ContentsFiscal 2014 Financial Highlights ............. 1Message To Our Shareholders ................. 2Historical Data ......................................... 3Property Holdings .................................... 4Form 10-K ................................................ 5Corporate Information ..... inside back coverirst Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey (“FREIT”) is an equity real estate investment trust with a portfolio primarily focused on multi-family apartment communities, open-air shopping centers, and mixed-use properties. These holdings are in primary markets with high barriers to entry in the Northeast and mid-Atlantic regions. Since its inception in 1961, operations have been managed by Hekemian & Co., with support from the seasoned and capable Board of Trustees, who provide invaluable oversight. This highly competent and effective team is core to FREIT’s success

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 000-25043

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey	22-1697095
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
505 Main Street, Hackensack, New Jersey	07601
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

201-488-6400

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each Class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	Not Applicable

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Shares of Beneficial Interest

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer x Non-Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s shares of beneficial interest held by non-affiliates was approximately $100 million. Computation is based on the closing sales price of such shares as quoted on the over-the-counter-market on April 30, 2014, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter.

As of January 14, 2015, the number of shares of beneficial interest outstanding was 6,821,171

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 2, 2015 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-K

PART I			Page No.
	Item 1	Business	3
	Item 1A	Risk Factors	10
	Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	13
	Item 2	Properties	13
	Item 3	Legal Proceedings	16
	Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	16
PART II
	Item 5	Market for FREIT’s Common Equity, Related Security Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	17
	Item 6	Selected Financial Data	18
	Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
	Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37
	Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	37
	Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	37
	Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	37
	Item 9B	Other Information	37
PART III
	Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	39
	Item 11	Executive Compensation	39
	Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	39
	Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	39
	Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	39
PART IV
	Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	40

2

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information included in this Annual Report contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The registrant cautions readers that forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to the registrant’s investment policies and objectives; the financial performance of the registrant; the ability of the registrant to borrow and service its debt; the economic and competitive conditions which affect the registrant’s business; the ability of the registrant to obtain the necessary governmental approvals for the development, expansion or renovation of its properties, the impact of environmental conditions affecting the registrant’s properties, and the registrant’s liquidity and capital resources, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors, including, without limitation, the registrant’s future financial performance; the availability of capital; general market conditions; national and local economic conditions, particularly long-term interest rates; federal, state and local governmental regulations that affect the registrant; and the competitive environment in which the registrant operates, including, the availability of retail space and residential apartment units in the areas where the registrant’s properties are located. In addition, the registrant’s continued qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex rules of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report and the registrant assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual results could differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1 BUSINESS

(a) General Business

First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey (“FREIT”) is an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) organized in New Jersey in 1961. FREIT acquires, develops, constructs and holds real estate properties for long-term investment and not for resale.

FREIT’s long-range investment policy is to review and evaluate potential real estate investment opportunities for acquisition that it believes will (i) complement its existing investment portfolio, (ii) generate increased income and distributions to its shareholders, and (iii) increase the overall value of FREIT’s portfolio. FREIT’s investments may take the form of wholly-owned fee interests, or if the circumstances warrant diversification of risk, ownership on a joint venture basis with other parties, including employees and affiliates of Hekemian & Co., Inc., FREIT’s managing agent (“Hekemian”) (See “Management Agreement”), provided FREIT is able to maintain management control over the property. While our general investment policy is to hold and maintain properties for the long-term, we may, from time-to-time, sell or trade certain properties in order to (i) obtain capital to be used to purchase, develop or renovate other properties which we believe will provide a higher rate of return and increase the value of our investment portfolio, and (ii) divest properties which we have determined or determine are no longer compatible with our growth strategies and investment objectives for our real estate portfolio.

FREIT Website: All of FREIT’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings for the past three years are available free of charge on FREIT’s website, which can be accessed at http://www.FREITNJ.com.

Fiscal Year 2014 Developments

(i) FINANCING

(a) The $19.1 million mortgage loan (as amended) on the Rotunda property was scheduled to mature on February 1, 2013. The Rotunda is located in Baltimore, Maryland and is owned by Grande Rotunda, LLC (“Grande”), FREIT’s 60% owned subsidiary. The due date of the loan was further extended to May 1, 2013 from February 1, 2013. Even though the bank agreed to an additional ninety-day (90) extension of the maturity date of the loan from May 1, 2013, FREIT elected to purchase the Rotunda loan from the bank and have all the bank’s rights assigned to FREIT. The purchase of this loan by FREIT was completed on May 28, 2013. FREIT subsequently sold this loan to Wells Fargo Bank, the lender providing the construction financing for the expansion of the Rotunda project. On December 9, 2013, Grande closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment and expansion project at the Rotunda. The construction loan is for a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. Under the operating agreement with the equity owners of Grande, FREIT would be responsible for 60% of any cash required by Grande, and 40% would be the responsibility of the minority interest, consistent with their respective percentage interests in Grande. Initial funding for the construction at the Rotunda was provided by the Grande members, who are FREIT and Rotunda 100, LLC, and who contributed approximately $14.5 million in accordance with the loan agreement with Wells Fargo Bank. Once the members contributed their respective shares towards the construction, draws could begin on the construction line. As of October 31, 2014, $42.7 million was drawn on the construction line with Wells Fargo Bank, of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $23.7 million was used towards the construction at the Rotunda. (See Notes 5 and 10 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.)

3

(b) FREIT has a $13 million line of credit provided by the Provident Bank. The line of credit is for a two year term ending on November 1, 2016, but can be cancelled by the bank, at its will, within 60 days before or after each anniversary date. The credit line will automatically be extended at the termination date of the current term and each subsequent term for an additional period of 24 months, provided there is no default and the credit line has not been cancelled. Draws against the credit line can be used for general corporate purposes, for property acquisitions, construction activities, and letters of credit. The interest rate on the line of credit has a floor of 3.5%. As of October 31, 2014, approximately $8 million was available under the line of credit, and $5 million was outstanding. (See Note 5 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.)

(c) On December 29, 2014, FREIT Regency, LLC closed on a $16.2 million mortgage loan with Provident Bank. The new loan bears a floating interest rate equal to 125 basis points over the BBA LIBOR and the loan will mature on December 15, 2024. In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, FREIT Regency, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.75% over the term of the loan. Proceeds from the loan will be used to pay-off the outstanding balance on FREIT’s credit line, and the remainder of the proceeds will be available to fund future capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.

(ii) CONSTRUCTION

The Rotunda, on an 11.5-acre site, currently consists of an office building containing 138,000 sq. ft. of office space and 78,000 sq. ft. of retail space on the lower floor of the main building. Development plans and studies for the expansion and renovation of our Rotunda property were substantially completed during Fiscal 2008. The original building plans incorporated an expansion of approximately 180,500 sq. ft. of retail space, approximately 302 residential rental apartments, 56 condominium units and 120 hotel rooms, and structured parking. Development costs for this project were expected to approximate $200 million. Due to the difficult economic environment, that redevelopment activity was placed on hold by FREIT during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008. As of October 31, 2014, FREIT has incurred approximately $14.6 million of pre-development costs, of which $3.7 million was written-off in Fiscal 2012 as a result of revisions to the scope of the redevelopment project (see discussion below). During Fiscal 2012, the original plans for the Rotunda redevelopment project were revised, primarily attributable to the lease termination by Giant of Maryland, LLC (“Giant”) and related termination agreement. (See Competitive Condition: (C) Renewal of Leases and Reletting of Space for more details.) As a result, we will not be required to construct a lower level Giant supermarket as part of the redevelopment plans at the Rotunda, which represented a costly component to the project. In addition, the Giant lease contained significant restrictions on Grande’s ability to make modifications to the property. In light of the Giant lease termination and its potential impact on the scope of the development plans for the Rotunda site, management proposed further revisions to the scope of the Rotunda development project. On July 24, 2012, FREIT’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) approved the revisions to the scope of the project, thereby further reducing the complexity and projected cost of the project. The revised building plans incorporate an expansion of approximately 115,000 square feet of retail space, approximately 350 residential rental apartments, and structured parking. As a result of the Board’s decision to move forward with the revised development plans, an additional $2.2 million of certain deferred project costs relating to planning and feasibility costs that had been included in Construction in Progress (“CIP”) were no longer deemed to have any utility, and were written-off in the 3rd Quarter of Fiscal 2012. Due to the revised scope of the development and the improved economic and financing climate, FREIT has now resumed the redevelopment of the Rotunda. On December 9, 2013, Grande and FREIT closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million, for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment and expansion project at the Rotunda. The construction loan is for a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. In order to avoid beginning construction during the winter months, Grande began construction on the parking lot areas in September 2013, and is currently moving forward with the next phase of the construction project.

(iii) PLANNED DISPOSITIONS & ACQUISITIONS

On May 2, 2012, FREIT’s Board authorized management to pursue the sale of its South Brunswick, NJ property. The decision to sell this property was based on the Board’s desire to re-deploy the net proceeds arising from the sale to real estate assets in other areas of FREIT’s operations. On December 20, 2013, FREIT’s South Brunswick property, which consisted of vacant land, was sold for $11 million resulting in a capital gain of approximately $8.7 million net of sales fees and commissions. FREIT structured this sale in a manner that qualifies it as a like-kind exchange of real estate pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The 1031 Exchange transaction will result in a deferral for income tax purposes of the $8.7 million capital gain. The net proceeds from this sale, which were approximately $9.8 million, were held in escrow until a replacement property was purchased. A replacement property related to this like-kind exchange was acquired on June 18, 2014, and the sale proceeds held in escrow were applied to the purchase price of such property.

On June 18, 2014, FREIT completed the acquisition of the Regency Club (“Regency”), a residential apartment complex located in Middletown, New York. The Regency complex consists of 132 units in 11 buildings and a clubhouse. The acquisition cost was $20,625,000 (exclusive of $648,000 of transaction costs charged to expense), which was funded in part with $9.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of the South Brunswick land, and the remaining balance of $11.5 million (inclusive of the $648,000 of transaction costs) was funded utilizing $10 million of FREIT’s credit line with Provident Bank, and FREIT's available cash. On December 29, 2014, FREIT Regency, LLC secured long-term financing in the amount of $16.2 million for the Regency property to replace the funds borrowed from its credit line. (See Notes 3 and 17 for further details.)

4

 (b) Financial Information about Segments

FREIT has two reportable segments: Commercial Properties and Residential Properties. These reportable segments have different types of tenants and are managed separately because each requires different operating strategies and management expertise. Segment information for the three years ended October 31, 2014 is included in Note 15 “Segment Information” to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.

 (c)  Narrative Description of Business

FREIT was founded and organized for the principal purpose of acquiring, developing, and owning a portfolio of diverse income producing real estate properties. FREIT’s developed properties include residential apartment communities and commercial properties that consist of multi and single tenanted properties. Our properties are located in New Jersey, Maryland and New York. We also currently own approximately 7.37 acres of unimproved land in New Jersey. See Item 2, “Properties - Portfolio of Investments.” 

FREIT elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. FREIT operates in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT in order to take advantage of certain favorable tax aspects of the REIT structure. Generally, a REIT will not be subject to federal income taxes on that portion of its ordinary income or capital gain that is currently distributed to its equity holders.

As an equity REIT, we generally acquire interests in income producing properties to be held as long-term investments. FREIT’s return on such investments is based on the income generated by such properties mainly in the form of rents.

From time to time, FREIT has sold, and may sell again in the future, certain of its properties in order to (i) obtain capital used or to be used to purchase, develop or renovate other properties which we believe will provide a higher rate of return and increase the value of our investment portfolio, and (ii) divest properties which FREIT has determined or determines are no longer compatible with our growth strategies and investment objectives for our real estate portfolio.

We do not hold any patents, registered trademarks, or licenses. 

Portfolio of Real Estate Investments

At October 31, 2014, FREIT’s real estate holdings included (i) seven (7) apartment buildings or complexes containing a total of 1,093 rentable units, (ii) ten (10) commercial properties (retail and office) containing approximately 1,264,000 square feet of leasable space, including one (1) single tenant store, two (2) separate one acre parcels subject to ground leases, and (iii) three (3) parcels of undeveloped land consisting of approximately 7.37 acres in total. On December 20, 2013, the South Brunswick property totaling 33 acres was sold (see Note 2 for more details). FREIT and its subsidiaries own all such properties in fee simple. See Item 2, “Properties - Portfolio of Investments” of this Annual Report for a description of FREIT’s separate investment properties and certain other pertinent information with respect to such properties that is relevant to FREIT’s business.

Investment in Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements (See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K) include the accounts of the following subsidiaries of FREIT:

Westwood Hills, LLC (“Westwood Hills”): FREIT owns a 40% membership interest in Westwood Hills, which owns and operates a 210-unit residential apartment complex in Westwood, NJ.

Wayne PSC, LLC (“WaynePSC”): FREIT owns a 40% membership interest in Wayne PSC, which owns a 322,000 sq. ft. community center in Wayne, NJ.

S And A Commercial Associates Limited Partnership (“S And A”): S And A owns a 100% interest in Pierre Towers, LLC, which owns a 266-unit residential apartment complex in Hackensack, NJ. FREIT owns a 65% partnership interest in S And A.

Grande Rotunda, LLC: FREIT owns a 60% membership interest in Grande Rotunda, which owns a 217,000 square foot mixed use property in Baltimore, MD, and is currently involved in a major redevelopment and expansion project at the property.

Damascus Centre, LLC: FREIT owns a 70% membership interest in Damascus Centre, LLC which owns the Damascus Center that has recently been renovated and expanded.

Damascus Second, LLC: FREIT owns a 70% interest in Damascus Second, LLC, which assumed a $21.3 million (originally $27.3 million) construction loan from Bank of America for the purpose of assisting Damascus Centre, LLC in owning, operating, managing and, as required, renovating the land and premises of the Damascus Center. On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced the construction loan with long-term financing provided by People’s United Bank. The amount of the new loan is $25 million, of which $20 million has been drawn. The balance, up to an additional $5 million, will be available as a one-time draw over the 36 month period ending December 26, 2015, and the amount available will depend on future leasing at the shopping center.

5

WestFREIT Corp: FREIT owns a 100% membership interest in WestFREIT, which owns Westridge, a 252,000 square foot shopping center in Frederick, MD.

WestFredic LLC: FREIT owns a 100% membership interest in WestFredic, which assumed a $22 million mortgage loan that is secured by Westridge in Frederick, MD.

FREIT Regency, LLC: FREIT owns 100% membership interest in FREIT Regency, LLC, which owns a 132 unit residential apartment complex located in Middletown, New York.

Employees

On October 31, 2014 FREIT and its subsidiaries had twenty six (26) full-time employees and three (3) part-time employees who work solely at the properties owned by FREIT or its subsidiaries. The number of part-time employees varies seasonally.

Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. John A. Aiello, Esq., Secretary and Executive Secretary, are the executive officers of FREIT. Mr. Hekemian devotes approximately seventy percent (70%) of his business activities to FREIT, Mr. Barney devotes approximately fifteen percent (15%) of his business activities to FREIT, and Mr. Aiello devotes approximately six percent (6%) of his business activities to FREIT. Refer to “Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.” Hekemian has been retained by FREIT to manage FREIT’s properties and is responsible for recruiting, on behalf of FREIT, the personnel required to perform all services related to the operation of FREIT’s properties. See “Management Agreement” below. 

Management Agreement

On April 10, 2002, FREIT and Hekemian executed a Management Agreement whereby Hekemian would continue as Managing Agent for FREIT. The term of the Management Agreement renewed on November 1, 2013 for a two-year term and will expire on October 31, 2015. The Management Agreement automatically renews for successive periods of two years unless either party gives not less than six (6) months prior notice to the other of non-renewal. The salient provisions of the Management Agreement are as follows: FREIT retains Hekemian as the exclusive management and leasing agent for properties which FREIT owned as of April 2002 and for the Preakness Shopping Center acquired on November 1, 2002 by Wayne PSC. However, FREIT may retain other managing agents to manage certain other properties acquired after April 10, 2002 and to perform various other duties such as sales, acquisitions, and development with respect to any or all properties. Hekemian does not serve as the exclusive advisor for FREIT to locate and recommend to FREIT investments, which Hekemian deems suitable for FREIT, and is not required to offer potential acquisition properties exclusively to FREIT before acquiring those properties for its own account. The Management Agreement includes a detailed schedule of fees for those services, which Hekemian may be called upon to perform. The Management Agreement provides for a termination fee in the event of a termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement under certain circumstances.

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, FREIT pays Hekemian certain fees and commissions as compensation for its services. From time to time, FREIT engages Hekemian to provide certain additional services, such as consulting services related to development, property sales and financing activities of FREIT. Separate fee arrangements are negotiated between Hekemian and FREIT with respect to such additional services. In Fiscal 2007, the Board approved development fee arrangements for the Rotunda and Damascus Center redevelopment projects. In connection with the development activities at the Rotunda and the redevelopment activities at the Damascus Center, definitive contract agreements for the development services to be provided by Hekemian Development Resources LLC (“Resources”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hekemian, have been approved and executed. The development fee arrangement for the Rotunda provides for Resources to receive a fee equal to 6.375% of the total development costs of up to $84.6 million (as may be modified, and less the amount of $3 million previously paid to Hekemian for the Rotunda project). In addition, the Board approved the payment of a fee to Resources in the amount of $1.4 million in connection with the revision to the scope of the Rotunda development project. The fee will be paid to Resources upon the following terms: (i) $500,000 of the $1.4 million will be paid on a monthly basis during the design phase (the $500,000 was paid in Fiscal 2013); and (ii) $900,000 of the $1.4 million will be paid upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the multi-family portion of the project. The fee for the redevelopment of the Damascus Center was equal to 7% of the redevelopment costs of up to approximately $17.3 million (as may be modified). The minority ownership interests of Grande and Damascus Centre, LLC are owned by Rotunda 100, LLC and Damascus 100, LLC, which are principally owned by employees of Hekemian, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian, FREIT’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a trustee of FREIT, and the members of the Hekemian family have majority management control of these entities. (See Note 10 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.)

Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a Trustee of FREIT, is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Hekemian. Mr. Hekemian owns approximately 0.2% of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hekemian. Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Jr, a Trustee of FREIT, is the President of Hekemian, and owns approximately 33.3% of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hekemian.

6

Real Estate Financing

FREIT funds acquisition opportunities and the development of its real estate properties largely through debt financing, including mortgage loans against certain of its properties. At October 31, 2014, FREIT’s aggregate outstanding mortgage debt was $251.6 million with an average interest cost on a weighted average basis of 4.65%. FREIT has mortgage loans against certain properties, which serve as collateral for such loans. See the tables in Item 2, “Properties - Portfolio of Investments” for the outstanding mortgage balances at October 31, 2014 with respect to each of these properties.

FREIT is currently highly leveraged and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. This increased level of indebtedness also presents an increased risk of default on the obligations of FREIT and an increase in debt service requirements that could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of FREIT. A number of FREIT’s mortgage loans are being amortized over a period that is longer than the terms of such loans; thereby requiring balloon payments at the expiration of the terms of such loans. FREIT has not established a cash reserve sinking fund with respect to such obligations and at this time does not expect to have sufficient funds from operations to make such balloon payments when due under the terms of such loans. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” under Item 7.

FREIT is subject to the normal risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that FREIT’s cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; the risk that indebtedness on its properties will not be able to be renewed, repaid or refinanced when due; or that the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the indebtedness being replaced. If FREIT were unable to refinance its indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all, FREIT might be forced to dispose of one or more of its properties on disadvantageous terms which might result in losses to FREIT. These losses could have a material adverse effect on FREIT and its ability to make distributions to shareholders and to pay amounts due on its debt. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and FREIT is unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose upon the property, appoint a receiver and receive an assignment of rents and leases or pursue other remedies, all with a consequent loss of revenues and asset value to FREIT. Further, payment obligations on FREIT’s mortgage loans will not be reduced if there is a decline in the economic performance of any of FREIT’s properties. If any such decline in economic performance occurs, FREIT’s revenues, earnings, and funds available for distribution to shareholders would be adversely affected.

Neither FREIT’s Declaration of Trust nor any policy statement formally adopted by the Board limits either the total amount of indebtedness or the specified percentage of indebtedness (based on the total capitalization of FREIT), which may be incurred by FREIT. Accordingly, FREIT may incur in the future additional secured or unsecured indebtedness in furtherance of its business activities, including, if or when necessary, to refinance its existing debt. Future debt incurred by FREIT could bear interest at rates which are higher than the rates on FREIT’s existing debt. Future debt incurred by FREIT could also bear interest at a variable rate. Increases in interest rates would increase FREIT’s variable interest costs (to the extent that the related indebtedness was not protected by interest rate protection arrangements), which could have a material adverse effect on FREIT and its ability to make distributions to shareholders and to pay amounts due on its debt or cause FREIT to be in default under its debt. Further, in the future, FREIT may not be able to, or may determine that it is not able to, obtain financing for property acquisitions or for capital expenditures to develop or improve its properties on terms which are acceptable to FREIT. In such event, FREIT might elect to defer certain projects unless alternative sources of capital were available, such as through an equity or debt offering by FREIT.

Competitive Conditions

FREIT is subject to normal competition with other investors to acquire real property and to profitably manage such property. Numerous other REITs, banks, insurance companies and pension funds, as well as corporate and individual developers and owners of real estate, compete with FREIT in seeking properties for acquisition and for tenants. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than FREIT.

In addition, retailers at FREIT's commercial properties face increasing competition from discount shopping centers, outlet malls, sales through catalogue offerings, discount shopping clubs, marketing and shopping through cable and computer sources, particularly over the internet, and telemarketing. In many markets, the trade areas of FREIT's commercial properties overlap with the trade areas of other shopping centers. Renovations and expansions at those competing shopping centers and malls could negatively affect FREIT's commercial properties by encouraging shoppers to make their purchases at such new, expanded or renovated shopping centers and malls. Increased competition through these various sources could adversely affect the viability of FREIT's tenants, and any new commercial real estate competition developed in the future could potentially have an adverse effect on the revenues of and earnings from FREIT's commercial properties.

(A) General Factors Affecting Investment in Commercial and Apartment Properties; Effect of Economic and Real Estate Conditions

The revenues and value of FREIT’s commercial and residential apartment properties may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation, the national economic climate; the regional economic climate (which may be adversely affected by plant closings, industry slowdowns and other local business factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of retail space or apartment units); perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the security, safety, convenience and attractiveness of a shopping center; perception by residential tenants of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of an apartment building or complex; the proximity and the number of competing shopping centers and apartment complexes; the availability of recreational and other amenities and the willingness and ability of the owner to provide capable management and adequate maintenance. In addition, other factors may adversely affect the fair market value of a commercial property or apartment building or complex without necessarily affecting the revenues, including changes in government regulations (such as limitations on development or on hours of operation) changes in tax laws or rates, and potential environmental or other legal liabilities.

7

(B) Commercial Shopping Center Properties' Dependence on Anchor Stores and Satellite Tenants

FREIT believes that its revenues and earnings; its ability to meet its debt obligations; and its funds available for distribution to shareholders would be adversely affected if space in FREIT's multi-store shopping center properties could not be leased or if anchor store tenants or satellite tenants failed to meet their lease obligations.

The success of FREIT's investment in its shopping center properties is largely dependent upon the success of its tenants. Unfavorable economic, demographic, or competitive conditions may adversely affect the financial condition of tenants and consequently the lease revenues from and the value of FREIT's investments in its shopping center properties. If the sales of stores operating in FREIT's shopping center properties were to decline due to deteriorating economic conditions, the tenants may be unable to pay their base rents or meet other lease charges and fees due to FREIT. In addition, any lease provisions providing for additional rent based on a percentage of sales would not be operative in this economic environment. In the event of default by a tenant, FREIT could suffer a loss of rent and experience extraordinary delays while incurring additional costs in enforcing its rights under the lease, which FREIT may not be able to recapture.

As at October 31, 2014 the following table lists the ten (10) largest commercial tenants, which account for approximately 56.3% of FREIT’s leased commercial rental space and 38.9% of fixed commercial rents.

Tenant	Center	Sq. Ft.	% of Revenue
Burlington Coat Factory	Westridge Square	85,992	4.1%
Kmart Corporation	Westwood Plaza	84,254	2.0%
Macy's Federated Department Stores, Inc.	Preakness	81,160	1.4%
Pathmark Stores Inc.	Patchoque	63,932	8.1%
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.	Preakness	61,020	3.7%
Safeway Stores Inc.	Damascus Center	58,358	5.9%
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.	Franklin Crossing	48,673	6.7%
G-Mart Frederick, Inc.	Westridge Square	40,000	2.0%
TJ MAXX	Westwood Plaza	28,480	3.4%
T-Bowl Inc.	Preakness	27,195	1.6%

(C) Renewal of Leases and Reletting of Space

There is no assurance that we will be able to retain tenants at our commercial properties upon expiration of their leases. Upon expiration or termination of leases for space located in FREIT's commercial properties, the premises may not be relet or the terms of reletting (including the cost of concessions to tenants) may not be as favorable as lease terms for the terminated lease. If FREIT were unable to promptly relet all or a substantial portion of this space or if the rental rates upon such reletting were significantly lower than current or expected rates, FREIT's revenues and earnings, FREIT’s ability to service its debt, and FREIT’s ability to make expected distributions to its shareholders, could be adversely affected.

On February 3, 2012, Grande entered into a lease termination agreement (“Agreement”) with Giant, the tenant and operator of the 35,994 sq. ft. Giant supermarket at the Rotunda. Giant, under the terms of the Agreement, agreed to (i) waive its right to extend the term of the lease through March 31, 2035, (ii) terminate the lease and surrender the premises to Grande no later than the earlier of commencement of the redevelopment of the property or March 31, 2015, and (iii) notwithstanding any earlier termination date, continue to pay monthly fixed rent payments plus its share of common area maintenance charges and taxes for the Rotunda property through March 31, 2015. Grande has agreed (i) not to lease more than 20,000 sq. ft. of any space in the property for use as a food supermarket through March 31, 2035, and (ii) if Grande decides to lease such space for use as a food supermarket, it must first offer the space for the same use under the terms acceptable to Grande, to Giant, which will have thirty days to accept the offer before the space may be leased to a third party.

During Fiscal 2011, FREIT was notified by the former tenant and operator of the 55,330 sq. ft. Giant Supermarket at Westridge that it would not extend the term of its lease, which expired on October 31, 2011. On July 27, 2012, FREIT signed a lease agreement with G-Mart Frederick, Inc., the operator of an international grocery store chain (“G-Mart”), for a significant portion (40,000 square feet) of the space previously occupied by Giant. G-Mart began operations at the center in September 2013. Effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this 40,000 square foot space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain, in November 2014. H-Mart is expected to open for business sometime in February 2015.

There were no other material lease expirations during Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013. There are no material lease expirations expected during Fiscal 2015.

8

(D) Illiquidity of Real Estate Investments; Possibility that Value of FREIT's Interests may be less than its Investment

Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Accordingly, the ability of FREIT to vary its portfolio in response to changing economic, market or other conditions is limited. Also, FREIT's interests in its partially owned subsidiaries are subject to transfer constraints imposed by the operating agreements which govern FREIT’s investment in these partially owned subsidiaries. Even without such restrictions on the transfer of its interests, FREIT believes that there would be a limited market for its interests in these partially owned subsidiaries.

