XML 28 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
INCOME TAXES
3 Months Ended
Sep. 02, 2017
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
INCOME TAXES
8.INCOME TAXES

 

We recorded an income tax provision of $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the first three months of fiscal 2018 and the first three months of fiscal 2017, respectively. The effective income tax rate during the first three months of fiscal 2018 was a tax provision of (133.3%), as compared to a tax provision of (21.1%) during the first three months of fiscal 2017. The difference in rate during the first three months of fiscal 2018, as compared to the first three months of fiscal 2017, reflects the change in the overall loss realized through the first quarter in each respective period, changes in our geographical distribution of income (loss), the recording of provision to return true-ups of various foreign jurisdictions and our positions with respect to ASC 740-30, Income Taxes - Other Considerations or Special Areas (“ASC 740-30”). The (133.3%) effective income tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 34.0% as a result of our geographical distribution of income (loss) and the recording of a valuation allowance against the increase in our U.S. state and federal net deferred tax assets.

 

In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. Generally, years prior to fiscal 2007 are closed for examination under the statute of limitation for U.S. federal, U.S. state and local, or non-U.S. tax jurisdictions. We are currently under examination in Germany (fiscal 2011 through 2014) and Thailand (fiscal 2008 through 2011). We are also under examination in the state of Illinois for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. Our primary foreign tax jurisdictions are Germany and the Netherlands. We have tax years open in Germany beginning in fiscal 2011 and the Netherlands beginning in fiscal 2011.

 

We have historically determined that certain undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, to the extent of cash available, will be repatriated to the U.S. Accordingly, we have provided a deferred tax liability totaling $5.7 million as of September 2, 2017, on foreign earnings of $39.5 million. In addition, as of September 2, 2017, approximately $6.4 million balance of cumulative positive earnings of some of our foreign subsidiaries are still considered permanently reinvested pursuant to ASC 740-30. Due to various tax attributes that are continuously changing, it is not practicable to determine what, if any, tax liability might exist if such earnings were to be repatriated.

 

We had no worldwide liability for uncertain tax positions related to continuing operations, excluding interest and penalties, as of September 2, 2017 and as of May 27, 2017. There is no change in recorded uncertain tax positions during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. We record penalties and interest relating to uncertain tax positions in the income tax expense line item within the unaudited consolidated statements of income (loss).

 

The valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets has increased to $9.2 million as of September 2, 2017 driven primarily by the Illinois income tax rate increase and the impact on the overall federal and Illinois deferred tax assets as well as additional domestic federal and state net deferred tax assets generated during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 due to additional losses in the U.S. jurisdiction of $0.5 million. The valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets that will more likely than not be realized was $8.5 million as of May 27, 2017. A full valuation allowance on the U.S. and state deferred tax assets will be maintained until sufficient positive evidence related to sources of future taxable income exists to support a reversal of the valuation allowance. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are increased, or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth.