XML 94 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Basis of presentation (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Recent accounting pronouncements
Leases. In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires that lessees recognize a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use (ROU) asset, representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, for all leases (except short-term leases) at the commencement date. For finance leases, a lessee is required to recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the ROU asset in the consolidated statements of income. For operating leases, a lessee is required to recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis.
The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as the date of initial application. Consequently, financial information for dates and periods before January 1, 2019 will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided (i.e., the Company will continue to report prior comparative periods presented in the financial statements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 840, including the required disclosures under ASC 840).
The most significant effect of the new standard relates to the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet for purchase power agreements and real estate operating leases. On adoption, the Company recognized lease liabilities of approximately $257 million for the Company and approximately $236 million for the Utilities ($215 million related to PPAs), based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments, with corresponding ROU assets for existing operating leases, under current leasing standards. In determining the lease liability upon transition, the Company used the incremental borrowing rates as of the adoption date based on the remaining lease term and remaining lease payments. See Note 6 for more information.
Credit losses. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. ASU No. 2016-13 requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date (based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts) and enhanced disclosures to help financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. In addition, ASU No. 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The other-than-temporary impairment model of accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will be replaced with an estimate of expected credit losses only when the fair value is below the amortized cost of the asset. The length of time the fair value of an available-for-sale debt security has been below the amortized cost will no longer impact the determination of whether a credit loss exists. The available-for-sale debt security model will also require the use of an allowance to record the estimated losses (and subsequent recoveries).
The Company has assembled a cross-functional team that continues to work through its implementation plan. The Company is in the final stages of validating and testing the models that will be used to calculate the credit loss reserve for its loan portfolio and is conducting parallel runs of its new processes and controls. The allowance for credit losses is a material
estimate of the Company, and given the change from an incurred loss model to a methodology that considers the credit loss over the expected life of the loan, the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses for its loans held for investment will increase at the adoption date. The magnitude of the increase will depend on the composition, characteristics and quality of its loans and off balance sheet credit exposures as well as the prevailing economic conditions as of the adoption date. Based on its assessment, the Company does not expect that the new standard will have a material impact to the Utilities’ customer and other accounts receivables and accrued unbilled revenue. The Company will continue to make refinements to its credit loss model throughout the remainder of 2019 and plans to adopt ASU No. 2016-13 in the first quarter of 2020. The guidance is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized in retained earnings at the date of initial application (January 1, 2020), and the Company expects the bank to remain well capitalized under the regulatory framework after the initial application of ASU No. 2016-03.
Codification Improvements. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments,” which is intended to clarify certain issues related to the accounting for financial instruments.
With respect to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, ASU No. 2019-04 allows entities to measure the allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable balances separately from other components of the amortized cost basis of associated financial assets, or to make an accounting policy election not to measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable amounts if an entity writes off the uncollectible accrued interest receivable balance in a timely manner and makes certain disclosures. ASU No. 2019-04 also allows an entity to make an accounting policy election regarding the presentation and disclosure of accrued interest receivables and the related allowance for credit losses for those accrued interest receivables. ASU No. 2019-04 also clarifies certain issues related to transfers between classifications or categories for loans and debt securities, recoveries, variable interest rates and prepayments, vintage disclosures, and contractual extensions and renewal options.
With respect to Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, ASU No. 2019-04 provides amendments, among others, that address partial-term fair value hedges, fair value hedge basis adjustments, and certain transition requirements.
With respect to Topic 825, Financial Instruments, ASU No. 2019-04 clarifies the scope of the guidance and disclosure requirements with respect to recognizing and measuring financial instruments.

The amended guidance in ASU No. 2019-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt ASU No. 2019-04 in the first quarter of 2020 and is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications Reclassifications made to prior year financial statements to conform to the 2019 presentation include classifying contributions in aid of construction with capital expenditures in the cash flows from investing activities section of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for HEI and Hawaiian Electric.