If FREIT had to liquidate all or substantially all of its real estate holdings, the value of such assets would likely be diminished if a sale was required to be completed in a limited time frame. The proceeds to FREIT from any such sale of the assets in FREIT’s real estate portfolio might be less than the fair market value of those assets.

Impact of Governmental Laws and Regulations on Registrant's Business

FREIT’s properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, including those relating to the environment and local rent control and zoning ordinances.

(A) Environmental Matters

Both federal and state governments are concerned with the impact of real estate construction and development programs upon the environment. Environmental legislation affects the cost of selling real estate, the cost to develop real estate, and the risks associated with purchasing real estate.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owners knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Such liability may be imposed on the owner in connection with the activities of any operator of, or tenant at, the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal injury or property damages and the property owner's liability therefore could exceed the value of the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. If FREIT incurred any such liability, it could reduce FREIT's revenues and ability to make distributions to its shareholders.

A property can also be negatively impacted by either physical contamination or by virtue of an adverse effect upon value attributable to the migration of hazardous or toxic substances, or other contaminants that have or may have emanated from other properties.

At this time, FREIT is aware of the following environmental matters affecting its properties:

(i) Westwood Plaza Shopping Center, Westwood, NJ

This property is in a Flood Hazard Zone. FREIT maintains flood insurance in the amount of $500,000 for the subject property, which is the maximum available under the Flood Program for the property. Any reconstruction of that portion of the property situated in the flood hazard zone is subject to regulations promulgated by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP"), which could require extraordinary construction methods.

(ii) Franklin Crossing, Franklin Lakes, NJ

The redeveloped Franklin Crossing shopping center was completed during the summer of 1997. Also in 1997, a historical discharge of hazardous materials was discovered at Franklin Crossing. The discharge was reported to the NJDEP in accordance with applicable regulations. FREIT completed the remediation required by the NJDEP.

In November 1999, FREIT received a No Further Action Letter from the NJDEP concerning the contaminated soil at Franklin Crossing. Monitoring of the groundwater will continue pursuant to a memorandum of agreement filed with the NJDEP.

(iii) Preakness Shopping Center, Wayne, NJ

Prior to its purchase, in November 2002 by Wayne PSC, a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment of the Preakness shopping center revealed soil and ground water contamination with Percloroethylene (Dry Cleaning Fluid) caused by the mishandling of this chemical by a former Dry Cleaner tenant.

The seller of the center to Wayne PSC is in the process of performing the remedial work in accordance with the requirements of the NJDEP. Additionally, the seller has escrowed the estimated cost of the remediation and has purchased a cap-cost insurance policy covering any expenses over and above the estimated cost.

9

In performing the remedial work, possible contamination of this property by groundwater migrating from an offsite source was discovered. The NJDEP has not made any determination with respect to responsibility for remediation of this possible condition, and it is not possible to determine whether or to what extent Wayne PSC will have potential liability with respect to this condition or whether or to what extent insurance coverage may be available.

(iv) Other

a) The State of New Jersey has adopted an underground fuel storage tank law and various regulations with respect to underground storage tanks.

FREIT no longer has underground storage tanks on any of its properties.

In prior years, FREIT conducted environmental audits for all of its properties except for its undeveloped land; retail properties in Franklin Lakes (Franklin Crossing) and Glen Rock, New Jersey. Except as noted in subparagraph (iii) above, the environmental reports secured by FREIT have not revealed any environmental conditions on its properties, which require remediation pursuant to any applicable Federal or state law or regulation.

b) FREIT has determined that several of its properties contain lead based paint (“LBP”). FREIT believes that it complies with all federal, state and local requirements as they pertain to LBP.

FREIT does not believe that the environmental conditions described in subparagraphs (i) - (iv) above will have a material adverse effect upon the capital expenditures, revenues, earnings, financial condition or competitive position of FREIT.

(B) Rent Control Ordinances

Each of the apartment buildings or complexes owned by FREIT is subject to some form of rent control ordinance which limits the amount by which FREIT can increase the rent for renewed leases, and in some cases, limits the amount of rent which FREIT can charge for vacated units, except for Westwood Hills and The Boulders at Rockaway which are not subject to any rent control law or regulation.

(C) Zoning Ordinances

Local zoning ordinances may prevent FREIT from renovating, expanding or converting its existing properties for their highest and best use as determined by the Board.

(D) Financial Information about Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sale

FREIT does not engage in operations in foreign countries and it does not derive any portion of its revenues from customers in foreign countries.

 ITEM 1 A RISK FACTORS

Almost all of FREIT’s income and cash flow are derived from the net rental income (revenues after expenses) from our properties. FREIT’s business and financial results are affected by the following fundamental factors:

· the national and regional economic climate;

· occupancy rates at the properties;

· tenant turnover rates;

· rental rates;

· operating expenses;

· tenant improvement and leasing costs;

· cost of and availability of capital;

· failure of banking institutions;

· failure of insurance carriers;

· new acquisitions and development projects; and

· changes in governmental regulations, real estate tax rates and similar matters.

A negative or adverse quality change in the above factors could potentially cause a detrimental effect on FREIT’s revenue, earnings and cash flow. If rental revenues decline, we would expect to have less cash available to pay our indebtedness and distribute to our shareholders.

Adverse Changes in General Economic Climate: FREIT derives the majority of its revenues from renting apartments to individuals or families, and from retailers renting space at its shopping centers. The improvement in the U.S. economy has been uneven, but trending data seem to indicate the recovery has finally gained traction. The following U.S. developments and factors are positive: (a) the improvement in the housing market is expected to continue and drag along ancillary services; (b) falling energy prices and slower increases in health care costs are keeping inflation low; (c) increasing consumer confidence should push spending modestly higher in 2015; (d) private sector employment is expected to continue to grow steadily; and (e) credit availability has improved. These factors should aid economic growth in the United States. However, there are factors that can be a drag on long-term economic growth, including, without limitation: (i) continued political gridlock in Washington; (ii) regulatory uncertainties; (iii) continued infrastructure deterioration; and (iv) a dramatic international crisis.

10

We receive a substantial portion of our operating income as rent under long-term leases with commercial tenants. At any time, any of our commercial tenants could experience a downturn in its business that might weaken its financial condition. These tenants might defer or fail to make rental payments when due, delay lease commencement, voluntarily vacate the premises or declare bankruptcy, which could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease, and could result in material losses to us and harm to our results of operations. Also, it might take time to terminate leases of underperforming or nonperforming tenants and we might incur costs to remove such tenants. Also, if tenants are unable to comply with the terms of our leases, we might modify lease terms in ways that are less favorable to us.

Tenants unable to pay rent: Financially distressed tenants may be unable to pay rents and expense recovery charges, where applicable, and may default on their leases. Enforcing our rights as landlord could result in substantial costs and may not result in a full recovery of unpaid rent. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, the tenant’s lease may be terminated. In each such instance FREIT’s income and cash flow would be negatively impacted.

Costs of re-renting space: If tenants fail to renew leases, fail to exercise renewal options, or terminate their leases early, the lost rents due to vacancy and the costs of re-renting the space could prove costly to FREIT. In addition to cleaning and renovating the vacated space, we may be required to grant concessions to a new tenant, and may incur leasing brokerage commissions. The lease terms to a new tenant may be less favorable than the prior tenant’s lease terms, and will negatively impact FREIT’s income and cash flow and adversely affect our ability to pay mortgage debt and interest or make distributions to our shareholders. FREIT is actively pursuing the re-leasing of the space at The Rotunda that was vacated by Giant as of April 2012, and initially re-leased a portion of the space (40,000 of 55,330 square feet of available space) that was vacated by Giant at its Westridge Square property to G-Mart, an international grocery chain. G-Mart opened for business at the center in September 2013. However, effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain. H-Mart is expected to open for business sometime in February 2015.

Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations: Increased inflation could have a pronounced negative impact on our operating and administrative expenses, as these costs may increase at a higher rate than our rents. While increases in most operating expenses at our commercial properties can be passed on to retail tenants, increases in expenses at our residential properties cannot be passed on to residential tenants. Unreimbursed increased operating expenses may reduce cash flow available for payment of mortgage debt and interest, and for distributions to shareholders.

Development and construction risks: As part of its investment strategy, FREIT seeks to acquire property for development and construction, as well as to develop and build on land already in its portfolio. FREIT has recently completed a major expansion project at the Damascus Center and is engaged in a major redevelopment at the Rotunda property in Baltimore, Maryland. Development and construction activities are challenged with the following risks, which may adversely affect our cash flow:

· financing may not be available in the amounts we seek, or may not be on favorable terms;

· long-term financing may not be available upon completion of the construction;

· failure to complete construction on schedule or within budget may increase debt service costs and construction costs; and

· abandoned project costs could result in an impairment loss.

Debt financing could adversely affect income and cash flow: FREIT relies on debt financing to fund its growth through acquisitions and development activities. To the extent third party debt financing is not available or not available on acceptable terms, acquisitions and development activities will be curtailed.

As of October 31, 2014, FREIT had approximately $203.9 million of non-recourse mortgage debt subject to fixed interest rates, and $47.7 million of variable interest rate debt, of which $42.7 million relates to outstanding draws on the Grande construction loan, and $5.0 million relates to outstanding draws on its line of credit. These mortgages are being repaid over periods (amortization schedules) that are longer than the terms of the mortgages. Accordingly, when the mortgages become due (at various times) significant balloon payments (the unpaid principal amounts) will be required. FREIT expects to refinance the individual mortgages with new mortgages when their terms expire. To this extent we have exposure to capital availability and interest rate risk. If interest rates, at the time any individual mortgage note is due, are higher than the current fixed interest rate, higher debt service may be required and/or refinancing proceeds may be less than the amount of the mortgage debt being retired. The $22.5 million mortgage loan entered into by Grande for the acquisition of the Rotunda was scheduled to come due on July 19, 2009, and was extended by the bank until February 1, 2010. On February 1, 2010, a principal payment of $3 million was made reducing the original loan amount of $22.5 million to $19.5 million and the due date was extended until February 1, 2013. The due date of the loan was further extended to May 1, 2013 from February 1, 2013. Even though the bank agreed to an additional ninety-day (90) extension of the maturity of the loan from May 1, 2013, FREIT elected to purchase the Rotunda loan from the bank and have all the bank’s rights assigned to FREIT. The purchase of this loan by FREIT was completed on May 28, 2013. FREIT intended to sell this loan to the lender providing the construction financing for the expansion of the Rotunda project. On December 9, 2013, Grande closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment and expansion project planned for the Rotunda. The construction loan is for a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. Under the agreement with the equity owners of Grande, FREIT would be responsible for 60% of any cash required by Grande, and 40% would be the responsibility of the minority interest. As of October 31, 2014, $42.7 million was drawn on the construction line with Wells Fargo Bank, of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $23.7 million was used towards the construction at the Rotunda.

11

To the extent we are unable to refinance our indebtedness on acceptable terms; we may need to dispose of one or more of our properties upon disadvantageous terms.

Our revolving $13 million credit line (of which $8 million was available as of October 31, 2014), and our Grande Rotunda construction loan, which was entered into on December 9, 2013, contain financial covenants that could restrict our acquisition activities and result in a default on these loans if we fail to satisfy these covenants.

Failure of banking and financing institutions: Banking and financing institutions such as insurance companies provide FREIT with credit lines and construction financing. The credit lines available to FREIT may be used for a variety of business purposes, including general corporate purposes, acquisitions, construction, and letters of credit. Construction financing enables FREIT to develop new properties, or renovate or expand existing properties. A failure of the banking institution making credit lines available may render the line unavailable and adversely affect FREIT’s liquidity, and negatively impact our operations in a number of ways. A failure of a financial institution unable to fund its construction financing obligations to FREIT may cause the construction to halt or be delayed. Substitute financing may be significantly more expensive, and construction delays may subject FREIT to delivery penalties.

Failure of insurance carriers: FREIT’s properties are insured against unforeseen liability claims, property damages, and other hazards. The insurance companies FREIT uses have good ratings at the time the policies are put into effect. Financial failure of our carriers may result in their inability to pay current and future claims. This inability to pay claims may have an adverse impact on FREIT’s financial condition. In addition, a failure of a FREIT insurance carrier may cause FREIT’s insurance renewal or replacement policy costs to increase.

Real estate is a competitive business: FREIT is subject to normal competition with other investors to acquire real property and to profitably manage such property. Numerous other REITs, banks, insurance companies and pension funds, as well as corporate and individual developers and owners of real estate, compete with FREIT in seeking properties for acquisition and for tenants. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than FREIT. In addition, retailers at FREIT's commercial properties face increasing competition from discount shopping centers, outlet malls, sales through catalogue offerings, discount shopping clubs, marketing and shopping through cable and computer sources, particularly over the internet, and telemarketing. In many markets, the trade areas of FREIT's commercial properties overlap with the trade areas of other shopping centers. Renovations and expansions at those competing shopping centers and malls could negatively affect FREIT's commercial properties by encouraging shoppers to make their purchases at such new, expanded or renovated shopping centers and malls. Increased competition through these various sources could adversely affect the viability of FREIT's tenants, and any new commercial real estate competition developed in the future could potentially have an adverse effect on the revenues of and earnings from FREIT's commercial properties.

Illiquidity of real estate investment: Real estate investments are relatively difficult to buy and sell quickly. Accordingly, the ability of FREIT to vary its portfolio in response to changing economic, market or other conditions is limited. Also, FREIT’s interests in its partially owned subsidiaries are subject to transfer constraints by the operating agreements that govern FREIT’s investment in these partially owned subsidiaries.

Environmental problems may be costly: Both federal and state governments are concerned with the impact of real estate construction and development programs upon the environment. Environmental legislation affects the cost of selling real estate, the cost to develop real estate, and the risks associated with purchasing real estate.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owners knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Such liability may be imposed on the owner in connection with the activities of any operator of, or tenant at the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal injury or property damages and the property owner's liability therefore could exceed the value of the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. If FREIT incurred any such liability, it could reduce FREIT's revenues and ability to make distributions to its shareholders.

A property can also be negatively impacted by either physical contamination or by virtue of an adverse effect upon value attributable to the migration of hazardous or toxic substances, or other contaminants that have or may have emanated from other properties.

12

Qualification as a REIT: Since its inception in 1961, FREIT has elected to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Governmental legislation, new regulations, and administrative interpretations may significantly change the tax laws with respect to the requirements for qualification as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. Although FREIT intends to continue to operate in a manner to allow it to qualify as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause it to revoke the REIT election or fail to qualify as a REIT. Such a revocation would subject FREIT’s income to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, and failure to qualify as a REIT would also eliminate the requirement that we pay dividends to our shareholders.

Change of investment and operating policies: FREIT’s investment and operating policies, including indebtedness and dividends, are exclusively determined by the Board, and not subject to shareholder approval.

ITEM 1 B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

  ITEM 2   PROPERTIES

Portfolio of Investments: The following tables set forth certain information relating to each of FREIT's real estate investments in addition to the specific mortgages encumbering the properties.  

Residential Apartment Properties as of October 31, 2014:
Property & Location	Year Acquired	No. of Units	Average Annual Occupancy Rate for the Year Ended 10/31/14	Average Monthly Rent per Unit @ 10/31/14	Average Monthly Rent per Unit @ 10/31/13	Mortgage Balance ($000)	Depreciated Cost of Land, Buildings & Equipment ($000)
Berdan Court	1965	176	95.2%	$1,661	$1,660	$18,686	$1,653
Wayne, NJ
Hammel Gardens	1972	80	95.4%	$1,440	$1,461	$8,374 (4)	$748
Maywood, NJ
Regency Club (6)	2014	132	99.5%	$1,396	N/A	N/A	$20,561
Middletown, NY
Steuben Arms	1975	100	95.9%	$1,432	$1,406	$11,037 (5)	$942
River Edge, NJ
Westwood Hills (1)	1994	210	97.4%	$1,631	$1,687	$21,974	$10,398
Westwood Hills, NJ
Pierre Towers (2)	2004	266	91.5%	$2,356	$2,307	$31,198	$41,546
Hackensack, NJ
Boulders (3)	2006	129	95.3%	$1,943	$1,942	$18,030	$17,080
Rockaway, NJ

(1) FREIT owns a 40% equity interest in Westwood Hills. See "Investment in Subsidiaries".

(2) Pierre Towers is 100% owned by S And A Commercial Associates LP, which is 65% owned by FREIT.

(3) Construction completed in August 2006 on land acquired in 1963 / 1964.

(4) On November 19, 2013, the Hammel Gardens loan was refinanced in the amount of $8.5 million at an interest rate of 4.54%.

(5) On November 19, 2013, the Steuben Arms loan was refinanced in the amount of $11.2 million at an interest rate of 4.54%.

(6) On June 18, 2014, FREIT completed the acquisition of the Regency Club, a residential apartment complex in Middletown, NY.

13

Commercial Properties as of October 31, 2014:
Property & Location	Year Acquired	Leasable Space- Approximate Sq.Ft.	Average Annual Occupancy Rate for the Year Ended 10/31/14	Average Annualized Rent per Sq. Ft. @ 10/31/14 *	Average Annualized Rent per Sq. Ft. @ 10/31/13 *	Mortgage Balance ($000)	Depreciated Cost of Land, Buildings & Equipment ($000)
Glen Rock, NJ	1962	4,800	40.9%	$18.35 (12)	$23.12	None (1)	$56
Franklin Crossing	1966 (2)	87,041	94.5%	$24.93	$24.78	None (1)	$7,654
Franklin Lakes, NJ
Westwood Plaza	1988	173,854	98.6%	$13.71	$13.19	$21,884	$8,375
Westwood, NJ
Westridge Square (3)	1992	251,991  (10)	82.9%	$13.81	$15.49	$22,000	$17,197
Frederick, MD
Pathmark Super Store	1997	63,962	100.0%	$20.03	$20.03	$5,376 (7)	$7,152
Patchogue, NY
Preakness Center (4)	2002	322,136	90.9%	$13.19	$13.34	$25,978	$26,945
Wayne, NJ
Damascus Center (5)	2003	143,471	75.4%	$20.47	$19.41	$19,326 (8)	$29,644
Damascus, MD
				.	.
The Rotunda (6)	2005	216,645 (11)	50.8%	$40.63	$31.56	$42,689 (9)	$79,268
Baltimore, MD
Rockaway, NJ	1964/1963	1 Acre	100.0%	N/A	N/A	None	$165
		Landlease
Rochelle Park, NJ	2007	1 Acre	N/A	N/A	N/A	None	$2,308
		Landlease

* Average annualized rent per sq ft includes the impact of straight-line rent escalations and the amortization of rent concessions and abatements.

(1) Security for draws against FREIT's Credit Line.

(2) The original 33,000 sq. ft. shopping center was replaced with a new 87,041 sq. ft. center that opened in October 1997.

(3) FREIT owns a 100% interest in WestFREIT Corp, that owns the center.

(4) FREIT owns a 40% equity interest in WaynePSC, that owns the center.

(5) FREIT owns a 70% equity interest in Damascus Centre, LLC, that owns the center. A major renovation and expansion project was completed November 1, 2011.

(6) FREIT owns a 60% equity interest in Grande Rotunda, LLC, that owns the center.

(7) Effective January 1, 2013, interest rate on loan was renegotiated to a fixed rate of 4.5%. All other terms of the loan remain unchanged.

(8) On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced the construction loan with a new mortgage loan in the amount of $20 million, bearing a floating rate equal to 210 basis points over the BBA LIBOR, and the new loan will mature on January 3, 2023.

(9) On December 9, 2013, Grande Rotunda, LLC closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a $120 million construction loan for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment at the Rotunda. As of October 31, 2014, approximately $42.7 million was drawn on the line, of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $23.7 million was used towards the construction at the Rotunda.

(10) Giant supermarket, which leases 55,330 sq ft, elected not to extend their lease as of November 1, 2011. Effective April 2013, 40,000 sq ft of this space leased to G-Mart. Effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain. H-Mart is expected to open for business sometime in February 2015.

(11) The Rotunda shopping center is currently undergoing a major redevelopment and expansion project, as a result, approximately 71% is currently leasable space.

(12) The decrease in average annualized rent per sq ft as of 10/31/2014, is due to 3,355 sq ft of space left vacant in November 2013, when bank left center.

14

Supplemental Segment Information:

Commercial lease expirations at October 31, 2014 assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options:
				Annual Rent of Expiring Leases
Year Ending	Number of	Expiring Leases	Percent of
October 31,	Expiring Leases	Sq. Ft.	Commercial Sq. Ft.	Total		Per Sq. Ft.
Month to month	64	62,139	6.0%	$	1,134,818	$	18.26
2015	16	28,280	2.7%	$	695,322	$	24.59
2016	26	147,417	14.3%	$	2,427,477	$	16.47
2017	29	258,495	25.1%	$	2,946,702	$	11.40
2018	22	54,768	5.3%	$	1,381,020	$	25.22
2019	17	140,198	13.6%	$	1,232,757	$	8.79
2020	6	19,480	1.9%	$	466,574	$	23.95
2021	12	27,289	2.7%	$	696,092	$	25.51
2022	6	72,587	7.1%	$	1,608,658	$	22.16
2023	7	50,466	4.9%	$	851,004	$	16.86
2024	7	38,278	3.7%	$	521,664	$	13.63
2026	1	61,020	5.9%	$	633,083	$	10.38
2027	1	1,800	0.2%	$	54,810	$	30.45
2029	1	58,358	5.7%	$	998,505	$	17.11
2037	1	48,673	4.7%	$	1,139,216	$	23.41

Land Under Development and Vacant Land as of October 31, 2014:

Vacant Land			Permitted Use Per	Acreage Per
Location (1)	Acquired	Current Use	Local Zoning Laws	Parcel
Franklin Lakes, NJ	1966	None	Residential	4.27
Wayne, NJ	2002	None	Commercial	2.1
Rockaway, NJ	1964	None	Residential	1.0

(1) All of the above land is unencumbered, except as noted.

FREIT believes that it has a diversified portfolio of residential and commercial properties. FREIT’s business is not materially dependent upon any single tenant or any one of its properties.

In Fiscal 2014, FREIT had one (1) property that contributed over 15% of FREIT’s total consolidated revenue. Within FREIT’s residential segment, Pierre Towers in Hackensack, NJ accounted for 15.5% of total consolidated revenue. In Fiscal 2013, FREIT had two (2) properties that contributed over 15% of FREIT’s total consolidated revenue. Within FREIT’s residential segment, Pierre Towers in Hackensack, NJ accounted for 15.6% of total consolidated revenue, and within FREIT’s commercial segment, the Preakness Center in Wayne, NJ accounted for 15.1% of total consolidated revenue. For Fiscal 2012, none of FREIT’s properties accounted for 15% or more of FREIT’s total consolidated revenue.

Although FREIT’s general investment policy is to hold properties as long-term investments, FREIT could selectively sell certain properties if it determines that any such sale is in FREIT’s and its shareholders’ best interests. See “Business-Planned Disposition” under Item 1 above. With respect to FREIT’s future acquisition and development activities, FREIT will evaluate various real estate opportunities, which FREIT believes would increase FREIT’s revenues and earnings, as well as complement and increase the overall value of FREIT’s existing investment portfolio.

Except for the Pathmark supermarket located in Patchogue, Long Island, the TD Bank branch located in Rockaway, NJ and the Pascack Community Bank branch located on our land in Rochelle Park, NJ, all of FREIT’s and its subsidiaries’ commercial properties have multiple tenants.

15

FREIT and its subsidiaries’ commercial properties have sixteen (16) anchor/major tenants, which account for approximately 61.8% of the space leased. The balance of the space is leased to one hundred forty-nine (149) satellite and office tenants. The following table lists the anchor / major tenants at each center and the number of satellite tenants:  

Commercial Property				No. of
Shopping Center (SC)		Net Leaseable		Additional/Satellite
Office Building (O)		Space	Anchor/Major Tenants	Tenants
Westridge Square	(SC)	251,991	Burlington Coat Factory	21
Frederick, MD (1)			G-Mart
Franklin Crossing	(SC)	87,041	Stop & Shop	20
Franklin, Lakes, NJ
Westwood Plaza	(SC)	173,854	Kmart Corp	20
Westwood, NJ			TJMaxx
Preakness Center (2)	(SC)	322,136	Stop & Shop	33
Wayne, NJ			Macy's
			CVS
			Annie Sez
			Clearview Theaters
Damascus Center (3)	(SC)	143,471	Safeway Stores	21
Damascus, MD
The Rotunda (4)	(O)	138,276	Clear Channel Broadcasting	33
Baltimore, MD			US Social Security Office
	(SC)	19,839	Horizon Cinema	–
			Rite Aid Corporation
Patchogue, NY	(SC)	63,962	Pathmark	–
Glen Rock, NJ (5)	(SC)	4,800	–	1

(1) Giant Food of Maryland vacated in May 2011. Replaced by G-Mart in September 2013. Effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart vacated its space at the center and terminated its lease. A new lease for this space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain. H-Mart is expected to open for business sometime in February 2015. 

(2) FREIT has a 40% interest in this property.

(3) FREIT has a 70% interest in this property.

(4) FREIT has a 60% interest in this property. Total square footage of shopping center decreased from 78,369 sq ft to 19,839 sq ft, as a result of current redevelopment project underway at the Rotunda shopping center.

(5) Effective November 30, 2013, Chase Bank elected not to renew their lease, and vacated the center. FREIT is actively pursuing bringing another tenant into this space. 

With respect to most of FREIT’s commercial properties, lease terms range from five (5) years to twenty-five (25) years with options, which if exercised would extend the terms of such leases. The lease agreements generally provide for reimbursement of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties. During the last three (3) completed fiscal years, occupancy at FREIT’s commercial properties averaged 82.7%, which represents the actual “physical” occupancy rate (based upon possession and use of leased space). The lower average occupancy level was primarily attributable to the vacancies at The Rotunda resulting from Giant vacating its space in April 2012, but agreeing to continue to pay rent in accordance with its lease terms through March 31, 2015. On July 27, 2012, FREIT signed a lease agreement with G-Mart, for a significant portion of the space (40,000 of 55,330 square feet of available space) that was vacated by Giant at its Westridge Square property. G-Mart began operations at the center in September 2013. However, effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain. H-Mart is expected to open for business sometime in February 2015.

Leases for FREIT’s apartment buildings and complexes are usually one (1) year in duration. Even though the residential units are leased on a short-term basis, FREIT has averaged, during the last three (3) completed fiscal years, a 94.5% occupancy rate with respect to FREIT’s available apartment units.

FREIT does not believe that any seasonal factors materially affect FREIT’s business operations and the leasing of its commercial and apartment properties.

FREIT believes that its properties are covered by adequate fire and property insurance provided by reputable companies and with commercially reasonable deductibles and limits. 

ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which FREIT is a party, or of which any of its properties is the subject. There is, however, ordinary and routine litigation involving FREIT's business including various tenancy and related matters. Except for the environmental conditions involving remediation disclosed in “Item 1(c) Narrative Description of Business - Impact of Governmental Laws and Regulations on Registrant’s Business; Environmental Matters,” there are no legal proceedings concerning environmental issues with respect to any property owned by FREIT.

ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

16

PART II

  ITEM 5   MARKET FOR FREIT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Shares of Beneficial Interest

Beneficial interests in FREIT are represented by shares without par value (the “Shares”). The Shares represent FREIT’s only authorized issued and outstanding class of equity. As of January 14, 2015, there were approximately 500 holders of record of the Shares.

