DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Commodity Derivatives

Forest periodically enters into commodity derivative instruments such as swap and collar agreements as an attempt to moderate the effects of wide fluctuations in commodity prices on Forest’s cash flow and to manage the exposure to commodity price risk. Forest’s commodity derivative instruments generally serve as effective economic hedges of commodity price exposure; however, Forest has elected not to designate its derivatives as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. As such, Forest recognizes all changes in fair value of its derivative instruments as unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The table below sets forth Forest’s outstanding commodity swaps as of September 30, 2012.

Commodity Swaps
	Natural Gas (NYMEX HH)			Oil (NYMEX WTI)			NGL (OPIS Refined Products)
Remaining Term	Bbtu Per Day	Weighted Average Hedged Price per MMBtu		Barrels Per Day	Weighted Average Hedged Price per Bbl		Barrels Per Day	Weighted Average Hedged Price per Bbl
October 2012 - December 2012(1)	155	$	4.63	4,500	$	97.26	2,000	$	45.22
Calendar 2013	160	3.98		4,000	95.53		—	—

____________________________________________

(1) 50 Bbtu per day of 2012 gas swaps with a weighted average hedged price per MMBtu of $5.30 are layered with a written put of $3.53 and a call spread of $4.00 to $4.50. Together with the put and call spread, Forest will receive the $5.30 swap price on 50 Bbtu per day except as follows: Forest will receive (i) NYMEX HH plus $1.77 when NYMEX HH is below $3.53; (ii) $5.30 plus the value of the call spread when NYMEX HH is between $4.00 and $4.50; and (iii) $5.80 when NYMEX HH is $4.50 or above.

In connection with several natural gas and oil swaps entered into, Forest granted option instruments (several commodity swaptions and puts) to the swap counterparties in exchange for Forest receiving premium hedged prices on the natural gas and oil swaps. Under the terms of the commodity swaption agreements, the counterparties have the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a specified swap agreement with Forest before the option expires. The table below sets forth key provisions of the outstanding options as of September 30, 2012. (As of October 24, 2012, none of the options in the table have been exercised by the counterparties.)

Commodity Options
		Natural Gas (NYMEX HH)			Oil (NYMEX WTI)
Underlying Term	Option Expiration	Underlying Bbtu Per Day	Underlying Hedged Price per MMBtu		Underlying Barrels Per Day	Underlying Hedged Price per Bbl
Gas Swaptions:
Calendar 2013	December 2012	30	$	4.02	—	$	—
Calendar 2013	December 2012	10	4.01		—	—
Oil Swaptions:
Calendar 2013	December 2012	—	—		2,000	95.00
Calendar 2014	December 2013	—	—		2,000	110.00
Calendar 2014	December 2013	—	—		1,000	109.00
Calendar 2014	December 2013	—	—		2,000	100.00
Calendar 2015	December 2014	—	—		3,000	100.00
Oil Put Options:
Monthly Oct - Dec 2012	Monthly Oct - Dec 2012	—	—		5,000	75.00

Derivative Instruments Entered Into Subsequent to September 30, 2012

Subsequent to September 30, 2012, through October 24, 2012, we entered into the following derivative agreements:

Commodity Swaps
	Natural Gas (NYMEX HH)
Swap Term	Bbtu Per Day	Weighted Average Hedged Price per MMBtu
Calendar 2014(1)	40	$	4.50

____________________________________

(1) In connection with entering into these natural gas swaps with premium hedged prices, Forest granted options to the counterparties to enter into gas swaps with Forest for Calendar 2014 covering 40 Bbtu per day at a weighted average hedged price per MMBtu of $4.50, with such options expiring in December 2013.

Interest Rate Derivatives

Forest periodically enters into interest rate derivative instruments in an attempt to manage the mix of fixed and floating interest rates within its debt portfolio. The Company has elected not to designate its derivatives as hedging instruments. As such, the Company recognizes all changes in fair value of its derivative instruments as unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The table below sets forth Forest’s outstanding fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2012.

Interest Rate Swaps
Remaining Term	Notional Amount (In Thousands)		Weighted Average Floating Rate	Weighted Average Fixed Rate
October 2012 - February 2014	$	500,000	1 month LIBOR + 5.89%	8.50	%

Fair Value and Gains and Losses

The table below summarizes the location and fair value amounts of Forest’s derivative instruments reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates indicated. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. For financial reporting purposes, Forest does not offset asset and liability fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments with the same counterparty under its master netting arrangements. See Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the fair values of Forest’s derivative instruments.

