SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
	Or
[   ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 0-11129

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky	61-0979818
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	IRS Employer Identification No.
346 North Mayo Trail Pikeville, Kentucky (address of principal executive offices)	41501 (Zip Code)

(606) 432-1414

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)

Yes  ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer  ü	Non-accelerated filer	Smaller reporting company
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes    No ü

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common stock – 15,697,596 shares outstanding at July 31, 2013

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. CTBI’s actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; the adoption by CTBI of a Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) policy that provides guidance on the reporting of delinquent consumer loans and the timing of associated credit charge-offs for financial institution subsidiaries; and the resolution of legal  proceedings and related matters.  In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect CTBI’s results.  These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying information has not been audited by our independent registered public accountants; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period.  All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K.  Accordingly, the reader of the Form 10-Q should refer to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for further information in this regard.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)	(unaudited) June 30 2013			December 31 2012
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	56,100		$	73,451
Interest bearing deposits		50,437			127,438
Federal funds sold		1,222			6,671
Cash and cash equivalents		107,759			207,560
Certificates of deposit in other banks		9,568			5,336
Securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $691,793 and $583,858, respectively)		687,362			603,343
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value of $1,621 and $1,659, respectively)		1,662			1,662
Loans held for sale		2,991			22,486
Loans		2,584,801			2,550,573
Allowance for loan losses		(33,601	)		(33,245	)
Net loans		2,551,200			2,517,328
Premises and equipment, net		52,703			54,321
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,673			25,673
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,886			4,885
Goodwill		65,490			65,490
Core deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $7,819 and $7,712, respectively)		797			904
Bank owned life insurance		52,903			44,893
Mortgage servicing rights		3,222			2,364
Other real estate owned		43,632			47,537
Other assets		28,403			31,882
Total assets	$	3,638,251		$	3,635,664
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	624,451		$	606,448
Interest bearing		2,297,722			2,297,400
Total deposits		2,922,173			2,903,848
Repurchase agreements		204,735			210,120
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings		14,075			12,314
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,347			1,429
Long-term debt		61,341			61,341
Other liabilities		34,236			46,268
Total liabilities		3,237,907			3,235,320
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued		-			-
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; shares outstanding 2013 – 15,665,211; 2012 – 15,612,935		78,326			78,065
Capital surplus		161,996			160,670
Retained earnings		162,902			148,944
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(2,880	)		12,665
Total shareholders’ equity		400,344			400,344
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,638,251		$	3,635,664

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
(in thousands except per share data)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale	$	32,672		$	34,278		$	65,520		$	69,330
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		3,129			3,083			6,024			5,854
Tax exempt		557			513			1,115			990
Interest and dividends on Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		342			345			690			709
Other, including interest on federal funds sold		83			136			210			298
Total interest income		36,783			38,355			73,559			77,181
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		2,902			4,930			5,921			9,401
Interest on repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings		234			321			497			659
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		6			8			13			19
Interest on long-term debt		299			777			589			1,777
Total interest expense		3,441			6,036			7,020			11,856
Net interest income		33,342			32,319			66,539			65,325
Provision for loan losses		3,661			2,425			5,220			3,585
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		29,681			29,894			61,319			61,740
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		6,182			5,955			11,949			11,827
Gains on sales of loans, net		755			705			2,152			1,322
Trust income		2,023			1,822			4,023			3,435
Loan related fees		1,496			610			2,444			1,897
Bank owned life insurance		1,327			430			1,748			858
Securities gains (losses)		(8	)		819			(8	)		819
Other noninterest income		1,499			1,648			2,886			3,018
Total noninterest income		13,274			11,989			25,194			23,176
Noninterest expense:
Officer salaries and employee benefits		2,635			2,324			5,186			4,680
Other salaries and employee benefits		10,579			10,078			21,010			20,535
Occupancy, net		1,972			1,859			3,899			3,712
Equipment		988			995			1,966			1,913
Data processing		1,775			1,548			3,588			3,127
Bank franchise tax		1,123			1,127			2,246			2,282
Legal fees		556			496			1,162			1,097
Professional fees		432			385			814			645
FDIC insurance		637			613			1,239			1,270
Other real estate owned provision and expense		1,170			758			3,009			1,548
Other noninterest expense		4,120			3,965			8,167			9,089
Total noninterest expense		25,987			24,148			52,286			49,898
Income before income taxes		16,968			17,735			34,227			35,018
Income taxes		5,026			5,503			10,465			10,917
Net income		11,942			12,232			23,762			24,101
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		(21,337	)		6,370			(23,923	)		4,168
Less: Reclassification adjustments for realized (gains) losses included in net income		8			(819	)		8			(819	)
Tax (benefit) expense		(7,465	)		1,943			(8,370	)		1,172
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(13,864	)		3,608			(15,545	)		2,177
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,922	)	$	15,840		$	8,217		$	26,278
Basic earnings per share	$	0.77		$	0.79		$	1.53		$	1.56
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.76		$	0.79		$	1.52		$	1.56
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		15,565			15,451			15,552			15,429
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		15,641			15,501			15,625			15,475
Dividends declared per share	$	0.315		$	0.310		$	0.630		$	0.620

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
(in thousands)	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	23,762		$	24,101
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,301			2,119
Deferred taxes		(8,370	)		(1,172	)
Stock-based compensation		335			294
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		42			448
Provision for loan losses		5,220			3,585
Write-downs of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets		1,776			359
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(2,152	)		(1,322	)
(Gains)/losses on sales of securities		8			(819	)
Losses on sale of assets, net		92			55
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		93,445			58,797
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale		(71,798	)		(57,979	)
Amortization of securities premiums and discounts, net		2,217			2,807
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(704	)		(688	)
Mortgage servicing rights:
Fair value adjustments		(296	)		119
New servicing assets created		(562	)		(340	)
Changes in:
Other assets		3,472			(1,338	)
Other liabilities		4,672			2,664
Net cash provided by operating activities		53,460			31,690
Cash flows from investing activities:
Certificates of deposit in other banks:
Maturity of certificates of deposit		240			875
Purchase of certificates of deposit		(4,472	)		0
Securities available-for-sale (AFS):
Purchase of AFS securities		(176,783	)		(181,292	)
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of AFS securities		66,622			68,785
Proceeds from the sales of AFS securities		0			12,025
Change in loans, net		(42,740	)		631
Purchase of premises and equipment		(603	)		(2,570	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		38			88
Additional investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock		(1	)		(1	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and other repossessed assets		5,730			5,041
Additional investment in other real estate and other repossessed assets		(48	)		(167	)
Additional investment in bank owned life insurance		(7,306	)		0
Net cash used in investing activities		(159,323	)		(96,585	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in deposits, net		18,325			62,356
Change in repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased, and other short-term borrowings, net		(3,624	)		(20,444	)
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(82	)		(20,092	)
Issuance of common stock		1,272			3,027
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		(42	)		(448	)
Dividends paid		(9,787	)		(9,537	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		6,062			14,862
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(99,801	)		(50,033	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		207,560			238,481
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	107,759		$	188,448
Supplemental disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	10,340		$	10,200
Interest paid		6,474			10,189
Non-cash activities:
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate and other repossessed assets		1,007			2,635
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter		4,904			4,796
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		4,655			7,495

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring accruals) necessary, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2013, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) for that period.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation – The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTBI and its separate and distinct, wholly owned subsidiaries Community Trust Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”) and Community Trust and Investment Company.  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications.  These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

New Accounting Standards –

ØAmounts Reclassified Out of Other Comprehensive Income – In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income.  The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP.  The new amendments will require an organization to:

-   Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

-   Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income.  Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual).  The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies.  The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 did not have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial statements.

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and the affected line items in the statements of income during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were:

Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities

	Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30					Six Months Ended June 30
Affected line item in the statements of income	2013			2012		2013			2012
Securities gains (losses)	$	(8	)	$	819	$	(8	)	$	819
Tax (benefit) expense		(3	)		315		(3	)		315
Net reclassified amount	$	(5	)	$	504	$	(5	)	$	504

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes.  Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates.  Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable.  These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.  Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

Our accounting policies are described above.  We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Investments –Management determines the classification of securities at purchase.  We classify securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories.  Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.  In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 320, Investment Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities.  Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.  If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related.

Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost.  Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

When the fair value of a security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists.  Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment.  The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity.  Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment.  If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a material effect on the CTBI’s results of operations and financial condition.

Loans –Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs.  Income is recorded on the level yield basis.  Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.  Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest.  Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured.  Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain.  Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.  A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses –We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio.  Since arriving at an appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses.  In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine the appropriate ALLL.  Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.