The Shares are traded in the over-the-counter market through use of the OTC Bulletin Board Service (the “OTC Bulletin Board”) provided by FINRA, Inc. FREIT does not believe that an active United States public trading market exists for the Shares since historically only small volumes of the Shares are traded on a sporadic basis. The following table sets forth, at the end of the periods indicated, the Bid and Asked quotations for the Shares on the OTC Bulletin Board.

	Bid		Asked
Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014
First Quarter	$	18.25	$	18.75
Second Quarter	$	18.75	$	18.90
Third Quarter	$	18.45	$	18.75
Fourth Quarter	$	18.25	$	18.70

	Bid		Asked
Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2013
First Quarter	$	16.65	$	17.25
Second Quarter	$	18.50	$	19.00
Third Quarter	$	18.75	$	19.50
Fourth Quarter	$	17.50	$	18.00

The bid quotations set forth above for the Shares reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The source of the bid and asked quotations is Janney Montgomery Scott, LLC members of the New York Stock Exchange and other national securities exchanges.

Dividends

The holders of Shares are entitled to receive distributions as may be declared by the Board. Dividends may be declared from time to time by the Board and may be paid in cash, property, or Shares. The Board’s present policy is to distribute annually at least ninety percent (90%) of FREIT’s REIT taxable income as dividends to the holders of Shares in order to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. Distributions are made on a quarterly basis. In Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013, FREIT paid or declared aggregate total dividends of $1.20 and $1.56 per share, respectively, to the holders of Shares.

See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Distributions to Shareholders.”

Share Repurchases

The following table sets forth information regarding FREIT’s repurchases of its shares of beneficial interest during the three months ended October 31, 2014.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share	(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
August 1, 2014  through August 31, 2014	0	—	—	—
September 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014	100,572 (1)	$18.45	—	—
October 1, 2014 through October 31, 2014	0	—	—	—
Total	100,572	$18.45	—	—

(1) On September 4, 2014, the Board authorized the repurchase of 100,572 FREIT shares held by the pension plan of Hekemian & Co., Inc., FREIT’s managing agent, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $1,855,553 or $18.45 per share, which was the closing price of FREIT shares on September 3, 2014. The repurchase was undertaken in connection with the termination of the pension plan. Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FREIT, and Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a Trustee of FREIT, and members of their family are participants in the pension plan.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

17

  ITEM 6   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data for FREIT for each of the five (5) fiscal years in the period ended October 31, 2014 are derived from financial statements herein or previously filed financial statements. This data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report and with FREIT’s consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report. 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
As At October 31,	2014		2013		2012		2011		2010
	(In thousands of dollars)
Total Assets	$	305,317	$	244,251	$	242,300	$	243,220	$	245,128
Mortgage Loans	$	251,552	$	199,423	$	200,420	$	203,275	$	204,604
Common Equity	$	15,727	$	14,869	$	17,564	$	13,850	$	16,802
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		6,908		6,942		6,942		6,942		6,942

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Year Ended October 31,	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
	(In thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Revenue from real estate operations	$	42,430		$	41,337		$	42,078		$	42,601		$	42,720
Income relating to early lease termination		—			—			2,950			—			—
Total revenue		42,430			41,337			45,028			42,601			42,720
Expenses:
Real estate operations		19,492			18,127			17,968			17,424			17,932
General and administrative expenses		1,396			1,623			1,624			1,543			1,567
Deferred project cost write-off		—			—			3,726			—			—
Depreciation		6,346			6,233			6,171			6,054			5,981
Totals		27,234			25,983			29,489			25,021			25,480
Operating income		15,196			15,354			15,539			17,580			17,240
Investment income		184			191			173			101			122
Acquisition expenses-Regency		(648	)		—			—			—			—
Interest expense including amortization of deferred financing costs		(11,309	)		(11,945	)		(11,704	)		(11,452	)		(13,608	)*
Income from continuing operations		3,423			3,600			4,008			6,229			3,754
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operation		7			797			460			484			377
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		8,734			3,545			7,528	**		—			—
Net income		12,164			7,942			11,996			6,713			4,131
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests    of subsidiaries		(507	)		(493	)		(645	)		(1,335	)		280
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449		$	11,351		$	5,378		$	4,411

* In 2010, includes $2.1 million prepayment penalty on early debt extinguishment.

** Represents gain of $9,493 net of federal and state income tax of $1,965.

Basic & diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.42	$	0.45	$	0.49	$	0.70	$	0.58
Discontinued operations		1.27		0.62		1.15		0.07		0.06
Net income	$	1.69	$	1.07	$	1.64	$	0.77	$	0.64
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share	$	1.20	$	1.56	$	1.10	$	1.20	$	1.20

18

ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement Identifying Important Factors That Could Cause FREIT’s Actual Results to Differ From Those Projected in Forward Looking Statements.

Readers of this discussion are advised that the discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of FREIT (including related notes thereto) appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Certain statements in this discussion may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect FREIT’s current expectations regarding future results of operations, economic performance, financial condition and achievements of FREIT, and do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. FREIT has tried, wherever possible, to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend, “ “plan,” “ estimate,” or words of similar meaning.

Although FREIT believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, affect demand for rental space, the availability of prospective tenants, lease rents, the financial condition of tenants and the default rate on leases, operating and administrative expenses and the availability of financing; adverse changes in FREIT’s real estate markets, including, among other things, competition with other real estate owners, competition confronted by tenants at FREIT’s commercial properties, governmental actions and initiatives; environmental/safety requirements; and risks of real estate development and acquisitions. The risks with respect to the development of real estate include: increased construction costs, inability to obtain construction financing, or unfavorable terms of financing that may be available, unforeseen construction delays and the failure to complete construction within budget.

OVERVIEW

FREIT is an equity real estate investment trust ("REIT") that is self-administered and externally managed. FREIT owns a portfolio of residential apartment and commercial properties. Our revenues consist primarily of fixed rental income from our residential and commercial properties and additional rent in the form of expense reimbursements derived from our income producing commercial properties. Our properties are primarily located in northern New Jersey, Maryland and New York. We acquire existing properties for investment. We also acquire properties that we feel have redevelopment potential, and we make changes and capital improvements to these properties. We develop and construct properties on our vacant land. Our policy is to acquire and develop real property for long-term investment.

The economic and financial environment: The recovery in the U.S. has finally gained traction: (a) the housing market has improved; (b) inflation is expected to remain in check; (c) consumer spending is increasing modestly; (d) private sector employment is growing steadily; and (e) credit availability has improved. These factors should continue to aid economic growth in the United States.

Residential Properties: We have aggressively increased rental rates. As a result, our rental rates continue to show year-over-year increases. We expect increases in rental rates to taper; however, the increased rental rates that are in place should positively impact future revenues.

Commercial Properties: The retail outlook has shown improvement because of increases in consumer spending over the past year and this improvement is expected to continue over the next couple of years.

Development Projects and Capital Expenditures: We continue to make only those capital expenditures that are absolutely necessary. On July 24, 2012, the Board approved revisions to the scope of the Rotunda redevelopment project, thereby reducing the complexity and projected cost of the project. In order to avoid beginning construction during the winter months, Rotunda began construction on the parking lot areas in September 2013, and is currently moving forward with the next phase of the construction project.

Debt Financing Availability: Financing for development projects has become more available. As a result, on December 9, 2013, Grande Rotunda, LLC closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment and expansion project at the Rotunda. On November 19, 2013, FREIT refinanced the first mortgages on its Hammel Gardens and Steuben Arms properties that were scheduled to mature on December 1, 2013. The mortgages, aggregating $9.4 million, were refinanced for $19.7 million.

Operating Cash Flow and Dividend Distributions: We expect that cash provided by net operating income will be adequate to cover mandatory debt service payments (excluding balloon payments), necessary capital improvements and dividends necessary to retain qualification as a REIT (90% of taxable income). Until the economic climate indicates that a change is appropriate, it is FREIT’s intention to maintain its quarterly dividend at a level not less than that required to maintain its REIT status for Federal income tax purposes.

19

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Pursuant to the SEC disclosure guidance for "Critical Accounting Policies," the SEC defines Critical Accounting Policies as those that require the application of management's most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, the preparation of which takes into account estimates based on judgments and assumptions that affect certain amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates. The accounting policies and estimates used, which are outlined in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements which is presented elsewhere in this Form 10-K, have been applied consistently as at October 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, and for the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. We believe that the following accounting policies or estimates require the application of management's most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments:

Revenue Recognition: Base rents, additional rents based on tenants' sales volume and reimbursement of the tenants' share of certain operating expenses are generally recognized when due from tenants. The straight-line basis is used to recognize base rents under leases if they provide for varying rents over the lease terms. Straight-line rents represent unbilled rents receivable to the extent straight-line rents exceed current rents billed in accordance with lease agreements. Before FREIT can recognize revenue, it is required to assess, among other things, its collectability.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets: We periodically assess the carrying value of long-lived assets whenever we determine that events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. When FREIT determines that the carrying value of long-lived assets may be impaired, the measurement of any impairment is based on a projected discounted cash flow method determined by FREIT's management. While we believe that our discounted cash flow methods are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows may significantly affect the measurement of impairment.

Real Estate Development Costs: It is FREIT’s policy to capitalize pre-development costs, which generally include legal and professional fees and other directly related third-party costs. Real estate taxes and interest costs incurred during the development and construction phases are also capitalized. FREIT ceases capitalization of these costs when the project or portion thereof becomes operational, or when construction has been postponed. Capitalization of these costs will recommence once construction on the project resumes.

Adopted and recently issued accounting standards:

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update requires companies to present the effects on the line items of net income of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be reclassified in its entirety to net income in the same reporting period. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012 with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance effective with its 1st quarter ended January 31, 2014. The adoption of this guidance in the year ended October 31, 2014 did not have any material impact on our financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity”, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation. The new guidance requires discontinued operation treatment for disposals of a component or group of components that represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major impact on an entity’s operations or financial results. The ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals that occur in annual periods (and interim periods therein) beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The ASU will be adopted by FREIT in the 1^st Quarter of its fiscal year ending October 31, 2015.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, (ASU 2014-09), which is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance. FREIT is currently assessing the impact this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

20

Results of Operations:

Fiscal Years Ended October 31, 2014 and 2013

Summary revenues and net income for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 (“Fiscal 2013”) and October 31, 2013 (“Fiscal 2013”) are as follows:

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			Change
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Real estate revenues:
Commercial properties	$	22,011		$	22,840		$	(829	)
Residential properties		20,419			18,497			1,922
Total real estate revenues		42,430			41,337			1,093
Operating expenses:
Real estate operations		19,492			18,127			1,365
General and administrative		1,396			1,623			(227	)
Depreciation		6,346			6,233			113
Total operating expenses		27,234			25,983			1,251
Operating income		15,196			15,354			(158	)
Investment income		184			191			(7	)
Acquisition costs-Regency		(648	)		—			(648	)
Financing costs		(11,309	)		(11,945	)		636
Income from continuing operations		3,423			3,600			(177	)
Income from discontinued operation		7			797	(a)		(790	)
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		8,734			3,545			5,189
Net income		12,164			7,942			4,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests in subsidiaries		(507	)		(493	)		(14	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449		$	4,208
Earnings per share - basic and diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.42		$	0.45		$	(0.03	)
Discontinued operations		1.27			0.62			0.65
Net income attributable to common equity	$	1.69		$	1.07		$	0.62
(a) Includes $720 federal and state income tax credit related to sale of Heights Manor property (see Note 2).
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and Diluted		6,908			6,942

Real estate revenue for Fiscal 2014 increased 2.6% to $42,430,000, compared to $41,337,000 for Fiscal 2013, inclusive of a $298,000 expense adjustment to write-off a straight-line rent balance related to the G-Mart early lease termination at the Westridge Square shopping center in Fiscal 2014.

Net Income attributable to common equity (“net income common equity”) for Fiscal 2014 was $11,657,000 ($1.69 per share basic and diluted), compared to $7,449,000 ($1.07 per share basic and diluted) for Fiscal 2013. Included in net income common equity for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 were gains from the sale of real estate amounting to $8,734,000 and $3,545,000, respectively. Also included in net income common equity for Fiscal 2014 were acquisition expenses amounting to approximately $648,000 relating to the Regency Club (“Regency”) acquisition in June 2014, and an expense adjustment of $73,000 related to the write-off of the remaining deferred lease commissions related to the G-Mart early lease termination at the Westridge Square shopping center. Included in income from discontinued operations for Fiscal 2013 is a $720,000 income tax credit related to the sale of the Heights Manor property.

21

The schedule below provides a detailed analysis of the major changes that impacted revenue and net income-common equity for Fiscal 2014 and 2013:

NET INCOME COMPONENTS
	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			Change
	(thousands of dollars)
Income from real estate operations:
Commercial properties	$	12,647		$	13,605		$	(958	)
Residential properties		10,662			9,605			1,057
Total income from real estate operations		23,309			23,210			99
Financing costs:
Fixed rate mortgages		(11,007	)		(10,729	)		(278	)
Floating rate - Rotunda & Damascus		(642	)		(563	)		(79	)
Credit line		(107	)		—			(107	)
Other - Corporate interest		(663	)		(653	)		(10	)
Less - capitalized interest		1,110			—			1,110
Total financing costs		(11,309	)		(11,945	)		636
Investment income		184			191			(7	)
General & administrative expenses:
Accounting fees		(509	)		(511	)		2
Legal & professional fees		(110	)		(97	)		(13	)
Trustee fees		(504	)		(503	)		(1	)
Corporate expenses		(273	)		(512	)		239
Total general & administrative expenses		(1,396	)		(1,623	)		227
Depreciation		(6,346	)		(6,233	)		(113	)
Adjusted income from continuing operations		4,442			3,600			842
G-Mart lease termination expense		(371	)		—			(371	)
Acquisition costs-Regency		(648	)		—			(648	)
Income from continuing operations		3,423			3,600			(177	)
Income from discontinued operation		7			797	(a)		(790	)
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		8,734			3,545			5,189
Net income		12,164			7,942			4,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
in subsidiaries		(507	)		(493	)		(14	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449		$	4,208

(a) Includes $720 federal and state income tax credit related to sale of Heights Manor property (see Note 2).

Adjusting income from continuing operations for the above mentioned comparability items included therein, adjusted income from continuing operations for Fiscal 2014 was $4,442,000 ($0.64 per share basic and diluted), compared to $3,600,000 ($0.52 per share basic and diluted) for Fiscal 2013. Adjusted income from continuing operations is a non-GAAP measure, which management believes is a useful and meaningful gauge to investors of our operating performance, since it excludes the impact of unusual and infrequent items specifically: the G-Mart early lease termination expenses, as well as income applicable to discontinued operations. (Refer to the segment disclosure below for a more detailed discussion on the financial performance of FREIT’s commercial and residential segments.)

22

SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following table sets forth comparative net operating income ("NOI") data for FREIT’s real estate segments and reconciles the NOI to consolidated net income-common equity for Fiscal 2014, as compared to Fiscal 2013 (See below for definition of NOI.):

	Commercial									Residential								Combined
	Years Ended									Years Ended								Years Ended
	October 31,				Increase (Decrease)					October 31,				Increase (Decrease)				October 31,
	2014		2013		$			%		2014		2013		$		%		2014		2013
	(in thousands)									(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Rental income	$	17,364	$	17,641	$	(277	)		-1.6%	$	19,961	$	18,214	$	1,747		9.6%	$	37,325	$	35,855
Reimbursements		5,054		5,006		48			1.0%		—		—		—				5,054		5,006
Other		6		229		(223	)		-97.4%		458		283		175		61.8%		464		512
Total revenue		22,424		22,876		(452	)		-2.0%		20,419		18,497		1,922		10.4%		42,843		41,373
Operating expenses		9,663		9,235		428			4.6%		9,757		8,892		865		9.7%		19,420		18,127
Net operating income	$	12,761	$	13,641	$	(880	)		-6.5%	$	10,662	$	9,605	$	1,057		11.0%		23,423		23,246
Average
Occupancy %		82.3%		81.9%					0.4%		95.4%		92.8%				2.6%

Reconciliation to consolidated net income-common equity:
Deferred rents - straight lining		(93	)		(12	)
Amortization of acquired leases		(21	)		(24	)
Investment income		184			191
General and administrative expenses		(1,396	)		(1,623	)
G-Mart lease termination expense		(371	)		—
Acquisition costs-Regency		(648	)		—
Depreciation		(6,346	)		(6,233	)
Financing costs		(11,309	)		(11,945	)
Income from continuing operations		3,423			3,600
Income from discontinued operation		7			797	(a)
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		8,734			3,545
Net income		12,164			7,942
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(507	)		(493	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449

(a) Includes $720 federal and state income tax credit related to sale of Heights Manor property (see Note 2).  

NOI is based on operating revenue and expenses directly associated with the operations of the real estate properties, but excludes deferred rents (straight lining), lease amortization, depreciation, financing costs and other items. FREIT assesses and measures segment operating results based on NOI.

Same Property NOI: FREIT considers same property net operating income (“Same Property NOI”) to be a useful supplemental non-GAAP measure of our operating performance. We define same property within both our commercial and residential segments to be those properties that we have owned and operated for both the current and prior periods presented, excluding those properties that we acquired, redeveloped or classified as discontinued operations during those periods. Any newly acquired property that has been in operation for less than a year, any property that is undergoing a major redevelopment, but may still be in operation at less than full capacity, and/or any property that is under contract for sale are not considered same property.

NOI and Same Property NOI are non-GAAP financial measures and are not measures of operating results or cash flow as measured by generally accepted accounting principles, and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.

COMMERCIAL SEGMENT

The commercial segment contains ten (10) separate properties. Seven are multi-tenanted retail or office centers, and one is a single tenanted store. In addition, FREIT owns land in Rockaway, NJ and Rochelle Park, NJ from which it receives monthly rental income, from tenants who have built and operate bank branches on the land. As indicated in the table above under the caption Segment Information, total revenue and NOI from FREIT’s commercial segment for Fiscal 2014 decreased by 2.0% and 6.5%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2013. The overall decline in revenue for Fiscal 2014 was primarily due to: (a) higher vacancies at the Rotunda, stemming from not renewing expired tenant leases to facilitate the renovation and expansion at the center, (b) slightly higher vacancies at the Preakness Shopping Center, and (c) lower common area maintenance charge reimbursements for the current year at the Preakness Shopping Center. Prior year’s common area maintenance charges included tenant reimbursements for major parking lot repairs at the center totaling approximately $200,000. The factors contributing to the decrease in revenue more than offset the benefits of higher base rent at the Damascus shopping center, the opening of the G-Mart international grocery store chain at the Westridge Square shopping center, and higher expense reimbursements stemming from an increase in common area maintenance charges due to the recent harsh winter in the northeast. The decrease in NOI for Fiscal 2014 was primarily due to a decrease in rental revenue, as described above, higher operating expenses in the current fiscal year, that could not be passed on to the tenants as part of common area maintenance charges, and an expense adjustment of $73,000 related to the write-off of the remaining deferred lease commissions related to the G-Mart early lease termination at the Westridge Square shopping center. It is not anticipated that the Giant space at the Rotunda (or a reconfiguration of this space) will be leased until the redevelopment of the Rotunda is completed. (See discussion below.)

23

Same Property Operating Results: FREIT’s commercial segment contains nine (9) same properties, excluding the results of the Rotunda, which is currently undergoing a major redevelopment and expansion project. (See definition of same property under Segment Information above.) For Fiscal 2014, same property revenue for our commercial segment increased by 1.0%, as compared to Fiscal 2013. The increase in same property revenue for Fiscal 2014 is primarily attributable to higher base rent at the Damascus shopping center, the opening of the G-Mart international grocery store chain at the Westridge Square shopping center, and higher expense reimbursements stemming from an increase in common area maintenance charges due to the recent harsh winter in the northeast, offset in part by slightly higher vacancies at the Preakness Shopping Center, and lower common area maintenance charge reimbursements for the current year at the Preakness Shopping Center. Prior year’s common area maintenance charges included tenant reimbursements for major parking lot repairs at the center totaling approximately $200,000. Same Property NOI for Fiscal 2014 decreased by 1.7% from Fiscal 2013, primarily due to higher operating expenses in the current fiscal year, that could not be passed on to the tenants as part of common area maintenance charges.

Leasing: The following table reflects leasing activity at our commercial properties for comparable leases (leases executed for spaces in which there was a tenant at some point during the previous twelve-month period) and non-comparable leases for Fiscal 2014:

	Number of Leases		Lease Area (Sq Ft)		Weighted Average Lease Rate (per Sq Ft)		Weighted Average Prior Lease Rate (per Sq Ft)		% Increase (Decrease)		Tenant Improvement Allowance (per Sq Ft)  (a)		Lease Commissions (per Sq Ft)   (a)
Comparable leases		19		42,831	$	22.83	$	22.77		0.3%	$	—	$	0.91
Non-comparable leases		3		6,050	$	25.90		N/A		N/A	$	3.97	$	1.20
Total leasing activity		22		48,881

(a) These leasing costs are presented as annualized costs per square foot and are allocated uniformly over the initial lease term.

The US economic recovery continued to show signs of improvement, with retail sales also showing slight improvement. Despite minor tenant fall-out at some of our properties, occupancy at our other commercial properties has been on the upswing for Fiscal 2014. Average occupancy rates for Fiscal 2014, increased 0.4% from last year’s comparable period. Exclusive of occupancy at the Rotunda, since it’s undergoing a major expansion, average occupancy for Fiscal 2014 increased 2.2% from Fiscal 2013.

Construction related to the expansion and renovation of the Damascus Center was completed in November 2011. We are currently in the negotiation process with potential tenants for the new, currently available space constructed in the final phase (Phase III) of this project. As of October 31, 2014, approximately 83% of the space at the Damascus Center is leased and 81% is occupied.

At Westridge Square, Giant elected not to extend its lease beyond October 31, 2011, and vacated its space at the center during May 2011. On July 27, 2012, FREIT signed a lease agreement with G-Mart for a significant portion (40,000 square feet) of the space previously occupied by Giant. FREIT incurred approximately $940,000 in tenant improvement costs associated with the lease to G-Mart, which began operations at the center in September 2013. However, effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this space was signed by H-Mart in November 2014, an international grocery store chain. H-Mart is expected to open for business sometime in February 2015. All of the tenant improvements related to G-Mart will be utilized for H-Mart.

On February 3, 2012, Grande Rotunda, LLC (“Grande”), a 60% owned affiliate of FREIT, entered into a lease termination agreement (“Agreement”) with Giant, the former tenant and operator of a 35,994 sq. ft. Giant supermarket at Grande’s Rotunda property located in Baltimore, Maryland. Under the terms of the Agreement, Giant agreed to (i) waive its right to extend the term of the lease through March 31, 2035, (ii) terminate the lease and surrender the premises to Grande no later than the earlier of commencement of the redevelopment of the property or March 31, 2015, and (iii) notwithstanding any earlier termination date, continue to pay monthly fixed rent payments plus its share of common area maintenance charges and taxes for the Rotunda property through March 31, 2015. Grande has agreed (i) not to lease more than 20,000 sq. ft. of any space in the Rotunda for use as a food supermarket through March 31, 2035, and (ii) if Grande decides to lease such space for use as a food supermarket, it must first offer the space to Giant for the same use under the terms acceptable to Grande, and Giant will have thirty days to accept the offer before the space may be leased to a third party. As a result of the Giant lease termination and the terms of the Agreement, Grande will not be required to construct a lower level Giant supermarket as part of the redevelopment project at the Rotunda, which represented a costly component of the project. In addition, the Giant lease contained significant restrictions on Grande’s ability to make modifications to the property. This development cleared the way for Grande to move forward with the redevelopment planning for this property. As a result of Giant terminating its lease and vacating its space at the Rotunda in April 2012, the results for Fiscal 2012 include income of $2.95 million relating to the Giant early lease termination, offset by a $3.73 million deferred project cost write-off relating to a change in development plans for the Rotunda, specifically $1.49 million related to the write-off of the design fees relating to the Giant portion of the project and $2.24 million of certain planning and feasibility costs that were no longer deemed to have any utility. The early lease termination fee is comprised of the net present value of the monthly rent in accordance with the terms of the terminated lease, projected common area maintenance charges, and real estate taxes from April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2015. In addition, included in the $2.95 million lease termination fee are the write-off of the balances in Below Market Value Lease Acquisition Costs, and In-Place Lease Costs relating to the Giant lease. In order to avoid starting construction during the winter months, FREIT started construction on the parking lot areas this past September 2013, and is currently moving forward with the next phase of the construction project.

24

On December 20, 2013, FREIT’s South Brunswick property was sold for $11 million resulting in a capital gain of approximately $8.7 million net of sales fees and commissions. FREIT has structured this sale in a manner that qualifies it as a like-kind exchange of real estate pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Such a transaction will result in a deferral for income tax purposes of the $8.7 million capital gain. On June 18, 2014, FREIT closed on its purchase of the Regency to complete this like-kind exchange transaction. (See Residential Segment below and Note 3 for further details.)

DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

The modernization and expansion project at the Damascus Center (owned by Damascus Centre, LLC, FREIT’s 70% owned affiliate) was completed in November 2011. Total construction costs, inclusive of tenant improvement costs, approximated $22.7 million. Certain tenant fit-up costs have been incurred with respect to space leased since November 2011, and additional tenant fit-up costs are expected, once the remaining new space is leased and occupied. Total construction costs were funded from a $21.3 million construction loan entered into on February 12, 2008. With the completion of each of the three phases of construction, certain tenant leases have been renewed and occupancy is beginning to increase. Approximately 83% of the space at the Damascus Center is leased and 81% is occupied. On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced its construction loan with long-term financing provided by People’s United Bank. (See discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources for further details regarding the Damascus financing.)

The Rotunda property in Baltimore, MD (owned by Grande, FREIT’s 60% owned affiliate) is an 11.5 acre site containing a 138,000 sq. ft. office building and approximately 78,000 sq. ft. of retail space on the lower level of the office building. The original plans for the renovation and expansion of the property were completed in 2008. As a result of Giant vacating its space at the Rotunda, the scope of the project and the development plans were revised to include, in addition to the office building, 379 residential apartment units, 170,675 sq. ft. of retail space, and over 864 above level parking spaces. With regard to the Rotunda’s redevelopment project, approximately $52.5 million has been incurred through October 31, 2014, of which $3.7 million in planning and feasibility studies costs were written-off in Fiscal 2012 as a result of revisions to the scope of the redevelopment project. All planning and feasibility study costs, as well as all ongoing construction costs related to this project are being capitalized to Construction In Progress (“CIP”) until the project is completed and becomes operational. On December 9, 2013, Grande closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used to reconfigure and expand the Rotunda property. Through October 31, 2014, funding for the construction at the Rotunda was provided by: (a) the Grande members, FREIT and Rotunda 100, LLC, who contributed approximately $14.5 million in accordance with the loan agreement with Wells Fargo Bank (See Note 10 for further information regarding this agreement.); and (b) $23.7 million in draws on the construction line with Wells Fargo Bank. (See discussion under Liquidity and Capital resources for further details regarding the Rotunda financing.)

