EX-99.4 15 d666535dex994.htm EX-99.4 EX-99.4

Exhibit 99.4

SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011


Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

     Page
Number
 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     1   

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 (unaudited) and 2012 (unaudited)

     2   

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 (unaudited), 2012 (unaudited), and 2011

     3   

Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2013 (unaudited), 2012 (unaudited), and 2011

     4   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 (unaudited), 2012 (unaudited), and 2011

     5   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     6   


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

Sealy Newmarket General Partnership

Shreveport, Louisiana

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital, and cash flows of Sealy Newmarket General Partnership (the “Partnership”) for the year then ended December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership for the year then ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Partnership will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership has suffered a significant decline in operating cash flow from operations and recurring net losses. In addition, the Partnership’s sole operating asset was foreclosed during the year ended December 31, 2013. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 6. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 7 and above, the Partnership’s sole operating asset was foreclosed during the year ended December 31, 2013. Due to this foreclosure, the results of operations and cash flows resulting from the foreclosed assets have been presented as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.

/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC

March 14, 2014

Atlanta, Georgia

 

1


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED) AND 2012 (UNAUDITED)

 

ASSETS   
     2013      2012  
     (UNAUDITED)      (UNAUDITED)  

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     

Buildings and improvements

   $ —         $ 36,640,265   

Land

     —           6,286,507   

Tenant improvements

     —           2,359,003   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total property and equipment, at cost

     —           45,285,775   

Less accumulated depreciation

     —           6,629,128   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total property and equipment, net

     —           38,656,647   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     553,775         482,182   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

RESTRICTED CASH

     —           6,406,939   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS

     

Acquired intangible assets, net

     —           419,806   

Deferred rent receivable

     —           458,288   

Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $125,758 for 2012

     —           116,075   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     9,535         36,234   

Tenant rent receivable

     —           22,448   

Due from related parties

     5,400         39,100   

Deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $317,750 for 2012

     —           291,161   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other assets

     14,935         1,383,112   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 568,710       $ 46,928,880   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL   

LIABILITIES

     

Note payable

   $ 392,388       $ 37,000,000   

Accrued interest payable

     —           9,099,095   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     171,702         57,010   

Unearned revenues

     —           110,471   

Tenant security deposits

     —           108,049   

Acquired intangible obligations, net

     —           305   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   $ 564,090       $ 46,374,930   

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

   $ 4,620       $ 553,950   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

   $ 568,710       $ 46,928,880   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

2


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

     2013     2012        
     (UNAUDITED)     (UNAUDITED)     2011  

OPERATING EXPENSES

      

General and administrative

     5,993        9,288        396   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     5,993        9,288        396   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

OPERATING LOSS

     (5,993     (9,288     (396
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

      

Operating loss from discontinued operations

     (18,876,067     (4,544,988     (4,402,747

Gain on foreclosure of the note payable

     18,332,730        —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loss from discontinued operations

     (543,337     (4,544,988     (4,402,747
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET LOSS

   $ (549,330   $ (4,554,276   $ (4,403,143
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

3


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

                 WRT TRS        
     Sealy Newmarket     WRT-Atlanta,     Management        
     Ventures, L.P.     L.L.C.     Corp     Total  

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2010

   $ 3,043,637      $ 6,467,732      $ —        $ 9,511,369   

Net Loss

     (1,409,006     (2,994,137     —          (4,403,143
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2011

     1,634,631        3,473,595        —          5,108,226   

Net Loss (UNAUDITED)

     (1,457,368     (3,096,908     —          (4,554,276
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2012 (UNAUDITED)

     177,263        376,687        —          553,950   

Transfer of Partnership Interest (UNAUDITED)

     —          (16,699     16,699        —     

Net Loss (UNAUDITED)

     (175,786     (359,988     (13,556     (549,330
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED)

   $ 1,477      $ —        $ 3,143      $ 4,620   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

4


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

     2013     2012        
     (UNAUDITED)     (UNAUDITED)     2011  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net loss

   $ (549,330   $ (4,554,276   $ (4,403,143

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

      

Gain on the foreclosure of the note payable

     (18,332,730     —          —     

Impairment of property and equipment

     14,562,200        —          —     

Depreciation expense

     1,179,099        1,357,440        1,494,515   

Amortization of acquired intangibles

     61,670        113,650        199,183   

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     29,022        29,021        29,021   

Amortization of deferred leasing costs

     194,160        111,605        96,348   

(Increase) decrease in:

      

Restricted cash

     (366,875     (1,048,695     (1,216,698

Deferred rent receivable

     7,126        59,397        (121,393

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     2,281,313        992        382   

