UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________to _________
Commission file number 0-11095
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California | 22-2385051 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)
(864) 239-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company [X] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 5
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
September 30, 2011
Assets |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 416 |
Receivables | 14 |
Total assets | 430 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Accounts payable | 3 |
Other liabilities | 95 |
Estimated costs to liquidate | 65 |
Total liabilities | 163 |
|
|
Net assets in liquidation | $ 267 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
|
BALANCE SHEET |
(in thousands) |
December 31, 2010
Assets held for sale: |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 20 |
Receivables and deposits | 67 |
Other assets | 168 |
Investment property: |
|
Land | 574 |
Buildings and related personal property | 10,334 |
Total investment property | 10,908 |
Less accumulated depreciation | (8,611) |
Investment property, net | 2,297 |
Total assets | $ 2,552 |
|
|
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit |
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale: |
|
Accounts payable | $ 31 |
Tenant security deposit liabilities | 41 |
Other liabilities | 100 |
Due to affiliates | 1,107 |
Mortgage notes payable | 6,716 |
Total liabilities | 7,995 |
|
|
Partners' Deficit |
|
General partner | (1,206) |
Limited partners | (4,237) |
Total partners deficit | (5,443) |
Total liabilities and partners deficit | $ 2,552 |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 5
STATEMENTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per unit data)
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||
| September 30, | September 30, | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
Loss from continuing operations | $ -- | $ -- | $ -- | $ -- |
Loss from discontinued |
|
|
|
|
operations: |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
Rental income | 239 | 340 | 897 | 1,014 |
Other income | 53 | 45 | 164 | 133 |
Total revenues | 292 | 385 | 1,061 | 1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Operating | 247 | 189 | 642 | 577 |
General and administrative | 47 | 25 | 105 | 84 |
Depreciation | 55 | 83 | 232 | 238 |
Interest | 106 | 137 | 380 | 406 |
Property taxes | 18 | 9 | 64 | 68 |
Loss on early extinguishment of |
|
|
|
|
debt | 102 | -- | 102 | -- |
Total expenses | 575 | 443 | 1,525 | 1,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty gain | 22 | 4 | 22 | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations | (261) | (54) | (442) | (210) |
Gain from sale of discontinued |
|
|
|
|
operations | 5,981 | -- | 5,981 | -- |
Net income (loss) | $ 5,720 | $ (54) | $ 5,539 | $ (210) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to |
|
|
|
|
general partner (3%) | $ 172 | $ (1) | $ 166 | $ (6) |
Net income (loss) allocated to |
|
|
|
|
limited partners (97%) | $ 5,548 | $ (53) | $ 5,373 | $ (204) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
per limited partnership unit | $ (3.07) | $ (0.64) | $ (5.20) | $ (2.47) |
Gain from sale of discontinued |
|
|
|
|
operations per limited |
|
|
|
|
partnership unit | 70.38 | -- | 70.38 | -- |
Net income (loss) per limited |
|
|
|
|
partnership unit | $ 67.31 | $ (0.64) | $ 65.18 | $ (2.47) |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 5
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIENCY)/NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
| |
| General | Limited |
|
| Partner | Partners | Total |
|
|
|
|
Partners' deficit |
|
|
|
at December 31, 2010 | $(1,206) | $(4,237) | $(5,443) |
|
|
|
|
Net income for the nine months |
|
|
|
ended September 30, 2011 | 166 | 5,373 | 5,539 |
|
|
|
|
Deficit restoration contribution |
|
|
|
from general partner | 236 | -- | 236 |
|
|
|
|
Partners' capital (deficiency) |
|
|
|
at September 30, 2011 | $ (804) | $ 1,136 | 332 |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to liquidation basis |
|
| (65) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets in liquidation |
|
|
|
at September 30, 2011 |
|
| $ 267 |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
| Nine Months Ended | |
| September 30, | |
| 2011 | 2010 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
Net income (loss) | $ 5,539 | $ (210) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash |
|
|
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
Bad debt expense | 33 | 16 |
Depreciation | 232 | 238 |
Amortization of loan costs | 16 | 18 |
Casualty gain | (22) | (16) |
Gain from sale of discontinued operations | (5,981) | -- |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 102 | -- |
Change in accounts: |
|
|
Receivables and deposits | 20 | (11) |
Other assets | 50 | (19) |
Accounts payable | (19) | (17) |
Tenant security deposit liabilities | (41) | (2) |
Accrued property taxes | -- | 68 |
Other liabilities | (38) | (20) |
Due to affiliates | (304) | 35 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (413) | 80 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
Property improvements and replacements | (139) | (159) |
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | 1,672 | -- |
Insurance proceeds received | 22 | 34 |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 1,555 | (125) |
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
Payments on mortgage notes payable | (64) | (65) |
Repayment of advances from affiliate | (984) | -- |
Advances from affiliate | 66 | 72 |
Deficit restoration contribution from general partner | 236 | -- |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (746) | 7 |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 396 | (38) |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 20 | 72 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ 416 | $ 34 |
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
Cash paid for interest | $ 451 | $ 387 |
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
Property improvements and replacements included in |
|
|
accounts payable | $ -- | $ 52 |
Assumption of mortgage notes payable by the purchaser | $ 6,652 | $ -- |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2011, National Property Investors 5 (the Partnership or Registrant) adopted the liquidation basis of accounting due to the sale of its remaining investment property (as discussed in Note D Disposition of Investment Property).
