10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                                                    to

Commission File Number:  1-7775

MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Delaware		95-0740960
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
4 North 4th Street, Richmond, Virginia		23219
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
	(804) 788-1800
	(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No[  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer “and “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes[  ] No [X]

As of July 31, 2007 there were 81,160,957 shares of common stock, $0.625 par value, outstanding.

 MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS	PAGE
Part I:   Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements	1
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	20
Part II:  Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	21
Item 1A. Risk Factors	21
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	22
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	22
Item 6. Exhibits	23
Signatures	24

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
UNAUDITED
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Revenues
Produced coal revenue	$	516,212		$	492,468		$	1,035,905		$	968,129
Freight and handling revenue		39,901			38,521			83,753			79,408
Purchased coal revenue		31,322			12,312			56,496			39,745
Other revenue		30,367			12,815			48,968			28,304
Total revenues		617,802			556,116			1,225,122			1,115,586
Costs and expenses
Cost of produced coal revenue		408,992			413,768			811,508			808,977
Freight and handling costs		39,901			38,521			83,753			79,408
Cost of purchased coal revenue		27,185			11,425			49,345			34,386
Depreciation, depletion and amortization, applicable to:
Cost of produced coal revenue		59,454			56,411			120,791			112,254
Selling, general and administrative		793			840			1,605			1,691
Selling, general and administrative		19,664			13,238			38,353			30,693
Other expense		1,686			1,576			4,082			3,550
Total costs and expenses		557,675			535,779			1,109,437			1,070,959
Income before interest and taxes		60,127			20,337			115,685			44,627
Interest income		6,819			5,176			12,228			10,115
Interest expense		(21,630	)		(21,631	)		(43,067	)		(43,243	)
Income before taxes		45,316			3,882			84,846			11,499
Income tax expense		(10,378	)		(657	)		(17,301	)		(2,024	)
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change		34,938			3,225			67,545			9,475
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		-			-			-			(639	)
Net income	$	34,938		$	3,225		$	67,545		$	8,836
Income per share - Basic
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.43		$	0.04		$	0.84		$	0.12
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-			-			-			(0.01	)
Net income	$	0.43		$	0.04		$	0.84		$	0.11
Income per share - Diluted
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.43		$	0.04		$	0.83		$	0.12
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-			-			-			(0.01	)
Net income	$	0.43		$	0.04		$	0.83		$	0.11
Shares used to calculate income per share
Basic		80,638			81,076			80,600			81,308
Diluted		81,672			81,856			81,347			82,024
Dividends per share	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.08		$	0.08

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1

MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
UNAUDITED
	June 30,		December 31,
	2007			2006*
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	321,869	$	239,245
Trade and other accounts receivable, less allowance of $445 and $576,
respectively		201,318		197,105
Inventories		207,407		191,056
Other current assets		167,126		172,322
Total current assets		897,720		799,728
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		1,797,352		1,776,781
Other Noncurrent Assets
Pension assets		32,662		34,974
Other		124,668		129,213
Total other noncurrent assets		157,330		164,187
Total assets	$	2,852,402	$	2,740,696

* Amounts at December 31, 2006 have been derived from audited financial statements.

(Continued On Next Page)

2

MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
UNAUDITED
	June 30,			December 31,
	2007				2006*
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, principally trade and bank overdrafts	$	148,402		$	117,157
Current portion of debt		1,797			2,583
Payroll and employee benefits		35,033			40,380
Income taxes payable		25,372			19,412
Other current liabilities		180,943			175,005
Total current liabilities		391,547			354,537
Noncurrent Liabilities
Long-term debt		1,102,418			1,102,324
Deferred taxes		113,164			116,690
Other noncurrent liabilities		473,676			469,854
Total noncurrent liabilities		1,689,258			1,688,868
Shareholders’ Equity
Capital stock
Preferred – authorized 20,000,000 shares without par value; none issued		-			-
Common – authorized 150,000,000 shares of $0.625 par value; issued
82,459,957 and 82,365,259 shares at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively		51,523			51,458
Treasury stock, 1,299,000 shares at cost		(49,995	)		(49,995	)
Additional capital		228,080			220,650
Retained earnings		582,171			515,894
Other comprehensive loss		(40,182	)		(40,716	)
Total shareholders’ equity		771,597			697,291
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,852,402		$	2,740,696

* Amounts at December 31, 2006 have been derived from audited financial statements.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
UNAUDITED
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	67,545		$	8,836
Adjustments to reconcile Net income to Cash provided by operating
activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-			639
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		122,396			113,945
Share-based compensation expense		5,867			2,963
Deferred income taxes		(5,299	)		(2,095	)
Gain on disposal of assets		(11,831	)		(8,450	)
Gain on reserve exchange		(10,284	)		-
Asset retirement obligations accretion		5,850			5,085
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable		(7,056	)		(26,172	)
Increase in inventories		(16,351	)		(7,349	)
Decrease in other current assets		5,196			28,331
Decrease in pension and other assets		5,044			6,251
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and bank overdrafts		31,245			(7,090	)
Increase in accrued income taxes		5,960			20,254
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities		2,399			(15,463	)
Increase in other noncurrent liabilities		12,723			10,017
Asset retirement obligations payments		(4,679	)		(1,828	)
Cash provided by operating activities		208,725			127,874
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(136,606	)		(161,566	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		17,024			9,792
Cash utilized by investing activities		(119,582	)		(151,774	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Stock repurchase		-			(49,995	)
Repayments of capital lease obligations		(1,698	)		(6,644	)
Cash dividends paid		(6,449	)		(6,328	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		1,144			796
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises		484			604
Cash utilized by financing activities		(6,519	)		(61,567	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		82,624			(85,467	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		239,245			319,418
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	321,869		$	233,951

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

      

        NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)      

    

(1)           General

The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include footnotes and certain financial information normally presented annually under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Massey Energy Company (“we,” “our,” “us”) for the year ended December 31, 2006. Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end. The results of operations for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals), which, in our opinion, are necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position at June 30, 2007 and our consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned and sole, direct operating subsidiary, A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc. (“A.T. Massey”), and A.T. Massey’s wholly and majority owned direct and indirect subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation. We have no independent assets or operations. We do not have a controlling interest in any separate independent operations. Investments in business entities in which we do not have control, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies, are accounted for under the equity method.

A.T. Massey fully and unconditionally guarantees our obligations under the 6.625% senior notes due 2010 (the “6.625% Notes”), the 6.875% senior notes due 2013 (the “6.875% Notes”), the 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2023 (the “4.75% Notes”) and the 2.25% convertible senior notes due 2024 (the “2.25% Notes”). In addition, the 6.625% Notes, the 6.875% Notes and the 2.25% Notes are fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally guaranteed by A.T. Massey and substantially all of our indirect operating subsidiaries, each such subsidiary being indirectly 100% owned by us. The subsidiaries not providing a guarantee of the 6.625% Notes, the 6.875% Notes and the 2.25% Notes are minor (as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 3-10(h)(6) of Regulation S-X). See Note 5 for a more complete discussion of debt.

(2)           Inventories

Inventories are comprised of:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(In Thousands)
Saleable coal	$	139,208	$	124,816
Raw coal		16,137		13,210
Subtotal coal inventory		155,345		138,026
Supplies inventory		52,062		53,030
Total inventory	$	207,407	$	191,056

 Saleable coal represents coal ready for sale, including inventories designated for customer facilities under consignment arrangements of $47.2 million and $61.0 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. Raw coal represents coal that generally requires further processing prior to shipment to the customer.

5

(3)           Other Current Assets

Other current assets are comprised of:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(In Thousands)
Longwall panel costs	$	24,051	$	38,843
Deposits		119,304		106,833
Other		23,771		26,646
Total other current assets	$	167,126	$	172,322

Deposits consist primarily of funds placed in restricted accounts with financial institutions to collateralize letters of credit that support workers’ compensation requirements, insurance and other obligations. As of both June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, deposits include $105.0 million of funds pledged as collateral to support $100.0 million of outstanding letters of credit. At June 30, 2007, deposits also include $13.2 million of United States Treasury securities supporting various regulatory obligations.

(4)           Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is comprised of:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(In Thousands)
Property, plant and equipment, at cost	$	3,569,097		$	3,477,550
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization		(1,771,745	)		(1,700,769	)
Net property, plant and equipment	$	1,797,352		$	1,776,781

Property, plant and equipment includes gross assets under capital leases of $17.3 million and $32.3 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

During the second quarter of 2007, we exchanged coal reserves with a third party, recognizing a gain of $10.3 million (pre-tax) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No 153: Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an Amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. The gain included a $1.0 million cash payment. The acquired coal reserves were recorded in Property, plant and equipment at the fair value of the reserves surrendered, less the $1.0 million payment received.

(5)           Debt

Debt is comprised of:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(In Thousands)
6.875% senior notes due 2013, net of discount	$	755,097		$	754,804
6.625% senior notes due 2010		335,000			335,000
2.25% convertible senior notes due 2024		9,647			9,647
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2023		730			730
Capital lease obligations		9,534			11,232
Fair value hedge adjustment		(5,793	)		(6,506	)
Total debt		1,104,215			1,104,907
Amounts due within one year		(1,797	)		(2,583	)
Total long-term debt	$	1,102,418		$	1,102,324

The weighted average effective interest rate of the outstanding borrowings was 7.0% at both June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, after giving effect to the amortization of the Fair value hedge adjustment. At June 30, 2007, our available liquidity was $435.6 million, comprised of cash and cash equivalents of $321.9 million and $113.7 million availability from our asset-based revolving credit facility.

