10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2012

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to            

Commission File Number	Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter, Address of Principal Executive Offices and Telephone  Number	State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization		I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
001-33072	SAIC, Inc.		Delaware		20-3562868
	1710 SAIC Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102
	(703) 676-4300
000-12771	Science Applications International Corporation		Delaware		95-3630868
	1710 SAIC Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102
	(703) 676-4300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

SAIC, Inc.	Yes   x     No   ¨
Science Applications International Corporation	Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

SAIC, Inc.	Yes   x     No   ¨
Science Applications International Corporation	Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

SAIC, Inc.	Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨	Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨
Science Applications International Corporation	Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨	Non-accelerated filer	x	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

SAIC, Inc.	Yes   ¨     No   x
Science Applications International Corporation	Yes   ¨     No   x

The number of shares issued and outstanding of each issuer’s classes of common stock as of May 11, 2012 was as follows:

SAIC, Inc.	341,576,401 shares of common stock ($.0001 par value per share)
Science Applications International Corporation	5,000 shares of common stock ($.01 par value per share) held by SAIC, Inc.

Explanatory Note

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report being filed by SAIC, Inc. (“SAIC”) and Science Applications International Corporation (“Science Applications”). SAIC is a holding company and Science Applications is a direct, 100%-owned subsidiary of SAIC. Each of SAIC and Science Applications is filing on its own behalf all of the information contained in this report that relates to such company. Where information or an explanation is provided that is substantially the same for each company, such information or explanation has been combined in this report. Where information or an explanation is not substantially the same for each company, separate information and explanation has been provided. In addition, separate condensed consolidated financial statements for each company, along with combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, are included in this report. Unless indicated otherwise, references in this report to the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer collectively to SAIC, Science Applications and its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

SAIC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenues	$	2,782		$	2,688
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		2,448			2,357
Selling, general and administrative expenses		126			101
Operating income		208			230
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income		2			1
Interest expense		(29	)		(28	)
Other income, net		2			4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		183			207
Provision for income taxes		(66	)		(77	)
Income from continuing operations		117			130
Discontinued operations (Note 1):
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes		—			2
Provision for income taxes		—			(1	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			1
Net income	$	117		$	131
Earnings per share (Note 2):
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35		$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—			.01
	$	.35		$	.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35		$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—			—
	$	.35		$	.36
Cash dividends paid per share	$	.12		$	—

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

SAIC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Net income	$	117		$	131
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1	)		1
Deferred taxes		1			(1	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		—			—
Pension liability adjustments		16			—
Deferred taxes		(6	)		—
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax		10			—
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax		10			—
Comprehensive income	$	127		$	131

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

SAIC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	April 30, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,167		$	1,592
Receivables, net		2,171			2,174
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets		453			439
Total current assets		3,791			4,205
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $439 million and $424 million at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively)		339			348
Intangible assets, net		166			176
Goodwill		1,826			1,826
Deferred income taxes		23			37
Other assets		75			75
	$	6,220		$	6,667
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,410		$	1,964
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		515			508
Income taxes payable		32			—
Notes payable and long-term debt, current portion		553			553
Total current liabilities		2,510			3,025
Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion		1,298			1,299
Other long-term liabilities		146			162
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 2 billion shares authorized, 342 million and 341 million shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		2,038			2,028
Retained earnings		229			164
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1	)		(11	)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,266			2,181
	$	6,220		$	6,667

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

SAIC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

	Shares of common stock			Additional paid-in capital			Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Total
	(in millions)
Balance at January 31, 2012		341		$	2,028		$	164		$	(11	)	$	2,181
Net income		—			—			117			—			117
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—			—			—			10			10
Issuances of stock		2			7			—			—			7
Repurchases of stock		(1	)		(9	)		(10	)		—			(19	)
Cash dividend of $0.12 per share		—			—			(42	)		—			(42	)
Adjustments for income tax benefits from stock-based compensation		—			(12	)		—			—			(12	)
Stock-based compensation		—			24			—			—			24
Balance at April 30, 2012		342		$	2,038		$	229		$	(1	)	$	2,266

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

SAIC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Net income	$	117		$	131
Income from discontinued operations		—			(1	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization		27			28
Stock-based compensation		24			24
Net gain on sales and disposals of assets		(1	)		(8	)
Other		1			1
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures, resulting from changes in:
Receivables		3			(81	)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets		(16	)		7
Deferred income taxes		—			1
Other assets		—			(12	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(554	)		17
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		9			10
Income taxes payable		28			37
Other long-term liabilities		1			—
Total cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations		(361	)		154
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(8	)		(9	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		—			15
Other		1			2
Total cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations		(7	)		8
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations:
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt		(1	)		(1	)
Sales of stock and exercises of stock options		4			7
Repurchases of stock		(19	)		(246	)
Dividend payment		(41	)		—
Other		—			(2	)
Total cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations		(57	)		(242	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations		(425	)		(80	)
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations		—			(6	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations		—			(6	)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			1
Total decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(425	)		(85	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,592			1,367
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,167		$	1,282

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	2,782		$	2,688
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		2,448			2,357
Selling, general and administrative expenses		126			101
Operating income		208			230
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income		2			1
Interest expense		(29	)		(30	)
Other income, net		2			4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		183			205
Provision for income taxes		(66	)		(76	)
Income from continuing operations		117			129
Discontinued operations (Note 1):
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes		—			2
Provision for income taxes		—			(1	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			1
Net income	$	117		$	130

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Net income	$	117		$	130
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1	)		1
Deferred taxes		1			(1	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		—			—
Pension liability adjustments		16			—
Deferred taxes		(6	)		—
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax		10			—
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax		10			—
Comprehensive income	$	127		$	130

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	April 30, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	967		$	1,592
Receivables, net		2,171			2,174
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets		453			439
Total current assets		3,591			4,205
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $439 million and $424 million at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively)		339			348
Intangible assets, net		166			176
Goodwill		1,826			1,826
Deferred income taxes		23			37
Other assets		75			75
Note receivable from SAIC, Inc. (Note 6)		122			—
	$	6,142		$	6,667
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,410		$	1,964
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		515			508
Income taxes payable		32			—
Notes payable and long-term debt, current portion		553			553
Total current liabilities		2,510			3,025
Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion		1,298			1,299
Note payable to SAIC, Inc. (Note 6)		—			120
Other long-term liabilities		146			162
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)
Stockholder’s equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 5,000 shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		233			233
Retained earnings		1,956			1,839
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1	)		(11	)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,188			2,061
	$	6,142		$	6,667

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

8

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

	Shares of common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Retained earnings		Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Total
	(in millions, except for share amounts)
Balance at January 31, 2012		5,000	$	233	$	1,839	$	(11	)	$	2,061
Net income		—		—		117		—			117
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—		10			10
Balance at April 30, 2012		5,000	$	233	$	1,956	$	(1	)	$	2,188

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

9

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Cash flows from continuing operations:
Net income	$	117		$	130
Income from discontinued operations		—			(1	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization		27			28
Stock-based compensation		24			24
Net gain on sales and disposals of assets		(1	)		(8	)
Other		1			1
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures, resulting from changes in:
Receivables		3			(81	)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets		(16	)		7
Deferred income taxes		—			1
Other assets		—			(12	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(553	)		17
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		9			10
Income taxes payable		28			37
Other long-term liabilities		1			—
Total cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations		(360	)		153
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(8	)		(9	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		—			15
Other		1			2
Total cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations		(7	)		8
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations:
Proceeds from note payable to SAIC, Inc.		26			323
Payments on note payable to SAIC, Inc.		(283	)		(563	)
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt		(1	)		(1	)
Total cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations		(258	)		(241	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations		(625	)		(80	)
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations		—			(6	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations		—			(6	)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			1
Total decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(625	)		(85	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,592			1,367
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	967		$	1,282

See accompanying combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

10

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

SAIC, Inc. (“SAIC”) is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary is Science Applications International Corporation (“Science Applications”), a provider of scientific, engineering, systems integration and technical services and solutions in the areas of defense, health, energy, infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity to agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and other U.S. Government civil agencies, state and local government agencies, foreign governments and customers in select commercial markets.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of SAIC include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries, including Science Applications. The condensed consolidated financial statements of Science Applications include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries. SAIC does not have separate operations, assets or liabilities independent of Science Applications, except for a note with Science Applications (the “related party note”), on which interest is recognized. From time to time, SAIC issues stock to Science Applications employees, which is reflected in SAIC’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and results in an increase to the related party note (see Note 6). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

These Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both SAIC and Science Applications. As SAIC consolidates Science Applications for financial statement purposes, disclosures that relate to activities of Science Applications also apply to SAIC. References to the “Company” refer collectively to SAIC, Science Applications, and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise noted.

The accompanying financial information has been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and combined notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information at the time of estimation and actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, the financial information as of April 30, 2012 and for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 reflects all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation thereof. Operating results for the three months ended April 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013, or any future period.

Unless otherwise noted, references to years are for fiscal years ended January 31. For example, the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013 is referred to as “fiscal 2013” in these combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Long-Term Receivables

The Company’s accounts receivable include unbilled receivables, which consist of costs and fees billable upon contract completion or the occurrence of a specified event, the majority of which is expected to be billed and collected within one year. Unbilled receivables are stated at estimated realizable value. Contract retentions are billed when the Company has negotiated final indirect rates with the U.S. Government and, once billed, are subject to audit and approval by government representatives. Consequently, the timing of collection of retention balances is outside the Company’s control. Based on the Company’s historical experience, the majority of retention balances are expected to be collected beyond one year. The Company has extended deferred payment terms with contractual maturities that may exceed one year to three commercial customers related to certain construction projects. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding receivables with deferred payment terms of $80 million, which are expected to be collected in fiscal 2013. When events or conditions indicate that amounts outstanding from customers may become uncollectible, an allowance is estimated and recorded.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Changes in estimates related to certain types of contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes. Changes in these estimates can routinely occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or retirements of risk for

11

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

amounts different than estimated, and changes in estimated incentive or award fees. Aggregate changes in contract estimates increased operating income by $4 million ($0.01 per diluted share) and $12 million ($0.02 per diluted share) for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

In June 2011, in order to better align its business portfolio with its strategy, the Company sold certain components of its business, which were historically included in the Company’s Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies. In fiscal 2012, the Company received net proceeds of $167 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $111 million related to this sale. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company has retained the assets and obligations of its defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. The Company has classified the operating results of these business components, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Following the sale, as a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets, are recorded in continuing operations.

The operating results of this discontinued operation for the three months ended April 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

Revenues	$	45
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		36
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7
Income before income taxes	$	2

Income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

Pension

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company transferred $46 million of pension plan assets to a successor contractor’s plan on behalf of certain participants in the Company’s defined benefit pension plan who previously transferred their employment to the successor contractor and settled $63 million of related pension plan obligations. As a result of the transfer, the Company recorded an immaterial settlement gain in selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended April 30, 2012.

Supplementary Cash Flow Information

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options	$	—	$	14
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3
Increase in accrued stock repurchases	$	—	$	5
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividend	$	1	$	—
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	8	$	7

Note 2—Earnings Per Share (EPS):

The Company is required to allocate a portion of its earnings to its unvested stock awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (participating securities) in calculating EPS using the two-class method.

In fiscal 2013, the Company began issuing unvested stock awards that do not contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. These stock awards are not participating securities requiring application of the two-class method but are dilutive common share equivalents subject to the treasury stock method. Unvested stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013 were participating securities requiring application of the two-class method. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income less earnings allocable to participating securities by the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS

12

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

is computed similar to basic EPS, except the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and other stock-based awards.

A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	127
Diluted EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	127

A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		347
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		1
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		348

Basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		.01
	$	.35	$	.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		—
	$	.35	$	.36

13

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

The following stock-based awards were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		21		23
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1

Note 3—Stock-Based Compensation:

Total Stock-Based Compensation.Total stock-based compensation expense for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock options	$	3	$	5
Vesting stock awards		20		18
Performance-based stock awards		1		1
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	24	$	24

Stock Options. Stock options granted during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 have terms of seven years and a vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company’s outside directors, which have a vesting period of one year.

The fair value of the Company’s stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock options granted for the periods presented were as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.22
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9
Expected volatility		24.4	%		23.4	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%

Stock option activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8		$	17.90		2.5	$	—
Options granted		4.9			13.21
Options forfeited or expired		(4.7	)		17.46
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		21.0			16.90		3.6		—
Exercisable at April 30, 2012		10.0			18.30		1.9		—

Vesting Stock Awards. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company began granting restricted stock units that have forfeitable dividend rights and no voting rights until the units vest and become included in shares of common stock outstanding. Prior to January 31, 2012, the Company granted restricted stock awards that have non-forfeitable dividend

14

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

rights and voting rights and are included in shares outstanding upon issuance (prior to vesting). Vesting stock award activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested stock awards at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.4			13.21
Awards forfeited		(0.3	)		16.36
Awards vested		(4.4	)		17.91
Unvested stock awards at April 30, 2012		13.7			15.39

The fair value of vesting stock awards that vested during each of the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 was $60 million.

Performance-Based Stock Awards. The Company’s performance-based stock awards vest and the stock is issued at the end of a three-year period based upon the achievement of specific performance criteria, with the number of shares ultimately awarded ranging from zero to 150% of the specified target awards. For awards granted in fiscal 2013, one-third of the target number of shares of stock granted under the awards will be allocated to each fiscal year over the three-year performance period and the actual number of shares to be issued with respect to each fiscal year will be based upon the achievement of that fiscal year’s performance criteria. For performance-based stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013, the number of shares of stock to be issued under the awards is determined based upon the achievement of the performance criteria measured over the entire three-year performance period. Performance-based stock award activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance- based stock awards		Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5	$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8		13.21
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		1.3		14.55

Adjustments to the expected number of shares of stock to be issued may occur due to changes in the expected level of achievement of the performance goals over the life of the awards.

Note 4—Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for Defense Solutions (DS), Health, Energy and Civil Solutions (HECS) and Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions (ICS) were as follows:

	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Goodwill at January 31, 2012	$	410	$	785		$	631	$	1,826
Corporate reorganizations		—		(10	)		10		—
Goodwill at April 30, 2012	$	410	$	775		$	641	$	1,826

Corporate reorganizations during the three months ended April 30, 2012 resulted from transfers of certain operations between the Company’s reportable segments.

15

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

	April 30, 2012							January 31, 2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	120	$	(67	)	$	53	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		147		(52	)		95		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		269		(120	)		149		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	286	$	(120	)	$	166	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

Finite-lived intangible assets with a gross carrying value of $1 million became fully amortized during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and are no longer reflected in the gross carrying value. Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $10 million and $11 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

There were no goodwill or intangible asset impairment losses during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011.

The estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets as of April 30, 2012 was as follows:

Fiscal Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2013 (remainder of the fiscal year)	$	25
2014		31
2015		27
2016		22
2017		16
2018		12
2019 and thereafter		16
	$	149

Actual amortization expense in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of future acquisitions, divestitures, impairments, the outcome and timing of completion of in-process research and development projects (the assets of which will become amortizable upon completion and placement into service, or will be impaired if abandoned), adjustments to preliminary valuations of intangible assets and other factors.

Note 5—Financial Instruments:

The Company’s cash equivalents were primarily comprised of investments in several large institutional money market funds that invest primarily in bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government guaranteed repurchase agreements fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. Government guaranteed securities and investment-grade corporate securities that have original maturities of three months or less. There are no restrictions on the withdrawal of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents are recorded at historical cost which equals fair value based on quoted market prices (Level 1 input as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements).

SAIC has a revolving credit facility, which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Science Applications, providing for up to $750 million in unsecured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined, at SAIC’s option, based on either LIBOR plus a margin or a defined base rate through fiscal 2017. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company extended the maturity date of the revolving credit facility for one additional year, to March 2016, as provided for in the terms of the revolving credit facility. As of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

16

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

The revolving credit facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, as well as certain affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenants contained in the revolving credit facility require that, for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants as of April 30, 2012. A failure by the Company to meet these financial covenants in the future would reduce and could eliminate the Company’s borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility.

Other covenants restrict certain of the Company’s activities, including among other things, its ability to create liens, dispose of certain assets and merge or consolidate with other entities. The revolving credit facility also contains certain customary events of default, including, among others, defaults based on certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment, cross-defaults to other debt, breach of specified covenants, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) events, material monetary judgments, change of control events and the material inaccuracy of the Company’s representations and warranties.

The Company’s notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following:

	Stated interest rate			Effective interest rate			April 30, 2012		January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45	%		4.53	%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95	%		6.03	%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2012		6.25	%		6.50	%		550		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13	%		7.43	%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50	%		5.78	%		296		296
Capital leases and other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2018		0-2.5	%		Various			8		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt								1,851		1,852
Less current portion								553		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion							$	1,298	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt							$	1,982	$	2,011

The fair value of long-term debt is determined based on current interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company’s existing debt arrangements (Level 2 and 3 inputs as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements).

The senior unsecured notes contain customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the Company’s ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of April 30, 2012.

Note 6—Related Party Transactions:

Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of SAIC under its $450 million 4.45% notes and $300 million 5.95% notes. These notes have been reflected as debt of Science Applications. Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed any borrowings under SAIC’s amended and restated revolving credit facility maturing in fiscal 2017. SAIC has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Science Applications under its $300 million 5.5% notes, $550 million 6.25% notes and $250 million 7.13% notes.

SAIC and Science Applications have a related party note in connection with a loan of cash between the entities, issuances of stock by SAIC to employees of Science Applications and its subsidiaries and Science Applications’ payment of certain obligations on behalf of SAIC. The related party note bears interest based on LIBOR plus a market-based premium. Portions of the related party note may be repaid at any time prior to its maturity date in November 2012. This maturity date will be automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless either SAIC or Science Applications provides prior notice to the other party.

17

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 7—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:

	April 30, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) million and $(2) million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million, as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $(1) million and $5 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively		2			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $1 million and $6 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	(1	)	$	(11	)

As of April 30, 2012, there is less than $1 million of the unrealized net loss on settled derivative instruments (pre-tax) that will be amortized and recognized as interest expense during the next 12 months.

Note 8—Business Segment Information:

The Company defines its reportable segments based on the way the chief operating decision maker (CODM), currently its chief executive officer, manages the operations of the Company for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.

The segment information for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	1,174		$	1,137
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		678			657
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		930			896
Intersegment elimination		—			(2	)
Total revenues	$	2,782		$	2,688
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	101		$	90
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		47			54
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		66			86
Corporate and Other		(6	)		—
Total operating income	$	208		$	230

Prior to February 1, 2012, the Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions reportable segment represented the aggregation of the Cyber and Information Solutions business unit and the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance group. Effective February 1, 2012, the Cyber and Information Solutions business unit, which previously reported directly to the CODM, commenced reporting to the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance group. After this change the reportable segment name has remained Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions. Also effective February 1, 2012, certain operations were transferred between the Company’s reportable segments. Prior year amounts have been adjusted for consistency with the current year’s presentation.

Note 9—Legal Proceedings:

Timekeeping Contract with City of New York

Since 2000, the Company performed under a systems development and implementation contract relating to an automated time and attendance and workforce management system (CityTime) for certain agencies of the City of New York (City), which was completed in June 2011.

18

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

In March 2012, the Company reached a settlement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the City relating to investigations being conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the City with respect to the CityTime program. In connection with this settlement, the Company entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office effective March 14, 2012. Under the DPA, the Company paid approximately $500 million, comprised of $370 million in restitution that was paid to the City by the U.S. Government, and a $130 million penalty during the three months ended April 30, 2012. The City and the Company exchanged mutual releases upon execution of the DPA, releasing each other from all claims arising out of the CityTime contract. The Company’s release of the City terminated the Company’s right to collect approximately $40 million in a receivable the City owed to the Company under the terms of the CityTime contract. The Company recorded $410 million, consisting of the $370 million remitted to the City and the cancellation of the $40 million account receivable from the City, as a reduction of revenues in fiscal 2012. The remaining $130 million was recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2012.

Under the terms of the DPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will defer prosecution of a single criminal count against the Company, which alleged that the Company, through the conduct of certain managerial employees and others, caused the City to significantly overpay for the CityTime system. If the Company complies with the terms of the DPA, the U.S Attorney will dismiss the criminal count at the end of a three-year period. Under the DPA, the Company has agreed, among other things, to retain an independent monitor, selected by the U.S. Attorney’s Office after consultation with the Company, who will report periodically to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and who will have broad authority to monitor and make recommendations on a number of the Company’s policies and practices. The DPA provides that the monitor will serve for a period of three years, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

With a substantial portion of the Company’s business derived from U.S. Government contracts, the Company has been in discussions with its U.S. Government customers regarding the CityTime matter, including the DPA and resolution of the matter with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the City. While the Company does not expect to be terminated on existing U.S. Government contracts or precluded from bidding on new U.S. Government contracts, it is working to resolve these matters with these government customers as quickly as possible, but no assurances can be given as to the timing or outcome of these discussions.

Data Privacy Litigation

The Company is a defendant in the following seven putative class action lawsuits filed in October 2011 through March 2012: (1) Richardson, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (2) Arrellano, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; (3) Biggerman, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (4) Moskowitz, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (5) Palmer, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al., in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (6) Losack, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California; and (7) Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuits were filed following the theft of computer backup tapes from a vehicle of a Company employee. The employee was transporting the backup tapes between federal facilities under an IT services contract the Company was performing in support of TRICARE, the health care program for members of the military, retirees and their families. The tapes contained

personally identifiable and protected health information of approximately five million military clinic and hospital patients. There is no evidence that any of the data on the backup tapes has actually been accessed or viewed by an unauthorized person. In order for an unauthorized person to access or view the data on the backup tapes, it would require knowledge of and access to specific hardware and software and knowledge of the system and data structure. The Company has notified potentially impacted persons by letter and is offering one year of credit monitoring services to those who request these services and in certain circumstances, one year of identity restoration services.

The complaints in the seven lawsuits vary in their allegations and causes of action against the Company and include allegations of negligence, breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts and statutory violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, California data breach notification requirements, the California Unfair Competition Law, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Privacy Act of 1974. The complaints seek monetary relief, including unspecified actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages of $1,000 for each class member and attorney’s fees, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company has filed motions to dismiss in five of the seven cases. In addition, the Company has filed a

motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to transfer the seven pending cases, plus a related case, to a

19

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

single court for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings. Proceedings in each of the seven pending cases and the related case have been stayed pending a decision by JPML on the Company’s motion.

The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims made in the class action lawsuits. The Company has insurance coverage against judgments or settlements relating to the claims being brought in these lawsuits, with a $10 million deductible. The insurance coverage also covers the Company’s defense costs, subject to the same deductible. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded a loss provision of $10 million related to these lawsuits, representing the low end of the Company’s estimated loss. The Company believes that, if any loss is experienced by the Company in excess of its estimate, such a loss would not exceed the Company’s insurance coverage. As these lawsuits progress, many factors will affect the amount of the ultimate loss, resulting from these claims being brought against the Company, including the outcome of the Company’s motions to dismiss, the results of any discovery, the outcome of any pretrial motions and the courts’ rulings on certain legal issues.

The Company has been informed that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is investigating matters related to the incident. OCR is the division of HHS charged with enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA) and the privacy, security and data breach rules which implement HIPAA. OCR may, among other things, require a corrective action plan and impose civil monetary penalties against the data owner (Department of Defense) and, in certain situations, against the data owners’ contractors, such as the Company. The Company is cooperating with TRICARE in responding to the OCR investigation.

Derivative and Securities Litigation

Between February and April 2012, the following six stockholder derivative complaints were filed, each purportedly on the Company’s behalf: (1) Stellini v. Havenstein et al. (initially filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California but transferred to the Southern District of New York); (2) Malanowski v. Havenstein et al. in New York Supreme Court, New York County; (3) Malanowski v. Denault et al. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; (4) Welch v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York; (5) Robaczynski v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York; and (6) Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York. Each complaint asserts claims against the Company’s directors and against varying groups of the Company’s current and former officers, including two former chief executive officers, the chief financial officer, the former manager of the CityTime program, and the former chief systems engineer of the CityTime program. The complaints claim that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company with respect to the CityTime contract for various reasons, including failure to supervise the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, allowing the Company to issue misleading financial statements, and failure to exercise their oversight responsibilities to ensure that the Company complied with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Some of the complaints further claim that the defendants are liable to the Company under theories of gross mismanagement, contribution and indemnification, abuse of control, waste of corporate assets, and/or violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company currently intends to file a motion to dismiss each of these complaints because the respective plaintiffs did not serve a pre-suit demand before filing the derivative complaints. The Company has also received a stockholder demand letter related to CityTime and TRICARE, which an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors is currently reviewing.

Between February and April 2012, alleged stockholders filed three putative securities class actions: (1) City of Westland Police & Fire Retirement System v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; (2) Williams v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; and (3) Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Each case names as defendants the Company, its chief financial officer, former chief executive officer, and the former program manager on the CityTime program, and each was filed purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of SAIC’s common stock from April 11, 2007 through September 1, 2011. Each complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegations that the Company and individual defendants made misleading statements or omissions about the Company’s revenues, operating income, and internal controls in connection with disclosures relating to the CityTime project. The plaintiffs seek to recover from the Company and the individual defendants an unspecified amount of damages class members allegedly incurred by buying SAIC’s stock at an inflated price. The plaintiff in the Williams case voluntarily dismissed his complaint in May 2012. Pending before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the two remaining securities cases is a motion by a purported stockholder group consisting of the Indiana Public Retirement System, Indiana State Teachers’ Retirement Fund and Indiana Public Employees’ Retirement Funds to be appointed lead plaintiff. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

The Company currently believes that a loss relating to the above-described stockholder matters is possible, but the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of potential loss in light of the fact that these matters are in their early stages.

20

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Greek Government Contract

Background and Arbitration. In May 2003, the Company entered into a firm-fixed-price contract with the Hellenic Republic of Greece (the Customer) to provide a Command, Control, Communications, Coordination and Integration System (the System) to support the 2004 Athens Summer Olympic Games (the Olympics) and to serve as the security system for the Customer’s public order departments following completion of the Olympics.

In November 2008, the Customer accepted the System in writing pursuant to the requirements of the contract. At the time, the Customer determined that the System substantially complied with the terms of the contract and accepted the System with certain alleged minor omissions and deviations. Upon System acceptance, the Company invoiced the Customer for approximately $18 million, representing the undisputed portion of the contract balance owed to the Company. The Customer has not paid this final invoice.

In June 2009, the Company initiated arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce against the Customer seeking damages for breaches of contract by the Customer. The Company seeks (i) aggregate damages in excess of $92 million for payment of amounts owed and other claims and damages, (ii) recovery of advance payment and performance bond amounts totaling $25 million and (iii) costs and expenses associated with the arbitration. The Customer filed an answer to the complaint denying liability on various grounds and a supplementary answer asserting set-off claims against amounts sought by the Company. The arbitration hearing was held in May 2012, and the Company expects the parties will file additional briefs in July 2012. Due to the complex nature of the legal and factual issues involved, the outcome of the arbitration is uncertain.

Financial Status and Contingencies. As a result of the significant uncertainties on this contract, the Company converted to the completed-contract method of accounting and ceased recognizing revenues for the System development portion of this contract in fiscal 2006. No profits or losses were recorded on the Greek contract during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $123 million of losses under the Greek contract, reflecting the Company’s estimated total cost to complete the System, assuming the Greek contract value was limited to the cash received to date. Based on the complex nature of this contractual situation and the difficulties encountered to date, significant uncertainties exist and the Company is unable to reliably estimate the ultimate outcome. The Company may reverse a portion of the losses from the Greek contract if it receives future payments as required under the modified Greek contract.

The Company has $15 million of receivables relating to value added tax (VAT) as of April 30, 2012 that the Company has paid and believes it is entitled to recover either as a refund from the taxing authorities or as a payment under the Greek contract. The Company has invoiced the Customer for $33 million for VAT and the Customer has failed to make payment. If the Customer fails to pay the outstanding VAT amounts or the Company is unable to recover the amount as a refund from the taxing authorities, the Company’s total losses on the Greek contract could increase.

