XML 69 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Regulatory Matters (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Regulated Operations [Abstract]  
Schedule of Potential Plant Retirements
The table below contains the net carrying value of generating facilities planned for retirement or included in recent IRPs as evaluated for potential retirement. Dollar amounts in the table below are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2021, and exclude capitalized asset retirement costs.
Remaining Net
CapacityBook Value
(in MW)(in millions)
Duke Energy Carolinas
Allen Steam Station Units 1-2(a)
324 $19 
Allen Steam Station Units 4-5(b)
516 362 
Cliffside Unit 5(b)
544 367 
Duke Energy Progress
Mayo Unit 1(b)
704 640 
Roxboro Units 3-4(b)
1,392 465 
Duke Energy Florida
Crystal River Units 4-5(c)
1,410 1,658 
Duke Energy Indiana (d)
Gibson Units 1-5(e)
2,822 1,814 
Cayuga Units 1-2(e)
995 713 
Total Duke Energy8,707 $6,038 
(a)As part of the 2015 resolution of a lawsuit involving alleged New Source Review violations, Duke Energy Carolinas must retire Allen Steam Station Units 1 through 3 by December 31, 2024. The long-term energy options considered in the IRP could result in retirement of these units earlier than their current estimated useful lives. Unit 3 with a capacity of 270 MW and a net book value of $26 million at December 31, 2020, was retired in March 2021.
(b)These units were included in the IRP filed by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress in North Carolina and South Carolina on September 1, 2020. The long-term energy options considered in the IRP could result in retirement of these units earlier than their current estimated useful lives. In 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed North Carolina rate cases that included depreciation studies that accelerate end-of-life dates for these plants. The NCUC issued orders in the 2019 rate cases of Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress on March 31, 2021, and April 16, 2021, respectively, in which the proposals to shorten the remaining depreciable lives of these units were denied, while indicating the IRP proceeding was the appropriate proceeding for the review of generating plant retirements.
(c)On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed a settlement agreement with the FPSC, which proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates for Duke Energy Florida's last two coal-fired generating facilities, Crystal River Units 4-5, eight years ahead of schedule in 2034 rather than in 2042. The settlement was approved by the FPSC on May 4, 2021.
(d)Gallagher Units 2 and 4 with a total capacity of 280 MW and a total net book value of $102 million at December 31, 2020, were retired on June 1, 2021.
(e)The rate case filed July 2, 2019, included proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates from 2026 to 2038. The depreciation rates reflecting these updated retirement dates were approved by the IURC as part of the rate case order issued on June 29, 2020.