RESIDENTIAL SEGMENT

FREIT currently operates seven (7) multi-family apartment communities totaling 1,093 apartment units. As indicated in the table above under the caption Segment Information, total revenue and NOI from FREIT’s residential segment for Fiscal 2014 increased by 10.4% and 11.0%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2013. The increase in total revenue and NOI for Fiscal 2014 was primarily attributable to: (a) increased base rent, (b) a net insurance recovery of $200,000, recorded in the current year’s first quarter, relating to damages incurred at our Steuben Arms property last year as a result of Hurricane Sandy, (c) higher occupancy levels at all of our properties, and (d) the Regency acquisition in June 2014. Average occupancy levels for the Fiscal 2014 increased 2.6%, as compared to last year’s comparable period. Exclusive of the Regency property, average occupancy rates for Fiscal 2014 increased 2.1% over last year’s comparable period.

Same Property Operating Results: FREIT’s residential segment currently contains six (6) same properties. (See definition of same property under Segment Information above.) Same property revenue and same property NOI for FREIT’s residential segment for Fiscal 2014 increased by 6.0% and 7.7%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2013. The increase in same property total revenue and NOI for Fiscal 2014 was primarily attributable to: (a) increased base rent, (b) a net insurance recovery of $200,000, recorded in the current year’s first quarter, relating to damages incurred at our Steuben Arms property last year as a result of Hurricane Sandy, and (c) higher occupancy levels at all of our properties. The Regency property is not included as same property, since it is a newly acquired property that has been in operation for less than a year. The Palisades Manor and Grandview Apartment properties, which were sold in April 2013 and August 2013, respectively, are classified as discontinued operations and therefore also not included as same property. (See discussion below.)

25

Our residential revenue is principally composed of monthly apartment rental income. Total rental income is a factor of occupancy and monthly apartment rents. Monthly average residential rents at the end of Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013 were $1,703 and $1,683, respectively. For comparability purposes, the average residential rent for Fiscal 2013 has been restated to include the impact of the Regency. A 1% decline in annual average occupancy and a 1% decline in average rents from current levels result in annual revenue declines of approximately $223,000 and $214,000, respectively.

On April 26, 2013, FREIT sold its Palisades Manor Apartments in Palisades Park, New Jersey and recognized a capital gain of $1.4 million from the sale. FREIT intended to structure this sale in a manner that would qualify as a like-kind exchange of real estate pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, which would have resulted in a deferral for income tax purposes of the $1.4 million gain of the Palisades Manor sale. However, management could not identify any property to complete the 1031 exchange transaction. Therefore, since the 1031 exchange did not occur, management decided to pay out the gain of $1.4 million as a capital gain dividend to FREIT shareholders in Fiscal 2013. The gain on the sale, as well as the earnings of the Palisades Manor operation are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying income statements for all periods presented.

On August 13, 2013, FREIT sold its Grandview Apartments in Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey for $2.5 million. FREIT recognized a $2.2 million capital gain from the sale of this property, which has been recorded in FREIT’s 4^th Quarter operating results. FREIT intended to structure this sale in a manner that would qualify as a like-kind exchange of real estate pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. However, management could not identify any property to complete the 1031 exchange transaction. Therefore, since the 1031 exchange did not occur, management decided to pay out the gain of $2.2 million as a capital gain dividend to FREIT shareholders in Fiscal 2013. In addition, the earnings of the Grandview operation have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying income statements for all periods presented.

In connection with the sale of FREIT’s Heights Manor property in August 2012, FREIT recognized a capital gain of approximately $9.5 million of which it distributed approximately $5 million to its shareholders during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012. As FREIT did not intend to distribute to its shareholders the remaining $4.5 million of capital gain, FREIT paid approximately $1.5 million federal and $400,000 state income taxes on such undistributed gain, which was charged to discontinued operations. In the quarter ended January 31, 2013, FREIT elected, under Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code, to treat the $1.4 million dividend paid during such period as a distribution of the prior year’s capital gain and, accordingly, reversed $720,000 of the income tax liability, which has been credited to discontinued operations in Fiscal 2013.

On June 18, 2014, FREIT completed the acquisition of the Regency, a residential apartment complex located in Middletown, New York. The Regency complex consists of 132 units in 11 buildings and a clubhouse. The acquisition cost was $20,625,000 (exclusive of $648,000 of transaction costs), which was funded in part with the $9.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of the South Brunswick land, and the remaining balance of $11.5 million was funded utilizing $10 million of FREIT’s credit line with Provident Bank, and FREIT’s available cash. On December 29, 2014, FREIT Regency, LLC secured long-term financing for the Regency property in the amount of $16.2 million from Provident Bank. A portion of the loan proceeds will be used to replace the funds borrowed from FREIT’s credit line, and the remainder will be available to fund FREIT’s future capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes (see Note 17).

FREIT identified the Regency as a replacement property for the vacant land located in South Brunswick, New Jersey that FREIT sold on December 20, 2013. The sale of the South Brunswick land and the subsequent purchase of the Regency were structured in a manner that would qualify as a like-kind exchange of real estate pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and resulted in a deferral for income tax purposes of the realization of the $8.7 million gain on the sale of the South Brunswick land. FREIT’s acquisition of the Regency completed this like-kind exchange.

Capital expenditures: Since all of our apartment communities, with the exception of The Boulders and the Regency, were constructed more than 25 years ago, we tend to spend more in any given year on maintenance and capital improvements than may be spent on newer properties. Major renovation programs (apartment renovations, parking structure restoration, air conditioning system replacement, and heating/cooling riser pipe replacement) have been undertaken at The Pierre. The parking structure restoration project, as well as the replacement of the A/C system, were completed this year at a cost of approximately $750,000 and $1 million, respectively. We have substantially completed modernizing, where required, all apartments. The remaining apartments will be renovated as they become vacant. In addition, we have begun a major project to replace the heating and cooling riser pipe system at The Pierre, which is expected to be completed within the next year, at an estimated cost of $1.5 million. Funds for these capital projects will be available from cash flow from the property's operations and cash reserves.

26

FINANCING COSTS

Financing costs are summarized as follows: 

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013
	($ in thousands)
Fixed rate mortgages:
1st Mortgages
Existing	$	8,757		$	10,215
New		1,879			—
2nd Mortgages
Existing		12			144
Variable rate mortgages:
Acquisition loan-Rotunda		82			442
Construction loan-Rotunda		560			—
Construction loan-Damascus		—			121
Credit line		107			—
Other		663			653
		12,060			11,575
Amortization of mortgage costs		359			370
Total financing costs		12,419			11,945
Less amounts capitalized		(1,110	)		—
Financing costs expensed	$	11,309		$	11,945

Total financing costs (before capitalized interest) for Fiscal 2014 increased 4.0%, as compared to Fiscal 2013. The increase for Fiscal 2014 was primarily attributable to interest related to: (a) $42.7 million in draws on Rotunda’s construction loan, of which $19 million was used to pay off the Rotunda acquisition loan purchased by FREIT in May 2013, and then refinanced on December 9, 2013 as part of the construction loan from Wells Fargo Bank at a lower interest rate, (b) the Westwood Plaza and Damascus refinancings included under new first mortgages, and (c) interest on FREIT’s $10 million draw on its credit line, of which $5 million was outstanding at October 31, 2014. The interest related to the variable rate Damascus construction loan for Fiscal 2013 relates to interest incurred up until the date the loan was refinanced on December 26, 2012. (See Note 5 for more details.)

INVESTMENT INCOME

Investment income for Fiscal 2014 decreased 3.7% to $184,000, as compared to Fiscal 2013. The primary reason for the decrease in investment income for the current fiscal year was due to a lower level of interest income related to the discounting of the Giant lease termination fee at the Rotunda. (See Commercial Segment disclosure above.) Investment income is principally derived from interest earned from cash on deposit in institutional money market funds and interest earned from secured loans receivable (loans made to Hekemian employees, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian, FREIT CEO and Chairman of the Board, and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a trustee of FREIT, for their equity investment in Grande Rotunda, LLC, a limited liability company in which FREIT owns a 60% equity interest, and Damascus Centre, LLC, a limited liability company in which FREIT owns a 70% equity interest).

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (“G & A”)

During Fiscal 2014, G & A was $1,396,000, as compared to $1,623,000 for the prior year’s period. The primary components of G&A are accounting fees, legal and professional fees and Trustees’ fees.

DEPRECIATION

Depreciation expense for Fiscal 2014 was $6,346,000, as compared to $6,233,000 for the prior year’s period. The increase was primarily attributable to the depreciation related to the Regency acquisition, and to current renovations and capitalized tenant improvements becoming operational in Fiscal 2014.

27

Results of Operations:

Fiscal Years Ended October 31, 2013 and 2012

Summary revenues and net income for Fiscal 2013 and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012 (“Fiscal 2012”) are as follows:

	Years Ended October 31,
	2013			2012			Change
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Real estate revenues:
Commercial properties	$	22,840		$	23,398		$	(558	)
Residential properties		18,497			18,680			(183	)
Total real estate revenues		41,337			42,078			(741	)
Operating expenses:
Real estate operations		18,127			17,968			159
General and administrative		1,623			1,624			(1	)
Deferred project cost write-off, net of income
relating to early lease termination		—			776			(776	)
Depreciation		6,233			6,171			62
Total operating expenses		25,983			26,539			(556	)
Operating income		15,354			15,539			(185	)
Investment income		191			173			18
Financing costs		(11,945	)		(11,704	)		(241	)
Income from continuing operations		3,600			4,008			(408	)
Income from discontinued operation		797	(a)		460			337
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		3,545			7,528	(b)		(3,983	)
Net income		7,942			11,996			(4,054	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests in subsidiaries		(493	)		(645	)		152
Net income attributable to common equity	$	7,449		$	11,351		$	(3,902	)
Earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.45		$	0.49		$	(0.04	)
Discontinued operations		0.62			1.15			(0.53	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	1.07		$	1.64		$	(0.57	)
(a) Includes $720 federal and state income tax credit related to sale of Heights Manor property (see Note 2).
(b) Represents gain of $9,493 net of federal and state tax of $1,965.
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		6,942			6,942

Real estate revenue for Fiscal 2013 decreased 1.8% to $41,337,000, compared to $42,078,000 for Fiscal 2012, exclusive of income of $2,950,000 relating to an early lease termination by Giant.

Net Income common equity for Fiscal 2013 was $7,449,000 ($1.07 per share basic), compared to $11,351,000 ($1.64 per share basic) for Fiscal 2012. Included in net income common equity for Fiscal 2013 were gains from the sale of real estate amounting to $3,545,000. For Fiscal 2012, net income common equity included the net after-tax gain of $7,528,000 related to the sale of real estate. Also included in income from discontinued operations for Fiscal 2013 is a $720,000 income tax credit related to the sale of the Heights Manor property. Additionally, Fiscal 2012 included certain other items that affect comparability, specifically $2,950,000 of income relating to the Giant early lease termination, offset by the related deferred project cost write-off of $3,726,000.

28

The schedule below provides a detailed analysis of the major changes that impacted revenue and net income-common equity for Fiscal 2013 and 2012:

NET INCOME COMPONENTS
	Years Ended October 31,
	2013			2012			Change
	(thousands of dollars)
Income from real estate operations:
Commercial properties	$	13,605		$	13,872		$	(267	)
Residential properties		9,605			10,238			(633	)
Total income from real estate operations		23,210			24,110			(900	)
Financing costs:
Fixed rate mortgages		(10,729	)		(9,954	)		(775	)
Floating rate - Rotunda & Damascus		(563	)		(1,176	)		613
Other - Corporate interest		(653	)		(574	)		(79	)
Total financing costs		(11,945	)		(11,704	)		(241	)
Investment income		191			173			18
General & administrative expenses:
Accounting fees		(511	)		(482	)		(29	)
Legal & professional fees		(97	)		(105	)		8
Trustee fees		(503	)		(542	)		39
Corporate expenses		(512	)		(495	)		(17	)
Total general & administrative expenses		(1,623	)		(1,624	)		1
Depreciation		(6,233	)		(6,171	)		(62	)
Adjusted income from continuing operations		3,600			4,784			(1,184	)
Deferred project cost write-off, net of income
relating to early lease termination		—			(776	)		776
Income from continuing operations		3,600			4,008			(408	)
Income from discontinued operation		797	(a)		460			337
Gain on sale of discontinued operation, net of tax		3,545			7,528	(b)		(3,983	)
Net income		7,942			11,996			(4,054	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
in subsidiaries		(493	)		(645	)		152
Net income attributable to common equity	$	7,449		$	11,351		$	(3,902	)

(a) Includes $720 federal and state income tax credit related to sale of Heights Manor property (see Note 2).

(b) Represents gain of $9,493 net of federal and state tax of $1,965.

Adjusting income from continuing operations for the above mentioned comparability items included therein, adjusted income from continuing operations for Fiscal 2013 was $3,600,000 ($0.52 per share basic), compared to $4,784,000 ($0.69 per share basic) for Fiscal 2012. Adjusted income from continuing operations is a non-GAAP measure, which management believes is a useful and meaningful gauge to investors of our operating performance, since it excludes the impact of unusual and infrequent items specifically: the Giant lease termination fee income, and the related project abandonment cost write-off, as well as income applicable to discontinued operations. (Refer to the segment disclosure below for a more detailed discussion on the financial performance of FREIT’s commercial and residential segments.)

29

SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following table sets forth comparative operating data related to continuing operations for FREIT’s real estate segments:

	Commercial									Residential									Combined
	Years Ended									Years Ended									Years Ended
	October 31,				Increase (Decrease)					October 31,				Increase (Decrease)					October 31,
	2013		2012		$			%		2013		2012		$			%		2013		2012
	(in thousands)									(in thousands)									(in thousands)
Rental income	$	17,641	$	18,090	$	(449	)		-2.5%	$	18,214	$	18,335	$	(121	)		-0.7%	$	35,855	$	36,425
Reimbursements		5,006		4,843		163			3.4%		—		—		—					5,006		4,843
Other		229		450		(221	)		-49.1%		283		345		(62	)		-18.0%		512		795
Total revenue		22,876		23,383		(507	)		-2.2%		18,497		18,680		(183	)		-1.0%		41,373		42,063
Operating expenses		9,235		9,526		(291	)		-3.1%		8,892		8,442		450			5.3%		18,127		17,968
Net operating income	$	13,641	$	13,857	$	(216	)		-1.6%	$	9,605	$	10,238	$	(633	)		-6.2%		23,246		24,095
Average
Occupancy %		81.9%		84.0%					-2.1%		92.8%		95.4%					-2.6%

Reconciliation to consolidated net income-common equity:
Deferred rents - straight lining		(12	)		17
Amortization of acquired leases		(24	)		(2	)
Investment income		191			173
General and administrative expenses		(1,623	)		(1,624	)
Depreciation		(6,233	)		(6,171	)
Deferred project cost write-off, net of
income relating to early termination fee		—			(776	)
Financing costs		(11,945	)		(11,704	)
Income from continuing operations		3,600			4,008
Income from discontinued operation		797	(a)		460
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		3,545			7,528	(b)
Net income		7,942			11,996
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(493	)		(645	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	7,449		$	11,351

(a) Includes $720 federal and state income tax credit related to sale of Heights Manor property (see Note 2).

(b) Represents gain of $9,493 net of federal and state tax of $1,965.      

COMMERCIAL SEGMENT

The commercial segment contains ten (10) separate properties. Seven are multi-tenanted retail or office centers, and one is a single tenanted store. In addition, FREIT owns land in Rockaway, NJ and Rochelle Park, NJ from which it receives monthly rental income, from tenants who have built and operate bank branches on the land. As indicated in the table above under the caption Segment Information, total revenue and NOI from FREIT’s commercial segment for Fiscal 2013 decreased by 2.2% and 1.6%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2012. The major contributing factors to the overall decline in revenue for Fiscal 2013 were the vacancy resulting from the termination of the Giant lease for 35,994 square feet of space at the Rotunda property in February 2012, and $300,000 in non-recurring easement income recognized by the Franklin Crossing Shopping Center, in Franklin Lakes, NJ during the 4^th Quarter of Fiscal 2012. It is not anticipated that the Giant space at the Rotunda (or a reconfiguration of this space) will be leased until the redevelopment of the Rotunda is completed. (See discussion below.) The decrease in rental revenue for the current year was slightly offset by a lower level of administrative expenses for Fiscal 2013, primarily due to a higher level of bad debt expense incurred in Fiscal 2012.

Same Property Operating Results: FREIT’s commercial segment currently contains ten (10) same properties. (See definition of same property under Segment Information above.) For Fiscal 2013, same property revenue and same property NOI for our commercial segment decreased by 2.2% and 1.6%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2012.

Construction related to the expansion and renovation of the Damascus Center was completed in November 2011. We are currently in the negotiation process with potential tenants for the new, currently available space constructed in the final phase (Phase III) of this project. As of October 31, 2013, approximately 86% of the space at the Damascus Center is leased and 76.8% is occupied.

RESIDENTIAL SEGMENT

FREIT currently operates six (6) multi-family apartment communities totaling 964 apartment units. As indicated in the table above under the caption Segment Information, total revenue and NOI from FREIT’s residential segment for Fiscal 2013 decreased by 1.0% and 6.2%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2012. The decrease in total revenue for Fiscal 2013 was primarily attributable to higher vacancy levels at several of our residential properties. Average occupancy levels for Fiscal 2013 decreased 2.6%, as compared to last year’s comparable period. The lower occupancy levels for the current year, combined with a higher level of operating expenses for the current year, specifically repair and maintenance expense, were the primary reasons for the decrease in NOI for Fiscal 2013.

Same Property Operating Results: FREIT’s residential segment currently contains six (6) same properties. (See definition of same property under Segment Information above.) Same property revenue and same property NOI for FREIT’s residential segment for Fiscal 2013 decreased by 1.0% and 6.2%, respectively, as compared to Fiscal 2012. The Palisades Manor property, which was sold in April 2013, and the Grandview Apartments property, which was sold in August 2013, are classified as discontinued operations and therefore not included as same property. (See discussion below.)

30

Our residential revenue is principally composed of monthly apartment rental income. Total rental income is a factor of occupancy and monthly apartment rents. Monthly average residential rents at the end of Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 were $1,706 and $1,659, respectively. A 1% decline in annual average occupancy and a 1% decline in average rents from current levels result in annual revenue declines of approximately $197,000 and $181,000, respectively.

Capital expenditures: Since all of our apartment communities, with the exception of The Boulders, were constructed more than 25 years ago, we tend to spend more in any given year on maintenance and capital improvements than may be spent on newer properties. Major renovation programs (apartment renovations, parking structure restoration, and air conditioning system replacement) are underway at The Pierre. We have substantially completed modernizing, where required, all apartments and some of the building’s mechanical services. As of October 31, 2013, approximately $6.2 million was expended at The Pierre for these capital improvements, of which $839,000 relates to Fiscal 2013. The remaining apartments will be renovated as they become temporarily vacant at an estimated cost of $1 - $1.5 million. The parking structure restoration project at The Pierre is expected to be completed within the next year, at a cost of approximately $600,000. In addition, we are in the planning stages of a major project to replace the current air conditioning system at The Pierre, which is expected to be completed within the next 2 years, at an estimated cost of $1.5 million. These costs will be financed from operating cash flow and cash reserves.

FINANCING COSTS

Financing costs are summarized as follows: 

	Years Ended October 31,
	2013		2012
	($ in thousands)
Fixed rate mortgages:
1st Mortgages
Existing	$	8,683	$	9,436
New		1,532		—
2nd Mortgages
Existing		144		150
Variable rate mortgages:
Acquisition loan-Rotunda		442		779
Construction loan-Damascus		121		397
Other		653		574
		11,575		11,336
Amortization of mortgage costs		370		368
Financing costs expensed	$	11,945	$	11,704

Total financing costs for Fiscal 2013 increased 2.1%, as compared to Fiscal 2012. The increase for Fiscal 2013 was primarily attributable to the Westwood Plaza and Damascus refinancings included under new first mortgages. The interest related to the variable rate Damascus construction loan for Fiscal 2013 relates to interest incurred up until the date the loan was refinanced on December 26, 2012. (See Note 5 for more details.)

INVESTMENT INCOME

Investment income for Fiscal 2013 increased 10.4% to $191,000, as compared to Fiscal 2012. The primary reason for the increase in investment income for the current year was due to the recognition of interest income related to the discounting of the Giant lease termination fee at the Rotunda. (See Commercial Segment disclosure above.) Investment income is principally derived from interest earned from cash on deposit in institutional money market funds and interest earned from secured loans receivable (loans made to Hekemian employees, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian, FREIT’s CEO and Chairman of the Board, and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a trustee of FREIT, for their equity investment in Grande Rotunda, LLC, a limited liability company in which FREIT owns a 60% equity interest, and Damascus Centre, LLC, a limited liability company in which FREIT owns a 70% equity interest).

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (“G & A”)

During Fiscal 2013, G & A was $1,623,000, as compared to $1,624,000 for the prior year’s period. The primary components of G&A are accounting fees, legal and professional fees and Trustees’ fees.

DEPRECIATION

Depreciation expense for Fiscal 2013 was $6,233,000, as compared to $6,171,000 for the prior year’s period. The increase was primarily attributable to the Damascus Center redevelopment project becoming operational, in addition to current renovation and capitalized tenant improvements becoming operational in Fiscal 2013.

31

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our financial condition remains strong. Net cash provided by operating activities was $12.4 million for Fiscal 2014 compared to $10.5 million for Fiscal 2013. We expect that cash provided by operating activities and cash reserves will be adequate to cover mandatory debt service payments (including payments of interest, but excluding balloon payments), real estate taxes, recurring capital improvements and dividends necessary to retain qualification as a REIT (90% of taxable income).

Included in cash used in investing activities for Fiscal 2014 are $20.6 million in cash used to purchase the Regency Club apartment complex in Middletown, New York, which is reduced by net proceeds of approximately $9.8 million related to the sale of FREIT’s land tract in South Brunswick, New Jersey. In Fiscal 2013, cash used in investing activities includes net proceeds of approximately $3.8 million related to the sales of FREIT’s Palisades Manor and Grandview Apartment properties. (See discussion under Residential Segment.)

As at October 31, 2014, FREIT had cash and marketable securities totaling $10.6 million compared to $7.8 million at October 31, 2013.

The modernization and expansion project at the Damascus Center was completed in November 2011. Total construction costs, inclusive of tenant improvement costs, approximated $22.7 million. Total construction and development costs were funded, in part, from a $21.3 million (as modified) construction loan facility, of which approximately $15 million was drawn and advances by FREIT in the approximate aggregate amount of $3.2 million. The construction loan, including the exercise of a one twelve (12) month extension option, was scheduled to mature on February 12, 2013. On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced the construction loan with long-term financing provided by People’s United Bank. The amount of the new loan is for $25 million of which $20 million has been drawn. The balance, up to an additional $5 million, will be available as a one-time draw over the 36 month period ending December 26, 2015, and the amount available will depend on future leasing at the shopping center. The new loan will mature on January 3, 2023. The loan bears a floating interest rate equal to 210 basis points over the BBA LIBOR. In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, Damascus Centre, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.81% over the term of the loan. The interest rate swap is considered a derivative financial instrument that will be used only to reduce interest rate risk, and not held or used for trading purposes.

We are currently underway with a major redevelopment and expansion at The Rotunda in Baltimore, MD. During Fiscal 2008, we substantially completed the planning and feasibility studies and expended approximately $8.0 million during this phase. Due to the difficult economic environment, that redevelopment activity was placed on hold by FREIT during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008. During Fiscal 2012, the original plans for the Rotunda redevelopment project were revised, primarily attributable to the Giant lease termination and related termination agreement. As a result, we will not be required to construct a lower level Giant supermarket as part of the redevelopment project at the Rotunda, which represented a costly component to the project. In addition, the Giant lease contained significant restrictions on Grande’s ability to make modifications to the property. This development clears the way for Grande to move forward with the redevelopment planning for this property. In light of the Giant lease termination and its potential impact on the scope of the development plans for the Rotunda site, management proposed further revisions to the scope of the Rotunda development project. On July 24, 2012, the Board approved the revisions to the scope of the project, thereby further reducing the complexity and projected cost of the project. The capital investment related to the revised redevelopment plan at the Rotunda is estimated at approximately $100 million, which is a significant reduction from the $200 million estimated for the original development plans. As a result of the Giant lease termination and the resulting change in project scope, and the Board’s decision to move forward with the revised development plans, $3.7 million of certain deferred project costs relating to planning and feasibility costs included in CIP were no longer deemed to have any utility, and were written-off in Fiscal 2012.

As at October 31, 2014, FREIT’s aggregate outstanding mortgage debt was $251.6 million. This debt bears a weighted average interest rate of 4.65%. The mortgages, which have an average life of approximately 5.2 years, are subject to repayment (amortization) schedules that are longer than the term of the mortgages. As such, balloon payments for all mortgage debt will be required as follows:  

Year	$ in Millions
2016	$	24.5
2017	$	22.0
2018	$	4.9
2019	$	87.9
2021	$	19.1
2022	$	14.3
2023	$	32.5
2024	$	15.9

On February 1, 2010, a principal payment of $3 million was made reducing the $22.5 million mortgage loan entered into by Grande for the acquisition of the Rotunda, to $19.5 million and the due date was extended until February 1, 2013. The due date of the loan was further extended to May 1, 2013 from February 1, 2013. Even though the bank agreed to an additional ninety-day (90) extension of the maturity of the loan from May 1, 2013, FREIT elected to purchase the Rotunda loan from the bank and have all the bank’s rights assigned to FREIT. The purchase of this loan by FREIT was completed on May 28, 2013. FREIT subsequently sold this loan to Wells Fargo Bank, the lender providing the construction financing for the expansion of the Rotunda project. On December 9, 2013, Grande closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment and expansion project planned for the Rotunda. The construction loan is for a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. Under the agreement with the equity owners of Grande, FREIT would be responsible for 60% of any cash required by Grande, and 40% would be the responsibility of the minority interest, consistent with their respective percentage interests in Grande Rotunda, LLC. As of October 31, 2014, $42.7 million was drawn on the construction line with Wells Fargo Bank, of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $23.7 million was used towards the construction at the Rotunda.

32

With regard to the funding of the Rotunda redevelopment project, Wells Fargo Bank required that the Grande contribute not less than $14,460,000 towards the construction before any construction loan proceeds could be disbursed. To secure these funds Grande has made a capital call on its members – FREIT and Rotunda 100, LLC (“Rotunda 100”). FREIT’s share (60%) amounts to approximately $8.7 million, and the Rotunda 100 members’ share (40%) amounts to approximately $5.8 million. FREIT, pursuant to previous agreements, has made secured loans to the Rotunda 100 members of approximately $2.1 million towards their share of the $5.8 million capital call. The balance of Rotunda 100’s capital call of approximately $3.7 million was initially made by FREIT until it was repaid by Rotunda 100 in August 2014. These loans bear an interest rate of 225 basis points over the 90 day LIBOR, and have a maturity date of June 19, 2015.

As of October 31, 2014, FREIT made its required capital call contribution of $8.7 million towards the Rotunda construction financing, and Rotunda 100 made its required capital call contribution of $5.8 million. Both FREIT and the Rotunda 100 members are treating their required capital call contributions as additional investments in Grande. Rotunda 100 is principally owned by employees of Hekemian, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr.

The following table shows the estimated fair value and carrying value of our long-term debt at October 31, 2014 and 2013: 

(In Millions)	October 31, 2014		October 31, 2013
Fair Value	$	256.0	$	201.9
Carrying Value	$	251.6	$	199.4

Fair values are estimated based on market interest rates at the end of each fiscal year and on discounted cash flow analysis. Changes in assumptions or estimation methods may significantly affect these fair value estimates.