The Company has met certain advance payment and performance bonding requirements through the issuance of euro-denominated standby letters of credit. As of April 30, 2012, there were $4 million in standby letters of credit outstanding relating to the support and maintenance of the System. The Company is seeking recovery of amounts drawn by the Customer in fiscal 2011 on the standby letters of credit in the ongoing arbitration. The principal subcontractor has provided to the Company euro-denominated standby letters of credit in the amount of $23 million as of April 30, 2012, of which $19 million relates to the delivery of the System. The Company may draw on the subcontractor’s standby letters of credit under certain circumstances by providing a statement to the responsible bank that the subcontractor has not fulfilled its obligations under the subcontract.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Company in September 2004 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging civil False Claims Act violations and breach of contract by the Company on two contracts that the Company had with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The complaint alleges that the Company’s performance of several subcontracts on separate U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, the participation of a Company employee in an industry trade association, and certain other alleged relationships created organizational conflicts of interest under the two NRC contracts. The Company disputes that the work performed on the DOE programs and the alleged relationships raised by the government created organizational conflicts of interest. In July 2008, the jury found in favor of the government on the breach of contract and two False Claims Act counts. The jury awarded a nominal amount of $78 in damages for breach of contract and $2 million in damages for the False Claims Act claims. The judge entered the judgment in October 2008, trebling the False Claims Act damages and awarding a total of $585,000 in civil penalties. The Company appealed to the

21

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s judgment as to both liability and damages of $78 on the breach of contract count and rescinded the judgment on the False Claims Act counts, including the aggregate damages and penalties. The Court of Appeals sent the False Claims Act counts back to the District Court for further proceedings. The Company has recorded a liability for an immaterial amount related to this matter as of April 30, 2012 based on its assessment of the likely outcome of this matter.

Other

The Company is also involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon current information, will likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 10—Other Commitments and Contingencies:

DS&S Joint Venture

In March 2006, the Company sold its interest in DS&S, a joint venture in which the Company owned a 50% interest. As part of the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser or DS&S for certain legal costs and expenses, including those related to a government investigation involving DS&S and any litigation resulting from that investigation up to the sum of the sales price of $9 million plus $1 million received by the Company in repayment of a loan owed by DS&S. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has deferred the potential $9 million gain on this sale pending resolution of the indemnification obligation.

Variable Interest Entity (VIE)

In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a fixed price agreement to provide engineering, procurement, and construction services to a special purpose limited liability company for a specific renewable energy project. The Company analyzed this arrangement and determined the entity is a VIE. However, this VIE was not consolidated by the Company because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The project is partially financed by the Company’s provision of extended payment terms in the amount of $100 million for certain of its services performed on the project. The arrangement also contemplates monetary penalties and project guarantees if the Company does not meet certain completion deadlines. The Company expects to bill a total of $216 million to complete the project. At April 30, 2012, the Company had a receivable of $19 million due from this VIE.

Government Investigations and Reviews

The Company is routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to federal, state and local government customers and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. Adverse findings in these investigations or reviews can lead to criminal, civil or administrative proceedings and the Company could face penalties, fines, repayments or compensatory damages. Adverse findings could also have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows due to its reliance on government contracts.

U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and others, routinely audit and review a contractor’s performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of the contractor’s compliance with government standards for its accounting and management internal control systems, including: control environment and overall accounting system, estimating system, purchasing system, property system and earned value management system. Both contractors and the U.S. Government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny. As a result, the current audits and reviews have become more rigorous and the standards to which the Company is held are being more strictly interpreted, increasing the likelihood of an audit or review resulting in an adverse outcome. During the course of its current audits, the DCAA is closely examining and questioning several of the Company’s long established and disclosed practices that it had previously audited and accepted, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate conclusion that will be reached.

The Company changed its indirect rate structure used in its indirect cost system and its direct labor bid structure used for its estimating system for fiscal 2011 and future years. The DCAA is performing reviews of these changes and the Company’s compliance with certain other U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards. A finding of significant control deficiencies in the Company’s system audits or other reviews can result in decremented billing rates to its U.S. Government customers until the control deficiencies are corrected and their remediation is accepted by the DCMA.

22

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

COMBINED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

The Company’s indirect cost audits by the DCAA have not been completed for fiscal 2005 and subsequent fiscal years. Although the Company has recorded contract revenues subsequent to fiscal 2004 based upon an estimate of costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review, the Company does not know the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments, and if future adjustments exceed the Company’s estimates, its profitability would be adversely affected. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded a liability of $35 million for its current best estimate of net amounts to be refunded to customers for potential adjustments from such audits or reviews of contract costs incurred subsequent to fiscal 2004.

Tax Audits and Reviews

The Company files income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to routine compliance reviews by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other taxing authorities. The Company has effectively settled with the IRS for fiscal years prior to and including fiscal 2008. The Company also settled fiscal 2011 as a result of the Company’s participation in the IRS Compliance Assurance Process beginning in fiscal 2011, in which the Company and the IRS endeavor to agree on the treatment of all tax positions prior to the tax return being filed, thereby greatly reducing the period of time between tax return submission and settlement with the IRS. Future and ongoing reviews could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

During the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of reviews by taxing authorities, both domestic and international, could be reached with respect to $102 million of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits including a negligible amount of previously accrued interest, depending on the timing of ongoing examinations, any litigation and expiration of statute of limitations, either because the Company’s tax positions are sustained or because the Company agrees to their disallowance and pays the related income tax. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $131 million, $29 million of which were classified as other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company’s uncertain tax positions were reduced by $1 million resulting from the resolution of certain tax uncertainties. While the Company believes it has adequate accruals for uncertain tax positions, the tax authorities may determine that the Company owes taxes in excess of recorded accruals or the recorded accruals may be in excess of the final settlement amounts agreed to by tax authorities.

The Company is subject to periodic audits by government agencies for taxes other than income taxes. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any other such tax matters would have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows.

Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds

The Company has outstanding letters of credit aggregating to $101 million at April 30, 2012, principally related to guarantees on contracts. The Company also has outstanding surety bonds in the amount of $347 million, principally related to performance and payment bonds on the Company’s contracts.

Other

The Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization Engineering, Manufacturing and Development program was terminated for convenience by the DoD effective September 30, 2011. From October 2009 through termination, the Company and its prime contractor performed on this program under an undefinitized change order with a provisional billing rate that allowed the Company to receive a lesser amount of the projected fee than the estimated fee due until the contract negotiations are completed. The Company has recognized revenues of approximately $490 million, including estimated fee, from October 2009 through April 30, 2012 under the undefinitized change order. The actual fee payable to the Company on this program is dependent on the outcome of the change order negotiations and may differ from amounts previously recognized.

23

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following combined discussion and analysis of SAIC’s and Science Applications’ financial condition and results of operations and quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related combined notes. As SAIC is a holding company and consolidates Science Applications for financial statement purposes, disclosures that relate to activities of Science Applications also apply to SAIC, unless otherwise noted. Science Applications’ revenues and operating expenses comprise 100% of SAIC’s revenues and operating expenses. In addition, Science Applications comprises approximately the entire balance of SAIC’s assets, liabilities and operating cash flows. Therefore, the following discussion is applicable to both SAIC and Science Applications, unless otherwise noted.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our intent, belief, or current expectations with respect to, among other things, trends affecting our financial condition or results of operations, backlog, our industry, government budgets and spending and the impact of competition. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Some of these factors include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012, as may be updated periodically through subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Due to such uncertainties and risks, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to update these factors or to publicly announce the results of any changes to our forward-looking statements due to future events or developments.

Except with respect to “Results of Operations—Discontinued Operations” and “—Net Income,” and “—Diluted EPS,” all amounts in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are presented for our continuing operations.

We use the terms “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” to refer to SAIC, Science Applications and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise noted, references to years are for fiscal years ended January 31. For example, we refer to the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013 as “fiscal 2013.”

Overview

We are a provider of scientific, engineering, systems integration and technical services and solutions in the areas of defense, health, energy, infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity to agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other U.S. Government civil agencies, state and local government agencies, foreign governments and customers in select commercial markets.

Our business is focused on using deep domain knowledge to solve issues of vital importance to the nation and the world in the areas of national security, energy and the environment, critical infrastructure and health. We are focusing our investments in our strategic growth areas including: intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; cybersecurity; logistics, readiness and sustainment; energy and environment; and health information technology. Our significant long-term management initiatives include:

• achieving internal, or non-acquisition related, annual revenue growth through internal collaboration and better leveraging of key differentiators across our company and the deployment of resources and investments into higher growth markets;

• improving our operating income margin through strong contract execution and growth in higher-margin business areas and continued improvement in our information technology (IT) systems infrastructure and related business processes for greater effectiveness and efficiency across all business functions;

• disciplined deployment of our cash resources and use of our capital structure to enhance growth and stockholder value through internal growth initiatives, strategic acquisitions, stock repurchases, dividends and other uses as conditions warrant; and

• investing in our people, including enhanced training and career development programs, with a focus on retention and recruiting.

Key financial highlights and events, including progress against management’s initiatives, during the three months ended April 30, 2012 include:

• Revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2012 increased 3% over the same period in the prior year, reflecting internal revenue growth (as defined in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”) of 2%. Internal revenue growth was driven primarily by increased activity in our Defense Solutions and Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions segments partially offset by a decline in our Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment.

24

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

• Operating income decreased $22 million to $208 million (7.5% as a percentage of revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2012 from $230 million (8.6% as a percentage of revenues) for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in operating margin is primarily due to increased indirect spending, including bid and proposal costs, an $8 million reduction in net positive changes in contract estimates and a $6 million gain on the sale of real estate assets during the three months ended April 30, 2011.

• Income from continuing operations for the three months ended April 30, 2012 decreased $13 million, or 10%, over the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreased operating income of $22 million partially offset by a lower effective tax rate.

• Diluted earnings per share (EPS) from continuing operations for the three months ended April 30, 2012 decreased $.01 per share, or 3%, as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the decline in income from continuing operations partially offset by a decline in the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding of 18 million, or 5%, primarily due to stock repurchases.

• Cash and cash equivalents decreased $425 million during the three months ended April 30, 2012 reflecting $361 million of cash used for operations, including a $500 million cash settlement payment related to the CityTime program described in Note 9 of the combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, a quarterly dividend payment of $41 million and cash used to repurchase SAIC common stock totaling $19 million.

• Net bookings (as defined in “Key Financial Metrics—Bookings and Backlog”) were approximately $2.1 billion for the three months ended April 30, 2012. Total backlog was $17.4 billion at April 30, 2012 as compared to $18.0 billion at January 31, 2012.

Business Environment and Trends

In fiscal 2012, we generated over 90% of our total revenues from contracts with the U.S. Government, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor to other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. Government. Revenues under contracts with the DoD, including subcontracts under which the DoD is the ultimate purchaser, represented approximately 75% of our total revenues in fiscal 2012. Accordingly, our business performance is subject to changes in the overall level of U.S. Government spending, especially national security, including defense, homeland security, and intelligence spending, and the alignment of our service and product offerings and capabilities with current and future budget priorities of the U.S. Government.

While we believe that national security, including defense, homeland security, and intelligence spending will continue to be a priority, the U.S. Government deficit and budget situation has created increasing pressure to examine and reduce spending in these areas. In August 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which increased the U.S. Government’s debt ceiling and enacted 10-year discretionary spending caps expected to generate over $1 trillion in savings for the U.S. Government. According to the Office of Management and Budget, these savings include $487 billion in DoD baseline spending reductions over the next 10 years. The Budget Control Act also established a joint bipartisan committee of Congress responsible to recommend at least $1.2 trillion in additional savings by November 23, 2011. The joint committee did not meet the November deadline for proposing recommended legislation. Unless Congress passes and the President signs legislation amending the Budget Control Act, additional automatic spending cuts (referred to as sequestration) totaling $1.2 trillion over nine years will be triggered. Assuming approximately $200 million in reduced debt-service costs, these discretionary spending cuts are expected to further reduce defense and non-defense spending by approximately $500 billion each, beginning in the government fiscal year ending September 30, 2013 (GFY13). We are evaluating the potential impacts of this legislation on our business, and while the ultimate effect on our business is uncertain, the amount and nature of these federal budget spending reductions could adversely impact our future revenues and growth prospects in those markets.

In January 2012, the DoD issued strategic guidance on the U.S. defense priorities for the next ten years, which identified the primary missions of the U.S. armed forces and the capabilities expected to be critical to future success, including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and cybersecurity. Although the impact of implementation of the strategic guidance on the DoD budget and our business is uncertain, we believe that we are well positioned to support many of these critical capabilities.

In February 2012, the Office of Management and Budget released the President’s GFY13 budget request. The budget request included a variety of tax proposals aimed at boosting the economy while collecting more revenue from high-income taxpayers, and as expected, it also included discretionary spending reductions stipulated by the Budget Control Act of 2011. Ultimately, we believe we will likely see delayed federal appropriation bills for GFY13, with continuing resolutions required to fund government into early GFY13 (late calendar year 2012), as well as the continued threat of possible additional spending cuts through sequestration.

25

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Competition for contracts with the U.S. Government continues to be intense. The U.S. Government has increasingly used contracting processes that give it the ability to select multiple winners or pre-qualify certain contractors to provide various services or products at established general terms and conditions. Such processes include purchasing services and solutions using indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) and U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) contract vehicles. This trend has served to increase competition for U.S. Government contracts. For more information on these risks and uncertainties, see “Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012.

Reportable Segments

Our business is aligned into four reportable segments: Defense Solutions; Health, Energy and Civil Solutions; Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions; and Corporate and Other. For additional information regarding our reportable segments, see Note 8 of the combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2012 contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and “Business” in Part I and Note 15 of the combined notes to consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012.

Key Financial Metrics

Bookings and Backlog. We received net bookings worth an estimated $2.1 billion during the three months ended April 30, 2012. Net bookings represent the estimated amount of revenues to be earned in the future from funded and unfunded contract awards that were received during the period, net of any adjustments to previously awarded backlog amounts. We calculate net bookings as the period’s ending backlog plus the period’s revenues less the prior period’s ending backlog and less the backlog obtained in acquisitions during the period.

Backlog represents the estimated amount of future revenues to be recognized under negotiated contracts as work is performed. We segregate our backlog into two categories as follows:

• Funded Backlog. Funded backlog for contracts with government agencies primarily represents contracts for which funding is appropriated less revenues previously recognized on these contracts, and does not include the unfunded portion of contracts where funding is incrementally appropriated or authorized on a quarterly or annual basis by the U.S. Government and other customers, even though the contract may call for performance over a number of years. Funded backlog for contracts with non-government agencies represents the estimated value on contracts, which may cover multiple future years, under which we are obligated to perform, less revenues previously recognized on these contracts.

• Negotiated Unfunded Backlog. Negotiated unfunded backlog represents estimated amounts of revenues to be earned in the future from (1) negotiated contracts for which funding has not been appropriated or otherwise authorized and (2) unexercised priced contract options. Negotiated unfunded backlog does not include any estimate of future potential task orders expected to be awarded under IDIQ, GSA Schedule, or other master agreement contract vehicles.

26

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

The estimated value of our total backlog as of the dates presented was as follows:

	April 30, 2012		January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
Defense Solutions:
Funded backlog	$	2,026	$	2,143
Negotiated unfunded backlog		4,605		4,961
Total Defense Solutions backlog	$	6,631	$	7,104
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions:
Funded backlog	$	1,940	$	2,077
Negotiated unfunded backlog		3,154		3,336
Total Health, Energy and Civil Solutions backlog	$	5,094	$	5,413
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions:
Funded backlog	$	1,752	$	1,317
Negotiated unfunded backlog		3,880		4,169
Total Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions backlog	$	5,632	$	5,486
Total:
Funded backlog	$	5,718	$	5,537
Negotiated unfunded backlog		11,639		12,466
Total backlog	$	17,357	$	18,003

Total backlog fluctuates from period to period depending on our success rate in winning contracts and the timing of contract awards, renewals, modifications and cancellations. Contract awards continue to be negatively impacted by on-going industry-wide delays in procurement decisions, which have resulted in an increase in the value of our submitted proposals awaiting decision.

We expect to recognize a substantial portion of our funded backlog as revenues within the next 12 months. However, the U.S. Government may cancel any contract at any time. In addition, certain contracts with commercial customers include provisions that allow the customer to cancel at any time. Most of our contracts have cancellation terms that would permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed.

Contract Types. Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenues derived from each type of contract. For additional information regarding the types of contracts under which we generate revenues, see “Business—Contract Types” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. The following table summarizes revenues by contract type as a percentage of total revenues for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
Cost-reimbursement		42	%		43	%
Time and materials (T&M) and fixed-price-level-of-effort (FP-LOE)		30			31
Firm-fixed-price (FFP)		28			26
Total		100	%		100	%

The increase in the percentage of revenues generated from FFP contracts during the three months ended April 30, 2012, as compared to the same period of the prior year was primarily due to increased revenues from increased deliveries under certain logistics, readiness and sustainment contracts, increased design and construction services and the continued ramp up of a program to operate and maintain the enterprise network IT infrastructure for the U.S. Department of State.

Revenue Mix. We generate revenues under our contracts from (1) the efforts of our technical staff, which we refer to as labor-related revenues, and (2) the materials provided on a contract and efforts of our subcontractors, which we refer to as M&S revenues. M&S revenues are generated primarily from large, multi-year systems integration contracts and contracts in our logistics, readiness and sustainment business area, as well as through sales of our proprietary products, such as our border, port and mobile security products and our checked baggage explosive detection systems. While our proprietary products are more profitable, these products represent a small percentage of our M&S revenues and the majority of our

27

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

M&S revenues generally have lower margins than our labor-related revenues. The following table presents changes in labor-related revenues and M&S revenues for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			Percent change			2011
	(dollars in millions)
Labor-related revenues	$	1,510			(2	)%	$	1,542
As a percentage of revenues		54	%					57	%
M&S revenues		1,272			11			1,146
As a percentage of revenues		46	%					43	%

Labor-related revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2012 have declined as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a reduction in the number of employees. In recent years, there have been increases in the relative proportion of M&S revenues as compared to labor-related revenues primarily due to increased activity as a prime contractor on large programs involving significant subcontracted efforts and increased volume of material deliveries under certain programs primarily with DoD customers.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			Percent change			2011
	(dollars in millions)
Revenues	$	2,782			3	%	$	2,688
Cost of revenues		2,448			4			2,357
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A):
General and administrative (G&A)		69			38			50
Bid and proposal (B&P)		43			19			36
Internal research and development (IR&D)		14			(7	)		15
Operating income		208			(10	)		230
Operating income margin		7.5	%					8.6	%
Non-operating expense, net		(25	)					(23	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		183			(12	)		207
Provision for income taxes		(66	)		(14	)		(77	)
Income from continuing operations		117			(10	)		130
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		—						1
Net income	$	117			(11	)	$	131

We classify indirect costs incurred within or allocated to our government customers as overhead (included in cost of revenues) and G&A expenses in the same manner as such costs are defined in our disclosure statements under U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts. Changes in estimates related to certain types of contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes. Changes in these estimates can routinely occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or retirements of risk for amounts different than estimated, and changes in estimated incentive or award fees. Aggregate changes in contract estimates increased operating income by $4 million ($0.01 per diluted share) and $12 million ($0.02 per diluted share) for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Reportable Segment Results. Effective February 1, 2012, certain operations were transferred between the Company’s reportable segments. Prior year amounts have been adjusted for consistency with the current year’s presentation.

28

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

The following table summarizes changes in Defense Solutions revenues and operating income for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
Defense Solutions	2012			Percent change			2011
	(dollars in millions)
Revenues	$	1,174			3	%	$	1,137
Operating income		101			12			90
Operating income margin		8.6	%					7.9	%

Defense Solutions revenues increased by $37 million, or 3%, all of which was internal revenue growth, for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Internal revenue growth was attributable to the continued ramp up of a program to operate and maintain the enterprise network IT infrastructure for the U.S. Department of State ($42 million), increased activity on systems integration and logistics programs for tactical and mine resistant ambush protected vehicles ($34 million) and ramp up of a new prime contract with the Defense Logistics Agency to provide supply chain management of military land and aircraft tires ($24 million). These increases were partially offset by reduced revenue from the U.S. Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization contract as a result of the program’s termination during the third quarter of fiscal 2012 ($54 million).

Defense Solutions operating income increased by $11 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to indirect cost reductions, strong program performance and fees on increased revenues ($3 million).

The following table summarizes changes in Health, Energy and Civil Solutions revenues and operating income for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions	2012			Percent change			2011
	(dollars in millions)
Revenues	$	678			3	%	$	657
Operating income		47			(13	)		54
Operating income margin		6.9	%					8.2	%

Health, Energy and Civil Solutions revenues increased $21 million, or 3%, for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the August 2011 acquisition of Vitalize Consulting Solutions, Inc. Internal revenue contracted 3% reflecting declines in various federal civilian programs ($28 million) and program completions in our federal health information technology business ($25 million), particularly with our U.S. DoD military health system customers. These declines were partially offset by increased deliveries of our non-intrusive cargo inspection systems ($22 million), increased design-build volume related to geothermal and biomass power plant construction ($19 million) and increases in healthcare IT consulting services with commercial clients ($17 million).

Health, Energy and Civil Solutions operating income decreased $7 million, or 13%, for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decline in operating income was primarily due to higher levels of indirect spending ($3 million), an increase in amortization associated with a prior year acquisition ($2 million) and unfavorable impacts of changes in contract estimates ($5 million). This decline was partially offset by reduced research and development expense ($4 million) primarily related to the timing of research and development activities for new homeland security product offerings.

The following table summarizes changes in Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions revenues and operating income for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions	2012			Percent change			2011
	(dollars in millions)
Revenues	$	930			4	%	$	896
Operating income		66			(23	)		86
Operating income margin		7.1	%					9.6	%

29

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions revenues increased $34 million, or 4%, all of which was internal revenue growth, for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Internal revenue growth was primarily attributable to increased activity on our airborne surveillance programs ($33 million) and increased activity on existing cybersecurity contracts ($14 million), both of which had significant material and subcontractor components. These increases were partially offset by a decline in revenues on intelligence analysis programs ($25 million) primarily due to the draw down of overseas U.S. military forces and a contract completed in the prior year.

Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions operating income decreased $20 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to higher levels of indirect spending, including the timing of B&P and IR&D spending which increased substantially over the prior year ($13 million), a reduction in net positive changes in contract estimates ($4 million) and a decline in sales of our higher-margin proprietary products ($5 million). The level of B&P activity fluctuates from period to period depending on the nature and timing of bidding opportunities.

The following table summarizes changes in Corporate and Other operating loss for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
Corporate and Other	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	—		$	—
Operating loss	$	(6	)	$	—

Corporate and Other operating loss for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 represents corporate costs that are unallowable under U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards and the net effect of various items that are not directly related to the operating performance of the reportable segments. Corporate and Other operating loss for the three months ended April 30, 2011 included a $6 million gain on sale of real estate.

Interest Expense. Interest expense remained relatively consistent for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period of the prior year.

Interest expense for Science Applications decreased $1 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period of the prior year, reflecting a $2 million decrease in interest on its note with SAIC partially offset by a $1 million increase in interest on third-party debt. Interest expense related to Science Application’s note with SAIC may fluctuate significantly from year to year based on changes in the underlying note balance and interest rates throughout the fiscal year.

Provision for Income Taxes.The provision for income taxes as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes was 36.1% and 37.2% for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was primarily due to a change in the estimated deductible amount of a prior year legal settlement and the tax deductibility of quarterly dividends paid on shares held by the SAIC Retirement Plan (an employee stock ownership plan), partially offset by expiration of the federal research and development tax credit on December 31, 2011. We file income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions and have effectively settled with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for fiscal years prior to and including fiscal 2008. We also settled fiscal 2011 as a result of our participation in the IRS Compliance Assurance Process beginning in fiscal 2011, in which we and the IRS endeavor to agree on the treatment of all tax positions prior to the filing of the tax return, thereby greatly reducing the period of time between return submission and settlement with the IRS.

Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS) from Continuing Operations. Diluted EPS from continuing operations decreased $.01 per share to $0.35 per share for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the decrease in income from continuing operations and a decline in the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding of 18 million, or 5%, primarily due to share repurchases.

Discontinued Operations.In June 2011, in order to better align our business portfolio with our strategy, we sold certain components of our business, which were historically included in the Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies. In fiscal 2012, we received net proceeds of $167 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $111 million related to this sale. Under terms of the definitive agreement, we retained the assets and obligations of our defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. We have classified the operating results of these business components, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations. Following the asset sale, as a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining

30

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets, are recorded in continuing operations.

The operating results of this discontinued operation for the three months ended April 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

Revenues	$	45
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		36
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7
Income before income taxes	$	2

Income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

Net Income. Net income decreased $14 million, or 11%, for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in net income for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year reflects a decrease in income from continuing operations.

Net income for Science Applications decreased $13 million, or 10%, for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year for the reasons described above.

Diluted EPS.Diluted EPS decreased $0.01 per share to $0.35 per share for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year due to a decrease in net income of $14 million partially offset by an 18 million share, or 5%, decline in the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding, primarily due to share repurchases.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had $1.167 billion in cash and cash equivalents at April 30, 2012, which were primarily comprised of investments in several large institutional money market funds that invest primarily in bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government guaranteed repurchase agreements fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. Government guaranteed securities and investment-grade corporate securities that have original maturities of three months or less. We anticipate our principal sources of liquidity for the next 12 months and beyond will be our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from operations. We may also borrow under our $750 million revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit facility is backed by a number of financial institutions, matures in fiscal 2017 and, by its terms, can be accessed on a same-day basis. We anticipate our principal uses of cash for the next 12 months and beyond will be for operating expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions of businesses, stock repurchases, dividends and payment of current portions of notes payable and long-term debt, including our $550 million senior unsecured notes maturing in July 2012. We anticipate that our operating cash flows, existing cash and cash equivalents, which have no restrictions on withdrawal, and borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.

Historical Trends

Cash and cash equivalents was $1.167 billion and $1.592 billion at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively. The following table summarizes cash flow information for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Total cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	$	(361	)	$	154
Total cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations		(7	)		8
Total cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations		(57	)		(242	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations		—			(6	)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			1
Total decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(425	)	$	(85	)

Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities of Continuing Operations.Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations decreased $515 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations were primarily impacted by a $500 million cash settlement payment related to the CityTime program described in Note 9 of the combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

31

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Any differences in cash flows from operations for Science Applications as compared to SAIC are primarily attributable to changes in interest payments made on the related party note.

Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities of Continuing Operations.We used $7 million of cash in support of investing activities of continuing operations during the three months ended April 30, 2012 including $8 million to purchase property, plant and equipment. We generated $8 million of cash in support of investing activities of continuing operations during the three months ended April 30, 2011 including $15 million of proceeds from the sale of real estate, partially offset by $9 million to purchase property, plant and equipment.

Cash Used in Financing Activities of Continuing Operations.We used $57 million of cash in support of financing activities of continuing operations during the three months ended April 30, 2012, including payment of a quarterly dividend of $41 million and $19 million to repurchase shares of our stock. We used $242 million of cash in support of financing activities of continuing operations during the three months ended April 30, 2011, including $246 million to repurchase shares of our stock.

Science Applications used cash in financing activities of continuing operations of $258 million during the three months ended April 30, 2012, including repayments on the related party note with SAIC of $283 million partially offset by proceeds on the related party note of $26 million. Science Applications used cash from financing activities of continuing operations of $241 million during the three months ended April 30, 2011, including repayments on the related party note with SAIC of $563 million partially offset by proceeds from the related party note with SAIC of $323 million.

Stock Repurchase Program

In March 2012, our board of directors terminated the stock repurchase program authorized in December 2010 and authorized a new stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to 40 million shares of SAIC common stock. Stock repurchases may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions with third-parties. Whether repurchases are made and the timing and actual number of shares repurchased depends on a variety of factors including price, corporate capital requirements, other market conditions and regulatory requirements.

Outstanding Indebtedness

Notes Payable and Long-term Debt.Our outstanding notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following:

	Stated interest rate			Effective interest rate			April 30, 2012		January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45	%		4.53	%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95	%		6.03	%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2012		6.25	%		6.50	%		550		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13	%		7.43	%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50	%		5.78	%		296		296
Capital leases and other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2018		0-2.5	%		Various			8		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt								1,851		1,852
Less current portion								553		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion							$	1,298	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt							$	1,982	$	2,011

These notes contain financial covenants and customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. We were in compliance with all covenants as of April 30, 2012.

