0001623632-21-001041.txt : 20210825 0001623632-21-001041.hdr.sgml : 20210825 20210825102745 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001623632-21-001041 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: N-CSR PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 10 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20210630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20210825 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20210825 EFFECTIVENESS DATE: 20210825 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000353101 IRS NUMBER: 251400935 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MA FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: N-CSR SEC ACT: 1940 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 811-03181 FILM NUMBER: 211204597 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4000 ERICSSON DRIVE CITY: WARRENDALE STATE: PA ZIP: 15086-7561 BUSINESS PHONE: 8003417400 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4000 ERICSSON DRIVE CITY: WARRENDALE STATE: PA ZIP: 15086-7561 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: FEDERATED SHORT-INTERMEDIATE DURATION MUNICIPAL TRUST DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20071029 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: FEDERATED SHORT TERM MUNICIPAL TRUST DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19950223 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SHORT TERM MUNICIPAL TRUST/ DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19930708 0000353101 S000009085 Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund C000024677 Institutional Shares FSHIX C000024678 Service Shares FSHSX C000037571 Class A Shares FMTAX N-CSR 1 form.htm EDGAR HTML

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form N-CSR

Certified Shareholder Report of Registered Management Investment Companies

 

 

 

 

811-3181

 

(Investment Company Act File Number)

 

Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust

_______________________________________________________________

 

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

 

Federated Hermes Funds

4000 Ericsson Drive

Warrendale, Pennsylvania 15086-7561

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

 

(412) 288-1900

(Registrant's Telephone Number)

 

 

Peter J. Germain, Esquire

1001 Liberty Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3779

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

(Notices should be sent to the Agent for Service)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of Fiscal Year End: 06/30/21

 

 

Date of Reporting Period: 06/30/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Item 1. Reports to Stockholders

 

Annual Shareholder Report
June 30, 2021
 
 
Share Class | Ticker
A | FMTAX
Institutional | FSHIX
Service | FSHSX
 
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund
Fund Established 1981
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust
Dear Valued Shareholder,
We are pleased to present the Annual Shareholder Report for your fund covering the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. This report includes Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance, a complete listing of your fund’s holdings, performance information and financial statements along with other important fund information.
As a global leader in active, responsible investment management, Federated Hermes is guided by our conviction that responsible investing is the best way to create wealth over the long term. The company provides capabilities across a wide range of asset classes to investors around the world.
In addition, FederatedInvestors.com offers quick and easy access to valuable resources that include timely fund updates, economic and market insights from our investment strategists and financial planning tools. You can also access many of those insights by following us on Twitter (@FederatedHermes) and LinkedIn.
Thank you for investing with us. We hope you find this information useful and look forward to keeping you informed.
Sincerely,  
John B. Fisher, President
Not FDIC Insured ▪ May Lose Value ▪ No Bank Guarantee
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance (unaudited)
The total return of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”), based on net asset value for the 12-month reporting period ended June 30, 2021, was 1.98% for the Class A Shares, 2.34% for the Institutional Shares and 2.00% for the Service Shares. The 2.34% total return for the Institutional Shares for the reporting period consisted of 1.07% of mostly AMT-free, tax-exempt dividends and reinvestments and 1.27% appreciation in the net asset value of the shares.1 The total return of the S&P Municipal Bond Short Index (SPMBSI),2 the broad-based securities market index for the Fund, was 1.09%. The total return of the Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average (LSMDF),3 a peer group average for the Fund, was 1.29% over the reporting period. The Fund’s and the LSMDF’s total returns for the most recently completed fiscal year reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and expenses which are not reflected in the total return of the SPMBSI.
During the reporting period, the most significant factors affecting the Fund’s performance relative to the SPMBSI were: (a) the effective duration of its portfolio (which indicates the portfolio’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates);4,5 (b) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as sectors); and (c) the credit rating of portfolio securities (credit quality).6
The following discussion will focus on the performance of the Fund’s Institutional Shares relative to the SPMBSI.
MARKET OVERVIEW
During the reporting period, 10-year U.S. Treasury yields increased from a low of 0.51% in August 2020 to a high of 1.74% in March 2021 and averaged 1.10%.
During the reporting period, the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) was committed to using its full range of tools to support the U.S. economy in this challenging time, thereby promoting its maximum employment and price stability goals.
The pandemic caused tremendous human and economic hardship across the United States and around the world. Following a moderation in the pace of the recovery, indicators of economic activity and employment turned up. The sectors most adversely affected by the pandemic remained weak and inflation continued to run below 2 percent. Overall financial conditions remained accommodative, reflecting Fed policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses. We believe the path of the U.S. economy will depend significantly on the course of the virus, including progress on vaccinations. The ongoing public health crisis continues to weigh on economic activity, employment and inflation, and still poses risks to the economic outlook.
Annual Shareholder Report
1
The evolving outlooks for the path of the virus and for fiscal policy were the main drivers of financial markets over the period. Progress on vaccinations had been slower than expected, and the near-term trajectory of the pandemic worsened, weighing on economic activity. However, even with the appearance of new strains of the virus, market confidence in the ultimate efficacy of the vaccination efforts seemed to remain high. The emergence of a narrow Democratic majority in the Senate bolstered investor expectations for additional fiscal stimulus, prompting upward revisions to forecasts for economic growth this year.
Against this backdrop, longer-term Treasury yields rose notably over the period. Longer-dated real yields were lifted by expectations for improved growth and increased Treasury issuance but remained deeply negative. Measures of inflation compensation increased over the period, with the five-year, five-year-forward measure rising to a level of around 2 percent. Overall financial conditions eased further, on net, as the recent rally in risk assets continued. Gains in U.S. equities again centered on cyclical sectors and smaller capitalization firms most sensitive to growth. Credit spreads narrowed further, especially for riskier borrowers.
Recent data pointed to a sharp slowing in foreign economic growth. Amid a further intensification of the pandemic, many foreign governments tightened social distancing restrictions. In a few countries, the emergence of new and more contagious virus strains was accompanied by a surge in cases and deaths. The increased virus spread and restrictions appeared to take a toll on foreign economic activity, particularly in Europe.
While generally acknowledging that the medium-term outlook for real GDP growth and employment had improved, the markets continued to see the uncertainty surrounding that economic outlook as elevated. The pandemic continued to pose considerable risks to the economic outlook, including risks associated with new virus strains, potential public resistance to vaccination and potential difficulties in the production and distribution of vaccines. Upside risks included the possibility that the fiscal policy could turn out to be more expansionary than anticipated, that households could display greater willingness to spend out of accumulated savings than expected, and that wide-spread vaccinations and easing of social distancing could result in a more rapid boost to spending and employment than anticipated.
The federal government’s several fiscal relief packages passed over the reporting period provided significant assistance to the municipal market. The $150 billion that state and local governments received from the CARES Act’s Coronavirus Relief Fund were meant to be used for coronavirus expense reimbursement rather than as a pure cash flow injection. Municipal issuers also benefited from the $454 billion economic stabilization fund–leveraged by the Fed–established under the CARES Act. Under these provisions, the Fed was allowed, though not required, to purchase municipals directly from issuers, in the secondary market, or to make loans or loan guarantees. The CARES Act
Annual Shareholder Report
2
did not provide free, direct funding to municipal issuers. Absent support for the municipal debt market, state and local government budgets would have been further stressed at the most inopportune time, particularly as revenues declined as a result of business closures and rising unemployment.
The most important and long-awaited development was the passage of the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan in early 2021, which provided an additional boost to the U.S. economy, especially for municipalities. Various municipal sectors received direct financial help, including state and local governments, which received $360 billion, including $350 billion in direct payments and $10 billion for a Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund. In addition, $300 billion will be allocated for public health, Medicaid, CHIP and schools, $30 billion for transportation and $15 billion for airlines. State and local governments will not be allowed to use the money to lower taxes, nor replenish their pension funds, although with respect to the latter, they might still be able to fund them out of their general accounts. Moreover, from the bondholder point of view, it might make a lot of sense for municipalities to use a portion of the funding for pensions, due to their high implied returns (close to 7%), and/or to retire some outstanding debt.
State and local employment, which has been lagging the job recovery in the private sector, also got a much-needed boost. Some of the funds will also likely be used for capital expenditures, but municipalities might wait to see if they can receive additional federal help in an infrastructure package later this year. Rating agencies have also acknowledged positive credit implications of the American Rescue Plan as issuers with negative credit outlooks, where funding of near-term deficits is a concern, will benefit the most from the package.
The municipal bond market’s technical (supply and demand) position was very favorable over the reporting period. The issuance of municipal debt in 2020 had been relatively comparable to previous periods, even though the ability to advance refund existing debt became disallowed. Flows from investors into short, intermediate, long and high-yield municipal bonds were very strong over the period, with demand far exceeding the supply of tax-exempt bonds.7 The market demand reflected the strong governmental response to the virus and federal aid to municipalities. Re-opening the economy was a large factor in the recovery of various economically sensitive municipal sectors, namely toll roads, airports, hospitals and various dedicated tax-backed debt.
DURATION
As determined at the end of the reporting period, the Fund’s dollar-weighted average duration was 2.5 years. Duration management and the positioning of the bond maturities held along the short-intermediate portion of the municipal yield curve continued to be a significant component of the Fund’s investment strategy.8 The Fund’s average duration (2.60 years) was long relative to the average duration (1.85 years) of the SPMBSI during the reporting period.
Annual Shareholder Report
3
The municipal short-intermediate yield curve steepened over the reporting period and became more upward sloping as high-grade municipal bond yields inside of 3 years declined, while yields from 5-10 years increased marginally.
The Fund’s long duration position resulted in a slight but positive impact on Fund performance over the reporting period as close to 70% of the Fund’s assets had an effective maturity inside of 4 years reflecting favorable yield curve positioning. The Fund utilized U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage duration near the end of the period. The use of these contracts resulted in a negligible impact to excess return over the reporting period.
Over the reporting period, about 10-12% of the Fund’s portfolio was held in low-duration floating-rate notes (FRNs). These FRNs generated above average distributable coupon income over the period and generally low-price volatility. Prices for these FRNs also increased significantly over the period as yields for comparable fixed-coupon instruments moved lower. The Fund’s security selection and allocation to FRNs, which are not included in the SPMBSI, had a positive impact on Fund performance.
SECTOR ALLOCATION
During the reporting period, the Fund’s sector allocations had a large and positive impact on Fund performance relative to the SPMBSI. The Fund’s overweight positioning and security selection relative to the SPMBSI in the health care sectors of hospitals and senior care as well as industrial development bonds generated large positive excess returns due to outperformance within the Fund and relative to the index.
The Fund also generated significant and positive excess returns from both its allocations and security selection in transportation related debt (toll roads and airports), local general obligation debt and public power sectors relative to the SPMBSI. The Fund’s underweight position in the large and underperforming pre-refunded sector (bonds for which the principal and interest payments are secured or guaranteed by cash or U.S. Treasury securities held in an escrow account) also added to performance as this sector experienced less demand during the rally in credit sensitive bonds over the period as the economic recovery progressed. The decision to hold an overweight position in and add to the Fund’s exposure in State of Illinois general obligation debt resulted in it being the Fund’s top performer as credit spreads declined significantly and the State was upgraded by the rating agencies.
CREDIT QUALITY
During the reporting period, investor appetite for lower credit quality debt surged as economic realities adjusted to the emergence from lockdowns which significantly affected employment and GDP. This resulted in outperformance of bonds rated “A,” “BBB” and below investment-grade (or unrated bonds of comparable quality) relative to bonds rated in the higher rating categories (or unrated bonds of comparable quality) of the SPMBSI.9
Annual Shareholder Report
4
The Fund’s overweight position, relative to the SPMBSI, in “A” and “BBB” debt added positive excess return as these securities experienced spread tightening (decreasing yields due to increasing prices) versus higher-quality debt over the reporting period. Conversely, the Fund’s underweight position, relative to the SPMBSI, in “AAA” and “AA” (or unrated bonds of comparable quality) debt during the reporting period had a positive impact on the Fund’s performance as bonds in these rating categories underperformed within the SPMBSI.
1
Income may be subject to state and local taxes. The investment adviser may invest the Fund’s assets without limitation in securities whose interest may be subject to (or may be a specific preference item for purposes of) the AMT for individuals. With respect to such investments, interest from the Fund’s investments may be subject to (or may be a specific preference item for purposes of) the AMT.
2
Please see the footnotes to the line graphs under “Fund Performance and Growth of a $10,000 Investment” below for the definition of, and more information about, the SPMBSI.
3
Please see the footnotes to the line graphs under “Fund Performance and Growth of a $10,000 Investment” below for the definition of, and more information about, the LSMDF.
4
Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates, and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.
5
Duration is a measure of a security’s price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations. For purposes of this Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance, duration is determined using a third-party analytical system.
6
Credit ratings pertain only to the securities in the portfolio and do not protect Fund shares against market risk. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.
7
The amount of public information available about municipal securities is generally less than that for corporate bonds. Special factors, such as legislative changes and local and business developments, may adversely affect the yield or value of municipal securities.
8
The yield curve is a graph showing the comparative yields of securities in a particular class according to maturity. Securities on the long end of the yield curve have longer maturities.
Annual Shareholder Report
5
9
Investment-grade securities are securities that are rated at least “BBB” or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Noninvestment-grade securities are securities that are not rated at least “BBB” or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Investment-grade securities and noninvestment-grade securities may either be: (a) rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization or rating agency; or (b) unrated securities that the Fund’s investment adviser (“Adviser”) believes are of comparable quality. The rating agencies that provided the ratings for rated securities include Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. and Fitch Rating Service. When ratings vary, the highest rating is used. Credit ratings of “AA” or better are considered to be high credit quality; credit ratings of “A” are considered high or medium/good quality; and credit ratings of “BBB” are considered to be medium/good credit quality and the lowest category of investment-grade securities; credit ratings of “BB” and below are lower-rated, noninvestment-grade securities or junk bonds; and credit ratings of “CCC” or below are noninvestment-grade securities that have high default risk. Any credit quality breakdown does not give effect to the impact of any credit derivative investments made by the Fund. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.
Annual Shareholder Report
6
FUND PERFORMANCE AND GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT
The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,0001 in the Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) from June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2021, compared to the S&P Municipal Bond Short Index (SPMBSI),2 the S&P Municipal Bond 1-5 Years Investment Grade Max 5% Pre-Refunded Index (SPMB5I)3 and the Lipper Short Municipal Debt Funds Average (LSMDF).4 The Average Annual Total Return table below shows returns for each class averaged over the stated periods.
Growth of a $10,000 Investment
Growth of $10,000 as of June 30, 2021  
■ Total returns shown for Class A include the maximum sales charge of 1.00% ($10,000 investment minus $100 sales charge = $9,900)
The Fund offers multiple share classes whose performance may be greater than or less than its other share class(es) due to differences in sales charges and expenses. See the Average Annual Returns table below for the returns of additional classes not shown in the line graph above.
Average Annual Total Returns for the Period Ended 6/30/2021
(returns reflect all applicable sales charges as specified below in footnote #1) 
 
1 Year
5 Years
10 Years
Class A Shares
1.00%
0.94%
1.13%
Institutional Shares
2.34%
1.56%
1.70%
Service Shares
2.00%
1.31%
1.45%
SPMBSI
1.09%
1.59%
1.44%
SPMB5I
1.43%
1.80%
1.83%
LSMDF
1.29%
1.29%
1.23%
 
Annual Shareholder Report
7
Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured.
1
Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting applicable sales charges: for Class A Shares, the maximum sales charge of 1.00% ($10,000 investment minus $100 sales charge = $9,900). The Fund’s performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The SPMBSI, SPMB5I and LSMDF have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes and the average.
2
The SPMBSI consists of bonds in the S&P Municipal Bond Index with a minimum maturity of six months and a maximum maturity of four years. The SPMBSI is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses and other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in the Fund’s performance. The SPMBSI is unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
3
The SPMB5I represents the portion of the S&P Municipal Bond Investment Grade Index composed solely of investment-grade bonds (those with ratings higher than “BBB-“/”Baa3”) with remaining maturities of between one and five years, 5% of which are pre-refunded. The SPMB5I is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses and other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in the Fund’s performance. The SPMB5I is unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
4
The LSMDF represents the average of the total returns reported by all the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling in the category indicated, and is not adjusted to reflect any sales charges. However, these returns are reported net of expenses or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a fund’s performance.
Annual Shareholder Report
8
Portfolio of Investments Summary Table (unaudited)
At June 30, 2021, the Fund’s sector composition1 was as follows: 
Sector Composition
Percentage of
Total Net Assets
Industrial Development/Pollution Control
13.2%
General Obligations-Local
10.5%
Hospital
9.6%
Prepaid Gas Utility
8.1%
Electric and Gas
7.9%
Airport
6.7%
Toll Road
6.6%
Public Power
5.4%
General Obligations-State
4.5%
Water and Sewer
4.3%
Other2
24.3%
Derivative Contracts3,4
(0.0)%
Other Assets and Liabilities—Net5
(1.1)%
TOTAL
100%
1
Sector classifications, and the assignment of holdings to such sectors, are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying obligor, as determined by the Fund’s Adviser. For securities that have been enhanced by a third-party, including bond insurers and banks, sector classifications are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying obligor, as determined by the Fund’s Adviser.
2
For purposes of this table, sector classifications constitute 76.8% of the Fund’s total net assets. Remaining sectors have been aggregated under the designation “Other.”
3
Represents less than 0.1%.
4
Based upon net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) or value of the derivative contracts as applicable. Derivative contracts may consist of futures, forwards, options and swaps. The impact of a derivative contract on the Fund’s performance may be larger than its unrealized appreciation (depreciation) or value may indicate. In many cases, the notional value or amount of a derivative contract may provide a better indication of the contract’s significance to the portfolio. More complete information regarding the Fund’s direct investment in derivative contracts, including unrealized appreciation (depreciation), value and notional values or amounts of such contracts, can be found in the table at the end of the Portfolio of Investments included in this Report.
5
Assets, other than investments in securities and derivatives, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Annual Shareholder Report
9
Portfolio of Investments
June 30, 2021 
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—89.3%
 
 
 
Alabama—1.8%
 
$6,500,000
 
Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Prepay Revenue Bonds
Project No. 4 (Series 2019A-1) TOBs, (Morgan Stanley GTD),
4.000%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2025
$7,418,767
1,000,000
 
Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Prepay Revenue Bonds
Project No. 5 (Series 2020A-1) TOBs, (Morgan Stanley GTD),
4.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2026
1,165,146
8,000,000
 
Lower Alabama Gas District, Gas Project Revenue Bonds Project
No. 2 (Series 2020A) TOBs, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD),
4.000%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2025
9,098,759
2,500,000
 
Mobile, AL IDB (Alabama Power Co.), PCR Bonds (Series 2007A)
TOBs, 1.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/26/2025
2,533,932
450,000
 
Prattville, AL IDB (International Paper Co.), Environmental
Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019B) TOBs,
2.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024
472,309
425,000
 
Prattville, AL IDB (International Paper Co.), Recovery Zone
Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019C) TOBs, 2.000%,
Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024
446,070
 
 
TOTAL
21,134,983
 
 
Alaska—0.4%
 
1,250,000
 
Alaska International Airports System, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2016A), 5.000%, 10/1/2024
1,437,628
1,010,000
 
Alaska State Housing Finance Corp., Revenue Bonds
(Series 2013A), 5.000%, 12/1/2022
1,054,909
1,550,000
 
Anchorage, AK Electric Utility System, Senior Lien Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2014A), (United States Treasury COL),
5.000%, 12/1/2022
1,655,219
 
 
TOTAL
4,147,756
 
 
Arizona—1.0%
 
3,330,000
 
Chandler, AZ IDA (Intel Corp.), Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds (Series 2019) TOBs, 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/3/2024
3,757,495
1,750,000
 
Phoenix, AZ Civic Improvement Corp.—Airport System, Junior
Lien Airport Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 7/1/2023
1,913,698
1,000,000
 
Phoenix, AZ Civic Improvement Corp.—Airport System, Junior
Lien Airport Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 7/1/2024
1,136,020
1,500,000
 
Phoenix, AZ Civic Improvement Corp.—Airport System, Junior
Lien Airport Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 7/1/2025
1,759,282
3,000,000
 
Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASU), Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017B), (Original Issue Yield: 4.750%), 4.700%, 10/1/2024
3,002,652
 
 
TOTAL
11,569,147
Annual Shareholder Report
10
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
California—6.2%
 