FREIT expects to re-finance the individual mortgages with new mortgages when their terms expire. To this extent we have exposure to interest rate risk on our fixed rate debt obligations. If interest rates, at the time any individual mortgage note is due, are higher than the current fixed interest rate, higher debt service may be required, and/or re-financing proceeds may be less than the amount of mortgage debt being retired. For example, a 1% interest rate increase would reduce the fair value of our debt by $9.9 million, and a 1% decrease would increase the fair value by $10.5 million.

We believe that the values of our properties will be adequate to command re-financing proceeds equal to, or higher than, the mortgage debt to be re-financed. We continually review our debt levels to determine if additional debt can prudently be utilized for property acquisition additions to our real estate portfolio that will increase income and cash flow to shareholders.

Credit Line: FREIT has a line of credit provided by the Provident Bank in the amount of $13 million. The line of credit is for a two year term ending on November 1, 2016, but can be cancelled by the bank, at its will, within 60 days before or after each anniversary date. The credit line will automatically be extended at the termination date of the current term and each subsequent term for an additional period of 24 months, provided there is no default and the credit line has not been cancelled. Draws against the credit line can be used for general corporate purposes, for property acquisitions, construction activities, and letters of credit. Draws against the credit line are secured by mortgages on FREIT’s Franklin Crossing Shopping Center, Franklin Lakes, NJ, and retail space in Glen Rock, NJ. Interest rates on draws will be set at the time of each draw for 30, 60, or 90-day periods, based on our choice of the prime rate or at 175 basis points over the 30, 60, or 90-day LIBOR rates at the time of the draws. The interest rate on the line of credit has a floor of 3.5%. The amount of the credit line was reduced to $13 million from the original amount of $18 million in connection with the sale of the Palisades Manor property in April 2013, and the Grandview Apartments property in August 2013, and the release of these properties as collateral for the credit line. On June 18, 2014, FREIT utilized $10 million of the credit line as partial funding for the Regency Club acquisition. As of October 31, 2014, $8 million was available under the line of credit. FREIT expects that the line of credit, as well as cash provided by net operating income, are adequate to cover mandatory debt service payments (excluding balloon payments), make necessary capital improvements, and pay dividends required to maintain its status as a REIT. FREIT repaid the outstanding balance on the line of credit from the proceeds of a $16.2 million mortgage loan from Provident Bank, which is described in further detail below.

Interest rate swap contract: To reduce interest rate volatility, FREIT uses a “pay fixed, receive floating” interest rate swap to convert floating interest rates to fixed interest rates over the term of a certain loan. We enter into this swap contract with a counterparty that is usually a high-quality commercial bank.

In essence, we agree to pay our counterparty a fixed rate of interest on a dollar amount of notional principal (which corresponds to our mortgage debt) over a term equal to the term of the mortgage note. Our counterparty, in return, agrees to pay us a short-term rate of interest - generally LIBOR - on that same notional amount over the same term as our mortgage note.

33

Current GAAP requires us to mark-to-market fixed pay interest rate swaps. As the floating interest rate varies from time-to-time over the term of the contract, the value of the contract will change upward or downward. If the floating rate is higher than the fixed rate, the value of the contract goes up and there is a gain and an asset. If the floating rate is less than the fixed rate, there is a loss and a liability. These gains or losses will not affect our income statement. Changes in the fair value of these swap contracts will be reported in other comprehensive income and appear in the equity section of our balance sheet. This gain or loss represents the economic consequence of liquidating our fixed rate swap contracts and replacing them with like-duration funding at current market rates, something we would likely never do. Periodic cash settlements of the swap contract will be accounted for as an adjustment to interest expense.

FREIT had a variable interest rate mortgage securing its Damascus Center property. To reduce interest rate fluctuations FREIT entered into an interest rate swap contract. This interest rate swap contract effectively converted variable interest rate payments to fixed interest rate payments. The contract was initially based on a notional amount of approximately $20,000,000 ($19,356,000 at October 31, 2014). FREIT has the following derivative-related risks with its swap contract: 1) early termination risk, and 2) counterparty credit risk.

Early Termination Risk: If FREIT wants to terminate its swap contract before maturity, it would be bought out or terminated at market value; i.e., the difference in the present value of the anticipated net cash flows from each of the swap’s parties. If current variable interest rates are significantly below FREIT’s fixed interest rate payments, this could be costly. Conversely, if interest rates rise above FREIT’s fixed interest payments and FREIT elected early termination, FREIT would realize a gain on termination. At October 31, 2014, FREIT’s swap contract was in-the-money. If FREIT had terminated its contract at that date it would have realized a gain of approximately $515,000. This amount has been included as an asset in FREIT’s balance sheet as at October 31, 2014, and the change (gain or loss) between reporting periods included in comprehensive income.

Counterparty Credit Risk: Each party to a swap contract bears the risk that its Counterparty will default on its obligation to make a periodic payment. FREIT reduces this risk by entering swap contracts only with major financial institutions that are experienced market makers in the derivatives market.

On January 14, 2013, FREIT refinanced its Westwood Plaza mortgage loan in the amount of $8.0 million, with a new mortgage loan in the amount of $22,750,000. The new loan is at a fixed interest rate of 4.75%, and matures in January 2023. Excess funds from this refinancing has been used to fund tenant fit-up costs at our retail shopping centers, as well as other operational and financing cash flow needs.

On November 19, 2013, FREIT refinanced the first mortgages on its Hammel Gardens and Steuben Arms properties that were scheduled to mature on December 1, 2013. The mortgages, aggregating $9.4 million, were refinanced for $19.7 million. The new mortgage amounts reflect, in part, the appreciated value of those assets. This refinancing resulted in: (i) a reduction of annual interest costs from 6.4% to 4.54%, and (ii) net refinancing proceeds of approximately $10 million that have been used for capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.

On December 29, 2014, FREIT Regency, LLC secured long-term financing for the Regency property in the amount of $16.2 million from Provident Bank. The new loan bears a floating interest rate equal to 125 basis points over the BBA LIBOR and the loan will mature on December 15, 2024. In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, FREIT Regency, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.75% over the term of the loan. A portion of the loan proceeds will be used to replace the funds borrowed from FREIT’s credit line, and the remainder will be available to fund FREIT’s future capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes (see Note 17 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements).

FREIT’s total contractual obligations under its mortgage loan and construction contracts in place as of October 31, 2014 are as follows:  

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS-PRINCIPAL
(in thousands of dollars)
			Within		2 - 3		4 - 5		After 5
	Total		One Year		Years		Years		Years
Long-Term Debt
Annual Amortization	$	25,420	$	4,101	$	7,382	$	6,807	$	7,130
Balloon Payments		221,132		—		46,546		92,783		81,803
Total Long-Term Debt		246,552		4,101		53,928		99,590		88,933
Line of Credit (a)		5,000		5,000		—		—		—
Total Contractual Obligations	$	251,552	$	9,101	$	53,928	$	99,590	$	88,933

(a) Represents draws on line of credit with Provident Bank.

FREIT’s annual estimated cash requirements related to interest on its mortgage loans and construction contracts in place as of October 31, 2014 are as follows:

INTEREST OBLIGATIONS
(in thousands of dollars)
	Within One Year			2 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years			After 5 Years
Interest on Fixed Rate Debt	$	10,449		$	17,814	$	13,020		$	10,836
Interest on Variable Rate Debt		44	(a)		—		4,184	(b)		—
Total Interest Obligations	$	10,493		$	17,814	$	17,204		$	10,836

(a) Interest on credit line draws outstanding.

(b) Interest on Rotunda construction loan accrued through maturity.

34

ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

Funds From Operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP measure defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). Effective October 31, 2013, FREIT revised its FFO calculation to be in conformance with the NAREIT definition. Although many consider FFO as the standard measurement of a REIT’s performance, FREIT modified the NAREIT computation of FFO to include other adjustments to GAAP net income that are not considered by management to be the primary drivers of their decision making process. These adjustments to GAAP net income are amortization of acquired leases, under market lease amortization, straight-line rents, acquisition expenses, FFO from discontinued operations and recurring capital improvements on our residential apartments. The modified FFO computation is referred to as Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”). FREIT believes that AFFO is useful to investors as a supplemental gauge of our operating performance. We compute FFO and AFFO as follows:

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(in thousands, except per share)
Funds From Operations ("FFO") (a)
Net income	$	12,164		$	7,942		$	11,996
Depreciation of consolidated properties		6,346			6,233			6,171
Depreciation of discontinued operations		—			11			44
Amortization of deferred leasing costs		391			295			291
Project abandonment costs related to asset impairment		—			—			3,726
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		(8,734	)		(3,545	)		(7,528	)(b)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(975	)		(462	)		(834	)
FFO	$	9,192		$	10,474		$	13,866
Per Share - Basic and Diluted	$	1.33		$	1.51		$	2.00
a) As prescribed by NAREIT.
(b) Represents gain of $9,493 net of federal and state tax of $1,965.
Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO")
FFO	$	9,192		$	10,474		$	13,866
Amortization of acquired leases		21			24			2
Under market lease amort re: Giant lease termination		—			—			(1,344	)
Deferred rents (Straight lining)		391			12			(17	)
Acquisition expenses-Regency		648			—			—
Less: FFO from discontinued operations		(7	)		(808	)		(504	)
Capital Improvements - Apartments		(549	)		(681	)		(697	)
AFFO	$	9,696		$	9,021		$	11,306
Per Share - Basic and Diluted	$	1.40		$	1.30		$	1.63
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic and Diluted		6,908			6,942			6,942

FFO and AFFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and therefore should not be considered a substitute for net income as a measure of results of operations or for cash flow from operations as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, the application and calculation of FFO and AFFO by certain other REITs may vary materially from that of FREIT’s, and therefore FREIT’s FFO and AFFO may not be directly comparable to those of other REITs.

Share Repurchases

On December 4, 2013, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 24,400 FREIT shares. On December 17, 2013, FREIT repurchased 20,400 shares in a privately-negotiated transaction with an unaffiliated party for an aggregate purchase price of $357,000, or $17.50 per share.

On September 4, 2014, the Board authorized the repurchase of 100,572 FREIT shares held by the pension plan of Hekemian & Co., Inc., FREIT’s managing agent, for an aggregate cash purchase of $1,855,553 or $18.45 per share, which was the closing price of FREIT shares on September 3, 2014. The repurchase was undertaken in connection with the termination of the pension plan. Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FREIT, and Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a Trustee of FREIT, and members of their family are participants in the pension plan.

35

Stock Option Plan

On September 4, 2014, the Board approved the grant of a total of 246,000 non-qualified share options under the Plan to certain FREIT Executive Officers, the members of the Board and certain employees of Hekemian & Co., Inc.. The options have an exercise price of $18.45 per share, will vest over a 5 year period at 20% per year, and will expire 10 years from the date of grant, which will be September 3, 2024.

Distributions to Shareholders

Since its inception in 1961, FREIT has elected to be treated as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of highly technical and complex operational requirements including that we must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. We anticipate making distributions to shareholders from operating cash flows, which are expected to increase from future growth in rental revenues. Although cash used to make distributions reduces amounts available for capital investment, we generally intend to distribute not less than the minimum of REIT taxable income necessary to satisfy the applicable REIT requirement as set forth in the Internal Revenue Code. With respect to the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, the reduction of the tax rate on dividends does not apply to FREIT dividends other than capital gains dividends, which are subject to capital gains rates. FREIT’s policy is to pass on at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to shareholders. FREIT’s taxable income is untaxed at the trust level to the extent distributed to shareholders. FREIT’s dividends of ordinary taxable income will be taxed as ordinary income to its shareholders and FREIT’s capital gains dividends will be taxed as capital gains to its shareholders. It has been our policy to pay fixed quarterly dividends for the first three quarters of each fiscal year, and a final fourth quarter dividend based on the fiscal year’s net income and taxable income.

The following tables list the quarterly dividends declared for the three most recent fiscal years and the dividends as a percentage of taxable income for those periods.

	Fiscal Year Ended October 31,
	2014		2013		2012
First Quarter	$	0.30	$	0.30	$	0.30
Second Quarter	$	0.30	$	0.30	$	0.30
Third Quarter	$	0.30	$	0.30	$	0.30
Fourth Quarter	$	0.30	$	0.66	$	0.20
Total For Year	$	1.20	$	1.56	$	1.10

			(in thousands of dollars)										Dividends
Fiscal	Per		Total		Ordinary			Capital Gain		Taxable			as a % of
Year	Share		Dividends		Income-Tax Basis			Income- Tax Basis		Income			Taxable Income
2014	$	1.20	$	8,276	$	4,242	*	$	—	$	4,242	*		195.1%
2013	$	1.56	$	10,830	$	4,497		$	3,566	$	8,063			134.3%
2012	$	1.10	$	7,637	$	3,434		$	9,153	$	12,587			60.7%

*Estimated

As indicated in the table above, FREIT realized capital gain income of $3.6 million and $9.2 million in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively, which related to the sale of its Palisades Manor and Grandview Apartments in Fiscal 2013, and its Heights Manor Apartments in Fiscal 2012. In December 2013, FREIT distributed as dividends to its shareholders the entire capital gain of approximately $3.6 million. In Fiscal 2012, FREIT distributed as dividends, $5 million of the capital gain. The remaining $4.2 million capital gain was undistributed; however, in the first quarter of Fiscal 2013, FREIT decided to elect, under Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code, to treat the $1.4 million 4^th Quarter Fiscal 2012 dividend paid as a distribution of the Fiscal 2012 capital gain.

INFLATION

Inflation can impact the financial performance of FREIT in various ways. Our commercial tenant leases normally provide that the tenants bear all or a portion of most operating expenses, which can reduce the impact of inflationary increases on FREIT. Apartment leases are normally for a one-year term, which may allow us to seek increased rents as leases renew or when new tenants are obtained.

36

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Segment Information” in Item 7 above.

ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements and supplementary data of FREIT are submitted as a separate section of this Form 10-K. See "Index to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page 40 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of FREIT’s disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with participation of FREIT’s management, including FREIT’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who concluded that FREIT’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no significant changes in FREIT’s internal controls or in other factors, which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date we carried out our evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in FREIT’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in FREIT’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including FREIT’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — FREIT’s management, under the supervision of FREIT’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management evaluated the effectiveness of FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2014. EisnerAmper LLP, FREIT’s independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2014, audited FREIT’s financial statements contained in this Form 10-K, and has issued the attestation report on FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting provided on the following page.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — FREIT’s management, with the participation of FREIT’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated whether any change in FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that there has been no change in FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION

None.

37

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees and Shareholders

First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey

We have audited First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey and subsidiaries’ (“FREIT”) internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. FREIT’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, included in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and Trustees of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, FREIT maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of FREIT as of and for the year ended October 31, 2014, and our report dated January 14, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

New York, New York

January 14, 2015

38

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is incorporated by reference to FREIT's definitive proxy statement (the "Proxy Statement") to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of FREIT's fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. Only those sections of the Proxy Statement that specifically address the items set forth in this Annual Report are incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement into this Annual Report.

ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled "Election of Trustees" and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in FREIT's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting to be held in April 2015.

ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Executive Compensation" in FREIT's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting to be held in April 2015.

ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in FREIT's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting to be held in April 2015. 

ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions; Director Independence" in FREIT's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting to be held in April 2015.

ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections titled “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” contained in FREIT’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting to be held in April 2015.

39

PART IV

ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

(a) Financial Statements:	Page
(i) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	42
(ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2014 and 2013	43
(iii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	44
(iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	45
(v) Consolidated Statements of  Equity for the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	46
(vi) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012	47
(vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	48
(b) Exhibits:
See Index to Exhibits.	65
(c) Financial Statement Schedule:
(i) XI - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.	63/64

40

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, FREIT has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey
Dated: January 14, 2015	By:  /s/ Robert S. Hekemian
	Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
	By:  /s/ Donald W. Barney
	Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of Robert S. Hekemian and Donald W. Barney his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent for him and in his name, place an stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as they might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated.

Signatures	Title	Date
/s/ Robert S. Hekemian	Chairman of the Board and Chief	January 14, 2015
Robert S. Hekemian	Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Trustee
/s/ Donald W. Barney	President, Treasurer, Chief Financial	January 14, 2015
Donald W. Barney	Officer (Principal Financial / Accounting Officer) and Trustee
/s/ Herbert C. Klein	Trustee	January 14, 2015
Herbert C. Klein
/s/ Ronald J. Artinian	Trustee	January 14, 2015
Ronald J. Artinian
/s/ Alan L. Aufzien	Trustee	January 14, 2015
Alan L. Aufzien
/s/ Robert S. Hekemian, Jr.	Trustee	January 14, 2015
Robert S. Hekemian, Jr.
/s/ David F. McBride	Trustee	January 14, 2015
David F. McBride

41

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees and Shareholders

First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey and subsidiaries (“FREIT”) as of October 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at item 15(c). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of FREIT's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), FREIT’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated January 14, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

New York, New York

January 14, 2015

42

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	October 31,
	2014			2013
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation	$	222,317		$	205,451
Construction in progress		50,146			12,092
Cash and cash equivalents		10,554			7,801
Tenants' security accounts		1,590			1,435
Receivables arising from straight-lining of rents		3,869			4,259
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		1,673			2,602
Secured loans receivable		5,451			3,323
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,059			3,393
Deferred charges, net		5,143			2,915
Interest rate swap contract		515			980
Total Assets	$	305,317		$	244,251
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable	$	251,552		$	199,423
Deferred trustee compensation payable		9,017			7,813
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		9,495			5,656
Dividends payable		2,046			4,582
Tenants' security deposits		2,319			2,118
Deferred revenue		1,042			854
Total Liabilities		275,471			220,446
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Equity:
Common equity:
Shares of beneficial interest without par value:
8,000,000 shares authorized; 6,993,152 shares issued		24,985			24,969
Treasury stock, at cost: 171,981 shares @ October 31, 2014;
51,009 shares @ October31, 2013		(3,348	)		(1,135	)
Dividends in excess of net income		(6,270	)		(9,651	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		360			686
Total Common Equity		15,727			14,869
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries		14,119			8,936
Total Equity		29,846			23,805
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	305,317		$	244,251

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

43

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME  

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(In Thousands of Dollars,  Except Per Share Amounts)
Revenue:
Rental income	$	36,913		$	35,819		$	36,440
Reimbursements		5,054			5,006			4,843
Income relating to early lease termination		—			—			2,950
Sundry income		463			512			795
		42,430			41,337			45,028
Expenses:
Operating expenses		11,405			10,374			10,118
Management fees		1,968			1,849			1,863
Real estate taxes		7,515			7,527			7,611
Depreciation		6,346			6,233			6,171
Deferred project cost write-off		—			—			3,726
		27,234			25,983			29,489
Operating income		15,196			15,354			15,539
Investment income		184			191			173
Acquisition expenses-Regency		(648	)		—			—
Interest expense including amortization
of deferred financing costs		(11,309	)		(11,945	)		(11,704	)
Income from continuing operations		3,423			3,600			4,008
Income from discontinued operations		7			797			460
Gain on sale of discontinued operations (net of tax of $1,965 in fiscal 2012)		8,734			3,545			7,528
Net income		12,164			7,942			11,996
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interest in subsidiaries		(507	)		(493	)		(645	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449		$	11,351
Earnings per share - basic and diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.42		$	0.45		$	0.49
Discontinued operations		1.27			0.62			1.15
Net income attributable to common equity	$	1.69		$	1.07		$	1.64
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic and diluted		6,908			6,942			6,942
Amounts attributable to common equity:
Income from continuing operations	$	2,916		$	3,107		$	3,363
Income related to discontinued operations		8,741			4,342			7,988
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449		$	11,351

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

44

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
Net income	$	12,164		$	7,942		$	11,996
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap contract
before reclassifications		(774	)		721			—
Amount reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income to interest expense		309			259			—
Net unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap contract		(465	)		980			—
Comprehensive income		11,699			8,922			11,996
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(507	)		(493	)		(645	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate swap contract
attributable to noncontrolling interests		140			(294	)		—
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(367	)		(787	)		(645	)
Comprehensive income attributable to common equity	$	11,332		$	8,135		$	11,351

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

45

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

	Common Equity
	Shares of Beneficial Interest		Treasury Shares at Cost			Dividends in Excess of Net Income			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total Common Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
	(In Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
Balance at October 31, 2011	$	24,969	$	(1,135	)	$	(9,984	)	$	—		$	13,850		$	8,800		$	22,650
Distributions to noncontrolling interests													—			(834	)		(834	)
Net income							11,351						11,351			645			11,996
Dividends declared ($1.10 per share)							(7,637	)					(7,637	)					(7,637	)
Balance at October 31, 2012		24,969		(1,135	)		(6,270	)		—			17,564			8,611			26,175
Distributions to noncontrolling interests													—			(462	)		(462	)
Net income							7,449						7,449			493			7,942
Dividends declared ($1.56 per share)							(10,830	)					(10,830	)					(10,830	)
Net unrealized gain on interest rate swap										686			686			294			980
Balance at October 31, 2013		24,969		(1,135	)		(9,651	)		686			14,869			8,936			23,805
Repurchase of 120,972 shares of beneficial interest				(2,213	)								(2,213	)					(2,213	)
Stock based compensation expense		16											16						16
Distributions to noncontrolling interests													—			(975	)		(975	)
Net income							11,657						11,657			507			12,164
Dividends declared ($1.20 per share)							(8,276	)					(8,276	)					(8,276	)
Net unrealized loss on interest rate swap										(326	)		(326	)		(140	)		(466	)
Additional investment by noncontrolling interest in Grande Rotunda, LLC													—			5,791			5,791
Balance at October 31, 2014	$	24,985	$	(3,348	)	$	(6,270	)	$	360		$	15,727		$	14,119		$	29,846

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

46

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
Operating activities:
Net income	$	12,164		$	7,942		$	11,996
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities (including discontinued operations):
Depreciation		6,346			6,244			6,215
Amortization		750			665			669
Stock based compensation		16			—			—
Net amortization of acquired leases		21			24			2
Income from early lease termination		—			—			(2,950	)
Deferred project cost write-off		—			—			3,726
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		(8,734	)		(3,545	)		(7,528	)(c)
Income tax adjustment on gain on sale of discontinued
operation		—			(720	)(a)		—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Tenants' security accounts		46			17			17
Accounts and straight-line rents receivable,
prepaid expenses and other assets		(217	)		(181	)		(324	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred
trustee compensation		1,812			318			1,541
Deferred revenue		190			(289	)		(239	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		12,394			10,475			13,125
Investing activities:
Capital improvements - existing properties		(3,770	)		(2,149	)		(2,114	)
Construction and pre-development costs		(33,579	)(e)		(4,732	)(b)		(3,999	)(d)
Regency acquisition		(10,855	)(f)		—			—
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations		—			3,752			9,908
Secured loans receivable to noncontrolling interest		(2,128	)		—			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(50,332	)		(3,129	)		3,795
Financing activities:
Repayment of mortgages and construction loan		(13,260	)		(45,747	)		(6,337	)
Repayment of credit line		(7,000	)		—			—
Proceeds from mortgages and construction loans		61,829			42,750			3,085
Proceeds from credit line		10,000			2,000			—
Deferred financing costs		(2,669	)		(1,059	)		(210	)
Dividends paid		(10,812	)		(7,637	)		(8,331	)
Repurchase of Company's shares of beneficial interest		(2,213	)		—			—
Additional investment by noncontrolling interest		5,791	(g)		—			—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(975	)		(462	)		(834	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		40,691			(10,155	)		(12,627	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,753			(2,809	)		4,293
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		7,801			10,610			6,317
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	10,554		$	7,801		$	10,610
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow data:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	10,206		$	10,933		$	10,526
Income taxes paid	$	—		$	1,072		$	—
Supplemental schedule of non cash activities:
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation applied to
acquisition of 1031 replacement property.	$	9,770		$	—		$	—
Accrued capital expenditures, construction costs,
pre-development costs and interest	$	8,091		$	3,766		$	747
Financing activities:
Dividends declared but not paid	$	2,046		$	4,582		$	1,389

(a) Income tax adjustment relating to fiscal 2012 gain on sale of discontinued operation.

(b) Includes $743 that was incurred and accrued in fiscal 2012; paid in fiscal 2013.

(c) Gain on sale of discontinued operation shown net of tax.

(d) Includes $2,256 that was incurred and accrued in fiscal 2011; paid in fiscal 2012.

(e) Includes $3,766 that was incurred and accrued in fiscal 2013; paid in fiscal 2014.

(f) Net of $9,770 of proceeds from the sale of South Brunswick property (see Note 2).

(g) Represents $5,791 investment in Grande Rotunda, LLC, of which $2,128  was loaned to noncontrolling interest by FREIT.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

47

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Organization and significant accounting policies:

Organization:

First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey ("FREIT" or the “Company”) was organized on November 1, 1961 as a New Jersey Business Trust. FREIT is engaged in owning residential and commercial income producing properties located primarily in New Jersey, Maryland and New York.

FREIT has elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust under the provisions of Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Accordingly, FREIT does not pay federal income tax on income whenever income distributed to shareholders is equal to at least 90% of real estate investment trust taxable income. Further, FREIT pays no federal income tax on capital gains distributed to shareholders.

FREIT is subject to federal income tax on undistributed taxable income and capital gains. FREIT may make an annual election under Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code to apply part of the regular dividends paid in each respective subsequent year as a distribution for the immediately preceding year.

Adopted and recently issued accounting standards:

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update requires companies to present the effects on the line items of net income of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be reclassified in its entirety to net income in the same reporting period. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012 with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance effective with its 1st quarter ended January 31, 2014. The adoption of this guidance in the year ended October 31, 2014 did not have any material impact on our financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity”, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation. The new guidance requires discontinued operation treatment for disposals of a component or group of components that represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major impact on an entity’s operations or financial results. The ASU is effective prospectively for all disposals that occur in annual periods (and interim periods therein) beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The ASU will be adopted by the Company in the 1^st Quarter of its fiscal year ending October 31, 2015.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry specific guidance. FREIT is currently assessing the impact this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

Principles of consolidation:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FREIT and the following subsidiaries in which FREIT has a controlling financial interest, including two LLCs in which FREIT is the managing member with a 40% ownership interest:

Subsidiary	Owning Entity		% Ownership		Year Acquired/Organized
Westwood Hills, LLC		FREIT		40%		1994
S and A Commercial Associates Limited Partnership   ("S and A")		FREIT		65%		2000
Wayne PSC, LLC		FREIT		40%		2002
Damascus Centre, LLC		FREIT		70%		2003
Pierre Towers, LLC		S and A		100%		2004
Grande Rotunda, LLC		FREIT		60%		2005
WestFREIT Corp		FREIT		100%		2007
WestFredic LLC		FREIT		100%		2007
Damascus Second, LLC		FREIT		70%		2008
FREIT Regency, LLC		FREIT		100%		2014

The consolidated financial statements include 100% of each subsidiary’s assets, liabilities, operations and cash flows, with the interests not owned by FREIT reflected as "noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries”. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

48

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents:

Financial instruments that potentially subject FREIT to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. FREIT considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. FREIT maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank and other accounts, the balances of which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits of $250,000.

