XML 51 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Bank segment (HEI only)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Bank Segment Disclosure [Abstract]  
Bank segment (HEI only)
5 · Bank segment (HEI only)
Selected financial information
American Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Statements of Income Data
Years ended December 31
2015

 
2014

 
2013

(in thousands)
 

 
 

 
 

Interest and dividend income
 

 
 

 
 

Interest and fees on loans
$
184,782

 
$
179,341

 
$
172,969

Interest and dividends on investment securities
15,120

 
11,945

 
13,095

Total interest and dividend income
199,902

 
191,286

 
186,064

Interest expense
 

 
 

 
 

Interest on deposit liabilities
5,348

 
5,077

 
5,092

Interest on other borrowings
5,978

 
5,731

 
4,985

Total interest expense
11,326

 
10,808

 
10,077

Net interest income
188,576

 
180,478

 
175,987

Provision for loan losses
6,275

 
6,126

 
1,507

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
182,301

 
174,352

 
174,480

Noninterest income
 

 
 

 
 

Fees from other financial services
22,211

 
21,747

 
27,099

Fee income on deposit liabilities
22,368

 
19,249

 
18,363

Fee income on other financial products
8,094

 
8,131

 
8,405

Bank-owned life insurance
4,078

 
3,949

 
3,928

Mortgage banking income
6,330

 
2,913

 
8,309

Gains on sale of investment securities

 
2,847

 
1,226

Other income, net
4,750

 
2,375

 
4,753

Total noninterest income
67,831

 
61,211

 
72,083

Noninterest expense
 

 
 

 
 

Compensation and employee benefits
90,518

 
79,885

 
82,910

Occupancy
16,365

 
17,197

 
16,747

Data processing
12,103

 
11,690

 
10,952

Services
10,204

 
10,269

 
9,015

Equipment
6,577

 
6,564

 
7,295

Office supplies, printing and postage
5,749

 
6,089

 
4,233

Marketing
3,463

 
3,999

 
3,373

FDIC insurance
3,274

 
3,261

 
3,253

Other expense
18,067

 
17,314

 
19,637

Total noninterest expense
166,320

 
156,268

 
157,415

Income before income taxes
83,812

 
79,295

 
89,148

Income taxes
29,082

 
27,994

 
31,421

Net income
$
54,730

 
$
51,301

 
$
57,727


Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31
2015

 
2014

 
2013

(in thousands)
 

 
 

 
 

Net income
$
54,730

 
$
51,301

 
$
57,727

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
 

 
 

 
 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for sale investment securities:
 

 
 

 
 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for sale investment securities arising during the period, net of (taxes) benefits of $1,541, ($3,856),and $9,037 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively
(2,334
)
 
5,840

 
(13,686
)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net income, net of taxes of nil, $1,132 and $488 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively

 
(1,715
)
 
(738
)
Retirement benefit plans:
 

 
 

 
 

Net gains (losses) arising during the period, net of (taxes) benefits of ($59), $6,164 and ($10,450) for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively
90

 
(9,336
)
 
15,826

Less: amortization of transition obligation, prior service credit and net losses recognized during the period in net periodic benefit cost, net of tax benefits of $1,011, $561 and $1,187 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively
1,531

 
850

 
1,797

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes
(713
)
 
(4,361
)
 
3,199

Comprehensive income
$
54,017

 
$
46,940

 
$
60,926


Balance Sheets Data
December 31
 
2015

 
2014

(in thousands)
 
 

 
 

Assets
 
 

 
 

Cash and due from banks
 
$
127,201

 
$
107,233

Interest-bearing deposits
 
93,680

 
54,230

Available-for-sale investment securities, at fair value
 
820,648

 
550,394

Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank, at cost
 
10,678

 
69,302

Loans receivable held for investment
 
4,615,819

 
4,434,651

Allowance for loan losses
 
(50,038
)
 
(45,618
)
Net loans
 
4,565,781

 
4,389,033

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value
 
4,631

 
8,424

Other
 
309,946

 
305,416

Goodwill
 
82,190

 
82,190

Total assets
 
$
6,014,755

 
$
5,566,222

Liabilities and shareholder’s equity
 
 

 
 

Deposit liabilities–noninterest-bearing
 
$
1,520,374

 
$
1,342,794

Deposit liabilities–interest-bearing
 
3,504,880

 
3,280,621

Other borrowings
 
328,582

 
290,656

Other
 
101,029

 
118,363

Total liabilities
 
5,454,865

 
5,032,434

Commitments and contingencies
 
 

 
 

Common stock
 
1

 
1

Additional paid in capital
 
340,496

 
338,411

Retained earnings
 
236,664

 
211,934

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefits
 
 
 
 
     Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities
$
(1,872
)
 
$
462

 
     Retirement benefit plans
(15,399
)
(17,271
)
(17,020
)
(16,558
)
Total shareholder’s equity
 
559,890

 
533,788

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity
 
$
6,014,755

 
$
5,566,222




December 31
 
2015

 
2014

(in thousands)
 
 

 
 

Other assets
 
 

 
 

Bank-owned life insurance
 
$
138,139

 
$
134,115

Premises and equipment, net
 
88,077

 
92,407

Prepaid expenses
 
3,550

 
3,196

Accrued interest receivable
 
15,192

 
13,632

Mortgage-servicing rights
 
8,884

 
11,540

Low-income housing equity investments
 
37,793

 
33,438

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans, net
 
1,030

 
891

Other
 
17,281

 
16,197

 
 
$
309,946

 
$
305,416

Other liabilities
 
 

 
 

Accrued expenses
 
$
30,705

 
$
37,880

Federal and state income taxes payable
 
13,448

 
28,642

Cashier’s checks
 
21,768

 
20,509

Advance payments by borrowers
 
10,311

 
9,652

Other
 
24,797

 
21,680

 
 
$
101,029

 
$
118,363


Bank-owned life insurance is life insurance purchased by ASB on the lives of certain key employees, with ASB as the beneficiary. The insurance is used to fund employee benefits through tax-free income from increases in the cash value of the policies and insurance proceeds paid to ASB upon an insured’s death.
Available-for-sale investment securities. The major components of investment securities were as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross unrealized losses
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
Estimated
 
Less than 12 months
 
12 months or longer
(dollars in thousands)
Amortized
cost
 
unrealized
gains
 
unrealized
losses
 
fair
value
 
Number of issues
 
Fair value
 
Amount
 
Number of issues
 
Fair value
 
Amount
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency obligations
$
213,234

 
$
1,025

 
$
(1,300
)
 
$
212,959

 
13
 
$
83,053

 
$
(866
)
 
3
 
$
17,378

 
$
(434
)
Mortgage-related securities- FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA
610,522

 
3,564

 
(6,397
)
 
607,689

 
38
 
305,785

 
(2,866
)
 
25
 
125,817

 
(3,531
)
 
$
823,756

 
$
4,589

 
$
(7,697
)
 
$
820,648

 
51
 
$
388,838

 
$
(3,732
)
 
28
 
$
143,195

 
$
(3,965
)
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency obligations
$
119,507

 
$
1,092

 
$
(1,039
)
 
$
119,560

 
6
 
$
41,970

 
$
(361
)
 
5
 
$
29,168

 
$
(678
)
Mortgage-related securities- FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA
430,120

 
5,653

 
(4,939
)
 
430,834

 
6
 
47,029

 
(164
)
 
29
 
172,623

 
(4,775
)
 
$
549,627

 
$
6,745

 
$
(5,978
)
 
$
550,394

 
12
 
$
88,999

 
$
(525
)
 
34
 
$
201,791

 
$
(5,453
)
ASB does not believe that the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2015, represent an other-than-temporary impairment. Total gross unrealized losses were primarily attributable to rising interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities. The contractual cash flows of the investment securities are backed by the full faith and credit guaranty of the United States government or an agency of the government. ASB does not intend to sell the securities before the recovery of its amortized cost basis and there have been no adverse changes in the timing of the contractual cash flows for the securities. ASB did not recognize OTTI for 2015, 2014 and 2013.
U.S. Treasury and federal agency obligations have contractual terms to maturity. Mortgage-related securities have contractual terms to maturity, but require periodic payments to reduce principal. In addition, expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay the underlying mortgages.
The contractual maturities of available-for-sale investment securities were as follows:
 
Amortized

 
Fair

December 31, 2015
Cost

 
value

(in thousands)
 
 
 
Due in one year or less
$

 
$

Due after one year through five years
86,379

 
86,935

Due after five years through ten years
71,972

 
71,812

Due after ten years
54,883

 
54,212

 
213,234

 
212,959

Mortgage-related securities-FNMA,FHLMC and GNMA
610,522

 
607,689

Total available-for-sale securities
$
823,756

 
$
820,648


The proceeds, gross gains and losses from sales of available-for-sale investment securities were as follows:
Years ended December 31
2015

 
2014

 
2013

(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds
$

 
$
79.6

 
$
71.4

Gross gains

 
2.8

 
1

Gross losses

 

 


Interest income from taxable and non-taxable investment securities were as follows:
Years ended December 31
2015

 
2014

 
2013

(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable
$
15,120

 
$
11,666

 
$
11,474

Non-taxable

 
279

 
1,621

 
$
15,120

 
$
11,945

 
$
13,095


ASB pledged securities with a market value of approximately $100.5 million and $88.6 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as collateral for public funds deposits, automated clearinghouse transactions with Bank of Hawaii, to-be-announced mortgage-backed securities settlements with JP Morgan, and deposits in ASB’s bankruptcy account with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, securities with a carrying value of $260.5 million and $230.2 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Stock in FHLB.  As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, ASB’s stock in FHLB was carried at cost ($10.7 million and $69.3 million, respectively) because it can only be redeemed at par and it is a required investment based on measurements of ASB’s capital, assets and borrowing levels. In May 2015, the FHLB of Seattle and FHLB of Des Moines completed the merger of the two banks and began operating as the FHLB of Des Moines on June 1, 2015. At December 31, 2014, the Company had $55 million of FHLB stock in excess of the required investment. With the merger, all of the Company's excess FHLB stock was repurchased. The FHLB repurchased a total of $58.6 million and $23.2 million of FHLB stock from ASB in 2015 and 2014, respectively. There was no other significant impact on ASB as a result of the merger.
Periodically and as conditions warrant, ASB reviews its investment in the stock of the FHLB for impairment. ASB evaluated its investment in FHLB stock for OTTI as of December 31, 2015, consistent with its accounting policy. ASB did not recognize an OTTI loss for 2015 based on its evaluation of the underlying investment, including:
the net income and growth in retained earnings recorded by the FHLB in the first nine months of 2015;
compliance by the FHLB with all of its regulatory capital requirements and being classified “adequately capitalized” by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency);
being authorized by the Finance Agency to repurchase excess stock;
the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB;
the liquidity position of the FHLB; and
ASB’s intent and assessment of whether it will more likely than not be required to sell the FHLB stock before recovery of its par value.
Future deterioration in the FHLB's financial position and/or negative developments in any of the factors considered in ASB's impairment evaluation above may result in future impairment losses.
Loans receivable.
The components of loans receivable were summarized as follows:
December 31
2015

 
2014

(in thousands)
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
$
2,069,665

 
$
2,044,205

Commercial real estate
690,561

 
531,917

Home equity line of credit
846,294

 
818,815

Residential land
18,229

 
16,240

Commercial construction
100,796

 
96,438

Residential construction
14,089

 
18,961

Total real estate
3,739,634

 
3,526,576

Commercial
758,659

 
791,757

Consumer
123,775

 
122,656

Total loans
4,622,068

 
4,440,989

Less: Deferred fees and discounts
(6,249
)
 
(6,338
)
          Allowance for loan losses
(50,038
)
 
(45,618
)
Total loans, net
$
4,565,781

 
$
4,389,033


ASB's policy is to require private mortgage insurance on all real estate loans when the loan-to-value ratio of the property exceeds 80% of the lower of the appraised value or purchase price at origination. For non-owner occupied residential properties, the loan-to-value ratio may not exceed 80% of the lower of the appraised value or purchase price at origination. ASB is subject to the risk that the insurance company cannot satisfy the bank's claim on policies.
ASB services real estate loans for investors (principal balance of $1.5 billion, $1.4 billion and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively), which are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets data. ASB reports fees earned for servicing such loans as income when the related mortgage loan payments are collected and charges loan servicing cost to expense as incurred.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, ASB had pledged loans with an amortized cost of approximately $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, as collateral to secure advances from the FHLB.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the aggregate amount of loans to directors and executive officers of ASB and its affiliates and any related interests (as defined in Federal Reserve Board (FRB) Regulation O) of such individuals, was $27.8 million and $49.6 million, respectively. The $21.8 million decrease in such loans in 2015 was attributed to closed lines of credits and repayments of $21.8 million. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $25.8 million and $46.2 million of the loan balances, respectively, were to related interests of individuals who are directors of ASB. All such loans were made at ASB’s normal credit terms. Management believes these loans do not represent more than a normal risk of collection.
Allowance for loan losses.  As discussed in Note 1, ASB must maintain an allowance for loan losses that is adequate to absorb estimated probable credit losses associated with its loan portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses (balances and changes) and financing receivables were as follows:
(in thousands)
Residential 1-4 family
 
Commercial
real estate
 
Home equity
line of credit
 
Residential land
 
Commercial construction
 
Residential construction
 
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
Unallo- cated
 
Total
December 31, 2015
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Allowance for loan losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Beginning balance
$
4,662

 
$
8,954

 
$
6,982

 
$
1,875

 
$
5,471

 
$
28

 
$
14,017

 
$
3,629

 
$

 
$
45,618

Charge-offs
(356
)
 

 
(205
)
 

 

 

 
(1,074
)
 
(4,791
)
 

 
(6,426
)
Recoveries
226

 

 
80

 
507

 

 

 
2,773

 
985

 

 
4,571

Provision
(346
)
 
2,388

 
403

 
(711
)
 
(1,010
)
 
(15
)
 
1,492

 
4,074

 


 
6,275

Ending balance
$
4,186

 
$
11,342

 
$
7,260

 
$
1,671

 
$
4,461

 
$
13

 
$
17,208

 
$
3,897

 
$

 
$
50,038

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
$
1,453

 
$

 
$
442

 
$
891

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,527

 
$
7

 


 
$
6,320

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
$
2,733

 
$
11,342

 
$
6,818

 
$
780

 
$
4,461

 
$
13

 
$
13,681

 
$
3,890

 
$

 
$
43,718

Financing Receivables:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance
$
2,069,665

 
$
690,561

 
$
846,294

 
$
18,229

 
$
100,796

 
$
14,089

 
$
758,659

 
$
123,775

 


 
$
4,622,068

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
$
22,457

 
$
1,188

 
$
3,225

 
$
5,683

 
$

 
$

 
$
21,119

 
$
13

 


 
$
53,685

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
$
2,047,208

 
$
689,373

 
$
843,069

 
$
12,546

 
$
100,796

 
$
14,089

 
$
737,540

 
$
123,762

 


 
$
4,568,383

December 31, 2014
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Allowance for loan losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Beginning balance
$
5,534

 
$
5,059

 
$
5,229

 
$
1,817

 
$
2,397

 
$
19

 
$
15,803

 
$
2,367

 
$
1,891

 
$
40,116

Charge-offs
(987
)
 

 
(196
)
 
(81
)
 

 

 
(1,872
)
 
(2,414
)
 

 
(5,550
)
Recoveries
1,180

 

 
752

 
469

 

 

 
1,636

 
889

 

 
4,926

Provision
(1,065
)
 
3,895

 
1,197

 
(330
)
 
3,074

 
9

 
(1,550
)
 
2,787

 
(1,891
)
 
6,126

Ending balance
$
4,662

 
$
8,954

 
$
6,982

 
$
1,875

 
$
5,471

 
$
28

 
$
14,017

 
$
3,629

 
$

 
$
45,618

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
$
951

 
$
1,845

 
$
46

 
$
1,057

 
$

 
$

 
$
760

 
$
6

 


 
$
4,665

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
$
3,711

 
$
7,109

 
$
6,936

 
$
818

 
$
5,471

 
$
28

 
$
13,257

 
$
3,623

 
$

 
$
40,953

Financing Receivables:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance
$
2,044,205

 
$
531,917

 
$
818,815

 
$
16,240

 
$
96,438

 
$
18,961

 
$
791,757

 
$
122,656

 


 
$
4,440,989

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
$
22,981

 
$
5,112

 
$
779

 
$
7,850

 
$

 
$

 
$
13,108

 
$
16

 


 
$
49,846

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
$
2,021,224

 
$
526,805

 
$
818,036

 
$
8,390

 
$
96,438

 
$
18,961

 
$
778,649

 
$
122,640

 


 
$
4,391,143


Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
2015

 
2014

 
2013

Allowance for loan losses, January 1
$
45,618

 
$
40,116

 
$
41,985

Provision for loan losses
6,275

 
6,126

 
1,507

Charge-offs, net of recoveries
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate loans
(252
)
 
(1,137
)
 
