XML 38 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
1. Organization and summary of significant accounting policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements  
Organization

Lattice Incorporated (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware May 1973 and commenced operations in July 1977. The Company began as a provider of specialized solutions to the telecom industry. Throughout its history Lattice has adapted to the changes in this industry by reinventing itself to be more responsive and open to the dynamic pace of change experienced in the broader converged communications industry of today. Currently Lattice provides advanced solutions for several vertical markets. The greatest change in operations is in the shift from being a component manufacturer to a solution provider focused on developing applications through software on its core platform technology. To further its strategy of becoming a solutions provider, the Company acquired a majority interest in “SMEI” in February 2005. In September 2006 the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of Lattice Government Services, Inc., (“LGS”) (formerly Ricciardi Technologies Inc. (“RTI”)). LGS was founded in 1992 and provides software consulting and development services for the command and control of biological sensors and other Department of Defense requirements to United States federal governmental agencies either directly or through prime contractors of such governmental agencies. LGS’s proprietary products include SensorView, which provides clients with the capability to command, control and monitor multiple distributed chemical, biological, nuclear, explosive and hazardous material sensors. In December 2009 we changed RTI’s name to Lattice Government Services Inc. In January 2007, we changed our name from Science Dynamics Corporation to Lattice Incorporated. On May 16, 2011 we acquired 100% of the shares of Cummings Creek Capital, a holding Company which itself owns 100% of the shares of CLR Group Limited. (“CLR”). CLR is a government contractor which complements our government services business by expanding markets and service offerings. Together the SMEI, RTI and CLR acquisitions formed our federal government services business unit. Through 2013 we operated in two segments, our federal government services unit and our telecommunication services business.

 

As part of the Company’s strategy to focus on its higher growth potential communications business, the Company decided during the first quarter of 2013 to exit the government services segment which derived its revenues mainly from contracts with federal government Department of Defense agencies either as prime contractor or as a subcontractor to another prime contractor. On April 2, 2013, we entered an Asset Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Blackwatch International, Inc. (“Blackwatch”), a Virginia corporation, pursuant to which we primarily sold our government Department of Defense (DoD) contract vehicles for approximately $1.2 million. These assets essentially comprised our Federal Government services segment operations. The Company retained the residual assets and liabilities of Lattice government services, Inc. We ceased operations of the federal government business back in April, 2013 coinciding with the sale of assets to Blackwatch. For the period ended June 30, 2013 the financial results of the government services business are being reported as discontinued operations.

 

On November 1, 2013 we purchased certain assets of Innovisit, LLC. The assets acquired included; awarded contracts, customer lists, and its intellectual property rights to the Video Visitation software assets. Under the agreement, the workforce and operating infrastructure supporting Innovisit’s business operations were transferred to Lattice, including but not limited to certain employees, and leases. This acquisition complimented the product offering of our telecom services business.

Basis of Presentation going concern

At June 30, 2014, our working capital deficiency was approximately $2,372,000 which improved from a working capital deficiency of approximately $4,490,000 at December 31, 2013. Cash from operations and available capacity on current credit facilities are insufficient to cover liabilities currently due and the liabilities which will mature over the next twelve months. Additionally, we are past due on promissory notes with investors and payables with trade creditors. We have several payment arrangements in place but face continuing pressures with negotiating payment arrangements with trade creditors regarding overdue payables. These conditions raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is highly dependent upon our ability to; improve our operating cash flow, maintain our credit lines and secure additional financing. Management was able raise $1,500,000 of convertible debt financing during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 which resulted in net proceeds of $1,352,000 which was used to improve our working capital, strengthen our balance sheet and provide liquidity for growth. Securing sufficient capital for our growth strategy may also reduce doubts about our ability to operate as a going concern. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, we closed on approximately $1,063,000 of equity financing by issuing restricted common stock to various accredited investors for cash proceeds of $796,441 and $266,818 resulting from the conversion of notes payable and accrued interest. There is no assurance, however, that we will succeed in raising additional financing and obtain the capital sufficient to provide for all of our liquidity needs. In the event we fail to obtain the additional capital needed and/or restructure our existing debts with current creditors, we may be required to curtail our operations significantly. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company received $60,000 of cash proceeds relating the sale of 500,000 shares of common stock subscribed.

 

Our current cash position, availability on our lines of credit and current level of operating cash flow is insufficient to support (i) current working capital requirements (ii) pay the interest costs and principal payments on maturing liabilities, and (iii) provide the additional capital for equipment purchases necessary to support our growth plans. In this regard, we are dependent on obtaining the additional financing needed for which we have been soliciting interest. Also, we remain dependent upon maintaining and increasing our cash flow from operations and maintaining the continuing availability on our lines of credit. There can be no assurances that our businesses will generate sufficient forward operating cash flows, we will be able to obtain the balance of the financing sought, or that future borrowings under our line of credit facilities will be available in an amount sufficient to service our current indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs.

 

The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, such condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair representation of the consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations. The consolidated results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  The interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 appearing in Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2014.

Principles of consolidation

The condensed financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For those consolidated subsidiaries where Company ownership is less than 100%, the outside stockholders’ interests are shown as non-controlling interest. Investments in affiliates over which the Company has significant influence but not a controlling interest are carried on the equity basis.

Use of estimates

The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates form the basis for judgments made about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and judgments are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. However, future events are subject to change and the best estimates and judgments routinely require adjustment. US GAAP requires estimates and judgments in several areas, including those related to impairment of goodwill and equity investments, revenue recognition, recoverability of inventory and receivables, the useful lives, long lived assets such as property and equipment, the future realization of deferred income tax benefits and the recording of various accruals. The ultimate outcome and actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.  

Share-based payments

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718-10, Accounting for Share-Based Payment , to account for compensation costs under its stock option plans and other share-based arrangements.  ASC 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.

 

For purposes of estimating fair value of stock options, we use the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation technique. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and twelve months ended December 31, 2013, there was approximately $590,000 and $706,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation awards granted under the equity compensation plans which do not include the effect of future grants of equity compensation, if any. The $590,000 will be amortized over the weighted average remaining service period.

Revenue Recognition

Telecommunication Services:

 

Revenues related to collect and prepaid calling services generated by the communication services segment are recognized during the period in which the calls are made. In addition, during the same period, the Company records the related telecommunication costs for validating, transmitting, billing and collection, and line and long distance charges, along with commissions payable to the facilities and allowances for uncollectible calls, based on historical experience.

 

Government Claims:

 

Unapproved claims relate to contracts where costs have exceeded the customer’s funded value of the task ordered on our cost reimbursement type contract vehicles. The unapproved claims are considered to be probable of collection and have been recognized as revenue in previous years. Unapproved claims included as a component of accounts receivable totaled approximately $1,244,000 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Consistent with industry practice, we classify assets and liabilities related to these claims as current, even though some of these amounts may not be realized within one year.

 

Revenues Recognition for Innovisit:

 

Revenues from construction contracts are included in contract revenue in the consolidated statements of operations and are recognized under the percentage-of-completion accounting method. The percent complete is measured by the cost incurred to date compared to the estimated total cost of each project. This method is used as management considers expended cost to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts, the majority of which are completed within one year, but may occasionally extend beyond one year. Inherent uncertainties in estimating costs make it at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term and over the life of the contracts.

 

Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance and completion. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred.

 

Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income. Such revisions are recognized in the period in which they are determined. An amount equal to contract costs incurred that are attributable to claims is included in revenue when realization is probable and the amount can be reliably estimated.

 

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings are comprised principally of revenue recognized on contracts (on the percentage-of-completion method) for which billings had not been presented to customers because the amount were not billable under the contract terms at the balance sheet date. Amounts are billed based on contractual terms. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings represent billings in excess of revenues recognized.

 

Service Revenues:

 

Service revenues are recorded when the service is provided and when collection can be reasonably assured

Segment Reporting

FASB ASC 280-10-50, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure, or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company. The Company had operated in two segments prior to 2013 but with the decision to focus on the communications business and exit the federal government services business, the Company now operates in one segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Depreciation, amortization and long-lived assets

Property, Plant and Equipment:

 

These assets are recorded at original cost. The Company depreciates the cost evenly over the assets’ estimated useful lives. For tax purposes, accelerated depreciation methods are used as allowed by tax laws.

 

Identifiable Intangible Assets:

 

The Company amortizes the cost of other intangibles over their useful lives unless such lives are deemed indefinite. Amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment based on undiscounted cash flows and, if impaired, written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized; however, they are tested annually for impairment and written down to fair value as required.

Fair value disclosures

Management believes that the carrying values of financial instruments, including, cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value as a result of the short-term maturities of these instruments. As discussed in Note 1(m), below, derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value.

 

The carrying values of the Company’s long term debts approximates their fair values based upon a comparison of the interest rates and terms of such debt to the rates and terms of debt currently available to the Company.

Recent accounting pronouncements

We do not believe there would have been a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements had any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards been adopted in the current period.