Tenant rent receivable

     (330,642     (14,866     12,168   

Due from related parties

     33,700        44,944        (70,744

Deferred leasing costs paid

     (236,852     (9,277     (180,819

Increase (decrease) in:

      

Accrued interest

     1,375,257        4,293,454        4,305,474   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     192,913        (321,915     77,644   

Unearned revenues

     201,523        (9,978     (77,083

Due to related parties

     1,600        —          —     

Tenant security deposits

     11,901        5,000        (34,072
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     315,055        56,496        110,783   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

      

Purchase of property and equipment

     (243,462     (10,902     (652,445
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (243,462     (10,902     (652,445
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in cash and cash equivalents

     71,593        45,594        (541,662

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

     482,182        436,588        978,250   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

   $ 553,775      $ 482,182      $ 436,588   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for interest

   $ —        $ —        $ 18,845   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

5


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

1. ORGANIZATION

Sealy Newmarket General Partnership (“the Partnership”), a Delaware partnership, was organized May 2, 2008 (expires December 31, 2056) by Sealy Newmarket Ventures, L.P. (“Sealy”) and WRT-Atlanta, L.L.C. (“WRT”) (collectively, the “Partners”) to acquire, own, hold, manage, operate, mortgage, pledge, sell, assign, transfer and lease certain commercial properties located in Cobb County, Georgia, (the “Property”).

On May 30, 2013, WRT-Atlanta, L.L.C. transferred its ownership interest to WRT TRS Management Corp. which assumed all obligations of Winthrop under the governing documents of the partnership.

The Partnership acquired the Property on August 20, 2008 and began operations. On December 3, 2013, the property was foreclosed by the bank (see Note 7).

 

  (a) Profits (Losses) Allocation

Profits and losses are allocated to the Partners in accordance with the terms of the Partnership agreement. Capital contributions of the Partners do not earn preferred returns. Profits are allocated as follows:

 

  (i) First, to the Partners, in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause their Capital Accounts to equal the balance of their Additional Capital Contributions Preferred Return Accounts; and

 

  (ii) Second, to the Partners, in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause their Capital Accounts to equal the sum of the amount referred to in tier (i) above, plus the balance of their respective Additional Capital Contribution Accounts; and

 

  (iii) Third, to the Partners, in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause their Capital Accounts to equal the sum of the amount referred to in tier (ii) above, plus the balance of their respective Initial Capital Contribution Account Balances; and

 

  (iv) Fourth, to the Partners, in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause their Capital Accounts to equal the sum of the amount referred to in tier (iii) above, plus the balance of their respective Initial Capital Contribution Account Balances; and

 

  (v) Fifth, to the Partners, in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause their Capital Accounts to equal the sum of the amount referred to in tier (iv) to be in the same proportions as their respective Residual Percentages; and

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

6


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

1. ORGANIZATION (CONTINUED)

 

  (vi) Sixth, any remainder allocated to the Partners in proportion to their respective Residual Percentage Interests.

Losses are allocated to the Partners as follows:

 

  (i) First, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause the amounts by which such Partners’ Capital Accounts exceed the sum referred to in tier (iv) of the profit allocation shown above to be in the same proportions as their respective Residual Percentages; and

 

  (ii) Second, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to reduce each Partners’ Capital Accounts to the sum referred to in tier (iv) of the profit allocation shown above; and

 

  (iii) Third, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to reduce each Partners’ Capital Accounts to the sum referred to in tier (iii) of the profit allocation shown above; and

 

  (iv) Fourth, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to reduce each Partners’ Capital Accounts to the sum referred to in tier (ii) of the profit allocation shown above; and

 

  (v) Fifth, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the amounts necessary to reduce each Partners’ Capital Accounts to the sum referred to in tier (i) of the profit allocation shown above; and

 

  (vi) Sixth, to the Partners in proportion to, and to the extent of the amounts necessary to cause their respective Capital Accounts to equal zero.

 

  (b) Distribution of cash flows

The Partnership’s distributable cash, as defined, shall be distributed as follows:

 

  (i) First, to the Partners in proportion to their respective Additional Capital Contributions Account balances until such balances are reduced to zero; and

 

  (ii) Second, to the Partners in proportion to their respective Initial Capital Preferred Return Account balances until their respective Additional Capital Preferred Return Account balances are reduced to zero; and

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

7


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

1. ORGANIZATION (CONTINUED)

 

  (iii) Third, any balance to the Partners in proportion to their respective Residual Percentage.

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation – The Partnership has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification (Codification). The Codification is the single official source of authoritative accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities and all of the Codification’s content carries the same level of authority.

The Partnership presents its consolidated financial statements on the going concern basis of accounting which contemplates realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business (see Note 6).

The Partnership’s consolidated financial statements include its accounts and the accounts of Sealy Newmarket, L.P., which holds the Property, and Sealy Newmarket General Partner, L.P. All intercompany profits, balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Property and equipment - Property and equipment, including property improvements are recorded at cost. Major renewals and purchases of equipment are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred.

Property and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives are 5 to 39 years for buildings and improvements, and 15 years for land improvements. Depreciation of tenant improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the life of the respective lease. Depreciation expense for the

years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $1,179,099, $1,357,440, and $1,494,515, respectively.

Deferred financing costs - Deferred financing costs are related to the Partnership’s note payable. Financing costs are amortized, as a component of interest expense, over the term of the loan using a method that approximates the effective-interest method.

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

8


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

Deferred leasing costs – Deferred leasing costs are related to commissions paid for certain tenant leases. Leasing costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the respective tenant lease.

Accounting for intangible assets and liabilities - Accounting guidance for acquisitions of a business prior to revised guidance effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, required that upon acquisition, the purchase price is to be allocated to the components of the acquisition based on the Partnership’s estimates and assumptions of each component’s fair value. These estimates and assumptions impact the amount of costs allocated between components. They also impact depreciation expense and gains or losses recorded on future sales of property. First, the Partnership determines the value of the physical property including land, buildings, and improvements utilizing an “as-if vacant” methodology. Factors considered by management in their analysis of the “as-if vacant” value include lost rentals at market rates during an expected lease-up period and costs to execute similar leases including incremental tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and other related expenses. The Partnership also considers information obtained about the property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence.

The balance of the purchase price is allocated to tenant improvements and acquired intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements represent the tangible assets associated with the acquired leases and are valued at estimated fair market value on the acquisition date considering the remaining lease terms. They are classified as a component of property and equipment on the consolidated financial statements and are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Expiration dates of acquired non-cancellable leases extend to 2018. Acquired intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of acquiring a property with existing in-place operating leases and come in three forms: (i) acquired lease origination values, (ii) acquired above and below market in place leases, and (iii) acquired tenant relationships.

Acquired lease origination values are costs the Partnership estimates, based on terms generally experienced in the local market, it would incur to execute leases with terms similar to the remaining lease terms of the in-place leases, including commissions and other related expenses. They are recorded as a component of acquired intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and are amortized over the remaining terms of the respective non-cancellable leases.

Acquired above and below market in place leases are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the property acquired and the respective tenants) of the difference between (i) the contractual amount to be paid pursuant to the in place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of the fair market lease rate for a comparable in place lease on the acquisition date, measured over a period equal to the

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

9


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

remaining non-cancellable term of the lease. Above market in place leases are classified as a component of acquired intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Below market in place leases are classified as a component of acquired intangible liabilities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.

Revenue recognition - Minimum rent revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreements regardless of when payments are due. Differences between rents billed in accordance with the lease terms and the minimum rent revenue recognized on a straight-line basis are reported as deferred rent receivable in the consolidated accompanying financial statements. Tenant reimbursements are accrued as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred by the Partnership. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 the Partnership incurred $2,410, $10,902, and $18,389 of costs related to tenant improvements on behalf of a tenant, which are reimbursable to the Partnership per the terms of the lease agreement. These direct tenant costs are presented as a component of repairs and maintenance and tenant reimbursement revenue on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Income taxes - No federal or state income taxes are payable by the Partnership, and none have been provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Partners are to include their respective shares of Partnership income or losses, determined on an income tax basis, in their individual tax returns. The Partnership’s tax return and the amount of allocable Partnership profits or losses are subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. If such examinations result in changes to Partnership profits or losses, then the tax liability of the Partners would be changed accordingly.

The Partnership recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions date back to the year ended December 31, 2010. Federal and state income tax positions taken or anticipated to be taken in the income tax returns are attributable to the Partners and not to the entity. As of December 31, 2013, there are no known items which would result in a material accrual attributable to uncertain tax positions.

Impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of - The Partnership reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

10


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

 

recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. The company recorded an impairment of $14,562,200 during 2013 (see Note 7).

 

3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Partnership has entered into a management agreement with a property management company related to Sealy, and will pay a monthly management fee of 3.5% of gross receipts from the Property less any third-party management fees, 50% of all late payments and returned checks collected, and an accounting fee of $2,025 per month. Management fees paid to related parties for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $86,612, $97,354, and $104,399, respectively. The management agreement also states that the related party may receive leasing commissions of 3.00% to 6.75%. Leasing commissions paid to the related party for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $32,701, $9,276, and $34,570, respectively. All employees are currently employed by Sealy Operating Company III, Inc., a related party, and the Partnership periodically reimburses the management company for the salaries of the onsite staff. The Partnership also reimburses Sealy & Company, L.L.C., a related party, for miscellaneous postage, copier charges, and bank statement fees incurred.

