EX-99.1 8 dex991.htm RISK FACTORS RISK FACTORS

Exhibit 99.1

 

RISK FACTORS

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

We have a history of significant operating losses and expect these losses to continue in the future.

 

We have experienced significant operating losses each year since our inception and expect these losses to continue for the foreseeable future. We had a net loss of approximately $29,789,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and as of December 31, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $155,564,000. We had a net loss of approximately $34,017,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and, as of December 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $125,775,000. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, we had a net loss of approximately $10,090,000, and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, we had a net loss of approximately $5,847,000. The losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in research and development, including our clinical trials, and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. These costs have exceeded our revenues which to date have been generated principally from collaborations, government grants and sequencing services.

 

Prior to the merger, GeneSoft Pharmaceuticals, Inc., referred to as Genesoft, had a net loss of approximately $26,089,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and as of December 31, 2003, Genesoft had an accumulated deficit of approximately $91,381,000. Genesoft had a net loss of approximately $25,569,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and, as of December 31, 2002, Genesoft had an accumulated deficit of approximately $55,568,000. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, Genesoft had a net loss of approximately $18,321,000, and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, Genesoft had a net loss of approximately $7,921,000. The losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in research and development, including Genesoft’s clinical trials, and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. These costs have exceeded Genesoft’s revenues which to date have been generated principally from funding from the U.S. government.

 

We anticipate that we will incur additional losses in the current year and in future years and cannot predict when, if ever, we will achieve profitability. These losses are expected to increase in the current year as we will significantly increase our expenditures in the sales and marketing area to prepare for the commercial launch of FACTIVE tablets. We also plan to continue to expand our research and development and clinical trial activities. In addition, our partners’ product development efforts which utilize our genomic discoveries are at an early stage and, accordingly, we do not expect our losses to be substantially mitigated by revenues from milestone payments or royalties under those agreements for a number of years, if ever.

 

Our business will be very dependent on the commercial success of FACTIVE tablets.

 

FACTIVE tablets are currently our only commercial product and we expect they will account for substantially all of our revenues for at least the next several years. FACTIVE tablets have FDA marketing approval for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of mild to moderate severity, or CAP, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, or ABECB. The commercial success of FACTIVE tablets will depend upon their acceptance by regulators, physicians, patients and other key decision-makers as a safe, therapeutic and cost-effective alternative to other anti-infectives and other products used, or currently being developed, to treat CAP and ABECB. If FACTIVE tablets are not commercially successful, we will have to find additional sources of funding or curtail or cease operations.

 

In December 2000, the FDA issued a non-approvable letter to the prior owner of rights to FACTIVE due, in part, to safety concerns arising out of an increased rate of rash relative to comparator drugs, especially in young women. While the FDA did approve FACTIVE tablets for marketing in April 2003, it required, as a postmarketing study commitment, that we conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing the FACTIVE tablet (5,000 patients) to an active comparator (2,500 patients) in patients with CAP or ABECB. This study will include patients of different ethnicities, to gain safety


information in populations not substantially represented in the existing clinical trial program, specifically as it relates to rash. Patients will be evaluated for clinical and laboratory safety. This Phase IV trial is in the design stage and the FDA required, as a condition to its approval, that the trial be initiated by March 2004. We have requested permission from the FDA to commence the Phase IV trial at a later date that is consistent with the planned launch of FACTIVE tablets. The FDA has indicated its willingness to grant this request. If our request is not granted, however, we will commence the Phase IV trial as soon as possible thereafter, which may not be before the end of March 2004. In connection with the approval of FACTIVE tablets, the FDA has also required us to obtain data on the prescribing patterns and use of FACTIVE tablets for the first three years after their initial marketing in the U.S. As part of this requirement, we will furnish periodic reports to the FDA on the number of prescriptions issued, including refills, and the diagnoses for which the prescriptions are dispensed. The results of the Phase IV trial and the periodic reports we are required to provide to the FDA, as well as other safety information arising out of the marketing of the product, could restrict our ability to commercialize FACTIVE tablets.

 

We will need to raise additional funds in the future.

 

In connection with the merger with Genesoft, we raised approximately $81,020,000, after deducting placement agents’ fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We believe that these funds along with our pre-existing cash and marketable securities and borrowings under equipment financing arrangements and anticipated cash flows from operations would be sufficient to support our current plans for at least 18 months. We expect to raise additional capital in the future to fund our operations. In particular, we expect we will raise additional funds to support our sales and marketing activities, and fund clinical trials and other research and development activities. We may seek funding through additional public or private equity offerings, debt financings or agreements with customers. Our ability to raise additional capital, however, will be heavily influenced by, among other factors, the investment market for biotechnology companies and the progress of the FACTIVE and Ramoplanin commercial and clinical development programs over that period. Additional financing may not be available to us when needed, or, if available, may not be available on favorable terms. If we cannot obtain adequate financing on acceptable terms when such financing is required, our business will be adversely affected.

 

Future fund raising could dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders.

 

In order to raise additional funds, we may issue equity or convertible debt securities in the future. Depending upon the market price of our shares at the time of any transaction, we may be required to sell a significant percentage of the outstanding shares of our common stock in order to fund our operating plans, potentially requiring a stockholder vote. In addition, we may have to sell securities at a discount to the prevailing market price, resulting in further dilution to our stockholders.

 

We will need to develop marketing and sales capabilities to successfully commercialize FACTIVE tablets and our other product candidates.

 

FACTIVE tablets are our first FDA approved product. To date, we have very limited marketing and sales experience. We will need to develop a marketing and sales staff to successfully commercialize FACTIVE tablets and our other product candidates, including Ramoplanin. In order to launch FACTIVE tablets in the second half of 2004, we will need to rapidly assemble a sales and marketing force. The development of these marketing and sales capabilities will require significant expenditures, management resources and time. We may be unable to build such a sales force, the cost of establishing such a sales force may exceed any product revenues, or our marketing and sales efforts may be unsuccessful. Failure to successfully establish sales and marketing capabilities in a timely and regulatory compliant manner or to find suitable sales and marketing partners may prevent us from successfully launching FACTIVE tablets in 2004, which would materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.


We will depend on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, including FACTIVE tablets and Ramoplanin.

