10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_________

FORM 10-Q

_________

ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2012

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from_____ to _____

Commission file number 0-362

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana	35-0827455
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
400 East Spring Street
Bluffton, Indiana	46714
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(260) 824-2900

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YESx NOo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YESx NOo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filerx Accelerated Filero Non-Accelerated Filero Smaller Reporting Companyo

1

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YESo NOx

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	Outstanding at
Class of Common Stock	October 31, 2012
$.10 par value	23,509,063 shares

2

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Number
Item 1.	Financial Statements	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Third Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Third Quarter and Nine Months Ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011	5
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011	8
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	35
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	35
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	36
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	37
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	37
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	37
Item 6.	Exhibits	37
Signatures		38
Exhibit Index		39
Exhibits

3

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
Net sales	$	237,557		$	224,391		$	686,177		$	633,841
Cost of sales	154,976			150,674			452,986			422,381
Gross profit	82,581			73,717			233,191			211,460
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	49,001			44,840			141,117			132,915
Restructuring (income)/expense	88			553			74			1,473
Operating income	33,492			28,324			92,000			77,072
Interest expense	(2,367		)	(2,917		)	(7,317		)	(7,529		)
Other income/(expense)	430			1,542			14,416			4,110
Foreign exchange income/(expense)	(896		)	(554		)	(1,551		)	(1,911		)
Income before income taxes	30,659			26,395			97,548			71,742
Income taxes	8,653			7,098			27,139			19,531
Net income	$	22,006		$	19,297		$	70,409		$	52,211
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(140		)	(77		)	(690		)	(657		)
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$	21,866		$	19,220		$	69,719		$	51,554
Income per share:
Basic	$	0.93		$	0.82		$	2.98		$	2.20
Diluted	$	0.91		$	0.80		$	2.91		$	2.16
Dividends per common share	$	0.15		$	0.14		$	0.43		$	0.40

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
Net income	$	22,006		$	19,297		$	70,409		$	52,211
Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	9,799			(26,841		)	284			(12,656		)
Employee benefit plan activity	671			908			1,845			2,725
Other comprehensive income/(loss)	$	10,470		$	(25,933	)	$	2,129		$	(9,931	)
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income	(263		)	(356		)	(723		)	(1,068		)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	$	10,207		$	(26,289	)	$	1,406		$	(10,999	)
Comprehensive income/(loss)	$	32,213		$	(6,992	)	$	71,815		$	41,212
Comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	(351		)	977			(325		)	(463		)
Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$	31,862		$	(6,015	)	$	71,490		$	40,749

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	95,717		$	153,337
Receivables, less allowances of $3,512 and $2,964, respectively	118,795			78,435
Inventories:
Raw material	72,005			49,615
Work-in-process	19,025			16,047
Finished goods	107,243			76,031
	198,273			141,693
Deferred income taxes	13,263			11,853
Other current assets	25,046			15,165
Total current assets	451,094			400,483
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land and buildings	87,697			85,623
Machinery and equipment	198,026			186,525
Furniture and fixtures	26,185			24,332
Other	20,869			13,059
	332,777			309,539
Less: Allowance for depreciation	(178,074		)	(163,130		)
	154,703			146,409
Asset held for sale	1,100			1,300
Intangible assets	150,391			94,538
Goodwill	200,560			168,846
Other assets	6,995			17,954
Total assets	$	964,843		$	829,530

6

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	58,721		$	45,481
Accrued expenses	62,181			58,692
Income taxes	7,129			5,946
Current maturities of long-term debt and short-term borrowings	17,743			13,978
Total current liabilities	145,774			124,097
Long-term debt	150,801			150,000
Deferred income taxes	45,097			15,348
Employee benefit plans	62,708			68,746
Other long-term liabilities	39,989			15,494
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)	—			—
Redeemable noncontrolling interest	5,184			5,407
Shareowners' equity:
Common stock (65,000 shares authorized, $.10 par value) outstanding (23,507 and 23,339, respectively)	2,350			2,333
Additional capital	164,261			144,609
Retained earnings	393,765			350,457
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(47,493		)	(49,264		)
Total shareowners' equity	512,883			448,135
Noncontrolling interest	2,407			2,303
Total equity	515,290			450,438
Total liabilities and equity	$	964,843		$	829,530

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)	Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	70,409		$	52,211
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	19,478			19,277
Share-based compensation	4,233			3,256
Deferred income taxes	9,970			1,566
(Gain)/loss on disposals of plant and equipment	(440		)	1,481
Gain on equity investment	(12,212		)	—
Asset impairment	583			200
Foreign exchange expense	1,551			1,911
Excess tax from share-based payment arrangements	(3,762		)	(930		)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Receivables	(26,861		)	(23,400		)
Inventory	(30,550		)	(5,796		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,794			7,931
Income taxes	4,777			7,436
Employee benefit plans	(4,158		)	(12,951		)
Other assets and liabilities	(8,742		)	253
Net cash flows from operating activities	26,070			52,445
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment	(19,310		)	(13,607		)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment	1,216			324
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(54,074		)	(25,143		)
Additional consideration for prior acquisition	—			(6,623		)
Loan to customer	—			(3,171		)
Proceeds from loan to customer	219			—
Net cash flows from investing activities	(71,949		)	(48,220		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt	70,124			5,080
Repayment of debt	(71,903		)	(4,258		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	11,796			4,246
Excess tax from share-based payment arrangements	3,762			930
Purchases of common stock	(16,484		)	(10,629		)
Dividends paid	(10,403		)	(9,294		)
Net cash flows from financing activities	(13,108		)	(13,925		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	1,367			(2,315		)
Net change in cash and equivalents	(57,620		)	(12,015		)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period	153,337			140,070
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	95,717		$	128,055

8

Cash paid for income taxes	$	17,809	$	7,450
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest of $161 and $0, respectively	$	8,355	$	7,529
Non-cash items:
Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc. liability for mandatory share purchase	$	22,924	$	—
Payable to seller of Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.	$	407	$	4,870
Payable to seller of Healy Systems, Inc.	$	—	$	717
Additions to property, plant, and equipment, not yet paid	$	59	$	1,339

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

9

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 29, 2012, and for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations.  In the opinion of management, all accounting entries and adjustments (including normal, recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operation for the interim period have been made. Operating results for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2012. For further information, including a description of the Company’s critical accounting policies, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

2. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2012-2 Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The new guidance gives companies the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. If the results of the qualitative assessment conclude that the fair value of the asset is more likely than not impaired, the quantitative impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be required. ASU 2012-2 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company did not early adopt ASU 2012-2 in preparing for its annual impairment testing. The Company will continue to test for impairment utilizing the quantitative method. As ASU 2012-2 was not early adopted, no material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows resulted.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 Comprehensive Income. The new guidance indefinitely defers certain provisions of ASU 2011-5 Statement of Comprehensive Income that required companies to present reclassification adjustments for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income in both net income and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. The deferral does not change the primary provisions of ASU 2011-5, as described below. The Company adopted ASU 2011-12 on a retrospective basis, effective January 1, 2012. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-12 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-8 Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The new guidance gives companies the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. If the results of the qualitative assessment conclude that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the applicable carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be required. ASU 2011-8 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company did not adopt ASU 2011-8 in preparing for its annual impairment testing. The Company will continue to test for impairment utilizing the quantitative method. As ASU 2011-8 was not adopted, no material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows resulted.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5 Statement of Comprehensive Income. The new guidance requires companies to present net income and comprehensive income in one continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company adopted ASU 2011-5 on a retrospective basis, effective January 1, 2012, presenting comprehensive income in a separate statement following the statement of income. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-5 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-4 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure. The new guidance requires additional disclosures for Level 3 measurements including quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in estimating fair value, a discussion of the sensitivity of the measurement to these inputs, and a description of the Company's valuation process. The Company adopted ASU 2011-4 on a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2012. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-4 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

10

3. ACQUISITIONS

In an agreement dated March 7, 2012, between the Company and Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc. ("PPH"), the Company acquired an additional 39.5 percent of the outstanding shares of PPH, net of debt acquired, for approximately $30.3 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. The Company funded the acquisition with approximately $30.3 million in cash. The Company previously held a 31.0 percent equity interest in PPH (see Note 6). As a result of the additional acquisition, the Company's total equity interest in PPH increased to 70.5 percent, resulting in the consolidation of PPH in the Company's financial statements. Accordingly, the original equity interest in PPH was remeasured to its fair value of $23.9 million as of March 7, 2012, based on the income approach which utilized management estimates and consultation with an independent third-party valuation firm. Inputs included an analysis of the enterprise value based on financial projections and ownership percentages. As a result, the Company recognized a one-time gain of $12.2 million in the "Other income/(expense)" line of the Company's condensed consolidated statement of income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2012.

PPH is the holding company for two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pioneer Pump, Inc. ("PPI") located in Canby, Oregon, and Pioneer Pump, Ltd. ("PPL") located in Rattlesden, United Kingdom, which holds an additional subsidiary in Wadeville, Germiston, South Africa. PPH is a leader in the manufacture of large, engine-driven centrifugal pumps used for dewatering in oil and gas, municipal, construction, and mining applications.

The Company also entered into a further stock purchase agreement with the noncontrolling interest holders to purchase the remaining shares of PPH on or about, but no later than, March 31, 2015, for a purchase price based on a multiple of PPH's adjusted average earnings for 2013 and 2014 less net indebtedness. Accordingly, a resulting liability of $22.9 million was recorded in the "Other long-term liabilities" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. Any required adjustments to the liability driven by changes in the expected purchase price will be recorded in the "Interest expense" line of the Company's condensed consolidated statement of income. The mandatory share purchase liability remained recorded at the initial carrying amount as of September 29, 2012. As a result, no adjustments were necessary for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012.

The PPH intangible assets of $43.9 million consist primarily of customer relationships, which will be amortized utilizing the straight line method over 17 to 19 years, and trademarks, which are classified as indefinite lived assets and will not be amortized.

The preliminary goodwill of $26.5 million resulting from the PPH acquisition consists primarily of expanding sales of packaged systems products and the recording of deferred taxes related to acquired assets. PPH's presence in the oil and gas market will also complement the Company's initiative to introduce submersible pumping systems in this market. All of the goodwill was recorded as part of the Water Systems segment and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Preliminary goodwill increased by $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 29, 2012, due to purchase accounting adjustments to intangible assets and inventory resulting from additional information provided for the provisional valuation.

In an agreement dated August 9, 2012, between the Company and Cerus Industrial Corporation (“Cerus”), the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cerus, net of debt acquired, for approximately $24.5 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. The Company funded the acquisition with cash on hand and short-term borrowings paid back within the period.

Cerus, located in Hillsboro, Oregon, designs, manufactures, and distributes motor controls, motor starters, contactors, protection devices, and variable frequency drives to a wide range of distributor and original equipment manufacturers in North America.

The Cerus intangible assets of $17.3 million consist primarily of customer relationships, which will be amortized utilizing the straight line method over 17 years, and trademarks, which are classified as indefinite lived assets and will not be amortized.

The preliminary goodwill of $5.5 million resulting from the Cerus acquisition consists primarily of accelerated growth resulting from increased technical and product development capacity, broadened product lines, reduced manufacturing costs, and movement into adjacent market areas. All of the goodwill was recorded as part of the Water Systems segment and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

11

The preliminary purchase prices assigned to the major identifiable assets and liabilities for the PPH and Cerus acquisitions are as follows:

(In millions)	PPH			Cerus			Total
Assets:
Cash acquired	$	0.8		$	—		$	0.8
Current assets	38.1			3.8			41.9
Property, plant, and equipment	3.6			0.3			3.9
Intangible assets	43.9			17.3			61.2
Goodwill	26.5			5.5			32.0
Total assets	112.9			26.9			139.8
Liabilities	(58.7		)	(2.4		)	(61.1		)
Total	54.2			24.5			78.7
Less: Fair value of original equity interest	(23.9		)	—			(23.9		)
Total purchase price	$	30.3		$	24.5		$	54.8

The fair values of the PPH and Cerus identifiable intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment are provisional amounts pending final valuations and purchase accounting adjustments. The Company utilized management estimates and consultation with an independent third-party valuation firm to assist in the valuations. Transaction costs were expensed as incurred under the guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, Business Combinations.  Transaction costs included in the "Selling, general, and administrative expenses" line of the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income were $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012.

The results of operations of PPH and Cerus were included in the Company's condensed consolidated statement of income, from the respective acquisition dates through the third quarter ended September 29, 2012. The difference between actual sales for the Company and proforma sales including PPH and Cerus as if they were acquired at the beginning of each period was not material as a component of the Company's consolidated sales for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively. Due to the immaterial nature of the acquisitions, the Company has not included full year proforma statements of income for the acquisition year and previous year.

The fair values of the identifiable intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment for the 2011 Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (“Impo”) acquisition were final as of the first quarter ended March 31, 2012.  The Company utilized management estimates and consultation with an independent third-party valuation firm to assist in the valuation.  No adjustments were required as a result of the final valuation to the preliminary amounts previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

4. REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

On May 2, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of 80 percent of Impo. The noncontrolling interest holders have the option, which is embedded in the noncontrolling interest, to require the Company to redeem their ownership interests beginning after May 2, 2014, three years after the original agreement was signed. The combination of a noncontrolling interest and a redemption feature resulted in a redeemable noncontrolling interest.

The 20 percent noncontrolling interest in Impo is redeemable at other than fair value as the redemption value is determined based on a specified formula.  The noncontrolling interest becomes redeemable after the passage of time, and therefore the Company records the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest at the greater of (1) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interest's share of net income or loss and its share of other comprehensive income or loss and dividends (“carrying amount”) or (2) the redemption value which is determined based on the greater of the redemption floor value or the then-current specified earnings multiple.  As of September 29, 2012, the Impo redeemable noncontrolling interest was recorded at the carrying amount.

12

According to FASB ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, and Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Topic No. D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities, redeemable noncontrolling interests issued in the form of common securities, to the extent that the noncontrolling interest holder has a contractual right to receive an amount upon share redemption that is other than the fair value of such shares, then the noncontrolling interest holder has, in substance, received a dividend distribution that is different from other common shareholders. Therefore, adjustments to the noncontrolling interest to reflect the redemption amount should be reflected in the computation of earnings per share using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, the Company has elected to treat as a dividend only the portion of the periodic redemption value adjustment (if any) that reflects a redemption value in excess of fair value.  As the redeemable noncontrolling interest for Impo is recorded at the carrying amount, no adjustments were necessary for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012. Adjustments totaling $0.2 million and $0.5 million resulting from the Company's previously held redeemable noncontrolling interest in Vertical S.p.A. ("Vertical") were necessary for the third quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively, and were included in the related earnings per share computations (see Note 11). The noncontrolling interest in Vertical was redeemed by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2011.

5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, provides guidance for defining, measuring, and disclosing fair value within an established framework and hierarchy. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The standard established a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value within the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets;

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

As of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as set forth in the table below. The "Recognized Loss" amounts in the table are accumulated totals since inception.

(In millions)	September 29, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Cash equivalents	$	14.7	$	14.7	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative assets	—		—		—		—		—
Impo contingent consideration	5.4		—		—		5.4		0.7
	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Cash equivalents	$	17.1	$	17.1	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative assets	0.1		—		0.1		—		—
Impo contingent consideration	5.0		—		—		5.0		0.7

The Company's Level 1 assets consist of cash equivalents which are comprised of domestic money market funds generally backed by treasury bills with fund prices readily observable and international high quality, highly liquid, bank guaranteed deposit accounts.

13

The Company's Level 2 assets consist of derivatives in the form of foreign currency forward contracts. The values were based on observable market inputs including forward and spot exchange rates for currencies. The contracts were marked-to-market with the resulting adjustments included in the "Other current assets" line on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the "Foreign exchange income/(expense)" line of the condensed consolidated statements of income. The contracts were initiated to reduce exchange rate volatility associated with both future required payments and possible contingency payments.

The Company's Level 3 liabilities consist of an acquisition-related contingent consideration. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company recorded $5.5 million (TL 8.5 million) of contingent consideration related to the second quarter 2011 acquisition of Impo. The fair value of $5.4 million (TL 9.7 million) as of September 29, 2012, was based on the income approach which involved analyzing future earnings projections, the probability of Impo achieving specified financial targets, and a discount factor of 15.0 percent. The Company recognized the additional accretion charge in the "Interest expense" line of the condensed consolidated statement of income. An additional impact of $0.8 million was attributed to foreign exchange translation. The contingent consideration is included in the "Other long-term liabilities" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as set forth in the table below. The "Recognized Loss" amounts included in the table are accumulated totals since inception.

(In millions)	September 29, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Asset held for sale	$	1.1	$	—	$	—	$	1.1	$	3.6
	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Asset held for sale	$	1.3	$	—	$	—	$	1.3	$	3.4

The Company's Level 3 assets consist of held for sale assets. The Company classified its former Siloam Springs manufacturing facility as held for sale and recorded the impairment as a restructuring expense on property, plant, and equipment during the second quarter of 2010. The current fair value reflects the sale price, less expected closing costs, at which the asset is currently under a letter of intent for sale that is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2012. The valuation process utilized to generate the original listing price on the asset involved an appraisal, broker market commentary, and observation of recent comparable sales and current comparable listings. A listing price was selected that placed the property near the median of such values based on price per square foot. Accordingly, no unobservable inputs were a significant factor in the list price. Subsequent to this original valuation process, as a result of the passage of time, the price was reduced sequentially for price discovery in order for the transaction to clear at the highest price possible. The Company is unaware of alternative uses for the property that would be in excess of the sale price in the letter of intent.

6. OTHER ASSETS

In 2005, the Company acquired a 35.0 percent equity interest in PPI, which was accounted for using the equity method. During the first quarter of 2012, the shareholders of PPI and PPL contributed shares to form a new holding company, PPH, in exchange for equivalent value and control in PPH. As a result of this contribution, the Company's equity interest decreased to 31.0 percent of PPH. On March 7, 2012, the Company acquired a controlling interest in PPH, resulting in the consolidation of PPH in the Company's financial statements (see Note 3). The carrying amount of the equity investment prior to the acquisition of the controlling interest was $11.7 million as of March 6, 2012 and $11.0 million as of December 31, 2011.  The Company’s proportionate share of earnings, included in the “Other income/(expense)” line of the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income, was $0.4 million through March 6, 2012 and $0.8 million and $1.9 million for the third quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively.

During the second quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the parent of a customer.  The current maturity portion is included in the "Receivables" line while the long-term portion is included in the "Other assets" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets. The agreement provides for interest on the loan at a variable market interest rate with the customer to repay the loan plus interest in semi-annual installments throughout the seven-year term.  The Company has a long-term relationship with the customer and considers the loan fully collectible.

14

7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

The carrying amounts of the Company's intangible assets are as follows:

(In millions)	September 29, 2012					December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangibles:
Patents	$	7.8	$	(5.6	)	$	7.8	$	(5.4	)
Supply agreements	4.4		(4.4		)	4.4		(4.4		)
Technology	7.5		(3.1		)	7.5		(2.7		)
Customer relationships	118.9		(21.3		)	78.7		(17.1		)
Software	1.0		(0.1		)	1.2		—
Other	1.1		(1.1		)	1.2		(1.1		)
Total	$	140.7	$	(35.6	)	$	100.8	$	(30.7	)
Unamortized intangibles:
Trade names	45.3		—			24.4		—
Total intangibles	$	186.0	$	(35.6	)	$	125.2	$	(30.7	)

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the third quarters ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively, and $5.2 million and $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively.

Amortization expense is projected as follows:

(In millions)	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016
	$	7.0	$	7.7	$	7.7	$	7.7	$	7.7

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting segment for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, is as follows:

(In millions)	Water Systems			Fueling Systems		Consolidated
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	109.9		$	58.9	$	168.8
Acquisitions	32.0			—		32.0
Adjustments to prior year acquisitions	—			—		—
Foreign currency translation	(0.4		)	0.2		(0.2		)
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	141.5		$	59.1	$	200.6

The acquired goodwill in the Water Systems segment for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, related to the Company's acquisition of PPH and Cerus.

15

8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Plans - As of September 29, 2012, the Company maintained two domestic pension plans and three German pension plans. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for these plans.

Other Benefits - The Company's other postretirement benefit plan provides health and life insurance benefits to domestic employees hired prior to 1992.

Effective for 2012, the Company redesigned certain U.S. retirement plan offerings. The redesign was completed in order to increase standardization of retirement plans among U.S. salaried employees and to reduce the expected cash funding volatility of retirement plans, while at the same time keeping in place a competitive retirement plan offering to attract and retain talent. The Company achieved this by freezing benefit accruals under both the Basic Pension Plan and the Cash Balance Plan as of December 31, 2011, with the exception of a limited number of Basic Pension Plan participants who will continue to accrue benefits over a five year sunset period. Also effective December 31, 2011, the Cash Balance Plan was closed to new participants (the Basic Retirement Plan was previously closed to new participants in 2006). The Basic Retirement Plan and Cash Balance Plan were merged effective December 31, 2011. As of January 1, 2012, the Company instituted a new service-based contribution, supplemental to the existing Company match for employees, into the defined contribution retirement plan offerings.

The following table sets forth the aggregated net periodic benefit cost for all pension plans for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively:

(In millions)	Pension Benefits
	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
Service cost	$	0.4		$	0.7		$	1.2		$	2.6
Interest cost	2.2			2.0			6.4			7.2
Expected return on assets	(2.7		)	(2.3		)	(7.9		)	(8.8		)
Amortization of transition obligation	—			—			—			—
Prior service cost	—			—			—			0.1
Loss	0.5			0.8			1.5			2.7
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	0.4		$	1.2		$	1.2		$	3.8

(In millions)	Other Benefits
	Third Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011		September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Service cost	$	0.1	$	—	$	0.1	$	—
Interest cost	0.1		0.2		0.4		0.5
Expected return on assets	—		—		—		—
Amortization of transition obligation	—		—		0.1		0.1
Prior service cost	—		0.1		0.2		0.1
Loss	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	0.3	$	0.4	$	0.9	$	0.8

In the nine months ended September 29, 2012, the Company made contributions to the funded plans of $4.8 million. The amount of contributions to be made to the plans during calendar year 2012 was finalized September 15, 2012, based upon the plans' year-end valuation at December 31, 2011, and the funding level required for the plan year ended December 31, 2011.

16

9. INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate continues to be lower than the United States statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to the indefinite reinvestment of foreign earnings taxed at rates below the U.S. statutory rate as well as recognition of foreign tax credits.  The Company has the ability to indefinitely reinvest these foreign earnings based on the earnings and cash projections of its other operations as well as cash on hand and available credit.

As of the beginning of fiscal year 2012, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $5.6 million, excluding accrued interest and penalties.  The unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $0.5 million for state income tax liabilities and $0.4 million for federal income tax liabilities based on state audits settled and evaluations made during the first nine months of 2012.  The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest and penalties, of $4.7 million as of September 29, 2012.

If recognized, the annual effective tax rate would be affected by the net unrecognized tax benefits of $4.5 million as of September 29, 2012.

Of the unrecognized tax benefits at September 29, 2012, $2.6 million are related to acquisitions for which indemnification was provided for in the respective purchase agreements.  The stock purchase agreements related to these acquisitions provide the Company with rights to recover tax liabilities related to pre-acquisition tax years from the sellers.  Other amounts are associated with domestic state tax issues, such as nexus, as well as other federal and state uncertain tax positions.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense, the impact of which is immaterial.  The Company has accrued interest and penalties as of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, of approximately $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, as of September 29, 2012, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008.

It is reasonably possible that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits could change up to $0.9 million in the next twelve months as a result of an audit or due to the expiration of a statute of limitation.

10. DEBT

Debt consisted of the following:

(In millions)	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Prudential Agreement - 5.79 percent	$	150.0		$	150.0
Capital leases	1.0			0.3
Subsidiary debt	17.5			13.7
	168.5			164.0
Less current maturities	(17.7		)	(14.0		)
Long-term debt	$	150.8		$	150.0

During the first quarter, the Company assumed $4.1 million of debt with the PPH acquisition. PPH has a short-term line of credit which expires in December 2012. The line of credit was extended beyond the original September 2012 maturity during the third quarter. Maximum borrowings available on the line of credit are $8.0 million. As of September 29, 2012, the outstanding balance on the line of credit was approximately $1.3 million. The line of credit is secured by all assets of PPH with an interest rate of the one month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 2.0 percent. The debt at third quarter end was included in the "Subsidiary debt" line of the above table.

During the third quarter, the Company assumed $1.2 million of debt with the Cerus acquisition. The debt resulting from a line of credit was repaid within the period with no amounts outstanding at third quarter end.

17

During the third quarter, the Company's prior year acquisition, Impo, incurred additional borrowings on previously available credit. Prior borrowings on the available credit also matured during the third quarter. As of September 29, 2012, Impo had short-term debt outstanding of approximately $16.1 million. The debt at third quarter end was included in the “Subsidiary debt” line of the above table.

The total estimated fair value of debt was $184.3 million and $179.2 million at September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  The fair value assumed floating rate debt was valued at par. In the absence of quoted prices in active markets considerable judgment is required in developing estimates of fair value.  Estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market transaction.  In determining the estimated fair value of its long-term debt, the Company uses various inputs including estimated borrowing rates currently available to the Company that reflect debt with similar terms, conditions, and remaining maturities as well as the current credit quality of the Company. Accordingly, the fair value of debt is classified as a Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

The following debt payments are expected to be paid in accordance with the following schedule:

(In millions)	Total		Year 1		Year 2		Year 3		Year 4		Year 5		More than 5 years
Debt	$	167.5	$	17.5	$	—	$	—	$	30.0	$	30.0	$	90.0
Capital leases	1.0		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		—
	$	168.5	$	17.7	$	0.2	$	0.2	$	30.2	$	30.2	$	90.0

11. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

(In millions, except per share amounts)	Third Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011		September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$	21.9	$	19.2	$	69.7	$	51.6
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		0.2		—		0.5
	$	21.9	$	19.0	$	69.7	$	51.1
Denominator:
Basic
Weighted average common shares	23.4		23.2		23.4		23.2
Diluted
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director incentive stock options and stock/stock unit awards	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares	23.9		23.7		23.9		23.7
Basic earnings per share	$	0.93	$	0.82	$	2.98	$	2.20
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.91	$	0.80	$	2.91	$	2.16
Anti-dilutive stock options	0.1		0.3		0.1		0.3

18

12. EQUITY ROLL FORWARD

The schedule below sets forth equity changes for the nine months ended September 29, 2012:

(In thousands)
Description	Common			Additional Paid in Capital		Retained Earnings			Minimum Pension Liability			Cumulative Translation Adjustment			Non controlling Interest			Total Equity			Redeemable Non controlling Interest
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	2,333		$	144,609	$	350,457		$	(47,219	)	$	(2,045	)	$	2,303		$	450,438		$	5,407
Net income						69,719									339			70,058			351
Dividends on common stock						(9,959		)										(9,959		)
Noncontrolling dividend															(444		)	(444		)
Common stock issued	44			11,752														11,796
Common stock repurchased or received for stock options exercised	(32		)			(16,452		)										(16,484		)
Share-based compensation	5			4,228														4,233
Tax benefit of stock options exercised				3,672														3,672
Currency translation adjustment												649			209			858			(574		)
Pension liability, net of taxes									1,122									1,122
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	2,350		$	164,261	$	393,765		$	(46,097	)	$	(1,396	)	$	2,407		$	515,290		$	5,184

19

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Financial information by reportable business segment is included in the following summary:

	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
	Net sales to external customers
Water Systems	$	189.8		$	179.4		$	557.5		$	510.1
Fueling Systems	47.8			45.0			128.7			123.7
Other	—			—			—			—
Consolidated	$	237.6		$	224.4		$	686.2		$	633.8
	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
	Operating income (loss)
Water Systems	$	35.1		$	29.0		$	102.0		$	86.7
Fueling Systems	11.4			9.6			26.0			22.2
Other	(13.0		)	(10.3		)	(36.0		)	(31.8		)
Consolidated	$	33.5		$	28.3		$	92.0		$	77.1
	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Total assets
Water Systems	$	707.9		$	535.3
Fueling Systems	233.5			222.2
Other	23.4			72.0
Consolidated	$	964.8		$	829.5

Cash is the major asset group in “Other” of total assets.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In August 2010, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) filed a civil complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company and Franklin Fueling Systems, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company).  The complaint relates to a third-party-supplied component part of the Company's Healy 900 Series nozzle, which is part of the Company's Enhanced Vapor Recovery (“EVR”) Systems installed in California gasoline filling stations.  This part, a diaphragm, was the subject of a retrofit during the first half of 2008.  As the Company previously reported, in October 2008 CARB issued a Notice of Violation to the Company alleging that the circumstances leading to the retrofit program violated California statutes and regulations.  The Company and CARB worked to resolve the diaphragm matter without court action, but were unable to reach agreement.

The claims in the complaintmirror those that CARB presented to the Company in the Notice of Violation, and include claims that the Company negligently and intentionally sold nozzles with a modified diaphragm without required CARB certification.  The Company believes that, throughout the period to which the complaint relates, it acted in full cooperation with CARB and in the best interests of CARB's vapor emissions control program.  Although the complaint seeks penalties of at least $25.0 million, it is the Company's position that there is no reasonable basis for penalties of this amount.

In addition, as the Company has previously reported, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (“SMAQMD”) issued a Notice of Violation to the Company concerning the diaphragm matter in March 2008.  Discussions with that agency about the circumstances leading to the retrofit in its jurisdiction and the resolution of the agency's concerns did not result in agreement, and in November 2010 SMAQMD filed a civil complaint in the Sacramento Superior Court, mirroring the claims brought by CARB with respect to the diaphragm issue and also alleging violation of SMAQMD rules.  SMAQMD's suit asks for at least $5.0 million in penalties for the violations claimed in its jurisdiction.

20

In July 2010, the Company entered into a tolling agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) and began discussions with that agency about the circumstances leading to the retrofit in its jurisdiction and the resolution of the agency's concerns.  Those discussions did not result in agreement and in December 2010, SCAQMD filed a civil complaint against the Company in Los Angeles Superior Court.  The complaint alleges violations of California statutes and regulations, similar to the complaint filed by CARB, as well as violation of SCAQMD rules, and seeks penalties of at least $12.5 million.  The SCAQMD complaint does not allege an intentional violation of any statute, rule, or regulation. This case has now been consolidated with the CARB case in Los Angeles Superior Court.

The Company believes that there is no reasonable basis for the amount of penalties claimed in the SMAQMD and SCAQMD suits.  The Company has answered the SMAQMD and SCAQMD complaints, as well as the CARB complaint, denying liability and asserting affirmative defenses. Discovery in all these cases commenced but has been stayed until October 31, 2012, and the consolidated CARB and SCAQMD cases are set for trial on December 17, 2012.

Neither CARB's filing of its suit nor the air district suits have any effect on CARB's certification of the Company's EVR System or any other products of the Company or its subsidiaries, and so do not interfere with continuing sales.  CARB has never decertified the Company's EVR System and does not propose to do so now.

The Company remains willing to discuss these matters and work toward resolving them.  The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of discussions to resolve these matters or any proceedings with respect to them.  Penalties awarded in the CARB or any air district proceedings or payments resulting from a settlement of these matters, depending on the amount, could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

On July 31, 2009, Sta-Rite Industries, LLC and Pentair, Inc. filed an action against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, alleging breach of the parties' 2004 Settlement Agreement and tortious interference with contract based on the Company's pricing of submersible electric products and seeking damages in excess of $10.0 million for each claimant.  The Company has denied liability, is defending the case vigorously, and has filed a counterclaim alleging Sta-Rite and Pentair's breach of the same Settlement Agreement.  Both the Company and Sta-Rite/Pentair filed Motions for Summary Judgment. The judge granted the Company's motion and dismissed Sta-Rite/Pentair's claims against it in September 2011. The judge also granted Sta-Rite/Pentair's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the Company's counterclaim. Sta-Rite/Pentair is appealing the dismissal of its claims.  The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments for November 29, 2012. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, and any settlement or adjudication of this matter, depending on the amount, could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

The Company is defending various other claims and legal actions, including environmental matters, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, based on current knowledge of the facts and after discussion with counsel, these claims and legal actions can be successfully defended or resolved without a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

As of September 29, 2012, the Company had $29.8 million of commitments primarily for conditional agreements related to building expansions as well as for the purchase of machinery and equipment.

The Company provides warranties on most of its products. The warranty terms vary but are generally two years from date of manufacture or one year from date of installation. In 2007, the Company began offering an extended warranty program to certain Water Systems customers which provides warranty coverage up to five years from the date of manufacture. Provisions for estimated expenses related to product warranty are made at the time products are sold or when specific warranty issues are identified. These estimates are established using historical information about the nature, frequency, and average cost of warranty claims. The Company actively studies trends of warranty claims and takes action to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. The Company believes that the warranty reserve is appropriate; however, actual claims incurred could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserve.

21

The changes in the carrying amount of the warranty accrual, as recorded in the "Accrued expenses" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, are as follows:

(In millions)
Beginning balance	$	9.9
Accruals related to product warranties	5.0
Additions related to acquisitions	0.4
Reductions for payments made	(5.6		)
Ending balance	$	9.7

15. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

On May 4, 2012, the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. 2012 Stock Plan (the “2012 Stock Plan”) was approved by the Company’s shareholders.  The Board of Directors of the Company had approved the 2012 Stock Plan on February 24, 2012. The 2012 Stock Plan is a stock-based compensation plan that provides for discretionary grants of stock options, stock awards, and stock unit awards to key employees and non-employee directors.  The 2012 Stock Plan authorizes 1,200,000 shares for issuance as follows:

2012 Stock Plan	Authorized Shares
Stock Options	840,000
Stock/Stock Unit Awards	360,000

The Company also maintains the Amended and Restated Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan") which, as amended in 2009, provided for discretionary grants of stock options and stock awards. The Stock Plan authorized 2,200,000 shares for issuance as follows:

Stock Plan	Authorized Shares
Stock Options	1,600,000
Stock Awards	600,000

All options remaining for grant under the Stock Plan were awarded during the first six months of 2012. The Company currently issues new shares from its common stock balance to satisfy option exercises and stock and stock unit awards under the 2012 Stock Plan and the Stock Plan.

Stock Options:

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with a single approach and amortized using a straight-line attribution method over the option’s vesting period.

The assumptions used for the Black-Scholes model to determine the fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, are as follows:

	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	1.01	%	2.49	%
Dividend yield	1.12	%	1.23	%
Volatility factor	0.388		0.431
Expected term	6.0 years		6.3 years
Forfeiture rate	3.99	%	3.59	%

There were no stock options granted during the third quarter ended September 29, 2012.

22

A summary of the Company’s outstanding stock option activity and related information for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	September 29, 2012				October 1, 2011
Stock Options	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of period	1,569		$	29.66	1,817		$	27.95
Granted	125		48.19		113		43.43
Exercised	(430	)	26.76		(160	)	24.49
Forfeited	(23	)	45.82		(14	)	39.27
Outstanding at end of period	1,241		$	32.50	1,756		$	29.17
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate	1,229		$	32.42	1,736		$	29.19
Vested and exercisable at end of period	841		$	31.73	1,207		$	30.38

A summary of the weighted average remaining contractual term and aggregate intrinsic value for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, is as follows:

Stock Options	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000’s)
Outstanding end of period	5.74 years	$	34,752
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate	5.71 years	$	34,479
Vested and exercisable end of period	4.67 years	$	24,188

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the third quarters ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, was $7.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

As of September 29, 2012, there was $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans related to stock options.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.08 years.

Stock/Stock Unit Awards:

A summary of the Company’s outstanding restricted stock/stock unit award activity and related information for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	September 29, 2012				October 1, 2011
Stock/Stock Unit Awards	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted-Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Non-vested at beginning of period	172		$	34.47	128		$	31.86
Awarded	104		49.79		68		43.40
Vested	(37	)	31.79		(3	)	39.12
Forfeited	(9	)	36.95		(20	)	47.41
Non-vested at end of period	230		$	41.77	173		$	34.44

As of September 29, 2012, there was $5.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans related to stock/stock unit awards.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.01 years.

23

16. RESTRUCTURING

In June 2011, the Company announced Phase IV of the Global Manufacturing Realignment Program. The Company transferred approximately 260,000 annual man hours of manufacturing activity from the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma facility primarily to the Linares, Mexico facility with a small portion transferred to another Oklahoma City based facility. Transfers related to the Oklahoma City facility were substantially complete at the end of the first quarter 2012. The Company also expects to incur miscellaneous expenses associated with realignments and movements of manufacturing and distribution facilities in a variety of international locations, including the relocation to a new manufacturing facility in Joinville, Brazil.

The Company has estimated the pretax charge for Phase IV to be between $2.6 million and $5.2 million, of which $1.2 million to $3.5 million is for closing the Oklahoma City manufacturing facility. Charges related to Phase IV began in the second quarter of 2011 and will substantially end in the fourth quarter of 2012, with the exception of asset dispositions, which may be incomplete at the end of 2012. Phase IV charges include severance, equipment relocation, and asset write-offs. The Company expects approximately 50.0 to 60.0 percent of the charges will be non-cash.

Costs incurred in the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012, included in the “Restructuring (income)/expense” line of the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income, are as follows:

(In millions)	Third Quarter Ended
	September 29, 2012
	Water Systems		Fueling Systems		Other		Consolidated
Equipment relocation	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Asset write-off	0.1		—		—		0.1
Asset sale	—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—
Total	$	0.1	$	—	$	—	$	0.1

(In millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012
	Water Systems			Fueling Systems		Other		Consolidated
Equipment relocation	$	0.1		$	—	$	—	$	0.1
Asset write-off	0.3			—		—		0.3
Asset sale	(0.4		)	—		—		(0.4		)
Other	0.1			—		—		0.1
Total	$	0.1		$	—	$	—	$	0.1

Restructuring expenses of $0.6 million and $1.5 million were incurred in the third quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively, primarily for the Water Systems realignment.

As of September 29, 2012, there were no restructuring reserves. As of October 1, 2011, there was $0.2 million in restructuring reserves primarily for severance.

24

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Third Quarter 2012 vs. Third Quarter 2011

OVERVIEW

Sales and earnings for the third quarter of 2012 were up from the same quarter last year.  The sales increase was primarily related to the Company's acquisitions, PPH and Cerus, as well as sales volume. The Company's consolidated gross profit was $82.6 million for the third quarter of 2012, an increase of $8.9 million or about 12 percent from the third quarter of 2011.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Sales

Net sales for the third quarter of 2012 were $237.6 million, an increase of $13.2 million or about 6 percent compared to 2011 third quarter sales of $224.4 million.  The incremental impact of sales from businesses acquired since the third quarter of 2011 was $13.8 million or about 6 percent.  Sales revenue decreased by $13.0 million or about 6 percent in the third quarter of 2012 due to foreign currency translation. The sales change for the third quarter of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $12.4 million or about 6 percent.

(In millions)	Q3 2012		Q3 2011		2012 v 2011
	Net Sales
Water Systems	$	189.8	$	179.4	$	10.4
Fueling Systems	47.8		45.0		2.8
Consolidated	$	237.6	$	224.4	$	13.2

Net Sales-Water Systems

Water Systems revenues were $189.8 million in the third quarter 2012, an increase of $10.4 million or about 6 percent versus the third quarter 2011. Sales from businesses acquired since the third quarter of 2011 were $13.8 million or increased sales by 8 percent. Water Systems sales were reduced by $11.4 million in the quarter due to foreign currency translation. Water Systems sales growth, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was 4 percent.

Water Systems sales in the U.S. and Canada were 43 percent of consolidated sales and grew by about 12 percent compared to the third quarter of the prior year. Excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, U.S. and Canada sales were flat compared to the third quarter of 2011. Sales of groundwater pumping equipment grew at a high single digit rate as the Company continued to gain market share. Wastewater pump sales in the U.S. and Canada continued to be lower as drier weather reduced demand for residential sump, sewage, and effluent pumps compared to the prior year.

Water Systems sales in EMEA, which is Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, were 18 percent of consolidated sales and declined by about 12 percent compared to the third quarter 2011. EMEA sales were reduced by about 13 percent in the quarter due to foreign currency translation. EMEA's organic sales decline was about 1 percent and was across the region as the general economic conditions in Europe still remain guarded. Sales from businesses acquired since the third quarter of 2011 increased sales by about 2 percent.

Water Systems sales in Latin America were about 12 percent of consolidated sales for the quarter and were up about 9 percent compared to the third quarter of the prior year. Latin American sales were reduced by about 18 percent in the quarter due to foreign currency translation. The organic sales increase was about 26 percent. Organic sales growth in Brazil was particularly strong, driven in part by submersible pumps and motors and a new line of energy efficient residential booster pumps. The Company's newly opened distribution center in Chile also contributed to the organic sales growth during the quarter.

Water Systems sales in the Asia Pacific region were 6 percent of consolidated sales and increased by about 26 percent, 13 percent excluding acquisitions, compared to the third quarter prior year. The Asia Pacific sales increase was led by strong sales in the Southeast Asian markets and Japan offset by lower sales in China.

25

Net Sales-Fueling Systems

Fueling Systems sales were $47.8 million or 20 percent of consolidated sales in the third quarter 2012 and increased about 6 percent from the third quarter 2011. Fueling Systems sales were reduced by $1.6 million in the quarter due to foreign currency translation. Fueling Systems sales growth, excluding foreign currency translation, was about 10 percent. This growth was split across both domestic and international markets, driven primarily by strong shipments of fuel pumping systems.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales as a percent of net sales for the third quarter of 2012 and 2011 was 65.2 percent and 67.2 percent, respectively. Correspondingly, the gross profit margin increased to 34.8 percent from 32.8 percent, a 200 basis point improvement. The gross profit margin increase in percentage terms was due to lower variable cost. The Company's consolidated gross profit was $82.6 million for the third quarter of 2012, up $8.9 million from the gross profit of $73.7 million in the third quarter of 2011. The gross profit margin increase was primarily due to productivity improvements in the Company's manufacturing facilities partially offset by raw material inflation which grew at a slower rate than the prior year.

Selling, General, and Administrative (“SG&A”)

Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $49.0 million in the third quarter of 2012 compared to $44.8 million from the third quarter of prior year, an increase of $4.2 million or about 9 percent. The increase attributed to businesses acquired since the third quarter of 2011 was $2.9 million or about 6 percent of the overall increase. Additional increases in SG&A in the third quarter of 2012 were $0.7 million related to information technology expenditures for software, telephone and other acquisition integration cost as well as to higher performance-based and stock-based compensation expenses.

