XML 24 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 29, 2012
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]  
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2012-2 Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The new guidance gives companies the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. If the results of the qualitative assessment conclude that the fair value of the asset is more likely than not impaired, the quantitative impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be required. ASU 2012-2 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company did not early adopt ASU 2012-2 in preparing for its annual impairment testing. The Company will continue to test for impairment utilizing the quantitative method. As ASU 2012-2 was not early adopted, no material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows resulted.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 Comprehensive Income. The new guidance indefinitely defers certain provisions of ASU 2011-5 Statement of Comprehensive Income that required companies to present reclassification adjustments for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income in both net income and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. The deferral does not change the primary provisions of ASU 2011-5, as described below. The Company adopted ASU 2011-12 on a retrospective basis, effective January 1, 2012. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-12 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-8 Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The new guidance gives companies the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. If the results of the qualitative assessment conclude that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the applicable carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be required. ASU 2011-8 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company did not adopt ASU 2011-8 in preparing for its annual impairment testing. The Company will continue to test for impairment utilizing the quantitative method. As ASU 2011-8 was not adopted, no material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows resulted.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5 Statement of Comprehensive Income. The new guidance requires companies to present net income and comprehensive income in one continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company adopted ASU 2011-5 on a retrospective basis, effective January 1, 2012, presenting comprehensive income in a separate statement following the statement of income. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-5 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-4 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure. The new guidance requires additional disclosures for Level 3 measurements including quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in estimating fair value, a discussion of the sensitivity of the measurement to these inputs, and a description of the Company's valuation process. The Company adopted ASU 2011-4 on a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2012. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-4 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.