in fair value of the derivatives that are not included in the measurement of ineffectiveness were insignificant for each reporting period.

NET INVESTMENT HEDGES IN FOREIGN OPERATIONS

We use currency exchange derivatives to protect our net investments in global operations conducted in non-U.S. dollar currencies. For derivatives that are designated as hedges of net investment in a foreign operation, we assess effectiveness based on changes in spot currency exchange rates. Changes in spot rates on the derivatives are recorded as a component of AOCI until such time as the foreign entity is substantially liquidated or sold, or upon the loss of a controlling interest in a foreign entity. Additionally, lower of cost or fair value, less cost to sell, assessments of foreign entities classified as held for sale take into account the related AOCI. The change in fair value of any forward points, which reflects the interest rate differential between the two countries on the derivative, is excluded from the effectiveness assessment.

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED THROUGH CTA
Gain (loss) recognized in CTAGain (loss) reclassified from CTA
for the three months ended September 30for the three months ended September 30
(In millions)2015201420152014
Currency exchange contracts$1,311$2,792$1,935$(24)

Reclassifications from CTA of $0 million and $(11) million were recorded in GECC revenues from services and $1,935 million and $(13) million in discontinued operations in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The amounts related to the change in the fair value of the forward points that are excluded from the measure of effectiveness were $(37) million and $(147) million in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and were recorded in interest and other financial charges.

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED THROUGH CTA
Gain (loss) recognized in CTAGain (loss) reclassified from CTA
for the nine months ended September 30for the nine months ended September 30
(In millions)2015201420152014
Currency exchange contracts$4,749$2,194$2,524$(14)

Reclassifications from CTA of $(34) million and $(11)million were recorded in GECC revenues from services and $2,558 million and $(3) million in discontinued operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The amounts related to the change in the fair value of the forward points that are excluded from the measure of effectiveness were $(93) million and $(458) million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and were recorded in interest and other financial charges.

FREE-STANDING DERIVATIVES

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not designated as hedges are recorded in earnings each period. As discussed above, these derivatives are typically entered into as economic hedges of changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, commodity prices and other risks. Gains or losses related to the derivative are typically recorded in revenues from services, based on our accounting policy. In general, the earnings effects of the item that represent the economic risk exposure are recorded in the same caption as the derivative. Gains (losses) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 on derivatives not designated as hedges were $(2,585) million composed of amounts related to interest rate contracts of $(101) million, currency exchange contracts of $(2,486) million, and other derivatives of $2 million. Substantially all of these losses were offset by the earnings effects from the underlying items that were economically hedged. Gains (losses) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 on derivatives not designated as hedges were $(603) million composed of amounts related to interest rate contracts of $(53) million, currency exchange contracts of $(553) million and other derivatives of $3 million. These losses were offset by the earnings effects from the underlying items that were economically hedged.

COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK

Fair values of our derivatives can change significantly from period to period based on, among other factors, market movements and changes in our positions. We manage counterparty credit risk (the risk that counterparties will default and not make payments to us according to the terms of our agreements) on an individual counterparty basis. Where we have agreed to netting of derivative exposures with a counterparty, we net our exposures with that counterparty and apply the value of collateral posted to us to determine the exposure. We actively monitor these net exposures against defined limits and take appropriate actions in response, including requiring additional collateral.

As discussed above, we have provisions in certain of our master agreements that require counterparties to post collateral (typically, cash or U.S. Treasury securities) when our receivable due from the counterparty, measured at current market value, exceeds a specified limit. The fair value of such collateral was $4,354 million at September 30, 2015, of which $2,844 million was cash and $1,510 million was in the form of securities held by a custodian for our benefit. Under certain of these same agreements, we post collateral to our counterparties for our derivative obligations, the fair value of which was $895 million at September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015, our exposure to counterparties (including accrued interest), net of collateral we hold, was $674 million. This excludes exposure related to embedded derivatives.

Additionally, our master agreements typically contain mutual downgrade provisions that provide the ability of each party to require termination if the long-term credit rating of the counterparty were to fall below A-/A3. In certain of these master agreements, each party also has the ability to require termination if the short-term rating of the counterparty were to fall below A-1/P-1. Our master agreements also typically contain provisions that provide termination rights upon the occurrence of certain other events, such as a bankruptcy or events of default by one of the parties. If an agreement was terminated under any of these circumstances, the termination amount payable would be determined on a net basis and could also take into account any collateral posted. The net amount of our derivative liability, after consideration of collateral posted by us and outstanding interest payments was $10 million at September 30, 2015. This excludes embedded derivatives.