-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, U2gMlTKmCFvz3xI35uJYbwh5w4MnKY1Vr4smkSDD1mj0DKEPtACCxEBaB5s8I/E6 3uBTV+QionO3asadBJr+9g== 0000034563-04-000047.txt : 20040513 0000034563-04-000047.hdr.sgml : 20040513 20040513160643 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000034563-04-000047 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 8 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20040331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20040513 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: FARMER BROTHERS CO CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000034563 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MISCELLANEOUS FOOD PREPARATIONS & KINDRED PRODUCTS [2090] IRS NUMBER: 950725980 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-01375 FILM NUMBER: 04803100 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 20333 S NORMANDIE AVE CITY: TORRANCE STATE: CA ZIP: 90502 BUSINESS PHONE: 3107875200 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 20333 SOUTH NORMANDIE AVENUE CITY: TORRANCE STATE: CA ZIP: 90502 10-Q 1 mar10q0304a.txt FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period from January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004. Commission File Number: 0-1375 FARMER BROS. CO. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 95-0725980 (State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification Number) 20333 S. Normandie Avenue, Torrance, California 90502 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (310) 787-5200 (Registrant's telephone number) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X] Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding: 16,075,080 as of May 11, 2004. PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) FARMER BROS. CO. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited) For the three months For the nine months ended March 31, ended March 31, 2004 2003 2004 2003 Net sales $49,069 $49,267 $146,245 $153,774 Cost of goods sold 18,488 17,229 53,459 55,050 Gross profit 30,581 32,038 92,786 98,724 Selling expense 22,735 22,696 68,019 66,256 General and administrative expenses 7,103 4,357 19,843 11,810 Operating expenses 29,838 27,053 87,862 78,066 Income from operations 743 4,985 4,924 20,658 Other income: Dividend income 844 811 2,527 2,440 Interest income 935 834 2,156 3,195 Other, net 4,980 3,677 6,149 2,725 Total other income 6,759 5,322 10,832 8,360 Income before taxes 7,502 10,307 15,756 29,018 Income taxes 1,899 3,968 5,077 11,172 Net income $ 5,603 $ 6,339 $10,679 $17,846 Net income per share $0.416 $0.352 $0.657 $ 0.978 Weighted average shares outstanding 13,457,300 18,009,140 16,266,410 18,248,020 Dividends declared per share $0.095 $0.090 $0.285 $0.270 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. FARMER BROS. CO. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) March 31, June 30, 2004 2003 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 25,773 $ 18,986 Short term investments 166,652 274,444 Accounts and notes receivable, net 17,568 13,756 Inventories 33,980 34,702 Income tax receivable 900 2,878 Prepaid expenses 3,123 1,851 Total current assets 247,996 346,617 Property, plant and equipment, net 42,223 41,753 Notes receivable 193 193 Other assets 24,235 26,390 Deferred income taxes 1,462 1,462 Total assets $316,109 $416,415 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 5,599 $ 3,321 Accrued payroll expenses 11,193 7,362 Deferred income tax 976 976 Other expense 4,648 5,000 Total current liabilities 22,416 16,659 Accrued postretirement benefits 26,725 25,041 Other long term liabilities - 5,570 49,141 47,270 Commitments and contingencies - - Shareholders' equity: Common stock, $1.00 par value, authorized 3,000,000 shares; 1,607,508 shares issued and outstanding 1,608 1,926 Additional paid-in capital 46,351 18,798 Retained earnings 282,913 382,831 Unearned ESOP shares (62,858) (33,364) Less accumulated comprehensive loss (1,046) (1,046) Total shareholders' equity 266,968 369,145 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $316,109 $416,415 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. FARMER BROS. CO. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Nine months ended March 31, 2004 2003 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $10,679 $17,846 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 5,302 4,316 (Gain) on sales of assets (52) (367) ESOP compensation expense 3,835 2,835 (Gain)on investments (631) (2,025) Change in assets and liabilities: Short term investments (2,738) 55,853 Accounts and notes receivable (3,846) 640 Inventories 722 1,029 Income tax receivable 1,978 2,553 Prepaid expenses and other assets 883 (2,066) Accounts payable 2,278 (186) Accrued payroll and expenses and other liabilities 3,479 733 Accrued postretirement benefits 1,684 1,446 Other long term liabilities (5,570) - Total adjustments 7.324 64,761 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 18,003 $82,607 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property, plant and equipment (5,806) (6,445) Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment 86 497 Notes receivable repaid 34 42 Net cash used in investing activities (5,686) (5,906) Cash flows from financing activities: Dividends paid (4,354) (4,916) ESOP contributions (32,412) (22,496) Proceeds from sale of short term investments 111,161 - Purchase of capital stock (111,161) - Sale of capital stock 31,236 - Net cash used in financing activities (5,530) (27,412) Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 6,787 49,289 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 18,986 7,047 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $25,773 $56,336 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Income tax payments 2,250 7,044 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) Note 1. Unaudited Financial Statements The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the period ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended June 30, 2004. The balance sheet at June 30, 2003 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Farmer Bros Co. annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2003. Reclassification: Certain 2003 balances have been reclassified to be consistent with the 2004 presentation. Note 2. Investments Investments are as follows (in thousands): March 31 June 30 2004 2003 U.S. Treasury Obligations $106,827 $220,057 Preferred Stock and Other 58,370 53,897 Futures, options and other derivative investments 1,455 490 Total short term investments $166,652 $274,444 Note 3. Inventories (In thousands) March 31, 2004 Processed Unprocessed Total Coffee $4,075 $9,110 $13,185 Allied products 10,918 3,872 14,790 Coffee brewing equipment 2,336 3,669 6,005 $17,329 $16,651 $33,980 June 30, 2003 Processed Unprocessed Total Coffee $3,853 $9,155 $13,008 Allied products 11,776 4,213 15,989 Coffee brewing equipment 2,372 3,333 5,705 $18,001 $16,701 $34,702 Interim LIFO Calculations An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must necessarily be based on management's estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these are subject to many forces beyond management's control, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. Note 4. Pension Plans The Company has a contributory defined benefit pension plan for all employees not covered under a collective bargaining agreement and a non-contributory defined benefit plan for certain hourly employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The net periodic pension costs for the defined benefit plans for the three months ended March 31 were as follows: Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands) Three months ended March 31, 2004 2003 Service cost 594 427 Interest cost 988 971 Expected return on plan assets (1,362) (1,491) Amortization of transition obligation ( 0 (164) Amortization of prior service cost 62 66 Amortization of net (gain) loss 336 4 Net periodic benefit cost 618 (187) Note 5. Stock Split On May 10, 2004 the Company affected a 10 for 1 stock split. The effect of this stock split has been retroactively reflected in the net income per share, dividends per share and weighted average shares reported in the accompanying condensed financial statements. Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Liquidity As reported in the Form 10-Q/A dated February 18, 2004, on December 24, 2003, the Company purchased the 443,845 shares of its common stock held by the Crowe Family and related trusts for approximately $111 million or approximately $250 per share. The closing market price for Farmer Bros. Co. common stock on December 24, 2003 was $316/share. Concurrently with this purchase, the Company offered its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) the opportunity to purchase 124,939 shares at the same price, fulfilling its previously announced intention to purchase 300,000 shares for the ESOP. This portion of the transaction was completed on January 11, 2004. The transactions can be summarized as follows: Cost of shares purchased $111,161,000 Cost of shares retired 79,926,000 Cost of shares transferred to ESOP 31,235,000 The ESOP, established in 2000 for all Farmer Bros. Co. employees, is a leveraged ESOP. Consistent with plan provisions, the ESOP buys Company stock with money loaned to the ESOP, in this case by the Company. Annually, the Company makes a federal income tax deductible contribution to the ESOP, and the ESOP uses that contribution to make its loan payment (principal and taxable interest) to the Company. When the loan payment is made, the shares that secured that payment amount are allocated to employees and held for them by a third party trust. When employees retire or leave the Company they receive the stock or cash. Cash amounts are based on the market price of its stock. At the inception of the ESOP, the Board authorized the purchase of 300,000 shares of Company stock. Our multi-year information systems project, is possibly the largest undertaking of its type the Company has ever attempted, has two major milestones left. The project began in the Fall of 2002, and the initial milestone was on July 1, 2003 when certain of the financial systems "went live." The manufacturing systems are expected to go live on September 1, 2004, and the sales system is expected to be phased into our branches beginning in February, 2005, to be complete by June 30, 2005. The additional cost of the information systems portion of the project, through fiscal 2005 is expected to exceed $7,000,000. Our working capital is composed of the following: (in thousands) March 30, June 30, 2004 2003 Current assets $247,096 $348,617 Current liabilities 22,505 $ 16,659 Working capital $224,591 $331,958 Total assets $315,209 $416,415 We expect all present and future liquidity needs will be met by internal sources. The Company tries not to rely on banks or other third parties for its working capital and other liquidity needs. There have been no changes in the needs or commitments described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10- K/A. Results of Operations Most operating trends discussed in the Form 10-K/A for fiscal 2003 have continued throughout fiscal 2004. A slight improvement in the downward sales trend seen this year was experienced during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004. Net sales decreased 0.4% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to $49,069,000 as compared to $49,267,000 in the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003. Year to date sales decreased 5% to $146,245,000 as compared to $153,774,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. In addition to the previously mentioned trends, the Company had decreased coffee brewing equipment sales of $4,049,000 in the current fiscal year as compared to the same period of fiscal 2003. Gross profit for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 decreased 5% to $30,582,000 as compared to $32,038,000 in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This decrease is primarily the result of higher green coffee costs. The average cost of green coffee during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 has increased 27% since the June 30, 2003 year end. The average cost of green coffee during the nine months of fiscal 2004 has been 9% higher than the average cost of green coffee over the same period of the prior fiscal year. Gross profit for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 decreased 6% to $92,786,000 as compared to $98,724,000 in the same period of the prior fiscal year. Operating expenses in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, consisting of selling and general and administrative expenses, increased 13% to $87,862,000 as compared to $78,066,000 in the same period of fiscal 2003. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004 increased 10% to $29,839,000 as compared to $27,053,000 in the same period of fiscal year 2003. This increase is primarily attributed to costs associated with our multi year program to update our information systems, increased employee benefits and legal expenses, detailed as follows for the nine months ended March 31. 2004 2003 Information systems $ 4,148,000 $ 563,000 Employee benefits 17,617,000 13,598,000 Legal services 1,857,000 502,000 Total $23,622,000 $14,663,000 Other income in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 increased 27% to $6,759,000 from $5,322,000 in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. Other income for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 increased 29% to $10,832,000 from $8,360,000 in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The Company's Chairman, Roy F. Farmer, who guided the Company for more than 50 years, died on March 16, 2004 (as more fully described in a Form 8-K filed March 16, 2004). The Company received payment of a key man life insurance policy on Mr. Farmer that is not taxable. Additionally, the deferred compensation due Mr. Farmer has been reclassified as a current liability in the most recent quarter. The Company prevailed in a lawsuit against the State of California regarding state taxability of dividends, as a result we will receive a tax refund of approximately $811,000 and interest income in excess of $627,000. The Company received another court award, as a plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit regarding price-fixing by sellers of monosodium glutamate. The increase in other income in the third quarter is primarily the result of the these non-recurring transactions. Key man life insurance $4,088,000 Court award 1,061,000 Interest on state tax refunds 627,000 Total $5,776,000 As the result of the above mentioned factors, net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 decreased 12% to $5,603,000 or $0.416 per share, as compared to $6,339,000, or $0.352 per share, in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. Net income for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 decreased 40% to $10,679,000 or $0.657 per share, as compared to $17,846,000 or $0.978 per share in the same period of the prior fiscal year. Quarterly Summary of Results (in thousands of dollars): 03/31/03 06/30/03 09/30/03 12/31/03 3/31/04 Net sales $49,267 $47,784 $45,665 $51,511 $49,069 Gross profit $32,038 $32,172 $29,632 $32,573 30,582 Income from operations $4,985 $3,230 $1,057 $3,124 743 Net income $6,339 $5,783 $2,511 $2,565 $ 5,604 Net income per share $0.352 $0.323 $0.141 $0.146 $0.416 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding the risks, circumstances and financial trends that may affect our future operating results, financial position and cash flows may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These statements are based on management's current expectations, assumptions, estimates and observations about our business and are subject to risks and uncertainties. As a result, actual results could materially differ from the forward looking statements contained herein. These forward looking statements can be identified by the use of words like "expects," "plans," "believes," "intends," "will," "assumes" and other words of similar meanings. These and other similar words can be identified by the fact that they do not relate solely to historical or current facts. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is impossible to predict the impact of such factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from predicted results. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only at the time of this report and do not undertake to update or revise these projections as more information becomes available. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Many but not all of these factors and assumptions are identified in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. Financial Markets We are exposed to market value risk arising from changes in interest rates on our securities portfolio. Our portfolio of investment grade money market instruments is primarily invested in treasury securities. As of March 31, 2004 over 83% of these funds were invested in instruments with maturities shorter than 90 days. This portfolio's interest rate risk is not hedged and its average maturity is approximately 70 days. A 100 basis point increase in the general level of interest rates would result in a change in the market value of the portfolio of approximately ($1,080,000). Our portfolio of preferred securities includes investments in derivatives that provide a natural economic hedge of interest rate risk. We review the interest rate sensitivity of these securities and (a) enter into "short positions" in futures contracts on U.S. Treasury securities or (b) hold put options on such futures contracts in order to reduce the impact of certain interest rate changes on such preferred stocks. Specifically, we attempt to manage the risk arising from changes in the general level of interest rates. We do not transact in futures contracts or put options for speculative purposes. The following table demonstrates the impact of varying interest rate changes based on the preferred stock holdings, futures and options positions, and market yield and price relationships at March 31, 2004. This table is predicated on an instantaneous change in the general level of interest rates and assumes predictable relationships between the prices of preferred securities holdings, the yields on U.S. Treasury securities and related futures and options. Interest Rate Changes (In thousands) Market Value of March 31, 2004 Change in Market Preferred Futures & Total Value of Total Stock Options Portfolio Portfolio - -150 basis points ("b.p.") $63,930 $- $63,930 $4,835 - -100 b.p. 62,578 6 62,584 3,489 Unchanged 58,355 740 59,095 0 +100 b.p. 53,020 5,080 58,100 ( 995) +150 b.p. 50,424 7,717 58,141 ( 954) The number and type of future and option contracts entered into depends on, among other items, the specific maturity and issuer redemption provisions for each preferred stock held, the slope of the Treasury yield curve, the expected volatility of Treasury yields, and the costs of using futures and/or options. Commodity Price Changes We are exposed to commodity price risk arising from changes in the market price of green coffee. We price our inventory on the LIFO basis. In the normal course of business, we enter into commodity purchase agreements with suppliers and we purchase green coffee contracts. The following table demonstrates the impact of changes in the price of green coffee on inventory and green coffee contracts at March 31, 2004. It assumes an immediate change in the price of green coffee, and the valuations of coffee index futures and put options and relevant commodity purchase agreements at March 31, 2004. Commodity Risk Disclosure (In thousands) Market Value of Coffee Cost Coffee March 31, 2004 Change in Market Value Change Inventory Futures & Options Totals Derivatives Inventory -20% $11,900 $6,355 $18,255 $6,356 ($1,300) unchanged 13,200 ( 1,450) 11,750 - - 20% 14,500 ( 7,806) 6,694 ( 6,356) 1,300 At March 31, 2004 the derivatives consisted mainly of commodity futures with maturities shorter than four months. Item 4 Controls & Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the Company's disclosure control and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14. They have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this quarterly report has been made known to them in a timely fashion. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting. PART II OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal proceedings. On February 4, 2004, Leonard Rosenthal, unilaterally and without payment of settlement filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice with the United States District Court for the Central District of California with respect to the action against the Company, its present directors and a former director, previously reported in the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003. Item 2. Changes in securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. (a) - (b) On February 17, 2004, the Company was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation by merger into a wholly-owned Delaware corporation. As a result of such reincorporation and the inclusion of certain provisions in the charter of the surviving Delaware corporation, changes in the rights of holders of the Company's common stock occurred. The changes are explained in the sections of the Company's proxy statement dated January 30, 2004 entitled: " Introduction to Proposals Three (A), Three (B), Three (C), Three (D) and Three (E);" "Proposal Three (A): Reincorporation of the Company in the State of Delaware;" "Comparison of the Charters and Bylaws of Farmer Bros. California and Farmer Bros. Delaware;" "Significant Differences Between the Corporation Laws of California and Delaware;" "Proposal Three (B): Elimination of the Right of Shareholders to Act by Written Consent;" " Proposal Three (C): Implementation of a Classified Board of Directors;" "Proposal Three (D): Elimination of Right to Call Special Meetings;" "and "Proposal Three (E): Elimination of Cumulative Voting for Directors." These sections appear at pp. 7 through 35 of the Company's printed Proxy Statement, and are incorporated hereat by this reference. A copy of the material incorporated by reference is filed as Exhibit 99 to this report. (c) As described in Part I, Item 2 - Management Discussion and Analysis of this report, supra, on December 24, 2003 the Company purchased the 443,845 shares of its common stock held by the Crowe Family and related trusts for approximately $111 million or approximately $250 per share. Concurrently with this purchase, the Company offered its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) the opportunity to acquire 124,939 shares at the same price. This portion of the transaction was completed on January 11, 2004 when the Company transferred said shares to the ESOP. No underwriters were involved. The ESOP is a non-contributory mandatory employee benefit plan. Accordingly the transaction did not constitute a sale for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. (d) Not applicable. (e) The following table summarizes the purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Period (a) Total (b) Average (c) Total Number (d) Maximum Number Number of Price Paid of Shares Purchased of Shares that Shares per Share as Part of Publicly May Be Purchased Purchased Announced Plans Under the Plans January 1 Through 50(1) $306 none NA January 31 February 1 Through none February 29 March 1 Through none March 31 (1) ESOP purchased shares from retired employee. Item 3. Defaults upon senior securities. none. Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders. The Company's annual meeting was held on February 23, 2004. At the meeting the following persons were elected to the terms indicated: Roy F. Farmer (Class I) 1 year Lewis A. Coffman (Class I) 1 year John Samore, Jr. (Class I) 1 year Guenter W. Berger (Class II) 2 years Thomas A. Maloof (Class II) 2 years John H. Merrell (Class III) 3 years Roy E. Farmer (Class III) 3 years Roy F. Farmer died on March 16,2004. The following "Report of Proxy Voting" was originally included in a Form 8-K dated February 23, 2004 and filed with the Commission on February 23, 2004. Report of Proxy Voting There were 1,607,508 shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the meeting and a total of 1,229,762 shares (76.50%) were represented at the meeting. 1. Election of Directors FOR WITHOLD Roy F. Farmer (Class I) 1,039,648 190,114 Lewis A. Coffman (Class I) 1,038,784 190,978 John Samore, Jr. (Class I) 1,039,470 190,292 Guenter W. Berger (Class II) 1,037,319 192,443 Thomas A. Maloof (Class II) 1,039,480 190,282 John H. Merrell (Class III) 1,039,470 190,292 Roy E. Farmer (Class III) 1,038,964 190,798 2. Approval of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent public accountants for fiscal year 2004. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 1,169,645 57,413 2,704 0 3. Approval of the reincorporation of the Company in the State of Delaware. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 996,860 232,546 356 0 4. Approval of the elimination of the right of our shareholders to act by written consent. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 992,798 236,290 674 0 5. Approval of the implementation of a classified Board of Directors. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 985,281 244,205 276 0 6. Approval of the elimination of the right of shareholders holding ten percent (10%) or more of the voting shares to call a special meeting of shareholders. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 991,318 237,669 775 0 7. Approval of the elimination of cumulative voting for our directors. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 995,228 234,348 186 0 8. Approval of the increase in authorized shares of common stock of the Company from 3,000,000 shares to 25,000,000 shares, and authorization of 500,000 shares of preferred stock of the Company. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 994,050 235,477 235 0 9. Shareholder proposal to amend the Company's bylaws to restore cumulative voting. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER NON-VOTE 216,937 1,011,562 1,263 0 Item 5. Other information none. Item 6. Exhibits and reports on Form 8-K. (a) Exhibits. 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation 3.2 Bylaws 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Section 302 of the Sarbannes- Oxley Act of 2002) 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Section 302 of the Sarbannes- Oxley Act of 2002) 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Section 906 of the Sarbannes- Oxley Act of 2002) 32.2 Certification Chief Financial Officer (Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002) 99 Excerpts incorporated by reference from proxy statement dated January 30, 2004. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. A Form 8-K dated January 12, 2004 and filed with the Commission on January 12, 2004, reporting the purchase of 124,939 shares of stock by the ESOP, completing the Company's goal of acquiring 300,000 shares of Company stock. A Form 8-K dated February 23, 2004 and filed with the Commission on February 23, 2004, reporting that the Company had filed to reincorporate in Delaware following shareholder approval at the shareholder's meeting held February 23, 2004. The Form 8-K also reported the results of proxy voting, and a report from management on the state of the company. A Form 8-K dated March 4, 2004 and filed with the Commission on March 4, 2004 noting that the Board of Directors declared a 10 for one stock split in the form of a one time stock dividend. The stock dividend will entitle each pre- split shareholder to receive nine shares of stock for each share owned at the opening of business on May 10, 2004. A Form 8-K dated March 16, 2004 and filed with the Commission on March 16, 2004 to announce the death of Chairman, Roy F. Farmer. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. FARMER BROS. CO. /s/ Roy E. Farmer Roy E. Farmer, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer) Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ John E. Simmons John E. Simmons, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) Date: May 14, 2004 EX-31 2 may311a.txt CERTIFICATION OF CEO 31.1 Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Roy E. Farmer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Farmer Bros. Co. ("Registrant"), certifies that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2004 /s/ Roy E. Farmer Roy E. Farmer President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) EX-31 3 may312a.txt CERTIFICATION OF CFO 31.2 Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, John E. Simmons, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Farmer Bros. Co. ("Registrant"), certifies that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2004 /s/ John E. Simmons John E. Simmons Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) EX-32 4 may321a.txt CERTIFICATION OF CEO 32.1 Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Farmer Bros. Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy E. Farmer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. Dated: May 13, 2004 /s/ Roy E. Farmer Roy E. Farmer President & Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) EX-32 5 may322a.txt CERTIFICATION OF CFO 32.2 Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Farmer Bros. Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Simmons, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. Dated: May 13, 2004 /s/ John E. Simmons John E. Simmons Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer EX-99 6 proxyinsa.txt INCORPATION BY REFERENCE FROM PROXY Sections of the Company's Proxy Statement dated January 30, 2004 and incorporated by reference in this filing INTRODUCTION TO PROPOSALS THREE(A), THREE(B), THREE(C), THREE(D), THREE(E) AND THREE(F) Of the publicly-held companies headquartered in California with a market capitalization of more than $25 million, more than two-thirds are incorporated in Delaware. The Board believes that it is essential to be able to draw upon well- established principles of corporate governance in making business and legal decisions. The prominence and predictability of Delaware corporate law provide a more reliable foundation on which the Company's corporate governance decisions can be based. Accordingly, as discussed in detail below, we believe that the Company and its shareholders will benefit in the near and longer term from reincorporating the Company in Delaware. These proposals grew out of a request by one of the Company's recently appointed independent directors, prior to the Company's receipt of any shareholder proposals, that a review be undertaken of the advantages and disadvantages of changing the Company's state of incorporation from California to Delaware. On August 19, 2003, the Board met to discuss the results of the review. On October 6, 2003, the Board again met and unanimously determined that the Proposed Reincorporation and the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures, as defined below, were in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders and approved the Agreement and Plan of Merger, Delaware Certificate of Incorporation and Delaware Bylaws attached hereto as Annexes A, B and C, respectively. The Board has unanimously approved and, for the reasons described below, recommends that the shareholders approve a change in the Company's state of incorporation from California to Delaware as described in Proposal Three(A) below (the "Reincorporation Proposal" or the "Proposed Reincorporation"). The Proposed Reincorporation would be accomplished by merging Farmer Bros. Co. (the "Company" or "Farmer Bros. California") into Farmer Bros. Co., a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary ("Farmer Bros. Delaware"), newly-formed for this purpose. Concurrently with the Reincorporation Proposal, the Board has unanimously approved, and recommends that the Shareholders approve, the inclusion of certain anti-takeover measures described in Proposals Three(B)-(F) below (the "Proposed Anti-takeover Measures") in the Delaware Certificate (as defined below) and the Delaware Bylaws (as defined below). Because Farmer Bros. Delaware will be governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL") if the Reincorporation Proposal and the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures are approved, the Proposed Reincorporation will result in certain changes in the rights of shareholders. These differences are summarized in Proposal Three(A) under the section entitled "Comparison of the Charters and Bylaws of Farmer Bros. California and Farmer Bros. Delaware" and "Significant Differences Between the Corporation Laws of California and Delaware." The Proposed Reincorporation, together with each of the five Proposed Anti- takeover Measures included in the Proposed Reincorporation, are being presented to shareholders as individual proposals with separate votes to approve, or not approve, each such proposal. Accordingly, the Board's proposals to: * reincorporate the Company in the State of Delaware; * eliminate the right of shareholders to act by written consent; * implement a classified board of directors; * eliminate the right of shareholders holding 10% or more of the voting shares to call a special meeting of the shareholders; * eliminate cumulative voting for directors; and * increase the authorized shares of common stock to 25,000,000 shares, and authorize 500,000 shares of preferred stock are each being presented as an individual proposal, as set forth in Proposals Three(A)-(F) below, to be voted upon separately by shareholders. Notwithstanding the separate presentation of Proposals Three(A)-(F) below, the Board considered and approved the matters set forth in Proposals Three(A)-(F) as one unitary transaction. Accordingly, if any one of Proposals Three (A)-(F) is not approved by the Shareholders, none of Proposals Three(A)-(F) will be approved. IN ORDER FOR THE PROPOSED REINCORPORATION TO BE EFFECTED, A MAJORITY OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK MUST APPROVE EACH OF PROPOSALS THREE(A), THREE(B), THREE(C), THREE(D), THREE(E) AND THREE(F). FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF SHAREHOLDERS OUR PROXY CARD INCLUDES THREE BOXES UNDER PROPOSAL THREE(A)-(F) ENTITLED "FOR ALL," "AGAINST ALL" AND "ABSTAIN ON ALL." CHECKING THE APPROPRIATE BOX WILL ALLOW A SHAREHOLDER TO VOTE FOR, AGAINST OR TO ABSTAIN AS TO ALL OF PROPOSALS THREE(A)-(F) WITHOUT THE NEED TO VOTE ON SUCH PROPOSALS AS THEY APPEAR INDIVIDUALLY ON THE PROXY CARD. AN "ABSTAIN ON ALL" VOTE IS THE SAME AS A VOTE "AGAINST ALL" OF PROPOSALS THREE(A)-(F). SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ CAREFULLY THIS SECTION OF THE PROXY STATEMENT, INCLUDING THE RELATED ANNEXES, BEFORE VOTING ON PROPOSALS THREE(A)-(F). PROPOSAL THREE(A): REINCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE Mechanics The Proposed Reincorporation will be effected by merging Farmer Bros. California into Farmer Bros. Delaware (the "Merger"). Upon completion of the Merger, Farmer Bros. California will cease to exist and Farmer Bros. Delaware will continue the business of the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, in substantially the form attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A (the "Merger Agreement"), each outstanding share of Farmer Bros. California Common Stock will be automatically converted into one share of Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock, no par value, upon the effective date of the Merger. Each stock certificate representing issued and outstanding shares of Farmer Bros. California Common Stock will continue to represent the same number of shares of Common Stock of Farmer Bros. Delaware. IT WILL NOT BE NECESSARY FOR SHAREHOLDERS TO EXCHANGE THEIR EXISTING STOCK CERTIFICATES FOR STOCK CERTIFICATES OF FARMER BROS. DELAWARE. Shareholders may, however, exchange their certificates if they so choose. The Common Stock of Farmer Bros. California is listed for trading on the Nasdaq National Market and, after the Merger, Farmer Bros. Delaware's Common Stock will continue to be traded on the Nasdaq National Market without interruption, under the same symbol "FARM" as the shares of Farmer Bros. California Common Stock are currently traded. Under California law, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of Farmer Bros. California is required for approval of the Merger Agreement and the other terms of the Proposed Reincorporation. See "Vote Required for the Reincorporation Proposal" below. The Proposed Reincorporation has been unanimously approved by the Board, which recommends a vote in favor of such proposal. If approved by the shareholders, we expect that the Merger will become effective as soon as practicable (the "Effective Date") following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. However, the Proposed Reincorporation may be abandoned, either before or after shareholder approval, if circumstances arise which, in the opinion of the Board, make it inadvisable to proceed. Although in some circumstances California law provides shareholders with the right to dissent from certain corporate reorganizations and receive cash for their shares, California law does not permit dissenter's rights in connection with the Proposed Reincorporation. The Reincorporation Proposal will only make a change in the legal domicile of the Company and certain other changes of a legal nature which are described in this Proxy Statement. The Proposed Reincorporation will not result in any change in the name, business, management, fiscal year, assets or liabilities or location of the principal offices of the Company. All employee benefit plans of Farmer Bros. California will be assumed and continued by Farmer Bros. Delaware. Approval of the Reincorporation Proposal will also constitute approval of the assumption of these plans by Farmer Bros. Delaware. The Company believes that the Proposed Reincorporation will not affect any of its material contracts with any third parties and that Farmer Bros. California's rights and obligations under such material contractual arrangements will continue and be assumed by Farmer Bros. Delaware. The directors who will be elected at the annual meeting of shareholders will become the directors of Farmer Bros. Delaware, except that if the Proposed Reincorporation is approved, the directors will be divided into three classes with staggered terms as described in Proposal Three(C) and under the section entitled "Classified Board," below. The discussion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, the Certificate of Incorporation of Farmer Bros. Delaware (the "Delaware Certificate") and the Bylaws of Farmer Bros. Delaware (the "Delaware Bylaws"), copies of which are attached to this Proxy Statement as Annexes A, B and C, respectively. Vote Required for Proposal Three(A) Approval of the Reincorporation Proposal, which will also constitute an approval of the Merger Agreement, the Delaware Certificate (without the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures set forth under Proposals Three(B)-(F) unless separately approved by the shareholders), the Delaware Bylaws (without the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures set forth under Proposals Three(B)-(F) unless separately approved by the shareholders) and all provisions of these documents will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of Farmer Bros. California. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED REINCORPORATION. THE EFFECT OF AN ABSTENTION OR A BROKER NON-VOTE IS THE SAME AS THAT OF A VOTE AGAINST THE REINCORPORATION PROPOSAL. Roy F. Farmer and Roy E. Farmer have notified the Company that they intend to vote all the shares owned by them directly, and all the shares held in various trusts, of which they are trustee, in favor of all of Proposals Three(A)-(F). This totals 39.38% of the shares entitled to vote on these proposals. The Company has recently amended the ESOP such that the shares unallocated to plan participants are to be voted for or against Proposals Three(A)-(F) in the same proportion that the allocated shares are voted by plan participants for or against such proposals. The ESOP holds 18.66% of the shares entitled to vote on these proposals. On December 4, 2003, Leonard Rosenthal brought suit in United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. CV03845) against the Company, the present directors and a former director ("Directors"), on behalf of himself and a purported class of persons (the "Rosenthal Litigation"). The Plaintiff alleges that the Company is operating as an unregistered investment company in violation of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "ICA"). The Plaintiff also alleges that the Company's loans of corporate funds to the ESOP to purchase stock of the Company violates federal law and that such purchases by the ESOP were intended to preserve the voting control of the Farmer family and entrench management. In addition, the Plaintiff alleges that the Company is pursuing an estate planning strategy designed to depress the stock price in order to lessen the estate taxes anticipated on the death of Roy F. Farmer. Plaintiff is seeking recovery against the Directors in an amount not less than the amount of the loans to the ESOP. Plaintiff also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the Company and the Directors from voting the Company stock beneficially owned by the ESOP at the Annual Meeting. On December 23, 2003, the U.S. District Court denied plaintiff's motion, ruling, inter alia, that plaintiff lacked standing to bring an action for violation of the ICA and that plaintiff had failed to show a likelihood of prevailing at trial on his claims that the Company was in violation of the ICA or that the Directors had violated their duties with respect to the ESOP. Consequently the Rosenthal Litigation is most unlikely to affect the voting of the ESOP's shares at the Annual Meeting. There is no assurance that the Reincorporation Proposal will be approved. The Board urges you to vote your shares for the Reincorporation Proposal. Principal Reasons for the Proposed Reincorporation For many years, Delaware has followed a policy of encouraging corporations to incorporate in that state. In furtherance of that policy, Delaware has long sought to be the leading state in adopting comprehensive and modern corporate laws that respond to the evolving legal and business needs of corporations organized under its laws. Because the DGCL has become widely regarded as the most extensive and well-defined body of corporate law in the United States, many corporations have chosen Delaware initially as their state of incorporation or have subsequently changed corporate domicile to Delaware in a manner similar to the Proposed Reincorporation. In light of Delaware's prominence as the state of incorporation for many major U.S. corporations, both the Delaware legislature and courts have demonstrated an ability and a willingness to act quickly and effectively to meet changing business needs. In doing so, the Delaware courts have developed considerable expertise in dealing with corporate issues and a substantial body of case law construing Delaware law and establishing public policies with respect to corporate legal affairs. For these reasons, the Board also believes that the DGCL and Delaware corporate law court decisions provide a broader foundation from which to respond to questions and predict outcomes relating to significant corporate matters or disputes, including, but not limited to: * duties of directors and officers; * liability of directors and officers and indemnification; and * contests for corporate control, including proxy contests and tender offers. In addition, the Company continually seeks to attract and retain the most capable individuals available to serve as officers and directors. The frequency of claims and litigation directed against directors and officers, in management's opinion, has expanded the risks facing directors and officers of corporations in exercising their duties. Furthermore, the amount of time and money required to respond to such claims and to defend such litigation can be substantial. We believe that, in general, Delaware law provides greater predictability to directors than California law in that Delaware case law regarding a corporation's ability to limit director liability is more developed and provides greater guidance than California law. The Board, therefore, believes that the Proposed Reincorporation may be a significant factor in continuing to attract and retain such individuals, and in freeing them to make corporate decisions on their own merits and for the benefit of shareholders rather than out of a desire to avoid personal liability. For additional discussion of this matter, see "Significant Differences Between the Corporation Laws of California and Delaware--Indemnification and Limitation of Liability," below. Proposed Anti-takeover Measures Delaware, like many other states, permits a corporation to adopt a number of measures through amendment of the corporate charter or bylaws or otherwise, which