We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits.  Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review.  The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated.  The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan.  We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision.  Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific allocations.  The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded.  The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under ASC 450, Contingencies.

When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on non-accrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to sell or a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value of the loan and the fair value assigned to the collateral is created until such time as the loan is foreclosed.  When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to CTBI, a charge off is taken, if necessary, in order that the remaining balance reflects the fair value estimated less costs to sell of the collateral then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets.  When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.

All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (5 monthly payments) delinquent.  If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent.  For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and foreclosure proceedings are initiated.  When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance, reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell, transferred to other real estate owned.

Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition.  We generally review the historical loss rates over eight quarters and four quarters on a rolling average basis.  Factors that we consider include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs, trend in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and underwriting exceptions.  Based upon management’s judgment, “best case,” “worst case,” and “most likely” scenarios are determined.  The total of each of these weighted factors is then applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted accordingly to approximate the most likely scenario.  Management continually reevaluates the other subjective factors included in its ALLL analysis.

Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales costs.  Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties.  When an updated appraisal reflects a market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales costs.  Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized by a charge to income.

Note 2 – Stock-Based Compensation

CTBI’s compensation expense related to stock option grants was $2 thousand and $20 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $5 thousand and $39 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Restricted stock expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $169 thousand and $158 thousand, respectively, including $31 thousand and $30 thousand, respectively, in dividends paid for each period.  Restricted stock expense for the first six months of 2013 and 2012 was $330 thousand and $316 thousand, respectively, including $62 thousand and $60 thousand, respectively, in dividends paid for each period.  As of June 30, 2013, there was a total of $15 thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 1.5 years and a total of $1.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock grants that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

There were no shares of restricted stock granted during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and 10,822 shares and 331 shares of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  The restrictions on the restricted stock granted in 2013 and 2012 will lapse over four years.  However, in the event of a change in control of CTBI or the death of the participant, the restrictions will lapse.  In the event of the disability of the participant, the restrictions will lapse on a pro rata basis.  The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will have discretion to review and revise restrictions applicable to a participant’s restricted stock in the event of the participant’s retirement.  There were no options granted to purchase shares of CTBI common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  There were 1,500 options granted to purchase shares of CTBI common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2013.  There were no options granted to purchase shares of CTBI common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

The fair values of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013, were established at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the weighted average assumptions as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30
	2013
Expected dividend yield		3.74	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.33	%
Expected volatility		39.11	%
Expected term (in years)		7.5
Weighted average fair value of options	$	9.05

Note 3 – Securities

Securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories.  Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities are those that CTBI has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.  Available-for-sale (AFS) securities are those that CTBI may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons.  Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2013 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	71,075	$	288	$	(3,755	)	$	67,608
State and political subdivisions		115,719		2,429		(2,206	)		115,942
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		449,999		6,291		(5,954	)		450,336
Total debt securities		636,793		9,008		(11,915	)		633,886
Marketable equity securities		55,000		0		(1,524	)		53,476
Total available-for-sale securities	$	691,793	$	9,008	$	(13,439	)	$	687,362

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	480	$	0	$	(42	)	$	438
State and political subdivisions		1,182		1		0			1,183
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	1,662	$	1	$	(42	)	$	1,621

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2012 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	60,625	$	463	$	(173	)	$	60,915
State and political subdivisions		107,987		5,369		(135	)		113,221
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		370,246		13,347		(12	)		383,581
Total debt securities		538,858		19,179		(320	)		557,717
Marketable equity securities		45,000		791		(165	)		45,626
Total available-for-sale securities	$	583,858	$	19,970	$	(485	)	$	603,343

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	480	$	0	$	(4	)	$	476
State and political subdivisions		1,182		1		0			1,183
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	1,662	$	1	$	(4	)	$	1,659

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2013 by contractual maturity are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	5,785	$	5,823	$	0	$	0
Due after one through five years		22,121		22,811		0		0
Due after five through ten years		121,095		117,651		1,182		1,183
Due after ten years		37,793		37,265		480		438
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		449,999		450,336		0		0
Total debt securities		636,793		633,886		1,662		1,621
Marketable equity securities		55,000		53,476		0		0
Total securities	$	691,793	$	687,362	$	1,662	$	1,621

As of June 30, 2013, there was a combined loss of $8 thousand due to the partial call of two municipal securities.  As of June 30, 2012, there was a combined gain of $819 thousand due to the sale of two agency securities.  A pre-tax gain of $885 thousand and a pre-tax loss of $66 thousand were realized as of June 30, 2012.

The amortized cost of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $250.8 million at June 30, 2013 and $262.4 million at December 31, 2012.

The amortized cost of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $241.5 million at June 30, 2013 and $237.3 million at December 31, 2012.

Certain investments in debt and marketable equity securities are reported in the financial statements at amounts less than their historical costs.  CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment.  The analysis performed as of June 30, 2013 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market driven, and not credit-related.  The percentage of total investments with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2013 was 61.4% compared to 14.8% as of December 31, 2012 as a result of changes in the market rates during the second quarter of 2013.  The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2013 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	60,516	$	(3,755	)	$	56,761
State and political subdivisions		57,652		(2,183	)		55,469
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		261,947		(5,954	)		255,993
Total debt securities		380,115		(11,892	)		368,223
Marketable equity securities		55,000		(1,524	)		53,476
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		435,115		(13,416	)		421,699
12 Months or More
State and political subdivisions		1,097		(23	)		1,074
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		1,097		(23	)		1,074
Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		60,516		(3,755	)		56,761
State and political subdivisions		58,749		(2,206	)		56,543
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		261,947		(5,954	)		255,993
Total debt securities		381,212		(11,915	)		369,297
Marketable equity securities		55,000		(1,524	)		53,476
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities	$	436,215	$	(13,439	)	$	422,773

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	480	$	(42	)	$	438
Total temporarily impaired HTM securities	$	480	$	(42	)	$	438

The analysis performed as of December 31, 2012 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, market driven, and not credit-related.  The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2012 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	47,576	$	(173	)	$	47,403
State and political subdivisions		11,126		(135	)		10,991
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		10,563		(12	)		10,551
Total debt securities		69,265		(320	)		68,945
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(165	)		19,835
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		89,265		(485	)		88,780
Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		47,576		(173	)		47,403
State and political subdivisions		11,126		(135	)		10,991
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		10,563		(12	)		10,551
Total debt securities		69,265		(320	)		68,945
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(165	)		19,835
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities	$	89,265	$	(485	)	$	88,780

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	480	$	(4	)	$	476
Total temporarily impaired HTM securities	$	480	$	(4	)	$	476

Note 4 – Loans

Major classifications of loans, net of unearned income and deferred loan origination costs, are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)	June 30 2013		December 31 2012
Commercial construction	$	103,800	$	119,447
Commercial secured by real estate		859,022		807,213
Equipment lease financing		9,383		9,246
Commercial other		376,906		376,348
Real estate construction		51,462		55,041
Real estate mortgage		692,934		696,928
Home equity		80,631		82,292
Consumer direct		123,565		122,581
Consumer indirect		287,098		281,477
Total loans	$	2,584,801	$	2,550,573

CTBI has segregated and evaluates its loan portfolio through nine portfolio segments. CTBI serves customers in small and mid-sized communities in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee.  Therefore, CTBI’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in these communities.

Commercial construction loans are for the purpose of erecting or rehabilitating buildings or other structures for commercial purposes, including any infrastructure necessary for development.   Included in this category are improved property, land development, and tract development loans.  The terms of these loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.

Commercial real estate loans include loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties, 1-4 family/ multi-family properties, farmland, and other commercial real estate.  These loans are originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and secondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Equipment lease financing loans are fixed, variable, and tax exempt leases for commercial purposes.

Commercial other loans consist of commercial check loans, agricultural loans, receivable financing, floorplans, loans to financial institutions, loans for purchasing or carrying securities, and other commercial purpose loans.  Commercial loans are underwritten based on the borrower’s ability to service debt from the business’s underlying cash flows.  As a general practice, we obtain collateral such as real estate, equipment, or other assets, although such loans may be uncollateralized but guaranteed.

Real estate construction loans are typically for owner-occupied properties.  The terms of these loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.

Residential real estate loans are a mixture of fixed rate and adjustable rate first and second lien residential mortgage loans.  As a policy, CTBI holds adjustable rate loans and sells the majority of its fixed rate first lien mortgage loans into the secondary market.  Changes in interest rates or market conditions may impact a borrower’s ability to meet contractual principal and interest payments.  Residential real estate loans are secured by real property.