$5,000,000
1
Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge
Revenue Bonds (SIFMA Index Rate Bonds Series 2007B-1) FRNs,
1.130% (SIFMA 7-day +1.100%), Mandatory Tender 4/1/2024
$5,081,404
10,000,000
1
Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge
Revenue Bonds (SIFMA Index Rate Bonds Series 2007G-1) FRNs,
1.130% (SIFMA 7-day +1.100%), Mandatory Tender 4/1/2024
10,162,835
2,045,000
 
California Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser
Permanente), Revenue Bonds (Series 2017C) TOBs, 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 11/1/2022
2,175,293
10,000,000
 
California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank
(Los Angeles County Museum of Art), Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2021A) TOBs, 1.200%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2028
10,076,980
1,000,000
 
California Municipal Finance Authority (Community Medical
Centers), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A),
5.000%, 2/1/2022
1,027,663
2,000,000
 
California Municipal Finance Authority (Community Medical
Centers), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A),
5.000%, 2/1/2023
2,149,682
2,000,000
 
California Municipal Finance Authority (Community Medical
Centers), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017A),
5.000%, 2/1/2024
2,240,539
1,500,000
2
California Municipal Finance Authority (Waste Management, Inc.),
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A) TOBs,
1.300%, Mandatory Tender 2/3/2025
1,542,595
2,500,000
2
California Municipal Finance Authority (Waste Management, Inc.),
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2017A) TOBs,
0.700%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2023
2,521,617
1,000,000
2
California Public Finance Authority (Kendal at Sonoma), Enso
Village TEMPS-50 Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series B-3), 2.125%, 11/15/2027
1,013,325
1,000,000
2
California Public Finance Authority (Kendal at Sonoma), Enso
Village TEMPS-70 Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series B-2), 2.375%, 11/15/2028
1,013,838
3,750,000
 
California State, UT GO Various Purpose Bonds,
5.000%, 3/1/2029
4,889,341
2,500,000
 
California State, UT GO Various Purpose Bonds,
5.000%, 3/1/2030
3,320,612
1,000,000
 
California State, Various Purpose GO Bonds (Series 2020-1),
5.000%, 11/1/2027
1,264,094
1,000,000
 
California State, Various Purpose GO Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020-2), 5.000%, 11/1/2026
1,232,975
2,000,000
 
California State, Various Purpose GO Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020-2), 5.000%, 11/1/2028
2,588,415
2,000,000
 
Los Angeles County, CA Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
Measure R Junior Subordinate Sales Tax Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A) Green Bonds, 5.000%, 6/1/2030
2,685,320
Annual Shareholder Report
11
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
California—continued
 
$2,860,000
 
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (Los Angeles, CA
Department of Water & Power (Electric/Power System)), Power
System Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 7/1/2029
$3,783,931
1,230,000
 
Los Angeles, CA Department of Airports (Los Angeles
International Airport), Subordinate Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021A), 5.000%, 5/15/2027
1,522,407
1,250,000
 
Los Angeles, CA Department of Airports (Los Angeles
International Airport), Subordinate Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021A), 5.000%, 5/15/2028
1,582,280
1,410,000
 
Los Angeles, CA Department of Airports (Los Angeles
International Airport), Subordinate Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021A), 5.000%, 5/15/2029
1,820,495
2,150,000
 
Los Angeles, CA Department of Airports (Los Angeles
International Airport), Subordinate Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021A), 5.000%, 5/15/2030
2,820,214
2,000,000
 
Southern California Public Power Authority (Power Projects),
Windy Point/Windy Flats Project Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020-1) Green Bonds, 5.000%, 4/1/2024
2,237,506
2,000,000
 
Western Placer, CA Unified School District, Community Facilities
District No. 2 2020 Bond Anticipation Notes, 2.000%, 6/1/2025
2,054,910
 
 
TOTAL
70,808,271
 
 
Colorado—1.3%
 
400,000
 
Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Christian Living
Communities), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016),
4.000%, 1/1/2022
405,435
640,000
 
Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Christian Living
Communities), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 1/1/2023
674,411
750,000
 
Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Christian Living
Communities), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 1/1/2024
814,874
600,000
 
Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Christian Living
Communities), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 1/1/2025
661,589
750,000
 
Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Covenant Retirement
Communities, Inc.), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2015A),
5.000%, 12/1/2021
763,937
250,000
 
Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Covenant Retirement
Communities, Inc.), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2015A),
5.000%, 12/1/2022
265,588
2,425,000
 
Denver, CO City & County Department of Aviation (Denver, CO
City & County Airport Authority), Airport System Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020B-2) TOBs, 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 11/15/2025
2,877,744
Annual Shareholder Report
12
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Colorado—continued
 
$3,000,000
 
Denver, CO City & County Department of Aviation (Denver, CO
City & County Airport Authority), Airport System Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2019D) TOBs, 5.000%, Mandatory
Tender 11/15/2022
$3,192,365
450,000
 
E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, Senior Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2024
513,064
280,000
 
E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, Senior Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2025
330,023
1,480,000
 
E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, Senior Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2026
1,797,277
2,000,000
 
E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, Senior Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2027
2,487,243
 
 
TOTAL
14,783,550
 
 
Connecticut—1.5%
 
400,000
 
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities (Stamford
Hospital), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021L-1), 4.000%, 7/1/2022
414,565
400,000
 
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities (Stamford
Hospital), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021L-1), 4.000%, 7/1/2023
428,460
600,000
 
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities (Stamford
Hospital), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021L-1), 4.000%, 7/1/2024
661,303
600,000
 
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities (Stamford
Hospital), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021L-1), 4.000%, 7/1/2025
677,519
700,000
 
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facilities (Stamford
Hospital), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021L-1), 4.000%, 7/1/2026
806,569
1,000,000
 
Connecticut State Special Transportation Fund, Special Tax
Obligation Bonds Transportation Infrastructure Purposes
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 5/1/2028
1,276,106
2,600,000
 
Connecticut State Special Transportation Fund, Special Tax
Obligation Bonds Transportation Infrastructure Purposes
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 5/1/2029
3,386,121
1,000,000
 
Connecticut State Special Transportation Fund, Special Tax
Obligation Bonds Transportation Infrastructure Purposes
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 5/1/2030
1,326,558
1,500,000
1
Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A)
FRNs, 0.930% (SIFMA 7-day +0.900%), 3/1/2023
1,512,099
2,255,000
1
Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A)
FRNs, 0.980% (SIFMA 7-day +0.950%), 3/1/2024
2,285,965
4,000,000
1
Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A)
FRNs, 1.020% (SIFMA 7-day +0.990%), 3/1/2025
4,087,059
 
 
TOTAL
16,862,324
 
 
Delaware—0.2%
 
2,000,000
 
Delaware Economic Development Authority (Delmarva Power and
Light Co.), Gas Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020A) TOBs, 1.050%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2025
2,041,526
Annual Shareholder Report
13
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Florida—1.2%
 
$575,000
 
Broward County, FL Port Facilities, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2011A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 9/1/2024
$579,462
1,500,000
 
Citizens Property Insurance Corp. FL, Revenue Bonds
(Series 2015A1), 5.000%, 6/1/2022
1,529,903
1,000,000
 
Halifax Hospital Medical Center, FL, Revenue Refunding Bonds,
5.000%, 6/1/2022
1,042,679
1,245,000
 
Hillsborough County, FL IDA (Tampa General Hospital), Hospital
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2012A), 5.000%, 10/1/2021
1,259,227
1,300,000
 
Hillsborough County, FL IDA (Tampa General Hospital), Hospital
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2012A), 5.000%, 10/1/2022
1,374,666
2,000,000
 
Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, Aviation Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 10/1/2031
2,630,049
3,265,000
 
Palm Beach County, FL Health Facilities Authority (ACTS
Retirement Life Communities, Inc.), Retirement Communities
Revenue Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 11/15/2021
3,319,388
1,345,000
 
Volusia County, FL Education Facility Authority (Stetson
University, Inc.), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2015),
5.000%, 6/1/2024
1,514,455
 
 
TOTAL
13,249,829
 
 
Georgia—3.1%
 
1,000,000
 
Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding
Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 12/1/2022
1,060,156
1,000,000
 
Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding
Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 12/1/2023
1,100,203
800,000
 
Atlanta, GA (Atlantic Station Project), Tax Allocation Refunding
Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 12/1/2024
909,824
3,000,000
 
Burke County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.),
Vogtle Project Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (Fifth Series
1995) TOBs, 2.050%, Mandatory Tender 11/19/2021
3,019,732
7,000,000
1
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2018B) FRNs, (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 0.809%
(1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.750%), Mandatory Tender 9/1/2023
7,034,874
5,000,000
 
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2018C) TOBs, (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 4.000%,
Mandatory Tender 12/1/2023
5,399,450
5,300,000
 
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019B) TOBs, (Toronto Dominion Bank GTD), 4.000%,
Mandatory Tender 12/2/2024
5,906,683
5,500,000
 
Monroe County, GA Development Authority Pollution Control
(Georgia Power Co.), Scherer Plant Pollution Control Revenue
Bonds (First Series 1995), 2.250%, 7/1/2025
5,656,134
3,500,000
 
Private Colleges & Universities Facilities of GA (Emory
University), Revenue Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 9/1/2030
4,702,958
Annual Shareholder Report
14
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Georgia—continued
 
$850,000
 
Savannah, GA EDA (International Paper Co.), Recovery Zone
Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019A) TOBs, 2.000%,
Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024
$892,140
 
 
TOTAL
35,682,154
 
 
Illinois—5.9%
 
400,000
 
Chicago, IL Board of Education, UT GO Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021B), 5.000%, 12/1/2021
407,637
400,000
 
Chicago, IL Board of Education, UT GO Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021B), 5.000%, 12/1/2022
425,405
1,000,000
 
Chicago, IL Midway Airport, Second Lien Revenue & Refunding
Bonds (Series 2014B), 5.000%, 1/1/2022
1,023,747
1,500,000
 
Chicago, IL Midway Airport, Second Lien Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2013C), 5.000%, 1/1/2022
1,535,620
500,000
 
Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport, General Airport Senior
Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 1/1/2024
558,311
500,000
 
Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport, General Airport Senior
Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 1/1/2026
597,903
500,000
 
Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport, General Airport Senior
Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 1/1/2028
629,673
1,000,000
 
Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport, General Airport Senior
Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 1/1/2029
1,286,510
1,000,000
 
Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport, General Airport Senior
Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 1/1/2030
1,312,513
1,000,000
 
Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport, Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2015B), 5.000%, 1/1/2023
1,070,643
1,135,000
 
Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue Bonds
(Series 2016A-1), 5.000%, 11/1/2023
1,253,695
1,000,000
 
Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.000%, 11/1/2021
1,015,145
5,000,000
 
Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.000%, 11/1/2022
5,303,330
2,645,000
 
Chicago, IL Water Revenue, Second Lien Water Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2004), 5.000%, 11/1/2023
2,921,606
1,500,000
 
Granite City, IL (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal
Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 1.250%, 5/1/2027
1,509,276
1,780,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake), Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 5/15/2022
1,815,973
1,845,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake), Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 5/15/2023
1,922,140
2,800,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (American Water Capital Corp.),
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020) TOBs, 0.700%,
Mandatory Tender 9/1/2023
2,802,676
Annual Shareholder Report
15
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Illinois—continued
 
$3,000,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (OSF Health Care Systems), Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020A) TOBs, 5.000%, Mandatory
Tender 11/15/2026
$3,598,166
1,200,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group),
Revenue Bonds (Series 2016A), 5.000%, 11/1/2021
1,217,890
1,500,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group),
Revenue Bonds (Series 2016A), 5.000%, 11/1/2022
1,589,134
1,800,000
 
Illinois Finance Authority (Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group),
Revenue Bonds (Series 2016A), 5.000%, 11/1/2023
1,985,137
2,125,000
1
Illinois Finance Authority (Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group),
Revenue Bonds (Series 2021B) FRNs, 0.730%, (SIFMA 7-day
+0.700%), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2026
2,125,003
3,000,000
 
Illinois Housing Development Authority (Century Woods),
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2019) TOBs, (GNMA
COL), 1.900%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2021
3,012,530
1,750,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.500%, 5/1/2024
1,991,890
2,500,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2021B), 5.000%, 3/1/2022
2,579,311
1,500,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A),
5.000%, 10/1/2021
1,517,844
2,000,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A),
5.000%, 10/1/2022
2,117,211
1,000,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A),
5.000%, 10/1/2023
1,100,942
2,300,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A),
5.000%, 10/1/2028
2,884,734
2,250,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A),
5.000%, 3/1/2023
2,423,050
2,000,000
 
Illinois State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A),
5.000%, 3/1/2024
2,235,022
6,465,000
 
Illinois State, UTGO Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 6/1/2028
7,646,552
1,925,000
 
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, IL, Tobacco Settlement
Revenue Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 6/1/2026
2,324,146
 
 
TOTAL
67,740,365
 
 
Indiana—0.5%
 
725,000
 
Ball State University, IN, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 7/1/2021
725,000
500,000
 
Ball State University, IN, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 7/1/2022
524,056
1,000,000
 
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2016C), 5.000%, 1/1/2024
1,113,966
1,000,000
 
Indiana State Finance Authority Environmental (Indianapolis, IN
Power & Light Co.), Environmental Facilities Refunding Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020A) TOBs, 0.750%, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2026
999,229
Annual Shareholder Report
16
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Indiana—continued
 
$2,000,000
 
Indiana State Finance Authority Environmental (Indianapolis, IN
Power & Light Co.), Environmental Facilities Refunding Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020B) TOBs, 0.950%, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2026
$2,003,098
1,000,000
 
Indiana State Finance Authority Hospital Revenue (Beacon Health
System Obligated Group), Hospital Revenue Bonds
(Series 2013A), 5.000%, 8/15/2021
1,005,766
 
 
TOTAL
6,371,115
 
 
Iowa—0.3%
 
1,040,000
 
Ames, IA Hospital Revenue (Mary Greeley Medical Center),
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 6/15/2023
1,130,889
2,000,000
 
Iowa Finance Authority (Gevo NW Iowa RNG, LLC), Solid Waste
Facility Revenue Bonds Renewable Gas Project (Series 2021)
TOBs, (Citibank N.A., New York LOC), 1.500%, Mandatory
Tender 4/1/2024
2,021,189
 
 
TOTAL
3,152,078
 
 
Kansas—0.2%
 
1,000,000
 
Wyandotte County, KS Unified Government Utility System,
Improvement & Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2014-A),
5.000%, 9/1/2021
1,007,743
1,000,000
 
Wyandotte County, KS Unified Government Utility System,
Revenue Bonds (Series 2016A), 5.000%, 9/1/2024
1,140,144
 
 
TOTAL
2,147,887
 
 
Kentucky—2.9%
 
2,640,000
 
Kentucky Bond Development Corp. (St. Elizabeth Medical
Center), Hospital Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2016), 5.000%, 5/1/2024
2,982,149
5,000,000
 
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority (Catholic
Health Initiatives), Revenue Bonds (Series 2009B) TOBs, 2.700%,
Mandatory Tender 11/10/2021
5,041,364
3,000,000
 
Louisville & Jefferson County, KY Metropolitan Government
(Louisville Gas & Electric Co.), Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
(Series 2005A) TOBs, 1.750%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2026
3,071,084
5,000,000
 
Public Energy Authority of Kentucky, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2018A) TOBs, (Morgan Stanley GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory
Tender 4/1/2024
5,463,401
4,000,000
 
Public Energy Authority of Kentucky, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2018B) TOBs, (BP PLC GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory
Tender 1/1/2025
4,442,862
9,000,000
 
Public Energy Authority of Kentucky, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A) TOBs, (BP PLC GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory
Tender 6/1/2026
10,376,220
2,250,000
 
Trimble County, KY (Louisville Gas & Electric Co.), PCR Refunding
Bonds (Series 2016A) TOBs, 1.300%, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2027
2,269,095
 
 
TOTAL
33,646,175
Annual Shareholder Report
17
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Louisiana—2.4%
 
$1,450,000
 
East Baton Rouge Sewerage Commission, Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 2/1/2028
$1,826,519
750,000
 
East Baton Rouge Sewerage Commission, Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 2/1/2030
989,517
5,000,000
 
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities Community
Development Authority (East Baton Rouge Sewerage
Commission), Subordinate Lien Multi-Modal Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020B) TOBs, 0.875%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2025
5,013,225
1,175,000
 
Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District, BANS (Series 2021),
4.000%, 7/3/2023
1,244,119
6,000,000
 
Louisiana State Offshore Terminal Authority (Loop LLC),
Deepwater Port Revenue Bonds (Series 2010B-1A) TOBs, 2.000%,
Mandatory Tender 10/1/2022
6,044,365
790,000
 
New Orleans, LA Aviation Board, Revenue Bonds (Series 2015A),
5.000%, 1/1/2024
882,132
3,765,000
 
St. Charles Parish, LA Gulf Opportunity Zone (Valero Energy
Corp.), Revenue Bonds (Series 2010) TOBs, 4.000%, Mandatory
Tender 6/1/2022
3,887,482
7,000,000
 
St. John the Baptist Parish, LA (Marathon Oil Corp.), Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2017B-2) TOBs, 2.375%, Mandatory
Tender 7/1/2026
7,376,858
 
 
TOTAL
27,264,217
 
 
Massachusetts—1.3%
 
2,000,000
 
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Harvard
University), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A),
5.000%, 10/15/2029
2,662,777
1,000,000
 
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Harvard
University), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A),
5.000%, 10/15/2030
1,359,966
1,750,000
 
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Waste
Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds
(Series 2002), 1.250%, 5/1/2027
1,760,822
2,600,000
 
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Williams College,
MA), Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2011N) TOBs, 0.450%,
Mandatory Tender 7/1/2025
2,594,292
6,000,000
 
Massachusetts State Development Finance Agency (Boston
University), Revenue Bonds (Series 2019 DD-1) TOBs, 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 4/1/2024
6,604,889
205,000
 
Massachusetts State Housing Finance Agency Housing Revenue,
SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 172), 4.000%, 6/1/2024
215,029
 
 
TOTAL
15,197,775
 
 
Michigan—2.7%
 
5,000,000
 
Lansing, MI Board of Water & Light, Utility System Revenue
Bonds (Series 2021B) TOBs, 2.000%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2026
5,331,446
Annual Shareholder Report
18
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Michigan—continued
 
$2,000,000
 
Michigan State Finance Authority (McLaren Health Care Corp.),
Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2015D-2) TOBs,
1.200%, Mandatory Tender 4/13/2028
$2,006,819
2,500,000
 
Michigan State Finance Authority Revenue (Great Lakes, MI
Water Authority Water Supply System), Senior Lien Revenue
Bonds (Series 2014 D-1), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 7/1/2021
2,500,000
5,000,000
 
Michigan State Finance Authority Revenue (Great Lakes, MI
Water Authority Water Supply System), Senior Lien Revenue
Bonds (Series 2014 D-1), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 7/1/2022
5,239,010
1,205,000
 
Michigan State Trunk Line, State Trunk Line Fund Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 11/15/2023
1,340,559
1,000,000
 
Michigan State Trunk Line, State Trunk Line Fund Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 11/15/2024
1,155,549
3,500,000
 
Michigan Strategic Fund (Detroit Edison Co.), Variable Rate
Limited Obligation Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2008ET-2)
TOBs, 1.450%, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2021
3,506,881
750,000
 
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco
Settlement Asset-Backed Senior Current Interest Bonds
(Series 2020A Class 1), 5.000%, 6/1/2026
915,511
2,000,000
 
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco
Settlement Asset-Backed Senior Current Interest Bonds
(Series 2020A Class 1), 5.000%, 6/1/2027
2,513,586
500,000
 
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco
Settlement Asset-Backed Senior Current Interest Bonds
(Series 2020A Class 1), 5.000%, 6/1/2029
658,097
1,000,000
 
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco
Settlement Asset-Backed Senior Current Interest Bonds
(Series 2020A Class 1), 5.000%, 6/1/2030
1,341,565
2,735,000
 
Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, Airport Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2015F), 5.000%, 12/1/2025
3,242,251
1,000,000
 
Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, Airport Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2015F), 5.000%, 12/1/2027
1,183,553
 
 
TOTAL
30,934,827
 
 
Minnesota—0.3%
 
2,955,000
1
Minnesota State HFA, Residential Housing Finance Bonds
(Series 2018D) FRNs, 0.460% (SIFMA 7-day +0.430%), Mandatory
Tender 7/3/2023
2,962,468
 
 
Mississippi—0.6%
 
1,250,000
 
Mississippi Business Finance Corp. (Waste Management, Inc.),
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2002) TOBs, 2.200%,
Mandatory Tender 6/3/2024
1,315,613
Annual Shareholder Report
19
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Mississippi—continued
 
$1,000,000
 
Mississippi Business Finance Corp. (Waste Management, Inc.),
Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2004) TOBs, 0.550%,
Mandatory Tender 9/1/2021
$1,000,575
4,000,000
 