Credit Facility.SAIC has a revolving credit facility, which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Science Applications, providing for up to $750 million in unsecured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined, at SAIC’s option, based on either LIBOR plus a margin or a defined base rate through fiscal 2017. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, we extended the maturity date of the revolving credit facility for one additional year, to March 2016, as provided for in the terms of the revolving credit facility. As of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility contains financial covenants and customary restrictive covenants. We were

32

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

in compliance with all covenants under the revolving credit facility as of April 30, 2012. A failure to meet the financial covenants in the future would reduce and could eliminate our borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have outstanding performance guarantees and cross-indemnity agreements in connection with certain of our unconsolidated joint venture investments. We also have letters of credit outstanding principally related to guarantees on contracts and surety bonds outstanding principally related to performance and payment bonds as described in Note 10 of the combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2012 contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These arrangements have not had, and management does not believe it is likely that they will in the future have, a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, operations or financial condition. We have also entered into an agreement with a variable interest entity (VIE) in connection with a renewable energy project as described in Note 10 of the combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2012 contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Commitments and Contingencies

We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits and other uncertainties related to our business. For a discussion of these items, see Notes 9 and 10 of the combined notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2012 contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates and assumptions have been prepared on the basis of the most current reasonably available information. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

We have several critical accounting policies, which were described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012, that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Typically, the circumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and complex have to do with making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the three months ended April 30, 2012.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we refer to internal revenue growth percentage, which is a non-GAAP financial measure that we reconcile to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. We calculate our internal revenue growth percentage by comparing our reported revenues for the current year period to the revenues for the prior year period adjusted to include the actual revenues of acquired businesses for the comparable prior year period before acquisition. This calculation has the effect of adding revenues for the acquired businesses for the comparable prior year period to our prior year period reported revenues.

We use internal revenue growth percentage as an indicator of how successful we are at growing our base business and how successful we are at growing the revenues of the businesses that we acquire. Our integration of acquired businesses allows our current management to leverage business development capabilities, drive internal resource collaboration, utilize access to markets and qualifications, and refine strategies to realize synergies, which benefits both acquired and existing businesses. As a result, the performance of the combined enterprise post-acquisition is an important measurement. In addition, as a means of rewarding the successful integration and growth of acquired businesses, and not acquisitions themselves, incentive compensation for our executives and the broader employee population is based, in part, on achievement of revenue targets linked to internal revenue growth.

The limitation of this non-GAAP financial measure as compared to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is that internal revenue growth percentage is one of two components of the total revenue growth percentage, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. We address this limitation by presenting the total revenue growth percentage next to or near disclosures of internal revenue growth percentage. This financial measure is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable GAAP measures and should be read only in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. The method that we use to calculate internal revenue growth percentage is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled financial measures presented by other companies.

33

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Internal revenue growth (contraction) percentages for the three months ended April 30, 2012 were calculated as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30, 2012
	(dollars in millions)
Defense Solutions:
Prior year period’s revenues, as reported	$	1,137
Revenues of acquired businesses for the comparable prior year period		—
Prior year period’s revenues, as adjusted	$	1,137
Current year period’s revenues, as reported		1,174
Internal revenue growth	$	37
Internal revenue growth percentage		3	%
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions:
Prior year period’s revenues, as reported	$	657
Revenues of acquired businesses for the comparable prior year period		41
Prior year period’s revenues, as adjusted	$	698
Current year period’s revenues, as reported		678
Internal revenue contraction	$	(20	)
Internal revenue contraction percentage		(3	)%
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions:
Prior year period’s revenues, as reported	$	896
Revenues of acquired businesses for the comparable prior year period		—
Prior year period’s revenues, as adjusted	$	896
Current year period’s revenues, as reported		930
Internal revenue growth	$	34
Internal revenue growth percentage		4	%
Total*:
Prior year period’s revenues, as reported	$	2,688
Revenues of acquired businesses for the comparable prior year period		41
Prior year period’s revenues, as adjusted	$	2,729
Current year period’s revenues, as reported		2,782
Internal revenue growth	$	53
Internal revenue growth percentage		2	%

* Total revenues include amounts related to Corporate and Other and intersegment eliminations.

Effects of Inflation

Approximately 50% of our revenues are derived from cost-reimbursement type contracts, which are generally completed within one year. Bids for longer-term FFP and T&M and FP-LOE contracts typically include sufficient provisions for labor and other cost escalations to cover anticipated cost increases over the period of performance. Consequently, revenues and costs have generally both increased commensurate with inflation. As a result, net income as a percentage of total revenues has not been significantly impacted by inflation.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, there were no material changes in our market risk exposure. For a discussion of our market risk associated with interest rate risk and foreign currency risk as of January 31, 2012, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer (our President and Chief Executive Officer) and principal financial officer (our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of SAIC’s and Science Applications’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the

34

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of April 30, 2012, and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission. These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the quarterly period covered by this report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

35

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We have provided information about legal proceedings in which we are involved in Note 9 of the combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended April 30, 2012 contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In addition to the matters disclosed in Note 9, we are routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations, including in connection with contract procurement, award and performance, with respect to our role as a contractor to governmental agencies and departments and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. Adverse findings in these investigations or reviews can lead to criminal, civil or administrative proceedings and we could face penalties, fines, repayments, compensatory damages or suspension or debarment from doing business with governmental agencies. Adverse findings could also have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows due to our reliance on government contracts.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Except for the updated risk factor described below, there were no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012.

Our failure to attract, train and retain skilled employees, including our management team, would adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy and may disrupt our operations.

Our business involves the development of tailored solutions for our customers, a process that relies heavily upon the expertise and services of our employees. Our continued success depends on our ability to recruit and retain highly trained and skilled engineering, technical and professional personnel. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and competitors aggressively recruit key employees. In addition, many U.S. Government programs require contractors to have security clearances. Depending on the level of required clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and personnel with security clearances are in great demand. Particularly in highly specialized areas, it has become more difficult to retain employees and meet all of our needs for employees in a timely manner, which may affect our growth in the current fiscal year and in future years. Although we intend to continue to devote significant resources to recruit, train and retain qualified employees, we may not be able to attract, effectively train and retain these employees. Any failure to do so could impair our ability to perform our contractual obligations efficiently and timely meet our customers’ needs and win new business, which could adversely affect our future results. Additionally, completion of the transition of corporate functions from San Diego, California to our McLean, Virginia headquarters and other locations expected to occur over the next year could result in employee turnover in these functions. There is little redundancy or overlap of responsibilities in our corporate functions and loss of key personnel in critical functions could lead to lack of business continuity or disruptions in our operations, financial reporting or control processes until we are able to hire and train replacement personnel.

In addition to attracting and retaining qualified engineering, technical and professional personnel, we believe that our success will also depend on the continued employment of a highly qualified and experienced senior management team and its ability to retain existing business and generate new business. Our senior management team is important to our business because personal reputations and individual business relationships are a critical element of retaining and obtaining customer contracts in our industry, particularly with agencies performing classified operations. In the past year, we have experienced changes in our senior executive team, including the appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2012. Our inability to retain appropriately qualified and experienced senior executives could cause us to lose customers or new business opportunities.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(c) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company

In March 2012, our board of directors terminated the stock repurchase program authorized in December 2010 (the 2010 Repurchase Program) and authorized a new stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to 40 million shares of SAIC common stock (the 2012 Repurchase Program). Stock repurchases may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions with third-parties. Whether repurchases are made and the timing and actual number of shares repurchased depends on a variety of factors including price, corporate capital requirements, other market conditions and regulatory requirements.

36

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

The following table presents repurchases of SAIC common stock during the quarter ended April 30, 2012:

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1)		(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Repurchase Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
February 1, 2012 – February 29, 2012		—	$	—		—		3,825,495
March 1, 2012 – March 31, 2012		288,811		15.87		—		40,000,000
April 1, 2012 – April 30, 2012		1,094,855		13.04		—		40,000,000
Total		1,383,666		13.63		—

⁽¹⁾  Includes shares purchased as follows:

	February		March		April
Upon surrender by stockholders of previously owned shares to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations related to vesting of stock awards		—		288,811		1,094,855

⁽²⁾  We may repurchase up to 40 million shares of SAIC common stock under the 2012 Repurchase Program, which was publicly announced in March 2012. The 2010 Repurchase Program was terminated in March 2012.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

37

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit
	10.1	Amendment No. Two to Science Applications International Corporation’s Stock Compensation Plan.
	10.2	Amendment No. Two to Science Applications International Corporation’s Management Stock Compensation Plan.
	10.3	Amendment No. Two to Science Applications International Corporation’s Keystaff Deferral Plan.
	10.4	Amendment No. Four to Science Applications International Corporation’s Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan.
	10.5	Amendment No. Two to SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
	10.6	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
	10.7	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (Non-Employee Directors).
	10.8	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (Management).
	10.9	Form of Performance Share Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (covering performance share awards after March 22, 2012).
	10.10	Form of Amendment to Performance Share Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (for Performance Share Award Agreements entered into prior to March 22, 2012).
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101	Interactive Data File.

38

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 31, 2012

SAIC, Inc.

/s/     MARK W. SOPP        

Mark W. Sopp

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and

as a duly authorized officer

Dated: May 31, 2012

Science Applications International Corporation

/s/    MARK W. SOPP        

Mark W. Sopp

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and

as a duly authorized officer

39

SAIC, INC.

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit
	10.1	Amendment No. Two to Science Applications International Corporation’s Stock Compensation Plan.
	10.2	Amendment No. Two to Science Applications International Corporation’s Management Stock Compensation Plan.
	10.3	Amendment No. Two to Science Applications International Corporation’s Keystaff Deferral Plan.
	10.4	Amendment No. Four to Science Applications International Corporation’s Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan.
	10.5	Amendment No. Two to SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
	10.6	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
	10.7	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (Non-Employee Directors).
	10.8	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (Management).
	10.9	Form of Performance Share Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (covering performance share awards after March 22, 2012).
	10.10	Form of Amendment to Performance Share Award Agreement of SAIC, Inc.’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (for Performance Share Award Agreements entered into prior to March 22, 2012).
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101	Interactive Data File.

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

Amendment No. Two

Effective on and after March 22, 2012, the Science Applications International Corporation Stock Compensation Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1. The definition of “Account” in Section 1.1 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“Account. The bookkeeping account established for a Participant pursuant to Article IV to record the number of Share Units awarded to the Participant, to record the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts, to record the number of Share Units credited as a result of such Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts, and to record the vesting of the amounts credited to the Account.”

2. The plan is amended by adding a definition for “Dividend Account” in Article I of the plan (with appropriate renumbering to the alphabetized definitions within Article I) as follows:

“Dividend Account. The portion of a Participant’s Account maintained by the Committee to record the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts.”

3. The plan is amended by adding a definition for “Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount” in Article I of the plan (with appropriate renumbering to the alphabetized definitions within Article I) as follows:

“Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount. The amount of Ordinary Dividends credited by the Company to a Participant’s Account. Such amount to be equal to the per share Ordinary Dividend paid by the Company on its Company Stock multiplied by the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Account as of the related dividend payment record date.”

4. The plan is amended by adding a new Section 4.3 to the plan, as follows:

“4.3 Ordinary Dividend Equivalents. As of any date that the Company pays an Ordinary Dividend, each Participant’s Dividend Account shall be credited with an Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount. Such Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount shall be credited to each Participant’s Account in the form of a number of Share Units (including partial Share Units) determined by dividing the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount (expressed in dollars) by the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock as of the crediting date. Amounts credited to a Participant’s Dividend Account shall vest (or be forfeited) in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.4.

5. Section 5.3 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“5.3 Dividends. All Ordinary Dividends on Company Stock held in Trust shall be held by the Trustee and reinvested as directed by the Committee. The Capital Restructuring Dividend on Company Stock held in Trust shall be immediately disbursed

1

by the Trustee to the Company for immediate distribution by the Company to Participants in accordance with Section 6.6. No person (including, but not limited to, the Trustee, the Company, the Committee or the Board) shall have the authority or ability to delay the immediate transfer of the Capital Restructuring Dividend from the Trustee to the Company pursuant to this Section 5.3.”

6. Section 7.1 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“7.1 Change in Control. All Accounts shall be immediately distributed to the Participants to whom such Accounts belong, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as hereinafter defined) of the Company. A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to occur if any person (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) other than the Company, any subsidiary or employee benefit plan or trust maintained by the Company or subsidiary, during any 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person, becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), directly or indirectly, of the Company’s stock representing thirty-five percent (35%) or more of the voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock; provided, however, that a transaction shall not constitute a Change in Control unless it is a “change in the ownership or effective control” of the Company, or a change “in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 409A. For purposes of the foregoing, a subsidiary is any corporation in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations, other than the last corporation in such chain, owns at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power in one of the other corporations in such chain.”

Science Applications International Corporation
By:	/s/ Lucy K. Moffitt
	Lucy K. Moffitt
Its:	Vice President for Finance

2

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

Amendment No. Two

Effective on and after March 22, 2012, the Science Applications International Corporation Management Stock Compensation Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1. The definition of “Account” in Section 1.1 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“Account. The bookkeeping account established for a Participant pursuant to Article IV to record the number of Share Units awarded to the Participant, to record the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts, to record the number of Share Units credited as a result of such Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts, and to record the vesting of the amounts credited to the Account.”

2. The plan is amended by adding a definition for “Dividend Account” in Article I of the plan (with appropriate renumbering to the alphabetized definitions within Article I) as follows:

“Dividend Account. The portion of a Participant’s Account maintained by the Committee to record the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts.”

3. The plan is amended by adding a definition for “Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount” in Article I of the plan (with appropriate renumbering to the alphabetized definitions within Article I) as follows:

“Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount. The amount of Ordinary Dividends credited by the Company to a Participant’s Account. Such amount to be equal to the per share Ordinary Dividend paid by the Company on its Company Stock multiplied by the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Account as of the related dividend payment record date.”

4. The plan is amended by adding a new Section 4.3 to the plan, as follows:

“4.3 Ordinary Dividend Equivalents. As of any date that the Company pays an Ordinary Dividend, each Participant’s Dividend Account shall be credited with an Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount. Such Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount shall be credited to each Participant’s Account in the form of a number of Share Units (including partial Share Units) determined by dividing the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount (expressed in dollars) by the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock as of the crediting date. Amounts credited to a Participant’s Dividend Account shall vest (or be forfeited) in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.4.

5. Section 5.3 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“5.3 Dividends. All Ordinary Dividends on Company Stock held in Trust shall be held by the Trustee and reinvested as directed by the Committee. The Capital Restructuring Dividend on Company Stock held in Trust shall be immediately disbursed

1

by the Trustee to the Company for immediate distribution by the Company to Participants in accordance with Section 6.6. No person (including, but not limited to, the Trustee, the Company, the Committee or the Board) shall have the authority or ability to delay the immediate transfer of the Capital Restructuring Dividend from the Trustee to the Company pursuant to this Section 5.3.”

6. Section 7.1 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“7.1 Change in Control. All Accounts shall be immediately distributed to the Participants to whom such Accounts belong, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as hereinafter defined) of the Company. A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to occur if any person (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) other than the Company, any subsidiary or employee benefit plan or trust maintained by the Company or subsidiary, during any 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person, becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), directly or indirectly, of the Company’s stock representing thirty-five percent (35%) or more of the voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock; provided, however, that a transaction shall not constitute a Change in Control unless it is a “change in the ownership or effective control” of the Company, or a change “in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 409A. For purposes of the foregoing, a subsidiary is any corporation in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations, other than the last corporation in such chain, owns at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power in one of the other corporations in such chain.”

Science Applications International Corporation
By:	/s/ Lucy K. Moffitt
	Lucy K. Moffitt
Its:	Vice President for Finance

2

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

KEYSTAFF DEFERRAL PLAN

Amendment No. Two

Effective on and after March 22, 2012 the Science Applications International Corporation Keystaff Deferral Plan is hereby amended as follows:

Section 9.3 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“9.3 All Accounts shall be immediately distributed to the Participants to whom such Accounts belong, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as hereinafter defined) of the Company. A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to occur if any person (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) other than the Company, any subsidiary or employee benefit plan or trust maintained by the Company or subsidiary, during any 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person, becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), directly or indirectly, of the Company’s stock representing thirty-five percent (35%) or more of the voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock; provided, however, that a transaction shall not constitute a Change in Control unless it is a “change in the ownership or effective control” of the Company, or a change “in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 409A. For purposes of the foregoing, a subsidiary is any corporation in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations, other than the last corporation in such chain, owns at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power in one of the other corporations in such chain.”

Science Applications International Corporation
By:	/s/ Lucy K. Moffitt
	Lucy K. Moffitt
Its:	Vice President for Finance

EX-10.4

Exhibit 10.4

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

KEY EXECUTIVE STOCK DEFERRAL PLAN

Amendment No. Four

Effective on and after March 22, 2012, the Science Applications International Corporation Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1. The definition of “Account” in Section 2.1 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“Account. The Account maintained for bookkeeping purposes by the Committee with respect to each Participant to evidence the Participant’s Deferrals of Deferrable Amounts hereunder, to record the number of Share Units credited as a result of such deferrals, to record the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts and to record the number of Share Units credited as a result of such Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts.”

2. The plan is amended by adding a definition for “Dividend Account” in Article II of the plan (with appropriate renumbering to the alphabetized definitions within Article II) as follows:

“Dividend Account. The portion of a Participant’s Account maintained by the Committee to record the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amounts.”

3. The plan is amended by adding a definition for “Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount” in Article II of the plan (with appropriate renumbering to the alphabetized definitions within Article II) as follows:

“Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount. The amount of Ordinary Dividends credited by the Company to a Participant’s Account. Such amount to be equal to the per share Ordinary Dividend paid by the Company on its Company Stock multiplied by the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Account as of the related dividend payment record date.”

4. The plan is amended by adding a new Section 5.5 to the plan, as follows:

“5.5 Ordinary Dividend Equivalents. As of any date that the Company pays an Ordinary Dividend, each Participant’s Dividend Account shall be credited with an Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount. Such Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount shall be credited to each Participant’s Account in the form of a number of Share Units (including partial Share Units) determined by dividing the Participant’s Ordinary Dividend Equivalent Amount (expressed in dollars) by the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock as of the crediting date. Amounts credited to a Participant’s Dividend Account shall be fully vested at all times; provided, however, that amounts credited to a Participant’s Dividend Account with respect to the portion of the Account balance attributable to bonuses of vesting restricted stock units shall vest (or be forfeited) in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.4.”

1

5. Section 6.3 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“6.3 Dividends. All Ordinary Dividends on Company Stock held in Trust shall be held by the Trustee and reinvested as directed by the Committee. The Capital Restructuring Dividend on Company Stock held in Trust shall be immediately disbursed by the Trustee to the Company for immediate distribution by the Company to Participants in accordance with Section 7.7. No person (including, but not limited to, the Trustee, the Company, the Committee or the Board) shall have the authority or ability to delay the immediate transfer of the Capital Restructuring Dividend from the Trustee to the Company pursuant to this Section 6.3.”

6. Section 8.1 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“8.1 Change in Control. All Accounts shall be immediately distributed to the Participants to whom such Accounts belong, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as hereinafter defined) of the Company. A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to occur if any person (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) other than the Company, any subsidiary or employee benefit plan or trust maintained by the Company or subsidiary, during any 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person, becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), directly or indirectly, of the Company’s stock representing thirty-five percent (35%) or more of the voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock; provided, however, that a transaction shall not constitute a Change in Control unless it is a “change in the ownership or effective control” of the Company, or a change “in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 409A. For purposes of the foregoing, a subsidiary is any corporation in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations, other than the last corporation in such chain, owns at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power in one of the other corporations in such chain.”

Science Applications International Corporation
By:	/s/ Lucy K. Moffitt
	Lucy K. Moffitt
Its:	Vice President for Finance

2

EX-10.5

Exhibit 10.5

SAIC, INC. 2006 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Amendment No. Two

Effective immediately, the SAIC, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended as follows:

Section 11 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

11. Payment of Purchase Price; Changes in Payroll Deductions; Issuance of Shares.

(a) The purchase price of the shares is accumulated by regular payroll deductions made during each Offering Period. The deductions are made as a percentage of the participant’s compensation in one percent (1%) increments, not less than one percent (1%), nor greater than ten percent (10%), or such lower limit set by the Committee. Compensation shall mean, in the case of employees subject to tax in the United States, all W-2 cash compensation, including, but not limited to, base salary, wages, bonuses, incentive compensation, commissions, overtime, shift premiums, plus draws against commissions, provided, however that compensation shall not include any long term disability or workers’ compensation payments, car allowances, relocation payments, expense reimbursements or payment of dividends on non-vested stock or payments representing dividends on stock units or stock rights and further provided, however, that for purposes of determining a participant’s compensation, any election by such participant to reduce his or her regular cash remuneration under Sections 125 or 401(k) of the Code shall be treated as if the participant did not make such election. In the case of employees not subject to tax in the United States, the Committee shall establish a comparable definition of compensation. Payroll deductions shall commence on the first payday of the Offering Period and shall continue to the end of the Offering Period unless sooner altered or terminated as provided in this Plan. If payroll deductions are not permitted in a jurisdiction, participants in that jurisdiction may contribute via check or pursuant to another method approved by the Committee.

SAIC, Inc.
By:	/s/ Lucy K. Moffitt
	Lucy K. Moffitt
Its:	Vice President for Finance

EX-10.6

Exhibit 10.6

SAIC, INC.

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT

BY ACCEPTING THIS AWARD, YOU VOLUNTARILY AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT AND IN THE PLAN.

SAIC, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to the participant named in the Grant Summary (as defined below) (“Recipient”), who is affiliated with the Company or an Affiliate as an employee, director or consultant, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) representing the right to receive one share of its Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”) for each RSU. Certain specific details of this award, including the number of RSUs and the Grant Date, may be found in the Grant Summary and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. The terms and conditions of the grant of RSUs (this “Award”) are set forth in this Agreement and in the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).

1. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings as defined below. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Plan.

“Affiliate” shall mean a “parent” or “subsidiary” (as each is defined in Section 424 of the Code) of the Company and any other entity that the Board or Committee designates as an “Affiliate” for purposes of this Plan.

“Committee” shall have the meaning as defined in the Plan.

“Executive Officer” shall mean an officer of the Company designated as such for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Grant Date” shall mean the date of the award of the RSUs as set forth in the Grant Summary.

“Grant Summary” shall mean the summary of this award as reflected in the electronic stock plan award administration system maintained by the Company or its designee that contains a link to this Agreement (which summary information is set forth in the appropriate records of the Company authorizing such award).

“Permanent Disability” shall mean the status of disability determined conclusively by the Committee based upon certification of disability by the Social Security Administration or, to the extent compliant with Section 409A, upon such other proof as the Committee may require, effective upon receipt of such certification or other proof by the Committee.

“Special Retirement” shall mean: (i) retirement by the Recipient after reaching age 59 ¹/2 with at least ten (10) years of service with the Company or an Affiliate; or (ii) retirement by the

March 2012

Recipient after reaching age 59 ¹/2 and Recipient’s age plus years of service with the Company or an Affiliate equals at least 70; or (iii) if Recipient is an Executive Officer at the time of retirement, retirement after reaching the applicable mandatory retirement age, regardless of years of service with the Company or (iv) if the Recipient is a director of the Company, retirement either (A) after reaching the applicable mandatory retirement age at retirement or (B) at the end of a term of office if Recipient is not nominated for a successive term of office on account of the fact that Recipient would have reached the applicable mandatory retirement age during such successive term of office, regardless of years of service with the Company. For Special Retirement purposes, years of service shall mean the period of service determined conclusively by the Committee.

2. RIGHTS OF THE RECIPIENT WITH RESPECT TO THE RSUs.

a) No Stockholder Rights. The RSUs granted pursuant to this Award do not and shall not entitle Recipient to any rights of a stockholder. The rights of Recipient with respect to the RSUs shall remain forfeitable at all times prior to the date on which such rights become vested, and the restrictions with respect to the RSUs lapse, in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5.

b) Additional RSUs as Dividend Equivalents. If the Company pays any cash dividends on its Common Stock, the Company shall credit to Recipient, on each dividend payment date, a number of additional RSUs (“Dividend Equivalents”) equal in value to the cash dividends that would have been paid on the shares of Common Stock underlying the unvested RSUs covered by this Agreement assuming that: (i) such underlying shares had been outstanding as of the record date for such dividends declared on or after the Grant Date and prior to the issuance date of the underlying shares; and (ii) the amount of the Dividend Equivalents had been reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock as of the payment date of such dividends. The number of additional RSUs representing Dividend Equivalents shall be determined by (a) multiplying the dollar amount of the cash dividends paid per share of Common Stock by the number of RSUs subject to this Award that remain unvested as of the applicable dividend payment date (including additional RSUs attributable to prior Dividend Equivalents) and (b) dividing such amount by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) of a share of Common Stock on the dividend payment date. Dividend Equivalents so credited shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as the RSUs to which such Dividend Equivalents relate, shall be distributed in shares of Common Stock when, and if, and to the extent that the RSUs to which they related are vested and settled as provided below, but shall be forfeited in the event that the RSUs with respect to which such Dividend Equivalents were credited are forfeited. For the avoidance of doubt, no Dividend Equivalents shall be credited or distributed with respect to any RSUs that have vested and for which the underlying shares have been issued prior to the applicable dividend payment date.

c) Conversion of RSUs; Issuance of Common Stock. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued to Recipient prior to the date on which the RSUs vest in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5. On the date that any RSUs vest pursuant to Section 3, 4 or 5 (or as promptly as administratively practicable thereafter), the Company shall cause to be issued in book-entry form, registered in Recipient’s name or in the name of Recipient’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, the underlying shares in payment of such vested whole RSUs (including additional RSUs credited as Dividend Equivalents), unless such payment is deferred in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Company’s non-qualified compensation deferral plans.

March 2012

2

3. VESTING SCHEDULE; RSUs SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE.

a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Award, the RSUs shall vest in accordance with the following vesting schedule:

1) On the first-year anniversary of the Grant Date, 20% of the RSUs shall vest.

2) On the second-year anniversary of the Grant Date, an additional 20% of the RSUs shall vest.

3) On the third-year anniversary of the Grant Date, an additional 20% of the RSUs shall vest.

4) On the fourth-year anniversary of the Grant Date, the remaining 40% of the RSUs shall vest.

If the application of the foregoing vesting schedule results in a fraction of a RSU being vested, such fractional RSU shall be deemed not to be vested and shall continue to be subject to forfeiture, as described below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, additional RSUs credited to Recipient as Dividend Equivalents shall vest on the same vesting schedule as the RSUs to which such Dividend Equivalents relate. Recipient shall not sell, transfer, assign, hypothecate, pledge, grant a security interest in, or in any other way alienate, any of the RSUs, or any interest or right therein.

b) Except in the event of death, Permanent Disability or Special Retirement or as set forth below, any unvested RSUs automatically shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited without compensation on the date that Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate as an employee, director or consultant terminates, or if Recipient is an employee or director of an Affiliate and such entity ceases to be an Affiliate, whether by Committee action or otherwise, on the date such entity ceases to be an Affiliate.

4. ACCELERATION OF VESTING UPON DEATH OR PERMANENT DISABILITY. If Recipient is an employee, director or consultant of the Company or an Affiliate and ceases to be affiliated with the Company or any Affiliate as a result of Recipient’s death or Permanent Disability, or if Recipient’s death or Permanent Disability occurs following a Special Retirement, all of the RSUs shall become fully vested.

5. CONTINUATION OF VESTING UPON SPECIAL RETIREMENT.

a) If Recipient is an Executive Officer and Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement in accordance with the provisions of subsection (iii) of the definition of the term “Special Retirement” in Section 1 above, or if Recipient is a director of the Company and Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement in accordance with the provisions of subsection (iv) of the definition of the term “Special Retirement” in Section 1 above, any unvested RSUs shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section 3 above.

March 2012

3

b) If, after the first anniversary of the Grant Date, Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or an Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement in accordance with the provisions of subsection (i) or (ii) of the definition of the term “Special Retirement” in Section 1 above, the remaining unvested RSUs shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section 3 above.

c) Notwithstanding the foregoing clauses (a) and (b), all unvested RSUs shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited in the event that Recipient violates the terms of his or her inventions, copyright and confidentiality agreement with the Company or an Affiliate or breaches his or her other contractual or legal obligations to the Company or an Affiliate, including the non-solicitation obligations set forth in Section 13 of this Agreement.

d) If Recipient is eligible for Special Retirement at the time of a Fundamental Transaction or is continuing to vest following Special Retirement under the foregoing clause (a) or (b), any unvested RSUs shall be treated as provided in the Plan, but the resulting consideration shall only be paid on the date the RSUs would have vested if a Fundamental Transaction had not occurred, unless the RSUs are terminated in a manner compliant with Section 409A.

6. TAX MATTERS

a) Tax Withholding. If the Company or an Affiliate is required to withhold any federal, state, local or other taxes upon the vesting or any acceleration of vesting of the RSUs, or any issuance of Common Stock or otherwise under this Agreement, the Company shall withhold a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon settlement of the RSUs at the then current Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) to meet the withholding obligation based on the minimum rates required by law; provided, however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, sell a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock on behalf of Recipient to satisfy such obligations, accept payment to satisfy such obligations in the form of cash or delivery to the Company of shares of Company stock already owned by Recipient, withhold amounts from Recipient’s compensation, or any combination of the foregoing or other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations.

b) Section 409A.

(i) This Award is intended to qualify for the short-term deferral exception to Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) described in the regulations promulgated under Section 409A to the maximum extent possible. To the extent Section 409A is applicable to this Award, this Award is intended to comply with Section 409A and to be interpreted and construed consistent with such intent.

(ii) With respect to any Recipient who is eligible for Special Retirement, this Award is intended to be paid on fixed payment dates under Sections 3 and 5 of this Agreement and such payments may not be accelerated except as set forth in Section 5(b) hereof or otherwise to the extent permitted under Section 409A.

March 2012

4

(iii) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Recipient is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A, as determined under the Company’s established methodology for determining specified employees, on the date of Recipient’s termination of service at a time when this Award pursuant its terms would be settled, then to the extent required in order to comply with Section 409A, shares of Common Stock that would be issued under this Award (or any other amount due hereunder) at such termination of service shall not be issued before the earlier of (x) the date that is six months following the Recipient’s termination of employment and (y) the date of the Recipient’s death.

(iii) For purposes of this Agreement, the terms “terminate,” “terminated” and “termination” mean a termination of the Recipient’s employment that constitutes a “separation from service” within the meaning of the default rules of Section 409A.

7. RIGHTS, RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS. All shares of Common Stock issued to Recipient pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the rights, restrictions and limitations set forth in the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Recipient shall not have the rights of a stockholder until Shares, if any, are issued on or following the applicable vesting date.

8. RESTRICTIONS UNDER SECURITIES LAW. The issuance of RSUs and the shares of Common Stock covered by this Agreement are subject to any restrictions which may be imposed under applicable state and federal securities laws and are subject to obtaining all necessary consents which may be required by, or any condition which may be imposed in accordance with, applicable state and federal securities laws or regulations.

9. EMPLOYMENT AT WILL.

a) If Recipient is an employee or consultant of the Company or an Affiliate, such employment or affiliation is not for any specified term and may be terminated by employee or by the Company or an Affiliate at any time, for any reason, with or without cause and with or without notice. Nothing in this Agreement (including, but not limited to, the vesting of the RSUs pursuant to the schedule set forth in Section 3 herein), the Plan or any covenant of good faith and fair dealing that may be found implicit in this Agreement or the Plan shall: (i) confer upon Recipient any right to continue in the employ of, or affiliation with, the Company or an Affiliate; (ii) constitute any promise or commitment by the Company or an Affiliate regarding the fact or nature of future positions, future work assignments, future compensation or any other term or condition of employment or affiliation; (iii) confer any right or benefit under this Agreement or the Plan unless such right or benefit has specifically accrued under the terms of this Agreement or Plan; or (iv) deprive the Company of the right to terminate Recipient at will and without regard to any future vesting opportunity that Recipient may have.

b) Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the right to continue vesting in the RSUs pursuant to the schedule set forth in Section 3 is earned only by continuing as an employee or consultant at the will of the Company or as a director (not through the act of being hired, being granted RSUs or any other award or benefit) and that the Company has the right to reorganize, sell, spin-out or otherwise restructure one or more of its businesses or Affiliates at any time or from time to time, as it deems appropriate (a “reorganization”). Recipient acknowledges and

March 2012

5

agrees that such a reorganization could result in the termination of Recipient’s relationship as an employee or consultant to the Company or an Affiliate, or the termination of Affiliate status of Recipient’s employer and the loss of benefits available to Recipient under this Agreement, including but not limited to, the termination of the right to continue vesting the RSUs under this Agreement.

10. INCORPORATION OF PLAN. The RSUs granted hereby are granted pursuant to the Plan, all the terms and conditions of which are hereby made a part hereof and are incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions contained herein and those set forth in the Plan, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall prevail.

11. RECOUPMENT OF AWARDS. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a recoupment policy on June 18, 2009 (the “Policy”), that may require members of senior management to return incentive compensation if there is a material restatement of the financial results upon which the compensation was originally based. The Policy also provides for recovery of incentive compensation from any employee involved in fraud or intentional misconduct, whether or not it results in a restatement of the Company’s financial results. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the Policy applies to RSUs and that any payments or issuances of Common Stock with respect to RSUs are subject to recoupment pursuant to the Policy, including any amendments to the Policy and any recoupment obligations imposed by applicable law or regulation. This Agreement shall be deemed to include the restrictions imposed by the Policy.

12. COPIES OF PLAN AND OTHER MATERIALS. Recipient acknowledges that Recipient has received copies of the Plan and the Plan prospectus from the Company and agrees to receive stockholder information, including copies of any annual report, proxy statement and periodic report, electronically from the Company. Recipient acknowledges that copies of the Plan, Plan prospectus, Plan information and stockholder information are also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company. Recipient acknowledges that a copy of the Policy referenced in Section 11 is available on ISSAIC, the Company’s intranet, and is also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company.

13. NON-SOLICITATION.

a) Solicitation of Employees. Recipient agrees that, both while employed by the Company or an Affiliate and for one year afterward, Recipient will not solicit or attempt to solicit any employee of the Company or an Affiliate to leave his or her employment or to violate the terms of any agreement or understanding that employee may have with the Company or an Affiliate. The foregoing obligations apply to both the Recipient’s direct and indirect actions, and apply to actions intended to benefit Recipient or any other person, business or entity.

b) Solicitation of Customers. Recipient agrees that, for one year after termination of employment with the Company or an Affiliate, Recipient will not participate in any solicitation of any customer or prospective customer of the Company or an Affiliate concerning any business that:

(i) involves the same programs or projects for that customer in which Recipient was personally and substantially involved during the 12 months prior to termination of employment; or

March 2012

6

(ii) has been, at any time during the 12 months prior to termination of employment, the subject of any bid, offer or proposal activity by the Company or an Affiliate in respect of that customer or prospective customer, or any negotiations or discussions about the possible performance of services by the Company or an Affiliate to that customer or potential customer, in which Recipient was personally and substantially involved.

In the case of a governmental, regulatory or administrative agency, commission, department or other governmental authority, the customer or prospective customer will be determined by reference to the specific program offices or activities for which the Company or an Affiliate provides (or may reasonably provide) goods or services.

c) Remedies. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that a breach of any of the promises or agreements contained in this Section 13 will result in immediate, irreparable and continuing damage to the Company for which there is no adequate remedy at law, and the Company or an Affiliate will be entitled to injunctive relief, a decree for specific performance, and other relief as may be proper, including money damages.

14. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter, provided, however, that if Recipient and the Company are parties to an existing written agreement addressing the subject matter of Section 13, such agreement shall control with respect to such subject matter until the termination thereof, at which time Section 13 shall control. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective parties, the successors and assigns of the Company, and the heirs, legatees and personal representatives of Recipient. The parties hereby agree that should any portion of this Agreement be judicially held to be invalid, unenforceable, or void, such portion shall be construed by limiting and reducing it, so as to be enforceable to the maximum extent compatible with the applicable law as is then in effect.

15. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to such state’s principles of conflict of laws.

16. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION. The parties agree that any book entry representing the RSUs granted hereunder may contain a legend, or notation as the case may be, indicating that such RSUs are subject to the restrictions of this Agreement.

17. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Recipient acknowledges that the RSUs constitute full and adequate consideration for Recipient’s obligations under this Agreement, the acceptance of the RSUs constitutes an unequivocal acceptance of this Agreement and any attempted modification or deletion will have no force or effect on the Company’s right to enforce the terms and conditions stated herein.

By accepting the RSUs, you agree to all of the terms and conditions set forth above and in the Plan.

March 2012

7

EX-10.7

Exhibit 10.7

SAIC, INC.

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT

(Non-Employee Directors)

BY ACCEPTING THIS AWARD, YOU VOLUNTARILY AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT AND IN THE PLAN.

SAIC, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to the participant named in the Grant Summary (as defined below) (“Recipient”), who is affiliated with the Company or an Affiliate as a non-employee director, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) representing the right to receive one share of its Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”) for each RSU. Certain specific details of this award, including the number of RSUs and the Grant Date, may be found in the Grant Summary and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. The terms and conditions of the grant of RSUs (this “Award”) are set forth in this Agreement and in the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).

1. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings as defined below. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Plan.

“Affiliate” shall mean a “parent” or “subsidiary” (as each is defined in Section 424 of the Code) of the Company and any other entity that the Board or Committee designates as an “Affiliate” for purposes of this Plan.

“Committee” shall have the meaning as defined in the Plan.

“Grant Date” shall mean the date of the award of the RSUs as set forth in the Grant Summary.

“Grant Summary” shall mean the summary of this award as reflected in the electronic stock plan award administration system maintained by the Company or its designee that contains a link to this Agreement (which summary information is set forth in the appropriate records of the Company authorizing such award).

“Permanent Disability” shall mean the status of disability determined conclusively by the Committee based upon certification of disability by the Social Security Administration or, to the extent compliant with Section 409A, upon such other proof as the Committee may require, effective upon receipt of such certification or other proof by the Committee.

“Special Retirement” shall mean retirement by a Recipient who is a director of the Company, either (A) after reaching the applicable mandatory retirement age at retirement or (B) at the end of a term of office if Recipient is not nominated for a successive term of office on account of the fact that Recipient would have reached the applicable mandatory retirement age during such successive term of office, regardless of years of service with the Company.

March 2012

2. RIGHTS OF THE RECIPIENT WITH RESPECT TO THE RSUs.

a) No Stockholder Rights. The RSUs granted pursuant to this Award do not and shall not entitle Recipient to any rights of a stockholder. The rights of Recipient with respect to the RSUs shall remain forfeitable at all times prior to the date on which such rights become vested, and the restrictions with respect to the RSUs lapse, in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5.

b) Additional RSUs as Dividend Equivalents. If the Company pays any cash dividends on its Common Stock, the Company shall credit to Recipient, on each dividend payment date, a number of additional RSUs (“Dividend Equivalents”) equal in value to the cash dividends that would have been paid on the shares of Common Stock underlying the unvested RSUs covered by this Agreement assuming that: (i) such underlying shares had been outstanding as of the record date for such dividends declared on or after the Grant Date and prior to the issuance date of the underlying shares; and (ii) the amount of the Dividend Equivalents had been reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock as of the payment date of such dividends. The number of additional RSUs representing Dividend Equivalents shall be determined by (a) multiplying the dollar amount of the cash dividends paid per share of Common Stock by the number of RSUs subject to this Award that remain unvested as of the applicable dividend payment date (including additional RSUs attributable to prior Dividend Equivalents) and (b) dividing such amount by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) of a share of Common Stock on the dividend payment date. Dividend Equivalents so credited shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as the RSUs to which such Dividend Equivalents relate, shall be distributed in shares of Common Stock when, and if, and to the extent that the RSUs to which they related are vested and settled as provided below, but shall be forfeited in the event that the RSUs with respect to which such Dividend Equivalents were credited are forfeited. For the avoidance of doubt, no Dividend Equivalents shall be credited or distributed with respect to any RSUs that have vested and for which the underlying shares have been issued prior to the applicable dividend payment date.

c) Conversion of RSUs; Issuance of Common Stock. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued to Recipient prior to the date on which the RSUs vest in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5. On the date that any RSUs vest pursuant to Section 3, 4 or 5 (or as promptly as administratively practicable thereafter), the Company shall cause to be issued in book-entry form, registered in Recipient’s name or in the name of Recipient’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, the underlying shares in payment of such vested whole RSUs (including additional RSUs credited as Dividend Equivalents), unless such payment is deferred in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Company’s non-qualified compensation deferral plans.

3. VESTING SCHEDULE; RSUs SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE.

a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Award, 100% the RSUs, including any additional RSUs credited to Recipient as Dividend Equivalents, shall vest on the later of (i) the first-year anniversary of the Grant Date, or (ii) the date the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company following the Grant Date is concluded.

March 2012

2

Recipient shall not sell, transfer, assign, hypothecate, pledge, grant a security interest in, or in any other way alienate, any of the RSUs, or any interest or right therein.

b) Except in the event of death, Permanent Disability or Special Retirement or as set forth below, any unvested RSUs automatically shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited without compensation on the date that Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate as a director terminates, or if Recipient is a director of an Affiliate and such entity ceases to be an Affiliate, whether by Committee action or otherwise, on the date such entity ceases to be an Affiliate.

4. ACCELERATION OF VESTING UPON DEATH OR PERMANENT DISABILITY. If Recipient ceases to be affiliated with the Company or any Affiliate as a result of Recipient’s death or Permanent Disability, or if Recipient’s death or Permanent Disability occurs following a Special Retirement, all of the RSUs shall become fully vested.

5. CONTINUATION OF VESTING UPON SPECIAL RETIREMENT.

a) If Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement, any unvested RSUs shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section 3 above.

b) Notwithstanding the foregoing clauses (a) and (b), all unvested RSUs shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited in the event that Recipient breaches his or her contractual or legal obligations to the Company or an Affiliate.

6. TAX MATTERS

a) Tax Withholding. If the Company or an Affiliate is required to withhold any federal, state, local or other taxes upon the vesting or any acceleration of vesting of the RSUs, or any issuance of Common Stock or otherwise under this Agreement, the Company shall withhold a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon settlement of the RSUs at the then current Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) to meet the withholding obligation based on the minimum rates required by law; provided, however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, sell a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock on behalf of Recipient to satisfy such obligations, accept payment to satisfy such obligations in the form of cash or delivery to the Company of shares of Company stock already owned by Recipient, withhold amounts from Recipient’s compensation, or any combination of the foregoing or other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations.

b) Section 409A.

(i) This Award is intended to qualify for the short-term deferral exception to Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) described in the regulations promulgated under Section 409A to the maximum extent possible. To the extent Section 409A is applicable to this Award, this Award is intended to comply with Section 409A and to be interpreted and construed consistent with such intent.

March 2012

3

(ii) With respect to any Recipient who is eligible for Special Retirement, this Award is intended to be paid on fixed payment dates under Sections 3 and 5 of this Agreement and such payments may not be accelerated except to the extent permitted under Section 409A.

7. RIGHTS, RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS. All shares of Common Stock issued to Recipient pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the rights, restrictions and limitations set forth in the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Recipient shall not have the rights of a stockholder until Shares, if any, are issued on or following the applicable vesting date.

8. RESTRICTIONS UNDER SECURITIES LAW. The issuance of RSUs and the shares of Common Stock covered by this Agreement are subject to any restrictions which may be imposed under applicable state and federal securities laws and are subject to obtaining all necessary consents which may be required by, or any condition which may be imposed in accordance with, applicable state and federal securities laws or regulations.

9. NO CONTINUED RIGHTS.

a) Nothing in this Agreement (including, but not limited to, the vesting of the RSUs pursuant to the schedule set forth in Section 3 herein), the Plan or any covenant of good faith and fair dealing that may be found implicit in this Agreement or the Plan shall: (i) confer upon Recipient any right to continue in affiliation with the Company or an Affiliate; (ii) constitute any promise or commitment by the Company or an Affiliate regarding the fact or nature of future positions, future work assignments, future compensation or any other term or condition of employment or affiliation; or (iii) confer any right or benefit under this Agreement or the Plan unless such right or benefit has specifically accrued under the terms of this Agreement or Plan.

b) Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the right to continue vesting in the RSUs pursuant to the schedule set forth in Section 3 is earned only by continuing as a director of the Company (not through being granted RSUs or any other award or benefit) and that the Company has the right to reorganize, sell, spin-out or otherwise restructure one or more of its businesses or Affiliates at any time or from time to time, as it deems appropriate (a “reorganization”). Recipient acknowledges and agrees that such a reorganization could result in the termination of Recipient’s relationship as a director of the Company or an Affiliate and the loss of benefits available to Recipient under this Agreement, including but not limited to, the termination of the right to continue vesting the RSUs under this Agreement.

10. INCORPORATION OF PLAN. The RSUs granted hereby are granted pursuant to the Plan, all the terms and conditions of which are hereby made a part hereof and are incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions contained herein and those set forth in the Plan, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall prevail.

11. COPIES OF PLAN MATERIALS. Recipient acknowledges that Recipient has received copies of the Plan and the Plan prospectus from the Company and agrees to receive stockholder information, including copies of any annual report, proxy statement and periodic report, electronically from the Company. Recipient acknowledges that copies of the Plan, Plan prospectus, Plan information and stockholder information are also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company.

March 2012

4

12. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective parties, the successors and assigns of the Company, and the heirs, legatees and personal representatives of Recipient.

13. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to such state’s principles of conflict of laws.

14. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION. The parties agree that any book entry representing the RSUs granted hereunder may contain a legend, or notation as the case may be, indicating that such RSUs are subject to the restrictions of this Agreement.

15. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Recipient acknowledges that the acceptance of the RSUs constitutes an unequivocal acceptance of this Agreement and any attempted modification or deletion will have no force or effect on the Company’s right to enforce the terms and conditions stated herein.

By accepting the RSUs, you agree to all of the terms and conditions set forth above and in the Plan.

March 2012

5

EX-10.8

Exhibit 10.8

SAIC, INC.

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT

(Management)

BY ACCEPTING THIS AWARD, YOU VOLUNTARILY AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT AND IN THE PLAN.

SAIC, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to the participant named in the Grant Summary (as defined below) (“Recipient”), who is affiliated with the Company or an Affiliate as an employee, director or consultant, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) representing the right to receive one share of its Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”) for each RSU. Certain specific details of this award, including the number of RSUs and the Grant Date, may be found in the Grant Summary and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. The RSUs shall be forfeited if certain performance conditions set forth below are not met. The terms and conditions of the grant of RSUs (this “Award”) are set forth in this Agreement and in the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).

1. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings as defined below. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Plan.

“Affiliate” shall mean a “parent” or “subsidiary” (as each is defined in Section 424 of the Code) of the Company and any other entity that the Board or Committee designates as an “Affiliate” for purposes of this Plan.

“Award Letter” shall mean the award notice delivered to Recipient concurrently with this Agreement and which is hereby made a part hereof and incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

“Committee” shall have the meaning as defined in the Plan.

“Determination Date” means the date on which the Committee certifies whether and to what extent the Performance Goals have been achieved.

“Executive Officer” shall mean an officer of the Company designated as such for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Grant Date” shall mean the date of the award of the RSUs as set forth in the Grant Summary.

“Grant Summary” shall mean the summary of this award as reflected in the electronic stock plan award administration system maintained by the Company or its designee that contains a link to this Agreement (which summary information is set forth in the appropriate records of the Company authorizing such award).

March 2012

“Performance Goals” means the goals set forth in the Award Letter that will determine whether, and to what extent, the RSUs shall be earned.

“Permanent Disability” shall mean the status of disability determined conclusively by the Committee based upon certification of disability by the Social Security Administration or, to the extent compliant with Section 409A, upon such other proof as the Committee may require, effective upon receipt of such certification or other proof by the Committee.

“Special Retirement” shall mean: (i) retirement by the Recipient after reaching age 59 ¹/2 with at least ten (10) years of service with the Company or an Affiliate; or (ii) retirement by the Recipient after reaching age 59 ¹/2 and Recipient’s age plus years of service with the Company or an Affiliate equals at least 70; or (iii) if Recipient is an Executive Officer at the time of retirement, retirement after reaching the applicable mandatory retirement age, regardless of years of service with the Company or (iv) if the Recipient is a director of the Company, retirement either (A) after reaching the applicable mandatory retirement age at retirement or (B) at the end of a term of office if Recipient is not nominated for a successive term of office on account of the fact that Recipient would have reached the applicable mandatory retirement age during such successive term of office, regardless of years of service with the Company. For Special Retirement purposes, years of service shall mean the period of service determined conclusively by the Committee.

2. RIGHTS OF THE RECIPIENT WITH RESPECT TO THE RSUs.

a) No Stockholder Rights. The RSUs granted pursuant to this Award do not and shall not entitle Recipient to any rights of a stockholder. The rights of Recipient with respect to the RSUs shall remain forfeitable at all times prior to the date on which such rights become vested, and the restrictions with respect to the RSUs lapse, in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5.

b) Additional RSUs as Dividend Equivalents. If the Company pays any cash dividends on its Common Stock, the Company shall credit to Recipient, on each dividend payment date, a number of additional RSUs (“Dividend Equivalents”) equal in value to the cash dividends that would have been paid on the shares of Common Stock underlying the unvested RSUs covered by this Agreement assuming that: (i) such underlying shares had been outstanding as of the record date for such dividends declared on or after the Grant Date and prior to the issuance date of the underlying shares; and (ii) the amount of the Dividend Equivalents had been reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock as of the payment date of such dividends. The number of additional RSUs representing Dividend Equivalents shall be determined by (a) multiplying the dollar amount of the cash dividends paid per share of Common Stock by the number of RSUs subject to this Award that remain unvested as of the applicable dividend payment date (including additional RSUs attributable to prior Dividend Equivalents) and (b) dividing such amount by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) of a share of Common Stock on the dividend payment date. Dividend Equivalents so credited shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as the RSUs to which such Dividend Equivalents relate, shall be distributed in shares of Common Stock when, and if, and to the extent that the RSUs to which they related are vested and settled as provided below, but shall be forfeited in the event that the

March 2012

2

RSUs with respect to which such Dividend Equivalents were credited are forfeited (including RSUs that are forfeited due to failure to meet the Performance Goals). For the avoidance of doubt, no Dividend Equivalents shall be credited or distributed with respect to any RSUs that have vested and for which the underlying shares have been issued prior to the applicable dividend payment date.

c) Conversion of RSUs; Issuance of Common Stock. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued to Recipient prior to the date on which the RSUs vest in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5. On the date that any RSUs vest pursuant to Section 3, 4 or 5 (or as promptly as administratively practicable thereafter), the Company shall cause to be issued in book-entry form, registered in Recipient’s name or in the name of Recipient’s legal representatives, beneficiaries or heirs, as the case may be, the underlying shares in payment of such vested whole RSUs (including additional RSUs credited as Dividend Equivalents), unless such payment is deferred in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Company’s non-qualified compensation deferral plans.

3. VESTING SCHEDULE; RSUs SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE.

a) If the Performance Goals are met, 100% of the RSUs shall be earned and eligible for vesting in accordance with clause (b) below. If the Performance Goals are not met, the RSUs shall be forfeited as of the Determination Date, and no RSUs hereunder shall become vested.

b) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Award, to the extent the RSUs are earned under clause (a) above, the RSUs shall vest in accordance with the following vesting schedule:

1) On the later of the Determination Date or first-year anniversary of the Grant Date, 20% of the RSUs shall vest.

2) On the second-year anniversary of the Grant Date, an additional 20% of the RSUs shall vest.

3) On the third-year anniversary of the Grant Date, an additional 20% of the RSUs shall vest.

4) On the fourth-year anniversary of the Grant Date, the remaining 40% of the RSUs shall vest.

If the application of the foregoing vesting schedule results in a fraction of a RSU being vested, such fractional RSU shall be deemed not to be vested and shall continue to be subject to forfeiture, as described below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, additional RSUs credited to Recipient as Dividend Equivalents shall vest on the same vesting schedule as the RSUs to which such Dividend Equivalents relate. Recipient shall not sell, transfer, assign, hypothecate, pledge, grant a security interest in, or in any other way alienate, any of the RSUs, or any interest or right therein.

c) Except in the event of death, Permanent Disability or Special Retirement or as set forth below, any unvested RSUs automatically shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited

March 2012

3

without compensation on the date that Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate as an employee, director or consultant terminates, or if Recipient is an employee or director of an Affiliate and such entity ceases to be an Affiliate, whether by Committee action or otherwise, on the date such entity ceases to be an Affiliate.

4. ACCELERATION OF VESTING UPON DEATH OR PERMANENT DISABILITY. If Recipient is an employee, director or consultant of the Company or an Affiliate and ceases to be affiliated with the Company or any Affiliate as a result of Recipient’s death or Permanent Disability, or if Recipient’s death or Permanent Disability occurs following a Special Retirement, all of the RSUs shall become fully vested whether or not earned under Section 3(a).

5. CONTINUATION OF VESTING UPON SPECIAL RETIREMENT.

a) If Recipient is an Executive Officer and Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement in accordance with the provisions of subsection (iii) of the definition of the term “Special Retirement” in Section 1 above, or if Recipient is a director of the Company and Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or any Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement in accordance with the provisions of subsection (iv) of the definition of the term “Special Retirement” in Section 1 above, any unvested RSUs shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section 3 above to the extent the RSUs are earned under Section 3(a).

b) If, after the first anniversary of the Grant Date, Recipient’s affiliation with the Company or an Affiliate terminates as a result of Recipient’s Special Retirement in accordance with the provisions of subsection (i) or (ii) of the definition of the term “Special Retirement” in Section 1 above, the remaining unvested RSUs shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section 3 above, to the extent the RSUs are earned under Section 3(a). With respect to the first vesting event under Section 3(b)(1), shares shall be issued, if earned under Section 3(a), no later than ninety (90) days following the first anniversary of the Grant Date.

c) Notwithstanding the foregoing clauses (a) and (b), all unvested RSUs shall be immediately and irrevocably forfeited in the event that Recipient violates the terms of his or her inventions, copyright and confidentiality agreement with the Company or an Affiliate or breaches his or her other contractual or legal obligations to the Company or an Affiliate, including the non-solicitation obligations set forth in Section 13 of this Agreement.

d) If Recipient is eligible for Special Retirement at the time of a Fundamental Transaction or is continuing to vest following Special Retirement under the foregoing clause (a) or (b), any unvested RSUs shall be treated as provided in the Plan, but the resulting consideration shall only be paid on the date the RSUs would have vested if a Fundamental Transaction had not occurred, unless the RSUs are terminated in a manner compliant with Section 409A.

6. TAX MATTERS

a) Tax Withholding. If the Company or an Affiliate is required to withhold any federal, state, local or other taxes upon the vesting or any acceleration of vesting of the RSUs, or

March 2012

4

any issuance of Common Stock or otherwise under this Agreement, the Company shall withhold a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon settlement of the RSUs at the then current Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) to meet the withholding obligation based on the minimum rates required by law; provided, however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, sell a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock on behalf of Recipient to satisfy such obligations, accept payment to satisfy such obligations in the form of cash or delivery to the Company of shares of Company stock already owned by Recipient, withhold amounts from Recipient’s compensation, or any combination of the foregoing or other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations.

b) Section 409A.

(i) This Award is intended to qualify for the short-term deferral exception to Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) described in the regulations promulgated under Section 409A to the maximum extent possible. To the extent Section 409A is applicable to this Award, this Award is intended to comply with Section 409A and to be interpreted and construed consistent with such intent.

(ii) With respect to any Recipient who is eligible for Special Retirement, this Award is intended to be paid on fixed payment dates under Sections 3 and 5 of this Agreement and such payments may not be accelerated except as set forth in Section 5(b) hereof or otherwise to the extent permitted under Section 409A.

(iii) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Recipient is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A, as determined under the Company’s established methodology for determining specified employees, on the date of Recipient’s termination of service at a time when this Award pursuant its terms would be settled, then to the extent required in order to comply with Section 409A, shares of Common Stock that would be issued under this Award (or any other amount due hereunder) at such termination of service shall not be issued before the earlier of (x) the date that is six months following the Recipient’s termination of employment and (y) the date of the Recipient’s death.

(iv) For purposes of this Agreement, the terms “terminate,” “terminated” and “termination” mean a termination of the Recipient’s employment that constitutes a “separation from service” within the meaning of the default rules of Section 409A.

7. RIGHTS, RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS. All shares of Common Stock issued to Recipient pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the rights, restrictions and limitations set forth in the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Recipient shall not have the rights of a stockholder until Shares, if any, are issued on or following the applicable vesting date.

8. RESTRICTIONS UNDER SECURITIES LAW. The issuance of RSUs and the shares of Common Stock covered by this Agreement are subject to any restrictions which may be imposed under applicable state and federal securities laws and are subject to obtaining all necessary consents which may be required by, or any condition which may be imposed in accordance with, applicable state and federal securities laws or regulations.

March 2012

5

9. EMPLOYMENT AT WILL.

a) If Recipient is an employee or consultant of the Company or an Affiliate, such employment or affiliation is not for any specified term and may be terminated by employee or by the Company or an Affiliate at any time, for any reason, with or without cause and with or without notice. Nothing in this Agreement (including, but not limited to, the vesting of the RSUs pursuant to the schedule set forth in Section 3 herein), the Plan or any covenant of good faith and fair dealing that may be found implicit in this Agreement or the Plan shall: (i) confer upon Recipient any right to continue in the employ of, or affiliation with, the Company or an Affiliate; (ii) constitute any promise or commitment by the Company or an Affiliate regarding the fact or nature of future positions, future work assignments, future compensation or any other term or condition of employment or affiliation; (iii) confer any right or benefit under this Agreement or the Plan unless such right or benefit has specifically accrued under the terms of this Agreement or Plan; or (iv) deprive the Company of the right to terminate Recipient at will and without regard to any future vesting opportunity that Recipient may have.

b) Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the right to continue vesting in the RSUs pursuant to the schedule set forth in Section 3 is earned only by continuing as an employee or consultant at the will of the Company or as a director (not through the act of being hired, being granted RSUs or any other award or benefit) and that the Company has the right to reorganize, sell, spin-out or otherwise restructure one or more of its businesses or Affiliates at any time or from time to time, as it deems appropriate (a “reorganization”). Recipient acknowledges and agrees that such a reorganization could result in the termination of Recipient’s relationship as an employee or consultant to the Company or an Affiliate, or the termination of Affiliate status of Recipient’s employer and the loss of benefits available to Recipient under this Agreement, including but not limited to, the termination of the right to continue vesting the RSUs under this Agreement.

10. INCORPORATION OF PLAN. The RSUs granted hereby are granted pursuant to the Plan, all the terms and conditions of which are hereby made a part hereof and are incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions contained herein and those set forth in the Plan, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall prevail.

11. RECOUPMENT OF AWARDS. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a recoupment policy on June 18, 2009 (the “Policy”), that may require members of senior management to return incentive compensation if there is a material restatement of the financial results upon which the compensation was originally based. The Policy also provides for recovery of incentive compensation from any employee involved in fraud or intentional misconduct, whether or not it results in a restatement of the Company’s financial results. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the Policy applies to RSUs and that any payments or issuances of Common Stock with respect to RSUs are subject to recoupment pursuant to the Policy, including any amendments to the Policy and any recoupment obligations imposed by applicable law or regulation. This Agreement shall be deemed to include the restrictions imposed by the Policy.

12. COPIES OF PLAN AND OTHER MATERIALS. Recipient acknowledges that Recipient has received copies of the Plan and the Plan prospectus from the Company and agrees

March 2012

6

to receive stockholder information, including copies of any annual report, proxy statement and periodic report, electronically from the Company. Recipient acknowledges that copies of the Plan, Plan prospectus, Plan information and stockholder information are also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company. Recipient acknowledges that a copy of the Policy referenced in Section 11 is available on ISSAIC, the Company’s intranet, and is also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company.

13. NON-SOLICITATION.

a) Solicitation of Employees. Recipient agrees that, both while employed by the Company or an Affiliate and for one year afterward, Recipient will not solicit or attempt to solicit any employee of the Company or an Affiliate to leave his or her employment or to violate the terms of any agreement or understanding that employee may have with the Company or an Affiliate. The foregoing obligations apply to both the Recipient’s direct and indirect actions, and apply to actions intended to benefit Recipient or any other person, business or entity.

b) Solicitation of Customers. Recipient agrees that, for one year after termination of employment with the Company or an Affiliate, Recipient will not participate in any solicitation of any customer or prospective customer of the Company or an Affiliate concerning any business that:

(i) involves the same programs or projects for that customer in which Recipient was personally and substantially involved during the 12 months prior to termination of employment; or

(ii) has been, at any time during the 12 months prior to termination of employment, the subject of any bid, offer or proposal activity by the Company or an Affiliate in respect of that customer or prospective customer, or any negotiations or discussions about the possible performance of services by the Company or an Affiliate to that customer or potential customer, in which Recipient was personally and substantially involved.

In the case of a governmental, regulatory or administrative agency, commission, department or other governmental authority, the customer or prospective customer will be determined by reference to the specific program offices or activities for which the Company or an Affiliate provides (or may reasonably provide) goods or services.

c) Remedies. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that a breach of any of the promises or agreements contained in this Section 13 will result in immediate, irreparable and continuing damage to the Company for which there is no adequate remedy at law, and the Company or an Affiliate will be entitled to injunctive relief, a decree for specific performance, and other relief as may be proper, including money damages.

14. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter, provided, however, that if Recipient and the Company are parties to an existing written agreement addressing the subject matter of Section 13, such agreement shall control with respect to such subject matter until the termination thereof, at which time Section 13 shall control. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective parties, the successors and assigns of the Company, and the heirs, legatees and personal representatives of Recipient. The parties hereby agree that should any portion of this

March 2012

7

Agreement be judicially held to be invalid, unenforceable, or void, such portion shall be construed by limiting and reducing it, so as to be enforceable to the maximum extent compatible with the applicable law as is then in effect.

15. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to such state’s principles of conflict of laws.

16. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION. The parties agree that any book entry representing the RSUs granted hereunder may contain a legend, or notation as the case may be, indicating that such RSUs are subject to the restrictions of this Agreement.

17. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Recipient acknowledges that the RSUs constitute full and adequate consideration for Recipient’s obligations under this Agreement, the acceptance of the RSUs constitutes an unequivocal acceptance of this Agreement and any attempted modification or deletion will have no force or effect on the Company’s right to enforce the terms and conditions stated herein.

By accepting the RSUs, you agree to all of the terms and conditions set forth above and in the Plan.

March 2012

8

EX-10.9

Exhibit 10.9

SAIC, INC.

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT

BY ACCEPTING THE AWARD DESCRIBED IN THIS AGREEMENT, YOU VOLUNTARILY AGREE TO ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE AWARD GRANT NOTICE AND IN THE PLAN.

This Performance Share Award Agreement (this “Agreement”), effective as of the Grant Date (as defined below), is between SAIC, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Recipient (as defined below).

This Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions applicable to the award granted to Recipient pursuant to the Award Grant Notice (as defined below) representing a right to receive a number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Shares”) based on the extent, if any, to which the applicable Performance Goals (as defined below) have been achieved for the Performance Period (as defined below) (the “Performance Share Award”).

1. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings as defined below. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the “Plan”).

“Award Goal Notices” means the notices delivered to Recipient setting forth the Performance Goals for each fiscal year during the Performance Period, which are hereby made a part hereof and incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

“Award Grant Notice” means the notice delivered to Recipient concurrently with this Agreement and which is hereby made a part hereof and incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

“Determination Date” means the date following the end of the Performance Period (and within two and one-half months following the end of the Performance Period) on which the Committee makes a final determination of whether and to what extent the Performance Goals set forth in the Award Goal Notices have been achieved for the entire Performance Period, as described in Section 3 hereof.

“Executive Officer” means an officer of the Company designated as such for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Grant Date” means the effective date of the grant of the Performance Share Award as set forth in the Award Grant Notice.

“Ineligible Position” means a position of employment with the Company or an Affiliate that is not eligible to receive Performance Share Awards as determined by the Committee.

“Performance Goals” means the goals approved by the Committee for each fiscal year during the Performance Period, to be set forth in the Award Goal Notices, which shall be used to determine whether, and to what extent, the Performance Share Award shall be earned and therefore Shares shall be issued to Recipient after the Determination Date pursuant to this Agreement.

“Performance Period” means the period of three fiscal years from fiscal year 20     through fiscal year 20    , inclusive, based on the Company’s audited annual financial statements. The Performance Goals shall be set and measured for each fiscal year during the Performance Period.

“Permanent Disability” means the status of disability determined conclusively by the Committee based upon certification of disability by the Social Security Administration or upon such other proof as the Committee may require, effective upon receipt of such certification or other proof by the Committee.

“Recipient” means the person granted a Performance Share Award as named in the Award Grant Notice who is affiliated with the Company or an Affiliate as an employee.

“Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code together with the regulations promulgated thereunder.

“Target Shares” means the target number of Shares as set forth in the Award Grant Notice.

“Special Retirement” means: (i) retirement by the Recipient after reaching age 59 ¹/2 with at least ten (10) years of service with the Company or an Affiliate; (ii) retirement by the Recipient after reaching age 59 ¹/2 and Recipient’s age plus years of service with the Company or an Affiliate equals at least 70; or (iii) if the Recipient is an Executive Officer at the time of retirement, retirement after reaching age 65 by the Recipient, regardless of years of service with the Company. For Special Retirement purposes, years of service shall mean the period of service determined conclusively by the Committee.

2. PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD SUBJECT TO TERMINATION. Except in the event of death, Permanent Disability or Special Retirement as set forth below, the Performance Share Award shall be terminated automatically without compensation and no Shares shall be issued to Recipient pursuant to this Agreement if, prior to the end of the Performance Period, Recipient’s employment with the Company or any Affiliate terminates, or if Recipient is an employee of an Affiliate and such entity ceases to be an Affiliate, whether by Committee action or otherwise, on the date such entity ceases to be an Affiliate.

2

3. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS.

a) Performance Goals. Following the end of the Performance Period, the Committee shall determine whether and the extent to which each of the Performance Goals have been achieved for the entire Performance Period and shall determine the number of Shares, if any, issuable to Recipient with respect to the level of achievement of each individual Performance Goal; provided that with respect to any Performance Share Award to a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall have certified the achievement of the Performance Goals. The aggregate number of Shares potentially issuable to Recipient with respect to all Performance Goals shall be between 0% and 150% of the number of Target Shares. If applicable, the Committee’s determinations with respect to the achievement of Performance Goals shall be based on the Company’s financial results reported in its annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC, subject to any adjustments made by the Committee in accordance with Section 3 (c) below.

b) Committee Discretion to Reduce Performance Share Award. Notwithstanding satisfaction, achievement or completion of the Performance Goals set forth in the Award Goal Notices (or any adjustments thereto as provided below), the number of Shares issuable hereunder may be reduced by the Committee on the basis of such further considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion shall determine.

c) Adjustment of Performance Goals. To the extent it is intended that this Performance Share Award comply with the performance-based exception to Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee shall make no adjustment to the Performance Goals set forth in the Award Goal Notices with respect to a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, including the performance targets or the method of calculating the actual performance achieved relative to the Performance Goals, except to exclude the impact of (i) changes in accounting standards or adoption of any new accounting standards in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, (ii) changes in federal statutory corporate tax rates, and (iii) extraordinary or unusual gains or losses, events or circumstances over which the Company has no or limited control, including the occurrence of any disaster, act of God or any other force majeure event.

d) Section 162(m). To the extent the Committee has determined that this Performance Share Award is intended to comply with the performance-based exception to Section 162(m) of the Code and the Recipient is a

3

“covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, all actions taken hereunder (including without limitation any adjustments of Performance Goals or determination of whether a Fundamental Transaction has occurred) shall be made in a manner which would comply with Section 162(m) of the Code.

4. ISSUANCE OF SHARES.

a) Shares. Shares shall be issued, if and to the extent earned based on the achievement of the Performance Goals as determined by the Committee, on (or as promptly as administratively practicable following) the Determination Date, and in no event later than ninety (90) days following the end of the Performance Period.

b) Additional Shares as Dividend Equivalents. If the Company pays any cash dividends on its common stock, Recipient will be entitled to receive a number of additional Shares (“Dividend Equivalents”) equal in value to the cash dividends that would have been paid on Shares earned and issued under this Agreement assuming that: (i) such Shares had been outstanding as of the record date for such dividends declared on or after the Grant Date and prior to the issuance date of the Shares; and (ii) the amount of the Dividend Equivalents had been reinvested in additional shares of common stock as of the payment date of such dividends. The number of additional Shares representing Dividend Equivalents shall be determined by (a) multiplying the dollar amount of the cash dividends paid per share of common stock by the number of Shares earned and issued under this Performance Share Award (including additional Shares attributable to prior Dividend Equivalents) and (b) dividing such amount by the Fair Market Value of a share of common stock on the applicable dividend payment date. Shares representing Dividend Equivalents will be subject to the same performance conditions and terms as the Shares originally subject to this Performance Share Award and will be distributed in shares of common stock when, and if, and to the extent that the Shares are issued. The right to receive Dividend Equivalents will cease and be forfeited upon the forfeiture and cancellation of this Performance Share Award.

c) Taxes, Deferrals and Other Matters. As a condition to the issuance of Shares hereunder, Recipient must have satisfied his or her tax withholding obligations as specified in this Agreement and must have completed, signed and returned any documents and taken any additional action that the Company deems appropriate to enable it to accomplish the delivery of the Shares. In no event will the Company be obligated to issue a fractional share. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Company shall not be obligated to deliver any Shares during any period when the Company determines that the issuance or the delivery of Shares hereunder would violate any federal, state or other applicable laws and/or may issue Shares

4

subject to any restrictive legends that, as determined by the Company, is necessary to comply with securities or other regulatory requirements, and (ii) the date on which Shares are issued may include a delay (but not later than the next December 31^st after the end of the Performance Period) in order to provide the Company such time as it determines appropriate to address tax withholding and other administrative matters. If eligible, Recipient shall be given the opportunity to elect to defer receipt of the Shares. Such deferral election shall be in accordance with the terms of the applicable non-qualified deferral plan of the Company or an Affiliate and the requirements of Section 409A and subject to such additional terms and conditions as are set by the Committee.

5. PARTIAL PAYMENT ON CERTAIN EVENTS.

a) Disability, Special Retirement or Transfer to an Ineligible Position.

(i) If Recipient ceases to be employed by the Company or an Affiliate as a result of Recipient’s Permanent Disability or Special Retirement and is not in an Ineligible Position at the time of such event, Recipient shall remain eligible to receive, on (or as promptly as administratively practicable following) the Determination Date, a prorated portion of the Shares that would otherwise be issuable to Recipient under the Performance Share Award in the absence of such employment termination based on the actual achievement of the Performance Goals for each fiscal year during the Performance Period in which Recipient remains so employed; provided that the prorated amount for the year in which such termination of employment occurs shall be determined based on the ratio of (x) the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the fiscal year to the employment termination date over (y) the number of days in the fiscal year (and not reflecting any shortening of the Performance Period as a result of a Fundamental Transaction as described below).

(ii) If Recipient is transferred to an Ineligible Position and either (i) remains employed by the Company or an Affiliate through the end of the Performance Period or, if applicable, through the time of consummation of a Fundamental Transaction as set forth in Section 5(c) below, or (ii) ceases to be employed by the Company or an Affiliate at any time prior to the end of the Performance Period as a result of Recipient’s Permanent Disability or Special Retirement, Recipient shall remain eligible to receive, on (or as promptly as administratively practicable following) the Determination Date, a prorated portion of the Shares that would otherwise be issuable to Recipient under the Performance Share Award in the absence of such transfer to an Ineligible Position based on the actual achievement of the Performance Goals for each

5

fiscal year during the Performance Period in which Recipient remained employed by the Company and not in an Ineligible Position; provided that the prorated amount for the year in which Recipient transfers to an Ineligible Position shall be determined based on the ratio of (x) the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the fiscal year to the date of transfer to an Ineligible Position over (y) the number of days in the fiscal year (and not reflecting any shortening of the Performance Period as a result of a Fundamental Transaction as described below).

(iii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, Recipient shall not be entitled to any Shares under the Performance Share Award if Recipient: (i) fails to execute and deliver, no later than ninety (90) days following the end of the Performance Period, a general release of claims if requested by, and in a form satisfactory to, the Company or an Affiliate, (ii) violates the terms of his or her inventions, copyright and confidentiality agreement with the Company or an Affiliate, or (iii) breaches his or her other contractual or legal obligations to the Company or an Affiliate, including the non-solicitation obligations set forth in Section 13 of this Agreement.

b) Death. If Recipient’s employment with the Company and its Affiliates terminates due to the death of Recipient, then Recipient’s estate shall receive, promptly after the date of death, a prorated portion of the Shares that Recipient would have been issued pursuant to the Performance Share Award based on the formula set forth in subsection (c) below as if a Fundamental Transaction had occurred on such date of death.

c) Change in Control of Company. If a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Plan) occurs prior to the end of the Performance Period while Recipient is employed by the Company or an Affiliate or remains entitled to receive Shares pursuant to Section 5(a) above, the Performance Period shall be terminated and Recipient shall be entitled to receive, immediately prior to the consummation of such Fundamental Transaction, the following number of Shares (the “CIC Earned Shares”):

(i) If the Fundamental Transaction occurs following completion of one or more fiscal years in the Performance Period, the number of Shares earned by Recipient for each such completed fiscal year based on the achievement of the applicable Performance Goals as determined by the Committee; plus

(ii) If the Fundamental Transaction occurs prior to completion of any fiscal year in the Performance Period a number of Shares based on the achievement of the Performance Goals for such fiscal year at the time of consummation of the Fundamental Transaction as determined by the Committee and prorated to reflect the portion of the fiscal year that has elapsed through the date of consummation of the Fundamental Transaction (or, if Recipient earlier transfers to an Ineligible Position, through the date of such transfer).

6

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company determines that this Performance Share Award is “deferred compensation” for purposes of Section 409A and is not eligible for any exemption from or exception to Section 409A, and that the Fundamental Transaction is not also a “change in ownership”, “change in effective control” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets” of the Company under Section 409A, then the CIC Earned Shares (or a comparable amount of cash or acquiring company stock, depending on the consideration received by Company stockholders on such Fundamental Transaction) shall only be issued to Recipient on the date such Shares would have been issued pursuant to Section 4 if a Fundamental Transaction had not occurred), unless this Performance Share Award is terminated in a manner compliant with Section 409A.

6. TAX MATTERS.

a) Tax Withholding. If the Company or an Affiliate is required to withhold any federal, state, local or other taxes upon the issuance of Shares or otherwise under this Agreement, the Company shall withhold a sufficient number of Shares to meet the withholding obligation based on the minimum rates required by law; provided, however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, sell a sufficient number of Shares on behalf of Recipient to satisfy such obligations, accept payment to satisfy such obligations in the form of cash or delivery to the Company of Shares already owned by Recipient, withhold amounts from Recipient’s compensation, or any combination of the foregoing or other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to satisfy any such tax withholding obligations.

b) Section 409A.

(i) This Performance Share Award is intended to qualify for the short-term deferral exception to Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) described in the regulations promulgated under Section 409A to the maximum extent possible, and for the Determination Date (and issuance of Shares hereunder) to be within 2 and  ¹/2 months following the end of the Performance Period.

(ii) To the extent Section 409A is applicable to this Performance Share Award, this Performance Share Award is intended to comply with Section 409A and to be interpreted and construed consistent with such intent.

(iii) With respect to any Recipient who is eligible for Special Retirement, this Performance Share Award is intended to be paid on fixed payment dates under Sections 4(a) and 5 of this Agreement and such payments may not be accelerated except as set forth in Section 5(b) hereof or otherwise to the extent permitted under Section 409A.

7

(iv) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if Recipient is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A, as determined under the Company’s established methodology for determining specified employees, on the date of Recipient’s termination of service at a time when this Performance Share Award pursuant its terms would be settled, then to the extent required in order to comply with Section 409A, shares of Common Stock that would be issued under this Performance Share Award (or any other amount due hereunder) at such termination of service shall not be issued before the first business day following the earlier of (x) the date that is six months following Recipient’s termination of employment and (y) the date of Recipient’s death.

(v) For purposes of this Agreement, the terms “terminate,” “terminated”, “termination” and “ceases to employed” and similar terms mean a termination of the Recipient’s employment that constitutes a “separation from service” within the meaning of the default rules of Section 409A.

7. RIGHTS, RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS. Any Shares issued to Recipient pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the rights, restrictions and limitations set forth in the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Recipient shall not have the rights of a stockholder until Shares, if any, are issued following the Determination Date. The Performance Share Award and rights under this Agreement may be not transferred by Recipient.

8. RESTRICTIONS UNDER SECURITIES LAW. The Performance Share Award and Shares potentially issuable pursuant this Agreement are subject to any restrictions which may be imposed under applicable state and federal securities laws and are subject to obtaining all necessary consents which may be required by, or any condition which may be imposed in accordance with, applicable state and federal securities laws or regulations.

9. EMPLOYMENT AT WILL.

a) Recipient’s employment or affiliation with the Company or an Affiliate is not for any specified term and may be terminated by Recipient or by the Company or an Affiliate at any time, for any reason, with or without cause and with or without notice. Nothing in this Agreement, the Plan or any covenant of good faith and fair dealing that may be found implicit in this Agreement or the Plan shall: (i) confer upon Recipient any right to continue in the employ of, or affiliation with, the Company or an Affiliate; (ii) constitute any promise or commitment by the Company or an Affiliate regarding the fact or nature of future positions, future work assignments, future compensation or any other term or condition of employment or affiliation; (iii) confer any right or benefit under this Agreement or the Plan unless such right or benefit has specifically accrued under the terms of this Agreement or Plan; or (iv) deprive the Company of the right to terminate Recipient at will and without regard to any future vesting opportunity that Recipient may have.

8

b) Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the right to receive Shares pursuant to this Agreement is earned, among other requirements, only by continuing as an employee at the will of the Company (not through the act of being hired, being granted the Performance Share Award or any other award or benefit) and that the Company has the right to reorganize, sell, spin-out or otherwise restructure one or more of its businesses or Affiliates at any time or from time to time, as it deems appropriate (a “reorganization”). Recipient acknowledges and agrees that such a reorganization could result in the termination of Recipient’s relationship as an employee to the Company or an Affiliate, or the termination of Affiliate status of Recipient’s employer and the loss of benefits available to Recipient under this Agreement, including but not limited to, the termination of the right to receive Shares under this Agreement. Recipient further acknowledges that if the Performance Goals are not met, it is possible that no Shares will be issued hereunder.

10. INCORPORATION OF PLAN. The Performance Share Award is granted pursuant to the Plan, all the terms and conditions of which are hereby made a part hereof and are incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions contained herein and those set forth in the Plan, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall prevail.

11. RECOUPMENT OF AWARDS. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a recoupment policy on June 18, 2009 (the “Policy”), that may require members of senior management to return incentive compensation if there is a material restatement of the financial results upon which the compensation was originally based. The Policy also provides for recovery of incentive compensation from any employee involved in fraud or intentional misconduct, whether or not it results in a restatement of the Company’s financial results. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the Policy applies to the Performance Share Award and that any payments or issuances of Shares are subject to recoupment pursuant to the Policy, including any amendments to the Policy and any recoupment obligations imposed by applicable law or regulation. This Agreement shall be deemed to include the restrictions imposed by the Policy.

12. COPIES OF PLAN AND OTHER MATERIALS. Recipient acknowledges that Recipient has received copies of the Plan and the Plan prospectus from the Company and agrees to receive stockholder information, including copies of any annual report, proxy statement and periodic report, electronically from the Company. Recipient acknowledges that copies of the Plan, Plan prospectus, Plan information and stockholder information are also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company. Recipient acknowledges that a copy of the Policy referenced in Section 11 is available on ISSAIC, the Company’s intranet, and is also available upon written or telephonic request to the Company.

9

13. NON-SOLICITATION.

a) Solicitation of Employees. Recipient agrees that, both while employed by the Company or an Affiliate and for one year afterward, Recipient will not solicit or attempt to solicit any employee of the Company or an Affiliate to leave his or her employment or to violate the terms of any agreement or understanding that employee may have with the Company or an Affiliate. The foregoing obligations apply to both the Recipient’s direct and indirect actions, and apply to actions intended to benefit Recipient or any other person, business or entity.

b) Solicitation of Customers. Recipient agrees that, for one year after termination of employment with the Company or an Affiliate, Recipient will not participate in any solicitation of any customer or prospective customer of the Company or an Affiliate concerning any business that:

(i) involves the same programs or projects for that customer in which Recipient was personally and substantially involved during the 12 months prior to termination of employment; or

(ii) has been, at any time during the 12 months prior to termination of employment, the subject of any bid, offer or proposal activity by the Company or an Affiliate in respect of that customer or prospective customer, or any negotiations or discussions about the possible performance of services by the Company or an Affiliate to that customer or potential customer, in which Recipient was personally and substantially involved.

In the case of a governmental, regulatory or administrative agency, commission, department or other governmental authority, the customer or prospective customer will be determined by reference to the specific program offices or activities for which the Company or an Affiliate provides (or may reasonably provide) goods or services.

c) Remedies. Recipient acknowledges and agrees that a breach of any of the promises or agreements contained in this Section 13 will result in immediate, irreparable and continuing damage to the Company for which there is no adequate remedy at law, and the Company or an Affiliate will be entitled to injunctive relief, a decree for specific performance, and other relief as may be proper, including money damages.

10

14. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement (together with the Award Grant Notice) contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter, provided, however, that if Recipient and the Company are parties to an existing written agreement addressing the subject matter of Section 13, such agreement shall control with respect to such subject matter until the termination thereof, at which time Section 13 shall control. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective parties, the successors and assigns of the Company, and the heirs, legatees and personal representatives of Recipient. The parties hereby agree that should any portion of this Agreement be judicially held to be invalid, unenforceable, or void, such portion shall be construed by limiting and reducing it, so as to be enforceable to the maximum extent compatible with the applicable law as is then in effect.

15. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to such state’s principles of conflict of laws.

16. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Recipient acknowledges that the Performance Share Award constitutes full and adequate consideration for Recipient’s obligations under this Agreement, the acceptance of the Performance Share Award constitutes an unequivocal acceptance of this Agreement and any attempted modification or deletion will have no force or effect on the Company’s right to enforce the terms and conditions stated herein.

By accepting the Performance Share Award, you agree to all of the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan.

11

EX-10.10

Exhibit 10.10

SAIC, INC.

AMENDMENT TO

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT

This Amendment, effective as of March 22, 2012 amends each outstanding Performance Share Award Agreement (each, an “Agreement”) between SAIC, Inc. and Recipient.

The provisions of each Agreement that are not amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement.

Section 4 of each Agreement is hereby amended to add the following new paragraph immediately following the existing text of Section 4:

“If the Company pays any cash dividends on its common stock, Recipient will be entitled to receive an amount in cash (less any required withholding for taxes) equal to the value of such cash dividends that would have been paid on Shares earned under this Agreement if such Shares had been outstanding as of the record date for such dividends declared on or after the Grant Date and prior to the issuance date of the Shares (“Dividend Equivalents”). Such Dividend Equivalents will be will be retained by the Company (without interest) and paid in cash when, and if, and to the extent that Shares are earned and issued based on the achievement of the Performance Goals. To the extent that Recipient has elected to defer receipt of the Shares in accordance with the terms of the applicable non-qualified deferral plan, payment of Dividend Equivalents with respect to such Shares will be subject to the terms and conditions of such plan. The right to Dividend Equivalents will cease and be forfeited upon the forfeiture and cancellation of this Performance Share Award.”

March 2012

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

SAIC, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P. Jumper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012 of SAIC, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including each registrants’ consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 31, 2012

/s/     JOHN P. JUMPER         

John P. Jumper

Chief Executive Officer and President

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

SAIC, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark W. Sopp, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012 of SAIC, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrants and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including each registrants’ consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 31, 2012

/s/      MARK W. SOPP         

Mark W. Sopp

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

SAIC, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SAIC, Inc. (“SAIC”) and Science Applications International Corporation (“Science Applications”, and together with SAIC, the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Jumper, Chief Executive Officer and President of each of SAIC and Science Applications, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 31, 2012

/s/     JOHN P. JUMPER         

John P. Jumper

Chief Executive Officer and President

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

SAIC, INC. AND SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SAIC, Inc. (“SAIC”) and Science Applications International Corporation (“Science Applications”, and together with SAIC, the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark W. Sopp, Chief Financial Officer of each of SAIC and Science Applications, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 31, 2012

/s/     MARK W. SOPP        

Mark W. Sopp

Chief Financial Officer

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Performance-Based Stock Award Activity) (Details) (Performance-Based Stock Awards [Member], USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012
Performance-Based Stock Awards [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares, beginning balance	0.5
Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance-based stock awards, Awards granted	0.8
Shares, ending balance	1.3
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, beginning balance	$ 17.02
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards granted	$ 13.21
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, ending balance	$ 14.55

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Schedule Of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Abstract]
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1 ) million and $(2) million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$ 2	$ 2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million, as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	(5)	(5)
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $(1) million and $5 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	2	(8)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $1 million and $6 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	(1)	(11)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, tax effect	(1)	(2)
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, tax effect	3	3
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, tax effect	(1)	5
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, tax effect	$ 1	$ 6

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Credit facility, maturity date	2017
Related party maturity date	November 2012
Period extension for portions of intercompany loans (years)	1
Notes Which Mature In December 2020 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	450
Stated interest rate	4.45%
Notes Which Mature In December 2040 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	300
Stated interest rate	5.95%
Notes Which Mature In July 2012 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	550
Stated interest rate	6.25%
Notes Which Mature In July 2032 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	250
Stated interest rate	7.13%
Notes Which Mature In July 2033 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes payable, related parties	300
Stated interest rate	5.50%

XML

Earnings Per Share (Schedule Of Stock-Based Awards Excluded From Weighted Average Shares Outstanding) (Details) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Antidilutive Stock Options Excluded [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive stock based awards	21	23
Performance-Based Stock Awards Excluded [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive stock based awards	1	1

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Abstract]

Schedule Of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

	April 30, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) million and $(2) million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million, as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $(1) million and $5 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively		2			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $1 million and $6 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	(1	)	$	(11	)

XML

Legal Proceedings (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		3 Months Ended									1 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y item	Jan. 31, 2012	Apr. 30, 2012 Timekeeping Contract With City Of New York [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Data Privacy Litigation [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Greek Government Contract [Member]	Apr. 30, 2011 Greek Government Contract [Member]	Jun. 30, 2009 Greek Government Contract [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Greek Government Contract [Member] Value Added Tax [Member]	Nov. 30, 2008 Greek Government Contract [Member] Invoice For Undisputed Portion Of Contract [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Greek Government Contract [Member] Standby Letters Of Credit [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Greek Government Contract [Member] Letters Of Credit Relating To Delivery [Member]	Jun. 30, 2009 Greek Government Contract [Member] Performance Guarantees [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Greek Government Contract [Member] Letters Of Credit Related System Support And Maintenance [Member] Letters Of Credit Relating To Delivery [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Nuclear Regulatory Commission [Member] Breach Of Contract [Member]	Jul. 31, 2008 Nuclear Regulatory Commission [Member] Breach Of Contract [Member]	Oct. 31, 2008 Nuclear Regulatory Commission [Member] False Claims Act Claims [Member]	Jul. 31, 2008 Nuclear Regulatory Commission [Member] False Claims Act Claims [Member]
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Cash settlement payment			$ 500,000,000
Reduction of revenue			410,000,000
Revenue remitted to the city			370,000,000
Accounts receivable cancelled			40,000,000
DPA provides that the monitor will serve for a period (in years)	3
Number of patients (in millions)	5,000,000
Number of lawsuits	7
Number of cases dismissed	5
Period of identity restoration services	1
Loss contingency charges to selling, general and administrative expenses			130,000,000
Damages sought	1,000
Judgments or settlements relating to the claims				10,000,000
Estimated loss, minimum				10,000,000
Contracts receivable								33,000,000	18,000,000
Damages sought by SAIC							92,000,000					25,000,000
Profit or loss recorded on contract					0	0
Recorded losses					123,000,000
Receivables relating to value added taxes								15,000,000
Amount outstanding	0	0											4,000,000
Letter of credit available to the company										23,000,000	19,000,000
Loss related to litigation settlement														78	78
Judgment rescinded on appeal																$ 585,000	$ 2,000,000

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets (Schedule Of Intangible Assets Including Estimates Of Assets Acquired) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	$ 269	$ 270
Accumulated amortization	(120)	(111)
Net carrying value	149	159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	17	17
Gross carrying value	286	287
Net carrying value	166	176
In-Process Research And Development [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	13	13
Trade Names [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	4	4
Customer Relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	120	120
Accumulated amortization	(67)	(62)
Net carrying value	53	58
Software And Technology [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	147	148
Accumulated amortization	(52)	(48)
Net carrying value	95	100
Other [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross carrying value	2	2
Accumulated amortization	(1)	(1)
Net carrying value	$ 1	$ 1

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Stock Option Activity) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y
Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Shares of stock under stock options, Outstanding, beginning balance	20.8
Shares of stock under stock options, Options granted	4.9
Shares of stock under stock options, Options forfeited or expired	(4.7)
Shares of stock under stock options, Outstanding, ending balance	21.0
Options Exercisable at April 30, 2012	10.0
Weighted average exercise price, Outstanding, beginning balance	$ 17.90
Weighted average exercise price, Options granted	$ 13.21
Weighted average exercise price, Options forfeited or expired	$ 17.46
Weighted average exercise price, Outstanding, ending balance	$ 16.90
Weighted average exercise price, Exercisable at April 30, 2012	$ 18.30
Weighted average remaining contractual term, Outstanding, beginning of period, (in years)	2.5
Weighted average remaining contractual term, Outstanding, end of period, (in years)	3.6
Weighted average remaining contractual term, Exercisable at April 30, 2012	1.9

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Abstract]
Unrealized net loss on settled derivatives which will be amortized and recognized	$ 1

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

SAIC, Inc. ("SAIC") is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary is Science Applications International Corporation ("Science Applications"), a provider of scientific, engineering, systems integration and technical services and solutions in the areas of defense, health, energy, infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity to agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and other U.S. Government civil agencies, state and local government agencies, foreign governments and customers in select commercial markets.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of SAIC include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries, including Science Applications. The condensed consolidated financial statements of Science Applications include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries. SAIC does not have separate operations, assets or liabilities independent of Science Applications, except for a note with Science Applications (the "related party note"), on which interest is recognized. From time to time, SAIC issues stock to Science Applications employees, which is reflected in SAIC's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity and results in an increase to the related party note (see Note 6). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

These Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both SAIC and Science Applications. As SAIC consolidates Science Applications for financial statement purposes, disclosures that relate to activities of Science Applications also apply to SAIC. References to the "Company" refer collectively to SAIC, Science Applications, and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise noted.

The accompanying financial information has been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and combined notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information at the time of estimation and actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, the financial information as of April 30, 2012 and for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 reflects all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation thereof. Operating results for the three months ended April 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013, or any future period.

Unless otherwise noted, references to years are for fiscal years ended January 31. For example, the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013 is referred to as "fiscal 2013" in these combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Long-Term Receivables

The Company's accounts receivable include unbilled receivables, which consist of costs and fees billable upon contract completion or the occurrence of a specified event, the majority of which is expected to be billed and collected within one year. Unbilled receivables are stated at estimated realizable value. Contract retentions are billed when the Company has negotiated final indirect rates with the U.S. Government and, once billed, are subject to audit and approval by government representatives. Consequently, the timing of collection of retention balances is outside the Company's control. Based on the Company's historical experience, the majority of retention balances are expected to be collected beyond one year. The Company has extended deferred payment terms with contractual maturities that may exceed one year to three commercial customers related to certain construction projects. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding receivables with deferred payment terms of $80 million, which are expected to be collected in fiscal 2013. When events or conditions indicate that amounts outstanding from customers may become uncollectible, an allowance is estimated and recorded.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Changes in estimates related to certain types of contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes. Changes in these estimates can routinely occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or retirements of risk for amounts different than estimated, and changes in estimated incentive or award fees. Aggregate changes in contract estimates increased operating income by $4 million ($0.01 per diluted share) and $12 million ($0.02 per diluted share) for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

In June 2011, in order to better align its business portfolio with its strategy, the Company sold certain components of its business, which were historically included in the Company's Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies. In fiscal 2012, the Company received net proceeds of $167 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $111 million related to this sale. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company has retained the assets and obligations of its defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. The Company has classified the operating results of these business components, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Following the sale, as a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets, are recorded in continuing operations.

The operating results of this discontinued operation for the three months ended April 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

Revenues	$	45
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		36
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7
Income before income taxes	$	2

Income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

Pension

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company transferred $46 million of pension plan assets to a successor contractor's plan on behalf of certain participants in the Company's defined benefit pension plan who previously transferred their employment to the successor contractor and settled $63 million of related pension plan obligations. As a result of the transfer, the Company recorded an immaterial settlement gain in selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended April 30, 2012.

Supplementary Cash Flow Information

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options	$	—	$	14
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3
Increase in accrued stock repurchases	$	—	$	5
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividend	$	1	$	—
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	8	$	7

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

SAIC, Inc. ("SAIC") is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary is Science Applications International Corporation ("Science Applications"), a provider of scientific, engineering, systems integration and technical services and solutions in the areas of defense, health, energy, infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity to agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and other U.S. Government civil agencies, state and local government agencies, foreign governments and customers in select commercial markets.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of SAIC include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries, including Science Applications. The condensed consolidated financial statements of Science Applications include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries. SAIC does not have separate operations, assets or liabilities independent of Science Applications, except for a note with Science Applications (the "related party note"), on which interest is recognized. From time to time, SAIC issues stock to Science Applications employees, which is reflected in SAIC's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity and results in an increase to the related party note (see Note 6). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

These Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both SAIC and Science Applications. As SAIC consolidates Science Applications for financial statement purposes, disclosures that relate to activities of Science Applications also apply to SAIC. References to the "Company" refer collectively to SAIC, Science Applications, and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise noted.

The accompanying financial information has been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and combined notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information at the time of estimation and actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, the financial information as of April 30, 2012 and for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 reflects all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation thereof. Operating results for the three months ended April 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013, or any future period.

Unless otherwise noted, references to years are for fiscal years ended January 31. For example, the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013 is referred to as "fiscal 2013" in these combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Long-Term Receivables

The Company's accounts receivable include unbilled receivables, which consist of costs and fees billable upon contract completion or the occurrence of a specified event, the majority of which is expected to be billed and collected within one year. Unbilled receivables are stated at estimated realizable value. Contract retentions are billed when the Company has negotiated final indirect rates with the U.S. Government and, once billed, are subject to audit and approval by government representatives. Consequently, the timing of collection of retention balances is outside the Company's control. Based on the Company's historical experience, the majority of retention balances are expected to be collected beyond one year. The Company has extended deferred payment terms with contractual maturities that may exceed one year to three commercial customers related to certain construction projects. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding receivables with deferred payment terms of $80 million, which are expected to be collected in fiscal 2013. When events or conditions indicate that amounts outstanding from customers may become uncollectible, an allowance is estimated and recorded.

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Changes in estimates related to certain types of contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes. Changes in these estimates can routinely occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or retirements of risk for amounts different than estimated, and changes in estimated incentive or award fees. Aggregate changes in contract estimates increased operating income by $4 million ($0.01 per diluted share) and $12 million ($0.02 per diluted share) for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

In June 2011, in order to better align its business portfolio with its strategy, the Company sold certain components of its business, which were historically included in the Company's Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies. In fiscal 2012, the Company received net proceeds of $167 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $111 million related to this sale. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company has retained the assets and obligations of its defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. The Company has classified the operating results of these business components, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Following the sale, as a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets, are recorded in continuing operations.

The operating results of this discontinued operation for the three months ended April 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

Revenues	$	45
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		36
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7
Income before income taxes	$	2

Income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

Pension

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company transferred $46 million of pension plan assets to a successor contractor's plan on behalf of certain participants in the Company's defined benefit pension plan who previously transferred their employment to the successor contractor and settled $63 million of related pension plan obligations. As a result of the transfer, the Company recorded an immaterial settlement gain in selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended April 30, 2012.

Supplementary Cash Flow Information

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options	$	—	$	14
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3
Increase in accrued stock repurchases	$	—	$	5
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividend	$	1	$	—
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	8	$	7

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets (Schedule Of Amortization Expense For Finite-Lived Intangible Assets) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012
Goodwill And Intangible Assets [Abstract]
2013 (remainder of the fiscal year)	$ 25
2014	31
2015	27
2016	22
2017	16
2018	12
2019 and thereafter	16
Total estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets	$ 149

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Schedule Of Supplementary Cash Flow Information) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options		$ 14
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	2	3
Increase in accrued stock repurchases		5
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividend	1
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$ 8	$ 7

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Schedule Of Operating Results Of Discontinued Operations) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2011
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Revenues	$ 45
Cost of revenues	36
Selling, general and administrative expenses	7
Income before income taxes	$ 2

XML

Financial Instruments (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y	Jan. 31, 2012
Financial Instruments [Abstract]
Unsecured borrowing capacity	$ 750
Extended maturity period of revolving credit facility (in years)	1
Extended maturity date of revolving credit facility	March 2016
Borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility	$ 0	$ 0
Revolving credit facility financial covenants description	for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0.
Ratio of consolidated funded debt to EBITDA, numerator, maximum	3.0
Ratio of consolidated funded debt to EBITDA, denominator, maximum	1.0
Minimum ratio of EBITDA to interest expense, numerator	3.5
Minimum ratio of EBITDA to interest expense, denominator	1.0

XML

Earnings Per Share (Reconciliation Of Income Used In Calculating Earnings Per Share) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$ 117	$ 130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities	(3)	(4)
Income from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	114	126
Net income, as reported	117	131
Net income, for computing basic EPS	114	127
Income from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	114	126
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$ 114	$ 127

XML

Earnings Per Share (Reconciliation Of Weighted Average Number Of Shares Outstanding) (Details) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	330	347
Dilutive common share equivalents-stock options and other stock awards		1
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	330	348

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Net income	$ 117	$ 131
Income from discontinued operations		(1)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization	27	28
Stock-based compensation	24	24
Net gain on sales and disposals of assets	(1)	(8)
Other	1	1
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures, resulting from changes in:
Receivables	3	(81)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	(16)	7
Deferred income taxes		1
Other assets		(12)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(554)	17
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	9	10
Income taxes payable	28	37
Other long-term liabilities	1
Total cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	(361)	154
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(8)	(9)
Proceeds from sale of assets		15
Other	1	2
Total cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations	(7)	8
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations:
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt	(1)	(1)
Sales of stock and exercises of stock options	4	7
Repurchases of stock	(19)	(246)
Dividend payment	(41)
Other		(2)
Total cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations	(57)	(242)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations	(425)	(80)
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations		(6)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations		(6)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1
Total decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(425)	(85)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	1,592	1,367
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	1,167	1,282
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Net income	117	130
Income from discontinued operations		(1)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization	27	28
Stock-based compensation	24	24
Net gain on sales and disposals of assets	(1)	(8)
Other	1	1
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures, resulting from changes in:
Receivables	3	(81)
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	(16)	7
Deferred income taxes		1
Other assets		(12)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(553)	17
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	9	10
Income taxes payable	28	37
Other long-term liabilities	1
Total cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	(360)	153
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(8)	(9)
Proceeds from sale of assets		15
Other	1	2
Total cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations	(7)	8
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations:
Proceeds from note payable to SAIC, Inc.	26	323
Payments on note payable to SAIC, Inc.	(283)	(563)
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt	(1)	(1)
Total cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations	(258)	(241)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations	(625)	(80)
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations		(6)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations		(6)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1
Total decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(625)	(85)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	1,592	1,367
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 967	$ 1,282

XML

Earnings Per Share (Schedule Of Basic And Diluted EPS) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$ 0.35	$ 0.36
Income from discontinued operations		$ 0.01
Total basic earnings per share	$ 0.35	$ 0.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$ 0.35	$ 0.36
Income from discontinued operations
Total diluted earnings per share	$ 0.35	$ 0.36

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Goodwill And Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets	$ 10	$ 11
Finite-lived intangible assets, amortized amount	$ 1

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Income (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Revenues	$ 2,782	$ 2,688
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues	2,448	2,357
Selling, general and administrative expenses	126	101
Operating income	208	230
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income	2	1
Interest expense	(29)	(28)
Other income, net	2	4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	183	207
Provision for income taxes	(66)	(77)
Income from continuing operations	117	130
Discontinued operations (Note 1):
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes		2
Provision for income taxes		(1)
Income from discontinued operations		1
Net income	117	131
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$ 0.35	$ 0.36
Income from discontinued operations		$ 0.01
Total basic earnings per share	$ 0.35	$ 0.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$ 0.35	$ 0.36
Income from discontinued operations
Total diluted earnings per share	$ 0.35	$ 0.36
Cash dividends paid per share	$ 0.12
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
Revenues	2,782	2,688
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues	2,448	2,357
Selling, general and administrative expenses	126	101
Operating income	208	230
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income	2	1
Interest expense	(29)	(30)
Other income, net	2	4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	183	205
Provision for income taxes	(66)	(76)
Income from continuing operations	117	129
Discontinued operations (Note 1):
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes		2
Provision for income taxes		(1)
Income from discontinued operations		1
Net income	$ 117	$ 130

XML

Financial Instruments (Schedule Of Notes Payable And Long-Term Debt) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Notes payable and long-term debt	$ 1,851,000,000	$ 1,852,000,000
Less current portion	553,000,000	553,000,000
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion	1,298,000,000	1,299,000,000
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt	1,982,000,000	2,011,000,000
Notes Which Mature In December 2020 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	450,000,000
Senior unsecured notes	449,000,000	449,000,000
Stated interest rate	4.45%
Effective interest rate	4.53%
Debt maturity date	Dec. 01, 2020
Notes Which Mature In December 2040 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	300,000,000
Senior unsecured notes	300,000,000	300,000,000
Stated interest rate	5.95%
Effective interest rate	6.03%
Debt maturity date	Dec. 01, 2040
Notes Which Mature In July 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	550,000,000
Senior unsecured notes	550,000,000	550,000,000
Stated interest rate	6.25%
Effective interest rate	6.50%
Debt maturity date	Jul. 01, 2012
Notes Which Mature In July 2032 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	250,000,000
Senior unsecured notes	248,000,000	248,000,000
Stated interest rate	7.13%
Effective interest rate	7.43%
Debt maturity date	Jul. 01, 2032
Notes Which Mature In July 2033 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior unsecured notes, face amount	300,000,000
Senior unsecured notes	296,000,000	296,000,000
Stated interest rate	5.50%
Effective interest rate	5.78%
Debt maturity date	Jul. 01, 2033
Capital Leases And Other Notes Payable Due On Various Dates Through Fiscal 2018 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2017	$ 8,000,000	$ 9,000,000
Minimum stated interest rate	0.00%
Maximum stated interest rate	2.50%

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statement Of Stockholders' Equity (USD $) In Millions, except Share data	Science Applications International Corporation [Member] Shares Of Common Stock [Member]	Science Applications International Corporation [Member] Additional Paid-In Capital [Member] USD ($)	Science Applications International Corporation [Member] Retained Earnings [Member] USD ($)	Science Applications International Corporation [Member] Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Member] USD ($)	Science Applications International Corporation [Member] USD ($)	Shares Of Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member] USD ($)	Retained Earnings [Member] USD ($)	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss [Member] USD ($)	Total USD ($)
Balance, value at Jan. 31, 2012		$ 233	$ 1,839	$ (11)	$ 2,061		$ 2,028	$ 164	$ (11)	$ 2,181
Balance, shares at Jan. 31, 2012	5,000					341,000,000
Net income			117		117			117		117
Other comprehensive income, net of tax				10	10				10	10
Issuances of stock, value							7			7
Issuances of stock, shares						2,000,000
Repurchases of stock, value							(9)	(10)		(19)
Repurchases of stock, shares						(1,000,000)
Cash dividend of $0.12 per share								(42)		(42)
Adjustments for income tax benefits from stock-based compensation							(12)			(12)
Stock-based compensation							24			24
Balance, value at Apr. 30, 2012		$ 233	$ 1,956	$ (1)	$ 2,188		$ 2,038	$ 229	$ (1)	$ 2,266
Balance, shares at Apr. 30, 2012	5,000					342,000,000

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Stock-Based Compensation Expenses) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	$ 24	$ 24
Stock Options [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	3	5
Performance-Based Stock Awards [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	1	1
Vesting Stock Awards [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total stock-based compensation expense	$ 20	$ 18

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Schedule Of Stock-Based Compensation Expenses

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock options	$	3	$	5
Vesting stock awards		20		18
Performance-based stock awards		1		1
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	24	$	24

Schedule Of Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value And Assumptions Used

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.22
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9
Expected volatility		24.4	%		23.4	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%

Schedule Of Stock Option Activity

	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8		$	17.90		2.5	$	—
Options granted		4.9			13.21
Options forfeited or expired		(4.7	)		17.46
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		21.0			16.90		3.6		—
Exercisable at April 30, 2012		10.0			18.30		1.9		—

Schedule Of Vesting Stock Award Activity

	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested stock awards at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.4			13.21
Awards forfeited		(0.3	)		16.36
Awards vested		(4.4	)		17.91
Unvested stock awards at April 30, 2012		13.7			15.39

Schedule Of Performance-Based Stock Award Activity

	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance- based stock awards		Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5	$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8		13.21
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		1.3		14.55

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value And Assumptions Used) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y	Apr. 30, 2011 Y
Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$ 1.81	$ 4.22
Expected term (in years)	5.0	4.9
Expected volatility	24.40%	23.40%
Risk-free interest rate	1.00%	2.20%
Dividend yield	3.70%	0.00%

XML

Financial Instruments (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Financial Instruments [Abstract]

Schedule Of Notes Payable And Long-Term Debt

	Stated interest rate			Effective interest rate			April 30, 2012		January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45	%		4.53	%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95	%		6.03	%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2012		6.25	%		6.50	%		550		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13	%		7.43	%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50	%		5.78	%		296		296
Capital leases and other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2018		0-2.5	%		Various			8		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt								1,851		1,852
Less current portion								553		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion							$	1,298	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt							$	1,982	$	2,011

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statement Of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidated Statement Of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Cash dividends paid per share	$ 0.12

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Net income	$ 117	$ 131
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(1)	1
Deferred taxes	1	(1)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Pension liability adjustments	16
Deferred taxes	(6)
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax	10
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax	10
Comprehensive income	127	131
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
Net income	117	130
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(1)	1
Deferred taxes	1	(1)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Pension liability adjustments	16
Deferred taxes	(6)
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax	10
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax	10
Comprehensive income	$ 127	$ 130

XML

Legal Proceedings

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Legal Proceedings

Note 9—Legal Proceedings:

Timekeeping Contract with City of New York

Since 2000, the Company performed under a systems development and implementation contract relating to an automated time and attendance and workforce management system (CityTime) for certain agencies of the City of New York (City), which was completed in June 2011.

In March 2012, the Company reached a settlement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the City relating to investigations being conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the City with respect to the CityTime program. In connection with this settlement, the Company entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the U.S. Attorney's Office effective March 14, 2012. Under the DPA, the Company paid approximately $500 million, comprised of $370 million in restitution that was paid to the City by the U.S. Government, and a $130 million penalty during the three months ended April 30, 2012. The City and the Company exchanged mutual releases upon execution of the DPA, releasing each other from all claims arising out of the CityTime contract. The Company's release of the City terminated the Company's right to collect approximately $40 million in a receivable the City owed to the Company under the terms of the CityTime contract. The Company recorded $410 million, consisting of the $370 million remitted to the City and the cancellation of the $40 million account receivable from the City, as a reduction of revenues in fiscal 2012. The remaining $130 million was recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2012.

Under the terms of the DPA, the U.S. Attorney's Office will defer prosecution of a single criminal count against the Company, which alleged that the Company, through the conduct of certain managerial employees and others, caused the City to significantly overpay for the CityTime system. If the Company complies with the terms of the DPA, the U.S Attorney will dismiss the criminal count at the end of a three-year period. Under the DPA, the Company has agreed, among other things, to retain an independent monitor, selected by the U.S. Attorney's Office after consultation with the Company, who will report periodically to the U.S. Attorney's Office and who will have broad authority to monitor and make recommendations on a number of the Company's policies and practices. The DPA provides that the monitor will serve for a period of three years, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

With a substantial portion of the Company's business derived from U.S. Government contracts, the Company has been in discussions with its U.S. Government customers regarding the CityTime matter, including the DPA and resolution of the matter with the U.S. Attorney's Office and the City. While the Company does not expect to be terminated on existing U.S. Government contracts or precluded from bidding on new U.S. Government contracts, it is working to resolve these matters with these government customers as quickly as possible, but no assurances can be given as to the timing or outcome of these discussions.

Data Privacy Litigation

The Company is a defendant in the following seven putative class action lawsuits filed in October 2011 through March 2012: (1) Richardson, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (2) Arrellano, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; (3) Biggerman, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (4) Moskowitz, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (5) Palmer, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al., in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (6) Losack, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California; and (7) Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuits were filed following the theft of computer backup tapes from a vehicle of a Company employee. The employee was transporting the backup tapes between federal facilities under an IT services contract the Company was performing in support of TRICARE, the health care program for members of the military, retirees and their families. The tapes contained

personally identifiable and protected health information of approximately five million military clinic and hospital patients. There is no evidence that any of the data on the backup tapes has actually been accessed or viewed by an unauthorized person. In order for an unauthorized person to access or view the data on the backup tapes, it would require knowledge of and access to specific hardware and software and knowledge of the system and data structure. The Company has notified potentially impacted persons by letter and is offering one year of credit monitoring services to those who request these services and in certain circumstances, one year of identity restoration services.

The complaints in the seven lawsuits vary in their allegations and causes of action against the Company and include allegations of negligence, breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts and statutory violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, California data breach notification requirements, the California Unfair Competition Law, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Privacy Act of 1974. The complaints seek monetary relief, including unspecified actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages of $1,000 for each class member and attorney's fees, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company has filed motions to dismiss in five of the seven cases. In addition, the Company has filed a

motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to transfer the seven pending cases, plus a related case, to a single court for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings. Proceedings in each of the seven pending cases and the related case have been stayed pending a decision by JPML on the Company's motion.

The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims made in the class action lawsuits. The Company has insurance coverage against judgments or settlements relating to the claims being brought in these lawsuits, with a $10 million deductible. The insurance coverage also covers the Company's defense costs, subject to the same deductible. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded a loss provision of $10 million related to these lawsuits, representing the low end of the Company's estimated loss. The Company believes that, if any loss is experienced by the Company in excess of its estimate, such a loss would not exceed the Company's insurance coverage. As these lawsuits progress, many factors will affect the amount of the ultimate loss, resulting from these claims being brought against the Company, including the outcome of the Company's motions to dismiss, the results of any discovery, the outcome of any pretrial motions and the courts' rulings on certain legal issues.

The Company has been informed that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is investigating matters related to the incident. OCR is the division of HHS charged with enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA) and the privacy, security and data breach rules which implement HIPAA. OCR may, among other things, require a corrective action plan and impose civil monetary penalties against the data owner (Department of Defense) and, in certain situations, against the data owners' contractors, such as the Company. The Company is cooperating with TRICARE in responding to the OCR investigation.

Derivative and Securities Litigation

Between February and April 2012, the following six stockholder derivative complaints were filed, each purportedly on the Company's behalf: (1) Stellini v. Havenstein et al. (initially filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California but transferred to the Southern District of New York); (2) Malanowski v. Havenstein et al. in New York Supreme Court, New York County; (3) Malanowski v. Denault et al. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; (4) Welch v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York; (5) Robaczynski v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York; and (6) Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York. Each complaint asserts claims against the Company's directors and against varying groups of the Company's current and former officers, including two former chief executive officers, the chief financial officer, the former manager of the CityTime program, and the former chief systems engineer of the CityTime program. The complaints claim that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company with respect to the CityTime contract for various reasons, including failure to supervise the adequacy of the Company's internal controls, allowing the Company to issue misleading financial statements, and failure to exercise their oversight responsibilities to ensure that the Company complied with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Some of the complaints further claim that the defendants are liable to the Company under theories of gross mismanagement, contribution and indemnification, abuse of control, waste of corporate assets, and/or violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company currently intends to file a motion to dismiss each of these complaints because the respective plaintiffs did not serve a pre-suit demand before filing the derivative complaints. The Company has also received a stockholder demand letter related to CityTime and TRICARE, which an independent committee of the Company's board of directors is currently reviewing.

Between February and April 2012, alleged stockholders filed three putative securities class actions: (1) City of Westland Police & Fire Retirement System v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; (2) Williams v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; and (3) Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Each case names as defendants the Company, its chief financial officer, former chief executive officer, and the former program manager on the CityTime program, and each was filed purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of SAIC's common stock from April 11, 2007 through September 1, 2011. Each complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegations that the Company and individual defendants made misleading statements or omissions about the Company's revenues, operating income, and internal controls in connection with disclosures relating to the CityTime project. The plaintiffs seek to recover from the Company and the individual defendants an unspecified amount of damages class members allegedly incurred by buying SAIC's stock at an inflated price. The plaintiff in the Williams case voluntarily dismissed his complaint in May 2012. Pending before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the two remaining securities cases is a motion by a purported stockholder group consisting of the Indiana Public Retirement System, Indiana State Teachers' Retirement Fund and Indiana Public Employees' Retirement Funds to be appointed lead plaintiff. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

The Company currently believes that a loss relating to the above-described stockholder matters is possible, but the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of potential loss in light of the fact that these matters are in their early stages.

Greek Government Contract

Background and Arbitration. In May 2003, the Company entered into a firm-fixed-price contract with the Hellenic Republic of Greece (the Customer) to provide a Command, Control, Communications, Coordination and Integration System (the System) to support the 2004 Athens Summer Olympic Games (the Olympics) and to serve as the security system for the Customer's public order departments following completion of the Olympics.

In November 2008, the Customer accepted the System in writing pursuant to the requirements of the contract. At the time, the Customer determined that the System substantially complied with the terms of the contract and accepted the System with certain alleged minor omissions and deviations. Upon System acceptance, the Company invoiced the Customer for approximately $18 million, representing the undisputed portion of the contract balance owed to the Company. The Customer has not paid this final invoice.

In June 2009, the Company initiated arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce against the Customer seeking damages for breaches of contract by the Customer. The Company seeks (i) aggregate damages in excess of $92 million for payment of amounts owed and other claims and damages, (ii) recovery of advance payment and performance bond amounts totaling $25 million and (iii) costs and expenses associated with the arbitration. The Customer filed an answer to the complaint denying liability on various grounds and a supplementary answer asserting set-off claims against amounts sought by the Company. The arbitration hearing was held in May 2012, and the Company expects the parties will file additional briefs in July 2012. Due to the complex nature of the legal and factual issues involved, the outcome of the arbitration is uncertain.

Financial Status and Contingencies.As a result of the significant uncertainties on this contract, the Company converted to the completed-contract method of accounting and ceased recognizing revenues for the System development portion of this contract in fiscal 2006. No profits or losses were recorded on the Greek contract during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $123 million of losses under the Greek contract, reflecting the Company's estimated total cost to complete the System, assuming the Greek contract value was limited to the cash received to date. Based on the complex nature of this contractual situation and the difficulties encountered to date, significant uncertainties exist and the Company is unable to reliably estimate the ultimate outcome. The Company may reverse a portion of the losses from the Greek contract if it receives future payments as required under the modified Greek contract.

The Company has $15 million of receivables relating to value added tax (VAT) as of April 30, 2012 that the Company has paid and believes it is entitled to recover either as a refund from the taxing authorities or as a payment under the Greek contract. The Company has invoiced the Customer for $33 million for VAT and the Customer has failed to make payment. If the Customer fails to pay the outstanding VAT amounts or the Company is unable to recover the amount as a refund from the taxing authorities, the Company's total losses on the Greek contract could increase.

The Company has met certain advance payment and performance bonding requirements through the issuance of euro-denominated standby letters of credit. As of April 30, 2012, there were $4 million in standby letters of credit outstanding relating to the support and maintenance of the System. The Company is seeking recovery of amounts drawn by the Customer in fiscal 2011 on the standby letters of credit in the ongoing arbitration. The principal subcontractor has provided to the Company euro-denominated standby letters of credit in the amount of $23 million as of April 30, 2012, of which $19 million relates to the delivery of the System. The Company may draw on the subcontractor's standby letters of credit under certain circumstances by providing a statement to the responsible bank that the subcontractor has not fulfilled its obligations under the subcontract.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Company in September 2004 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging civil False Claims Act violations and breach of contract by the Company on two contracts that the Company had with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The complaint alleges that the Company's performance of several subcontracts on separate U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, the participation of a Company employee in an industry trade association, and certain other alleged relationships created organizational conflicts of interest under the two NRC contracts. The Company disputes that the work performed on the DOE programs and the alleged relationships raised by the government created organizational conflicts of interest. In July 2008, the jury found in favor of the government on the breach of contract and two False Claims Act counts. The jury awarded a nominal amount of $78 in damages for breach of contract and $2 million in damages for the False Claims Act claims. The judge entered the judgment in October 2008, trebling the False Claims Act damages and awarding a total of $585,000 in civil penalties. The Company appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's judgment as to both liability and damages of $78 on the breach of contract count and rescinded the judgment on the False Claims Act counts, including the aggregate damages and penalties. The Court of Appeals sent the False Claims Act counts back to the District Court for further proceedings. The Company has recorded a liability for an immaterial amount related to this matter as of April 30, 2012 based on its assessment of the likely outcome of this matter.

Other

The Company is also involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in the opinion of the Company's management, based upon current information, will likely have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Legal Proceedings

Note 9—Legal Proceedings:

Timekeeping Contract with City of New York

Since 2000, the Company performed under a systems development and implementation contract relating to an automated time and attendance and workforce management system (CityTime) for certain agencies of the City of New York (City), which was completed in June 2011.

In March 2012, the Company reached a settlement with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the City relating to investigations being conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the City with respect to the CityTime program. In connection with this settlement, the Company entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the U.S. Attorney's Office effective March 14, 2012. Under the DPA, the Company paid approximately $500 million, comprised of $370 million in restitution that was paid to the City by the U.S. Government, and a $130 million penalty during the three months ended April 30, 2012. The City and the Company exchanged mutual releases upon execution of the DPA, releasing each other from all claims arising out of the CityTime contract. The Company's release of the City terminated the Company's right to collect approximately $40 million in a receivable the City owed to the Company under the terms of the CityTime contract. The Company recorded $410 million, consisting of the $370 million remitted to the City and the cancellation of the $40 million account receivable from the City, as a reduction of revenues in fiscal 2012. The remaining $130 million was recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2012.

Under the terms of the DPA, the U.S. Attorney's Office will defer prosecution of a single criminal count against the Company, which alleged that the Company, through the conduct of certain managerial employees and others, caused the City to significantly overpay for the CityTime system. If the Company complies with the terms of the DPA, the U.S Attorney will dismiss the criminal count at the end of a three-year period. Under the DPA, the Company has agreed, among other things, to retain an independent monitor, selected by the U.S. Attorney's Office after consultation with the Company, who will report periodically to the U.S. Attorney's Office and who will have broad authority to monitor and make recommendations on a number of the Company's policies and practices. The DPA provides that the monitor will serve for a period of three years, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

With a substantial portion of the Company's business derived from U.S. Government contracts, the Company has been in discussions with its U.S. Government customers regarding the CityTime matter, including the DPA and resolution of the matter with the U.S. Attorney's Office and the City. While the Company does not expect to be terminated on existing U.S. Government contracts or precluded from bidding on new U.S. Government contracts, it is working to resolve these matters with these government customers as quickly as possible, but no assurances can be given as to the timing or outcome of these discussions.

Data Privacy Litigation

The Company is a defendant in the following seven putative class action lawsuits filed in October 2011 through March 2012: (1) Richardson, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (2) Arrellano, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; (3) Biggerman, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (4) Moskowitz, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al. in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (5) Palmer, et al. v. TRICARE Management Activity, Science Applications International Corporation, United States Department of Defense, et al., in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; (6) Losack, et al. v. SAIC, Inc. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California; and (7) Deatrick v. Science Applications International Corporation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuits were filed following the theft of computer backup tapes from a vehicle of a Company employee. The employee was transporting the backup tapes between federal facilities under an IT services contract the Company was performing in support of TRICARE, the health care program for members of the military, retirees and their families. The tapes contained

personally identifiable and protected health information of approximately five million military clinic and hospital patients. There is no evidence that any of the data on the backup tapes has actually been accessed or viewed by an unauthorized person. In order for an unauthorized person to access or view the data on the backup tapes, it would require knowledge of and access to specific hardware and software and knowledge of the system and data structure. The Company has notified potentially impacted persons by letter and is offering one year of credit monitoring services to those who request these services and in certain circumstances, one year of identity restoration services.

The complaints in the seven lawsuits vary in their allegations and causes of action against the Company and include allegations of negligence, breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts and statutory violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, California data breach notification requirements, the California Unfair Competition Law, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Privacy Act of 1974. The complaints seek monetary relief, including unspecified actual damages, punitive damages, statutory damages of $1,000 for each class member and attorney's fees, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company has filed motions to dismiss in five of the seven cases. In addition, the Company has filed a

motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to transfer the seven pending cases, plus a related case, to a single court for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings. Proceedings in each of the seven pending cases and the related case have been stayed pending a decision by JPML on the Company's motion.

The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims made in the class action lawsuits. The Company has insurance coverage against judgments or settlements relating to the claims being brought in these lawsuits, with a $10 million deductible. The insurance coverage also covers the Company's defense costs, subject to the same deductible. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded a loss provision of $10 million related to these lawsuits, representing the low end of the Company's estimated loss. The Company believes that, if any loss is experienced by the Company in excess of its estimate, such a loss would not exceed the Company's insurance coverage. As these lawsuits progress, many factors will affect the amount of the ultimate loss, resulting from these claims being brought against the Company, including the outcome of the Company's motions to dismiss, the results of any discovery, the outcome of any pretrial motions and the courts' rulings on certain legal issues.

The Company has been informed that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is investigating matters related to the incident. OCR is the division of HHS charged with enforcement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended (HIPAA) and the privacy, security and data breach rules which implement HIPAA. OCR may, among other things, require a corrective action plan and impose civil monetary penalties against the data owner (Department of Defense) and, in certain situations, against the data owners' contractors, such as the Company. The Company is cooperating with TRICARE in responding to the OCR investigation.

Derivative and Securities Litigation

Between February and April 2012, the following six stockholder derivative complaints were filed, each purportedly on the Company's behalf: (1) Stellini v. Havenstein et al. (initially filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California but transferred to the Southern District of New York); (2) Malanowski v. Havenstein et al. in New York Supreme Court, New York County; (3) Malanowski v. Denault et al. in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; (4) Welch v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York; (5) Robaczynski v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York; and (6) Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Havenstein et al. in the Southern District of New York. Each complaint asserts claims against the Company's directors and against varying groups of the Company's current and former officers, including two former chief executive officers, the chief financial officer, the former manager of the CityTime program, and the former chief systems engineer of the CityTime program. The complaints claim that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company with respect to the CityTime contract for various reasons, including failure to supervise the adequacy of the Company's internal controls, allowing the Company to issue misleading financial statements, and failure to exercise their oversight responsibilities to ensure that the Company complied with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Some of the complaints further claim that the defendants are liable to the Company under theories of gross mismanagement, contribution and indemnification, abuse of control, waste of corporate assets, and/or violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company currently intends to file a motion to dismiss each of these complaints because the respective plaintiffs did not serve a pre-suit demand before filing the derivative complaints. The Company has also received a stockholder demand letter related to CityTime and TRICARE, which an independent committee of the Company's board of directors is currently reviewing.

Between February and April 2012, alleged stockholders filed three putative securities class actions: (1) City of Westland Police & Fire Retirement System v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; (2) Williams v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; and (3) Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust v. SAIC, Inc. et al., in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Each case names as defendants the Company, its chief financial officer, former chief executive officer, and the former program manager on the CityTime program, and each was filed purportedly on behalf of all purchasers of SAIC's common stock from April 11, 2007 through September 1, 2011. Each complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegations that the Company and individual defendants made misleading statements or omissions about the Company's revenues, operating income, and internal controls in connection with disclosures relating to the CityTime project. The plaintiffs seek to recover from the Company and the individual defendants an unspecified amount of damages class members allegedly incurred by buying SAIC's stock at an inflated price. The plaintiff in the Williams case voluntarily dismissed his complaint in May 2012. Pending before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the two remaining securities cases is a motion by a purported stockholder group consisting of the Indiana Public Retirement System, Indiana State Teachers' Retirement Fund and Indiana Public Employees' Retirement Funds to be appointed lead plaintiff. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

The Company currently believes that a loss relating to the above-described stockholder matters is possible, but the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of potential loss in light of the fact that these matters are in their early stages.

Greek Government Contract

Background and Arbitration. In May 2003, the Company entered into a firm-fixed-price contract with the Hellenic Republic of Greece (the Customer) to provide a Command, Control, Communications, Coordination and Integration System (the System) to support the 2004 Athens Summer Olympic Games (the Olympics) and to serve as the security system for the Customer's public order departments following completion of the Olympics.

In November 2008, the Customer accepted the System in writing pursuant to the requirements of the contract. At the time, the Customer determined that the System substantially complied with the terms of the contract and accepted the System with certain alleged minor omissions and deviations. Upon System acceptance, the Company invoiced the Customer for approximately $18 million, representing the undisputed portion of the contract balance owed to the Company. The Customer has not paid this final invoice.

In June 2009, the Company initiated arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce against the Customer seeking damages for breaches of contract by the Customer. The Company seeks (i) aggregate damages in excess of $92 million for payment of amounts owed and other claims and damages, (ii) recovery of advance payment and performance bond amounts totaling $25 million and (iii) costs and expenses associated with the arbitration. The Customer filed an answer to the complaint denying liability on various grounds and a supplementary answer asserting set-off claims against amounts sought by the Company. The arbitration hearing was held in May 2012, and the Company expects the parties will file additional briefs in July 2012. Due to the complex nature of the legal and factual issues involved, the outcome of the arbitration is uncertain.

Financial Status and Contingencies.As a result of the significant uncertainties on this contract, the Company converted to the completed-contract method of accounting and ceased recognizing revenues for the System development portion of this contract in fiscal 2006. No profits or losses were recorded on the Greek contract during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $123 million of losses under the Greek contract, reflecting the Company's estimated total cost to complete the System, assuming the Greek contract value was limited to the cash received to date. Based on the complex nature of this contractual situation and the difficulties encountered to date, significant uncertainties exist and the Company is unable to reliably estimate the ultimate outcome. The Company may reverse a portion of the losses from the Greek contract if it receives future payments as required under the modified Greek contract.

The Company has $15 million of receivables relating to value added tax (VAT) as of April 30, 2012 that the Company has paid and believes it is entitled to recover either as a refund from the taxing authorities or as a payment under the Greek contract. The Company has invoiced the Customer for $33 million for VAT and the Customer has failed to make payment. If the Customer fails to pay the outstanding VAT amounts or the Company is unable to recover the amount as a refund from the taxing authorities, the Company's total losses on the Greek contract could increase.

The Company has met certain advance payment and performance bonding requirements through the issuance of euro-denominated standby letters of credit. As of April 30, 2012, there were $4 million in standby letters of credit outstanding relating to the support and maintenance of the System. The Company is seeking recovery of amounts drawn by the Customer in fiscal 2011 on the standby letters of credit in the ongoing arbitration. The principal subcontractor has provided to the Company euro-denominated standby letters of credit in the amount of $23 million as of April 30, 2012, of which $19 million relates to the delivery of the System. The Company may draw on the subcontractor's standby letters of credit under certain circumstances by providing a statement to the responsible bank that the subcontractor has not fulfilled its obligations under the subcontract.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the Company in September 2004 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging civil False Claims Act violations and breach of contract by the Company on two contracts that the Company had with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The complaint alleges that the Company's performance of several subcontracts on separate U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) programs, the participation of a Company employee in an industry trade association, and certain other alleged relationships created organizational conflicts of interest under the two NRC contracts. The Company disputes that the work performed on the DOE programs and the alleged relationships raised by the government created organizational conflicts of interest. In July 2008, the jury found in favor of the government on the breach of contract and two False Claims Act counts. The jury awarded a nominal amount of $78 in damages for breach of contract and $2 million in damages for the False Claims Act claims. The judge entered the judgment in October 2008, trebling the False Claims Act damages and awarding a total of $585,000 in civil penalties. The Company appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's judgment as to both liability and damages of $78 on the breach of contract count and rescinded the judgment on the False Claims Act counts, including the aggregate damages and penalties. The Court of Appeals sent the False Claims Act counts back to the District Court for further proceedings. The Company has recorded a liability for an immaterial amount related to this matter as of April 30, 2012 based on its assessment of the likely outcome of this matter.

Other

The Company is also involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in the opinion of the Company's management, based upon current information, will likely have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

Document And Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	May 11, 2012
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Apr. 30, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Entity Registrant Name	SAIC, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001336920
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--01-31
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Trading Symbol	sai
SAIC, Inc. [Member]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		341,576,401
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Apr. 30, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Entity Registrant Name	SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000353394
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--01-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		5,000

XML

Other Commitments And Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Other Commitments And Contingencies

Note 10—Other Commitments and Contingencies:

DS&S Joint Venture

In March 2006, the Company sold its interest in DS&S, a joint venture in which the Company owned a 50% interest. As part of the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser or DS&S for certain legal costs and expenses, including those related to a government investigation involving DS&S and any litigation resulting from that investigation up to the sum of the sales price of $9 million plus $1 million received by the Company in repayment of a loan owed by DS&S. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has deferred the potential $9 million gain on this sale pending resolution of the indemnification obligation.

Variable Interest Entity (VIE)

In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a fixed price agreement to provide engineering, procurement, and construction services to a special purpose limited liability company for a specific renewable energy project. The Company analyzed this arrangement and determined the entity is a VIE. However, this VIE was not consolidated by the Company because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The project is partially financed by the Company's provision of extended payment terms in the amount of $100 million for certain of its services performed on the project. The arrangement also contemplates monetary penalties and project guarantees if the Company does not meet certain completion deadlines. The Company expects to bill a total of $216 million to complete the project. At April 30, 2012, the Company had a receivable of $19 million due from this VIE.

Government Investigations and Reviews

The Company is routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to federal, state and local government customers and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. Adverse findings in these investigations or reviews can lead to criminal, civil or administrative proceedings and the Company could face penalties, fines, repayments or compensatory damages. Adverse findings could also have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows due to its reliance on government contracts.

U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and others, routinely audit and review a contractor's performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of the contractor's compliance with government standards for its accounting and management internal control systems, including: control environment and overall accounting system, estimating system, purchasing system, property system and earned value management system. Both contractors and the U.S. Government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny. As a result, the current audits and reviews have become more rigorous and the standards to which the Company is held are being more strictly interpreted, increasing the likelihood of an audit or review resulting in an adverse outcome. During the course of its current audits, the DCAA is closely examining and questioning several of the Company's long established and disclosed practices that it had previously audited and accepted, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate conclusion that will be reached.

The Company changed its indirect rate structure used in its indirect cost system and its direct labor bid structure used for its estimating system for fiscal 2011 and future years. The DCAA is performing reviews of these changes and the Company's compliance with certain other U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards. A finding of significant control deficiencies in the Company's system audits or other reviews can result in decremented billing rates to its U.S. Government customers until the control deficiencies are corrected and their remediation is accepted by the DCMA.

The Company's indirect cost audits by the DCAA have not been completed for fiscal 2005 and subsequent fiscal years. Although the Company has recorded contract revenues subsequent to fiscal 2004 based upon an estimate of costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review, the Company does not know the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments, and if future adjustments exceed the Company's estimates, its profitability would be adversely affected. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded a liability of $35 million for its current best estimate of net amounts to be refunded to customers for potential adjustments from such audits or reviews of contract costs incurred subsequent to fiscal 2004.

Tax Audits and Reviews

The Company files income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to routine compliance reviews by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other taxing authorities. The Company has effectively settled with the IRS for fiscal years prior to and including fiscal 2008. The Company also settled fiscal 2011 as a result of the Company's participation in the IRS Compliance Assurance Process beginning in fiscal 2011, in which the Company and the IRS endeavor to agree on the treatment of all tax positions prior to the tax return being filed, thereby greatly reducing the period of time between tax return submission and settlement with the IRS. Future and ongoing reviews could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

During the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of reviews by taxing authorities, both domestic and international, could be reached with respect to $102 million of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits including a negligible amount of previously accrued interest, depending on the timing of ongoing examinations, any litigation and expiration of statute of limitations, either because the Company's tax positions are sustained or because the Company agrees to their disallowance and pays the related income tax. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $131 million, $29 million of which were classified as other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company's uncertain tax positions were reduced by $1 million resulting from the resolution of certain tax uncertainties. While the Company believes it has adequate accruals for uncertain tax positions, the tax authorities may determine that the Company owes taxes in excess of recorded accruals or the recorded accruals may be in excess of the final settlement amounts agreed to by tax authorities.

The Company is subject to periodic audits by government agencies for taxes other than income taxes. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any other such tax matters would have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows.

Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds

The Company has outstanding letters of credit aggregating to $101 million at April 30, 2012, principally related to guarantees on contracts. The Company also has outstanding surety bonds in the amount of $347 million, principally related to performance and payment bonds on the Company's contracts.

Other

The Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization Engineering, Manufacturing and Development program was terminated for convenience by the DoD effective September 30, 2011. From October 2009 through termination, the Company and its prime contractor performed on this program under an undefinitized change order with a provisional billing rate that allowed the Company to receive a lesser amount of the projected fee than the estimated fee due until the contract negotiations are completed. The Company has recognized revenues of approximately $490 million, including estimated fee, from October 2009 through April 30, 2012 under the undefinitized change order. The actual fee payable to the Company on this program is dependent on the outcome of the change order negotiations and may differ from amounts previously recognized.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Other Commitments And Contingencies

Note 10—Other Commitments and Contingencies:

DS&S Joint Venture

In March 2006, the Company sold its interest in DS&S, a joint venture in which the Company owned a 50% interest. As part of the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser or DS&S for certain legal costs and expenses, including those related to a government investigation involving DS&S and any litigation resulting from that investigation up to the sum of the sales price of $9 million plus $1 million received by the Company in repayment of a loan owed by DS&S. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has deferred the potential $9 million gain on this sale pending resolution of the indemnification obligation.

Variable Interest Entity (VIE)

In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into a fixed price agreement to provide engineering, procurement, and construction services to a special purpose limited liability company for a specific renewable energy project. The Company analyzed this arrangement and determined the entity is a VIE. However, this VIE was not consolidated by the Company because the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The project is partially financed by the Company's provision of extended payment terms in the amount of $100 million for certain of its services performed on the project. The arrangement also contemplates monetary penalties and project guarantees if the Company does not meet certain completion deadlines. The Company expects to bill a total of $216 million to complete the project. At April 30, 2012, the Company had a receivable of $19 million due from this VIE.

Government Investigations and Reviews

The Company is routinely subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to federal, state and local government customers and in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. Adverse findings in these investigations or reviews can lead to criminal, civil or administrative proceedings and the Company could face penalties, fines, repayments or compensatory damages. Adverse findings could also have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows due to its reliance on government contracts.

U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and others, routinely audit and review a contractor's performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of the contractor's compliance with government standards for its accounting and management internal control systems, including: control environment and overall accounting system, estimating system, purchasing system, property system and earned value management system. Both contractors and the U.S. Government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny. As a result, the current audits and reviews have become more rigorous and the standards to which the Company is held are being more strictly interpreted, increasing the likelihood of an audit or review resulting in an adverse outcome. During the course of its current audits, the DCAA is closely examining and questioning several of the Company's long established and disclosed practices that it had previously audited and accepted, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate conclusion that will be reached.

The Company changed its indirect rate structure used in its indirect cost system and its direct labor bid structure used for its estimating system for fiscal 2011 and future years. The DCAA is performing reviews of these changes and the Company's compliance with certain other U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards. A finding of significant control deficiencies in the Company's system audits or other reviews can result in decremented billing rates to its U.S. Government customers until the control deficiencies are corrected and their remediation is accepted by the DCMA.

The Company's indirect cost audits by the DCAA have not been completed for fiscal 2005 and subsequent fiscal years. Although the Company has recorded contract revenues subsequent to fiscal 2004 based upon an estimate of costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review, the Company does not know the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments, and if future adjustments exceed the Company's estimates, its profitability would be adversely affected. As of April 30, 2012, the Company has recorded a liability of $35 million for its current best estimate of net amounts to be refunded to customers for potential adjustments from such audits or reviews of contract costs incurred subsequent to fiscal 2004.

Tax Audits and Reviews

The Company files income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to routine compliance reviews by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other taxing authorities. The Company has effectively settled with the IRS for fiscal years prior to and including fiscal 2008. The Company also settled fiscal 2011 as a result of the Company's participation in the IRS Compliance Assurance Process beginning in fiscal 2011, in which the Company and the IRS endeavor to agree on the treatment of all tax positions prior to the tax return being filed, thereby greatly reducing the period of time between tax return submission and settlement with the IRS. Future and ongoing reviews could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

During the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of reviews by taxing authorities, both domestic and international, could be reached with respect to $102 million of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits including a negligible amount of previously accrued interest, depending on the timing of ongoing examinations, any litigation and expiration of statute of limitations, either because the Company's tax positions are sustained or because the Company agrees to their disallowance and pays the related income tax. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $131 million, $29 million of which were classified as other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company's uncertain tax positions were reduced by $1 million resulting from the resolution of certain tax uncertainties. While the Company believes it has adequate accruals for uncertain tax positions, the tax authorities may determine that the Company owes taxes in excess of recorded accruals or the recorded accruals may be in excess of the final settlement amounts agreed to by tax authorities.

The Company is subject to periodic audits by government agencies for taxes other than income taxes. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any other such tax matters would have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows.

Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds

The Company has outstanding letters of credit aggregating to $101 million at April 30, 2012, principally related to guarantees on contracts. The Company also has outstanding surety bonds in the amount of $347 million, principally related to performance and payment bonds on the Company's contracts.

Other

The Army Brigade Combat Team Modernization Engineering, Manufacturing and Development program was terminated for convenience by the DoD effective September 30, 2011. From October 2009 through termination, the Company and its prime contractor performed on this program under an undefinitized change order with a provisional billing rate that allowed the Company to receive a lesser amount of the projected fee than the estimated fee due until the contract negotiations are completed. The Company has recognized revenues of approximately $490 million, including estimated fee, from October 2009 through April 30, 2012 under the undefinitized change order. The actual fee payable to the Company on this program is dependent on the outcome of the change order negotiations and may differ from amounts previously recognized.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 1,167	$ 1,592
Receivables, net	2,171	2,174
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	453	439
Total current assets	3,791	4,205
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $439 million and $424 million at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively)	339	348
Intangible assets, net	166	176
Goodwill	1,826	1,826
Deferred income taxes	23	37
Other assets	75	75
Total assets	6,220	6,667
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,410	1,964
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	515	508
Income taxes payable	32
Notes payable and long-term debt, current portion	553	553
Total current liabilities	2,510	3,025
Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion	1,298	1,299
Other long-term liabilities	146	162
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital	2,038	2,028
Retained earnings	229	164
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1)	(11)
Total stockholders' equity	2,266	2,181
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	6,220	6,667
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	967	1,592
Receivables, net	2,171	2,174
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets	453	439
Total current assets	3,591	4,205
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $439 million and $424 million at April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively)	339	348
Intangible assets, net	166	176
Goodwill	1,826	1,826
Deferred income taxes	23	37
Other assets	75	75
Note receivable from SAIC, Inc. (Note 6)	122
Total assets	6,142	6,667
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,410	1,964
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	515	508
Income taxes payable	32
Notes payable and long-term debt, current portion	553	553
Total current liabilities	2,510	3,025
Notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion	1,298	1,299
Note payable to SAIC, Inc. (Note 6)		120
Other long-term liabilities	146	162
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital	233	233
Retained earnings	1,956	1,839
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1)	(11)
Total stockholders' equity	2,188	2,061
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 6,142	$ 6,667

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Goodwill And Intangible Assets

Note 4—Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for Defense Solutions (DS), Health, Energy and Civil Solutions (HECS) and Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions (ICS) were as follows:

	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Goodwill at January 31, 2012	$	410	$	785		$	631	$	1,826
Corporate reorganizations		—		(10	)		10		—
Goodwill at April 30, 2012	$	410	$	775		$	641	$	1,826

Corporate reorganizations during the three months ended April 30, 2012 resulted from transfers of certain operations between the Company's reportable segments.

