Delaware | 04-2281015 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Number) | |
incorporation or organization) |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibits | |||
31.1 | * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32 | * | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
101 | ** | The following materials from The Allied Defense Group, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): . |
* | Filed with original Form 10-Q on August 12, 2011. | |
** | Filed herewith. |
THE ALLIED DEFENSE GROUP, INC. |
||||
/s/ Charles S. Ream | ||||
Date: September 11, 2011 | Charles S. Ream | |||
Director and Chief Financial Officer |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets (Liquidation Basis) (Unaudited) (USD $)
In Thousands |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets (Liquidation Basis) [Abstract] | Â | Â |
Net assets on liquidation basis at beginning of period | $ 45,606 | $ 45,629 |
Changes in fair value of net assets in liquidation | Â | Â |
Adjust net assets to fair value | (248) | (461) |
Adjust estimated costs to be incurred during liquidation | (917) | (727) |
Net assets on liquidation basis at end of period | $ 44,441 | $ 44,441 |
Document and Entity Information (USD $)
|
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jul. 31, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
|
Document and Entity Information [Abstract] | Â | Â | Â |
Entity Registrant Name | ALLIED DEFENSE GROUP INC | Â | Â |
Entity Central Index Key | 0000003952 | Â | Â |
Document Type | 10-Q | Â | Â |
Document Period End Date | Jun. 30, 2011 | ||
Amendment Flag | false | Â | Â |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 | Â | Â |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q2 | Â | Â |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | Â | Â |
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer | No | Â | Â |
Entity Voluntary Filers | No | Â | Â |
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes | Â | Â |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | Â | Â |
Entity Public Float | Â | Â | $ 29,471,514 |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | Â | 8,235,195 | Â |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share [Abstract] | Â | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
NOTE 7 — EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes potential common shares and is computed by dividing
net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The
computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share excludes the effects of stock options, warrants
and restricted stock (unvested stock awards), if such effect is anti-dilutive. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has excluded warrants, unvested stock awards and stock
options from the calculation of loss per share from continuing operations, discontinued operations,
and total loss since their effect would be anti-dilutive. Consequently, the basic and diluted
weighted average number of common shares is equal to 8,174,363 and 8,174,521 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The table below shows the calculation of basic and
diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] | Â |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Except as set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” in this Note 12, there are no
material pending legal proceedings to which Allied or any of its subsidiaries is a party.
The Company entered into employment agreements with certain management personnel at the
Company’s subsidiaries and with certain domestic management personnel. These agreements provided
for severance payments in the event of termination under certain conditions. In September 2010,
the Company paid $1,650 in complete satisfaction of its severance obligations to the Company’s
management personnel. Employment agreements with employees at Mecar and Mecar USA were assigned as
part of the sale transactions.
The Company leases domestic office space for the former corporate offices under an
operating lease which expires in early 2013. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company
entered into a sublease which will offset a portion of the lease expense during the remainder of
the lease.
Legal Proceedings
DOJ Subpoena
On January 19, 2010, the Company received a subpoena and communications from the U.S.
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) requesting the Company produce documents relating to its dealings
with foreign governments. The subpoena stated that it was issued in connection with an ongoing
criminal investigation. On the same day, the Company also became aware through a press release
issued by the DOJ that an employee of Mecar USA had been indicted by the DOJ for allegedly engaging
in schemes to bribe foreign government officials to obtain business. The unsealed indictment of
this employee and the DOJ’s press release indicate that the alleged criminal conduct was on behalf
of a Decatur, Georgia company which is unrelated to the Company or Mecar USA. Mecar USA’s
employment agreement with the employee provided that the employee not actively engage in any other
employment, occupation or consulting activity that conflicts with the interests of the Company. In
light of the employee’s breach of his employment agreement, Mecar USA terminated his employment on
January 20, 2010.
According to the DOJ’s press release, the former employee was arrested on January 19, 2010,
along with twenty-one
other individuals, after a large-scale undercover operation that targeted foreign bribery in the
military and law enforcement products industry. The indictments of the twenty-two individuals
allege that the defendants conspired to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”),
conspired to engage in money laundering and engaged in substantive violations of the FCPA.
Subsequently, the Company received notice from the DOJ that indicated that it would request
additional documents and expand its review beyond matters relating to the indicted former employee
of Mecar USA. The Company understood that the DOJ’s expanded review was in connection with an
industry-wide review. The Company has also received inquiries from the SEC regarding this matter.
