XML 190 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Option
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value, Options [Abstract]  
Fair Value Option
Fair Value Option
 
We have elected to apply fair value option (“FVO”) reporting to certain of our fixed rate debt issuances which also qualify for FVO reporting under International Financial Reporting Standards. At June 30, 2013, fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO totaled $10.0 billion, of which $9.5 billion is included as a component of long-term debt and $.5 billion is included as a component of due to affiliates. At June 30, 2013, we had not elected FVO for $7.3 billion of fixed rate long-term debt carried on our balance sheet. Fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO at June 30, 2013 has an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $9.3 billion which included a foreign currency translation adjustment relating to our foreign denominated FVO debt which increased the debt balance by $166 million.
At December 31, 2012, fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO totaled $10.2 billion, of which $9.7 billion is included as a component of long-term debt and $.5 billion is included as a component of due to affiliates. At December 31, 2012, we had not elected FVO for $8.1 billion of fixed rate long-term debt carried on our balance sheet. Fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO at December 31, 2012 has an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $9.4 billion which included a foreign currency translation adjustment relating to our foreign denominated FVO debt which increased the debt balance by $247 million.
We determine the fair value of the fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO through the use of a third party pricing service. Such fair value represents the full market price (including credit and interest rate impacts) based on observable market data for the same or similar debt instruments. See Note 15, "Fair Value Measurements,” for a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO.
The components of gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives are as follows:
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value(1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate component
$
119

 
$
12

 
$
205

 
$
91

Credit risk component
23

 
18

 
(18
)
 
(461
)
Total mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value
142

 
30

 
187

 
(370
)
Mark-to-market on the related derivatives(1)
(107
)
 
(46
)
 
(220
)
 
(162
)
Net realized gains on the related derivatives
84

 
108

 
168

 
228

Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives
$
119

 
$
92

 
$
135

 
$
(304
)
 
(1) 
Mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives excludes market value changes due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Foreign currency translation gains (losses) recorded in derivative related income (expense) associated with debt designated at fair value was a loss of $29 million and a gain of $144 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and a gain of $81 million and a gain of $84 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Offsetting gains (losses) recorded in derivative related income (expense) associated with the related derivatives was a gain of $29 million and a loss of $144 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and a loss of $81 million and a loss of $84 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The movement in the fair value reflected in gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives includes the effect of our own credit spread changes and interest rate changes, including any economic ineffectiveness in the relationship between the related swaps and our debt and any realized gains or losses on those swaps. With respect to the credit component, as our credit spreads narrow accounting losses are booked and the reverse is true if credit spreads widen. Differences arise between the movement in the fair value of our debt and the fair value of the related swap due to the different credit characteristics and differences in the calculation of fair value for debt and derivatives. The size and direction of the accounting consequences of such changes can be volatile from period to period but do not alter the cash flows intended as part of the documented interest rate management strategy. On a cumulative basis, we have recorded fair value option adjustments which increased the value of our debt by $637 million and $824 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The change in the fair value of the debt and the change in value of the related derivatives reflect the following:
Interest rate curve – Rising long-term interest rates during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 resulted in a gain in the interest rate component on the mark-to-market of the debt and a loss on the mark-to-market of the related derivative. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, changes in market movements on certain debt and related derivatives that mature in the near term resulted in a gain in the interest rate component on the mark-to-market of the debt and a loss on the mark-to-market of the related derivative. As these items near maturity, their values are less sensitive to interest rate movements. Changes in the value of the interest rate component of the debt as compared with the related derivative are also affected by differences in cash flows and valuation methodologies for the debt and the derivatives. Cash flows on debt are discounted using a single discount rate from the bond yield curve for each bond’s applicable maturity while derivative cash flows are discounted using rates at multiple points along an interest rate yield curve. The impacts of these differences vary as short-term and long-term interest rates shift and time passes. Furthermore, certain derivatives have been called by the counterparty resulting in certain FVO debt having no related derivatives.
Credit – Our secondary market credit spreads widened minimally during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. However, during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our credit spreads tightened on overall positive economic news. The tightening of credit spreads was more pronounced during the first quarter of 2012.
Net income volatility, whether based on changes in the interest rate or credit risk components of the mark-to-market on debt designated at fair value and the related derivatives, impacts the comparability of our reported results between periods. Accordingly, gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives for the six months ended June 30, 2013 should not be considered indicative of the results for any future periods.