XML 20 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Note 20
9 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
                20.  ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, provides a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair-value measurements and establishes a fair-value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value summarized as follows:

Level 1                      Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2                      Fair value determined using significant other observable inputs.

Level 3                      Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs.

Our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

(In thousands)
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Fair Value at
July 31, 2011
   
Fair Value at
October 31, 2010
 
               
Mortgage loans held for sale (1)
Level 2
  $ 53,711     $ 86,501  
Interest rate lock commitments
Level 2
    314       79  
Forward contracts
Level 2
    (827 )     (254 )
      $ 53,198     $ 86,326  

(1)  The aggregate unpaid principal balance was $51.2 million and $84.1 million at July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, respectively.

We elected the fair value option for our loans held for sale for mortgage loans originated subsequent to October 31, 2008 in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments”, which permits us to measure financial instruments at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis.  Management believes that the election of the fair value option for loans held for sale improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.  In addition, the fair value of servicing rights is included in the Company’s loans held for sale as of July 31, 2011.  Fair value of the servicing rights is determined based on values in the Company’s servicing sales contracts.  Fair value of loans held for sale is based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics.

For the financial instruments measured at fair value, gains and losses from initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in the Financial Services segment’s earnings (loss).  The changes in fair values that are included in earnings (loss) are shown, by financial instrument and financial statement line item, below:

   
Three Months Ended July 31, 2011
 
(In thousands)
 
Loans Held
For Sale
   
Mortgage Loan Commitments
   
Forward Contracts
 
                   
Increase (decrease) in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues
  $ 11     $ (72 )   $ 186  

   
Three Months Ended July 31, 2010
 
(In thousands)
 
Loans Held
For Sale
   
Mortgage Loan Commitments
   
Forward Contracts
 
                   
Increase (decrease)  in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues
  $ 1,088     $ 122     $ (565 )

   
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2011
 
(In thousands)
 
Loans Held
For Sale
   
Interest Rate Lock Commitments
   
Forward Contracts
 
                   
(Decrease) increase in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues
  $ (369 )   $ 235     $ (573 )

   
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2010
 
(In thousands)
 
Loans Held
For Sale
   
Interest Rate Lock Commitments
   
Forward Contracts
 
                   
Increase (decrease) in fair value included in net income (loss), all reflected in financial services revenues
  $ 783     $ 198     $ (708 )

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are those assets for which the Company has recorded valuation adjustments and write-offs during the periods presented.  The assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are all within the Company’s Homebuilding operations and are summarized below:

Non-financial Assets

     
Three Months Ended
 
     
July 31, 2011
 
(In thousands)
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Pre-Impairment Amount
   
Total Losses
   
Fair Value
 
                     
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development
Level 3
  $ 14,827     $ (4,445 )   $ 10,382  
Land and land options held for future development or sale
Level 3
  $ 1,864     $ (689 )   $ 1,175  

     
Three Months Ended
 
     
July 31, 2010
 
(In thousands)
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Pre-Impairment Amount
   
Total Losses
   
Fair Value
 
                     
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development
Level 3
  $ 52,787     $ (27,428 )   $ 25,359  
Land and land options held for future development or sale
Level 3
  $ 29,434     $ (22,219 )   $ 7,215  

     
Nine Months Ended
 
     
July 31, 2011
 
(In thousands)
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Pre-Impairment Amount
   
Total Losses
   
Fair Value
 
                           
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development
Level 3
  $ 81,532     $ (18,472 )   $ 63,060  
Land and land options held for future development or sale
Level 3
  $ 45,294     $ (9,734 )   $ 35,560  

     
Nine Months Ended
 
     
July 31, 2010
 
(In thousands)
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Pre-Impairment Amount
   
Total Losses
   
Fair Value
 
                     
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development
Level 3
  $ 56,173     $ (28,817 )   $ 27,356  
Land and land options held for future development or sale
Level 3
  $ 35,063     $ (25,339 )   $ 9,724  

We record impairment losses on inventories related to communities under development and held for future development when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their related carrying amounts.  If the expected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, then the community is written down to its fair value.  We estimate the fair value of each impaired community by determining the present value of the estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the risk of the respective community.  For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, our discount rates used for the impairments recorded ranged from 17.5% to 19.8%.  Should the estimates or expectations used in determining cash flows or fair value decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may need to recognize additional impairments.

The Financial Services segment had a pipeline of loan applications in process of $263.5 million at July 31, 2011.  Loans in process for which interest rates were committed to the borrowers totaled approximately $42.7 million as of July 31, 2011.  Substantially all of these commitments were for periods of 60 days or less.  Since a portion of these commitments is expected to expire without being exercised by the borrowers, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Financial Services segment uses investor commitments and forward sales of mandatory mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) to hedge its mortgage-related interest rate exposure.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk.  Credit risk is managed by entering into MBS forward commitments, option contracts with investment banks, federally regulated bank affiliates and loan sales transactions with permanent investors meeting the segment’s credit standards.  The segment’s risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments and option contracts.  At July 31, 2011, the segment had open commitments amounting to $23.5 million to sell MBS with varying settlement dates through August 18, 2011, which have subsequently settled.

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, deposits and notes, accounts payable and other liabilities, customer deposits, mortgage loans held for sale, nonrecourse land and operating properties mortgages, letter of credit agreements and facilities, mortgage warehouse line of credit, accrued interest, and the senior secured, senior and senior subordinated notes payable.  The fair value of financial instruments is determined by reference to various market data and other valuation techniques, as appropriate.  The fair value of each of the senior secured, senior and senior subordinated notes is estimated based on recent trades for the same or similar issues or the quoted market prices on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturities.  The fair value of the senior secured, senior and senior subordinated notes is estimated at $750.0 million, $520.6 million and $7.3 million, respectively, as of July 31, 2011 and $830.7 million, $515.6 million and $113.6 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2010.  The fair value of our other financial instruments approximates their recorded values.