 

We will not have the internal capability to manufacture commercial quantities of pharmaceutical products under the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices. We are party to an agreement with LG Life Sciences to manufacture bulk quantities of FACTIVE. We have also entered into an agreement with Biosearch (which merged with Versicor Inc. in March 2003 and subsequently changed its name to Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc.) to manufacture bulk quantities of Ramoplanin, and we expect to enter into similar agreements with third parties for the manufacture of future product candidates. Although the LG Life Sciences facilities have previously been inspected by the FDA, they had not been actively manufacturing product for 32 months until their re-start of activity in October 2003. Future inspections may find deficiencies in the facilities or processes that may delay or prevent the manufacture or sale of FACTIVE tablets.

 

LG Life Sciences is obligated to provide us with finished product until the termination or expiration of its existing agreement with SB Pharmco Puerto Rico, Inc., or SB Pharmco, which provides for the supply of finished FACTIVE product by SB Pharmco. The term of this agreement ends on June 30, 2004 but, subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements, may be extended by LG Life Sciences to September 30, 2004. We are currently in discussions with other potential providers of finished products to assume these responsibilities for subsequent periods. We estimate that it will take 12 to 18 months to qualify a new provider of finished products. We expect to obtain quantities of FACTIVE tablets from SB Pharmco that will provide us with sufficient inventory until the new provider can be qualified. If we are unable to qualify a new provider by the time that our supply of finished product to be received from SB Pharmco is exhausted, our supply of FACTIVE product would be interrupted and our business may be materially adversely affected. In addition, we cannot assure you that SB Pharmco or any new secondary manufacturer will be able to avoid batch failures or other production delays.

 

We cannot be certain that LG Life Sciences, Vicuron or future manufacturers will be able to deliver commercial quantities of product candidates to us or that such deliveries will be made on a timely basis. Currently, the only source of supply for FACTIVE bulk drug product is LG Life Sciences’ facility in South Korea, and if such facility were damaged or otherwise unavailable, we would incur substantial costs and delay in the commercialization of FACTIVE tablets. If we are forced to find an alternative source for Ramoplanin or other product candidates, we could also incur substantial costs and delays in the further commercialization of such products. We may not be able to enter into alternative supply arrangements at commercially acceptable rates, if at all. Also, if we change the source or location of supply or modify the manufacturing process, regulatory authorities will require us to demonstrate that the product produced by the new source or from the modified process is equivalent to the product used in any clinical trials that we had conducted.

 

Moreover, while we may choose to manufacture products in the future, we have no experience in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for clinical trials or commercial purposes. If we decide to manufacture products, it would be subject to the regulatory requirements described above. In addition, we would require substantial additional capital and would be subject to delays or difficulties encountered in manufacturing pharmaceutical products. No matter who manufactures the products, we will be subject to continuing obligations regarding the submission of safety reports and other post-market information.

 

We cannot expand the indications for which we will market FACTIVE unless we receive FDA approval for each additional indication. Failure to expand these indications will limit the size of the commercial market for FACTIVE.

 

In April 2003, FACTIVE tablets were approved by the FDA for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of mild to moderate severity and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. One of the objectives of ours is to expand the indications for which FACTIVE is approved for marketing by the FDA, including for the indication of acute bacterial sinusitis. While clinical trials for acute bacterial sinusitis have previously been completed, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials in order to market FACTIVE for this indication. In order to market FACTIVE for other indications, we will need to conduct additional clinical trials, obtain positive results from those trials and obtain FDA approval for such proposed indications. If we are unsuccessful in expanding the approved indications for the use of FACTIVE, the size of the commercial market for FACTIVE will be limited.


Failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions will prevent us from marketing FACTIVE abroad.

 

In order to market FACTIVE in the European Union and other foreign jurisdictions for which we have rights to market the product, we or our distribution partners must obtain separate regulatory approvals. Obtaining foreign approvals may require additional trials and expense. We may not be able to obtain approval or may be delayed in obtaining approval from any or all of the jurisdictions in which we seek approval to market FACTIVE.

 

Sales of FACTIVE in European countries in which we do not have rights to market the product could adversely affect sales in the European countries in which we have exclusive rights to market the product.

 

Our exclusive rights to market FACTIVE in Europe are limited to France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, the Netherlands, Austria, Greece, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City. These countries include the current members of the European Union. However, in the future, a number of additional European countries in which we do not have rights to market FACTIVE may be admitted as members of the European Union. If LG Life Sciences were to sell FACTIVE or license a third party to sell FACTIVE in such countries after they are admitted to the European Union, our ability to maintain our projected profit margins based on sales in the territories covered by the LG Life Sciences license agreement may be adversely affected because customers in our territory may purchase FACTIVE from neighboring countries in the European Union and our ability to prohibit such purchases may be limited under European Union antitrust restrictions.

 

Failure to secure distribution partners in foreign jurisdictions will prevent us from marketing FACTIVE abroad.

 

We intend to market FACTIVE through distribution partners in most, if not all, of the international markets for which we have a license to market the product. This will include the European Union, Canada and Mexico. We may not be able to secure distribution partners at all, or those that we do secure may not be successful in marketing and distributing FACTIVE. If we are not able to secure distribution partners or those partners are unsuccessful in their efforts, it would significantly limit the revenues that we expect to obtain from the sales of FACTIVE.

 

The development and commercialization of our products may be terminated or delayed, and the costs of development and commercialization may increase, if third parties who we rely on to manufacture and support the development and commercialization of our products do not fulfill their obligations.

 

Our development and commercialization strategy entails entering into arrangements with corporate and academic collaborators, contract research organizations, distributors, third-party manufacturers, licensors, licensees and others to conduct development work, manage our clinical trials, manufacture our products and market and sell our products outside of the United States. We will not have the expertise or the resources to conduct such activities on our own and, as a result, we will be particularly dependent on third parties in these areas.

 

We may not be able to maintain our existing arrangements with respect to the commercialization of FACTIVE or establish and maintain arrangements to develop and commercialize Ramoplanin or any additional product candidates or products we may acquire on terms that are acceptable to us. Any current or future arrangements for development and commercialization may not be successful. If we are not able to establish or maintain agreements relating to FACTIVE, Ramoplanin or any additional products we may acquire on terms which we deem favorable, our results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

 

Third parties may not perform their obligations as expected. The amount and timing of resources that third parties devote to developing, manufacturing and commercializing our products are not within our control. Furthermore, our interests may differ from those of third parties that manufacture or commercialize our products. Disagreements that may arise with these third parties could delay or lead to the termination of the development or commercialization of our product candidates, or result in litigation or arbitration, which would be time consuming and expensive.


