XML 114 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Commitments and contingencies
12 Months Ended
Jan. 03, 2015
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure Text Block

19. Commitments and contingencies

Plum Dispute

Plum, PBC, a Delaware public benefit corporation (“Plum”), and SunOpta Global Organic Ingredients, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“SGOI”), are parties to a manufacturing and packaging agreement dated September 21, 2011 (the “Plum Manufacturing Agreement”). Pursuant to the Plum Manufacturing Agreement, SGOI agreed to manufacture and package certain food items for Plum at SGOI’s Allentown, Pennsylvania facility in accordance with Plum’s specifications regarding, among other things, product ingredients and packaging, manufacturing process, and quality control standards. On November 8, 2013, Plum initiated a voluntary recall of certain products manufactured by SGOI at its Allentown facility. On February 3, 2015, Plum filed a complaint in the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas in Allentown, Pennsylvania. In the complaint, Plum alleges it initiated the recall in response to consumer complaints of spoiled packaging of certain products, which could lead to gastrointestinal symptoms and discomfort if consumed. Plum alleges in its complaint that the spoilage of its products resulted from a post-processing issue at SGOI’s Allentown facility. Plum is seeking unspecified damages equal to the direct costs of the recall and handling of undistributed product, incidental and consequential damages, lost profits and attorneys’ fees. The Company disputes the allegations made by Plum in its complaint and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims; however, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of this claim, nor can it estimate the amount of loss, or range of loss, if any, that may result from this claim.

Other Claims

In addition, various claims and potential claims arising in the normal course of business are pending against the Company. It is the opinion of management that these claims or potential claims are without merit and the amount of potential liability, if any, to the Company is not determinable. Management believes the final determination of these claims or potential claims will not materially affect the financial position or results of the Company.

Environmental Laws

The Company believes that, with respect to both its operations and real property, it is in material compliance with current environmental laws. Based on known existing conditions and the Company’s experience in complying with emerging environmental issues, the Company is of the view that future costs relating to environmental compliance will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, but there can be no assurance that unforeseen changes in the laws or enforcement policies of relevant governmental bodies, the discovery of changed conditions on the Company’s real property or in its operations, or changes in the use of such properties and any related site restoration requirements, will not result in the incurrence of significant costs.

Grain Held for Others

As at January 3, 2015, the Company held grain for the benefit of others in the amount of $1,936 (December 28, 2013 – $3,112). The Company is liable for any deficiencies of grade or shortage of quantity that may arise in connection with such grain.

Letters of Credit

The Company has outstanding letters of credit at January 3, 2015 totaling $4,453 (December 28, 2013 – $3,944).

Real Property Lease Commitments

The Company has entered into various leasing arrangements, which have fixed monthly rents that are adjusted annually each year for inflation.

Minimum commitments under operating leases, principally for processing facilities, warehouse and distribution facilities, and equipment for the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:

$
2015 19,262
2016 17,910
2017 16,548
2018 15,474
2019 12,645
Thereafter 8,710
90,549

In the years ended January 3, 2015, December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, net minimum rents, including contingent rents and sublease rental income, were $15,283, $12,091 and $10,704, respectively.