The following tables summarize financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and their assigned levels within the valuation hierarchy at July 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012:

July 31, 2013
(in thousands)		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Other Assets Not Held at Fair Value		Total

Financial assets:
Cash equivalents	$	99,310	$	3,700	$	-		$	-	$	103,010
Investments:
Investment securities, trading:
Cash management assets		-		10,477			-		-		10,477
Debt - consolidated sponsored funds
and separately managed accounts		74,601		73,825			-		-		148,426
Equity - consolidated sponsored funds
and separately managed accounts		52,137		38,085			-		-		90,222
Investment securities, available-for-sale		12,099		5,358		-			-		17,457
Investment in non-consolidated CLO
entity⁽¹⁾		-		-		-			317		317
Investments in equity method investees⁽²⁾		-		-		-			271,044		271,044
Investments, other⁽³⁾		-		61		-			7,470		7,531
Derivative instruments		-		1,302		-			-		1,302
Assets of consolidated CLO entity:
Cash equivalents		56,725		-		-			-		56,725
Bank loans and other investments		-		242,946		3,045			-		245,991
Total financial assets	$	294,872	$	375,754	$	3,045		$	278,831	$	952,502

Financial liabilities:
Derivative instruments	$	-	$	6,668	$	-		$	-	$	6,668
Securities sold, not yet purchased		-		1,572		-			-		1,572
Liabilities of consolidated CLO entity:
Senior and subordinated note obligations		-		2,635		288,540			-		291,175
Total financial liabilities	$	-	$	10,875	$	288,540		$	-	$	299,415

October 31, 2012
(in thousands)			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Other Assets Not Held at Fair Value		Total

Financial assets:
Cash equivalents		$	16,390	$	139,469	$	-		$	-	$	155,859
Investments:
Investment securities, trading – debt			4,512		66,293			-		-		70,805
Investment securities, trading – equity			87,991		31,457			-		-		119,448
Investment securities, available-for-sale			26,736		4,412		-			-		31,148
Investment in non-consolidated CLO
entity⁽¹⁾			-		-		-			350		350
Investments in equity method investees⁽²⁾			-		-		-			257,652		257,652
Investments, other⁽³⁾			-		60		-			7,470		7,530
Derivative instruments			-		2,229		-			-		2,229
Assets of consolidated CLO entity:
Cash equivalents			34,561		-		-			-		34,561
Bank loans and other investments			98		428,282		2,203			-		430,583
Total financial assets		$	170,288	$	672,202	$	2,203		$	265,472	$	1,110,165

Financial liabilities:
Derivative instruments		$	-	$	788	$	-		$	-	$	788
Securities sold, not yet purchased			-		26,142		-			-		26,142
Liabilities of consolidated CLO entity:
Senior and subordinated note obligations			-		2,659		443,946			-		446,605
Total financial liabilities		$	-	$	29,589	$	443,946		$	-	$	473,535
(1)	The Company’s investment in this CLO entity is measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using Level 3 inputs.
	The investment is carried at amortized cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the investment has been
	impaired, at which time the investment is written down to fair value. There was no re-measurement of this asset during
	the nine month period ended July 31, 2013 or the twelve month period ended October 31, 2012.
(2)	Investments in equity method investees are not measured at fair value in accordance with GAAP.
(3)	Investments, other include investments carried at cost that are not measured at fair value in accordance with GAAP.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as well as the general classification of those assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of investments in money market funds, government and agency securities, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. Money market funds are valued using published net asset values and are classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy. Government and agency securities are valued based upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or corroborated by observable market data. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these assets are generally classified as Level 1 or 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The carrying amounts of commercial paper and certificates of deposit are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value, and are generally classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Investment securities, trading – corporate cash management assets consist of certificates of deposit, commercial paper and corporate debt obligations with original maturities from three months to twenty-four months. Debt obligations are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third-party pricing services, as derived from such services' pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker-dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Depending on the nature of the inputs, investment securities, trading – corporate cash management assets are generally classified as Level 1 or 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Investment securities, trading – debt-consolidated funds and separately managed accounts

Investment securities, trading – debt, consist of debt obligations held in the portfolios of consolidated sponsored funds and separately managed accounts. Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third-party pricing services, as derived from such services' pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker-dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less (excluding those that are non-U.S. denominated, which typically are valued by a third-party pricing service or dealer quotes) are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Depending upon the nature of the inputs, investment securities, trading – debt, are generally classified as Level 1 or 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Investment securities, trading – equity-consolidated funds and separately managed accounts

Investment securities, trading – equity, consist of foreign and domestic equity securities held in the portfolios of consolidated sponsored funds and separately managed accounts. Equity securities listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale or closing price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria as established by our fair value pricing service, the portfolios use a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. The service utilizes a multi-factor model that considers such information as an issue's local closing price and post-closing fluctuations in relevant general market and sector indices, currencies, depositary receipts and futures, as applicable. The size of the adjustment is determined by the observed changes in these factors since the close of the applicable foreign market. The pricing service uses a multiple regression methodology and back testing to validate the quality and correlations of their evaluations. In addition, the Company performs its own independent back test review of fair values versus the subsequent local market opening prices when available. Depending upon the nature of the inputs, investment securities, trading – equity are generally classified as Level 1 or 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Investment securities, available-for-sale, consist of investments in sponsored mutual funds and privately offered equity funds. Sponsored mutual funds that are listed on an active exchange are valued using published net asset values and are classified as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy. Investments in sponsored privately offered equity funds and portfolios that are not listed on an active exchange but have net asset values that are comparable to mutual funds and have no redemption restrictions are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Derivative instruments, which include foreign exchange contracts, stock index futures contracts and commodity futures contracts, are recorded as either other assets or other liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign exchange contracts are valued by interpolating a value using the spot foreign exchange rate and forward points, which are based on spot rate and currency interest rate differentials. Index futures contracts and commodity futures contracts are valued using a third-party pricing service that determines fair value based on bid and ask prices. Derivative instruments are generally classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Assets of the consolidated CLO entity include investments in money market funds, equity securities, debt securities, bank loans and warrants. Fair value is determined utilizing unadjusted quoted market prices when available. Interests in senior floating-rate loans for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mid-point of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third-party pricing service. Fair value may also be based upon valuations obtained from independent third-party brokers or dealers utilizing matrix pricing models that consider information regarding securities with similar characteristics. In certain instances, fair value has been determined utilizing discounted cash flow analyses or single broker non-binding quotes. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these assets are classified as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the valuation hierarchy.

Securities sold, not yet purchased, are recorded as other liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are valued by a third-party pricing service that determines fair value based on bid and ask prices. Securities sold, not yet purchased, are generally classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

Liabilities of the consolidated CLO entity include debt securities and senior and subordinated note obligations of the consolidated CLO entity. The debt securities are valued based upon quoted prices for identical or similar liabilities that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or corroborated by observable market data. The senior and subordinated notes are valued based upon model-based valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable in the market. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these liabilities are classified as Level 2 or 3 within the valuation hierarchy.

The following table summarizes fair value transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 and 2012:

			Three Months Ended July 31,				Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in thousands)			2013		2012		2013		2012
Transfers from Level 1 into Level 2⁽¹⁾		$	237	$	7,861	$	43	$	18,104
Transfers from Level 2 into Level 1⁽²⁾			149		-		1,332		-

⁽¹⁾	Transfers from Level 1 into Level 2 primarily represent debt and equity securities that were valued based on prices of similar
	securities because unadjusted quoted market prices were not available in the current period.
⁽²⁾	Transfers from Level 2 into Level 1 primarily represent debt and equity securities due to the availability of unadjusted quoted
	market prices in active markets.

The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements of assets and liabilities that are valued on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2013 and 2012:

			Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
			July 31, 2013				July 31, 2012
(in thousands)			Bank loans and other investments of consolidated CLO entity		Senior and subordinated note obligations of consolidated CLO entity		Bank loans and other investments of consolidated CLO entity		Senior and subordinated note obligations of consolidated CLO entity

Beginning balance		$	2,819	$	365,460	$	2,150	$	483,062
Net gains (losses) on investments and
	note obligations included in net
	income⁽¹⁾		(101)		(720)		(139)		(8,599)
Principal paydown			0		(76,200)		0		-
Transfers into Level 3⁽²⁾			327		-		122		-
Transfers out of Level 3⁽³⁾			-		-		(15)		-
Ending balance		$	3,045	$	288,540	$	2,118	$	474,463
Change in unrealized (losses) gains
	included in net income relating to
	assets and liabilities held	$	(101)	$	(720)	$	(139)	$	(8,599)

				Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
				July 31, 2013				July 31, 2012
(in thousands)				Bank loans and other investments of consolidated CLO entity		Senior and subordinated note obligations of consolidated CLO entity		Bank loans and other investments of consolidated CLO entity		Senior and subordinated note obligations of consolidated CLO entity

Beginning balance			$	2,203	$	443,946	$	5,910	$	477,699
Net gains (losses) on investments and
	note obligations included in net
	income⁽¹⁾			(80)		4,536		(139)		(603)
Principal paydown				0		(159,942)		0		-
Transfers into Level 3⁽²⁾				922		-		137		-
Transfers out of Level 3⁽³⁾				-		-		(3,790)		(2,633)
Ending balance			$	3,045	$	288,540	$	2,118	$	474,463
Change in unrealized (losses) gains
	included in net income relating to
	assets and liabilities held		$	(80)	$	4,536	$	(139)	$	(603)
(1)		Substantially all net gains and losses on investments and note obligations attributable to the assets and borrowings of the Company's
		consolidated CLO entity are allocated to non-controlling and other beneficial interests on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)		Transfers into Level 3 were the result of a reduction in the availability of significant observable inputs used in determining the fair value
		of a second lien term loan. Fair value was determined utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis.
(3)		Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 were due to an increase in the observability of the inputs used in determining the fair value of certain
		instruments.

The following table shows the valuation technique and significant unobservable inputs utilized in the fair value measurement of Level 3 liabilities at July 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012:

	October 31, 2012			Valuation	Unobservable
	($ in thousands)		Fair Value	Technique	Inputs⁽¹⁾	Range

	Liabilities of consolidated CLO entity:

					Prepayment rate	30 percent
					Recovery rate	70 percent
	Senior and subordinated				Default rate	200 bps
	note obligations	$	443,946	Income approach	Discount rate	135-700 bps
⁽¹⁾	Discount rate refers to spread over LIBOR. Lower spreads relate to the more senior tranches in the CLO note structure;
	higher spreads relate to the less senior tranches. The default rate refers to the constant annual default rate. Recovery rate is the
	expected recovery of defaulted amounts received through asset sale or recovery through bankruptcy restructuring or other
	settlement processes. Prepayment rate is the rate at which the underlying collateral is expected to repay principal.

The Company elected the fair value option for both the collateral assets held and senior and subordinated notes issued by its consolidated CLO entity upon consolidation to mitigate any accounting inconsistencies between the carrying value of the assets held to provide cash flows for the note obligations and the carrying value of those note obligations.

Senior and subordinated note obligations of the Company's consolidated CLO entity are issued in various tranches with different risk profiles. The notes are valued on a quarterly basis by the Company's bank loan investment team utilizing an income approach that projects the cash flows of the collateral assets using the team's projected default rate, prepayment rate, recovery rate and discount rate, as well as observable assumptions about market yields, collateral reimbursement assumptions, callability and other market factors that vary based on the nature of the investments in the underlying collateral pool. Once the undiscounted cash flows of the collateral assets have been determined, the bank loan team applies appropriate discount rates that it believes a reasonable market participant would use to determine the discounted cash flow valuation of the notes. The bank loan team routinely monitors market conditions and model inputs for cyclical and secular changes in order to identify any material factors that could influence the Company's valuation method. The bank loan team reports directly to the Chief Income Investment Officer.

For senior and subordinated notes issued by the Company's consolidated CLO entity, a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is generally accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for discount rates. Significant increases in either of these inputs would result in a significantly lower measurement of fair value.

Although the Company believes the valuation methods described above are appropriate, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine fair value could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 107

-Paragraph 15A

-Subparagraph a-d

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 107

-Paragraph 15C, 15D

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 107

-Paragraph 3, 10, 14, 15

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 157

-Paragraph 32, 33, 34

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 825

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 21

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13537-108611

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 133

-Paragraph 44A, 44B

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 825

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 10

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13433-108611

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 825

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 28

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14064-108612

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 820

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 2

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7578670&loc=d3e19207-110258

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 825

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 30

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14172-108612

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Accounting Standards Codification

-Topic 825

-SubTopic 10

-Section 50

-Paragraph 16

-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=7491637&loc=d3e13504-108611

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 107

-Paragraph 15B

-Subparagraph a, b

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef

-Publisher FASB

-Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS)

-Number 159

-Paragraph 17-22, 27, 28

-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

+ Details