XML 1128 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Loans
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Loans [Abstract]  
Loans

Note 4 q Loans

The following table provides the balance of loans by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Components of the Loan Portfolio

For purposes of this disclosure the loan portfolio was disaggregated into segments and then further disaggregated into classes for certain disclosures. A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses. A class is generally determined based on the initial measurement attribute (i.e., amortized cost or purchased credit impaired), risk characteristics of the loan, and an entity's method for monitoring and assessing credit risk. Commercial loan portfolio segments include commercial, financial, and industrial ("C&I") and commercial real estate ("CRE"). Commercial classes within C&I include general C&I, loans to mortgage companies, and the trust preferred loans ("TRUPs")(i.e., loans to bank and insurance-related businesses) portfolio. Loans to mortgage companies includes commercial lines of credit to qualified mortgage companies exclusively for the temporary warehousing of eligible mortgage loans prior to the borrower's sale of those mortgage loans to third party investors. Commercial classes within commercial real estate include income CRE and residential CRE. Retail loan portfolio segments include consumer real estate, permanent mortgage, and the combined credit card and other portfolios. Retail classes include HELOC and real estate ("R/E") installment loans within the consumer real estate segment, permanent mortgage (which is both a segment and a class), and credit card and other. Restricted real estate loans include HELOCs that were previously securitized on balance sheet as well as HELOC and some permanent mortgages that were consolidated on January, 1, 2010 in conjunction with the adoption of amendments to ASC 810.

In third quarter 2011, FHN executed bulk sales of certain consumer and commercial loans, a significant majority of which were nonperforming. The largest transaction was a sale of permanent mortgages with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $188 million, or $126 million after consideration of partial charge-offs and lower of cost or market ("LOCOM") adjustments previously taken on the loans. FHN recognized a loss on sale of $29.8 million which is recognized within the loan loss provision and $40.2 million of net charge-offs associated with this sale. FHN also sold nonperforming commercial loans with unpaid principal balance of approximately $32 million and $23 million after consideration of amounts already charged off. FHN recognized a loss which is reflected in the loan loss provision of $6.0 million and $7.3 million of net charge-offs related to this commercial loan bulk sale.

Concentrations

FHN has a concentration of loans secured by residential real estate (42 percent of total loans), the majority of which is in the consumer real estate portfolio (32 percent of total loans). Additionally, on December 31, 2011,FHN had a sizeable portfolio of bank-related loans, including TRUPs totaling $0.6 billion (8 percent of the C&I portfolio, or 4 percent of total loans). While the stronger borrowers in this portfolio class have stabilized, the weaker financial institutions remain under stress due to limited availability of market liquidity and capital, and the impact from economic conditions on these borrowers.

Restrictions

On December 31, 2011, $4.9 billion of commercial loans were pledged to secure potential discount window borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank. Additionally, as of December 31, 2011, FHN pledged all of its held-to-maturity first and second lien mortgages and HELOCs, excluding restricted real estate loans, to secure potential borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The ALLL includes the following components: reserves for commercial loans evaluated based on pools of credit graded loans and reserves for pools of smaller-balance homogeneous retail loans, both determined in accordance with the ASC Topic related to Contingencies ("ASC 450-20-50"). The reserve factors applied to these pools are an estimate of probable incurred losses based on management's evaluation of historical net losses from loans with similar characteristics and are subject to adjustment by management to reflect current events, trends, and conditions (including economic considerations and trends). The slow economic recovery, weak housing market, elevated unemployment levels, and both positive and negative portfolio segment-specific trends, are examples of additional factors considered by management in determining the allowance for loan losses. Also included are reserves, determined in accordance with the Receivables Topic ("ASC 310-10-45"), for loans determined by management to be individually impaired.

Commercial

For commercial loans, reserves are established using historical net loss factors by grade level, loan product, and business segment. An assessment of the quality of individual commercial loans is made utilizing credit grades assigned internally based on a dual grading system which estimates both the probability of default ("PD") and loss severity in the event of default. PD grades range from 1-16 while estimated loss severities, or loss given default ("LGD") grades range from 1-12. This credit grading system is intended to identify and measure the credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the migration of loans between grading categories. It is also integral to the estimation methodology utilized in determining the allowance for loan losses since an allowance is established for pools of commercial loans based on the credit grade assigned. The appropriate relationship team performs the process of categorizing commercial loans into the appropriate credit grades, initially as a component of the approval of the loan, and subsequently throughout the life of the loan as part of the servicing regimen. The proper loan grade for larger exposures is confirmed by a senior credit officer in the approval process. To determine the most appropriate credit grade for each loan, the credit risk grading system employs scorecards for particular categories of loans that consist of a number of objective and subjective measures that are weighted in a manner that produces a rank ordering of risk within pass-graded credits. Loan grading discipline is regularly reviewed by Credit Risk Assurance to determine if the process continues to result in accurate loan grading across the portfolio.