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, the Partnership paid $0, $0, and $22,500, respectively, on behalf of Sealy Acquisitions, LLC, a related party, for costs incurred related to the loan renegotiation. The remaining related party receivables represent amounts paid by the Partnership on behalf of the Partners for tax preparation and annual registration fees that are expected to be reimbursed at some time in the future. No interest is due and there are no set repayment terms on any of the related party receivables. All amounts are expected to be collected.

 

4. NOTE PAYABLE

On August 20, 2008, in connection with the acquisition of the Property, the Partnership assumed a $37,000,000 note payable (the “Note”) from the seller. The Note bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.12% per annum and matures on November 10, 2016, at which time any unpaid principal and interest were due. From December 2006 until November 2011, monthly

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

11


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

4. NOTE PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

 

interest only payments were due. From December 2011 until the maturity date, monthly principal and interest payments of $224,696 were due. The Note was collateralized by the Property, an assignment of rents and leases, all deposits held by lender, all account receivables and personal guarantees from two affiliates of Sealy. The Note was foreclosed on December 3, 2013 (see Note 7).

Upon closing of the loan, the seller was required to set aside certain amounts of the loan proceeds into escrow accounts to pay future costs such as insurance, repairs, taxes and leasing commissions. These escrow accounts were transferred to the Partnership upon assumption of the loan. The Partnership was required to make monthly payments into these escrow accounts to pay future costs such as insurance, repairs, taxes and leasing commissions. The balances in these escrow accounts were transferred to the bank upon foreclosure.

Since the Note was in default, the Note was subject to the default interest rate as described in the Note of 5.00% per annum in addition to the fixed rate of 6.12% per annum, for a total of 11.12% per annum. Late fees were charged equal to 5.00% of the payment amount due.

 

5. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposits, which at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

 

6. GOING CONCERN

The Partnership has a history of recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the sole operating asset of the Partnership was foreclosed (see Note 7). The Partnership is currently evaluating its options regarding future operations and funding sources. No assurance can be given that the Partnership will continue in its current form and structure or whether additional debt and/or equity can be raised and if available it will be on terms acceptable to the Partnership. Collectively, these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Partnership be unable to restructure the debt and continue in existence as a going concern.

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

12


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

7. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The historical operating results and gains (losses) from the disposition of certain assets, including operating properties sold, are required to be reflected in a separate section (“discontinued operations”) in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. As a result, the revenues and expenses of Sealy Newmarket, L.P. are included in loss from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.

On December 3, 2013, the property was foreclosed by the bank. Thus, the partnership recorded a gain on the foreclosure of the note payable of $18,332,730 and a loss on the impairment of property and equipment of $14,562,200. The gain on the foreclosure of the note payable was based on the fair value of the property and equipment of $24,675,000, which was based on the sales price of the property sold by the bank, less the note payable of $37,000,000, accrued interest payable of $10,474,352, offset by restricted cash of $4,466,622 transferred to the bank. The loss on the foreclosure of the property and equipment was based on the fair value of the property and equipment of $24,675,000, less The net book value of the property and equipment of $37,766,993, net book value of intangible assets of $1,216,567, and net unearned revenue and uncollected tenant receivables of $253,640.

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

13


SEALY NEWMARKET GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED), 2012 (UNAUDITED), AND 2011

 

7. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

 

The following table shows the revenues and expenses of the above-described discontinued operations.

 

     2013     2012        
     (UNAUDITED)     (UNAUDITED)     2011  

REVENUES

      

Minimum rent

   $ 2,200,323      $ 2,305,484      $ 2,628,897   

Tenant Reimbursements

     295,475        302,387        379,433   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 2,495,798      $ 2,607,871      $ 3,008,330   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

      

Impairment of property and equipment

     14,562,200       

Depreciation and amortization

     1,318,168        1,502,975        1,648,561   

Repairs and maintenance

     529,328        549,622        644,250   

Property taxes

     307,529        323,182        336,181   

General and administrative

     538,413        289,371        244,540   

Management fees

     86,612        97,354        104,399   

Bad Debt

     —          —          22,648   

Insurance

     74,398        74,157        75,722   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     17,416,648        2,836,661        3,076,301   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

     (14,920,850     (228,790     (67,971
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

      

Gain on the foreclsoure of note payable

     18,332,730       

Other income

     14,372        6,278        18,563   

Interest expense

     (3,969,589     (4,322,476     (4,353,339
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expense

     14,377,513        (4,316,198     (4,334,776
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NET LOSS

   $ (543,337   $ (4,544,988   $ (4,402,747
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

14