Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The Company follows accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), which are referred to as generally accepted accounting principles or “GAAP,” as contained in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Bolt Technology Corporation and its subsidiary companies. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Refer to Note 12 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding concentration of cash and cash equivalent balances.

Allowance For Doubtful Accounts [Policy Text Block]

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

The allowance for uncollectible accounts is established through a provision for bad debts charged to expense. Accounts receivable are charged against the allowance for uncollectible accounts when the Company believes that collection of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that the Company believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses on existing accounts receivable balances based on the evaluation of their collectability and prior bad debt experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration factors such as changes in the nature and volume of the accounts receivable, overall quality of accounts receivable, review of specific problem accounts receivable, and current economic and industry conditions that may affect customers’ ability to pay. While the Company uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic and industry conditions or any other factors considered in the Company’s evaluation.

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost principally determined on an average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out method. The Company maintains an inventory valuation reserve to provide for slow moving and obsolete inventory. Amounts are charged to the reserve when the Company scraps or disposes of inventory. Refer to Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning inventories.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation for financial accounting purposes is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of 40 years for buildings, over the shorter of the term of the lease or the estimated useful life for leasehold improvements, and 5 to 10 years for machinery and equipment. Major improvements that add to the productive capacity or extend the life of an asset are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Refer to Note 4 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning property, plant and equipment.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Goodwill, Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives and Other Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill represents the unamortized excess cost over the value of net assets acquired in business combinations. The Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance for testing goodwill for impairment provides the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity elects to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that an impairment is more likely than not, the entity is then required to perform a two-step quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. An entity also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the two-step quantitative impairment test. The ultimate outcome of the goodwill impairment review for a reporting unit should be the same whether an entity chooses to perform the qualitative assessment or proceeds directly to the two-step quantitative impairment test.

Step one of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test is to compare the “fair value” of the reporting unit with its “carrying amount.” The fair value of a reporting unit is the amount that a willing party would pay to buy or sell the unit other than in a forced liquidation sale. The carrying amount of a reporting unit is total assets, including goodwill, minus total liabilities. If the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than the carrying amount, the Company considers goodwill not to be impaired. If the fair value is below the carrying amount, the Company would proceed to the next step, which is to measure the impairment loss. Any such impairment loss would be recognized in the Company’s results of operations in the period in which the impairment loss arose.

The Company conducted an assessment of qualitative factors regarding the A-G reporting unit at June 30, 2013 and 2012. The qualitative assessments indicated no impairment of the A-G goodwill balance at June 30, 2013 and 2012.

For the RTS reporting unit, the Company performed the quantitative impairment test at June 30, 2013 and 2012. The estimated fair value of the RTS reporting unit was determined utilizing the capitalized cash flow method and the market price method. The capitalized cash flow method relies on historical financial performance, an estimate of the long-term growth rate in free cash flows and a determination of the weighted average cost of capital for the unit. The market price method gives consideration to the prices paid for publicly traded stocks of comparable companies. The impairment tests for the RTS reporting unit indicated no impairment of the goodwill balance at June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Goodwill relating to the SBX acquisition was tested for impairment at December 31, 2012 and 2011 using the capitalized cash flow method and the market price method, as well as the discounted cash flow method, and the tests indicated no impairment of the goodwill balance. The discounted cash flow method relies on the estimated future cash flows that are discounted back to their present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate to arrive at an estimated value of the reporting unit. The Company’s review of the SBX goodwill balance at June 30, 2013 did not result in any indicators of impairment.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives must be tested annually or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment, to determine if events and circumstances still justify the carrying value of such asset. The test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. Any such loss would be recognized in the period in which the impairment arose. The SBX intangible asset with an indefinite life was tested for impairment at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the tests indicated no impairment. The Company reviewed intangible assets with indefinite lives at June 30, 2013 and 2012 and such reviews did not result in any indicators of impairment, and therefore no impairment tests were performed.

The Company’s other long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment, other intangible assets with definite lives and other non-current assets. The Company reviews these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount is considered impaired when anticipated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount. Any such impairment is measured based on the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the asset and would be recognized in the Company’s results of operations in the period in which the impairment loss arose. The Company’s reviews as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 did not result in any indicators of impairment, and therefore no impairment tests were performed.

Refer to Notes 2, 5 and 6 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning goodwill and other intangible assets.

Revenue Recognition and Warranty Costs [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition and Warranty Costs

The Company recognizes sales revenue when it is realized and earned. The Company’s reported sales revenue is based on meeting the following criteria: (1) manufacturing products based on customer specifications; (2) establishing a set sales price with the customer; (3) delivering product to the customer before the close of the reporting period, whereby delivery results in the transfer of ownership risk to the customer; (4) collecting the sales revenue from the customer is reasonably assured; and (5) no contingencies exist.

Warranty costs and product returns incurred by the Company have not been significant.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is determined under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. The provision for income taxes is the sum of the amount of income tax paid or payable for the period determined by applying the provisions of enacted tax laws to the taxable income for that period and the net change during the period in the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Company follows the accounting standard for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under this guidance, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company’s policy is to record any interest and penalties relating to an uncertain tax position as a component of income tax expense.

Refer to Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the provision for income taxes and deferred tax accounts.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most critical estimates made by the Company are those relating to inventory reserves, the potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, long-lived assets impairment, contingent earnout liability and realization of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Valuation Of Acquisitions [Policy Text Block]

Valuation of Acquisitions

The Company allocates the amounts it pays for each acquisition to the assets it acquires and the liabilities it assumes based on estimated fair values at acquisition date. The Company determines the estimated fair values of identifiable intangible assets based on detailed valuations that use historical information and market assumptions. The Company allocates any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill. The use of different valuation assumptions, including estimated cash flows and discount rates, or different estimated useful life assumptions could result in different purchase price allocations and intangible asset amortization expense in current and future periods.

In the SBX acquisition, the Company is obligated under an earnout arrangement to make cash payments to the former SBX stockholders if certain revenue and gross profit margin targets are achieved. The Company recorded a contingent earnout liability at the acquisition date at its estimated fair value, which takes into account the range and probability of projected future revenues of the acquired entity over the earnout period. The Company revalues the contingent earnout liability at the close of each accounting period and records any change in the estimated fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Income as adjustment of contingent earnout liability.

Increases or decreases in the fair value of the SBX contingent earnout liability can result from changes in assumed revenues, probabilities of achieving revenue targets and discount rates. Significant judgment is used in determining the appropriateness of fair value assumptions at the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. As a result, actual contingent earnout payments can differ from estimates, and the differences could be material.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Computation of Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period including common share equivalents (which includes stock option grants and restricted stock awards) assuming dilution. Unvested shares of restricted stock are included in computing basic earnings per share because they contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends. The following is a reconciliation of basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share for each of the last three fiscal years:

	Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2011
Net income available to common stockholders	$	6,700,000	$	1,982,000	$	5,527,000
Divided by:
Weighted average common shares		8,608,694		8,592,193		8,510,590
Weighted average common share equivalents		2,788		3,409		24,772
Total weighted average common shares and common share equivalents		8,611,482		8,595,602		8,535,362
Basic earnings per share	$	.78	$	.23	$	.65
Diluted earnings per share	$	.78	$	.23	$	.65

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the calculation included all options to acquire shares because they were all dilutive. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the calculations do not include options to acquire 62,000 shares and 70,500 shares, respectively, since the inclusion of these shares would have been anti-dilutive.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recent Accounting Developments

Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2012-02 (“ASU 2012-02”), Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The purpose of ASU 2012-02, which amends the guidance to Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other, is to simplify the guidance for testing the decline in the realizable value (impairment) of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. ASU 2012-02 allows an entity to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets is necessary, similar in approach to the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in ASU 2012-02 permit an entity to first assess qualitatively whether it is more-likely-than-not (more than 50%) that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, thus necessitating that it perform the quantitative impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test unless the entity determines that it is more-likely-than-not that the asset is impaired. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.