are designed to reduce a corporation's vulnerability to hostile takeover attempts. It should be noted, however, that the Reincorporation Proposal and the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures are not being proposed in order to prevent any present attempt known to the Board to acquire control of the Company or to obtain representation on the Board. If the Reincorporation Proposal is approved, certain measures will be implemented under Delaware law and the Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws which may have anti-takeover implications. These measures (as described below and under Proposals Three(B)-(F)) include the elimination of shareholders' ability to act by written consent (Proposal Three(B)), the implementation of a classified board of directors (Proposal Three(C)), the elimination of the ability of shareholders controlling ten percent (10%) or more of the voting shares to call a special meeting of shareholders (Proposal Three(D)), the elimination of cumulative voting which the Company eliminated in 1994 by amending its bylaws by vote of more than sixty-five percent (65%) of the outstanding shares (Proposal Three(E)), the establishment of advance notice procedures for shareholder nominations and other proposals, and the elimination of the ability of the shareholders to remove directors without cause. Following the Proposed Reincorporation, which will not occur unless all of the Anti-takeover Measures are approved, the Delaware Certificate will also provide for an increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock and for the Board's ability to designate and issue preferred stock (Proposal Three(F)), although the Company has no present plans to do so. Such preferred stock, if issued and depending on its terms, may make it more difficult for an unsolicited bidder to make a takeover attempt. For additional discussion of these changes, see "Comparison of the Charters and Bylaws of Farmer Bros. California and Farmer Bros. Delaware," below. In addition to the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures, certain differences between California and Delaware law, which will be effective upon consummation of the Merger without further action of the Board or shareholders, could have a bearing on unapproved takeover attempts. Section 203 of the DGCL, which Farmer Bros. Delaware does not intend to opt out of, restricts certain "business combinations" with "interested shareholders" for three years following the date that a person becomes an interested shareholder, unless the Board approves the business combination. For a discussion of differences between the laws of California and Delaware that may affect the shareholders, see "Significant Differences Between the Corporation Laws of California and Delaware," below. The Board may also consider in the future certain defensive strategies allowed under the DGCL which are designed to enhance the Board's ability to negotiate with an unsolicited bidder. Such strategies include, but are not limited to, the adoption of a shareholder rights plan and severance agreements for its management and key employees which would become effective upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. The Board recognizes that unsolicited hostile takeover attempts do not always have unfavorable consequences or effects and may provide all of the shareholders with considerable value for their shares. To the extent that the Proposed Reincorporation and the Proposed Anti-takeover Measures may provide greater deterrence to takeover offers and greater defenses against takeovers, the Proposed Reincorporation and Proposed Anti-takeover Measures may have the effect of discouraging or defeating future takeover attempts which a substantial number or majority of the Company's shareholders might wish to accept and which might provide a substantial premium over market prices. The Board, however, believes that the potential suddenness and disadvantages of unapproved takeover attempts (such as disruption of our business and the possibility of terms which may be less favorable to all of the shareholders than would be available in a board-approved transaction) are sufficiently great that, on balance, prudent steps to reduce the likelihood of such takeover attempts and to help ensure that the Board has adequate opportunity to fully consider and respond to any takeover attempt and actively negotiate its terms, are in the Company's best interests and the best interests of its shareholders. COMPARISON OF THE CHARTERS AND BYLAWS OF FARMER BROS. CALIFORNIA AND FARMER BROS. DELAWARE The following discussion is a summary of the material differences between the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the "California Articles") and Bylaws, as amended (the "California Bylaws"), of Farmer Bros. California and the Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws. All statements herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the respective corporation laws of California and Delaware and the full text of the California Articles and California Bylaws and the Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws. Approval by the Shareholders of the Proposed Reincorporation and the Proposed Anti- takeover Measures will automatically result in the adoption of all the provisions set forth in the Delaware Articles and Delaware Bylaws. A copy of the Delaware Certificate is attached hereto as Annex B and a copy of the Delaware Bylaws is attached hereto as Annex C. The California Articles and California Bylaws are on file with the SEC and are available from the Company upon request. Authorized Stock The California Articles currently authorize the Company to issue up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock. The Delaware Certificate provides that the Company will have 25,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, no par value, and 500,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share (See Proposal Three(F)). The Delaware Certificate provides that the Board is entitled to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the authorized and unissued preferred stock at the time of issuance. Cumulative Voting Cumulative voting entitles a shareholder to cast as many votes as there are directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares registered in such shareholder's name. The shareholder may cast all of such votes for a single nominee or may distribute them among any two or more nominees. Under California law, shareholders of a corporation have the right to cumulative voting unless a corporation has outstanding shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange, or has outstanding securities qualified for trading on the Nasdaq National Market and opts out of cumulative voting. The Company's shareholders have previously chosen to eliminate the right to cumulative voting by prohibiting cumulative voting in the California Bylaws. Therefore, shareholders currently do not have the right to cumulative voting. Mitchell Partners, L.P. has proposed an amendment to the Company's California Bylaws that would restore cumulative voting (See Proposal Four). If the Reincorporation Proposal is approved by the Company's shareholders, Proposal Four will have no effect even if it is passed by the Company's shareholders because it proposes to amend the California Bylaws, which, upon consummation of the Merger, will no longer be effective. Under Delaware law, cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted unless specifically provided for in a company's charter or bylaws. As permitted by Delaware law, the Delaware Articles will specifically prohibit cumulative voting (See Proposal Three(E)). Size of the Board of Directors Under California law, the number of directors of a corporation may be fixed in the articles of incorporation or bylaws of a corporation, or a range may be established for the number of directors, with the board of directors given authority to fix the exact number of directors within such range. The California Bylaws establish a range of five to nine for the number of directors and authorize the Board to fix the exact number of directors within the range by resolution or unanimous written consent. The number of directors is currently set at seven. Shareholders may also fix the number of directors by an affirmative vote of the majority of the shares entitled to vote or by written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. Under California law, no subsequent amendment seeking to reduce the authorized number of directors below five can be implemented if a number of shares equal to or greater than sixteen and two-thirds percent (16 2/3%) of the total outstanding shares are voted in opposition to the amendment. Under Delaware law, the number of directors of a corporation, or the range of authorized directors, may be fixed or changed by the board of directors acting alone by amendment to the corporation's bylaws, unless the directors are not authorized to amend the bylaws or the number of directors is fixed in the certificate of incorporation, in which case shareholder approval is required. The Delaware Certificate establishes a range of five to seven for the number of directors and provides that the number of directors shall be fixed within these limits from time to time by resolution of a majority of the active directors. The shareholders will not have the right to fix the number of directors within these limits. Changes in the size of the Board outside of these limits can only be adopted with the approval of the shareholders as would be the case under the California Articles and California Bylaws. Classified Board A classified board is one on which a certain number, but not all, of the directors are elected on a rotating basis each year. Under California law, a corporation generally may provide for a classified board of directors by adopting amendments to its articles of incorporation or bylaws, if the amendments are also approved by the shareholders. Under California law, a classified board with two classes requires a minimum of six directors and a classified board with three classes requires a minimum of nine directors. The California Articles and California Bylaws do not currently provide for a classified board. Delaware law permits, but does not require, a classified board of directors under which the directors can be divided into as many as three classes with staggered terms of office, with only one class of directors standing for election each year. Delaware, unlike California, does not require a minimum of three directors in each class. The Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws provide for a classified board of three classes, with directors elected to three year terms (See Proposal Three(C)). Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number directors constituting the entire board of directors. Class I would consist of three directors (initially, Lewis A. Coffman, Roy F. Farmer, John Samore, Jr.) who would hold office initially for a one year term expiring at the 2004 Annual Meeting, Class II would consist of two directors (initially, Guenter W. Berger and Thomas A. Maloof) who would hold office initially for a two year term expiring at the 2005 Annual Meeting, and Class III would consist of two directors (initially, Roy E. Farmer and John H. Merrell) who would hold office initially for a three year term expiring at the 2006 Annual Meeting, in all cases subject to the election and qualification of their successors and to their earlier death, resignation or removal. As a result of the classification of directors, it will take at least two years in order to effect a change to the majority of the members of the Board. At each Annual Meeting following this initial classification and election, the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at that meeting would be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding Annual Meeting after their election and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Filling Vacancies on the Board of Directors Under California law, any vacancy on the Board other than one created by removal of a director may be filled by the Board. If the number of directors is less than a quorum, a vacancy may be filled by the unanimous written consent of the directors then in office, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors at a meeting held pursuant to notice or waivers of notice or by a sole remaining director. A vacancy created by removal of a director may be filled by the board only if so authorized by a corporation's articles of incorporation or by a bylaw approved by the corporation's shareholders. The California Bylaws permit vacancies to be filled by a majority of the remaining directors, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Directors are not permitted to fill vacancies created by the removal of a director. Under Delaware law, vacancies and newly-created directorships may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director, unless otherwise provided in a corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws (or unless the certificate of incorporation directs that a particular class of stock is to elect such director(s), in which case a majority of the directors elected by such class, or a sole remaining director so elected, shall fill such vacancy or newly created directorship). The Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws provide that any vacancy, including any vacancy created by the removal of a director by the shareholders of Farmer Bros. Delaware, may be filled by a majority of the directors, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Monetary Liability of Directors The California Articles and the Delaware Certificate both provide for the elimination of personal monetary liability of directors to the fullest extent permissible under the law of the respective states. The provision eliminating monetary liability of directors set forth in the Delaware Certificate is potentially more expansive than the corresponding provision in the California Articles due to differences between California and Delaware law. For a more detailed explanation of the foregoing, see "Significant Differences Between the Corporation Laws of California and Delaware-- Limitation of Liability and Indemnification," below. Action by Written Consent Under California and Delaware law, shareholders are permitted to act by written consent in lieu of a shareholder meeting. The California Bylaws currently permit shareholders to take action by written consent, provided that the consent is signed by the minimum number of shareholders necessary to authorize such action at a meeting where all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and vote. In the case of election of directors, such consent is only effective if signed by the holders of all outstanding shares entitled to vote for the election of directors. Under the Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws, shareholders will not have the right to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting (See Proposal Three(B)). Accordingly, all shareholder action must be carried out by a shareholder vote at a shareholder meeting. Power to Call Special Meetings of Shareholders Under California law and the California Bylaws, a special meeting of shareholders may be called by the Board, the Chairman of the Board, the President, the holders of shares entitled to cast not less than ten percent (10%) of the votes at such meeting and such additional persons as are authorized by the articles of incorporation or the bylaws. Under Delaware law, a special meeting of shareholders may be called by the board of directors or any other person authorized to do so in the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws. The Delaware Bylaws authorize the Chairman of the Board, the President and the Board to call a special meeting of shareholders. Therefore, if the Reincorporation Proposal is adopted, holders of ten percent (10%) or more of the voting shares of the Company will no longer be able to call a special meeting of shareholders (See Proposal Three(D)). Nominations of Director Candidates and Introduction of Business at Shareholder Meetings The California Bylaws do not include advance notice procedures for shareholders with regard to the nomination of directors or with regard to certain matters to be brought before an annual or special meeting of shareholders. The Delaware Bylaws include an advance notice procedure for shareholders with regard to the nomination of directors (the "Nomination Procedure") and with regard to certain matters to be brought before an annual meeting or special meeting of shareholders (the "Business Procedure"). The Nomination Procedure provides that only persons nominated by or at the direction of the board of directors or by a shareholder who has given timely notice in proper written form to the Company's Secretary prior to the meeting (and is a shareholder of record at the time of such notice) will be eligible for election as directors. The Business Procedure provides that at an annual meeting, and subject to any other applicable requirements, only such business may be conducted as has been brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the board of directors or by a shareholder of record who has given timely notice in proper written form to the Company's Secretary of such shareholder's intention to bring such business before the meeting (and is a shareholder of record at the time of such notice). To be timely, notice must be received by the Company's Secretary: * in the case of an annual meeting, not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the anniversary of the immediately preceding year's annual meeting, except that if the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than thirty (30) days from such anniversary date, notice by the shareholders to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the earlier of the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made; and * in the case of a special meeting at which directors are to be elected, not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the earlier of the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made. Under the Nomination Procedure, a shareholder's notice to the Company's Secretary must contain certain information about the nominee, including name, age, business and residence address, occupation, the class and number of shares beneficially owned or of record, the nominee's consent to be nominated, other information that is be required to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of the proposed nominee, and certain information about the shareholder proposing to nominate that person, including name, address, the class and number of shares beneficially owned or of record, a description of all arrangements or understandings between such shareholder and each proposed nominee any other persons (and their names) pursuant to which nominations are to be made by such shareholder, a representation that such shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persons named in the notice and any other information required to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of the proposed nominee. Under the Business Procedure, notice relating to the conduct of business (other than the nomination of directors) at an annual meeting must contain certain information about the business and about the shareholder who proposes to bring the business before the meeting. If the chairman of the meeting determines that a person was not nominated in accordance with the Nomination Procedure, such person will not be eligible for election as a director, or if he or she determines that other business was not properly brought before such meeting in accordance with the Business Procedure, such business will not be conducted at such meeting. Nothing in the Nomination Procedure or the Business Procedure will preclude discussion by any shareholder of any nomination or business properly made or brought before an annual or special meeting in accordance with the above-described procedures. SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CORPORATION LAWS OF CALIFORNIA AND DELAWARE The following provides a summary of the major substantive differences between the corporation laws of California and Delaware. It is not an exhaustive description of all differences between the laws of the two states. Accordingly, all statements herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the respective corporation laws of California and Delaware. Shareholder Voting In the context of a proposed acquisition, both California and Delaware law generally require that a majority of the shareholders of both acquiring and target corporations approve a statutory merger. In addition, both California and Delaware law require that a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of a corporation be approved by a majority of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation transferring such assets. Delaware law does not require a shareholder vote of the surviving corporation in a merger (unless the corporation provides otherwise in its certificate of incorporation) if: * the merger agreement does not amend the existing certificate of incorporation; * each share of stock of the surviving corporation outstanding immediately before the effective date of the merger is an identical outstanding share after the merger; and * either no shares of common stock of the surviving corporation and no shares, securities or obligations convertible into such stock are to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger, or the authorized unissued shares or treasury shares of common stock of the surviving corporation to be issued or delivered under the plan of merger plus those initially issuable upon conversion of any other shares, securities or obligations to be issued or delivered under such plan do not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the shares of common stock of such constituent corporation outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the merger. California law contains a similar exception to its voting requirements for reorganizations where shareholders or the corporation itself, or both, immediately prior to the reorganization will own immediately after the reorganization equity securities constituting more than five-sixths (5/6) of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring corporation or its parent entity. Shareholder Approval of Certain Business Combinations Delaware, like a number of states, has adopted special laws designed to make certain kinds of "unfriendly" corporate takeovers, or other transactions involving a corporation and one or more of its significant shareholders, more difficult. Under Section 203 of the DGCL, a Delaware corporation is prohibited from engaging in a "business combination" with an "interested shareholder" for three years following the date that such person or entity becomes an interested shareholder. With certain exceptions, an interested shareholder is a person or entity who or which owns, individually or with or through certain other persons or entities, fifteen percent (15%) or more of the corporation's outstanding voting stock (including any rights to acquire stock pursuant to an option, warrant, agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion or exchange rights, and stock with respect to which the person has voting rights only). The three-year moratorium imposed by Section 203 on business combinations does not apply if: * prior to the date on which such shareholder becomes an interested shareholder the board of directors of the subject corporation approves either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the person or entity becoming an interested shareholder; * upon consummation of the transaction that made him or her an interested shareholder, the interested shareholder owns at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the corporation's voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding, for purposes of determining voting stock outstanding shares owned by directors who are also officers of the subject corporation and shares held by employee stock plans that do not give employee participants the right to decide confidentially whether to accept a tender or exchange offer); or * on or after the date such person or entity becomes an interested shareholder, the board of directors approves the business combination and it is also approved at a shareholder meeting by sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested shareholder. Although a Delaware corporation may elect not to be governed by Section 203, the Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws do not contain such an "opt out" election, and the Board intends that the Company will be governed by Section 203 if the Proposed Reincorporation is approved. The Board believes that Section 203 will encourage any potential acquiror to negotiate with the Board. Section 203 also might have the effect of limiting the ability of a potential acquiror to make a two-tiered bid for Farmer Bros. Delaware in which all shareholders would not be treated equally. Shareholders should note, however, that the application of Section 203 to Farmer Bros. Delaware will confer upon the Board the power to reject a proposed business combination in certain circumstances, even though a potential acquiror may be offering a substantial premium for Farmer Bros. Delaware's shares over the then-current market price. Section 203 could also discourage certain potential acquirors who are unwilling to comply with its provisions. California law requires that holders of common stock receive common stock in a merger of the corporation with the holder of more than fifty percent (50%) but less than ninety percent (90%) of the target's common stock or its affiliate unless all of the target company's shareholders consent to the transaction or the transaction has been approved by the California Commissioner of Corporations at a "fairness hearing." This provision of California law may have the effect of making a "cash-out" merger by a majority shareholder more difficult to accomplish. Although Delaware law does not parallel California law in this respect, under some circumstances Section 203 does provide similar protection to shareholders against coercive two-tiered bids for a corporation in which the shareholders are not treated equally. Removal of Directors Under California law, any director or the entire board of directors may be removed, with or without cause, with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. However, in the case of a corporation with cumulative voting or whose board is classified, no individual director may be removed (unless the entire board is removed) if the number of votes cast against such removal would be sufficient to elect the director under cumulative voting rules. The California Articles and California Bylaws do not provide for a classified board of directors or cumulative voting. As a result, Farmer Bros. California directors may be removed, with or without cause, with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. Under Delaware law, any director or the entire board of directors of a corporation that does not have a classified board of directors or cumulative voting may be removed with or without cause with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. Unless the certificate of incorporation otherwise provides, in the case of a Delaware corporation whose board is classified, however, shareholders may effect such removal only for cause. In addition, as in California, if a Delaware corporation has cumulative voting, and if less than the entire board is to be removed, a director may not be removed without cause by a majority of the outstanding shares if the votes cast against such removal would be sufficient to elect the director under cumulative voting rules. Delaware law also permits a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a supermajority voting requirement in connection with the removal of directors. The Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws provide for a classified board of directors but not for cumulative voting, and provide that directors can be removed only for cause and only upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Limitation of Liability and Indemnification California and Delaware have similar laws respecting indemnification by a corporation of its officers, directors, employees and other agents. The laws of both states also permit corporations to adopt a provision in their charters eliminating the liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for breach of the director's fiduciary duty of care. Nonetheless, there are certain differences between the laws of the two states respecting indemnification and limitation of liability. The DGCL was amended in 1986 in response to widespread concern about the ability of Delaware corporations to attract capable directors in light of then- current difficulties in obtaining and maintaining directors and officers insurance. The legislative commentary to the law states that it is "intended to allow Delaware corporations to provide substitute protection, in various forms, to their directors and to limit director liability under certain circumstances." One provision of the revised DGCL permits a corporation to include a provision in its certificate of incorporation which limits or eliminates the personal liability of a director for monetary damages arising from breaches of his or her fiduciary duties to the corporation or its stockholders, subject to certain exceptions. The Delaware Certificate eliminates the liability of directors to the corporation for monetary damages to the fullest extent permissible under Delaware law. Under Delaware law, such provision may not eliminate or limit director monetary liability for: * breaches of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; * acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law; * the payment of unlawful dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or * transactions in which the director received an improper personal benefit. Such limitation of liability provisions also may not limit a director's liability for violation of, or otherwise relieve the Company or its directors from the necessity of complying with federal or state securities laws, or affect the availability of non-monetary remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission. In effect, under the Delaware law provision, Farmer Bros. Delaware directors could not be held liable for monetary damages for gross negligence or lack of due care in carrying out his or her fiduciary duties as a director so long as such gross negligence or lack of due care does not involve bad faith or a breach of his or her duty of loyalty to Farmer Bros. Delaware. The Delaware Certificate provides for indemnification to the maximum extent permissible under Delaware law. Delaware law requires indemnification when there has been a successful defense on the merits or otherwise by a present or former director or officer of the corporation. Delaware law generally permits indemnification of expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred in the defense or settlement of a derivative or third-party action, provided there is a determination by (i) a majority vote of disinterested directors (even though less than a quorum), (ii) a committee comprised of and established by such disinterested directors, (iii) independent legal counsel in a written opinion if there are no such directors or such directors so direct, or (iv) the shareholders that the person seeking indemnification has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct. Without requisite court approval, however, no indemnification may be made in the defense of any derivative action in which the person is found to be liable in the performance of his or her duty to the corporation. Expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending an action may be paid in advance, under Delaware law, if such director or officer undertakes to repay such amounts if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to indemnification. In addition, Delaware law authorizes a corporation to purchase indemnity insurance for the benefit of its officers, directors, employees and agents whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify against the liability covered by the policy. Delaware law permits a Delaware corporation to provide indemnification in excess of that provided by statute by means of any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Delaware law does not require authorizing provisions in the certificate of incorporation and does not contain express prohibitions on indemnification in certain circumstances. Limitations on indemnification may be imposed by a court, however, based on principles of public policy. The California Articles and California Bylaws eliminate the liability of directors to the corporation for monetary damages to the fullest extent permissible under California law. California law does not permit the elimination of monetary liability where such liability is based on: * intentional misconduct or knowing and culpable violation of law; * acts or omissions that a director believes to be contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders or that involve the absence of good faith on the part of the director; * receipt of an improper personal benefit; * acts or omissions that show reckless disregard for the director's duty to the corporation or its shareholders, where the director in the ordinary course of performing a director's duties should be aware of a risk of serious injury to the corporation or its shareholders; * acts or omissions that constitute an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director's duty to the corporation and its shareholders; * transactions between the corporation and a director who has a material financial interest in such transaction; and * liability for improper distributions, loans or guarantees. The California Articles and California Bylaws authorize the Company to indemnify directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by California law. California law requires indemnification when the individual seeking indemnification has defended successfully on the merits any action, claim, issue or matter. California law generally permits indemnification of expenses, actually and reasonably incurred in the defense or settlement of a derivative or third-party action, provided there is a determination by (i) majority vote of a quorum of disinterested directors, (ii) independent legal counsel in a written opinion if such a quorum of directors is not obtainable (iii) shareholders, with the shares owned by the person to be indemnified not being entitled to vote thereon, if any, or (iv) the court in which the proceeding is or was pending upon application made by the corporation, agent or other person rendering services in connection with the defense, whether or not the application by such person is opposed by the corporation, that the person seeking indemnification has satisfied the applicable standard of conduct. With respect to derivative actions, however, no indemnification may be provided under California law for amounts paid in settling or otherwise disposing of a pending action or expenses incurred in defending a pending action that is settled or otherwise disposed of, or with respect to the defense of any person adjudged to be liable to the corporation in the performance of his or her duty to the corporation and its shareholders without court approval. Like Delaware, under California law expenses incurred by an officer or director in defending an action may be paid in advance if such director or officer undertakes to repay such amounts if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to indemnification. In addition, the laws of California also authorize a corporation's purchase of indemnity insurance for the benefit of its officers, directors, employees and agents whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify against the liability covered by the policy. Consistent with Delaware law, California law permits a California corporation to provide rights to indemnification beyond those provided therein except that such additional indemnification must be authorized in the corporation's articles of incorporation. Thus, if so authorized, rights to indemnification may be provided pursuant to agreements or bylaw provisions which make mandatory the permissive indemnification provided by California law. Both the California Articles and California Bylaws provide for indemnification beyond that expressly mandated by California law. Consistent with the provisions of the California Articles and California Bylaws allowing for indemnification in excess of that allowed by statute, the California Bylaws, subject to certain exceptions, provide for indemnification for the settlement of derivative actions and for expenses incurred therein whether or not such settlement was approved by the court. In addition, the California Bylaws also mandate that in the event that California General Corporation Law (the "CGCL") is amended or interpreted judicially so as to permit broader indemnification rights, such broader indemnification rights automatically are made a part of the California Bylaws and supercede any conflicting exceptions to such indemnification. Inspection of Shareholder Lists Both California and Delaware law allow any shareholder to inspect a corporation's shareholder list for a purpose reasonably related to the person's interest as a shareholder. California law provides, in addition, for an absolute right to inspect and copy the corporation's shareholder list by persons holding an aggregate of five percent (5%) or more of the corporation's voting shares, or shareholders holding an aggregate of one percent (1%) or more of such shares who have contested the election of directors. Delaware law also allows the shareholders to inspect the list of shareholders entitled to vote at a meeting within a ten-day period preceding a shareholders' meeting for any purpose germane to the meeting. Delaware law, however, contains no provisions comparable to the absolute right of inspection provided by California law to certain shareholders. Dividends and Repurchases of Shares Delaware law permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or for the preceding fiscal year as long as the amount of capital of the corporation following the declaration and payment of the dividend is not less than the aggregate amount of the capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. In addition, Delaware law generally provides that a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only if the capital of the corporation is not impaired and the redemption or repurchase would not cause an impairment. Under California law, a corporation may not make any distribution to its shareholders unless either: (i) the corporation's retained earnings immediately prior to the proposed distribution equal or exceed the amount of the proposed distribution; or (ii) immediately after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation's assets (exclusive of goodwill, capitalized research and development expenses and deferred charges) would be at least equal to one and one fourth (1 1/4) times its liabilities (not including deferred taxes, deferred income and other deferred credits), and the corporation's current assets would be at least equal to its current liabilities (or one and one fourth (1 1/4) times its current liabilities if the average pre-tax and pre- interest expense earnings for the preceding two fiscal years were less than the average interest expense for such years). These tests are applied on a consolidated basis. Appraisal Rights Under both California and Delaware law, a shareholder of a corporation participating in certain major corporate transactions may, under varying circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights under which the shareholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair market value of his or her shares in place of the consideration he or she would otherwise receive in the transaction. Under Delaware law, such fair market value is determined exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, and appraisal rights are generally not available: (a) with respect to the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the assets of a corporation; (b) with respect to a merger or consolidation by a corporation the shares of which are either listed on a national securities exchange or are held of record by more than 2,000 holders if such shareholders receive only shares of the surviving corporation or shares of any other corporation that are either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares of such corporations or any combination thereof; or (c) to shareholders of a corporation surviving a merger if no vote of the shareholders of the surviving corporation is required to approve the merger under Delaware law. The limitations on the availability of appraisal rights under California law are different from those under Delaware law. Shareholders of a California corporation whose shares are listed on a national securities exchange generally do not have such appraisal rights unless the holders of at least five percent (5%) of the class of outstanding shares claim the right or the corporation or any law restricts the transfer of such shares. Appraisal rights are also unavailable if the shareholders of a corporation or the corporation itself, or both, immediately prior to the reorganization will own immediately after the reorganization equity securities representing more than five-sixths (5/6) of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring corporation or its parent entity. California law generally affords appraisal rights in sale of asset reorganizations. Dissolution Under California law, the holders of fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power may authorize a corporation's dissolution, with or without the approval of the corporation's board of directors, and this right may not be modified by the articles of incorporation. Under Delaware law, unless the board of directors approves the proposal to dissolve, the dissolution must be unanimously approved by all the shareholders entitled to vote on the matter. Only if the dissolution is initially approved by the board of directors may the dissolution be approved by a simple majority of the outstanding shares of the Delaware corporation's stock entitled to vote. In the event of such a board- initiated dissolution, Delaware law allows a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a supermajority (greater than a simple majority) voting requirement in connection with dissolutions. The Delaware Certificate contains no such supermajority voting requirement. Interested Director Transactions Under both California and Delaware law, certain contracts or transactions in which one or more of a corporation's directors has an interest are not void or voidable because of such interest, if certain conditions, such as obtaining the required approval and fulfilling the requirements of good faith and full disclosure, are met. With certain exceptions, the conditions are similar under California and Delaware law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 currently prohibits personal loans to any executive officer or director of a corporation. Shareholder Derivative Suits California law provides that a shareholder bringing a derivative action on behalf of a corporation need not have been a shareholder at the time of the transaction in question, if certain tests are met. Under Delaware law, a shareholder may bring a derivative action on behalf of the corporation only if the shareholder was a shareholder of the corporation at the time of the transaction in question or if his or her stock thereafter came to be owned by him or her by operation of law. California law also provides that the corporation or the defendant in a derivative suit may make a motion to the court for an order requiring the plaintiff shareholder to furnish a security bond. Delaware does not have a similar bonding requirement. Application of the California General Corporation Law to Delaware Corporations Under Section 2115 of the CGCL, certain foreign corporations (i.e., corporations not organized under California law) which have significant contacts with California are subject to a number of provisions of the CGCL. However, an exemption from Section 2115 is provided for corporations whose shares are listed on a major national securities exchange, such as the Nasdaq National Market. Following the Proposed Reincorporation, the Common Stock of Farmer Bros. Delaware will continue to be traded on the Nasdaq National Market and, accordingly, it is expected that Farmer Bros. Delaware will be exempt from Section 2115. In September 2002, California adopted the California Corporate Disclosure Act (the "Act"). The Act went into effect on January 1, 2003, and applies to publicly traded corporations incorporated in California or qualified to do business in California. Thus, the Company will be subject to the Act regardless of whether or not this