UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): February 28, 2007

Fremont General Corporation
__________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	001-08007	95-2815260
_____________________ (State or other jurisdiction	_____________ (Commission	______________ (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation)	File Number)	Identification No.)
2425 Olympic Boulevard , 3rd Floor, Santa Monica, California		90404
_________________________________ (Address of principal executive offices)		___________ (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 315-5500

Not Applicable
______________________________________________
Former name or former address, if changed since last report

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

[  ]  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[  ]  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[  ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[  ]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 8.01 Other Events.

Fremont Indemnity Company (in Liquidation) v. Fremont General Corporation, et al:

In June 2004, the then State of California Insurance Commissioner, John Garamendi (the "Commissioner"), as statutory liquidator of Fremont Indemnity Company ("Fremont Indemnity"), filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court against Fremont General Corporation (the "Company") alleging the improper utilization by the Company of certain net operating loss deductions ("NOLs") allegedly belonging to its Fremont Indemnity subsidiary. This complaint involves issues that were considered resolved in an agreement dated July 2, 2002, among the California Department of Insurance, Fremont Indemnity and the Company (the "Letter Agreement"). The Letter Agreement was executed on behalf of the California Department of Insurance by the Honorable Harry Low, the State of California Insurance Commissioner at that time. On November 22, 2005, upon the Third Amended Complaint, the Court dismissed the lawsuit. Shortly thereafter, the Commissioner commenced an appeal.

On February 28, 2007, the Court of Appeal of the State of California reversed the trial court’s dismissal and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. The Company continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.


Fremont Indemnity Company (in Liquidation as Successor in Interest to Comstock Insurance Company) v. Fremont General Corporation, et al:

In August 2004, the Commissioner, as statutory liquidator of Fremont Indemnity, filed an additional and separate complaint against the Company on behalf of Fremont Indemnity as successor in interest to Comstock Insurance Company ("Comstock"), a former affiliate of Fremont Indemnity, which was subsequently merged into Fremont Indemnity. This case alleged similar causes of action regarding the usage of Comstock’s NOLs as improper transactions with other insurance subsidiaries and affiliates of Fremont Indemnity. This complaint also i nvolves issues that were considered resolved in the Letter Agreement. On April 22, 2005, the Court dismissed, without leave to amend, the entire complaint. Shortly thereafter, the Commissioner appealed.

On February 28, 2007, the Court of Appeal of the State of California reversed the trial court’s dismissal and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. The Company continues to believe that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.

Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Forward-Looking Statements

This report may contain “forward-looking statements” which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements and the Company’s currently reported results are based on the Company’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on the Company. These statements and the Company’s reported results are not guarantees of future performance and there can be no assurance that actual developments will be those anticipated by the Company. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s projected or reported results as a result of significant risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficul t to predict, including:

• the impact of the Company’s withdrawal from the subprime residential real estate mortgage lending business;
• changes in the interest rate and competitive environments;
• changes in general and specific economic conditions and trends;
• changes in asset and loan valuations and the costs of originating loans;
• changes in the volumes of loans originated, loans sold, the pricing of existing and future loans, and the values realized upon the sale of such loans;
• access to the necessary capital and deposit resources to fund loan originations and the condition of the whole loan sale and securitization markets;
• the impact of valuation and other changes in the commercial and residential real estate markets;
• the effect of litigation, state and federal legislation and regulations, and development of, and the variability in determining, the allowance for loan losses;
• the impact of th e final terms of a proposed Cease and Desist order from the FDIC on the Company’s ability to conduct its business;
• the impact of other regulatory actions taken by the FDIC, the Department of Financial Institutions of the State of California or other regulatory bodies on the Company's ability to conduct its business;
• the impact of changes in federal and state tax laws and interpretations, including tax rate changes;
• the ability to maintain an effective system of internal and financial disclosure controls, and to identify and remediate any control deficiencies, under the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
• other events and factors beyond our control.

For a more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties, see the Company’s other public filings with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	Fremont General Corporation
March 5, 2007	By:	/s/ Patrick E. Lamb
		Name: Patrick E. Lamb
		Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer)