XML 36 R5.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPINION OF MANAGEMENT
3 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2013
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPINION OF MANAGEMENT  
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPINION OF MANAGEMENT

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPINION OF MANAGEMENT

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all of the information and financial statement disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  In the opinion of management, the information furnished herein includes all adjustments necessary to reflect a fair statement of the interim periods reported.  The December 29, 2012 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  References to “we,” “us,” “our,” “its,” “Supreme,” or the “Company” refer to Supreme Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

 

The Company has adopted a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending the last Saturday in December.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 are for 13-week periods.

 

Revised Financial Statements

 

As disclosed in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as a result of its recent implementation of a perpetual inventory system, the Company determined that certain of its previously filed financial statements contained errors related to revenue recognition whereby beginning in the third quarter of 2009 and continuing through the first quarter of 2012 revenue at the Texas armored division plant was inappropriately recognized prior to the product being delivered to a customer due to an irregularity.  The Company concluded that the errors were isolated to this one location and were not material.  In order to assess materiality with respect to the errors, the Company considered Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 99, Materiality, and SAB 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, and determined that the impact of the errors on prior period consolidated financial statements was immaterial.  Accordingly, the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2012, was revised and reflects the correction of these immaterial errors.  The following table summarizes the impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

($000’s omitted)

 

As Previously Reported

 

As Revised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

72,520

 

$

72,167

 

Net income

 

$

2,558

 

$

2,482