6

On December 9, 2005, we exercised our right to terminate our interest rate swap agreement on the 6.625% Notes, which we entered into in November 2003, because of anticipated increases in the variable interest rate component of the swap. We paid a $7.9 million termination payment to the swap counterparty on December 13, 2005. The termination payment, which is reflected in the table above as Fair value hedge adjustment, is being amortized into Interest expense through November 15, 2010. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of the Fair value hedge adjustment was amortized into Interest expense.

(6)           Income Taxes

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007, at which time we increased retained earnings by $5.2 million for the cumulative effect of adoption. We accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Other noncurrent liabilities and recognize the related expense in Income tax expense. We accrued less than $100,000 for the payment of interest and penalties at January 1, 2007, and $2.4 million for the payment of interest and penalties at June 30, 2007. We recorded the additional $2.4 million of uncertain tax position based upon an Industry Director Directive issued by a taxing authority in the second quarter of 2007.

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various state jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has examined our federal income tax returns, or statutes of limitations have expired for years through 2000. Additionally, the IRS has sent notification to us of no change for our calendar year ended December 31, 2002 federal income tax return.  We are currently under audit from the IRS for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2001, and calendar years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. In the various states where we file state income tax returns, the state tax authorities have examined our state returns, or statutes of limitations have expired through 2001.  While management believes that we have adequately provided for any income taxes and interest and penalties that may ultimately be paid with respect to all open tax years, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and state tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including penalties and interest, as of January 1, 2007 was approximately $2.3 million and as of June 30, 2007, was approximately $4.7 million. All unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if we were to recognize them.  Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits is uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits that may occur within the next twelve months. Currently, we do not anticipate any significant changes to current unrecognized tax benefits during the remainder of 2007.

(7)          Pension Expense

Net periodic pension expense for both our qualified defined benefit pension plan and nonqualified supplemental benefit pension plan is comprised of the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(In Thousands)
Service cost	$	2,429		$	2,265		$	4,858		$	4,531
Interest cost		3,756			3,393			7,511			6,786
Expected return on plan assets		(5,607	)		(4,988	)		(11,213	)		(9,976	)
Recognized loss		1,017			1,537			2,034			3,075
Amortization of prior service cost		10			(4	)		20			(8	)
Net periodic pension expense	$	1,605		$	2,203		$	3,210		$	4,408

For the three months ended June 30, 2007, we did not contribute to the qualified defined benefit pension plan. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we contributed $4.6 million. Contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $0.4 million and $9.2 million, respectively. We paid benefits to participants of the nonqualified supplemental benefit pension plan of $0.02 million for both the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

7

(8)           Other noncurrent liabilities

Other noncurrent liabilities are comprised of:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(In Thousands)
Reclamation	$	151,580	$	142,687
Workers' compensation and black lung		91,563		89,227
Other postretirement benefits		141,380		138,109
Other		89,153		99,831
Total other noncurrent liabilities	$	473,676	$	469,854

(9)           Black Lung and Workers’ Compensation Expense

Expenses for black lung benefits and workers’ compensation related benefits include the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(In Thousands)						(In Thousands)
Self-insured black lung benefits:
Service cost	$	611		$	632		$	1,223		$	1,264
Interest cost		817			711			1,634			1,421
Amortization of actuarial gain		(663	)		(957	)		(1,326	)		(1,913	)
Subtotal black lung benefits expense		765			386			1,531			772
Other workers' compensation benefits		6,816			8,597			14,417			17,827
Total black lung and workers' compensation benefits expense	$	7,581		$	8,983		$	15,948		$	18,599

Payments for benefits, premiums and other costs related to black lung and workers’ compensation liabilities were $6.3 million and $7.9 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively, and were $13.2 million and $20.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(10)           Other Postretirement Benefits Expense

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost includes the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(In Thousands)						(In Thousands)
Service cost	$	917		$	940		$	1,834		$	1,879
Interest cost		2,117			1,990			4,233			3,980
Recognized loss		466			577			932			1,154
Amortization of prior service credit		(188	)		(188	)		(375	)		(375	)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost	$	3,312		$	3,319		$	6,624		$	6,638

Payments for benefits related to postretirement benefit cost were $1.3 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and were $2.5 million and $2.7 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(11)           Other Items Affecting Net Income

During the second quarter of 2007, we recorded a net charge of $6.3 million (pre-tax) resulting from adjustments to litigation reserves for certain legal matters.  During the six month period ended June 30, 2007, we recorded net charges of $9.4 million (pre-tax) in litigation reserves for certain legal matters.

8

(12)           Earnings Per Share

The number of shares of our common stock, $0.625 par value (“Common Stock”) used to calculate basic earnings per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is based on the weighted average of outstanding shares during the respective periods. The number of shares of Common Stock used to calculate diluted earnings per share is based on the number of shares of Common Stock used to calculate basic earnings per share plus the dilutive effect of stock options and other stock-based instruments held by our employees and directors during each period and debt securities currently convertible into shares of Common Stock during each period. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), the effect of dilutive securities in the amount of 0.3 million shares was excluded from the calculation of the diluted income per common share in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as such inclusion would result in antidilution.

The computations for basic and diluted income per share are based on the following per share information:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)				(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Numerator:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	34,938	$	3,225	$	67,545	$	9,475
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		-		-		-		(639	)
Net income - numerator for basic		34,938		3,225		67,545		8,836
Effect of convertible notes		50		-		100		-
Adjusted net income - numerator for diluted	$	34,988	$	3,225	$	67,645	$	8,836
Denominator:
Weighted average shares - denominator for basic		80,638		81,076		80,600		81,308
Effect of stock options/restricted stock		710		780		423		716
Effect of convertible notes		324		-		324		-
Adjusted weighted average shares - denominator for diluted		81,672		81,856		81,347		82,024
Income per share:
Basic
Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.43	$	0.04	$	0.84	$	0.12
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-		-		-		(0.01	)
Net income	$	0.43	$	0.04	$	0.84	$	0.11
Diluted
Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.43	$	0.04	$	0.83	$	0.12
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-		-		-		(0.01	)
Net income	$	0.43	$	0.04	$	0.83	$	0.11

The 4.75% Notes are convertible by holders into shares of Common Stock during certain periods under certain circumstances. As of June 30, 2007, the price of Common Stock had reached the specified threshold for conversion. Consequently, the 4.75% Notes are convertible until September 28, 2007, the last business day of our third quarter. The 4.75% Notes may be convertible beyond this date if the specified threshold for conversion is met in subsequent quarters. If all of the 4.75% Notes outstanding at June 30, 2007 had been converted, we would have issued 37,649 shares.

The 2.25% Notes are convertible by holders into shares of Common Stock during certain periods under certain circumstances. The 2.25% Notes were not eligible for conversion at June 30, 2007. If all of the 2.25% Notes outstanding at June 30, 2007 had been eligible and were converted, we would have issued 287,113 shares.

(13)           Contingencies

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel

On April 27, 2005, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation (“WPS”) sued our subsidiary Central West Virginia Energy Company (“CWVE”) in the Circuit Court of Brooke County, West Virginia, seeking (a) an order requiring CWVE to specifically perform its obligations under a Coal Supply Agreement (“CSA”) and (b) compensatory damages due to CWVE’s alleged failure to perform under the CSA and for alleged damages to WPS’s coke ovens. WPS later amended its complaint to add Mountain State Carbon, LLC (“MSC”) as a plaintiff, us as a defendant, and claims for bad faith, misrepresentation and punitive damages.  It is CWVE’s position that its failure to perform was excused due to the occurrence of events that rendered performance commercially impracticable and/or force majeure events as defined by the parties in the CSA, including unforeseen labor shortages, mining and geologic problems at certain of our coal mines, railroad car shortages, transportation problems and other events beyond our control.

On May 29, 2007, the trial commenced.  On July 2, 2007, the jury awarded damages in favor of WPS and MSC in the amount of $219.9 million, comprised of $119.9 million compensatory and $100 million punitive damages.

On July 30, 2007, a hearing was held by the trial court to review the punitive damages award, and to consider pre-judgment interest and a counterclaim filed by CWVE related to damages for non-payment of the escalated purchase price under the CSA for coal delivered to MSC in November and December 2006.  At the hearing, the trial court awarded WPS and MSC pre-judgment interest of approximately $24 million and awarded CWVE approximately $4.5 million (including pre-judgment interest) on the counterclaim.  On August 2, 2007, the trial court entered the jury award of compensatory and punitive damages, which, including the above mentioned pre-judgment interest of $24 million, totals approximately $240 million (net of the $4.5 million awarded to CWVE).

We believe, in consultation with legal counsel, that we have strong legal arguments to raise in post-trial motions and subsequently on appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that create significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate outcome of this matter.  Given the size of the punitive damages awarded, West Virginia case precedent, and the significant legal questions the case presents for appeal, we believe it is probable that the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals will agree to hear our appeal.  Ultimately, we believe it is unlikely any punitive damages will be assessed in this matter.  We further believe in consultation with legal counsel that due to matters of law in the conduct of the recently completed trial, there is a strong possibility that the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals will remand the compensatory damages claim for retrial or significantly reduce the amount of the compensatory damages awarded by the jury.

We believe the range of possible loss in this matter is from $16 million to $244 million, prior to post-judgment interest or other costs. The minimum loss we expect to incur upon final settlement or adjudication is the amount of excess costs incurred by WPS to acquire coal required but not delivered under the CSA (plus pre-judgment interest) adjusted for performance excused by events of force majeure.  Amounts in excess of this amount may ultimately be awarded if the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals upholds the circuit court’s decisions, in whole or in part, or if the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals remands the case for retrial and a jury awards the plaintiffs an amount in excess of what we have accrued. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter and believe there is no amount in the range that is a better estimate than any other amount given the various possible outcomes on appeal.  Included in these reasonably possible outcomes are reversal of the compensatory damage and punitive awards, remand and retrial, or reduction of some or all of the awards.  As there is no amount in the range that is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum amount in the range has been accrued (included in Other current liabilities).  It is reasonably possible that our judgments regarding these matters could change in the near term, resulting in the recording of additional material losses that would affect our operating results and financial position.

We are currently evaluating our insurance coverage, which may be applicable to the property damage allegations related to WPS’s coke ovens and a portion of the punitive damage elements of the award.  The possible recoveries from insurance of any losses that may arise from claims related to this matter have not been considered in determining our accrual for this matter.

We expect the trial court to order an appeal bond be posted by us in an amount of no greater than the statutory limit of $50 million to proceed with an appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.  While timing of a requirement to post an appeal bond is uncertain and dependent on actions by the trial court, an appeal bond will likely be required to be posted during the current fiscal year.

Harman

In December 1997, A.T. Massey’s then subsidiary Wellmore Coal Corporation (“Wellmore”) declared force majeure under its coal supply agreement with Harman Mining Corporation (“Harman”) and reduced the amount of coal to be purchased from Harman. On October 29, 1998, Harman and its sole shareholder sued A.T. Massey and five of its subsidiaries (“Massey Defendants”) in the Circuit Court of Boone County, West Virginia, alleging that the Massey Defendants tortiously interfered with Wellmore’s agreement with Harman, causing Harman to go out of business. On August 1, 2002, the jury awarded the plaintiffs $50 million in compensatory and punitive damages. On April 5, 2007, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals accepted the Massey Defendants’ Petition for Appeal. Oral arguments are scheduled for October 10, 2007.  The range of possible loss in this matter extends up to approximately $75 million including the jury award and post-judgment interest to date. We believe we have strong arguments to raise on appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. As of June 30, 2007, we had accrued a liability of $32.8 million, including $10.8 million of interest, which is included in Other current liabilities.

West Virginia Flooding

Since July 2001, we and nine of our subsidiaries have been sued in 17 consolidated civil actions filed in the Circuit Courts of Boone, Fayette, Kanawha, McDowell, Mercer, Raleigh and Wyoming Counties, West Virginia, for alleged property damages and personal injuries arising out of flooding on or about July 8, 2001. Along with 32 other consolidated cases not involving us or our subsidiaries, these cases cover approximately 4,300 plaintiffs seeking unquantified compensatory and punitive damages from approximately 200 defendants. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals transferred all 49 cases (the “Referred Cases”) to the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, West Virginia, to be handled by a mass litigation panel of three judges. The panel judges will hold multiple trials, each relating to all or part of a watershed. On January 18, 2007, a panel judge dismissed all claims asserted by all plaintiffs within the Coal River watershed, which directly involves approximately 400 plaintiffs and we believe impacts another 800 plaintiffs. Plaintiffs filed a petition seeking appeal of this decision with the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. On March 15, 2007, in a case not directly involving us or our subsidiaries, a second panel judge vacated a jury verdict covering the Mullens/Oceana subwatershed, entering judgment for defendants. We believe we have insurance coverage applicable to these matters.

Since August 2004, five of our subsidiaries have been sued in six civil actions filed in the Circuit Courts of Boone, McDowell, Mingo, Raleigh, Summers, and Wyoming Counties, West Virginia, for alleged property damages and personal injuries arising out of flooding on or about May 2, 2002. A sixth subsidiary was dropped from a seventh suit. These complaints cover approximately 355 plaintiffs seeking unquantified compensatory and punitive damages from approximately 35 defendants.

10

Since May 2006, we and twelve of our subsidiaries have been sued in three civil actions filed in the Circuit Courts of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia, for alleged property damages and personal injuries arising out of flooding between May 30 and June 4, 2004. These complaints cover approximately 425 plaintiffs seeking unquantified compensatory and punitive damages from approximately 52 defendants. Two of these cases (both in Logan County) have been stayed pending appeal of the Coal River watershed decision noted above.

On April 10, 2007, two of our subsidiaries were sued in a civil action filed in the Circuit Court of Boone County, West Virginia, for alleged property damages and personal injuries arising out of flooding on or about July 29, 2001. This is a refiling on behalf of certain plaintiffs who originally attempted to assert their claims in the Referred Cases before the panel judges, but were dismissed. This complaint covers 17 plaintiffs seeking unquantified compensatory and punitive damages from five defendants.

We believe these matters will be resolved without a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

             West Virginia Trucking

Since January 2003, an advocacy group and residents in Boone, Kanawha, Mingo and Raleigh Counties, West Virginia, filed 17 suits in the Circuit Courts of Kanawha and Mingo Counties, West Virginia, against us and 15 of our subsidiaries. The claims against us and three of our subsidiaries were dismissed. Plaintiffs alleged that we and our subsidiaries named in the suit illegally transported coal in overloaded trucks, causing damage to state roads, thereby interfering with plaintiffs’ use and enjoyment of their properties and their right to use the public roads. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and unquantified compensatory and punitive damages. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals referred the consolidated lawsuits, and three similar lawsuits against other coal and transportation companies not involving us or our subsidiaries, to the Circuit Court of Lincoln County, West Virginia, to be handled by a mass litigation panel of one judge. Plaintiffs filed motions requesting class certification. On June 7, 2007, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their public nuisance claims seeking monetary damages for road and bridge repairs. Defendants filed a motion requesting that the mass litigation panel judge recommend to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that the cases be sent back to the circuit courts of origin for resolution. Defendants’ motion is scheduled for hearing on August 24, 2007. No dates have been set for a hearing on class certification or for trial. We believe we have insurance coverage applicable to these matters and that they will be resolved without a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

Well Water Contamination

Since September 2004, approximately 710 plaintiffs filed approximately 400 suits against us and our subsidiary Rawl Sales & Processing Co. in the Circuit Court of Mingo County, West Virginia, for alleged property damage and personal injuries arising out of slurry injection and impoundment practices allegedly contaminating plaintiffs’ water wells. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and unquantified compensatory and punitive damages. Trial is scheduled to commence on October 16, 2007. We believe we have insurance coverage applicable to these matters and that they will be resolved without a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

Surface Mining Fills

Since September 2005, three environmental groups sued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (the “trial Court”), asserting the Corps unlawfully issued permits to four of our surface mines to construct mining fills. The suit alleges the Corps failed to comply with the requirements of both Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, including preparing environmental impact statements for individual permits. We intervened in the suit to protect our interests. On March 23, 2007, the trial Court rescinded four of our permits, resulting in the temporary suspension of mining at these surface mines. We appealed that ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. On April 17, 2007, the trial Court partially stayed its ruling, permitting mining to resume in fills that were already under construction. On June 14, 2007, the trial Court issued an additional ruling, finding the Corps improperly approved placement of sediment ponds in streams below fills on the four permits in question.  We requested the trial Court to modify its ruling to allow these ponds to remain in place, as the ponds and fills have already been constructed.  The trial Court’s ruling could impact the issuance of permits for the placement of sediment ponds for future operations. If the permits for the fills or sediment ponds are ultimately held to be unlawfully issued, production could be affected at these surface mines, and the process of obtaining new Corps permits for all surface mines could become more difficult. We do not expect any material impact to our financial statements through 2008 and will continue to monitor developments in the matter.

Virginia Electric and Power Company

On December 30, 2005, Virginia Electric and Power Company (“VEPCO”) filed suit in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia against A.T. Massey and Massey Coal Sales Company, Inc. (“MCS”) alleging A.T. Massey and MCS (i) fraudulently induced VEPCO to enter a coal supply agreement (“CSA”) and (ii) breached the CSA. Previously, in June 2005 VEPCO agreed MCS had until July 2006 to complete delivery of all contracted coal. MCS completed and VEPCO accepted delivery of all coal at the contract price. On November 26, 2006, VEPCO amended its complaint to (i) revive its fraud claims previously dismissed in June 2006, (ii) assert A.T. Massey tortiously interfered with the CSA, and (iii) assert A.T. Massey and MCS conspired for the purpose of injuring VEPCO in its trade or business in violation of a Virginia business conspiracy statute. VEPCO seeks (i) damages in excess of $15 million, asserting such damages should be trebled pursuant to the business conspiracy statute, (ii) recovery of its attorneys’ fees and costs, and (iii) punitive damages (which a Virginia statute caps at $350,000). On March 21, 2007, the Court again sustained the motion to dismiss the fraud counts, but overruled the motion to dismiss the statutory conspiracy and tortious interference counts. On April 11, 2007, A.T. Massey and MCS filed their Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim seeking damages of $16 million. The trial is scheduled to commence October 29, 2007. We believe this matter will be resolved without a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

11

Clean Water Act

On May 10, 2007, the United States, on behalf of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), filed suit against us and twenty-seven of our subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.  The suit alleges that a number of our subsidiaries violated the Federal Clean Water Act on thousands of occasions by discharging pollutants in excess of monthly and daily permit limits from 2000 to 2006.  The complaint seeks penalties for the alleged discharges and injunctive relief compelling us and our subsidiaries to improve processes to prevent future discharges.  We have reviewed the allegations and believe that many of the alleged violations were not, in fact, violations.  We are currently attempting to negotiate a resolution to the suit with the EPA. While we believe we have sufficient legal reserves for this matter, it is possible that the actual outcome of the matter could vary significantly from this amount. We estimated our potential liability in this case to be in the range of $1.5 to $7.0 million, using both internal analysis and an objective third-party analysis of the relevant data conducted for us by a recognized expert on penalty calculation in Clean Water Act cases.  While we believe we have sufficient legal reserves for this matter, it is possible that the actual outcome of the matter could vary significantly from this amount. We will continue to review the amount of our accrual and any adjustment required to increase or decrease the accrual based on development of the matter will be made in the period determined.

Other Legal Proceedings

We are parties to a number of other legal proceedings, incident to our normal business activities. These include contract dispute, personal injury, property damage and employment matters. While we cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings, based on our current estimates we do not believe that any liability arising from these matters individually or in the aggregate should have a material impact upon our consolidated cash flows, results of operations or financial condition. It is reasonably possible, however, that the ultimate liabilities in the future with respect to these lawsuits and claims, in the aggregate, may be material to our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

(14)           Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. It does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently assessing the potential impact of the statement on our financial position and results of operations.

* * * * * * * *

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

From time to time, we make certain comments and disclosures in reports, including this report, or through statements made by our officers that may be forward-looking in nature. Examples include statements related to our future outlook, anticipated capital expenditures, projected cash flows and borrowings, and sources of funding. We caution readers that forward-looking statements, including disclosures that use words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project” and similar statements are subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause actual cash flows, results of operations, financial condition, cost reductions, acquisitions, dispositions, financing transactions, operations, expansion, consolidation and other events to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements are also subject to a number of assumptions regarding, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions. These assumptions are based on facts and conditions, as they exist at the time such statements are made as well as predictions as to future facts and conditions, the accurate prediction of which may be difficult and involve the assessment of circumstances and events beyond our control. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements unless required by securities law, and we caution the reader not to rely on them unduly.

12

We have based any forward-looking statements we have made on our current expectations and assumptions about future events and circumstances that are subject to risks, uncertainties and contingencies that could cause results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to:

(i)	our cash flows, results of operation or financial condition;
(ii)	the consummation of acquisition, disposition or financing transactions and the effect thereof on our business;
(iii)	governmental policies and regulatory actions affecting the coal industry;
(iv)	legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims and the availability of insurance coverage related thereto;
(v)	weather conditions or catastrophic weather-related damage;
(vi)	our ability to produce coal to meet market expectations and customer requirements;
(vii)	our ability to obtain and renew permits necessary for our existing and planned operations in a timely manner;
(viii)	the availability of transportation for our produced coal;
(ix)	the expansion of our mining capacity;
(x)	our ability to manage production costs;
(xi)	the market demand for coal, electricity and steel;
(xii)	the cost and perceived benefits of alternative sources of energy such as natural gas and nuclear energy;
(xiii)	competition among coal and other energy producers, at home and abroad;
(xiv)	our ability to timely obtain necessary supplies and equipment;
(xv)	our reliance upon and relationship with our customers and suppliers;
(xvi)	the creditworthiness of our customers and suppliers;
(xvii)	our ability to attract, train and retain a skilled workforce to meet replacement or expansion needs;
(xviii)	our assumptions and projections concerning economically recoverable coal reserve estimates;
(xix)	future economic or capital market conditions;
(xx)	the availability and costs of credit, surety bonds and letters of credit that we require;
(xxi)	our assumptions and projections regarding pension and other post-retirement benefit liabilities; and
(xxii)	the successful implementation of our strategic plans and objectives.

Any forward-looking statements should be considered in context with the various disclosures made by us about our businesses in our public filings with the SEC, including without limitation the risk factors more specifically described in Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

13

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any of our document files at the SEC’s public reference room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. We make available, free of charge through our Internet website, www.masseyenergyco.com, our annual report, quarterly reports, current reports, proxy statements, section 16 reports and other information (and any amendments thereto) as soon as practicable after filing or furnishing the material to the SEC, in addition to, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, codes of ethics and the charters of the Audit, Compensation, Executive, Governance and Nominating, and Safety, Environmental, and Public Policy Committees. These materials also may be requested at no cost by telephone at (866) 814-6512 and by mail at: Massey Energy Company, Post Office Box 26765, Richmond, Virginia 23261, Attention: Investor Relations.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

We operate coal mines and processing facilities in Central Appalachia, which generate revenues and cash flow through the mining, processing and selling of steam and metallurgical grade coal, primarily of low sulfur content. We also generate income and cash flow through other coal-related businesses, including the management of material handling facilities and a synfuel production plant. Other revenue is obtained from royalties, rentals, gas well revenues, gains on the sale of non-strategic assets and miscellaneous income.  

We reported after-tax earnings for the second quarter of $34.9 million, or $0.43 per basic and diluted share, compared to after-tax earnings of $3.2 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share, for the comparable period in 2006. The results for the second quarter of 2007 included a $10.3 million pre-tax gain on an exchange of coal reserves (net after-tax impact of $0.08 per share) and $6.3 million in net pre-tax adjustments to litigation reserves (net after-tax impact of ($0.07) per share).

Produced tons sold were 10.0 million in the quarter, compared to 10.2 million in the second quarter of 2006. We produced 10.2 million tons during the second quarter of 2007, compared to 10.0 million tons produced in the second quarter of 2006. Exports increased to 1.2 million tons compared to 1.0 million tons exported in the second quarter of 2006.

During the second quarter of 2007, Produced coal revenue increased by 4.8% over the prior year second quarter on fewer tons shipped as we benefited from higher sales prices secured in new coal sales agreements as lower-priced contracts expired and we shipped a larger percentage of higher-priced metallurgical tons in the second quarter of 2007. These higher priced contracts were negotiated during a period of strong economic growth in China, India, the U.S. and other regions of the world, during which a worldwide shortage of certain grades of coal existed, stockpile inventories at utilities were low, and the cost of natural gas and oil was high. In late 2006, coal prices softened as a warm winter and relatively mild summer weather in the U.S. allowed utilities to rebuild their stockpiles, allowing natural gas storage injections to reach record levels and lowering the price of natural gas. Our average Produced coal revenue per ton sold in the second quarter of 2007 of $51.40 increased by 6% compared to $48.34 in the second quarter of 2006. Our average Produced coal revenue per ton in the second quarter of 2007 for metallurgical tons sold increased by 5% to $72.16 per ton compared to $68.58 in the second quarter of 2006.

Our Average cash cost per ton sold (see Note below) was $42.68, compared to $41.92 in the previous year’s second quarter. The increased cost level is primarily due to increased sales-related costs, higher supply costs and litigation accruals. Total capital spending for the second quarter of 2007 was $76.8 million, compared to $85 million for the second quarter of 2006.

On July 2, 2007, a jury awarded damages in favor of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation and Mountain State Carbon, LLC in the amount of $219.9 million, comprised of $119.9 million compensatory and $100 million punitive damages.  On July 30, 2007, the court awarded an additional $24 million of pre-judgment interest.  We plan to appeal this decision to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.  We believe that we have strong legal arguments to raise in post-trial motions and subsequently on appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals that create significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate outcome of this matter.  Ultimately, we believe it is unlikely any punitive damages will be assessed in this matter.  We further believe there is a strong possibility that the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals will remand the compensatory damages claim for retrial or significantly reduce the amount of the compensatory damages awarded by the jury.

We believe the range of possible loss in this matter is from $16 million to $244 million, prior to post-judgment interest or other costs. The minimum loss we expect to incur upon final settlement or adjudication is the amount of excess costs incurred by WPS to acquire coal required but not delivered under the contract (plus pre-judgment interest) adjusted for performance excused by events of force majeure. Amounts in excess of this amount may ultimately be awarded if the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals upholds the circuit court’s decisions, in whole or in part, or if the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals remands the case for retrial and a jury awards the plaintiffs an amount in excess of what we have accrued. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter and believe there is no amount in the range that is a better estimate than any other amount given the various possible outcomes on appeal and, therefore, the minimum amount in the range has been accrued (included in Other current liabilities).  It is reasonably possible that our judgments regarding these matters could change in the near term, resulting in the recording of additional material losses that would affect our operating results and financial position.

 We expect the trial court to order an appeal bond be posted by us in an amount of no greater than $50 million to proceed with an appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.  While timing of a requirement to post an appeal bond is uncertain and dependent on actions by the trial court, an appeal bond will likely be required to be posted during the current fiscal year. Refer to Note 13 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

14

___________

Note: Average cash cost per ton is calculated as the sum of Cost of produced coal revenue and Selling, general and administrative expense (excluding Depreciation, depletion and amortization), divided by the number of produced tons sold. Although Average cash cost per ton is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, management believes that it is useful to investors in evaluating us because it is widely used in the coal industry as a measure to evaluate a company’s control over its cash costs. Average cash cost per ton should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because Average cash cost per ton is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. The table below reconciles the GAAP measure of Total costs and expenses to Average cash cost per ton.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2007			2006
			$per ton			$per ton
	(In Millions, Except Per Ton Amounts)
Total costs and expenses	$	557.7		$	535.8
Less: Freight and handling costs		39.9			38.5
Less: Cost of purchased coal revenue		27.2			11.5
Less: Depreciation, depletion and amortization		60.2			57.2
Less: Other expense		1.7			1.6
Average cash cost	$	428.7	$   42.68	$	427.0	$   41.92

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to three months ended June 30, 2006

Revenues

For the second quarter of 2007, produced coal revenue increased 4.8% to $516.2 million compared with $492.5 million for the second quarter of 2006. The following is a breakdown by market served of the changes in produced tons sold and average produced coal revenue per ton sold for the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2007		2006		Increase (Decrease)			% Increase (Decrease)
	(In millions, except per ton amounts)
Produced tons sold:
Utility		6.9		7.5		(0.6	)		(8	)%
Metallurgical		2.2		1.9		0.3			16	%
Industrial		0.9		0.8		0.1			13	%
Total		10.0		10.2		(0.2	)		(2	)%
Produced coal revenue per ton sold:
Utility	$	45.17	$	42.71	$	2.46			6	%
Metallurgical		72.16		68.58		3.58			5	%
Industrial		49.34		53.25		(3.91	)		(7	)%
Weighted average	$	51.40	$	48.34	$	3.06			6	%

The improvement in average per ton sales price for the second quarter of 2007 is attributable to prices contracted during a period of increased demand for most grades of coal in the United States and to current strong worldwide market demand for metallurgical coal. The higher demand resulted in shortages of certain coals, increasing the market prices of these coals, and allowed us to negotiate agreements containing higher price terms as lower-priced contracts expired. The decrease in average per ton sales price for the industrial market is mainly attributable to the shipment of more lower-quality, lower-priced industrial coal in the second quarter of 2007 than in the second quarter of 2006 and lower pricing on recently priced sales.