As a result of the decision to liquidate the Partnership, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting for its financial statements at September 30, 2011 to the liquidation basis of accounting. Consequently, assets have been valued at estimated net realizable value and liabilities are presented at their estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation of the Partnership. The valuation of assets and liabilities necessarily requires many estimates and assumptions and there are substantial uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation. The actual realization of assets and settlement of liabilities could be higher or lower than amounts indicated and is based upon the managing general partners estimates as of the date of the financial statements.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the managing general partner, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
NPI Equity Investments, Inc. (NPI Equity or the Managing General Partner) estimates that the liquidation process will be completed by September 30, 2012. Because the success in realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities is based on the Managing General Partners best estimates, the liquidation period may be shorter than projected or it may be extended beyond the projected period.
The accompanying statements of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 reflect the operations of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments as discontinued operations and the balance sheet at December 31, 2010 reflects the assets and liabilities of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments as held for sale as a result of the propertys sale to a third party on September 8, 2011 (as discussed in Note D).
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2010 balances to conform to the 2011 presentation.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership had outstanding 82,428 limited partnership units.
The Partnerships management evaluated subsequent events through the time this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed.
Note B Adjustment to Liquidation Basis of Accounting
At September 30, 2011, in accordance with the liquidation basis of accounting, assets were adjusted to their estimated net realizable value and liabilities were adjusted to their estimated settlement amount. The net adjustment required to convert to the liquidation basis of accounting was a decrease in net assets of approximately $65,000, which is included in the Statement of Changes in Partners Capital (Deficiency)/ Net Assets in Liquidation.
Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for property management services based on a percentage of revenue and for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner received 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $58,000 and $56,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $50,000 and $41,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses, investment property and gain from sale of discontinued operations. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property and gain from sale of discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $9,000 and $6,000, respectively. At December 31, 2010, approximately $154,000 of these accountable administrative expenses were unpaid and were included in due to affiliates. No such amounts were due to affiliates at September 30, 2011.
For services relating to the administration of the Partnership and operation of the Partnerships property, the Managing General Partner was entitled to receive payment for non-accountable expenses up to a maximum of $100,000 per year, based upon the original number of Partnership units sold, subject to certain limitations. No such reimbursements were earned during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
Upon the sale of the Partnership's property, NPI Equity was entitled to an incentive compensation fee equal to 3% of the difference between the sales price of the property and the appraised value for such property at February 1, 1992. Payment of the incentive compensation fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners, of: (a) distributions from capital transaction proceeds of an amount equal to their appraised investment in the Partnership at February 1, 1992, and (b) distributions from all sources (capital transactions as well as cash flow) of an amount equal to six percent (6%) per annum cumulative, non-compounded, on their appraised investment in the Partnership at February 1, 1992. As these preferences were met prior to 2010, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Managing General Partner earned and was paid an incentive compensation fee of approximately $115,000 in connection with the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments (as discussed in Note D Disposition of Investment Property) which is reflected as a reduction of gain from sale of discontinued operations.
In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $66,000 and $72,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, to fund operating expenses at Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. The advances bore interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum. Interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $36,000 and $28,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership repaid advances and associated accrued interest of approximately $1,055,000 and $30,000, respectively, with proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments and cash from operations, respectively. At December 31, 2010, approximately $953,000 of advances and associated accrued interest was due to AIMCO Properties, L.P., and was included in due to affiliates. There were no advances or associated accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. at September 30, 2011.
Note D Disposition of Investment Property
On September 8, 2011, the Partnership sold its sole investment property, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments, to a third party for a gross sale price of $8,950,000, less $400,000 funded by the Partnership for a capital improvement escrow. The net proceeds realized by the Partnership were approximately $1,672,000 after payment of closing costs of approximately $226,000 and the assumption of the mortgage debt encumbering the property of approximately $6,652,000 by the purchaser. The Partnership recognized a gain during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of approximately $5,981,000 as a result of the sale. In addition, the Partnership recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of approximately $102,000 as a result of the write off of unamortized loan costs.
The Partnership Agreement dictates that if prior to the dissolution of the Partnership the Managing General Partner has a deficiency in their capital account, on a tax basis, the Managing General Partner shall contribute an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the deficiency in the Managing General Partners capital account or (b) 1.01% of the original invested capital that has not yet been returned or (c) the deficit in a hypothetical capital account of the Managing General Partner assuming it only had an aggregate of 1% of each material item of income or loss at all times during the existence of the Partnership and excluding all previous actual distributions. As a result, the Managing General Partner contributed approximately $236,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 based on the deficit in the hypothetical capital account.
In January 2009, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments suffered significant damage to the propertys landscaping as a result of freeze damage. The damage was estimated to be approximately $51,000. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $21,000 and removed undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $39,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $30,000 and recognized a casualty gain of approximately $12,000.
In May 2009, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments suffered water damage to its property as a result of severe rain storms. The cost to repair the damage was approximately $26,000. Insurance proceeds of approximately $14,000 were received during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, which included approximately $10,000 for emergency expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $4,000 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated at the time of the casualty. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $28,000, which included approximately $6,000 for emergency expenses, which are reflected as a reduction of operating expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership recognized an additional casualty gain of approximately $22,000 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated at the time of the casualty.
Note G Contingencies
The Partnership is unaware of any pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its former investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain potentially hazardous materials present on a property, including lead-based paint, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum-based fuels, and other miscellaneous materials. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such materials. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, these materials may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the improper management of these materials on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of these materials through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of these materials is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its former property, the Partnership could potentially be responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its former property.
Note H Investment Property
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership retired and wrote off personal property no longer being used that had a cost basis of approximately $2,152,000 and accumulated depreciation of approximately $2,152,000.
Note I Subsequent Event
Subsequent to September 30, 2011, the Partnership distributed approximately $131,000 to the limited partners (approximately $1.59 per limited partnership unit) from proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. No distributions were made to the Managing General Partner.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Quarterly Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors, some of which are beyond the Partnerships control, including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions, including the pace of job growth and the level of unemployment; the terms of governmental regulations that can affect the Partnership and interpretations of those regulations; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties previously owned by the Partnership. Readers should carefully review the Partnerships financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Results of Operations
As of September 30, 2011, the Partnership adopted the liquidation basis of accounting due to the sale of its remaining investment property, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments, on September 8, 2011. Prior to adopting the liquidation basis of accounting, the Partnerships net income was approximately $5,720,000 and $5,539,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to net loss of approximately $54,000 and $210,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The increase in net income for both periods is due to the gain from sale of discontinued operations in 2011, partially offset by an increase in loss from discontinued operations.
On September 8, 2011, the Partnership sold its sole investment property, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments, to a third party for a gross sale price of $8,950,000, less $400,000 funded by the Partnership for a capital improvement escrow. The net proceeds realized by the Partnership were approximately $1,672,000 after payment of closing costs of approximately $226,000 and the assumption of the mortgage debt encumbering the property of approximately $6,652,000 by the purchaser. The Partnership recognized a gain during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of approximately $5,981,000 as a result of the sale. In addition, the Partnership recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of approximately $102,000 as a result of the write off of unamortized loan costs.
Excluding the impact of the gain from sale of discontinued operations, the Partnerships loss from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $261,000 and $442,000 respectively, compared to loss from discontinued operations of approximately $54,000 and $210,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The increase in loss from discontinued operations for both periods is due to a decrease in total revenues and an increase in total expenses. The decrease in total revenues for both periods is due to a decrease in rental income, partially offset by an increase in other income. Rental income decreased for both periods as a result of the sale of the Partnerships remaining investment property on September 8, 2011 (as discussed above). The increase in other income for both periods is due to an increase in lease cancellation fees at Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. Total expenses increased for both periods primarily due to the recognition of loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2011 (as discussed above) and increases in operating and general and administrative expenses, partially offset by decreases in depreciation and interest expense as a result of the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. Operating expenses increased for both periods primarily due to increases in hazard insurance expense, software maintenance expense and clean up costs associated with multiple minor casualties at the property during 2011.
In January 2009, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments suffered significant damage to the propertys landscaping as a result of freeze damage. The damage was estimated to be approximately $51,000. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $21,000 and removed undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $39,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $30,000 and recognized a casualty gain of approximately $12,000.
In May 2009, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments suffered water damage to its property as a result of severe rain storms. The cost to repair the damage was approximately $26,000. Insurance proceeds of approximately $14,000 were received during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, which included approximately $10,000 for emergency expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $4,000 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated at the time of the casualty. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $28,000, which included approximately $6,000 for emergency expenses, which are reflected as a reduction of operating expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership recognized an additional casualty gain of approximately $22,000 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated at the time of the casualty.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Partnership expects to liquidate during 2012 due to the sale of its remaining investment property, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments.
