XML 51 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Farmer Bros. Co. and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” or “Farmer Bros.”), is a manufacturer, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. The Company is a direct distributor of coffee to restaurants, hotels, casinos, offices, quick service restaurants ("QSR's"), convenience stores, healthcare facilities and other foodservice providers, as well as private brand retailers in the QSR, grocery, drugstore, restaurant, convenience store and independent coffeehouse channels. The Company was founded in 1912, was incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. The Company operates in one business segment.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S‑X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise indicated) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial data have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. Events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2014 have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 16, 2014 (the "2014 10-K").
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from those estimates.
Corrections to Previously Issued Financial Statements
Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2013, the Company identified certain errors in the consolidated statements of operations. Accordingly, the Company has corrected the accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2013 in order to comply with GAAP.
The corrections to the consolidated statements of operations include:
1.
reclassification of fuel surcharges billed to customers previously netted against the Company's fuel expenses in "Selling expenses" to "Net sales";
2.
reclassification of certain labor and overhead expenses previously included in "Selling expenses" and "General and administrative expenses" to "Cost of goods sold"; and
3.
reclassification of “Net gains from sales of assets” previously presented within "Other, net" to a separate line item within "Income from operations.”
These errors had no impact on the amounts previously reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of cash flows and statements of comprehensive income (loss). Management has evaluated the materiality of these errors quantitatively and qualitatively, including the impact of the errors on gross profit and income from operations, and has concluded that the corrections of these errors are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements as a whole.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2013 has been corrected for the errors described above. The following table presents the impact of these corrections:
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
 
Six Months Ended December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
 
As Previously Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Corrected
Net sales
 
$
270,712

 
$
1,946

 
$
272,658

Cost of goods sold
 
165,802

 
4,477

 
170,279

Gross profit
 
104,910

 
(2,531
)
 
102,379

Selling expenses
 
76,326

 
(1,390
)
 
74,936

General and administrative expenses
 
19,970

 
(1,141
)
 
18,829

Net gains from sales of assets
 

 
(50
)
 
(50
)
Operating expenses
 
96,296

 
(2,581
)
 
93,715

Income from operations
 
8,614

 
50

 
8,664

Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividend income
 
526

 

 
526

Interest income
 
218

 

 
218

Interest expense
 
(765
)
 

 
(765
)
Other, net
 
(1,370
)
 
(50
)
 
(1,420
)
Total other expense
 
(1,391
)
 
(50
)
 
(1,441
)
Income before taxes
 
7,223

 

 
7,223

Income tax expense
 
709

 

 
709

Net income
 
$
6,514

 
$

 
$
6,514


Derivative Instruments
The Company purchases various derivative instruments to create economic hedges of its commodity price risk and interest rate risk. These derivative instruments consist primarily of futures and swaps. The Company reports the fair value of derivative instruments on its consolidated balance sheets in "Short-term derivative assets," "Other assets," "Short-term derivative liabilities," or "Long-term derivative liabilities." The Company determines the current and noncurrent classification based on the timing of expected future cash flows of individual trades and reports these amounts on a gross basis. Additionally, the Company reports cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments on a gross basis on its consolidated balance sheets in "Restricted cash," if restricted from withdrawal due to a net loss position in such margin accounts.
The accounting for the changes in fair value of the Company's derivative instruments can be summarized as follows:  
Derivative Treatment
  
Accounting Method
Normal purchases and normal sales exception
  
Accrual accounting
Designated in a qualifying hedging relationship
  
Hedge accounting
All other derivative instruments
  
Mark-to-market accounting
The Company enters into green coffee purchase commitments at a fixed price or at a price to be fixed (“PTF”). PTF contracts are purchase commitments whereby the quality, quantity, delivery period, price differential to the coffee "C" market price and other negotiated terms are agreed upon, but the date, and therefore the price at which the base “C” market price will be fixed has not yet been established. The coffee "C" market price is fixed at some point after the purchase contract date and before the futures market closes for the delivery month and may be fixed either at the direction of the Company to the vendor, or by the application of a derivative that was separately purchased as a hedge. For both fixed-price and PTF contracts, the Company expects to take delivery of and to utilize the coffee in a reasonable period of time and in the conduct of normal business. Accordingly, these purchase commitments qualify as normal purchases and are not recorded at fair value on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
The Company accounts for certain coffee-related derivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in the Company's quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods. For a derivative to qualify for designation in a hedging relationship, it must meet specific criteria and the Company must maintain appropriate documentation. The Company establishes hedging relationships pursuant to its risk management policies. The hedging relationships are evaluated at inception and on an ongoing basis to determine whether the hedging relationship is, and is expected to remain, highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the underlying risk being hedged. The Company also regularly assesses whether the hedged forecasted transaction is probable of occurring. If a derivative ceases to be or is no longer expected to be highly effective, or if the Company believes the likelihood of occurrence of the hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, hedge accounting is discontinued for that derivative, and future changes in the fair value of that derivative are recognized in “Other, net.”
For commodity derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the derivative instrument's change in fair value is recognized currently in “Other, net.” Gains or losses deferred in AOCI associated with terminated derivative instruments, derivative instruments that cease to be highly effective hedges, derivative instruments for which the forecasted transaction is reasonably possible but no longer probable of occurring, and cash flow hedges that have been otherwise discontinued remain in AOCI until the hedged item affects earnings. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge will not occur, any gain or loss deferred in AOCI is recognized in “Other, net” at that time. For derivative instruments that are not designated in a hedging relationship, and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected, the changes in fair value are reported in “Other, net.”
The following gains and losses on derivative instruments are netted together and reported in “Other, net” in the Company's consolidated statements of operations:
Gains and losses on all derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected; and
The ineffective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges.
The fair value of derivative instruments is based upon broker quotes. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately 86% and 90%, respectively, of the Company's outstanding coffee-related derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges (see Note 2).
Coffee Brewing Equipment and Service
The Company classifies certain expenses related to coffee brewing equipment provided to customers as cost of goods sold. These costs include the cost of the equipment as well as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributable to the generation of revenues from its customers. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements in the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $6.4 million and $6.5 million, respectively. In addition, depreciation expense related to capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported in cost of goods sold in the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $2.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
Coffee brewing equipment costs included in cost of goods sold in the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $12.9 million and $13.0 million, respectively. Depreciation expense related to capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported in cost of goods sold in the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $5.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment in the amount of $5.8 million in each of the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Revenue Recognition
Most product sales are made “off-truck” to the Company’s customers at their places of business by the Company’s route sales representatives. Revenue is recognized at the time the Company’s route sales representatives physically deliver products to customers and title passes or when it is accepted by the customer when shipped by third-party delivery.
The Company sells roast and ground coffee and tea to The J.M. Smucker Company ("J.M. Smucker") pursuant to a co–packing agreement. The Company recognizes revenue from the co-packing arrangement for the sale of tea on a net basis, net of direct costs of revenue, since the Company acts as an agent of J.M. Smucker in such transactions. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, the Company had $0.5 million of receivables relating to this arrangement which are included in "Other receivables" (see Note 5).
Net Income Per Common Share
Net income per share (“EPS”) represents net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unallocated shares held by the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"). Diluted EPS represents net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. However, nonvested restricted stock awards (referred to as participating securities) are excluded from the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding in accordance with authoritative guidance under the two-class method. The nonvested restricted stockholders are entitled to participate in dividends declared on common stock as if the shares were fully vested and hence are deemed to be participating securities. Under the two-class method, net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders is excluded from net income attributable to common stockholders for purposes of calculating basic and diluted EPS.
Computation of EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 includes the dilutive effect of 153,971 shares and 116,724 shares issuable under stock options, respectively, and computation of EPS for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 includes the dilutive effect of 141,741 shares and 79,356 shares issuable under stock options, respectively (see Note 11). Computation of EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 excludes 988 shares and 157,962 shares issuable under stock options, respectively, because including them would be anti-dilutive. Computation of EPS for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 excludes 69,073 shares and 297,896 shares issuable under stock options, respectively, because including them would be anti-dilutive.
Dividends
The Company’s Board of Directors has omitted the payment of a quarterly dividend since the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The amount, if any, of dividends to be paid in the future will depend upon the Company’s then available cash, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, loan agreement restrictions, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other relevant factors.
Impairment of Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company performs its annual impairment test of indefinite-lived intangible assets as of June 30. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, as well as on an interim basis if events or changes in circumstances between annual tests indicate that an asset might be impaired, by comparing their fair values to their carrying values. An impairment charge is recorded if the estimated fair value of such assets has decreased below their carrying value. There were no such events or circumstances during the six months ended December 31, 2014.
Long-Lived Assets, Excluding Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. There were no such events or circumstances during the six months ended December 31, 2014.
Self-Insurance
The Company is self-insured for workers’ compensation insurance subject to specific retention levels and uses historical analysis to determine and record the estimates of expected future expenses resulting from workers’ compensation claims. The estimated outstanding losses are the accrued cost of unpaid claims. The estimated outstanding losses, including allocated loss adjustment expenses (“ALAE”), include case reserves, the development of known claims and incurred but not reported claims. ALAE are the direct expenses for settling specific claims. The amounts reflect per occurrence and annual aggregate limits maintained by the Company. The analysis does not include estimating a provision for unallocated loss adjustment expenses.
The Company accounts for its accrued liability relating to workers’ compensation claims on an undiscounted basis. The estimated gross undiscounted workers’ compensation liability relating to such claims was $10.5 million and $9.6 million, respectively, and the estimated recovery from reinsurance was $1.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014. The short-term and long-term accrued liabilities for workers’ compensation claims are presented on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in "Other current liabilities" and in "Accrued workers' compensation liabilities," respectively. The estimated insurance receivable is included in "Other assets" on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Due to its failure to meet the minimum credit rating criteria for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability, the Company posted a $5.9 million letter of credit as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans. At December 31, 2014, this letter of credit continues to serve as a security deposit and has been increased to $6.5 million.
The estimated liability related to the Company's self-insured group medical insurance at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014 was $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively, recorded on an incurred but not reported basis, within deductible limits, based on actual claims and the average lag time between the date insurance claims are filed and the date those claims are paid.
General liability, product liability and commercial auto liability are insured through a captive insurance program. The Company retains the risk within certain aggregate amounts. Cost of the insurance through the captive program is accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions and historical claims experience. The Company's liability reserve for such claims at each of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, was $0.5 million.
The estimated liability related to the Company's self-insured group medical insurance, general liability, product liability and commercial auto liability is included on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in "Other current liabilities."
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
None.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-9, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-9”). ASU 2014-9 requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-9 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption prohibited. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-9 on its consolidated financial statements.