The Company is cooperating with the DOJ and SEC and complying with the DOJ’s subpoena and
SEC’s request for information. The Company’s ongoing compliance with these matters is being
overseen by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is being assisted in these
matters by independent outside counsel. The Company cannot predict the outcome of these matters or
the impact, if any, that they may have on our plan to return the net proceeds of the Chemring sale
to our stockholders.
Litigation Initiated by Former Employee
A former executive employee of the Company has instituted a lawsuit in the Circuit Court for
Fairfax County, Virginia against the Company and others alleging fraud, constructive fraud, breach
of contract, unjust encroachment, tortuous interference with business expectancy and civil
conspiracy, all relating to the former executive employee’s change of control severance agreement.
The former executive employee seeks damages in excess of $6.0 million. The Company believes this
lawsuit is without merit and is vigorously defending it.
Litigation Relating to Consulting Agreement (MECAR)
A former consultant to MECAR has initiated a lawsuit in Belgium against MECAR and the Company
for unpaid consulting fees in excess of $0.75 million. The Company believes that any liability
with respect to this matter will be borne by MECAR and not the Company.
Indemnification provisions
The Company has sold its SeaSpace, Titan, the VSK Group, GMS and NSM subsidiaries in separate
transactions starting with the first transaction closing in 2007. In each transaction, the Company
agreed to indemnify the purchaser for periods subsequent to closing for losses arising from
breaches of representations, warranties and covenants. Indemnification periods varied based on the
particular representation, warranty or covenant covered, the vast majority of which have all
expired. As of June 30, 2011, the only remaining indemnification obligations relate to
representations and warranties concerning taxes, environmental matters, breaches of title, breaches
of authorization and fraud. For SeaSpace, Titan, the VSK Group, GMS and NSM, these indemnification
provisions have been capped at $1,000, $950, $6,806 (€5,000), $5,200 and $863, respectively. At
June 30, 2011, no amount has been accrued related to these indemnifications as a liability is not
deemed probable.
On June 24, 2010, the Company signed a definitive purchase and sale agreement with Chemring
Group PLC pursuant to which Chemring agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of the
Company for $59,560 in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities. The purchase and sale
agreement contains certain indemnification provisions pursuant to which the Company may be required
to indemnify the buyer for a period subsequent to the completion of the sale for any and all losses
directly or indirectly based upon, related to, arising out of or in connection with Mecar’s
completed contracts, Mecar USA liabilities retained by the Company and any failure by the Company
to satisfy all transaction related expenses. The Company’s indemnification liability is limited to,
and capped at, the escrowed amount of $15,000 plus the accumulated interest. The Company’s
indemnification obligations expire upon the earlier of (i) June 30, 2015 or (ii) the Company’s
entry into either a court or administrative order or a Chemring-approved settlement agreement, in
either case, finally resolving the matters relating to the DOJ’s subpoena. In the absence of such
final resolution, in certain circumstances, up to 50% of the escrowed funds may be released as
early as June 24, 2013. At June 30, 2011, no amount has been accrued related to this
indemnification as a liability is not deemed probable.
|
Discontinued Operations
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued Operations [Abstract] | Â | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
NOTE 3 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Mecar and Mecar USA
On June 24, 2010, the Company signed a definitive purchase and sale agreement with Chemring
Group PLC pursuant to which Chemring agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of the
Company for $59,560 in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities. On September 1, 2010, the
Company completed the asset sale to Chemring contemplated by the Agreement. Pursuant to the
Agreement, Chemring acquired all of the capital stock of Mecar for approximately $45,810 in cash,
and separately Chemring acquired substantially all of the assets of Mecar USA for $13,750 in cash
and the assumption by Chemring of certain specified liabilities of Mecar USA. A portion of the
purchase price was paid through the repayment of certain intercompany indebtedness owed to the
Company that would otherwise have been cancelled at closing. $15,000 of the proceeds from the sale
was deposited into escrow to secure the Company’s indemnification obligations under the Agreement.
Such amounts are included in Funds held in escrow on the Statement of Net Assets (Liquidation
Basis).