If any third party that manufactures or supports the development or commercialization of our products breaches or terminates its agreement with us, or fails to conduct its activities in a timely and regulatory compliant manner, such breach, termination or failure could:

 

  delay or otherwise adversely impact the development or commercialization of FACTIVE tablets, Ramoplanin, our other product candidates or any additional product candidates that we may acquire or develop;

 

  require us to undertake unforeseen additional responsibilities or devote unforeseen additional resources to the development or commercialization of our products; or

 

  result in the termination of the development or commercialization of our products.

 

Clinical trials are costly, time consuming and unpredictable, and we have limited experience conducting and managing necessary preclinical and clinical trials for our product candidates.

 

Our lead product, FACTIVE tablets, will need to complete a Phase IV post-approval clinical trial in compliance with FDA requirements pursuant to the product’s approval. Additionally, clinical trials may be necessary to gain approval to market the product for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Additional clinical trials will be required to gain approval to market FACTIVE for other indications. Our lead product candidate, Ramoplanin, is in a Phase III clinical trial for the prevention of bloodstream infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci, also known as VRE, a Phase II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Ramoplanin to treat Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, or CDAD, and a pilot study into the use of Ramoplanin to reduce the transmission of VRE in the hospital setting. Prior clinical and preclinical trials for Ramoplanin were conducted by Biosearch Italia S.p.A. and its licensees, from whom we acquired our license to develop Ramoplanin. We currently expect to complete the Phase II trial of Ramoplanin for CDAD in the first half of 2004 and commence a Phase III CDAD trial before the end of 2004. The pilot study is expected to conclude in the first half of 2004. The Phase III trial of Rampolanin to prevent VRE bloodstream infections continues, but at a slow pace. Many patients are ineligible to participate in this trial because they are participating in other experimental protocols to treat their underlying cancers. We received approval from the FDA to introduce the capsule formulation into the study; however, based on the pace of enrollment, we do not expect to file a New Drug Application, or NDA, based on the results of this trial prior to the end of 2005. We continue to review with the FDA alternative approaches to facilitate filing an NDA for the VRE bloodstream infection prevention indication. We may not be able to complete these trials or make the filings within the timeframes we currently expect. If we are delayed in completing the trials or making the filings, our business may be adversely affected, including as a result of increased costs.

 

We may not be able to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of FACTIVE in indications other than those for which it has already been approved or of our other products including Ramoplanin, in each case, to the satisfaction of the FDA, or other regulatory authorities. We may also be required to demonstrate that our proposed products represent an improved form of treatment over existing therapies and we may be unable to do so without conducting further clinical studies. Negative, inconclusive or inconsistent clinical trial results could prevent regulatory approval, increase the cost and timing of regulatory approval or require additional studies or a filing for a narrower indication.

 

The speed with which we are able to complete our clinical trials and our applications for marketing approval will depend on several factors, including the following:

 

  the rate of patient enrollment, which is a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the study and the nature of the protocol;

 

  fluctuations in the infection rates for patients enrolled in our trials;

 

  compliance of patients and investigators with the protocol and applicable regulations;


  prior regulatory agency review and approval of our applications and procedures;

 

  analysis of data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities which are susceptible to varying interpretations, which interpretations could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval;

 

  changes in the policies of regulatory authorities for drug approval during the period of product development; and

 

  the availability of skilled and experienced staff to conduct and monitor clinical studies, to accurately collect data and to prepare the appropriate regulatory applications.

 

In addition, the cost of human clinical trials varies dramatically based on a number of factors, including the order and timing of clinical indications pursued, the extent of development and financial support from alliance partners, the number of patients required for enrollment, the difficulty of obtaining clinical supplies of the product candidate, and the difficulty in obtaining sufficient patient populations and clinicians.

 

We have limited experience in conducting and managing the preclinical and clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory marketing approvals. We may not be able to obtain the approvals necessary to conduct clinical studies. Also, the results of our clinical trials may not be consistent with the results obtained in preclinical studies or the results obtained in later phases of clinical trials may not be consistent with those obtained in earlier phases. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after experiencing promising results in early animal and human testing.

 

If regulatory approval of a drug is granted, such approval is likely to limit the indicated uses for which it may be marketed. Furthermore, even if a product gains regulatory approval, the product and the manufacturer of the product will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including the requirement to conduct post-approval clinical studies. We may be restricted or prohibited from marketing or manufacturing a product, even after obtaining product approval, if previously unknown problems with the product or its manufacture are subsequently discovered.

 

Our product candidates will face significant competition in the marketplace.

 

FACTIVE tablets are approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of mild to moderate severity and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. There are several classes of antibiotics that are primary competitors for the treatment of these indications, including:

 

  other fluoroquinolones such as Levaquin® (levofloxacin), a product of Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Tequin® (gatifloxacin), a product of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Cipro® (ciprofloxacin) and Avelox® (moxifloxacin), both products of Bayer Corporation;

 

  macrolides such as Biaxin® (clarithromycin), a product of Abbott Laboratories and Zithromax® (azithromycin), a product of Pfizer Inc.; and

 

  penicillins such as Augmentin® (amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium), a product of GlaxoSmithKline.

 

In addition, a new drug application for Ketek®, a ketolide antibiotic from Aventis Pharmaceuticals, has been submitted to the FDA and Ketek is currently marketed in Europe. Many generic antibiotics are also currently prescribed to treat these infections. Moreover, a number of the antibiotic products that are competitors of FACTIVE tablets will be going off patent at dates ranging from 2003 to 2010. As these competitors lose patent protection, makers of generic drugs will likely begin to produce some of these competing products and this could result in pressure on the price at which we are able to sell FACTIVE tablets and reduce our profit margins.


Ramoplanin is currently in development for the prevention of bloodstream infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). We have no knowledge of any product currently approved by the FDA for this indication, nor are we aware of any product candidate currently in clinical trials for this indication. It is possible that competition exists without our knowledge and that current discovery and preclinical efforts are ongoing for this indication. Ramoplanin is also in clinical development for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). We are aware of two products currently utilized in the marketplace—Vanconin® (vancomycin), a product of Eli Lilly, and metronidazole, a generic product—for treatment of this indication. We are also aware of at least three companies with products in development for the treatment of CDAD—Geltex/Genzyme in Phase II; ImmuCell in Phase I/II; and Acambis in Phase I/II. It is also possible that other companies are developing competitive products for this indication. We are aware that Vicuron and Novartis Pharma are jointly developing PDF inhibitor agents that may compete with any PDF products developed by us.

