XML 93 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
3. Fair Value Measurements

REIT securities, loan securities and derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value. The accounting standards establish a framework for measuring fair value as well as disclosures about fair value measurements. They emphasize that fair value is a market based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the standards establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

The Trust’s Level 3 loan securities carried at fair value primarily consist of non-agency mortgage-related securities. The non-agency mortgage-related securities market continued to be illiquid during the first quarter of 2013, with low transaction volumes, wide credit spreads, and limited transparency. The Trust values the loan securities carried at fair value it holds based primarily on prices received from a pricing service. The techniques used by the pricing service to develop the prices generally are either: (a) a comparison to transactions involving instruments with similar collateral and risk profiles; or (b) industry standard modeling, such as a discounted cash flow model. The significant inputs and assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Trust’s loan securities include prepayment rates, probability of default, loss severity and yield to maturity percentages.

Recurring Measurements

The table below presents the Trust’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 according to the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall (in thousands):

 

                                 

Recurring Basis

  Quoted Prices in 
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
    Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
    Total  

Assets

                               

Securities carried at fair value

  $  12,220     $  —       $  —       $ 12,220  

Loan securities carried at fair value

    —         —         11       11  

Interest rate caps

    —         7       —         7  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 12,220     $ 7     $ 11     $ 12,238  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The table below presents the Trust’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012, according to the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall (in thousands):

 

                                 

Recurring Basis

  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
    Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
    Total  

Assets

                               

Securities carried at fair value

  $ 19,694     $  —       $  —       $ 19,694  

Loan securities carried at fair value

    —         —         11       11  

Interest rate caps

    —         8       —         8  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 19,694     $ 8     $ 11     $ 19,713  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value assets and liabilities.

The tables below include a roll forward of the balance sheet amounts from January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013 and from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012, including the change in fair value, for financial instruments classified by the Trust within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy (in thousands). When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement.

 

                 

Loan Securities Carried at Fair Value

  Three Months Ended
March 31, 2013
    Three Months Ended
March 31, 2012
 

Fair value, January 1

  $ 11     $ 5,309  

Net unrealized gain

    —         164  

Sales

    —         —    

Payoff at par

    —         —    
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value, March 31

  $ 11     $ 5,473  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date

  $  —       $ 164  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

At March 31, 2013 the Trust held only one loan security which is valued at $11,000, or 1% of face value. The valuation reflects assumptions that would be considered by market participants along with management’s assessment of collectible future cash flows.

Non-Recurring Measurements

Non-recurring measurements of fair value of assets or liabilities would typically include investments in real estate and equity investments. The Trust did not recognize any valuation adjustments as a result of non-recurring measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 or March 31, 2012.

 

Financial Instruments Not Reported at Fair Value

The carrying value and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis but required to be disclosed at fair value were as follows (in thousands):

 

                                         
    March 31, 2013  
   

Carrying
Amount

          Fair value hierarchy level  
      Fair Value     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  

Loans receivable

  $ 130,212     $ 143,247       —         —         143,247  

Mortgage loans payable

    278,824       269,423       —         —         269,423  

Senior notes payable

    86,250       89,700       89,700       —         —    

Secured financings

    42,803       43,098       —         —         43,098  

Notes payable

    1,660       1,660       —         —         1,660  
   
    December 31, 2012  
   

Carrying
Amount

          Fair value hierarchy level  
      Fair Value     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  

Loans receivable

  $ 211,250     $ 222,246       —         —         222,246  

Mortgage loans payable

    280,576       270,923       —         —         270,923  

Senior notes payable

    86,250       89,183       89,183       —         —    

Secured financings

    52,920       53,253       —         —         53,253  

Notes payable

    1,676       1,676       —         —         1,676  

Loans Receivable and Mortgage Loans Payable

Fair values of loans receivable and mortgage loans payable are primarily determined by discounting the expected cash flows at current interest rates plus an applicable risk spread, which reflects credit quality and maturity of the loans. The risk spread is based on loans with comparable credit quality, maturities and risk profile. Loans receivable may also be based on the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral less cost to sell, which is estimated using appraised values. These are classified as Level 3.

Fair Value Option

The current accounting guidance for fair value measurement provides a fair value option election that allows companies to irrevocably elect fair value as the measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities. Changes in fair value for assets and liabilities for which the election is made are recognized in earnings on a quarterly basis based on the then market price regardless of whether such assets or liabilities have been disposed of at such time. The fair value option guidance permits the fair value option election to be made on an instrument by instrument basis when it is initially recorded or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that asset or liability. The Trust elected the fair value option for all loan securities and REIT securities acquired.

For these securities, during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Trust recognized net unrealized gains of $1,718,000 and $5,096,000, respectively. The change in fair value of the REIT securities and loan securities for which the fair value option was elected is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss in the Trust’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Income related to securities carried at fair value is recorded as interest and dividend income.

 

The following table presents as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Trust’s financial assets for which the fair value option was elected (in thousands):

 

                 

Financial Instruments at Fair Value

  March 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  

Assets

               

Securities carried at fair value:

               

REIT common shares

  $ 12,220     $ 19,694  

Loan securities carried at fair value

    11       11  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 12,231     $ 19,705  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The table below presents as of March 31, 2013 the difference between fair values and the aggregate contractual amounts due for which the fair value option has been elected (in thousands):

 

                         
    Fair Value at
March 31, 2013
    Amount Due
Upon Maturity
    Difference  

Assets

                       

Loan securities carried at fair value

  $ 11     $ 1,130     $ 1,119  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 11     $ 1,130     $ 1,119