proposal is passed. The Act greatly increases the annual disclosure that the Company must make to the California Secretary of State. Substantial portions of the Act, however, cover the same general categories of information that the Company includes in its SEC filings. Certain Federal Tax Consequences The following is a discussion of certain United States federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to holders of Farmer Bros. California Common Stock who receive Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock as a result of the Proposed Reincorporation. The discussion does not address all of the tax consequences of the Proposed Reincorporation that may be relevant to particular Farmer Bros. California shareholders, such as non-United States persons, or dealers in securities. Furthermore, no foreign, state, or local tax considerations are addressed herein. THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED REINCORPORATION ARE COMPLEX AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE (EITHER ON A PROSPECTIVE OR RETROACTIVE BASIS), AND THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE DISCUSSION OF ALL THE POSSIBLE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED REINCORPORATION. IN VIEW OF THE VARYING NATURE OF SUCH TAX CONSEQUENCES, EACH SHAREHOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT HIS OR HER OWN TAX ADVISOR AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED REINCORPORATION, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN TAX LAWS. Subject to the limitations, qualifications and exceptions described below, and assuming the Proposed Reincorporation qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), the following tax consequences generally should result: * No gain or loss should be recognized by holders of Farmer Bros. California Common Stock upon receipt of Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock pursuant to the Proposed Reincorporation; * The aggregate tax basis of the Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock received by each shareholder in the Proposed Reincorporation should be equal to the aggregate tax basis of the Farmer Bros. California Common Stock exchanged therefore; and * The holding period of the Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock received by each shareholder of Farmer Bros. California should include the period for which such shareholder held the Farmer Bros. California Common Stock exchanged therefore, provided that such Farmer Bros. California Common Stock was held by the shareholder as a capital asset at the time of the Proposed Reincorporation. The Company has not requested a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") with respect to the federal income tax consequences of the Proposed Reincorporation under the Code. A successful IRS challenge to the Proposed Reincorporation could result in a shareholder recognizing gain or loss with respect to each share of Farmer Bros. California Common Stock exchanged in the Proposed Reincorporation equal to the difference between the shareholder's basis in such share and the fair market value, as of the time of the Proposed Reincorporation, of the Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock received in exchange therefore. In such event, a shareholder's aggregate basis in the shares of Farmer Bros. Delaware Common Stock received in the exchange would equal their fair market value on such date, and the shareholder's holding period for such shares would not include the period during which the shareholder held Farmer Bros. California Common Stock. State, local or foreign income tax consequences to shareholders may vary from the federal tax consequences described above. The Company should not recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of the Proposed Reincorporation, and Farmer Bros. Delaware should succeed, without adjustment, to the federal income tax attributes of Farmer Bros. California. Investment Company Act Concerns have been raised by the SEC Staff that the Company may be an unregistered investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the ICA, because the fair market value of its securities exceeds 50 percent of the total book value of its assets as of June 30, 2003. The Company believes, after consultation with counsel, that it is primarily engaged in the coffee business and that it is not an investment company under this Section or any other section of the ICA. If the Company were ever found to be an investment company, in order to remain in the coffee business, the Company would have to reduce the amount of its securities that it owns, which reduction could be accomplished in a variety of ways including, without limitation, by making acquisitions, repurchasing shares, or paying a special dividend. The Company might not be able to implement this proposal to reincorporate in Delaware if the Company were found to be an unregistered investment company. Recommendation: Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposal to reincorporate the Company in the State of Delaware. Due to the potentially broader indemnification and other protections afforded to directors under Delaware law, the members of the Board may have interests in the reincorporation that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of the Company's shareholders. PROPOSAL THREE(B): ELIMINATION OF THE RIGHT OF SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT Under California and Delaware law, shareholders are permitted to act by written consent in lieu of a shareholder meeting. The California Bylaws currently permit shareholders to take action by written consent, provided that the consent is signed by the minimum number of shareholders necessary to authorize such action at a meeting where all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and vote. In the case of election of directors, such consent is only effective if signed by the holders of all outstanding shares entitled to vote for the election of directors. The Board proposes to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate that would eliminate the right of shareholders to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting. Accordingly, all shareholder action must be carried out by a shareholder vote at a shareholder meeting. Actions by written consent require neither a meeting, prior notice or a formal voting process. The Board believes that elimination of actions by written consent would enhance the Board's and shareholders' opportunity to consider shareholder proposals at a meeting where all views can be heard and with sufficient time to permit the exchange of views to facilitate the informed exercise of the shareholder franchise. In addition, the Board is aware that the use of certain takeover tactics in recent years combined with the written consent process, can be highly disruptive to a corporation as well as divert valuable corporate resources and place undue pressure on a corporation's board and shareholders to act hastily and without complete information. These tactics can also result in a lost opportunity to consider fully all available alternatives before shareholders are forced to act. The Board believes the best interests of the Company's shareholders will be served by establishing appropriate defenses to coercive tender offers or other coercive efforts to gain control of the Company. Shareholders, however, should be aware that elimination of the shareholders' right to act by written consent may lengthen the amount of time to take certain shareholder actions because certain actions by written consent are not subject to the minimum notice requirement of a shareholders' meeting. The elimination of shareholders' right to act by written consent may deter or make more difficult hostile takeover attempts because of the lengthened shareholder approval process. Without the ability to act by written consent, a holder or a group of holders controlling a majority in interest of Farmer Bros. Delaware's capital stock will not be able to amend the Delaware By-Laws or remove directors for cause pursuant to a written consent. Any such holder or group of holders would have to wait until a shareholders' meeting was held to take any action. For additional discussion, see "Proposal Three(A): The Proposed Reincorporation - Anti-takeover Measures," above. Vote Required for Proposal Three(B) The approval of Proposal Three(B) will require the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of outstanding common stock of the Company. The effect of an abstention or a broker non-vote is the same as that of a vote against Proposal Three(B). A failure to approve Proposal Three(B) will result in a failure to approve the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal Three(A)) and all the other Proposed Anti-takeover Measures (Proposals Three(B)-(F)). Recommendation: Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposal to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate that would eliminate the right of shareholders to act by written consent. PROPOSAL THREE(C): IMPLEMENTATION OF A CLASSIFIED BOARD OF DIRECTORS A classified board is one on which a certain number, but not all, of the directors are elected on a rotating basis each year. Under California law, a corporation generally may provide for a classified board of directors by adopting amendments to its articles of incorporation or bylaws, if the amendments are also approved by the shareholders. Under California law, a classified board with two classes requires a minimum of six directors and a classified board with three classes requires a minimum of nine directors. The California Articles and California Bylaws do not currently provide for a classified board. Delaware law permits, but does not require, a classified board of directors under which the directors can be divided into as many as three classes with staggered terms of office, with only one class of directors standing for election each year. Delaware, unlike California, does not require a minimum of three directors in each class. The Board proposes to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate and Delaware Bylaws providing for a classified board of three classes, with directors elected to three year terms. Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number of directors constituting the entire board of directors. Class I would consist of three directors (initially, Lewis A. Coffman, Roy F. Farmer, John Samore, Jr.) who would hold office initially for a one year term expiring at the 2004 Annual Meeting, Class II would consist of two directors (initially, Guenter W. Berger and Thomas A. Maloof) who would hold office initially for a two year term expiring at the 2005 Annual Meeting, and Class III would consist of two directors (initially, Roy E. Farmer and John H. Merrell) who would hold office initially for a three year term expiring at the 2006 Annual Meeting, in all cases subject to the election and qualification of the their successors and to their earlier death, resignation or removal. As a result of the classification of directors, it will take at least two years in order to effect a change to the majority of the members of the Board. At each Annual Meeting following this initial classification and election, the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at that meeting would be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding Annual Meeting after their election and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. The Board believes that classification will promote continuity and stability in the Company's management and policies since a majority of the Company's directors at any given time will have prior experience with the Company. The Board also believes that the classified board proposal will facilitate long- range planning. Currently, our entire Board stands for election at each Annual Meeting. Accordingly, although the Company has not experienced problems with continuity with its Board or management in the past, it is possible that all or a majority of the current directors could be replaced at any given Annual Meeting. The Board of Farmer Bros. Delaware will be divided into three classes upon approval of the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal Three(A)) and all the other Proposed Anti-takeover Measures (Proposals Three(B)-(F)), only one of which classes will stand for election at each Annual Meeting thereafter. In addition, a classified board reduces the possibility of a sudden change in control of a board. The Board believes that a classified board will help insure that if the Board is faced with an unsolicited offer for the Company, it will have sufficient time to evaluate all relevant alternatives and, if appropriate, will have increased negotiating leverage so as to be in the best position to maximize shareholder value. In addition, the Board believes that a classified board will assist the Company in dealing with, and possibly deterring proxy contests that, while unrelated to a takeover offer, may distract the Board in carrying out its duties to the Company and its shareholders. Shareholders, however, should be aware that a classified board may discourage proxy contests or hostile takeovers by making it more difficult for an acquiror or a dissident shareholder group to obtain control without the approval of the Board. For additional discussion, see "Proposal Three(A): The Proposed Reincorporation - Anti-takeover Measures," above. Vote Required for Proposal Three(C) The approval of Proposal Three(C) will require the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of outstanding common stock of the Company. The effect of an abstention or a broker non-vote is the same as that of a vote against Proposal Three(C). A failure to approve Proposal Three(C) will result in a failure to approve the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal Three(A)) and all the other Proposed Anti-takeover Measures (Proposals Three(B)-(F)). Recommendation: Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposal to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws implementing a classified Board of Directors. PROPOSAL THREE(D): ELIMINATION OF RIGHT TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS Under California law and the California Bylaws, a special meeting of shareholders may be called by the Board, the Chairman of the Board, the President, the holders of shares entitled to cast not less than ten percent (10%) of the votes at such meeting and such additional persons as are authorized by the articles of incorporation or the bylaws. Under Delaware law, a special meeting of shareholders may be called by the board of directors or any other person authorized to do so in the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws. The Board proposes to include in the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws a provision authorizing the Chairman of the Board, the President and the Board to call a special meeting of shareholders. Therefore, holders of ten percent (10%) or more of the voting shares of the Company will no longer be able to call a special meeting of shareholders. The Board believes that elimination of the procedures for shareholders to call special meetings may prevent proxy contest initiated by shareholders in between annual meetings that may be disruptive to, and distract, management and the Board in carrying out their respective duties to the Company and its shareholders. Shareholders, however, should be aware that elimination of the procedures for shareholders to call special meetings could discourage or make more difficult efforts by potential bidders to obtain control of the Company, including, without limitation, through a tender offer or a proxy contests, and, therefore, could have the effect of deterring or delaying efforts to seek control of the Company on a basis which some shareholders may deem favorable. For additional discussion, see "Proposal Three(A): The Proposed Reincorporation - Anti- takeover Measures," above. Vote Required for Proposal Three(D) The approval of Proposal Three(D) will require the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of outstanding common stock of the Company. The effect of an abstention or a broker non-vote is the same as that of a vote against Proposal Three(D). A failure to approve Proposal Three(D) will result in a failure to approve the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal Three(A)) and all the other Proposed Anti-takeover Measures (Proposals Three(B)-(F)). Recommendation: Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposal to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws eliminating the right of shareholders holding ten percent (10%) or more of the voting shares to call a special meeting of the shareholders. PROPOSAL THREE(E): ELIMINATION OF CUMULATIVE VOTING FOR DIRECTORS Cumulative voting entitles a shareholder to cast as many votes as there are directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares registered in such shareholder's name. The shareholder may cast all of such votes for a single nominee or may distribute them among any two or more nominees. Under California law, shareholders of a corporation have the right to cumulative voting unless a corporation has outstanding shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange, or has outstanding securities qualified for trading on the Nasdaq National Market and opts out of cumulative voting. The Company's shareholders have previously chosen to eliminate the right to cumulative voting by prohibiting cumulative voting in the California Bylaws. Therefore, shareholders currently do not have the right to cumulative voting. Mitchell Partners, L.P. has proposed an amendment to the Company's California Bylaws that would restore cumulative voting. See Proposal Four. If the Reincorporation Proposal is approved by the Company's shareholders, Proposal Four will have no effect even if it is passed by the Company's shareholders because it proposes to amend the California Bylaws, which, upon consummation of the Merger, will no longer be effective. Under Delaware law, cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted unless specifically provided for in a company's charter or bylaws. The Board has proposed to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate that will specifically prohibit cumulative voting because the Board believes that all directors should be elected by a plurality of votes of shareholders. The Board recommends elimination of cumulative voting because one of the principal results of cumulative voting is to make it more likely that an individual or group of individuals, owning less than a plurality of the Company's voting stock, could obtain representation on the Board. Such an individual or group may have interests and goals inconsistent with, or even actively conflicting with, the best interests of a majority of the shareholders. Dissident directors may distract the remaining Board members from carrying out their duties to the Company and its shareholders and may also deter qualified directors from agreeing to serve on the Board. Shareholders, however, should be aware that if the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal Three(A)) and all the other Proposed Anti-takeover Measures (Proposals Three(B)-(F)) are approved, the ability of an organized block of minority shareholders to elect a representative to the Board without the cooperation of shareholders owning a plurality of the voting shares would be reduced or eliminated. Under some circumstances the elimination of cumulative voting could have an anti-takeover effect by making it more difficult for a hostile acquiror holding a minority block of stock from obtaining a foothold on the Board. Under other circumstances, however, the existence of cumulative voting can have an anti-takeover effect by making it more difficult for a hostile potential acquiror who obtains a majority but not all shares from consolidating control of the Company. For additional discussion, see "Proposal Three(A): The Proposed Reincorporation - Anti-takeover Measures," above. Vote Required for Proposal Three(E) The approval of Proposal Three(E) will require the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of outstanding common stock of the Company. The effect of an abstention or a broker non-vote is the same as that of a vote against Proposal Three(E). A failure to approve Proposal Three(E) will result in a failure to approve the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal Three(A)) and all the other Proposed Anti-takeover Measures (Proposals Three(B)-(F)). Recommendation: Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the proposal to include a provision in the Delaware Certificate that will eliminate cumulative voting for directors. EX-99 7 certincdela.txt DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF FARMER BROS. CO. First : The name of the Corporation is Farmer Bros. Co. (the "Corporation"). Second : The address of the registered office of the Corporation in the State of Delaware is 2711 Centerville Road, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle. The name of its registered agent at that address is Corporation Service Company. Third : The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "GCL"). Fourth : (a) Authorized Capital Stock. The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 25,500,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of (i) 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 (the "Common Stock"), and (ii) 500,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Preferred Stock"). (b) No Cumulative Voting. The holders of shares of Common Stock shall not have cumulative voting rights. (c) No Preemptive or Subscription Rights. No holder of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to preemptive or subscription rights. (d) Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors is hereby expressly authorized to provide for the issuance of all or any shares of the Preferred Stock in one or more classes or series, and to fix for each such class or series such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issuance of such class or series, including, without limitation, the authority to provide that any such class or series may be (i) subject to redemption at such time or times and at such price or prices; (ii) entitled to receive dividends (which may be cumulative or non- cumulative) at such rates, on such conditions, and at such times, and payable in preference to, or in such relation to, the dividends payable on any other class or classes or any other series; (iii) entitled to such rights upon the dissolution of, or upon any distribution of the assets of, the Corporation; or (iv) convertible into, or exchangeable for, shares of any other class or classes of stock, or of any other series of the same or any other class or classes of stock, of the Corporation at such price or prices or at such rates of exchange and with such adjustments; all as may be stated in such resolution or resolutions. (e) Power to Sell and Purchase Shares. Subject to the requirements of applicable law, the Corporation shall have the power to issue and sell all or any part of any shares of any class of stock herein or hereafter authorized to such persons, and for such consideration, as the Board of Directors shall from time to time, in its discretion, determine, whether or not greater consideration could be received upon the issue or sale of the same number of shares of another class, and as otherwise permitted by law. Subject to the requirements of applicable law, the Corporation shall have the power to purchase any shares of any class of stock herein or hereafter authorized from such persons, and for such consideration, as the Board of Directors shall from time to time, in its discretion, determine, whether or not less consideration could be paid upon the purchase of the same number of shares of another class, and as otherwise permitted by law. Fifth : The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and for further definition, limitation and regulation of the powers of the Corporation and of its directors and stockholders: (a) The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors. (b) The Board of Directors shall consist of not less than five or more than seven members, the exact number of which shall be fixed from time to time by resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the active Board of Directors. (c) The directors shall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number of directors constituting the entire Board of Directors. The initial division of the Board of Directors into classes shall be made by the decision of the affirmative vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors. The term of the initial Class I directors shall terminate on the date of the 2004 annual meeting; the term of the initial Class II directors shall terminate on the date of the 2005 annual meeting; and the term of the initial Class III directors shall terminate on the date of the 2006 annual meeting. At each succeeding annual meeting of stockholders beginning in 2005, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at that annual meeting shall be elected for a three-year term. If the number of directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any additional director of any class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of that class, but in no case will a decrease in the number of directors shorten the term of any incumbent director. (d) A director shall hold office until the annual meeting for the year in which his or her term expires and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify, subject, however, to prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office. (e) Subject to the terms of any one or more classes or series of Preferred Stock, any vacancy on the Board of Directors that results from an increase in the number of directors may be filled by a majority of the Board of Directors then in office, provided that a quorum is present, and any other vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors may be filled by a majority of the Board of Directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Any director of any class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors of such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of that class. Any director elected to fill a vacancy not resulting from an increase in the number of directors shall have the same remaining term as that of his predecessor. Subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of shares of Preferred Stock then outstanding, any or all of the directors of the Corporation may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the Corporation's then outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whenever the holders of any one or more classes or series of Preferred Stock issued by the Corporation shall have the right, voting separately by class or series, to elect directors at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, the election, term of office, filling of vacancies and other features of such directorships shall be governed by the terms of this Certificate of Incorporation applicable thereto, and such directors so elected shall not be divided into classes pursuant to this Article FIFTH unless expressly provided by such terms. (f) In addition to the powers and authority hereinbefore or by statute expressly conferred upon them, the directors are hereby empowered to exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things as may be exercised or done by the Corporation, subject, nevertheless, to the provisions of the GCL, this Certificate of Incorporation, and any By-Laws adopted by the stockholders; provided, however, that no By-Laws hereafter adopted by the stockholders shall invalidate any prior act of the directors which would have been valid if such By-Laws had not been adopted. Sixth : No director shall be personally liable to the Corporation or any of its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the GCL as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. If the GCL is amended hereafter to authorize the further elimination or limitation of the liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent authorized by the GCL, as so amended. Any repeal or modification of this Article SIXTH shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to such repeal or modification. Seventh : The Corporation shall indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by law, as now or hereafter in effect, and such right to indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the Corporation and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives; provided, however, that, except for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, the Corporation shall not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer (or his or her heirs, executors or personal or legal representatives) in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized or consented to by the Board of Directors. The right to indemnification conferred by this Article SEVENTH shall include the right to be paid by the Corporation the expenses incurred in defending or otherwise participating in any proceeding in advance of its final disposition. The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of the Corporation similar to those conferred in this Article SEVENTH to directors and officers of the Corporation. The rights to indemnification and to the advance of expenses conferred in this Article SEVENTH shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire under this Certificate of Incorporation, the By-Laws of the Corporation, any statute, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Any repeal or modification of this Article SEVENTH shall not adversely affect any rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses of a director or officer of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification with respect to any acts or omissions occurring prior to such repeal or modification. Eighth : Any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation, and the ability of the stockholders to consent in writing to the taking of any action is hereby specifically denied. Ninth : Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Delaware, as the By-Laws may provide. The books of the Corporation may be kept (subject to any provision contained in the GCL) outside the State of Delaware at such place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or in the By-Laws of the Corporation. Tenth : Unless otherwise required by law, Special Meetings of Stockholders, for any purpose or purposes, may be called by either (i) the Chairman of the Board of Directors, if there be one, (ii) the President or (iii) the Board of Directors. The ability of the stockholders to call a Special Meeting of Stockholders is hereby specifically denied. Eleventh : In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred upon it by the laws of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors shall have the power to adopt, amend, alter or repeal the Corporation's By-Laws. The affirmative vote of at least a majority of the entire Board of Directors shall be required to adopt, amend, alter or repeal the Corporation's By-Laws. The Corporation's By-Laws also may be adopted, amended, altered or repealed by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. Twelfth : The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate of Incorporation in the manner now or hereafter prescribed in this Certificate of Incorporation, the Corporation's By-Laws or the GCL, and all rights herein conferred upon stockholders are granted subject to such reservation; provided, however, that, notwithstanding any other provision of this Certificate of Incorporation (and in addition to any other vote that may be required by law), the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors shall be required to amend, alter, change or repeal, or to adopt any provision as part of this Certificate of Incorporation inconsistent with the purpose and intent of Articles FIFTH, EIGHTH, TENTH and ELEVENTH of this Certificate of Incorporation or this Article TWELFTH. Thirteenth : The name and mailing address of the Sole Incorporator is as follows: Name: Mary E. Keogh Address: P.O. Box 636, Wilmington, DE 19899 I, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the Sole Incorporator hereinbefore named, for the purpose of forming a corporation pursuant to the GCL, do make this Certificate, hereby declaring and certifying that this is my act and deed and the facts herein stated are true, and accordingly have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of February, 2004. /s/ Mary E. Keogh Name: Mary E. Keogh Title: Sole Incorporator EX-99 8 delbylawsrev3a.txt DELAWARE BY-LAWS BY-LAWS OF FARMER BROS. CO. a Delaware Corporation Adopted as of: February 17, 2004 Amended as of: March 4, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I OFFICES 1.1 Registered Office 1 1.2 Other Offices 1 ARTICLE II MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS 1 2.1 Place of Meetings 1 2.2 Annual Meetings 1 2.3 Nature of Business at Meetings of Stockholders 1 2.4 Nomination of Directors 2 2.5 Special Meetings 4 2.6 Notice 4 2.7 Adjournments 4 2.8 Quorum 4 2.9 Voting 4 2.1 Proxies 5 2.11 List of Stockholders Entitled to Vote 5 2.12 Record Date 6 2.13 Stock Ledger 6 2.14 Conduct of Meetings 6 2.15 Inspectors of Election 7 ARTICLE III DIRECTORS 7 3.1 Number and Election of Directors 7 3.2 Vacancies 7 3.3 Duties and Powers 8 3.4 Meetings 8 3.5 Organization 8 3.6 Resignations and Removals of Directors 8 3.7 Quorum 8 3.8 Actions of the Board by Written Consent 9 3.9 Meetings by Means of Conference Telephone 9 3.1 Committees 9 3.11 Compensation 9 3.12 Interested Directors 9 ARTICLE IV OFFICERS 10 4.1 General 10 4.2 Election 10 4.3 Voting Securities Owned by the Corporation 10 4.4 Chairman of the Board of Directors 11 4.5 President 11 4.6 Vice Presidents 11 4.7 Secretary 12 4.8 Treasurer 12 4.9 Assistant Secretaries 12 4.1 Assistant Treasurers 13 4.11 Other Officers 13 ARTICLE V STOCK 13 5.1 Form of Certificates 13 5.2 Signatures 13 5.3 Lost Certificates 13 5.4 Transfers 14 5.5 Dividend Record Date 14 5.6 Record Owners 14 5.7 Transfer and Registry Agents 14 ARTICLE VI NOTICES 15 6.1 Notices 15 6.2 Waivers of Notice 15 ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS 15 7.1 Dividends 15 7.2 Disbursements 15 7.3 Fiscal Year 16 7.4 Corporate Seal 16 ARTICLE VIII INDEMNIFICATION 16 8.1 Power to Indemnify in Actions, Suits or Proceedings other than Those by or in the Right of the Corporation 16 8.2 Power to Indemnify in Actions, Suits or Proceedings by or in the Right of the Corporation 16 8.3 Authorization of Indemnification 17 8.4 Good Faith Defined 17 8.5 Indemnification by a Court 17 8.6 Expenses Payable in Advance 18 8.7 Nonexclusivity of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses 18 8.8 Insurance 18 8.9 Certain Definitions 18 8.1 Survival of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses 19 8.11 Limitation on Indemnification 19 8.12 Indemnification of Employees and Agents 19 ARTICLE IX AMENDMENTS 19 9.1 Amendments 19 9.2 Entire Board of Directors 20 BY-LAWS OF FARMER BROS. CO. a Delaware Corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") ARTICLE I OFFICES 1.1 Registered Office. The registered office of the Corporation shall be in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, State of Delaware. 1.2 Other Offices. The Corporation may also have offices at such other places, both within and without the State of Delaware, as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine. ARTICLE II MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS 2.1 Place of Meetings. Meetings of the stockholders for the election of directors or for any other purpose shall be held at such time and place, either within or without the State of Delaware, as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors. 2.2 Annual Meetings. The Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the election of directors shall be held on such date and at such time as shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors. Any other proper business may be transacted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 2.3 Nature of Business at Meetings of Stockholders. No business may be transacted at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than business that is either (a) specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (or any duly authorized committee thereof), (b) otherwise properly brought before the Annual Meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (or any duly authorized committee thereof), or (c) otherwise properly brought before the Annual Meeting by any stockholder of the Corporation (i) who is a stockholder of record on the date of the giving of the notice provided for in this Section 2.3 and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at such Annual Meeting and (ii) who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 2.3. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for business to be properly brought before an Annual Meeting by a stockholder, such stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a stockholder's notice to the Secretary must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the Annual Meeting is called for a date that is not within thirty (30) days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting was made, whichever first occurs. To be in proper written form, a stockholder's notice to the Secretary must set forth as to each matter such stockholder proposes to bring before the Annual Meeting (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the Annual Meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the Annual Meeting, (ii) the name and record address of such stockholder, (iii) the class or series and number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder, (iv) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such business by such stockholder and any material interest of such stockholder in such business and (v) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to bring such business before the meeting. No business shall be conducted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders except business brought before the Annual Meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 2.3; provided, however, that, once business has been properly brought before the Annual Meeting in accordance with such procedures, nothing in this Section 2.3 shall be deemed to preclude discussion by any stockholder of any such business. If the chairman of an Annual Meeting determines that business was not properly brought before the Annual Meeting in accordance with the foregoing procedures, the chairman shall declare to the meeting that the business was not properly brought before the meeting and such business shall not be transacted. 2.4 Nomination of Directors. Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the following procedures shall be eligible for election as directors of the Corporation, except as may be otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation with respect to the right of holders of preferred stock of the Corporation to nominate and elect a specified number of directors in certain circumstances. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at any Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or at any Special Meeting of Stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, (a) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (or any duly authorized committee thereof) or (b) by any stockholder of the Corporation (i) who is a stockholder of record on the date of the giving of the notice provided for in this Section 2.4 and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting and (ii) who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this Section 2.4. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for a nomination to be made by a stockholder, such stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a stockholder's notice to the Secretary must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Corporation (a) in the case of an Annual Meeting, not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the Annual Meeting is called for a date that is not within thirty (30) days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting was made, whichever first occurs; and (b) in the case of a Special Meeting of Stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which notice of the date of the Special Meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the Special Meeting was made, whichever first occurs. To be in proper written form, a stockholder's notice to the Secretary must set forth (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the person, (iii) the class or series and number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are owned beneficially or of record by the person and (iv) any other information relating to the person that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice (i) the name and record address of such stockholder, (ii) the class or series and number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder, (iii) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and each proposed nominee and any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the nomination(s) are to be made by such stockholder, (iv) a representation that such stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the persons named in its notice and (v) any other information relating to such stockholder that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Such notice must be accompanied by a written consent of each proposed nominee to being named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. No person shall be eligible for election as a director of the Corporation unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section 2.4. If the Chairman of the meeting determines that a nomination was not made in accordance with the foregoing procedures, the Chairman shall declare to the meeting that the nomination was defective and such defective nomination shall be disregarded. 2.5 Special Meetings. Unless otherwise required by law or by the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation, as amended and restated from time to time (the "Certificate of Incorporation"), Special Meetings of Stockholders, for any purpose or purposes, may be called by either (i) the Chairman, if there be one, (ii) the President or (iii) the Board of Directors. At a Special Meeting of Stockholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall be specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto). 2.6 Notice. Whenever stockholders are required or permitted to take any action at a meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given which shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting, and, in the case of a Special Meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called. Unless otherwise required by law, written notice of any meeting shall be given not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting. 2.7 Adjournments. Any meeting of the stockholders may be adjourned from time to time to reconvene at the same or some other place, and notice need not be given of any such adjourned meeting if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. At the adjourned meeting, the Corporation may transact any business which might have been transacted at the original meeting. If the adjournment is for more than thirty (30) days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the adjourned meeting in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.6 hereof shall be given to each stockholder of record entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. 2.8 Quorum. Unless otherwise required by applicable law or the Certificate of Incorporation, the holders of a majority of the Corporation's capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the stockholders for the transaction of business. A quorum, once established, shall not be broken by the withdrawal of enough votes to leave less than a quorum. If, however, such quorum shall not be present or represented at any meeting of the stockholders, the stockholders entitled to vote thereat, present in person or represented by proxy, shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time, in the manner provided in Section 2.7 hereof, until a quorum shall be present or represented. 2.9 Voting. Unless otherwise required by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws, any question brought before any meeting of the stockholders, other than the election of directors, shall be decided by the vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of votes of the Corporation's capital stock represented and entitled to vote thereat, voting as a single class. Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, and subject to Section 2.12 of this Article II, each stockholder represented at a meeting of the stockholders shall be entitled to cast one (1) vote for each share of the capital stock entitled to vote thereat held by such stockholder. Such votes may be cast in person or by proxy as provided in Section 2.10 of this Article II. The Board of Directors, in its discretion, or the officer of the Corporation presiding at a meeting of the stockholders, in such officer's discretion, may require that any votes cast at such meeting shall be cast by written ballot. 