XML 102 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Option
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Option
Fair Value Option
 
We have elected to apply fair value option (“FVO”) reporting to certain of our fixed rate debt issuances which also qualify for FVO reporting under International Financial Reporting Standards. The following table summarizes fixed rate debt issuances accounted for under FVO:
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(in millions)
Fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO reported in:
 
 
 
Long-term debt
$
8,025

 
$
9,725

Due to affiliates
496

 
514

Total fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO
$
8,521

 
$
10,239

 
 
 
 
Unpaid principal balance of fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO(1)
$
7,942

 
$
9,415

 
 
 
 
Fixed rate long-term debt not accounted for under FVO
$
7,083

 
$
8,057

 
(1) 
Balance includes a foreign currency translation adjustment relating to our foreign denominated FVO debt which increased the debt balance by $245 million and $247 million at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
We determine the fair value of the fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO through the use of a third party pricing service. Such fair value represents the full market price (including credit and interest rate impacts) based on observable market data for the same or similar debt instruments. See Note 20, "Fair Value Measurements,” for a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO.
The following table summarizes the components of the gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
Year Ended December 31,
2013
 
2012
 
2011
 
(in millions)
Mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value(1):
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate component
$
314

 
$
166

 
$
25

Credit risk component
(71
)
 
(758
)
 
616

Total mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value
243

 
(592
)
 
641

Mark-to-market on the related derivatives(1)
(333
)
 
(260
)
 
(81
)
Net realized gains on the related derivatives
318

 
403

 
604

Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives
$
228

 
$
(449
)
 
$
1,164

 
(1) 
Mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives excludes market value changes due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Foreign currency translation gains (losses) recorded in derivative related income (expense) associated with debt designated at fair value was a loss of $73 million, a loss of $35 million and a gain of $63 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Offsetting gains (losses) recorded in derivative related income (expense) associated with the related derivatives was and a gain of $73 million, a gain of $35 million and a loss of $63 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The movement in the fair value reflected in gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives includes the effect of our own credit spread changes and interest rate changes, including any economic ineffectiveness in the relationship between the related derivatives and our debt and any realized gains or losses on those derivatives. With respect to the credit component, as our credit spreads narrow accounting losses are booked and the reverse is true if credit spreads widen. Differences arise between the movement in the fair value of our debt and the fair value of the related derivative due to the different credit characteristics and differences in the calculation of fair value for debt and derivatives. The size and direction of the accounting consequences of such changes can be volatile from period to period but do not alter the cash flows intended as part of the documented interest rate management strategy. On a cumulative basis, we have recorded fair value option adjustments which increased the value of our debt by $581 million and $824 million at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The change in the fair value of the debt and the change in value of the related derivatives during 2013 and 2012 reflect the following:
Interest rate curve – Rising long-term interest rates during 2013 resulted in a gain in the interest rate component on the mark-to-market of the debt and a loss on the mark-to-market of the related derivative. During 2012 and 2011, changes in market movements on certain debt and related derivatives that mature in the near term resulted in a gain in the interest rate component on the mark-to-market of the debt and a loss on the mark-to-market of the related derivative. As these items near maturity, their values are less sensitive to interest rate movements. Changes in the value of the interest rate component of the debt as compared with the related derivative are also affected by differences in cash flows and valuation methodologies for the debt and the derivatives. Cash flows on debt are discounted using a single discount rate from the bond yield curve for each bond’s applicable maturity while derivative cash flows are discounted using rates at multiple points along an interest rate yield curve. The impacts of these differences vary as short-term and long-term interest rates shift and time passes. Furthermore, certain FVO debt no longer has any corresponding derivatives.
Credit – Our secondary market credit spreads tightened during 2013 and 2012 on overall positive economic news, although the tightening was more pronounced during 2012. In 2011, our secondary market credit spreads widened due to the continuing concerns with the European sovereign debt crisis which caused spreads to widen throughout the financial services industry as well as the uncertain economic recovery in the United States.
Net income volatility, whether based on changes in the interest rate or credit risk components of the mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value and the related derivatives, impacts the comparability of our reported results between periods. Accordingly, gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives for 2013 should not be considered indicative of the results for any future periods.