 

All of our other internal product programs are in earlier stages and have not yet reached clinical development and are not yet indication specific. Our alliance-related product development programs are also all in preclinical stages, and it is therefore not possible to identify any product profiles or competitors for these product development programs at this time. Our industry is very competitive and it therefore is likely that if and when product candidates from our early stage internal programs or our alliance programs reach the clinical development stage or are commercialized for sale, these products will also face competition.

 

Many of our competitors will have substantially greater capital resources, facilities and human resources than us. Furthermore, many of those competitors are more experienced than us in drug discovery, development and commercialization, and in obtaining regulatory approvals. As a result, those competitors may discover, develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products or services before us. In addition, our competitors may discover, develop and commercialize products or services that are more effective than, or otherwise render non-competitive or obsolete, the products or services that we or our collaborators are seeking to develop and commercialize. Moreover, these competitors may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that would limit our rights or the ability of our collaborators to develop or commercialize pharmaceutical products or services.

 

We will rely upon existing and prospective alliance partners, licensees and government grants and contracts as a source of revenue for our operations and as a means of developing and commercializing our products.

 

Our strategy for developing and commercializing therapeutic, vaccine and diagnostic products depends, in part, on strategic alliances and licensing arrangements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology partners. We currently have alliances with AstraZeneca, bioMérieux, Schering-Plough and Wyeth. Over the past several years, we have received a substantial portion of our revenue from these alliances. However, our research obligations under our strategic alliances have been fulfilled or are anticipated to be completed in the near future. As a result, any substantial additional revenues under these alliances will consist of milestone payments based on the achievement by the alliance partner of development milestones or royalties based on the sale of products arising from the alliance. The achievement of any of the development milestones and successful development of any products under these alliances are dependent on the alliance partners’ activities and are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that any milestones will be attained, that any products will be successfully developed by the alliance partners or that we will receive any substantial additional revenues under these alliances.

 

In order to maintain the collaboration agreement with Wyeth, we must fulfill certain obligations, including providing reasonable technical assistance in using the know-how or other information that we have licensed to them. We believe that we are currently in compliance with our obligations under our collaboration agreement, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully complete our obligations in the future.


If our partners develop products using our discoveries, we will rely on these partners for product development, regulatory approval, manufacturing and marketing of those products before we can receive some of the milestone payments, royalties and other payments to which we may be entitled under the terms of some of its alliance agreements. Our agreements with our partners typically allow the partners significant discretion in electing whether to pursue any of these activities. We will not be able to control the amount and timing of resources our partners may devote to our programs or potential products. As a result, there can be no assurance that our partners will perform their obligations as expected.

 

Our strategy will include entering into multiple, concurrent alliances and business partnerships, including, but not limited to in-licensing and co-promotion agreements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage multiple alliances and partnerships successfully. The risks we will face in managing multiple alliances and partnerships include maintaining confidentiality among partners, avoiding conflicts between partners and avoiding conflicts between us and our partners. If we fail to manage our alliances and partnerships effectively, or if any of the problems described above arise, one or more of the following could occur which could have a material adverse effect on our business:

 

  use of significant resources to resolve conflicts,

 

  delay in, or an adverse effect on, sales and marketing efforts for our products,

 

  delay in development activities,

 

  legal claims involving significant time,

 

  significant expense,

 

  loss of reputation, and

 

  termination of one or more alliances, or loss of capital and loss of revenues.

 

We have applied for and received grants from the U.S. government in the past. Our strategy going forward will include the continued pursuit of government grants and contracts. We can not assure you that we will obtain any additional grants or that our existing grants will continue to be funded. If we are unable to obtain additional grants or maintain our existing grants, our revenues would be adversely affected.

 

Development of therapeutic, diagnostic and vaccine products by our strategic alliance partners based on our discoveries will be subject to the high risks of failure inherent in the development or commercialization of biopharmaceutical products.

 

There can be no assurance of the successful development or commercialization of any products by our strategic alliance partners. Successful development and commercialization will be subject to numerous risks at each stage. For example, there can be no assurance that the high-throughput screening or lead optimization processes for a given strategic alliance will identify any compounds suitable for clinical development. Even if product candidates based on our discoveries undergo clinical trials, there can be no assurance that those clinical trials will indicate that the product candidates are safe or effective. The pace at which the clinical trials proceed is also uncertain. Furthermore, after the completion of clinical trials, a product could fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals due to negative, inconclusive or insufficient clinical data or other reasons beyond our control. Even if the necessary regulatory approvals for a product are obtained, it may be difficult or impossible to manufacture the product on a large scale, be uneconomical to market, fail to be developed prior to the successful marketing of similar products by competitors or infringe on proprietary rights of third parties.

 

 


Our failure to acquire and develop additional product candidates or approved products will impair our ability to grow.

 

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to acquire and develop additional product candidates or approved products. The success of this strategy depends upon our ability to identify, select and acquire biopharmaceutical products that meet our criteria. We may not be able to acquire the rights to additional product candidates and approved products on terms that we find acceptable, or at all.

 

New product candidates acquired or in-licensed by us may require additional research and development efforts prior to commercial sale, including extensive preclinical and/or clinical testing and approval by the FDA and corresponding foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to the risks of failure inherent in pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that the product candidate will not be safe, non-toxic and effective or approved by regulatory authorities. In addition, it is uncertain whether any approved products that we develop or acquire will be:

 

  manufactured or produced economically;

 

  successfully commercialized; or

 

  widely accepted in the marketplace.

 

Future acquisitions may absorb significant resources and may be unsuccessful.

 

As part of our strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of businesses or assets or investments in or other relationships and alliances with third parties. Acquisitions may involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, additional operating losses, dilutive issuances of equity securities, and expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. For example, to the extent that we elect to pay the purchase price for such acquisitions in shares of our stock, the issuance of additional shares of our stock will be dilutive to our stockholders. Acquisitions involve numerous other risks, including:

 

  difficulties integrating acquired technologies and personnel into our business;

 

  diversion of management from daily operations;

 

  inability to obtain required financing on favorable terms or at all;

 

  entering new markets in which we have little or no previous experience;

 

  potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies;

 

  assumption of the liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies; and

 

  amortization of the intangible assets of acquired companies.