2.10 Proxies. Each stockholder entitled to vote at a meeting of the stockholders may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy, but no such proxy shall be voted upon after three years from its date, unless such proxy provides for a longer period. Without limiting the manner in which a stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy, the following shall constitute a valid means by which a stockholder may grant such authority: (i) A stockholder may execute a writing authorizing another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy. Execution may be accomplished by the stockholder or such stockholder's authorized officer, director, employee or agent signing such writing or causing such person's signature to be affixed to such writing by any reasonable means, including, but not limited to, by facsimile signature. (ii) A stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder as proxy by transmitting or authorizing the transmission of a telegram or cablegram to the person who will be the holder of the proxy or to a proxy solicitation firm, proxy support service organization or like agent duly authorized by the person who will be the holder of the proxy to receive such telegram or cablegram, provided that any such telegram or cablegram must either set forth or be submitted with information from which it can be determined that the telegram or cablegram was authorized by the stockholder. If it is determined that such telegrams or cablegrams are valid, the inspectors or, if there are no inspectors, such other persons making that determination shall specify the information on which they relied. Any copy, facsimile telecommunication or other reliable reproduction of the writing, telegram or cablegram authorizing another person or persons to act as proxy for a stockholder may be substituted or used in lieu of the original writing, telegram or cablegram for any and all purposes for which the original writing, telegram or cablegram could be used; provided, however, that such copy, facsimile telecommunication or other reproduction shall be a complete reproduction of the entire original writing, telegram or cablegram. 2.11 List of Stockholders Entitled to Vote. The officer of the Corporation who has charge of the stock ledger of the Corporation shall prepare and make, at least ten (10) days before every meeting of the stockholders, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, and showing the address of each stockholder and the number of shares registered in the name of each stockholder. Such list shall be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting (i) either at a place within the city where the meeting is to be held, which place shall be specified in the notice of the meeting, or, if not so specified, at the place where the meeting is to be held or (ii) during ordinary business hours, at the principal place of business of the Corporation. The list shall also be produced and kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by any stockholder who is present. 2.12 Record Date. In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of the stockholders or any adjournment thereof, the Board of Directors may fix a record date, which record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors, and which record date shall not be more than sixty (60) nor less than ten (10) days before the date of such meeting. If no record date is fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of the stockholders shall be at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which notice is given, or, if notice is waived, at the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held. A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting of the stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of the meeting; provided, however, that the Board of Directors may fix a new record date for the adjourned meeting. 2.13 Stock Ledger. The stock ledger of the Corporation shall be the only evidence as to who are the stockholders entitled to examine the stock ledger, the list required by Section 10 of this Article II or the books of the Corporation, or to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders. 2.14 Conduct of Meetings. The Board of Directors of the Corporation may adopt by resolution such rules and regulations for the conduct of any meeting of the stockholders as it shall deem appropriate. Except to the extent inconsistent with such rules and regulations as adopted by the Board of Directors, the chairman of any meeting of the stockholders shall have the right and authority to prescribe such rules, regulations and procedures and to do all such acts as, in the judgment of such chairman, are appropriate for the proper conduct of the meeting. Such rules, regulations or procedures, whether adopted by the Board of Directors or prescribed by the chairman of the meeting, may include, without limitation, the following: (i) the establishment of an agenda or order of business for the meeting; (ii) the determination of when the polls shall open and close for any given matter to be voted on at the meeting; (iii) rules and procedures for maintaining order at the meeting and the safety of those present; (iv) limitations on attendance at or participation in the meeting to stockholders of record of the Corporation, their duly authorized and constituted proxies or such other persons as the chairman of the meeting shall determine; (v) restrictions on entry to the meeting after the time fixed for the commencement thereof; and (vi) limitations on the time allotted to questions or comments by participants. 2.15 Inspectors of Election. In advance of any meeting of the stockholders, the Board of Directors, by resolution, the Chairman or the President shall appoint one or more inspectors to act at the meeting and make a written report thereof. One or more other persons may be designated as alternate inspectors to replace any inspector who fails to act. If no inspector or alternate is able to act at a meeting of the stockholders, the chairman of the meeting shall appoint one or more inspectors to act at the meeting. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, inspectors may be officers, employees or agents of the Corporation. Each inspector, before entering upon the discharge of the duties of inspector, shall take and sign an oath faithfully to execute the duties of inspector with strict impartiality and according to the best of such inspector's ability. The inspector shall have the duties prescribed by law and shall take charge of the polls and, when the vote is completed, shall make a certificate of the result of the vote taken and of such other facts as may be required by applicable law. ARTICLE III DIRECTORS 3.1 Number and Election of Directors. The number of directors shall be determined by the Certificate of Incorporation. The directors shall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number of directors constituting the entire Board of Directors. The initial division of the Board of Directors into classes shall be made by the decision of the affirmative vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors. The term of the initial Class I directors shall terminate on the date of the 2004 Annual Meeting; the term of the initial Class II directors shall terminate on the date of the 2005 Annual Meeting; and the term of the initial Class III directors shall terminate on the date of the 2006 Annual Meeting or, in each case, upon such director's earlier death, resignation or removal. At each succeeding Annual Meeting of Stockholders beginning in 2004, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at that Annual Meeting shall be elected for a three-year term and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. If the number of directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any additional director of any class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in such class or from the removal from office, death, disability, resignation or disqualification of a director or other cause shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of that class, but in no case will a decrease in the number of directors have the effect of removing or shortening the term of any incumbent director. 3.2 Vacancies. Any vacancy on the Board of Directors that results from an increase in the number of directors may be filled by a majority of the Board of Directors then in office, provided that a quorum is present, and any other vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors may be filled by a majority of the Board of Directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Any director of any class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors of such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of that class. Any director elected to fill a vacancy not resulting from an increase in the number of directors shall have the same remaining term as that of his or her predecessor. 3.3 Duties and Powers. The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors which may exercise all such powers of the Corporation and do all such lawful acts and things as are not by statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these By-Laws required to be exercised or done by the stockholders. 3.4 Meetings. The Board of Directors may hold meetings, both regular and special, either within or without the State of Delaware. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors may be held without notice at such time and at such place as may from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors. Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the Chairman, if there be one, the President, or by any two directors. Notice thereof stating the place, date and hour of the meeting shall be given to each director either by mail not less than forty-eight (48) hours before the date of the meeting, by telephone or telegram on twenty-four (24) hours' notice, or on such shorter notice as the person or persons calling such meeting may deem necessary or appropriate in the circumstances. 3.5 Organization. At each meeting of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or, in his or her absence, a director chosen by a majority of the directors present, shall act as chairman. The Secretary of the Corporation shall act as secretary at each meeting of the Board of Directors. In case the Secretary shall be absent from any meeting of the Board of Directors, an Assistant Secretary shall perform the duties of secretary at such meeting; and in the absence from any such meeting of the Secretary and all the Assistant Secretaries, the chairman of the meeting may appoint any person to act as secretary of the meeting. 3.6 Resignations and Removals of Directors. Any director of the Corporation may resign at any time, by giving notice in writing to the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or the Secretary of the Corporation. Such resignation shall take effect at the time therein specified or, if no time is specified, immediately; and, unless otherwise specified in such notice, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. Except as otherwise required by applicable law and subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of shares of preferred stock then outstanding, any director or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause, and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in the election of directors. 3.7 Quorum. Except as otherwise required by law or the Certificate of Incorporation, at all meetings of the Board of Directors, a majority of the entire Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and the act of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which there is a quorum shall be the act of the Board of Directors. If a quorum shall not be present at any meeting of the Board of Directors, the directors present thereat may adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting of the time and place of the adjourned meeting, until a quorum shall be present. 3.8 Actions of the Board by Written Consent. Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws, any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting, if all the members of the Board of Directors or committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in writing, and the writing or writings are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or committee. 3.9 Meetings by Means of Conference Telephone. Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws, members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, or any committee thereof, may participate in a meeting of the Board of Directors or such committee by means of a conference telephone or other communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other, and participation in a meeting pursuant to this Section 3.9 shall constitute presence in person at such meeting. 3.10 Committees. The Board of Directors may designate one or more committees, each committee to consist of one or more of the directors of the Corporation. The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of any such committee. In the absence or disqualification of a member of a committee, and in the absence of a designation by the Board of Directors of an alternate member to replace the absent or disqualified member, the member or members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, whether or not such member or members constitute a quorum, may unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in the place of any absent or disqualified member. Any committee, to the extent permitted by law and provided in the resolution establishing such committee, shall have and may exercise all the powers and authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation, and may authorize the seal of the Corporation to be affixed to all papers which may require it. Each committee shall keep regular minutes and report to the Board of Directors when required. 3.11 Compensation. The directors may be paid their expenses, if any, of attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors and may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or a stated salary for service as director, payable in cash or securities. No such payment shall preclude any director from serving the Corporation in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefor. Members of special or standing committees may be allowed like compensation for service as committee members. 3.12 Interested Directors. No contract or transaction between the Corporation and one or more of its directors or officers, or between the Corporation and any other corporation, partnership, association or other organization in which one or more of its directors or officers are directors or officers or have a financial interest, shall be void or voidable solely for this reason, or solely because the director or officer is present at or participates in the meeting of the Board of Directors or committee thereof which authorizes the contract or transaction, or solely because any such director's or officer's vote is counted for such purpose if: (i) the material facts as to the director's or officer's relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the Board of Directors or the committee, and the Board of Directors or committee in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by the affirmative votes of a majority of the disinterested directors, even though the disinterested directors be less than a quorum; or (ii) the material facts as to the director's or officer's relationship or interest and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known to the stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the contract or transaction is specifically approved in good faith by vote of the stockholders; or (iii) the contract or transaction is fair as to the Corporation as of the time it is authorized, approved or ratified by the Board of Directors, a committee thereof or the stockholders. Common or interested directors may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting of the Board of Directors or of a committee which authorizes the contract or transaction. ARTICLE IV OFFICERS 4.1 General. The officers of the Corporation shall be chosen by the Board of Directors and shall be a President, a Secretary and a Treasurer. The Board of Directors, in its discretion, also may choose a Chairman of the Board of Directors (who must be a director) and one or more Vice Presidents, Assistant Secretaries, Assistant Treasurers and other officers. Any number of offices may be held by the same person, unless otherwise prohibited by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws. The officers of the Corporation need not be stockholders of the Corporation nor, except in the case of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, need such officers be directors of the Corporation. 4.2 Election. The Board of Directors, at its first meeting held after each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, shall elect the officers of the Corporation who shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors; and each officer of the Corporation shall hold office until such officer's successor is elected and qualified, or until such officer's earlier death, resignation or removal. Any officer elected by the Board of Directors may be removed at any time by the Board of Directors. Any vacancy occurring in any office of the Corporation shall be filled by the Board of Directors. The salaries of all officers of the Corporation shall be fixed by the Board of Directors or by a committee of the Board of Directors. 4.3 Voting Securities Owned by the Corporation. Powers of attorney, proxies, waivers of notice of meeting, consents and other instruments relating to securities owned by the Corporation may be executed in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation by the President or any Vice President or any other officer authorized to do so by the Board of Directors and any such officer may, in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation, take all such action as any such officer may deem advisable to vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of security holders of any corporation in which the Corporation may own securities and at any such meeting shall possess and may exercise any and all rights and power incident to the ownership of such securities and which, as the owner thereof, the Corporation might have exercised and possessed if present. The Board of Directors may, by resolution, from time to time confer like powers upon any other person or persons. 4.4 Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, if there be one, shall preside at all meetings of the stockholders and of the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, unless the Board of Directors designates the President as the Chief Executive Officer, and, except where by law the signature of the President is required, the Chairman of the Board of Directors shall possess the same power as the President to sign all contracts, certificates and other instruments of the Corporation which may be authorized by the Board of Directors. During the absence or disability of the President, the Chairman of the Board of Directors shall exercise all the powers and discharge all the duties of the President. The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall also perform such other duties and may exercise such other powers as may from time to time be assigned by these By-Laws or by the Board of Directors. 4.5 President. The President shall, subject to the control of the Board of Directors and, the Chief Executive Officer if other than the President, have general supervision of the business of the Corporation and shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect. The President shall execute all bonds, mortgages, contracts and other instruments of the Corporation requiring a seal, under the seal of the Corporation, except where required or permitted by law to be otherwise signed and executed and except that the other officers of the Corporation may sign and execute documents when so authorized by these By-Laws, the Board of Directors or the President. In the absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or if there be none, the President shall preside at all meetings of the stockholders and, provided the President is also a director, the Board of Directors. The foregoing notwithstanding, the Chief Executive Officer may appoint any officer of the Corporation to preside at meetings of stockholders. If there be no Chairman of the Board of Directors, or if the Board of Directors shall otherwise designate, the President shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. The President shall also perform such other duties and may exercise such other powers as may from time to time be assigned to such officer by these By-Laws or by the Board of Directors. 4.6 Vice Presidents. At the request of the President or in the President's absence or in the event of the President's inability or refusal to act (and if there be no Chairman of the Board of Directors), the Vice President, or the Vice Presidents if there are more than one (in the order designated by the Board of Directors), shall perform the duties of the President, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the President. Each Vice President shall perform such other duties and have such other powers as the Board of Directors from time to time may prescribe. If there be no Chairman of the Board of Directors and no Vice President, or if the Board of Directors otherwise deems it advisable, the Board of Directors shall designate the officer of the Corporation who, in the absence of the President or in the event of the inability or refusal of the President to act, shall perform the duties of the President, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the President. 