(678
)
Other loans
2,107

 
1,761

 
4,054

Net charge-offs
1,855

 
624

 
3,376

Allowance for loan losses, December 31
$
50,038

 
$
45,618

 
$
40,116

Ratio of net charge-offs to average total loans
0.04
%
 
0.01
%
 
0.09
%

Credit quality.  ASB performs an internal loan review and grading on an ongoing basis. The review provides management with periodic information as to the quality of the loan portfolio and effectiveness of its lending policies and procedures. The objectives of the loan review and grading procedures are to identify, in a timely manner, existing or emerging credit trends so that appropriate steps can be initiated to manage risk and avoid or minimize future losses. Loans subject to grading include commercial, commercial real estate and commercial construction loans.
Each loan is assigned an Asset Quality Rating (AQR) reflecting the likelihood of repayment or orderly liquidation of that loan transaction pursuant to regulatory credit classifications:  Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful, and Loss. The AQR is a function of the PD Model rating, the LGD, and possible non-model factors which impact the ultimate collectability of the loan such as character of the business owner/guarantor, interim period performance, litigation, tax liens, and major changes in business and economic conditions. Pass exposures generally are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the asset or underlying collateral. Special Mention loans have potential weaknesses that, if left uncorrected, could jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank may sustain some loss. An asset classified Doubtful has the weaknesses of those classified Substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
The credit risk profile by internally assigned grade for loans was as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(in thousands)
Commercial
real estate
 
Commercial
construction
 
Commercial
 
Total
 
Commercial
real estate
 
Commercial
construction
 
Commercial
 
Total
Grade:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Pass
$
642,410

 
$
86,991

 
$
703,208

 
1,432,609

 
$
493,105

 
$
79,312

 
$
743,334

 
$
1,315,751

Special mention
7,710

 
13,805

 
7,029

 
28,544

 
5,209

 

 
16,095

 
21,304

Substandard
40,441

 

 
47,975

 
88,416

 
33,603

 
17,126

 
31,665

 
82,394

Doubtful

 

 
447

 
447

 

 

 
663

 
663

Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
$
690,561

 
$
100,796

 
$
758,659

 
1,550,016

 
$
531,917

 
$
96,438

 
$
791,757

 
$
1,420,112


The credit risk profile based on payment activity for loans was as follows:
(in thousands)
30-59
days
past due
 
60-89
days
past due
 
Greater
than
90 days
 
Total
past due
 
Current
 
Total
financing
receivables
 
Recorded
investment>
90 days and
accruing
December 31, 2015
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
$
4,967

 
$
3,289

 
$
11,503

 
$
19,759

 
$
2,049,906

 
$
2,069,665

 
$

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

 
690,561

 
690,561

 

Home equity line of credit
896

 
706

 
477

 
2,079

 
844,215

 
846,294

 

Residential land

 

 
415

 
415

 
17,814

 
18,229

 

Commercial construction

 

 

 

 
100,796

 
100,796

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

 
14,089

 
14,089

 

Commercial
125

 
223

 
878

 
1,226

 
757,433

 
758,659

 

Consumer
1,383

 
593

 
644

 
2,620

 
121,155

 
123,775

 

Total loans
$
7,371

 
$
4,811

 
$
13,917

 
$
26,099

 
$
4,595,969

 
$
4,622,068

 
$

December 31, 2014
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
$
6,124

 
$
1,732

 
$
12,632

 
$
20,488

 
$
2,023,717

 
$
2,044,205

 
$

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

 
531,917

 
531,917

 

Home equity line of credit
1,341

 
501

 
194

 
2,036

 
816,779

 
818,815

 

Residential land

 

 

 

 
16,240

 
16,240

 

Commercial construction

 

 

 

 
96,438

 
96,438

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

 
18,961

 
18,961

 

Commercial
699

 
145

 
569

 
1,413

 
790,344

 
791,757

 

Consumer
829

 
333

 
403

 
1,565

 
121,091

 
122,656

 

Total loans
$
8,993

 
$
2,711

 
$
13,798

 
$
25,502

 
$
4,415,487

 
$
4,440,989

 
$


The credit risk profile based on nonaccrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more past due, and TDR loans was as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(in thousands)
 
 
 
Real estate:
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
$
20,554

 
$
19,253

Commercial real estate
1,188

 
5,112

Home equity line of credit
2,254

 
1,087

Residential land
970

 
720

Commercial construction

 

Residential construction

 

Commercial
20,174

 
10,053

Consumer
895

 
661

Total nonaccrual loans
$
46,035

 
$
36,886

Real estate:
 
 
 
Residential 1-4 family
$

 
$

Commercial real estate

 

Home equity line of credit

 

Residential land

 

Commercial construction

 

Residential construction

 

Commercial

 

Consumer

 

Total accruing loans 90 days or more past due
$

 
$

Real estate:
 
 
 
Residential 1-4 family
$
13,962

 
$
13,525

Commercial real estate

 

Home equity line of credit
2,467

 
480

Residential land
4,713

 
7,130

Commercial construction

 

Residential construction

 

Commercial
1,104

 
2,972

Consumer

 

Total troubled debt restructured loans not included above
$
22,246

 
$
24,107


The total carrying amount and the total unpaid principal balance of impaired loans were as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(in thousands)
Recorded
investment
 
Unpaid
principal
balance
 
Related
allow-
ance
 
Average
recorded
investment
 
Interest
income
recognized*
 
Recorded
investment
 
Unpaid
principal
balance
 
Related
allow-
ance
 
Average
recorded
investment
 
Interest
income
recognized*
With no related allowance recorded
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
$
10,596

 
$
11,805

 
$

 
$
11,215

 
$
332

 
$
11,654

 
$
12,987

 
$

 
$
9,056

 
$
227

Commercial real estate
1,188

 
1,436

 

 
370

 
74

 
571

 
626

 

 
194

 

Home equity line of credit
707

 
948

 

 
484

 
4

 
363

 
606

 

 
402

 
5

Residential land
1,644

 
2,412

 

 
2,397

 
137

 
2,344

 
3,200

 

 
2,728

 
172

Commercial construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial
5,671

 
6,333

 