Restructuring Expenses

Restructuring expenses for the third quarter of 2012 were $0.1 million and had no impact on diluted earnings per share. Restructuring expenses in the third quarter of 2012 were related to the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma facility. Restructuring expenses for the third quarter of 2011 were $0.6 million and reduced diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.02. Restructuring expenses in the third quarter of 2011 included severance cost, asset write-down, and manufacturing equipment relocation costs primarily related to the closing of the Siloam Springs, Arkansas facility.

Operating Income

Operating income was $33.5 million in the third quarter of 2012, up $5.2 million or 18 percent from $28.3 million for the third quarter 2011.

(In millions)	Q3 2012			Q3 2011			2012 v 2011
	Operating income (loss)
Water Systems	$	35.1		$	29.0		$	6.1
Fueling Systems	11.4			9.6			1.8
Other	(13.0		)	(10.3		)	(2.7		)
Consolidated	$	33.5		$	28.3		$	5.2

There were a couple of specific items in the third quarter of 2012 and 2011 that impacted operating income that were not operational in nature.  In 2012 they were as follows:

• $0.1 million in restructuring charges from the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma facility.

• $0.1 million in SG&A cost related to the Cerus acquisition.

In 2011 they were as follows:

• $0.6 million of restructuring charges primarily from the Siloam Springs, Arkansas facility.

26

The Company refers to these items as “non-GAAP adjustments” for purposes of presenting the non-GAAP financial measures of operating income after non-GAAP adjustments and percent operating income after non-GAAP adjustments to net sales.  The Company believes this information helps investors understand underlying trends in the Company's business more easily.  The differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most comparable GAAP measures are reconciled in the following tables:

Operating Income and Margins
Before and After Non-GAAP Adjustments
(in millions)	For the Third Quarter 2012
	Water			Fueling			Corporate			Consolidated
Reported Operating Income	$	35.1		$	11.4		$	(13.0	)	$	33.5
% Operating Income to Net Sales	18.5		%	23.8		%				14.1		%
Non-GAAP Adjustments:
Restructuring	$	0.1		$	—		$	—		$	0.1
Acquisition related items	$	0.1		$	—		$	—		$	0.1
Operating Income after Non-GAAP Adjustments	$	35.3		$	11.4		$	(13.0	)	$	33.7
% Operating Income to Net Sales after Non-GAAP Adjustments (Operating Income Margin after Non-GAAP Adjustments)	18.6		%	23.8		%				14.2		%
	For the Third Quarter 2011
	Water			Fueling			Corporate			Consolidated
Reported Operating Income	$	29.0		$	9.6		$	(10.3	)	$	28.3
% Operating Income to Net Sales	16.2		%	21.3		%				12.6		%
Non-GAAP Adjustments:
Restructuring	$	0.6		$	—		$	—		$	0.6
Acquisition related items	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating Income after Non-GAAP Adjustments	$	29.6		$	9.6		$	(10.3	)	$	28.9
% Operating Income to Net Sales after Non-GAAP Adjustments (Operating Income Margin after Non-GAAP Adjustments)	16.5		%	21.3		%				12.9		%

Operating Income-Water Systems

Water Systems operating income after non-GAAP adjustments was $35.3 million in the third quarter 2012, an increase of 19 percent versus the third quarter 2011. The third quarter operating income margin after non-GAAP adjustments was 18.6 percent and was up 210 basis points compared to the third quarter of 2011. This profit improvement can be attributed to a combination of sales growth, expense control, and pricing actions that were effective in the first quarter of 2012.

Operating Income-Fueling Systems

Fueling Systems operating income after non-GAAP adjustments was $11.4 million in the third quarter of 2012 compared to $9.6 million after non-GAAP adjustments in the third quarter of 2011, an increase of 19 percent. The third quarter operating income margin after non-GAAP adjustments was 23.8 percent and increased by 250 basis points compared to the 21.3 percent of net sales in the third quarter 2011. This profit improvement can be attributed to a combination of sales growth, expense control, and pricing actions that were effective in the first quarter of 2012.

Operating Income-Other

Operating income-other is composed primarily of unallocated general and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased due to higher systems expenses of $0.7 million related to information technology expenditures for software, telephone, and other acquisition integration cost and increases due to higher performance-based and stock-based compensation expenses.

27

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the third quarter of 2012 and 2011 was $2.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively.

Other Income or Expense

Other income or expense was a gain of $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2012 and a gain of $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2011.  Included in other income for the third quarter of 2012 was interest income of $0.4 million, primarily derived from the investment of cash balances in short-term securities. Included in other income for the third quarter of 2011 was income from equity investments of $0.8 million and interest income of $0.7 million, primarily derived from the investment of cash balances in short-term securities.

Foreign Exchange

Foreign currency-based transactions produced a loss for the third quarter of 2012 of $0.9 million. The loss was primarily due to rate changes in the Mexican peso and euro versus the U.S. dollar and the Turkish lira and Czech koruna versus the euro.  Foreign currency-based transactions produced a loss for the third quarter of 2011 of $0.6 million, primarily due to Turkish lira rate changes relative to the U.S. dollar and other currencies.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes in the third quarter of 2012 and 2011 was $8.7 million and $7.1 million, respectively. The effective tax rate, excluding discrete events, for the third quarter 2012 was about 28.1 percent, which the Company believes is also a reasonable estimate for full year 2012. The third quarter and projected tax rate are higher than the prior year 2011 rate of 27.2 percent, excluding the impact of discrete events. The rate is higher due to the stronger U.S. dollar which in effect reduces foreign earnings when translated to U.S. dollars and has increased the percentage of U.S. based earnings on a consolidated basis. The tax rate continues to be lower than the statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to the indefinite reinvestment of certain foreign earnings and reduced taxes on foreign and repatriated earnings after the restructuring of certain foreign entities. The Company has the ability to indefinitely reinvest these foreign earnings based on the earnings and cash projections of its other operations, current cash on hand, and available credit.

Net Income

Net income for the third quarter of 2012 was $22.0 million compared to 2011 third quarter net income of $19.3 million.  Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc. for the third quarter of 2012 was $21.9 million, or $0.91 per diluted share, compared to 2011 third quarter net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc. of $19.2 million or $0.80 per diluted share.

First Nine Months of 2012 vs. First Nine Months of 2011

OVERVIEW

Sales and earnings in the first nine months of 2012 were up from the same period last year.  The sales increase was related to the Company's acquisitions, as well as, sales volume and price increases, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation. The Company's consolidated gross profit was $233.2 million for the first nine months of 2012, an increase of $21.7 million or about 10 percent from the first nine months of 2011.

The Company's first nine months of 2012 earnings include a gain on the previously held equity investment in PPH as indicated in the announcement made on March 7, 2012, regarding the acquisition of a controlling interest in PPH. This gain, included in "Other income/(expense)" in the Company's statement of income, represents about $12 million of pre-tax earnings or $0.37 earnings per share. Consistent with the terms of the stock purchase agreement between the Company and the minority shareholders and current GAAP guidance, the Company has included the liability to purchase the remaining shares, representing about 30 percent of the outstanding PPH stock, in "Other long-term liabilities".

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Sales

Net sales in the first nine months of 2012 were $686.2 million, an increase of $52.4 million or about 8 percent compared to the first nine months sales of 2011 of $633.8 million.  The incremental impact of sales from acquired businesses was $47.6 million or about 8 percent.  Sales revenue decreased by $29.2 million or about 5 percent in the first nine months of 2012 due to foreign currency translation. The sales change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $34.0 million or about 5 percent.

28

(In millions)	YTD September 29, 2012		YTD October 1, 2011		2012 v 2011
	Net Sales
Water Systems	$	557.5	$	510.1	$	47.4
Fueling Systems	128.7		123.7		5.0
Consolidated	$	686.2	$	633.8	$	52.4

Net Sales-Water Systems

Water Systems sales were $557.5 million in the first nine months of 2012, an increase of $47.4 million or about 9 percent versus the first nine months of 2011. The incremental impact of sales from acquired businesses was $47.6 million or about 9 percent. Foreign currency translation rate changes decreased sales $25.7 million, or about 5 percent, compared to sales in the first nine months of 2011. The Water Systems sales change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $25.5 million or about 5 percent.

Water Systems sales in the U.S. and Canada were 42 percent of consolidated sales and grew by about 15 percent compared to the first nine months of 2011. The incremental impact of sales from acquired businesses was $29.9 million or about 12 percent. Foreign currency translation rate changes decreased sales $0.9 million, compared to sales in the first nine months of 2011. The Water Systems sales in the U.S. and Canada change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $9.1 million or about 4 percent. Sales of groundwater pumping equipment in the U.S. and Canada grew by about 10 percent compared to the first nine months of the prior year as the Company continued to gain share in this market. Wastewater pump sales in the U.S. and Canada continued to be lower as drier weather reduced demand for residential sump, sewage, and effluent pumps compared to the prior year.

Water Systems sales in EMEA, which is Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, were 20 percent of consolidated sales and declined by about 1 percent compared to the first nine months of 2011. The incremental impact of sales from acquired businesses was $14.1 million or about 10 percent. Foreign currency translation rate changes decreased sales $16.3 million, or about 12 percent, compared to sales in the first nine months of 2011. The Water Systems sales in EMEA change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $0.5 million.

Water Systems sales in Latin America were about 12 percent of consolidated sales for the first nine months of 2012 and grew by about 5 percent compared to the prior year first nine months. The incremental impact of sales from acquired businesses was $0.3 million. Foreign currency translation rate changes decreased sales $8.9 million, or about 11 percent, compared to sales in the first nine months of 2011. The Water Systems sales in Latin America change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $12.9 million or about 16 percent. Sales in Mexico continued to grow in local currency, with sales up about 21 percent in the first nine months of 2012. The first nine months year-on-year sales increase in Brazil, in local currency, was 19 percent.

Water Systems sales in the Asia Pacific region were 7 percent of consolidated sales and grew by about 17 percent compared to the first nine months of the prior year. The incremental impact of sales from acquired businesses was $3.3 million or about 8 percent. Foreign currency translation rate changes increased sales $0.2 million compared to sales in the first nine months of 2011. The Water Systems sales in the Asia Pacific region change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding acquisitions and foreign currency translation, was an increase of $3.0 million or about 8 percent. The sales increase in the Asia Pacific region was led by increases in Southeast Asia, Japan and India offset by lower sales in China.

Net Sales-Fueling Systems

Fueling Systems sales were $128.7 million or about 19 percent of consolidated sales in the first nine months of 2012 and increased $5.0 million or about 4 percent from the first nine months of 2011. Foreign currency translation rate changes decreased sales $3.5 million, or about 3 percent, compared to sales in the first nine months of 2011. The Fueling Systems sales change in the first nine months of 2012, excluding foreign currency translation, was an increase of $8.5 million or about 7 percent.

This growth was driven primarily by strong shipments of fuel pumping systems in the Asia Pacific region where the Company was awarded a large supply contract with a state owned oil company, continued mid-single digit sales growth in the U.S. and Canada, and strong customer demand for a number of new products including the Colibri® and TS 550 evo® fuel management systems and the new Gemini® fuel containment system.

29

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales as a percent of net sales for the first nine months of 2012 and 2011 was 66.0 percent and 66.6 percent, respectively. Correspondingly, the gross profit margin was 34.0 percent and 33.4 percent, a 60 basis point improvement. The gross profit margin increase in percentage terms was due to fixed cost leverage, lower labor and variable burden cost partially offset by higher direct material cost. The Company's consolidated gross profit was $233.2 million for the first nine months of 2012, up $21.7 million from the gross profit of $211.5 million in the first nine months of 2011.

Selling, General, and Administrative (“SG&A”)

Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $141.1 million in the first nine months of 2012 and increased by $8.2 million or about 6 percent in the first nine months of 2012 compared to the first nine months of last year. The increase was primarily due to SG&A expenses of businesses acquired since the third quarter of 2011. In the first nine months of 2012, increases in SG&A expenses attributable to acquisitions were $6.0 million. Additional increases in SG&A in the first nine months of 2012 were $1.2 million related to information technology expenditures for software, telephone and other acquisition integration cost as well as to higher performance-based and stock-based compensation expenses.

Restructuring Expenses

There were $0.1 million of restructuring expenses for the first nine months of 2012 that had no impact on diluted earnings per share. Restructuring expenses for the first nine months of 2011 were $1.5 million and reduced diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.04. Restructuring expenses in the first nine months of 2011 included asset write-down and severance costs primarily related to the Siloam Springs, Arkansas facility.  

Operating Income

Operating income was $92.0 million in the first nine months of 2012, up $14.9 million from $77.1 million in the first nine months of 2011.

(In millions)	YTD September 29, 2012			YTD October 1, 2011			2012 v 2011
	Operating income (loss)
Water Systems	$	102.0		$	86.7		$	15.3
Fueling Systems	26.0			22.2			3.8
Other	(36.0		)	(31.8		)	(4.2		)
Consolidated	$	92.0		$	77.1		$	14.9

There were specific items in the first nine months of 2012 and 2011 that impacted operating income that were not operational in nature.   In 2012 they were as follows:

• $0.1 million in restructuring charges from the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma facility.

• $1.3 million in cost related to acquisitions comprised of $1.0 million in additional cost of sales recognized on sold acquired inventory that was increased to fair value as required by GAAP related to the PPH transaction that was considered non-operational and $0.3 million in SG&A cost related to the PPH and Cerus acquisitions.

In 2011 they were as follows:

• $1.5 million of restructuring charges primarily from the Siloam Springs, Arkansas facility.

• $0.7 million for certain legal matters.

30

The Company refers to these items as “non-GAAP adjustments” for purposes of presenting the non-GAAP financial measures of operating income after non-GAAP adjustments and percent operating income after non-GAAP adjustments to net sales.  The Company believes this information helps investors understand underlying trends in the Company's business more easily.  The differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most comparable GAAP measures are reconciled in the following tables:

Operating Income and Margins
Before and After Non-GAAP Adjustments
(in millions)	For the First Nine Months of 2012
	Water			Fueling			Corporate			Consolidated
Reported Operating Income	$	102.0		$	26.0		$	(36.0	)	$	92.0
% Operating Income to Net Sales	18.3		%	20.2		%				13.4		%
Non-GAAP Adjustments:
Restructuring	$	0.1		$	—		$	—		$	0.1
Legal matters	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Acquisition related items	$	1.3		$	—		$	—		$	1.3
Operating Income after Non-GAAP Adjustments	$	103.4		$	26.0		$	(36.0	)	$	93.4
% Operating Income to Net Sales after Non-GAAP Adjustments (Operating Income Margin after Non-GAAP Adjustments)	18.5		%	20.2		%				13.6		%
	For the First Nine Months of 2011
	Water			Fueling			Corporate			Consolidated
Reported Operating Income	$	86.7		$	22.2		$	(31.8	)	$	77.1
% Operating Income to Net Sales	17.0		%	17.9		%				12.2		%
Non-GAAP Adjustments:
Restructuring	$	1.5		$	—		$	—		$	1.5
Legal matters	$	—		$	0.7		$	—		$	0.7
Acquisition related items	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating Income after Non-GAAP Adjustments	$	88.2		$	22.9		$	(31.8	)	$	79.3
% Operating Income to Net Sales after Non-GAAP Adjustments (Operating Income Margin after Non-GAAP Adjustments)	17.3		%	18.5		%				12.5		%

Operating Income-Water Systems

Water Systems operating income, after non-GAAP adjustments, was $103.4 million in the first nine months of 2012, an increase of 17 percent versus the first nine months of 2011. The first nine months of 2012 operating income margin after non-GAAP adjustments was 18.5 percent and increased by 120 basis points compared to the first nine months of 2011. This increased profitability was the result of operating leverage, increases in pricing, and productivity improvements.

Operating Income-Fueling Systems

Fueling Systems operating income after non-GAAP adjustments was $26.0 million in the first nine months of 2012 compared to $22.9 million after non-GAAP adjustments in the first nine months of 2011, an increase of 14 percent. The first nine months of 2012 operating income margin after non-GAAP adjustments was 20.2 percent and increased by 170 basis points compared to the 18.5 percent of net sales in the first nine months of 2011 due to sales growth, expense control, and increases in pricing.

Operating Income-Other

Operating income-other is composed primarily of unallocated general and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses were higher due to systems expenses of $1.2 million related to information technology expenditures for software, telephone, and other acquisition integration costs and increases due to higher performance-based and stock-based compensation expenses.

31

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the first nine months of 2012 and 2011 was $7.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively.

Other Income or Expense

Other income or expense was a gain of $14.4 million in the first nine months of 2012 and a gain of $4.1 million in the first nine months of 2011.  Included in other income in the first nine months of 2012 was a one-time gain on the PPH transaction of $12.2 million. The gain on the original investment the Company had held in PPH arises as the result of a new enterprise valuation of the PPH entity that is then compared to the book value of the equity investment the Company had previously made in PPH. Also included in other income was income from equity investments of $0.6 million and interest income of $1.9 million, primarily derived from the investment of cash balances in short-term securities, partially offset by other expenses of $0.3 million.

Included in other income in the first nine months of 2011 was income from equity investments of $1.9 million and interest income of $1.7 million, primarily derived from the investment of cash balances in short-term securities. Other income or expense in the first nine months of 2011 reflected the fact that, in conjunction with the Impo acquisition, the Company entered into a forward purchase contract for Turkish lira for a portion of the estimated acquisition price.  The contract was settled in the first nine months of 2011 resulting in a pre-tax gain included in other income of approximately $0.6 million.  

Foreign Exchange

Foreign currency-based transactions produced a loss for the first nine months of 2012 of $1.6 million, primarily the Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar and the Czech koruna versus the euro.  Foreign currency-based transactions produced a loss for the first nine months of 2011 of $1.9 million, primarily due to the Turkish lira relative to the U.S. dollar and other currencies. 

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes in the first nine months of 2012 and 2011 was $27.1 million and $19.5 million, respectively. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2012 was about 28.1 percent, excluding discrete events, which the Company believes is also a reasonable estimate for full year 2012. The projected tax rate is higher than the first nine months of 2011 tax rate of about 27.3 percent, excluding the impact of discrete events. The rate was higher due to the stronger U.S. dollar which in effect reduces foreign earnings when translated to U.S. dollars and has increased the percentage of U.S. based earnings on a consolidated basis. The tax rate continues to be lower than the statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to the indefinite reinvestment of certain foreign earnings and reduced taxes on foreign and repatriated earnings after the restructuring of certain foreign entities. The Company has the ability to indefinitely reinvest these foreign earnings based on the earnings and cash projections of its other operations, current cash on hand, and available credit.

Net Income

Net income for the first nine months of 2012 was $70.4 million compared to 2011 first nine months net income of $52.2 million.  Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc. for the first nine months of 2012 was $69.7 million, or $2.91 per diluted share, compared to 2011 first nine months net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc. of $51.6 million or $2.16 per diluted share.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Overview

The Company's primary sources of liquidity include cash on hand, cash flows from operations, and funds available under its committed, unsecured, revolving credit agreement (the “Agreement”) in the amount of $150.0 million and its amended and restated, uncommitted, note purchase and private shelf agreement (the “Prudential Agreement”) in the amount of $200.0 million. The Agreement matures on December 14, 2016, while the currently drawn amount under the Prudential Agreement begins maturing in 2015 with a final maturity in 2019. As of September 29, 2012, the Agreement had no amounts outstanding with a borrowing capacity of $146.1 million as a result of outstanding letters of credit totaling $3.9 million. As of September 29, 2012, the Prudential Agreement had $150.0 million of notes issued and outstanding with a remaining borrowing capacity of $50.0 million.

The Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. The affirmative covenants include financial statements, notices of material events, conduct of business, inspection of property, maintenance of insurance, compliance with laws, and most favored lender obligations. The affirmative covenants also include financial covenants with a maximum leverage ratio of 3.50 to 1.00 and an interest coverage ratio equal to or greater than 3.00 to 1.00. The negative covenants include limitations on loans or advances, investments, and the granting of liens by the Company or its subsidiaries, as well as prohibitions on certain consolidations, mergers, sales, and transfers of assets. The Prudential Agreement also contains certain

32

financial covenants in regards to borrowings, interest coverage, loans or advances, and investments. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

As of September 29, 2012, the Company had $95.7 million of cash on hand at various locations worldwide. Approximately 15 percent of the cash on hand was located in various U.S. locations and readily accessible. The Company regularly reviews its international cash balances and if appropriate, will reposition cash among its global entities based on forecasted expenditures and considerations for post-tax economic efficiencies. Cash investments are managed in accordance with a global written policy and generally are invested in bank demand accounts and bank time deposits with the preservation of principal as the highest priority. In addition, the Company generally sources inputs and sells outputs in the local currency of operations on a country by country basis, thereby insulating local cash balances from currency volatility.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $26.1 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, compared to $52.4 million for the nine months ended October 1, 2011. Cash from operations declined in the current period compared to the same period in the prior year primarily related to changes in receivables and inventories, which were a $57.4 million use of cash for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, compared to a $29.2 million use of cash for the same period in the prior year. Inventory levels were elevated in anticipation of market demand and sales increases. Net income increased significantly over the prior year, even without regard to the non-cash gain on the PPH equity investment.

The Company redesigned certain U.S. retirement plan offerings, effective for the 2012 plan year. The redesign was completed in order to increase standardization of retirement plans among U.S. salaried employees and to reduce the expected cash funding volatility of retirement plans, while at the same time keeping in place a competitive retirement plan offering to attract and retain employees. The Company achieved this by freezing benefit accruals under both the Basic Pension Plan and the Cash Balance Plan as of December 31, 2011, with the exception of a limited number of Basic Pension Plan participants who will continue to accrue benefits over a five-year sunset period. Also effective December 31, 2011, the Cash Balance Plan was closed to new participants (the Basic Retirement Plan was previously closed to new participants in 2006). The Basic Retirement Plan and Cash Balance Plan were merged effective December 31, 2011. As of January 1, 2012, the Company instituted a new service-based contribution, supplemental to the existing Company match for employees, into the defined contribution retirement plan offerings.

Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities was $71.9 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, compared to $48.2 million for the nine months ended October 1, 2011. The current period activity was primarily related to the acquisition of PPH and Cerus, which were acquired for $54.0 million, net of cash acquired. The PPH acquisition was funded with cash on hand while the Cerus acquisition was funded with cash on hand and short-term borrowings that were paid back within the period. The prior period activity was primarily related to the acquisition of Impo, which was acquired for $25.1 million, net of cash acquired and working capital adjustments. The Impo acquisition was funded with cash on hand. The Company also made an earn-out payment related to a prior acquisition totaling $6.6 million and entered into a loan agreement with an international customer for approximately $3.2 million during the nine months ended October 1, 2011. The Company evaluates potential future acquisitions by reviewing opportunities that place emphasis on increasing global distribution and adding complementary product lines that can be effectively marketed through the Company's current global distribution channels.

The Company recently began constructing a new Global Corporate Headquarters and Engineering Center of Excellence on property acquired in the Fort Wayne, Indiana, metropolitan area.  The new facility of approximately 110,000 square feet is expected to be completed and occupied in the summer of 2013. The Company has estimated the preliminary costs for the land acquisition, improvements, and building construction to be between $32.0 million and $36.0 million. The preliminary estimates do not include any effects for economic development incentives.

The Company expects net cash used by investing activities to be elevated for both 2012 and 2013 as result of the Global Corporate Headquarters and Engineering Center of Excellence project as well as the construction of a new manufacturing facility in Brazil. A competitive source of financing is currently available to the Company that may be utilized to partially finance the Global Corporate Headquarters and Engineering Center of Excellence project.

Financing Activities

Net cash used by financing activities was $13.1 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, compared to $13.9 million for the nine months ended October 1, 2011. The net cash used by financing activities for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, was primarily related to the payment of $10.4 million in dividends to the Company's shareholders, including the payment of $0.4 million in dividends to minority shareholders. The Company also repurchased approximately 319,800 shares of the Company's common stock for $16.5 million. The current year share repurchase transactions included

33

161,300 shares related to the Company's stock repurchase program with the remaining balance representing shares withheld by the Company as payment of stock option exercise prices and related withholding taxes as well as shares withheld in restricted stock award transactions to cover withholding taxes. The net cash used by financing activities for the nine months ended October 1, 2011, was primarily related to the payment of $9.3 million in dividends to the Company's shareholders in addition to the repurchase of approximately 250,300 shares of the Company's common stock for $10.6 million. The prior year share repurchase transactions included 250,000 shares related to the Company's stock repurchase program with the remaining balance representing shares withheld by the Company as payment of stock option exercise prices and related withholding taxes as well as shares withheld in restricted stock award transactions to cover withholding taxes.

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking information, such as statements about the Company’s financial goals, acquisition strategies, financial expectations including anticipated revenue or expense levels, business prospects, market positioning, product development, manufacturing re-alignment, capital expenditures, tax benefits and expenses, and the effect of contingencies or changes in accounting policies.  Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” “plan,” “goal,” “target,” “strategy,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.”  While the Company believes that the assumptions underlying such forward-looking statements are reasonable based on present conditions, forward-looking statements made by the Company involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including regional or general economic and currency conditions, various conditions specific to the Company’s business and industry, new housing starts, weather conditions, market demand, competitive factors, changes in distribution channels, supply constraints, effect of price increases, raw material costs and availability, technology factors, integration of acquisitions, litigation, government and regulatory actions, the Company’s accounting policies, and other risks, all as described in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings, included in Part I, Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and in Exhibit 99.1 thereto.  Any forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based upon information presently available. The Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking information, except as required by law.

34

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no significant changes in the Company's exposure to market risk during the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012. For additional information, refer to Part II, Item 7A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 under the Exchange Act during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

35

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In August 2010, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) filed a civil complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company and Franklin Fueling Systems, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company).  The complaint relates to a third-party-supplied component part of the Company's Healy 900 Series nozzle, which is part of the Company's Enhanced Vapor Recovery (“EVR”) Systems installed in California gasoline filling stations.  This part, a diaphragm, was the subject of a retrofit during the first half of 2008.  As the Company previously reported, in October 2008 CARB issued a Notice of Violation to the Company alleging that the circumstances leading to the retrofit program violated California statutes and regulations.  The Company and CARB worked to resolve the diaphragm matter without court action, but were unable to reach agreement.

The claims in the complaintmirror those that CARB presented to the Company in the Notice of Violation, and include claims that the Company negligently and intentionally sold nozzles with a modified diaphragm without required CARB certification.  The Company believes that, throughout the period to which the complaint relates, it acted in full cooperation with CARB and in the best interests of CARB's vapor emissions control program.  Although the complaint seeks penalties of at least $25.0 million, it is the Company's position that there is no reasonable basis for penalties of this amount.

In addition, as the Company has previously reported, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (“SMAQMD”) issued a Notice of Violation to the Company concerning the diaphragm matter in March 2008.  Discussions with that agency about the circumstances leading to the retrofit in its jurisdiction and the resolution of the agency's concerns did not result in agreement, and in November 2010 SMAQMD filed a civil complaint in the Sacramento Superior Court, mirroring the claims brought by CARB with respect to the diaphragm issue and also alleging violation of SMAQMD rules.  SMAQMD's suit asks for at least $5.0 million in penalties for the violations claimed in its jurisdiction.

In July 2010, the Company entered into a tolling agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) and began discussions with that agency about the circumstances leading to the retrofit in its jurisdiction and the resolution of the agency's concerns.  Those discussions did not result in agreement and in December 2010, SCAQMD filed a civil complaint against the Company in Los Angeles Superior Court.  The complaint alleges violations of California statutes and regulations, similar to the complaint filed by CARB, as well as violation of SCAQMD rules, and seeks penalties of at least $12.5 million.  The SCAQMD complaint does not allege an intentional violation of any statute, rule, or regulation. This case has now been consolidated with the CARB case in Los Angeles Superior Court.

The Company believes that there is no reasonable basis for the amount of penalties claimed in the SMAQMD and SCAQMD suits.  The Company has answered the SMAQMD and SCAQMD complaints, as well as the CARB complaint, denying liability and asserting affirmative defenses. Discovery in all these cases commenced but has been stayed until October 31, 2012, and the consolidated CARB and SCAQMD cases are set for trial on December 17, 2012.

Neither CARB's filing of its suit nor the air district suits have any effect on CARB's certification of the Company's EVR System or any other products of the Company or its subsidiaries, and so do not interfere with continuing sales.  CARB has never decertified the Company's EVR System and does not propose to do so now.

The Company remains willing to discuss these matters and work toward resolving them.  The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of discussions to resolve these matters or any proceedings with respect to them.  Penalties awarded in the CARB or any air district proceedings or payments resulting from a settlement of these matters, depending on the amount, could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

On July 31, 2009, Sta-Rite Industries, LLC and Pentair, Inc. filed an action against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, alleging breach of the parties' 2004 Settlement Agreement and tortious interference with contract based on the Company's pricing of submersible electric products and seeking damages in excess of $10.0 million for each claimant.  The Company has denied liability, is defending the case vigorously, and has filed a counterclaim alleging Sta-Rite and Pentair's breach of the same Settlement Agreement.  Both the Company and Sta-Rite/Pentair filed Motions for Summary Judgment. The judge granted the Company's motion and dismissed Sta-Rite/Pentair's claims against it in September 2011. The judge also granted Sta-Rite/Pentair's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the Company's counterclaim. Sta-Rite/Pentair is appealing the dismissal of its claims.  The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments for November 29, 2012. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, and any settlement or adjudication of this matter, depending on the amount, could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

36

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There were no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.  Additional risks and uncertainties, not presently known to the Company or currently deemed immaterial, could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations or financial condition in the future.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c) Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

In April 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously approved a plan to increase the number of shares remaining for repurchase from 628,692 to 2,300,000 shares. There is no expiration date for the plan. The Company did not repurchase any shares under the plan during the third quarter of 2012. The maximum number of shares that may still be purchased under the Company plan as of September 29, 2012, is 1,239,613.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits are set forth in the Exhibit Index located on page 39.

37

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.
		Registrant
Date: November 8, 2012	By	/s/ R. Scott Trumbull
		R. Scott Trumbull
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 8, 2012	By	/s/ John J. Haines
		John J. Haines
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

38

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX TO THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2012

Number	Description
10.1	Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012)*
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

* Management contract, compensatory plan, or arrangement of the Company.

39

EX-10.1

EXHIBIT 10.1

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AND

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS
		Page
ARTICLE 1.	DEFINITIONS	1
1.1.	"Account"	1
1.2.	"Affiliated Company"	1
1.3.	"Award"	1
1.4.	"Award Deferrals"	1
1.5.	"Board"	1
1.6.	"Code"	1
1.7.	"Committee"	1
1.8.	"Compensation"	1
1.9.	“Credited Service”	1
1.10.	"Deferral Agreement"	2
1.11.	"Employment Termination"	2
1.12.	“ERISA”	2
1.13.	“FERP”	2
1.14.	“MOCC”	2
1.15.	"Participant"	2
1.16.	"Participating Company"	2
1.17.	“Pension Restoration Plan Account”	2
1.18.	"Plan"	2
1.19.	"Plan Year"	2
1.20.	“Restoration Contribution”	2
1.21.	”Salary”	2
1.22.	"Salary Deferrals"	2
1.23.	“Supplemental Executive Retirement (SERP) Contribution”	2
1.24.	"Unforeseeable Emergency"	3
1.25.	"Valuation Date"	3
1.26.	“Vesting Service”	3
ARTICLE 2.	ELIGIBILITY AND MEMBERSHIP	3
2.1.	In General	3
2.2.	Employment Termination; Re-employment	3

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
		Page
2.3.	Change in Status	4
ARTICLE 3.	DEFERRAL AGREEMENTS	4
3.1.	In General	4
3.2.	Filing Requirements	4
3.3.	Changing Deferrals	5
ARTICLE 4.	EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS	6
4.1.	Restoration Contributions	6
4.2.	SERP Contributions	7
4.3.	Special Exception for Continuing Pension Restoration Plan Participants	7
4.4.	Contribution for Year of Employment Termination	7
4.5.	Pension Restoration Plan Account Transfer	7
ARTICLE 5.	VESTING AND MAINTENANCE OF ACCOUNTS	8
5.1.	Accounts Generally	8
5.2.	Vesting of Account	8
5.3.	Crediting Dates	8
5.4.	Adjustment of Account for Earnings/Losses	9
5.5.	Investment Elections	9
5.6.	Changing Investment Elections	10
5.7.	Individual Account Records	10
ARTICLE 6.	PAYMENT OF BENEFITS	10
6.1.	Commencement and Method of Payment	10
6.2.	Hardship Withdrawal	11
6.3.	Designation of Beneficiary	11
6.4.	Status of Account Pending Distribution	12
6.5.	Installments and Withdrawals Pro-Rata	12
ARTICLE 7.	AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION	12
7.1.	Right to Terminate	12
7.2.	Right to Amend	13
ARTICLE 8.	GENERAL PROVISIONS	13

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
		Page
8.1.	No Funding	13
8.2.	No Contract of Employment	14
8.3.	Withholding Taxes	14
8.4.	Non-alienation	14
8.5.	Administration	14
8.6.	Construction	15
8.7.	Code Section 409A Standards	15

iv

INTRODUCTION

This Franklin Electric Co., Inc. ("Franklin") Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is unfunded and is maintained by Franklin primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly-compensated employees. The Plan was adopted effective as of December 12, 2008, to allow eligible executive officers of Franklin and certain affiliates to defer receipt of portions of their base salary and bonus awards. The Plan is hereby amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2012, to permit Franklin to make contributions to the Plan on behalf of eligible executive officers, regardless of their election to defer portions of their salary and bonus into the Plan.

ARTICLE 1.

DEFINITIONS

1.1. "Account" shall mean the bookkeeping account maintained for each Participant to record his Salary Deferrals, Award Deferrals, Restoration Contributions, SERP Contributions and his transferred Pension Restoration Plan Account, all asadjusted pursuant to Article 5.

1.2. "Affiliated Company" shall mean any company that together with Franklin would be treated as a single employer under section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code.

1.3. "Award" shall mean the amount awarded to a Participant as a bonus under the Franklin Executive Officer Annual Incentive Cash Bonus Program or any other successor plan or program.

1.4. "Award Deferrals" shall mean the amounts credited to a Participant's Account under Section 3.2(b).

1.5. "Board" shall mean the board of directors of Franklin.

1.6. "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

1.7. "Committee" shall mean the Franklin Employee Benefits Committee, as appointed by the Board from time to time.

1.8. "Compensation" shall mean a Participant's Annual Compensation as such term is defined in the FERP, prior to the exclusion of the Participant's Salary Deferrals and/or Award Deferrals for such Plan Year.

1.9. “Credited Service” shall mean a Participant's “Credited Service” as such term is defined in the FERP.

1

1.10. "Deferral Agreement" shall mean a completed agreement between a Participant and a Participating Company of which he is an employee under which the Participant agrees to defer Salary or an Award under the Plan, as the case may be.

1.11. "Employment Termination" shall mean the termination of a Participant's employment for any reason by the Participating Company that had been employing the Participant and all other Affiliated Companies; provided, however, that no event shall constitute an "Employment Termination" under this Plan if it does not constitute a "separation from service" within the meaning of Code section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i).

1.12. “ERISA” shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time.

1.13. “FERP” shall mean the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Retirement Program, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2012, and as further amended from time to time.

1.14. “MOCC” shall mean the Management Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board.

1.15. "Participant" shall mean any individual who is eligible, pursuant to Section 2.1, to participate in this Plan.

1.16. "Participating Company" shall mean Franklin and any Affiliated Company which the Board designates for participation in the Plan in accordance with Section 8.5(b).

1.17. “Pension Restoration Plan Account” shall mean the account transferred into a Participant's Account pursuant to Section 4.3.

1.18. "Plan" shall mean the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time.

1.19. "Plan Year" shall mean the calendar year.

1.20. “Restoration Contribution” shall mean an amount credited to a Participant's Account under Section 4.1.

1.21. "Salary” shall mean a Participant's base salary.

1.22. "Salary Deferrals" shall mean the amounts credited to a Participant's Account under Section 3.2(a).

1.23. “Supplemental Executive Retirement (SERP) Contribution” shall mean an amount credited to a Participant's Account under Section 4.2.

2

1.24. "Unforeseeable Emergency" shall mean a severe financial hardship as defined in Section 6.2(b) of this Plan.

1.25. "Valuation Date" shall mean each business day on which the securities markets are open.

1.26. “Vesting Service” shall mean a Participant's “Vesting Service” as such term is defined in the FERP.

ARTICLE 2.

ELIGIBILITY AND MEMBERSHIP

2.1. In General.

(a) Eligibility to participate in the Plan shall be limited to any employee of a Participating Company who is designated as a Participant by Franklin's Chief Executive Officer and, in the case of eligibility for Salary Deferrals, Award Deferrals and SERP Contributions, approved by the MOCC. Any employee of a Participating Company may be designated as a Participant by Franklin's Chief Executive Officer with respect to eligibility for Restoration Contributions.

(b) A Participant's participation in the Plan shall be effective upon the earliest of (i) the date he files his initial Deferral Agreement with the Committee, (ii) the date the Committee allocates his Pension Restoration Plan Account to his Account or (iii) the date the Committee allocates his initial Restoration Contribution and/or SERP Contribution to his Account. As a condition of membership the Committee may require such other information as it deems appropriate.

(c) A Participant's participation in the Plan shall continue until such time as his Accounts are fully distributed to him or, in the event of his death, his beneficiary or estate.

2.2. Employment Termination; Re-employment. A Participant's Salary Deferrals and Award Deferrals shall cease upon his Employment Termination. A Participant who is eligible to receive a Restoration Contribution and/or SERP Contribution pursuant to Article 4 shall not receive such contribution(s) for the Plan Year in which his Employment Termination occurs, unless his Employment Termination occurs (a) on or after attaining age 65 or (b) on or after attaining age 55 with 10 years of Vesting Service. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a Participant shall not receive a Restoration Contribution or SERP Contribution for the Plan Year in which his Employment Termination occurs if his Employment Termination occurs for cause, as such term is determined in

3

the full discretion of the MOCC. If a Participant receives a Restoration Contribution and/or SERP Contribution for the Plan Year in which his Employment Termination occurs, such contribution shall be based on Compensation received during such Plan Year. A terminated Participant will receive no further such contribution(s) thereafter until his employment resumes and he is again designated a Participant pursuant to Section 2.1.

2.3. Change in Status. In the event that a Participant ceases to be eligible to participate in the Plan but continues to be employed by Franklin or an Affiliated Company (either by transfer of employment from a Participating Company or designation of ineligibility by the CEO and MOCC), (a) his Salary Deferrals and Award Deferrals shall thereupon be suspended and (b) he shall not receive Restoration Contributions or SERP Contributions for any Compensation earned after the date his Plan eligibility ceases. All other provisions of his Deferral Agreement(s) shall remain in force.

ARTICLE 3.

DEFERRAL AGREEMENTS

3.1. In General. A Deferral Agreement shall be in writing and properly completed on a form approved by the Committee, or pursuant to such procedures established by the Committee, which shall be the sole judge of the proper completion thereof. Such Agreement shall provide for Salary Deferrals or for Award Deferrals, shall specify the distribution option applicable to the deferrals, and may include such other provisions as the Committee deems appropriate. A Deferral Agreement shall not be revoked or modified with respect to the allocation of prior deferrals except pursuant to Section 3.3 or Article 5.

3.2.    Filing Requirements.

(a) Salary Deferrals.

(i) A Participant must complete a Deferral Agreement during any December in order to defer Salary otherwise payable for services performed during the following Plan Year.

(ii) Notwithstanding subsection (i) above, when an individual first becomes eligible to participate in this Plan, and is not a participant in another plan sponsored by Franklin or an Affiliated Company that is considered to be of a similar type as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(c)(2)(i)(A) or as otherwise provided by the Code, he must complete a Deferral Agreement within 30 days after the Committee notifies the individual of his eligibility to participate in the Plan, in

4

order to defer Salary otherwise payable for services performed during the Plan Year.

(iii) The minimum percentage of Salary a Participant may defer is 5%, and the maximum percentage of Salary a Participant may defer is 50%. Salary must be deferred in 5% increments.

(iv) Each Deferral Agreement shall be effective only with respect to payroll periods beginning on or after the first day of the month following the date the Deferral Agreement is filed with the Committee.

(b) Award Deferrals.

(i) With respect to an Award for services rendered for a Plan Year or a period of Plan Years (in the case of a long-term Award), a Participant may elect to defer a portion of that Award by filing a Deferral Agreement on or before the close of business on June 30 of that Plan Year, or, in the case of a long-term Award, by June 30 of the final Plan Year of the Award term. In the event that June 30 does not fall on a weekday, such filing must be made by the close of business on the last prior business day.

(ii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the Plan's initial Plan Year, a Participant, pursuant to transition relief rules issued by the Internal Revenue Service, could elect to defer an Award, including a long-term Award, payable in 2009 by filing a Deferral Agreement by December 31, 2008.

(iii) A Participant's election to defer a portion of hisAward shall be effective on the last day that such deferral may be elected under this Section 3.2(b) and shall be effective only for the Award so designated by the Participant.

(iv) The minimum amount of Award that can be deferred is 5% of the Award, and the maximum amount of Award that can be deferred is 90% of the Award. Awards must be deferred in 5% increments.

3.3.    Changing Deferrals.

(a) Salary Deferrals. A Participant's election of the rate at which he authorizes Salary Deferrals shall become irrevocable and remain in effect for the full Plan Year following his election, except as described in Section 3.3(c) below. His election shall continue to remain in effect in subsequent Plan Years unless he completes a new Deferral Agreement. The amendment shall be filed by December 31 and shall be effective for payroll periods beginning on or after the following January 1.

5

(b) Award Deferrals. A Participant may change his election to defer a portion of his Award prior the effective date in Section 3.2(b)(iii), but his election shall become irrevocable as of the date the election becomes effective, except as described in Section 3.3(c) below. A Participant's Award Deferral election will not automatically remain in effect in subsequent Plan Years; he must make a new Award Deferral election for each Plan Year.

(c) Cancellation Due to Unforeseeable Emergency or FERP Hardship Distribution. Salary Deferrals and Award Deferrals shall be canceled in the case of a Participant's Unforeseeable Emergency or as required under the FERP in the event the Participant receives a hardship distribution from the FERP. A Participant may make subsequent Salary Deferrals and Award Deferrals by executing a new Deferral Agreement in accordance with Sections 3.2(a) and/or 3.2(b).

ARTICLE 4.

EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS

4.1. Restoration Contributions. For Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and except as set forth in Section 4.3, the Committee shall credit a Restoration Contribution each Plan Year on behalf of each Participant who participates in the FERP, receives a Service Contribution to the FERP, and has such Service Contribution limited by the IRS compensation limitation for such Plan Year, in an amount equal to:

(a) an amount equal to his Service Contribution made to the FERP for such Plan Year calculated by using the Plan's definition of Compensation and without regard to the IRS compensation limitation for such Plan Year; less

(b) his actual Service Contribution made to the FERP for such Plan Year.

The IRS compensation limitation is established in Code Section 401(a)(17) and is $250,000 for 2012. The limitation may be adjusted for inflation by the IRS in future years. The following chart shows the Restoration Contribution schedule using the 2012 IRS compensation limitation.

6

FERP Service	FERP Contribution	Restoration Contribution
0 - 4 years	3% of Annual Compensation below $250,000	3% of Compensation above $250,000
5 - 9 years	4% of Annual Compensation below $250,000	4% of Compensation above $250,000
10 - 14 years	5% of Annual Compensation below $250,000	5% of Compensation above $250,000
15 - 19 years	7% of Annual Compensation below $250,000	7% of Compensation above $250,000
20+ years	9% of Annual Compensation below $250,000	9% of Compensation above $250,000

4.2. SERP Contributions. For Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and except as set forth in Section 4.3, the Committee shall credit a SERP Contribution for each Plan Year on behalf of each Participant in a percentage of such Participant's Compensation as determined by his Credited Service completed as of the end of such Plan Year according to the following schedule:

Credited Service	SERP Contribution
0-4 years	2% of Compensation
5-9 years	3% of Compensation
10 or more years	4% of Compensation

For the first Plan Year a Participant participates in the Plan, only his Compensation earned after the date his participation begins shall be used to calculate his SERP Contribution.

4.3. Special Exception for Continuing Pension Restoration Plan Participants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant who continues to participate in the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Pension Restoration Plan (the “Pension Restoration Plan”) on or after January 1, 2012 shall not be eligible to receive a Restoration Contribution or SERP Contribution for the duration of his participation in the Pension Restoration Plan.

4.4. Contribution for Year of Employment Termination. A Participant shall not receive a Restoration Contribution or SERP Contribution for the Plan Year in which his Employment Termination occurs, except as provided in Section 2.2.

4.5. Pension Restoration Plan Account Transfer. A Participant whose participation in the Pension Restoration Plan ceased as of December 31, 2011 had his Pension Restoration Plan Account transferred to his Plan Account effective as of January 1, 2012.

7

ARTICLE 5.

VESTING AND MAINTENANCE OF ACCOUNTS

5.1. Accounts Generally. The Committee shall credit Salary Deferrals, Award Deferrals, Restoration Contributions, SERP Contributions and the transferred Pension Restoration Plan Account, as applicable, to a Participant's Account, and shall create a separate “sub-account” recordkeeping entry within the Account for each type of deferral or contribution.

5.2.    Vesting of Account.

(a) Each Participant shall be fully vested at all times in the sub-account to which his Salary Deferrals, Award Deferrals and transferred Pension Restoration Account are credited.

(b) Each Participant shall be fully vested in the sub-account to which his Restoration Contributions are credited upon the earlier of his completion of three years of Vesting Service or his death.

(c) Each Participant shall be fully vested in the sub-account to which his SERP Contributions are credited upon the earliest of (i) the attainment of his 65th birthday, (ii) his completion of 10 years of Vesting Service and the attainment of his 55th birthday or (iii) his death.

(d) All unvested amounts credited to a Participant's Account shall be forfeited upon the Participant's Employment Termination, and shall only be restored upon the Participant's subsequent reemployment if the Participant is subsequently reemployed by Franklin or any Affiliated Company and designated a Participant pursuant to Section 2.1 within five years of his prior Employment Termination.

5.3.    Crediting Dates.

(a) Salary Deferrals shall be credited to the Participant's Account as of the Valuation Date coincident or next following each payroll date the Participant would have otherwise received such Salary.

(b) Award Deferrals shall be credited to the Participant's Account as of the Valuation Date coincident with or next following the date the Award would have been paid to the Participant.

(c) Restoration Contributions and SERP Contributions shall be credited as of December 31 of each Plan Year.

8

(d) The transferred Pension Restoration Plan Account shall be credited as of January 1, 2012.

5.4.    Adjustment of Account for Earnings/Losses.

(a) As of each Valuation Date, a Participant's Account shall be credited or debited with investment earnings or losses in the following manner:

(i) The sub-accounts to which a Participant's Salary Deferrals, Award Deferrals and Restoration Contributions are credited will be credited or debited with the same investment earnings or losses with which such sub-accounts would have been credited or debited assuming they had been actually invested in one or more the investment funds made available by the Committee and selected by the Participant.

(ii) The sub-account to which a Participant's SERP Contributions are credited will be credited with interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of (A) 4.5% or (B) the rate of interest on 30-year Treasury Securities for the month of November last preceding the first day of the Plan Year for which each SERP Contribution is made. Such interest will be credited as of the December 31st of each Plan Year, based on the value of the Participant's SERP Contribution sub-account calculated as of the prior January 1st of that same Plan Year.

(iii) The sub-account to which a Participant's transferred Pension Restoration Account is credited will be credited with interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of (A) 4.5% or (B) the rate of interest on 30-year Treasury Securities for the month of November 2011 for the period beginning on January 1, 2012 and ending on December 31, 2012. Thereafter, such sub-account will be credited or debited with investment earnings or losses pursuant to Section 5.4(a)(i).

(b) The designation of any investment funds or indices shall not require Franklin or any Affiliated Company to invest or earmark its general assets in any specific manner.

5.5. Investment Elections. Each Participant shall file an initial investment election with the Committee with respect to the investment of the amounts in his sub-accounts listed in Sections 5.4(a)(i) and 5.4(a)(iii) within such time period and on such written form or by such other means as the Committee may prescribe. The election shall designate the investment fund or funds which shall be used to measure the investment performance of the Participant's sub-accounts and shall remain in place for future

9

Award Deferrals, Salary Deferrals and Restoration Contributions until changed pursuant to Section 5.4.

5.6. Changing Investment Elections. As of any Valuation Date, a Participant may change his election in Section 5.4 with respect to his future Award Deferrals, Salary Deferrals and/or Restoration Contributions or may reallocate the current balance of any or all of his sub-accounts listed in Section 5.4(a)(i) and 5.4(a)(iii), thereby changing the investment fund or funds used to measure the future investment performance of his existing sub-account balance, by filing an appropriate written form or by such other means as approved by the Committee from time to time.

5.7. Individual Account Records. The Committee shall maintain, or cause to be maintained, records showing the individual balances of each Participant's Account. At least once each Plan Year, each Participant shall be furnished with a statement setting forth the value of his Account.

ARTICLE 6.

PAYMENT OF BENEFITS

6.1.    Commencement and Method of Payment.

(a) Except to the extent a Participant makes an election pursuant to Section 6.1(b), the Participant's Account shall be distributed to him, or in the event of his death to his Beneficiary, in a cash single sum payment within 30 days following the Participant's Employment Termination.

(b) Notwithstanding Section 6.1, at the time a Participant completes a Deferral Agreement, the Participant may make an irrevocable election to receive distribution of the portion of his sub-accounts attributable to the Salary Deferrals and/or Award Deferrals subject to such Deferral Agreement in semi-annual installments over a period not to exceed ten (10) years. Installments shall be paid on each succeeding January 1 and July 1 following the Participant's Employment Termination. The amount of each installment shall equal the balance in the Account as of the immediately preceding Valuation Date, divided by the number of remaining installments (including the installment being determined). In the event of the Participant's death prior to the payment of all of the installments, his Beneficiary shall receive a cash single sum payment equal to the remaining balance in the Participant's sub-accounts within 30 days following the Participant's death.

(c) Notwithstanding Sections 6.1(a) and (b), if any Participant employed by that Participating Company is a "key employee"

10

within the meaning of Code section 416(i) (without regard to paragraph (5) of that subsection), distribution of a lump sum payment or of the first installment payment made, in either event, on account of his Employment Termination for a reason other than death, shall not be made until six months after the date of such Employment Termination.

6.2.    Hardship Withdrawal.

(a) While employed by a Participating Company, a Participant may request a withdrawal from his vested Account in the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency. The request shall be made in a time and manner determined by the Committee, shall not be for a greater amount than the amount reasonably needed to satisfy the emergency need, plus amounts necessary to pay taxes reasonably anticipated as a result of the distribution, and shall be subject to approval by the Committee.

(b) Unforeseeable Emergency shall mean a severe financial hardship to the Participant resulting from a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Participant, the Participant's spouse, or of a dependent (as defined in Section 152(a) of the Code), loss of the Participant's property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant. The existence of an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Payment may not be made to the extent that the financial hardship is or may be relieved:

(i) through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise; or

(ii) by liquidation of the Participant's assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship.

6.3. Designation of Beneficiary. A Participant may, in a time and manner determined by the Committee, designate a beneficiary and one or more contingent beneficiaries (which may include the Participant's estate) to receive any benefits which may be payable under this Plan upon his death. If the Participant fails to designate a beneficiary or contingent beneficiary, or if the beneficiary and all contingent beneficiaries fail to survive the Participant, such benefits shall be paid to the Participant's estate. A Participant may revoke or change any designation made under this Section 6.3 in a time and manner determined by the Committee.

11

6.4. Status of Account Pending Distribution. Pending distribution following a Participant's Employment Termination, a Participant's Account shall continue to be credited with earnings and losses as provided in Section 5.4.

6.5. Installments and Withdrawals Pro-Rata. An installment payment or hardship withdrawal shall be made on a pro-rata basis from the portions of the Participant's existing Account balance that are subject to different measures of investment performance.

ARTICLE 7.

AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION

7.1. Right to Terminate. The MOCC may, in its sole discretion, terminate the entire Plan, or terminate a portion of the Plan that is identified as an elective account balance plan as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(c)(2)(i)(A), or as a nonelective account balance plan as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(c)(2)(i)(B). Upon termination of the Plan or portion thereof, distribution of Accounts shall continue to be made to each Participant or beneficiary in the manner and at the time prescribed in Article 6. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the MOCC may in its discretion require earlier distribution of all benefits due under the Plan or portion thereof, provided that:

(a) The termination of the Plan does not occur proximate to a downturn in the financial health of Franklin (as determined by the Committee);

(b) Franklin also terminates all other plans or arrangements which are considered to be of a similar type as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(c)(2)(i), or as otherwise provided by the Code, as the portion of the Plan which has been terminated;

(c) No payments made in connection with the termination of the Plan occur earlier than 12 months following the Plan termination date other than payments the Plan would have made irrespective of Plan termination;

(d) All payments made in connection with the termination of the Plan are completed within 24 months following the Plan termination date;

(e) Franklin does not establish a new plan of a similar type as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(c)(2)(i), within three years following the termination date of the portion of the Plan which has been terminated; and

12

(f) Franklin meets any other requirements determined necessary to comply with provisions of the Code and applicable regulations which permit the acceleration of the time and form of payment made in connection with plan terminations and liquidations.

7.2. Right to Amend. The Committee or the MOCC may, in its sole discretion, amend this Plan and the related Deferral Agreements on 30 days' prior notice to the Participants.

ARTICLE 8.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

8.1. No Funding. This Plan is an unfunded plan maintained primarily to provide deferred compensation benefits for a select group of “management or highly-compensated employees” within the meaning of Sections 201, 301 and 401 of ERISA, and therefore is exempt from the provisions of Parts 2, 3 and 4 of Title I of ERISA. No provision shall at any time be made with respect to segregating any assets of Franklin or any Affiliated Company for payment of any distributions hereunder. The right of a Participant or his beneficiary to receive a distribution hereunder shall be an unsecured claim against the general assets of Franklin, and neither a Participant nor a beneficiary shall have any rights in or against any specific assets of Franklin or any Affiliated Company. All amounts credited to Accounts of Participants shall constitute general assets of Franklin and may be disposed of by Franklin at such time and for such purposes as it may deem appropriate.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 8.1, Franklin may, at its discretion, enter into a trust agreement (“Trust Agreement”) with a bank or trust company located in the continental United States as trustee, whereby Franklin and any Participating Company may at its discretion contribute deferrals under the Plan to a trust (“Trust”). Such Trust Agreement shall be substantially in the form of the model trust agreement set forth in Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 92-64, or any subsequent Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure, and shall include provisions required in such model trust agreement that all assets of the Trust shall be subject to creditors of Franklin in the event of insolvency. To the extent any benefits provided under the Plan are paid from the Trust, Franklin shall have no further obligation to pay them. If not paid from the Trust, such benefits shall remain the obligation of Franklin. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no contributions shall be made to the Trust if doing so would violate the provisions of section 409A of the Code.

13

8.2. No Contract of Employment. The existence of this Plan or of a Deferral Agreement does not constitute a contract for continued employment between a Participant and Franklin or any Affiliated Company. Franklin and the Affiliated Companies reserve the right to modify Participant's remuneration and to terminate a Participant for any reason and at any time, notwithstanding the existence of this Plan or of a Deferral Agreement.

8.3. Withholding Taxes. All payments under this Plan and all amounts credited to Accounts hereunder shall be net (unless withholdings are, with the Committee's consent, deducted from other income) of an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state or local income and employment tax withholding requirements.

8.4. Non-alienation. The right to receive any benefit under this Plan may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or encumbered by a Participant, beneficiary or contingent beneficiary in any manner and any attempt to do so shall be void. No such benefit shall be subject to garnishment, attachment or other legal or equitable process without the prior written consent of Franklin and/or the Affiliated Companies. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Franklin may make distributions to someone other than the Participant if such payment is necessary to comply with a domestic relations order, as defined in Code Section 414(p)(1)(B), involving the Participant.

8.5.    Administration.

(a) This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall interpret the Plan with discretionary authority, establish regulations to further the purposes of the Plan and take any other action necessary to the proper operation of the Plan in accordance with guidelines established by the Committee or, if there are no such guidelines, consistent with furthering the purpose of the Plan.

(b) The MOCC, in its sole discretion and upon such terms as it may prescribe, may permit any Affiliated Company to participate in the Plan.

(c) Prior to paying any benefit under this Plan, the Committee may require a Participant, beneficiary or contingent beneficiary to provide such information or material as the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall deem necessary for it to make any determination it may be required to make under this Plan. The Committee may withhold payment of any benefit under this Plan until it receives all such information and material and is reasonably satisfied of its correctness and genuineness.

14

(d) Subject to applicable law, any interpretation of the provisions of the Plan and any decision on any matter within the discretion of the Committee made by the Committee in good faith shall be binding on all persons. A misstatement or other mistake of fact shall be corrected when it becomes known and the Committee shall make such adjustment on account thereof as the Committee considers equitable and practicable.

(e) If a claim for benefits made by a Participant or his beneficiary is denied, the Committee shall, within 90 days (or 180 days if special circumstances require an extension of time) after the claim is made, furnish the person making the claim with a written notice specifying the reasons for the denial. Such notice shall also refer to the pertinent Plan provisions on which the denial is based, describe any additional material or information necessary for properly completing the claim and explain why such material or information is necessary, and explain the Plan's claim review procedures. If requested in writing, the Committee shall afford each claimant whose claim has been denied a full and fair review of its decision and, within 60 days (120 days if special circumstances require additional time) of the request for reconsideration of the denied claim, the Committee shall notify the claimant in writing of the Committee's final decision. This notice shall specify the reasons for the denial, refer to the pertinent Plan provisions on which the denial is based and state that the Participant is entitled to receive copies of all documents and records relevant to the Participant's claim and bring suit under ERISA.

8.6.    Construction.

(a) The Plan shall, to the extent not preempted by federal law, be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Indiana without giving effect to applicable principles of conflicts of law to the extent that the application of the law of another jurisdiction would be required thereby.

(b) The masculine pronoun shall mean the feminine wherever appropriate.

(c) The captions in this Plan document are inserted as a matter of convenience and shall not affect the construction of the Plan.

8.7. Code Section 409A Standards. This Plan, and all Deferral Agreements pursuant to this Plan, shall be affected, interpreted, and applied in a manner consistent with the standards for nonqualified deferred compensation plans established by Code section 409A and its interpretive

15

regulations (the "Section 409A Standards"). To the extent that any terms of the Plan or a Deferral Agreement would subject any Participant to gross income inclusion, interest, or additional tax pursuant to Code section 409A, those terms are to that extent superseded by the applicable Section 409A Standards.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Franklin has caused this Plan to be executed as of this 24th day of September, 2012.

FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

By: /s/ Thomas J. Strupp

Title: VP - Global Human Resources &

Member, Employee Benefits Committee

16

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. Scott Trumbull, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ending September 29, 2012 of Franklin Electric Co., Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Franklin Electric Co., Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any changes in Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s board of directors:

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 8, 2012
	/s/ R. Scott Trumbull
	R. Scott Trumbull
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	Franklin Electric Co., Inc.

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John J. Haines, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ending September 29, 2012 of Franklin Electric Co., Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Franklin Electric Co., Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s board of directors:

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 8, 2012
	/s/ John J. Haines
	John J. Haines
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	Franklin Electric Co., Inc.

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ending September 29, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Scott Trumbull, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	November 8, 2012
	/s/ R. Scott Trumbull
	R. Scott Trumbull
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	Franklin Electric Co., Inc.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ending September 29, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Haines, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	November 8, 2012
	/s/ John J. Haines
	John J. Haines
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	Franklin Electric Co., Inc.

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Narrative and Impo Contingent Consideration) (Details) (Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended				9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012 USD ($)	Sep. 29, 2012 TRY	Jul. 02, 2011 USD ($)	Jul. 02, 2011 TRY	Sep. 29, 2012 Recurring Basis USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2011 Recurring Basis USD ($)	Sep. 29, 2012 Recurring Basis Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2011 Recurring Basis Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) USD ($)
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Impo contingent consideration	$ 5.4	9.7	$ 5.5	8.5	$ 5.4	$ 5.0	$ 5.4	$ 5.0
Fair value measurements, discount factor	15.00%
Additional impact attributed to foreign exchange translation	0.8
Accretion charges					$ 0.7	$ 0.7

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Details) (USD $) Share data in Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Numerator
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$ 21,866,000	$ 19,220,000	$ 69,719,000	$ 51,554,000
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc. excluding undistributed earnings	21,900,000	19,000,000	69,700,000	51,100,000
Basic
Weighted average common shares (in shares)	23.4	23.2	23.4	23.2
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director incentive stock options and stock/stock unit awards (in shares)	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares (in shares)	23.9	23.7	23.9	23.7
Basic earnings per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.93	$ 0.82	$ 2.98	$ 2.20
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.91	$ 0.80	$ 2.91	$ 2.16
Stock Options
Effect of dilutive securities:
Anti-dilutive stock options (in shares)	0.1	0.3	0.1	0.3
Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
Numerator
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest	0		0
Vertical S.p.A.
Numerator
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest		$ 200,000		$ 500,000

XML

DEBT (Details) (USD $)			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Mar. 07, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Sep. 29, 2012 Cerus Industrial Corporation	Aug. 09, 2012 Cerus Industrial Corporation	Sep. 29, 2012 Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.	Sep. 29, 2012 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Dec. 31, 2011 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Debt
Prudential agreement, fixed interest rate	5.79%
Prudential agreement - 5.79 percent	$ 150,000,000	$ 150,000,000
Capital leases	1,000,000	300,000
Subsidiary debt	17,500,000	13,700,000		4,100,000
Long-term debt	168,500,000	164,000,000
Less current maturities	17,743,000	13,978,000					16,100,000
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities	150,801,000	150,000,000
Line of credit, borrowing capacity			8,000,000
Line of credit, amount outstanding			1,300,000		0	1,200,000
Line of credit, interest rate term (in months)			1 month
Line of credit, basis spread on LIBOR variable rate			2.00%
Estimated fair value of long term debt								$ 184,300,000	$ 179,200,000

XML

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Schedule of Authorized Number of Shares

The 2012 Stock Plan authorizes 1,200,000 shares for issuance as follows:

2012 Stock Plan	Authorized Shares
Stock Options	840,000
Stock/Stock Unit Awards	360,000

The Company also maintains the Amended and Restated Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan") which, as amended in 2009, provided for discretionary grants of stock options and stock awards. The Stock Plan authorized 2,200,000 shares for issuance as follows:

Stock Plan	Authorized Shares
Stock Options	1,600,000
Stock Awards	600,000

Schedule of Assumptions Used to Determine the Fair Value of Options Granted

The assumptions used for the Black-Scholes model to determine the fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, are as follows:

	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	1.01	%	2.49	%
Dividend yield	1.12	%	1.23	%
Volatility factor	0.388		0.431
Expected term	6.0 years		6.3 years
Forfeiture rate	3.99	%	3.59	%

Schedule of Stock Option Activity

A summary of the Company’s outstanding stock option activity and related information for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	September 29, 2012				October 1, 2011
Stock Options	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of period	1,569		$	29.66	1,817		$	27.95
Granted	125		48.19		113		43.43
Exercised	(430	)	26.76		(160	)	24.49
Forfeited	(23	)	45.82		(14	)	39.27
Outstanding at end of period	1,241		$	32.50	1,756		$	29.17
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate	1,229		$	32.42	1,736		$	29.19
Vested and exercisable at end of period	841		$	31.73	1,207		$	30.38

Schedule of Stock Options, Contractual Term and Aggregate Intrinsic Value

A summary of the weighted average remaining contractual term and aggregate intrinsic value for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, is as follows:

Stock Options	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000’s)
Outstanding end of period	5.74 years	$	34,752
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate	5.71 years	$	34,479
Vested and exercisable end of period	4.67 years	$	24,188

Schedule of Restricted Stock/Stock Unit Award Activity

A summary of the Company’s outstanding restricted stock/stock unit award activity and related information for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	September 29, 2012				October 1, 2011
Stock/Stock Unit Awards	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted-Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Non-vested at beginning of period	172		$	34.47	128		$	31.86
Awarded	104		49.79		68		43.40
Vested	(37	)	31.79		(3	)	39.12
Forfeited	(9	)	36.95		(20	)	47.41
Non-vested at end of period	230		$	41.77	173		$	34.44

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis

As of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as set forth in the table below. The "Recognized Loss" amounts in the table are accumulated totals since inception.