Warren County, MS Gulf Opportunity Zone (International Paper
Co.), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A) TOBs, 1.375%,
Mandatory Tender 6/16/2025
4,130,537
 
 
TOTAL
6,446,725
 
 
Missouri—0.6%
 
1,570,000
 
Cape Girardeau County, MO IDA (St. Francis Medical Center,
MO), Revenue Bonds (Series 2013A), 5.000%, 6/1/2022
1,638,326
500,000
 
Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016A), 5.000%, 2/1/2023
535,129
650,000
 
Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2022
667,087
1,200,000
 
Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2023
1,284,310
750,000
 
Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2024
834,169
850,000
 
Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2025
978,363
750,000
 
Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living
Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2026
888,421
 
 
TOTAL
6,825,805
 
 
Montana—0.4%
 
4,710,000
1
Montana Facility Finance Authority (Billings Clinic Obligated
Group), Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2018C) FRNs,
0.580% (SIFMA 7-day +0.550%), Mandatory Tender 8/15/2023
4,716,485
 
 
Nevada—1.7%
 
6,665,000
 
Clark County, NV Airport System, Airport System Subordinate
Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019A), 5.000%, 7/1/2026
8,121,530
3,000,000
 
Clark County, NV School District, LT GO Building Bonds
(Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 6/15/2028
3,834,650
875,000
 
Clark County, NV School District, LT GO Building Bonds
(Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 6/15/2030
1,161,589
6,500,000
 
Washoe County, NV Gas & Water Facilities Revenue (Sierra
Pacific Power Co.), Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B)
TOBs, 3.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2022
6,660,089
 
 
TOTAL
19,777,858
 
 
New Hampshire—0.7%
 
1,960,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
1.000%, 1/1/2022
1,967,007
Annual Shareholder Report
20
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
New Hampshire—continued
 
$220,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2024
$239,487
290,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2025
325,360
265,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2026
305,174
250,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2027
293,361
285,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2028
331,650
300,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2029
346,928
280,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living),
Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021),
4.000%, 1/1/2030
321,648
4,000,000
 
National Finance Authority, NH (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid
Waste Disposal Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2019A-2)
TOBs, 2.150%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2024
4,192,368
 
 
TOTAL
8,322,983
 
 
New Jersey—5.7%
 
2,600,000
 
Camden, NJ BANs, 1.500%, 8/12/2021
2,601,643
800,000
 
Lyndhurst Township, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 10/8/2021
801,616
1,000,000
 
Lyndhurst Township, NJ BANs, 1.000%, 2/4/2022
1,004,436
400,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2022
417,994
220,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2023
240,311
300,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2024
340,106
385,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2025
450,781
555,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2026
668,404
410,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2027
505,716
400,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2028
503,537
Annual Shareholder Report
21
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
New Jersey—continued
 
$1,000,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2029
$1,277,621
500,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2031
652,982
500,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Construction Bonds
(Series 2021QQQ), 5.000%, 6/15/2032
651,218
5,000,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Facilities
Construction Refunding Bonds (Series 2015 XX),
5.000%, 6/15/2022
5,224,921
10,000,000
1
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Facilities
Construction Refunding SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013 I) FRNs,
1.280% (SIFMA 7-day +1.250%), 9/1/2025
10,151,445
1,000,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey-American Water Co., Inc.), Water
Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A),
1.000%, 6/1/2023
1,012,090
2,000,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey-American Water Co., Inc.), Water
Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2020C),
1.150%, 6/1/2023
2,026,054
4,075,000
 
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey-American Water Co., Inc.), Water
Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2020D) TOBs,
1.100%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2027
4,048,856
1,750,000
 
New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority (New
Jersey State), Transportation System Bonds (Series 2021A),
5.000%, 6/15/2027
2,158,544
2,500,000
 
New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority (New
Jersey State), Transportation System Bonds (Series 2021A),
5.000%, 6/15/2028
3,147,106
2,000,000
 
New Jersey State, Covid-19 GO Emergency Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 6/1/2027
2,483,546
1,000,000
 
New Jersey State, Covid-19 GO Emergency Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 6/1/2028
1,270,163
1,000,000
 
New Jersey State, Covid-19 GO Emergency Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 6/1/2029
1,294,901
1,000,000
 
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2017A),
5.000%, 1/1/2027
1,231,059
5,000,000
1
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Turnpike Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017D-3) FRNs, 0.664% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70
+0.600%), 1/1/2023
5,021,561
5,000,000
1
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Turnpike Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017D-4) FRNs, 0.765% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70
+0.700%), 1/1/2024
5,049,487
600,000
 
Newark, NJ, UT GO Qualified General Improvement Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 10/1/2025
702,440
Annual Shareholder Report
22
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
New Jersey—continued
 
$500,000
 
Newark, NJ, UT GO Qualified General Improvement Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 10/1/2026
$601,748
625,000
 
Newark, NJ, UT GO Qualified General Improvement Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 10/1/2027
770,725
1,300,000
 
Newark, NJ, UT GO Qualified General Improvement Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 10/1/2028
1,633,496
500,000
 
Newark, NJ, UT GO Qualified School Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020B), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 10/1/2024
567,741
500,000
 
Newark, NJ, UT GO Qualified School Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020B), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS),
5.000%, 10/1/2025
585,367
1,000,000
 
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.000%, 6/1/2022
1,043,390
2,500,000
 
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.000%, 6/1/2023
2,724,744
2,000,000
 
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds (Series 2018A), 5.000%, 6/1/2024
2,266,776
 
 
TOTAL
65,132,525
 
 
New Mexico—0.9%
 
3,500,000
 
Farmington, NM (Public Service Co., NM), Pollution Control
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2010B) TOBs, 2.125%,
Mandatory Tender 6/1/2022
3,555,365
4,000,000
 
Farmington, NM (Public Service Co., NM), Pollution Control
Revenue Refunding Bonds San Juan Project (Series 2010D) TOBs,
1.100%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2023
4,053,395
2,200,000
 
New Mexico Municipal Energy Acquisition Authority, Gas Supply
Revenue Refunding and Acquisition Bonds (Series 2019A) TOBs,
(Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory
Tender 5/1/2025
2,558,407
 
 
TOTAL
10,167,167
 
 
New York—7.8%
 
5,500,000
 
Chautauqua County, NY Capital Resource Corporation (NRG
Energy, Inc.), Exempt Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020) TOBs, 1.300%, Mandatory Tender 4/3/2023
5,557,804
4,000,000
 
Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General
Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B) TOBs, 1.650%, Mandatory
Tender 9/1/2024
4,127,516
900,000
 
Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General
Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2028
1,158,898
1,200,000
 
Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General
Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2029
1,577,980
Annual Shareholder Report
23
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
New York—continued
 
$875,000
 
Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General
Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 9/1/2030
$1,173,932
4,040,000
 
Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General
Revenue Bonds (Series 2020B) TOBs, 0.850%, Mandatory
Tender 9/1/2025
4,044,897
5,000,000
 
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation
Revenue), Transportation Revenue Bond Anticipation Notes
(Series 2019D-1), 5.000%, 9/1/2022
5,273,971
2,645,000
1
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation
Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds
(Series 2002G-1F), 0.463% (SOFR x 0.67 +0.430%), 11/1/2026
2,645,003
2,500,000
1
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation
Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds
(Series 2005D-1) TOBs, 0.363% (SOFR x 0.67 +0.330%),
Mandatory Tender 4/1/2024
2,500,002
5,000,000
1
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation
Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds
(Series 2011B) FRNs, 0.612% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +0.550%),
Mandatory Tender 11/1/2022
5,023,494
7,500,000
 
New York City Housing Development Corp., Multi-Family Housing
Revenue Sustainable Development Bonds (Series 2021F-2) TOBs,
0.600%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2025
7,474,742
3,000,000
 
New York City Housing Development Corp., Sustainable
Neighborhood Bonds (Series 2019B-2) TOBs, 2.100%, Mandatory
Tender 7/3/2023
3,031,125
1,000,000
 
New York City, NY IDA (Queens Baseball Stadium), PILOT
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 1/1/2028
1,258,627
500,000
 
New York City, NY IDA (Queens Baseball Stadium), PILOT
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 1/1/2029
643,255
1,000,000
 
New York City, NY IDA (Queens Baseball Stadium), PILOT
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 1/1/2030
1,311,568
1,000,000
 
New York City, NY IDA (Yankee Stadium LLC), Pilot Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 3/1/2028
1,248,937
1,500,000
 
New York City, NY IDA (Yankee Stadium LLC), Pilot Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 3/1/2029
1,911,109
1,600,000
 
New York City, NY IDA (Yankee Stadium LLC), Pilot Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 3/1/2030
2,074,460
365,000
 
New York State HFA, Affordable Housing Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019F Group 3) TOBs, (New York State Mortgage Agency
GTD), 1.875%, Mandatory Tender 11/1/2021
365,319
Annual Shareholder Report
24
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
New York—continued
 
$4,000,000
 
New York State HFA, Affordable Housing Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020J), 0.750%, 5/1/2025
$4,012,886
3,500,000
 
New York State HFA, Affordable Housing Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020K), 0.700%, 11/1/2024
3,514,055
2,750,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (American
Airlines, Inc.), Special Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021), 2.250%, 8/1/2026
2,820,555
1,000,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK
International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 12/1/2025
1,187,384
980,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK
International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 12/1/2026
1,194,885
1,500,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK
International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 12/1/2029
1,941,918
1,000,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK
International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020C), 5.000%, 12/1/2026
1,228,192
1,600,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK
International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020C), 5.000%, 12/1/2028
2,058,724
2,250,000
 
New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK
International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020C), 5.000%, 12/1/2029
2,958,995
4,000,000
 
Suffolk County, NY, (Series I) TANs, 2.000%, 7/22/2021
4,004,139
10,000,000
 
Suffolk County, NY, (Series I) TANs, 2.000%, 9/24/2021
10,039,614
2,000,000
 
Suffolk County, NY, (Series II) TANs, 2.000%, 8/19/2021
2,004,582
 
 
TOTAL
89,368,568
 
 
North Carolina—2.2%
 
825,000
 
Columbus County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control
Financing Authority (International Paper Co.), Environmental
Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019A) TOBs,
2.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024
865,900
850,000
 
North Carolina HFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2017 38-B),
4.000%, 7/1/2047
923,844
5,000,000
 
North Carolina Medical Care Commission (CaroMont Health),
Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2021B) TOBs, 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 2/1/2026
6,002,055
1,875,000
 
North Carolina State Grant Anticipation Revenue, Grant
Anticipation Revenue Vehicle Bonds (Series 2019),
5.000%, 3/1/2025
2,191,650
1,600,000
 
North Carolina State Grant Anticipation Revenue, Grant
Anticipation Revenue Vehicle Bonds (Series 2019),
5.000%, 3/1/2026
1,933,845
Annual Shareholder Report
25
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
North Carolina—continued
 
$4,500,000
 
North Carolina State Turnpike Authority, Triangle Expressway
System Senior Lien Turnpike Revenue Bonds (Series 2020),
5.000%, 2/1/2024
$5,033,784
1,750,000
 
North Carolina State Turnpike Authority, Triangle Expressway
System Senior Lien Turnpike Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2018), 5.000%, 1/1/2027
2,139,544
1,000,000
 
North Carolina State Turnpike Authority, Triangle Expressway
System Senior Lien Turnpike Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2018), 5.000%, 1/1/2028
1,249,319
2,000,000
 
Wake County, NC, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A),
5.000%, 4/1/2027
2,499,459
1,000,000
 
Wake County, NC, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A),
5.000%, 4/1/2028
1,282,643
500,000
 
Wake County, NC, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A),
5.000%, 4/1/2029
656,582
 
 
TOTAL
24,778,625
 
 
North Dakota—0.4%
 
5,000,000
 
Cass County Joint Water Resource District, ND, UT GO
Temporary Refunding Improvement Bonds (Series 2021A),
0.480%, 5/1/2024
4,990,004
 
 
Ohio—2.1%
 
3,500,000
 
Allen County, OH (Bon Secours Mercy Health), Hospital Facilities
Revenue Bonds (Series 2017B) TOBs, 2.150%, Mandatory
Tender 5/5/2022
3,636,064
1,350,000
 
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP—Combined
Hydroelectric Projects), Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 2/15/2026
1,617,011
1,600,000
 
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP—Combined
Hydroelectric Projects), Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 2/15/2027
1,967,349
1,750,000
 
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP—Combined
Hydroelectric Projects), Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020A), 5.000%, 2/15/2028
2,206,369
1,500,000
 
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2017A), 5.000%, 2/15/2025
1,742,879
650,000
 
Cleveland, OH (Cleveland, OH Water), Water Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020FF), 5.000%, 1/1/2026
780,800
950,000
 
Cleveland, OH (Cleveland, OH Water), Water Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020FF), 5.000%, 1/1/2027
1,175,868
600,000
 
Cleveland, OH (Cleveland, OH Water), Water Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020FF), 5.000%, 1/1/2028
760,810
1,100,000
 
Cleveland, OH (Cleveland, OH Water), Water Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020FF), 5.000%, 1/1/2029
1,428,052
800,000
 
Cleveland, OH (Cleveland, OH Water), Water Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020FF), 5.000%, 1/1/2030
1,059,135
Annual Shareholder Report
26
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Ohio—continued
 
$500,000
 
Hamilton County, OH Hospital Facilities Authority (UC Health),
Revenue Bonds (Series 2014), 5.000%, 2/1/2023
$536,676
3,500,000
 
Lancaster, OH Port Authority, Gas Supply Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2019) TOBs, (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 2/1/2025
4,030,929
1,500,000
 
Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority (American Electric
Power Co., Inc.), Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2014A) TOBs, 2.400%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2029
1,589,356
455,000
 
Ohio State Hospital Revenue (University Hospitals Health System,
Inc.), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 1/15/2026
540,924
345,000
 
Ohio State Hospital Revenue (University Hospitals Health System,
Inc.), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 1/15/2027
420,766
1,000,000
 
Ohio State Hospital Revenue (University Hospitals Health System,
Inc.), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2020B) TOBs, 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 1/15/2025
1,153,666
 
 
TOTAL
24,646,654
 
 
Oklahoma—1.8%
 
2,285,000
 
Canadian County Educational Facilities Authority, OK (Mustang
Public Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds
(Series 2012), 4.500%, 9/1/2021
2,301,092
3,500,000
 
Cleveland County, OK Educational Facilities Authority (Norman
Public Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 6/1/2024
3,938,794
3,200,000
 
Cleveland County, OK Educational Facilities Authority (Norman
Public Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 6/1/2025
3,714,721
5,000,000
 
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority (Gilcrease Developers,
LLC), Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds (Series 2020),
1.625%, 7/6/2023
5,039,259
1,850,000
 
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority (Waste Management,
Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A),
2.375%, 12/1/2021
1,866,028
1,000,000
 
Oklahoma State Turnpike Authority, Second Senior Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 1/1/2028
1,268,016
1,000,000
 
Oklahoma State Turnpike Authority, Second Senior Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 1/1/2030
1,325,831
1,000,000
 
Tulsa County, OK Industrial Authority (Broken Arrow Public
Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds
(Series 2016), 5.000%, 9/1/2022
1,056,184
 
 
TOTAL
20,509,925
 
 
Oregon—1.1%
 
1,450,000
 
Port of Portland, OR Airport, Portland International Airport
Revenue Bonds (Series Twenty-Seven A), 5.000%, 7/1/2026
1,744,638
1,700,000
 
Port of Portland, OR Airport, Portland International Airport
Revenue Bonds (Series Twenty-Seven A), 5.000%, 7/1/2027
2,099,891
Annual Shareholder Report
27
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Oregon—continued
 
$1,600,000
 
Port of Portland, OR Airport, Portland International Airport
Revenue Bonds (Series Twenty-Seven A), 5.000%, 7/1/2028
$2,022,495
2,635,000
 
Port of Portland, OR Airport, Portland International Airport
Revenue Bonds (Series Twenty-Seven A), 5.000%, 7/1/2029
3,387,439
2,400,000
 
Port of Portland, OR Airport, Portland International Airport
Revenue Bonds (Series Twenty-Seven A), 5.000%, 7/1/2030
3,129,081
 
 
TOTAL
12,383,544
 
 
Pennsylvania—6.9%
 
850,000
 
Allegheny County, PA Sanitation Authority, Sewer Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. INS), 5.000%, 12/1/2025
1,015,827
1,115,000
 
Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Diakon Lutheran
Social Ministries), Revenue Bonds (Series of 2016),
5.000%, 1/1/2022
1,139,660
1,155,000
 
Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Diakon Lutheran
Social Ministries), Revenue Bonds (Series of 2016),
5.000%, 1/1/2024
1,278,038
500,000
 
East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Willow Valley Retirement
Communities), Revenue & Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2016), 5.000%, 12/1/2022
531,543
750,000
 
East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Willow Valley Retirement
Communities), Revenue & Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2016), 5.000%, 12/1/2023
829,343
12,500,000
1
Geisinger Authority, PA Health System (Geisinger Health System),
Health System Revenue Bonds (Series 2014B) FRNs, 1.134%
(1-month USLIBOR x 0.67 +1.070%), Mandatory Tender 6/1/2024
12,654,140
5,000,000
 
Lehigh County, PA IDA (PPL Electric Utilities Corp.), Pollution
Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016A) TOBs, 1.800%,
Mandatory Tender 9/1/2022
5,083,782
2,250,000
1
Montgomery County, PA Higher Education & Health Authority
Hospital (Thomas Jefferson University), Revenue Bonds
(Series 2018C) FRNs, 0.750% (SIFMA 7-day +0.720%), Mandatory
Tender 9/1/2023
2,250,090
1,000,000
1
Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (St. Luke’s
University Health Network), Variable Rate Hospital Revenue
Bonds (Series 2018B) FRNs, 1.105% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70
+1.040%), Mandatory Tender 8/15/2024
1,005,965
15,000,000
 
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority
(Republic Services, Inc.), (Series 2014) TOBs, 0.220%, Mandatory
Tender 10/1/2021
15,000,000
6,500,000
 
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Waste
Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds
(Series 2011) TOBs, 2.150%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2024
6,840,556
2,000,000
 
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Waste
Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017A) TOBs, 0.700%, Mandatory Tender 8/2/2021
2,000,835
Annual Shareholder Report
28
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Pennsylvania—continued
 
$4,000,000
1
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Waste
Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds
(Series 2021A) FRNs, 0.430% (SIFMA 7-day +0.400%), Mandatory
Tender 6/3/2024
$4,000,028
2,000,000
 
Pennsylvania EDFA (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste
Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 1.850%, 11/1/2021
2,010,372
2,000,000
1
Pennsylvania HFA, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 2018-127C) FRNs,
0.633% (1-month USLIBOR x 0.70 +0.570%), Mandatory
Tender 10/1/2023
2,008,508
1,500,000
 
Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority
(University of the Sciences in Philadelphia), Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2015A), 5.000%, 11/1/2023
1,655,826
250,000
 
Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 12/1/2026
308,095
400,000
 
Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 12/1/2027
505,285
500,000
 
Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 12/1/2028
646,247
750,000
 
Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 12/1/2029
986,332
525,000
 
Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue
Bonds (Series 2020B), 5.000%, 12/1/2030
703,761
5,000,000
1
Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Variable Rate Turnpike
Revenue Bonds (SIFMA Index Bonds) (Series 2014B) FRNs,
1.010% (SIFMA 7-day +0.980%), 12/1/2021
5,001,466
1,200,000
 
Philadelphia, PA Airport System, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021), 5.000%, 7/1/2024
1,362,856
1,600,000
 
Philadelphia, PA Airport System, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021), 5.000%, 7/1/2025
1,873,548
2,000,000
 
Philadelphia, PA Airport System, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2021), 5.000%, 7/1/2026
2,407,457
1,700,000
 
Philadelphia, PA Gas Works, 1998 General Ordinance Revenue
Refunding Bonds (14th Series 2016), 5.000%, 10/1/2021
1,720,072
1,000,000
 
Philadelphia, PA, GO Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 2/1/2025
1,158,465
1,000,000
 
Philadelphia, PA, GO Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 2/1/2026
1,196,901
1,250,000
 
Philadelphia, PA, GO Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 2/1/2027
1,550,097
 
 
TOTAL
78,725,095
 
 
Rhode Island—0.7%
 
2,250,000
 
Rhode Island State Health and Educational Building Corp.
(Lifespan Obligated Group), Hospital Financing Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 5/15/2022
2,337,534
2,000,000
 
Rhode Island State Health and Educational Building Corp.
(Lifespan Obligated Group), Hospital Financing Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 5/15/2023
2,156,168
Annual Shareholder Report
29
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Rhode Island—continued
 
$3,285,000
 
Rhode Island State Health and Educational Building Corp.
(Lifespan Obligated Group), Hospital Financing Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 5/15/2024
$3,670,089
 