FHN may utilize availability of guarantors/sponsors to support lending decisions during the credit underwriting process and when determining the assignment of internal loan grades. Where guarantor contributions are determined to be a source of repayment, an assessment of the guarantee is made. This guarantee assessment would include but not be limited to factors such as type and feature of the guarantee, consideration for the guarantee, key provisions of the guarantee agreement, and ability of the guarantor to be a viable secondary source of repayment. Reliance on the guarantee as a viable secondary source of repayment is a function of an analysis proving capability to pay, factoring in, among other things, liquidity and direct/indirect debt cash flows. Therefore, a proper evaluation of each guarantor is critical. FHN establishes a guarantor's ability (financial wherewithal) to support a credit based on an analysis of recent information on the guarantor's financial condition. This would generally include income and asset information from sources such as recent tax returns, credit reports, and personal financial statements. In analyzing this information FHN seeks to assess a combination of liquidity, global cash flow, cash burn rate, and contingent liabilities to demonstrate the guarantor's capacity to sustain support for the credit and fulfill the obligation. FHN also considers the volume and amount of guarantees provided for all global indebtedness and the likelihood of realization. Guarantor financial information is periodically updated throughout the life of the loan. FHN presumes a guarantor's willingness to perform until financial support becomes necessary or if there is any current or prior indication or future expectation that the guarantor may not willingly and voluntarily perform under the terms of the guarantee. In FHN's risk grading approach, it is deemed that financial support becomes necessary generally at a point when the loan would otherwise be graded substandard, reflecting a well-defined weakness. At that point, provided willingness and capacity to support are appropriately demonstrated, a strong, legally enforceable guarantee can mitigate the risk of default or loss, justify a less severe rating, and consequently reduce the level of allowance or charge-off that might otherwise be deemed appropriate. FHN establishes guarantor willingness to support the credit through documented evidence of previous and ongoing support of the credit. Previous performance under a guarantor's obligation to pay is not considered if the performance was involuntary.

Retail

The ALLL for smaller-balance homogenous retail loans is determined based on pools of similar loan types that have similar credit risk characteristics. FHN manages retail loan credit risk on a class basis. Reserves by portfolio are determined using segmented roll-rate models that incorporate various factors including historical delinquency trends, experienced loss frequencies, and experienced loss severities. Generally, reserves for retail loans reflect inherent losses in the portfolio that are expected to be recognized over the following twelve months.

Individually Impaired

Generally, classified nonaccrual commercial loans over $1 million and all commercial and consumer loans classified as troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") are deemed to be impaired and are individually assessed for impairment measurement in accordance with ASC 310-10. For all commercial portfolio segments, commercial TDRs and other individually impaired commercial loans are measured based on the present value of expected future payments discounted at the loan's effective interest rate ("the DCF method"), observable market prices, or for loans that are solely dependent on the collateral for repayment, the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell (net realizable value). For loans measured using the DCF method or by observable market prices, if the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds this amount, a specific allowance is established as a component of the allowance for loan and lease losses until such time as a loss is expected and recognized; however, for impaired collateral-dependent loans, FHN will charge off the full difference between the book value and the best estimate of net realizable value.

For all segments of consumer TDRs with the exception of the permanent mortgage segment, the associated allowance is determined by estimating the expected cash flows using the modified interest rate (if an interest rate concession), incorporating payoff and net charge-off rates specific to the TDRs within the portfolio segment being assessed, and discounted using the pre-modification interest rate. The discounted cash flows are then compared to the outstanding principal balance in order to determine required reserves. The reserve for consumer real estate TDRs utilizes total portfolio loss and attrition rates rather than TDR specific data. Prior to third quarter 2011, FHN removed TDRs entirely from the roll-rate model previously discussed which resulted in an increase in required TDR reserves for this portfolio segment. Currently, for the permanent mortgage segment, the base roll-rate models are run both with and without the TDRs to determine incremental reserves needed for restructured mortgage loans. Additionally, a qualitative factor representing the incremental inherent loss in such TDRs is applied to estimate the total required reserves for permanent mortgage TDRs.