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

	April 30, 2012							January 31, 2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	120	$	(67	)	$	53	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		147		(52	)		95		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		269		(120	)		149		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	286	$	(120	)	$	166	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

Finite-lived intangible assets with a gross carrying value of $1 million became fully amortized during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and are no longer reflected in the gross carrying value. Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $10 million and $11 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

There were no goodwill or intangible asset impairment losses during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011.

The estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets as of April 30, 2012 was as follows:

Fiscal Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2013 (remainder of the fiscal year)	$	25
2014		31
2015		27
2016		22
2017		16
2018		12
2019 and thereafter		16
	$	149

Actual amortization expense in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of future acquisitions, divestitures, impairments, the outcome and timing of completion of in-process research and development projects (the assets of which will become amortizable upon completion and placement into service, or will be impaired if abandoned), adjustments to preliminary valuations of intangible assets and other factors.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Goodwill And Intangible Assets

Note 4—Goodwill and Intangible Assets:

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for Defense Solutions (DS), Health, Energy and Civil Solutions (HECS) and Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions (ICS) were as follows:

	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Goodwill at January 31, 2012	$	410	$	785		$	631	$	1,826
Corporate reorganizations		—		(10	)		10		—
Goodwill at April 30, 2012	$	410	$	775		$	641	$	1,826

Corporate reorganizations during the three months ended April 30, 2012 resulted from transfers of certain operations between the Company's reportable segments.

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

	April 30, 2012							January 31, 2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	120	$	(67	)	$	53	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		147		(52	)		95		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		269		(120	)		149		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	286	$	(120	)	$	166	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

Finite-lived intangible assets with a gross carrying value of $1 million became fully amortized during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and are no longer reflected in the gross carrying value. Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $10 million and $11 million for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

There were no goodwill or intangible asset impairment losses during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011.

The estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets as of April 30, 2012 was as follows:

Fiscal Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2013 (remainder of the fiscal year)	$	25
2014		31
2015		27
2016		22
2017		16
2018		12
2019 and thereafter		16
	$	149

Actual amortization expense in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of future acquisitions, divestitures, impairments, the outcome and timing of completion of in-process research and development projects (the assets of which will become amortizable upon completion and placement into service, or will be impaired if abandoned), adjustments to preliminary valuations of intangible assets and other factors.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Stock-Based Compensation

Note 3—Stock-Based Compensation:

Total Stock-Based Compensation.Total stock-based compensation expense for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock options	$	3	$	5
Vesting stock awards		20		18
Performance-based stock awards		1		1
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	24	$	24

Stock Options. Stock options granted during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 have terms of seven years and a vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company's outside directors, which have a vesting period of one year.

The fair value of the Company's stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock options granted for the periods presented were as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.22
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9
Expected volatility		24.4	%		23.4	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%

Stock option activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8		$	17.90		2.5	$	—
Options granted		4.9			13.21
Options forfeited or expired		(4.7	)		17.46
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		21.0			16.90		3.6		—
Exercisable at April 30, 2012		10.0			18.30		1.9		—

Vesting Stock Awards. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company began granting restricted stock units that have forfeitable dividend rights and no voting rights until the units vest and become included in shares of common stock outstanding. Prior to January 31, 2012, the Company granted restricted stock awards that have non-forfeitable dividend rights and voting rights and are included in shares outstanding upon issuance (prior to vesting). Vesting stock award activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested stock awards at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.4			13.21
Awards forfeited		(0.3	)		16.36
Awards vested		(4.4	)		17.91
Unvested stock awards at April 30, 2012		13.7			15.39

The fair value of vesting stock awards that vested during each of the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 was $60 million.

Performance-Based Stock Awards. The Company's performance-based stock awards vest and the stock is issued at the end of a three-year period based upon the achievement of specific performance criteria, with the number of shares ultimately awarded ranging from zero to 150% of the specified target awards. For awards granted in fiscal 2013, one-third of the target number of shares of stock granted under the awards will be allocated to each fiscal year over the three-year performance period and the actual number of shares to be issued with respect to each fiscal year will be based upon the achievement of that fiscal year's performance criteria. For performance-based stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013, the number of shares of stock to be issued under the awards is determined based upon the achievement of the performance criteria measured over the entire three-year performance period. Performance-based stock award activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance- based stock awards		Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5	$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8		13.21
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		1.3		14.55

Adjustments to the expected number of shares of stock to be issued may occur due to changes in the expected level of achievement of the performance goals over the life of the awards.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Stock-Based Compensation

Note 3—Stock-Based Compensation:

Total Stock-Based Compensation.Total stock-based compensation expense for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock options	$	3	$	5
Vesting stock awards		20		18
Performance-based stock awards		1		1
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	24	$	24

Stock Options. Stock options granted during the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 have terms of seven years and a vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company's outside directors, which have a vesting period of one year.

The fair value of the Company's stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock options granted for the periods presented were as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	1.81		$	4.22
Expected term (in years)		5.0			4.9
Expected volatility		24.4	%		23.4	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%		2.2	%
Dividend yield		3.7	%		0	%

Stock option activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Shares of stock under stock options			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual term		Aggregate intrinsic value
	(in millions)					(in years)		(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		20.8		$	17.90		2.5	$	—
Options granted		4.9			13.21
Options forfeited or expired		(4.7	)		17.46
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		21.0			16.90		3.6		—
Exercisable at April 30, 2012		10.0			18.30		1.9		—

Vesting Stock Awards. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company began granting restricted stock units that have forfeitable dividend rights and no voting rights until the units vest and become included in shares of common stock outstanding. Prior to January 31, 2012, the Company granted restricted stock awards that have non-forfeitable dividend rights and voting rights and are included in shares outstanding upon issuance (prior to vesting). Vesting stock award activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Shares of stock under stock awards			Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Unvested stock awards at January 31, 2012		12.0		$	17.50
Awards granted		6.4			13.21
Awards forfeited		(0.3	)		16.36
Awards vested		(4.4	)		17.91
Unvested stock awards at April 30, 2012		13.7			15.39

The fair value of vesting stock awards that vested during each of the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 was $60 million.

Performance-Based Stock Awards. The Company's performance-based stock awards vest and the stock is issued at the end of a three-year period based upon the achievement of specific performance criteria, with the number of shares ultimately awarded ranging from zero to 150% of the specified target awards. For awards granted in fiscal 2013, one-third of the target number of shares of stock granted under the awards will be allocated to each fiscal year over the three-year performance period and the actual number of shares to be issued with respect to each fiscal year will be based upon the achievement of that fiscal year's performance criteria. For performance-based stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013, the number of shares of stock to be issued under the awards is determined based upon the achievement of the performance criteria measured over the entire three-year performance period. Performance-based stock award activity for the three months ended April 30, 2012 was as follows:

	Expected number of shares of stock to be issued under performance- based stock awards		Weighted average grant- date fair value
	(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		0.5	$	17.02
Awards granted		0.8		13.21
Outstanding at April 30, 2012		1.3		14.55

Adjustments to the expected number of shares of stock to be issued may occur due to changes in the expected level of achievement of the performance goals over the life of the awards.

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Goodwill And Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Schedule Of Changes In Goodwill By Segment

	DS		HECS			ICS		Total
	(in millions)
Goodwill at January 31, 2012	$	410	$	785		$	631	$	1,826
Corporate reorganizations		—		(10	)		10		—
Goodwill at April 30, 2012	$	410	$	775		$	641	$	1,826

Schedule Of Intangible Assets Including Estimates Of Assets Acquired

	April 30, 2012							January 31, 2012
	Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value		Gross carrying value		Accumulated amortization			Net carrying value
	(in millions)
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	120	$	(67	)	$	53	$	120	$	(62	)	$	58
Software and technology		147		(52	)		95		148		(48	)		100
Other		2		(1	)		1		2		(1	)		1
Total finite-lived intangible assets		269		(120	)		149		270		(111	)		159
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
In-process research and development		13		—			13		13		—			13
Trade names		4		—			4		4		—			4
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets		17		—			17		17		—			17
Total intangible assets	$	286	$	(120	)	$	166	$	287	$	(111	)	$	176

Schedule Of Amortization Expense For Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

Fiscal Year Ending January 31
	(in millions)
2013 (remainder of the fiscal year)	$	25
2014		31
2015		27
2016		22
2017		16
2018		12
2019 and thereafter		16
	$	149

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Nature Of Operations And Basis Of Presentation

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

SAIC, Inc. ("SAIC") is a holding company whose direct 100%-owned subsidiary is Science Applications International Corporation ("Science Applications"), a provider of scientific, engineering, systems integration and technical services and solutions in the areas of defense, health, energy, infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and cybersecurity to agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and other U.S. Government civil agencies, state and local government agencies, foreign governments and customers in select commercial markets.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of SAIC include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries, including Science Applications. The condensed consolidated financial statements of Science Applications include the accounts of its majority-owned and 100%-owned subsidiaries. SAIC does not have separate operations, assets or liabilities independent of Science Applications, except for a note with Science Applications (the "related party note"), on which interest is recognized. From time to time, SAIC issues stock to Science Applications employees, which is reflected in SAIC's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity and results in an increase to the related party note (see Note 6). All intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

These Combined Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both SAIC and Science Applications. As SAIC consolidates Science Applications for financial statement purposes, disclosures that relate to activities of Science Applications also apply to SAIC. References to the "Company" refer collectively to SAIC, Science Applications, and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise noted.

The accompanying financial information has been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and combined notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current and best available information at the time of estimation and actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, the financial information as of April 30, 2012 and for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 reflects all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation thereof. Operating results for the three months ended April 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013, or any future period.

Unless otherwise noted, references to years are for fiscal years ended January 31. For example, the fiscal year ending January 31, 2013 is referred to as "fiscal 2013" in these combined notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Long-Term Receivables

Long-Term Receivables

The Company's accounts receivable include unbilled receivables, which consist of costs and fees billable upon contract completion or the occurrence of a specified event, the majority of which is expected to be billed and collected within one year. Unbilled receivables are stated at estimated realizable value. Contract retentions are billed when the Company has negotiated final indirect rates with the U.S. Government and, once billed, are subject to audit and approval by government representatives. Consequently, the timing of collection of retention balances is outside the Company's control. Based on the Company's historical experience, the majority of retention balances are expected to be collected beyond one year. The Company has extended deferred payment terms with contractual maturities that may exceed one year to three commercial customers related to certain construction projects. As of April 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding receivables with deferred payment terms of $80 million, which are expected to be collected in fiscal 2013. When events or conditions indicate that amounts outstanding from customers may become uncollectible, an allowance is estimated and recorded.

Changes In Estimates On Contracts

Changes in Estimates on Contracts

Changes in estimates related to certain types of contracts accounted for using the percentage of completion method of accounting are recognized in the period in which such changes are made for the inception-to-date effect of the changes. Changes in these estimates can routinely occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons, including changes in contract scope, changes in contract cost estimates due to unanticipated cost growth or retirements of risk for amounts different than estimated, and changes in estimated incentive or award fees. Aggregate changes in contract estimates increased operating income by $4 million ($0.01 per diluted share) and $12 million ($0.02 per diluted share) for the three months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Operations

In June 2011, in order to better align its business portfolio with its strategy, the Company sold certain components of its business, which were historically included in the Company's Health, Energy and Civil Solutions segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies. In fiscal 2012, the Company received net proceeds of $167 million resulting in a gain on sale before income taxes of $111 million related to this sale. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company has retained the assets and obligations of its defined benefit pension plan in the United Kingdom. The Company has classified the operating results of these business components, including pension expense through the date of sale, as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Following the sale, as a result of retaining the pension obligation, the remaining components of ongoing pension expense, primarily interest costs and assumed return on plan assets, are recorded in continuing operations.

The operating results of this discontinued operation for the three months ended April 30, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

Revenues	$	45
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		36
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7
Income before income taxes	$	2

Income from discontinued operations also includes other activity that is immaterial and not reflected in the table above.

Pension

Pension

During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company transferred $46 million of pension plan assets to a successor contractor's plan on behalf of certain participants in the Company's defined benefit pension plan who previously transferred their employment to the successor contractor and settled $63 million of related pension plan obligations. As a result of the transfer, the Company recorded an immaterial settlement gain in selling, general and administrative expenses during the three months ended April 30, 2012.

Supplementary Cash Flow Information

Supplementary Cash Flow Information

Supplementary cash flow information, including non-cash investing and financing activities, for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options	$	—	$	14
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3
Increase in accrued stock repurchases	$	—	$	5
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividend	$	1	$	—
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	8	$	7

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Note 7—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:

	April 30, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) million and $(2) million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million, as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $(1) million and $5 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively		2			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $1 million and $6 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	(1	)	$	(11	)

As of April 30, 2012, there is less than $1 million of the unrealized net loss on settled derivative instruments (pre-tax) that will be amortized and recognized as interest expense during the next 12 months.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Note 7—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:

	April 30, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(1) million and $(2) million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Unrecognized net loss on settled derivative instruments associated with outstanding debt, net of taxes of $3 million, as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012		(5	)		(5	)
Unrecognized loss on defined benefit plan, net of taxes of $(1) million and $5 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively		2			(8	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes of $1 million and $6 million as of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, respectively	$	(1	)	$	(11	)

As of April 30, 2012, there is less than $1 million of the unrealized net loss on settled derivative instruments (pre-tax) that will be amortized and recognized as interest expense during the next 12 months.

XML

Financial Instruments

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Financial Instruments

Note 5—Financial Instruments:

The Company's cash equivalents were primarily comprised of investments in several large institutional money market funds that invest primarily in bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government guaranteed repurchase agreements fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. Government guaranteed securities and investment-grade corporate securities that have original maturities of three months or less. There are no restrictions on the withdrawal of the Company's cash and cash equivalents. The Company's cash equivalents are recorded at historical cost which equals fair value based on quoted market prices (Level 1 input as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements).

SAIC has a revolving credit facility, which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Science Applications, providing for up to $750 million in unsecured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined, at SAIC's option, based on either LIBOR plus a margin or a defined base rate through fiscal 2017. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company extended the maturity date of the revolving credit facility for one additional year, to March 2016, as provided for in the terms of the revolving credit facility. As of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

The revolving credit facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, as well as certain affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenants contained in the revolving credit facility require that, for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants as of April 30, 2012. A failure by the Company to meet these financial covenants in the future would reduce and could eliminate the Company's borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility.

Other covenants restrict certain of the Company's activities, including among other things, its ability to create liens, dispose of certain assets and merge or consolidate with other entities. The revolving credit facility also contains certain customary events of default, including, among others, defaults based on certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment, cross-defaults to other debt, breach of specified covenants, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) events, material monetary judgments, change of control events and the material inaccuracy of the Company's representations and warranties.

The Company's notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following:

	Stated interest rate			Effective interest rate			April 30, 2012		January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45	%		4.53	%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95	%		6.03	%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2012		6.25	%		6.50	%		550		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13	%		7.43	%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50	%		5.78	%		296		296
Capital leases and other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2018		0-2.5	%		Various			8		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt								1,851		1,852
Less current portion								553		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion							$	1,298	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt							$	1,982	$	2,011

The fair value of long-term debt is determined based on current interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company's existing debt arrangements (Level 2 and 3 inputs as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements).

The senior unsecured notes contain customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the Company's ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of April 30, 2012.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Financial Instruments

Note 5—Financial Instruments:

The Company's cash equivalents were primarily comprised of investments in several large institutional money market funds that invest primarily in bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government guaranteed repurchase agreements fully collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. Government guaranteed securities and investment-grade corporate securities that have original maturities of three months or less. There are no restrictions on the withdrawal of the Company's cash and cash equivalents. The Company's cash equivalents are recorded at historical cost which equals fair value based on quoted market prices (Level 1 input as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements).

SAIC has a revolving credit facility, which is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Science Applications, providing for up to $750 million in unsecured borrowing capacity at interest rates determined, at SAIC's option, based on either LIBOR plus a margin or a defined base rate through fiscal 2017. During the three months ended April 30, 2012, the Company extended the maturity date of the revolving credit facility for one additional year, to March 2016, as provided for in the terms of the revolving credit facility. As of April 30, 2012 and January 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

The revolving credit facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, as well as certain affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenants contained in the revolving credit facility require that, for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, the Company maintains a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this facility, to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants as of April 30, 2012. A failure by the Company to meet these financial covenants in the future would reduce and could eliminate the Company's borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility.

Other covenants restrict certain of the Company's activities, including among other things, its ability to create liens, dispose of certain assets and merge or consolidate with other entities. The revolving credit facility also contains certain customary events of default, including, among others, defaults based on certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment, cross-defaults to other debt, breach of specified covenants, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) events, material monetary judgments, change of control events and the material inaccuracy of the Company's representations and warranties.

The Company's notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following:

	Stated interest rate			Effective interest rate			April 30, 2012		January 31, 2012
	(in millions)
SAIC senior unsecured notes:
$450 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2020		4.45	%		4.53	%	$	449	$	449
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2011, which mature in December 2040		5.95	%		6.03	%		300		300
Science Applications senior unsecured notes:
$550 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2012		6.25	%		6.50	%		550		550
$250 million notes issued in fiscal 2003, which mature in July 2032		7.13	%		7.43	%		248		248
$300 million notes issued in fiscal 2004, which mature in July 2033		5.50	%		5.78	%		296		296
Capital leases and other notes payable due on various dates through fiscal 2018		0-2.5	%		Various			8		9
Total notes payable and long-term debt								1,851		1,852
Less current portion								553		553
Total notes payable and long-term debt, net of current portion							$	1,298	$	1,299
Fair value of notes payable and long-term debt							$	1,982	$	2,011

The fair value of long-term debt is determined based on current interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company's existing debt arrangements (Level 2 and 3 inputs as defined by the accounting standard for fair value measurements).

The senior unsecured notes contain customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on the Company's ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of April 30, 2012.

XML

Related Party Transactions

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Related Party Transactions

Note 6—Related Party Transactions:

Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of SAIC under its $450 million 4.45% notes and $300 million 5.95% notes. These notes have been reflected as debt of Science Applications. Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed any borrowings under SAIC's amended and restated revolving credit facility maturing in fiscal 2017. SAIC has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Science Applications under its $300 million 5.5% notes, $550 million 6.25% notes and $250 million 7.13% notes.

SAIC and Science Applications have a related party note in connection with a loan of cash between the entities, issuances of stock by SAIC to employees of Science Applications and its subsidiaries and Science Applications' payment of certain obligations on behalf of SAIC. The related party note bears interest based on LIBOR plus a market-based premium. Portions of the related party note may be repaid at any time prior to its maturity date in November 2012. This maturity date will be automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless either SAIC or Science Applications provides prior notice to the other party.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Related Party Transactions

Note 6—Related Party Transactions:

Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of SAIC under its $450 million 4.45% notes and $300 million 5.95% notes. These notes have been reflected as debt of Science Applications. Science Applications has fully and unconditionally guaranteed any borrowings under SAIC's amended and restated revolving credit facility maturing in fiscal 2017. SAIC has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of Science Applications under its $300 million 5.5% notes, $550 million 6.25% notes and $250 million 7.13% notes.

SAIC and Science Applications have a related party note in connection with a loan of cash between the entities, issuances of stock by SAIC to employees of Science Applications and its subsidiaries and Science Applications' payment of certain obligations on behalf of SAIC. The related party note bears interest based on LIBOR plus a market-based premium. Portions of the related party note may be repaid at any time prior to its maturity date in November 2012. This maturity date will be automatically extended for successive one-year periods unless either SAIC or Science Applications provides prior notice to the other party.

XML

Business Segment Information

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Business Segment Information

Note 8—Business Segment Information:

The Company defines its reportable segments based on the way the chief operating decision maker (CODM), currently its chief executive officer, manages the operations of the Company for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.

The segment information for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	1,174		$	1,137
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		678			657
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		930			896
Intersegment elimination		—			(2	)
Total revenues	$	2,782		$	2,688
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	101		$	90
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		47			54
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		66			86
Corporate and Other		(6	)		—
Total operating income	$	208		$	230

Prior to February 1, 2012, the Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions reportable segment represented the aggregation of the Cyber and Information Solutions business unit and the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance group. Effective February 1, 2012, the Cyber and Information Solutions business unit, which previously reported directly to the CODM, commenced reporting to the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance group. After this change the reportable segment name has remained Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions. Also effective February 1, 2012, certain operations were transferred between the Company's reportable segments. Prior year amounts have been adjusted for consistency with the current year's presentation.

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Business Segment Information

Note 8—Business Segment Information:

The Company defines its reportable segments based on the way the chief operating decision maker (CODM), currently its chief executive officer, manages the operations of the Company for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.

The segment information for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	1,174		$	1,137
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		678			657
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		930			896
Intersegment elimination		—			(2	)
Total revenues	$	2,782		$	2,688
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	101		$	90
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		47			54
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		66			86
Corporate and Other		(6	)		—
Total operating income	$	208		$	230

Prior to February 1, 2012, the Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions reportable segment represented the aggregation of the Cyber and Information Solutions business unit and the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance group. Effective February 1, 2012, the Cyber and Information Solutions business unit, which previously reported directly to the CODM, commenced reporting to the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance group. After this change the reportable segment name has remained Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions. Also effective February 1, 2012, certain operations were transferred between the Company's reportable segments. Prior year amounts have been adjusted for consistency with the current year's presentation.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y	Apr. 30, 2011 Y
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected term (in years)	5.0	4.9
Vesting period (in years)	three
Fair value of vesting awards that vested	$ 60	$ 60
Minimum percentage that will ultimately be awarded	0.00%
Maximum percentage that will ultimately be awarded	150.00%
Stock Options [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected term (in years)	7	7
Vesting period (in years)	four	four
Outside Directors [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period (in years)	one

XML

Other Commitments And Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended			3 Months Ended					1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011	Jan. 31, 2012	Apr. 30, 2012 Government Investigations And Reviews [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Restructuring Proposals [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Tax Audits And Reviews [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Standby Letters Of Credit [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 Performance Guarantees [Member]	Mar. 31, 2006 DS And S [Member]	Apr. 30, 2012 DS And S [Member]
Other Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Ownership interest									50.00%
Sale price of business									$ 9
Cash received for repayment of loan									1
Deferred gain related to sale of business										9
Project financing from the company's provision of extended payment terms	100
Total project billings	216
Receivable due from VIE	19
Liability for estimate of loss				35
Unrecognized tax benefits						102
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions						131
Other long-term liabilities	146		162			29
Reduction of uncertain tax position from resolution						1
Amount outstanding							101
Surety bonds								347
Revenues	$ 2,782	$ 2,688			$ 490

XML

Earnings Per Share (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Reconciliation Of Income Used In Calculating Earnings Per Share

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	127
Diluted EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	127

Reconciliation Of Weighted Average Number Of Shares Outstanding

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		347
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		1
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		348

Schedule Of Basic And Diluted EPS

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		.01
	$	.35	$	.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		—
	$	.35	$	.36

Schedule Of Stock-Based Awards Excluded From Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		21		23
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1

XML

Business Segment Information (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Business Segment Information [Abstract]

Schedule Of Segment Reporting Information By Segment

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Revenues:
Defense Solutions	$	1,174		$	1,137
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		678			657
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		930			896
Intersegment elimination		—			(2	)
Total revenues	$	2,782		$	2,688
Operating income (loss):
Defense Solutions	$	101		$	90
Health, Energy and Civil Solutions		47			54
Intelligence and Cybersecurity Solutions		66			86
Corporate and Other		(6	)		—
Total operating income	$	208		$	230

XML

Business Segment Information (Schedule Of Segment Reporting Information By Segment) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012	Apr. 30, 2011
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Revenues	$ 2,782	$ 2,688
Operating income (loss)	208	230
Defense Solutions [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Revenues	1,174	1,137
Operating income (loss)	101	90
Health, Energy And Civil Solutions [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Revenues	678	657
Operating income (loss)	47	54
Intelligence And Cybersecurity Solutions [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Revenues	930	896
Operating income (loss)	66	86
Intersegment Elimination [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Revenues		(2)
Corporate And Other [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating income (loss)	$ (6)

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets (Schedule Of Changes In Goodwill By Segment) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	$ 1,826
Corporate reorganizations
Ending balance, Goodwill	1,826
Defense Solutions [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	410
Corporate reorganizations
Ending balance, Goodwill	410
Health, Energy And Civil Solutions [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	785
Corporate reorganizations	(10)
Ending balance, Goodwill	775
Cybersecurity Solutions [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	631
Corporate reorganizations	10
Ending balance, Goodwill	$ 641

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Property, plant and equipment, accumulated depreciation and amortization	$ 439	$ 424
Common stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized	2,000,000,000	2,000,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	342,000,000	341,000,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	342,000,000	341,000,000
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
Property, plant and equipment, accumulated depreciation and amortization	$ 439	$ 424
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	10,000	10,000
Common stock, shares issued	5,000	5,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	5,000	5,000

XML

Earnings Per Share

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share

Note 2—Earnings Per Share (EPS):

The Company is required to allocate a portion of its earnings to its unvested stock awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (participating securities) in calculating EPS using the two-class method.

In fiscal 2013, the Company began issuing unvested stock awards that do not contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. These stock awards are not participating securities requiring application of the two-class method but are dilutive common share equivalents subject to the treasury stock method. Unvested stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013 were participating securities requiring application of the two-class method. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income less earnings allocable to participating securities by the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS, except the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and other stock-based awards.

A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	127
Diluted EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	127

A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		347
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		1
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		348

Basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		.01
	$	.35	$	.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		—
	$	.35	$	.36

The following stock-based awards were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		21		23
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1

Science Applications International Corporation [Member]

Earnings Per Share

Note 2—Earnings Per Share (EPS):

The Company is required to allocate a portion of its earnings to its unvested stock awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (participating securities) in calculating EPS using the two-class method.

In fiscal 2013, the Company began issuing unvested stock awards that do not contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. These stock awards are not participating securities requiring application of the two-class method but are dilutive common share equivalents subject to the treasury stock method. Unvested stock awards granted prior to fiscal 2013 were participating securities requiring application of the two-class method. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income less earnings allocable to participating securities by the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS, except the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and other stock-based awards.

A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Basic EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing basic EPS	$	114		$	127
Diluted EPS:
Income from continuing operations, as reported	$	117		$	130
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Income from continuing operations, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	126
Net income, as reported	$	117		$	131
Less: allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(3	)		(4	)
Net income, for computing diluted EPS	$	114		$	127

A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		347
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards		—		1
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		330		348

Basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented was as follows:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
Basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		.01
	$	.35	$	.37
Diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	.35	$	.36
Income from discontinued operations		—		—
	$	.35	$	.36

The following stock-based awards were excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Antidilutive stock options excluded		21		23
Performance-based stock awards excluded		1		1

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012 Y item	Apr. 30, 2011
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Period for billing and collection of unbilled receivables, maximum (in years)	1
Period of collection for contract retentions, minimum (in years)	1
Outstanding receivables	$ 80
Period of extension for deferred payment terms (in years)	1
Number of commercial customers within extended deferred payments terms	3
Increase in income due to contract estimates	4	12
Increase in income due to contract estimates per diluted share	$ 0.01	$ 0.02
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations	167
Gain on sale before income taxes	111
Amount of pension plan assets transferred	46
Amount of settlement related to pension plan obligations	$ 63
Science Applications International Corporation [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Ownership interest	100.00%

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Vesting Stock Award Activity) (Details) (Vesting Stock Awards [Member], USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2012
Vesting Stock Awards [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares, beginning balance	12.0
Shares of stock under stock awards, Awards granted	6.4
Shares of stock under stock awards, Awards forfeited	(0.3)
Shares of stock under stock awards, Awards vested	(4.4)
Shares, ending balance	13.7
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, beginning balance	$ 17.50
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards granted	$ 13.21
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards forfeited	$ 16.36
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Awards vested	$ 17.91
Weighted average grant-date fair value, Shares, ending balance	$ 15.39

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Apr. 30, 2012

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Schedule Of Operating Results Of Discontinued Operations

Revenues	$	45
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues		36
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7
Income before income taxes	$	2

Schedule Of Supplementary Cash Flow Information

	Three Months Ended April 30
	2012		2011
	(in millions)
Stock exchanged at fair value upon exercises of stock options	$	—	$	14
Vested stock issued as settlement of annual bonus accruals	$	2	$	3
Increase in accrued stock repurchases	$	—	$	5
Stock issued in lieu of cash dividend	$	1	$	—
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)	$	8	$	7