Home equity lines are revolving adjustable rate credit lines secured by real property.

Consumer direct loans are fixed rate products comprised of unsecured loans, consumer revolving credit lines, deposit secured loans, and all other consumer purpose loans.

Consumer indirect loans are fixed rate loans secured by automobiles, trucks, vans, and recreational vehicles originated at the selling dealership underwritten and purchased by CTBI’s indirect lending department.  Both new and used products are financed.  Only dealers who have executed dealer agreements with CTBI participate in the indirect lending program.

Not included in the loan balances above were loans held for sale in the amount of $3.0 million at June 30, 2013 and $22.5 million at December 31, 2012.  The amount of capitalized fees and costs under ASC 310-20, included in the above loan totals were $0.04 million and $0.4 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Refer to note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our nonaccrual policy.  Nonaccrual loans segregated by class of loans were as follows:

(in thousands)	June 30 2013		December 31 2012
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	4,655	$	5,955
Commercial secured by real estate		7,371		5,572
Commercial other		2,678		1,655
Residential:
Real estate construction		610		315
Real estate mortgage		3,445		3,153
Home equity		253		141
Total nonaccrual loans	$	19,012	$	16,791

The following tables present CTBI’s loan portfolio aging analysis, segregated by class, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90+ and Accruing*
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	0	$	30	$	6,772	$	6,802	$	96,998	$	103,800	$	2,243
Commercial secured by real estate		2,256		2,703		16,282		21,241		837,781		859,022		10,924
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		9,383		9,383		0
Commercial other		1,197		570		6,552		8,319		368,587		376,906		4,186
Residential:
Real estate construction		208		160		801		1,169		50,293		51,462		191
Real estate mortgage		1,619		4,233		7,023		12,875		680,059		692,934		4,263
Home equity		820		333		610		1,763		78,868		80,631		370
Consumer:
Consumer direct		948		258		73		1,279		122,286		123,565		73
Consumer indirect		1,867		697		312		2,876		284,222		287,098		312
Total	$	8,915	$	8,984	$	38,425	$	56,324	$	2,528,477	$	2,584,801	$	22,562

	December 31, 2012
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90+ and Accruing*
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	1,413	$	312	$	9,598	$	11,323	$	108,124	$	119,447	$	3,778
Commercial secured by real estate		9,733		1,633		10,456		21,822		785,391		807,213		5,943
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		9,246		9,246		0
Commercial other		259		1,142		5,164		6,565		369,783		376,348		3,867
Residential:
Real estate construction		248		572		511		1,331		53,710		55,041		196
Real estate mortgage		2,765		4,029		7,138		13,932		682,996		696,928		4,511
Home equity		921		102		565		1,588		80,704		82,292		441
Consumer:
Consumer direct		1,360		336		98		1,794		120,787		122,581		98
Consumer indirect		2,772		907		381		4,060		277,417		281,477		381
Total	$	19,471	$	9,033	$	33,911	$	62,415	$	2,488,158	$	2,550,573	$	19,215

*90+ and Accruing are also included in 90+ Days Past Due column.

The risk characteristics of CTBI’s material portfolio segments are as follows:

Commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate.  Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan.  Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy.  Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria.

Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower.  The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value.  Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis.  In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, CTBI generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded.  Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles.  Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit.  Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income and credit rating of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels.  Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties.  Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

Credit Quality Indicators:

CTBI categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors.  CTBI also considers the fair value of the underlying collateral and the strength and willingness of the guarantor(s).  CTBI analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk.  Loans classified as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention are reviewed quarterly by CTBI for further deterioration or improvement to determine if appropriately classified and valued if deemed impaired.  All other commercial loan reviews are completed every 12 to 18 months.  In addition, during the renewal process of any loan, as well as if a loan becomes past due or if other information becomes available, CTBI will evaluate the loan grade.  CTBI uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Ø   Pass grades include investment grade, low risk, moderate risk, and acceptable risk loans.  The loans range from loans that have no chance of resulting in a loss to loans that have a limited chance of resulting in a loss.  Customers in this grade have excellent to fair credit ratings.  The cash flows are adequate to meet required debt repayments.

Ø   Watch graded loans are loans that warrant extra management attention but are not currently criticized.  Loans on the watch list may be potential troubled credits or may warrant “watch” status for a reason not directly related to the asset quality of the credit.  The watch grade is a management tool to identify credits which may be candidates for future classification or may temporarily warrant extra management monitoring.

Ø   Other assets especially mentioned (OAEM) reflects loans that are currently protected but are potentially weak.  These loans constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard.  The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of circumstances surrounding a specific asset. Loans in this grade display potential weaknesses which may, if unchecked or uncorrected, inadequately protect CTBI’s credit position at some future date.  The loans may be adversely affected by economic or market conditions.

Ø   Substandard grading indicates that the loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged.  These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt with the distinct possibility that CTBI will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Ø   Doubtful graded loans have the weaknesses inherent in the substandard grading with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.  The probability of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to CTBI’s advantage or strengthen the asset(s), its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.  Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of CTBI’s commercial loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Leases		Commercial Other		Total
June 30, 2013
Pass	$	77,966	$	725,401	$	9,383	$	315,390	$	1,128,140
Watch		13,938		79,507		0		39,418		132,863
OAEM		28		12,764		0		5,365		18,157
Substandard		7,213		35,179		0		14,402		56,794
Doubtful		4,655		6,171		0		2,331		13,157
Total	$	103,800	$	859,022	$	9,383	$	376,906	$	1,349,111
December 31, 2012
Pass	$	92,140	$	665,764	$	9,246	$	328,646	$	1,095,796
Watch		12,915		79,517		0		28,760		121,192
OAEM		1,054		16,532		0		2,816		20,402
Substandard		7,383		40,021		0		14,878		62,282
Doubtful		5,955		5,379		0		1,248		12,582
Total	$	119,447	$	807,213	$	9,246	$	376,348	$	1,312,254

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the CTBI’s residential real estate and consumer loan portfolios based on performing or nonperforming status, segregated by class, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

(in thousands)	Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
June 30, 2013
Performing	$	50,661	$	685,226	$	80,008	$	123,492	$	286,786	$	1,226,173
Nonperforming (1)		801		7,708		623		73		312		9,517
Total	$	51,462	$	692,934	$	80,631	$	123,565	$	287,098	$	1,235,690
December 31, 2012
Performing	$	54,530	$	689,264	$	81,710	$	122,483	$	281,096	$	1,229,083
Nonperforming (1)		511		7,664		582		98		381		9,236
Total	$	55,041	$	696,928	$	82,292	$	122,581	$	281,477	$	1,238,319

(1)  A loan is considered nonperforming if it is 90 days or more past due and/or on nonaccrual.

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable CTBI will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan.  Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.

The following table presents impaired loans, the average investment in impaired loans, and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the periods ended June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012:

	June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	5,921	$	6,498	$	0
Commercial secured by real estate		29,232		30,155		0
Commercial other		16,036		19,760		0
Real estate mortgage		1,027		1,027		0
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		4,655		5,511		1,890
Commercial secured by real estate		6,194		6,448		1,866
Commercial other		353		477		83
Totals:
Commercial construction		10,576		12,009		1,890
Commercial secured by real estate		35,426		36,603		1,866
Commercial other		16,389		20,237		83
Real estate mortgage		1,027		1,027		0
Total	$	63,418	$	69,876	$	3,839

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013				June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	6,043	$	53	$	5,634	$	127
Commercial secured by real estate		29,422		236		31,665		533
Commercial other		15,825		151		15,630		305
Real estate mortgage		1,025		17		842		24
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		4,656		0		5,366		0
Commercial secured by real estate		6,298		0		5,232		0
Commercial other		379		0		624		0
Totals:
Commercial construction		10,699		53		11,000		127
Commercial secured by real estate		35,720		236		36,897		533
Commercial other		16,204		151		16,254		305
Real estate mortgage		1,025		17		842		24
Total	$	63,648	$	457	$	64,993	$	989

	December 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	3,692	$	4,146	$	0	$	4,249	$	97
Commercial secured by real estate		35,046		35,818		0		35,542		1,337
Commercial other		13,285		15,484		0		11,083		416
Real estate mortgage		695		695		0		481		30
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		5,703		6,933		1,820		6,585		0
Commercial secured by real estate		3,067		3,189		1,090		3,243		0
Commercial other		1,010		2,331		338		1,441		0
Totals:
Commercial construction		9,395		11,079		1,820		10,834		97
Commercial secured by real estate		38,113		39,007		1,090		38,785		1,337
Commercial other		14,295		17,815		338		12,524		416
Real estate mortgage		695		695		0		481		30
Total	$	62,498	$	68,596	$	3,248	$	62,624	$	1,880

