XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company, from time to time, may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company may also become involved with contract issues and disputes with customers.
Based on the Company’s experience, the Company’s management believes that the damages amounts claimed in a case are not a meaningful indicator of the potential liability. Claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of cases. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses in connection with its current lawsuits and material claims and disputes and intends to vigorously contest each of them.
In the opinion of the Company’s management based upon information currently available to the Company, while the outcome of its lawsuits, claims and disputes is uncertain, the likely results of these lawsuits, claims and disputes are not expected, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows, although the effect could be material to the Company’s results of operations or cash flows for any interim reporting period. For some matters, the Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss due to the stage of the matter and/or other particular circumstances of the matter. For others, a range of reasonably possible loss can be estimated. For those matters for which such a range can be estimated, the Company estimates that, in the aggregate, the range of reasonably possible loss does not exceed $20 million. This is in addition to any amounts that have been accrued.
Beginning on August 3, 2018, subsequent to the Company’s announcement of the Merger Agreement with Broadcom (as defined in Note 1, “Accounting Policies,” above), four (4) purported class action complaints were filed on behalf of the Company’s stockholders (the “Broadcom Acquisition-Related Litigation”). These included:
(i)
Kelli Harvey v. Michael Gregoire, Jens Alder, Raymond Bromark, Jean Hobby, Rohit Kapoor, Jeffrey Katz, Kay Koplovitz, Christopher Lofgren, Richard Sulpizio, Laura Unger, Arthur Weinbach, Collie Acquisition Corp., and Broadcom Inc., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (1:18-cv-06996-JGK) (filed August 3, 2018);
(ii)
Vladimir Guzinsky Rev. Trust v. Michael P. Gregoire, Jens Alder, Raymond J. Bromark, Jean M. Hobby, Rohit Kapoor, Jeffrey G. Katz, Kay Koplovitz, Christopher B. Lofgren, Richard Sulpizio, Laura S. Unger, and Arthur Weinbach, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (1:18-cv-01221-LPS) (filed August 9, 2018);
(iii)
Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account v. CA, Inc. Michael Gregoire, Jens Alder, Raymond Bromark, Jean Hobby, Rohit Kapoor, Jeffrey Katz, Kay Koplovitz, Christopher Lofgren, and Richard Sulpizio, United States District Court for the District of Delaware (1:18-cv-01251-LPS) (filed August 15, 2018); and
(iv)
Kenneth Gilley v. CA, Inc. Michael Gregoire, Jens Alder, Raymond Bromark, Jean Hobby, Rohit Kapoor, Jeffrey Katz, Kay Koplovitz, Christopher Lofgren, and Richard Sulpizio, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (1:18-cv-01286-LPS) (filed August 22, 2018),
(collectively, the “Stockholder Actions”).
The plaintiffs sought to enjoin the defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, or, if the transaction was consummated, the plaintiffs alternatively sought rescission and/or damages. The plaintiffs also sought costs and fees associated with the suits.
To avoid the risk of the Stockholder Actions delaying or adversely affecting the merger and to minimize the expense of defending the Broadcom Acquisition-Related Litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, on September 5, 2018, the Company made certain disclosures that supplemented and revised those contained in the definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2018. On September 24, 2018, each of the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, and each of the four (4) cases is now closed.