At September 30, 2011, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $416,000, compared to approximately $20,000 at December 31, 2010. Cash and cash equivalents increased approximately $396,000 due to approximately $1,555,000 of cash provided by investing activities, partially offset by approximately $746,000 and $413,000 of cash used in financing and operating activities, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities consisted of net proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments and insurance proceeds received, partially offset by property improvements and replacements. Cash used in financing activities consisted of repayment of advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P. and principal payments made on mortgages encumbering the Partnerships investment property, partially offset by advances received from AIMCO Properties, L.P. and a deficit restoration contribution by the Managing General Partner.
In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $66,000 and $72,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, to fund operating expenses at Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. The advances bore interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum. Interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $36,000 and $28,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership repaid advances and associated accrued interest of approximately $1,055,000 and $30,000, respectively, with proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments and cash from operations, respectively. At December 31, 2010, approximately $953,000 of advances and associated accrued interest was due to AIMCO Properties, L.P., and was included in due to affiliates. There were no advances or associated accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. at September 30, 2011.
As a result of the decision to liquidate the Partnership, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting for its financial statements at September 30, 2011 to the liquidation basis of accounting. Consequently, assets have been valued at estimated net realizable value and liabilities are presented at their estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation of the Partnership. The valuation of assets and liabilities necessarily requires many estimates and assumptions and there are substantial uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation. The actual realization of assets and settlement of liabilities could be higher or lower than amounts indicated and is based upon the Managing General Partners estimates as of the date of the financial statements.
In accordance with the liquidation basis of accounting, at September 30, 2011, assets were adjusted to their estimated net realizable value and liabilities were adjusted to their estimated settlement amount. The net adjustment required to convert to the liquidation basis of accounting was a decrease in net assets of approximately $65,000, which is included in the Statement of Changes in Partners Capital (Deficiency) / Net Assets in Liquidation.
The Partnership Agreement dictates that if prior to the dissolution of the Partnership the Managing General Partner has a deficiency in their capital account, on a tax basis, the Managing General Partner shall contribute an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the deficiency in the Managing General Partners capital account or (b) 1.01% of the original invested capital that has not yet been returned or (c) the deficit in a hypothetical capital account of the Managing General Partner assuming it only had an aggregate of 1% of each material item of income or loss at all times during the existence of the Partnership and excluding all previous actual distributions. As a result, the Managing General Partner contributed approximately $236,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 based on the deficit in the hypothetical capital account.
There were no distributions made to the partners during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Subsequent to September 30, 2011, the Partnership distributed approximately $131,000 to the limited partners (approximately $1.59 per limited partnership unit) from proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. The Partnerships cash available for distribution will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the amount of cash remaining after fully liquidating the Partnership.
Other
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, Aimco and its affiliates own 53,930 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 65.43% of the outstanding Units at September 30, 2011. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by Aimco or its affiliates. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 65.43% of the outstanding Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. When voting on matters, Aimco would in all likelihood vote the Units it acquired in a manner favorable to the interest of the Managing General Partner because of its affiliation with the Managing General Partner. However, with respect to 37,149 Units, Aimco is required to vote such Units: (i) against any increase in compensation payable to the Managing General Partner or to affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by it or its affiliates, in proportion to the votes cast by non-tendering Unit holders. Except for the foregoing, no other limitations are imposed on Aimco's ability to influence voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to Aimco as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to Aimco as its sole stockholder.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.
Impairment of Long-Lived Asset
Investment property was recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset was not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of the property would not be recoverable, the Partnership made an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnerships estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeded the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership recognized an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeded the estimated fair value of the property.
Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may have adversely affected the economic performance and value of the Partnerships investment property. These factors included, but were not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might have adversely affected apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not have been offset by increased rents; changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing; and change in interest rates and the availability of financing. Any adverse changes in these and other factors could have caused an impairment of the Partnerships asset.
Revenue Recognition
The Partnership generally leased apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership offered rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area. Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, was recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluated all accounts receivable from residents and established an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
Assets Held for Sale
The Partnership classifies long-lived assets as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met: management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset; the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; the sale of the asset is probable, and transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale, within one year; the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Depreciation is not recorded during the period in which the long-lived asset is classified as held for sale. When the asset is designated as held for sale, the related results of operations are presented as discontinued operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Partnerships management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There has been no change in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Exhibit Index.
The agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. The Partnership acknowledges that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, it is responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this Form 10-Q not misleading. Additional information about the Partnership may be found elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the Partnerships other public filings, which are available without charge through the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 5 |
|
|
| By: NPI EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC. |
| Managing General Partner |
|
|
Date: November 14, 2011 | By: /s/Steven D. Cordes |
| Steven D. Cordes |
| Senior Vice President |
|
|
Date: November 14, 2011 | By: /s/Stephen B. Waters |
| Stephen B. Waters |
| Senior Director of Partnership Accounting |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Description of Exhibit
2.1 NPI, Inc. Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 17, 1995.
2.2 Partnership Units Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 1995.
2.3 Management Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 1995.
2.5 Master Indemnity Agreement dated as of August 17, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 1995.
2.6 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 1, 1999, by and between AIMCO and IPT incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated as of October 16, 1999.
3.4 (a) Agreement of Limited Partnership incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Prospectus of the Partnership dated January 4, 1982, included in the Partnership's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-74143).
(b) Amendments to Agreement of Limited Partnership incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement of the Partnership dated April 3, 1991.
(c) Amendments to the Partnership Agreement, incorporated by reference to the Statement Furnished in Connection with the Solicitation of the Registrant dated August 28, 1992.
(d) Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2004.
10.34 Purchase and Sale Contract between National Property Investors 5, a California limited partnership, and BHE Acquisitions, L.L.C., an Iowa limited liability company, incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 2011.
10.35 First Amendment of Purchase and Sale Contract between National Property Investors 5, a California limited partnership, and BHE Acquisitions, L.L.C., an Iowa limited liability company, incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.
31.1 Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from National Property Investors 5s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) statement of net assets in liquidation, (ii) balance sheet, (iii) statements of discontinued operations, (iv) statement of changes in partners capital (deficiency)/net assets in liquidation, (v) statements of cash flows, and (vi) notes to financial statements. (1)
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven D. Cordes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors 5;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 14, 2011
/s/Steven D. Cordes
Steven D. Cordes
Senior Vice President of NPI Equity Investments, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors 5;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over porting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 14, 2011
/s/Stephen B. Waters
Stephen B. Waters
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting of NPI Equity Investments, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors 5 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| /s/Steven D. Cordes |
| Name: Steven D. Cordes |
| Date: November 14, 2011 |
|
|
| /s/Stephen B. Waters |
| Name: Stephen B. Waters |
| Date: November 14, 2011 |
This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Balance Sheet (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands | Dec. 31, 2010 |
---|---|
Assets held for sale: | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 20 |
Receivables and deposits | 67 |
Other assets | 168 |
Investment property: | |
Land | 574 |
Buildings and related personal property | 10,334 |
Total investment property | 10,908 |
Less accumulated depreciation | (8,611) |
Investment property, net | 2,297 |
Total assets | 2,552 |
Liabilities related to assets held for sale: | |
Accounts payable | 31 |
Tenant security deposit liabilities | 41 |
Other liabilities | 100 |
Due to affiliates | 1,107 |
Mortgage notes payable | 6,716 |
Total liabilities | 7,995 |
Partners' Deficit | |
General partner | (1,206) |
Limited partners | (4,237) |
Total partners' deficit | (5,443) |
Total liabilities and partners' deficit | $ 2,552 |
Document and Entity Information | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Document and Entity Information | |
Entity Registrant Name | NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 5 |
Document Type | 10-Q |
Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2011 |
Amendment Flag | false |
Entity Central Index Key | 0000355637 |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 82,428 |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company |
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes |
Entity Voluntary Filers | No |
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer | No |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Extraordinary and Unusual Items | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Extraordinary and Unusual Items | |
Unusual or Infrequent Items Disclosure [Text Block] | Note F Casualty Events
In January 2009, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments suffered significant damage to the propertys landscaping as a result of freeze damage. The damage was estimated to be approximately $51,000. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $21,000 and removed undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $39,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $30,000 and recognized a casualty gain of approximately $12,000.
In May 2009, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments suffered water damage to its property as a result of severe rain storms. The cost to repair the damage was approximately $26,000. Insurance proceeds of approximately $14,000 were received during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, which included approximately $10,000 for emergency expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $4,000 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated at the time of the casualty. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $28,000, which included approximately $6,000 for emergency expenses, which are reflected as a reduction of operating expenses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership recognized an additional casualty gain of approximately $22,000 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated at the time of the casualty. |
Property, Plant, and Equipment | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Property, Plant, and Equipment | |
Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure [Text Block] | Note H Investment Property
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership retired and wrote off personal property no longer being used that had a cost basis of approximately $2,152,000 and accumulated depreciation of approximately $2,152,000. |
Subsequent Events | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Subsequent Events | |
Subsequent Events [Text Block] | Note I Subsequent Event
Subsequent to September 30, 2011, the Partnership distributed approximately $131,000 to the limited partners (approximately $1.59 per limited partnership unit) from proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. No distributions were made to the Managing General Partner. |
Related Party Disclosures | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Related Party Disclosures | |
Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block] | Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for property management services based on a percentage of revenue and for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner received 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $58,000 and $56,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $50,000 and $41,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses, investment property and gain from sale of discontinued operations. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property and gain from sale of discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $9,000 and $6,000, respectively. At December 31, 2010, approximately $154,000 of these accountable administrative expenses were unpaid and were included in due to affiliates. No such amounts were due to affiliates at September 30, 2011.
For services relating to the administration of the Partnership and operation of the Partnerships property, the Managing General Partner was entitled to receive payment for non-accountable expenses up to a maximum of $100,000 per year, based upon the original number of Partnership units sold, subject to certain limitations. No such reimbursements were earned during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
Upon the sale of the Partnership's property, NPI Equity was entitled to an incentive compensation fee equal to 3% of the difference between the sales price of the property and the appraised value for such property at February 1, 1992. Payment of the incentive compensation fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners, of: (a) distributions from capital transaction proceeds of an amount equal to their appraised investment in the Partnership at February 1, 1992, and (b) distributions from all sources (capital transactions as well as cash flow) of an amount equal to six percent (6%) per annum cumulative, non-compounded, on their appraised investment in the Partnership at February 1, 1992. As these preferences were met prior to 2010, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Managing General Partner earned and was paid an incentive compensation fee of approximately $115,000 in connection with the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments (as discussed in Note D Disposition of Investment Property) which is reflected as a reduction of gain from sale of discontinued operations.
In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $66,000 and $72,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, to fund operating expenses at Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments. The advances bore interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum. Interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $36,000 and $28,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership repaid advances and associated accrued interest of approximately $1,055,000 and $30,000, respectively, with proceeds from the sale of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments and cash from operations, respectively. At December 31, 2010, approximately $953,000 of advances and associated accrued interest was due to AIMCO Properties, L.P., and was included in due to affiliates. There were no advances or associated accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. at September 30, 2011.
The Partnership insured its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco, which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insured its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $24,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. The Partnership was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $41,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2010. |
Commitment and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Commitment and Contingencies | |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block] | Note G Contingencies
The Partnership is unaware of any pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its former investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain potentially hazardous materials present on a property, including lead-based paint, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum-based fuels, and other miscellaneous materials. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such materials. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, these materials may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the improper management of these materials on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of these materials through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of these materials is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its former property, the Partnership could potentially be responsible for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its former property. |
Equity (USD $) In Thousands | 9 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | Sep. 30, 2010 | |
Equity | ||
Partners' Capital Notes Disclosure [Text Block] | Note E Deficit Restoration
The Partnership Agreement dictates that if prior to the dissolution of the Partnership the Managing General Partner has a deficiency in their capital account, on a tax basis, the Managing General Partner shall contribute an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the deficiency in the Managing General Partners capital account or (b) 1.01% of the original invested capital that has not yet been returned or (c) the deficit in a hypothetical capital account of the Managing General Partner assuming it only had an aggregate of 1% of each material item of income or loss at all times during the existence of the Partnership and excluding all previous actual distributions. As a result, the Managing General Partner contributed approximately $236,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 based on the deficit in the hypothetical capital account. | |
Deficit restoration contribution from general partner | $ 236 | $ 0 |
`1TV-2\M
MG3W]PK:%&+OPG\%H-!Z<1,$G(`3PSUS;QDT:0J/F'XS:5=C?;O?ZH*T*?AZ$
MY!;X>LVM.X=K7^]6X+S$M>N@G:#W(ZYE*$SJJZ,8]HM>[\O@B.A,,]8@GW='
MEU](?]26R'!0@2M'PP3&:?`8U+;A D\K"#BC43T,E@5`/%KC$=A[?R^.`9)O!^`1/#87G
MRQ23!MX&!T90CP9R!C$G@I0JOR]5Y6\2()X'7HL.%8%PO0X[27-L\(`E+UC]
M&H-"GL?!:CP+P`=FN-#(G\]$M`KP)Y$E<2`6H7QVLA!XF1!V&=9SAZ!71`#V
MLC`(NFF](J")5BR>9%@.'L[C5,N"41H$VTJ@1YMPR@U\M)E@0X1655_4UM^1
M6,)8;;R(]@DF>K$R':%VL,1M"7$*J.(E5F7I[-L2NDHCCO"MQ>]M51H];*2JQHP4C`5VN)CZ:_K@;65X@GA@JT&\A&/QXNYBR;EVZ1@>E
M-.HPFQ@BB,\71?VJ6AH$)"%R">OFJ;Y%%"/,\URO$2E5WHR]_PCK%*6$I#^@
M!*VE`%,CRBP2/FR*":R(2R&DBF:NYX*(E'&:&K0>G&14@DT\IE@Y`T_EHR5`
M$#)9(%W,,XK#(Z1"`^_FV-ABE0W1ELU#I+6+PW,B;81\\M\8K$&-3"8365T!