Freight and handling revenue increased $1.4 million, or 3.6%, to $39.9 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared with $38.5 million for the second quarter of 2006, due primarily to an increase in freight rates.

Purchased coal revenue increased $19.0 million, or 154.5%, to $31.3 million for the second quarter of 2007 from $12.3 million for the second quarter of 2006, due to an increase in purchased tons sold from 0.2 million in the second quarter of 2006 to 0.6 million in the second quarter of 2007, partially offset by a 3.1% decrease in the price per ton of purchased coal sold. We purchase varying amounts of coal each quarter to supplement produced coal sales.

15

Other revenue, which consists of royalties, rentals, earnings associated with coal handling facilities, gas well revenues, synfuel earnings, gains on the sale of non-strategic assets, contract settlement payments, and miscellaneous income, increased to $30.4 million for the second quarter of 2007 from $12.8 million for the second quarter of 2006, primarily due to a gain on an exchange of reserves for $10.3 million in the second quarter of 2007. In addition, synfuel earnings increased in the second quarter of 2007 versus the second quarter of 2006, as a portion of the synfuel tax credit was phased out in 2006 due to the high price of oil, while earnings for the second quarter of 2007 do not reflect any potential phase out.

Costs

Cost of produced coal revenue decreased approximately 1.2% to $409.0 million for the second quarter of 2007 from $413.8 million for the second quarter of 2006, primarily due to a decrease in tons sold from 10.2 million in the second quarter of 2006 versus 10.0 million in the second quarter of 2007. Cost of produced coal revenue on a per ton of coal sold basis increased 0.8% in the second quarter of 2007 compared with the second quarter of 2006. Tons produced in the second quarter of 2007 were 10.2 million compared to 10.0 million in the second quarter of 2006.

Freight and handling costs increased $1.4 million, or 3.6%, to $39.9 million for the second quarter of 2007, compared with $38.5 million for the second quarter of 2006, due primarily to an increase in freight rates.

Cost of purchased coal revenue increased $15.8 million, or 138.6%, to $27.2 million for the second quarter of 2007 from $11.4 million for the second quarter of 2006, due to an increase in purchased tons sold from 0.2 million in the second quarter of 2006 to 0.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 and a 5.8% increase in the average cost of purchased coal.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased by 5.1% to $60.2 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $57.3 million for the second quarter of 2006.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $19.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $13.2 million for the second quarter of 2006. Increased costs were due to higher performance-based compensation accruals and increased litigation expenses.

Other expense, which consists of costs associated with the generation of Other revenue, such as costs to operate the synfuel facility, gas wells, and other miscellaneous expenses, were $1.7 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to $1.6 million for the second quarter of 2006.

Interest

Interest expense remained at $21.6 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $10.4 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared to Income tax expense of $0.7 million for the second quarter of 2006. The tax rates for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006 were favorably impacted by percentage depletion allowances. Additionally, the tax rate for the second quarter 2007 was negatively impacted by accruals for uncertain tax positions.

16

Six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to six months ended June 30, 2006

Revenues

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, produced coal revenue increased 7.0% to $1,035.9 million compared with $968.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The following is a breakdown by market served of the changes in produced tons sold and average produced coal revenue per ton sold for the first six months of 2007 compared to the first six months of 2006:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2007		2006		Increase (Decrease)			% Increase (Decrease)
	(In millions, except per ton amounts)
Produced tons sold:
Utility		13.5		14.6		(1.1	)		(8	)%
Metallurgical		4.5		4.0		0.5			13	%
Industrial		2.0		1.7		0.3			18	%
Total		20.0		20.3		(0.3	)		(1	)%
Produced coal revenue per ton sold:
Utility	$	45.09	$	41.96	$	3.13			7	%
Metallurgical		72.94		65.33		7.61			12	%
Industrial		50.24		54.35		(4.11	)		(8	)%
Weighted average	$	51.83	$	47.63	$	4.20			9	%

The improvement in average per ton sales price for the first six months of 2007 is attributable to prices contracted during a period of increased demand for most grades of coal in the United States and for metallurgical coal worldwide. The higher demand resulted in shortages of certain coals, increasing the market prices of these coals, and allowed us to negotiate agreements containing higher price terms as lower-priced contracts expired.  The decrease in average per ton sales price for the industrial market is mainly attributable to the shipment of more lower-quality, lower-priced industrial coal in the first six months of 2007 than in the first six months of 2006 and lower pricing on recently priced sales.

Freight and handling revenue increased $4.4 million, or 5.5%, to $83.8 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $79.4 million for the first six months of 2006, due primarily to an increase in freight rates.

Purchased coal revenue increased $16.8 million, or 42.3%, to $56.5 million for the first six months of 2007 from $39.7 million for the first six months of 2006, due to an increase in purchased tons sold from 0.8 million in the first six months of 2006 to 1.1 million in the first six months of 2007. We purchase varying amounts of coal each quarter to supplement produced coal sales.

Other revenue, which consists of royalties, rentals, earnings associated with coal handling facilities, gas well revenues, synfuel earnings, gains on the sale of non-strategic assets, contract settlement payments, and miscellaneous income, increased to $49.0 million for the first six months of 2007 from $28.3 million for the first six months of 2006, due primarily to a gain on an exchange of reserves of $10.3 million in the second quarter of 2007. In addition, synfuel earnings increased in the first six months of 2007 versus the first six months of 2006, as a portion of the synfuel tax credit was phased out in 2006 due to the high price of oil, while earnings for the first six months of 2007 do not reflect any potential phase out.

Costs

Cost of produced coal revenue increased approximately 0.3% to $811.5 million for the first six months of 2007 from $809.0 million for the first six months of 2006. Cost of produced coal revenue on a per ton of coal sold basis increased 1.8% in the first six months of 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006. This increase resulted from a variety of factors including higher labor and benefit costs, higher litigation expenses and higher supply costs. Tons produced in the first six months of 2007 and 2006 were 20.7 million and 20.4 million, respectively.

Freight and handling costs increased $4.4 million, or 5.5%, to $83.8 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $79.4 million for the first six months of 2006, due primarily to an increase in freight rates.

Cost of purchased coal revenue increased $14.9 million, or 43.3%, to $49.3 million for the first six months of 2007 from $34.4 million for the first six months of 2006, due to an increase in purchased tons sold from 0.8 million in the first six months of 2006 to 1.1 million in the first six months of 2007.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased by 7.5% to $122.4 million in the first six months of 2007 compared to $113.9 million for the first six months of 2006, due primarily to increased capital spending and higher depletion from increased production.

17

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $38.4 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $30.7 million for the first six months of 2006. The increase was attributable to higher performance-based compensation accruals and increased legal fee accruals.

 Other expense, which consists of costs associated with the generation of Other revenue, such as costs to operate the synfuel facility, gas wells, and other miscellaneous expenses, increased $0.5 million to $4.1 million for the first six months of 2007 from $3.6 million for the first six months of 2006.

Interest

Interest expense decreased to $43.1 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $43.2 million for the first six months of 2006.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $17.3 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to Income tax expense of $2.0 million for the first six months of 2006. The tax rate for the first six months of 2007 and 2006 were favorably impacted by percentage depletion allowances. Additionally, the tax rate for the first six months of 2007 was negatively impacted by accruals for uncertain tax positions.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2007, our available liquidity was $435.6 million, comprised of Cash and cash equivalents of $321.9 million and $113.7 million availability from our asset-based revolving credit facility. Our total debt-to-book capitalization ratio was 59% at June 30, 2007.

Debt was comprised of:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(In Thousands)
6.875% senior notes due 2013, net of discount	$	755,097		$	754,804
6.625% senior notes due 2010		335,000			335,000
2.25% convertible senior notes due 2024		9,647			9,647
4.75% convertible senior notes due 2023		730			730
Capital lease obligations		9,534			11,232
Fair value hedge adjustment		(5,793	)		(6,506	)
Total debt		1,104,215			1,104,907
Amounts due within one year		(1,797	)		(2,583	)
Total long-term debt	$	1,102,418		$	1,102,324

Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operating activities was $208.7 million for the first six months of 2007 compared to $127.9 million for the first six months of 2006. Cash provided by operating activities reflects net income adjusted for non-cash charges and changes in working capital requirements.

Net cash utilized by investing activities was $119.6 million and $151.8 million for the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. The cash used in investing activities reflects capital expenditures in the amount of $136.6 million and $161.6 million for the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. These capital expenditures are for replacement of mining equipment, the expansion of mining and shipping capacity, and projects to improve the efficiency of mining operations. Additionally, the first six months of 2007 and 2006 included $17.0 million and $9.8 million, respectively, of proceeds provided by the sale of assets.

Net cash utilized by financing activities was $6.5 million compared to $61.6 million for the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Financing activities for the first six months of 2007 and 2006 primarily reflect changes in debt levels, as well as the exercising of stock options and payments of dividends. In addition, financing activities for 2006 included $50 million for the repurchase of 1.3 million shares of Common Stock under the share repurchase program.

18

We believe that cash on hand, cash generated from operations and our borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures (other than major acquisitions), scheduled debt payments, potential share repurchases, anticipated dividend payments and expected settlements and final awards of outstanding litigation for at least the next few years. Nevertheless, our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations, to fund planned capital expenditures, to repurchase shares, pay dividends or pay settlements and final awards of outstanding litigation will substantially depend upon our future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in the coal industry, debt covenants, and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. We frequently evaluate potential acquisitions. In the past, we have funded acquisitions primarily with cash generated from operations, but we may consider a variety of other sources, depending on the size of any transaction, including debt or equity financing. Additional capital resources may not be available to us on terms that we find acceptable, or at all.

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of certain of our significant contractual obligations as of June 30, 2007. Please refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” of Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, for a more complete discussion of our significant contractual obligations.

	Payments Due by Years
In thousands	Total		Within 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
Long-term debt (1)	$	1,550,875	$	74,695	$	149,391	$	462,197	$	864,592
Capital lease obligations (2)		10,691		2,256		4,513		3,922		-
Operating lease obligations		131,131		33,830		59,665		30,395		7,241
Total Obligations (3)	$	1,692,697	$	110,781	$	213,569	$	496,514	$	871,833

___________

(1)	Long-term debt obligations reflect the future interest and principal payments of our fixed rate senior unsecured notes outstanding as of June 30, 2007. See Note 5 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(2)	Capital lease obligations include the amount of imputed interest over the terms of the leases.
(3)	The contractual obligation table does not include obligations to taxing authorities due to the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate settlement of amounts and timing of these obligations.

CERTAIN TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES

In addition to the trends and uncertainties set forth below, please refer to “Certain Trends and Uncertainties” of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, for a discussion of certain trends and uncertainties that may impact our business.

High oil prices may lead to a partial phase-out of IRC Section 45K tax credits, which would reduce our earnings from our operating and financial arrangements with a synfuel facility we previously owned and currently manage.

Owners of facilities that produce synthetic fuels can qualify for tax credits under the provisions of Section 45K of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 45K”). In 2001 and 2002, we sold most of our interest in a synfuel facility and subsequently entered into an agreement to manage the facility. As part of the compensation for the sale, we received a contingent promissory note that is paid on a cents per Section 45K credit dollar earned based on synfuel tonnage shipped through 2007. The payments to be received by us under the contingent promissory note may be reduced or eliminated if the price of oil remains above a certain threshold price set by the IRS (the “threshold price”).  Once the threshold price is reached, the Section 45K credits will be phased out ratably over an approximate $14.00 per barrel range above the threshold price. The threshold price for 2006 was set by the IRS in April 2007 and at a level where there was a partial phase-out of 2006 Section 45K tax credits. The threshold price for 2007 is expected to be set by the IRS in April 2008. For the year-to-date period through July 31, 2007, the average price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil was approximately $63.40 per barrel. Assuming the price of oil remains at or above this average in 2007, a portion of the Section 45K credits for 2007 may be phased out and our earnings from our operating and financial arrangements with the synfuel facility may be reduced. If the price of oil rises too high causing a portion or all of the credits to be phased out, the majority owner of the synfuel facility may decide to close the facility, which would eliminate all of our future earnings from our operating and financial arrangements with the synfuel facility.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements including guarantees, operating leases, indemnifications, and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit and performance or surety bonds. Liabilities related to these arrangements are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets, and, except for the operating leases, we do not expect any material impact on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements.

19

We use surety bonds to secure post-mining reclamation, workers’ compensation, wage payment and collection bonds and other miscellaneous obligations. As of June 30, 2007, we had $311.5 million of outstanding surety bonds. Those bonds were in place to secure obligations as follows: post-mining reclamation bonds of $302.0 million, federal black lung bonds of $3.9 million, and other miscellaneous obligation bonds of $5.6 million.

Generally, the availability and market terms of surety bonds continue to be challenging. If we are unable to meet certain financial tests, or to the extent that surety bonds otherwise become unavailable, we would need to replace the surety bonds or seek to secure them with letters of credit, cash deposits, or other suitable forms of collateral. As of June 30, 2007, we had secured $46.1 million of surety obligations with letters of credit.

From time to time we use bank letters of credit to secure our obligations for worker’s compensation programs, various insurance contracts and other obligations. The Office of Workers’ Claims (“OWC”) for the Commonwealth of Kentucky notified us of the application of a new actuarial methodology for deriving potential total obligations of existing claims, which resulted in a preliminary assessment indicating the need for an additional $37.1 million of surety against potential claims. We protested the assessment and, following a hearing, the OWC reduced the assessment to $19 million.  We do not believe that the OWC's assessment is supported by Kentucky law and have appealed the assessment to the Franklin County Circuit Court of Kentucky.  We have also requested a stay of the assessment pending the court’s decision. Any additional surety that is ultimately required will likely be satisfied with a bank letter of credit.

At June 30, 2007, we had $161.1 million of letters of credit outstanding, of which $100.0 million was collateralized by $105.0 million of cash deposited in restricted, interest bearing accounts pledged to issuing banks, and $61.0 million was issued under our asset-based lending arrangement. No claims were outstanding against those letters of credit as of June 30, 2007.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end. The results of operations for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the full year. Please refer to the section entitled “Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions” of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, for a discussion of our critical accounting estimates and assumptions.

We adopted FIN 48, which amended our accounting for income taxes, on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. There have been no other material changes to the previously reported information concerning our Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions.

RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. It does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently assessing the potential impact of the statement on our financial position and results of operations.

Item 3:  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT MARKET RISK

Please refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Discussions About Market Risk, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, for a discussion of certain market risk factors, which may impact our business. There has been no significant change to our market risk exposures for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Item 4:  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), we carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is our principal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), who is our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

20

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of the controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. 

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The following describes material developments in legal proceedings affecting us, as previously described in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and in subsequently filed interim reports, as they relate to the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007. Certain other information responsive to this Item 1 is contained in Note 13, “Contingencies,” of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

International Coal Group

On November 18, 2005, ICG, LLC (“ICG”), a subsidiary of International Coal Group, Inc., sued our subsidiary Massey Coal Sales Company, Inc., d/b/a Massey Utility Sales Company (“MUS”), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, seeking declaratory relief and compensatory and punitive damages due to MUS’s alleged failure to deliver coal and related matters. On June 1, 2006, ICG also sued MUS, us, and our subsidiary Sidney Coal Company, Inc. in Circuit Court in Pike County, Kentucky, alleging tortious interference with a contract between ICG and its customer, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. On August 2, 2006, the federal court dismissed ICG’s fraud claims and certain breach of contract claims, ruling there was no basis for punitive damages. On July 6, 2007, we reached an agreement with ICG whereby ICG agreed to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims filed against us and our subsidiaries in exchange for, among other items, our agreement to ship during 2008 through 2010 all tonnage previously missed at prices specified in the contract.

Shareholder Suit

On July 2, 2007, Manville Personal Injury Trust (“Manville”) filed a suit in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia styled as a shareholder derivative action asserting that it is a shareholder acting on our behalf. We are named as a nominal defendant. Each of the members of our Board of Directors, certain of our officers, and certain of our former directors and officers are named as defendants (“Defendants”). The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duties to us arising out of Defendants’ alleged failure to cause us to comply with applicable state and federal environmental and worker-safety laws and regulations. The complaint seeks to recover unspecified damages in favor of us, appropriate equitable relief, and an award to Manville of the costs and expenses associated with this action. We believe we have insurance coverage applicable to this matter. We believe this matter will be resolved without a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are subject to a variety of risks, including, but not limited to those referenced under the heading “Certain Trends and Uncertainties” of Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those referenced herein to other Items contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, including Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 1. Business, under the headings “Customers and Coal Contracts,” “Competition,” and “Environmental, Safety and Health Laws and Regulations,” Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the headings “Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions,” “Certain Trends and Uncertainties” and elsewhere in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

21

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table summarizes information about shares of Common Stock that were purchased during the second quarter of 2007.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
	(In Thousands, Except Average Price Paid Per Share)
April 1 through April 30		-		-		-		-
May 1 through May 31		-		-		-		-
June 1 through June 30		-		-		-		-
Total		-				-		21,077,283	(2)

______

(1)	The Repurchase Program was authorized by the Board of Directors and announced on November 14, 2005 for an aggregate amount not to exceed $500 million. The Repurchase Program does not require us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be terminated at any time.
(2)	Calculated using $450 million that may yet be purchased under our share repurchase program and $21.35, the closing price of Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on July 31, 2007.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On May 22, 2007, our stockholders voted on the following proposals at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders at which there were present at the meeting, in person or by proxy, the holders of 70,573,103 shares of Common Stock, representing 87.03 percent of the total number of shares outstanding as of the record date, such percentage constituting a quorum. The independent inspectors of election certified the following results with respect to each of the following proposals:

(1) Election of Directors. We proposed to elect Richard M. Gabrys, Dan R. Moore and Baxter F. Phillips, Jr. as Class II directors to hold office for three years and until their respective successors are duly qualified and elected. Based upon the voting provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation related to the election of directors, the following director candidates having received the number of votes following their name were elected by our stockholders to the Board of Directors: Mr. Gabrys (69,619,445 votes), Mr. Moore (69,813,396 votes), and Mr. Phillips, Jr. (69,947,637 votes).  The following directors had terms of office that did not expire at the 2007 Annual Meeting: Don L. Blankenship, James B. Crawford, E. Gordon Gee, Robert H. Foglesong, Bobby R. Inman, Daniel S. Loeb, and Todd Q. Swanson. There were no broker non-votes.

(2) Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. Our stockholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 with 70,208,665 “Votes For,” 265,933 “Votes Against,” and 98,505 “Abstentions.” The “Votes For” represented 99.5% of the shares of Common Stock represented at the meeting, which was more than the 50% required by our Certificate of Incorporation to pass. There were no broker non-votes.

(3) Stockholder proposal regarding political contribution reports. The stockholder proposal regarding political contribution reports did not pass, having received 9,962,965 “Votes For,” 31,515,494 “Votes Against,” and 19,523,162 “Abstentions.” The “Votes For” represented 14.1% of the shares of Common Stock represented at the meeting, which was less than the 50% required by our Certificate of Incorporation to pass. There were 9,571,482 broker non-votes.

(4) Stockholder proposal regarding a climate change report. The stockholder proposal regarding a climate change reportdid not pass, having received 7,562,957 “Votes For,” 34,155,274 “Votes Against” and 19,283,390 “Abstentions.” The “Votes For” represented 10.7% of the shares of Common Stock represented at the meeting, which was less than the 50% required by our Certificate of Incorporation to pass. There were 9,571,482 broker non-votes.

22

Item 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBITS
10.1	Limited Consent and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 19, 2007.
23.1	Consent of Robert H. Fuhrman, recognized Clean Water Act penalty valuation expert dated August 9, 2007.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
	(Registrant)
Date:  August 9, 2007
	/s/ E. B. Tolbert
	E. B. Tolbert,
	Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	/s/ D. W. Owings
	D. W. Owings,
	Controller

24

EX-10.1

EXHBIT 10.1

LIMITED CONSENT AND SECOND AMENDMENT

TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

This LIMITED CONSENT AND SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of July 19, 2007, by and among A. T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Administrative Borrower”), individually and as agent on behalf of the other Loan Parties (such term and each other capitalized term used but not defined herein having the meaning given to it in Article I of the Credit Agreement referenced below), the Required Lenders signatory hereto, UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), and THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., as collateral agent and as security trustee (the “Collateral Agent”; and together with the Administrative Agent, the “Agents”) for the Secured Parties and Issuing Bank.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Administrative Borrower, the other Borrowers, the Guarantors, the Administrative Agent, the Collateral Agent and Lenders entered into that certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 15, 2006 (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”);

WHEREAS, the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties), the Administrative Agent, the Collateral Agent, and the Required Lenders entered into that certain Limited Waiver, Consent and First Amendment to Credit Agreement effective as of March 12, 2007;

WHEREAS, the Administrative Borrower has informed the Administrative Agent of its desire to form one or more corporations (each an “Insurance Subsidiary”), as direct or indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of the Administrative Borrower to engage in the Insurance Business (as defined in Section 2.1 hereof);

WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that federal and state insurance laws and regulations will impose certain restrictions on the business and activities of the Insurance Subsidiaries, including their ability to declare and issue Dividends, to grant or permit Liens on their assets, to guarantee Obligations of their parent corporations and to incur Indebtedness and such insurance laws and regulations may preclude or restrict any transfer or pledge of the Equity Interests of the Insurance Subsidiaries;

WHEREAS, the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties) has requested that Agents and the Required Lenders (i) consent to the formation of one or more Insurance Subsidiaries under Section 6.12 of the Credit Agreement as direct or indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of the Administrative Borrower, and (ii) amend certain Sections of the Credit Agreement to permit the capitalization of such Insurance Subsidiaries, to permit the incurrence of Indebtedness and other obligations by the Insurance Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their business and the granting of Liens (except Liens on the Collateral) to secure such obligations and to relieve the Insurance Subsidiaries of certain covenants and restrictions otherwise applicable to Subsidiaries under the provisions of the Credit Agreement, all upon the terms, and subject to the limitations, set forth herein.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, mutual agreements contained herein and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Agents, the Required Lenders and the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties) agree as follows:

1Limited Consent.  Subject to the satisfaction of each of the conditions to effectiveness set forth in Section 3 hereof, the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties), the Agents and the Required Lenders hereby agree as follows:

1.1Immediately upon the effectiveness of this Agreement, the Agents and the Required Lenders hereby consent to the formation of one or more Insurance Subsidiaries pursuant to Section 6.12 of the Credit Agreement and to the issuance by any such Insurance Subsidiary of the Equity Interests therein to the Administrative Borrower or to any of its direct or indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries.

1.2The limited consent set forth in Section 1.1 above is  effective solely for the purposes set forth herein and shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed to be a consent to any amendment, waiver or modification of any term or condition of the Credit Agreement, Security Agreement or of any other Loan Document, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, or prejudice any right or rights that Administrative Agent or Lenders have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Credit Agreement, the Security Agreement or any other Loan Document.

2Agreements and Amendments to Credit Agreement.  Subject to the satisfaction of each of the conditions to effectiveness set forth in Section 3 hereof, the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties), the Agents and the Required Lenders hereby agree as follows:

2.1Immediately upon the effectiveness of this Agreement, the following sections of the Credit Agreement are amended as follows:

2.1.1                      Section 1.01 (Defined Terms) of the Credit Agreement is amended by adding the following additional defined terms:

“Insurance Business” shall mean the business of (i) issuing surety bonds, reclamation bonds, performance bonds, workers’ compensation insurance policies, fronting policies for all risk general liability, casualty and property insurance and other similar obligations as a captive insurance/bonding company to support and/or insure reclamation and workers’ compensation obligations and all risk general liability, casualty and property risks customarily covered by fronting policies, in each case incurred by the Companies in the ordinary course of their businesses, and (ii) conducting all activities ancillary thereto, including entering into reinsurance arrangements, receiving premiums, establishing reserves for the payment of claims and for the return of unearned premiums and investing funds in support of such reserves, all as may be required or permitted by applicable insurance laws and regulations.

“Insurance Subsidiary” shall mean any direct or indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of the Administrative Borrower that is engaged solely in the Insurance Business.

2.1.2                      Section 5.04 (Insurance) of the Credit Agreement is amended by adding a new clause (c) as follows:

“(c)           Notwithstanding any provision of this Section 5.04 to the contrary, no Insurance Subsidiary shall be permitted to provide any insurance coverage with respect to the Collateral without the prior written consent of each of the Administrative Agent and the Collateral Agent (as determined in their sole discretion) and the Required Lenders.  Subject to the provisions of the preceding sentence, the Loan Parties shall not be deemed to have breached any provision of this Section 5.04 solely as a result of maintaining insurance coverages with any Insurance Subsidiary.”

2.1.3                      Section 5.11 (Additional Collateral; Additional Guarantors) of the Credit Agreement is amended by inserting the following provision as new clause (d):

“(d)           Notwithstanding any provision of this Section 5.11 to the contrary, clauses (a), (b) and (c) above shall not apply to any Insurance Subsidiary.”

2.1.4                      Section 6.01 (Indebtedness) of the Credit Agreement is amended by (i) deleting the “and” at the end of existing clause (o) thereof, (ii) deleting the “.” at the end of existing clause (p) thereof and substituting “; and” in its place and (iii) inserting the following provision as new clause (q):

“(q)           Indebtedness and other obligations incurred by any Insurance Subsidiary in the ordinary course of its Insurance Business.”

2.1.5                      Section 6.02 (Liens) of the Credit Agreement is amended by amending and restating clause (l) and (v) as follows:

“(l)           claims of insureds against properties of any Insurance Subsidiary and Liens granted or incurred on properties of any Insurance Subsidiary in the ordinary course of its Insurance Business.”

*                       *                         *

“(v)           other Liens (not of a type set forth in clauses (a) through (u) above) incurred in the ordinary course of business of any Company with respect to obligations (including without limitation, any Capitalized Lease Obligations resulting from the conversion of operating leases existing on December 1, 2003, but excluding any other Indebtedness) or securing any surety bonds, reclamation bonds, performance bonds, workers’ compensation property, casualty or general liability insurance policies and other similar obligations issued or incurred by any Insurance Subsidiary in the ordinary course of its Insurance Business (but excluding any other Indebtedness) that do not in the aggregate exceed at any one time outstanding 5% of Consolidated Net Tangible Assets; provided that such Liens permitted under this clause (v) do not attach to any Collateral;”

2.1.6                      Section 6.04 (Investments, Loans and Advances) of the Credit Agreement is amended by amending and restating clauses (h) and (p) as follows:

“(h)           Investments (other than as described in Section 6.04(e)) (i) by any Borrower in any Guarantor that is a Subsidiary, (ii) by any Company in any Borrower or any Guarantor that is a Subsidiary, (iii) by Holdings in any Borrower, (iv) by a Guarantor in another Guarantor, (v) by any Loan Party in a Company that is not a Loan Party (other than the Insurance Subsidiary); provided, however, that the aggregate amount of all Investments permitted pursuant to this clause (v) shall not exceed $25 million at any time; and (vi) by any Loan Party in any Insurance Subsidiary; provided, however, that (A) the aggregate amount of Investments permitted pursuant to this clause (vi) with respect to the initial formation and capitalization of the Insurance Subsidiaries shall not exceed $60 million and (B) during any Fiscal Year, additional Investments from and after the initial formation and capitalization of any Insurance Subsidiary shall not exceed the sum of $20 million plus the cumulative unused amount, if any, otherwise permitted under clause (A) above or this clause (B); provided, that any Investment in one or more of the Insurance Subsidiaries shall not be permitted if, after giving effect to such Investment, (x) the aggregate amount of all Investments permitted pursuant to this clause (vi) would exceed $125 million at any time or (y) Excess Availability is less than $30,000,000 after giving effect to such Investment;”

*                       *                         *

“(p)           Each Borrower and its Subsidiaries may make or acquire Investments in connection with Permitted Acquisitions and each Insurance Subsidiary may make or acquire Investments permitted by applicable insurance laws and regulations;”

2.1.7                      Section 6.05 (Mergers, Consolidations, Sales of Assets and Acquisitions) of the Credit Agreement is amended by amending and restating the final paragraph thereof as follows:

“To the extent the Required Lenders waive the provisions of this Section 6.05 with respect to the sale of any Collateral, or, subject in each case to Section 11.02(b)(vii), any Collateral is sold, exchanged or otherwise disposed of as permitted by this Section 6.05, such Collateral (unless sold, exchanged or transferred to a Company) shall be sold, exchanged or otherwise disposed of free and clear of the Liens created by the Security Documents, and the Administrative Agent and the Collateral Agent shall take all actions deemed appropriate in order to effect the foregoing.”