The following table provides a rollforward of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for 2011, 2010 and 2009:

Impaired Loans

The average balance of impaired loans was $551.3 million for 2011, $593.5 million for 2010, and $532.2 million for 2009. Interest income of approximately $7 million for 2011, $4 million for 2010 and $1 million for 2009 was recognized during the periods related to such impaired loans.

The following tables provide information by class related to individually impaired loans. Recorded investment is defined as the amount of the investment in a loan, before valuation allowance but which does reflect any direct write-down of the investment.

Asset Quality Indicators

As previously discussed, FHN employs a dual grade commercial risk grading methodology to assign an estimate for PD and the LGD for each commercial loan, factors specific to various industry, portfolio, or product segments that result in a rank ordering of risk and the assignment of grades PD 1 to PD 16. Each PD grade corresponds to an estimated one-year default probability percentage; a PD 1 has the lowest expected default probability, and probabilities increase as grades progress down the scale. PD 1 through PD 12 are "pass" grades. Prior to second quarter 2011, all loans with an assigned PD grade of "12" which is the lowest pass grade were included on the Watch List. In second quarter 2011, FHN implemented an enhanced process for determining which loans warrant additional oversight and monitoring. The identification of Watch List loans is now determined by the appropriate relationship team and is generally driven by specific events that may impact borrowers, rather than being driven solely by the assigned PD grade. This process enhancement did not have a material impact on the allowance for loan and lease losses. PD grades 13-16 correspond to the regulatory-defined categories of special mention (13), substandard (14), doubtful (15), and loss (16). Pass loan grades are required to be reassessed no less frequently than annually or whenever there has been a material change in the financial condition of the borrower or risk characteristics of the relationship. All commercial loans over $1 million and certain commercial loans over $500,000 that are graded 13 or worse are reassessed on a quarterly basis. LGD grades are assigned based on a scale of 1-12 and represent FHN's expected recovery based on collateral type in the event a loan defaults.

The following tables provide the balances of commercial loan portfolio classes, disaggregated by PD grade as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:

The retail portfolio is comprised primarily of smaller-balance loans which are very similar in nature in that most are standard products and are backed by residential real estate. Because of the similarities of retail loan-types, FHN is able to utilize the Fair Isaac Corporation ("FICO") score, among other attributes, to assess the quality of consumer borrowers. FICO scores are refreshed on a quarterly basis in an attempt to reflect the recent risk profile of the borrowers. Accruing delinquency amounts are also indicators of other retail portfolio asset quality.

The following tables reflect period-end balances and various asset quality indicators by origination vintage for the HELOC, real estate installment, and permanent mortgage classes of loans as of December 31, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HELOC
(Dollars in millions)

 

Period End
Balance (a)

 

Origination Characteristics

 

Avg
Refreshed
FICO

 

Avg orig
CLTV

 

Avg orig
FICO

 

%
Broker

 

%
TN

 

%
1st Lien

Origination Vintage

 

pre-2003

 

 

$

 

182

 

 

 

 

75.6

%

 

 

 

 

723

 

 

 

 

15.2

%

 

 

 

 

40.3

%

 

 

 

 

22.9

%

 

 

 

 

719

 

2003

 

 

 

273

 

 

 

 

76.1

%

 

 

 

 

733

 

 

 

 

23.8

%

 

 

 

 

26.6

%

 

 

 

 

16.8

%

 

 

 

 

726

 

2004

 

 

 

588

 

 

 

 

79.7

%

 

 

 

 

728

 

 

 

 

31.7

%

 

 

 

 

17.4

%

 

 

 

 

19.6

%

 

 

 

 

720

 

2005

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

79.5

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

 

15.9

%

 

 

 

 

16.6

%

 

 

 

 

12.0

%

 

 

 

 

722

 

2006

 

 

 

544

 

 

 

 

76.8

%

 

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

 

6.6

%

 

 

 

 

22.9

%

 

 

 

 

13.8

%

 

 

 

 

726

 

2007

 

 

 

566

 

 

 

 

77.5

%

 

 

 

 

746

 

 

 

 

13.6

%

 

 

 

 

28.8

%

 

 

 

 

15.0

%

 

 

 

 

732

 

2008

 

 

 

293

 

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

 

 

 

755

 

 

 

 

8.7

%

 

 

 

 

69.9

%

 

 

 

 

37.2

%

 

 

 

 

749

 

2009

 

 

 

179

 

 

 

 

71.6

%

 

 

 

 

754

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

86.6

%

 

 

 

 

45.4

%

 

 

 

 

755

 

2010

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

72.9

%

 

 

 

 

755

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

94.6

%

 

 

 

 

45.2

%

 

 

 

 

757

 

2011

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

 

71.1

%

 

 

 

 

760

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

92.6

%

 

 

 

 

51.5

%

 

 

 

 

758

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

3,690

 

 

 

 

76.9

%

 

 

 

 

740

 

 

 

 

14.5

%

 

 

 

 

36.0

%

 

 

 

 

21.7

%

 

 

 

 

731

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R/E Installment Loans
(Dollars in millions)

 

Period End
Balance

 

Origination Characteristics

 

Avg
Refreshed
FICO

 

Avg orig
CLTV

 

Avg orig
FICO

 

%
Broker

 

%
TN

 

%
1st Lien

Origination Vintage

 

pre-2003

 

 

$

 

56

 

 

 

 

77.8

%

 

 

 

 

689

 

 

 

 

18.3

%

 

 

 

 

62.1

%

 

 

 

 

66.2

%

 

 

 

 

687

 

2003

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

 

72.5

%

 

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

 

 

43.6

%

 

 

 

 

77.5

%

 

 

 

 

732

 

2004

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

74.1

%

 

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

 

 

49.6

%

 

 

 

 

72.8

%

 

 

 

 

708

 

2005

 

 

 

272

 

 

 

 

83.3

%

 

 

 

 

720

 

 

 

 

26.3

%

 

 

 

 

20.4

%

 

 

 

 

27.5

%

 

 

 

 

714

 

2006

 

 

 

295

 

 

 

 

79.4

%

 

 

 

 

721

 

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

 

 

23.5

%

 

 

 

 

24.2

%

 

 

 

 

706

 

2007

 

 

 

415

 

 

 

 

82.5

%

 

 

 

 

730

 

 

 

 

16.1

%

 

 

 

 

23.5

%

 

 

 

 

24.7

%

 

 

 

 

714

 

2008

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

 

77.9

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

 

6.2

%

 

 

 

 

77.6

%

 

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

 

 

729

 

2009

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

 

72.7

%

 

 

 

 

751

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

90.1

%

 

 

 

 

82.7

%

 

 

 

 

751

 

2010

 

 

 

196

 

 

 

 

85.8

%

 

 

 

 

747

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

88.8

%

 

 

 

 

97.9

%

 

 

 

 

753

 

2011

 

 

 

461

 

 

 

 

78.9

%

 

 

 

 

760

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

88.5

%

 

 

 

 

97.5

%

 

 

 

 

759

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

2,202

 

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

 

8.4

%

 

 

 

 

52.7

%

 

 

 

 

60.0

%

 

 

 

 

729

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Permanent Mortgage
(Dollars in millions)

 

Period End
Balance (a)

 

Origination Characteristics

 

Avg
Refreshed
FICO

 

Avg orig
CLTV

 

Avg orig
FICO

 

%
Broker

 

%
TN

 

%
1st Lien

Origination Vintage

 

pre-2004

 

 

$

 

170

 

 

 

 

64.8

%

 

 

 

 

726

 

 

 

 

48.7

%

 

 

 

 

10.0

%

 

 

 

 

96.9

%

 

 

 

 

739

 

2004

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

78.2

%

 

 

 

 

719

 

 

 

 

17.8

%

 

 

 

 

15.0

%

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

690

 

2005

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

74.4

%

 

 

 

 

740

 

 

 

 

37.3

%

 

 

 

 

2.6

%

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

733

 

2006

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

 

71.5

%

 

 

 

 

735

 

 

 

 

37.9

%

 

 

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

710

 

2007

 

 

 

314

 

 

 

 

71.0

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

 

55.5

%

 

 

 

 

1.2

%

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

706

 

2008

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

 

73.9

%

 

 

 

 

742

 

 

 

 

50.1

%

 

 

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

 

 

99.9

%

 

 

 

 

718

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

828

 

 

 

 

70.9

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

 

48.7

%

 

 

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

 

 

99.4

%

 

 

 

 

717

 

 