	June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	4,554	$	4,554	$	0
Commercial secured by real estate		35,835		36,307		0
Commercial other		12,253		14,382		0
Real estate mortgage		277		278		0
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		7,561		8,414		1,823
Commercial secured by real estate		3,057		4,196		1,084
Commercial other		911		2,239		422
Totals:
Commercial construction		12,115		12,968		1,823
Commercial secured by real estate		38,892		40,503		1,084
Commercial other		13,164		16,621		422
Real estate mortgage		277		278		0
Total	$	64,448	$	70,370	$	3,329

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012				June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	4,499	$	40	$	4,591	$	58
Commercial secured by real estate		35,964		353		36,235		685
Commercial other		12,504		43		9,645		59
Real estate mortgage		278		5		279		8
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		7,479		0		6,644		0
Commercial secured by real estate		3,059		0		3,222		0
Commercial other		939		0		1,884		0
Totals:
Commercial construction		11,978		40		11,235		58
Commercial secured by real estate		39,023		353		39,457		685
Commercial other		13,443		43		11,529		59
Real estate mortgage		278		5		279		8
Total	$	64,722	$	441	$	62,500	$	810

*Cash basis interest is substantially the same as interest income recognized.

Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are certain loans and leases that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring, where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances.  Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification.  All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower.  In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification.  This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.

When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate all troubled debt restructuring, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.

During 2013, certain loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings, where economic concessions were granted to borrowers consisting of reductions in the interest rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, and forbearances.  Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2012:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		3	$	493	$	0	$	0	$	493
Commercial secured by real estate		15		662		0		0		662
Commercial other		13		872		0		0		872
Residential:
Real estate mortgage		1		373		0		0		373
Total troubled debt restructurings		32	$	2,400	$	0	$	0	$	2,400

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		6	$	2,603	$	0	$	0	$	2,603
Commercial secured by real estate		20		1,267		0		0		1,267
Commercial other		22		6,365		0		92		6,457
Residential:
Real estate mortgage		1		373		0		0		373
Total troubled debt restructurings		49	$	10,608	$	0	$	92	$	10,700

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		5	$	557
Commercial secured by real estate		2		728
Commercial other		10		1,018
Total troubled debt restructurings		17	$	2,303

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		5	$	557
Commercial secured by real estate		5		2,393
Commercial other		11		1,066
Total troubled debt restructurings		21	$	4,016

	Year Ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		5	$	557
Commercial secured by real estate		11		4,506
Commercial other		23		3,233
Residential:
Real estate mortgage		1		391
Total troubled debt restructurings		40	$	8,687

No charge-offs have resulted from modifications for any of the presented periods.

Loans retain their accrual status at the time of their modification. As a result, if a loan is on nonaccrual at the time it is modified, it stays as nonaccrual, and if a loan is on accrual at the time of the modification, it generally stays on accrual.  Commercial and consumer loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default.  If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, CTBI evaluates the loan for possible further impairment.  The allowance for loan losses may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.  Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings which have subsequently defaulted.  CTBI considers a loan in default when it is 90 days or more past due or transferred to nonaccrual.

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013				Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Number of Loans		Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Recorded Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		1	$	831		3	$	1,159
Commercial secured by real estate		1		1,229		3		1,891
Commercial other		5		2,061		6		2,073
Total defaulted restructured loans		7	$	4,121		12	$	5,123

Note 5 – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2012:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Lease Financing			Commercial Other		Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	3,827	$	13,682	$	128		$	5,151	$	372	$	4,980	$	571	$	1,098	$	3,584	$	33,393
Provision charged to expense		1,119		1,132		(11	)		541		34		112		127		174		433		3,661
Losses charged off		1,112		653		0			972		38		151		126		277		786		4,115
Recoveries		1		1		0			73		0		9		4		139		435		662
Ending balance	$	3,835	$	14,162	$	117		$	4,793	$	368	$	4,950	$	576	$	1,134	$	3,666	$	33,601
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,890	$	1,866	$	0		$	83	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	3,839
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,945	$	12,296	$	117		$	4,710	$	368	$	4,950	$	576	$	1,134	$	3,666	$	29,762
Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,576	$	35,426	$	0		$	16,389	$	0	$	1,027	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	63,418
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	93,224	$	823,596	$	9,383		$	360,517	$	51,462	$	691,907	$	80,631	$	123,565	$	287,098	$	2,521,383

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Lease Financing			Commercial Other		Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	4,033	$	13,541	$	126		$	5,469	$	376	$	4,767	$	563	$	1,102	$	3,268	$	33,245
Provision charged to expense		907		1,616		(9	)		386		30		446		177		339		1,328		5,220
Losses charged off		1,112		1,018		0			1,304		38		282		173		591		1,785		6,303
Recoveries		7		23		0			242		0		19		9		284		855		1,439
Ending balance	$	3,835	$	14,162	$	117		$	4,793	$	368	$	4,950	$	576	$	1,134	$	3,666	$	33,601
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,890	$	1,866	$	0		$	83	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	3,839
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,945	$	12,296	$	117		$	4,710	$	368	$	4,950	$	576	$	1,134	$	3,666	$	29,762
Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,576	$	35,426	$	0		$	16,389	$	0	$	1,027	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	63,418
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	93,224	$	823,596	$	9,383		$	360,517	$	51,462	$	691,907	$	80,631	$	123,565	$	287,098	$	2,521,383

	Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Lease Financing		Commercial Other		Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect			Total
Allowance for loan losses
Balance, beginning of year	$	4,023	$	11,753	$	112	$	5,608	$	354	$	4,302	$	562	$	917	$	5,540		$	33,171
Provision charged to expense		1,009		3,520		14		2,330		183		1,437		238		892		(173	)		9,450
Losses charged off		1,034		2,035		0		3,233		189		1,123		248		1,245		3,483			12,590
Recoveries		35		303		0		764		28		151		11		538		1,384			3,214
Balance, end of year	$	4,033	$	13,541	$	126	$	5,469	$	376	$	4,767	$	563	$	1,102	$	3,268		$	33,245
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,820	$	1,090	$	0	$	338	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	3,248
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,213	$	12,451	$	126	$	5,131	$	376	$	4,767	$	563	$	1,102	$	3,268		$	29,997
Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	9,395	$	38,113	$	0	$	14,295	$	0	$	695	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	62,498
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	110,052	$	769,100	$	9,246	$	362,053	$	55,041	$	696,233	$	82,292	$	122,581	$	281,477		$	2,488,075

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Lease Financing		Commercial Other		Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	4,066	$	12,977	$	105	$	5,965	$	344	$	4,240	$	546	$	846	$	4,083	$	33,172
Provision charged to expense		209		1,170		37		207		42		414		64		69		213		2,425
Losses charged off		457		891		0		783		0		232		36		203		605		3,207
Recoveries		113		6		0		98		4		50		0		145		328		744
Ending balance	$	3,931	$	13,262	$	142	$	5,487	$	390	$	4,472	$	574	$	857	$	4,019	$	33,134
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,823	$	1,084	$	0	$	422	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	3,329
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,108	$	12,178	$	142	$	5,065	$	390	$	4,472	$	574	$	857	$	4,019	$	29,805
Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	12,115	$	38,892	$	0	$	13,164	$	0	$	277	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	64,448
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	103,852	$	775,733	$	10,714	$	368,473	$	56,451	$	647,557	$	83,101	$	124,946	$	312,161	$	2,482,988

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Lease Financing		Commercial Other		Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	4,023	$	11,753	$	112	$	5,608	$	354	$	4,302	$	562	$	917		$	5,540		$	33,171
Provision charged to expense		251		2,450		30		925		197		485		93		(48	)		(798	)		3,585
Losses charged off		475		987		0		1,395		171		422		82		349			1,452			5,333
Recoveries		132		46		0		349		10		107		1		337			729			1,711
Ending balance	$	3,931	$	13,262	$	142	$	5,487	$	390	$	4,472	$	574	$	857		$	4,019		$	33,134
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,823	$	1,084	$	0	$	422	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	0		$	3,329
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,108	$	12,178	$	142	$	5,065	$	390	$	4,472	$	574	$	857		$	4,019		$	29,805
Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	12,115	$	38,892	$	0	$	13,164	$	0	$	277	$	0	$	0		$	0		$	64,448
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	103,852	$	775,733	$	10,714	$	368,473	$	56,451	$	647,557	$	83,101	$	124,946		$	312,161		$	2,482,988

Note 6 – Other Real Estate Owned

Activity for other real estate owned was as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
(in thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Beginning balance of other real estate owned	$	45,720		$	59,154		$	47,537		$	56,965
New assets acquired		2,608			2,125			4,655			7,495
Capitalized costs		6			77			6			167
Fair value adjustments		(630	)		(180	)		(1,776	)		(359	)
Sale of assets		(4,072	)		(4,741	)		(6,790	)		(7,833	)
Ending balance of other real estate owned	$	43,632		$	56,435		$	43,632		$	56,435

Foreclosed properties at June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $43.1 million and $55.8 million, respectively.  Also included in other real estate owned are two properties totaling $0.6 million which were not acquired through foreclosure.  Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were $1.2 million and $0.8 million.  Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $3.0 million and $1.5 million.