4.7 Secretary. The Secretary shall attend all meetings of the Board of Directors and all meetings of the stockholders and record all the proceedings thereat in a book or books to be kept for that purpose; the Secretary shall also perform like duties for committees of the Board of Directors when required. The Secretary shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of the stockholders and special meetings of the Board of Directors, and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the President, under whose supervision the Secretary shall be. If the Secretary shall be unable or shall refuse to cause to be given notice of all meetings of the stockholders and special meetings of the Board of Directors, and if there be no Assistant Secretary, then either the Board of Directors or the President may choose another officer to cause such notice to be given. The Secretary shall have custody of the seal of the Corporation and the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary, if there be one, shall have authority to affix the same to any instrument requiring it and when so affixed, it may be attested by the signature of the Secretary or by the signature of any such Assistant Secretary. The Board of Directors may give general authority to any other officer to affix the seal of the Corporation and to attest to the affixing by such officer's signature. The Secretary shall see that all books, reports, statements, certificates and other documents and records required by law to be kept or filed are properly kept or filed, as the case may be. 4.8 Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have the custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the Corporation and shall deposit all moneys and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in such depositories as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Treasurer shall disburse the funds of the Corporation as may be ordered by the Board of Directors, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to the President and the Board of Directors, at its regular meetings, or when the Board of Directors so requires, an account of all transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Corporation. If required by the Board of Directors, the Treasurer shall give the Corporation a bond in such sum and with such surety or sureties as shall be satisfactory to the Board of Directors for the faithful performance of the duties of the office of the Treasurer and for the restoration to the Corporation, in case of the Treasurer's death, resignation, retirement or removal from office, of all books, papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in the Treasurer's possession or under the Treasurer's control belonging to the Corporation. Unless the Board of Directors otherwise determines, the Treasurer shall be the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. 4.9 Assistant Secretaries. Assistant Secretaries, if there be any, shall perform such duties and have such powers as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice President, if there be one, or the Secretary, and in the absence of the Secretary or in the event of the Secretary's inability or refusal to act, shall perform the duties of the Secretary, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the Secretary. 4.10 Assistant Treasurers. Assistant Treasurers, if there be any, shall perform such duties and have such powers as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice President, if there be one, or the Treasurer, and in the absence of the Treasurer or in the event of the Treasurer's inability or refusal to act, shall perform the duties of the Treasurer, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions upon the Treasurer. If required by the Board of Directors, an Assistant Treasurer shall give the Corporation a bond in such sum and with such surety or sureties as shall be satisfactory to the Board of Directors for the faithful performance of the duties of the office of Assistant Treasurer and for the restoration to the Corporation, in case of the Assistant Treasurer's death, resignation, retirement or removal from office, of all books, papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in the Assistant Treasurer's possession or under the Assistant Treasurer's control belonging to the Corporation. 4.11 Other Officers. Such other officers as the Board of Directors may choose shall perform such duties and have such powers as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may delegate to any other officer of the Corporation the power to choose such other officers and to prescribe their respective duties and powers. ARTICLE V STOCK 5.1 Form of Certificates. Every holder of stock in the Corporation shall be entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name of the Corporation (i) by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the President or a Vice President and (ii) by the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer, or the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Corporation, certifying the number of shares owned by such stockholder in the Corporation. 5.2 Signatures. Any or all of the signatures on a certificate may be a facsimile. In case any officer, transfer agent or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if such person were such officer, transfer agent or registrar at the date of issue. 5.3 Lost Certificates. The Board of Directors may direct a new certificate to be issued in place of any certificate theretofore issued by the Corporation alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming the certificate of stock to be lost, stolen or destroyed. When authorizing such issue of a new certificate, the Board of Directors may, in its discretion and as a condition precedent to the issuance thereof, require the owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate, or such owner's legal representative, to advertise the same in such manner as the Board of Directors shall require and/or to give the Corporation a bond in such sum as it may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against the Corporation on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of such certificate or the issuance of such new certificate. 5.4 Transfers. Stock of the Corporation shall be transferable in the manner prescribed by applicable law and in these By-Laws. Transfers of stock shall be made on the books of the Corporation only by the person named in the certificate or by such person's attorney lawfully constituted in writing and upon the surrender of the certificate therefor, properly endorsed for transfer and payment of all necessary transfer taxes; provided, however, that such surrender and endorsement or payment of taxes shall not be required in any case in which the officers of the Corporation shall determine to waive such requirement. Every certificate exchanged, returned or surrendered to the Corporation shall be marked "Cancelled," with the date of cancellation, by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Corporation or the transfer agent thereof. No transfer of stock shall be valid as against the Corporation for any purpose until it shall have been entered in the stock records of the Corporation by an entry showing from and to whom transferred. 5.5 Dividend Record Date. In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend or other distribution or allotment of any rights or the stockholders entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any change, conversion or exchange of stock, or for the purpose of any other lawful action, the Board of Directors may fix a record date, which record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted, and which record date shall be not more than sixty (60) days prior to such action. If no record date is fixed, the record date for determining stockholders for any such purpose shall be at the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution relating thereto. 5.6 Record Owners. The Corporation shall be entitled to recognize the exclusive right of a person registered on its books as the owner of shares to receive dividends, and to vote as such owner, and to hold liable for calls and assessments a person registered on its books as the owner of shares, and shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in such share or shares on the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice thereof, except as otherwise required by law. 5.7 Transfer and Registry Agents. The Corporation may from time to time maintain one or more transfer offices or agencies and registry offices or agencies at such place or places as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VI NOTICES 6.1 Notices. Whenever written notice is required by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws, to be given to any director, member of a committee or stockholder, such notice may be given by mail, addressed to such director, member of a committee or stockholder, at such person's address as it appears on the records of the Corporation, with postage thereon prepaid, and such notice shall be deemed to be given at the time when the same shall be deposited in the United States mail. Written notice may also be given personally or by telegram, telex or cable. 6.2 Waivers of Notice. Whenever any notice is required by applicable law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws, to be given to any director, member of a committee or stockholder, a waiver thereof in writing, signed by the person or persons entitled to notice, whether before or after the time stated therein, shall be deemed equivalent thereto. Attendance of a person at a meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except where the person attends the meeting for the express purpose of objecting at the beginning of the meeting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened. Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, any Annual or Special Meeting of Stockholders or any regular or special meeting of the directors or members of a committee of directors need be specified in any written waiver of notice unless so required by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these By-Laws. ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1 Dividends. Dividends upon the capital stock of the Corporation, subject to the requirements of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL") and the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, if any, may be declared by the Board of Directors at any regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors (or any action by written consent in lieu thereof in accordance with Section 8 of Article III hereof), and may be paid in cash, in property, or in shares of the Corporation's capital stock. Before payment of any dividend, there may be set aside out of any funds of the Corporation available for dividends such sum or sums as the Board of Directors from time to time, in its absolute discretion, deems proper as a reserve or reserves to meet contingencies, or for purchasing any of the shares of capital stock, warrants, rights, options, bonds, debentures, notes, scrip or other securities or evidences of indebtedness of the Corporation, or for equalizing dividends, or for repairing or maintaining any property of the Corporation, or for any proper purpose, and the Board of Directors may modify or abolish any such reserve. 7.2 Disbursements. All checks or demands for money and notes of the Corporation shall be signed by such officer or officers or such other person or persons as the Board of Directors may from time to time designate. 7.3 Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Corporation shall end on June 30 of each year unless changed by resolution of the Board of Directors. 7.4 Corporate Seal. The corporate seal shall have inscribed thereon the name of the Corporation, the year of its organization and the words "Corporate Seal, Delaware". The seal may be used by causing it or a facsimile thereof to be impressed or affixed or reproduced or otherwise. ARTICLE VIII INDEMNIFICATION 8.1 Power to Indemnify in Actions, Suits or Proceedings other than Those by or in the Right of the Corporation. Subject to Section 8.3 of this Article VIII, the Corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the Corporation), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was a director or officer of the Corporation serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person's conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that such person's conduct was unlawful. 8.2 Power to Indemnify in Actions, Suits or Proceedings by or in the Right of the Corporation. Subject to Section 8.3 of this Article VIII, the Corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was a director or officer of the Corporation serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation; except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the Corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper. 8.3 Authorization of Indemnification. Any indemnification under this Article VIII (unless ordered by a court) shall be made by the Corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the present or former director or officer is proper in the circumstances because such person has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Section 8.1 or Section 8.2 of this Article VIII, as the case may be. Such determination shall be made, with respect to a person who is a director or officer at the time of such determination, (i) by a majority vote of the directors who are not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, even though less than a quorum, or (ii) by a committee of such directors designated by a majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum, or (iii) if there are no such directors, or if such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion or (iv) by the stockholders. Such determination shall be made, with respect to former directors and officers, by any person or persons having the authority to act on the matter on behalf of the Corporation. To the extent, however, that a present or former director or officer of the Corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding described above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith, without the necessity of authorization in the specific case. 8.4 Good Faith Defined. For purposes of any determination under Section 8.3 of this Article VIII, a person shall be deemed to have acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, or, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, to have had no reasonable cause to believe such person's conduct was unlawful, if such person's action is based on the records or books of account of the Corporation or another enterprise, or on information supplied to such person by the officers of the Corporation or another enterprise in the course of their duties, or on the advice of legal counsel for the Corporation or another enterprise or on information or records given or reports made to the Corporation or another enterprise by an independent certified public accountant or by an appraiser or other expert selected with reasonable care by the Corporation or another enterprise. The provisions of this Section 8.4 shall not be deemed to be exclusive or to limit in any way the circumstances in which a person may be deemed to have met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Section 8.1 or Section 8.2 of this Article VIII, as the case may be. 8.5 Indemnification by a Court. Notwithstanding any contrary determination in the specific case under Section 8.3 of this Article VIII, and notwithstanding the absence of any determination thereunder, any director or officer may apply to the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any other court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Delaware for indemnification to the extent otherwise permissible under Section 8.1 or Section 8.2 of this Article VIII. The basis of such indemnification by a court shall be a determination by such court that indemnification of the director or officer is proper in the circumstances because such person has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Section 8.1 or Section 8.2 of this Article VIII, as the case may be. Neither a contrary determination in the specific case under Section 8.3 of this Article VIII nor the absence of any determination thereunder shall be a defense to such application or create a presumption that the director or officer seeking indemnification has not met any applicable standard of conduct. Notice of any application for indemnification pursuant to this Section 8.5 shall be given to the Corporation promptly upon the filing of such application. If successful, in whole or in part, the director or officer seeking indemnification shall also be entitled to be paid the expense of prosecuting such application. 8.6 Expenses Payable in Advance. Expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by a director or officer in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding shall be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized in this Article VIII. Such expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by former directors and officers or other employees and agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the Corporation deems appropriate. 8.7 Nonexclusivity of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses. The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this Article VIII shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the Certificate of Incorporation, these By-Laws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in such person's official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, it being the policy of the Corporation that indemnification of the persons specified in Section 8.1 and Section 8.2 of this Article VIII shall be made to the fullest extent permitted by law. The provisions of this Article VIII shall not be deemed to preclude the indemnification of any person who is not specified in Section 8.1 or Section 8.2 of this Article VIII but whom the Corporation has the power or obligation to indemnify under the provisions of the DGCL, or otherwise. 8.8 Insurance. The Corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was a director or officer of the Corporation serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person's status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power or the obligation to indemnify such person against such liability under the provisions of this Article VIII. 8.9 Certain Definitions. For purposes of this Article VIII, references to "the Corporation" shall include, in addition to the resulting corporation, any constituent corporation (including any constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors or officers, so that any person who is or was a director or officer of such constituent corporation, or is or was a director or officer of such constituent corporation serving at the request of such constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall stand in the same position under the provisions of this Article VIII with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as such person would have with respect to such constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued. The term "another enterprise" as used in this Article VIII shall mean any other corporation or any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise of which such person is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent. For purposes of this Article VIII, references to "fines" shall include any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to an employee benefit plan; and references to "serving at the request of the Corporation" shall include any service as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation which imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director or officer with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner "not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation" as referred to in this Article VIII. 8.10 Survival of Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses. The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant to, this Article VIII shall, unless otherwise provided when authorized or ratified, continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. 8.11 Limitation on Indemnification. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Article VIII to the contrary, except for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification (which shall be governed by Section 8.5 of this Article VIII), the Corporation shall not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer (or his or her heirs, executors or personal or legal representatives) or advance expenses in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized or consented to by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. 8.12 Indemnification of Employees and Agents. The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of the Corporation similar to those conferred in this Article VIII to directors and officers of the Corporation. ARTICLE IX AMENDMENTS 9.1 Amendments. These By-Laws may be altered, amended or repealed, in whole or in part, or new By-Laws may be adopted by the stockholders or by the Board of Directors; provided, however, that notice of such alteration, amendment, repeal or adoption of new By-Laws be contained in the notice of such meeting of the stockholders or Board of Directors, as the case may be. All such amendments must be approved by either the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote thereon or by a majority of the entire Board of Directors then in office. 9.2 Entire Board of Directors. As used in this Article IX and in these By- Laws generally, the term "entire Board of Directors" means the total number of directors which the Corporation would have if there were no vacancies. Adopted as of: February 17, 2004 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE BY-LAWS OF FARMER BROS. CO. This First Amendment to the By-Laws, dated March 4, 2004 (the "By-Laws") of Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), amends the By- Laws adopted as of February 17, 2004, as follows: Article V, Section 5.1 of the By-Laws of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "5.1 Form of Certificate. Shares of the Corporation's stock may be certificated or uncertificated, as provided under Delaware law, provided that every holder of stock represented by certificates and upon request every holder of uncertificated shares shall be entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name of the Corporation (i) by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the President or a Vice President and (ii) by the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer, or the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Corporation, certifying the number of shares owned by such stockholder in the Corporation." Article V, Section 5.4 of the By-Laws of the Corporation is amended to delete the phrase "person named in the certificate" from the second sentence and insert the phrase 'record holder of such stock" in place thereof. -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----