Real estate development costs:

It is FREIT’s policy to capitalize pre-development costs, which generally include legal and other professional fees and other directly related third-party costs. Real estate taxes and interest costs incurred during the development and construction phases are also capitalized. FREIT ceases capitalization of these costs, when the project or portion thereof becomes operational, or when construction has been postponed. Capitalization of these costs will recommence once construction on the project resumes.

Depreciation:

Real estate and equipment are depreciated on the straight-line method by annual charges to operations calculated to absorb costs of assets over their estimated useful lives.

Impairment of long-lived assets:

Impairment losses on long-lived assets, such as real estate and equipment, are recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by such assets are less than their carrying value and, accordingly, all or a portion of such carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment losses are then measured by comparing the fair value of assets to their carrying amounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, there were no impairments of long-lived assets.

Deferred charges:

Deferred charges consist of mortgage costs and leasing commissions. Deferred mortgage costs are amortized on the straight-line method by annual charges to income over the terms of the mortgages. Amortization of such costs is included in interest expense and approximated $359,000, $370,000 and $368,000 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Deferred leasing commissions are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of the applicable leases.

Revenue recognition:

Income from leases is recognized on a straight-line basis regardless of when payment is due. Lease agreements between FREIT and commercial tenants generally provide for additional rentals and reimbursements based on such factors as percentage of tenants' sales in excess of specified volumes, increases in real estate taxes, Consumer Price Indices and common area maintenance charges. These additional rentals are generally included in income when reported to FREIT, when earned, or ratably over the appropriate period.

Interest rate swap contract:

FREIT utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce interest rate risk. FREIT does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. FREIT recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. Changes in fair value of those instruments, which qualify as cash flow hedges, are reported in other comprehensive income (see Note 6).

Advertising:

FREIT expenses the cost of advertising and promotions as incurred. Advertising costs charged to operations amounted to approximately $133,000, $93,000 and $127,000 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock-based compensation:

FREIT has a stock-based compensation plan that was approved by FREIT’s Board of Trustees (“Board”), and ratified by FREIT’s shareholders. Stock based awards under the plan to employees are accounted for based on their grant-date fair value (see Note 12).

Stock-based awards to nonemployees are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments on the vesting date.

49

Acquired Over Market and Below Market Value Leases and In-Place Leases:

Capitalized above-market lease values are being amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are being amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the leases, including renewal options. The value ascribed to leases in place is being amortized over the weighted average remaining lease terms.

Note 2 – Discontinued operations:

On December 20, 2013, FREIT’s South Brunswick property, which consisted of vacant land, was sold for $11 million resulting in a capital gain of approximately $8.7 million net of sales fees and commissions. FREIT structured this sale in a manner that qualifies it as a like-kind exchange of real estate pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The 1031 Exchange transaction will result in a deferral for income tax purposes of the $8.7 million capital gain. The net proceeds from this sale, which were approximately $9.8 million, were held in escrow until a replacement property was purchased. A replacement property related to this like-kind exchange was acquired on June 18, 2014, and the sale proceeds held in escrow were applied to the purchase price of such property (see Note 3 for further details).

On April 26, 2013, FREIT sold its Palisades Manor Apartments in Palisades Park, New Jersey for $1.6 million and recognized a capital gain of approximately $1.4 million from the sale. On August 13, 2013, FREIT sold its Grandview Apartments in Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey for $2.5 million and recognized a capital gain of approximately $2.2 million from the sale of this property.

On August 29, 2012, FREIT sold its Heights Manor Apartments in Spring Lake Heights, NJ. In connection with the Heights Manor sale, FREIT recognized a capital gain of approximately $9.5 million of which it distributed approximately $5 million to its shareholders during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012. As FREIT did not intend to distribute to its shareholders the remaining $4.5 million of capital gain, FREIT paid approximately $1.5 million federal and $400,000 state income taxes on such undistributed gain, which were charged to discontinued operations during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012. In the quarter ended January 31, 2013, FREIT elected, under Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code, to treat the $1.4 million dividend paid during such period as a distribution of the prior year’s capital gain and, accordingly, reversed $720,000 of the income tax liability, which has been credited to income from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013.

The gains from the sale of the properties as described above, as well as the related results of their operations for the other three properties described above, have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of income for all periods presented. Revenue attributable to discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $1,000, $317,000 and $1,299,000, respectively.

Note 3 – Property acquisition:

On June 18, 2014, FREIT completed the acquisition of the Regency Club (“Regency”), a residential apartment complex located in Middletown, New York. The Regency complex consists of 132 units in 11 buildings and a clubhouse. The acquisition cost was $20,625,000 (exclusive of $648,000 of transaction costs charged to expense), which was funded in part with $9.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of the South Brunswick land, and the remaining balance of $11.5 million (inclusive of the $648,000 of transaction costs) was funded utilizing $10 million of FREIT’s credit line with Provident Bank, and FREIT's available cash. On December 29, 2014, FREIT secured long-term financing for this property in the amount of $16.2 million from Provident Bank. A portion of the loan will be used to replace the funds borrowed from its credit line, and the remainder will be available to fund FREIT’s future capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes (see Note 17).

The acquisition price of $20,625,000 has been preliminarily allocated as follows: $17.8 million (86.3%) to the buildings and $2.8 million (13.7%) to the land. These allocated values are subject to change as more data becomes available and the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired can be more accurately determined.

The Regency is part of FREIT’s Residential segment. Results of Regency’s operations are included in the accompanying financial statements from June 18, 2014, the date of acquisition. Since its acquisition, total revenue, net operating income, and net income recorded for the Regency amounts to $808,000, $314,000, and $165,000, respectively.

FREIT identified the Regency as a replacement property for the vacant land located in South Brunswick, New Jersey that FREIT sold on December 20, 2013 (see Note 2).

50

The following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of operations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for FREIT and Subsidiaries as though the Regency had been acquired at the beginning of fiscal 2012:

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(In Thousands)
Revenues	$	44,016		$	43,672		$	47,213
Net expenses		40,033			39,935			42,942
Income from continuing operations		3,983			3,737			4,271
Income from discontinued operations		7			797			460
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		—			3,545			7,528
Net income		3,990			8,079			12,259
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		(507	)		(493	)		(645	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	3,483		$	7,586		$	11,614
Earnings per share - basic and diluted:
Continuing operations	$	0.50		$	0.47		$	0.52
Discontinued operations		0.00			0.62			1.15
Net income attributable to common equity	$	0.50		$	1.09		$	1.67
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted		6,908			6,942			6,942

The pro forma results for the current and prior year periods reflect the following adjustments: (a) additional depreciation expense based on the purchase price allocated to the buildings and a depreciable life of 40 years, (b) additional interest expense based on the $10 million loan used towards the purchase of the property at acquisition date, (c) exclusion of the $8.7 million gain from the sale of the South Brunswick land in June 2014, since this sale was treated as a 1031 Exchange, and would have had to occur prior to the Regency acquisition under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, and (d) exclusion of the $648,000 in non-recurring acquisition expenses related to the Regency purchase.

The pro forma results of operations set forth above are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisition been made at the beginning of fiscal 2012, or of future results of operations of FREIT’s combined properties.

Note 4 - Real estate:

Real estate consists of the following:

	Range of
	Estimated	October 31,
	Useful Lives	2014		2013
		(In Thousands of Dollars)
Land		$	79,435	$	76,602
Unimproved land			354		883
Apartment buildings	7-40 years		101,968		81,972
Commercial buildings/shopping centers	15-50 years		119,027		118,253
Equipment/Furniture	3-15 years		3,102		2,967
			303,886		280,677
Less accumulated depreciation			81,569		75,226
Totals		$	222,317	$	205,451

51

Note 5 – Mortgages, notes payable and credit line:

	October 31,
	2014		2013
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
Frederick, MD (A)	$	22,000	$	22,000
Rockaway, NJ (B)		18,030		18,440
Westwood, NJ (C)		21,884		22,388
Patchogue, NY (D)		5,376		5,503
Wayne, NJ (E)		18,686		18,976
River Edge, NJ (F):
First mortgage		—		3,952
Second mortgage		—		1,494
River Edge, NJ (G)		11,037		—
Maywood, NJ (H):
First mortgage		—		2,868
Second mortgage		—		1,060
Maywood, NJ (I)		8,374		—
Westwood, NJ (J)		21,974		22,383
Wayne, NJ (K)		25,978		26,863
Hackensack, NJ (L)		31,198		31,797
Damascus, MD (M)		19,326		19,699
Total fixed rate mortgage loans		203,863		197,423
Baltimore, MD (N)		42,689		—
Line of credit - Provident Bank (O)		5,000		2,000
Total  mortgages, notes payable and credit line	$	251,552	$	199,423

(A) Payable in monthly installments of interest only computed over the actual number of days in the elapsed monthly interest period at the rate of 5.55% through May 2017 at which time the outstanding balance is due. The mortgage is secured by a retail building in Frederick, MD having a net book value of approximately $17,197,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(B) Payable in monthly installments of $115,850 including interest at 5.37% through February 2022 at which time the outstanding balance is due. The mortgage is secured by a residential building in Rockaway, NJ having a net book value of approximately $17,080,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(C) On January 14, 2013, FREIT refinanced its Westwood Plaza mortgage loan in the amount of $8.0 million, with a new mortgage loan in the amount of $22,750,000, which is payable in monthly installments of $129,702 including interest at 4.75% through January 2023 at which time the outstanding balance is due. The new mortgage is secured by a retail building in Westwood, NJ having a net book value of approximately $8,375,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(D) The loan, modified effective January 31, 2013, is payable in monthly installments of $31,046 including interest at 4.5%, through March 2018 at which time the outstanding balance is due. Under the terms of the mortgage loan agreement, FREIT can request, during the term of the loan, additional fundings that will bring the outstanding principal balance up to 75% of loan-to-value (percentage of mortgage loan to total appraised value of property securing the loan). The mortgage is secured by a retail building in Patchogue, NY having a net book value of approximately $7,152,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(E) Payable in monthly installments of $121,100 including interest at 6.09%, through September 1, 2019 at which time the outstanding balance is due. The mortgage is secured by an apartment building in Wayne, NJ having a net book value of approximately $1,653,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(F) The first mortgage was payable in monthly installments of $34,862 including interest at 6.75% through December 2013 at which time the outstanding balance was due. The second mortgage is payable in monthly installments of $12,318 including interest at 5.53% through December 2013 at which time the outstanding balance was due (see G).

(G) On November 19, 2013, FREIT refinanced these mortgage loans, which were scheduled to mature on December 1, 2013. The amount of the new loan is $11,200,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.54%, with a scheduled maturity of December 1, 2023. The mortgages are secured by an apartment building in River Edge, NJ having a net book value of approximately $942,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(H) The first mortgage was payable in monthly installments of $25,295 including interest at 6.75% through December 2013 at which time the outstanding balance was due. The second mortgage is payable in monthly installments of $8,739 including interest at 5.53% through December 2013 at which time the outstanding balance was due (see I).

(I) On November 19, 2013, FREIT refinanced these mortgage loans, which were scheduled to mature on December 1, 2013. The amount of the new loan is $8,500,000 at a fixed interest rate of 4.54%, with a scheduled maturity of December 1, 2023. The mortgages are secured by an apartment building in Maywood, NJ having a net book value of approximately $748,000 as of October 31, 2014.

52

(J) Payable in monthly installments of $120,752 including interest of 4.62%, through November 1, 2020, at which time the outstanding balance is due. The mortgage is secured by an apartment building in Westwood, NJ having a net book value of approximately $10,398,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(K) Payable in monthly installments of $206,960 including interest of 6.04% until June 2016 at which time the unpaid balance is due. The mortgage is secured by a shopping center in Wayne, NJ having a net book value of approximately $26,945,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(L) Payable in monthly installments of $191,197 including interest of 5.38% until May 2019 at which time the unpaid balance is due. The mortgage is secured by an apartment building in Hackensack, NJ having a net book value of approximately $41,546,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(M) On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced its $15 million construction loan with long-term financing provided by People’s United Bank. The amount of the new loan is $25 million, of which $20 million has been drawn as of October 31, 2014. The balance, up to an additional $5 million, will be available as a one-time draw over the 36 month period ending December 26, 2015, and the amount available will depend on future leasing at the shopping center. The new loan bears a floating interest rate equal to 210 basis points over the BBA LIBOR and the loan will mature on January 3, 2023. In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, Damascus Centre, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.81% over the term of the loan (see Note 6 for additional information relating to the interest rate swap). The shopping center securing the loan has a net book value of approximately $29,644,000 as of October 31, 2014.

(N) On February 1, 2010, a principal payment of $3 million was made reducing the original loan amount of $22.5 million to $19.5 million and the due date was extended until February 1, 2013. As part of the terms of the loan extension agreement, the loan was further collateralized by a first mortgage lien and the assignment of the ground lease on FREIT’s Rochelle Park, NJ land parcel. Under the restructured terms, the interest rate is now 350 basis points above the BBA LIBOR with a floor of 4%, and monthly principal payments of $10,000 are required. An additional principal payment of $110,000 was required on February 1, 2012 in order to reduce the loan to achieve the stipulated debt service coverage ratio. Under the agreement with the equity owners of Grande Rotunda, LLC, FREIT would be responsible for 60% of any cash required by Grande Rotunda, LLC, and 40% would be the responsibility of the minority interest. The due date of the loan was further extended to May 1, 2013 from February 1, 2013. While the bank agreed to an additional extension of ninety-days (90) from May 1, 2013, FREIT elected to purchase the Rotunda loan from the bank and have all the bank’s rights assigned to FREIT. The purchase of this loan by FREIT was completed on May 28, 2013. FREIT subsequently sold this loan to Wells Fargo Bank, the lender providing the construction financing for the expansion of the Rotunda project. On December 9, 2013, Grande Rotunda, LLC closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used for the purpose of funding the major redevelopment and expansion project in progress at the Rotunda. The construction loan is for a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. Interest on the loan is accrued and applied to principal. Such interest will be due and payable at maturity. The loan is secured by the Rotunda property in Baltimore, MD, which has a net book value of approximately $79,268,000 as of October 31, 2014, including $48.8 million classified as construction in progress. As of October 31, 2014, $42.7 million was drawn on the construction loan with Wells Fargo Bank, of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $23.7 million was used towards the construction at the Rotunda.

(O) Credit Line: FREIT has a line of credit provided by the Provident Bank in the amount of $13 million. The line of credit is for a two year term ending on November 1, 2016, but can be cancelled by the bank, at its will, within 60 days before or after each anniversary date. The credit line will automatically be extended at the termination date of the current term and each subsequent term for an additional period of 24 months, provided there is no default and the credit line has not been cancelled. Draws against the credit line can be used for general corporate purposes, for property acquisitions, construction activities, and letters of credit. Draws against the credit line are secured by mortgages on FREIT’s Franklin Crossing Shopping Center, in Franklin Lakes, NJ, and retail space in Glen Rock, NJ. Interest rates on draws will be set at the time of each draw for 30, 60, or 90-day periods, based on our choice of the prime rate or at 175 basis points over the 30, 60, or 90-day LIBOR rates at the time of the draws. The interest rate on the line of credit has a floor of 3.5%. The Palisades Manor and the Grandview Apartment properties had been part of the collateral for the line of credit prior to FREIT’s sales of these properties in April 2013 and August 2013, respectively. Provident Bank released these properties as collateral for the credit line in connection with these dispositions, and as a result, the credit line was reduced from $18 million to approximately $13 million as of July 2013. As of October 31, 2014, approximately $8 million was available under the line of credit, and $5 million was outstanding.

Certain of the Company’s mortgage loans and the Credit Line contain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants as of October 31, 2014.

Fair Value of Long-Term Debt:

The following table shows the estimated fair value and carrying value of FREIT’s long-term debt at October 31, 2014 and 2013:

	October 31,		October 31,
($ in Millions)	2014		2013
Fair Value	$	256.0	$	201.9
Carrying Value	$	251.6	$	199.4

Fair values are estimated based on market interest rates at October 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 and on discounted cash flow analysis. Changes in assumptions or estimation methods may significantly affect these fair value estimates. The fair value, which is based on observable inputs, has been characterized as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as provided by authoritative guidance.

53

Principal amounts (in thousands of dollars) due under the above obligations in each of the five years subsequent to October 31, 2014 are as follows: 

Year Ending October 31,	Amount
2015	$	4,101
2016	$	28,434
2017	$	25,494
2018	$	8,489
2019	$	91,102	(a)

(a) Includes $42,689 relating to the Rotunda construction loan, due December 2018. (See Note 5(N).)

Note 6 - Interest rate swap contract: 

On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced its $15 million construction loan with a variable rate $25 million mortgage loan of which $20 million has been drawn as of October 31, 2014. The new loan will mature on January 3, 2023 (see Note 5(M) for additional information regarding the refinanced loan). In connection therewith, on December 26, 2012, FREIT entered into an interest rate swap contract to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the LIBOR based variable rate mortgage. At October 31, 2014, the derivative financial instrument has a notional amount of approximately $19,356,000 and a current maturity date of January 2023. The contract effectively converts the LIBOR based variable rate to a fixed rate of 3.81%. In accordance with ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, FREIT is accounting for this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge and marks to market its fixed pay interest rate swap, taking into account present interest rates compared to the contracted fixed rate over the life of the contract. For the year ended October 31, 2013, FREIT recorded an unrealized gain of $980,000 in comprehensive income representing the fair value of the swap, which resulted in a $980,000 corresponding asset as of October 31, 2013. During the year ended October 31, 2014, FREIT recorded an unrealized loss of $465,000 in comprehensive income representing the reduction in the fair value of the swap for fiscal 2014, which resulted in a $515,000 corresponding asset as of October 31, 2014. The fair value is based on observable inputs (level 2 in the fair value hierarchy).

Note 7 - Capitalized interest

Interest costs associated with amounts expended at the Rotunda development are capitalized and included in the cost of the project. Interest capitalized during the year ended October 31, 2014, amounted to $1,110,000.

Note 8 - Commitments and contingencies:

Leases:

Commercial tenants:

FREIT leases commercial space having a net book value of approximately $179 million at October 31, 2014 to tenants for periods of up to twenty-five years. Most of the leases contain clauses for reimbursement of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses of the properties.

Minimum rental income (in thousands of dollars) to be received from non-cancelable operating leases in years subsequent to October 31, 2014 is as follows:

Year Ending October 31,	Amount
2015	$	16,667
2016		15,398
2017		12,276
2018		10,258
2019		8,861
Thereafter		56,270
Total	$	119,730

The above amounts assume that all leases which expire are not renewed and, accordingly, neither minimal rentals nor rentals from replacement tenants are included.

Minimum future rentals do not include contingent rentals, which may be received under certain leases on the basis of percentage of reported tenants' sales volume or increases in Consumer Price Indices. Rental income that is contingent on future events is not included in income until the contingency is resolved. Contingent rentals included in income for each of the three years for the period ended October 31, 2014 were not material.

54

Residential tenants:

Lease terms for residential tenants are usually one year or less.

Environmental concerns:

The Westwood Plaza Shopping Center property is in a Flood Hazard Zone. FREIT maintains flood insurance in the amount of $500,000 for the subject property, which is the maximum available under the Flood Program for the property. Any reconstruction of that portion of the property situated in the flood hazard zone is subject to regulations promulgated by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP"), which could require extraordinary construction methods.

Prior to its purchase by Wayne PSC, LLC, a 40% owned affiliate of FREIT (“Wayne PSC”), a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment of the Preakness shopping center revealed soil and ground water contamination with Percloroethylene (Dry Cleaning Fluid) caused by the mishandling of this chemical by a former dry cleaner tenant.

The seller of the Preakness shopping center to Wayne PSC is in the process of performing the remedial work in accordance with the requirements of the NJDEP. Additionally, the seller has escrowed the estimated cost of the remediation and has purchased a cap-cost insurance policy covering any expenses over and above the estimated cost.

In performing the remedial work, possible contamination of this property by groundwater migrating from an offsite source was discovered. The NJDEP has not made any determination with respect to responsibility for remediation of this possible condition, and it is not possible to determine whether or to what extent Wayne PSC will have potential liability with respect to this condition or whether or to what extent insurance coverage may be available.

FREIT has conducted environmental audits for all of its properties except for its undeveloped land and retail properties in Franklin Lakes (Franklin Crossing) and Glen Rock, New Jersey. Except as noted above, the environmental reports secured by FREIT have not revealed any environmental conditions on its properties, which require remediation pursuant to any applicable federal or state law or regulation.

FREIT has determined that several of its properties contain lead based paint (“LBP”). FREIT believes that it complies with all federal, state and local requirements as they pertain to LBP.

FREIT does not believe that the environmental conditions described above will have a materially adverse effect upon the capital expenditures, revenues, earnings, financial condition or competitive position of FREIT.

Note 9 - Giant lease termination; Rotunda project cost write-off:

On February 3, 2012, Grande entered into a lease termination agreement (“Agreement”) with Giant of Maryland LLC (“Giant”), the former tenant and operator of the 35,994 sq. ft. Giant supermarket at Grande’s Rotunda property located in Baltimore, Maryland. Giant, under the terms of the Agreement, agreed to (i) waive its right to extend the term of the lease through March 31, 2035, (ii) terminate the lease and surrender the premises to Grande no later than the earlier of commencement of the redevelopment of the property or March 31, 2015, and (iii) notwithstanding any earlier termination date, continue to pay monthly fixed rent payments plus its share of common area maintenance charges and taxes for the Rotunda property through March 31, 2015. Grande agreed (i) not to lease more than 20,000 sq. ft. of any space in the property for use as a food supermarket through March 31, 2035, and (ii) if Grande decides to lease such space for use as a food supermarket, it must first offer the space for the same use under the terms acceptable to Grande, to Giant, which will have thirty days to accept the offer before the space may be leased to a third party. As a result of the Giant lease termination and the terms of the Agreement, Grande will not be required to construct a lower level Giant supermarket as part of the redevelopment project at the Rotunda, which represented a costly component to the project. In addition, the Giant lease contained significant restrictions on Grande’s ability to make modifications to the property. This development cleared the way for Grande to move forward with the redevelopment planning for this property. As a result of Giant terminating its lease and vacating its space at the Rotunda shopping center, the results for Fiscal 2012 include income of $2.95 million relating to the Giant early lease termination, offset by a $1.49 million deferred project cost write-off relating to a change in the future development plans for the Rotunda shopping center, specifically the impact that the Giant portion of the project had on the design fees incurred to date and included in Construction in Progress (“CIP”). The early lease termination fee is comprised of the net present value of the monthly rent in accordance with the terms of the terminated lease, projected common area maintenance charges and real estate taxes from April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2015. In addition, included in the $2.95 million lease termination fee are the write-off of the balances in Below Market Value Acquisition Costs, and In-Place Lease Costs relating to the Giant lease. Accretion of the present value discount during Fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 amounted to approximately $44,000, $87,000 and $69,000, respectively, which is included in investment income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.

55

In light of the Giant lease termination and its potential impact on the scope of the development plans for the Rotunda site, management proposed further revisions to the scope of the Rotunda development project. On July 24, 2012, the Board approved the revisions to the scope of the project, thereby further reducing the complexity and projected cost of the project. As a result of the Board’s decision to move forward with the revised development plans, an additional $2.2 million of certain deferred project costs relating to planning and feasibility costs included in CIP were no longer deemed to have any utility, and were written-off in Fiscal 2012.

Note 10 - Management agreement, fees and transactions with related party:

On April 10, 2002, FREIT and Hekemian & Co., Inc. (“Hekemian”) executed a Management Agreement whereby Hekemian would continue as Managing Agent for FREIT. The term of the Management Agreement was renewed on November 1, 2013 for a two-year term which will expire on October 31, 2015. The Management Agreement automatically renews for successive periods of two years unless either party gives not less than six (6) months prior notice to the other of non-renewal.

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement: FREIT retains Hekemian as the exclusive management and leasing agent for properties which FREIT owned as of April 2002 and for the Preakness Shopping Center acquired on November 1, 2002 by Wayne PSC. However, FREIT may retain other managing agents to manage certain other properties acquired after April 10, 2002 and to perform various other duties such as sales, acquisitions, and development with respect to any or all properties. Hekemian does not serve as the exclusive advisor for FREIT to locate and recommend to FREIT investments, which Hekemian deems suitable for FREIT, and is not required to offer potential acquisition properties exclusively to FREIT before acquiring those properties for its own account. The Management Agreement includes a detailed schedule of fees for those services, which Hekemian may be called upon to perform. The Management Agreement provides for a termination fee in the event of a termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement under certain circumstances.

Hekemian currently manages all the properties owned by FREIT, except for the Rotunda, a mixed-use office and retail facility located in Baltimore, Maryland, which is managed by an independent third party management company. The management agreement with Hekemian, effective November 1, 2001, requires the payment of management fees equal to a percentage of rents collected. Such fees were approximately $1,866,000, $1,747,000 and $1,792,000 in Fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In addition, the management agreement provides for the payment to Hekemian of leasing commissions, as well as the reimbursement of operating expenses incurred on behalf of FREIT. Such fees amounted to approximately $673,000, $339,000 and $402,000 in Fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The primary reason for the increase in fees for fiscal 2014 was leasing commissions amounting to approximately $396,000. Total Hekemian management fees outstanding at October 31, 2014 and 2013 were $171,000 and $152,000, respectively, and included in Accounts Payable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. FREIT also uses the resources of the Hekemian insurance department to secure various insurance coverages for its properties and subsidiaries. Hekemian is paid a commission for these services. Such commissions amounted to approximately $133,000, $121,000 and $122,000 in fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Grande owns and operates the Rotunda. FREIT owns a 60% equity interest in Grande, and Rotunda 100, LLC (“Rotunda 100”) owns a 40% equity interest.

Damascus Centre, LLC owns and operates the Damascus Center. During fiscal 2005, the Board authorized an investor group, Damascus 100, LLC (“Damascus 100”), to acquire a 30% equity interest in Damascus Centre, LLC. The sale price, based on the fair market value of the shopping center, reduced FREIT’s equity interest to 70%. The sale was completed on October 31, 2006, at a sales price of $3,224,000, of which FREIT financed approximately $1,451,000. The sale price was equivalent to the book value of the interest sold.

The equity owners of Rotunda 100, and Damascus 100 are principally employees of Hekemian. To incentivize the employees of Hekemian, FREIT has agreed to advance, only to employees of Hekemian, up to 50% of the amount of the equity contributions that the Hekemian employees were required to invest in Rotunda 100 and Damascus 100. These advances are in the form of secured loans that bear interest that will float at 225 basis points over the ninety (90) day LIBOR, as adjusted each November 1, February 1, May 1 and August 1. These loans are secured by the Hekemian employees’ interests in Rotunda 100 and Damascus 100, and are full recourse loans. Interest only payments are required to be made quarterly.

No principal payments are required during the term of the notes, except that the borrowers are required to pay to FREIT all refinancing proceeds and other cash flow they receive from their interests in Damascus Centre, LLC and Grande. These payments shall be applied first to accrued and unpaid interest and then any outstanding principal. The notes mature at the earlier of (a) ten (10) years after issue (Grande– 6/19/2015, Damascus Centre, LLC – 9/30/2016), or, (b) at the election of FREIT, ninety (90) days after the borrower terminates employment with Hekemian, at which time all outstanding unpaid principal is due. On May 8, 2008, the Board approved amendments to the existing loan agreements with the Hekemian employees, relative to their interests in Rotunda 100, to increase the aggregate amount that FREIT may advance to such employees from $2 million to $4 million. No other terms of the loan agreements were amended.