Note 7 – Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
(in thousands except per share data)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Numerator:
Net income	$	11,942	$	12,232	$	23,762	$	24,101
Denominator:
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average shares		15,565		15,451		15,552		15,429
Diluted earnings per share:
Effect of dilutive stock options		76		50		73		46
Adjusted weighted average shares		15,641		15,501		15,625		15,475
Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.77	$	0.79	$	1.53	$	1.56
Diluted earnings per share		0.76		0.79		1.52		1.56

Options to purchase 88,246 common shares at a weighted average price of $38.95 were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, because the exercise prices on the options were greater than the average market price for the period.  In addition to in-the-money stock options, unvested restricted stock grants were also used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share based on the treasury method.  Options to purchase 89,746 and 178,569 common shares, respectively, were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Note 8 – Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.  Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.  In support of this principle, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.  The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

Recurring Measurements

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – recurring basis
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	67,608	$	0	$	67,608	$	0
State and political subdivisions		115,942		0		115,942		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		450,336		0		450,336		0
Marketable equity securities		53,476		53,476		0		0
Mortgage servicing rights		3,222		0		0		3,222

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – recurring basis
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	60,915	$	0	$	60,915	$	0
State and political subdivisions		113,221		0		113,221		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		383,581		0		383,581		0
Marketable equity securities		45,626		45,626		0		0
Mortgage servicing rights		2,364		0		0		2,364

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  These valuation methodologies were applied to all of CTBI’s financial assets carried at fair value.  CTBI had no liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.  There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.  For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Available-for-Sale Securities

Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value on a recurring basis.  CTBI’s CRA investment funds and Federated GNMA trust funds (included in marketable equity securities) are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy where quoted market prices are available in the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

If quoted market prices are not available, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service, such as Interactive Data, which utilizes pricing models to determine fair value measurement.  CTBI reviews the pricing quarterly to verify the reasonableness of the pricing.  The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other factors.  U.S. Treasury and government agencies, state and political subdivisions, and U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities are classified as Level 2 inputs.

In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.  Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements are estimated on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States.  As of June 30, 2013, CTBI does not own any securities classified as Level 3 inputs.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices.  CTBI reports mortgage servicing rights at fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on change in fair value.

In determining fair value, CTBI utilizes the expertise of an independent third party.  Accordingly, fair value is determined by the independent third party by utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates, discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry demand.  Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.  Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements of mortgage servicing rights are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States.  See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 mortgage servicing rights.

Transfers between Levels

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3 as of June 30, 2013.

Level 3 Reconciliation

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying balance sheet using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013					Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Marketable Equity Securities		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Marketable Equity Securities		Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning balance	$	0	$	2,652		$	0	$	2,364
Total recognized gains (losses)
Included in net income		0		529			0		646
Issues		0		205			0		562
Settlements		0		(164	)		0		(350	)
Ending balance	$	0	$	3,222		$	0	$	3,222
Total gains (losses) for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date	$	0	$	529		$	0	$	646

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012					Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Marketable Equity Securities		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Marketable Equity Securities		Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning balance	$	211	$	2,640		$	211	$	2,282
Total recognized gains (losses)
Included in net income		0		(169	)		0		172
Issues		0		189			0		340
Settlements		0		(157	)		0		(291	)
Ending balance	$	211	$	2,503		$	211	$	2,503
Total gains (losses) for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date	$	0	$	(169	)	$	0	$	172

Realized and unrealized gains and losses for items reflected in the tables above are included in net income in the consolidated statements of income as follows:

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013				Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Noninterest Income		Noninterest Expense		Noninterest Income		Noninterest Expense
Total gains	$	365	$	0	$	296	$	0

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012					Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Noninterest Income			Noninterest Expense		Noninterest Income			Noninterest Expense
Total gains	$	(326	)	$	0	$	(119	)	$	0

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis
Impaired loans (collateral dependent)	$	5,419	$	0	$	0	$	5,419
Other real estate/assets owned		9,587		0		0		9,587

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis
Impaired loans (collateral dependent)	$	5,465	$	0	$	0	$	5,465
Other real estate/assets owned		13,892		0		0		13,892

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent)

The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

CTBI considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value.  Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral.  These discounts and estimates are developed by the Chief Credit Officer by comparison to historical results.

Loans considered impaired under ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value.  Quarter-to-date fair value adjustments on impaired loans were $1.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively.

Other Real Estate Owned

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, other real estate owned (OREO) is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell.  Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals or evaluations.  OREO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  Long-lived assets are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral.  Quarter-to-date fair value adjustments on other real estate/assets owned were $0.6 million, $1.8 million, and $0.2 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively.

Appraisals of OREO are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following tables present quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

(in thousands)	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value at June 30, 2013		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	3,222	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Constant prepayment rate		6.1% - 26.0% (12.3%)
				Probability of default		0.52% - 5.77% (2.61%)
				Discount rate	Not applicable (10.5%)
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)	$	5,419	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount		5.0% - 10.0% (7.0%)
Other real estate/assets owned	$	9,587	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments (%)		5.0% - 57.0% (10.0%)

(in thousands)	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value at December 31, 2012		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	2,364	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Constant prepayment rate		8.5% - 25.0% (16.3%)
				Probability of default		1.02% - 4.81% (2.65%)
				Discount rate	Not applicable (10.5%)
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)	$	5,465	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount		5.0% - 10.0% (7.0%)
Other real estate/assets owned	$	13,892	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments (%)		5.0% - 35.0% (13.0%)

Sensitivity of Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following is a discussion of the sensitivity of significant unobservable inputs, the interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in recurring fair value measurement and of how those inputs might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Market value for mortgage servicing rights is derived based on unobservable inputs, such as prepayment speeds of the underlying loans generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model, FHLMC/FNMA guidelines, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted average coupon, and the weighted average default rate.  Significant increases (decreases) in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.  Generally, a change in the assumption used for prepayment speeds is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the assumption for interest rates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2013 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013 Using
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs  (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	107,759	$	107,759	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit in other banks		9,568		0		9,614		0
Securities available-for-sale		687,362		53,476		633,886		0
Securities held-to-maturity		1,662		0		1,621		0
Loans held for sale		2,991		3,052		0		0
Loans, net		2,551,200		0		0		2,552,860
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,673		0		25,673		0
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,886		0		4,886		0
Accrued interest receivable		12,975		0		12,975		0
Mortgage servicing rights		3,222		0		0		3,222
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,922,173	$	624,451	$	2,295,659	$	0
Repurchase agreements		204,735		0		0		204,711
Federal funds purchased		14,075		0		14,075		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,347		0		1,609		0
Long-term debt		61,341		0		0		31,271
Accrued interest payable		1,854		0		1,854		0
Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0
Forward sale commitments		0		0		0		0

The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs  (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	207,560	$	207,560	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit in other banks		5,336		0		5,370		0
Securities available-for-sale		603,343		45,626		557,717		0
Securities held-to-maturity		1,662		0		1,659		0
Loans held for sale		22,486		22,960		0		0
Loans, net		2,517,328		0		0		2,540,272
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,673		0		25,673		0
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,885		0		4,885		0
Accrued interest receivable		12,970		0		12,790		0
Mortgage servicing rights		2,364		0		0		2,364
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,903,848	$	606,448	$	2,297,632	$	0
Repurchase agreements		210,120		0		0		210,008
Federal funds purchased		12,314		0		12,314		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,429		0		1,719		0
Long-term debt		61,341		0		0		31,185
Accrued interest payable		1,309		0		1,309		0
Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0
Forward sale commitments		0		0		0		0

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Certificates of deposit in other banks – Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments.