 
5,185

 
157

 
8,235

 
11,471

 

 
5,204

 
38

Consumer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8

 

 
19,806

 
22,934

 

 
19,651

 
704

 
23,167

 
28,890

 

 
17,592

 
442

With an allowance recorded
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
11,861

 
11,914

 
1,453

 
11,578

 
562

 
11,327

 
11,347

 
951

 
8,822

 
419

Commercial real estate

 

 

 
1,699

 

 
4,541

 
4,541

 
1,845

 
3,415

 
478

Home equity line of credit
2,518

 
2,579

 
442

 
1,597

 
49

 
416

 
420

 
46

 
132

 
6

Residential land
4,039

 
4,117

 
891

 
4,337

 
318

 
5,506

 
5,584

 
1,057

 
6,415

 
484

Commercial construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial
15,448

 
16,073

 
3,527

 
12,507

 
211

 
4,873

 
5,211

 
760

 
12,089

 
438

Consumer
13

 
13

 
7

 
14

 

 
16

 
16

 
6

 
9

 

 
33,879

 
34,696

 
6,320

 
31,732

 
1,140

 
26,679

 
27,119

 
4,665

 
30,882

 
1,825

Total
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family
22,457

 
23,719

 
1,453

 
22,793

 
894

 
22,981

 
24,334

 
951

 
17,878

 
646

Commercial real estate
1,188

 
1,436

 

 
2,069

 
74

 
5,112

 
5,167

 
1,845

 
3,609

 
478

Home equity line of credit
3,225

 
3,527

 
442

 
2,081

 
53

 
779

 
1,026

 
46

 
534

 
11

Residential land
5,683

 
6,529

 
891

 
6,734

 
455

 
7,850

 
8,784

 
1,057

 
9,143

 
656

Commercial construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial
21,119

 
22,406

 
3,527

 
17,692

 
368

 
13,108

 
16,682

 
760

 
17,293

 
476

Consumer
13

 
13

 
7

 
14

 

 
16

 
16

 
6

 
17

 

 
$
53,685

 
$
57,630

 
$
6,320

 
$
51,383

 
$
1,844

 
$
49,846

 
$
56,009

 
$
4,665

 
$
48,474

 
$
2,267


* Since loan was classified as impaired.
Troubled debt restructurings.  A loan modification is deemed to be a TDR when ASB grants a concession it would not otherwise consider were it not for the borrower’s financial difficulty. When a borrower experiencing financial difficulty fails to make a required payment on a loan or is in imminent default, ASB takes a number of steps to improve the collectability of the loan and maximize the likelihood of full repayment. At times, ASB may modify or restructure a loan to help a distressed borrower improve its financial position to eventually be able to fully repay the loan, provided the borrower has demonstrated both the willingness and the ability to fulfill the modified terms. TDR loans are considered an alternative to foreclosure or liquidation with the goal of minimizing losses to ASB and maximizing recovery.
ASB may consider various types of concessions in granting a TDR including maturity date extensions, extended amortization of principal, temporary deferral of principal payments, and temporary interest rate reductions. ASB rarely grants principal forgiveness in its TDR modifications. Residential loan modifications generally involve interest rate reduction, extending the amortization period, or capitalizing certain delinquent amounts owed not to exceed the original loan balance. Land loans at origination are typically structured as a three-year term, interest-only monthly payment with a balloon payment due at maturity. Land loan TDR modifications typically involve extending the maturity date up to five years and converting the payments from interest-only to principal and interest monthly, at the same or higher interest rate. Commercial loan modifications generally involve extensions of maturity dates, extending the amortization period, and temporary deferral or reduction of principal payments. ASB generally does not reduce the interest rate on commercial loan TDR modifications. Occasionally, additional collateral and/or guaranties are obtained.
All TDR loans are classified as impaired and are segregated and reviewed separately when assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on the appropriate method of measuring impairment:  (1) present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective original contractual rate, (2) fair value of collateral less cost to sell, or (3) observable market price. The financial impact of the calculated impairment amount is an increase to the allowance associated with the modified loan. When available information confirms that specific loans or portions thereof are uncollectible (confirmed losses), these amounts are charged off against the allowance for loan losses.
Loan modifications that occurred during 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
Years ended December 31
2015
 
2014
 
Number
 
Outstanding recorded investment
 
Net increase in ALLL
 
Number
 
Outstanding recorded investment
 
Net increase in ALLL
(dollars in thousands)
of
contracts
 
Pre-modification
 
Post-modification
 
 
of
contracts
 
Pre-modification
 
Post-modification
 
Troubled debt restructurings
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Residential 1-4 family
19

 
$
3,594

 
$
3,668

 
$
87

 
38

 
$
10,680

 
$
10,737

 
$
163

Commercial real estate
1

 
1,500

 
1,500

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity line of credit
39

 
2,441

 
2,441

 
370

 
8

 
502

 
502

 
42

Residential land
1

 
218

 
218

 

 
18

 
4,304

 
4,304

 
242

Commercial construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial
8

 
2,267

 
2,267

 
486

 
7

 
3,827

 
3,827

 
13

Consumer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
68

 
$
10,020

 
$
10,094

 
$
943

 
71

 
$
19,313

 
$
19,370

 
$
460


Loans modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default of 90 days or more in 2015 and 2014, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification, were as follows:
Years ended December 31
2015
 
2014
(dollars in thousands)
Number of
 contracts
 
Recorded
 investment
 
Number of
 contracts
 
Recorded
 investment
Troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted
 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential 1-4 family

 
$

 
1

 
$
390

Commercial real estate

 

 

 

Home equity line of credit
1

 
6

 

 

Residential land

 

 

 

Commercial construction

 

 

 

Residential construction

 

 

 

Commercial
1

 
1,056

 
1

 
14

Consumer

 

 

 