 
TOTAL
8,163,791
 
 
South Carolina—1.0%
 
7,200,000
 
Laurens County, SC Water and Sewer Commission, Waterworks
Distribution System Bond Anticipation Notes (Series 2020),
(United States Treasury PRF 7/1/2021@100), 1.375%, 2/1/2022
7,200,000
1,545,000
 
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, SC, Electric Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021A), 4.000%, 1/1/2025
1,734,718
2,000,000
 
South Carolina Public Service Company (Santee Cooper),
Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds (Series 2020A),
5.000%, 12/1/2031
2,645,681
 
 
TOTAL
11,580,399
 
 
South Dakota—0.1%
 
750,000
 
Educational Enhancement Funding Corp., SD, Tobacco
Settlement Revenue Bonds (Series 2013B), 5.000%, 6/1/2023
812,468
 
 
Tennessee—1.7%
 
11,300,000
 
Tennergy Corp., TN Gas Revenue, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019A) TOBs, (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024
12,868,600
5,500,000
 
Tennergy Corp., TN Gas Revenue, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds
(Series 2021A) TOBs, (Morgan Stanley GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory
Tender 9/1/2028
6,598,728
250,000
 
Tennessee Housing Development Agency, Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 220142C), 4.000%, 1/1/2045
264,937
 
 
TOTAL
19,732,265
 
 
Texas—13.8%
 
1,500,000
 
Alvin, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate Unlimited
Tax Schoolhouse Bonds (Series 2014B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent
School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 0.450%, Mandatory
Tender 8/15/2023
1,498,700
600,000
 
Austin, TX Airport System, Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B),
5.000%, 11/15/2024
690,709
650,000
 
Austin, TX Airport System, Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B),
5.000%, 11/15/2025
771,354
1,000,000
 
Austin, TX Airport System, Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B),
5.000%, 11/15/2026
1,218,966
4,570,000
 
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Subordinate Lien
Revenue BAN (Series 2021C), 5.000%, 1/1/2027
5,394,633
3,000,000
 
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Subordinate Lien
Revenue Bond Anticipation Notes (Series 2020F),
5.000%, 1/1/2025
3,394,710
Annual Shareholder Report
30
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Texas—continued
 
$1,500,000
 
Dallas, TX Area Rapid Transit, Senior Lien Sales Tax Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 12/1/2022
$1,602,362
9,000,000
 
Denton, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT GO
School Building Bonds (Series 2014-B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent
School Fund Guarantee Program INS), 2.000%, Mandatory
Tender 8/1/2024
9,443,944
6,580,000
 
Eagle Mountain-Saginaw, TX Independent School District,
Variable Rate Unlimited Tax School Building Bonds (Series 2011)
TOBs, (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD),
2.000%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024
6,910,789
3,000,000
 
Eanes, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT School
Building Bonds (Series 2019B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent School
Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 1.750%, Mandatory
Tender 8/1/2025
3,095,121
5,920,000
 
Fort Bend, TX Independent School District, UT GO Refunding
Bonds (Series 2019A) TOBs, (Texas Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program GTD), 1.950%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2022
6,025,771
3,500,000
 
Fort Bend, TX Independent School District, UT GO Refunding
Bonds (Series 2021B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent School Fund
Guarantee Program GTD), 0.720%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2026
3,491,468
2,500,000
 
Fort Bend, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate
Unlimited Tax School Building and Refunding Bonds
(Series 2020B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee
Program GTD), 0.875%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2025
2,523,114
2,500,000
 
Georgetown, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate
Unlimited Tax School Building Bonds (Series 2019B) TOBs, (Texas
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.750%,
Mandatory Tender 8/1/2022
2,570,355
1,250,000
 
Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority (Waste Management,
Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B),
1.500%, 5/1/2028
1,263,824
2,900,000
 
Harlandale, TX Independent School District, Fixed and Variable
Rate Unlimited Tax Refunding Bonds (Series 2020) TOBs, (Texas
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 0.750%,
Mandatory Tender 8/15/2025
2,901,286
5,635,000
1
Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.
(Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 0.930% (SIFMA 7-day +0.900%),
6/1/2022
5,651,586
4,500,000
1
Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.
(Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 0.980% (SIFMA 7-day +0.950%),
6/1/2023
4,526,154
5,685,000
1
Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.
(Memorial Hermann Health System), Hospital Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2013B) FRNs, 1.080% (SIFMA 7-day +1.050%),
6/1/2024
5,742,984
Annual Shareholder Report
31
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Texas—continued
 
$5,000,000
 
Harris County, TX Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Texas
Children’s Hospital), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B)
TOBs, 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024
$5,740,000
3,000,000
 
Harris County, TX Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Texas
Medical Center), Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A) TOBs, 0.900%,
Mandatory Tender 5/15/2025
3,001,159
2,500,000
 
Houston, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate Limited
Tax Schoolhouse Bonds (Series 2013B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent
School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 3.000%, Mandatory
Tender 6/1/2024
2,691,932
2,000,000
 
Hutto, TX Independent School District, Unlimited Tax School
Building Bonds (Series 2017) TOBs, (Texas Permanent School
Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.000%, Mandatory
Tender 8/1/2025
2,110,619
1,905,000
1
Irving, TX Hospital Authority (Baylor Scott & White Medical
Center, Irving), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2017B) FRNs,
1.130% (SIFMA 7-day +1.100%), Mandatory Tender 10/15/2023
1,914,396
1,500,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2024
1,697,337
1,000,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2025
1,170,524
750,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2026
904,322
1,000,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2027
1,238,376
1,000,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2028
1,267,344
1,000,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020), 5.000%, 5/15/2025
1,170,524
1,250,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services
Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Series 2020), 5.000%, 5/15/2026
1,507,204
2,300,000
 
Matagorda County, TX Navigation District No. 1 (AEP Texas,
Inc.), Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2001A),
2.600%, 11/1/2029
2,468,608
7,535,000
 
Midlothian, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate
Unlimited Tax Refunding Bonds (Series 2013C) TOBs, (Texas
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.000%,
Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024
7,880,642
Annual Shareholder Report
32
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Texas—continued
 
$2,730,000
 
Midlothian, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate
Unlimited Tax School Building Bonds (Series 2017B) TOBs, (Texas
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.000%,
Mandatory Tender 8/1/2023
$2,825,192
270,000
 
Midlothian, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate
Unlimited Tax School Building Bonds (Series 2017B) TOBs,
(United States Treasury PRF 8/1/2023@100), 2.000%, Mandatory
Tender 8/1/2023
278,941
855,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Longhorn Village), Retirement Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017), 5.000%, 1/1/2022
868,397
945,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Longhorn Village), Retirement Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017), 5.000%, 1/1/2024
1,015,638
980,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Longhorn Village), Retirement Facilities Revenue Bonds
(Series 2017), 5.000%, 1/1/2025
1,079,526
735,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016),
4.000%, 11/1/2021
743,877
500,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 11/1/2023
552,681
625,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 11/1/2024
717,777
1,105,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation
(Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016),
5.000%, 11/1/2025
1,286,339
1,500,000
 
North East, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT GO
Refunding Bonds (Series 2019) TOBs, (Texas Permanent School
Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.200%, Mandatory
Tender 8/1/2024
1,567,624
1,400,000
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2017A), 5.000%, 1/1/2025
1,500,434
2,000,000
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, Second Tier Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 1/1/2025
2,317,925
2,500,000
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, Second Tier Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 1/1/2026
2,995,670
2,500,000
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, Second Tier Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 1/1/2027
3,080,684
7,885,000
 
Northside, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT GO
School Building and Refunding Bonds (Series 2019) TOBs, (Texas
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 1.600%,
Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024
8,150,398
Annual Shareholder Report
33
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Texas—continued
 
$6,000,000
 
Pflugerville, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT
School Building Bonds (Series 2019B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent
School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.500%, Mandatory
Tender 8/15/2023
$6,270,698
2,500,000
 
Prosper, TX Independent School District, Adjustable Rate UT
School Building Bonds (Series 2019B) TOBs, (Texas Permanent
School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.000%, Mandatory
Tender 8/15/2023
2,588,580
550,000
 
Sam Rayburn, TX Municipal Power Agency, Power Supply System
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2012), 5.000%, 10/1/2021
556,494
4,000,000
 
San Antonio, TX Water System, Water System Variable Rate
Junior Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2019A) TOBs, 2.625%,
Mandatory Tender 5/1/2024
4,261,776
2,000,000
 
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. III, Gas Supply
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), (Macquarie Group Ltd.
GTD), 5.000%, 12/15/2022
2,134,422
1,700,000
 
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. III, Gas Supply
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), (Macquarie Group Ltd.
GTD), 5.000%, 12/15/2024
1,955,756
4,000,000
 
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. III, Gas Supply
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), (Macquarie Group Ltd.
GTD), 5.000%, 12/15/2026
4,884,523
750,000
 
Texas Municipal Power Agency, Transmission System Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. GTD), 3.000%, 9/1/2024
809,864
1,000,000
 
Texas Municipal Power Agency, Transmission System Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. GTD), 3.000%, 9/1/2025
1,097,877
950,000
 
Texas Municipal Power Agency, Transmission System Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), (Assured Guaranty Municipal
Corp. GTD), 3.000%, 9/1/2026
1,058,609
 
 
TOTAL
158,080,519
 
 
Utah—0.4%
 
4,000,000
 
Utah County, UT Hospital Revenue (IHC Health Services, Inc.),
Revenue Bonds (Series 2020 B-2) TOBs, 5.000%, Mandatory
Tender 8/1/2026
4,858,154
 
 
Virginia—2.2%
 
2,650,000
 
Amelia County, VA IDA (Waste Management, Inc.), Tax-Exempt
Adjustable Mode Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds
(Series 2002), 1.450%, 4/1/2027
2,695,560
1,000,000
 
Charles City County, VA IDA (Waste Management, Inc.),
Tax-Exempt Adjustable Mode Solid Waste Disposal Revenue
Bonds (Series 2002), 1.450%, 4/1/2027
1,017,193
4,500,000
 
Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District, VA, First Tier General
Resolution Revenue Bonds Anticipation Notes (Series 2019),
5.000%, 11/1/2023
4,978,364
Annual Shareholder Report
34
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Virginia—continued
 
$7,500,000
 
Louisa, VA IDA (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), PCR Refunding
Bonds (Series 2008A) TOBs, 1.900%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2023
$7,713,472
2,500,000
 
Virginia State Public Building Authority Public Facilities, Public
Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B),
5.000%, 8/1/2025
2,964,423
1,500,000
 
Virginia State Public Building Authority Public Facilities, Public
Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B),
5.000%, 8/1/2030
2,016,451
3,750,000
 
Wise County, VA IDA (Virginia Electric & Power Co.),
(Series 2010A) TOBs, 1.200%, Mandatory Tender 5/31/2024
3,836,915
 
 
TOTAL
25,222,378
 
 
Washington—2.6%
 
1,000,000
 
Energy Northwest, WA, Columbia Generating Station Electric
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 7/1/2030
1,338,736
2,000,000
 
Energy Northwest, WA, Project 1 Electric Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2017-A), 5.000%, 7/1/2026
2,094,161
1,250,000
 
Energy Northwest, WA, Project 1 Electric Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 7/1/2027
1,564,726
1,000,000
 
Energy Northwest, WA, Project 1 Electric Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 7/1/2028
1,283,474
1,750,000
 
Port of Seattle, WA Revenue, Intermediate Lien Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 4/1/2022
1,812,022
2,000,000
 
Port of Seattle, WA Revenue, Intermediate Lien Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 4/1/2023
2,164,452
1,500,000
 
Port of Seattle, WA Revenue, Intermediate Lien Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 4/1/2024
1,684,675
1,825,000
 
Port of Seattle, WA Revenue, Intermediate Lien Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 4/1/2025
2,120,160
2,000,000
 
Port of Seattle, WA Revenue, Intermediate Lien Revenue Bonds
(Series 2019), 5.000%, 4/1/2026
2,393,502
2,000,000
1
Seattle, WA Municipal Light & Power, Refunding Revenue
Bonds—SIFMA Index (Series 2018C) FRNs, 0.520% (SIFMA 7-day
+0.490%), Mandatory Tender 11/1/2023
2,005,558
1,500,000
 
Seattle, WA Municipal Light & Power, Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series 2016C), 5.000%, 10/1/2023
1,661,939
3,760,000
1
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority (Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center), Variable Rate LIBOR Index
Revenue Bonds (Series 2017B) FRNs, 1.161% (1-month USLIBOR
x 0.67 +1.100%), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2022
3,770,219
3,000,000
1
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority (Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center), Variable Rate SIFMA Index
Revenue Bonds (Series 2017C) FRNs, 1.080% (SIFMA 7-day
+1.050%), Mandatory Tender 7/3/2023
3,021,422
Annual Shareholder Report
35
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
 
MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued
 
 
 
Washington—continued
 
$3,000,000
 
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority (Providence St.
Joseph Health), Revenue Bonds (Series 2012B) TOBs, 5.000%,
Mandatory Tender 10/1/2021
$3,035,801
 
 
TOTAL
29,950,847
 
 
West Virginia—0.4%
 
4,000,000
 
West Virginia EDA Solid Waste Disposal Facilities (Appalachian
Power Co.), Revenue Refunding Bonds Amos Project
(Series 2015A) TOBs, 2.550%, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2024
4,212,290
 
 
Wyoming—0.3%
 
3,000,000
 
Sweetwater County, WY PCRB (Idaho Power Co.), PCR Refunding
Bonds (Series 2006), 1.700%, 7/15/2026
3,093,310
 
 
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $1,000,025,278)
1,022,194,831
 
1
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—11.8%
 
 
 
California—3.8%
 
8,775,000
 
Los Angeles, CA Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds (CORE
Related/GALA Rentals, LP), SPEAR’s 3a7 (Series DBE-8081)
VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank AG LIQ)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC),
0.490%, 7/1/2021
8,775,000
17,600,000
 
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund,
(Series A) Weekly VRDPs, 0.330%, 7/1/2021
17,600,000
6,700,000
 
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund, PUTTERs 3a-7
(Series 5038) (VRDP Series 5) Daily VRDNs, (JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. LIQ), 0.180%, 7/1/2021
6,700,000
10,000,000
 
San Francisco, CA City and County (1500 Mission Urban Housing
LP), SPEARs 3a7 (Series DBE-8059) VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank AG
LIQ)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 0.490%, 7/1/2021
10,000,000
 
 
TOTAL
43,075,000
 
 
Florida—0.3%
 
3,100,000
 
Jacksonville, FL HFA (Millennia Jacksonville TC LP), SPEARs
(Series DBE-8055) VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank AG LIQ)/(Deutsche
Bank AG LOC), 0.490%, 7/1/2021
3,100,000
 
 
Georgia—1.4%
 
3,000,000
 
Appling County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power
Co.), (1st Series 1997) Daily VRDNs, 0.060%, 7/1/2021
3,000,000
850,000
 
Appling County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power
Co.), (First Series 2011) Daily VRDNs, 0.060%, 7/1/2021
850,000
4,580,000
 
Floyd County, GA Development Authority PCRB (Georgia Power
Co.), (First Series 1996) Daily VRDNs, 0.060%, 7/1/2021
4,580,000
7,400,000
 
Heard County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.),
(First Series 2007) Daily VRDNs, 0.060%, 7/1/2021
7,400,000
 
 
TOTAL
15,830,000
Annual Shareholder Report
36
Principal
Amount
 
 
Value
 
1
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—continued
 
 
 
Kentucky—1.2%
 
$2,150,000
 
Louisville, KY Regional Airport Authority (BT-OH LLC),
(Series 2006A) Daily VRDNs, (United Parcel Service, Inc. GTD),
0.070%, 7/1/2021
$2,150,000
11,400,000
 
Meade County, KY Industrial Building Revenue Authority (Nucor
Corp.), (Series 2020B-1) Daily VRDNs, 0.090%, 7/1/2021
11,400,000
 
 
TOTAL
13,550,000
 
 
Louisiana—0.4%
 
4,495,000
 
Calcasieu Parish, LA Public Trust Authority (Le Jolliet LP), SPEARs
3a7 (Series DBE-8060) VRDNs, (Deutsche Bank AG
LIQ)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 0.490%, 7/1/2021
4,495,000
 
 
Multi State—0.3%
 
3,600,000
 
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, Series D
Weekly VRDPs, 0.330%, 7/1/2021
3,600,000
 
 
New York—0.6%
 
2,500,000
 
New York City, NY, (Series 2021-2) Weekly VRENs,
0.160%, 7/1/2021
2,500,000
2,500,000
 
New York City, NY, (Series 2021-3) Weekly VRENs,
0.160%, 7/1/2021
2,500,000
1,850,000
 
New York City, NY, (Series B-3) Weekly VRENs, 0.160%, 7/1/2021
1,850,000
 
 
TOTAL
6,850,000
 
 
Texas—3.4%
 
1,700,000
 
Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX
(Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010B) Daily VRDNs,
0.060%, 7/1/2021
1,700,000
17,650,000
 
Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX
(Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010C) Daily VRDNs,
0.070%, 7/1/2021
17,650,000
20,000,000
 
Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, TX
(Motiva Enterprises LLC), (Series 2010D) Weekly VRDNs,
0.080%, 7/7/2021
20,000,000
 
 
TOTAL
39,350,000
 
 
Wisconsin—0.4%
 
4,500,000
 
Wisconsin State HEFA (Marshfield Clinic), (Series 2020C) Weekly
VRENs, 0.130%, 7/1/2021
4,500,000
 
 
TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS
(IDENTIFIED COST $134,350,000)
134,350,000
 
 
TOTAL INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES—101.1%
(IDENTIFIED COST $1,134,375,278)3
1,156,544,831
 
 
OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET—(1.1)%4
(12,248,858)
 
 
TOTAL NET ASSETS—100%
$1,144,295,973
Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 12.8% of the Fund’s portfolio as calculated based upon total market value (unaudited).
Annual Shareholder Report
37
At June 30, 2021, the Fund had the following open futures contracts: 
Description
Number of
Contracts
Notional
Value
Expiration
Date
Value and
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
Short Futures
 
 
 
 
5United States Treasury Notes 5-Year
100
$12,342,969
September 2021
$25,180
5United States Treasury Notes
10-Year
100
$13,250,000
September 2021
$(79,923)
NET UNREALIZED DEPRECIATION ON FUTURES CONTRACTS
$(54,743)
1
Current rate and current maturity or next reset date shown for floating rate notes and variable rate notes/demand instruments. Certain variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread but are determined by the issuer or agent and are based on current market conditions. These securities do not indicate a reference rate and spread in their description above.
2
Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or availing of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At June 30, 2021, these restricted securities amounted to $6,091,375, which represented 0.5% of total net assets.
3
The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $1,134,367,483.
4
Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
5
Non-income producing security.
Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at June 30, 2021.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). Also includes securities valued at amortized cost.
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Annual Shareholder Report
38
The following is a summary of the inputs used, as of June 30, 2021, in valuing the Fund’s assets carried at fair value: 
Valuation Inputs
 
Level 1—
Quoted
Prices
Level 2—
Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
Level 3—
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Total
Debt Securities:
 
 
 
 
Municipal Bonds
$—
$1,022,194,831
$—
$1,022,194,831
Short-Term Municipals
—
134,350,000
—
134,350,000
TOTAL SECURITIES
$—
$1,156,544,831
$—
$1,156,544,831
Other Financial Instruments:1
 
 
 
 
Assets
$25,180
$—
$—
$25,180
Liabilities
(79,923)
$—
$—
(79,923)
TOTAL OTHER
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
$(54,743)
$—
$—
$(54,743)
1
Other financial instruments are futures contracts.
Annual Shareholder Report
39
The following acronym(s) are used throughout this portfolio: 
BANs
—Bond Anticipation Notes
COL
—Collateralized
EDA
—Economic Development Authority
EDFA
—Economic Development Finance Authority
FRNs
—Floating Rate Notes
GNMA
—Government National Mortgage Association
GO
—General Obligation
GTD
—Guaranteed
HEFA
—Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA
—Housing Finance Authority
IDA
—Industrial Development Authority
IDB
—Industrial Development Bond
INS
—Insured
LIBOR
—London Interbank Offered Rates
LIQ
—Liquidity Agreement
LOC
—Letter of Credit
LT
—Limited Tax
PCR
—Pollution Control Revenue
PILOT
—Payment in Lieu of Taxes
PRF
—Pre-refunded
PUTTERs
—Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts
SFM
—Single Family Mortgage
SIFMA
—Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
SOFR
—Secured Overnight Financing Rate
SPEARs
—Short Puttable Exempt Adjustable Receipts
TANs
—Tax Anticipation Notes
TEMPS
—Tax Exempt Mandatory Paydown Securities
TOBs
—Tender Option Bonds
UT
—Unlimited Tax
VRDNs
—Variable Rate Demand Notes
VRDPs
—Variable Rate Demand Preferreds
VRENs
—Variable Rate Extendible Notes
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
40
Financial Highlights–Class A Shares
(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period) 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.25
$10.30
$10.22
$10.27
$10.35
Income From Investment Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
0.08
0.13
0.14
0.11
0.09
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
0.12
(0.05)
0.08
(0.05)
(0.08)
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS
0.20
0.08
0.22
0.06
0.01
Less Distributions:
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from net investment income
(0.08)
(0.13)
(0.14)
(0.11)
(0.09)
Net Asset Value, End of Period
$10.37
$10.25
$10.30
$10.22
$10.27
Total Return1
1.98%
0.81%
2.20%
0.60%
0.09%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Net expenses2
0.71%
0.81%3
0.96%3
0.96%3
0.96%
Net investment income
0.78%
1.30%
1.41%
1.07%
0.86%
Expense waiver/reimbursement4
0.10%
0.11%
0.10%
0.09%
0.08%
Supplemental Data:
 