Securities held-to-maturity – Fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available.  If a quoted price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted prices for similar securities.  The fair value estimate is provided to management from a third party using modeling assumptions specific to each type of security that are reviewed and approved by management.  Quarterly sampling of fair values provided by additional third parties supplement the fair value review process.

Loans held for sale – The fair value is predetermined at origination based on sale price.

Loans (net of the allowance for loan and lease losses) – The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.  For other variable rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value.  Loans acquired through acquisition were booked at their fair value on their date of acquisition.  Management utilized a third party to assist in the valuation of the acquired loans and considered such factors as coupon rate on the acquired loans versus the current rate for similar instruments on the date of acquisition, weighted average expected life and expected loss rates using both national and regional loss rates on similar loans, and the historic loss rates on the pools of loans acquired.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock – The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Federal Reserve Bank stock – The carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.

Accrued interest receivable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Deposits – The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.  For deposits including demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and certain money market accounts, the carrying value approximates fair value.

Repurchase agreements – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Federal funds purchased – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank – The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.

Long-term debt – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Accrued interest payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Commitments to originate loans, forward sale commitments, letters of credit, and lines of credit – The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.  For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.  The fair value of forward sale commitments is estimated based on current market prices for loans of similar terms and credit quality.  The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.  The fair values of these commitments are not material.

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

Overview

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., our operations, and our present business environment.  The MD&A is provided as a supplement to—and should be read in conjunction with—our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this quarterly report.  The MD&A includes the following sections:

v   Our Business

v   Results of Operations and Financial Condition

v   Dividends

v   Liquidity and Market Risk

v   Interest Rate Risk

v   Capital Resources

v   Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

v   Stock Repurchase Program

v   Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our Business

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky.  Currently, we own one commercial bank and one trust company.  Through our subsidiaries, we have eighty-one banking locations in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee, four trust offices across Kentucky, and one trust office in northeastern Tennessee.  At June 30, 2013, we had total consolidated assets of $3.6 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $3.1 billion, making us the largest bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.  Total shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2013 was $400.3 million.

Through our subsidiaries, we engage in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust and wealth management activities, which include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services.  The lending activities of our Bank include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and personal loans.  Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based financing, are also available.  Our corporate subsidiaries act as trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee benefit trusts, as registrars, transfer agents, and paying agents for bond and stock issues, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service brokerage services.  For further information, see Item 1 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

For the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we reported earnings of $11.9 million, or $0.77 per basic share, compared to $12.2 million, or $0.79 per basic share, earned during the second quarter 2012 and $11.8 million, or $0.76 per basic share, earned during the first quarter 2013.  Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $23.8 million, or $1.53 per basic share, a 1.4% decrease from the $24.1 million, or $1.56 per basic share earned during the first six months of 2012.

2nd Quarter 2013 Highlights

v   CTBI's basic earnings per share for the quarter decreased $0.02 per share from the second quarter 2012 but increased $0.01 per share from the first quarter 2013.  Year-to-date basic earnings per share decreased $0.03 per share from prior year.

v   Net interest income for the quarter increased 3.2% from prior year second quarter and 0.4% from prior quarter as our net interest margin increased 6 basis points and decreased 3 basis points, respectively, for those time periods.  Average earning assets increased 1.1% from the second quarter 2012 and remained stable from prior quarter.  Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased 1.9% from prior year.

v   Nonperforming loans at $41.6 million increased $5.6 million from December 31, 2012 and $7.7 million from March 31, 2013.  Nonperforming assets at $84.7 million increased $1.7 million from December 31, 2012 and increased $5.6 million from March 31, 2013.

v   Net loan charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 were $3.5 million, or 0.54% of average loans annualized, compared to $2.5 million, or 0.39%, experienced for the second quarter 2012 and $1.4 million, or 0.22%, for the first quarter 2013.  Year-to-date net charge-offs were $4.9 million, or 0.38%, compared to $3.6 million, or 0.29%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

v   Our loan loss provision for the quarter increased $1.2 million from prior year second quarter and $2.1 million from prior quarter.  Year-to-date provision expense of $5.2 million is $1.6 million higher than 2012.

v   Our loan loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding remained at 1.30% from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013.  Our reserve coverage (allowance for loan loss reserve to nonperforming loans) at June 30, 2013 was 80.8% compared to 92.3% at December 31, 2012 and 98.6% at March 31, 2013, primarily the result of one loan previously identified as impaired migrating from the 30-89 days past due category to 90+ days past due.  This credit is well-secured and in the process of collection.

v   Noninterest income increased 10.7% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 and 11.4% from prior quarter.  Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased 8.7%.  The increase in noninterest income included a $0.9 million increase in bank owned life insurance income, primarily as a result of death benefits received.

v   Noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 increased 7.6% from prior year second quarter but decreased 1.2% from prior quarter.  Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased 4.8% from prior year.  The increase from prior year resulted primarily from increases in personnel expense and other real estate owned expense.  The decrease from prior quarter includes a $0.7 million decrease in other real estate owned expense.

v   Our loan portfolio increased $34.2 million from December 31, 2012 and $21.5 million during the quarter.

v   Our investment portfolio increased $84.0 million from December 31, 2012 and $9.9 million during the quarter.

v   Deposits, including repurchase agreements, increased $12.9 million from December 31, 2012 but declined $20.2 million during the quarter.

v   Our tangible common equity/tangible assets ratio remains strong at 9.35%.

Income Statement Review

(dollars in thousands)							Change 2013 vs. 2012
Six Months Ended March 31	2013			2012			Amount			Percent
Net interest income	$	66,539		$	65,325		$	1,213			1.9	%
Provision for loan losses		5,220			3,585			1,635			45.6
Noninterest income		25,194			23,176			2,017			8.7
Noninterest expense		52,286			49,898			2,388			4.8
Income taxes		10,465			10,917			(453	)		(4.1	)
Net income	$	23,762		$	24,101		$	(339	)		(1.4	)%
Average earning assets	$	3,393,593		$	3,337,376		$	56,217			1.7	%
Yield on average earnings assets		4.42	%		4.71	%		(0.28	)%		(6.0	)%
Cost of interest bearing funds		0.54	%		0.91	%		(0.37	)%		(40.2	)%
Net interest margin		4.01	%		3.99	%		0.02	%		0.4	%

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the quarter increased $1.0 million from prior year second quarter and $0.1 million from prior quarter as our net interest margin increased 6 basis points and decreased 3 basis points, respectively.  Average earning assets increased 1.1% from the second quarter 2012 and remained stable from prior quarter.  The yield on average earning assets decreased 25 basis points and 5 basis points for these time periods.  Loans represented 75.6% of our average earning assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared to 75.8% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and 75.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.  The cost of interest bearing funds decreased 39 basis points from prior year second quarter and 3 basis points from prior quarter.  Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $1.2 million from prior year with average earning assets increasing 1.7% and our net interest margin increasing 2 basis points.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses that was added to the allowance for the second quarter 2013 was $3.7 million compared to $2.4 million in the second quarter 2012 and $1.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.  Year-to-date allocations to the reserve were $5.2 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $3.6 million at June 30, 2012.  This provision represented a charge against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income increased 10.7% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 and 11.4% from prior quarter.  Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased 8.7%.  The increase in noninterest income included a $0.9 million increase in bank owned life insurance, primarily as a result of death benefits received.  The increase in noninterest income from prior year also included increased gains on sales of loans, trust revenue, and loan related fees offset partially by a $0.8 million decrease in securities gains.  Loan related fees were impacted by a $0.4 million variance in fair value adjustments to our mortgage servicing rights.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the second quarter 2013 increased 7.6% from prior year second quarter but decreased 1.2% from prior quarter.  The increase from prior year resulted primarily from a $0.8 million increase in personnel expense, a $0.4 million increase in other real estate owned expense, and a $0.3 million increase in repossession expense.  The decrease from prior quarter includes a $0.7 million decrease in other real estate owned expense.  Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased 4.8% from prior year, including a $1.0 million increase in personnel expense and $1.5 million increase in other real estate owned expense.

Balance Sheet Review

CTBI’s total assets at $3.6 billion increased $2.6 million, or an annualized 0.1%, from December 31, 2012 but decreased $33.8 million, or an annualized 3.7%, during the quarter.  Loans outstanding at June 30, 2013 were $2.6 billion, increasing $34.2 million, or an annualized 2.7%, from December 31, 2012 and $21.5 million, or an annualized 3.4%, during the quarter.  Loan growth during the quarter of $13.7 million in the commercial loan portfolio and $11.0 in the consumer loan portfolio was partially offset by a $3.2 million decline in the residential loan portfolio.  Loans held for sale declined $19.5 million from December 31, 2012, primarily as a result of one large commercial loan which was sold during the first quarter 2012.  CTBI’s investment portfolio increased $84.0 million, or an annualized 28.1%, from December 31, 2012 and $9.9 million, or an annualized 5.8%, during the quarter.  Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at $3.1 billion increased $12.9 million, or an annualized 0.8%, from December 31, 2012 but decreased $20.2 million, or an annualized 2.6%, from prior quarter.  Deposits in other banks declined $60.4 million during the quarter as a result of loan growth and a decline in deposits.

