XML 40 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
INCOME TAXES
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2021
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
INCOME TAXES NOTE 16. INCOME TAXES. Our consolidated effective income tax rate was 59.7% and 0.9% during the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The rate for 2021 is higher than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the cost of global activities, including the base erosion and global intangible minimum tax provisions and from tax expense associated with the unrealized gain in our remaining interest in Baker Hughes. This was partially offset by an adjustment to decrease the 2021 three-month tax rate to be in line with the lower expected full-year rate and by U.S. business credits. The rate for 2020 is lower than the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the lower tax rate on the sale of our BioPharma business. The tax rate on the BioPharma sale was low because the gain outside the U.S. was taxed at lower than 21% and because we recorded $633 million of the tax associated with preparatory steps for the transaction in the fourth quarter of 2019.The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently auditing our consolidated U.S. income tax returns for 2016-2018. The United Kingdom tax authority (the UK Government) disallowed interest deductions claimed by GE Capital for the years 2004-2015 that could result in a potential impact of approximately $1.1 billion, which includes a possible assessment of tax and reduction of deferred tax assets, not including interest and penalties. We are contesting the disallowance. The UK Government is seeking to set aside a 2005 tax settlement agreement, alleging that GE misstated or omitted relevant facts. In October 2019, the UK Government asserted three new claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, one of which the Business and Property Court allowed in a July 2020 decision to go forward. In April 2021, the UK Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the equitable portion of that claim was time barred. The UK Government has petitioned the UK Supreme Court to hear an appeal, and the case remains scheduled for trial this fall in the Business and Property Court and may (depending on the outcome of the trial) be subject to further proceedings in the UK tax tribunal. We comply with all applicable tax laws and judicial doctrines of the United Kingdom and believe that the entire benefit is more likely than not to be sustained on its technical merits.