56

With regard to the funding of the Rotunda redevelopment project, Wells Fargo Bank, the construction lender, required that Grande contribute not less than $14,460,000 towards the construction before any construction loan proceeds could be disbursed. To secure these funds Grande made a capital call on its members – FREIT and Rotunda 100. FREIT’s share (60%) amounts to approximately $8.7 million, and the Rotunda 100 members’ share (40%) amounts to approximately $5.8 million. During Fiscal 2014, FREIT, pursuant to previous agreements, has made secured loans to the Rotunda 100 members of approximately $2.1 million towards their share of the $5.8 million capital call. The balance of Rotunda 100’s capital call of approximately $3.7 million was initially made by FREIT until it was repaid by Rotunda 100 in August 2014. These loans bear an interest rate of 225 basis points over the 90 day LIBOR, and have a maturity date of June 19, 2015. These loans are included in Secured Loans Receivable on FREIT’s consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2014.

As of October 31, 2014, FREIT and Rotunda 100 have made their required capital call contributions of $8.7 million and $5.8 million, respectively, towards the Rotunda construction financing. Both FREIT and the Rotunda 100 members are treating their required capital call contributions as additional investments in Grande. Rotunda 100 is principally owned by employees of Hekemian, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr.

The aggregate outstanding principal balance of the notes at October 31, 2014 and 2013 was $5,451,000 and $3,323,000, respectively. The accrued but unpaid interest related to these notes for Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013 amounted to approximately $595,000 and $486,000, respectively, and is included in Accounts Receivable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

From time to time, FREIT engages Hekemian to provide certain additional services, such as consulting services related to development, property sales and financing activities of FREIT. Separate fee arrangements are negotiated between Hekemian and FREIT with respect to such additional services. In Fiscal 2007, the Board approved development fee arrangements for the Rotunda and Damascus Center redevelopment projects. In connection with the development activities at the Rotunda and the redevelopment activities at the Damascus Center, definitive contract agreements for the development services to be provided by Hekemian Development Resources LLC (“Resources”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hekemian, have been approved and executed. The development fee arrangement for the Rotunda provides for Resources to receive a fee equal to 6.375% of the total development costs of up to $84.6 million (as may be modified, and less the amount of $3 million previously paid to Hekemian for the Rotunda project). In addition, the Board approved the payment of a fee to Resources in the amount of $1.4 million in connection with the revision to the scope of the Rotunda development project. The fee will be paid to Resources upon the following terms: (i) $500,000 of the $1.4 million will be paid on a monthly basis during the design phase (the $500,000 was paid in Fiscal 2013); and (ii) $900,000 of the $1.4 million will be paid upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the multi-family portion of the project, (the $900,000 is included in Accounts Payable at October 31, 2014 and 2013). The fee for the redevelopment of the Damascus Center was equal to 7% of the redevelopment costs of up to approximately $17.3 million (as may be modified). Such fees incurred to Hekemian and Resources during Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 were $1,998,000, $1,823,000 and $317,000, respectively. Included within the $2.0 million in fees for Fiscal 2014 are: (a) development fees of approximately $1 million paid to Resources, relating to the Rotunda development project, and (b) commissions of $880,000 relating to the sale of the South Brunswick land and the subsequent acquisition of the Regency apartment complex. Included within the $1.8 million in fees incurred for Fiscal 2013 are: (a) development fees totaling $1.4 million payable to Resources, relating to the Rotunda development project, referred to above, (b) services performed with regard to the Westwood Plaza shopping center and Damascus shopping center mortgage loan refinancings amounting to $239,000 (see Note 5), and (c) $185,000 relating to commissions paid to Hekemian for the sale of the Palisades Manor and Grandview Apartment properties. In Fiscal 2012, FREIT paid Hekemian $317,000 relating to the commission on the sale of the Heights Manor property. All such fees, expect for those related to sales of properties, were capitalized.

Resources, Rotunda 100, and Damascus 100 are principally owned by employees of Hekemian, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a Trustee of FREIT, is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Hekemian. Robert S. Hekemian, Jr, a Trustee of FREIT, is the President of Hekemian. Trustee fee expense (including interest) incurred by FREIT for Fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $642,000, $586,000 and $546,000, respectively, for Robert S. Hekemian, and $46,000, $40,000 and $43,000, respectively, for Robert S. Hekemian, Jr. The members of the Hekemian family have majority management control of these entities.

57

Note 11 - Income taxes:

FREIT distributed as dividends to its shareholders 100% of its ordinary taxable income for each of the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes related to such ordinary taxable income was recorded in the Company’s financial statements. As described in Note 2, FREIT has completed a like-kind exchange with respect to the sale of the South Brunswick, NJ property, which was sold on December 20, 2013 at a gain of approximately $8.7 million. Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes related to such gain was recorded in the Company’s financial statements. The tax basis of Regency, which was the replacement property in the like-kind exchange, is approximately $8 million lower than the acquisition cost of approximately $20.6 million recorded for financial reporting purposes. In December 2013, FREIT distributed as dividends in December 2013, the entire capital gain of approximately $3.5 million realized on the sale of its Palisades Manor and Grandview properties in Fiscal 2013, and in Fiscal 2012, FREIT distributed $5 million of the $9.5 million capital gain realized from the sale of its Heights Manor Apartments (see Note 2). With regard to such capital gains dividend distributions for Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, no provisions for federal or state income taxes related to such capital gain income was recorded in the Company’s financial statements. However, since FREIT did not intend to distribute to its shareholders the remaining $4.5 million of capital gain realized on the Heights Manor sale, FREIT provided approximately $1.5 million federal and $400,000 state income taxes on such undistributed gain, which was charged to discontinued operations in Fiscal 2012. In the quarter ended January 31, 2013, FREIT decided to elect, under Section 858 of the Internal Revenue Code, to treat the $1.4 million dividend paid during such period as a distribution of the prior year’s capital gain and, accordingly, reversed $720,000 of the income tax liability, which has been credited to income from discontinued operations for Fiscal 2013.

As of October 31, 2014, the Company had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years subsequent to and including the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

Note 12- Equity incentive plan:

On September 10, 1998, the Board approved FREIT's Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") which was ratified by FREIT's shareholders on April 7, 1999, whereby up to 920,000 of FREIT's shares of beneficial interest (adjusted for stock splits) may be granted to key personnel in the form of stock options, restricted share awards and other share-based awards. In connection therewith, the Board approved an increase of 920,000 shares in FREIT's number of authorized shares of beneficial interest. Key personnel eligible for these awards include trustees, executive officers and other persons or entities including, without limitation, employees, consultants and employees of consultants, who are in a position to make significant contributions to the success of FREIT. Under the Plan, the exercise price of all options will be the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The consideration to be paid for restricted share and other share-based awards shall be determined by the Board, with the amount not to exceed the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The maximum term of any award granted may not exceed ten years. The Board will determine the actual terms of each award.

On April 4, 2007, FREIT shareholders approved amendments to the Plan as follows: (a) reserving an additional 300,000 shares for issuance under the Plan; and (b) extending the term of the Plan until September 10, 2018. As of October 31, 2014, 220,000 shares are available for issuance under the Plan.

On September 4, 2014, the Board approved the grant of a total of 246,000 non-qualified share options under the Plan to certain FREIT Executive Officers, the members of the Board and certain employees of Hekemian & Co., Inc., FREIT’s managing agent. The options have an exercise price of $18.45 per share, will vest over a 5 year period at 20% per year, and will expire 10 years from the date of grant, which will be September 3, 2024.

During Fiscal 2013 and 2012, no options or other stock awards were granted under the Plan. There were no options outstanding at October 31, 2013, since all previously granted options expired in September 2008 or were exercised prior to that date.

58

The following table summarizes stock option activity for Fiscal 2014:

	Year Ended October 31,
	2014
	No. of Options		Exercise
	Outstanding		Price
Options outstanding beginning of period		—		—
Options granted during period		246,000	$	18.45
Options outstanding end of period		246,000	$	18.45
Options expected to vest		—
Options exercisable at end of period		—

The estimated fair value of options granted during Fiscal 2014 was $1.91 per option. Such value was estimated on the grant date using a binomial lattice option pricing model using the following assumptions:

· Expected volatility – 30.50%

· Risk-free interest rate – 2.50%

· Imputed option life – 6.81 years

· Expected dividend yield – 6.60%

The expected volatility over the options’ expected life was based on the historical volatility of the weekly closing price of the Company’s stock over a five (5) year period. The risk-free interest rate is based on the annual yield on the grant date of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury Bond the maturity of which equals the option’s expected life. The imputed option life is based on the simplified expected term calculation permitted by the SEC, which defines the expected life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted-average vesting period for all option tranches. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s historical dividend yield, exclusive of capital gain dividends.

For Fiscal 2014, compensation expense related to stock options granted amounted to $16,000. At October 31, 2014, there was approximately $454,000 of unrecognized compensation cost relating to outstanding non-vested stock options to be recognized over a vesting period of approximately five (5) years.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at October 31, 2014 was $12,300.

Note 13- Deferred fee plan:

During fiscal 2001, the Board adopted a deferred fee plan for its officers and trustees, which was amended and restated in fiscal 2009 to make the deferred fee plan compliant with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Deferred Fee Plan"). Pursuant to the Deferred Fee Plan, any officer or trustee may elect to defer receipt of any fees that would be due them. These fees include annual retainer and meeting attendance fees as determined by the full Board of Trustees. FREIT has agreed to pay any participant (the "Participant") in the Deferred Fee Plan interest on any deferred fee at 9% per annum, compounded quarterly. Any such deferred fee is to be paid to the Participants at the later of: (i) the retirement age specified in the deferral election; (ii) actual retirement; or (iii) upon cessation of a Participant's duties as an officer or trustee.

The Deferred Fee Plan provides that any such deferral fee will be paid in a lump sum or in annual installments over a period not to exceed 10 years, at the election of the Participant. Trustee fee expense (including interest) for each of the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $1,204,000, $1,101,000, and $1,045,000, respectively. As of October 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $5,163,000 and $4,703,000, respectively, of fees have been deferred together with accrued interest of approximately $3,854,000 and $3,110,000, respectively.

On September 4, 2014, the Board approved the following amendments to the FREIT Deferred Fee Plan, effective November 1, 2014, as follows:

(a) On a prospective basis, a change in the interest rate payable on deferred fees payable to FREIT Trustees from 9% per annum, compounded quarterly, to a floating rate, adjusted quarterly, equal to the average interest rate on ten year treasury bonds plus 150 basis points;

(b) On a prospective basis, allowing for the continued deferral of fees payable to FREIT Trustees, but not for the deferral of salaries payable to Executive Officers of FREIT;

(c) To provide for the issuance of share units payable in FREIT shares in respect of (i) deferred amounts of fees on a prospective basis; (ii) interest on fees deferred prior to November 1, 2014; and (iii) dividends payable in respect of share units allocated to participants in the Deferred Fee Plan as a result of the deferrals described in subparagraphs (c)(i) and (c)(ii) above. The number of share units will be determined by the closing price of FREIT shares on the date of the deferral. The number of share units will be converted into an equivalent number of FREIT shares upon distribution to the participant on a future date designated by the participant.

59

Note 14- Dividends and earnings per share:

FREIT declared dividends of $8,276,000 ($1.20 per share), $10,830,000 ($1.56 per share) and $7,637,000 ($1.10 per share) to shareholders of record during Fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to common equity by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is similar to that of basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares which would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive shares, such as those issuable upon the exercise of stock options had been issued during the period, after utilizing the exercise proceeds to repurchase outstanding shares at the average market price during the period under the Treasury Stock method.

For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, no options or other potentially diluted shares were outstanding. On September 4, 2014, a total of 246,000 non-qualified stock options were granted and outstanding at October 31, 2014. (See Note 12.)

For fiscal 2014, outstanding stock options were anti-dilutive, since the exercise price was higher than the average market price for FREIT shares during the period the options were outstanding.

Note 15- Segment information:

ASC 280-10, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", established standards for reporting financial information about operating segments in interim and annual financial reports and provides for a "management approach" in identifying the reportable segments.

FREIT has determined that it has two reportable segments: commercial properties and residential properties. These reportable segments offer different types of space, have different types of tenants, and are managed separately because each requires different operating strategies and management expertise.

The commercial segment is comprised of ten (10) properties during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. The residential segment is comprised of seven (7) properties during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014, inclusive of the property acquired in fiscal 2014, and six (6) properties during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, exclusive of the residential properties sold in Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 which have been classified as discontinued operations.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1.

The chief operating decision-making group of FREIT's commercial segment, residential segment and corporate/other is comprised of the Board.

FREIT assesses and measures segment operating results based on net operating income ("NOI"). NOI is based on operating revenue and expenses directly associated with the operations of the real estate properties, but excludes: deferred rents (straight lining), depreciation, financing costs, amortization of acquired lease values and other items. NOI is not a measure of operating results or cash flows from operating activities as measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.

60

Continuing real estate rental revenue, operating expenses, NOI and recurring capital improvements for the reportable segments are summarized below and reconciled to consolidated net income attributable to common equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2014. Asset information is not reported since FREIT does not use this measure to assess performance.

	Years Ended October 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(In Thousands of Dollars)
Real estate rental revenue:
Commercial	$	22,424		$	22,876		$	23,383
Residential		20,419			18,497			18,680
Totals		42,843			41,373			42,063
Real estate operating expenses:
Commercial		9,663			9,235			9,526
Residential		9,757			8,892			8,442
Totals		19,420			18,127			17,968
Net operating income:
Commercial		12,761			13,641			13,857
Residential		10,662			9,605			10,238
Totals	$	23,423		$	23,246		$	24,095
Recurring capital improvements-
residential	$	(549	)	$	(681	)	$	(697	)
Reconciliation to consolidated net
income-common equity:
Segment NOI	$	23,423		$	23,246		$	24,095
Deferred rents - straight lining		(93	)		(12	)		17
Amortization of acquired above and below
market value leases		(21	)		(24	)		(2	)
Net investment income		184			191			173
General and administrative expenses		(1,396	)		(1,623	)		(1,624	)
G-Mart lease termination expenses		(371	)		—			—
Acquisition costs-Regency		(648	)		—			—
Depreciation		(6,346	)		(6,233	)		(6,171	)
Deferred project cost write-off, net of
income relating to early lease termination		—			—			(776	)
Financing costs		(11,309	)		(11,945	)		(11,704	)
Income from continuing operations		3,423			3,600			4,008
Income from discontinued operation		7			797			460
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		8,734			3,545			7,528	(a)
Net income		12,164			7,942			11,996
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries		(507	)		(493	)		(645	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	11,657		$	7,449		$	11,351

(a) Represents gain of $9,493 net of federal and state tax of $1,965.

Note 16- Share repurchases:

On December 4, 2013, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 24,400 FREIT shares. On December 17, 2013, FREIT repurchased 20,400 shares in a privately-negotiated transaction with an unaffiliated party for an aggregate purchase price of $357,000, or $17.50 per share.

On September 4, 2014, the Board authorized the repurchase of 100,572 FREIT shares held by the pension plan of Hekemian & Co., Inc., FREIT’s managing agent, for an aggregate cash purchase of $1,855,553 or $18.45 per share, which was the closing price of FREIT shares on September 3, 2014. The repurchase was undertaken in connection with the termination of the pension plan. Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FREIT, and Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a Trustee of FREIT, and members of their family are participants in the pension plan.

Note 17- Subsequent events:

On December 29, 2014, FREIT Regency, LLC closed on a $16.2 million mortgage loan with Provident Bank. The new loan bears a floating interest rate equal to 125 basis points over the BBA LIBOR and the loan will mature on December 15, 2024. In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, FREIT Regency, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.75% over the term of the loan. Proceeds from the loan will be used to pay-off the outstanding balance on FREIT’s credit line, and the remainder of the proceeds will be available to fund future capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.

61

Note 18- Selected quarterly financial data (unaudited):

The following summary represents the results of operations for each quarter for the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

2014:	Quarter Ended												Year
	January 31,			April 30,			July 31,			October 31,			October 31,
Revenue	$	10,572		$	10,632		$	10,433		$	10,793	(c)	$	42,430
Expenses		9,454			9,742			9,716	(b)		10,095	(d)		39,007
Income from continuing operations		1,118			890			717			698			3,423
Income from discontinued operations		8,700	(a)		41			—			—			8,741
Net income		9,818			931			717			698			12,164
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		(193	)		(98	)		(162	)		(54	)		(507	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	9,625		$	833		$	555		$	644		$	11,657
Basic & diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.13		$	0.11		$	0.08	(b)	$	0.10	(c)	$	0.42
Discontinued operations		1.26	(a)		0.01			—			—			1.27
Net income attributable to common equity	$	1.39		$	0.12		$	0.08		$	0.10		$	1.69
Dividends declared per share	$	0.30		$	0.30		$	0.30		$	0.30		$	1.20

(a) Represents gain on sale of discontinued operations of $8,734

(b) Includes $648 in expenses related to Regency acquisition ($0.09 per share)

(c) Includes $298 in straight-line rent expense related to G-Mart lease termination ($0.04 per share)

(d) Includes $73 in expenses related to G-Mart lease termination ($0.01 per share)

2013:	Quarter Ended												Year
	January 31,			April 30,			July 31,			October 31,			October 31,
Revenue	$	10,387		$	9,907		$	10,384		$	10,659		$	41,337
Expenses		9,417			9,403			9,339			9,578			37,737
Income from continuing operations		970			504			1,045			1,081			3,600
Income from discontinued operations		730	(a)		1,409	(b)		48			2,155	(c)		4,342
Net income		1,700			1,913			1,093			3,236			7,942
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		(229	)		(43	)		(182	)		(39	)		(493	)
Net income attributable to common equity	$	1,471		$	1,870		$	911		$	3,197		$	7,449
Basic earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.11		$	0.07		$	0.12		$	0.15		$	0.45
Discontinued operations		0.10	(a)		0.20	(b)		0.01			0.31	(c)		0.62
Net income attributable to common equity	$	0.21		$	0.27		$	0.13		$	0.46		$	1.07
Dividends declared per share	$	0.30		$	0.30		$	0.30		$	0.66		$	1.56

(a) Includes $720 reversal of income tax provision ($0.10 per share) (See Note 11)

(b) Includes gain on sale of discontinued operations of $1,377 ($0.20 per share)

(c) Includes gain on sale of discontinued operations of $2,168 ($0.31 per share)

62

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE XI – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

OCTOBER 31, 2014

(In Thousands of Dollars)

Column A	Column B		Column C				Column D								Column E						Column F		Column G	Column H	Column I
			Initial Cost				Costs Capitalized								Gross Amount at Which
			to Company				Subsequent to Acquisition								Carried at Close of Period
																									Life on
					Buildings												Buildings								Which De-
	Encum-				and					Improve-			Carrying				and				Accumulated		Date of	Date	preciation
Description	brances		Land		Improvements		Land			ments			Costs		Land		Improvements		Total (1)		Depreciation		Construction	Acquired	is Computed
Residential Properties:
Hammel Gardens, Maywood, NJ	$	8,374		312		728		—			1,272					312		2,000		2,312		1,564	1949	1972	7-40 years
Steuben Arms, River Edge, NJ		11,037		364		1,773		—			1,573					364		3,346		3,710		2,768	1966	1975	7-40 years
Berdan Court, Wayne, NJ		18,686		250		2,206		—			4,221					250		6,427		6,677		5,024	1964	1965	7-40 years
Westwood Hills, Westwood, NJ		21,974		3,849		11,546		—			2,674					3,849		14,220		18,069		7,671	1965-70	1994	7-40 years
Pierre Towers, Hackensack, NJ		31,198		8,390		37,486		19			7,932					8,409		45,418		53,827		12,281	1970	2004	7-40 years
Boulders - Rockaway, NJ		18,030		1,683		—		3,335			16,274					5,018		16,274		21,292		4,212	2005-2006	1963/1964	7-40 years
Regency Club - Middletown, NY		—		2,833		17,792		—			85					2,833		17,877		20,710		149	2003	2014	7-40 years
Retail Properties:
Damascus Shopping Center,
Damascus, MD		19,326		2,950		6,987		6,296			17,425					9,246		24,412		33,658		4,014	1960's	2003	15-39 years
Franklin Crossing, Franklin Lakes, NJ		—		29		—		3,382			7,999					3,411		7,999		11,410		3,756	1963/75/97	1966	10-50 years
Glen Rock, NJ		—		12		36		—			213					12		249		261		204	1940	1962	10-31.5 years
Pathmark Super Center,
Patchogue, NY		5,376		2,128		8,818		—			(21	)				2,128		8,797		10,925		3,773	1997	1997	39 years
Westridge Square S/C, Frederick, MD		22,000		9,135		19,159		(1	)		4,196					9,134		23,355		32,489		15,292	1986	1992	15-31.5 years
Westwood Plaza, Westwood, NJ		21,884		6,889		6,416		—			2,487					6,889		8,903		15,792		7,417	1981	1988	15-31.5 years
Preakness S/C, Wayne, NJ		25,978		9,280		24,217		—			1,685					9,280		25,902		35,182		8,524	1955/89/00	2002	15-31.5 years
The Rotunda, Baltimore, MD		42,689		16,263		14,634		232			53,525					16,495		68,159		84,654		4,682	1920	2005	40 years
Land Leased:
Rockaway, NJ		—		114		—		51			—					165		—		165		—		1963/1964
Rochelle Park, NJ		—		1,640		905		—			—					1,640		905		2,545		238		2007
Vacant Land:								`
Franklin Lakes, NJ		—		224		—		(156	)		—					68		—		68		—		1966/93
Wayne, NJ		—		286		—					—					286		—		286		—		2002
	$	246,552	$	66,631	$	152,703	$	13,158		$	121,540		$	—	$	79,789	$	274,243	$	354,032	$	81,569

(1) Total cost for each property is the same for Federal income tax purposes, with the exception of Pierre Towers, Preakness S/C, The Rotunda and the Regency Club whose cost for Federal income tax purposes is approximately $40.9 million, $35.4 million, $71.6 million and $12.6 million, respectively.

63

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE XI - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

(In Thousands of Dollars)

Reconciliation of Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation:

	2014			2013			2012
Real estate:
Balance, Beginning of year	$	292,769		$	283,703		$	285,137
Additions:
Buildings and improvements		62,340			9,903			4,267
Deferred project cost write-off		—			—			(3,726	)
Sale of discontinued operation		(1,077	)		(837	)		(1,975	)
Balance, end of year	$	354,032		$	292,769		$	283,703
Accumulated depreciation:
Balance, beginning of year	$	75,226		$	69,619		$	64,976
Additions - Charged to operating expenses		6,346			6,244			6,215
Sale of discontinued operation		—			(631	)		(1,561	)
Adjustments/Deletions		(3	)		(6	)		(11	)
Balance, end of year	$	81,569		$	75,226		$	69,619

64

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY (“FREIT”)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.
3.1	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of FREIT. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to FREIT’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2008)
3.2	Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated May 31, 1994. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014.)
3.3	Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated September 10, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014.)
3.4	Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated January 21, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014.)
3.5	Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated May 15, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014.)
3.6	Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated March 4, 2008. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014.)
3.7	Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated December 4, 2013. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014.)
4	Form of Specimen Share Certificate, Beneficial Interest in FREIT. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to FREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1998)
10.1	Management Agreement dated April 10, 2002, by and between FREIT and Hekemian & Co., Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2010)
10.2	Indemnification Agreements by Damascus 100, LLC and Rotunda 100, LLC to FREIT. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2, respectively, to FREIT’s 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 and filed with the SEC on June 9, 2008)
10.3	Notes to Hekemian employees relative to their investments in each of Grande Rotunda, LLC and Damascus Centre, LLC and the related documents (pledge and security agreements and amendments).  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.3 and 10.4, respectively, to FREIT’s 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 and filed with the SEC on June 9, 2008)
10.4	Agency Agreement dated August 13, 2008 between Damascus Centre, LLC and Hekemian Development Resources, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to FREIT’s 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 and filed with the SEC on September 9, 2008)
10.5	Agency Agreement dated November 10, 2009 between Grande Rotunda, LLC and Hekemian Development Resources, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to FREIT’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 and filed with the SEC on June 9, 2010)
10.6	Amendment No. 1 to Agency Agreement dated as of July 24, 2012 between Grande Rotunda, LLC and Hekemian Resources Development, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014)
10.7	Line of Credit Note in the principal amount of $18 million executed by FREIT as Borrower, and delivered to The Provident Bank, as Lender, in connection with the Credit Facility provided by The Provident Bank to FREIT. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to FREIT’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 and filed with the SEC on January 14, 2010.)
10.8	Amended and Restated Deferred Fee Plan, adopted as of October 31, 2014

65

21	Subsidiaries of FREIT
22	Consent of EisnerAmper LLP
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) - Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) - Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101	The following materials from FREIT’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) consolidated balance sheets; (ii) consolidated statements of income; (iii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income; (iv) consolidated statements of equity; (v) consolidated statements of cash flows; and (vi) notes to consolidated financial statements.

66

EXHIBIT 10.8

AMENDED AND RESTATED DEFERRED FEE PLAN

ARTICLE I
BACKGROUND, PURPOSE AND EFFECTIVE DATE

Section 1.1            Background and Purpose of the Plan, Certain Definitions.

First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey, a New Jersey business trust (the “Trust”), has established the Amended and Restated Officers and/or Trustees Deferred Fee Plan (the “Plan”) to allow its Trustees the opportunity to defer payment of all or a portion of the fees they receive for serving as an Officer and/or Trustee of the Trust.

Section 1.2            Effective Date and Term.

The Plan was established and became effective as of November 1, 2000, and was initially restated effective December 31, 2008 to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), and as such the Plan should be interpreted and construed consistent with this intent. The Plan is amended and restated herein effective October 31, 2014. The Plan shall remain in effect until otherwise amended or terminated by the Board of Trustees of the Trust. The Plan, as herein amended and restated, shall be deemed adopted and approved by the Board of Trustees of the Trust as of, and the effective date of the Plan, as herein amended and restated, shall be, October 31, 2014 (the “Effective Date”).

ARTICLE II
CONTRIBUTIONS; RESERVATION OF SHARES

Section 2.1            Deferred Fees.

During the period in which this Plan remains in effect, the Trust shall credit to the Cash Account, as hereinafter defined, of any Trustee who elects to participate in this Plan (a “Participant”), the amount of future fees for service as a Trustee of the Trust that such Participant elects in writing (on a “Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form” provided by the Trust) to defer (hereinafter “Deferred Fees”). On and after the Effective Date, all amounts previously deferred by a Participant prior to the Effective Date, including, without limitation, amounts deferred for services as a Trustee or as an Officer of the Trust, shall be credited to the Participant’s Cash Account (a Participant’s “Transferred Balance”). For the purpose of clarity, the Transferred Balance of a Participant who served as an Officer of the Trust prior to the Effective Date may include deferrals of compensation payable to such Participant for services as an Officer of the Trust; however, from and after the Effective Date, any Participant who is also an Officer of the Trust shall not be permitted to defer under this Plan any amounts paid or payable to such Participant as compensation for services as an Officer of the Trust. Each Trustee of the Trust can elect to defer all or a portion of his or her annual fees and/or his or her meeting fees. Elections to defer shall be made prior to the calendar year for which they are effective, which election shall include an election as to when the Participant’s benefits under the Plan shall commence. A Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form setting forth the election to defer must be delivered to the Trust on or before the December 31 of the calendar year preceding the calendar year to which the election relates. An election to defer as set forth in the Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form shall be irrevocable with respect to the calendar year in which it applies, and shall be effective only for that calendar year. A Participant who wishes to defer all or a portion of his or her annual fees and/or meeting fees for any successive calendar year must make a new election pursuant to a Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form for each successive year in accordance with this Section 2.1 except to the extent set forth in the next sentence. In the event a Participant has elected an in-service distribution date on a prior year’s Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form and fails to file a new Deferral of Fees and Election Form for the current deferral period so that the previously elected in-service distribution date is then twenty-four (24) months or less from the current deferral period, the Participant will be deemed to have filed a new Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form for the current deferral period to have the amounts deferred for such period paid to him or her at retirement. The crediting of the amounts deferred under this Plan shall be made on the date on which such amounts would otherwise have been paid to the Participant.