Shareholders’ equity was $400.3 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and $406.6 million at March 31, 2013.  The change in shareholders’ equity reflects a $13.9 million decrease in the market value of our securities portfolio driven by changes in the market rates during the second quarter of 2013.  CTBI's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of June 30, 2013 was 3.54%.

Loans

(in thousands)	June 30, 2013
Loan Category	Balance		Variance from Prior Year-End			Net Charge-Offs		Nonperforming		ALLL
Commercial:
Construction	$	103,800		(13.1	)%	$	1,105	$	6,898	$	3,835
Secured by real estate		859,022		6.4			995		18,295		14,162
Equipment lease financing		9,383		1.5			0		0		117
Other commercial		376,906		0.1			1,062		6,864		4,793
Total commercial		1,349,111		2.8			3,162		32,057		22,907
Residential:
Real estate construction		51,462		(6.5	)		38		801		368
Real estate mortgage		692,934		(0.6	)		263		7,708		4,950
Home equity		80,631		(2.0	)		164		623		576
Total residential		825,027		(1.1	)		465		9,132		5,894
Consumer:
Consumer direct		123,565		0.8			307		73		1,134
Consumer indirect		287,098		2.0			930		312		3,666
Total consumer		410,663		1.6			1,237		385		4,800
Total loans	$	2,584,801		1.3	%	$	4,864	$	41,574	$	33,601

Asset Quality

CTBI's total nonperforming loans were $41.6 million at June 30, 2013, a 15.5% increase from the $36.0 million at December 31, 2012 and a 22.7% increase from the $33.9 million at March 31, 2013.  The increase for the quarter included a $7.0 million increase in the 90+ days past due category and a $0.7 million increase in nonaccrual loans.  Loans 30-89 days past due at $16.5 million is a decrease of $10.5 million from December 31, 2012 and $9.6 million from March 31, 2013.  The increase in our 90+ days past due loans includes $7.7 million for one customer which moved from 30-89 days past due during the quarter.  This credit was previously identified as impaired and is well-secured and in the process of collection.  Total past due loans declined $2.6 million during the quarter.  Our loan portfolio management processes focus on the immediate identification, management, and resolution of problem loans to maximize recovery and minimize loss.   Our loan risk management processes include weekly delinquent loan review meetings at the market levels and monthly delinquent loan review meetings involving senior corporate management to review all nonaccrual loans and loans 30 days or more past due.  Any activity regarding a criticized/classified loan (i.e. problem loan) must be approved by CTB's Watch List Asset Committee (i.e. Problem Loan Committee).  CTB's Watch List Asset Committee also meets on a quarterly basis and reviews every criticized/classified loan of $100,000 or greater.  We also have a Loan Review Department that reviews every market within CTB annually and performs extensive testing of the loan portfolio to assure the accuracy of loan grades and classifications for delinquency, troubled debt restructuring, impaired status, impairment, nonaccrual status, and adequate loan loss reserves.

Impaired loans, loans not expected to meet contractual principal and interest payments other than insignificant delays, at June 30, 2013 totaled $63.4 million, compared to $62.5 million at December 31, 2012 and $66.5 million at March 31, 2013.  Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.  At June 30, 2013, CTBI had $18.8 million in commercial loans secured by real estate, $8.5 million in commercial real estate construction loans, $10.1 million in commercial other loans, and $1.0 million in consumer loans that were modified in troubled debt restructurings and impaired.  Management evaluates all impaired loans for impairment and records a direct charge-off or provides specific reserves when necessary.

For further information regarding nonperforming and impaired loans, see note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CTBI generally does not offer high risk loans such as option ARM products, high loan to value ratio mortgages, interest-only loans, loans with initial teaser rates, or loans with negative amortizations, and therefore, CTBI would have no significant exposure to these products.

Net loan charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 were $3.5 million, or 0.54% of average loans annualized, compared to $2.5 million, or 0.39%, experienced for the second quarter 2012 and $1.4 million, or 0.22%, for the first quarter 2013.  Of the total net charge-offs for the quarter, $2.7 million were in commercial loans, $0.4 million were in indirect auto loans, and $0.3 million were in residential real estate mortgage loans.  Year-to-date net charge-offs were $4.9 million, or 0.38%, compared to $3.6 million, or 0.29%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  Allocations to loan loss reserves were $3.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 compared to $2.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and $1.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.  Our loan loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding has remained at 1.30% from June 30, 2012 to June 30, 2013.

Our level of foreclosed properties at $43.1 million at June 30, 2013 was a decrease from $47.0 million at December 31, 2012 and $45.2 million at March 31, 2013.  Sales of foreclosed properties for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $6.8 million while new foreclosed properties totaled $4.7 million.  At June 30, 2013, the book value of properties under contracts to sell was $8.0 million; however, the closings had not occurred at quarter-end.

When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales costs.  Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties.  When an updated appraisal reflects a market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales costs.   Charges to earnings in the second quarter 2013 to reflect the decrease in current market values of foreclosed properties totaled $0.6 million.  There were 24 properties reappraised during the second quarter 2013.  Of these, 14 were written down by a total of $0.5 million.  The remaining write-downs were primarily the result of pending sales with agreed upon prices.  Charges during the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 were $1.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively.  Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  Sixty-two percent of our OREO properties have been reappraised within the past 12 months.  Our nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties remain primarily concentrated in our Central Kentucky Region.  Management anticipates that our foreclosed properties will remain elevated as we work through current market conditions.

The major classifications of foreclosed properties are shown in the following table:

(in thousands)	June 30,  2013		December 31, 2012
1-4 family	$	9,956	$	12,381
Agricultural/farmland		653		653
Construction/land development/other		22,053		23,823
Multifamily		2,512		1,281
Non-farm/non-residential		7,906		8,848
Total foreclosed properties	$	43,080	$	46,986

The appraisal aging analysis of foreclosed properties, as well as the holding period, at June 30, 2013 is shown below:

(in thousands)
Appraisal Aging Analysis			Holding Period Analysis
Days Since Last Appraisal	Current Book Value		Holding Period	Current Book Value
Up to 90 days	$	3,389	Less than one year	$	5,521
91 to 180 days		4,888	1 to 2 years		16,031
181 to 270 days		15,637	2 to 3 years		5,563
271 to 365 days		2,586	3 to 4 years		11,288
Over one year		16,580	Over 4 years		4,677
Total	$	43,080	Total	$	43,080

Dividends

The following schedule shows the quarterly cash dividends paid for the past six quarters:

Pay Date	Record Date	Amount Per Share
July 1, 2013	June 15, 2013	$0.315
April 1, 2013	March 15, 2013	$0.315
January 1, 2013	December 15, 2012	$0.315
October 1, 2012	September 15, 2012	$0.315
July 1, 2012	June 15, 2012	$0.310
April 1, 2012	March 15, 2012	$0.310

On July 23, 2013, the Board of Directors of CTBI approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.32 per share to be paid on October 1, 2013, to shareholders of record on September 15, 2013.

Liquidity and Market Risk

The objective of CTBI’s Asset/Liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within our policy limits. This objective is accomplished through management of our consolidated balance sheet composition, liquidity, and interest rate risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions, interest rates, and customer preferences. The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand or deposit withdrawals. This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, sufficient unused borrowing capacity, and growth in core deposits. As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately $107.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $687.4 million in securities valued at estimated fair value designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis.  Additional asset-driven liquidity is provided by the remainder of the securities portfolio and the repayment of loans.  In addition to core deposit funding, we also have a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources available.  We also rely on Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of our asset/liability position.  Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $1.3 million at June 30, 2013 and $1.4 million at December 31, 2012.  As of June 30, 2013, we had a $337.6 million available borrowing position with the Federal Home Loan Bank.  We generally rely upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for our investing activities.  As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, and issuance of long-term debt.  At June 30, 2013, we had $44 million in lines of credit with various correspondent banks available to meet any future cash needs.  Our primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations.  We do not rely on any one source of liquidity and manage availability in response to changing consolidated balance sheet needs.  At June 30, 2013, federal funds sold were $1.2 million compared to $6.7 million at December 31, 2012, and deposits with the Federal Reserve were $46.4 million compared to $123.9 million at December 31, 2012.  Additionally, we project cash flows from our investment portfolio to generate additional liquidity over the next 90 days.