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(In Thousands)
Current assets:
Commodity derivatives:
Derivative instruments	$	32,369	$	79,487
Interest rate derivatives:
Derivative instruments	11,484		10,134
Total current assets	$	43,853	$	89,621
Long-term assets:
Commodity derivatives:
Derivative instruments	$	913	$	—
Interest rate derivatives:
Derivative instruments	4,360		10,422
Total long-term assets	$	5,273	$	10,422
Current liabilities:
Commodity derivatives:
Derivative instruments	$	7,759	$	28,944
Long-term liabilities:
Commodity derivatives:
Derivative instruments	$	16,640	$	—

The table below summarizes the amount of derivative instrument gains and losses reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as net realized and unrealized (gains) losses on derivative instruments for the periods indicated. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Commodity derivatives:
Realized gains	$	(26,242	)	$	(8,639	)	$	(78,637	)	$	(21,478	)
Unrealized losses (gains)	50,231			(51,886		)	41,659			(36,113		)
Interest rate derivatives:
Realized gains	(2,758		)	(2,774		)	(8,479		)	(8,616		)
Unrealized losses (gains)	1,564			(2,662		)	4,713			(4,425		)
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on derivative instruments, net	$	22,795		$	(65,961	)	$	(40,744	)	$	(70,632	)

Due to the volatility of natural gas and liquids prices, the estimated fair values of Forest’s commodity derivative instruments are subject to large fluctuations from period to period. Forest has experienced the effects of these commodity price fluctuations in both the current period and prior periods and expects that volatility in commodity prices will continue.

Credit Risk

Forest executes with each of its derivative counterparties an International Swap and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) Master Agreement, which is a standard industry form contract containing general terms and conditions applicable to many types of derivative transactions. Additionally, Forest executes, with each of its derivative counterparties, a Schedule, which modifies the terms and conditions of the ISDA Master Agreement according to the parties’ requirements and the specific types of derivatives to be traded. As of September 30, 2012, all but one of Forest’s derivative counterparties are lenders, or affiliates of lenders, under the Credit Facility.  The terms of the Credit Facility provide that any security granted by Forest thereunder shall also extend to and be available to those lenders that are counterparties to derivative transactions. None of these counterparties requires collateral beyond that already pledged under the Credit Facility.  The remaining counterparty, a purchaser of Forest’s natural gas production, generally owes money to Forest and therefore does not require collateral under the ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule it has executed with Forest.

The ISDA Master Agreements and Schedules contain cross-default provisions whereby a default under the Credit Facility will also cause a default under the derivative agreements. Such events of default include non-payment, breach of warranty, non-performance of the financial covenant, default on other indebtedness, certain pension plan events, certain adverse judgments, change of control, and a failure of the liens securing the Credit Facility.  In addition, bankruptcy and insolvency events with respect to Forest or certain of its U.S. subsidiaries will result in an automatic acceleration of the indebtedness under the Credit Facility. None of these events of default is specifically credit-related, but some could arise if there were a general deterioration of Forest’s credit. The ISDA Master Agreements and Schedules contain a further credit-related termination event that would occur if Forest were to merge with another entity and the creditworthiness of the resulting entity was materially weaker than that of Forest.

The majority of Forest’s derivative counterparties are financial institutions that are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics that, in general, could cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Forest does not require the posting of collateral for its benefit under its derivative agreements. However, the ISDA Master Agreements and Schedules generally contain netting provisions whereby if on any date amounts would otherwise be payable by each party to the other, then on such date, the party that owes the larger amount will pay the excess of that amount over the smaller amount owed by the other party, thus satisfying each party’s obligations. These provisions generally apply to all derivative transactions, or all derivative transactions of the same type (e.g., commodity, interest rate, etc.), with the particular counterparty. If all counterparties failed, Forest would be exposed to a risk of loss equal to this net amount owed to Forest, the fair value of which was $28.7 million at September 30, 2012. If Forest suffered an event of default, each counterparty could demand immediate payment, subject to notification periods, of the net obligations due to it under the derivative agreements. At September 30, 2012, Forest owed a net derivative liability to threecounterparties, the fair value of which was $4.0 million. In the absence of netting provisions, at September 30, 2012, Forest would be exposed to a risk of loss of $49.1 million under its derivative agreements, and Forest’s derivative counterparties would be exposed to a risk of loss of $24.4 million.

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was enacted. As part of a broader financial regulatory reform, the Dodd-Frank Act includes derivatives reform that may impact Forest’s business. Congress delegated many of the details of the Dodd-Frank Act to federal regulatory agencies, which are in the process of writing and implementing new rules. Forest is monitoring the impact, if any, that the Dodd-Frank Act and related rules will have on its existing derivative transactions under its outstanding ISDA Master Agreements and Schedules, as well as its ability to enter into such transactions and agreements in the future.