 
2

 
$
1,062

 
2

 
$
404


If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, ASB evaluates the loan for further impairment. Based on its evaluation, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. Commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been impaired or modified in TDRs totaled $0.1 million at December 31, 2015.
Mortgage servicing rights. In its mortgage banking business, ASB sells residential mortgage loans to government-sponsored entities and other parties, who may issue securities backed by pools of such loans. ASB retains no beneficial interests in these loans, but may retain the servicing rights of the loans sold.
ASB received $275.3 million, $155.0 million, and $273.8 million of proceeds from the sale of residential mortgages in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, and recognized gains on such sales of $6.3 million, $2.9 million, and $8.3 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Repurchased mortgage loans in 2015, 2014, and 2013, were nil, $0.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
Mortgage servicing fees, a component of other income, net, were $3.5 million, $3.5 million, and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Changes in carrying value of mortgage servicing rights were as follows:
(in thousands)
Gross
carrying amount
 
Accumulated amortization
 
Valuation allowance
 
Net
carrying amount
December 31, 2015
$
14,531

1 
$
(5,647
)
1 
$

 
$
8,884

December 31, 2014
$
27,185

 
$
(15,436
)
 
$
(209
)
 
$
11,540

1 Reflects sale of mortgage servicing rights and impact of loans paid in full.

Changes related to mortgage servicing rights were as follows:
(in thousands)
2015

 
2014

 
2013

Mortgage servicing rights
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, January 1
$
11,749

 
$
11,938

 
$
11,316

Amount capitalized
3,123

 
1,637

 
2,611

Amortization
(2,682
)
 
(1,731
)
 
(1,802
)
Sale of mortgage servicing rights
(3,302
)
 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment
(4
)
 
(95
)
 
(187
)
Carrying amount before valuation allowance, December 31
8,884

 
11,749

 
11,938

Valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, January 1
209

 
251

 
498

Provision (recovery)
(205
)
 
53

 
(60
)
Other-than-temporary impairment
(4
)
 
(95
)
 
(187
)
Balance, December 31

 
209

 
251

Net carrying value of mortgage servicing rights
$
8,884

 
$
11,540

 
$
11,687


The estimated aggregate amortization expenses of mortgage servicing rights for 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 are $1.3 million, $1.2 million, $1.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
ASB capitalizes mortgage servicing rights acquired through either the purchase or origination of mortgage loans for sale with servicing rights retained. On a monthly basis, ASB compares the net carrying value of the mortgage servicing rights to its fair value to determine if there are any changes to the valuation allowance and/or other-than-temporary impairment for the mortgage servicing rights. ASB's MSRs are stratified based on predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans including loan type such as fixed-rate 15 and 30 year mortgages and note rate in bands of 50 to 100 basis points. For each stratum, fair value is calculated by discounting expected net income streams using discount rates that reflect industry pricing for similar assets. Changes in mortgage interest rates impact the value of ASB's mortgage servicing rights. Rising interest rates typically result in slower prepayment speeds in the loans being serviced for others which increases the value of mortgage servicing rights, whereas declining interest rates typically result in faster prepayment speeds which decrease the value of mortgage servicing rights and increase the amortization of the mortgage servicing rights. Expected net income streams are estimated based on industry assumptions regarding prepayment expectations and income and expenses associated with servicing residential mortgage loans for others.
ASB uses a present value cash flow model using techniques described above to estimate the fair value of MSRs. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for each stratum when the carrying amount exceeds fair value, with any associated provision recorded as a component of loan servicing fees included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of income. A direct write-down is recorded when the recoverability of the valuation allowance is deemed to be unrecoverable.
Key assumptions used in estimating the fair value of ASB’s mortgage servicing rights used in the impairment analysis were as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
Unpaid principal balance
$
1,097,314

 
$
1,391,030

Weighted average note rate
4.05
%
 
4.07
%
Weighted average discount rate
9.6
%
 
9.6
%
Weighted average prepayment speed
9.3
%
 
9.5
%

The sensitivity analysis of fair value of MSR to hypothetical adverse changes of 25 and 50 basis points in certain key assumptions was as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(in thousands)
 
 
 
Prepayment rate:
 
 
 
25 basis points adverse rate change
$
(561
)
 
$
(757
)
50 basis points adverse rate change
(1,104
)
 
(1,524
)
Discount rate:
 
 
 
25 basis points adverse rate change
(111
)
 
(140
)
50 basis points adverse rate change
(220
)
 
(278
)

The effect of a variation in certain assumptions on fair value is calculated without changing any other assumptions. This analysis typically cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of a change in one key assumption to the changes in the fair value of MSRs typically is not linear.
Deposit liabilities. The summarized components of deposit liabilities were as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(dollars in thousands)
Weighted-average stated rate

 
Amount

 
Weighted-average stated rate

 
Amount 

Savings
0.07
%
 
$
2,030,644

 
0.06
%
 
$
1,923,062

Checking
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing
0.02

 
831,143

 
0.02

 
768,787

Noninterest-bearing

 
746,875

 

 
665,005

Commercial checking

 
773,499

 

 
677,789

Money market
0.13

 
167,641

 
0.12

 
158,010

Term certificates
0.93

 
475,452

 
0.83

 
430,762

 
0.12
%
 
$
5,025,254

 
0.11
%
 
$
4,623,415


As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, term certificates of $100,000 or more totaled $163.2 million and $119.9 million, respectively.
The approximate scheduled maturities of term certificates outstanding at December 31, 2015 were as follows:
(in thousands)
 
2016
$
197,095

2017
72,817

2018
63,876

2019
53,525

2020
84,749

Thereafter
3,390

 
$
475,452


Interest expense on deposit liabilities by type of deposit was as follows:
Years ended December 31
2015

 
2014

 
2013

(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
Term certificates
$
3,747

 
$
3,603

 
$
3,702

Savings
1,257

 
1,134

 
1,052

Money market
205

 
214

 
232

Interest-bearing checking
139

 
126

 
106

 
$
5,348

 
$
5,077

 
$
5,092


Other borrowings.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as financing transactions and the obligations to repurchase these securities are recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet. ASB pledges investment securities as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase. All such agreements are subject to master netting arrangements, which provide for conditional right of set-off in case of default by either party; however, ASB presents securities sold under agreements to repurchase on a gross basis in the balance sheet. The following tables present information about the securities sold under agreements to repurchase, including the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties:
(in millions)
 
Gross amount of
recognized liabilities
 
Gross amount
 offset in the
 Balance Sheet
 
Net amount of
 liabilities presented
in the Balance Sheet
Repurchase agreements
 
 

 
 

 
 

December 31, 2015
 
$
229

 
$

 
$
229

December 31, 2014
 
191

 

 
191

 
 
 
Gross amount not offset in the Balance Sheet
(in millions)
 
Net amount of 
liabilities presented
in the Balance Sheet
 
Financial
instruments
 
Cash
collateral
pledged
December 31, 2015
 
 

 
 

 
 

Financial institution
 
$
50

 
$
56

 
$

Government entities
 
56

 
61

 

Commercial account holders
 
123

 
144

 

Total
 
$
229

 
$
261

 
$

December 31, 2014
 
 

 
 

 
 

Financial institution
 
$
50

 
$
57

 
$

Government entities
 
56

 
59

 

Commercial account holders
 
85

 
115

 

Total
 
$
191

 
$
231

 
$


The securities underlying the agreements to repurchase are book-entry securities and were delivered by appropriate entry into the counterparties’ accounts or into segregated tri-party custodial accounts at the FHLB. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as financing transactions and the obligations to repurchase these securities are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The securities underlying the agreements to repurchase continue to be reflected in ASB’s asset accounts. The counterparties or tri-parties may determine that additional collateral is required based on movements in the fair value of the collateral. Typically, a five percent discount is taken from the fair value of the investment securities to determine the value of the collateral pledged for the repurchase agreements.
Information concerning securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which provided for the repurchase of identical securities, was as follows:
(dollars in millions)
2015

 
2014

 
2013

Amount outstanding as of December 31
$
229

 
$
191

 
$
145

Average amount outstanding during the year
$
219

 
$
155

 
$
147

Maximum amount outstanding as of any month-end
$
277

 
$
195

 
$
151

Weighted-average interest rate as of December 31
1.24
%
 
1.45
%
 
1.75
%
Weighted-average interest rate during the year
1.29
%
 
1.67
%
 
1.74
%
Weighted-average remaining days to maturity as of December 31
117

 
343

 
367


Securities sold under agreements to repurchase were summarized as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
Maturity
Repurchase liability

 
Weighted-average
interest rate

 
Collateralized by
 mortgage-related
securities and federal
agency obligations at fair value plus
 accrued interest

 
Repurchase liability

 
Weighted-average
interest rate

 
Collateralized by
mortgage-related
securities and federal
agency obligations at fair value plus
accrued interest

(dollars in thousands)
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Overnight
$
122,684

 
0.15
%
 
$
144,146

 
$
84,758

 
0.15
%
 
$
114,883

1 to 29 days

 

 

 

 

 

30 to 90 days
18,535

 
0.29

 
20,364

 

 

 

Over 90 days
87,363

1 
2.96

 
96,553

 
105,898

1 
2.50

 
115,842

 
$
228,582

 
1.24
%
 
$
261,063

 
$
190,656

 
1.45
%
 
$
230,725

1  
$50.3 million callable by the counterparties quarterly at par until maturity in 2016.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank. FHLB advances are fixed rate for a specific term and consist of the following:
December 31, 2015
Weighted-average
stated rate

 
Amount

 
(dollars in thousands)
 

 
 

 
Due in
 

 
 

 
2016
%
 
$

 
2017
4.28

 
50,000

1 
2018
1.95

 
50,000

 
2019

 

 
2020

 

 
Thereafter

 

 
 
3.12
%
 
$
100,000

 
1  
Callable quarterly at par until maturity in 2017.
ASB and the FHLB are parties to an Advances, Security and Deposit Agreement (Advances Agreement), which applies to currently outstanding and future advances, and governs the terms and conditions under which ASB borrows and the FHLB makes loans or advances from time to time. Under the Advances Agreement, ASB agrees to abide by the FHLB’s credit policies, and makes certain warranties and representations to the FHLB. Upon the occurrence of and during the continuation of an “Event of Default” (which term includes any event of nonpayment of interest or principal of any advance when due or failure to perform any promise or obligation under the Advances Agreement or other credit arrangements between the parties), the FHLB may, at its option, declare all indebtedness and accrued interest thereon, including any prepayment fees or charges, to be immediately due and payable. Advances from the FHLB are collateralized by loans and stock in the FHLB. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, ASB’s available FHLB borrowing capacity was $1.7 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. ASB is required to obtain and hold a specific number of shares of capital stock of the FHLB. ASB was in compliance with all Advances Agreement requirements as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Common stock equity.  In 1988, HEI agreed with the OTS predecessor regulatory agency at the time, to contribute additional capital to ASB up to a maximum aggregate amount of approximately $65.1 million (Capital Maintenance Agreement). As of December 31, 2015, as a result of capital contributions in prior years, HEI’s maximum obligation to contribute additional capital under the Capital Maintenance Agreement has been reduced to approximately $28.3 million. As of December 31, 2015, ASB was in compliance with the minimum capital requirements under OCC regulations.
In 2015, ASB paid cash dividends of $30 million to HEI, compared to cash dividends of $36 million in 2014. The FRB and OCC approved the dividends.
Related-party transactions. HEI charged ASB $2.1 million, $2.3 million and $1.9 million for general management and administrative services in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amounts charged by HEI for services performed by HEI employees to its subsidiaries are allocated primarily on the basis of time expended in providing such services.
Derivative financial instruments. ASB enters into interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) with borrowers, and forward commitments to sell loans or to-be-announced mortgage-backed securities to investors to hedge against the inherent interest rate and pricing risk associated with selling loans.
ASB enters into IRLCs for residential mortgage loans, which commit ASB to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specific interest rate and within a specified period of time. IRLCs that relate to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale are considered derivative financial instruments under applicable accounting guidance. Outstanding IRLCs expose ASB to the risk that the price of the mortgage loans underlying the commitments may decline due to increases in mortgage interest rates from inception of the rate lock to the funding of the loan. The IRLCs are free-standing derivatives which are carried at fair value with changes recorded in mortgage banking income.
ASB enters into forward commitments to hedge the interest rate risk for rate locked mortgage applications in process and closed mortgage loans held for sale. These commitments are primarily forward sales of to-be-announced mortgage backed securities. Generally, when mortgage loans are closed, the forward commitment is liquidated and replaced with a mandatory delivery forward sale of the mortgage to a secondary market investor. In some cases, a best-efforts forward sale agreement is utilized as the forward commitment. These commitments are free-standing derivatives which are carried at fair value with changes recorded in mortgage banking income.
Changes in the fair value of IRLCs and forward commitments subsequent to inception are based on changes in the fair value of the underlying loan resulting from the fulfillment of the commitment and changes in the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment, which is affected primarily by changes in interest rates and the passage of time.
The notional amount and fair value of ASB’s derivative financial instruments were as follows:
December 31
2015
 
2014
(in thousands)
Notional amount
 
Fair value
 
Notional amount
 
Fair value
Interest rate lock commitments
$
22,241

 
$
384

 
$
29,330

 
$
390

Forward commitments
23,644

 
(29
)
 
32,833

 
(106
)

ASB’s derivative financial instruments, their fair values, and balance sheet location were as follows:
Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
as Hedging Instruments 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31
2015
 
2014
(in thousands)
Asset derivatives
 
Liability derivatives
 
Asset derivatives
 
Liability derivatives
Interest rate lock commitments
$
384

 
$

 
$
393

 
$
3

Forward commitments
1

 
30

 
5

 
111

 
$
385

 
$
30

 
$
398

 
$
114

1 Asset derivatives are included in other assets and liability derivatives are included in other liabilities in the balance sheets.
The following table presents ASB’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the net gains or losses recognized in the statements of income:
Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated
Location of net gains
 
 
 
 
 
 
as Hedging Instruments
(losses) recognized in
 
Years ended December 31
(in thousands)
the Statements of Income
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
Interest rate lock commitments
Mortgage banking income
 
$
(6
)
 
$
(74
)
 
$
464

Forward commitments
Mortgage banking income
 
77

 
(245
)
 
139

 

 
$
71

 
$
(319
)
 
$
603


Commitments. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitments. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since certain of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company minimizes its exposure to loss under these commitments by requiring that customers meet certain conditions prior to disbursing funds. The amount of collateral, if any, is based on a credit evaluation of the borrower and may include residential real estate, accounts receivable, inventory and property, plant and equipment.
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee payment and performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.
The following is a summary of outstanding off-balance sheet arrangements:
December 31
2015

 
2014

(in thousands)
 
 
 
Unfunded commitments to extend credit:
 

 
 
Home equity line of credit
$
1,096,532

 
$
1,089,633

Commercial and commercial real estate
631,780

 
526,133

Consumer
60,198

 
56,312

Residential 1-4 family
24,863

 
20,524

Commercial and financial standby letters of credit
18,709

 
20,082

Total
$
1,832,082

 
$
1,712,684


Guarantees.  In October 2007, ASB, as a member financial institution of Visa U.S.A. Inc., received restricted shares of Visa, Inc. (Visa) as a result of a restructuring of Visa U.S.A. Inc. in preparation for an initial public offering by Visa. As a part of the restructuring, ASB entered into a judgment and loss sharing agreement with Visa in order to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to indemnified litigation involving Visa. In November 2012, a federal judge granted preliminary approval to a proposed settlement between merchants and Visa over credit card fees and in December 2013, a federal judge granted final approval to the settlement. Some merchants and trade organizations filed a notice of appeal shortly after the approval was issued. As of December 31, 2015, ASB had accrued a reserve of $1.1 million related to the agreement. Because the extent of ASB’s obligations under this agreement depends entirely upon the occurrence of future events, ASB’s maximum potential future liability under this agreement is not determinable.
Contingencies.  In March 2011, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the First Circuit Court of the state of Hawaii by a customer who claimed that ASB had improperly charged overdraft fees on debit card transactions. ASB filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the basis that ASB’s overdraft practices are governed by federal regulations established for federal savings banks which preempt the customer’s state law claims. In July 2011, the Circuit Court denied ASB's motion without prejudice and ASB appealed that decision to the Hawaii Supreme Court. However, in December 2014, through a voluntary mediation process, ASB reached a tentative settlement of the claims. The tentative settlement, which received final Circuit Court approval on May 21, 2015, provided for a payment of $2.0 million into a class settlement fund, the proceeds of which would be used to refund class members and pay attorneys’ fees and administrative and other costs, in exchange for a complete release of all claims asserted against ASB. The $2.0 million settlement amount was fully reserved by ASB in December 2014 and paid into the settlement fund in January 2015.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessment. In February 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) finalized rules to change its assessment base from total domestic deposits to average total assets minus average tangible equity, as required in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). Assessment rates were reduced to a range of 2.5 to 9 basis points on the new assessment base for financial institutions in the lowest risk category. Financial institutions in the highest risk category have assessment rates of 30 to 45 basis points. The new rate schedule was effective April 1, 2011. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, ASB’s FDIC insurance assessments were $3.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The FDIC may impose special assessments in the future if it is deemed necessary to ensure the Deposit Insurance Fund ratio does not decline to a level that is close to zero or that could otherwise undermine public confidence in federal deposit insurance.