(In millions)	September 29, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Cash equivalents	$	14.7	$	14.7	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative assets	—		—		—		—		—
Impo contingent consideration	5.4		—		—		5.4		0.7
	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Cash equivalents	$	17.1	$	17.1	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative assets	0.1		—		0.1		—		—
Impo contingent consideration	5.0		—		—		5.0		0.7

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets Measured on Nonrecurring Basis

As of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as set forth in the table below. The "Recognized Loss" amounts included in the table are accumulated totals since inception.

(In millions)	September 29, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Asset held for sale	$	1.1	$	—	$	—	$	1.1	$	3.6
	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Asset held for sale	$	1.3	$	—	$	—	$	1.3	$	3.4

XML

SEGMENT INFORMATION (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Segment Reporting Information
Net sales to external customers	$ 237,557	$ 224,391	$ 686,177	$ 633,841
Operating income (loss)	33,492	28,324	92,000	77,072
Total assets	964,843		964,843		829,530
Water Systems
Segment Reporting Information
Net sales to external customers	189,800	179,400	557,500	510,100
Operating income (loss)	35,100	29,000	102,000	86,700
Total assets	707,900		707,900		535,300
Fueling Systems
Segment Reporting Information
Net sales to external customers	47,800	45,000	128,700	123,700
Operating income (loss)	11,400	9,600	26,000	22,200
Total assets	233,500		233,500		222,200
Other
Segment Reporting Information
Net sales to external customers	0	0	0	0
Operating income (loss)	(13,000)	(10,300)	(36,000)	(31,800)
Total assets	$ 23,400		$ 23,400		$ 72,000

XML

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL (Goodwill) (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012
Change in the Carrying Amount of Goodwill by Reporting Segment
Goodwill, beginning balance	$ 168,846,000
Acquisitions	32,000,000
Adjustments to prior year acquisitions	0
Foreign currency translation	(200,000)
Goodwill, ending balance	200,560,000
Water Systems
Change in the Carrying Amount of Goodwill by Reporting Segment
Goodwill, beginning balance	109,900,000
Acquisitions	32,000,000
Adjustments to prior year acquisitions	0
Foreign currency translation	(400,000)
Goodwill, ending balance	141,500,000
Fueling Systems
Change in the Carrying Amount of Goodwill by Reporting Segment
Goodwill, beginning balance	58,900,000
Acquisitions	0
Adjustments to prior year acquisitions	0
Foreign currency translation	200,000
Goodwill, ending balance	$ 59,100,000

XML

REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 01, 2011 Vertical S.p.A.	Oct. 01, 2011 Vertical S.p.A.	Sep. 29, 2012 Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.	Sep. 29, 2012 Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.	May 02, 2011 Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Percentage of outstanding shares acquired					80.00%
Ownership percentage by noncontrolling owners					20.00%
Adjustment to recorded amount of redeemable noncontrolling interest	$ 0.2	$ 0.5	$ 0	$ 0

XML

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012 Stock Options	Sep. 29, 2012 Employee Stock/Stock Unit Award	Oct. 01, 2011 Employee Stock/Stock Unit Award	May 04, 2012 2012 Stock Plan	May 04, 2012 2012 Stock Plan Stock Options	May 04, 2012 2012 Stock Plan Employee Stock/Stock Unit Award	Apr. 24, 2009 2009 Stock Plan	Apr. 24, 2009 2009 Stock Plan Stock Options	Apr. 24, 2009 2009 Stock Plan Stock Awards
Share-based Compensation
Authorized shares							1,200,000	840,000	360,000	2,200,000	1,600,000	600,000
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation (in dollars)				$ 2,600,000	$ 5,900,000
Total unrecognized compensation cost, reconginzed over a weighted-average period (in years)				2 years 29 days	3 years 4 days
Fair Value Assumptions
Risk-free interest rate (as a percent)		1.01%	2.49%
Dividend yield (as a percent)		1.12%	1.23%
Volatility factor (as a percent)		38.80%	43.10%
Expected term (in years)		6.0 years	6.3 years
Forfeiture rate (as a percent)		3.99%	3.59%
Stock Option Activity and Related Information
Outstanding beginning of period, shares		1,569,000	1,817,000
Outstanding beginning of period, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)		$ 29.66	$ 27.95
Granted, shares	0	125,000	113,000
Granted, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)		$ 48.19	$ 43.43
Exercised, shares		(430,000)	(160,000)
Exercised, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)		$ 26.76	$ 24.49
Forfeited, shares		(23,000)	(14,000)
Forfeited, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)		$ 45.82	$ 39.27
Outstanding end of period, shares	1,241,000	1,241,000	1,756,000
Outstanding end of period, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 32.50	$ 32.50	$ 29.17
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate, shares	1,229,000	1,229,000	1,736,000
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 32.42	$ 32.42	$ 29.19
Vested and exercisable end of period, shares	841,000	841,000	1,207,000
Vested and exercisable end of period, weighted-average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 31.73	$ 31.73	$ 30.38
Summary of Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term and Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding end of period, weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)		5 years 270 days
Outstanding end of period, aggregate intrinsic value	34,752,000	34,752,000
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate, weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)		5 years 259 days
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate, aggregate intrinsic value	34,479,000	34,479,000
Vested and exercisable end of period, weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years)		4 years 244 days
Vested and exercisable end of period, aggregate intrinsic value	24,188,000	24,188,000
Intrinsic value of options exercised (in dollars)	$ 7,300,000	$ 7,300,000	$ 800,000
Stock/Stock Unit Award Activity and Related Information
Nonvested at beginning of period, shares					172,000	128,000
Nonvested at beginning of period, weighted-average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)					$ 34.47	$ 31.86
Awarded, shares					104,000	68,000
Awarded, weighted-average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)					$ 49.79	$ 43.40
Vested, shares					(37,000)	(3,000)
Vested, weighted-average date fair value (in dollars per share)					$ 31.79	$ 39.12
Forfeited, shares					(9,000)	(20,000)
Forfeited, weighted-average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)					$ 36.95	$ 47.41
Nonvested at end of period, shares					230,000	173,000
Nonvested at the end of period, weighted-average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)					$ 41.77	$ 34.44

XML

DEBT (Debt Payments Expected to be Paid) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 29, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Long-term Debt, Fiscal Year Maturity
Long-term debt	$ 168.5	$ 164.0
Year 1	17.7
Year 2	0.2
Year 3	0.2
Year 4	30.2
Year 5	30.2
More than 5 years	90.0
Debt
Long-term Debt, Fiscal Year Maturity
Long-term debt	167.5
Year 1	17.5
Year 2	0
Year 3	0
Year 4	30.0
Year 5	30.0
More than 5 years	90.0
Capital leases
Long-term Debt, Fiscal Year Maturity
Long-term debt	1.0
Year 1	0.2
Year 2	0.2
Year 3	0.2
Year 4	0.2
Year 5	0.2
More than 5 years	$ 0

XML

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2012-2 Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The new guidance gives companies the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. If the results of the qualitative assessment conclude that the fair value of the asset is more likely than not impaired, the quantitative impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be required. ASU 2012-2 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company did not early adopt ASU 2012-2 in preparing for its annual impairment testing. The Company will continue to test for impairment utilizing the quantitative method. As ASU 2012-2 was not early adopted, no material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows resulted.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12 Comprehensive Income. The new guidance indefinitely defers certain provisions of ASU 2011-5 Statement of Comprehensive Income that required companies to present reclassification adjustments for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income in both net income and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. The deferral does not change the primary provisions of ASU 2011-5, as described below. The Company adopted ASU 2011-12 on a retrospective basis, effective January 1, 2012. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-12 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-8 Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The new guidance gives companies the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. If the results of the qualitative assessment conclude that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the applicable carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. Otherwise, further testing would not be required. ASU 2011-8 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company did not adopt ASU 2011-8 in preparing for its annual impairment testing. The Company will continue to test for impairment utilizing the quantitative method. As ASU 2011-8 was not adopted, no material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows resulted.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-5 Statement of Comprehensive Income. The new guidance requires companies to present net income and comprehensive income in one continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company adopted ASU 2011-5 on a retrospective basis, effective January 1, 2012, presenting comprehensive income in a separate statement following the statement of income. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-5 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-4 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure. The new guidance requires additional disclosures for Level 3 measurements including quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in estimating fair value, a discussion of the sensitivity of the measurement to these inputs, and a description of the Company's valuation process. The Company adopted ASU 2011-4 on a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2012. As the ASU addressed only disclosure requirements, adoption of ASU 2011-4 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

XML

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Benefit Cost
Additional period for benefit accrual (in years)			5 years
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Defined benefit plan, contributions by employer			$ 4.8
Pension Benefits
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	0.4	0.7	1.2	2.6
Interest cost	2.2	2.0	6.4	7.2
Expected return on assets	(2.7)	(2.3)	(7.9)	(8.8)
Amortization of transition obligation	0	0	0	0
Prior service cost	0	0	0	0.1
Loss	0.5	0.8	1.5	2.7
Total net periodic benefit cost	0.4	1.2	1.2	3.8
Domestic Pension Plans
Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Benefit Cost
Number of pension plans (in ones)	2		2
German Pension Plans
Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Benefit Cost
Number of pension plans (in ones)	3		3
Other Benefits
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	0.1	0	0.1	0
Interest cost	0.1	0.2	0.4	0.5
Expected return on assets	0	0	0	0
Amortization of transition obligation	0	0	0.1	0.1
Prior service cost	0	0.1	0.2	0.1
Loss	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1
Total net periodic benefit cost	$ 0.3	$ 0.4	$ 0.9	$ 0.8

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Schedule of Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

(In millions, except per share amounts)	Third Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011		September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$	21.9	$	19.2	$	69.7	$	51.6
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		0.2		—		0.5
	$	21.9	$	19.0	$	69.7	$	51.1
Denominator:
Basic
Weighted average common shares	23.4		23.2		23.4		23.2
Diluted
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director incentive stock options and stock/stock unit awards	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares	23.9		23.7		23.9		23.7
Basic earnings per share	$	0.93	$	0.82	$	2.98	$	2.20
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.91	$	0.80	$	2.91	$	2.16
Anti-dilutive stock options	0.1		0.3		0.1		0.3

XML

DEBT (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Long-term Debt

Debt consisted of the following:

(In millions)	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Prudential Agreement - 5.79 percent	$	150.0		$	150.0
Capital leases	1.0			0.3
Subsidiary debt	17.5			13.7
	168.5			164.0
Less current maturities	(17.7		)	(14.0		)
Long-term debt	$	150.8		$	150.0

Schedule of Long-term Debt Payments

The following debt payments are expected to be paid in accordance with the following schedule:

(In millions)	Total		Year 1		Year 2		Year 3		Year 4		Year 5		More than 5 years
Debt	$	167.5	$	17.5	$	—	$	—	$	30.0	$	30.0	$	90.0
Capital leases	1.0		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		—
	$	168.5	$	17.7	$	0.2	$	0.2	$	30.2	$	30.2	$	90.0

XML

INCOME TAXES (Rate) (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012
Statutory Income Tax Rate
United States statutory rate	35.00%

XML

EQUITY ROLL FORWARD (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Schedule of Stockholders' Equity

The schedule below sets forth equity changes for the nine months ended September 29, 2012:

(In thousands)
Description	Common			Additional Paid in Capital		Retained Earnings			Minimum Pension Liability			Cumulative Translation Adjustment			Non controlling Interest			Total Equity			Redeemable Non controlling Interest
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	2,333		$	144,609	$	350,457		$	(47,219	)	$	(2,045	)	$	2,303		$	450,438		$	5,407
Net income						69,719									339			70,058			351
Dividends on common stock						(9,959		)										(9,959		)
Noncontrolling dividend															(444		)	(444		)
Common stock issued	44			11,752														11,796
Common stock repurchased or received for stock options exercised	(32		)			(16,452		)										(16,484		)
Share-based compensation	5			4,228														4,233
Tax benefit of stock options exercised				3,672														3,672
Currency translation adjustment												649			209			858			(574		)
Pension liability, net of taxes									1,122									1,122
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	2,350		$	164,261	$	393,765		$	(46,097	)	$	(1,396	)	$	2,407		$	515,290		$	5,184

XML

SEGMENT INFORMATION (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Schedule of Financial Information by Reportable Business Segment

Financial information by reportable business segment is included in the following summary:

	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
	Net sales to external customers
Water Systems	$	189.8		$	179.4		$	557.5		$	510.1
Fueling Systems	47.8			45.0			128.7			123.7
Other	—			—			—			—
Consolidated	$	237.6		$	224.4		$	686.2		$	633.8
	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
	Operating income (loss)
Water Systems	$	35.1		$	29.0		$	102.0		$	86.7
Fueling Systems	11.4			9.6			26.0			22.2
Other	(13.0		)	(10.3		)	(36.0		)	(31.8		)
Consolidated	$	33.5		$	28.3		$	92.0		$	77.1
	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Total assets
Water Systems	$	707.9		$	535.3
Fueling Systems	233.5			222.2
Other	23.4			72.0
Consolidated	$	964.8		$	829.5

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 29, 2012, and for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations.  In the opinion of management, all accounting entries and adjustments (including normal, recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operation for the interim period have been made. Operating results for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2012. For further information, including a description of the Company’s critical accounting policies, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Franklin Electric Co., Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Changes in the Carrying Amount of the Warranty Accrual

The changes in the carrying amount of the warranty accrual, as recorded in the "Accrued expenses" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, are as follows:

(In millions)
Beginning balance	$	9.9
Accruals related to product warranties	5.0
Additions related to acquisitions	0.4
Reductions for payments made	(5.6		)
Ending balance	$	9.7

XML

OTHER ASSETS (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended			2 Months Ended
	Jul. 02, 2011	Mar. 06, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Oct. 01, 2011 Pioneer Pump Inc	Oct. 01, 2011 Pioneer Pump Inc	Dec. 31, 2011 Pioneer Pump Inc	Sep. 20, 2005 Pioneer Pump Inc	Mar. 06, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc
Schedule of Other Assets
Percent equity interest						35.00%
Step acquisition, percent equity interest prior to acquisition		31.00%
Carrying value of the investment					$ 11.0		$ 11.7
Proportionate share of earnings			$ 0.8	$ 1.9			$ 0.4
Loans receivable, maturity term (in years)	7 years

XML

RESTRUCTURING (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	$ 88,000	$ 553,000	$ 74,000	$ 1,473,000
Restructuring reserves	0	200,000	0	200,000
Water Systems
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense		553,000		1,473,000
Phase IV
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	88,000		74,000
Phase IV | Restructuring Costs | Minimum
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring and related cost, expected cost			2,600,000
Percentage of non-cash charges related to restructuring (as a percent)			50.00%
Phase IV | Restructuring Costs | Maximum
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring and related cost, expected cost			5,200,000
Percentage of non-cash charges related to restructuring (as a percent)			60.00%
Phase IV | Facility Closing | Minimum
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring and related cost, expected cost			1,200,000
Phase IV | Facility Closing | Maximum
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring and related cost, expected cost			3,500,000
Phase IV | Equipment relocation
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		100,000
Phase IV | Asset write-off
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	100,000		300,000
Phase IV | Asset sale
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		(400,000)
Phase IV | Other
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		100,000
Phase IV | Man Hours Transfer
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Manufacturing activity, man hours			260,000
Phase IV | Water Systems
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	100,000		100,000
Phase IV | Water Systems | Equipment relocation
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		100,000
Phase IV | Water Systems | Asset write-off
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	100,000		300,000
Phase IV | Water Systems | Asset sale
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		(400,000)
Phase IV | Water Systems | Other
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		100,000
Phase IV | Fueling Systems
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Fueling Systems | Equipment relocation
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Fueling Systems | Asset write-off
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Fueling Systems | Asset sale
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Fueling Systems | Other
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Other
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Other | Equipment relocation
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Other | Asset write-off
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Other | Asset sale
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	0		0
Phase IV | Other | Other
Restructuring Cost and Reserve
Restructuring (income)/expense	$ 0		$ 0

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Income Statement
Net sales	$ 237,557	$ 224,391	$ 686,177	$ 633,841
Cost of sales	154,976	150,674	452,986	422,381
Gross profit	82,581	73,717	233,191	211,460
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	49,001	44,840	141,117	132,915
Restructuring (income)/expense	88	553	74	1,473
Operating income	33,492	28,324	92,000	77,072
Interest expense	(2,367)	(2,917)	(7,317)	(7,529)
Other income/(expense)	430	1,542	14,416	4,110
Foreign exchange income/(expense)	(896)	(554)	(1,551)	(1,911)
Income before income taxes	30,659	26,395	97,548	71,742
Income taxes	8,653	7,098	27,139	19,531
Net income	22,006	19,297	70,409	52,211
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(140)	(77)	(690)	(657)
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$ 21,866	$ 19,220	$ 69,719	$ 51,554
Per share data:
Basic (in dollars per share)	$ 0.93	$ 0.82	$ 2.98	$ 2.20
Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.91	$ 0.80	$ 2.91	$ 2.16
Dividends per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.15	$ 0.14	$ 0.43	$ 0.40

XML

INCOME TAXES (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Contingency
Unrecognized tax benefits	$ 4.7	$ 5.6
Unrecognized tax benefits that would impact effective tax rate if recognized	4.5
Increases resulting from prior period tax positions related to acquistions	2.6
Reserve for interest and penalties	0.4	0.5
Significant change in unrecognized tax benefits is reasonably possible, estimated range of change, upper bound	0.9
State
Income Tax Contingency
Unrecognized tax benefits, decreases resulting from current period tax positions	0.5
Federal
Income Tax Contingency
Unrecognized tax benefits, decreases resulting from current period tax positions	$ 0.4

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$ 70,409	$ 52,211
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	19,478	19,277
Share-based compensation	4,233	3,256
Deferred income taxes	9,970	1,566
(Gain)/loss on disposals of plant and equipment	(440)	1,481
Gain on equity investment	(12,212)	0
Asset impairment	583	200
Foreign exchange expense	1,551	1,911
Excess tax from share-based payment arrangements	(3,762)	(930)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Receivables	(26,861)	(23,400)
Inventory	(30,550)	(5,796)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,794	7,931
Income taxes	4,777	7,436
Employee benefit plans	(4,158)	(12,951)
Other assets and liabilities	(8,742)	253
Net cash flows from operating activities	26,070	52,445
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(19,310)	(13,607)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	1,216	324
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(54,074)	(25,143)
Additional consideration for prior acquisition	0	(6,623)
Loan to customer	0	(3,171)
Proceeds from loan to customer	219	0
Net cash flows from investing activities	(71,949)	(48,220)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt	70,124	5,080
Repayment of debt	(71,903)	(4,258)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	11,796	4,246
Excess tax from share-based payment arrangements	3,762	930
Purchases of common stock	(16,484)	(10,629)
Dividends paid	(10,403)	(9,294)
Net cash flows from financing activities	(13,108)	(13,925)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	1,367	(2,315)
Net change in cash and equivalents	(57,620)	(12,015)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period	153,337	140,070
Cash and equivalents at end of period	95,717	128,055
Cash paid for income taxes	17,809	7,450
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest of $161 and $0, respectively	8,355	7,529
Non-cash items:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment, not yet paid	59	1,339
Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc
Non-cash items:
Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc. liability for mandatory share purchase	22,924	0
Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
Non-cash items:
Payable to seller of acquired entities	407	4,870
Healy Systems Inc
Non-cash items:
Payable to seller of acquired entities	$ 0	$ 717

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended					9 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Sep. 29, 2012	Sep. 29, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Jun. 30, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Mar. 07, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Mar. 06, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Sep. 29, 2012 Cerus Industrial Corporation	Sep. 29, 2012 Minimum Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Sep. 29, 2012 Maximum Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Sep. 29, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Sep. 29, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc
Business Acquisition
Percentage of outstanding shares acquired					39.50%
Cash paid for business acquisition				$ 30,300,000
Step acquisition, percent equity interest prior to acquisition						31.00%
Percent total ownership					70.50%
Step acquisition, net remeasurement gain (loss)	12,212,000
Liability for mandatory share purchase										22,900,000	22,900,000
Accretion charges										0	0
Acquired finite-lived intangible asset, weighted average useful life (in years)							17 years	17 years	19 years
Goodwill, purchase accounting adjustments			1,500,000
Acquisition related costs		$ 300,000

XML

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

On May 4, 2012, the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. 2012 Stock Plan (the “2012 Stock Plan”) was approved by the Company’s shareholders.  The Board of Directors of the Company had approved the 2012 Stock Plan on February 24, 2012. The 2012 Stock Plan is a stock-based compensation plan that provides for discretionary grants of stock options, stock awards, and stock unit awards to key employees and non-employee directors.  The 2012 Stock Plan authorizes 1,200,000 shares for issuance as follows:

2012 Stock Plan	Authorized Shares
Stock Options	840,000
Stock/Stock Unit Awards	360,000

The Company also maintains the Amended and Restated Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan") which, as amended in 2009, provided for discretionary grants of stock options and stock awards. The Stock Plan authorized 2,200,000 shares for issuance as follows:

Stock Plan	Authorized Shares
Stock Options	1,600,000
Stock Awards	600,000

All options remaining for grant under the Stock Plan were awarded during the first six months of 2012. The Company currently issues new shares from its common stock balance to satisfy option exercises and stock and stock unit awards under the 2012 Stock Plan and the Stock Plan.

Stock Options:

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with a single approach and amortized using a straight-line attribution method over the option’s vesting period.

The assumptions used for the Black-Scholes model to determine the fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, are as follows:

	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	1.01	%	2.49	%
Dividend yield	1.12	%	1.23	%
Volatility factor	0.388		0.431
Expected term	6.0 years		6.3 years
Forfeiture rate	3.99	%	3.59	%

There were no stock options granted during the third quarter ended September 29, 2012.

A summary of the Company’s outstanding stock option activity and related information for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	September 29, 2012				October 1, 2011
Stock Options	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of period	1,569		$	29.66	1,817		$	27.95
Granted	125		48.19		113		43.43
Exercised	(430	)	26.76		(160	)	24.49
Forfeited	(23	)	45.82		(14	)	39.27
Outstanding at end of period	1,241		$	32.50	1,756		$	29.17
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate	1,229		$	32.42	1,736		$	29.19
Vested and exercisable at end of period	841		$	31.73	1,207		$	30.38

A summary of the weighted average remaining contractual term and aggregate intrinsic value for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, is as follows:

Stock Options	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000’s)
Outstanding end of period	5.74 years	$	34,752
Expected to vest after applying forfeiture rate	5.71 years	$	34,479
Vested and exercisable end of period	4.67 years	$	24,188

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the third quarters ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, was $7.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

As of September 29, 2012, there was $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans related to stock options.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.08 years.

Stock/Stock Unit Awards:

A summary of the Company’s outstanding restricted stock/stock unit award activity and related information for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	September 29, 2012				October 1, 2011
Stock/Stock Unit Awards	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted-Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Non-vested at beginning of period	172		$	34.47	128		$	31.86
Awarded	104		49.79		68		43.40
Vested	(37	)	31.79		(3	)	39.12
Forfeited	(9	)	36.95		(20	)	47.41
Non-vested at end of period	230		$	41.77	173		$	34.44

As of September 29, 2012, there was $5.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans related to stock/stock unit awards.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.01 years.

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Purchase Price Assigned to Major Identifiable Assets and Liabilities) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 29, 2012	Mar. 07, 2012 Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc	Aug. 09, 2012 Cerus Industrial Corporation
Assets:
Cash acquired	$ 0.8	$ 0.8	$ 0
Current assets	41.9	38.1	3.8
Property, plant, and equipment	3.9	3.6	0.3
Intangible assets	61.2	43.9	17.3
Goodwill	32.0	26.5	5.5
Total assets	139.8	112.9	26.9
Liabilities	(61.1)	(58.7)	(2.4)
Total	78.7	54.2	24.5
Fair value of original equity interest	(23.9)	(23.9)	0
Total purchase price	$ 54.8	$ 30.3	$ 24.5

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Schedule of Purchase Price Allocation

The preliminary purchase prices assigned to the major identifiable assets and liabilities for the PPH and Cerus acquisitions are as follows:

(In millions)	PPH			Cerus			Total
Assets:
Cash acquired	$	0.8		$	—		$	0.8
Current assets	38.1			3.8			41.9
Property, plant, and equipment	3.6			0.3			3.9
Intangible assets	43.9			17.3			61.2
Goodwill	26.5			5.5			32.0
Total assets	112.9			26.9			139.8
Liabilities	(58.7		)	(2.4		)	(61.1		)
Total	54.2			24.5			78.7
Less: Fair value of original equity interest	(23.9		)	—			(23.9		)
Total purchase price	$	30.3		$	24.5		$	54.8

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Capitalized interest	$ 161	$ 0

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Net income	$ 22,006	$ 19,297	$ 70,409	$ 52,211
Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	9,799	(26,841)	284	(12,656)
Employee benefit plan activity	671	908	1,845	2,725
Other comprehensive income/(loss)	10,470	(25,933)	2,129	(9,931)
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income	(263)	(356)	(723)	(1,068)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	10,207	(26,289)	1,406	(10,999)
Comprehensive income/(loss)	32,213	(6,992)	71,815	41,212
Comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	(351)	977	(325)	(463)
Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$ 31,862	$ (6,015)	$ 71,490	$ 40,749

XML

DEBT

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

DEBT

DEBT

Debt consisted of the following:

(In millions)	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Prudential Agreement - 5.79 percent	$	150.0		$	150.0
Capital leases	1.0			0.3
Subsidiary debt	17.5			13.7
	168.5			164.0
Less current maturities	(17.7		)	(14.0		)
Long-term debt	$	150.8		$	150.0

During the first quarter, the Company assumed $4.1 million of debt with the PPH acquisition. PPH has a short-term line of credit which expires in December 2012. The line of credit was extended beyond the original September 2012 maturity during the third quarter. Maximum borrowings available on the line of credit are $8.0 million. As of September 29, 2012, the outstanding balance on the line of credit was approximately $1.3 million. The line of credit is secured by all assets of PPH with an interest rate of the one month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 2.0 percent. The debt at third quarter end was included in the "Subsidiary debt" line of the above table.

During the third quarter, the Company assumed $1.2 million of debt with the Cerus acquisition. The debt resulting from a line of credit was repaid within the period with no amounts outstanding at third quarter end.

During the third quarter, the Company's prior year acquisition, Impo, incurred additional borrowings on previously available credit. Prior borrowings on the available credit also matured during the third quarter. As of September 29, 2012, Impo had short-term debt outstanding of approximately $16.1 million. The debt at third quarter end was included in the “Subsidiary debt” line of the above table.

The total estimated fair value of debt was $184.3 million and $179.2 million at September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  The fair value assumed floating rate debt was valued at par. In the absence of quoted prices in active markets considerable judgment is required in developing estimates of fair value.  Estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market transaction.  In determining the estimated fair value of its long-term debt, the Company uses various inputs including estimated borrowing rates currently available to the Company that reflect debt with similar terms, conditions, and remaining maturities as well as the current credit quality of the Company. Accordingly, the fair value of debt is classified as a Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

The following debt payments are expected to be paid in accordance with the following schedule:

(In millions)	Total		Year 1		Year 2		Year 3		Year 4		Year 5		More than 5 years
Debt	$	167.5	$	17.5	$	—	$	—	$	30.0	$	30.0	$	90.0
Capital leases	1.0		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2		—
	$	168.5	$	17.7	$	0.2	$	0.2	$	30.2	$	30.2	$	90.0

XML

DOCUMENT AND ENTITY INFORMATION	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 31, 2012
Document Information
Entity Registrant Name	FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000038725
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-29
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 29, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		23,509,063

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

EARNINGS PER SHARE

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

(In millions, except per share amounts)	Third Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011		September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Franklin Electric Co., Inc.	$	21.9	$	19.2	$	69.7	$	51.6
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interest	—		0.2		—		0.5
	$	21.9	$	19.0	$	69.7	$	51.1
Denominator:
Basic
Weighted average common shares	23.4		23.2		23.4		23.2
Diluted
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director incentive stock options and stock/stock unit awards	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares	23.9		23.7		23.9		23.7
Basic earnings per share	$	0.93	$	0.82	$	2.98	$	2.20
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.91	$	0.80	$	2.91	$	2.16
Anti-dilutive stock options	0.1		0.3		0.1		0.3

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 29, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 95,717	$ 153,337
Receivables, less allowances of $3,512 and $2,964, respectively	118,795	78,435
Inventories:
Raw material	72,005	49,615
Work-in-process	19,025	16,047
Finished goods	107,243	76,031
Total inventories	198,273	141,693
Deferred income taxes	13,263	11,853
Other current assets	25,046	15,165
Total current assets	451,094	400,483
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land and buildings	87,697	85,623
Machinery and equipment	198,026	186,525
Furniture and fixtures	26,185	24,332
Other	20,869	13,059
Property, plant, and equipment, gross	332,777	309,539
Less: Allowance for depreciation	(178,074)	(163,130)
Property, plant, and equipment, net	154,703	146,409
Asset held for sale	1,100	1,300
Intangible assets	150,391	94,538
Goodwill	200,560	168,846
Other assets	6,995	17,954
Total assets	964,843	829,530
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	58,721	45,481
Accrued expenses	62,181	58,692
Income taxes	7,129	5,946
Current maturities of long-term debt and short-term borrowings	17,743	13,978
Total current liabilities	145,774	124,097
Long-term debt	150,801	150,000
Deferred income taxes	45,097	15,348
Employee benefit plans	62,708	68,746
Other long-term liabilities	39,989	15,494
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)	0	0
Redeemable noncontrolling interest	5,184	5,407
Shareowners' equity:
Common stock (65,000 shares authorized, $.10 par value) outstanding (23,507 and 23,339, respectively)	2,350	2,333
Additional capital	164,261	144,609
Retained earnings	393,765	350,457
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(47,493)	(49,264)
Total shareowners' equity	512,883	448,135
Noncontrolling interest	2,407	2,303
Total equity	515,290	450,438
Total liabilities and equity	$ 964,843	$ 829,530

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, provides guidance for defining, measuring, and disclosing fair value within an established framework and hierarchy. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The standard established a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value within the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets;

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

As of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as set forth in the table below. The "Recognized Loss" amounts in the table are accumulated totals since inception.

(In millions)	September 29, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Cash equivalents	$	14.7	$	14.7	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative assets	—		—		—		—		—
Impo contingent consideration	5.4		—		—		5.4		0.7
	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Cash equivalents	$	17.1	$	17.1	$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative assets	0.1		—		0.1		—		—
Impo contingent consideration	5.0		—		—		5.0		0.7

The Company's Level 1 assets consist of cash equivalents which are comprised of domestic money market funds generally backed by treasury bills with fund prices readily observable and international high quality, highly liquid, bank guaranteed deposit accounts.

The Company's Level 2 assets consist of derivatives in the form of foreign currency forward contracts. The values were based on observable market inputs including forward and spot exchange rates for currencies. The contracts were marked-to-market with the resulting adjustments included in the "Other current assets" line on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the "Foreign exchange income/(expense)" line of the condensed consolidated statements of income. The contracts were initiated to reduce exchange rate volatility associated with both future required payments and possible contingency payments.

The Company's Level 3 liabilities consist of an acquisition-related contingent consideration. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company recorded $5.5 million (TL 8.5 million) of contingent consideration related to the second quarter 2011 acquisition of Impo. The fair value of $5.4 million (TL 9.7 million) as of September 29, 2012, was based on the income approach which involved analyzing future earnings projections, the probability of Impo achieving specified financial targets, and a discount factor of 15.0 percent. The Company recognized the additional accretion charge in the "Interest expense" line of the condensed consolidated statement of income. An additional impact of $0.8 million was attributed to foreign exchange translation. The contingent consideration is included in the "Other long-term liabilities" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as set forth in the table below. The "Recognized Loss" amounts included in the table are accumulated totals since inception.

(In millions)	September 29, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Asset held for sale	$	1.1	$	—	$	—	$	1.1	$	3.6
	December 31, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Recognized Loss
Asset held for sale	$	1.3	$	—	$	—	$	1.3	$	3.4

The Company's Level 3 assets consist of held for sale assets. The Company classified its former Siloam Springs manufacturing facility as held for sale and recorded the impairment as a restructuring expense on property, plant, and equipment during the second quarter of 2010. The current fair value reflects the sale price, less expected closing costs, at which the asset is currently under a letter of intent for sale that is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2012. The valuation process utilized to generate the original listing price on the asset involved an appraisal, broker market commentary, and observation of recent comparable sales and current comparable listings. A listing price was selected that placed the property near the median of such values based on price per square foot. Accordingly, no unobservable inputs were a significant factor in the list price. Subsequent to this original valuation process, as a result of the passage of time, the price was reduced sequentially for price discovery in order for the transaction to clear at the highest price possible. The Company is unaware of alternative uses for the property that would be in excess of the sale price in the letter of intent.

XML

REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]

REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

On May 2, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of 80 percent of Impo. The noncontrolling interest holders have the option, which is embedded in the noncontrolling interest, to require the Company to redeem their ownership interests beginning after May 2, 2014, three years after the original agreement was signed. The combination of a noncontrolling interest and a redemption feature resulted in a redeemable noncontrolling interest.

The 20 percent noncontrolling interest in Impo is redeemable at other than fair value as the redemption value is determined based on a specified formula.  The noncontrolling interest becomes redeemable after the passage of time, and therefore the Company records the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest at the greater of (1) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interest's share of net income or loss and its share of other comprehensive income or loss and dividends (“carrying amount”) or (2) the redemption value which is determined based on the greater of the redemption floor value or the then-current specified earnings multiple.  As of September 29, 2012, the Impo redeemable noncontrolling interest was recorded at the carrying amount.

According to FASB ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, and Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Topic No. D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities, redeemable noncontrolling interests issued in the form of common securities, to the extent that the noncontrolling interest holder has a contractual right to receive an amount upon share redemption that is other than the fair value of such shares, then the noncontrolling interest holder has, in substance, received a dividend distribution that is different from other common shareholders. Therefore, adjustments to the noncontrolling interest to reflect the redemption amount should be reflected in the computation of earnings per share using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, the Company has elected to treat as a dividend only the portion of the periodic redemption value adjustment (if any) that reflects a redemption value in excess of fair value.  As the redeemable noncontrolling interest for Impo is recorded at the carrying amount, no adjustments were necessary for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012. Adjustments totaling $0.2 million and $0.5 million resulting from the Company's previously held redeemable noncontrolling interest in Vertical S.p.A. ("Vertical") were necessary for the third quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively, and were included in the related earnings per share computations (see Note 11). The noncontrolling interest in Vertical was redeemed by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2011.

XML

RESTRUCTURING

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]

RESTRUCTURING

RESTRUCTURING

In June 2011, the Company announced Phase IV of the Global Manufacturing Realignment Program. The Company transferred approximately 260,000 annual man hours of manufacturing activity from the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma facility primarily to the Linares, Mexico facility with a small portion transferred to another Oklahoma City based facility. Transfers related to the Oklahoma City facility were substantially complete at the end of the first quarter 2012. The Company also expects to incur miscellaneous expenses associated with realignments and movements of manufacturing and distribution facilities in a variety of international locations, including the relocation to a new manufacturing facility in Joinville, Brazil.

The Company has estimated the pretax charge for Phase IV to be between $2.6 million and $5.2 million, of which $1.2 million to $3.5 million is for closing the Oklahoma City manufacturing facility. Charges related to Phase IV began in the second quarter of 2011 and will substantially end in the fourth quarter of 2012, with the exception of asset dispositions, which may be incomplete at the end of 2012. Phase IV charges include severance, equipment relocation, and asset write-offs. The Company expects approximately 50.0 to 60.0 percent of the charges will be non-cash.

Costs incurred in the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012, included in the “Restructuring (income)/expense” line of the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income, are as follows:

(In millions)	Third Quarter Ended
	September 29, 2012
	Water Systems		Fueling Systems		Other		Consolidated
Equipment relocation	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Asset write-off	0.1		—		—		0.1
Asset sale	—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—
Total	$	0.1	$	—	$	—	$	0.1

(In millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012
	Water Systems			Fueling Systems		Other		Consolidated
Equipment relocation	$	0.1		$	—	$	—	$	0.1
Asset write-off	0.3			—		—		0.3
Asset sale	(0.4		)	—		—		(0.4		)
Other	0.1			—		—		0.1
Total	$	0.1		$	—	$	—	$	0.1

Restructuring expenses of $0.6 million and $1.5 million were incurred in the third quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively, primarily for the Water Systems realignment.

As of September 29, 2012, there were no restructuring reserves. As of October 1, 2011, there was $0.2 million in restructuring reserves primarily for severance.

XML

EQUITY ROLL FORWARD

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

EQUITY ROLL FORWARD

EQUITY ROLL FORWARD

The schedule below sets forth equity changes for the nine months ended September 29, 2012:

(In thousands)
Description	Common			Additional Paid in Capital		Retained Earnings			Minimum Pension Liability			Cumulative Translation Adjustment			Non controlling Interest			Total Equity			Redeemable Non controlling Interest
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	2,333		$	144,609	$	350,457		$	(47,219	)	$	(2,045	)	$	2,303		$	450,438		$	5,407
Net income						69,719									339			70,058			351
Dividends on common stock						(9,959		)										(9,959		)
Noncontrolling dividend															(444		)	(444		)
Common stock issued	44			11,752														11,796
Common stock repurchased or received for stock options exercised	(32		)			(16,452		)										(16,484		)
Share-based compensation	5			4,228														4,233
Tax benefit of stock options exercised				3,672														3,672
Currency translation adjustment												649			209			858			(574		)
Pension liability, net of taxes									1,122									1,122
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	2,350		$	164,261	$	393,765		$	(46,097	)	$	(1,396	)	$	2,407		$	515,290		$	5,184

XML

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Plans - As of September 29, 2012, the Company maintained two domestic pension plans and three German pension plans. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for these plans.

Other Benefits - The Company's other postretirement benefit plan provides health and life insurance benefits to domestic employees hired prior to 1992.

Effective for 2012, the Company redesigned certain U.S. retirement plan offerings. The redesign was completed in order to increase standardization of retirement plans among U.S. salaried employees and to reduce the expected cash funding volatility of retirement plans, while at the same time keeping in place a competitive retirement plan offering to attract and retain talent. The Company achieved this by freezing benefit accruals under both the Basic Pension Plan and the Cash Balance Plan as of December 31, 2011, with the exception of a limited number of Basic Pension Plan participants who will continue to accrue benefits over a five year sunset period. Also effective December 31, 2011, the Cash Balance Plan was closed to new participants (the Basic Retirement Plan was previously closed to new participants in 2006). The Basic Retirement Plan and Cash Balance Plan were merged effective December 31, 2011. As of January 1, 2012, the Company instituted a new service-based contribution, supplemental to the existing Company match for employees, into the defined contribution retirement plan offerings.

The following table sets forth the aggregated net periodic benefit cost for all pension plans for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively:

(In millions)	Pension Benefits
	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
Service cost	$	0.4		$	0.7		$	1.2		$	2.6
Interest cost	2.2			2.0			6.4			7.2
Expected return on assets	(2.7		)	(2.3		)	(7.9		)	(8.8		)
Amortization of transition obligation	—			—			—			—
Prior service cost	—			—			—			0.1
Loss	0.5			0.8			1.5			2.7
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	0.4		$	1.2		$	1.2		$	3.8

(In millions)	Other Benefits
	Third Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011		September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Service cost	$	0.1	$	—	$	0.1	$	—
Interest cost	0.1		0.2		0.4		0.5
Expected return on assets	—		—		—		—
Amortization of transition obligation	—		—		0.1		0.1
Prior service cost	—		0.1		0.2		0.1
Loss	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	0.3	$	0.4	$	0.9	$	0.8

In the nine months ended September 29, 2012, the Company made contributions to the funded plans of $4.8 million. The amount of contributions to be made to the plans during calendar year 2012 was finalized September 15, 2012, based upon the plans' year-end valuation at December 31, 2011, and the funding level required for the plan year ended December 31, 2011.

XML

OTHER ASSETS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Other Assets [Abstract]

OTHER ASSETS

OTHER ASSETS

In 2005, the Company acquired a 35.0 percent equity interest in PPI, which was accounted for using the equity method. During the first quarter of 2012, the shareholders of PPI and PPL contributed shares to form a new holding company, PPH, in exchange for equivalent value and control in PPH. As a result of this contribution, the Company's equity interest decreased to 31.0 percent of PPH. On March 7, 2012, the Company acquired a controlling interest in PPH, resulting in the consolidation of PPH in the Company's financial statements (see Note 3). The carrying amount of the equity investment prior to the acquisition of the controlling interest was $11.7 million as of March 6, 2012 and $11.0 million as of December 31, 2011.  The Company’s proportionate share of earnings, included in the “Other income/(expense)” line of the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income, was $0.4 million through March 6, 2012 and $0.8 million and $1.9 million for the third quarter and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively.

During the second quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the parent of a customer.  The current maturity portion is included in the "Receivables" line while the long-term portion is included in the "Other assets" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets. The agreement provides for interest on the loan at a variable market interest rate with the customer to repay the loan plus interest in semi-annual installments throughout the seven-year term.  The Company has a long-term relationship with the customer and considers the loan fully collectible.

XML

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

The carrying amounts of the Company's intangible assets are as follows:

(In millions)	September 29, 2012					December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangibles:
Patents	$	7.8	$	(5.6	)	$	7.8	$	(5.4	)
Supply agreements	4.4		(4.4		)	4.4		(4.4		)
Technology	7.5		(3.1		)	7.5		(2.7		)
Customer relationships	118.9		(21.3		)	78.7		(17.1		)
Software	1.0		(0.1		)	1.2		—
Other	1.1		(1.1		)	1.2		(1.1		)
Total	$	140.7	$	(35.6	)	$	100.8	$	(30.7	)
Unamortized intangibles:
Trade names	45.3		—			24.4		—
Total intangibles	$	186.0	$	(35.6	)	$	125.2	$	(30.7	)

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the third quarters ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively, and $5.2 million and $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively.