The following tables reflect period-end balances and various asset quality indicators by origination vintage for the HELOC, real estate installment, and permanent mortgage classes of loans as of December 31, 2010:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HELOC
(Dollars in millions)

 

Period End
Balance (a)

 

Origination Characteristics

 

Avg
Refreshed
FICO

 

Avg orig
CLTV

 

Avg orig
FICO

 

%
Broker

 

%
TN

 

%
1st Lien

Origination Vintage

 

pre-2003

 

 

$

 

230

 

 

 

 

75.5

%

 

 

 

 

724

 

 

 

 

14.2

%

 

 

 

 

42.3

%

 

 

 

 

22.7

%

 

 

 

 

723

 

2003

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

 

76.3

%

 

 

 

 

733

 

 

 

 

24.4

%

 

 

 

 

25.7

%

 

 

 

 

15.4

%

 

 

 

 

730

 

2004

 

 

 

690

 

 

 

 

79.5

%

 

 

 

 

729

 

 

 

 

31.8

%

 

 

 

 

17.3

%

 

 

 

 

18.8

%

 

 

 

 

722

 

2005

 

 

 

855

 

 

 

 

79.5

%

 

 

 

 

735

 

 

 

 

16.5

%

 

 

 

 

17.0

%

 

 

 

 

11.7

%

 

 

 

 

722

 

2006

 

 

 

630

 

 

 

 

76.8

%

 

 

 

 

742

 

 

 

 

7.0

%

 

 

 

 

24.4

%

 

 

 

 

13.6

%

 

 

 

 

730

 

2007

 

 

 

630

 

 

 

 

77.5

%

 

 

 

 

746

 

 

 

 

13.8

%

 

 

 

 

28.9

%

 

 

 

 

14.3

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

2008

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

 

74.1

%

 

 

 

 

755

 

 

 

 

8.8

%

 

 

 

 

69.7

%

 

 

 

 

36.8

%

 

 

 

 

753

 

2009

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

 

71.8

%

 

 

 

 

756

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

86.6

%

 

 

 

 

45.3

%

 

 

 

 

759

 

2010

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

 

73.0

%

 

 

 

 

758

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

94.9

%

 

 

 

 

46.5

%

 

 

 

 

757

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

4,083

 

 

 

 

77.2

%

 

 

 

 

740

 

 

 

 

15.4

%

 

 

 

 

33.6

%

 

 

 

 

19.9

%

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R/E Installment Loans
(Dollars in millions)

 

Period End
Balance

 

Origination Characteristics

 

Avg
Refreshed
FICO

 

Avg orig
CLTV

 

Avg orig
FICO

 

%
Broker

 

%
TN

 

%
1st Lien

Origination Vintage

 

pre-2003

 

 

$

 

83

 

 

 

 

77.2

%

 

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

 

17.7

%

 

 

 

 

62.3

%

 

 

 

 

67.2

%

 

 

 

 

727

 

2003

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

 

72.4

%

 

 

 

 

726

 

 

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

 

 

44.4

%

 

 

 

 

77.5

%

 

 

 

 

731

 

2004

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

 

73.6

%

 

 

 

 

714

 

 

 

 

7.2

%

 

 

 

 

51.4

%

 

 

 

 

71.5

%

 

 

 

 

724

 

2005

 

 

 

343

 

 

 

 

82.5

%

 

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

 

25.7

%

 

 

 

 

21.7

%

 

 

 

 

27.8

%

 

 

 

 

721

 

2006

 

 

 

378

 

 

 

 

78.3

%

 

 

 

 

723

 

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

 

 

25.5

%

 

 

 

 

25.6

%

 

 

 

 

728

 

2007

 

 

 

520

 

 

 

 

81.1

%

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

15.7

%

 

 

 

 

24.2

%

 

 

 

 

24.3

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

2008

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

 

76.8

%

 

 

 

 

740

 

 

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

 

 

78.7

%

 

 

 

 

78.3

%

 

 

 

 

751

 

2009

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

 

71.1

%

 

 

 

 

753

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

 

 

 

82.6

%

 

 

 

 

760

 

2010

 

 

 

217

 

 

 

 

82.1

%

 

 

 

 

748

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

 

 

96.5

%

 

 

 

 

751

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

2,236

 

 

 

 

78.3

%

 

 

 

 

729

 

 

 

 

10.3

%

 

 

 

 

44.4

%

 

 

 

 

50.2

%

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Permanent Mortgage
(Dollars in millions)