The following summarizes the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 for Mecar and Mecar USA:
NS Microwave Systems, Inc. (NSM)
On August 7, 2009, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement to sell NSM for $400 in cash
and a promissory note in the amount of $1,325 at closing. The note is due 24 months after closing
and is subject to a reduction based on certain terms as defined in the Purchase Agreement. On
December 31, 2009 and again on June 30, 2010, the Company wrote-off $250, for a total write-off of
$500, against the receivable as it was unlikely that one of the Purchase Agreement conditions would
be met. As of June 30, 2011, the outstanding amount of the note receivable was $825. The note
bears interest at a rate of one-year London Interbank Offered Rate plus 5% subject to a maximum
interest cap of 8%.
|
Share- Based Compensation
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Share- Based Compensation [Abstract] | Â |
SHARE- BASED COMPENSATION |
NOTE 9 — SHARE- BASED COMPENSATION
Under the going concern basis of accounting, total share-based compensation was $102 and $145
(including outside directors compensation of $89 and $108) for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010, respectively. The share-based compensation expense for the period includes costs
associated with stock options, restricted stock grants, and the compensatory element of the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
In conjunction with the Company’s signing a definitive Merger Agreement on
January 18, 2010, all equity compensation plans were suspended pending the Company’s merger.
Thereafter, no new equity awards were made. With the June 24, 2010 signing of the definitive Sale
Agreement, the original Merger Agreement was terminated. The Company’s equity compensation plans
are no longer suspended, although no new issuances have been made since June 24, 2010. As of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there are no outstanding options.
|
Industry Segments
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Industry Segments [Abstract] | Â |
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS |
NOTE 10— INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
Prior to September 2010, the Company operated within two operating segments: Mecar and Mecar
USA. In September 2010, the Company completed the divesture of Mecar and Mecar USA. As a result,
Allied no longer has operating segments. The Company’s continuing operations include only those
expenses incurred to support the Company’s corporate headquarters and its non-operating European
subsidiaries.
|
Other - Net
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other - Net [Abstract] | Â | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER - NET |
NOTE 8 — OTHER — NET
Other income (expense) included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Principles of Consolidation/Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements [Abstract] | Â |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
NOTE 1 — CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Business Operations
The Allied Defense Group Inc. (“Allied” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, previously
conducted a multinational defense business focused on the manufacture and sale of ammunition and
ammunition related products for use by the U.S. and foreign governments. Allied’s business was
conducted by its two wholly owned subsidiaries: MECAR sprl, formerly Mecar S.A. (“Mecar”), and ADG
Sub USA, Inc., formerly Mecar USA, Inc. (“Mecar USA”).
Plan of Dissolution and Liquidation
On June 24, 2010, the Company signed a definitive purchase and sale agreement (the
“Agreement”) with Chemring Group PLC (“Chemring”) pursuant to which Chemring agreed to acquire
substantially all of the assets of the Company for $59,560 in cash and the assumption of certain
liabilities. On September 1, 2010, the Company completed the asset sale to Chemring contemplated
by the Agreement. Pursuant to the Agreement, Chemring acquired all of the capital stock of Mecar
for approximately $45,810 in cash, and separately Chemring acquired substantially all of the assets
of Mecar USA for $13,750 in cash and the assumption by Chemring of certain specified liabilities of
Mecar USA. A portion of the purchase price was paid through the repayment of certain intercompany
indebtedness owed to the Company that would otherwise have been cancelled at closing. $15,000 of
the proceeds from the sale was deposited into escrow to secure the Company’s indemnification
obligations under the Agreement. The $15,000 of cash plus earned interest income remains in escrow
as of June 30, 2011.
In conjunction with the Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company unanimously approved
the dissolution of the Company pursuant to a Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution (“Plan of
Dissolution”). The Company’s stockholders approved the Plan of Dissolution on September 30, 2010.
In response to concerns of certain of the Company’s stockholders, the Company agreed to delay the
filing of a certificate of dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State so that the
stockholders may continue to transfer the Company’s common stock while the Company resolves the
matters relating to a U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) subpoena. The Company expects to file a
Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State on or about August 31, 2011.
On September 2, 2010, the Company received a staff determination letter (the “Staff
Determination”) from NYSE Amex LLC (the “Exchange”). The Staff Determination stated that the
Exchange determined that the Company no longer complied with the requirements for continued listing
set forth in NYSE Amex LLC Company Guide Section 1003(c)(i) as a result of the sale of
substantially all of the Company’s assets. On September 20, 2010, the Company announced that
trading of shares of the Company’s common stock had been transferred from the NYSE Amex to the
OTCQB™ Marketplace effective September 20, 2010. The Company’s trading symbol is now ADGI. Upon
filing the Certificate of Dissolution, the Company’s shares will cease to be publicly traded.
Basis of Presentation
Liquidation Basis of Accounting
With the authorization of the Plan of Dissolution, the Company adopted the liquidation basis
of accounting effective as the close of business on September 30, 2010. The liquidation basis of
accounting will continue to be used by the Company until such time that the plan is terminated.
Under the liquidation basis of accounting, the carrying amounts of assets as of the close of
business on September 30, 2010, the date of the authorization of the Plan of Dissolution by the
Company, were adjusted to their estimated net realizable values and liabilities, including the
estimated costs associated with implementing the Plan of Dissolution, were stated at their
estimated settlement amounts. Such value estimates were updated by the Company as of December 31,
2010 and June 30, 2011. The majority of net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2010 and June 30,
2011 were highly liquid and did not require significant adjustment as their estimated net realizable value
approximates their current book value.
Consolidated Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation and Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
are the principal financial statements presented under the liquidation basis of accounting. The
valuations of assets at their net realizable value and
liabilities at their anticipated settlement amounts represent estimates, based on present
facts and circumstances associated with carrying out the Plan of Dissolution based on the
assumptions set forth below. The actual values and costs associated with carrying out the Plan of
Dissolution are expected to differ from the amounts shown herein because of the inherent
uncertainty and will be greater than or less than the amounts recorded. Such differences may be
material. In particular, the estimates of the Company’s costs will vary with the length of time it
operates under the Plan of Dissolution. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict the aggregate
amount or timing of future distributions to stockholders, as long as the Plan of Dissolution is in
effect and no assurance can be given that the amount of liquidating distributions to be received
will equal or exceed the estimate of net assets in liquidation presented in the accompanying
Statement of Net Assets in Liquidation.
The estimated net costs to be incurred during liquidation were $3,390 as of June 30, 2011.
The $3,390 in net remaining costs consists of $365 in compensation for former employees and
remaining directors; $809 for compliance and other office costs, including resident filing fees and
costs to settle remaining leases; $401 for insurance; $1,865 in fees for professional service
providers including legal representation relating to the DOJ subpoena; and income tax payments not
to exceed $150 for the repatriation of cash balances held in foreign countries; offset by $200
estimated to be received on our cash and short-term investment balances during liquidation. Such
estimates are based on assumptions regarding the Company’s ability to settle outstanding
obligations to creditors, resolve outstanding litigation, settle remaining leases and the ultimate
timing of distributions to its stockholders, but does not include any settlement amounts, fines or
penalties, if any, that the Company might incur as a result of the DOJ subpoena or any other legal
proceedings. These estimates will be adjusted from time to time as projections and assumptions
change.
Following the September 1, 2010 sale of substantially all of our assets, the Company’s
liquidation basis accounting has been based on the assumption that the Company would conclude the
DOJ/SEC inquiries and make final distributions to stockholders prior to the end of 2012.
Accordingly, the estimate of net costs to be incurred during liquidation included anticipated costs
to be incurred through December 31, 2012. Due to events beyond the Company’s control, including a
recent mistrial in the first of several expected trials of individual defendants implicated in
DOJ’s investigation, there has been a delay in the Company’s ability to resume discussions with DOJ
and the SEC and the Company has had no substantive contact with either agency since early 2011.
For this reason, and based on advice from independent outside counsel, the Company is now
estimating that conclusion of the DOJ/SEC inquiries and final distributions to stockholders will
not occur until 2013. As a result, the estimate of net costs to be incurred during liquidation now
includes estimated costs for 2013.
Going Concern Basis of Accounting
For all periods preceding the authorization of the Plan of Dissolution, the Company’s
financial statements are also presented on the going concern basis of accounting. Such financial
statements reflect the historical results of operations and changes in cash for the period from
January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010.
|
Short-Term Investments
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Short-Term Investments [Abstract] | Â |
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
NOTE 4 — SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Cash in excess of funds required for immediate use by the Company have been invested with the
primary goal to preserve capital. As such, the funds are invested in short-term, high-quality,
fixed-income securities and are accounted for at fair value. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, the fair value of these investments was $31,247 and $18,801 respectively, and was included in
short-term investments on the Balance Sheet. An unrealized loss of $343 and $526 was recorded for
the three and six months ending June 30, 2011.
|
Warrants
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Warrants [Abstract] | Â |
WARRANTS |
NOTE 5 — WARRANTS
On March 6, 2006, in conjunction with the issuance of convertible notes, the Company issued
detachable warrants to the purchasers exercisable for an aggregate of 226,800 shares of Allied
common stock. At December 31, 2010, the Company determined the fair value of the warrants was $0.