 

It may be difficult for us to complete these types of transactions quickly and to integrate the businesses efficiently into our business. Any acquisitions or investments by us may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We will depend on key personnel in a highly competitive market for skilled personnel.

 

We will be highly dependent on the principal members of our senior management and key scientific and technical personnel. The loss of any of its personnel could have a material adverse effect on its ability to achieve its goals. We currently maintain employment agreements with the following senior officers: Steven M. Rauscher, President and Chief Executive Officer; Stephen Cohen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Martin D. Williams, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development & Marketing; and Gary Patou, M.D., Executive Vice President, Chief Medical Officer. The term of each employment agreement continues until it is terminated by the officer or us, except for Dr. Patou’s agreement which runs through January 1, 2005, after which he becomes a consultant for one year. We do not currently maintain key person life insurance on any of our employees.

 

Our future success is dependent upon our ability to attract and retain additional qualified sales and marketing, clinical development, scientific and managerial personnel. The plan to launch the commercial sale of FACTIVE tablets during the second half of 2004 will require us to significantly increase our hiring of new employees, primarily with expertise in the areas of sales and marketing. Like others in our industry, we may face, and in the past we have faced from time to time, difficulties in attracting and retaining certain employees with the requisite expertise and qualifications. We believe that our historical recruiting periods and employee turnover rates are similar to those of others in our industry; however, we cannot be certain that we will not encounter greater difficulties in the future.

 

Our intellectual property protection and other protections may be inadequate to protect our products.

 

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain commercially valuable patent claims and protect our intellectual property. We currently own or license approximately 50 issued U.S. patents, approximately 127 pending U.S. patent applications, 50 issued foreign patents and approximately 143 pending foreign patent applications. These patents and patent applications primarily relate to (1) the field of human and pathogen genetics, (2) the chemical composition, use, and method of manufacturing FACTIVE, (3) metalloenzyme inhibitors, their uses, and their targets, and (4) DNA-Nanobinder compounds and their use as anti-infective therapeutics. Our material patents are as follows:

 

  U.S. Patent No. 5,633,262 granted May 27, 1997, relating to quinoline carboxylic acid derivatives having 7-(4-amino-methyl-3-oxime) pyrrolidine substituent; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring June 15, 2015

 

  U.S. Patent No. 5,776,944 granted July 7, 1998, relating to 7-(4-aminomethyl-3-methyloxyiminopyrroplidin-1-yl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydro-1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxylic acid ; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring June 15, 2015

 

  U.S. Patent No. 5,869,670 granted February 9, 1999, relating to 7-(4-aminomethyl-3-methyloxyiminopyrrolidin-1-yl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydro-1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxylic acid; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring June 15, 2015

 

  U.S. Patent No. 5,962,468 granted October 5, 1999, relating to 7-(4-aminomethyl-3-methyloxyiminopyrrolidin-1-yl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydro-1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxylic acid; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring June 15, 2015


  U.S. Patent No. 6,340,689 granted January 22, 2002, relating to methods of using quinolone compounds against atypical upper respiratory pathogenic bacteria; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring September 14, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,262,071 granted July 17, 2001, relating to methods of using antimicrobial compounds against pathogenic Mycoplasma bacteria; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring September 21, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,331,550 granted December 18, 2001, relating to methods of using of quinolone compounds against anaerobic pathogenic bacteria; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring September 21, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,455,540 granted September 24, 2002, relating to methods of Use of quinolone compounds against anaerobic pathogenic bacteria; licensed from LG Life Sciences; expiring September 21, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,423,690 granted July 23, 2002, relating to antibacterial agents; licensed from Vernalis; expiring February 5, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,441,042 granted August 27, 2002, relating to hydroxamic acid derivatives as antibacterials; licensed from Vernalis; expiring May 14, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,380,370 granted April 30, 2002, relating to Staphylococcus epidermidis; expiring August 13, 2018

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,551,795 granted April 22, 2003, relating to Pseudomonas aeruginosa; expiring February 18, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,562,958 granted May 13, 2003, relating to Acinetobacter baumannii; expiring June 4, 2019

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,583,275 granted June 24, 2003, relating to Enterococcus faecium; expiring June 30, 2018

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,583,266 granted June 24, 2003, relating to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and leprae; expiring June 24, 2020

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,605,709 granted August 12, 2003, relating to Proteus mirabilis; expiring April 5, 2020

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,6105,836 granted August 26, 2003, relating to Klebsiella pneumoniae; expiring January 27, 2020

 

  U.S. Patent No. 6,617,156 granted September 9, 2003, relating to Enterococcus faecalis; expiring August 13, 2018

 

While it is difficult to assess the value of our intellectual property portfolio, the patents named above may provide a competitive advantage in certain instances in the pathogen and anti-infective field by


requiring others to obtain a license from us if they wish to produce competing products. However, there is no assurance that any of these patents, if challenged, will be found to be enforceable or that any of these patents will provide us with a competitive advantage.

 

We are not currently involved in any litigation, settlement negotiations, or other legal action regarding patent issues and we are not aware of any patent litigation threatened against us. Our patent position involves complex legal and factual questions, and legal standards relating to the validity and scope of claims in the applicable technology fields are still evolving. Therefore, the degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain.

 

Under our license agreement with LG Life Sciences, we obtained an exclusive license to develop and market gemifloxacin in certain territories. This license covers 11 issued U.S. patents and a broad portfolio of corresponding foreign patents and pending patent applications. These patents include claims that relate to the chemical composition of FACTIVE, methods of manufacturing and their use for the prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial infections. The U.S. patents are currently set to expire at various dates, ranging from 2015, in the case of the principal patents relating to FACTIVE, to 2019. We have filed patent term extension applications, covering the regulatory review process, for the principal patents. If granted, these extensions would extend the exclusivity period through 2017. We also have the exclusive right to use FACTIVE trademarks, trade names, domain names and logos in conjunction with the use or sale of the product in the territories covered by the license.

 

LG Life Sciences, as owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,776,944 and 5,962,468, submitted requests for reexamination to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, or PTO, in order to place additional references into the record of each patent. Both requests were granted by the PTO. Patent ‘468 has been reexamined with relatively minor modifications to the claims and confirmed patentable over the submitted references. The reexamination of Patent ‘944 is currently pending. If the PTO does not confirm the claims in this patent as patentable, our patent protection with respect to FACTIVE in the U.S. may be weakened.

 

The patents that we license to Ramoplanin under our agreement with Vicuron include claims relating to methods of manufacturing Ramoplanin as well as methods increasing the yield of the active compound. We also have applications pending relating to various novel uses of Ramoplanin. The patent covering the chemical composition of Ramoplanin has expired. To provide additional protection for Ramoplanin, we rely on proprietary know-how relating to maximizing yields in the manufacture of Ramoplanin, and intend to rely on the five year data exclusivity provisions under the Hatch-Waxman Act.

 

The risks and uncertainties that we will face with respect to our patents and other proprietary rights include the following:

 

  the pending patent applications that we have filed or to which they have exclusive rights may not result in issued patents or may take longer than expected to result in issued patents;

 

  the claims of any patents which are issued may be limited from those in the patent applications and may not provide meaningful protection;

 

  we may not be able to develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;

 

  the patents licensed or issued to us or our partners may not provide a competitive advantage;

 

  other companies may challenge patents licensed or issued to us or our partners;

 

  patents issued to other companies may harm our ability to do business;


  other companies may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate our technologies; and other companies may design around technologies we have licensed or developed.

 

In addition, we are aware that some companies have published patent applications relating to nucleic acids and proteins from various pathogenic organisms. If these companies receive issued patents, their patents may limit our ability and the ability of our collaborators to practice under any patents that may be issued to us or our collaborators. Because of this, we or our collaborators may not be able to obtain patents with respect to the genes of infectious agents or the value of certain other patents issued to us or our collaborators may be limited. Also, even if a patent were issued to us, the scope of coverage or protection afforded to such patent may be limited.

 

We will bear substantial responsibilities under our license agreements for FACTIVE and Ramoplanin, and there can be no assurance that we will successfully fulfill our responsibilities.

 

In connection with the merger, we have assumed Genesoft’s exclusive license from LG Life Sciences to develop and market FACTIVE in North America and France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, the Netherlands, Austria, Greece, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City. Under this agreement, we are responsible, at our expense and through consultation with LG Life Sciences, for the clinical and commercial development of FACTIVE in the countries covered by the license, including the conduct of clinical trials, the filing of drug approval applications with the FDA and other applicable regulatory authorities and the marketing, distribution and sale of FACTIVE in our territory; provided, that LG Life Sciences has the right to co-promote the product on terms to be negotiated in our territory for 2008 and periods commencing thereafter, in which case our royalty obligations to LG Life Sciences would cease. The agreement also requires a minimum sales commitment over a period of time, which if not met, would result in the technology being returned to LG Life Sciences. We believe that we are currently in compliance with our obligations under the agreement with LG Life Sciences, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to remain in compliance due to the limitations on our resources and the many risks of conducting clinical trials, as described above in “Clinical trials are costly, time consuming and unpredictable, and we have limited experience conducting and managing necessary preclinical and clinical trials for our product candidates” and the challenges inherent in the commercialization of new products as described above in “Our product candidates will face significant competition in the marketplace”.

 

LG Life Sciences has the obligation under the agreement to diligently maintain its patents and the patents of third parties to which it has rights that, in each case, relate to gemifloxacin, the active ingredient in FACTIVE tablets. We have the right, at our expense, to control any litigation relating to suits brought by a third party alleging that the manufacture, use or sale of gemifloxacin in its licensed field in the territories covered by the license infringes upon our rights. We also have the primary right to pursue actions for infringement of any patent licensed from LG Life Sciences under the license agreement within the territories covered by the license. If we elect not to pursue any infringement action, LG Life Sciences has the right to pursue it. The costs of any infringement actions are first paid out of any damages recovered. If we are the plaintiff, the remainder of the damages are retained by us, subject to our royalty obligations to LG Life Sciences. If LG Life Sciences is the plaintiff, the remainder of the damages are divided evenly between us and LG Life Sciences, subject to our royalty obligations to LG Life Sciences. The costs of pursuing any such action could substantially diminish our resources.

 

Under our agreement with Vicuron, we have obtained an exclusive license to develop and market oral Ramoplanin in the United States and Canada. Under this agreement, we are responsible, at our expense, for the clinical and non-clinical development of Ramoplanin in our field, the prevention and treatment of human disease, in the United States and Canada, including the conduct of clinical trials and the filing of drug approval applications with the FDA and other applicable regulatory authorities. Vicuron is responsible for providing us with all information in its possession relating to Ramoplanin in our licensed field, for cooperating with us in obtaining regulatory approvals of Ramoplanin and for using diligent efforts


to provide us with bulk Ramoplanin sufficient to carry out our clinical development activities. We believe that we are currently in compliance with our obligations under the License and Supply Agreement, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to remain in compliance due to the limitations on our resources and the many risks of conducting clinical trials, as described above in “Clinical trials are costly, time consuming and unpredictable, and we have limited experience conducting and managing necessary preclinical and clinical trials for our product candidates”.

 

Under our agreement with Vicuron, Vicuron has the obligation to prosecute patents relating to Ramoplanin that are made by Vicuron personnel or conceived jointly by our personnel and Vicuron’s personnel. We have the obligation to prosecute patents relating to Ramoplanin that are made solely by our personnel. We have the right to control any suits brought by a third party alleging that the manufacture, use or sale of Ramoplanin in our licensed field in the United States or Canada infringes upon our rights. We will bear the costs of any such actions, which could be substantial; provided that if we are obligated to pay any royalties or other payments to a third party to sell Ramoplanin as a result of this litigation, including any settlement reached with Vicuron’s consent, Vicuron is obligated to pay that expense. We also have the primary right to pursue actions for infringement of any patent licensed from Vicuron within the United States and Canada within our licensed field. Vicuron has the primary right to pursue actions for infringement of any patents that it licenses to us outside of our licensed field within the United States and Canada and for all purposes outside of the United States and Canada. If the party with the primary right to pursue the infringement action elects not to pursue it, the other party generally has the right to pursue it. The costs of any infringement actions are first paid out of any damages recovered and are then allocated to the parties depending upon their interest in the suit. The costs of pursuing any such action could substantially diminish our resources.

 

Our proprietary position may depend on our ability to protect trade secrets.

 

We rely upon trademarks, unpatented trade secrets and improvements, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We generally protect this information with confidentiality agreements that provide that all confidential information developed or made known to others during the course of the employment, consulting or business relationship shall be kept confidential except in specified circumstances. Agreements with employees provide that all inventions conceived by the individual while employed by us are our exclusive property. We cannot guarantee, however, that these agreements will be honored, that we will have adequate remedies for breach if they are not honored or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors.

 

We may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties and may become involved in expensive intellectual property litigation.

 

The intellectual property rights of biotechnology companies, including us, are generally uncertain and involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions. Our success in developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products may depend, in part, on our ability to operate without infringing on the intellectual property rights of others and to prevent others from infringing on our intellectual property rights.

 

There has been substantial litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights in the biopharmaceutical industry. We may become party to patent litigation or proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or a foreign patent office to determine our patent rights with respect to third parties which may include competitors in the biopharmaceutical industry. Interference proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or opposition proceedings in a foreign patent office may be necessary to establish which party was the first to discover such intellectual property. We may become involved in patent litigation against third parties to enforce our patent rights, to invalidate patents held by such third parties, or to defend against such claims. The cost to us of any patent litigation or similar proceeding could be substantial, and it may absorb significant management time. We do not expect to maintain separate insurance to cover intellectual property infringement. Our general liability insurance policy may not cover our infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, depending upon the circumstances. The


aggregate coverage provided under our existing general liability insurance policy is $10 million. We do not currently intend to increase the amount of this insurance, though we will continue to evaluate the sufficiency of its coverage levels periodically. If an infringement litigation against us is resolved unfavorably, we may be enjoined from manufacturing or selling certain of our products or services without a license from a third party. We may not be able to obtain such a license on commercially acceptable terms, or at all.

 

We may not be able to obtain meaningful patent protection for discoveries under our government contracts.

 

Under our government grants and contracts, the government will have a statutory right to practice or have practiced any inventions developed under the government research contracts. In addition, under certain circumstances, such as inaction on our part or our licensees to achieve practical application of the invention or a need to alleviate public health or safety concerns not reasonably satisfied by us or our licensees, the government will have the right to grant to other parties licenses to any inventions first reduced to practice under the government grants and contracts. If the government grants such a license to a third party, our patent position may be jeopardized. In addition, the government will have ownership rights in the data and discoveries derived from any materials furnished to us by the government.

 

International patent protection is uncertain.

 

Patent law outside the United States is uncertain and is currently undergoing review and revision in many countries. Further, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws. We may participate in opposition proceedings to determine the validity of our or our competitors’ foreign patents, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our efforts.

 

Our activities will involve hazardous materials and may subject us to environmental liability.

 

Our research and development activities will involve the controlled use of hazardous and radioactive materials and biological waste. We will be subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and certain waste products. Although we believe that our existing safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with legally prescribed standards, we will not be able to completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of an accident, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines, and this liability could exceed our resources. We do not expect our company to maintain separate insurance to cover contamination or injuries relating to hazardous materials. Such liabilities may not be covered by our existing general liability insurance coverage, depending upon the circumstances. The aggregate coverage provided under our general liability insurance policy is $10 million. We do not currently intend to increase the amount of this insurance, though we will continue to evaluate the sufficiency of its coverage levels periodically.

 

We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of the merger with Genesoft.

 

The success of our merger with Genesoft will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities from integrating our business with the former business of Genesoft. Our success in realizing these benefits and the timing of this realization depends upon the successful integration of the former operations of Genesoft. The full integration of two independent companies, especially when one company is located on the West Coast and the other on the East Coast, is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies and realizing the expected benefits of the merger include, among others:

 

  coordinating commercial and clinical development initiatives and staffs for FACTIVE and Ramoplanin;

 

  raising sufficient capital to fund the significant expenditures that are needed to launch and successfully commercialize FACTIVE and the further clinical development of Ramoplanin;


  retaining key employees;

 

  consolidating research and development operations;

 

  consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and physical plant;

 

  integrating and managing the technology of two companies; and

 

  minimizing the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns.

 

We cannot assure you that we will realize the full benefits anticipated by us to result from the merger. In addition, we may not have sufficient capital to fully implement our strategies following the merger which may cause a delay in the launch of FACTIVE tablets and could further prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits of the merger.

 

Risks Related to Our Industry

 

Health care insurers and other payers may not pay for our products or may impose limits on reimbursement.

 

Our ability to commercialize FACTIVE tablets, Ramoplanin and our future products will depend, in part, on the extent to which reimbursement for such products will be available from third-party payers, such as Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations, health insurers and other public and private payers. If we succeed in bringing FACTIVE tablets, Ramoplanin or other products in the future to market, we cannot assure you that third-party payers will pay for such products or will establish and maintain price levels sufficient for realization of an appropriate return on our investment in product development. If adequate coverage and reimbursement levels are not provided by government and private payers for use of our products, our products may fail to achieve market acceptance and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In addition, in December 2003 President Bush signed into law new Medicare prescription drug coverage legislation. While we cannot yet predict the impact the new legislation could have on our ability to commercialize FACTIVE tablets, Ramoplanin and any future products, the new legislation could adversely affect our anticipated revenues and results of operations, possibly materially.

 

Many health maintenance organizations and other third-party payers use formularies, or lists of drugs for which coverage is provided under a health care benefit plan, to control the costs of prescription drugs. Each payer that maintains a drug formulary makes its own determination as to whether a new drug will be added to the formulary and whether particular drugs in a therapeutic class will have preferred status over other drugs in the same class. This determination often involves an assessment of the clinical appropriateness of the drug and sometimes the cost of the drug in comparison to alternative products. We cannot assure you that FACTIVE tablets, Ramoplanin or any of our future products will be added to payers’ formularies, whether our products will have preferred status to alternative therapies, nor whether the formulary decisions will be conducted in a timely manner. We may also decide to enter into discount or formulary fee arrangements with payers, which could result in our receiving lower or discounted prices for FACTIVE tablets, Ramoplanin or future products.

 

If a successful product liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities, we could be forced to pay substantial damage awards.

 

The use of any of our product candidates in clinical trials, and the sale of any approved products, might expose us to product liability claims. We currently maintain, and we expect that we will continue to maintain, product liability insurance coverage in the amount of $10 million per occurrence and $10 million in the aggregate. Such insurance coverage might not protect us against all of the claims to which we might become subject. We might not be able to maintain adequate insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts or scope to protect us against potential losses. In the event a claim is brought against us, we might be required to pay legal and other expenses to defend the claim, as well as uncovered damage awards resulting from a claim brought successfully against us. Furthermore, whether or not we are ultimately successful in defending any such claims, we might be required to direct financial and managerial resources to such defense and adverse publicity could result, all of which could harm our business.

 


Risks Related to The Securities Market

 

Our stock price is highly volatile.

 

The market price of our stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile due to the risks and uncertainties described in this section of the exhibit, as well as other factors, including:

 

  our ability to successfully launch and commercialize FACTIVE tablets;

 

  the revenues that we may derive from the sale of FACTIVE tablets, as compared to analyst estimates;

 

  the results of our clinical trials for Ramoplanin and additional indications for FACTIVE and the pace of our progress in those clinical trials;

 

  our ability to license or develop other compounds for clinical development;

 

  the timing of the achievement of our development milestones and other payments under our strategic alliance agreements;

 

  termination of, or an adverse development in, our strategic alliances;

 

  conditions and publicity regarding the biopharmaceutical industry generally;

 

  price and volume fluctuations in the stock market at large which do not relate to our operating performance; and

 

  comments by securities analysts, or our failure to meet market expectations.

 

Over the two-year period ending February 27, 2004 the closing price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market ranged from a high of $7.01 to a low of $1.03. The stock market has from time to time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility have sometimes been the subject of securities class action litigation. If litigation were instituted on this basis, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

 

We have issued warrants to purchase 3,245,806 shares of common stock and the re-sale of the shares underlying these warrants could cause a dilution of our existing shareholders.

 

On June 4, 2003, as part of the Amendment, Redemption and Exchange Agreement pertaining to our convertible notes held by two institutional investors, we issued warrants that are exercisable to purchase 535,806 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.37 per share (subject to anti-dilution and other adjustments), which are exercisable and expire on June 4, 2008. In connection with the issuance of these convertible notes, we are also obligated to issue additional warrants that are exercisable to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $15.00 per share, which warrants expire on March 5, 2005. On September 29, 2003 and October 15, 2003, we had closings of a private


placement transaction in which we issued warrants to purchase 1,910,000 and 700,000 shares of common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $3.48. The September 2003 warrants become exercisable on March 29, 2004 and remain exercisable until September 29, 2008. The October 2003 warrants become exercisable on April 15, 2004 and remain exercisable until October 15, 2008. The shares underlying all of these warrants have been registered for re-sale and are therefore freely tradeable without restriction. The exercise of all or a substantial portion of these warrants would cause a significant reduction in the relative percentage interests of our stockholders in our earnings, voting power, liquidation value and book and market value. In addition, if all or a substantial portion of these warrants were exercised and sold, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly.

 

The $22,309,647 in aggregate original principal amount of convertible notes that we issued at the closing of the merger with Genesoft will, if converted into our common stock, substantially reduce the percentage interests of our stockholders.

 

At the closing of the merger, we assumed approximately $24 million of debt of Genesoft, of which approximately $1.7 million was paid at closing. The remainder of the debt consists of promissory notes of Genesoft that we exchanged with holders of such notes for our convertible promissory notes, which will bear interest at 5% per annum and have a maturity date of five years from the closing date. If these notes are not converted into shares of our common stock during the five-year period, the subsequent payment of these notes at maturity may require us to expend a significant portion of our capital resources. Depending upon the combined company’s capital resources at the maturity date, the payment of these notes could impair the combined company’s working capital and prevent it from pursuing important clinical development and commercialization programs.

 

The $22,309,647 in aggregate original principal amount of our convertible notes issued at the closing of the merger, including accrued interest, are convertible into shares of our common stock at the holder’s election at any time after the closing of the merger at a price per share equal to $6.6418, subject to subsequent adjustments. In addition, following the one year anniversary of the closing of the merger, we have the right to force conversion if the price of our common stock closes above 150% of the then effective conversion price for 15 consecutive days. The conversion of all or a substantial portion of these convertible notes would cause a significant reduction in the relative percentage interests of our stockholders in our earnings, voting power, liquidation value and book and market value.

 

Multiple factors beyond our control may cause fluctuations in our operating results and may cause our business to suffer.

 

Our revenues and results of operations may fluctuate significantly, depending on a variety of factors, including the following:

 

  the pace of our commercial launch of FACTIVE tablets;

 

  the level of acceptance by physicians and third party payors of FACTIVE;

 

  the progress of our clinical trials for FACTIVE, Ramoplanin and our other product candidates;

 

  our success in concluding deals to acquire additional approved products and product candidates;

 

  the introduction of new products and services by our competitors;

 

  regulatory actions; and


  expenses related to, and the results of, litigation and other proceedings relating to intellectual property rights.

 

We will not be able to control many of these factors. In addition, if our revenues in a particular period do not meet expectations, we may not be able to adjust our expenditures in that period, which could cause our business to suffer. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results will not necessarily be meaningful. You should not rely on these comparisons as an indication of our future performance. If our operating results in any future period fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, our stock price may fall, possibly by a significant amount.

 

Certain of our financial statements have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, and the ability to recover damages from Arthur Andersen may be limited.

 

Prior to June 24, 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP served as our independent public accountants. Our inability to obtain the consent of Arthur Andersen to include its report on certain financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen may limit your recovery against Arthur Andersen. SEC rules require us to include or incorporate by reference certain historical financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 that were audited by Arthur Andersen. As a result of the well-publicized events concerning Arthur Andersen, we have not been able to obtain the consent of Arthur Andersen to the inclusion of its audit report in financial statements audited by them and will not be able to obtain Arthur Andersen’s consent in the future. The absence of this consent may limit any recovery to which you might be entitled against Arthur Andersen. It is also likely that these events concerning Arthur Andersen would materially adversely affect its ability to satisfy any claims we might have arising from its provision of auditing and other services to us.