 

Period End
Balance (a)

 

Origination Characteristics

 

Avg
Refreshed
FICO (b)

 

Avg orig
CLTV

 

Avg orig
FICO

 

%
Broker

 

%
TN

 

%
1st Lien

Origination Vintage

 

pre-2004

 

 

$

 

190

 

 

 

 

67.8

%

 

 

 

 

727

 

 

 

 

48.2

%

 

 

 

 

9.6

%

 

 

 

 

99.6

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

2004

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

82.0

%

 

 

 

 

725

 

 

 

 

19.2

%

 

 

 

 

25.7

%

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

2005

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

 

 

 

742

 

 

 

 

34.3

%

 

 

 

 

5.4

%

 

 

 

 

98.3

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

2006

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

 

79.2

%

 

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

 

41.1

%

 

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

 

 

 

97.0

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

2007

 

 

 

447

 

 

 

 

79.1

%

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

56.1

%

 

 

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

 

 

95.6

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

2008

 

 

 

256

 

 

 

 

79.9

%

 

 

 

 

737

 

 

 

 

55.7

%

 

 

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

1,143

 

 

 

 

77.6

%

 

 

 

 

733

 

 

 

 

50.7

%

 

 

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

 

 

97.7

%

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

The following table reflects accruing delinquency amounts for the credit card and other portfolio classes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Credit Card

 

Other

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

Accruing delinquent balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30-89 days past due

 

 

$

 

1.9

 

 

 

$

 

1.9

 

 

 

$

 

0.4

 

 

 

$

 

0.8

 

90+ days past due

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Total

 

 

$

 

3.3

 

 

 

$

 

3.5

 

 

 

$

 

0.5

 

 

 

$

 

1.0

 

 

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans

For all portfolio segments and classes, loans are placed on nonaccrual status if it becomes evident that full collection of principal and interest is at risk, impairment has been recognized as a partial charge-off of principal balance, or on a case-by-case basis if FHN continues to receive principal and interest payments, but there are atypical loan structures or other borrower-specific issues. FHN does have a meaningful portion of loans that are classified as nonaccrual but where it continues to receive payments.

The following table reflects accruing and non-accruing loans by class on December 31, 2011:

Troubled Debt Restructurings

As part of FHN's ongoing risk management practices, FHN attempts to work with borrowers when necessary to extend or modify loan terms to better align with their current ability to repay. Extensions and modifications to loans are made in accordance with internal policies and guidelines which conform to regulatory guidance. Each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately. FHN considers regulatory guidelines when restructuring loans to ensure that prudent lending practices are followed. As such, qualification criteria and payment terms consider the borrower's current and prospective ability to comply with the modified terms of the loan.

A modification is classified as a TDR if the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and it is determined that FHN has granted a concession to the borrower. FHN may determine that a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty if the borrower is currently in default on any of its debt, or if it is probable that a borrower may default in the foreseeable future. Many aspects of a borrower's financial situation are assessed when determining whether they are experiencing financial difficulty, particularly as it relates to commercial borrowers due to the complex nature of loan structures, business/industry risk, and borrower/guarantor structures. Concessions could include reductions of interest rates, extension of the maturity date at a rate lower than current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, reduction of accrued interest, or principal forgiveness. When evaluating whether a concession has been granted, FHN also considers whether the borrower has provided additional collateral or guarantors and whether such additions adequately compensate FHN for the restructured terms. The assessments of whether a borrower is experiencing (or is likely to experience) financial difficulty and whether a concession has been granted is subjective in nature and management's judgment is required when determining whether a modification is classified as a TDR.

Although each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately, for all classes within the commercial portfolio segment, TDRs are typically modified through forbearance agreements (generally 3 to 6 months). Forbearance agreements could include reduced interest rates, reduced payments, release of guarantor, or entering into short sale agreements. FHN's proprietary modification programs for consumer loans are generally structured using parameters of U.S. government-sponsored programs such as Home Affordable Modification Programs ("HAMP"). Within the HELOC, R/E installment loans, and permanent mortgage classes of the consumer portfolio segment, TDRs are typically modified by reducing the interest rate (in increments of 25 basis points to a minimum of 1 percent for up to 5 years) and a possible maturity date extension to reach an affordable housing debt ratio. Contractual maturities may be extended up to 40 years on permanent mortgages and up to 20 years for consumer real estate loans. Within the credit card class of the consumer portfolio segment, TDRs are typically modified through either a short-term credit card hardship program or a longer-term credit card workout program. In the credit card hardship program, borrowers may be granted rate and payment reductions for 6 months to 1 year. In the credit card workout program, customers are granted a rate reduction to 0 percent and term extensions for up to 5 years to pay off the remaining balance. On December 31, 2011 and 2010, FHN had loans classified as TDRs of $284.2 million and $282.8 million, respectively. Additionally, FHN had restructured $98.0 million and $56.0 million of loans held for sale as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For restructured loans in the portfolio, FHN had loan loss reserves of $52.7 million, or 19 percent of the recorded investment amount, as of December 31, 2011. On December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no significant outstanding commitments to advance additional funds to customers whose loans had been restructured.