Amortization expense is projected as follows:

(In millions)	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016
	$	7.0	$	7.7	$	7.7	$	7.7	$	7.7

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting segment for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, is as follows:

(In millions)	Water Systems			Fueling Systems		Consolidated
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	109.9		$	58.9	$	168.8
Acquisitions	32.0			—		32.0
Adjustments to prior year acquisitions	—			—		—
Foreign currency translation	(0.4		)	0.2		(0.2		)
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	141.5		$	59.1	$	200.6

The acquired goodwill in the Water Systems segment for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, related to the Company's acquisition of PPH and Cerus.

XML

INCOME TAXES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate continues to be lower than the United States statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to the indefinite reinvestment of foreign earnings taxed at rates below the U.S. statutory rate as well as recognition of foreign tax credits.  The Company has the ability to indefinitely reinvest these foreign earnings based on the earnings and cash projections of its other operations as well as cash on hand and available credit.

As of the beginning of fiscal year 2012, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $5.6 million, excluding accrued interest and penalties.  The unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $0.5 million for state income tax liabilities and $0.4 million for federal income tax liabilities based on state audits settled and evaluations made during the first nine months of 2012.  The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest and penalties, of $4.7 million as of September 29, 2012.

If recognized, the annual effective tax rate would be affected by the net unrecognized tax benefits of $4.5 million as of September 29, 2012.

Of the unrecognized tax benefits at September 29, 2012, $2.6 million are related to acquisitions for which indemnification was provided for in the respective purchase agreements.  The stock purchase agreements related to these acquisitions provide the Company with rights to recover tax liabilities related to pre-acquisition tax years from the sellers.  Other amounts are associated with domestic state tax issues, such as nexus, as well as other federal and state uncertain tax positions.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense, the impact of which is immaterial.  The Company has accrued interest and penalties as of September 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, of approximately $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, as of September 29, 2012, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008.

It is reasonably possible that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits could change up to $0.9 million in the next twelve months as a result of an audit or due to the expiration of a statute of limitation.

XML

RESTRUCTURING (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Restructuring and Related Activities [Abstract]

Schedule of Restructuring Cost Incurred, Included in Restructuring Expense

Costs incurred in the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012, included in the “Restructuring (income)/expense” line of the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income, are as follows:

(In millions)	Third Quarter Ended
	September 29, 2012
	Water Systems		Fueling Systems		Other		Consolidated
Equipment relocation	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Asset write-off	0.1		—		—		0.1
Asset sale	—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—
Total	$	0.1	$	—	$	—	$	0.1

(In millions)	Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012
	Water Systems			Fueling Systems		Other		Consolidated
Equipment relocation	$	0.1		$	—	$	—	$	0.1
Asset write-off	0.3			—		—		0.3
Asset sale	(0.4		)	—		—		(0.4		)
Other	0.1			—		—		0.1
Total	$	0.1		$	—	$	—	$	0.1

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012
Commitments
Commitments for the purchase of machinery and equipment and building expansions	$ 29.8
Product Warranties Disclosures
Standard manufacture warranty obligation term (in years)	2 years
Standard installation warranty obligation term (in years)	1 year
Extended warranty obligation term (in years)	5 years
Changes in the Carrying Amount of the Warranty Accrual
Beginning balance	9.9
Accruals related to product warranties	5.0
Additions related to acquisitions	0.4
Reductions for payments made	(5.6)
Ending balance	9.7
California Air Resources Board
Loss Contingencies
Penalties sought	25.0
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District | Minimum
Loss Contingencies
Penalties sought	5.0
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Loss Contingencies
Penalties sought	12.5
StaRite Industries LLC and Pentair Inc | Minimum
Loss Contingencies
Penalties sought	$ 10.0

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In August 2010, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) filed a civil complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company and Franklin Fueling Systems, Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company).  The complaint relates to a third-party-supplied component part of the Company's Healy 900 Series nozzle, which is part of the Company's Enhanced Vapor Recovery (“EVR”) Systems installed in California gasoline filling stations.  This part, a diaphragm, was the subject of a retrofit during the first half of 2008.  As the Company previously reported, in October 2008 CARB issued a Notice of Violation to the Company alleging that the circumstances leading to the retrofit program violated California statutes and regulations.  The Company and CARB worked to resolve the diaphragm matter without court action, but were unable to reach agreement.

The claims in the complaintmirror those that CARB presented to the Company in the Notice of Violation, and include claims that the Company negligently and intentionally sold nozzles with a modified diaphragm without required CARB certification.  The Company believes that, throughout the period to which the complaint relates, it acted in full cooperation with CARB and in the best interests of CARB's vapor emissions control program.  Although the complaint seeks penalties of at least $25.0 million, it is the Company's position that there is no reasonable basis for penalties of this amount.

In addition, as the Company has previously reported, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (“SMAQMD”) issued a Notice of Violation to the Company concerning the diaphragm matter in March 2008.  Discussions with that agency about the circumstances leading to the retrofit in its jurisdiction and the resolution of the agency's concerns did not result in agreement, and in November 2010 SMAQMD filed a civil complaint in the Sacramento Superior Court, mirroring the claims brought by CARB with respect to the diaphragm issue and also alleging violation of SMAQMD rules.  SMAQMD's suit asks for at least $5.0 million in penalties for the violations claimed in its jurisdiction.

In July 2010, the Company entered into a tolling agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) and began discussions with that agency about the circumstances leading to the retrofit in its jurisdiction and the resolution of the agency's concerns.  Those discussions did not result in agreement and in December 2010, SCAQMD filed a civil complaint against the Company in Los Angeles Superior Court.  The complaint alleges violations of California statutes and regulations, similar to the complaint filed by CARB, as well as violation of SCAQMD rules, and seeks penalties of at least $12.5 million.  The SCAQMD complaint does not allege an intentional violation of any statute, rule, or regulation. This case has now been consolidated with the CARB case in Los Angeles Superior Court.

The Company believes that there is no reasonable basis for the amount of penalties claimed in the SMAQMD and SCAQMD suits.  The Company has answered the SMAQMD and SCAQMD complaints, as well as the CARB complaint, denying liability and asserting affirmative defenses. Discovery in all these cases commenced but has been stayed until October 31, 2012, and the consolidated CARB and SCAQMD cases are set for trial on December 17, 2012.

Neither CARB's filing of its suit nor the air district suits have any effect on CARB's certification of the Company's EVR System or any other products of the Company or its subsidiaries, and so do not interfere with continuing sales.  CARB has never decertified the Company's EVR System and does not propose to do so now.

The Company remains willing to discuss these matters and work toward resolving them.  The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of discussions to resolve these matters or any proceedings with respect to them.  Penalties awarded in the CARB or any air district proceedings or payments resulting from a settlement of these matters, depending on the amount, could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

On July 31, 2009, Sta-Rite Industries, LLC and Pentair, Inc. filed an action against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, alleging breach of the parties' 2004 Settlement Agreement and tortious interference with contract based on the Company's pricing of submersible electric products and seeking damages in excess of $10.0 million for each claimant.  The Company has denied liability, is defending the case vigorously, and has filed a counterclaim alleging Sta-Rite and Pentair's breach of the same Settlement Agreement.  Both the Company and Sta-Rite/Pentair filed Motions for Summary Judgment. The judge granted the Company's motion and dismissed Sta-Rite/Pentair's claims against it in September 2011. The judge also granted Sta-Rite/Pentair's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the Company's counterclaim. Sta-Rite/Pentair is appealing the dismissal of its claims.  The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments for November 29, 2012. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, and any settlement or adjudication of this matter, depending on the amount, could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

The Company is defending various other claims and legal actions, including environmental matters, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, based on current knowledge of the facts and after discussion with counsel, these claims and legal actions can be successfully defended or resolved without a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, and net cash flows.

As of September 29, 2012, the Company had $29.8 million of commitments primarily for conditional agreements related to building expansions as well as for the purchase of machinery and equipment.

The Company provides warranties on most of its products. The warranty terms vary but are generally two years from date of manufacture or one year from date of installation. In 2007, the Company began offering an extended warranty program to certain Water Systems customers which provides warranty coverage up to five years from the date of manufacture. Provisions for estimated expenses related to product warranty are made at the time products are sold or when specific warranty issues are identified. These estimates are established using historical information about the nature, frequency, and average cost of warranty claims. The Company actively studies trends of warranty claims and takes action to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. The Company believes that the warranty reserve is appropriate; however, actual claims incurred could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserve.

The changes in the carrying amount of the warranty accrual, as recorded in the "Accrued expenses" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, are as follows:

(In millions)
Beginning balance	$	9.9
Accruals related to product warranties	5.0
Additions related to acquisitions	0.4
Reductions for payments made	(5.6		)
Ending balance	$	9.7

XML

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Carrying Amounts of Intangible Assets

The carrying amounts of the Company's intangible assets are as follows:

(In millions)	September 29, 2012					December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangibles:
Patents	$	7.8	$	(5.6	)	$	7.8	$	(5.4	)
Supply agreements	4.4		(4.4		)	4.4		(4.4		)
Technology	7.5		(3.1		)	7.5		(2.7		)
Customer relationships	118.9		(21.3		)	78.7		(17.1		)
Software	1.0		(0.1		)	1.2		—
Other	1.1		(1.1		)	1.2		(1.1		)
Total	$	140.7	$	(35.6	)	$	100.8	$	(30.7	)
Unamortized intangibles:
Trade names	45.3		—			24.4		—
Total intangibles	$	186.0	$	(35.6	)	$	125.2	$	(30.7	)

Schedule of Amortization Expense

Amortization expense is projected as follows:

(In millions)	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016
	$	7.0	$	7.7	$	7.7	$	7.7	$	7.7

Schedule of Change in the Carrying Amount of Goodwill by Reporting Segment

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting segment for the nine months ended September 29, 2012, is as follows:

(In millions)	Water Systems			Fueling Systems		Consolidated
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	109.9		$	58.9	$	168.8
Acquisitions	32.0			—		32.0
Adjustments to prior year acquisitions	—			—		—
Foreign currency translation	(0.4		)	0.2		(0.2		)
Balance as of September 29, 2012	$	141.5		$	59.1	$	200.6

XML

EQUITY ROLL FORWARD (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			$ 450,438
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, beginning balance			5,407
Net income	22,006	19,297	70,409	52,211
Equity, ending balance	515,290		515,290
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, ending balance	5,184		5,184
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, beginning balance			5,407
Net income			351
Currency translation adjustment			(574)
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, ending balance	5,184		5,184
Total Equity
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			450,438
Net income			70,058
Dividends on common stock			(9,959)
Noncontrolling dividend			(444)
Common stock issued			11,796
Common stock repurchased or received for stock options exercised			(16,484)
Share-based compensation			4,233
Tax benefit of stock options exercised			3,672
Currency translation adjustment			858
Pension liability, net of taxes			1,122
Equity, ending balance	515,290		515,290
Common
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			2,333
Common stock issued			44
Common stock repurchased or received for stock options exercised			(32)
Share-based compensation			5
Equity, ending balance	2,350		2,350
Additional Paid-in Capital
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			144,609
Common stock issued			11,752
Share-based compensation			4,228
Tax benefit of stock options exercised			3,672
Equity, ending balance	164,261		164,261
Retained Earnings
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			350,457
Net income			69,719
Dividends on common stock			(9,959)
Common stock repurchased or received for stock options exercised			(16,452)
Equity, ending balance	393,765		393,765
Minimum Pension Liability
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			(47,219)
Pension liability, net of taxes			1,122
Equity, ending balance	(46,097)		(46,097)
Cumulative Translation Adjustment
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			(2,045)
Currency translation adjustment			649
Equity, ending balance	(1,396)		(1,396)
Noncontrolling Interest
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Equity, beginning balance			2,303
Net income			339
Noncontrolling dividend			(444)
Currency translation adjustment			209
Equity, ending balance	$ 2,407		$ 2,407

XML

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL (Intangible Assets) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Sep. 29, 2012	Oct. 01, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	$ 140.7		$ 140.7		$ 100.8
Accumulated amortization	(35.6)		(35.6)		(30.7)
Gross carrying amount, total intangibles	186.0		186.0		125.2
Amortization expense, intangible assets	1.8	1.6	5.2	4.5
Future Amortization Expense
2012	7.0		7.0
2013	7.7		7.7
2014	7.7		7.7
2015	7.7		7.7
2016	7.7		7.7
Patents
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	7.8		7.8		7.8
Accumulated amortization	(5.6)		(5.6)		(5.4)
Supply Agreements
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	4.4		4.4		4.4
Accumulated amortization	(4.4)		(4.4)		(4.4)
Technology
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	7.5		7.5		7.5
Accumulated amortization	(3.1)		(3.1)		(2.7)
Customer Relationships
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	118.9		118.9		78.7
Accumulated amortization	(21.3)		(21.3)		(17.1)
Software
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	1.0		1.0		1.2
Accumulated amortization	(0.1)		(0.1)		0
Other
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, amortized intangibles	1.1		1.1		1.2
Accumulated amortization	(1.1)		(1.1)		(1.1)
Trade Names
Intangible Assets
Gross carrying amount, unamortized intangibles	$ 45.3		$ 45.3		$ 24.4

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 29, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Current assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts (in dollars)	$ 3,512	$ 2,964
Shareowners' equity:
Common shares, authorized	65,000	65,000
Common shares, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.10	$ 0.10
Common shares, outstanding	23,507	23,339

XML

ACQUISITIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Business Combinations [Abstract]

ACQUISITIONS

ACQUISITIONS

In an agreement dated March 7, 2012, between the Company and Pioneer Pump Holdings, Inc. ("PPH"), the Company acquired an additional 39.5 percent of the outstanding shares of PPH, net of debt acquired, for approximately $30.3 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. The Company funded the acquisition with approximately $30.3 million in cash. The Company previously held a 31.0 percent equity interest in PPH (see Note 6). As a result of the additional acquisition, the Company's total equity interest in PPH increased to 70.5 percent, resulting in the consolidation of PPH in the Company's financial statements. Accordingly, the original equity interest in PPH was remeasured to its fair value of $23.9 million as of March 7, 2012, based on the income approach which utilized management estimates and consultation with an independent third-party valuation firm. Inputs included an analysis of the enterprise value based on financial projections and ownership percentages. As a result, the Company recognized a one-time gain of $12.2 million in the "Other income/(expense)" line of the Company's condensed consolidated statement of income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2012.

PPH is the holding company for two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pioneer Pump, Inc. ("PPI") located in Canby, Oregon, and Pioneer Pump, Ltd. ("PPL") located in Rattlesden, United Kingdom, which holds an additional subsidiary in Wadeville, Germiston, South Africa. PPH is a leader in the manufacture of large, engine-driven centrifugal pumps used for dewatering in oil and gas, municipal, construction, and mining applications.

The Company also entered into a further stock purchase agreement with the noncontrolling interest holders to purchase the remaining shares of PPH on or about, but no later than, March 31, 2015, for a purchase price based on a multiple of PPH's adjusted average earnings for 2013 and 2014 less net indebtedness. Accordingly, a resulting liability of $22.9 million was recorded in the "Other long-term liabilities" line of the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. Any required adjustments to the liability driven by changes in the expected purchase price will be recorded in the "Interest expense" line of the Company's condensed consolidated statement of income. The mandatory share purchase liability remained recorded at the initial carrying amount as of September 29, 2012. As a result, no adjustments were necessary for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012.

The PPH intangible assets of $43.9 million consist primarily of customer relationships, which will be amortized utilizing the straight line method over 17 to 19 years, and trademarks, which are classified as indefinite lived assets and will not be amortized.

The preliminary goodwill of $26.5 million resulting from the PPH acquisition consists primarily of expanding sales of packaged systems products and the recording of deferred taxes related to acquired assets. PPH's presence in the oil and gas market will also complement the Company's initiative to introduce submersible pumping systems in this market. All of the goodwill was recorded as part of the Water Systems segment and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Preliminary goodwill increased by $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 29, 2012, due to purchase accounting adjustments to intangible assets and inventory resulting from additional information provided for the provisional valuation.

In an agreement dated August 9, 2012, between the Company and Cerus Industrial Corporation (“Cerus”), the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Cerus, net of debt acquired, for approximately $24.5 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. The Company funded the acquisition with cash on hand and short-term borrowings paid back within the period.

Cerus, located in Hillsboro, Oregon, designs, manufactures, and distributes motor controls, motor starters, contactors, protection devices, and variable frequency drives to a wide range of distributor and original equipment manufacturers in North America.

The Cerus intangible assets of $17.3 million consist primarily of customer relationships, which will be amortized utilizing the straight line method over 17 years, and trademarks, which are classified as indefinite lived assets and will not be amortized.

The preliminary goodwill of $5.5 million resulting from the Cerus acquisition consists primarily of accelerated growth resulting from increased technical and product development capacity, broadened product lines, reduced manufacturing costs, and movement into adjacent market areas. All of the goodwill was recorded as part of the Water Systems segment and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The preliminary purchase prices assigned to the major identifiable assets and liabilities for the PPH and Cerus acquisitions are as follows:

(In millions)	PPH			Cerus			Total
Assets:
Cash acquired	$	0.8		$	—		$	0.8
Current assets	38.1			3.8			41.9
Property, plant, and equipment	3.6			0.3			3.9
Intangible assets	43.9			17.3			61.2
Goodwill	26.5			5.5			32.0
Total assets	112.9			26.9			139.8
Liabilities	(58.7		)	(2.4		)	(61.1		)
Total	54.2			24.5			78.7
Less: Fair value of original equity interest	(23.9		)	—			(23.9		)
Total purchase price	$	30.3		$	24.5		$	54.8

The fair values of the PPH and Cerus identifiable intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment are provisional amounts pending final valuations and purchase accounting adjustments. The Company utilized management estimates and consultation with an independent third-party valuation firm to assist in the valuations. Transaction costs were expensed as incurred under the guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, Business Combinations.  Transaction costs included in the "Selling, general, and administrative expenses" line of the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income were $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2012.

The results of operations of PPH and Cerus were included in the Company's condensed consolidated statement of income, from the respective acquisition dates through the third quarter ended September 29, 2012. The difference between actual sales for the Company and proforma sales including PPH and Cerus as if they were acquired at the beginning of each period was not material as a component of the Company's consolidated sales for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively. Due to the immaterial nature of the acquisitions, the Company has not included full year proforma statements of income for the acquisition year and previous year.

The fair values of the identifiable intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment for the 2011 Impo Motor Pompa Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (“Impo”) acquisition were final as of the first quarter ended March 31, 2012.  The Company utilized management estimates and consultation with an independent third-party valuation firm to assist in the valuation.  No adjustments were required as a result of the final valuation to the preliminary amounts previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

XML

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Aggregated Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Benefit Cost

The following table sets forth the aggregated net periodic benefit cost for all pension plans for the third quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively:

(In millions)	Pension Benefits
	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
Service cost	$	0.4		$	0.7		$	1.2		$	2.6
Interest cost	2.2			2.0			6.4			7.2
Expected return on assets	(2.7		)	(2.3		)	(7.9		)	(8.8		)
Amortization of transition obligation	—			—			—			—
Prior service cost	—			—			—			0.1
Loss	0.5			0.8			1.5			2.7
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	0.4		$	1.2		$	1.2		$	3.8

(In millions)	Other Benefits
	Third Quarter Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011		September 29, 2012		October 1, 2011
Service cost	$	0.1	$	—	$	0.1	$	—
Interest cost	0.1		0.2		0.4		0.5
Expected return on assets	—		—		—		—
Amortization of transition obligation	—		—		0.1		0.1
Prior service cost	—		0.1		0.2		0.1
Loss	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Total net periodic benefit cost	$	0.3	$	0.4	$	0.9	$	0.8

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 29, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Recurring Basis | Estimate of Fair Value
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Cash equivalents	$ 14.7	$ 17.1
Derivative assets	0	0.1
Recurring Basis | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Cash equivalents	14.7	17.1
Derivative assets	0	0
Recurring Basis | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Cash equivalents	0	0
Derivative assets	0	0.1
Recurring Basis | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Cash equivalents	0	0
Derivative assets	0	0
Nonrecurring Basis
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Asset held for sale	1.1	1.3
Recognized loss	3.6	3.4
Nonrecurring Basis | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Asset held for sale	0	0
Nonrecurring Basis | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Asset held for sale	0	0
Nonrecurring Basis | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
Asset held for sale	$ 1.1	$ 1.3

XML

SEGMENT INFORMATION

9 Months Ended

Sep. 29, 2012

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

SEGMENT INFORMATION

SEGMENT INFORMATION

Financial information by reportable business segment is included in the following summary:

	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In millions)	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
	Net sales to external customers
Water Systems	$	189.8		$	179.4		$	557.5		$	510.1
Fueling Systems	47.8			45.0			128.7			123.7
Other	—			—			—			—
Consolidated	$	237.6		$	224.4		$	686.2		$	633.8
	Third Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011			September 29, 2012			October 1, 2011
	Operating income (loss)
Water Systems	$	35.1		$	29.0		$	102.0		$	86.7
Fueling Systems	11.4			9.6			26.0			22.2
Other	(13.0		)	(10.3		)	(36.0		)	(31.8		)
Consolidated	$	33.5		$	28.3		$	92.0		$	77.1
	September 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Total assets
Water Systems	$	707.9		$	535.3
Fueling Systems	233.5			222.2
Other	23.4			72.0
Consolidated	$	964.8		$	829.5

Cash is the major asset group in “Other” of total assets.