 
 
 
 
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
$509,643
$250,177
$178,706
$178,414
$228,127
Portfolio turnover
11%
49%
39%
18%
32%
1
Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable.
2
Amount does not reflect net expenses incurred by investment companies in which the Fund may invest.
3
The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio is 0.81% for the year ended June 30, 2020 and 0.96% for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, after taking into account these expense reductions.
4
This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above. Amount does not reflect expense waiver/reimbursement recorded by investment companies in which the Fund may invest.
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
41
Financial Highlights–Institutional Shares
(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period) 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.24
$10.30
$10.21
$10.26
$10.35
Income From Investment Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
0.11
0.17
0.19
0.16
0.14
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
0.13
(0.06)
0.09
(0.05)
(0.09)
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS
0.24
0.11
0.28
0.11
0.05
Less Distributions:
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from net investment income
(0.11)
(0.17)
(0.19)
(0.16)
(0.14)
Net Asset Value, End of Period
$10.37
$10.24
$10.30
$10.21
$10.26
Total Return1
2.34%
1.07%
2.81%
1.10%
0.49%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Net expenses2
0.46%
0.46%3
0.46%3
0.46%3
0.46%
Net investment income
1.05%
1.66%
1.91%
1.58%
1.36%
Expense waiver/reimbursement4
0.17%
0.18%
0.21%
0.24%
0.23%
Supplemental Data:
 
 
 
 
 
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
$624,552
$561,612
$575,676
$689,739
$840,891
Portfolio turnover
11%
49%
39%
18%
32%
1
Based on net asset value.
2
Amount does not reflect net expenses incurred by investment companies in which the Fund may invest.
3
The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio is 0.46% for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 after taking into account these expense reductions.
4
This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above. Amount does not reflect expense waiver/reimbursement recorded by investment companies in which the Fund may invest.
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
42
Financial Highlights–Service Shares
(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period) 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.25
$10.30
$10.22
$10.26
$10.35
Income From Investment Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
Net investment income
0.08
0.14
0.17
0.14
0.11
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
0.12
(0.05)
0.08
(0.04)
(0.09)
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS
0.20
0.09
0.25
0.10
0.02
Less Distributions:
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions from net investment income
(0.08)
(0.14)
(0.17)
(0.14)
(0.11)
Net Asset Value, End of Period
$10.37
$10.25
$10.30
$10.22
$10.26
Total Return1
2.00%
0.93%
2.46%
0.95%
0.25%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Net expenses2
0.70%
0.70%3
0.70%3
0.71%3
0.70%
Net investment income
0.82%
1.42%
1.67%
1.30%
1.12%
Expense waiver/reimbursement4
0.10%
0.21%
0.35%
0.34%
0.33%
Supplemental Data:
 
 
 
 
 
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)
$10,101
$11,431
$11,663
$14,429
$31,831
Portfolio turnover
11%
49%
39%
18%
32%
1
Based on net asset value.
2
Amount does not reflect net expenses incurred by investment companies in which the Fund may invest.
3
The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio is 0.70% for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 and 0.71% for the year ended June 30, 2018, after taking into account these expense reductions.
4
This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above. Amount does not reflect expense waiver/reimbursement recorded by investment companies in which the Fund may invest.
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
43
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
June 30, 2021
 
Assets:
 
 
Investment in securities, at value (identified cost $1,134,375,278)
 
$1,156,544,831
Due from broker
 
232,500
Cash
 
42,940
Income receivable
 
7,649,316
Receivable for shares sold
 
7,564,048
Receivable for investments sold
 
180,329
TOTAL ASSETS
 
1,172,213,964
Liabilities:
 
 
Payable for investments purchased
$26,207,772
 
Payable for shares redeemed
1,272,189
 
Income distribution payable
113,070
 
Due to broker
16,228
 
Payable for other service fees (Notes 2 and 5)
139,379
 
Payable for daily variation margin on futures contracts
29,688
 
Payable for investment adviser fee (Note 5)
9,510
 
Payable for administrative fee (Note 5)
1,939
 
Accrued expenses (Note 5)
128,216
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
27,917,991
Net assets for 110,359,605 shares outstanding
 
$1,144,295,973
Net Assets Consists of:
 
 
Paid-in capital
 
$1,135,391,601
Total distributable earnings (loss)
 
8,904,372
TOTAL NET ASSETS
 
$1,144,295,973
Annual Shareholder Report
44
Statement of Assets and Liabilities–continued
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds
Per Share:
 
 
Class A Shares:
 
 
Net asset value per share ($509,642,640 ÷ 49,148,640 shares
outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized
 
$10.37
Offering price per share (100/99.00 of $10.37)
 
$10.47
Redemption proceeds per share
 
$10.37
Institutional Shares:
 
 
Net asset value per share ($624,552,072 ÷ 60,237,186 shares
outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized
 
$10.37
Offering price per share
 
$10.37
Redemption proceeds per share
 
$10.37
Service Shares:
 
 
Net asset value per share ($10,101,261 ÷ 973,779 shares
outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized
 
$10.37
Offering price per share
 
$10.37
Redemption proceeds per share
 
$10.37
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
45
Statement of Operations
Year Ended June 30, 2021
 
Investment Income:
 
 
 
Interest
 
 
$15,045,845
Expenses:
 
 
 
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
 
$3,998,808
 
Administrative fee (Note 5)
 
775,511
 
Custodian fees
 
40,991
 
Transfer agent fees
 
316,114
 
Directors’/Trustees’ fees (Note 5)
 
11,442
 
Auditing fees
 
33,100
 
Legal fees
 
11,564
 
Other service fees (Notes 2 and 5)
 
1,456,225
 
Portfolio accounting fees
 
221,007
 
Share registration costs
 
142,511
 
Printing and postage
 
33,258
 
Miscellaneous (Notes 5)
 
35,360
 
TOTAL EXPENSES
 
7,075,891
 
Waiver and Reimbursement:
 
 
 
Waiver of investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$(978,550)
 
 
Reimbursement of other operating expenses (Notes 2
and 5)
(389,805)
 
 
TOTAL WAIVER AND REIMBURSEMENT
 
(1,368,355)
 
Net expenses
 
 
5,707,536
Net investment income
 
 
9,338,309
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments
and Futures Contracts:
 
 
 
Net realized loss on investments
 
 
(117,827)
Net realized loss on futures contracts
 
 
(59,899)
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments
 
 
10,426,198
Net change in unrealized appreciation of futures contracts
 
 
(54,743)
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and
futures contracts
 
 
10,193,729
Change in net assets resulting from operations
 
 
$19,532,038
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
46
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
 
 
Operations:
 
 
Net investment income
$9,338,309
$12,791,105
Net realized loss
(177,726)
(8,293,147)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation
10,371,455
1,952,628
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
19,532,038
6,450,586
Distributions to Shareholders:
 
 
Class A Shares
(3,228,351)
(2,664,326)
Institutional Shares
(6,014,951)
(9,910,741)
Service Shares
(89,355)
(159,725)
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS
TO SHAREHOLDERS
(9,332,657)
(12,734,792)
Share Transactions:
 
 
Proceeds from sale of shares
743,752,032
353,571,070
Proceeds from shares issued in connection with the tax-free
transfer of assets from PNC Tax Exempt Limited Maturity
Bond Fund
—
72,083,408
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of
distributions declared
7,860,550
10,233,287
Cost of shares redeemed
(440,736,167)
(372,428,512)
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM
SHARE TRANSACTIONS
310,876,415
63,459,253
Change in net assets
321,075,796
57,175,047
Net Assets:
 
 
Beginning of period
823,220,177
766,045,130
End of period
$1,144,295,973
$823,220,177
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Shareholder Report
47
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2021
1. ORGANIZATION
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust (the “Trust”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of one diversified portfolio, Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”). The Fund offers three classes of shares: Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide dividend income which is exempt from federal regular income tax. The Fund pursues this investment objective by investing its assets so that normally distributions of annual interest income are exempt from federal regular income tax. Interest from the Fund’s investments may be subject to (or may be a specific preference item for purposes of) federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) for individuals. Distributions may be subject to state and local taxes.
On November 15, 2019, the Fund acquired all the net assets of PNC Tax Exempt Limited Maturity Bond Fund (the “Acquired Fund”), an open end investment company in a tax-free reorganization, in exchange for shares of the Fund pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by the Acquired Fund’s shareholders on November 5, 2019. The purpose of this transaction was to combine two portfolios with comparable investment objectives and strategies. For financial reporting purposes, the assets received and the shares issued by the Fund were recorded at fair value; however, the cost basis of the investments received from the Acquired Fund was carried forward to align ongoing reporting of the Fund’s realized gains and losses with amounts distributable to shareholders for tax purposes.
For every Institutional Share of the Acquired Fund exchanged, a shareholder of the Acquired Fund received approximately 1.02 of Institutional Shares of the Fund. For every Class A Share of the Acquired Fund exchanged, a shareholder of the Acquired Fund received approximately 1.02 of Service Shares.
The Fund received net assets from the Acquired Fund as the result of the tax-free reorganization as follows: 
Shares of the
Fund Issued
Acquired Fund
Net Assets
Received
Unrealized
Appreciation1
Net Assets
of the Fund
Immediately
Prior to
Combination
Net Assets
of the Fund
Immediately
After
Combination
6,991,585
$72,083,408
$1,739,110
$796,990,717
$869,074,125
1
Unrealized Appreciation is included in Acquired Fund Net Assets Received amount shown above.
Annual Shareholder Report
48
Assuming the acquisition had been completed on July 1, 2019, the beginning of the annual reporting period of the Fund, the Fund’s pro forma results of the operations for the year ended June 30, 2020, are as follows: 
Net Investment Income
$13,259,438
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments
$(6,115,331)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations
$7,144,107
Because the combined investment portfolios have been managed as a single integrated portfolio since the acquisition was completed, it is not practicable to separate the amount of earnings of the Acquired Fund that has been included in the Fund’s Statement of Changes in Net Assets as of June 30, 2020.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Investment Valuation
In calculating its net asset value (NAV), the Fund generally values investments as follows:
■ Fixed-income securities are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Trustees”).
■ Shares of other mutual funds or non-exchange-traded investment companies are valued based upon their reported NAVs.
■ Derivative contracts listed on exchanges are valued at their reported settlement or closing price, except that options are valued at the mean of closing bid and asked quotations.
■ Over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by the Trustees.
■ For securities that are fair valued in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trustees, certain factors may be considered such as: the last traded or purchase price of the security, information obtained by contacting the issuer or dealers, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents, fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, the movement of the market in which the security is normally traded, public trading in similar securities or derivative contracts of the issuer or comparable issuers, movement of a relevant index, or other factors including but not limited to industry changes and relevant government actions.
If any price, quotation, price evaluation or other pricing source is not readily available when the NAV is calculated, if the Fund cannot obtain price evaluations from a pricing service or from more than one dealer for an investment within a reasonable period of time as set forth in the Fund’s valuation policies and procedures, or if information furnished by a pricing service, in the opinion of the valuation committee (“Valuation Committee”), is deemed not representative of the fair value of such security, the Fund uses the fair value of the investment determined in accordance with the procedures described below. There can be no assurance that the Fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it sold the investment at approximately the time at which the Fund determines its NAV per share, and the actual value obtained could be materially different.
Annual Shareholder Report
49
Fair Valuation Procedures
The Trustees have ultimate responsibility for determining the fair value of investments for which market quotations are not readily available. The Trustees have appointed a Valuation Committee comprised of officers of the Fund, Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”) and certain of the Adviser’s affiliated companies to assist in determining fair value and in overseeing the calculation of the NAV. The Trustees have also authorized the use of pricing services recommended by the Valuation Committee to provide fair value evaluations of the current value of certain investments for purposes of calculating the NAV. The Valuation Committee employs various methods for reviewing third-party pricing-service evaluations including periodic reviews of third-party pricing services’ policies, procedures and valuation methods (including key inputs, methods, models and assumptions), transactional back-testing, comparisons of evaluations of different pricing services and review of price challenges by the Adviser based on recent market activity. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the Valuation Committee determines the fair value of the investment in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees. The Trustees periodically review and approve the fair valuations made by the Valuation Committee and any changes made to the procedures.
Factors considered by pricing services in evaluating an investment include the yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, call rights and other potential prepayments, terms and type, reported transactions, indications as to values from dealers and general market conditions. Some pricing services provide a single price evaluation reflecting the bid-side of the market for an investment (a “bid” evaluation). Other pricing services offer both bid evaluations and price evaluations indicative of a price between the prices bid and asked for the investment (a “mid” evaluation). The Fund normally uses bid evaluations for any U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The Fund normally uses mid evaluations for any other types of fixed-income securities and any OTC derivative contracts. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the fair value of the investment is determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees.
Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions
Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified-cost basis. Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Dividend income and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Amortization/accretion of premium and discount is included in investment income. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that select classes will bear certain expenses unique to those classes. The detail of the total fund expense waiver and reimbursement of $1,368,355 is disclosed in various locations in this Note 2 and Note 5.
Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.
Annual Shareholder Report
50
Other Service Fees
The Fund may pay other service fees up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund’s Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares to unaffiliated financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for other service fees. For the year ended June 30, 2021, other service fees for the Fund were as follows: 
 
Other
Service Fees
Incurred
Other
Service Fees
Reimbursed
Class A Shares
$1,040,264
$—
Institutional Shares
389,802
(389,802)
Service Shares
26,159
(3)
TOTAL
$1,456,225
$(389,805)
Federal Taxes
It is the Fund’s policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary. As of and during the year ended June 30, 2021, the Fund did not have a liability for any uncertain tax positions. The Fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to tax liabilities as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. As of June 30, 2021, tax years 2018 through 2021 remain subject to examination by the Fund’s major tax jurisdictions, which include the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Transactions
The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed-delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.
Restricted Securities
The Fund may purchase securities which are considered restricted. Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer’s expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted
Annual Shareholder Report
51
securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund’s restricted securities, like other securities, are priced in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trustees.
Additional information on restricted securities held at June 30, 2021, is as follows: 
Security
Acquisition
Date
Acquisition
Cost
Value
California Municipal Finance Authority (Waste Management,
Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A)
TOBs, 1.300%, Mandatory Tender 2/3/2025
1/30/2020
$1,500,000
$1,542,595
California Municipal Finance Authority (Waste Management,
Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2017A)
TOBs, 0.700%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2023
12/1/2020
$2,500,000
$2,521,617
California Public Finance Authority (Kendal at Sonoma), Enso
Village TEMPS-50 Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series B-3), 2.125%, 11/15/2027
5/27/2021
$1,000,000
$1,013,325
California Public Finance Authority (Kendal at Sonoma), Enso
Village TEMPS-70 Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Series B-2), 2.375%, 11/15/2028
5/27/2021
$1,000,000
$1,013,838
 
 
 
 
Futures Contracts
The Fund purchases and sells financial futures contracts to seek to manage duration risk. Upon entering into a financial futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker, either U.S. government securities or a specified amount of cash, which is shown as due from broker in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a “variation margin” account. The Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. There is minimal counterparty risk to the Fund since futures contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearing house, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures contracts, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Futures contracts outstanding at period end are listed after the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
The average notional values of short futures contracts held by the Fund throughout the period was $5,905,288. This is based on amounts held as of each month-end throughout the fiscal period.
Annual Shareholder Report
52
Additional Disclosure Related to Derivative Instruments 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
 
Liability
 
 
 
Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location
Fair
Value
Derivatives not accounted for
as hedging instruments under
ASC Topic 815
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 
 
Payable for variation
margin on
future contracts
$54,743*
*
Includes cumulative depreciation of futures contracts as reported in the footnotes to the Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Year Ended June 30, 2021  
Amount of Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income
 
 
 
 
Interest
Rate
Contracts
Futures Contracts
 
 
 
$(59,899)
 
Change in Unrealized Appreciation or (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income
 
 
 
 
Interest
Rate
Contracts
Futures Contracts
 
 
 
$(54,743)
Other
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from those estimated. The Fund applies investment company accounting and reporting guidance.
Annual Shareholder Report
53
3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
The following tables summarize share activity: 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
Class A Shares:
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Shares sold
47,219,152
$489,044,329
17,277,889
$177,588,498
Shares issued to shareholders in payment
of distributions declared
309,430
3,203,002
254,356
2,613,605
Shares redeemed
(22,797,898)
(236,148,176)
(10,465,660)
(107,445,312)
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM
CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS
24,730,684
$256,099,155
7,066,585
$72,756,791
 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
Institutional Shares:
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Shares sold
24,607,058
$254,516,619
16,964,998
$174,293,170
Proceeds from shares issued in
connection with the tax-free transfer of
assets from PNC Tax Exempt Limited
Maturity Bond Fund
—
—
6,976,326
71,926,097
Shares issued to shareholders in payment
of distributions declared
442,046
4,574,149
727,281
7,474,683
Shares redeemed
(19,634,130)
(202,844,515)
(25,761,369)
(262,806,964)
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM
INSTITUTIONAL SHARE
TRANSACTIONS
5,414,974
$56,246,253
(1,092,764)
$(9,113,014)
 
Year Ended June 30
2021
2020
Service Shares:
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Shares sold
18,455
$191,084
165,367
$1,689,402
Proceeds from shares issued in connection
with the tax-free transfer of assets from PNC
Tax Exempt Limited Maturity Bond Fund
—
—
15,258
157,311
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of
distributions declared
8,056
83,399
14,110
144,999
Shares redeemed
(168,057)
(1,743,476)
(211,953)
(2,176,236)
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM
SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS
(141,546)
$(1,468,993)
(17,218)
$(184,524)
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM
TOTAL FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS
30,004,112
$310,876,415
5,956,603
$63,459,253
Annual Shareholder Report
54
4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION
The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the year ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, was as follows: 
 
2021
2020
Ordinary income
$—
$151,757
Tax-exempt income
$9,332,657
$12,583,035
As of June 30, 2021, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows: 
Undistributed tax-exempt income
$18,178
Net unrealized appreciation
$22,177,348
Capital loss carryforwards
$(13,291,154)
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities and mark-to-market of futures contracts.
At June 30, 2021, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $1,134,367,483. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $22,177,348. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $22,538,427 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $361,079. The amounts are inclusive of derivative contracts.
As of June 30, 2021, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $13,291,154 which will reduce the Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code, thereby reducing the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, these net capital losses retain their character as either short-term or long-term and do not expire.
The following schedule summarizes the Fund’s capital loss carryforwards: 
Short-Term
Long-Term
Total
$7,950,054
$5,341,100
$13,291,154
5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Investment Adviser Fee
The advisory agreement between the Fund and the Adviser provides for an annual fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Under the investment advisory contract, which is subject to annual review by the Trustees, the Adviser will reimburse the amount, limited to the amount of the advisory fee, by which the Fund’s Institutional Shares aggregate annual operating expenses, including the investment advisory fee, but excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of registering and qualifying the Fund and its shares under federal and state laws and regulations, expenses of withholding taxes and extraordinary expenses, exceed 0.45% of the Fund’s Institutional Shares average daily net assets. To comply with the 0.45% limitation imposed under the
Annual Shareholder Report
55
investment advisory contract, the Adviser may waive its advisory fee and/or reimburse its advisory fee or other Fund expenses, affiliates of the Adviser may waive, reimburse or reduce amounts otherwise included in the aggregate annual operating expenses of the Fund, or there may be a combination of waivers, reimbursements and/or reductions by the Adviser and its affiliates. The amount that the Adviser waives/reimburses under the investment advisory contract will be reduced to the extent that affiliates of the Adviser waive, reimburse or reduce amounts that would otherwise be included in the aggregate annual operating expenses of the Fund. In addition, subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, the Adviser may also voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended June 30, 2021, the Adviser waived $978,550 of its fee.
Administrative Fee
Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. For purposes of determining the appropriate rate breakpoint, “Investment Complex” is defined as all of the Federated Hermes Funds subject to a fee under the Administrative Services Agreement. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average daily net assets of the Investment Complex as specified below: 
Administrative Fee
Average Daily Net Assets
of the Investment Complex
0.100%
on assets up to $50 billion
0.075%
on assets over $50 billion
Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended June 30, 2021, the annualized fee paid to FAS was 0.078% of average daily net assets of the Fund.
In addition, FAS may charge certain out-of-pocket expenses to the Fund.
Distribution Services Fee
The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund’s Class A Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses at 0.05% of average daily net assets annually of Class A Shares, to compensate FSC.
When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares.
For the year ended June 30, 2021, the Fund’s Class A Shares did not incur a distribution services fee; however, it may begin to incur this fee upon approval of the Trustees.
Other Service Fees
For the year ended June 30, 2021, FSSC received $1,108 and reimbursed $389,805 of other service fees disclosed in Note 2.
Annual Shareholder Report
56
Expense Limitation
In addition to the contractual fee waiver described under “Investment Adviser Fee” above with regards to the Fund’s Institutional Shares, the Adviser and certain of its affiliates (which may include FSC, FAS and FSSC) on their own initiative have agreed to waive certain amounts of their respective fees and/or reimburse expenses. The total annual fund operating expenses (as shown in the financial highlights, excluding interest expense, extraordinary expenses and proxy-related expenses, if any) paid by the Fund’s Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares (after the voluntary waivers and reimbursements) will not exceed 0.71%, 0.47% and 0.71% (the “Fee Limit”), respectively, up to but not including the later of (the “Termination Date”): (a) September 1, 2022; or (b) the date of the Fund’s next effective Prospectus. While the Adviser and its applicable affiliates currently do not anticipate terminating or increasing these arrangements prior to the Termination Date, these arrangements may only be terminated or the Fee Limit increased prior to the Termination Date with the agreement of the Trustees.
Interfund Transactions
During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Trustees and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $336,810,000 and $276,120,000 respectively. Net realized gain (loss) recognized on these sale transactions was $0.
Directors’/Trustees’ and Miscellaneous Fees
Certain Officers and Directors of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of certain of the above companies. To efficiently facilitate payment, Independent Directors’/Trustees’ fees and certain expenses related to conducting meetings of the Directors/Trustees and other miscellaneous expenses are paid by an affiliate of the Adviser which in due course are reimbursed by the Fund. These expenses related to conducting meetings of the Directors/ Trustees and other miscellaneous expenses may be included in the Accrued and Miscellaneous Expenses on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the Statement of Operations, respectively.
6. Investment TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended June 30, 2021, were as follows: 
Purchases
$342,098,766
Sales
$101,369,282
7. LINE OF CREDIT
The Fund participates with certain other Federated Hermes Funds, on a several basis, in an up to $500,000,000 unsecured, 364-day, committed, revolving line of credit (LOC) agreement dated June 23, 2021. The LOC was made available to temporarily finance the repurchase or redemption of shares of the Fund, failed trades, payment of dividends, settlement of trades and for other short-term, temporary or emergency general business purposes. The Fund cannot borrow under the LOC if an inter-fund loan is outstanding. The Fund’s ability to borrow under the LOC also is subject to the
Annual Shareholder Report
57
limitations of the Act and various conditions precedent that must be satisfied before the Fund can borrow. Loans under the LOC are charged interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest, on any day, of (a) (i) the federal funds effective rate, (ii) the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), or a replacement rate as appropriate, and (iii) 0.0%, plus (b) a margin. Any fund eligible to borrow under the LOC pays its pro rata share of a commitment fee based on the amount of the lenders’ commitment that has not been utilized, quarterly in arrears and at maturity. As of June 30, 2021, the Fund had no outstanding loans. During the year ended June 30, 2021, the Fund did not utilize the LOC.
8. INTERFUND LENDING
Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Fund, along with other funds advised by subsidiaries of Federated Hermes, Inc., may participate in an interfund lending program. This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the Fund to borrow from other participating affiliated funds. As of June 30, 2021, there were no outstanding loans. During the year ended June 30, 2021, the program was not utilized.
9. OTHER MATTERS
An outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus was first detected in China in late 2019 and subsequently spread globally. As of the date of the issuance of these financial statements, this coronavirus has resulted in closing borders, enhanced health screenings, disruptions to healthcare service preparation and delivery, quarantines, cancellations, and disruptions to supply chains, workflow operations and consumer activity, as well as general concern and uncertainty. The impact of this coronavirus may be short-term or may last for an extended period of time and has resulted in a substantial economic downturn. Health crises caused by outbreaks, such as the coronavirus outbreak, may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks. The impact of this outbreak, and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future, could continue to negatively affect the worldwide economy, as well as the economies of individual countries, individual companies (including certain Fund service providers and issuers of the Fund’s investments) and the markets in general in significant and unforeseen ways. Any such impact could adversely affect the Fund’s performance.
10. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, 100% of distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.
Annual Shareholder Report
58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TO THE BOARD OF Trustees of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust AND SHAREHOLDERS OF Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal fund:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) (the sole portfolio constituting Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust (the “Trust”)), including the portfolio of investments, as of June 30, 2021, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund (the sole portfolio constituting Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust) at June 30, 2021, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and its financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Annual Shareholder Report
59
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of June 30, 2021, by correspondence with the custodian and others or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from others were not received. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.  
We have served as the auditor of one or more Federated Hermes investment companies since 1979.
Boston, Massachusetts
August 24, 2021
Annual Shareholder Report
60
Shareholder Expense Example (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or other service fees and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021.
ACTUAL EXPENSES
The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.
HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES
The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Annual Shareholder Report
61
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher. 
 
Beginning
Account Value
1/1/2021
Ending
Account Value
06/30/2021
Expenses Paid
During Period1
Actual:
 
 
 
Class A Shares
$1,000
$1,001.50
$3.57
Institutional Shares
$1,000
$1,002.80
$2.33
Service Shares
$1,000
$1,001.60
$3.52
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return
before expenses):
 
 
 
Class A Shares
$1,000
$ 1,021.22
$ 3.61
Institutional Shares
$1,000
$ 1,022.46
$ 2.36
Service Shares
$1,000
$ 1,021.27
$3.56
1
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized net expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half-year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows: 
Class A Shares
0.72%
Institutional Shares
0.47%
Service Shares
0.71%
Annual Shareholder Report
62
Board of Trustees and Trust Officers
The Board of Trustees is responsible for managing the Trust’s business affairs and for exercising all the Trust’s powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Trustee and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Trustees who are “interested persons” of the Fund (i.e., “Interested” Trustees) and those who are not (i.e., “Independent” Trustees). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3779. The address of all Independent Trustees listed is 4000 Ericsson Drive, Warrendale, PA 15086-7561; Attention: Mutual Fund Board. As of December 31, 2020, the Trust comprised one portfolio(s), and the Federated Hermes Fund Family consisted of 41 investment companies (comprising 163 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Trustee oversees all portfolios in the Federated Hermes Fund Family and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.
Interested Trustees Background 
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupations: Principal Executive Officer and President of
certain of the Funds in the Federated Hermes Fund Family; Director or
Trustee of the Funds in the Federated Hermes Fund Family; President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Hermes, Inc.;
Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company;
Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director,
Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman and
Trustee, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania;
Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director,
Federated Services Company.
Previous Positions: President, Federated Investment Counseling;
President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment
Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management
Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.
Annual Shareholder Report
63
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas R. Donahue*
Birth Date: October 20, 1958
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving: May 2016
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of certain of the funds in
the Federated Hermes Fund Family; Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,
Vice President and Assistant Secretary, Federated Hermes, Inc.;
Chairman and Trustee, Federated Administrative Services; Chairman
and Director, Federated Administrative Services, Inc.; Trustee and
Treasurer, Federated Advisory Services Company; Director or Trustee
and Treasurer, Federated Equity Management Company of
Pennsylvania, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.,
Federated Investment Counseling, and Federated Investment
Management Company; Director, MDTA LLC; Director, Executive Vice
President and Assistant Secretary, Federated Securities Corp.;
Director or Trustee and Chairman, Federated Services Company and
Federated Shareholder Services Company; and Director and
President, FII Holdings, Inc.
Previous Positions: Director, Federated Hermes, Inc.; Assistant
Secretary, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated
Global Investment Management Company and Passport Research,
LTD; Treasurer, Passport Research, LTD; Executive Vice President,
Federated Securities Corp.; and Treasurer, FII Holdings, Inc.
*
Family relationships and reasons for “interested” status: J. Christopher Donahue and Thomas R. Donahue are brothers. Both are “interested” due to their beneficial ownership of shares of Federated Hermes, Inc. and the positions they hold with Federated Hermes, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
INDEPENDENT Trustees Background 
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
John T. Collins
Birth Date: January 24, 1947
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving:
September 2013
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee, and Chair of the Board of
Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Hermes Fund Family; formerly,
Chairman and CEO, The Collins Group, Inc. (a private equity
firm) (Retired).
Other Directorships Held: Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Director, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (oilfield services); former
Director of KLX Corp. (aerospace).
Qualifications: Mr. Collins has served in several business and financial
management roles and directorship positions throughout his career.
Mr. Collins previously served as Chairman and CEO of The Collins
Group, Inc. (a private equity firm) and as a Director of KLX Corp.
Mr. Collins serves as Chairman Emeriti, Bentley University. Mr. Collins
previously served as Director and Audit Committee Member, Bank of
America Corp.; Director, FleetBoston Financial Corp.; and Director,
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Harvard University
Affiliate Hospital).
Annual Shareholder Report
64
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
G. Thomas Hough
Birth Date: February 28, 1955
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving: August 2015
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee, Chair of the Audit
Committee of the Federated Hermes Fund Family; formerly, Vice
Chair, Ernst & Young LLP (public accounting firm) (Retired).
Other Directorships Held: Director, Chair of the Audit Committee,
Equifax, Inc.; Director, Member of the Audit Committee, Haverty
Furniture Companies, Inc.; formerly, Director, Member of Governance
and Compensation Committees, Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Qualifications: Mr. Hough has served in accounting, business
management and directorship positions throughout his career.
Mr. Hough most recently held the position of Americas Vice Chair of
Assurance with Ernst & Young LLP (public accounting firm). Mr. Hough
serves on the President’s Cabinet and Business School Board of
Visitors for the University of Alabama. Mr. Hough previously served on
the Business School Board of Visitors for Wake Forest University, and
he previously served as an Executive Committee member of the
United States Golf Association.
Maureen Lally-Green
Birth Date: July 5, 1949
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving: August 2009
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Hermes
Fund Family; Adjunct Professor Emerita of Law, Duquesne University
School of Law; formerly, Dean of the Duquesne University School of
Law and Professor of Law and Interim Dean of the Duquesne
University School of Law; formerly, Associate General Secretary and
Director, Office of Church Relations, Diocese of Pittsburgh.
Other Directorships Held: Director, CNX Resources Corporation
(formerly known as CONSOL Energy Inc.).
Qualifications: Judge Lally-Green has served in various legal and
business roles and directorship positions throughout her career. Judge
Lally-Green previously held the position of Dean of the School of Law
of Duquesne University (as well as Interim Dean). Judge Lally-Green
previously served as a member of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania
and as a Professor of Law, Duquesne University School of Law. Judge
Lally-Green was appointed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to
serve on the Supreme Court’s Board of Continuing Judicial Education
and the Supreme Court’s Appellate Court Procedural Rules
Committee. Judge Lally-Green also currently holds the positions on
not for profit or for profit boards of directors as follows: Director
and Chair, UPMC Mercy Hospital; Regent, Saint Vincent Seminary;
Member, Pennsylvania State Board of Education (public); Director,
Catholic Charities, Pittsburgh; and Director CNX Resources
Corporation (formerly known as CONSOL Energy Inc.). Judge
Lally-Green has held the positions of: Director, Auberle; Director,
Epilepsy Foundation of Western and Central Pennsylvania; Director,
Ireland Institute of Pittsburgh; Director, Saint Thomas More Society;
Director and Chair, Catholic High Schools of the Diocese of
Pittsburgh, Inc.; Director, Pennsylvania Bar Institute; Director,
St. Vincent College; Director and Chair, North Catholic High
School, Inc.; and Director and Vice Chair, Our Campaign for the
Church Alive!, Inc.
Annual Shareholder Report
65
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
Thomas M. O’Neill
Birth Date: June 14, 1951
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving: October 2006
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Hermes
Fund Family; Sole Proprietor, Navigator Management Company
(investment and strategic consulting).
Other Directorships Held: None.
Qualifications: Mr. O’Neill has served in several business, mutual fund
and financial management roles and directorship positions throughout
his career. Mr. O’Neill serves as Director, Medicines for Humanity and
Director, The Golisano Children’s Museum of Naples, Florida.
Mr. O’Neill previously served as Chief Executive Officer and President,
Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Fleet Investment
Advisors; President and Chief Executive Officer, Aeltus Investment
Management, Inc.; General Partner, Hellman, Jordan Management
Co., Boston, MA; Chief Investment Officer, The Putnam Companies,
Boston, MA; Credit Analyst and Lending Officer, Fleet Bank; Director
and Consultant, EZE Castle Software (investment order management
software); and Director, Midway Pacific (lumber).
Madelyn A. Reilly
Birth Date: February 2, 1956
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving:
November 2020
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Hermes
Fund Family; Senior Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel
and Secretary of the Board of Trustees, Duquesne University.
Other Directorships Held: None.
Qualifications: Ms. Reilly has served in various business and legal
management roles throughout her career. Ms. Reilly previously served
as Director of Risk Management and Associate General Counsel,
Duquesne University. Prior to her work at Duquesne University,
Ms. Reilly served as Assistant General Counsel of Compliance and
Enterprise Risk as well as Senior Counsel of Environment, Health and
Safety, PPG Industries.
P. Jerome Richey
Birth Date: February 23, 1949
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving:
September 2013
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Hermes
Fund Family; Management Consultant; Retired; formerly, Senior Vice
Chancellor and Chief Legal Officer, University of Pittsburgh and
Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, CONSOL Energy Inc.
(now split into two separate publicly traded companies known as
CONSOL Energy Inc. and CNX Resources Corp.).
Other Directorships Held: None.
Qualifications: Mr. Richey has served in several business and legal
management roles and directorship positions throughout his career.
Mr. Richey most recently held the positions of Senior Vice Chancellor
and Chief Legal Officer, University of Pittsburgh. Mr. Richey previously
served as Chairman of the Board, Epilepsy Foundation of Western
Pennsylvania and Chairman of the Board, World Affairs Council of
Pittsburgh. Mr. Richey previously served as Chief Legal Officer and
Executive Vice President, CONSOL Energy Inc. and CNX Gas
Company; and Board Member, Ethics Counsel and Shareholder,
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (a law firm).
Annual Shareholder Report
66
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held, Previous Position(s) and Qualifications
John S. Walsh
Birth Date:
November 28, 1957
Trustee
Indefinite Term
Began serving: March 1999
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Hermes
Fund Family; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer
of construction temporary heaters); President and Director,
Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction
heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers
Products, Inc.
Other Directorships Held: None.
Qualifications: Mr. Walsh has served in several business management
roles and directorship positions throughout his career. Mr. Walsh
previously served as Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.
(paving contractors).
OFFICERS 
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years
and Previous Position(s)
Lori A. Hensler
Birth Date: January 6, 1967
TREASURER
Officer since: April 2013
Principal Occupations: Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Federated Hermes Fund Family; Senior Vice President, Federated
Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for
Federated Securities Corp.; and Assistant Treasurer, Federated
Investors Trust Company. Ms. Hensler has received the Certified
Public Accountant designation.
Previous Positions: Controller of Federated Hermes, Inc.; Senior Vice
President and Assistant Treasurer, Federated Investors Management
Company; Treasurer, Federated Investors Trust Company; Assistant
Treasurer, Federated Administrative Services, Federated
Administrative Services, Inc., Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood
Services, Inc., Federated Advisory Services Company, Federated
Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania, Federated Global
Investment Management Corp., Federated Investment Counseling,
Federated Investment Management Company, Passport Research,
Ltd., and Federated MDTA, LLC; Financial and Operations Principal for
Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe
Distribution Services, Inc.
Annual Shareholder Report
67
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years
and Previous Position(s)
John B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 16, 1956
PRESIDENT
Officer since: November 2004
Principal Occupations: Principal Executive Officer and President of
certain of the Funds in the Federated Hermes Fund Family; Director or
Trustee of certain of the Funds in the Federated Hermes Fund Family;
Vice President, Federated Hermes, Inc.; President, Director/Trustee
and CEO, Federated Advisory Services Company, Federated Equity
Management Company of Pennsylvania, Federated Global Investment
Management Corp., Federated Investment Counseling, Federated
Investment Management Company; President and CEO of Passport
Research, Ltd.; President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund
Complex and Director, Federated Investors Trust Company.
Previous Positions: President and Director of the Institutional Sales
Division of Federated Securities Corp.; President and Director of
Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Edgewood Securities
Corp.; Director, Federated Services Company; Director, Federated
Hermes, Inc.; Chairman and Director, Southpointe Distribution
Services, Inc. and President, Technology, Federated
Services Company.
Peter J. Germain
Birth Date:
September 3, 1959
CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER,
SECRETARY and EXECUTIVE
VICE PRESIDENT
Officer since: January 2005
Principal Occupations: Mr. Germain is Chief Legal Officer, Secretary
and Executive Vice President of the Federated Hermes Fund Family.
He is General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary and Executive
Vice President, Federated Hermes, Inc.; Trustee and Senior Vice
President, Federated Investors Management Company; Trustee and
President, Federated Administrative Services; Director and President,
Federated Administrative Services, Inc.; Director and Vice President,
Federated Securities Corp.; Director and Secretary, Federated Private
Asset Management, Inc.; Secretary, Federated Shareholder Services
Company; and Secretary, Retirement Plan Service Company of
America. Mr. Germain joined Federated Hermes, Inc. in 1984 and is a
member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association.
Previous Positions: Deputy General Counsel, Special Counsel,
Managing Director of Mutual Fund Services, Federated Hermes, Inc.;
Senior Vice President, Federated Services Company; and Senior
Corporate Counsel, Federated Hermes, Inc.
Stephen Van Meter
Birth Date: June 5, 1975
CHIEF COMPLIANCE
OFFICER AND SENIOR
VICE PRESIDENT
Officer since: July 2015
Principal Occupations: Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance
Officer of the Federated Hermes Fund Family; Vice President and
Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Hermes, Inc. and Chief
Compliance Officer of certain of its subsidiaries. Mr. Van Meter joined
Federated Hermes, Inc. in October 2011. He holds FINRA licenses
under Series 3, 7, 24 and 66.
Previous Positions: Mr. Van Meter previously held the position of
Compliance Operating Officer, Federated Hermes, Inc. Prior to joining
Federated Hermes, Inc., Mr. Van Meter served at the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission in the positions of Senior
Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Investment Management
and Senior Counsel, Division of Enforcement.
Annual Shareholder Report
68
Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years
and Previous Position(s)
Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date:
September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Officer since: August 2011
Principal Occupations: Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief
Investment Officer of Federated Hermes’ money market products in
2004. She joined Federated Hermes in 1981 and has been a Senior
Portfolio Manager since 1997 and an Executive Vice President of the
Fund’s Adviser since 2009. Ms. Cunningham has received the
Chartered Financial Analyst designation and holds an M.S.B.A. in
Finance from Robert Morris College.
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date:
September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Officer since: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment
Officer of Federated Hermes’ tax-exempt, fixed-income products in
2004 and Chief Investment Officer of Federated Hermes’ Tax-Free
Money Markets in 2010. She joined Federated Hermes in 1982 and
has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of
the Fund’s Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson has received the Chartered
Financial Analyst designation and holds an M.B.A. in Finance from the
University of Pittsburgh.
 
