XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
GOODWILL
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
GOODWILL
GOODWILL
 
As of December 31, 2016, all of the goodwill was recorded within our NobelClad segment. The changes to the carrying amount of goodwill during the period are summarized below:
 
 
 
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2016
$
16,097

Adjustment due to recognition of tax benefit of tax amortization of certain goodwill
(450
)
Adjustment due to exchange rate differences
1,937

Goodwill impairment
(17,584
)
 
 
Goodwill balance at September 30, 2017
$


 
As required under ASC 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, we routinely review the carrying value of our net assets, including goodwill, to determine if any impairment has occurred. A quantitative assessment was conducted at June 30, 2017, at which time, based on existing conditions and management’s outlook, we determined there was no impairment. In the third quarter of 2017, activity in NobelClad’s primary end markets slowed considerably. NobelClad experienced a significant decline in its small size core maintenance bookings within the oil and gas industry. Additionally, certain large petrochemical projects previously forecasted to ship in the next twelve months were delayed, and uncertainty exists as to the ultimate timing of booking and shipping these potential orders. As a result, we determined that a potential indicator of goodwill impairment existed during the third quarter of 2017. We utilized an income approach (discounted cash flow analysis) to determine the fair value of the NobelClad reporting unit and concluded that our long-term forecasts were not materializing and needed to be revised downward. We believe the discounted cash flow approach is the most reliable indicator of fair value. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included, among other measures, expected future sales, operating income, working capital and capital expenditures. The discount rate was determined using a peer-based, risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital.

We determined that the estimated fair value of the NobelClad reporting unit was less than its carrying value primarily due to the factors described above and their related impact on expected future cash flows. During the third quarter, we adopted ASU 2017-04 which amends and simplifies how an entity measures a goodwill impairment loss by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. As the carrying value of the NobelClad reporting unit exceeded the fair value by more than the book value of goodwill, we recorded an impairment charge of $17,584 to fully impair the goodwill related to this reporting unit as of September 30, 2017.

For purchased intangible assets, we performed an assessment of the recoverability in accordance with the general valuation requirements set forth under ASC 360, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.” The result of this assessment indicated that no impairment existed for purchased intangible assets.