The following table reflects modifications of portfolio loans occurring during the year ending December 31, 2011 that have been classified as TDRs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2011

 

Number

 

Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment

 

Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded Investment

 

Commercial (C&I):

 

 

 

 

 

 

General C&I

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

$

 

15,960

 

 

 

$

 

15,524

 

Loans to Mortgage Companies

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

TRUPS

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

Total commercial (C&I)

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

15,960

 

 

 

 

15,524

 

 

Commercial real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income CRE

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

13,630

 

 

 

 

13,155

 

Residential CRE

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

2,257

 

 

 

 

2,735

 

 

Total commercial real estate

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

15,887

 

 

 

 

15,890

 

 

Consumer real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

HELOC

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

 

21,093

 

 

 

 

20,992

 

R/E installment loans

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

 

21,044

 

 

 

 

21,249

 

 

Total consumer real estate

 

 

 

316

 

 

 

 

42,137

 

 

 

 

42,241

 

 

Permanent mortgage

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

 

79,776

 

 

 

 

82,633

 

 

Credit card & other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit card

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

 

451

 

 

 

 

590

 

Other

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

Total credit card & other

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

 

451

 

 

 

 

590

 

 

Total troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

584

 

 

 

$

 

154,211

 

 

 

$

 

156,878

 

 

Financing receivables modified as TDRs within the previous 12 months and for which there was a payment default during the period are calculated by first identifying TDRs that defaulted during the period and then determining whether they were modified within the 12 months prior to the default.

The following table reflects TDRs within the previous 12 months for which there was a payment default during the year ending December 31, 2011. For purposes of this disclosure, FHN defines payment default as generally 30 plus days past due.

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2011

 

Number

 

Recorded
Investment

 

Commercial (C&I):

 

 

 

 

General C&I

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

$

 

31,663

 

Loans to Mortgage Companies

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

TRUPS

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

Total commercial (C&I)

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

31,663

 

 

Commercial real estate:

 

 

 

 

Income CRE

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

26,563

 

Residential CRE

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

18,512

 

 

Total commercial real estate

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

45,075

 

 

Consumer real estate:

 

 

 

 

HELOC

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

6,041

 

R/E installment loans

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

2,421

 

 

Total consumer real estate

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

8,462

 

 

Permanent mortgage

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

37,976

 

 

Credit card & other:

 

 

 

 

Credit card

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

3,842

 

Other

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

Total credit card & other

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

3,842

 

 

Total troubled debt restructurings

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

$

 

127,018

 

 

The determination of whether a TDR is placed on nonaccrual status generally follows the same internal policies and procedures as other portfolio loans. However, FHN will typically place a consumer loan on nonaccrual status if it is 30 or more days delinquent upon modification into a TDR. For commercial loans, nonaccrual TDRs that are reasonably assured of repayment according to their modified terms may be returned to accrual status by FHN upon a detailed credit evaluation of the borrower's financial condition and prospects for repayment under the revised terms. For consumer loans, FHN's evaluation supporting the decision to return a modified loan to accrual status includes consideration of the borrower's sustained historical repayment performance for a reasonable period prior to the date on which the loan is returned to accrual status, which is generally a minimum of six months. FHN may also consider a borrower's sustained historical repayment performance for a reasonable time prior to the restructuring in assessing whether the borrower can meet the restructured terms, as it may indicate that the borrower is capable of servicing the level of debt under the modified terms. Otherwise, FHN will continue to classify restructured loans as nonaccrual. Consistent with regulatory guidance, upon sustained performance and classification as a TDR over FHN's year-end, the loan will be removed from TDR status as long as the modified terms were market-based at the time of modification.