67

Section 2.2            Reservation of Shares. There shall be reserved for issuance under this Plan an indeterminate number of shares of the Trust’s beneficial interest (“Common Shares”) to allow for the issuance of Common Shares to Participants with respect to the Share Units (as hereinafter defined) credited to the Participants’ Share Unit Accounts (as hereinafter defined) from time to time as specified in the Participants’ Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Forms.

ARTICLE III
ACCOUNTS AND MAINTENANCE

Section 3.1            Accounts.

(a)          Cash Account. The Trust shall maintain for each Participant an account to which it shall credit all amounts allocated thereto in accordance with Section 2.1 (the “Cash Accounts”). Each Cash Account shall be credited with interest on the amount in such account at a rate equal to a floating rate, adjusted quarterly, equal to the average interest rate on ten year Treasury bonds plus 150 basis points, credited in arrears.

(b)          Share Unit Account. From and after the Effective Date, on the last day of each calendar quarter, the aggregate amount of deferred fees pursuant to Section 2.1, but not the amount of a Participant’s Transferred Balance, and the interest accrued on each Cash Account (the “Conversion Balance”), shall be converted into share units (“Share Units”) equivalent to Common Shares. A Participant’s Transferred Balance shall not be converted into Share Units and shall remain in cash in the Participant’s Cash Account. Such conversion of the Conversion Balance shall be determined by dividing the aggregate amount to be converted on the last day of each calendar quarter by the Fair Market Value of one Common Share on the immediately preceding trading day. The Trust shall maintain for each Participant an account to which the Trust shall allocate the number of Share Units for full Common Shares so determined (the “Share Unit Account”), and the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Share Units so allocated shall be charged to such Participant’s Cash Account to reduce the balance thereof, but not below the Participant’s Transferred Balance.

68

(c)          In the event that any cash dividend is paid by the Trust with respect to the Common Shares, each Participant’s Share Unit Account will be credited with a number of Share Units equal to (x) the amount of the cash dividend paid with respect to one Common Share, (y) multiplied by the total number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account as of the record date for such dividend, (z) divided by the Fair Market Value of one Common Share on the trading day immediately preceding the payment date of such dividend. In the event that any dividend is paid with respect to the Common Shares by the Trust in Common Shares, additional credits of Share Units shall be made to a Participant’s Share Unit Account equal to the number of full Common Shares that the Participant would have received had he or she been the owner, on the record date for such dividend, of a number of Common Shares equal to the number of Share Units in his or her Share Unit Account on such date. The Share Units credited to a Participant’s Share Unit Account, together with the balance of a Participant’s Cash Account, shall be collectively referred to herein as a Participant’s “Plan Benefits.”

(d)          Rights with Respect to Share Units. A Participant shall not have any rights as a shareholder (including, without limitation, the right to vote on any matter subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Trust) with respect to the Share Units credited to his or her Share Unit Account, except the right to receive credits for dividends paid with respect to the Common Shares as described in Section 3.1(b) above, nor shall a Participant have the right to transfer or otherwise dispose of any Share Units, until such time as such Share Units are issued to the Participant as Common Shares pursuant to the terms of this Plan.

(e)          Neither a Cash Account nor a Share Unit Account constitutes a trust fund or escrow. No funds or Common Shares shall be set aside or earmarked for any Cash Account or Share Unit Account, and such accounts shall be solely bookkeeping devices.

Section 3.2            Vesting.

At all times a Participant shall have a 100% nonforfeitable right to the amounts credited to his or her Cash Account and the Common Shares credited as Share Units to his or her Share Unit Account, provided that neither a Participant nor his or her Beneficiary shall be entitled to receive any amount in the Participant’s Cash Account or any Common Shares credited as Share Units to the Participant’s Share Unit Account if it is determined at any time that such Participant engaged in a dishonest act in the Participant’s relationship with the Trust, in the sole discretion of the Board of Trustees of the Trust.

ARTICLE IV
BENEFITS

Section 4.1            Payment of Benefits.

(a)          Payment At Retirement Age Election. At the time of entering into a deferral election, a Participant may elect to receive his or her Plan Benefits either at the retirement age specified by the Participant in his or her Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form, or actual retirement, whichever occurs earlier (the “Payment Date”). On the Payment Date, (i) the Conversion Balance shall be converted using the Fair Market Value of the Common Shares on the immediately preceding trading day, and the resulting Share Units shall be credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account, (ii) the remaining balance of the Participant’s Cash Account after such conversion (and reduction) shall be paid to the Participant in a lump sum, or in a number of substantially equal annual installments (not to exceed 10), as elected by a Participant at the same time and in the same manner as the election to defer is made pursuant to Section 2.1 on the Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form, and (iii) the Trust shall issue to the Participant a number of Common Shares equal to the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account as of the Payment Date, including the Share Units credited to the Share Unit Account pursuant to clause (i) of this Section 4.1(a).

69

(b)          Special Rule for Participants Who are Officers. A Participant who is an Officer of the Trust who retires as an Officer on the last day of the Trust’s fiscal year shall receive payment of any Plan Benefits that such Participant is otherwise entitled to receive during the fiscal year in which retirement occurs, in the following fiscal year, notwithstanding the payment election made by such Participant. A Participant who is an Officer of the Trust who retires as an Officer prior to the last day of the Trust’s fiscal year shall be entitled to receive payment of his or her Plan Benefits in the same fiscal year during which the Participant retires in accordance with the Participant’s payment election.

(c)          Payment Upon Cessation of Service as a Trustee Election. Following a Participant’s cessation of service as a Trustee for any reason prior to retirement (as set forth in Section 4.1(a) above) or death (the date of which shall be referred to as the “Date of Cessation”), (i) the Conversion Balance shall be converted into Share Units using the Fair Market Value of the Common Shares on the trading day immediately preceding the Date of Cessation, and the resulting Share Units shall be credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account, (ii) the Trust shall pay to the Participant the remaining balance of the Participant’s Cash Account (after the reduction of the balance thereof as a result of the conversion described in clause (i) above), either in a lump sum, or in a number of substantially equal annual installments (not to exceed 10), as elected by a Participant at the same time and in the same manner as the election to defer is made pursuant to Section 2.1 on the Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form, and (iii) the Trust shall issue to the Participant a number of Common Shares equal to the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account as of the Date of Cessation.

(d)          In-Service Distributions Payment Election. At the time of entering into a deferral election, a Participant may elect to receive all or a part of his or her Plan Benefits as an in-service distribution at some designated time in the future, provided that the in-service distribution date shall be no earlier than the January 1^st of the calendar year that is at least two (2) years following the year for which the deferral election is made. Deferred Fees for which a specific in-service distribution year (“In-Service Distribution Year”) is elected shall be allocated to a Cash Account that will be maintained separately from the Cash Account maintained under (a) or (c) above, and Share Units credited to the Participant with respect to the Conversion Balance shall be credited to a Share Unit Account that will be maintained separately from the Share Unit Account maintained under (a) or (c) above. If amounts are deferred in two (2) or more separate calendar years but are designated for distribution in the same In-Service Distribution Year, then such amounts shall be allocated to the same Cash Account. Upon attainment of the In-Service Distribution Year, Plan Benefits designated for the in-service distribution shall be paid to the Participant as follows: (i) the Conversion Balance designated for such In-Service Distribution Year shall be converted using the Fair Market Value of the Common Share on the last trading day of the In-Service Distribution Year, and the resulting Share Units shall be credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account, (ii) the remaining balance of the Cash Account designated for such In-Service Distribution Year shall be paid to the Participant, either in a lump sum (after the reduction of the balance thereof as a result of the conversion described in clause (i) above, if any), or in a number of substantially equal annual installments (not to exceed 10), as elected by a Participant at the same time and in the same manner as the election to defer is made pursuant to Section 2.1 on the Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form, and (iii) the Trust shall issue to the Participant a number of Common Shares equal to the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account designated for such In-Service Distribution Year.

70

(e)          Payment on a Change in Control Election. A Participant may also elect that all of the amounts then allocated to the Participant’s Cash Account(s) and Share Unit Account(s) be distributable to the Participant upon a Change in Control of the Trust. The existence of a Change in Control event shall be determined by the Committee in accordance with Section 409A of the Code and the guidance and Regulations issued thereunder.

(f)          Benefit Payment Restrictions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the time or schedule of any payment or amount scheduled to be paid pursuant to the terms of this Plan may not be modified except as otherwise permitted under Section 409A of the Code and the guidance and Regulations issued thereunder. In addition, if applicable, and to the extent required under Section 409A of the Code (and the guidance and Regulations issued thereunder), no payment shall be made to a Participant if he or she is a specified employee/key employee (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and Regulation Section 1.409A-1(i)) sooner than six (6) months after the date of his or her separation from service with the Trust (within the meaning of Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h)).

(g)          Change in Payment Election. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section 4.1 to the contrary, a Participant may subsequently elect, in such form and manner as prescribed by the Committee, that the benefits credited to one or more of his or her Cash Account(s) and Share Unit Account(s) be distributed commencing on a date later than that originally selected, provided that any such election is modified at least twelve (12) months (and more than one calendar year) prior to (i) the date payments would otherwise commence; (ii) the Participant is still a member of the Board of the Trust; and (iii) the length of the postponement be for at least an additional five (5) years from the date the payment otherwise would have been paid.

Section 4.2            Upon Death.

(a)          Prior to Commencement of Payment of the Benefit. In the event of a Participant’s death prior to the commencement of payment of the Plan Benefits under Section 4.1, the Trust shall pay the Plan Benefit to the Participant’s Beneficiary, in a lump sum payment or in that number of substantially equal annual payments (not to exceed 10) as elected by the Participant at the same time and in the same manner as the election to defer is made pursuant to Section 2.1 in the Participant’s Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form. The Survivor Benefit shall be payable at the time specified in the Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form.

71

(b)          After Commencement of Payment of the Benefit. In the event of the death of a Participant after commencement of the Payment of the Plan Benefit under Section 4.1, the Trust shall continue Payment of the remaining Plan Benefits to the Participant’s Beneficiary in the same manner and at the same times as if the Participant had not died.

Section 4.3            Unforeseeable Emergency.

(a)          In the case of an Unforeseeable Emergency, as defined below, a Participant may submit a written request to the Committee for (1) a distribution of all or a part of his or her Cash Account(s) and Share Unit Account(s) prior to the date benefits otherwise would be payable, or (2) an acceleration of the payment of installment payments which have already begun. Withdrawals or acceleration because of an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be permitted only to the extent reasonably necessary to satisfy the emergency.

(b)          An Unforeseeable Emergency is a severe financial hardship resulting from extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of one or more recent events beyond the control of the Participant and as defined in Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(3). The need to send the Participant’s child to college or the desire to purchase a residence will not be considered Unforeseeable Emergencies. Withdrawals will not be permitted to the extent such emergency is or may be relieved: (a) through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise or (b) by liquidation of the Participant’s assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship.

Section 4.4            Distribution Upon Determination that the Participant is not Exempt Under ERISA.

If it is determined that the Participant is not a “management or highly compensated employee” within the meaning of Section 201(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), by a opinion of the United States Department of Labor, a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, or the reasonable opinion of the Trust’s counsel, the Trust shall cause an immediate distribution of the Participant’s Cash Account(s) and Share Unit Account(s) as if the Participant had attained the designated distribution date as elected on his or her Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form and that the method of distribution elected was in the form of a lump sum.

Section 4.5            Distribution Upon Determination of Taxability.

(a)          If it shall be determined that any Participant entitled to benefits under the Plan is subject to federal or state income taxes on benefits accruing to him or her under the Plan in a calendar year prior to the calendar year of his or her receipt of such benefits (pursuant to Section 409A of the Code or due to a change in the federal tax or revenue laws, a published ruling or similar announcement issued by the Internal Revenue Service, a Regulation issued by the Secretary of Treasury, a decision by a court of competent jurisdiction involving the Participant, or a closing agreement made pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code that is approved by the Internal Revenue Service and specifically involves the Participant, or with respect to state income taxation, any relevant state law, regulation, ruling, announcement, court decision or settlement agreement involving the Participant and the state taxing authority), then, within thirty (30) days after the Administrator has learned of the incidence of such taxation, the Trust shall cause a distribution to be made to the Participant from his or her Cash Account(s) and/or an issuance of Common Shares with respect to the Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account(s), in an amount equal to the maximum marginal individual federal and state income tax rate for the year of inclusion multiplied by an amount subject to such federal or state income taxation. If all or part of the distribution is to be made from a Participant’s Share Unit Account(s), the Trust shall issue to the Participant a number of Common Shares with a Fair Market Value on the trading day immediately preceding the date of such distribution equal to the amount of such distribution with a corresponding number of Share Units deducted from the Share Unit Account. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any such distribution and/or issuance shall not be made to a Participant subject to taxation unless he or she acknowledges to the Trust that such distribution and/or issuance will reduce/be taken from his or her Cash Account(s) and/or Share Unit Account(s), respectively.

72

(b)          The Trust may also accelerate the time or schedule of payments from a Participant’s Cash Account(s) and/or issuances of Common Shares with respect to the Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account(s), to pay the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (“FICA”) tax imposed under Sections 3101, 3121(a) or 3121(v)(2) of the Code or to pay the income tax at the source on wages imposed under Section 3401 of the Code or the corresponding withholding provisions of applicable state law. If the time or schedule of issuances of Common Shares with respect to a Participant’s Share Unit Account is to be accelerated, the acceleration shall relate to issuances of Common Shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value on the trading day immediately preceding the date of such acceleration equal to the amount of the FICA tax so imposed, and a corresponding number of Share Units shall be deducted from the Share Unit Account. Notwithstanding the above, the total payment from a Participant’s Cash Account(s) and/or issuance of Common Shares with respect to the Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Unit Account(s) under this subparagraph may not exceed the aggregate FICA amount and the income tax withholding related to the FICA amounts. Notwithstanding the above, any such distribution and/or issuance shall not be made unless the Participant acknowledges to the Trust that such distribution and/or issuance will reduce/be taken from his or her Cash Account(s) and/or Share Unit Account(s), respectively.

ARTICLE V
ADMINISTRATION

Section 5.1            Administrator.

The Plan shall be administered by the Board of Trustees of the Trust or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees (hereinafter, in either case, the “Administrator”). The Administrator shall be authorized to interpret the Plan and to make decisions regarding any questions arising thereunder. Any such interpretation or decision of the Administrator shall, unless overruled or modified by the Board of Trustees, be final, conclusive and binding upon all Participants and upon any person claiming benefits or rights under the Plan by or through any such individual. No member of the Board of Trustees or Compensation Committee serving as the Administrator shall be entitled to act on or decide any matter relating solely to himself or herself or any of his or her rights or benefits under the Plan. The Administrator may, in its discretion, designate a person or persons to carry out such duties or functions as the Administrator determines. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, if the Administrator is the Compensation Committee, any duty or function which may be performed by the Compensation Committee may instead be performed by the Board of Trustees if the Board of Trustees so determines in its sole discretion.

73

Section 5.2            Plan Intent and Interpretation.

The Plan is intended to be, to the maximum extent possible and permitted under applicable laws, an unfunded non-qualified benefit plan maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for management/highly compensated employees, as contemplated by Sections 201(2), 301(a)(3) and 401(a)(1) of ERISA. The Plan is not intended to comply with the requirements of Section 401(a) of the Code or to be subject to parts 2, 3 and 4 of Title I of ERISA. The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator so as to effectuate this intent. Furthermore, the Plan is intended to be a non-qualified deferred compensation plan as described in Section 409A of the Code and it is intended that it shall be operated, administered and construed to give effect to such intent.

ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENT, SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION

Section 6.1            Amendment, Suspension or Termination.

The Board of Trustees of the Trust may amend, suspend or terminate this Plan, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time by resolution adopted at a regular or special meeting of such Board, and only in such manner. Notwithstanding the above, the Trust reserves the right to amend this Plan at any time to comply with Section 409A of the Code and the guidance and Regulations issued thereunder or for any other purpose, provided that such amendment will not result in taxation to or of any Participant under Section 409A of the Code. The Trust also reserves the right to terminate the Plan at any time to comply with Section 409A of the Code if it is terminating all of the Trust’s like kind plans pursuant to Regulation Section 1.409A-1(c)(2).

Section 6.2            No Reduction.

No amendment, suspension or termination shall operate to adversely affect the existing Plan Benefits accrued for any Participant who is in service or the Plan Benefits otherwise available to a Participant if the Participant had ceased to be an Officer and/or Trustee as of the effective date of such amendment, suspension, or termination. Any Plan Benefits determined as of such date shall continue to be payable as provided in Article IV.

ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Section 7.1            Beneficiary.

“Beneficiary” shall mean any one or more persons, corporations or trusts, or any combination thereof, last designated by a Participant to receive the Plan Benefits provided under this Plan. Any designation made hereunder shall be revocable, shall be in writing either on a facsimile of the form annexed hereto as Schedule 1 or in a written instrument containing the information requested in Schedule 1, and shall be effective when delivered to the Trust at its principal office. If the Trust in its sole discretion determines that there is not a valid designation, the Beneficiary shall be the executor or administrator of the Participant’s estate.

74

Section 7.2            Nonassignability.

The interest of any person under this Plan (other than the Trust) shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, attachment or encumbrance, or the claims of creditors of such person, and any attempt to effectuate any such actions shall be void.

Section 7.3            Interest of Participant.

(a)          A Participant and any Beneficiary shall be, in respect to the Cash Account(s), Share Unit Account(s) and any Plan Benefits to be paid, and shall remain, simply a general unsecured creditor of the Trust in the same manner as any other creditor having a general claim for compensation, if and when the Participant’s or Beneficiary’s rights to receive the Plan Benefits shall mature and become payable. As such, the Trust’s obligation to a Participant and his or her Beneficiary under this Plan shall be a general unsecured contractual obligation of the Trust and neither the Participant nor his or her Beneficiary shall have at any time any right, title or interest, legal or equitable, security lien or other proprietary interest in or to any asset of the Trust, including, but not limited to, any amounts credited to the Cash Account(s) and the shares of Common Share credited as Share Units to the Share Unit Account(s).

(b)          Unfunded Plan. For purposes of the Code and ERISA, this Plan shall be considered unfunded. Accordingly, any Plan Benefits to be provided under this Plan are unfunded obligations of the Trust. Any payment under this Plan shall be made from the general funds of the Trust and nothing in this Plan shall require the Trust to segregate any monies from its general funds, to create any trust, or to make any special deposits, or to purchase any policies of insurance or other investment vehicles with respect to such obligations. If the Trust elects to purchase individual policies of insurance on any Participant or segregate funds to invest in other investment vehicles to help finance any of the obligations under the Plan, such policies and/or investment vehicles and the proceeds therefrom shall, at all times remain the sole property of the Trust, and neither the Participants or their Beneficiaries shall have any ownership rights to such policies of insurance or other investment vehicles.

Each Participant entitled to Plan Benefits has the status of a general unsecured creditor of the Trust and this Plan constitutes a mere promise by the Trust to make benefit payments in the future. If the Trust should transfer to a trust any assets which could in the future be used to pay Plan Benefits, such trust created by the Trust and any assets held by the trust to assist the Trust in meeting its obligations under this Plan will conform to the terms of the model trust described in Revenue Procedure 92-64. Except with respect to transfers to such a trust, if applicable, no provisions shall at anytime be made with respect to segregating assets of the Trust for payment of Benefit Payments under the Plan. In addition, nothing contained in this Plan shall constitute a guaranty by the Trust or any other entity or individual that the Trust’s assets will be sufficient to pay benefits under this Plan.

75

Section 7.4            Withholding.

The Trust shall have the right to deduct or withhold from the Plan Benefits paid under this Plan all taxes which may be required to be deducted or withheld under any provision of law (including, but not limited to, FICA Tax payments, income tax withholding and any other deduction or withholding required by law) now in effect or which may become effective any time during the term of this Plan.

Section 7.5            Exclusivity of Plan.

This Plan is intended solely for the purpose of deferring fees to the Participants to the mutual advantage of the parties. Nothing contained in this Plan shall in any way affect or interfere with the right of a Participant to participate in any other benefit plan in which he or she may be entitled to participate.

Section 7.6            No Right to Continued Service.

This Plan shall not confer any right to continued service on a Participant of the Trust.

Section 7.7            Notice.

Each notice and other communication to be given pursuant to this Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed given only when (a) delivered by hand, (b) transmitted by facsimile (provided that a copy is sent at approximately the same time by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested), (c) received by the addressee, if sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or (d) by Express Mail, Federal Express or other overnight delivery service, to the Trust at its principal office and to a Participant at the last known address of such Participant (or to such other address or facsimile number as a party may specify by notice given to the other party pursuant to this Section).

Section 7.8            Compliance with Code.

The Participants and the Trust intend that this Plan, in form and operation, comply with Section 409A of the Code and the Regulations issued thereunder. The Trust and the Administrator will at all times interpret the Plan’s terms in a manner which is consistent with all applicable laws and Regulations; however, as required under Regulation Section 1.409A-1(c)(1), the interpretation of the Plan does not permit the deletion of material terms which are expressly contrary to Section 409A of the Code and the Regulations issued thereunder and also does not permit the addition of missing terms necessary to comply thereunder. Such deletion or addition may be accomplished only in the form of a Plan amendment in accordance with Section 6.1 of the Plan.

Section 7.9            New Jersey Law Controlling.

This Plan shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey.

76

Section 7.10            Binding on Successors.

This Plan shall be binding upon the Participants and the Trust, and their heirs, successors, legal representatives and assigns.

77

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY

_____________________

Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form

_____________________

Name:

Address:

Telephone (daytime):

Social Security Number:

I. Deferral of Fees Election:

I elect to defer the following fees in the following amounts or percentages:

TYPE OF FEE	AMOUNT OR PERCENTAGE DEFERRED
Trustee’s annual fee
Trustee’s meeting fee
Date of this election: __________________

78

II.          Benefit Payment Elections:

With respect to the fees deferred pursuant to my Deferral of Fees dated ______________, I _________________________, hereby elect to have my Plan Benefit commence and the form of Plan Benefit payment to be as follows (Complete 1 or 2 plus 3 and 4):

1.            (a)          Retirement Benefit.

I elect to receive my Plan Benefits as follows:

Benefit to commence:          At retirement age of _____, or actual retirement, if later.

Benefit to be paid: (check one) [___] Lump sum          [___] Installments over ___ years (not to exceed 10).

               (b)          Termination of Benefit

If my service as a trustee of the Trust ceases before I am eligible to retire, I elect to receive my benefit as follows:

Benefit to commence:          [___] At termination          [___] At the retirement age set forth above.

Benefit to be paid: (check one) [___] Lump sum          [___] Installments over ___ years (not to exceed 10).

2. In-Service Distribution

I elect to receive my Plan benefits during service as follows:

Benefit to commence in ___ calendar years (must be at least 2 calendar years after the year for which deferrals are made).

Benefit to be paid: (check one) [___] Lump sum          [___] Installments over ___ years (not to exceed 10).

3. Survivor Benefit

If my death occurs prior to commencement of my retirement benefits, I elect to have survivor benefits paid as follows:

Benefit to commence:          [___] Immediately          [___] When it would have been otherwise paid to me as elected above.

I designate the following as my beneficiary: ___________________________________

79

4. Change in Control

If a Change in Control occurs, I elect to receive my Plan Benefits as follows:

Benefit to commence:          [___] Immediately          [___] When it would have been otherwise paid to me as elected above.

Benefit to be paid:          [___] Lump sum          [___] Installments over ___ years (not to exceed 10).

I understand that if I defer the date at which a Plan Benefit is to commence, the change shall supersede the date of payment herein selected. Any such change must be made on forms provided by the Company and must be made at least twelve (12) months (and more than one calendar year) prior to the date payments would otherwise commence (and the Change must defer Plan Benefit Payment no less than five (5) years from the date Plan Benefits were originally scheduled to commence.

Trustee’s Signature: ______________________

Received by: (Signature): ________________________________

Date: ___________________ Title: _______________________

80

FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY

_____________________

Change of Payment Election Form

_____________________

With respect to the fees deferred pursuant to my Deferral of Fees and Payment Election Form dated _____________, I, ________________, hereby elect to change the date at which my Plan Benefit is to commence as follows to a date which is at least five (5) years later than the date when any Plan Benefits were originally scheduled to commence:

1. Retirement Benefit

I elect to receive my Plan Benefits as follows:

Benefit to commence:          At retirement age of ___, or actual retirement, if later but in no event earlier than five (5) years from the date when the applicable Plan Benefits were originally scheduled to be paid.

2. In-Service Distribution

I elect to receive my Plan Benefit during service as follows:

Benefit to commence on a date in ___ calendar year (which is at least five (5) years later than the date originally selected for any In-Service Distribution Plan Benefits to commence.)

I understand that any change in the date at which a Plan Benefit is to commence shall supersede the date of payment previously selected, provided it is made at least twelve (12) months (and more than one calendar year) prior to the date payments would otherwise commence and the change must defer the payment date of any Plan Benefits at least five (5) years from the date on which any Plan Benefits were originally scheduled to be paid.

Dated:          

 Trustee’s Signature: ____________________

81

EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Name	State of Formation and Organization	Trade Name
S And A Commercial Associates Limited Partnership	Maryland	None
Pierre Towers, LLC *	New Jersey	Pierre Towers
Damascus Centre, LLC	New Jersey	Damascus Center
Damascus Second, LLC	Maryland	None
Westwood Hills, LLC	New Jersey	Westwood Hills
Wayne PSC, LLC	New Jersey	Preakness S/C
Grande Rotunda, LLC	New Jersey	The Rotunda
WestFREIT Corp	Maryland	Westridge Square
WestFredic LLC	Maryland	None
FREIT Regency, LLC	New Jersey	Regency Club

* Owned 100% by S And A Commercial Associates

82

EXHIBIT 22

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (No. 333-79555 and No. 333-142675) of our reports dated January 14, 2015, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2014, the financial statement schedule listed in index item 15(c), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP 

New York, New York

January 14, 2015

83

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert S. Hekemian, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 14, 2015	/s/ Robert S. Hekemian
	Robert S. Hekemian
	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

84

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald W. Barney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 14, 2015	/s/ Donald W. Barney
	Donald W. Barney
	President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

85

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2014 (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and,

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 14, 2015	/s/ Robert S. Hekemian
	Robert S. Hekemian
	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

86

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2014 (the “Report”), I, Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and,

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 14, 2015	/s/ Donald W. Barney
	Donald W. Barney
	President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

87