Annual Shareholder Report
69
Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract–May 2021
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”)
At its meetings in May 2021 (the “May Meetings”), the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory contract between the Fund and Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”) (the “Contract”) for an additional one-year term. The Board’s determination to approve the continuation of the Contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment after considering all of the information and factors believed to be relevant and appropriate on whether to approve the continuation of the existing arrangement. The information, factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board’s approval are summarized below.
Information Received and Review Process
At the request of the Independent Trustees, the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO”) furnished to the Board in advance of its May Meetings an independent written evaluation presenting on the topics discussed below. The Board considered the CCO’s independent written evaluation (the “CCO Fee Evaluation Report”), along with other information, in evaluating the reasonableness of the Fund’s management fee and in determining to approve the continuation of the Contract. The CCO, in preparing the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, has the authority to retain consultants, experts or staff as reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and can be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the Independent Trustees. At the request of the Independent Trustees, the CCO Fee Evaluation Report followed the same general approach and covered the same topics as that of the report that had previously been delivered by the CCO in his capacity as “Senior Officer” prior to the elimination of the Senior Officer position in December 2017.
In addition to the extensive materials that comprise and accompany the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, the Board considered information specifically prepared in connection with the approval of the continuation of the Contract that was presented at the May Meetings. In this regard, in the months preceding the May Meetings, the Board requested and reviewed written responses and supporting materials prepared by the Adviser and its affiliates (collectively, “Federated Hermes”) in response to requests posed to Federated Hermes on behalf of the Independent Trustees encompassing a wide variety of topics, including those summarized below. The Board also considered such additional
Annual Shareholder Report
70
matters as the Independent Trustees deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Contract, which included detailed information about the Fund and Federated Hermes furnished to the Board at its meetings throughout the year and in between regularly scheduled meetings on particular matters as the need arose.
The Board’s consideration of the Contract included review of materials and information covering the following matters, among others: the Adviser’s investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund’s short-term and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, and relative to the Fund’s particular investment program and a group of its peer funds and/or its benchmark, as appropriate) and comments on the reasons for the Fund’s performance; the Fund’s investment objectives; the Fund’s expenses, including the advisory fee and the overall expense structure of the Fund (both in absolute terms and relative to a group of its peer funds), with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations (if any); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund’s portfolio securities (if any); and the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Board also considered the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders; the entrepreneurial and other risks assumed by the Adviser in sponsoring and managing the Fund; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund’s relationship to the other funds advised by Federated Hermes (each, a “Federated Hermes Fund” and, collectively, the “Federated Hermes Funds”), which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies, and the benefits to shareholders of being part of the family of Federated Hermes Funds, which include the general right to exchange investments between the same class of shares without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated Hermes Funds and Federated Hermes’ affiliates that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated Hermes’ responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated Hermes Funds and/or Federated Hermes may be responding to them. The Board noted that its evaluation process is evolutionary and that the criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria may change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.
The Board also considered judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees in determining to approve the Contract. Using these judicial decisions as a guide, the Board observed that the following factors may be relevant to an adviser’s fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: (1) the nature and quality of the services provided by an adviser to a fund and its shareholders (including the performance of the
Annual Shareholder Report
71
fund, its benchmark, and comparable funds); (2) an adviser’s cost of providing the services (including the profitability to an adviser of providing advisory services to a fund); (3) the extent to which an adviser may realize “economies of scale” as a fund grows larger and, if such economies of scale exist, whether they have been appropriately shared with a fund and its shareholders or the family of funds; (4) any “fall-out” benefits that accrue to an adviser because of its relationship with a fund (including research services received from brokers that execute fund trades and any fees paid to affiliates of an adviser for services rendered to a fund); (5) comparative fee and expense structures (including a comparison of fees paid to an adviser with those paid by similar funds both internally and externally as well as management fees charged to institutional and other advisory clients of the adviser for what might be viewed as like services); and (6) the extent of care, conscientiousness and independence with which the fund’s board members perform their duties and their expertise (including whether they are fully informed about all facts the board deems relevant to its consideration of an adviser’s services and fees). The Board noted that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) disclosure requirements regarding the basis for a fund board’s approval of the fund’s investment advisory contract generally align with the factors listed above. The Board was guided by these factors in its review of the Contract to the extent it considered them to be appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below. The Board considered and weighed these factors in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated Hermes on matters relating to the Federated Hermes Funds.
In addition to considering the above-referenced factors, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew the Contract. In particular, the Board recognized that many shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of Federated Hermes’ industry standing and reputation and with the expectation that Federated Hermes will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board observed that in the marketplace there are a range of investment options available to the Fund’s shareholders and such shareholders, having had the opportunity to consider other investment options, have effectively selected Federated Hermes by virtue of investing in the Fund.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Contract, the members of the Board reviewed and evaluated information and factors they believed to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their reasonable business judgment. While individual members of the Board may have weighed certain factors differently, the Board’s determination to approve the continuation of the Contract was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Board throughout the year and specifically with respect to the continuation of the Contract. The Independent Trustees were assisted throughout the evaluation process by independent legal counsel. In connection
Annual Shareholder Report
72
with their deliberations at the May Meetings, the Independent Trustees met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and without management present to review the relevant materials and consider their responsibilities under applicable laws. In addition, senior management representatives of Federated Hermes also met with the Independent Trustees and their independent legal counsel to discuss the materials and presentations furnished to the Board at the May Meetings. The Board considered the approval of the Contract for the Fund as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the Federated Hermes Funds family, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and the resources of the Adviser and its affiliates dedicated to the Fund. In this regard, the Board evaluated, among other things, the terms of the Contract and the range of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Board considered the Adviser’s personnel, investment philosophy and process, investment research capabilities and resources, trade execution capabilities, experience and performance track record. The Board reviewed the qualifications, backgrounds and responsibilities of the portfolio management team primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund and the Adviser’s ability and experience in attracting and retaining qualified personnel to service the Fund. The Fund’s ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its Performance Peer Group (as defined below) was also deemed to be relevant by the Board as a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund’s investment program.
In addition, the Board considered the financial resources and overall reputation of Federated Hermes and its willingness to consider and make investments in personnel, infrastructure, technology, cybersecurity, business continuity planning and operational enhancements that are designed to benefit the Federated Hermes Funds. The Board noted the significant acquisition of Hermes Fund Managers Limited by Federated Hermes in 2018, which has deepened the organization’s investment management expertise and capabilities and expanded the investment process for all of the Federated Hermes Funds to have access to analytical resources related to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) factors and issuer engagement on ESG matters.
The Board considered the quality of the Adviser’s communications with the Board and responsiveness to Board inquiries and requests made from time to time with respect to the Fund and other Federated Hermes Funds. In this regard, the Board took into account the Adviser’s communications with the Board in light of the market volatility amidst the pandemic. The Board also considered that Federated Hermes is responsible for providing the Federated Hermes Funds’ officers.
Annual Shareholder Report
73
The Board received and evaluated information regarding the Adviser’s regulatory and compliance environment. The Board considered the Adviser’s compliance program, compliance history, and reports from the CCO about the Adviser’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including responses to regulatory developments and any compliance or other issues raised by regulatory agencies. The Board also noted Federated Hermes’ support of the Federated Hermes Funds’ compliance control structure and, in particular, the compliance-related resources devoted by the Adviser and its affiliates in support of the Fund’s obligations pursuant to Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, including the Adviser’s commitment to respond to rulemaking and other regulatory initiatives of the SEC. The Board considered Federated Hermes’ day-to-day oversight of the Federated Hermes Funds’ compliance with their investment objectives and policies as well as with applicable laws and regulations, noting that regulatory and other developments had over time led to an increase in the scope of Federated Hermes’ oversight in this regard, including in connection with the designation of the Federated Hermes Funds’ investment advisers as the administrators of the Federated Hermes Funds’ liquidity risk management program.
The Board also considered discussions with Federated Hermes regarding the implementation of its business continuity plans and recognized steps taken by Federated Hermes to continue to provide the same nature, extent and quality of services to the Federated Hermes Funds during the pandemic. In addition, the Board noted Federated Hermes’ commitment to maintaining high quality systems and expending substantial resources to prepare for and respond to ongoing changes due to the market, regulatory and control environments in which the Fund and its service providers operate, including changes associated with the pandemic.
Based on these considerations, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the Adviser’s investment management and related services warrant the continuation of the Contract.
Fund Investment Performance
In evaluating the Fund’s investment performance, the Board considered performance results in light of the Fund’s investment objective, strategies and risks, as disclosed in the Fund’s prospectus. The Board also considered detailed investment reports on, and the Adviser’s analysis of, the Fund’s performance over different time periods that were provided to the Board throughout the year and in connection with the May Meetings. These reports include, among other items, information on the Fund’s gross and net returns, the Fund’s investment performance compared to one or more relevant investment categories and the Fund’s benchmark index, portfolio attribution information and commentary on the effect of current and recent market conditions.
Annual Shareholder Report
74
The Board also reviewed comparative information regarding the performance of other mutual funds in the category of peer funds selected by Morningstar, Inc. (the “Morningstar”), an independent fund ranking organization (the “Performance Peer Group”), noting the CCO’s view that comparisons to fund peer groups may be helpful, though not conclusive, in evaluating the performance of the Adviser in managing the Fund. The Board considered, in evaluating such comparisons, that in some cases there may be differences in the funds’ objectives or investment management techniques, or the costs to implement the funds, even within the same Performance Peer Group.
For the periods ended December 31, 2020, the Fund’s performance for the five-year period was above the median of the Performance Peer Group, and the Fund’s performance fell below the median of the Performance Peer Group for the one-year and three-year periods. The Board discussed the Fund’s performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being taken by the Adviser in the context of other factors considered relevant by the Board.
Following such evaluation and full deliberations, the Board concluded that the performance of the Fund supported renewal of the Contract.
Fund Expenses
The Board considered the advisory fee and overall expense structure of the Fund and the comparative fee and expense information that had been provided in connection with the May Meetings. In this regard, the Board was presented with, and considered, information regarding the contractual advisory fee rates, net advisory fee rates, total expense ratios and each element of the Fund’s total expense ratio (i.e., gross and net advisory fees, administrative fees, custody fees, portfolio accounting fees and transfer agency fees) relative to an appropriate group of peer funds compiled by Federated Hermes from the category of peer funds selected by Morningstar (the “Expense Peer Group”). The Board received a description of the methodology used to select the Expense Peer Group from the overall Morningstar category. The Board also reviewed comparative information regarding the fees and expenses of the broader group of funds in the overall Morningstar category.
While mindful that courts have cautioned against giving too much weight to comparative information concerning fees charged by other advisers for managing funds with comparable investment programs, the Board noted that it found the use of such comparisons to be relevant to its deliberations. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because such comparisons are believed to be more relevant. The Board considered that other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, in that they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of
Annual Shareholder Report
75
investment vehicle, in fact, chosen and maintained by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board noted that the range of such other mutual funds’ fees and expenses, therefore, appears to be a relevant indicator of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the marketplace in which the Fund competes.
The Board reviewed the contractual advisory fee rate, net advisory fee rate and other expenses of the Fund and noted the position of the Fund’s fee rates relative to its Expense Peer Group. In this regard, the Board noted that the contractual advisory fee rate was above the median of the Expense Peer Group, but the Board noted the applicable waivers and reimbursements, and that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive in the context of other factors considered by the Board.
The Board also received and considered information about the fees charged by Federated Hermes for providing advisory services to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Federated Hermes Funds, including non-mutual fund clients (such as institutional separate accounts) and third-party unaffiliated mutual funds for which the Adviser or its affiliates serve as sub-adviser. The Board noted the CCO’s conclusion that non-mutual fund clients are inherently different products due to the following differences, among others: (i) different types of targeted investors; (ii) different applicable laws and regulations; (iii) different legal structures; (iv) different average account sizes and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows and different associated costs; (v) the time spent by portfolio managers and their teams (among other personnel across various departments, including legal, compliance and risk management) in reviewing securities pricing, addressing different administrative responsibilities, and addressing different degrees of risk associated with management; and (vi) a variety of different costs. The Board also considered information regarding the differences in the nature of the services required for Federated Hermes to manage its proprietary mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a sub-adviser to another institution’s mutual fund, noting the CCO’s view that Federated Hermes generally performs significant additional services and assumes substantially greater risks in managing the Fund and other Federated Hermes Funds than in its role as sub-adviser to an unaffiliated third-party mutual fund. The Board noted that the CCO did not consider the fees for providing advisory services to other types of clients to be determinative in judging the appropriateness of the Federated Hermes Funds’ advisory fees.
Following such evaluation and full deliberations, the Board concluded that the fees and expenses of the Fund are reasonable and supported renewal of the Contract.
Annual Shareholder Report
76
Profitability and Other Benefits
The Board also received financial information about Federated Hermes, including information regarding the compensation and ancillary (or “fall-out”) benefits that Federated Hermes derived from its relationships with the Federated Hermes Funds. This information covered not only the fees under the Federated Hermes Funds’ investment advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated Hermes’ affiliates for providing other services to the Federated Hermes Funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated Hermes Funds’ administrator and distributor). In this regard, the Board considered that certain of Federated Hermes’ affiliates provide distribution and shareholder services to the Federated Hermes Funds, for which they may be compensated through distribution and servicing fees paid pursuant to Rule 12b-1 plans or otherwise. The Board also received and considered information detailing any indirect benefit that Federated Hermes may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute portfolio trades for the Federated Hermes Funds. In addition, the Board considered that, in order for the Federated Hermes Funds to remain competitive in the marketplace, the Adviser and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have disclosed to Federated Hermes Fund shareholders and/or reported to the Board their intention to do so (or continue to do so) in the future. Moreover, the Board received and considered regular reports from Federated Hermes throughout the year as to the institution, adjustment or elimination of these voluntary waivers and/or reimbursements.
The Board received and considered information furnished by Federated Hermes, as requested by the CCO, that reported revenues on a fund-by-fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund-by-fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the CCO and described to the Board. The Board considered the CCO’s view that, while these cost allocation reports apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs continues to cause the CCO to question the precision of the process and to conclude that such reports may be unreliable because a single change in an allocation estimate may dramatically alter the resulting estimate of cost and/or profitability of a Federated Hermes Fund and may produce unintended consequences. The allocation information, including the CCO’s view that cost allocations on a fund-by-fund basis may be unreliable, was considered in the evaluation by the Board. In addition, the Board considered the CCO’s view that the allocation methodologies used by Federated Hermes in estimating profitability for purposes of reporting to the Board in connection with the continuation of the Contract are consistent with the methodologies previously reviewed by an independent consultant. The Board noted that the independent consultant had previously conducted a review of the allocation methodologies and reported that, although there is no single best method to allocate expenses, the methodologies used by Federated Hermes are reasonable.
Annual Shareholder Report
77
The Board also reviewed information compiled by Federated Hermes comparing its profitability information to other publicly held fund management companies, including information regarding profitability trends over time. The Board considered the CCO’s conclusion that, based on such profitability information, Federated Hermes’ profit margins did not appear to be excessive. The Board also considered the CCO’s view that Federated Hermes appeared financially sound, with the resources necessary to fulfill its obligations under its contracts with the Federated Hermes Funds.
Economies of Scale
The Board received and considered information about the notion of possible realization of “economies of scale” as a fund grows larger, the difficulties of calculating economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders. In this regard, the Board considered that Federated Hermes has made significant and long-term investments in areas that support all of the Federated Hermes Funds, such as personnel and processes for the portfolio management (including market data on which portfolio managers make investment decisions), trading operations, issuer engagement (including with respect to ESG matters), shareholder services, compliance, business continuity, internal audit and risk management functions, as well as systems technology (including technology relating to cybersecurity) and use of data. The Board noted that Federated Hermes’ investments in these areas are extensive and are designed to provide enhanced services to the Federated Hermes Funds and their shareholders. The Board considered that the benefits of these investments (as well as the benefits of any economies of scale, should they exist) are likely to be shared with the family of Federated Hermes Funds as a whole. In addition, the Board considered that the Adviser and its affiliates have frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses for the Federated Hermes Funds and that such waivers and reimbursements are another means for potential economies of scale to be shared with shareholders and can provide protection from an increase in expenses if a Federated Hermes Fund’s assets decline. The Board also considered reports on adviser-paid fees (commonly referred to as “revenue sharing”) that were provided to the Board throughout the year and in connection with the May Meetings. The Board considered the beliefs of Federated Hermes and the CCO that this information should be viewed to determine if there was an incentive to either not apply breakpoints, or to apply breakpoints at higher levels, and should not be viewed to determine the appropriateness of advisory fees. The Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with “breakpoints” that serve to reduce the fees as a fund attains a certain size.
Annual Shareholder Report
78
Conclusions
The Board considered: (i) the CCO’s conclusion that his observations and the information accompanying the CCO Fee Evaluation Report show that the management fee for the Fund was reasonable; and (ii) the CCO’s recommendation that the Board approve the management fee. The Board noted that, under these circumstances, no changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of, the Contract by the CCO. The CCO also recognized that the Board’s evaluation of the Federated Hermes Funds’ advisory and sub-advisory arrangements is a continuing and ongoing process that is informed by the information that the Board requests and receives from management throughout the course of the year and, in this regard, the CCO noted certain items for future reporting to the Board or further consideration by management as the Board continues its ongoing oversight of the Federated Hermes Funds.
On the basis of the information and factors summarized above, among other information and factors deemed relevant by the Board, and the evaluation thereof, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously voted to approve the continuation of the Contract. The Board based its determination to approve the Contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view of past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were necessarily deemed to be relevant to the Fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were deemed to be relevant, the Board’s determination to approve the continuation of the Contract reflects its view that Federated Hermes’ performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the determination to approve the continuation of the existing arrangement.
Annual Shareholder Report
79
Liquidity Risk Management Program–
Annual Evaluation of Adequacy and Effectiveness
In accordance with Rule 22e-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Liquidity Rule”), Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust (the “Trust”) has adopted and implemented a liquidity risk management program (the “Program”) for Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund” and, collectively with the other non-money market open-end funds advised by Federated Hermes, the “Federated Hermes Funds”). The Program seeks to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk. “Liquidity risk” is defined under the Liquidity Rule as the risk that the Fund is unable to meet redemption requests without significantly diluting remaining investors’ interests in the Fund. The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) has approved the designation of the Fund’s investment adviser as the administrator for the Program with respect to the Fund (the “Administrator”). Each affiliated Federated Hermes advisory subsidiary (including the Fund’s investment adviser) that serves as investment adviser to a Federated Hermes Fund (including the Fund) has been approved as the administrator of the Program with respect to each Federated Hermes Fund that is managed by such advisory subsidiary (collectively, the “Administrator”). The Administrator, in turn, has delegated day-to-day responsibility for the administration of the Program to multiple Liquidity Risk Management Committees, which are comprised of representatives from certain divisions within Federated Hermes.
The Program is comprised of various components designed to support the assessment and/or management of liquidity risk, including: (1) the periodic assessment (no less frequently than annually) of certain factors that influence the Fund’s liquidity risk; (2) the periodic classification (no less frequently than monthly) of the Fund’s investments into one of four liquidity categories that reflect an estimate of their liquidity under current market conditions; (3) a 15% limit on the acquisition of “illiquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule); (4) to the extent a Fund does not invest primarily in “highly liquid investments” (as defined under the Liquidity Rule), the determination of a minimum percentage of the Fund’s assets that generally will be invested in highly liquid investments (an “HLIM”); (5) if a Fund has established an HLIM, the periodic review (no less frequently than annually) of the HLIM and the adoption of policies and procedures for responding to a shortfall of the Fund’s highly liquid investments below its HLIM; and (6) periodic reporting to the Board.
At its meetings in May 2021, the Board received and reviewed a written report (the “Report”) from the Federated Hermes Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Risk Officer, on behalf of the Administrator, concerning the operation of the Program for the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021 (the “Period”). The Report addressed the operation of the
Annual Shareholder Report
80
Program and assessed its adequacy and effectiveness, including, where applicable, the operation of any HLIM established for a Federated Hermes Fund and each Federated Hermes Fund’s access to other available funding sources such as the Federated Hermes Funds’ interfund lending facility, redemptions in-kind and committed lines of credit. There were no material changes to the Program during the Period. The Report summarized the operation of the Program and the information and factors considered by the Administrator in assessing whether the Program has been adequately and effectively implemented with respect to the Federated Hermes Funds. Such information and factors included, among other things:
■ confirmation that the Fund did not utilize alternative funding sources during the Period;
■ the periodic classifications of the Fund’s investments into one of four liquidity categories and the methodologies and inputs used to classify the investments, including the Fund’s reasonably anticipated trade size;
■ the analysis received from a third-party liquidity assessment vendor that is taken into account in the process of determining the liquidity classifications of the Fund’s investments and the results of an evaluation of the services performed by the vendor in support of this process;
■ the fact that the Fund invested primarily in highly liquid investments during the Period and, therefore, was not required to establish, and has not established, an HLIM and the procedures for monitoring the status of the Fund as investing primarily in highly liquid investments;
■ the fact that the Fund invested no more than 15% of its assets in illiquid investments during the Period and the procedures for monitoring this limit; and
■ liquidity events during the Period, including the impact on liquidity caused by extended non-U.S. market closures and the March-April 2020 market conditions, and the fact that there were no specific liquidity events during the Period that materially affected the Fund’s liquidity risk.
Based on this review, the Administrator concluded that the Program is operating effectively to assess and manage the Fund’s liquidity risk, and that the Program has been and continues to be adequately and effectively implemented to monitor and, as applicable, respond to the Fund’s liquidity developments.
Annual Shareholder Report
81
Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund’s portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on “Form N-PX” of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available via the Proxy Voting Record (Form N-PX) link associated with the Fund and share class name at FederatedInvestors.com/FundInformation. Form N-PX filings are also available at the SEC’s website at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Schedule
Each fiscal quarter, the Fund will file with the SEC a complete schedule of its monthly portfolio holdings on “Form N-PORT.” The Fund’s holdings as of the end of the third month of every fiscal quarter, as reported on Form N-PORT, will be publicly available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov within 60 days of the end of the fiscal quarter upon filing. You may also access this information via the link to the Fund and share class name at FederatedInvestors.com.
Annual Shareholder Report
82
Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.
This Report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s Prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses and other information.   
 
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund
Federated Hermes Funds
4000 Ericsson Drive
Warrendale, PA 15086-7561
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.
Federated Securities Corp., Distributor
CUSIP 313907305
CUSIP 313907107
CUSIP 313907206
37173 (8/21)
© 2021 Federated Hermes, Inc.
 
  Item 2. Code of Ethics

 

(a) As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics (the "Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers") that applies to the registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer; the registrant's Principal Financial Officer also serves as the Principal Accounting Officer.

(c) There was no amendment to the registrant’s code of ethics described in Item 2(a) above during the period covered by the report.

(d) There was no waiver granted, either actual or implicit, from a provision to the registrant’s code of ethics described in Item 2(a) above during the period covered by the report.

(e) Not Applicable

(f)(3) The registrant hereby undertakes to provide any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics. To request a copy of the code of ethics, contact the registrant at 1-800-341-7400, and ask for a copy of the Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The registrant's Board has determined that each of the following members of the Board's Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert,” and is "independent," for purposes of this Item:   G. Thomas Hough and Thomas M. O'Neill. 

 

  Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

(a)       Audit Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2021 – $32,800

Fiscal year ended 2020 - $31,600

(b)       Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2021 - $0

Fiscal year ended 2020 - $0

Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $1,347 respectively. Fiscal year ended 2020- Audit consent fee for N-14 merger document.

(c)        Tax Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2021 - $0

Fiscal year ended 2020 - $0

Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.

(d)       All Other Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2021 - $0

Fiscal year ended 2020 - $0

Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.

(e)(1) Audit Committee Policies regarding Pre-approval of Services.

The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services do not impair the auditor’s independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditor has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

Certain services have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of the general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee will annually review the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee and may grant general pre-approval for such services. The Audit Committee will revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations. The Audit Committee will not delegate to management its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor.

The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its chairman (the “Chairman”) for services that do not exceed a specified dollar threshold. The Chairman or Chief Audit Executive will report any such pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Committee will designate another member with such pre-approval authority when the Chairman is unavailable.

AUDIT SERVICES

The annual audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, registered investment company (RIC) structure or other matters.

In addition to the annual audit services engagement specifically approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval for other audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain audit services; with limited exception, all other audit services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES

Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the RIC’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee believes that the provision of audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor, and has pre-approved certain audit-related services; all other audit-related services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

TAX SERVICES

The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide tax services to the RIC such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence. However, the Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain tax services; with limited exception, all tax services involving large and complex transactions must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

ALL OTHER SERVICES

With respect to the provision of permissible services other than audit, review or attest services the pre-approval requirement is waived if:

  (1) With respect to such services rendered to the Funds, the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the audit client to its accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; and,

 

  (2) With respect to such services rendered to the Fund’s investment adviser ( the “Adviser”)and any entity controlling, controlled by to under common control with the Adviser such as affiliated non-U.S. and U.S. funds not under the Audit Committee’s purview and which do not fall within a category of service which has been determined by the Audit Committee not to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the RIC, the aggregate amount of all services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid to the RIC’s auditor by the RIC, its Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; and

 

  (3) Such services were not recognized by the issuer or RIC at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and

 

  (4) Such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit Committee who are members of the Board of Directors to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee.

 

The Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to those permissible non-audit services which qualify for pre-approval and which it believes are routine and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the auditor.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of these services and applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.

PRE-APPROVAL FEE LEVELS

Pre-approval fee levels for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding these levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

PROCEDURES

Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by the Fund’s Principal Accounting Officer and/or the Chief Audit Executive of Federated Hermes, Inc., only after those individuals have determined that the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

(e)(2) Percentage of services identified in items 4(b) through 4(d) that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X:

4(b)

Fiscal year ended 2021 – 0%

Fiscal year ended 2020 - 0%

Percentage of services provided to the registrant’s Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

4(c)

Fiscal year ended 2021 – 0%

Fiscal year ended 2020 – 0%

Percentage of services provided to the registrant’s Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

4(d)

Fiscal year ended 2021 – 0%

Fiscal year ended 2020 – 0%

Percentage of services provided to the registrant’s Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

  (f) NA

 

  (g) Non-Audit Fees billed to the registrant, the registrant’s Adviser, and certain entities controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser:

Fiscal year ended 2021 - $57,354

Fiscal year ended 2020 - $145,425

  (h) The registrant’s Audit Committee has considered that the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s Adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

 

  Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

 

Not Applicable

 

  Item 6. Schedule of Investments

 

(a) The registrant’s Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of this form.

 

(b) Not Applicable; Fund had no divestments during the reporting period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing.

 

  Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

 

Not Applicable

 

  Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

 

Not Applicable

 

  Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

 

Not Applicable

 

  Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

No Changes to Report

 

  Item 11. Controls and Procedures

 

(a) The registrant’s President and Treasurer have concluded that the

registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient to form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR.

 

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

  Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

 

Not Applicable

 

  Item 13. Exhibits

 

(a)(1) Code of Ethics- Not Applicable to this Report.

 

(a)(2) Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.

 

(a)(3) Not Applicable.

 

(b) Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Registrant Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust

 

By /S/ Lori A. Hensler

 

Lori A. Hensler, Principal Financial Officer

 

Date August 23, 2021

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

By /S/ John B. Fisher

 

John B. Fisher, Principal Executive Officer

 

Date August 23, 2021

 

 

By /S/ Lori A. Hensler

 

Lori A. Hensler, Principal Financial Officer

 

Date August 23, 2021

 

 

 GRAPHIC 2 img87a61a751.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 img87a61a751.gif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end GRAPHIC 3 fisherjohnsigsmall.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 fisherjohnsigsmall.jpg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fhsimfar37173a.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 fhsimfar37173a.jpg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end GRAPHIC 5 ernstyoungsig.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 ernstyoungsig.jpg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edelivery.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 edelivery.jpg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end GRAPHIC 7 fhilogok11p.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 fhilogok11p.jpg M_]C_X 02D9)1@ ! 0$ 9 !D #_X@H@24-#7U!23T9)3$4 0$ H0 M (0 !M;G1R4D="(%A96B !A8W-P05!03 M ]M4 0 #3+ M ID97-C _ M 'QC<')T !> "AW='!T !H !1B:W!T !M !1R6%E: ! MR !1G6%E: !W !1B6%E: !\ !1R5%)# "! " QG5%)# M "! " QB5%)# "! " QD97-C ")!"!3;V9T=V%R92 R M,#$Q %A96B #S40 ! 1;,6%E:( !8 M65H@ ;Z( #CU #D%A96B !BF0 MX4 !C:6%E:( M "2@ /A ML]C=7)V ! % H #P 4 !D '@ C "@ M+0 R #< .P! $4 2@!/ %0 60!> &, : !M '( =P!\ ($ A@"+ ) E0": M )\ I "I *X L@"W +P P0#& ,L T #5 -L X #E .L \ #V /L! 0$' 0T! M$P$9 1\!)0$K 3(!. $^ 44!3 %2 5D!8 %G 6X!=0%\ 8,!BP&2 9H!H0&I M ;$!N0'! $!Z0'R ?H" P(, A0"'0(F B\". )! DL"5 )= F<" M<0)Z H0"C@*8 J("K *V L$"RP+5 N "ZP+U P #"P,6 R$#+0,X T,#3P-: M V8#<@-^ XH#E@.B ZX#N@/' ],#X /L _D$!@03!" $+00[!$@$501C!'$$ M?@2,!)H$J 2V!,0$TP3A!/ $_@4-!1P%*P4Z!4D%6 5G!7<%A@66!:8%M07% M!=4%Y07V!@8&%@8G!C<&2 99!FH&>P:,!IT&KP; !M$&XP;U!P<'&09!ZP'OP?2!^4'^ @+"!\(,@A&"%H(;@B"")8(J@B^"-((YPC[ M"1 ))0DZ"4\)9 EY"8\)I FZ"<\)Y0G["A$*)PH]"E0*:@J!"I@*K@K%"MP* M\PL+"R(+.0M1"VD+@ N8"[ +R OA"_D,$@PJ#$,,7 QU#(X,IPS #-D,\PT- M#28-0 U:#70-C@VI#<,-W@WX#A,.+@Y)#F0.?PZ;#K8.T@[N#PD/)0]!#UX/ M>@^6#[,/SP_L$ D0)A!#$&$0?A";$+D0UQ#U$1,1,1%/$6T1C!&J$)%ZX7TA?W M&!L80!AE&(H8KQC5&/H9(!E%&6L9D1FW&=T:!!HJ&E$:=QJ>&L4:[!L4&SL; M8QN*&[(;VAP"'"H<4AQ['*,0!YJ'I0>OA[I M'Q,?/A]I'Y0?OQ_J(!4@02!L()@@Q"#P(1PA2"%U(:$ASB'[(B--@U M$S5--8Y",$)R0K5"]T,Z0WU#P$0#1$=$BD3.11)%546: M1=Y&(D9G1JM&\$25^!8+UA]6,M9 M&EEI6;A:!UI66J9:]5M%6Y5;Y5PU7(9O5\/7V%?LV % M8%=@JF#\84]AHF'U8DEBG&+P8T-CEV/K9$!DE&3I93UEDF7G9CUFDF;H9SUG MDV?I:#]HEFCL:4-IFFGQ:DAJGVKW:T]KIVO_;%=LKVT(;6!MN6X2;FMNQ&\> M;WAOT7 K<(9PX'$Z<95Q\')+%V/G:;=OAW M5G>S>!%X;GC,>2IYB7GG>D9ZI7L$>V-[PGPA?(%\X7U!?:%^ 7YB?L)_(W^$ M?^6 1X"H@0J!:X'-@C""DH+T@U>#NH0=A("$XX5'A:N&#H9RAM>'.X>?B 2( M:8C.B3.)F8G^BF2*RHLPBY:+_(QCC,J-,8V8C?^.9H[.CS:/GI &D&Z0UI$_ MD:B2$9)ZDN.339.VE""4BI3TE5^5R98TEI^7"I=UE^"83)BXF229D)G\FFB: MU9M"FZ^<')R)G/>=9)W2GD">KI\=GXN?^J!IH-BA1Z&VHB:BEJ,&HW:CYJ16 MI,>E.*6IIAJFBZ;]IVZGX*A2J,2I-ZFIJARJCZL"JW6KZ:QK_UP'# [,%GP>/"7\+;PUC# MU,11Q,[%2\7(QD;&P\=!Q[_(/%$XIZ#+HO.E&Z=#J6^KEZW#K^^R&[1'MG.XH[K3O0._,\%CPY?%R\?_R MC/,9\Z?T-/3"]5#UWO9M]OOWBO@9^*CY./G'^E?ZY_MW_ ?\F/TI_;K^2_[< M_VW____; $, " 8&!P8%" <'!PD)" H,% T,"PL,&1(3#Q0=&A\>'1H<'" D M+B<@(BPC'!PH-RDL,#$T-#0?)SD].#(\+C,T,O_; $,!"0D)# L,& T-&#(A M'"$R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R,C(R M,C(R,C(R,O_ !$( "@ G@,!(@ "$0$#$0'_Q ? !!0$! 0$! 0 M 0(#! 4&!P@)"@O_Q "U$ " 0,# @0#!04$! 7T! @, !!$%$B$Q M008346$'(G$4,H&1H0@C0K'!%5+1\"0S8G*""0H6%Q@9&B4F)R@I*C0U-CH.$A8:'B(F*DI.4 ME9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7V-G:X>+C MY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?K_Q ? 0 # 0$! 0$! 0$! 0(#! 4& M!P@)"@O_Q "U$0 " 0($! ,$!P4$! ! G< 0(#$00%(3$&$D%1!V%Q$R(R M@0@40I&AL<$)(S-2\!5B7J"@X2%AH>(B8J2DY25EI>8F9JB MHZ2EIJ>HJ:JRL[2UMK>XN;K"P\3%QL?(RKR M\_3U]O?X^?K_V@ , P$ A$#$0 _ -;5_'WB?3/BK'X5%_$]F][;P>:;=!)L MEV$\XQD!^N.W2NQ\4W'BC0[BSNM/U:&YLA,GVJWFMT\U8=ZJSJ5QD#<,\<9K MRGQBKO\ M#QHDAC=M1L K@ E3MBYP>*]7@TC6=,\5ZQJ=_>-JMK+IA%NLD05 M4*G)C(''.0<]^?2@9U%[K>DZ;,L-_JEE:RL,JD]PB$C.. 3ZU>5E=0RL&5AD M$'((KYZ^%\#^,I/%=I?ZFJ7FI1H97DB$DDB9;=MR1C!V^O\ #Z5M?$$W?@'X M;VGAS3M5FN%FN7BDF8X>./;N\O@\9R/P/O0(W?BWXI2T\+G^Q/$D=O?QW 22 M&TN4\QE(P00/F&,@\8ZUT'PWO&?X:Z3=WEP6/E.\DTSY_C;)+&O/O&=C8_\ M#/\ X?DMXX_W2V\@91T=E/F<^[$Y]ZY7Q9JMY#\+/!NEQNZ6D\4TLN#@2,LF M #],D_B/2@9]&6&LZ7JCNFGZE9W;( 7%O.LA4>^"<4^;5-/MYFAFOK:.5$,C M(\RAE4=6()Z#UKBK;P7:7NO:3XPCUL(D,$:1+!"L<;Q8("GYCU#;>OI7FOA+ M0K+5/BSXLT.1/+M)5OH $ ^1?- &,^G&/I0(]_M]4T^[L3?6U_:S6@SF>.96 MC&.OS XJ.PUS2=5D>/3M4LKQTY9;>X20K]0I.*\IUSP]HW@'P]I>COXIO+<2 M7QNY85@,AO -H*; < ?*OWC@DGKQC!TVWBTK]HJ*WL;1M/A,N?LWRC8'M]Q7 M"DKC)S@'C\* /5%^(VB7'C.#PW92K,<<#USQ7376I M6-C;"YN[VWM[E SW2SO[/48//L;N"ZA MSCS() ZY^HK$\7ZY8Z=H.I1'6[?3[\6KO#F>-9-P&5PK=PO)]F,86,2LV0ZKG^')X]#6!\-$@U+X6>,+F[(N;VX:O4L0?7- C1^!NK:CK$&O7&I7UQ=S>;" \\A<@8;@9Z"O4]1%T=, MNQ8D"\,+^03C DVG;U]\5Y!^SW_R#]>_ZZP_R>O8+Z[2PT^YO)03';Q-*P7J M0H)./RH ^3[JP\-?P+8!//2O0=#^-^K:QXBTO3#H]G&EW=Q0.X9V*JS M $CW .:]OH \5UCPYX4U'QA+KEWX^@AU7STDVH$7RW3 4!22>-HX/I7J5SXA MTO1K2V;6-6M86E7*RR?NED]P"3_.O!O&C00?M AY@JP+J%D\GRY&W;$6X'7O M78_&;Q!I.J^!XX+2Y$LJWD;@>6PP-K#.2/>@!B_"WPGXDU>?4?#7B22%-Y:2 M.S8.L9/4*P^[UZVT^@R7]K8W%KJJ!Y%L M7+2662-N_DYX8'HO?TY &Q_!2V30)=*?Q%J,D;RJZJ?]5'@Y.(\XW'^\:V9_ MA;I5YX+M?#=Y=W,R6;,]KL7_AO:--EC3:DAC'SL5P2P/S M [%OA)I_AR^BNY=4N[]H&WV\,ORQ1OU#; >2#R/?FIM#^&8T/Q MC-XEBUJ:6ZN))'GC: !'\PY8<'CGIZ8'6N?*)S@ *#N/N>!R.*DU#XM:ZG@RQ\16?AR(6TC>5//-."@DR1A5!W8XZGZ>Y M .I\=?#FS\;SV5S)?3V=Q:@JKQJ&#*2#T/0@]#[UGS?"B&3Q;:^(D\0:BMY& M$,SL%9Y65=I.[HN1QC'':FZI\5[;2O .E:_+9;KW4E(AM ^!N7AF)_N@X]^1 M]:DL?B%=Q^,;/0-1@L[E+R)"MWIS%DAE.A!&63S7%L P2K=L_0]34_BSX3:/XI^SS/=W<%[#&(C^T:QN[F#R+B>WCEEA_YYLR@E?P)Q0!R_AWX:Z5H=A=V]U<7.J27<)MY) M+IL[8SU5!_". ?7('I6#I_P4L=,NKMK?Q!JD=M<1M'Y$;^7D$$ .5(W@9Z<9 MKU*B@#C? OP_@\"K="WU.XNA<[?,61%5Y[UV#JC1LL@4H00P;H1WS M3JK:A:"_TVZLRYC%Q"\1=>J[@1D?G0!Y!>Z7\%1>2A[N%&W'8$@#)Z\5R\GP"\3"1A'J.D,F?E+22*2/< M;#C\ZZ_X;_"C5/"7B1M6U2^LY-D+1QQVK,V2V,DEE&.,]*!G6Z)\,_"?A_48 M]0L=,Q=1\QR2RO)L/J 3C/OC-=;110(^;?%-W%)\=EU6(M)8Q:A9NTZ*2N$$ M88YZ<;3^5>@?'"ZAG\#VUM!(LLTUU')&D?S%DVM\W';IS[T44#.$_L6ZU_X) M6,&GH\M]I5Y++/: ?O/+8GY@O4]1^M=1\/\ XFWDVD6'AN/P]>76IVR+;(Z8 M6(*HPK2'J@ QGKT]\444 8>KR*/VB4O68?95NX T^/D!$**>>@P01[5Z1\7V M!^&>J0@YEE,*QH.K$2H2 ._ )_"BB@#S&!@/V>KFR)_THWXQ#_']]3]WKT!- M$[ _L\VMF/\ CZ^WG]S_ !_?8_=Z]"#^-%% %#7] OM6^%OA?4[&&6<:>DUO M=PH"7AS(2&*]0/Z$5Z5X+^*%WXJ-II\&@W37J[5N[DD"",#[SD]] M%% 'G'BWPWI%_I\GB?0+W[-J/GK]JT<\2I,S $Q#[V,_,!CIR",8KWOPI_:? M_"*:7_;._P#M'[.OG[_O;L=_?&,^]%% &Q1110(*K:C)/4-0U">TB\U[R)B5C3Y& W+P!\^WBOH& *BB@&%%%% '__V0$! end GRAPHIC 8 fscbug_small.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 fscbug_small.jpg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end EX-99.CERT302 9 fsidmt-cert302.htm

N-CSR Item 13(a)(2) - Exhibits: Certifications

 

 

I, John B. Fisher, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust on behalf of: Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund ("registrant");

 

  1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  1. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  1. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

 

    1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

    1. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

    1. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

 

    1. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  1. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

    1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

    1. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

Date: August 23, 2021

/S/ John B. Fisher

John B. Fisher

President - Principal Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

N-CSR Item 13(a)(2) - Exhibits: Certifications

 

 

I, Lori A. Hensler, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust on behalf of: Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund ("registrant");

 

  1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  1. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  1. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

 

    1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

    1. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

    1. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

 

    1. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  1. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

    1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

    1. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

Date: August 23, 2021

/S/ Lori A. Hensler

Lori A. Hensler, Treasurer - Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 EX-99.CERT906 10 fsidmt-cert906.htm

N-CSR Item 13(b) - Exhibits: Certifications

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, the undersigned officers of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust on behalf of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Registrant”), hereby certify, to the best of our knowledge, that the Registrant’s Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended June 30, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

Dated: August 23, 2021

 

/s/ John B. Fisher

John B. Fisher

Title: President, Principal Executive Officer

 

 

 

Dated: August 23, 2021

 

/s/ Lori A. Hensler

Lori A. Hensler

Title: Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer

 

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.