M[)%VSE^+!+CH^2F*"OVA%A[E+9-M"OPDE*4=2C&0-`,I<568%7R93.IB2[>-
M=89[/!GLM4U0979=&'>,%H^GW0[#)\)ET9FX8YE(_CY:Q7`(+&Z\1'W;@Z.?A[TQF.E/QU$8,:`S3>,@%W'+-&8\
MT+G)KICCJ4)=9+UA#%<1Z#@-0C!'[(AT..C&L4:!96[UAFZ1F!WQ#3+W&(<9
M0WOMK)C]R:!SPS0<@^VZS^DHAC@'JL0,R='IA7#@88?I9UPXXIY_,OYR#1T=
M;DV\8X6W$&9LO_MOM3>.,SEGFW&)@V[5Q=,?GV2H#@!*F=T%;/2!FH!9S)PS
M:MM;<)"_4=,M9FC&E5X'GK/'="S';/[T4EXL!H#M`/XK"+8:T3N#[Y$IJ-^4_LH*W]/
MBG;D2^]7RQ4N-:^A,E[8["\7I';IL/6E)5P;A^5N;*XQIMM].YDQP9,
M:HM[$RO0)3\^P<;_9!IN5&8[_AHH/)0NS=F6>S2'2Q6\8JTZL`:E0D8\/.B1
MZV&$A^_%]HW&6=E,I4^04X.S@;4KX9E/1EZ'"Z4/!E,W@0>>PPK``L9_@N;P
M1Y3.5Q3=)_H5*BJ=F11\#IFA\_)<@<@ESE>."K'`HT,H]Y^=5-4C:L5,7;)'
M5ATTG65O$L4!*IY<"YZ,P@K#UJ6/WB*FD(<3CX6E)
1<;K!W.;58$RI>6)P:`@V@[E0=[-G)P=<=Z,6TZ&$]!(I)=V$JD7)
M.EK.][AP>H3WX./H;AF,H7482TZ@$6E#VIAYBT8L9.:-',OADCG8M>/;YF">
MKK*GB?7XELMIO@FS`=5UCFR@\)&:VI3D4J>*=M4("_8WPVY"6DJ^#"ZT`3U%
M-=#+7KO1+1-P;S+,GWD?W/ODY-Y)>Y035S?AA"\GN&'-O`*X
M56_IU(U2F]LK"!M,)%)C?J=DFN1P./=UY%;K?5DY.K8SH[!4!`J`F@.)!Y'J
M%/,.5($<(K`3W?$1WT7%C=9]"KB4]#`4@^?1'&3>!NQ6X6TLW(@[2(>:/J90
M`-J3?%J]5XANY7SE?J>.RPG[8__:A)%_4$L#!!0````(`/E0;C]]L%@[J`T`
M`#33```5`!P`;G!I-2TR,#$Q,#DS,%]D968N>&UL550)``/&+L%.QB[!3G5X
M"P`!!"4.```$.0$``.U=WW/;N!%^SLW<_Z#F'MS.1):=-&V2.?=&EAV?.D[D
ML9U,WS*0"$EH*4`'@++5O[X`15H4"8"01).`ZI?\H`!P]_L6BP6X`'[][7$6
MMA:0,D3PV='I\09I0R,Z(K
M[0,E6DTK["3%6=`8A3\N&4=B=@>#'F&
F@UYN-,BH28F5(@
MI$(8T&6,2^6FL^0#.PB6<;*I+9JJ56^D&LB"5)EB6"3&1>7`
MOH#!,.\2#5;R'F\3NZ#L>V,7AK/'-:8I?A\G2?R%T*7*EJ-N#][:C*Q`H%,.
