DEF 14A

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Company’s offices, 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

We are taking advantage of rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that allow us to furnish proxy materials to you via the Internet. Unless you have already requested to receive a printed set of proxy materials, you will receive a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Notice. The Notice contains instructions on how to access proxy materials and vote your shares via the Internet or, if you prefer, to request a printed set of proxy materials at no additional cost to you. We believe that this approach provides a convenient way for you to access your proxy materials and vote your shares, while lowering our printing and delivery costs and reducing the environmental impact associated with our Annual Meeting.

Your broker cannot vote your shares without your instructions for the election of directors, for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and for the Amendment to the 2005 Plan. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted or counted for the election of directors, for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and for the Amendment to the 2005 Plan. It is, therefore, important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.

Stockholders of record as of March 27, 2013 can vote at the Annual Meeting. On or about April 9, 2013, we will mail the Notice or, for stockholders who have already requested to receive a printed set of proxy materials, this proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and annual report. Please vote before the Annual Meeting in one of the following ways:

Your vote is very important. Please vote before the Annual Meeting using one of the methods above to ensure that your vote will be counted. Your proxy may be revoked at any time before the vote at the Annual Meeting by following the procedures outlined in the accompanying proxy statement.

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

2013 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS INFORMATION


Date and Time:		Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time
Place:		Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.’s offices located at 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89148
Record Date:		March 27, 2013

VOTING MATTERS


Proposals	Board Recommendation		Page Number for Additional Information
1. Election of Directors		FOR		5
2. Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation		FOR		49
3. Amendment to 2005 Plan		FOR		50
4. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		FOR		64

OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Committee Memberships

Name

Age

Directors
Since

Principal Occupation & Employer

Independent

NGC

Comp C

Other
Current
Public
Boards

Stephen C. Comer

2007

Retired Accounting Firm Managing Partner

Yes

LOGO

Richard J. Goeglein

2003

Chairman of the Board, Owner, Evening Star Holdings, LLC, and Former Gaming Executive

Yes

—

Bruce A. Leslie

2002

Partner, Armstrong Teasdale LLP

Yes

LOGO

—

James L. Marineau

1999

Vice Chairman of the Board, Business Advisor and Private Investor

Yes

LOGO

—

Desirée Rogers

2012

Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Publishing Company, LLC

Yes

LOGO

—

Anthony M. Sanfilippo

2010

President and Chief Executive Officer

—

Jaynie Miller Studenmund

2012

Corporate Director and Advisor

Yes

LOGO

AC = Audit Committee CC = Compensation Committee NGC = Nominating & Governance Committee

Comp C = Compliance Committee

LOGO = Member LOGO = Chair


Size of Board		7
Number of Independent Directors		6
Board Committees Consists Entirely of Independent Directors		Yes
All Directors Attended at least 75% of Meetings Held		Yes
Annual Election of All Directors		Yes
Majority Voting for Directors		Yes
Separate Chairman & CEO		Yes
Independent Directors Meet Regularly in Executive Session		Yes
Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations		Yes
Stockholder Ability to Call Special Meetings		Yes
Stockholder Ability to Act by Written Consent		Yes
Annual Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation		Yes
Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors and Executive Officers		Yes

OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICES

The overriding principle driving our compensation programs is our belief that it benefits all of our constituencies for management’s compensation to be tied to our current and long-term performance. The following factors demonstrate our continued and heightened commitment to pay-for-performance and to corporate governance best practices:

•

A significant percentage (over 60%) of our executive officers’ compensation consists of long-term and short-term incentive awards.

•

We do not provide for gross-ups of excise tax values under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

•

We have clawback provisions, providing for the return of any excess compensation received by an executive officer if our financial statements are the subject of a restatement due to error or misconduct.

•

Our executive officers and directors are prohibited from short-selling Pinnacle stock or engaging in transactions involving Pinnacle-based derivative securities.

•

Our executive officers and directors are prohibited from placing shares of Pinnacle Common Stock in margin accounts and pledging shares of Pinnacle Common Stock.

•

While our cash incentive compensation is designed to reward outstanding performance of our executive officers, payouts under each plan are capped to discourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking by our executive officers.

COMPENSATION COMPONENTS:


Component		Key Characteristics
Base Salary		Based on positioning relative to market, individual role, performance and contribution levels.
Annual Incentive Plan		Our executive officers are eligible to receive performance-based compensation contingent upon (i) our achievement of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA; and (ii) our achievement of non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income.
Stock Option Awards		Stock options vest over four years with a seven year term.
Restricted Stock Units		Restricted stock units vest over four years.

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the stockholders of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Pinnacle” or the “Company”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of the Company’s stockholders to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Company’s offices located at 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

At the Annual Meeting, holders of the Company’s Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share (“Pinnacle Common Stock”), will be asked to vote upon:

This Proxy Statement, the accompanying Proxy Card, the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), and the Annual Report to Stockholders (the “Annual Report”) are first being mailed to the Company’s stockholders on or about April 9, 2013. The address of the principal executive offices of the Company is 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148.

Only holders of record of Pinnacle Common Stock at the close of business on March 27, 2013 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 58,381,813 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote, held of record by 2,106 stockholders. A majority, or 29,190,907 of these shares, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Each of the Company’s stockholders is entitled to one vote for each share of Pinnacle Common Stock held as of the Record Date.

All properly executed, returned and unrevoked Proxy Cards will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. Executed but unmarked Proxy Cards will be voted: (i) “FOR” the election of each director nominee listed on the Proxy Card; (ii) “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of

the Company’s named executive officers; (iii) “FOR” the approval of the Amendment to the 2005 Plan; and (vi) “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of independent auditors for the 2013 fiscal year. The Company’s Board of Directors does not presently intend to bring any business before the Annual Meeting other than that referred to in this Proxy Statement and specified in the notice of the Annual Meeting. By signing the Proxy Cards, stockholders confer discretionary authority on the proxies (who are persons designated by the Board of Directors) to vote all shares covered by the Proxy Cards in their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including any motion made for adjournment of the Annual Meeting.

You may submit your proxy by mail, telephone or the internet. Proxies submitted by any of those methods will be treated in the same manner. If you are a stockholder of record, you may submit your proxy by signing and returning the enclosed Proxy Card by mail, telephone at 1-800-690-6903 or on the internet at http://www.proxyvote.com. If you hold your shares in street name, please follow the voting instructions forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other nominee.

Whether the proxy is submitted by mail, telephone or the internet, any stockholder who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering a written revocation to, or delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to, the Secretary of the Company, at 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, or (ii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). If you voted by telephone or the Internet and wish to change your vote, you may call the toll-free number or go to the Internet site, as may be applicable in the case of your earlier vote, and follow the directions for changing your vote.

The Company has adopted a majority vote standard in uncontested director elections. To be elected, each director nominee must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” will have no effect on the election of directors because only votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a nominee will be counted.

The proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” with respect to such proposal.

The proposal to approve the Amendment to the 2005 Plan requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to that proposal in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, provided that the total votes so cast on the proposal represents more than 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposal.

The proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the 2013 fiscal year requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” with respect to such proposal.

A stockholder may “ABSTAIN” on any proposal that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. If a stockholder chooses to “ABSTAIN,” such stockholder’s shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum on all matters and will be considered entitled to vote, but will have no effect with respect to the outcome of the vote to elect directors, to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers or to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent auditors.

However, according to the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, rules, a vote to “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to approve the Amendment to the 2005 Plan will be considered as a vote cast with respect to such matter, and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” that proposal.

Under the rules of the NYSE, if a broker or other financial institution holds a client’s shares in its name and the client does not provide voting instructions to them, that firm has discretion to vote such shares for certain routine matters. Proposal No. 4, the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditor, is a routine matter. On the other hand, the broker or other financial institution that holds a client’s shares in its name does not have discretion to vote such shares for non-routine matters. Proposals Nos. 1, 2, and 3 are non-routine matters, and the firm that holds shares in its name may not vote on those items, absent instruction from the client. When a firm votes a client’s shares on some, but not all, of the proposals at the Annual Meeting, the missing votes are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Those shares will be included in determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but are not considered voting power for purposes of voting on the non-routine items. Accordingly, broker non-votes will have no effect on any proposals, except that, with respect to the proposal to approve the Amendment to the 2005 Plan, the broker non-votes will not count toward the requirement that the total number of votes cast on the proposal, including abstentions, represent over 50% of the total shares entitled to vote on the proposal.

Delivery of One Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice to a Single Household to Reduce Duplicate Mailings

In connection with the Annual Meeting, the Company is required to send to each stockholder of record the Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice, and to arrange for an Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice to be sent to each beneficial stockholder whose shares are held by or in the name of a broker, bank, trust or other nominee. Because many stockholders hold shares of Pinnacle Common Stock in multiple accounts, this process would result in duplicate mailings of the Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice to stockholders who share the same address. To avoid this duplication, unless the Company receives instructions to the contrary from one or more of the stockholders sharing a mailing address, only one Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice will be sent to each address. Stockholders may, on their own initiative, avoid receiving duplicate mailings and save the Company the cost of producing and mailing duplicate documents as follows:

Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered in your own name and you are interested in consenting to the delivery of a single Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice, to enroll in the electronic delivery service go directly to our transfer agent’s website at www.amstock.com anytime and follow the instructions.

Beneficial Stockholders. If your shares are not registered in your own name, your broker, bank, trust or other nominee that holds your shares may have asked you to consent to the delivery of a single Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice if there are other Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. stockholders who share an address with you. If you currently receive more than one Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice at your household, and would like to receive only one copy of each in the future, you should contact your nominee.

Right to Request Separate Copies. If you consent to the delivery of a single Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice but later decide that you would prefer to receive a separate copy of the Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice, as applicable, for each stockholder sharing your address, then please notify us or your nominee, as applicable, and we or they will promptly deliver such additional Annual Reports, Proxy Statements or Notices. If you wish to receive a separate copy of the Annual Report, Proxy Statement or Notice for each stockholder sharing your address in the future, you may contact our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, directly by telephone at 1-800-937-5449, by mail 6201 15^th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219 or by visiting its website at www.amstock.com and following the instructions.

Under Delaware law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal or dissenters’ rights with respect to the proposals presented in this Proxy Statement.

Proxies are being solicited by the Company. The Company will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies from its stockholders, although stockholders who vote by telephone or the internet may incur telephone or internet access charges. The directors, executive officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, telegram, letter, facsimile, e-mail or in person. Such directors, executive officers and employees will not be specifically compensated for such services. Arrangements may also be made with brokers, custodians, nominees, and other record holders to forward proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock held of record by such brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders, and the Company may reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith.

At the Annual Meeting, holders of Pinnacle Common Stock will be asked to vote on the election of seven directors who will constitute the full Board of Directors of the Company. The Board of Directors has adopted a majority vote standard in uncontested director elections. Because we did not receive advance notice under our Bylaws of any stockholder nominees for director, the 2013 election of directors is an uncontested election. To be elected in an uncontested election, a director nominee must receive more “FOR” votes than “AGAINST” votes. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” will have no effect on the election of directors because only votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a nominee will be counted. Your brokerage firm or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to the election of directors without specific instructions from you as to how to vote with respect to the election of each of the eight nominees for director, because the election of directors is not considered a “routine” matter under the NYSE rules.

Each director elected will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders (and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified). The Company is a Delaware corporation and, under Delaware law, if an incumbent director is not elected, that director remains in office until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal. To address this potential outcome, the Board has adopted a director resignation and recusal policy in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Under this policy, the Board of Directors will nominate for re-election only those incumbent candidates who tender irrevocable resignations. The Board of Directors has obtained such resignations from each director nominee for election at the Annual Meeting. The irrevocable resignations will be effective upon (1) the failure to receive the required vote at any annual meeting at which directors are nominated for re-election and (2) Board acceptance of the resignations. In the event that a director nominee does not receive the required vote at the Annual Meeting, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept or reject a tendered resignation. The Board of Directors will publicly disclose its decision within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. In addition, the Board of Directors expects the director whose resignation is under consideration to abstain from participating in any decision regarding that resignation. If the Board of Directors does not accept the resignation, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. If the Board of Directors accepts the resignation, then the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of the Board of Directors.

Following the conclusion of the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Lynn P. Reitnouer retired from the Board of Directors. On January 15, 2013, John V. Giovenco retired as a director. In addition, on February 11, 2013, the Board of Directors approved a resolution reducing the size of the Board of Directors from eight members to seven members.

After the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors may increase the size of the Board and fill any resulting vacancy or vacancies, but the Board of Directors has no present intention to do so. If the Board of Directors increases the size of the Board and elects a new director to fill the resulting vacancy or vacancies, the new director or directors must stand for election at the next year’s annual meeting of stockholders. All of the nominees listed below currently serve on the Board of Directors of the Company.

Each proxy received will be voted for the election of the persons named below, unless the stockholder signing such proxy abstains with respect to one or more of these nominees in the manner described in the proxy. Although it is not contemplated that any nominee named below will decline or be unable to serve as a director, in the event any nominee declines or is unable to serve as a director, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders for a substitute nominee as directed by the Board of Directors.

There are no family relationships between any director, nominee or executive officer and any other director, nominee or executive officer of the Company. There are no arrangements or understandings between any director, nominee or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he has been or will be selected as a director, nominee and/or executive officer of the Company other than arrangements or understandings with any such director, nominee and/or executive officer acting in his or her capacity as such. See “—Information Regarding the Director Nominees.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ELECTION OF ALL OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

It is the policy of the Board, as set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, to select director nominees who have achieved success in their personal fields and who demonstrate integrity and high personal and professional ethics, sound business judgment, and willingness to devote the requisite time to their duties as director, and who will contribute to the Company’s overall corporate goals. Board members are evaluated and selected based on their individual merit, as well as in the context of the needs of the Board as a whole.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying, recruiting, reviewing, and recommending to the Board qualified individuals to be nominated for election or reelection as directors, consistent with the criteria set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Depending on the circumstances, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers candidates recommended by Board members, third parties and, to the extent deemed appropriate, director search firms.

Before recommending to the Board a new or incumbent director for election or reelection, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews his or her qualifications, including capability, availability to serve, conflicts of interest, understanding of the gaming industry, finance and other elements relevant to the Company’s business, educational, business and professional background, age and past performance as a Board member (including past attendance at, and participation in, meetings of the Board and its committees and contributions to their activities). The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, in conducting such evaluation, may also take into account such other factors as it deems relevant. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also receives disclosures relating to a director’s independence and assists the Board in making determinations as to the independence of the directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also conducts an annual review of the composition of the Board as a whole, including whether the Board reflects the appropriate degree of independence, balance of sound judgment, business specialization, technical skills, diversity and other desired qualities, and satisfies the other requirements set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

In particular, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks directors with established strong professional reputations and expertise in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of the Company’s business. While the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines do not prescribe diversity standards, as a matter of practice, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers diversity in the context of the Board as a whole and takes into account the personal characteristics (gender, ethnicity, age) and experience (industry, professional, public service) of current and prospective directors to facilitate Board deliberations that reflect a broad range of perspectives. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the effectiveness of those efforts as part of its annual self-evaluation process.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider Board nominee recommendations by stockholders who have beneficially owned more than five percent of the Company’s then-outstanding shares of Pinnacle Common Stock for at least two consecutive years as of the date of making the proposal and who submit in writing the names and supporting information to the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee at the address of the Company’s principal executive offices. A stockholder recommendation must

contain: (a) the name and address of the stockholder making the recommendation, the class and number of shares of the Company’s capital stock owned beneficially by such stockholder, and documentary support that such stockholder satisfies the requisite stock ownership threshold and holding period; and (b) as to the proposed nominee, the name, age, business and residence addresses, principal occupation or employment, number of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock held by the nominee, a résumé of his or her business and educational background, information that would be required in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee, and a signed consent of the nominee to serve as a director, if nominated and elected. In order to be considered, a stockholder recommendation for nomination with respect to an upcoming annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee no later than the 120^th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date of the Company’s proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting, with certain exceptions that are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Company’s policies and procedures regarding the selection of director nominees are described in greater detail in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which are available on the Company’s website at www.pnkinc.com. In addition, printed copies of such Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are available upon written request to Investor Relations, Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148.

As contrasted to a stockholder recommendation of a nominee for consideration by the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, stockholders who wish to nominate directors at future annual meetings must comply with the applicable provisions of the Company’s Bylaws, as described in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for the Next Annual Meeting.”

Set forth below is information with respect to the nominees, including their recent employment or principal occupation, a summary of their specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that they are qualified to serve as a director, the names of other public companies for which they currently serve as a director or have served as a director within the past five years, their period of service as a Pinnacle’s director and their age. All of the nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and have agreed to serve on the Board of Directors, if elected.

Mr. Comer has been one of the Company’s directors since July 2007. He is a retired accounting firm managing partner. He brings substantial accounting expertise to the Company. He serves as a director of Southwest Gas Corporation and has served in that role since January 2007. He began his career with Arthur Andersen LLP in Los Angeles and established Arthur Andersen’s Las Vegas office, as its managing partner, in 1985. Leaving Arthur Andersen in 2002, Mr. Comer took a position as partner with Deloitte & Touche LLP and

was promoted to managing partner of its Nevada practice in 2004 and retired in 2006. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Nevada Society of Certified Public Accountants and holds professional CPA license in Nevada. He is also active in numerous civic, educational, and charitable organizations. Mr. Comer’s over 35 years of accounting experience and expertise and his integral involvement in other public gaming companies’ auditing practices provide our Board with invaluable expertise in these areas, including in his role as Chair of our Audit Committee.

Mr. Goeglein has been one of the Company’s directors since December 2003. He brings more than 35 years of experience in the hospitality and gaming industry and is a National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Board Leadership Fellow. In addition to his position as director of the Company, he has served as the Non-executive Chairman of the Board of the Company since March 2010; lead director of the Company from May 2009 to November 2009; Interim Non-executive Chairman of the Board from November 2009 to March 2010; and was also a director of the Company from 1997 to 1998; Owner and Managing Member, Evening Star Holdings, LLC (Business Consulting Firm) since mid-2005; Owner and Managing Member, Evening Star Hospitality, LLC (acquirer, developer and operator of non-gaming resort properties) from 2003 to early 2005; President and Chief Operating Officer, Holiday Corporation (the parent company of Holiday Inn, Harrah’s Hotels and Casinos, Hampton Inns and Embassy Suites) from 1984 to 1987; Executive Vice President and Director, Holiday Corporation from 1978 to 1984; President and Chief Executive Officer, Harrah’s Hotels and Casinos from 1980 to 1984; and Director, Boomtown, Inc. from 1993 to 1997. He served as President from 1997 and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 of Aladdin Gaming, LLC and Aladdin Gaming Holdings, LLC (developer and operator of the Aladdin Resort & Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada), in each case until September 2001. Mr. Goeglein’s extensive experience as a senior executive in the hospitality industry, including his service as chief executive officer of Harrah’s Hotels and Casinos and Aladdin Gaming LLC, provide significant insight and expertise to our Board in all facets of the Company’s operations and in its financing activities.

Mr. Leslie has been one of the Company’s directors since October 2002 and has been a Partner of Armstrong Teasdale LLP (law firm) since January 2008. In addition, he was Of Counsel of Beckley, Singleton (law firm) from 2003 to 2008; Partner, Leslie & Campbell (law firm) from 2001 to 2003; Partner, Bernhard & Leslie (law firm) from 1996 to 2001; Partner, Beckley, Singleton from 1986 to 1996; and an Associate, then Partner, Vargas & Bartlett (law firm) from 1979 to 1986. He is an honorary citizen of the City of New Orleans. Mr. Leslie’s extensive legal career, including his representation of various clients on gaming industry issues, gives him the leadership and consensus building skills to guide our Board on a variety of matters, including governance, audit, compliance, risk management and legal oversight, and provides our Board with invaluable expertise in these areas, including in his role as Chair of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Mr. Martineau has been one of the Company’s directors since 1999 and has served as Vice Chairman of the Board since May 2012. He is currently a business advisor and private investor. In addition, he was Chairman, Genesis Portfolio Partners, LLC (start-up company development) from 1998 to 2009; Director, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. from 1973 to June 2010; Director, Borgen Systems from 1994 to 2005; Director, Northstar Photonics (telecommunications business) from 1998 to 2002; Executive Vice President, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (a glass design and development corporation that acquired Viracon, Inc. in 1973) from 1996 to 1998; President and Founder, Viracon, Inc. (flat glass fabricator) from 1970 to 1996; and Trustee, Owatonna Foundation since 1973. Mr. Martineau’s background as an entrepreneur and as a businessman has been very valuable to the Board both in an operational context and in terms of evaluating its various development projects. Mr. Martineau’s service on several other boards of directors provides him with insights that are valuable to the Board in the areas of compensation, corporate governance and other Board functions.

Ms. Rogers has been one of the Company’s directors since March 2012. She brings over 25 years of experience to our Board of Directors for working in both the public and private sectors. She is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Publishing Company, LLC, a lifestyle company inspired by the African American experience, and has served in this role since August 2010. Prior to this position, she served as the White House Social Secretary for President Obama from January 2009 to April 2010; President of Social Networking for

Allstate Financial, a business unit of The Allstate Corporation, an insurance provider, from July 2008 to December 2008; President of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas, two utility companies of Peoples Energy Corporation (a public company acquired by Integrys Energy Group), from 2004 to July 2008; Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and Vice President of Peoples Energy Corporation from 1997 to 2004; and Director, Illinois Lottery from 1991 to 1997. In addition, Ms. Rogers served on the Board of Trustees of Equity Residential, a publicly traded real estate investment trust, from October 2003 to January 2009. She has also served on several corporate and not-for-profit boards, including Blue Cross Blue Shield, and as the Vice Chairman of the Lincoln Park Zoo and the Museum of Science and Industry. She also currently serves on the boards of DonorsChoose, Northwestern Memorial Foundation and World Business Chicago. Ms. Rogers’ extensive experience as a senior executive in the public and private sectors provide significant insight and expertise to our Board related to operations and marketing and in the Company’s development and financings activities.

Mr. Sanfilippo has been the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and one of the Company’s directors since March 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sanfilippo was the President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Multimedia Games, Inc., a slot machine manufacturer (which is now known as Multimedia Gaming Holding Company, Inc.) from June 2008 until March 2010. Prior to joining Multimedia Games, he was employed with Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. (which is now known as Caesars Entertainment, Inc.), the world’s largest casino company and a provider of branded casino entertainment. While at Harrah’s, Mr. Sanfilippo served as President of both the Western Division (2003—2004) and the Central Division (1997—2002 and 2004—2007), overseeing the operations of more than two dozen casino and casino-hotel destinations. He was also part of the senior management team that led the successful integration of numerous gaming companies acquired by Harrah’s, including Jack Binion’s Horseshoe Casinos, the Grand Casino & Hotel brand, Players International, and Louisiana Downs Racetrack. In addition to his duties as divisional President, Mr. Sanfilippo was also President and Chief Operating Officer for Harrah’s New Orleans and a member of the Board of Directors of Jazz Casino Corporation prior to its acquisition by Harrah’s. He has directed tribal gaming operations in Arizona, California and Kansas, and has held gaming licenses in most states that offer legalized gambling. Mr. Sanfilippo brings to the Company and our Board more than 30 years of industry experience, including managing and developing gaming operations in diverse jurisdictions, including Louisiana, Missouri, Indiana and Nevada. Mr. Sanfilippo’s extensive experience as a senior executive in the gaming industry and gaming manufacturing industry provide our Board with invaluable expertise in these areas.

Ms. Studenmund has been one of the Company’s directors since March 2012. She is a corporate director and advisor. She also serves as a director of Orbitz Worldwide, Inc., an online travel company, and has served in that role since July 2007. In addition, she serves as a director for CoreLogic, Inc., a business analytics company, and has served in that role since July 2012. She also has serves as a director for several public funds as well as other funds for Western Asset, a major fixed income fund, since 2004; and as a director of several private companies, including Forest Lawn Memorial Parks, an industry-leading memorial parks provider, since 2002. She is also a director of Huntington Memorial Hospital, a regional teaching hospital in Pasadena, California. From January 2001 to January 2004, Ms. Studenmund was Chief Operating Officer of Overture Services, Inc., the creator of paid search, acquired by Yahoo, Inc. in 2004. From February 2000 to January 2001, she was President and Chief Operating Officer of PayMyBills.com, the leading online bill management company. Before becoming an executive in the internet business, she was an executive in the financial services industry, primarily at First Interstate Bank, now known as Wells Fargo. Ms. Studenmund has over 30 years of comprehensive executive management and operating experience across a diverse set of businesses, including start-ups, rapid growth, turnarounds and mergers and acquisitions in the internet and financial services industries. Within these environments, she has served as a successful President, Chief Operating Officer and director of both public and private companies. Ms. Studenmund’s extensive experience as a senior executive and as a director provide our Board with broad operational expertise and insights that are valuable to the Board in the areas of compensation, corporate governance and other Board functions.

The Board of Directors has determined that each of the following directors is an independent director as defined by the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE and the categorical independence standards adopted by the Board of Directors: Stephen C. Comer, Richard J. Goeglein, John V. Giovenco, Bruce A. Leslie, James L. Martineau, Desirée Rogers, Lynn P. Reitnouer and Jaynie Miller Studenmund. The Board of Directors determined that Anthony M. Sanfilippo, who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is not an independent director. The Board of Directors considered all relationships between the independent directors and the Company and determined that each such director had no relationship with the Company (except as director, stockholder and bondholder). The categorical independence standards are available on the Company’s website at www.pnkinc.com. The Board of Directors has also determined that all members of the Audit, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Compensation Committees are independent directors, as defined by the Corporate Governance Rules of the NYSE and the categorical independence standards adopted by the Board of Directors. The directors nominated by the Board of Directors for election at the Annual Meeting were recommended by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Stockholders and interested parties wishing to communicate directly with the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board, the Chair of any committee, or the non-management directors as a group or any of the individual directors about matters of general interest to stockholders are welcome to do so by writing the Company’s Secretary at 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148. The Secretary will forward these communications as directed by the stockholders and interested parties.

The Company’s non-management directors meet periodically in executive session, as required by the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Richard J. Goeglein, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, presides at these executive sessions. If the non-management directors were to include directors who are not independent pursuant to the NYSE rules, then the independent directors will meet in executive session at least once a year. Any non-management director may request that an executive session of the non-management members of the Board be scheduled.

The Company’s Bylaws mandate that the Chairman of the Board be a director who is not the current Chief Executive Officer or current employee of the Company. The Company believes that this separation of roles promotes more effective communication channels for the Board to express its views on management. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Anthony M. Sanfilippo, has over 30 years experience in the gaming industry and is responsible for the strategic direction, day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company. The Company’s Chairman of the Board, Richard J. Goeglein, who has extensive experience as a senior executive in the hospitality industry and as a member of the Company’s Board, presides over meetings and executive sessions of the Board of Directors and serves as the primary liaison between the President and Chief Executive Officer and the other directors. Given the size of the Board, we believe that this separation of roles and allocation of distinct responsibilities to each role facilitates communication between senior management and the full Board of Directors about issues such as corporate governance, management development, executive compensation and company performance.

Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, the Chairman of the Board may call special meetings of stockholders and the Board of Directors act as Chairman of the meeting of stockholders and preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors and stockholders at which he or she shall be present and shall have, and may exercise, such powers as may, from time to time, be assigned to him or her by the Board of Directors, the Company’s Bylaws or as may be provided by law.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethical Business Conduct, a code of ethics that applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees. Any substantive amendments to the provisions of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct that apply to the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer and any waiver from a provision of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct to the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer will be disclosed on the Company’s website or in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Code of Ethical Business Conduct is publicly available on the Company’s website at www.pnkinc.com and in print upon written request to Investor Relations, Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148.

The full Board of Directors of the Company had twenty-three meetings in 2012. During 2012, each incumbent director of the Company during his or her term attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of the committees of the Board on which he or she served.

Although the Company has no formal policy with regard to Board members’ attendance at its annual meetings of stockholders, eight out of the nine of the Company’s directors then serving attended the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Company has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee within the meaning of Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Company’s Audit Committee is currently chaired by Mr. Comer and consists of Messrs. Comer and Leslie and Ms. Studenmund. Among its functions, the Committee is:

Messrs. Comer and Leslie and Ms. Studenmund are independent as that term is defined in Rule 303A.02 of the NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(ii) of the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that Mr. Comer is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules, based upon, among other things, his accounting background and having served as a partner of a major accounting firm. The Audit Committee met eight times in 2012.

The Company has a Compensation Committee, which is currently chaired by Mr. Martineau and consists of Messrs. Martineau and Comer and Ms. Studenmund. Among its functions, the Compensation Committee is:

The Compensation Committee met nine times in 2012. The Compensation Committee may, to the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations, form and delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee so long as such subcommittee consists of at least two members of the Compensation Committee. In carrying out its purposes and responsibilities, the Compensation Committee has authority to retain outside counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate. For a discussion regarding the Compensation Committee’s use of outside advisors and the role of executives officers in compensation matters, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Role of Management in Compensation Process and Role of Outside Consultants” below.

The Company has a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which is currently chaired by Mr. Leslie and consists of Messrs. Leslie and Martineau and Ms. Rogers. Among its functions, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is:

The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which are available on the Company’s website at www.pnkinc.com. Printed copies of these documents are also available upon written request to Investor Relations, Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148.

The Company has a Compliance Committee that monitors the Company’s compliance with gaming laws in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Mr. Leslie and Mses. Rogers and Studenmund currently serve on the Company’s Compliance Committee with other Compliance Committee members who are not directors, and on the Compliance Subcommittee of the Board of Directors. During 2012, the Compliance Committee had four meetings and the Compliance Subcommittee had one meeting. The Compliance Subcommittee was instituted to ensure timely notification to the Board of Directors of any material compliance issues, assist the Compliance Committee in performing its duties and to supervise the Company’s actions in response to reports received from the Company’s employee hotline.

The Board of Directors and each of the committees of the Board of Directors indentifies, prioritizes and evaluates various risks that are in the purview of their charters. Management also independently identifies, prioritizes and evaluates enterprise risks. Management regularly reports on such risks to the Board of Directors. Particular financial risks are overseen by the Audit Committee of the Board; compliance and reputational risks are typically overseen by the Compliance Committee and the Compliance Subcommittee of the Board. The

enterprise risk management program as a whole is reviewed annually by the Board. Additional review or reporting on enterprise risks is conducted as needed or as requested by the Board or any Committee. Also, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation programs so they do not encourage excessive risk-taking. The Board’s administration of its risk oversight function has not affected the Board’s leadership structure.

The compensation of the Company’s non-employee directors is paid in the form of an annual retainer, meeting and chair fees and stock-based awards. The fees that each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) or committee chair received for his or her service during 2012 are the following:

The Chairman of the Board receives an annual retainer of $191,000, effective as of May 22, 2012; prior to that date, the Chairman of the Board received an annual retainer of $185,000. The annual retainer paid to the Chairman of the Board was in lieu of the annual retainer of $66,000 paid to other directors and attendance fees for attending Board or committee meetings, except prior to May 22, 2012, when the Chairman of the Board was a member of the Compliance Committee, he received fees for attending meetings of the Compliance Committee (which are $1,500 per meeting).

In 2012, Pinnacle granted to each non-employee director who was then serving 10,000 options, which were granted on the date of the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The exercise price for each option was the closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on the date of grant. All of the options vested immediately on the date of grant. In addition, Pinnacle granted to each non-employee director who was then serving 6,000 restricted stock units, which were granted and vested on the date of the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. On March 19, 2012, Pinnacle granted 10,000 fully vested options to each of Mses. Rogers and Studenmund upon becoming members of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of the options was the closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on the date of grant. In addition, on May 15, 2012, Mr. Martineau was granted 3,000 restricted stock units and Messrs. Leslie, Reitnouer and Giovenco were each granted 500 restricted stock units in connection with the work done by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in recommending that Mses. Rogers and Studenmund become members of the Board of Directors. Each of the restricted stock units vested on the date of grant.

Pursuant to the Directors Health and Medical Insurance Plan, or the Directors Health Plan, directors and their dependents are entitled to receive the same coverage as the Company’s employees under the Company’s group health plan. The Directors Health Plan provides for coverage for members of the Board of Directors, their spouses and children up to age 26 under the Company’s group health plan, and upon cessation of the services of a member who is in office on January 1, 2011, a continuation of health and medical coverage under the Company’s group health plans for the member, his or her spouse and children up to age 26 for a period, for one year for every two years of service, up to a maximum of five years of extended medical coverage. Any new director who joins our Board after January 1, 2011 will not be entitled to extended coverage following cessation of service as a director, but may be eligible to elect continuation coverage as provided by law under the Company’s group health plan. The Directors Health Plan further provides that, to the extent that a director receives coverage outside of the Company’s group health plan network, the director will be responsible for paying the first $5,000 of any co-payments or co-deductibles, and the Company will be responsible for any amount that exceeds $5,000. If at any time during this extended coverage period, the eligible director, or his or her spouse or minor children, is insured under another health plan or Medicare, the Company’s health plans will provide secondary coverage to the extent permitted by law. Upon a change in control, the Company will use its best efforts to provide continuation of health insurance under individual policies provided to the directors.

Participation in the Company’s 2008 Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, or the Directors Plan, is limited to directors of Pinnacle, and each eligible director may elect to defer all or a portion of his or her annual retainer and any fees for meetings attended. Any such deferred compensation is credited to a deferred compensation account, either in cash or in shares of Pinnacle Common Stock, at each director’s election. The only condition to each director’s receipt of shares credited to his or her deferred compensation account is cessation of such director’s service as a director of Pinnacle.

As of the date the director’s compensation would otherwise have been paid, and depending on the director’s election, the director’s deferred compensation account will be credited with either:

If a director elects to defer compensation in cash, all such amounts credited to the director’s deferred compensation account will bear interest at an amount to be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. No current director has deferred compensation in cash.

If a director has elected to receive shares of Pinnacle Common Stock in lieu of his or her cash, and we declare a dividend, such director’s deferred compensation account is credited at the end of each calendar quarter with the number of full and/or fractional shares of Pinnacle Common Stock obtained by dividing the dividends which would have been paid on the shares credited to the director’s deferred compensation account by the closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on the NYSE on the date such dividend was paid.

Participating directors do not have any interest in the cash and/or Pinnacle Common Stock credited to their deferred compensation accounts until distributed in accordance with the Directors Plan, nor do they have any voting rights with respect to such shares until shares credited to their deferred compensation accounts are distributed. The rights of a director to receive payments under the Directors Plan are no greater than the rights of an unsecured general creditor of Pinnacle.

Each participating director may elect to have the aggregate amount of cash and shares credited to his or her deferred compensation account distributed to him or her in one lump sum payment or in a number of approximately equal annual installments over a period of time not to exceed fifteen years. The lump sum payment or the first installment will be paid as of the first business day of the calendar quarter immediately following the cessation of the director’s service as a director. Before the beginning of any calendar year, a director may elect to change the method of distribution of any future interests in cash and/or Pinnacle Common Stock credited to his or her deferred compensation account in such calendar year.

The maximum number of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock that can be issued pursuant to the Directors Plan is 525,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock. As of March 27, 2013, 218,647 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock were available for issuance under the Directors Plan. The shares of Pinnacle Common Stock to be issued under the Directors Plan may be either authorized and unissued shares or reacquired shares. Messrs. Leslie and Comer are the only directors that currently participate in the Directors Plan.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation earned by or paid to each non-employee director who served on the Board of Directors in 2012.

During 2012, Messrs. Comer, Reitnouer and Martineau and Ms. Studenmund served on the Compensation Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee or former officer or employee of Pinnacle or its subsidiaries or has any interlocking relationships that are subject to disclosure under the rules of the SEC relating to compensation committees.

Executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors, subject to rights, if any, under contracts of employment. See “Employment Agreements and Other Change in Control Provisions” below. The current executive officers are as follows:

For biographical information for Mr. Sanfilippo, see “—Information Regarding the Director Nominees” above.

Mr. Ruisanchez has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2011. Prior to serving as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ruisanchez served as the Company’s Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning and Development from August 2008 to April 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ruisanchez was Senior Managing Director at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (a brokerage, investment advisory, and corporate advisory services company) where he held various positions starting from 1997 to 2008. As Senior Managing Director of Bear, Stearns & Co., Mr. Ruisanchez was responsible for corporate clients in the gaming, lodging and leisure industries, as well as financial sponsor banking relationships.

Mr. Godfrey has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President since February 2005 and as Secretary and General Counsel of the Company since August 2002; Senior Vice President of the Company from August 2002 to February 2005; Partner, Schreck Brignone Godfrey (law firm) from January 1997 to August 2002; Partner, Schreck, Jones, Bernhard, Woloson & Godfrey (law firm) from June 1984 to December 1996; Chief Deputy Attorney General, Nevada Attorney General’s Office, Gaming Division, from 1983 to 1984; Deputy Attorney General, Nevada Attorney General’s Office, Gaming Division, from 1980 to 1983; Deputy State Industrial Attorney for the State of Nevada from 1977 to 1980; Trustee, International Association of Gaming Advisors (and former President) from October 2000 to October 2006 and Counselor since 2007; and Member, Executive Committee of the Nevada State Bar’s Gaming Law Section since June 2002.

Ms. Shanks has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer since October 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Shanks served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Multimedia Games, Inc., a slot machine manufacturer (which is now known as Multimedia Gaming Holding Company, Inc.) from July 2008 until October 2010. Ms. Shanks brings to the Company more than 30 years of marketing experience in gaming entertainment, including as Senior Vice President of Brand Management for Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. (which is now known as Caesars Entertainment, Inc.). During her time with Harrah’s, Ms. Shanks was responsible for maximizing the value of the company’s key strategic brands—Caesars, Harrah’s, and Horseshoe Casinos; the Total Rewards player loyalty program; and the World Series of Poker.

Mr. Iafrate has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Regional Operations since April 2012. Mr. Iafrate currently oversees all of the operations of the Company’s properties in Louisiana and Retama Park Racetrack in Texas. From January 2012 to April 2012, Mr. Iafrate served as the Company’s Senior Vice President—Louisiana Operations. From May 2010 to January 2012, Mr. Iafrate severed as the Company’s Vice President and General Manager of L’Auberge Lake Charles. Before joining the Company in May 2010, Mr. Iafrate spent 12 years at Harrah’s Entertainment. During his time at Harrah’s, Mr. Iafrate served in various management positions at the operational and regional levels and was most recently the Senior Vice President and General Manager of Harrah’s Northwest Louisiana Operations.

Mr. Walkoff has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Regional Operations since April 2012. Mr. Walkoff currently oversees all of the operations of the Company’s properties in Missouri, Indiana, and Ohio. Prior to April 2012, Mr. Walkoff served as Senior Vice President and General Manager—St. Louis since August 2010. Before joining the Company in August 2010, Mr. Walkoff served as the General Manager of the Seneca Niagara Casino and Hotel and Buffalo Creek Casino for Seneca Gaming Corporation from February 2010 to August 2010. From May 1993 to February 2010, Mr. Walkoff served in various management positions at the operational and regional levels of Harrah’s and was most recently Vice President and Assistant General Manager of Horeshoe Southern Indiana from August 2007 to January 2010.

Mr. Boudreaux has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President since August 2010 and as Chief Accounting Officer since April 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Boudreaux served in various finance and accounting positions at the operational, regional and corporate levels of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. from June 1999 through April 2007. Earlier in his career, Mr. Boudreaux held various accounting positions within the energy and retail industries and began his career working for PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, an international public accounting firm.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed by the Company on behalf of its directors and officers, or furnished to the Company by its stockholders holding more than 10% of Pinnacle Common Stock, during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2012 pursuant to Rule 16a-3(e) of the Exchange Act, all required reports on such forms were timely filed, except for an amended Form 3 filed on June 18, 2012, on behalf of Mr. Iafrate, an amended Form 3 filed on October 1, 2012, on behalf of Mr. Walkoff, and a Form 4 filed on October 10, 2012, on behalf of Ms. Shanks.

The following table sets forth the name, number of shares and percent of the outstanding shares of Pinnacle Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 27, 2013 (except where a different date is indicated below) by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Pinnacle Common Stock, each director, each named executive officer (as defined in the SEC rules), and all directors and executive officers as a group. In each instance, except as otherwise indicated, information as to the number of shares owned and the nature of ownership has been provided by the individuals or entities identified or described and is not within the direct knowledge of the Company.

Compensation Policies and Practices As They Relate to the Company’s Risk Management

The Compensation Committee has also reviewed the Company’s compensation programs for employees, including executive officers, and has concluded that these programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee believes that the design of the Company’s annual cash and long-term equity incentives provide an effective and appropriate mix of incentives to help ensure that the Company’s performance is focused on long-term stockholder value creation and does not encourage the taking of short-term risks at the expense of long-term results. In general, bonus opportunities for Company employees are capped, and the Company has discretion to reduce bonus payments (or pay no bonus) based on individual performance and any other factors it may determine to be appropriate in the circumstances.

The Company’s Audit Committee charter requires that the Audit Committee review on an ongoing basis and approve or disapprove all related party transactions that are required to be disclosed by Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

In August 2010, John V. Giovenco purchased in the open market $400,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s then outstanding 7.50% senior subordinated notes due 2015 (the “7.50% Notes”). In November 2011, Mr. Giovenco purchased in the open market $300,000 in aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Notes. In December 2011, Mr. Giovenco purchased in the open market $500,000 in aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Notes. As a result, Mr. Giovenco held a total of $1.2 million in aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Notes. As a holder of the 7.50% Notes, he was entitled to receive semi-annual interest payments at a rate of 7.50%. Mr. Giovenco’s acquisition of the 7.50% Notes and the receipt of interest payments thereon were acquired in the open market and any benefits he received in respect of the 7.50% Notes were afforded to all holders of the 7.50% Notes on a pro rata basis. As a result, each of these open market purchases of the 7.50% Notes did not require the approval of the Audit Committee.

On March 20, 2012, the Company redeemed all $385 million in aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, including the 7.50% Notes held by Mr. Giovenco. The 7.50% Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 103.750% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest. When the Board of Directors (except for Mr. Giovenco who abstained from voting) approved the redemption of all $385 million in aggregate principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, it approved the redemption of Mr. Giovenco’s 7.50% Notes. Since the Board of Directors of the Company approved the redemption of the 7.50% Notes, a separate approval was not required by the Audit Committee.

In addition, in August 2011, Mr. Giovenco purchased in the open market $300,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 8.625% senior notes due 2017 (the “8.625% Notes”). As a holder of the 8.625% Notes, he is entitled to receive semi-annual interest payments at a rate of 8.625% Notes of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.625% Notes that he holds. Mr. Giovenco’s acquisition of the 8.625% Notes and the receipt of interest payments thereon were acquired in the open market and any benefits he received in respect of the 8.625% Notes were afforded to all holders of the 8.625% Notes on a pro rata basis. As a result, this open market purchase of the 8.625% Notes did not require the approval of the Audit Committee.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides narrative disclosure regarding the compensation plans, programs and arrangements we employed for individuals serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the 2012 fiscal year, as determined under the rules of the SEC (collectively, our “named executive officers”).

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. is an owner, operator and developer of casinos and related hospitality and entertainment facilities. Our current operating properties include:

In December 2012, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Ameristar Casinos, Inc. (“Ameristar”) for $26.50 per share, in an all cash transaction valued at $2.8 billion, including assumed debt. Ameristar owns and operates casino facilities in St. Charles near St. Louis, Missouri; Kansas City, Missouri; Council Bluffs, Iowa; Black Hawk, Colorado; Vicksburg, Mississippi; East Chicago, Indiana; and the Jackpot properties in Jackpot, Nevada. Ameristar is currently developing a casino resort adjacent to L’Auberge Lake Charles. We expect that the transaction will close by the end of the third quarter 2013, subject to closing conditions and regulatory approvals. We believe that this transaction will be transformative for our Company, stockholders and team members.

The Company also owns a minority equity interest in Asian Coast Development (Canada), Ltd. (“ACDL”), a British Columbia corporation. ACDL is the owner and developer of the Ho Tram Strip beachfront complex of integrated resorts and residential developments in southern Vietnam. The Company also has entered into a management agreement to manage a future second integrated resort at the Ho Tram Strip through 2058, with a potential 20-year extension. The first phase of the first integrated resort has been substantially completed. The opening of Grand Ho Tram is subject to regulatory approvals, including obtaining an amendment to an Investment Certificate. The project is subject to a number of risks as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

As a discretionary consumer entertainment and leisure product, our business is particularly sensitive to economic cycles and consumer sentiment, and, therefore, results from year to year can be volatile and somewhat unpredictable. Our business operations are also generally susceptible to changes in the competitive and legislative environment which can have an unanticipated impact on our operating results. Notwithstanding the above, the Company’s stock price increased by 56% during 2012.

In developing compensation plans for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee seeks to balance all of these business characteristics and create a program that will motivate and reward named executive officers for their performance and for creating value for our stockholders over time. The Compensation Committee regularly evaluates and revises, as necessary, our compensation programs to ensure that they support our business objectives and provide competitive compensation levels for our named executive officers. As both an owner-operator of existing casino properties and a developer of new properties, the business objectives that need to be recognized in our compensation programs include:

More specifically, our compensation programs strive to support our business needs by meeting the following objectives:

Although we reference the market from time to time for competitive pay practices in setting overall target pay levels for our executives, we do not define a specific percentile of market for targeting executive pay. We consider many factors, including the actual performance and contribution of our executives, and internal pay comparisons between our executives, when determining individual executive pay, as discussed in more detail below.

The Compensation Committee considers all relevant information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of the Company, knowledge of the peer companies discussed below, knowledge of each named executive officers and their business judgment when making decisions regarding our executive compensation program.

Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. has a strong philosophy that executive pay should increase and decrease as performance increases and decreases in order to align executive interests with those of our stockholders over time. Our executive pay system is thoughtfully designed to reinforce this philosophy and to drive value-creating financial, operating, and strategic results, while also taking our external environment into account. Our executive compensation program brings this philosophy to life by incorporating the following features:

In 2012, the Company’s Consolidated net revenues climbed 4.9% to a record $1.2 billion. This increase was outpaced by the rise in Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, which was up 13.1% to a record $285.2 million due to our focus on operational excellence. In 2012, we achieved record financial performance by implementing revenue growth and operational improvement initiatives across the Company’s properties. We continued to execute on revenue growth and operational improvement initiatives in 2012. Our mychoice customer loyalty program has gained significant traction, and we reduced a number of non-value added expenses across the Company, including reduced corporate overhead expenses. For a further discussion regarding Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to Income (loss) from continuing operations, please see Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations of the Annual Report on Form 10-K on pages 36 and 37.

Our operating performance in 2012 allowed us to continue to strengthen our balance sheet. In March 2012, the Company completed the issuance of $325 million of 7.75% senior subordinated notes due 2022 and entered into a $325 million term loan which matures in March 2019. Among other items, we used the proceeds of these financing transactions to redeem $385 million aggregate principal amount of 7.50% senior subordinated notes due 2015, and repaid the Company’s borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

The Compensation Committee took each of these accomplishments into account in assessing the performance of our named executive officers in 2012.

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for the compensation programs and policies pertaining to our named executive officers. The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee related to executive compensation include:

The Compensation Committee also is responsible for reviewing and submitting to the Board recommendations concerning compensation for our non-employee directors.

The Compensation Committee relies significantly on the input and recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer when evaluating factors relative to the compensation of the named executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer). Our Chief Executive Officer provides the Compensation Committee with his assessment of the performance of each named executive officer and his perspective on the factors described

above in developing his recommendations for each named executive officer’s compensation, including salary adjustments, equity grants and incentive bonuses. The Compensation Committee discusses our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, consults with its independent advisor, and then approves or modifies the recommendations in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, other than for his own compensation.

Our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is determined solely by the Compensation Committee, which approves any adjustments to his base salary, performance incentive compensation and equity awards from year to year. The Compensation Committee solicits our Chief Executive Officer’s perspective on his compensation, but makes determinations regarding his compensation independently and without him present. Our Chief Executive Officer attends portions of the Compensation Committee meetings, but does not attend portions of those meetings related to making specific decisions on his compensation.

In addition to recommendations put forth by our Chief Executive Officer, other members of our executive team are involved in the compensation process by assembling data to present to the Compensation Committee and by working with the outside independent compensation consultants to give them the information necessary for them to complete their reports. Other members of our executive management team also occasionally attend portions of the Compensation Committee meetings.

The Compensation Committee retains the services of outside independent executive compensation consultants to assess the competitiveness of our compensation programs, conduct other research as directed by the Compensation Committee, and support the Compensation Committee in the design of executive and Board of Director compensation. From 2007 through 2012, the Compensation Committee retained Farient Advisors LLC (the “Compensation Consultant”) to assist in the review and assessment of our compensation programs. During fiscal 2011, the Compensation Consultant support included a competitive assessment of compensation pertaining to our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, a review and recommendations regarding the terms of the Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement, an assessment regarding Board of Directors compensation levels and practices, and a review of management’s recommended revisions to our 2011 Annual Incentive Plan. In 2012, the Compensation Consultant reviewed the 2012 Annual Incentive Plan and related performance goals related to executive compensation and conducted an analysis related to director stock options and the ability of directors to exercise stock options following retirement. In 2013, the Compensation Committee retained Exequity LLP to review the Company’s compensation programs.

When determining the compensation opportunity for individual named executive officers, including salaries, bonuses, and equity grants, the Compensation Committee takes many factors into account, including such executive’s experience, responsibilities, management abilities, job performance, performance of the Company as a whole, current market conditions, competitive pay for similar positions at comparable companies and at companies in other industries that could recruit Pinnacle executives, and pay relative to other executives at Pinnacle. These factors are considered by the Compensation Committee in a subjective manner without any specific formula or weighting. The Company does not set compensation at a specific percentile of market comparisons. However, the Compensation Committee references the market from time to time for executives at similar companies to assess the overall competitiveness and reasonableness of pay.

More specifically, with the assistance of a compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee periodically considers information on the executive compensation from a peer group of publicly traded companies and from compensation surveys, which include data from companies in other industries that might recruit Pinnacle executives.

In order to assist the Compensation Committee in evaluating the pay of the Chief Executive Officer and also in evaluating the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation for the pay of the Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Consultant provided a competitive compensation analysis in 2011 which relied, in part, on an analysis of compensation at peer companies that are considered to be the closest comparisons to Pinnacle. These peer companies include:

In addition, the Compensation Consultant utilized broader compensation survey data, covering general industry and the hospitality and leisure industry, to further develop comparative data and to validate the peer group data. In addition, the Compensation Consultant collected data from the following additional larger peer reference companies to compare pay program design and pay policies, but not pay levels:

For 2012, the total direct compensation (including salary, target bonus, and the grant value of long-term incentives) for our Chief Executive Officer was below the gaming industry peer group median as disclosed in such companies’ proxy statements filed in 2012, while the Company’s one and three years annualized total shareholder returns exceeded the median of the same peer group.

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive team has unique skills and experience that, in some cases, limit the direct comparability of market data due to the relatively few number of gaming companies. Therefore, the Compensation Committee believes that differences from market medians, where they occur, are acceptable and appropriate for certain members of our senior leadership team. From time to time, we re-evaluate the companies that are in our peer group and we are currently considering changing our peer group in light of the potential Ameristar acquisition.

During fiscal 2012, our executive compensation and benefits consisted of the components listed in the table below, which provides a brief description of the principal types of compensation, how performance is factored into each type of compensation, and the objectives served by each element. A description of each element is discussed in greater detail following the table.

We intend for the base salaries of our named executive officers to provide a minimum level of compensation for highly qualified executives. The base salaries of our named executive officers were determined in the course of negotiations with the Company and are subject to occasional modification based on a subjective evaluation of each executive’s contribution, experience, responsibilities, external market data as well as the relative pay among senior executives at the Company. Each factor is considered on a discretionary basis without formulas or weights. We consider relative pay between executives because our perspective is that some consistency in pay emphasizes teamwork across the senior leadership level.

The table below shows the salaries for each named executive officer during 2012.

We intend that bonuses paid to our named executive officers will reward them for the achievement of successful financial, strategic, and operational performance over a short period of time. Beginning in fiscal 2011, we substantially revised our incentive plan designs. Similar to the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, the 2012 Annual Incentive Plan measures and rewards our named executive officers based on a formula directly linked to the annual financial results of the Company, as measured by Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income are discussed below and were used for calculating bonuses. These measures provide a highly operational focus and align the pay for our top executives directly with the short-term results delivered to our stockholders. It is the perspective of the Company and the Compensation Committee that an objective annual incentive system provides clarity for the senior executive team regarding their focus and rewards and encourages the attainment of “stretch” performance objectives by providing a clearly defined upside in the incentive plan design. The specific decisions related to 2012 are described in more detail below.

The 2012 Annual Incentive Plan approved by the Compensation Committee established a clearly defined annual incentive opportunity for all of our named executive officers. The objectives include:

Specifically, our annual bonuses for the named executive officers for 2012 were based on a formula using objective factors, with quantitative short-term financial targets set at the beginning of the year. Each executive had a defined bonus target as a percentage of salary, and the final bonus payable at the end of the year was determined based on the quantitative financial results at year end, compared to the targets set at the beginning of the year, along with a portion (up to 20% for 2012) linked to and subject to reduction for individual performance and contribution measured in a more subjective fashion. The upside potential for the quantitative performance goals was up to 200% of the target award for superior performance, with the potential to earn zero for underperformance relative to the stated performance objective.

Pursuant to the 2012 Annual Incentive Plan, each named executive officer was paid 75% of his or her bonus in cash and 25% of his or her bonus in restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The RSUs will vest on December 31, 2013 and settle in shares of Pinnacle Common Stock on January 1, 2016. In addition, each named executive officer was permitted to elect to be paid an additional 25% of his or her bonus in RSUs, which vested on the date of grant, March 8, 2013, and will settle in shares of Pinnacle Common Stock on January 1, 2016. For 2012, Mr. Sanfilippo elected to receive an additional 10% of his bonus in RSUs and the other named executive officers did not elect to receive an additional percentage of their bonus in RSUs. As a result, Mr. Sanfilippo received 65% of his bonus in cash and 35% of his bonus in RSUs and the other named executive officers received 75% of their bonuses in cash and 25% of their bonuses in RSUs. The number of the RSUs granted was determined by dividing

the dollar amount of the bonus payable in RSUs by the average closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on the last trading day of each month during the period beginning December 2011 and ending December 2012. The average price used for determining the number of RSUs was $11.43. The Compensation Committee determined that the use of RSUs helps retain executives and also ties their compensation to the long-term sustainable results of the Company.

For 2012, the specific award opportunities at threshold, target and maximum performance for each named executive officer was as follows:

To measure performance, the Compensation Committee selected a combination of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income to measure success in order to balance near term operational performance with delivering sustained improvements in cash flow from reduction of costs, investment and financing activities. The personal performance objectives were set to provide a subjective evaluation of each executive officer based on individual performance and contribution.

The Compensation Committee established targets for Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income near the beginning of 2012. For 2012, the threshold Adjusted EBITDA was $229.7 million, the target Adjusted EBITDA was $270.2 million and the maximum Adjusted EBITDA was $310.7 million. The percentage of the bonuses allocated to the achievement of Adjusted EBITDA was 70% of the total bonus. In addition, the Compensation Committee established a minimum Adjusted Net Income of $10.6 million and a target Adjusted Net Income of $51.1 million. The percentage of the bonuses allocated to the achievement of target Adjusted Net Income was 30% of the total bonus. In establishing the 2012 Annual Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee retained the discretion to decrease by up to 20%, but not to increase, the amount of any bonus even if the Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income goals were met or exceeded, based on such objective or subjective factors and circumstances as the Compensation Committee deems relevant or appropriate.

For purposes of determining bonuses, the Company achieved Adjusted EBITDA of $283.2 million and Adjusted Net Income of $57.2 million in 2012. The actual bonus awards as a percentage of the targets for Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income was 105%.

In calculating Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of determining bonuses, the Company began with income (loss) from continuing operations and made adjustments for the following items: income tax benefit (expense); other non-operating income; loss on extinguishment of debt; loss from equity method investment; interest expense, net of capitalized interest, write-downs, reserves, and recoveries; non-cash share-based compensation; pre-opening and development costs; depreciation and amortization; and results from L’Auberge Baton Rouge. In addition, the Compensation Committee made adjustments for the following items in calculating Adjusted EBITDA: lost income caused by weather related business disruptions; and adjustments to reserves for abandoned office space. In calculating Adjusted Net Income for purposes of determining bonuses, the Company began with net income and made adjustments for the following items: pre-opening and development costs; write-downs, reserves and recoveries; loss on early extinguishment of debt; adjustments for taxes on the foregoing; income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes; and results from L’Auberge Baton Rouge. In addition, the Compensation Committee made adjustments for the following items in calculating Adjusted Net Income: lost income caused by weather related business disruptions; adjustments to reserves for abandoned office space;

compensation expense related to director option grants; expenses associated with interest expense related to refinancings; and impairments related to Boomtown Reno and Atlantic City land holdings.

In determining whether to reduce the computed formula bonuses based on the Personal Performance Objectives, the Compensation Committee considered internal pay considerations among executives and the performance of the executives in performing his or her duties.

Based on the factors described in the table above, the Compensation Committee approved the following bonuses for our named executive officers for 2012:

We believe that awards of equity to our named executive officers provide a valuable incentive for them and helps align their interests with that of our stockholders for periods of time longer than one fiscal year. Stock options are an important part of our philosophy for aligning pay for performance, as executives can realize value on their stock options only if the stock price increases over the exercise price. RSU awards also help align pay with performance as their value fluctuates with changes in the share price over time. However, RSU awards also maintain some value in difficult economic environments and, therefore, meet our objectives of retaining executive talent and maintaining effective incentives during different economic environments. Both stock options and RSUs are typically subject to vesting and require each executive to remain employed with the Company for a period of time or risk forfeiting the award.

Beginning with fiscal 2010, the Company began making executive incentive grants annually (except as otherwise agreed for new hires as part of any inducement grants to join the Company or when an executive officer is promoted to a new position). It is our perspective that frequent grants of stock options allow us to provide stock option grants with exercise prices throughout the economic and business cycle, with executives receiving both high and low-priced options over time.

In 2012, the Compensation Committee approved option grants to each of our named executive officers. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved RSU grants to each of the named executive officers, except for Mr. Ruisanchez who received a large option grant to purchase 240,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock in 2011 for his new role as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The Compensation Committee took into consideration the guidelines it established for annual stock option grants when determining the size of these awards for 2012. The exercise price of each stock option is the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee does not delegate to management or others its decisions regarding stock options granted to named executive officers.

As a result of these considerations, the Compensation Committee approved the following equity grants for the following named executive officers on May 22, 2012:

The stock option grants vest in four equal annual installments beginning on May 24, 2012 and have 7-year terms. The RSUs vest in four equal annual installments beginning on March 24, 2012.

Further, as discussed above, the Compensation Committee granted RSUs to each named executive officer as part of their 2012 bonus, which is discussed on pages 29 and 30.

In December 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved of stock ownership guidelines for each of the Company’s executive officers and directors. Pursuant to the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, the Company’s executive officers are required to own the following shares of Pinnacle Common Stock within five years of January 1, 2011 or by December 31, 2016: President and Chief Executive Officer, 300,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock, Executive Vice Presidents, 50,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock, Senior Vice Presidents, 20,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock and directors, 20,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock. The following count toward the targeted ownership: (1) shares of Pinnacle Common Stock owned outright; (2) shares of Pinnacle Common Stock held in benefit plans (e.g., 401(k) Plan); (3) vested and/or unvested restricted stock; (4) vested and/or unvested restricted stock units; and (5) phantom stock units. Unexercised options do not count toward the targeted ownership. Each of the named executive officers exceeds the targeted ownership pursuant to the stock ownership guidelines.

The Company’s insider trading plan prohibits executive officers and directors from hedging their ownership of Pinnacle Common Stock, including transactions in puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to Pinnacle Common Stock. In addition, the Company’s insider trading plan prohibits executive officers and directors from placing shares of Pinnacle Common Stock in margin accounts and pledging shares of Pinnacle Common Stock.

With respect to risk related to compensation matters, the Compensation Committee considers, in establishing and reviewing the Company’s executive compensation program, whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk taking and has concluded that it does not. Executives’ base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage risk-taking. Bonuses are capped and are tied to overall corporate performance. A portion of compensation provided to the executive officers is in the form of options and restricted stock units that are important to help further align executives’ interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that these awards do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking, as the value of the restricted stock awards fluctuate dollar for dollar with the Company’s stock price and do not represent significant downward/upward risk and reward.

In March 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a policy on recovery of incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement, also known as a “clawback policy.” The policy provides that the

Compensation Committee may take any action to recover all or a portion of any excess bonus paid to an executive officer provided that (1) there is a restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year for which a bonus is paid, other than a restatement due to changes in accounting principles or applicable law, and (2) the Compensation Committee determines that the executive officer has received an “excess bonus” for the relevant fiscal year. The amount of the excess bonus shall be equal to the difference between the bonus paid to the executive officer and the payment or grant that would have been made based on the restated financial results. The requirement of an executive officer to repay all or a portion of the excess bonus as determined by the Compensation Committee shall only exist if the Audit Committee has taken steps to consider restating the financials prior to the end of the third year following the year in question.

The Compensation Committee may take such action in its discretion that it determines appropriate to recover all or a portion of the excess bonus if it deems such action appropriate under the facts and circumstances. Such actions may include recovery of all or a portion of such amount from the executive officer from any of the following sources: prior incentive compensation payments, future payments of incentive compensation, cancellation of outstanding equity awards, future equity awards, gains realized on the exercise of stock options, and direct repayment by the executive officer.

The named executive officers are eligible to participate in all of the Company’s normal retirement, and welfare programs on the same terms as generally available to substantially all of our full-time employees. These include a 401(k) plan and matching contributions, health and disability insurance coverage, and group life insurance programs. In addition, the Company’s named executive officers are covered by the Company’s general health plan applicable to all of the Company’s employees.

In addition to these standard retirement and welfare benefits, the Company provides certain additional savings and benefit programs available to our senior management, which we believe are in the best interest of our stockholders, as they enable us to attract and retain high quality executives and help those executives maintain their focus on the business needs of the Company rather than their own personal financial considerations. During 2012, these additional executive benefits included:

The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, or the Executive Plan, allows executive officers to elect to defer a portion of their salary and bonuses each year into a non-qualified deferred compensation account, which is an unsecured obligation of the Company to pay compensation at a later date. This allows the executives to receive tax-deferred savings and appreciation to support their individual retirement needs.

The Compensation Committee has the discretion to change the floating crediting rate for deferrals under the Executive Plan on a prospective basis as of the beginning of any quarter. Amounts that an executive officer elects to defer under the Executive Plan are credited with a floating rate of interest based on average yields on 30-year U.S. treasury bonds, plus two percentage points, not to exceed 8% per annum, compounded quarterly.

On March 1, 2011, the Board approved certain amendments to the Executive Plan effective as of January 1, 2011. The amendments to the Plan provide for the deferral of a portion of a Plan participant’s compensation in the form of restricted stock units, defined as “Other Stock Unit Awards,” in coordination with the 2005 Plan. The restricted stock units deferred under the Executive Plan are credited to the participant’s stock unit account under the Executive Plan. On the date of distribution, the restricted stock units are settled in an equal number of shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company reimburses certain members of senior management, including the named executive officers, for expenses related to financial or tax assistance and estate planning. The named executive officers are entitled to be reimbursed for expenses up to the following amounts: (1) $7,500 for Mr. Sanfilippo; and (2) $5,000 for Messrs. Ruisanchez, Godfrey and Iafrate and Ms. Shanks.

We also provide limited perquisites to our named executive officers. The perquisites consist of the following: (a) financial and tax planning expenses (as discussed above); (b) relocation expenses; (c) travel expenses for family members; and (d) expenses associated with the annual physical examination of the executive and his or her spouse or significant other, which include travel expenses, hotel accommodations and related expenses. In addition, we also paid for certain travel expenses associated with Ms. Shanks, who lives in Reno, Nevada and commutes to Las Vegas, Nevada, including a corporate apartment and incidental expenses associated with the corporate apartment, use of a Company automobile, airfare and incidental expenses associated with Ms. Shanks traveling to and from Reno, Nevada to our Las Vegas, Nevada offices. In 2012, Messrs. Sanfilippo, Ruisanchez and Godfrey did not receive perquisites which exceeded $10,000. For details regarding the perquisites that Ms. Shanks and Mr. Iafrate received in 2012, please see the Summary Compensation Table on page 36. The Compensation Committee believes that our named executive officers value the perquisites provided to them and the cost to us of the perquisites is not significant.

Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to each of the company’s chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated officers, except for compensation that is “performance based.” Our general intent is to provide compensation awards to our named executive officers so that most, if not all, awards will be deductible without limitation. However, we may make compensation awards that are not deductible if our best interests so require. In addition, in recent years, we have not had to pay federal income tax due to loss carry-forwards, tax depreciation (particularly from new properties) and financial leverage. We believe that our new properties and the financial leverage resulting from their construction will result in much of our cash flow from operations not being subject to current income taxation over the next few years, limiting the impact of Section 162(m) as it related to current compensation practices.

At the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC by 91% of votes cast, excluding abstentions and broker non-votes. The Compensation Committee reviewed and considered the final vote results for that resolution, and we have not made any changes to our executive compensation policies or decisions as a result of the vote. We have determined that our stockholders should cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers on an annual basis. Accordingly, our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposal 2 at the Annual Meeting. For more information, see “Proposal 2—Advisory Approval of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers.”

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to each of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with all of its currently employed named executive officers. In the discussion of the terms of their employment agreements below, we sometimes refer to them collectively, as the “Executives” and individually, as an “Executive.” Capitalized terms used but not defined below have the respective meanings set forth in the applicable employment agreement.

On March 13, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement, effective as of March 14, 2010, with Anthony M. Sanfilippo for his role as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, with an annual base salary of $840,000. On March 1, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Sanfilippo. On December 14, 2011, the Company entered into a first amendment to his employment agreement, which increased his annual base salary to $900,000, effective as of January 1, 2012. Mr. Sanfilippo does not receive any compensation for his service as a member of the Board. Mr. Sanfilippo’s employment agreement provides for an initial term ending March 13, 2014; however, commencing on November 14, 2013 and as of November 14 of each year thereafter, his employment agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 120 days before the next renewal date.

On March 28, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement, effective as of April 1, 2011, with Carlos A. Ruisanchez for his role as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, with an annual base salary of $580,000. On December 14, 2011, the Company entered into a first amendment to his employment agreement, which increased his annual base salary to $600,000 effective as of January 1, 2012. Mr. Ruisanchez’s employment agreement provides for an initial term ending March 31, 2014; however, commencing on November 30, 2013 and as of November 30 of each year thereafter, his employment agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 120 days before the next renewal date.

On August 13, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John A. Godfrey, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. The parties subsequently amended and restated the employment agreement, first effective as of June 13, 2006 and again effective as of December 22, 2008. On September 23, 2010, the Company entered into a first amendment to his employment agreement, which increased his annual base salary from $425,000 to $475,000. On April 5, 2012, the Company entered into a new employment agreement, effective April 5, 2012, with Mr. Godfrey for continuation of his role as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary with an annual base salary of $475,000. Mr. Godfrey’s employment agreement provides for an initial term ending April 4, 2015; however, commencing on December 6, 2014 and as of December 6 of each year thereafter, his employment agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 120 days before the next renewal date.

On November 29, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement, effective as of November 15, 2011, with Virginia E. Shanks for her role as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, with an annual base salary of $450,000. On December 14, 2011, the Company entered into a first amendment to her employment agreement, which increased her annual base salary to $465,000, effective as of January 1, 2012. Ms. Shanks’ employment agreement provides for an initial term ending November 14, 2014; however, commencing on July 13, 2014 and as of July 13 of each year thereafter, her employment agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 120 days before the next renewal date.

On April 24, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement, effective as of April 10, 2012, with Geno M. Iafrate for his role as Executive Vice President, Regional Operations, with an annual base salary of $416,000. Mr. Iafrate’s employment agreement provides for an initial term ending April 10, 2015; however, commencing on December 11, 2014 and as of December 11 of each year thereafter, his employment agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 120 days before the next renewal date.

The table below sets forth information about the Executives’ eligibility for bonuses under the terms of their respective employment agreements. The parties to the employment agreements contemplate that the setting of the targets and goals and the payment of bonuses described below will be done in such a manner as to qualify such bonuses as “performance based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Payments and Benefits upon Termination; Treatment of Equity Grants—Generally

In general, if an Executive’s employment is terminated (regardless of the reason therefor), the Company would pay or cause to be paid to such Executive all accrued but unpaid annual base salary and any compensation previously voluntarily deferred by such Executive, and all benefits provided to such Executive under his or her employment agreement would cease. In addition, the Executives would be entitled to receive a prorated bonus for the year of termination except in the case of termination for Cause.

The employment agreements of the Executives provide that all vested stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units (collectively, the “Equity Grants”) would terminate on the earlier of the expiration of their stated terms or one year after termination of employment, except that if an Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by such Executive without Good Reason, all vested Equity Grants would terminate on the earlier of the expiration of their stated terms or 30 days after termination. Further, unvested Equity Grants would terminate on the termination of an Executive’s employment with the Company, except as otherwise provided in the applicable Equity Grant agreements or in the employment agreements.

The Executives may be entitled to receive additional payments or benefits, or the consequences of termination of employment described above may be subject to change, depending on the circumstances under which an Executive’s employment is terminated, as further described below under the headings “Payments and Benefits upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason, Other than Change of Control,” “Payments and Benefits upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason upon a Change of Control” and “Payments and Benefits upon Termination upon Death or Disability.”

If an Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by such Executive without Good Reason, such Executive would not be entitled to receive any payments or benefits other than as specified above under the heading “Payments and Benefits upon Termination; Treatment of Equity Grants—Generally.”

Payments and Benefits upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason, Other than Change of Control

If an Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by such Executive for Good Reason other than within 18 months following a Change of Control, the following would apply:

Payments and Benefits upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason upon a Change of Control

If an Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by such Executive for Good Reason on or within 18 months after a Change of Control, the following would apply:

If an Executive’s employment is terminated due to such Executive’s death or Disability, the Executive and such Executive’s dependents would be entitled to receive continuation of health benefits coverage for such Executive and his or her dependents and disability insurance coverage for such Executive for up to 18 months following termination. The Company would pay any applicable premiums on such insurance coverage on behalf of Mr. Sanfilippo and reimburse him or his estate, as the case may be, for any taxes payable thereon. Messrs. Ruisanchez, Godfrey and Iafrate and Ms. Shanks and their respective dependents would pay any applicable premiums or other applicable payments for their health coverage on the same basis as other senior executives of the Company.

Under certain circumstances, any payment on account of termination of an Executive’s employment which is deemed to be “deferred compensation” under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A will be delayed for six months after the termination, except in the case of such Executive’s death.

It is a condition to an Executive’s right to receive severance payments and benefits under such Executive’s employment agreement that the Executive execute a general release in favor of the Company and its affiliates. Certain non-competition, no-hire-away, and non-solicitation covenants apply to the Executives for specified periods following the termination of employment under certain circumstances but these covenants are not conditions to an Executive’s right to receive severance payments or benefits under such Executive’s employment agreement.

The employment agreements of the Executives contain a “best net” provision in the event any payment or benefit to be paid or made payable to an Executive or for his or her benefit under his or her employment agreement on a “change of control” (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code) would constitute an “excess parachute payment” (within the meaning of Section 280 and 4999 of the Code). Under the employment agreements, if the excise tax is triggered, then the payments or benefits received under the employment agreement shall be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid triggering the excise tax, unless the Executive would have a more favorable after-tax result by receiving the unreduced payments and paying the excise tax himself or herself, without a gross-up from the Company. Accordingly, the amounts payable under the employment agreements of the Executives set forth below may be reduced.

The following table sets forth the amounts payable under the employment agreements of the Executives in the event of a termination by the Company without cause or by the Executive for good reason other than in connection with a change of control. The amounts in the table assume that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2012. The closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on December 31, 2012 was $15.83.

The following table sets forth the amounts payable under the employment agreements of the Executives in the event of a termination without cause or for good reason upon a change of control. The amounts in the table assume that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2012. The closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on December 31, 2012 was $15.83.

The following table sets forth the amounts payable under the employment agreements of the Executives in the event of a termination due to death or disability. The amounts in the table assume that the termination took place on December 31, 2012. The closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock on December 31, 2012 was $15.83.

In 2000, we adopted the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, or the Executive Plan, which allows certain of our highly compensated employees to defer, on a pre-tax basis, a portion of their base annual salaries and bonuses. The Executive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, and participation in the Executive Plan is limited to employees who are (i) determined by us to be includable within a select group of employees, (ii) subsequently chosen from the select group, and (iii) approved by the Compensation Committee.

Under the Executive Plan, a participating employee may elect in December of each year to defer up to 75% of his or her salary for the next year, and up to 90% of his or her bonus for the next year. Any such deferred compensation is credited to a deferral contribution account. A participating employee is at all times fully vested in his or her deferred contributions, as well as any appreciation or depreciation attributable thereto. Amounts that a participating employee elects to defer under the Executive Plan are credited with a floating rate of interest based on average yields on 30-year U.S. treasury bonds, plus two percentage points, not to exceed 8% per annum, compounded quarterly. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to change the crediting rate for deferrals under the Executive Plan on a prospective basis as of the beginning of any quarter.

In general, distributions under the Executive Plan are payable upon death, disability and upon the occurrence of a financial emergency. The Executive Plan was amended and restated effective December 27, 2004 and December 31, 2007 to cause these distribution terms and other plan provisions to comply with Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”), and to make certain other changes in the Executive Plan. A participating employee will also receive distributions upon a change in control of the Company, to the extent permitted under Section 409A. When making an election to defer salary and bonus, a participating employee can specify that the amounts deferred will be paid on certain dates at least two years after the amounts are deferred. Also, a participant will receive an immediate payment of his or her deferred amounts with interest on a change in control of the Company.

The Executive Plan was further amended March 1, 2011, effective January 1, 2011, to permit the deferral of compensation in the form of restricted stock units, to be distributed upon the elected or predetermined distribution date in the form of a whole number of shares, with any fractional unit to be paid in cash. These provisions coordinate with the Company’s 2005 Plan to allow for the payment of annual bonuses in the form of restricted stock units, which are deferred under the Executive Plan, and vested and distributed on such dates as determined by the Compensation Committee on the date of grant.

The following table shows the deferred compensation activity for our named executive officers for the Executive Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Ms. Shanks and Mr. Iafrate were the only named executive officers to participate in the Executive Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

We adopted our 2005 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, or the 2005 Plan, in April 2005, and our stockholders approved the 2005 Plan at our annual meeting on May 3, 2005. In May 2008, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares available for awards under the 2005 Plan from 3,000,000 to 4,750,000, and to reapprove the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan. In December 2008, our Board of Directors further amended the 2005 Plan to address certain technical matters, including compliance with Section 409A; the December 2008 amendment does not materially or substantively increase the benefits available under the 2005 Plan. In May 2010, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares available for awards under the 2005 Plan from 4,750,000 to 5,850,000. In May 2012, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares available for awards under the 2005 Plan from 5,850,000 to 7,150,000. The 2005 Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has broad discretion and power in administering the 2005 Plan, in determining which of our employees, directors, and consultants shall participate, and the terms of individual awards.

Awards under the 2005 Plan may consist of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards, performance awards, dividend equivalents or any combination of the foregoing.

The shares authorized under the 2005 Plan are governed by the following principles:

Under the 2005 Plan, the exercise price for an option or stock appreciation right cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the grant date. The 2005 Plan does not permit the repricing of options or stock appreciation rights. At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved a one-time value-for-value option exchange, which was required to be completed within 12 months following the approval by the stockholders pursuant to the 2005 Plan. On September 9, 2011, the Company completed the one-time value-for-value option exchange, which excluded executive officers and directors.

Performance awards under the 2005 Plan are awards that provide payments determined by the achievement of performance goals over a performance period. The Compensation Committee determines the relevant performance goals and the performance period. The performance goals will be based on the attainment of specified levels of, or growth of, one or any combination of (or a formula based on) modified calculations of certain specified factors. The eligible factors include: net sales; pretax income before or after allocation of corporate overhead and bonus; earnings per share; net income; division, group or corporate financial goals; return on stockholders’ equity; return on assets; attainment of strategic and operational initiatives; appreciation in and/or maintenance of the price of the shares or any of our other publicly-traded securities; market share; gross profits; earnings before taxes; earnings before interest and taxes; EBITDA; an adjusted formula of EBITDA; economic value-added models; comparisons with various stock market indices; reductions in costs, and/or return on invested capital of Pinnacle or any affiliate, division or business unit of Pinnacle for or within which the participant is primarily employed. Such performance goals also may be based solely by reference to our performance or the performance of an affiliate, division or business unit of Pinnacle, or based upon the relative performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to other companies. We intend that bonuses received by each of our named executive officers under his or her employment agreement will be performance awards under the 2005 Plan.

The 2005 Plan provides that it is not the only plan or arrangement under which we may compensate officers, and we reserve the right to pay bonuses or other compensation to our named executive officers in addition to their bonuses or other awards under the 2005 Plan.

The following table provides information regarding our grant of plan-based awards made to each named executive officer in 2012.

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity award grants held at December 31, 2012 by each named executive officer.

The following table provides information regarding the exercise of options and vesting of stock awards for our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

The exercise price of the options referenced above granted to Mr. Ruisanchez is $11.35 and the options vested over a four-year period. The options expire on August 1, 2018, subject to certain termination events as governed by the grant of options and Mr. Ruisanchez’s Employment Agreement.

The exercise price of the options referenced above granted to Mr. Sanfilippo is $8.64, and the options vest over a five-year period. The options expire on March 14, 2020, subject to certain termination events as governed by the grant of options and Mr. Sanfilippo’s Employment Agreement.

Upon the approval of the 2005 Plan at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we canceled the Prior Plans, so that no further grants or awards will be made under the Prior Plans. However, any shares subject to awards under the Prior Plans which are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without issuance of shares, or are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of shares, are authorized for issuance under the 2005 Plan. In addition, grants and awards made under the Prior Plans before their cancellation will continue in effect. The stock option grants to Messrs. Ruisanchez and Sanfilippo described in footnote (d) above, also continue in effect, and such shares will be authorized for issuance under the 2005 Plan in the event of forfeiture, expiration or termination without issuance of shares.

We are asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement. We urge stockholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 22 of this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation table and other related compensation tables and narrative, appearing on pages 36 through 48, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our named executive officers reported in this Proxy Statement has contributed to the Company’s recent and long-term success.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, and as a matter of good corporate governance, the Company is asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, is non-binding on the Board of Directors, whether or not the resolution is approved. Although non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results in their entirety when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation program.

We have determined that our stockholders should cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers on an annual basis. Unless this policy changes, the next advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will be at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Approval of Proposal No. 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal. For purposes of determining the number of votes cast on the matter, only those cast “FOR” and “AGAINST” are included, while abstentions and broker non-votes are not included.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

In 2005, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved the Company’s 2005 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The original 2005 Plan authorized for issuance up to an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock, plus any shares subject to awards granted under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements (as such terms are defined in the 2005 Plan) which are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without the issuance of shares, or are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of shares, on or after the effective date of the 2005 Plan. In 2008, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of awards granted under the 2005 Plan by 1,750,000 and to increase the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as incentive stock options from 3,000,000 to 4,750,000 shares. In 2010, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of awards granted under the 2005 Plan by 1,100,000 and to increase the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as incentive stock options from 4,750,000 shares to 5,850,000 shares. In 2012, the Board of Directors adopted and the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of awards granted under the 2005 Plan by 1,300,000 and to increase the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as incentive stock options from 5,850,000 shares to 7,150,000 shares. As of February 28, 2013, 2,473,654 shares remained available for future grants of awards under the 2005 Plan (excluding any additional shares available under the 2005 Plan as a result of future forfeiture, expiration or other termination of awards under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements after such date). Accordingly, the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to increase the number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of awards granted under the 2005 Plan by 1,800,000 shares and to increase the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as incentive stock options from 7,150,000 shares to 8,950,000 shares.

The terms of the 2005 Plan, assuming that the stockholders approve this Proposal 3, are described below under “Summary of the 2005 Plan.” The 2005 Plan is attached in this Proxy Statement as Appendix A and reflects the proposed amendment to the 2005 Plan. The proposed amendment to the 2005 Plan would increase the number of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock that may be issued under the 2005 Plan by 1,800,000 and would increase the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as incentive stock options from 7,150,000 to 8,950,000 shares.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company has successfully attracted and retained highly qualified officers and other employees by providing adequate incentives through the issuance of stock awards. The Board believes that the proposed amendment to the 2005 Plan with respect to the increase in shares is necessary to ensure that the Company maintains the ability to continue attracting and retaining talent in the future. In addition, the Board believes that the proposed amendment to the 2005 Plan is needed to be able to retain future employees that join the Company as the result of the Ameristar transaction. As of February 28, 2013, 2,473,654 shares of Pinnacle Common Stock remained available for future grants of awards under the 2005 Plan (excluding any additional shares available under the 2005 Plan as a result of future forfeiture, expiration or other termination of awards under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements after such date). The amendment to the 2005 Plan is therefore necessary to ensure that enough shares will be available for the issuance of stock awards so as to incentivize and retain key employees of the Company as well as future employees that may join the Company as a result of the Ameristar transaction, which can assist in maximizing the full potential of stockholder value.

The Board of Directors reviewed the modeling utilized by Institutional Shareholder Services or ISS, a provider of proxy voting and corporate governance services, in arriving at the number of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock to be included in the Amendment to the 2005 Plan. Our average burn rate over the last three years is 3.60%, which is below the industry benchmark used by ISS. In addition, the total number of shares available under the 2005 Plan if Proposal 3 is approved would produce a voting power dilution, calculated in accordance with ISS methodology, of 6.30% of the shares outstanding as of December 31, 2012, which the Board of Directors views as reasonable.

We calculated the burn rate as the total number of equity awards (in the form of stock options/stock appreciation rights and full-value awards) granted during the fiscal year divided by the fiscal year weighted average common shares outstanding. Any equity awards that are counted against the 2005 Plan’s share reserve will be considered in the numerator of the burn rate calculation, which includes awards made to employees, non-employee directors, advisors and consultants. Awards include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, actual performance-based shares earned, deferred shares earned and any equity awards that deplete the share reserve. Voting power dilution is measured using a division equation that assesses the relative reduction in voting power as options are exercised and existing stockholders’ proportional ownership is diluted.

Accordingly, stockholders are requested to approve the amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase by 1,800,000 the maximum number of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock that may be issued or subject to awards under the 2005 Plan and to increase the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as incentive stock options from 7,150,000 to 8,950,000 shares.

Affirmative votes representing a majority of the votes cast “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to the proposal in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve this proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal represent more than 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposal. According to NYSE rules, a vote to “ABSTAIN” on the proposal will be considered as a vote cast with respect to such matter, and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal, unless the votes otherwise cast constitute less than over 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposal.

For 2013, the dollar value of awards under the 2005 Plan are not currently determinable because such amounts are dependent on the Company’s future performance and future grants which have not yet been determined.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN.

The Board of Directors believes that the 2005 Plan as proposed to be amended is necessary to ensure that the Company maintains the ability in the future to continue to attract and retain highly qualified officers and other employees by providing adequate incentives through the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards and performance awards. The 2005 Plan as proposed to be amended will also permit the award of other stock unit awards or performance awards payable in cash or shares, or the award of restricted stock, in each case with restrictions lapsing on the attainment of performance goals, to certain executive officers of the Company which are intended to qualify as “performance based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as discussed below.

Upon the approval of the 2005 Plan at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company canceled the Prior Plans, so that no further grants or awards may be made under the Prior Plans. However, grants and awards made under the Prior Plans before their cancellation continue to be in effect. In addition, the Individual Arrangements granted to Messrs. Sanfilippo and Ruisanchez, concurrently with their hiring in 2010 and 2008, respectively, continue to be in effect. Shares subject to awards granted under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements that are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without the issuance of shares, or are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of shares, shall again be available for awards under the 2005 Plan.

The following is a summary of the key provisions of the 2005 Plan, assuming that stockholders approve this Proposal 3. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all the provisions of the 2005 Plan, and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2005 Plan. A copy of the 2005 Plan is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. Any stockholder who desires to obtain a copy of the 2005 Plan may do so by written request to the Secretary of the Company, at 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148.

Up to an aggregate of 8,950,000 (assuming that this Proposal 3 is approved by the stockholders) shares of Pinnacle Common Stock, plus any shares subject to awards granted under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements which are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without issuance of Shares, or are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of Shares, on or after the effective date of the 2005 Plan, are authorized for issuance under the 2005 Plan. However, the maximum number of awards under the 2005 Plan that may be issued as ISOs (as defined below) will be 8,950,000 shares (assuming that this Proposal 3 is approved by the stockholders). Any shares that are subject to awards of options or stock appreciation rights shall be counted against this limit as one share for every one share granted. Any shares that are subject to awards other than options or stock appreciation rights (including shares delivered on the settlement of dividend equivalents) shall be counted against this limit as 1.4 shares for every one share granted. The aggregate number of shares available under the 2005 Plan and the number of shares subject to outstanding options will be increased or decreased to reflect any changes in the outstanding Pinnacle Common Stock by reason of any recapitalization, spin-off, reorganization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar transaction.

If any shares subject to an award under the 2005 Plan or to an award under the Prior Plans or Individual Arrangements are forfeited, expire or are terminated without issuance of such shares, or are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of such shares, the shares shall again be available for awards under the 2005 Plan. Any shares that again become available for grant shall be added back as one share if such shares were subject to options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2005 Plan or options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Prior Plans or Individual Arrangements, and as 1.4 shares if such shares were subject to awards other than options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2005 Plan. Shares which are received or withheld by the Company to satisfy tax liabilities arising from the grant or exercise of an option or award, or as a result of the use of shares to pay the option price, shall not again be available to awards under the 2005 Plan.

All employees (including officers), directors, and consultants of the Company or any subsidiary are eligible for selection to receive awards under the 2005 Plan, subject to the following restrictions: (a) no ISO may be granted to any person who, at the time of grant, is not an employee of the Company or any subsidiary, (b) no participant may be granted options or stock appreciation rights during any 12-month period with respect to more than 1,500,000 shares, (c) no participant may be granted restricted stock, performance awards and/or other stock unit awards that are denominated in shares in any 12-month period with respect to more than 750,000 shares, and (d) the maximum dollar value payable to any participant in any 12-month period with respect to performance

awards and/or other stock unit awards that are valued with reference to cash or property other than shares is $2,500,000 (excluding awards denominated by reference to a number of shares). The share limitations set forth above are subject to adjustment in the event of a reorganization, spin-off, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, or similar transaction during any fiscal year of the Company or portion thereof. If an option or stock appreciation right expires or terminates for any reason without having been exercised in full, or if any award is cancelled, the unpurchased shares subject to that expired or terminated option or stock appreciation right or cancelled award continue to be counted against the maximum number of shares for which options or stock appreciation rights or other awards may be granted to a participant during a 12-month period. Subject to such limitations, an individual who has been granted an option or stock appreciation right or other award may, if such individual is otherwise eligible, be granted additional options or stock appreciation rights or other awards as the Compensation Committee may determine.

The 2005 Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors consisting of two or more directors of the Company who are both (a) “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and (b) “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee has extremely broad discretion and power in interpreting and operating the 2005 Plan and in determining the employees, directors and consultants who shall be participants, and the terms of individual options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards, performance awards, and dividend equivalents. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more directors or officers the authority to grant awards to employees or officers who are not directors, “covered employees” whose compensation is subject to the limits of Section 162(m) of the Code, or officers subject to the short-swing rules of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. For a description of the limitation on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to certain executive officers, see “—Federal Income Tax Matters—$1,000,000 Limit on Deductible Compensation.”

Awards under the 2005 Plan may consist of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards, performance awards or dividend equivalents. The nature of each type of award is discussed below. Each award will be made by an award agreement whose form and content shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, consistent with the provisions of the 2005 Plan. The terms of award agreements for a particular type of award need not be uniform.

Two types of options may be granted under the 2005 Plan: options intended to qualify as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) under Section 422 of the Code, and options not so qualified for favorable federal income tax treatment (“NSOs”).

The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may also issue stock appreciation rights to participants. A stock appreciation right is a right to receive a payment based on the increase in the fair market value of a share after the date of grant. The Compensation Committee may determine in its discretion that a stock appreciation right will be paid out in cash or in shares on its exercise. The number of shares that may be issued on the exercise of a stock appreciation right shall be determined by dividing: (a) the total number of shares as to which the stock appreciation right is exercised, multiplied by the amount by which the fair market value of one share on the exercise date exceeds the fair market value of one share on the date of grant of the stock appreciation right, by (b) the fair market value of one share on the exercise date; provided, however, that fractional shares shall not be issued and in lieu thereof, a cash adjustment shall be paid. In lieu of issuing shares on the exercise of a stock

appreciation right, the Compensation Committee may in its sole discretion elect to pay the cash value of such shares. The Compensation Committee will not, however, take any action regarding a stock appreciation right, or otherwise under the 2005 Plan, that could subject a participant to a penalty tax under Section 409A of the Code.

The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may also grant awards of restricted stock to participants. Restricted stock shall be shares granted or sold to a participant that are subject to vesting restrictions based on continued employment or attainment of performance goals.

The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may grant other stock unit awards, which are awards valued in whole or part by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares. Other stock unit awards shall be subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be determined by the Compensation Committee, and may be payable in the form of cash or shares.

The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may issue performance awards to participants, the payment of which will be determined by the achievement of performance goals over a performance period. Upon the grant of a performance award, the Compensation Committee shall determine the relevant performance goals and the performance period. The performance based award provisions of the 2005 Plan permit the Company to grant performance awards to executive officers of the Company whose compensation is subject to the deductibility limit of Section 162(m) of the Code that will qualify as “performance based” compensation and that will thus be deductible without regard to the deductibility limit. Similarly, these provisions of the 2005 Plan permit the Company to provide that the vesting of restricted stock, and the vesting or payment of any other stock unit award, granted to such an executive officer will be subject to the achievement of the objective performance goals over a performance period, and thus satisfy the requirements to be “performance based” compensation which is deductible without regard to the deductibility limit. The Compensation Committee may also grant awards that are not “performance based,” and that will be subject to the deductibility limit of Section 162(m), if it determines that such awards are in the best interests of the Company.

The performance goals shall be based on the attainment of specified levels, or growth, of one or any combination of the following: net sales; pretax income before allocation of corporate overhead and bonus; earnings per share; net income; division, group or corporate financial goals; return on stockholders’ equity; return on assets; attainment of strategic and operational initiatives; appreciation in and/or maintenance of the price of the shares or any other publicly-traded securities of the Company; market share; gross profits; earnings before taxes; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; economic value-added models; comparisons with various stock market indices; reductions in costs; and/or return on invested capital of the Company or any affiliate, division or business unit of the Company for or within which the participant is primarily employed. Such performance goals also may be based solely by reference to the Company’s performance or the performance of an affiliate, division or business unit of the Company, or based upon the relative performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to other companies. Unless the Committee determines otherwise when it sets the performance goals, objective adjustments shall be made to any of the foregoing measures for items that will not properly reflect the Company’s financial performance for these purposes, such as the write-off of debt issuance costs, pre-opening and development costs, gain or loss from asset dispositions, asset or other impairment charges, litigation settlement costs, and other non-routine items that may occur during the performance period. Also, unless the Committee determines otherwise when it sets the performance goals, the performance goals shall be applied by excluding the impact of (a) restructurings, discontinued operations, and charges for extraordinary items, (b) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management, or (c) a change in accounting standards required or recommended by generally accepted accounting principles.

The performance period shall be determined by the Compensation Committee, but shall not be shorter than six months nor longer than five years.

Performance awards will generally be paid only after the end of the relevant performance period, and may be paid in cash, shares, other property, or any combination thereof, in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee at the time of payment.

In the case of any performance awards, restricted stock, or other stock unit awards that are intended to constitute “performance based” compensation, the performance goals and other terms and conditions of the award will be set by the Compensation Committee within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder. If the performance period is 12 months or longer, such performance goals must be set by the Compensation Committee within the first 90 days of the performance period.

The Compensation Committee may adjust downward, but not upward, the amount payable to any executive officer of the Company under any award that is intended to constitute “performance based” compensation under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee may not waive the achievement of the applicable performance goals under Section 162(m), except in the case of death or disability of the participant, or the occurrence of a change in control of the Company.

Before the vesting, payment, settlement or lapsing of any restrictions with respect to any award that is intended to constitute “performance based” compensation under Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee shall certify in writing that the applicable performance criteria have been achieved to the extent necessary for such award to qualify as “performance based” compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m).

The Compensation Committee shall have the power to impose such other restrictions on awards intended to constitute “performance based” compensation as it may deem necessary or appropriate to ensure that such awards satisfy all requirements to constitute “performance based” compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m), or which are not inconsistent with such requirements.

Unless affirmative votes representing a majority of the votes cast under applicable law or rules approve the continuation of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan at the first duly constituted meeting of the stockholders of the Company that occurs in the fifth year following the later of (i) effective date of the 2005 Plan or (ii) the then most recent re-approval of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan, no awards other than stock options or stock appreciation rights shall be made under the 2005 Plan following the date of such meeting to executive officers of the Company whose compensation is subject to the deduction limit of Section 162(m). Under currently applicable law or rules, to be duly constituted, a majority of the shares of capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote would have to be present in person or by proxy at the meeting at which stockholders vote to approve the continuation of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan. The stockholders of the Company approved the continuation of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that a participant who receives an award will also be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, stock or other property dividends, or cash payments in amounts equivalent to stock or other property dividends on shares (“dividend equivalents”) with respect to the number of shares covered by the award. The Compensation Committee may also provide that such amounts (if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares or otherwise reinvested. In the event of a recapitalization, reorganization, spin-off, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar transaction, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, make an appropriate adjustment to dividend equivalents.

The purchase price for shares covered by each option shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant, but if an ISO is granted to a 10% stockholder of the Company or its subsidiaries (measured by ownership of voting power), the purchase price of an ISO shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant. The base price for a stock appreciation right shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of shares as of the date of grant. The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may determine the purchase price, if any, for restricted stock, other stock unit awards, and performance awards.

Exercisability of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights; Vesting of Restricted Stock and Other Awards

The Compensation Committee shall determine when and under what conditions any option or stock appreciation right shall become exercisable and when restricted stock, other stock unit awards, and performance awards shall become vested. However, there is a limit on the number of options that become exercisable for the first time in any year that can be ISOs. In any year, the options that become exercisable for the first time can be treated as ISOs only to the extent that the aggregate fair market value of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock (with such fair market value determined as of the date of grant of the options) covered by the options does not exceed $100,000. Any options that first become exercisable in the year in excess of this limit shall be treated as NSOs. The purchase price of shares on the exercise of an option shall be paid in full at the time of exercise in cash or by check payable to the order of the Company, or, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee and subject to applicable law, by the delivery of shares of Pinnacle Common Stock already owned by the participant, through a “broker’s” exercise involving the immediate sale or pledge of shares with a value sufficient to pay the exercise price, or by any other method permitted by applicable law. The Compensation Committee shall determine, in its discretion, the form of any payment for restricted stock, other stock unit awards, and performance shares.

Each option or stock appreciation right shall expire on the date specified by the Compensation Committee, but not later than 10 years from the date of grant. ISOs granted to 10% stockholders of the Company (measured by ownership of voting power) shall expire not later than five years from the date of grant.

The Compensation Committee has no authority to reprice any option, to reduce the base price of any stock appreciation right, or cancel any option when the fair market value of shares is less than the option’s exercise price per share. At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved a one-time value-for-value option exchange, which was required to be completed within 12 months following the approval by the stockholders pursuant to the 2005 Plan. On September 9, 2011, the Company completed the one-time value-for-value option exchange, which excluded executive officers and directors.

If a participant ceases to be employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries for any reason other than termination for cause, death or permanent disability, the participant’s options that were vested and exercisable shall remain exercisable until the end of the original term or for a maximum period of 90 days after the termination of employment, whichever is earlier (unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee in an individual option agreement or otherwise). If a participant dies or becomes permanently disabled, the participant’s options that were vested and exercisable shall be exercisable for the remainder of their original term or for 36 months after the date of death or permanent disability, whichever is earlier (unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee in an individual award agreement or otherwise). Options that were not vested and exercisable at the date of termination, death, or permanent disability shall revert to the 2005 Plan,

unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise. The Compensation Committee may determine that the unexercisable portion of the option will become exercisable at the times and on the terms determined by the Compensation Committee. After a participant’s death, options may be exercised by the person or persons to whom the participant’s rights pass by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise in its discretion, similar rules shall apply to stock appreciation rights. The treatment of each award of restricted stock, other stock unit award, or performance award on the termination of employment, death, or disability of the participant shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. If a participant’s employment is terminated for cause, all of his or her awards may be immediately terminated and canceled, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

Upon the happening of a merger, reorganization or sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company or other change of control events specified in the 2005 Plan, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, do one or more of the following: (i) shorten the period during which options and stock appreciation rights are exercisable (provided they remain exercisable for at least 30 days after the date notice of such shortening is given to the participants); (ii) accelerate any vesting schedule to which an option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, other stock unit award or performance award is subject; (iii) arrange to have the surviving or successor entity or any parent entity thereof assume the restricted stock, other stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights or options or grant replacement options or stock appreciation rights with appropriate adjustments in the option prices and adjustments in the number and kind of securities issuable upon exercise; (iv) cancel options upon payment to the participants in cash of an amount that is the equivalent of the excess of the fair market value of the Pinnacle Common Stock (at the effective time of the merger, reorganization, sale or other event) over the exercise price of the option to the extent the options are vested and exercisable, and cancel stock appreciation rights by paying the value thereof; or (v) make any other modification or adjustment that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and fair in its discretion. The Compensation Committee may also provide for one or more of the foregoing alternatives in any particular award agreement.

The recipient of an option or stock appreciation right will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to shares of Pinnacle Common Stock covered by an option or stock appreciation right until the date such recipient becomes a holder of record of such shares, unless the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, elects to grant the participant dividend equivalent rights in connection with such option or stock appreciation right. The recipient of restricted stock or of another stock unit award will generally have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Pinnacle Common Stock issued pursuant to such award, including the right to vote such shares, but any dividends and distributions with respect to such shares will generally be subject to the same vesting restrictions, if any, as the underlying shares.

An ISO granted under the 2005 Plan shall, by its terms, be non-transferable by the participant, either voluntarily or by operation of law, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by him or her. Any award issued under the 2005 Plan other than an ISO shall be nontransferable by the participant, either voluntarily or by operation of law, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except as the Compensation Committee may determine in its discretion. With the consent of the Compensation Committee, an award under the 2005 Plan other than an ISO may be assigned, in whole or in part, during the participant’s lifetime by gift to one or more members of the participant’s immediate family or to a trust for their benefit.

The 2005 Plan became effective on the date of its adoption by the Board on April 1, 2005. The 2005 Plan shall continue in effect for 10 years thereafter. The Board of Directors, however, may suspend or terminate the 2005 Plan at any time. However, unless affirmative votes representing a majority of the votes cast under applicable law or rules approve the continuation of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan at the first duly constituted meeting of the stockholders of the Company that occurs in the fifth year following the later of (i) the effective date of the 2005 Plan or (ii) the then most recent re-approval of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan, no awards other than options or stock appreciation rights shall be made under the 2005 Plan following the date of such meeting to executive officers of the Company whose compensation is subject to the deduction limit of Section 162(m). Under currently applicable rules, to be duly constituted, a majority of the shares of capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote would have to be present in person or by proxy at the meeting at which stockholders vote to approve the continuation of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan. The stockholders of the Company re-approved the continuation of the “performance based” compensation provisions of the 2005 Plan at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The suspension or termination of the 2005 Plan will generally not affect the validity of any option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, other stock unit award, performance award or dividend equivalent outstanding on the date of termination.

The Board of Directors may also amend the 2005 Plan at any time, except that the Board of Directors may not amend the 2005 Plan in a way which violates Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors may not amend the 2005 Plan without obtaining stockholder approval to (a) increase the number of shares that may be the subject of awards under the 2005 Plan, (b) expand the types of awards available under the 2005 Plan, (c) materially expand the class of persons eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan, (d) amend any provision prohibiting the Compensation Committee from repricing options or taking similar action, (e) increase the maximum permissible term of any option, (f) amend the limits on grants of awards to any participant during a 12-month period, or (g) make any modification that requires stockholder approval under applicable law. Furthermore, no amendment of the 2005 Plan shall amend or impair any rights or obligations under any award theretofore granted under the 2005 Plan without the written consent of the holder of the affected award.

The following table shows the number of stock options, restricted stock units, and phantom stock units, including any awards that were subsequently cancelled or surrendered for taxes, which Pinnacle has awarded, as of February 28, 2013, to the following individuals and groups:

The closing price of Pinnacle Common Stock was $14.00 per share on February 28, 2013.

The following discussion of federal income tax consequences does not purport to be a complete analysis of all of the potential tax effects of the 2005 Plan. It is based upon laws, regulations, rulings and decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change. No information is provided with respect to persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States, or foreign, state or local tax laws, or estate and gift tax considerations. In addition, the tax consequences to a particular participant may be affected by matters not discussed above. ACCORDINGLY, EACH PARTICIPANT IS URGED TO CONSULT HIS OR HER TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO HIM OR HER OF THE 2005 PLAN, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS AND OF CHANGES IN THE TAX LAWS.

The 2005 Plan is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and is not qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code.

Under current federal income tax law, the grant of an NSO has no immediate tax effect on the Company or the participant. If the shares of Pinnacle Common Stock received on the exercise of an NSO are not subject to restrictions on transfer or substantial risk of forfeiture, the exercise of the NSO will result in ordinary income to the participant equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the option price. The participant’s tax basis in the shares will be equal to the option price plus the amount of ordinary income recognized upon the exercise of the option. Upon any subsequent disposition of the shares, any gain or loss recognized by the participant will be treated as capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares are held for more than one year after exercise. At the time of recognition of ordinary income by the participant upon exercise, the Company will normally be allowed to take a deduction for federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to such recognized ordinary income.

If the shares received on the exercise of an NSO are subject to restrictions on transfer or substantial risk of forfeiture (e.g., a vesting condition), different rules will apply, and the tax consequences will depend on whether the participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days after exercise of the option. If the participant does not make a Section 83(b) election, the participant will recognize ordinary income when the shares vest in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value on the date of vesting over the exercise price. In that case, the participant’s basis in the shares will be the fair market value of the shares on the date of vesting, and the participant’s holding period will begin on the date of vesting. Upon any later disposition of the shares, any gain or loss that the participant recognizes will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the participant holds the shares more than one year after vesting. The Company will be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes when the shares vest equal to the amount of ordinary income the participant recognizes.

On the other hand, if the participant makes a Section 83(b) election, the participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise equal to the excess of the fair market value on the date of exercise over the exercise price. The Company will be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes on the date of exercise equal to the amount of ordinary income he or she recognizes. The participant’s basis in the shares will generally begin on the date of exercise, and the participant’s basis in the shares will generally be the option price increased by the amount of ordinary income the participant recognized at the time of exercise. Upon any later disposition of the shares, any gain or loss that the participant recognizes will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the participant holds the shares more than one year after exercise. However, if the participant later forfeits the shares, the participant will recognize a capital loss equal to excess (if any) of the option price over any amount the participant receives from the Company on the forfeiture. In other words, if a participant makes the Section 83(b) election and thereby recognizes ordinary income on the date of exercise, the participant will receive no corresponding deduction or loss if the participant later forfeits the shares for the amount of ordinary income the participant recognized.

The federal income tax consequences associated with ISOs are generally more favorable to the participant and less favorable to the Company than those associated with NSOs. Under current federal income tax law, the grant of an ISO does not result in income to the participant or in a deduction for the Company at the time of the grant. Generally, the exercise of an ISO will not result in income for the participant if the participant does not dispose of the shares within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the date of exercise. If these requirements are met, the basis of the shares of Pinnacle Common Stock upon a later disposition will be the option price, any gain on the later disposition will be taxed to the participant as long-term capital gain, and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction. The excess of the fair market value on the exercise date over the option price is an adjustment to regular taxable income in determining alternative minimum taxable income, which could cause the participant to be subject to the alternative minimum tax, thereby in effect depriving the participant of the tax benefits of ISO treatment. If the participant disposes of the shares before the expiration of either of the holding periods described above (a “Disqualifying Disposition”), the participant will have

compensation taxable as ordinary income, and the Company will normally be entitled to a deduction, equal to the lesser of (a) the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date minus the option price, or (b) the amount realized on the disposition minus the option price. If the price realized in any such Disqualifying Disposition of the shares exceeds the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date, the excess will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on the participant’s holding period for the shares.

A participant holding a stock appreciation right will recognize ordinary income on the exercise of the stock appreciation right equal to the amount of cash or the fair market value of the shares he or she receives on the exercise. The Company will receive a tax deduction in the same amount. Upon disposition of the shares acquired, the participant will recognize the appreciation or depreciation on the shares after the date of grant as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the shares have been held.

The taxation of an award other than an option or a stock appreciation right depends on whether or not it consists of restricted stock (i.e., stock subject to a vesting restriction based on continued employment or attainment of performance goals). If any other stock unit award or a performance award does not consist of restricted stock, and is not settled in restricted stock, the participant will recognize ordinary income on the receipt of cash or shares equal to the amount of cash, or the excess of the fair market value of the shares over the amount (if any) that the participant pays for the shares. The Company will receive a tax deduction in the same amount. Upon disposition of the shares acquired, the participant will recognize the appreciation or depreciation on the shares after the date of grant as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the shares have been held.

In general, no taxable income will be recognized by a participant at the time restricted stock is granted. Generally, on the date the restricted stock becomes vested, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date the shares vest and the purchase price, and the Company will receive a tax deduction for the same amount. Upon disposition of the shares acquired, the participant will recognize the appreciation or depreciation on the shares after the date of vesting as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the shares have been held.

Alternatively, a participant may elect to make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to unvested shares. If a participant makes a Section 83(b) election with the Internal Revenue Service within 30 days from the date of grant, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant and the purchase price, and the Company will receive a tax deduction for the same amount. If the participant makes a timely Section 83(b) election, the participant will not recognize ordinary income when the shares vest. Upon disposition of the shares acquired, the participant will recognize the appreciation or depreciation on the shares after the date of grant as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the shares have been held. If the participant forfeits unvested shares, the participant will recognize a capital loss equal to the excess (if any) of the purchase price over any amount the participant receives from the Company on the forfeiture. Generally, if the participant makes a Section 83(b) election, and thereby recognizes ordinary income on the date of grant, the participant will receive no corresponding deduction or loss for the amount of ordinary income the participant recognized if the participant later forfeits any unvested shares.

Section 162(m) of the Code provides that any publicly-held corporation will be denied a deduction for compensation paid to certain executive officers to the extent that the compensation exceeds $1,000,000 per officer per year. However, the deduction limit does not apply to “performance based” compensation, as defined in Section 162(m). Compensation is performance based compensation if (i) the compensation is payable on

account of the attainment of one or more performance goals; (ii) the performance goals are established by a compensation committee of the Board of Directors of directors consisting of “outside directors”; (iii) the material terms of the compensation and the performance goals are disclosed to and approved by the stockholders in a separate vote; and (iv) before any payment of such compensation, the compensation committee certifies that the performance goals have been satisfied. The Company believes that, since the stockholders have approved the 2005 Plan, the stock options and stock appreciation rights granted thereunder will satisfy the requirements to be treated as performance based compensation, and accordingly will not be subject to the deduction limit of Section 162(m) of the Code. As discussed above, the performance based award provisions of the 2005 Plan permit the Company to grant performance awards to executive officers of the Company whose compensation is subject to the deductibility limit of Section 162(m) of the Code that are intended to qualify as “performance based” compensation, and to provide that the vesting of restricted stock, and the vesting or payment of any other stock unit award, granted to such an executive officer will be subject to the achievement of the objective performance goals over a performance period, with the intention that such awards will satisfy the requirements to be “performance based” compensation. The Compensation Committee may also grant awards that are not “performance based,” and that will be subject to the deductibility limit of Section 162(m), if it determines that such awards are in the best interests of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rules and regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) are complicated and subject to change, potentially with retroactive effect. In addition, a number of requirements must be met in order for compensation to qualify as “performance based” under Section 162(m). As such, there can be no assurance that compensation awarded or paid under the 2005 Plan will be deductible.

Under Section 4999 of the Code, certain officers, stockholders, or highly-compensated individuals (“Disqualified Individuals”) will be subject to an excise tax (in addition to federal income taxes) of 20% of the amount of certain “excess parachute payments” which they receive as a result of a change in control of the Company. Furthermore, Section 280G of the Code prevents the Company from taking a deduction for any “excess parachute payments.” The cash out or acceleration of the vesting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards or performance awards upon a change of control may cause the holders of such stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards and performance awards who are Disqualified Individuals to recognize certain amounts as “excess parachute payments” on which they must pay the 20% excise tax, and for which the Company will be denied a tax deduction.

Section 409A of the Code imposes certain additional taxes on an employee or service provider who receives “deferred compensation” that does not comply with the requirements of Section 409A. The Company believes that stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan will not constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A. The Company also believes that other awards under the 2005 Plan that are payable within a limited period of time after vesting will not constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A. The Company intends that awards under the 2005 Plan that constitute “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A will have terms that conform with the requirements of Section 409A, so that persons who receive such awards will not be subject to additional taxes under Section 409A.

Special tax rules may apply to a participant who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Other special tax rules will apply if a participant exercises a stock option by delivering shares of Pinnacle Common Stock which he or she already owns, or through a “broker’s exercise.”

The Company may take whatever steps the Compensation Committee deems appropriate to comply with any applicable withholding tax obligation in connection with the exercise of an option or stock appreciation right or the grant or vesting of restricted stock, other stock unit awards, or performance awards, including requiring any participant to pay the amount of any applicable withholding tax to the Company in cash. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, authorize “cashless withholding.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN.

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the 2013 fiscal year and to audit the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. This appointment is being presented to stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors is not required by the Company’s Bylaws or otherwise. The Company is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Ernst & Young LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent audit firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make statements if they desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The action of the Audit Committee in appointing Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the 2013 fiscal year will be ratified upon the approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE 2013 FISCAL YEAR.

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

Audit Fees relate to professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2012 and 2011, in connection with reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, certain procedures in connection with registration statements and prospectus supplements and other offering documents, and the audit of the Company’s financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act).

Audit-Related Fees relate to professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with assurance or related services (such as employee benefit plan audits, internal control reviews, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation) rendered in 2012 that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. In 2011, Ernst & Young LLP did not bill the Company for any Audit-Related Fees.

Tax fees relate to tax compliance and tax advice and planning service rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2012 and 2011.

Except as described above, Ernst & Young LLP did not bill the Company for any fees for, or deliver or render to the Company, any other products or services in 2012 or 2011.

The Audit Committee has adopted formal policies and procedures with regard to the approval of all professional services provided to the Company by Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members and the Audit Committee delegated this pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All of the fees described in the table above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or its delegate) in 2012. The Audit Committee (or its delegate) pre-approves services either by: (1) approving a request from management describing a specific project at a specific fee or rate, or (2) by pre-approving certain types of services that would comprise the fees within each of the above categories at usual and customary rates. The percentage of hours expended to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than Ernst & Young LLP’s full time, permanent employees was 0%.

The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and the notes thereto.

Management is responsible for preparing the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control. The Audit Committee, in its oversight role, has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and the notes thereto.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), the Company’s independent auditors, the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding E&Y’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with E&Y its independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, stockholder proposals submitted for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card for the next annual meeting would have to be received by the Secretary of the Company no later than December 10, 2013 if the next annual meeting were held on or near May 21, 2014. In the event that the Company elects to hold its next annual meeting more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of this Annual Meeting, such stockholder proposals would have to be received by the Company a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials. Stockholder nominations of directors are not stockholder proposals within the meaning of Rule 14a-8 and are not eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement.

Under the Company’s Bylaws, stockholders who wish to present proposals for action, or to nominate directors (other than proposals to be included in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy card pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act), at the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company (that is, the next annual meeting following the Annual Meeting to which this Proxy Statement relates) must give written notice thereof to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth on the cover page of this Proxy Statement in accordance with the then current provisions of the Company’s Bylaws. The Bylaws currently require that such notice be given not more than 120 days, nor less than 90 days, prior to the first anniversary of this year’s Annual Meeting (i.e., no earlier than January 21, 2014 and no later than February 20, 2014). If, however, the Company advances the date of the next annual meeting by more than 30 days before or delays such date by more than 60 days after the first anniversary of this Annual Meeting, notice by the stockholder must be given not later than the later of (i) 90 days in advance of such annual meeting or, (ii) the tenth day following the first public announcement of the date of such meeting by the Company. Stockholder notices must contain the information required by Section 2 of Article I of the Company’s Bylaws. If the Company does not have notice of a matter to come before the next annual meeting by February 20, 2014 (or, in the event the next annual meeting is held more than 30 days before or 60 days after the first anniversary of this Annual Meeting, then by the date described above relating to such delay or advance in the meeting date), the Company’s proxy for such meeting will confer discretionary authority to vote on such matter.

The Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders contains financial and other information about the Company, but is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not to be considered a part of these proxy soliciting materials or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. The information contained in the “Compensation Committee Report,” and the “Audit Committee Report” and the Company-operated websites referenced in this Proxy Statement shall not be deemed filed with the SEC or subject

to Regulations 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of the Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE WITHOUT CHARGE A COPY OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR 2012 AND ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS, FILED WITH THE SEC FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 TO ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER OF PINNACLE COMMON STOCK AS OF THE RECORD DATE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 8918 SPANISH RIDGE AVENUE, LAS VEGAS, NV 89148, ATTENTION: JOHN A. GODFREY, GENERAL COUNSEL.

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Company”), hereby establishes and adopts the following 2005 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”). Certain capitalized terms used in the Plan are defined in Article II.

WHEREAS, the Company desires to encourage high levels of performance by those individuals who are key to the success of the Company, to attract new individuals who are highly motivated and who are expected to contribute to the success of the Company and to encourage such individuals to remain as directors, employees, consultants and/or advisors of the Company and its Affiliates by increasing their proprietary interest in the Company’s growth and success; and

WHEREAS, to attain these ends, the Company has formulated the Plan embodied herein to authorize the granting of Awards to Participants whose judgment, initiative and efforts are or have been or are expected to be responsible for the success of the Company.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby constitutes, establishes and adopts the following Plan and agrees to the following provisions:

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to assist the Company and its Affiliates in attracting and retaining selected individuals to serve as directors, employees, consultants and/or advisors of the Company who are expected to contribute to the Company’s success and to achieve long-term objectives which will inure to the benefit of all stockholders of the Company through the additional incentives inherent in the Awards hereunder.

2.1 “Affiliate” shall mean (i) any person or entity that directly, or through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company (including any Parent or Subsidiary) or (ii) any entity in which the Company has a significant equity interest, as determined by the Committee.

2.2 “Applicable Laws” means the legal requirements relating to the administration of and issuance of securities under stock incentive plans, including, without limitation, the requirements of state corporations law, federal and state securities law, federal and state tax law, and the requirements of any stock exchange or quotation system upon which the Shares may then be listed or quoted. For all purposes of this Plan, references to statutes and regulations shall be deemed to include any successor statutes and regulations, to the extent reasonably appropriate as determined by the Committee.

2.3 “Award” shall mean any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Performance Award, Dividend Equivalent, Other Stock Unit Award or any other right, interest or option relating to Shares or other property (including cash) granted pursuant to the provisions of the Plan.

2.4 “Award Agreement” shall mean any written agreement, contract or other instrument or document evidencing any Award granted by the Committee hereunder.

2.6 “Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in a Participant’s employment or consulting agreement with the Company (if any), or if not defined therein, shall mean (a) acts or omissions by the Participant which constitute intentional material misconduct or a knowing violation of a material policy of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (b) the Participant personally receiving a benefit in money, property or services from the Company or any of its subsidiaries or from another person dealing with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, in material violation of applicable law or Company policy, (c) an act of fraud, conversion, misappropriation, or embezzlement by the Participant or his conviction of, or entering a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to, a felony, or the equivalent thereof (other than DUI), or (d) any deliberate and material misuse or improper disclosure of confidential or proprietary information of the Company.

2.7 “Change of Control” shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events:

(i) The direct or indirect acquisition by an unrelated “Person” or “Group” of “Beneficial Ownership” (as such terms are defined below) of more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s issued and outstanding voting securities in a single transaction or a series of related transactions;

(ii) The direct or indirect sale or transfer by the Company of substantially all of its assets to one or more unrelated Persons or Groups in a single transaction or a series of related transactions;

(iii) The merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company with or into another corporation or other entity in which the Beneficial Owners (as such term is defined below) of more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s issued and outstanding voting securities immediately before such merger or consolidation do not own more than 50% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding voting securities of the surviving corporation or other entity immediately after such merger, consolidation or reorganization; or

(iv) During any consecutive 12-month period, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board of the Company (together with any new Directors whose election to such Board or whose nomination for election by the stockholders of the Company was approved by a vote of a majority of the Directors of the Company then still in office who were either Directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board of the Company then in office.

None of the foregoing events, however, shall constitute a Change of Control if such event is not a “Change in Control Event” under Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) or successor IRS guidance. For purposes of determining whether a Change of Control has occurred, the following Persons and Groups shall not be deemed to be “unrelated”: (A) such Person or Group directly or indirectly has Beneficial Ownership of more than 50% of the issued and outstanding voting power of the Company’s voting securities immediately before the transaction in question, (B) the Company has Beneficial Ownership of more than 50% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding voting securities of such Person or Group, or (C) more than 50% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding voting securities of such Person or Group are owned, directly or indirectly, by Beneficial Owners of more than 50% of the issued and outstanding voting power of the Company’s voting securities immediately before the transaction in question. The terms “Person,” “Group,” “Beneficial Owner,” and “Beneficial Ownership” shall have the meanings used in the Exchange Act, and the rules promulgated thereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (I) Persons will not be considered to be acting as a “Group” solely because they purchase or own stock of this Company at the same time, or as a result of the same public offering, (II) however, Persons will be considered to be acting as a “Group” if they are owners of a corporation that enters into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar business transaction, with the Company, and (III) if a Person, including an entity, owns stock both in the Company and in a corporation that enters into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar transaction, with the Company, such stockholders shall be considered to be acting as a Group with other stockholders only with respect to the ownership in the corporation before the transaction.

2.8 “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto.

2.9 “Committee” shall mean the Committee constituted under Section 4.2 to administer this Plan.

2.10 “Company” has the meaning set forth in introductory paragraph of the Plan.

2.11 “Consultant” means any person, including an advisor, who (i) is a natural person, (ii) provides bona fide services to the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary, and (iii) provides services that are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and that do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the securities of the Company; provided that the term ‘Consultant’ does not include (i) Employees or (ii) Directors who are paid only a director’s fee by the Company or who are not compensated by the Company for their services as Directors.

2.12 “Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant” means that the employment, director or consulting relationship is not interrupted or terminated by the Company, any Parent or Subsidiary, or by the Employee, Director or Consultant. Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant will not be considered interrupted in the case of: (i) any leave of absence approved by the Board, including sick leave, military leave, or any other personal leave, provided, that for purposes of Incentive Stock Options, any such leave may not exceed 90 days, unless reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is guaranteed by contract (including certain Company policies) or statute; (ii) transfers between locations of the Company or between the Company, its Parent, its Subsidiaries or its successor; or (iii) in the case of an Award other than an Incentive Stock Option, the ceasing of a person to be an Employee while such person remains a Director or Consultant, the ceasing of a person to be a Director while such person remains an Employee or Consultant or the ceasing of a person to be a Consultant while such person remains an Employee or Director.

2.13 “Covered Employee” shall mean a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(3) of the Code, or any successor provision thereto.

2.14 “Director” shall mean a non-employee member of the Board or a non-employee member of the board of directors of a Parent or Subsidiary.

2.15 “Disability” shall mean total and permanent disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

2.16 “Dividend Equivalents” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 12.5.

2.17 “Eligible Employees” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 14.3.

2.18 “Eligible Option” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 14.3.

2.19 “Employee” shall mean any employee of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary.

2.20 “Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.22 “Fair Market Value” shall mean, with respect to any property other than Shares, the market value of such property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Committee. The Fair Market Value of Shares as of any date shall be determined as follows:

(i) If the Shares are listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including without limitation, the National Market System of NASDAQ, the Fair Market Value of a Share will be (i) the closing sales price for such Shares (or the closing bid, if no sales are reported) as quoted on that

system or exchange (or the system or exchange with the greatest volume of trading in Shares) on the last market trading day prior to the day of determination or (ii) any sales price for such Shares (or the closing bid, if no sales are reported) as quoted on that system or exchange (or the system or exchange with the greatest volume of trading in Shares) on the day of determination, as the Committee may select, in each case as reported in the Wall Street Journal or any other source the Committee considers reliable.

(ii) If the Shares are quoted on the NASDAQ System (but not on the NASDAQ National Market System) or are regularly quoted by recognized securities dealers but selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a Share will be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Shares on (i) the last market trading day prior to the day of determination or (ii) the day of determination, as the Committee may select, in each case as reported in the Wall Street Journal or any other source the Committee considers reliable.

(iii) If the Shares are not traded as set forth above, the Fair Market Value will be determined in good faith by the Committee with reference to the earnings history, book value and prospects of the Company in light of market conditions generally, and any other factors the Committee considers appropriate, such determination by the Committee to be final, conclusive and binding.

2.23 “Family Member” means any child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive relationships, any person sharing the Participant’s household (other than a tenant or employee), a trust in which these persons (or the Participant) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the Participant) own more than 50 percent of the voting interests.

2.24 “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

2.25 “Individual Arrangements” means the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated as of January 11, 2003 by and between the Company and Stephen H. Capp, the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreements dated as of April 10, 2002 by and between the Company and Daniel R. Lee, the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008 by and between the Company and Carlos Ruisanchez, and the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated as of March 14, 2010 by and between the Company and Anthony M. Sanfilippo.

2.27 “Option” shall mean any right granted to a Participant under the Plan allowing such Participant to purchase Shares at such price or prices and during such period or periods as the Committee shall determine.

2.28 “Option Exchange Program” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 14.2.

2.29 “Other Stock Unit Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.1.

2.30 “Parent” means a “parent corporation” with respect to the Company, whether now or later existing, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.

2.31 “Participant” shall mean an Employee, Director or Consultant who is selected by the Committee to receive an Award under the Plan.

2.33 “Performance Award” shall mean any Award of Performance Shares or Performance Units granted pursuant to Article IX.

2.34 “Performance Period” shall mean that period established by the Committee at the time any Performance Award is granted or at any time thereafter during which any performance goals specified by the Committee with respect to such Award are to be measured.

2.35 “Performance Share” shall mean any grant pursuant to Article IX of a unit valued by reference to a designated number of Shares, which value may be paid to the Participant by delivery of such property as the Committee shall determine, including cash, Shares, other property, or any combination thereof, upon achievement of such performance goals during the Performance Period as the Committee shall establish at the time of such grant or thereafter.

2.36 “Performance Unit” shall mean any grant pursuant to Article IX of a unit valued by reference to a designated amount of property (including cash) other than Shares, which value may be paid to the Participant by delivery of such property as the Committee shall determine, including cash, Shares, other property, or any combination thereof, upon achievement of such performance goals during the Performance Period as the Committee shall establish at the time of such grant or thereafter.

2.37 “Prior Plans” shall mean, collectively, the Company’s 1993, 1996, 2001 and 2002 Option Plans, as amended.

2.38 “Restricted Stock” shall mean any Share issued with the restriction that the holder may not sell, transfer, pledge or assign such Share and with such other restrictions as the Committee, in its sole discretion, may impose (including any restriction on the right to vote such Share and the right to receive any dividends), which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such time or times, in installments or otherwise, as the Committee may deem appropriate.

2.39 “Restricted Period” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.1.

2.40 “Restricted Stock Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.1.

2.41 “Shares” shall mean the shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.10 per share.

2.42 “Stock Appreciation Right” shall mean the right granted to a Participant pursuant to Article VI.

2.43 “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, at the time of the granting of the Award, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.

2.44 “Substitute Awards” shall mean Awards granted or Shares issued by the Company in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, awards previously granted, or the right or obligation to make future awards, by a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary or with which the Company or any Subsidiary combines.

(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12.2, a total of ~~7,150,000~~8,950,000 Shares shall be authorized for grant under the Plan, plus any Shares subject to awards granted under the Prior Plans and Individual Arrangements, which such awards are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without issuance of Shares, or are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of Shares, on or after the effective date of this Plan. Any Shares that are subject to Awards of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be counted against this limit as one Share for every one Share granted. Any Shares that are subject to Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights (including, but not limited to, Shares delivered in satisfaction of Dividend Equivalents) shall be counted against this limit as 1.4 Shares for every one Share granted.

(b) If any Shares subject to an Award or to an award under the Prior Plans or Individual Arrangements are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without issuance of such Shares, or any Award or award under the Prior Plans or Individual Arrangements is settled for cash or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of the Shares subject to such Award, the Shares shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration, termination, cash settlement or non-issuance, again be available for Awards under the Plan, subject to Section 3.1(e) below.

(c) In the event that (i) any Option or other Award granted under this Plan or any option or award granted under the Prior Plans or Individual Arrangements is exercised through the tendering of Shares (either actually, by attestation, or by the giving of instructions to a broker to remit to the Company that portion of the sales price required to pay the exercise price) or by the withholding of Shares by the Company, or (ii) withholding tax liabilities arising from such Options or Awards under this Plan or options or awards under a Prior Plan or an Individual Arrangement are satisfied by the tendering of Shares (either actually, by attestation, or by the giving of instructions to a broker to remit to the Company that portion of the sales price required to pay the exercise price) or by the withholding of Shares by the Company, then the Shares so tendered or withheld shall not again be available for Awards under the Plan.

(d) Substitute Awards shall not reduce the Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan or authorized for grant to a Participant in any calendar year. Additionally, in the event that a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary, or with which the Company or any Subsidiary combines, has shares available under a pre-existing plan approved by shareholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such pre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan; provided that Awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were employees, directors or consultants of such acquired or combined company before such acquisition or combination.

(e) Any Shares that again become available for grant pursuant to this Article III shall be added back as one Share if such Shares were subject to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan or options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Prior Plans or Individual Arrangements, and as 1.4 Shares if such Shares were subject to Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan.

3.2 Limitations on Grants to Individual Participant. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12.2, no Participant may be granted (i) Options or Stock Appreciation Rights during any 12-month period with respect to more than 1,500,000 Shares, or (ii) Restricted Stock, Performance Awards and/or Other Stock Unit Awards that are denominated in Shares in any 12-month period with respect to more than 750,000 Shares (the “Limitations”). In addition to the foregoing, the maximum dollar value payable to any Participant in any 12-month period with respect to Performance Awards and/or Other Stock Unit Awards that are valued with reference to cash or property other than Shares is $2,500,000. If an Award is cancelled, the cancelled Award shall continue to be counted toward the applicable Limitations.

3.3 Character of Shares. Any Shares issued hereunder may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares or shares purchased in the open market or otherwise.

4.1 Eligibility. Any Employee, Director or Consultant shall be eligible to be selected as a Participant. Only Employees may receive awards of Incentive Stock Options.

(i) The Committee will consist of the Board, or a committee designated by the Board, which Committee will be constituted to satisfy Applicable Laws. Once appointed, a Committee will serve in its designated capacity until otherwise directed by the Board. The Board may increase the size of the Committee and appoint additional members, remove members (with or without cause) and substitute new members, fill vacancies (however caused), and remove all members of the Committee and thereafter directly administer the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless the Board expressly resolves to the contrary, while the Company is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, the Plan will be administered only by the Compensation Committee of the Board (or such other committee designated by the Compensation Committee of the Board), consisting of no fewer than two Directors, each of whom is (A) a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 (or any successor rule) of the Exchange Act, (B) an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C)(i) of the Code, and (C) an “independent director” for purpose of the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange or other exchange or quotation system on which the Shares are principally traded; provided, however, the failure of the Committee to be composed solely of individuals who are “non-employee directors,” “outside directors,” and “independent directors” shall not render ineffective or void any awards or grants made by, or other actions taken by, such Committee.

(ii) The Plan may be administered by different bodies with respect to Directors, officers who are not Directors, and Employees and Consultants who are neither Directors nor officers, and Covered Employees.

(b) The Committee shall have full discretion, power and authority, subject to the provisions of the Plan and subject to such orders or resolutions not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan as may from time to time be adopted by the Board, to: (i) select the Employees, Consultants and Directors to whom Awards may from time to time be granted hereunder; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, to be granted to each Participant hereunder; (iii) determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted hereunder; (iv) determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder and the form and content of any Award Agreement; (v) determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances Awards may be settled in cash, Shares or other property, subject to the provisions of the Plan; (vi) determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances any Award shall be modified, amended, canceled or suspended; (vii) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement entered into under or in connection with the Plan, including any Award Agreement; (viii) correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award in the manner and to the extent that the Committee shall deem desirable to carry it into effect; (ix) establish such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan; (x) determine whether any Award will have Dividend Equivalents; (xi) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares, or other property payable with respect to an Award shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Participant; provided that the Committee shall take no action that would subject the Participant to a penalty tax under Section 409A of the Code; and (xii) make any other determination and take any other action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for administration of the Plan.

(c) Decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons or entities, including the Company, any Participant, any stockholder and any Employee or any Affiliate. A majority of the members of the Committee may determine its actions and fix the time and place of its meetings.

(d) The Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more Directors of the Company or, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, to one or more officers or a committee of officers, the authority to grant Awards to Employees and officers of the Company who are not Directors, Covered Employees, or “officers,” as such term is defined by Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act, and to cancel or suspend Awards

to Employees and officers of the Company who are not Directors, Covered Employees, or “officers,” as such term is defined by Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act.

5.1 Grant of Options. Options may be granted hereunder to Participants either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan. Any Option shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Article V and to such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall deem desirable.

5.2 Award Agreements. All Options granted pursuant to this Article V shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement in such form and containing such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine which are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan. Granting of an Option pursuant to the Plan shall impose no obligation on the recipient to exercise such Option. Any individual who is granted an Option pursuant to this Article V may hold more than one Option granted pursuant to the Plan at the same time.

5.3 Option Price. Other than in connection with Substitute Awards, the option price per each Share purchasable under any Option granted pursuant to this Article V shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of such Share on the date of grant of such Option. Other than pursuant to Section 12.2, the Committee shall not be permitted to (a) lower the option price per Share of an Option after it is granted, (b) cancel an Option when the option price per Share exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares in exchange for another Award (other than in connection with Substitute Awards), and (c) take any other action with respect to an Option that may be treated as a repricing under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange or other exchange or quotation system on which the Shares are principally traded.

5.4 Option Period. The term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee in its sole discretion; provided that no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten years from the date the Option is granted.

5.5 Exercise of Options. Vested Options granted under the Plan shall be exercised by the Participant or by a Permitted Assignee thereof (or by the Participant’s executors, administrators, guardian, beneficiary, or legal representative, or Family Members, as may be provided in an Award Agreement) as to all or part of the Shares covered thereby, by the giving of written notice of exercise to the Company or its designated agent, specifying the number of Shares to be purchased, accompanied by payment of the full purchase price for the Shares being purchased. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, full payment of such purchase price shall be made at the time of exercise and shall be made (a) in cash or by certified check or bank check or wire transfer of immediately available funds, (b) with the consent of the Committee, by tendering previously acquired Shares (either actually or by attestation, valued at their then Fair Market Value) that have been owned for a period of at least six months (or such other period to avoid accounting charges against the Company’s earnings), (c) with the consent of the Committee, by delivery of other consideration (including, where permitted by law and the Committee, other Awards) having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the total purchase price, (d) with the consent of the Committee, by withholding Shares otherwise issuable in connection with the exercise of the Option, (e) with the consent of the Committee, by delivery of a properly executed exercise notice together with any other documentation as the Committee and the Participant’s broker, if applicable, require to effect an exercise of the Option and delivery to the Company of the sale or other proceeds (as permitted by Applicable Law) required to pay the exercise price, (f) through any other method specified in an Award Agreement, or (g) any combination of any of the foregoing. In connection with a tender of previously acquired Shares pursuant to clause (b) above, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit the Participant to constructively exchange Shares already owned by the Participant in lieu of actually tendering such Shares to the Company, provided that adequate documentation concerning the ownership of the Shares to be constructively tendered is furnished in form satisfactory to the Committee. The notice of exercise, accompanied by such payment, shall be delivered to

the Company at its principal business office or such other office as the Committee may from time to time direct, and shall be in such form, containing such further provisions consistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee may from time to time prescribe. In no event may any Option granted hereunder be exercised for a fraction of a Share. No adjustment shall be made for cash dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to the date of such issuance.

5.6 Form of Settlement. In its sole discretion, the Committee may provide, at the time of grant, that the Shares to be issued upon an Option’s exercise shall be in the form of Restricted Stock or other similar securities, or may reserve the right so to provide after the time of grant.

5.7 Incentive Stock Options. With respect to the Options that may be granted by the Committee under the Plan, the Committee may grant Options intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options to any Employee of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, subject to the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. The Award Agreement of an Option intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option shall designate the Option as an Incentive Stock Option Notwithstanding anything in Section 3.1 to the contrary and solely for the purposes of determining whether Shares are available for the grant of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Plan shall be ~~7,150,000~~8,950,000 Shares. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.3, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent of the voting power of all classes of capital stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the per Share exercise price will be no less than 110% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.4, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than ten percent of the voting power of all classes of capital stock of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary, the term of the Incentive Stock Option will be five years from the date of grant or any shorter term specified in the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Shares subject to an Employee’s Incentive Stock Options (granted under all plans of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary), which become exercisable for the first time during any calendar year, have a Fair Market Value in excess of $100,000, the Options accounting for this excess will be not be treated as Incentive Stock Options. For purposes of the preceding sentence, Incentive Stock Options will be taken into account in the order in which they were granted, and the Fair Market Value of the Shares will be determined as of the time of grant.

5.8 Termination of Employment or Consulting Relationship or Directorship. If a Participant holds exercisable Options on the date his or her Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates (other than because of termination due to Cause, death or Disability), the Participant may exercise the Options that were vested and exercisable as of the date of termination until the end of the original term or for a period of 90 days following such termination, whichever is earlier (or such other period as is set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee). If the Participant is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Option at the date of such termination, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Option will revert to the Plan, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee. The Committee may determine in its sole discretion that such unexercisable portion of the Option will become exercisable at such times and on such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If the Participant does not exercise an Option within the time specified above after termination, that Option will expire, and the Shares covered by it will revert to the Plan, except as otherwise determined by the Committee.

5.9 Disability of Participant. If a Participant holds exercisable Options on the date his or her Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates because of Disability, the Participant may exercise the Options that were vested and exercisable as of the date of termination until the end of the original term or for a period of 36 months following such termination, whichever is earlier (or such other period as is set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee). If the Participant is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Option at the date of such termination, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Option will revert to the Plan, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee. The Committee

may determine in its sole discretion that such unexercisable portion of the Option will become exercisable at such times and on such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If the Participant does not exercise an Option within the time specified above after termination, that Option will expire, and the Shares covered by it will revert to the Plan, except as otherwise determined by the Committee.

5.10 Death of Participant. If a Participant holds exercisable Options on the date his or her death, the Participant’s estate or a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance or under Section 12.3 may exercise the Options that were vested and exercisable as of the date of death until the end of the original term or for a period of 36 months following the date of death, whichever is earlier (or such other period as is set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee). If the Participant is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Option at the date of death, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Option will revert to the Plan, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee. The Committee may determine in its sole discretion that such unexercisable portion of the Option will become exercisable at such times and on such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If the Participant’s estate or a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance or under Section 12.3 does not exercise the Option within the time specified above after the date of death, the Option will expire, and the Shares covered by it will revert to the Plan, except as otherwise determined by the Committee.

6.1 Grant and Exercise. The Committee may provide Stock Appreciation Rights either alone or in addition to other Awards upon such terms and conditions as the Committee may establish in its sole discretion.

6.2 Terms and Conditions. Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to such terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as shall be determined from time to time by the Committee, including the following:

(a) Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, the holder shall have the right to receive the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of one Share on the date of exercise or such other amount as the Committee shall so determine at any time during a specified period before the date of exercise over (ii) the grant price of the right on the date of grant, which, except in the case of Substitute Awards or in connection with an adjustment provided in Section 12.2, shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one Share on such date of grant of the right.

(b) Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, payment shall be made in whole Shares, or cash to the extent permissible without penalty to the Participant under Section 409A of the Code.

(d) The Committee may impose such other conditions or restrictions on the terms of exercise and the exercise price of any Stock Appreciation Right, as it shall deem appropriate. In connection with the foregoing, the Committee shall consider the applicability and effect of Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.2, but subject to Section 12.2, a Stock Appreciation Right shall not have (i) an exercise price less than Fair Market Value on the date of grant, or (ii) a term of greater than ten years. In addition to the foregoing, but subject to Section 12.2, the base amount of any Stock Appreciation Right shall not be reduced after the date of grant. The Committee shall take no action under this Article VI that would subject a Participant to a penalty tax under Section 409A of the Code.

6.3 Termination of Employment or Consulting Relationship or Directorship. If a Participant holds exercisable Stock Appreciation Rights on the date his or her Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates (other than because of termination due to Cause, death or Disability), the Participant may

exercise the Stock Appreciation Rights that were vested and exercisable as of the date of termination until the end of the original term or for a period of 90 days following such termination, whichever is earlier (or such other period as is set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee). If the Participant is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Stock Appreciation Right at the date of such termination, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Stock Appreciation Right will revert to the Plan, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee. The Committee may determine in its sole discretion that such unexercisable portion of the Stock Appreciation Right will become exercisable at such times and on such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If the Participant does not exercise a Stock Appreciation Right within the time specified above after termination, that Stock Appreciation Right will expire, and the Shares covered by it will revert to the Plan, except as otherwise determined by the Committee.

6.4 Disability of Participant. If a Participant holds exercisable Stock Appreciation Rights on the date his or her Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant terminates because of Disability, the Participant may exercise the Stock Appreciation Rights that were vested and exercisable as of the date of termination until the end of the original term or for a period of 36 months following such termination, whichever is earlier (or such other period as is set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee). If the Participant is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Stock Appreciation Right at the date of such termination, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Stock Appreciation Right will revert to the Plan, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee. The Committee may determine in its sole discretion that such unexercisable portion of the Stock Appreciation Right will become exercisable at such times and on such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If the Participant does not exercise a Stock Appreciation Right within the time specified above after termination, that Stock Appreciation Right will expire, and the Shares covered by it will revert to the Plan, except as otherwise determined by the Committee.

6.5 Death of Participant. If a Participant holds exercisable Stock Appreciation Rights on the date his or her death, the Participant’s estate or a person who acquired the right to exercise the Stock Appreciation Rights by bequest or inheritance or under Section 12.3 may exercise the Stock Appreciation Rights that were vested and exercisable as of the date of death until the end of the original term or for a period of 36 months following the date of death, whichever is earlier (or such other period as is set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee). If the Participant is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Stock Appreciation Right at the date of death, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Stock Appreciation Right will revert to the Plan, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement or determined by the Committee. The Committee may determine in its sole discretion that such unexercisable portion of the Stock Appreciation Right will become exercisable at such times and on such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion. If the Participant’s estate or a person who acquired the right to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right by bequest or inheritance or under Section 12.3 does not exercise the Stock Appreciation Right within the time specified above after the date of death, the Stock Appreciation Right will expire, and the Shares covered by it will revert to the Plan, except as otherwise determined by the Committee.

7.1 Grants. Awards of Restricted Stock may be issued hereunder to Participants either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan (a “Restricted Stock Award”). A Restricted Stock Award shall be subject to restrictions imposed by the Committee covering a period of time specified by the Committee (the “Restriction Period”). The provisions of Restricted Stock Awards need not be the same with respect to each recipient. The Committee has absolute discretion to determine whether any consideration (other than services) is to be received by the Company or any Affiliate as a condition precedent to the issuance of Restricted Stock.

7.2 Award Agreements. The terms of any Restricted Stock Award granted under the Plan shall be set forth in a written Award Agreement which shall contain provisions determined by the Committee and not inconsistent with the Plan.

7.3 Rights of Holders of Restricted Stock. Except as otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, beginning on the date of grant of the Restricted Stock Award and subject to execution of the Award Agreement, the Participant shall become a shareholder of the Company with respect to all Shares subject to the Award Agreement and shall have all of the rights of a shareholder, including the right to vote such Shares and the right to receive distributions made with respect to such Shares; provided, however that any Shares or any other property (other than cash) distributed as a dividend or otherwise with respect to any Restricted Shares as to which the restrictions have not yet lapsed shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Restricted Shares.

8.1 Other Stock Unit Awards. Other Awards of Shares and other Awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on, Shares or other property (“Other Stock Unit Awards”) may be granted hereunder to Participants, either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan, and such Other Stock Unit Awards shall also be available as a form of payment in the settlement of other Awards granted under the Plan. Other Stock Unit Awards shall be paid in Shares or cash. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the Employees, Consultants and Directors to whom and the time or times at which such Other Stock Unit Awards shall be made, the number of Shares to be granted pursuant to such Awards, and all other conditions of the Awards. The provisions of Other Stock Unit Awards need not be the same with respect to each recipient.

8.2 Terms and Conditions. Shares (including securities convertible into Shares) subject to Awards granted under this Article VIII may be issued for no consideration or for such minimum consideration as may be required by Applicable Law. Shares (including securities convertible into Shares) purchased pursuant to a purchase right awarded under this Article VIII shall be purchased for such consideration as the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion.

9.1 Terms of Performance Awards. Performance Awards may be issued hereunder to Participants, for no consideration or for such minimum consideration as may be required by Applicable Law, either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan. The performance criteria to be achieved during any Performance Period and the length of the Performance Period shall be determined by the Committee upon the grant of each Performance Award; provided, however, that a Performance Period shall not be shorter than six months nor longer than five years. Except as provided in Article XI or as may be provided in an Award Agreement, Performance Awards will be distributed only after the end of the relevant Performance Period. Performance Awards may be paid in cash, Shares, other property, or any combination thereof, in the sole discretion of the Committee at the time of payment. The performance goals to be achieved for each Performance Period shall be conclusively determined by the Committee and may be based upon the criteria set forth in Section 10.2. The amount of the Award to be distributed shall be conclusively determined by the Committee. Performance Awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following the close of the Performance Period.

10.1 Covered Employees. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, if the Committee determines at the time Restricted Stock, a Performance Award or an Other Stock Unit Award is granted to a Participant who is,

or is likely to be, as of the end of the tax year in which the Company would claim a tax deduction in connection with such Award, a Covered Employee, then the Committee may provide that this Article X is applicable to such Award.

10.2 Performance Criteria. If Restricted Stock, a Performance Award or an Other Stock Unit Award is subject to this Article X, then the lapsing of restrictions thereon and the distribution of cash, Shares or other property pursuant thereto, as applicable, shall be subject to the achievement of one or more objective performance goals established by the Committee, which shall be based on the attainment of specified levels of or growth of one or any combination of the following factors, or an objective formula determined at the time of the Award that is based on modified or unmodified calculations of one or any combination of the following factors: net sales; pretax income before or after allocation of corporate overhead and bonus; earnings per share; net income; division, group or corporate financial goals; return on stockholders’ equity; return on assets; attainment of strategic and operational initiatives; appreciation in and/or maintenance of the price of the Shares or any other publicly-traded securities of the Company; market share; gross profits; earnings before taxes; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); an adjusted formula of EBITDA determined by the Committee; economic value-added models; comparisons with various stock market indices; reductions in costs, and/or return on invested capital of the Company or any Affiliate, division or business unit of the Company for or within which the Participant is primarily employed. Such performance goals also may be based solely by reference to the Company’s performance or the performance of an Affiliate, division or business unit of the Company, or based upon the relative performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to other companies. Unless the Committee specifies otherwise when it sets performance goals for an Award, objective adjustments shall be made to any of the foregoing measures for items that will not properly reflect the Company’s financial performance for these purposes, such as the write-off of debt issuance costs, pre-opening and development costs, gain or loss from asset dispositions, asset or other impairment charges, litigation settlement costs, and other non-routine items that may occur during the Performance Period. Also, unless the Committee determines otherwise in setting the performance goals for an Award, such performance goals shall be applied by excluding the impact of (a) restructurings, discontinued operations and charges for extraordinary items, (b) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management, or (c) a change in accounting standards required by generally accepted accounting principles. Such performance goals shall be set by the Committee within the time period prescribed by, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of, Section 162(m) of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and the regulations thereunder.

10.3 Adjustments. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan (other than Article XI), with respect to any Restricted Stock, Performance Award or Other Stock Unit Award that is subject to this Article X, the Committee may adjust downward, but not upward, the amount payable pursuant to such Award, and the Committee may not waive the achievement of the applicable performance goals, except in the case of the death or Disability of the Participant or the occurrence of a Change of Control.

10.4 Determination of Performance. Prior to the vesting, payment, settlement or lapsing of any restrictions with respect to any Restricted Stock, Performance Award or Other Stock Unit Award that is subject to this Article X, the Committee shall certify in writing that the applicable performance goals have been achieved to the extent necessary for such Award to qualify as “performance based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.

10.5 Restrictions. The Committee shall have the power to impose such other restrictions on Awards subject to this Article X as it may deem necessary or appropriate to ensure that such Awards satisfy all requirements for “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, or which are not inconsistent with such requirements.

11.1 Impact of Change of Control. The terms of any Award may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing the Award, or the Committee may determine in its discretion, that, upon a Change of Control of the Company, (a) Options and Stock Appreciation Rights outstanding as of the date of the Change of Control immediately vest and become fully exercisable, (b) restrictions and deferral limitations on Restricted Stock lapse and the Restricted Stock become free of all restrictions and limitations and become fully vested, (c) all Performance Awards shall be considered to be earned and payable (either in full or pro-rata based on the portion of Performance Period completed as of the date of the Change of Control), and any deferral or other restriction shall lapse and such Performance Awards shall be immediately settled or distributed, (d) the restrictions and deferral limitations and other conditions applicable to any Other Stock Unit Awards or any other Awards shall lapse, and such Other Stock Unit Awards or such other Awards shall become free of all restrictions, limitations or conditions and become fully vested and transferable to the full extent of the original grant, and (e) such other additional benefits, changes or adjustments as the Committee deems appropriate and fair shall apply, subject in each case to any terms and conditions contained in the Award Agreement evidencing such Award. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Committee, in its discretion, may determine that, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control of the Company, (a) each Option and Stock Appreciation Right shall remain exercisable for only a limited period of time determined by the Committee (provided that they remain exercisable for at least 30 days after notice of such action is given to the Participants), or (b) each Option and Stock Appreciation Right outstanding shall terminate within a specified number of days after notice to the Participant, and such Participant shall receive, with respect to each Share subject to such Option or Stock Appreciation Right, an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of such Share immediately prior to the occurrence of such Change of Control over the exercise price per share of such Option and/or Stock Appreciation Right; such amount to be payable in cash, in one or more kinds of stock or property (including the stock or property, if any, payable in the transaction) or in a combination thereof, as the Committee, in its discretion, shall determine. Notwithstanding the foregoing and the provisions of Section 11.2, the Committee will take no action that would subject any Participant to a penalty tax under Section 409A of the Code.

11.2 Assumption Upon Change of Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of any Award Agreement may also provide that, if in the event of a Change of Control the successor company assumes or substitutes for an Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Share of Restricted Stock or Other Stock Unit Award, then each outstanding Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Share of Restricted Stock or Other Stock Unit Award shall not be accelerated as described in Sections 11.1(a), (b) and (d). For the purposes of this Section 11.2, an Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Share of Restricted Stock or Other Stock Unit Award shall be considered assumed or substituted for if following the Change of Control the award confers the right to purchase or receive, for each Share subject to the Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award or Other Stock Unit Award immediately prior to the Change of Control, the consideration (whether stock, cash or other securities or property) received in the transaction constituting a Change of Control by holders of Shares for each Share held on the effective date of such transaction (and if holders were offered a choice of consideration, the type of consideration chosen by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares); provided, however, that if such consideration received in the transaction constituting a Change of Control is not solely common stock of the successor company, the Committee may, with the consent of the successor company, provide that the consideration to be received upon the exercise or vesting of an Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award or Other Stock Unit Award, for each Share subject thereto, will be solely common stock of the successor company substantially equal in fair market value to the per share consideration received by holders of Shares in the transaction constituting a Change of Control. The determination of such substantial equality of value of consideration shall be made by the Committee in its sole discretion and its determination shall be conclusive and binding. Any assumption or substitution of an Incentive Stock Option will be made in a manner that will not be considered a “modification” under the provisions of Section 424(h)(3) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, on such terms and conditions as may be set forth in an Award Agreement, in the event of a termination of a Participant’s employment in such successor company within a specified time period

following such Change of Control, each Award held by such Participant at the time of the Change of Control shall be accelerated as described in Sections 11.1(a), (b) and (d) above.

12.1 Amendment and Modification of the Plan. The Board may, from time to time, alter, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan as it shall deem advisable, subject to any requirement for stockholder approval imposed by Applicable Law; provided that the Board may not amend the Plan in any manner that would result in noncompliance with Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act; and further provided that the Board may not, without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, amend the Plan to (a) increase the number of Shares that may be the subject of Awards under the Plan (except for adjustments pursuant to Section 12.2), (b) expand the types of awards available under the Plan, (c) materially expand the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan, (d) amend any provision of Section 5.3, (e) increase the maximum permissible term of any Option specified by Section 5.4, or (f) amend any provision of Section 3.2. In addition, no amendments to, or termination of, the Plan (other than by reason of the failure of stockholders to approve the Plan in the manner set forth in Section 13.12) shall in any way impair the rights of a Participant under any Award previously granted without such Participant’s consent.

12.2 Adjustments. In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, dividend or distribution (whether in cash, shares or other property), stock split, reverse stock split, spin-off or similar transaction or other change in corporate structure affecting the Shares or the value thereof, such adjustments and other substitutions shall be made to the Plan and to Awards as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems equitable or appropriate, including such adjustments in the aggregate number, class and kind of securities that may be delivered under the Plan and, in the aggregate or to any one Participant, in the number, class, kind and option or exercise price of securities subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Plan (including, if the Committee deems appropriate, the substitution of similar options to purchase the shares of, or other awards denominated in the shares of, another company) as the Committee may determine to be appropriate in its sole discretion; provided, however, that the number of Shares subject to any Award shall always be a whole number. Where an adjustment under this Section 12.2 is made to an Incentive Stock Option, the adjustment will be made in a manner which will not be considered a “modification” under the provisions of subsection 424(h)(3) of the Code.

12.3 Transferability of Awards. Except as provided below, and except as otherwise authorized by the Committee in an Award Agreement, no Award, and no Shares subject to Awards that have not been issued or as to which any applicable restriction, performance or deferral period has not lapsed, may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and such Award may be exercised during the life of the Participant only by the Participant or the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Committee so authorizes in the Award Agreement or otherwise, an Award other than an Incentive Stock Option may be assigned, in whole or in part, during the Participant’s lifetime to one or more Family Members of the Participant. Rights under the assigned portion may be exercised by the Family Member(s) who acquire a proprietary interest in such Award pursuant to the assignment. The terms applicable to the assigned portion shall be the same as those in effect for the Award immediately before such assignment and shall be set forth in such documents issued to the assignee as the Committee deems appropriate.

(a) Designation of Beneficiary. A Participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any Awards that remain unexercised in the event of the Participant’s death. If a Participant is married and the designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent will be required for the designation to be effective. The Participant may change such designation of beneficiary at any time by written notice to the Committee, subject to the above spousal consent requirement.

(b) Effect of No Designation. If a Participant dies and there is no beneficiary validly designated and living at the time of the Participant’s death, the Company will deliver such Participant’s Awards to the executor or administrator of his or her estate, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its discretion, may deliver such Awards to the spouse or to any one or more dependents or relatives of the Participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Company, then to such other person as the Company may designate.

(c) Death of Spouse or Dissolution of Marriage. If a Participant designates his or her spouse as beneficiary, that designation will be deemed automatically revoked if the Participant’s marriage is later dissolved. Similarly, any designation of a beneficiary will be deemed automatically revoked upon the death of the beneficiary if the beneficiary predeceases the Participant. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the interest in Awards of a spouse of a Participant who has predeceased the Participant or whose marriage has been dissolved will automatically pass to the Participant, and will not be transferable by such spouse in any manner, including but not limited to such spouse’s will, nor will any such interest pass under the laws of intestate succession.

12.4 Termination of Employment. The Committee shall determine and set forth in each Award Agreement whether any Awards granted in such Award Agreement will continue to be exercisable, and the terms of such exercise, on and after the date that a Participant ceases to be employed by or to provide services to the Company or any Affiliate (including as a Director), whether by reason of death, disability, voluntary or involuntary termination of employment or services, or otherwise. The date of termination of a Participant’s employment or services will be determined by the Committee, which determination will be final.

12.5 Dividend Equivalents. Subject to the provisions of the Plan and any Award Agreement, the recipient of an Award (including any deferred Award) may, if so determined by the Committee, be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, stock or other property dividends, or cash payments in amounts equivalent to stock or other property dividends on Shares (“Dividend Equivalents”) with respect to the number of Shares covered by the Award, as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and the Committee may provide that such amounts (if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares or otherwise reinvested.

13.1 Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the right to make all payments or distributions pursuant to the Plan to a Participant (or to the Participant’s executors, administrators, guardian, beneficiary, or legal representative, or Family Members) (any such person, a “Payee”) net of any applicable Federal, State and local taxes required to be paid or withheld as a result of (a) the grant of any Award, (b) the exercise of an Option or Stock Appreciation Rights, (c) the delivery of Shares or cash, (d) the lapse of any restrictions in connection with any Award, or (e) any other event occurring pursuant to the Plan. The Company or any Affiliate shall have the right to withhold from wages or other amounts otherwise payable to such Payee such withholding taxes as may be required by law, or to otherwise require the Payee to pay such withholding taxes. If the Payee shall fail to make such tax payments as are required, the Company or its Affiliates shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to such Payee or to take such other action as may be necessary to satisfy such withholding obligations. The Committee shall be authorized to establish procedures for election by Participants to satisfy such obligation for the payment of such taxes by tendering previously acquired Shares (either actually or by attestation, valued at their then Fair Market Value) that have been owned for a period of at least six months (or such other period to avoid accounting charges against the Company’s earnings), or by directing the Company to retain Shares (up to the employee’s minimum required tax withholding rate) otherwise deliverable in connection with the Award. If Shares acquired upon exercise of any Incentive Stock Option are disposed of in a disposition that, under Section 422 of the Code, disqualifies the holder from the application of Section 421(a) of the Code, the holder of the Shares immediately before the disposition will comply with any requirements imposed by the Company in order to enable the Company to secure the related income tax deduction to which it is entitled in such event.

13.2 Right of Discharge Reserved; Claims to Awards. Nothing in the Plan nor the grant of an Award hereunder shall confer upon any Employee, Consultant or Director the right to continue in the employment or service of the Company or any Affiliate or affect any right that the Company or any Affiliate may have to terminate the employment or service of (or to demote or to exclude from future Awards under the Plan) any such Employee, Consultant or Director at any time for any reason. The Company shall not be liable for the loss of existing or potential profit from an Award granted in the event of termination of an employment or other relationship. No Employee or Participant shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of Employees or Participants under the Plan.

13.3 Prospective Recipient. The prospective recipient of any Award under the Plan shall not, with respect to such Award, be deemed to have become a Participant, or to have any rights with respect to such Award, until and unless such recipient shall have executed an agreement or other instrument evidencing the Award and delivered a copy thereof to the Company, and otherwise complied with the then applicable terms and conditions.

13.4 Cancellation of Award. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, all outstanding Awards granted to any Participant may be canceled in the discretion of the Committee if the Participant’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director or Consultant is terminated for Cause, or if, after the termination of the Participant’s Continuous Status as an Employee, Director, or Consultant, the Committee determines that Cause existed before such termination.

13.5 Stop Transfer Orders. All certificates for Shares delivered under the Plan pursuant to any Award shall be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the provisions of this Plan, the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Shares are then listed, and any applicable federal or state securities law, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

13.6 Nature of Payments. All Awards made pursuant to the Plan are in consideration of services performed or to be performed for the Company or any Affiliate, division or business unit of the Company. Any income or gain realized pursuant to Awards under the Plan and any Stock Appreciation Rights constitute a special incentive payment to the Participant and shall not be taken into account, to the extent permissible under Applicable Law, as compensation for purposes of any of the employee benefit plans of the Company or any Affiliate except as may be determined by the Committee or by the Board or board of directors of the applicable Affiliate.

13.7 Other Plans. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Board from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements, subject to stockholder approval if such approval is required; and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.

13.8 Severability. If any provision of the Plan shall be held unlawful or otherwise invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall (a) be deemed limited to the extent that such court of competent jurisdiction deems it lawful, valid and/or enforceable and as so limited shall remain in full force and effect, and (b) not affect any other provision of the Plan or part thereof, each of which shall remain in full force and effect. If the making of any payment or the provision of any other benefit required under the Plan shall be held unlawful or otherwise invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such unlawfulness, invalidity or unenforceability shall not prevent any other payment or benefit from being made or provided under the Plan, and if the making of any payment in full or the provision of any other benefit required under the Plan in full would be unlawful or otherwise invalid or unenforceable, then such unlawfulness, invalidity or unenforceability shall not prevent such payment or benefit from being made or provided in part, to the extent that it would not be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable, and the maximum payment or benefit that would not be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable shall be made or provided under the Plan.

13.9 Construction. All references in the Plan to “Section,” “Sections,” or “Article” are intended to refer to the Section, Sections or Article, as the case may be, of the Plan. As used in the Plan, the words “include” and “including,” and variations thereof, shall not be deemed to be terms of limitation, but rather shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.”

13.10 Unfunded Status of the Plan. The Plan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant by the Company, nothing contained herein shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company. In its sole discretion, the Committee may authorize the creation of trusts or other arrangements to meet the obligations created under the Plan to deliver the Shares or payments in lieu of or with respect to Awards hereunder; provided, however, that the existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent with the unfunded status of the Plan.

13.11 Governing Law. The Plan and all determinations made and actions taken thereunder, to the extent not otherwise governed by the Code or the laws of the United States, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and construed accordingly.

13.12 Effective Date of Plan; Termination of Plan. The Plan shall be effective on the date of its adoption by the Board, subject to the approval of the Plan, within 12 months thereafter, by affirmative votes representing a majority of the votes cast under Applicable Laws at a duly constituted meeting of the stockholders of the Company. After the adoption of this Plan by the Board, Awards may be made, but all such Awards shall be subject to stockholder approval of this Plan in accordance with the first sentence of this Section 13.12, and no Options or Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised prior to such stockholder approval of the Plan. If the stockholders do not approve this Plan in the manner set forth in the first sentence of this Section 13.12, this Plan, and all Awards granted hereunder, shall be null and void and of no effect. Awards may be granted under the Plan at any time and from time to time on or prior to the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the Plan (unless the Board sooner suspends or terminates the Plan under Section 12.1), on which date the Plan will expire except as to Awards then outstanding under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless affirmative votes representing a majority of the votes cast under Applicable Laws approve the continuation of Article X at the first duly constituted meeting of the stockholders of the Company that occurs in the fifth year following the later of i) the effective date of this Plan or ii) the then most recent re-approval of the continuation of Article X of the Plan, no Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be made to Covered Employees following the date of such meeting. Except as set forth in the third sentence of this Section 13.12, outstanding Awards shall remain in effect until they have been exercised or terminated, or have expired.

13.13 Foreign Employees. Awards may be granted to Participants who are foreign nationals or employed outside the United States, or both, on such terms and conditions different from those applicable to Awards to Employees employed in the United States as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be necessary or desirable in order to recognize differences in local law or tax policy. The Committee also may impose conditions on the exercise or vesting of Awards in order to minimize the Company’s obligation with respect to tax equalization for Employees on assignments outside their home country.

13.14 Effect on Prior Plans. On the approval of this Plan by the stockholders of the Company in the manner set forth in Section 13.12, the Prior Plans shall be cancelled and no further grants or awards shall be made under the Prior Plans. Grants and awards made under the Prior Plans before the date of such cancellation, however, shall continue in effect in accordance with their terms. Grants and awards made under the Individual Arrangements shall likewise continue in effect in accordance with their terms.

13.15 Other Company Compensation Plans. Shares available for Awards under the Plan may be used by the Company as a form of payment of compensation under other Company compensation plans, whether or not existing on the date hereof. To the extent any Shares are used as such by the Company, such Shares will reduce the then number of Shares available under Article III of the Plan for future Awards.

13.16 Captions. The captions in the Plan are for convenience of reference only, and are not intended to narrow, limit or affect the substance or interpretation of the provisions contained herein.

14.1 Establishment of Option Exchange Program. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Company, by action of the Compensation Committee of the Board, may effect an option exchange program (the “Option Exchange Program”), through one or more option exchange offers to be commenced within 12 months of the approval by the stockholders; provided, however, that in no event may more than one offer to exchange be made for any outstanding option.

14.2 Procedure for Exchanging Options. Under the Option Exchange Program, Eligible Employees will be offered the opportunity to exchange Eligible Options for new grants of options (each an “Exchange Grant”), as follows:

(a) the Compensation Committee shall determine the exchange ratio for an exchange of Eligible Options for Exchange Grants; provided, however, that the ratio shall be such that the fair value as of either the start of the exchange offer or the date of the exchange (for financial accounting purposes) of an Exchange Grant shall be no more than the fair value (for financial accounting purposes) of the Eligible Options for which the Exchange Grant is exchanged,

(b) the per share exercise price of each Exchange Grant that is a stock option shall not be less than the fair market value of a Share on the date of issuance of the Exchange Grant,

(d) the expiration of each Exchange Grant will be the same as its corresponding Eligible Option.

All other terms of the Exchange Grants shall be governed by the provisions of the Plan. Any Eligible Employee may receive Exchange Grants where the Shares underlying such Exchange Grants exceed either one percent of the number of Shares or one percent of the voting power outstanding before the issuance of such Exchange Grants.

(a) “Eligible Employees” means employees of the Company other than the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and executive officers (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).

(b) “Eligible Option” means any option granted under the Plan where, as of the date specified by the terms of the Exchange Offer (which date shall be not more than ten business days prior to any exchange offer), the per share exercise price of such option is greater than the higher of (i) the then-current 52-week high trading price of the Shares and (ii) 150% of the then-current price of the Shares.

14.4 Additional Terms. Subject to the foregoing, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall be permitted to determine additional terms, restrictions or requirements relating to the Option Exchange Program that they deem necessary or advisable, consistent with the terms of the Plan.

PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS 8918 SPANISH RIDGE AVENUE If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. in LAS VEGAS, NV 89148 mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors For Against Abstain 1a Stephen C. Comer 1b Richard J. Goeglein For Against Abstain 1c Bruce A. Leslie 3. Amendment to the Company’s 2005 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan. 1d James L. Martineau 4. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2013. 1e Desirée Rogers 1f Anthony M. Sanfilippo NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 1g Jaynie M. Studenmund The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4: For Against Abstain 2. Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation. For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Yes No Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting 0000157622 Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Annual Report is/ are available at www.proxyvote.com . PINNACLE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS MAY 21, 2013 The undersigned hereby appoints Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Carlos A. Ruisanchez and John A. Godfrey, or any of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot and in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting, all of the shares of Common Stock of Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, on Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at Pinnacle’s Corporate Offices, 8918 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.


Name	Age		Position with the Company
Stephen C. Comer (a)(b)		63	Director
Richard J. Goeglein		78	Chairman of the Board and Director
Bruce A. Leslie (a)(c)(d)		62	Director
James L. Martineau (b)(d)		72	Vice Chairman of the Board and Director
Desirée Rogers (c)(d)		53	Director
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		55	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jaynie M. Studenmund (a)(b)(c)		58	Director


Name (a)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (b)		Stock Awards ($) (c) (d)		Option Awards ($) (e) (f)		Total ($)
Stephen C. Comer	$	147,760	$	57,960	$	52,391	$	258,111
John V. Giovenco	$	119,760	$	63,035	$	52,391	$	235,186
Richard J. Goeglein	$	191,661	$	57,960	$	52,391	$	302,012
Bruce A. Leslie	$	141,475	$	63,035	$	52,391	$	256,901
James L. Martineau	$	139,292	$	88,410	$	52,391	$	280,093
Lynn P. Reitnouer	$	59,989	$	5,075	$	0	$	65,064
Desirée Rogers	$	85,427	$	57,960	$	109,316	$	252,703
Jaynie M. Studenmund	$	91,427	$	57,960	$	109,316	$	258,703


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned			Percent of Shares Outstanding (a)
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC 227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		6,043,000	(b)		10.35	%

Prudential Financial, Inc. 751 Broad Street Newark, NJ 07102		5,314,397	(c)		9.10	%

Jennison Associates LLC 466 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017		4,787,486	(d)		8.20	%

BlackRock, Inc. 40 East 52^nd Street New York, NY 10022		4,616,468	(e)		7.91	%

The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355		3,619,174	(f)		6.20	%

Eagle Asset Management, Inc. 880 Carillon Parkway St. Petersburg, Florida 33716		3,312,911	(g)		5.67	%

Anthony M. Sanfilippo		1,072,149	(h)		1.82	%
Daniel P. Boudreaux		83,632	(i)		*
Stephen C. Comer		113,284	(j)		*
John A. Godfrey		363,436	(k)		*
Richard J. Goeglein		125,909	(l)		*
Geno M. Iafrate		97,648	(m)		*
Bruce A. Leslie		244,372	(n)		*
James L. Martineau		160,819	(o)		*
Desirée Rogers		26,000	(p)		*
Carlos A. Ruisanchez		484,002	(q)		*
Virginia E. Shanks		114,708	(r)		*
Jaynie Miller Studenmund		26,000	(s)		*
Neil E. Walkoff		69,808	(t)		*
Directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)		2,981,767			4.93	%


Fiscal 2012 Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

Element	Description	Performance Considerations	Primary Objectives
Base Salary	• Fixed cash payment	• Based on level of responsibility, experience, and individual performance, compared to other executives and the external market	• Attract and retain talent • Recognize career experience and individual performance • Provide a competitive salary • Recognize internal relationship between pay and responsibility by level

Annual Bonuses	• Performance-based annual incentive bonuses for named executive officers, which are payable 75% in cash and 25% in restricted stock units	• Named executive officer bonus amounts tied to level of achievement of financial objectives, subject to adjustment based on individual performance evaluations	• Promote and reward achievement of Company annual financial objectives and individual performance contribution • Align executive interests with stockholder interests • Retain talent

Equity Awards	• Annual grants of stock options and/ or restricted stock units with multi- year vesting, except for new hire or promotional grants which may be episodic	• Value of pay directly linked with long-term stock price performance	• Align executive interests with stockholder interests • Attract and retain talent • Focus on long-term performance outcomes

Retirement and Welfare Benefits	• Medical, dental, vision, life insurance and long-term disability insurance • Non-qualified deferred compensation plan • Group Term Life Insurance	• Not applicable	• Attract and retain talent • Provide competitive compensation

Executive Perquisites	• Financial and Tax Planning	• Not applicable	• Attract and retain talent • Provide competitive compensation


2012 Performance Bonus

Name	Bonus Payable in Cash (1)		Bonus Payable in Restricted Stock Units		Number of Restricted Stock Units (2)		Total Dollar Value of 2012 Bonus
Anthony M. Sanfilippo	$	737,100	$	396,900		34,724	$	1,134,000
Carlos A. Ruisanchez	$	453,600	$	151,200		13,228	$	604,800
John A. Godfrey	$	351,525	$	117,175		10,252	$	468,700
Virginia E. Shanks	$	351,525	$	117,175		10,252	$	468,700
Geno M. Iafrate	$	299,100	$	99,700		8,723	$	398,800


Name	2012 Salary
Anthony M. Sanfilippo	$	900,000
Carlos A. Ruisanchez	$	600,000
John A. Godfrey	$	475,000
Virginia E. Shanks	$	465,000
Geno M. Iafrate	$	416,000


Name	2012 Threshold Incentive as % of Salary			2012 Target Incentive as % of Salary			2012 Maximum Incentive as % of Salary
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		50	%		100	%		200	%
Carlos A. Ruisanchez		40	%		80	%		160	%
John A. Godfrey		40	%		80	%		160	%
Virginia E. Shanks		40	%		80	%		160	%
Geno M. Iafrate		40	%		80	%		160	%


Name	Stock Options		Restricted Stock Units
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		200,000		30,000
Carlos A. Ruisanchez		30,000		—
John A. Godfrey		42,000		5,000
Virginia E. Shanks		42,000		5,000
Geno M. Iafrate		42,000		5,000


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($) (a)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($) (b)		Option Awards ($) (c)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (Section 162(m) Compensation) ($) (d)		Change in Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (e)		All Other Compensation ($) (f)		Total ($)
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		2012	$	900,000	$	—	$	769,953	$	970,460	$	737,100	$	—	$	3,875	$	3,381,388
President and Chief Executive Officer		2011	$	840,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	841,680	$	—	$	3,063	$	1,684,743
President and Chief Executive Officer		2010	$	662,308	$	—	$	—	$	3,497,195	$	1,258,000	$	—	$	178,021	$	5,595,524

Carlos A. Ruisanchez (g)		2012	$	600,000	$	—	$	157,811	$	145,569	$	453,600	$	—	$	3,875	$	1,360,855
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2011	$	552,135	$	—	$	287,858	$	1,634,304	$	553,275	$	—	$	3,063	$	3,030,635
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2010	$	438,461	$	—	$	287,625	$	359,813	$	320,142	$	—	$	31,615	$	1,437,656

John A. Godfrey		2012	$	475,000	$	—	$	178,796	$	203,797	$	351,525	$	—	$	3,875	$	1,212,993
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary		2011	$	475,000	$	—	$	327,758	$	198,481	$	457,500	$	—	$	3,063	$	1,461,802
		2010	$	438,461	$	—	$	287,625	$	359,813	$	320,142	$	2,921	$	3,063	$	1,412,025


Virginia E. Shanks		2012	$	465,000	$	—	$	178,796	$	203,797	$	351,525	$	1,290	$	54,808	$	1,255,216
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer		2011	$	450,000	$	—	$	74,770	$	141,772	$	457,500	$	280	$	48,374	$	1,172,696
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer

Geno M. Iafrate (g)		2012	$	416,000	$	—	$	150,494	$	203,797	$	299,100	$	1,002	$	70,754	$	1,141,147
Executive Vice President, Regional Operations


Name		Bonus Eligibility
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		• Targeted bonus of 100% of his annual base salary based upon meeting performance targets developed by the Compensation Committee. • Also entitled to an upside potential for his bonus of not less than 150% of his annual base salary if maximum performance goals are satisfied; • May also receive special bonuses in addition to his annual bonus eligibility at the discretion of the Board or the Compensation Committee. • In some circumstances, a portion of the annual bonus may be paid in restricted stock.

Carlos A. Ruisanchez, John A. Godfrey, Virginia E. Shanks and Geno M. Iafrate		• Targeted bonus of 80% of his annual base salary based upon meeting performance targets developed by the Compensation Committee. • May also receive special bonuses in addition to his annual bonus eligibility at the discretion of the Board or the Compensation Committee. • Bonus paid may be in cash or restricted stock, as determined in the Company’s discretion.


Name	Cash Severance ($) (a)		Value of Options and Restricted Stock Units that Have Accelerated Vesting ($) (b)		Value of Medical Continuation ($) (c)		Total ($)
Anthony M. Sanfilippo	$	3,407,352	$	4,513,000	$	28,336	$	7,948,688
Carlos A. Ruisanchez	$	1,875,251	$	1,270,372	$	24,376	$	3,169,999
John A. Godfrey	$	1,555,851	$	1,005,785	$	25,996	$	2,587,632
Virginia E. Shanks	$	1,528,266	$	973,346	$	24,376	$	2,525,988
Geno M. Iafrate	$	1,253,150	$	733,885	$	25,312	$	2,012,347


Name	Cash Severance ($) (a)		Value of Options and Restricted Stock Units that Have Accelerated Vesting ($) (b)		Value of Medical Continuation ($) (c)		Total ($)
Anthony M. Sanfilippo	$	3,407,352	$	1,361,925	$	28,336	$	4,797,613
Carlos A. Ruisanchez	$	1,875,251	$	446,995	$	24,376	$	2,346,622
John A. Godfrey	$	1,555,851	$	346,034	$	25,996	$	1,927,881
Virginia E. Shanks	$	1,528,266	$	398,134	$	24,376	$	1,950,776
Geno M. Iafrate	$	1,253,150	$	216,438	$	25,312	$	1,494,900


Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) (a)		Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) (b)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)
Virginia E. Shanks	$	46,471	$	0	$	3,474	$	0	$	96,211
Geno M. Iafrate	$	60,241	$	0	$	2,688	$	0	$	71,456


Name	Grant Date (a)		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-equity Incentive Plan Awards (b)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (c)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (d)
Name	Grant Date (a)		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)						Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (c)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (d)
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		—	$	450,000	$	900,000	$	1,800,000
		3/02/2012								16,236		—		—	$	180,057
		3/02/2012								27,060		—		—	$	300,095
		5/22/2012								30,000		—		—	$	289,800
		5/22/2012										200,000	$	9.66	$	970,460

Carlos A. Ruisanchez		—	$	240,000	$	480,000	$	960,000
		3/02/2012								14,230		—		—	$	157,811
		5/22/2012										30,000	$	9.66	$	145,569

John A. Godfrey		—	$	190,000	$	380,000	$	760,000
		3/02/2012								11,767		—		—	$	130,496
		5/22/2012								5,000		—		—	$	48,300
		5/22/2012										42,000	$	9.66	$	203,797

Virginia E. Shanks		—	$	186,000	$	372,000	$	744,000
		3/02/2012								11,767		—		—	$	130,496
		5/22/2012								5,000		—		—	$	48,300
		5/22/2012								—		42,000	$	9.66	$	203,797

Geno M. Iafrate		—	$	166,400	$	332,800	$	665,600
		3/02/2012								9,215		—		—	$	102,194
		5/22/2012								5,000		—		—	$	48,300
		5/22/2012								—		42,000	$	9.66	$	203,797


	Option Awards (a)									Stock Awards (b)
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable			Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (c)
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		260,000		390,000	(d)	$	8.64		3/14/2020
		—		200,000	(e)	$	9.66		5/22/2019
											30,000	(e)	$	474,900

Carlos A. Ruisanchez		200,000		—		$	11.35		8/01/2018
		30,000		45,000	(f)	$	7.67		3/01/2020
		60,000		180,000	(g)	$	13.14		3/28/2018
		—		30,000	(e)	$	9.66		5/22/2019
											14,774	(h)	$	233,872

John A. Godfrey		100,000		—		$	16.92		5/16/2015
		70,000		—		$	14.68		5/20/2018
		20,000		—		$	11.13		7/30/2018
		30,000		45,000	(f)	$	7.67		3/01/2020
		7,000		21,000	(i)	$	14.25		5/24/2018
		—		42,000	(e)	$	9.66		5/22/2019
											14,774	(h)	$	233,872
											2,100	(i)	$	33,243
											5,000	(e)	$	79,150

Virginia E. Shanks		50,000		50,000	(j)	$	11.15		10/02/2017
		5,000		15,000	(i)	$	14.25		5/24/2018
		—		42,000	(e)	$	9.66		5/22/2019
											20,000	(j)	$	316,600
											3,838	(h)	$	60,756
											5,000	(e)	$	79,150

Geno M. Iafrate		30,000		45,000	(k)	$	13.37		5/06/2017
		5,000		15,000	(i)	$	14.25		5/24/2018
		—		42,000	(e)	$	9.66		5/22/2019
											15,000	(k)	$	237,450
											1,500	(i)	$	23,745
											5,000	(e)	$	79,150


	Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise (#)			Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (a)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		—		—			43,296	$	608,417
Carlos A. Ruisanchez		—		—			40,366	$	517,723
John A. Godfrey		25,247	$	82,305	(b)		—		—
							38,603	$	485,474
Virginia E. Shanks		—		—			23,685	$	331,634
Geno M. Iafrate		—		—			14,715	$	203,188


Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (a)		4,669,345	$	12.23	(b)		2,730,251	(c)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (d)		850,000	$	9.28			—

Total		5,519,345	$	11.78			2,730,251


Name and Position	Number of Securities Underlying Stock Options Granted		Number of Shares of Restricted Stock Units Awarded		Number of Shares of Phantom Stock Units Awards
Anthony M. Sanfilippo		200,000		73,296		—
President and Chief Executive Officer (1)
Carlos A. Ruisanchez		345,000		29,004		—
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2)
John A. Godfrey		335,000		33,641		—
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Virginia E. Shanks		162,000		40,605		—
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Geno M. Iafrate		137,000		30,715		—
Executive Vice President, Regional Operations
All Current Executive Officers, as a Group		1,411,546		242,865		—
All Current Non-Employee Directors, as a Group		443,000		81,500		5,636
Stephen C. Comer		69,000		16,500		1,409
Richard J. Goeglein		106,000		16,500		1,409
Bruce A. Leslie		114,000		17,000		1,409
James L. Martineau		114,000		19,500		1,409
Desirée Rogers		20,000		6,000		—
Jaynie M. Studenmund		20,000		6,000		—
All Employees, Including All Current Officers who are not Executive Officers, as a Group		1,490,949		89,993		—


Fee Category	2012		2011
Audit Fees	$	1,651,887	$	1,117,550
Audit-Related Fees	$	65,056		—
Tax Fees	$	360,953	$	160,482
All Other Fees		—		—

Total All Fees	$	2,077,896	$	1,278,032