Recently issued accounting standards

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2020

Accounting Standards Update and Change in Accounting Principle [Abstract]

Recently issued accounting standards

Note 2 – Recently issued accounting standards:

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”, which supersedes the existing guidance for lease accounting, “Leases (Topic 840)”. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize leases on their balance sheets, and leaves lessor accounting largely unchanged; however, certain refinements were made to conform the standard with the recently issued revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09, “Revenue From Contracts With Customers”, specifically related to the allocation and recognition of contract consideration earned from lease and non-lease revenue components. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to elect to use certain transition relief. The Leasing Standard was amended by ASU 2018-11, “Targeted Improvements” (the “Practical Expedient Amendment”) in July of 2018, also codified as ASC 842, which created a practical expedient that provides lessors an option not to separate lease and non-lease components when certain criteria are met and instead account for those components as a single lease component. The Company determined that its lease arrangements meet the criteria under the practical expedient to account for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component, which alleviates the requirement upon adoption of ASC 842 that we reallocate or separately present consideration from lease and non-lease components. As such, the Company elected the practical expedient as allowed by the Practical Expedient Amendment and adopted ASU 2016-02 in the first quarter of Fiscal 2020.

Substantially all of FREIT’s revenues are within the scope of ASC 842. FREIT will continue to account for its leases as operating leases. Leases for FREIT’s apartment buildings and complexes are generally short-term in nature (one to two-years in duration), based on fixed payments and contain separate lease components within the contract for each revenue stream (i.e. base rent, garage rent, etc.). Given the nature of these leases, the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 had no impact on the accounting for the Company’s leases within the residential segment.

With respect to most of FREIT’s commercial properties, lease terms range from five years to twenty-five years with options, which if exercised would extend the terms of such leases. These lease agreements generally provide for reimbursement of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties (known as common area maintenance costs (“CAM”)). Some of FREIT’s leases in its commercial segment may contain lease and nonlease components. Generally, the primary lease component in most of FREIT’s commercial leases is base rent charged for the rental of space in an office complex/shopping center. Depending on the lease, the following nonlease components could be present: 1) fixed (or in substance fixed) payments related to real estate taxes and insurance; 2) variable payments that depend on an index or rate initially measured using the index or rate at the commencement date; and 3) fixed CAM reimbursements or CAM expense reimbursements based on the tenant’s proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses and CAM capital expenditures for the property.

FREIT accrues fixed lease income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. FREIT accrues reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of real estate taxes, insurance, and CAM as variable lease consideration in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred recognizing differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year. Some of FREIT’s retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. FREIT recognizes this variable lease consideration only when each tenant’s sales exceed the applicable sales threshold. Given that this standard has minimal impact on real estate operating lessors, the adoption of this new accounting guidance did not have a significant impact on FREIT’s consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures. As a result, there was no cumulative effect adjustment to opening equity. Additionally, based on this new accounting guidance, the Company will no longer be able to capitalize certain leasing costs, such as legal expenses, as it relates to activities before a lease is entered into. (See Note 15 to FREIT’s condensed consolidated financial statements for further details).

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)", which amends the current approach to estimate credit losses on certain financial assets, including trade and other receivables, available-for-sale securities, and other financial instruments. Generally, this amendment requires entities to establish a valuation allowance for the expected lifetime losses of these certain financial assets. Subsequent changes in the valuation allowance are recorded in current earnings and reversal of previous losses are permitted. Currently, U.S. GAAP requires entities to write down credit losses only when losses are probable and loss reversals are not permitted. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19 “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses”, which clarifies that operating lease receivables are outside the scope of the new standard. Instead, impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with Topic 842, “Leases (Topic 842)”. FREIT does not expect the adoption of this new accounting guidance to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

Page 11

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815")” which amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815. The update is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedge programs. ASU 2017-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. FREIT adopted ASU 2017-12 in the first quarter of Fiscal 2020. This guidance requires that for cash flow and net investment hedges, all changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument (i.e. both the effective and ineffective portions) will be deferred in other comprehensive income and recognized in earnings at the same time that the hedged item affects earnings. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the amendments in this update. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively.

The adoption of ASU 2017-12 had no impact on the accounting for FREIT’s interest rate swap contracts, which were previously deemed effective cash flow hedges, on the following entities: Damascus Centre, LLC (“Damascus Centre”), Wayne PSC, LLC (“Wayne PSC”), FREIT Regency, LLC (“Regency”) and Station Place on Monmouth, LLC (“Station Place”). Accordingly, these interest rate swap contracts will continue to be accounted for by marking these contracts to market, taking into account present interest rates compared to the contracted fixed rate over the life of the contract and recording the unrealized gain or loss on the swaps in comprehensive income. The adoption of this accounting guidance has an impact on the accounting for Grande Rotunda, LLC’s (“Grande Rotunda”) interest rate cap, which was previously deemed an ineffective cash flow hedge and for which previous to the adoption of this guidance, the change in the fair value was reported in the statements of operations. Based on this new guidance, FREIT will record the change in the fair value of Grande Rotunda’s interest rate cap in other comprehensive income on a prospective basis. FREIT did not record an adjustment in Fiscal 2020 to the opening balance of retained earnings as the value of Grande Rotunda’s interest rate cap was $0 as of October 31, 2019. (See Note 4 to FREIT’s condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details).

In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16 “Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging”. ASU 2018-16 expands the list of U.S benchmark interest rates permitted in the application of hedge accounting by adding the OIS rate based on SOFR as an eligible benchmark interest rate. ASU 2018-16 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. FREIT adopted this update in the first quarter of Fiscal 2020 which did not have an impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements or footnote disclosures.

In April 2020, the FASB staff issued a question and answer document (the “Lease Modification Q&A”) focused on the application of lease accounting guidance to lease concessions provided as a result of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Under existing GAAP, the Company would have to determine, on a lease by lease basis, if a lease concession was the result of a new arrangement reached with the tenant (treated within the lease modification accounting framework) or if a lease concession was under the enforceable rights and obligations within the existing lease agreement (precluded from applying the lease modification accounting framework). The Lease Modification Q&A allows the Company, if certain criteria have been met, to bypass the lease by lease analysis, and instead elect to either apply the lease modification accounting framework or not, with such election applied consistently to leases with similar characteristics and similar circumstances. This election is only available when total cash flows resulting from the modified lease are substantially similar to or less than the cash flows in the original lease. FREIT has made this election and accounts for rent deferrals by increasing its rent receivables as receivables accrue and continuing to recognize income during the deferral period. Lease concessions or amendments other than rent deferrals are evaluated to determine if a substantive change to the consideration in the original lease contract has occurred and should be accounted for as a lease modification. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements or footnote disclosures.