2.1.8                      Section 6.07 (Transactions with Affiliates) of the Credit Agreement is amended by (i) deleting the “and” at the end of the existing clause (d) thereof, (ii) deleting the “.” at the end of the existing clause (e) thereof and substituting “; and” in its place and (iii) inserting the following provision as new clause (f):

“(f)           any Company may pay insurance premiums to any Insurance Subsidiary so long as the proceeds of such payments are either (i) used to pay such Insurance Subsidiary’s franchise taxes, income taxes and other current period operating expenses (including any reinsurance premiums), (ii) used or invested by such Insurance Subsidiary to support loss reserves, or (iii) retained by such Insurance Subsidiary as capital; provided, however, that any such retained amount shall apply against the amounts permitted by Section 6.04(h)(vi).”

2.1.9                      Section 6.10 (Limitation on Certain Restrictions on  Subsidiaries) of the Credit Agreement is amended by adding a new sentence at the end of Section 6.10 as follows:

“Notwithstanding any provision of this Section 6.10 to the contrary, clauses (a) and (b) above shall not apply to any Insurance Subsidiary.”

2.1.10                      Section 6.13 (Business) of the Credit Agreement is amended by amending and restating clause (b) as follows:

“(b)           With respect to the Borrowers and their Subsidiaries, engage (directly or indirectly) in any business other than those businesses in which the Borrowers and their Subsidiaries are engaged on the Restatement Date, whether in connection with a Permitted Acquisition or otherwise; provided that this Section shall not preclude (i) a Permitted Acquisition of any entity engaged in a Permitted Business or the formation of a Subsidiary of Holdings to be engaged in a Permitted Business or (ii) any Insurance Subsidiary from engaging in the Insurance Business.”

2.1.11                      Section 6.16 (Negative Pledges) is amended by adding a new clause (c) as follows:

“(c)           Notwithstanding any provision of this Section 6.16 to the contrary, clauses (a) and (b) above shall not apply to any assets (other than Equity Interests) of any Insurance Subsidiary.”

2.2The parties acknowledge and agree that the financial performance of each Insurance Subsidiary shall be included in the calculations to determine compliance with the financial covenants in Section 6.08 of the Credit Agreement.

3Conditions to Effectiveness.  This Agreement shall be effective on the date on which all of the following conditions precedent are satisfied:

3.1This Agreement shall have been executed and delivered by the Administrative Agent, the Collateral Agent, the Required Lenders and the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties).

3.2The representations and warranties contained herein shall be true and correct in all respects, and, after giving effect to this Agreement, no Event of Default or Default shall exist on the date hereof.

4Representations and Warranties.

4.1The execution, delivery and performance by Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties) of this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action and this Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Administrative Borrower and each of the other Loan Parties enforceable against the Administrative Borrower and each of the other Loan Parties in accordance with its terms, except as the enforcement thereof may be subject to (i) the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors’ rights generally and (ii) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law);

4.2Each of the representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement is true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof as if made on the date hereof, except to the extent that such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date; and

4.3Neither the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties) nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby does or shall result in a breach of, or violate (i) any provision of the Administrative Borrower’s or any other Loan Party’s articles of incorporation or bylaws, (iii) any law or regulation, or any order or decree of any court or government instrumentality, applicable to the Administrative Borrower or the other Loan Parties or binding upon any of their properties, or (iii) any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, lease, agreement or other instrument to which the Administrative Borrower or any other Loan Party is a party or by which the Administrative Borrower or any other Loan Party or any of their property is bound, except in any such case to the extent such conflict or breach has been waived by a written waiver document, a copy of which has been delivered to the Agents on or before the date hereof.

5Reference to and Effect upon the Credit Agreement.

5.1Except as specifically set forth above, the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.

5.2The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of any Agent or any Lender under the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, nor constitute amendment of any provision of the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document, except as specifically set forth herein.  Upon the effectiveness of this Agreement, each reference in the Credit Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby.

5.3The Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties) acknowledges and agrees that the execution and delivery by Agents and Required Lenders of this Agreement shall not be deemed (i) to create a course of dealing or otherwise obligate Agents or Lenders to forbear, waive, consent or execute similar amendments under the same or similar circumstances in the future, or (ii) to amend, relinquish or impair any right of Agents or Lenders to receive any indemnity or similar payment from any Person or entity as a result of any matter arising from or relating to this Agreement.

5.4The Administrative Borrower (on behalf of itself and each of the other Loan Parties) affirms and acknowledges that this Agreement constitutes a Loan Document under the Credit Agreement and any reference to the Loan Documents under the Credit Agreement contained in any notice, request, certificate or other document executed concurrently with or after the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall be deemed to include this Agreement unless the context shall otherwise specify.

6Costs and Expenses.  As provided in Section 11.03 of the Credit Agreement, Borrowers agree to reimburse Agents for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the Administrative Agent and the Collateral Agent in connection with the preparation, execution and delivery of this Agreement, including the fees, charges and disbursements of Latham & Watkins, LLP, counsel for the Administrative Agent and Hahn & Hessen, LLP, counsel to the Collateral Agent.

7GOVERNING LAW.  THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS (AS OPPOSED TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS PROVISIONS) OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

8Headings.  Section headings in this Agreement are included herein for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement for any other purposes.

9Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.    In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf the signature is executed) the same with the same force and effect as if such facsimile signature page were an original thereof, and such party shall promptly follow its facsimile signature page by mailing of a hard copy original.

[Signature Pages Follow]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first written above.

ADMINISTRATIVE BORROWER

A. T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., individually and as agent for each of the other Loan Parties

By:  /s/ Philip W. Nichols                                                              

Name: Philip W. Nichols

Title: Treasurer

       AGENTS

UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, as the Administrative Agent

By:  /s/ David B. Julie                                                              

Name: David B. Julie

Title: Associate Director

By:  /s/ Irja R. Otsa                                                               

Name: Irja R. Otsa

Title: Associate Director

LENDERS

UBS LOAN FINANCE LLC,

as Swingline Lender

By:   /s/ David B. Julie                                                             

Name: David B. Julie

Title: Associate Director

By:  /s/ Irja R. Otsa                                                              

Name: Irja R. Otsa

Title: Associate Director

UBS LOAN FINANCE LLC,

as a Lender

By:  /s/ David B. Julie                                                             

Name: David B. Julie

Title: Associate Director

By:  /s/ Irja R. Otsa                                                                                                                             

Name: Irja R. Otsa

Title: Associate Director

        THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., as the Collateral Agent

By: /s/ Eddy L. Milstein                                                             

 Name: Eddy L. Milstein

 Title: Vice President

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, as a Lender

By:  /s/ Meenoo Sameer                                                              

Name: Meenoo Sameer

Title: Duly Authorized Signatory

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as a Lender

By:  /s/ Lawrence P. Garni                                                              

Name: Lawrence P. Garni

Title: Sr. Vice President

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender

By:  /s/ Scott O'Donnell                                                              

Name: Scott O'Donnell

Title: Credit Officer

EX-23.1

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF RECOGNIZED EXPERT

 ON CLEAN WATER ACT PENALTY VALUATION

August 9, 2007

Massey Energy Company

4 North 4^th Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I hereby consent to the reference of my status as a recognized expert on penalty calculation in Clean Water Act cases, and to my estimate of potential liability of the suit filed on May 10, 2007 against Massey Energy Company and several of the Company’s subsidiaries by the United States, on behalf of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, prepared for Massey Energy Company based on analysis of the relevant data and appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10−Q of Massey Energy Company and to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements of Massey Energy Company and in the related prospectuses.

Sincerely,

By:           /s/ Robert H. Fuhrman

Name: Robert H. Fuhrman*

____

* Mr. Fuhrman earned a Master in Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School and served as an economist in the Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from 1977 to 1983.  During the last twenty years, as an economic and financial consultant in private practice, he has provided analyses in over 150 environmental civil penalty cases, including deposition testimony in twenty matters and court testimony on eight occasions, mostly in federal district courts.  Mr. Fuhrman has also participated in at least twenty face-to-face settlement negotiations with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on such matters.

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

Section 302 Certification

I, Don L. Blankenship, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Massey Energy Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

Date:  August 9, 2007	/s/ Don L. Blankenship
	Don L. Blankenship
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

Section 302 Certification

I, Eric B. Tolbert, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Massey Energy Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

Date:  August 9, 2007	/s/ Eric B. Tolbert
	Eric B. Tolbert
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Don L. Blankenship, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 9, 2007	/s/ Don L. Blankenship
	Don L. Blankenship
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric B. Tolbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 9, 2007	/s/ Eric B. Tolbert
	Eric B. Tolbert
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer