XML 68 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE H – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012:

 

                                                 
    At June 30, 2012     At March 31, 2012  
    Fair Value
Measurement Using
Input Types
    Estimated
Fair
Value
    Fair Value
Measurement Using
Input Types
    Estimated
Fair
Value
 

(in millions)

  Level 1       Level 2       Total     Level 1       Level 2       Total  

Assets:

                                               

Money market funds

  $ 1,418     $ —       $ 1,418 (1)     $ 1,374     $ —       $ 1,374 ((2)  

Foreign exchange derivatives ( 3 )

    —         14       14       —         2       2  

Interest rate derivatives ( 3 )

    —         25       25       —         27       27  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

  $ 1,418     $ 39     $ 1,457     $ 1,374     $ 29     $ 1,403  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

                                               

Foreign exchange derivatives ( 3 )

  $ —       $ 17     $ 17     $ —       $ 4     $ 4  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

  $ —       $ 17     $ 17     $ —       $ 4     $ 4  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

At June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $1,368 million and $50 million of investments in money market funds classified as “Cash and cash equivalents” and “Other noncurrent assets, net” for restricted cash amounts, respectively, in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(2) 

At March 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $1,324 million and $50 million of investments in money market funds classified as “Cash and cash equivalents” and “Other noncurrent assets, net” for restricted cash amounts, respectively, in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3) 

See Note G, “Derivatives” for additional information.

At June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012:

 

                                 
    At June 30, 2012     At March 31, 2012  

(in millions)

    Carrying  
Value
    Estimated
Fair Value
      Carrying  
Value
    Estimated
Fair Value
 

Liabilities:

                               

Total debt (1)

  $ 1,298     $ 1,422     $ 1,301     $ 1,408  

Facilities abandonment reserve (2)

  $ 37     $ 43     $ 42     $ 48  

 

(1)

Estimated fair value of total debt is based on quoted prices for similar liabilities for which significant inputs are observable except for certain long-term lease obligations, for which fair value approximates carrying value (Level 2).

(2)

Estimated fair value for the facilities abandonment reserve is determined using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012. At June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the facilities abandonment reserve included approximately $15 million and $16 million, respectively, in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” and approximately $22 million and $26 million, respectively, in “Other noncurrent liabilities” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Level 3).

The carrying values of financial instruments classified as current assets and current liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and short-term debt, approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments. The fair values of total debt, including current maturities, have been based on quoted market prices.