The investment portfolio consists of investment grade short-term issues suitable for bank investments.  The majority of the investment portfolio is in U.S. government and government sponsored agency issuances.  The average life of the portfolio is5.03 years.At the end of June 30, 2013, available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities comprised approximately 99.8%of the total investment portfolio, and the AFS portfoliowas approximately 172%of equity capital.  Seventy-three percentof the pledge eligible portfolio was pledged.

Interest Rate Risk

We consider interest rate risk one of our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates.  Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk.  We employ a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to changing interest rates.  The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and liabilities.  Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model.  These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income.  Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

CTBI’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which includes executive and senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board-approved policy limits.  Our current exposure to interest rate risks is determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income spread evenly over the twelve-month period.

Capital Resources

Shareholders’ equity was $400.3 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and $406.6 million at March 31, 2013.  The change in shareholders’ equity reflects a $13.9 million decrease in the market value of our securities portfolio driven by changes in the market rates during the second quarter of 2013.  CTBI's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of June 30, 2013 was 3.54%.  Our primary source of capital growth is the retention of earnings.  Cash dividends were $0.63 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $0.62 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  We retained 58.8% of our earnings for the first six months of 2013 compared to 60.3% for the first six months of 2012.

Regulatory guidelines require bank holding companies, commercial banks, and savings banks to maintain certain minimum capital ratios and define companies as “well-capitalized” that sufficiently exceed the minimum ratios.  The banking regulators may alter minimum capital requirements as a result of revising their internal policies and their ratings of individual institutions.  To be “well-capitalized” banks and bank holding companies must maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of no less than 5.0%, a Tier 1 risk based ratio of no less than 6.0%, and a total risk based ratio of no less than 10.0%.  Our ratios as of June 30, 2013 were 11.01%, 15.52%, and 16.77%, respectively, all exceeding the threshold for meeting the definition of “well-capitalized.”

As of June 30, 2013, we are not aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations, except as provided for in the Dodd-Frank Act, which is discussed in the Supervision and Regulation section of Item 1. Business in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, and Basel III.  On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amend the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to CTBI and CTB.  The FDIC has subsequently approved these rules.  The final rules were adopted following the issuance of proposed rules by the Federal Reserve in June 2012, and implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.  “Basel III” refers to two consultative documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010, and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements.

The rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which would be phased in from 2015 to 2019, and would refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to CTBI and CTB under the final rules would be: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions.  The final rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital. The capital conservation buffer will be phased-in over four years beginning on January 1, 2016, as follows: the maximum buffer will be 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. This will result in the following minimum ratios beginning in 2019: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. Under the final rules, institutions are subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.

Basel III provided discretion for regulators to impose an additional buffer, the “countercyclical buffer,” of up to 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to take into account the macro-financial environment and periods of excessive credit growth.  However, the final rules permit the countercyclical buffer to be applied only to “advanced approach banks” ( i.e. , banks with $250 billion or more in total assets or $10 billion or more in total foreign exposures), which currently excludes CTBI and CTB.  The final rules also implement revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier 1 capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses, as well as certain instruments that will no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital, some of which will be phased out over time.  However, the final rules provide that small depository institution holding companies with less than $15 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2009 (which includes CTBI) will be able to permanently include non-qualifying instruments that were issued and included in Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital prior to May 19, 2010 in additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital until they redeem such instruments or until the instruments mature.

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness.  These revisions take effect January 1, 2015.  Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insured depository institutions will be required to meet the following increased capital level requirements in order to qualify as “well capitalized:” (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% (increased from 6%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 10% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% (increased from 4%).

The final rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, which we will be required to utilize beginning January 1, 2015.  The standardized approach final rule utilizes an increased number of credit risk exposure categories and risk weights, and also addresses: (i) an alternative standard of creditworthiness consistent with Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act; (ii) revisions to recognition of credit risk mitigation; (iii) rules for risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans; (iv) revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions; and (v) disclosure requirements for top-tier banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total assets that are not subject to the “advance approach rules” that apply to banks with greater than $250 billion in consolidated assets.  Based on our current capital composition and levels, we anticipate that our capital ratios, on a Basel III basis, will continue to exceed the well-capitalized minimum capital requirements upon the effectiveness of the final rule.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories.  However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio.  Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.

We believe one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is our ability to react to changes in interest rates.  We seek to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.

Our success is dependent on the general economic conditions of the communities we serve.  Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide financial and banking services primarily to eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee. The economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on loan demand, the ability of borrowers to repay loans, and the value of the collateral securing loans.  A significant decline in general economic conditions will affect these local economic conditions and will negatively affect the financial results of our banking operations.  Factors influencing general conditions include inflation, recession, unemployment, and other factors beyond our control.

The national and global economic downturn has resulted in unprecedented levels of financial market volatility and has in general adversely impacted the market value of financial institutions, limited access to capital, and had an adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of banking companies in general, including CTBI.  From early 2008 to the middle of 2010, CTBI experienced significant challenges, credit quality deteriorated, and net income and results of operations were adversely impacted.  While there has been improvement in economic conditions in our markets starting in the second half of 2010 and continuing into the second quarter of 2013, we believe that we will continue to experience a challenging environment throughout 2013.  CTBI is a part of the financial system and a continuation of systemic lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets, and reduced business activity could materially and adversely impact CTBI’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Stock Repurchase Program

CTBI’s stock repurchase program currently has 288,519 shares remaining under CTBI’s current repurchase authorization.  We have not repurchased any shares of our common stock since February 2008.  As of June 30, 2013, a total of 2,211,481 shares have been repurchased through this program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes.  Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates.  Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable.  These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.  Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

Our accounting policies are described in note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.  We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Investments –Management determines the classification of securities at purchase.  We classify securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories.  Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.  In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 320, Investment Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities.  Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.  If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related.

Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost.  Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

When the fair value of a security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists.  Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment.  The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity.  Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment.  If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a material effect on the CTBI’s results of operations and financial condition.

Loans –Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs.  Income is recorded on the level yield basis.  Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.  Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest.  Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured.  Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain.  Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.  A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses –We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio.  Since arriving at an appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses.  In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine the appropriate ALLL.  Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.

We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits.  Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review.  The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated.  The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan.  We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision.  Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific allocations.  The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded.  The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under ASC 450, Contingencies.

When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on non-accrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to sell or a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value of the loan and the fair value assigned to the collateral is created until such time as the loan is foreclosed.  When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to CTBI, a charge off is taken, if necessary, in order that the remaining balance reflects the fair value estimated less costs to sell of the collateral then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets.  When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.

All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (5 monthly payments) delinquent.  If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent.  For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and foreclosure proceedings are initiated.  When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance, reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell, transferred to other real estate owned.

Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition.  We generally review the historical loss rates over eight quarters and four quarters on a rolling average basis.  Factors that we consider include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs, trend in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and underwriting exceptions.  Based upon management’s judgment, “best case,” “worst case,” and “most likely” scenarios are determined.  The total of each of these weighted factors is then applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted accordingly to approximate the most likely scenario.  Management continually reevaluates the other subjective factors included in its ALLL analysis.

Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales costs.  Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties.  When an updated appraisal reflects a market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales costs.  Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized by a charge to income.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits.  CTBI uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates.  Given a 200 basis point increase to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated net interest income for CTBI would decrease by 0.07 percent over one year and by 2.99 percent over two years.  A 25 basis point decrease in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 0.04 percent over one year and by 0.23 percent over two years.  For further discussion of CTBI’s market risk, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Market Risk included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item  4.  Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CTBI’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by CTBI’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on this evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	None
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	None
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	None
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	None
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	Not applicable
Item 5.	Other Information:
	CTBI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have furnished to the SEC the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Item 6.	a. Exhibits:
	(1)   Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2
	(2)   Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2
	(3)  XBRL Instance Document*	Exhibit 101.INS
	(4)  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*	Exhibit 101.SCH
	(5)  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.CAL
	(6)  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.DEF
	(7)  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.LAB
	(8)  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.PRE

* These interactive data files are being submitted electronically with this report and, in accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, are not deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CTBI has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.
Date: August 9, 2013	By:	/s/ Jean R. Hale
		Jean R. Hale
		Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

By:	/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
	Kevin J. Stumbo
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer