XML 1166 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 9 — Fair Value Measurements
 
Pursuant to the accounting guidance for fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price the Company would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with a market participant at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which the asset or liability would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Under fair value accounting guidance, there is a three-tier fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect management’s market assumptions.
 
The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels are defined as follows:
 
Level 1  — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2  — Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs.
  
Level 3  — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on management’s best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.
 
Set forth below is a summary of liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on the three-level valuation hierarchy:
 
 
 
Quoted Market
Prices for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At June 30, 2013 – Contingent earnout liability
 
$
 
$
 
$
3,315,000
 
$
3,315,000
 
At June 30, 2012 – Contingent earnout liability
 
$
 
$
 
$
5,000,000
 
$
5,000,000
 
 
This liability relates to the estimated fair value of earnout payments to former SeaBotix Inc. stockholders for the earnout period ending December 31, 2014. The current and non-current portions of the fair value of the contingent earnout liability at June 30, 2013 are $1,715,000 and $1,600,000, respectively. The current and non-current portions of the fair value of the contingent earnout liability at June 30, 2012 are $1,700,000 and $3,300,000, respectively. Refer to Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements for SeaBotix Inc. acquisition information.
 
Set forth below are the changes in the Level 3 liability from June 30, 2012 to June 30, 2013:
 
 
 
Fair Value of
Contingent
Earnout Liability
 
Balance at June 30, 2012
 
$
5,000,000
 
Adjustment to contingent earnout liability
 
 
500,000
 
Cash payment for achieving performance threshold
 
 
(2,185,000)
 
Balance at June 30, 2013
 
$
3,315,000
 
 
The Company determined the fair value of the contingent earnout liability at June 30, 2013 using a probability weighted approach. The principal inputs to the approach include expectations of the specific business’s revenue in calendar years 2013 and 2014 and the probability of achieving required gross margin thresholds using an appropriate discount rate. Given the use of significant inputs that are not observable in the market, the contingent liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. There were no significant changes to this methodology during the year ended June 30, 2013.