No warrants have been exercised. All warrants expired on March 9, 2011.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract] | Â | ||||||||||||||
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
NOTE 6 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company values its assets and liabilities using the methods of fair-value as described in
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company
determines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The
Company generally applies the income approach to determine fair value. This method uses valuation
techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount. The measurement is based on the
value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.
ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair
value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to active markets for identical assets and
liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurement). We classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair
value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair
value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
The Company believes the fair value of its financial instruments consisting of cash, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments, adjusted to recognize unrealized gains and losses,
approximate their carrying values due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments.
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Principles of Consolidation/Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements [Abstract] | Â | |||||||||||||||||||
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION |
NOTE 2 — PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
As of June 30, 2011, the consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts
of Allied and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which are as follows:
On September 1, 2010, Chemring acquired the assets of Mecar USA and the stock of Mecar, a
wholly owned subsidiary of ARC Europe. As a result of the acquisition, the Net Income (Loss) for
Mecar and Mecar USA has been reclassified to net income (loss) from discontinued operations on the
Statement of Operations for the period from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010.
|
Provision for Taxes
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Provision for Taxes [Abstract] | Â |
PROVISION FOR TAXES |
NOTE 11 — PROVISION FOR TAXES
The Company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets and establishes a
valuation allowance as deemed appropriate. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
generation of sufficient income by the Company in the jurisdictions in which it has operations and,
in some cases, by specific location. Because the Company experienced losses
in previous years and continued losses in the current year, management recorded a full
valuation allowance against the Company’s net deferred tax asset as of June 30, 2011.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no unrecognized tax liabilities or
benefits, nor did it have any that would have an effect on the effective tax rate. Income taxes
are provided based on the liability method for financial reporting purposes. For the six months
ended June 30, 2011, there was no interest or penalties recorded.
In Belgium, the Company is still open to examination by the Belgian tax authorities from 2007
forward. In the United States, the Company is still open to examination from 2007 forward, although
carryforward tax attributes that were generated prior to 2007 may still be adjusted upon
examination by the U.S. tax authorities if they either have been or will be utilized.
Currently, the Company has significant net deferred tax assets that have a full valuation
allowance in accordance with ASC 740 Accounting for Income Taxes. As of December 31, 2010, the
Company provided for U.S. tax on foreign earnings of approximately $25,475 that is expected to be
repatriated. As of June 30, 2011, $13,757 had been successfully repatriated. In anticipation of the
repatriation, the NOL carryforwards are no longer included in the deferred tax assets. Income taxes
related to repatriation of cash held in foreign countries is not expected to exceed $350 ($200 paid
to date; the balance included in the estimated costs for liquidation). As of June 30, 2010, the
fair value of net deferred tax assets is zero due to full valuation allowance.
The Company may undergo, or may already have undergone, an “ownership change” within the
meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, which could affect the Company’s ability to
offset gains realized in the asset sale against net operating losses and foreign tax credit
carryovers. If it is determined that an ownership change has occurred, this could significantly
increase the tax expense incurred from the sale transactions.
|
Consolidated Statements of Net Assets (Liquidation Basis) (USD $)
In Thousands, except Share data |
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
---|---|---|
ASSETS | Â | Â |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 737 | $ 14,462 |
Short-term investments | 31,247 | 18,801 |
Prepaid and other current assets | 406 | 606 |
Notes receivable | 825 | 875 |
Property and Equipment, net | 0 | 2 |
Funds held in escrow | 15,010 | 15,003 |
TOTAL ASSETS | 48,225 | 49,749 |
LIABILITIES | Â | Â |
Estimated net costs to be incurred during liquidation | 3,390 | 3,564 |
Accounts payable | 83 | 68 |
Accrued liabilities | 223 | 399 |
Income taxes payable | 0 | 2 |
Other liabilities | 88 | 87 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 3,784 | 4,120 |
NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION | $ 44,441 | $ 45,629 |
NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING | 8,235,195 | 8,235,195 |
NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION PER SHARE | $ 5.40 | $ 5.54 |