M[@M:K"==WT4L%V!,Q79YS?R$'S"[<;.7DU*YW=+4@8);S0#,'X%RTQNA\WCE
MH3Y;/>FF3MLD]O'04BB4T@_!FC#I&FY/JM9@S!C8@-E&Y-"_#]9Q^D=4J!-\
MPX]!`'4(62W$>"BZRNYQHO4YJ+8`HZ6%'`0A8CA/3?HM4ZUC02G:H2ZQI_$\
MYPJ-?)D
M9RH@:X`Q'H(_TSS-@^@JN:"+1'J&7+"']5:Y7FK<%>"V[@[&?5=&0:X<`2>5
M;=`R(-[D/N@KB#KL^BW9F"^$!TQS8S&\1C,'=_YVPC#KAQS3PQM]^V2;5W>=
MF*>TI]5\Z>VKF38Z#F!+4S$W<'S$\$8UR,2T)K4G&/UA+QVS;4T/RJF>0&6B
MAL+R9_46JO=Q_"A2L.3B=;1^$J\CA0#TSR3MHO3WU3Q+,[+B*M0/<1XS:"Q24]'C)S%HZ6_3\
M]>]>^/81=)16B]]C]U4=,2EE0&C*6B:AS02PHO(2B(*)SN^);""*^B^>6>X!GD,7I70I*
MII#&
'5$X-3B^Q"A>.Q8=*WYEIZ8.`U%A5SMG,@[YBWQ"XVU_!
MMY@[P5SVG9
KJ\1'E958ZC32TI`1MZNNZQ#2`6[B.`6=
ML,IGQZHU<*UCJL.N6X]=632:R]X!:0/R`X[T.6HX(419(+,/UX%SN`Q.+@(9
M&3L0ZI>EBR
Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups | |
Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations, Disclosure [Text Block] | Note D Disposition of Investment Property
On September 8, 2011, the Partnership sold its sole investment property, Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments, to a third party for a gross sale price of $8,950,000, less $400,000 funded by the Partnership for a capital improvement escrow. The net proceeds realized by the Partnership were approximately $1,672,000 after payment of closing costs of approximately $226,000 and the assumption of the mortgage debt encumbering the property of approximately $6,652,000 by the purchaser. The Partnership recognized a gain during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of approximately $5,981,000 as a result of the sale. In addition, the Partnership recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of approximately $102,000 as a result of the write off of unamortized loan costs. |
Statement of Shareholders Equity (Deficit)/Net Assets in Liquidation (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands | Total | General Partner | Limited Partners |
---|---|---|---|
Partners' capital (deficit) at Dec. 31, 2010 | $ (5,443) | $ (1,206) | $ (4,237) |
Net income | 5,539 | 166 | 5,373 |
Deficit restoration contribution from general partner | 236 | 236 | 0 |
Partners' capital (deficit) at Sep. 30, 2011 | 332 | (804) | 1,136 |
Adjustment to liquidation basis at Sep. 30, 2011 | (65) | ||
Net assets in liquidation at September 30, 2011 at Sep. 30, 2011 | $ 267 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] | Note A Basis of Presentation
As of September 30, 2011, National Property Investors 5 (the Partnership or Registrant) adopted the liquidation basis of accounting due to the sale of its remaining investment property (as discussed in Note D Disposition of Investment Property).
As a result of the decision to liquidate the Partnership, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting for its financial statements at September 30, 2011 to the liquidation basis of accounting. Consequently, assets have been valued at estimated net realizable value and liabilities are presented at their estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation of the Partnership. The valuation of assets and liabilities necessarily requires many estimates and assumptions and there are substantial uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation. The actual realization of assets and settlement of liabilities could be higher or lower than amounts indicated and is based upon the managing general partners estimates as of the date of the financial statements.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the managing general partner, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
NPI Equity Investments, Inc. (NPI Equity or the Managing General Partner) estimates that the liquidation process will be completed by September 30, 2012. Because the success in realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities is based on the Managing General Partners best estimates, the liquidation period may be shorter than projected or it may be extended beyond the projected period.
The accompanying statements of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 reflect the operations of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments as discontinued operations and the balance sheet at December 31, 2010 reflects the assets and liabilities of Willow Park on Lake Adelaide Apartments as held for sale as a result of the propertys sale to a third party on September 8, 2011 (as discussed in Note D).
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2010 balances to conform to the 2011 presentation.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership had outstanding 82,428 limited partnership units.
The Partnerships management evaluated subsequent events through the time this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed.
Note B Adjustment to Liquidation Basis of Accounting
At September 30, 2011, in accordance with the liquidation basis of accounting, assets were adjusted to their estimated net realizable value and liabilities were adjusted to their estimated settlement amount. The net adjustment required to convert to the liquidation basis of accounting was a decrease in net assets of approximately $65,000, which is included in the Statement of Changes in Partners Capital (Deficiency)/ Net Assets in Liquidation. |
Statement of Net Assets in Liquidation (Unaudited) (Liquidation Basis) (USD $) In Thousands | Sep. 30, 2011 |
---|---|
Assets | |
Cash | $ 416 |
Receivables | 14 |
Total assets | 430 |
Liabilities | |
Accounts payable | 3 |
Other liabilities | 95 |
Estimated costs to liquidate | 65 |
Total liabilities | 163 |
Net assets in liquidation | $ 267 |