10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _______________

Commission File Number 1-8182

PIONEER DRILLING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TEXAS	74-2088619
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 1000, San Antonio, Texas	78209
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

210-828-7689

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	þ
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

As of October 22, 2010 there were 54,168,870 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per share, of the registrant issued and outstanding.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PIONEER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(unaudited)			(audited)
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,904		$	40,379
Receivables:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		67,745			26,648
Unbilled		20,089			8,586
Insurance recoveries		4,322			5,107
Income taxes		3,029			41,126
Deferred income taxes		12,443			5,560
Inventory		8,583			5,535
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,842			6,199
Total current assets		140,957			139,140
Property and equipment, at cost		1,079,307			967,893
Less accumulated depreciation		412,145			330,871
Net property and equipment		667,162			637,022
Intangible assets, net of amortization		23,118			25,393
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		—			2,339
Other long-term assets		25,839			21,061
Total assets	$	857,076		$	824,955
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	41,423		$	15,324
Current portion of long-term debt		1,659			4,041
Prepaid drilling contracts		3,668			408
Accrued expenses:
Payroll and related employee costs		18,306			7,740
Insurance premiums and deductibles		9,110			8,615
Insurance claims and settlements		4,322			5,042
Other		9,380			7,634
Total current liabilities		87,868			48,804
Long-term debt, less current portion		281,300			258,073
Other long-term liabilities		8,888			6,457
Deferred income taxes		80,403			90,173
Total liabilities		458,459			403,507
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock $.10 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 54,168,870 shares and 54,120,852 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		5,419			5,413
Additional paid-in capital		337,456			332,534
Treasury stock, at cost; 25,380 shares and 5,174 shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		(161	)		(31	)
Accumulated earnings		57,956			85,225
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,053	)		(1,693	)
Total shareholders’ equity		398,617			421,448
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	857,076		$	824,955

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

PIONEER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Drilling services	$	85,667		$	48,084		$	217,580		$	165,170
Production services		49,877			26,282			121,012			79,156
Total revenue		135,544			74,366			338,592			244,326
Costs and expenses:
Drilling services		59,957			35,315			164,409			107,880
Production services		29,196			16,638			73,688			50,260
Depreciation and amortization		30,847			26,952			89,275			78,467
Selling, general and administrative		13,030			8,892			36,760			27,870
Bad debt recovery		(22	)		(1,409	)		(104	)		(1,713	)
Total costs and expenses		133,008			86,388			364,028			262,764
Income (loss) from operations		2,536			(12,022	)		(25,436	)		(18,438	)
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense		(7,596	)		(1,839	)		(18,811	)		(5,555	)
Interest income		23			43			65			182
Other		845			222			1,644			847
Total other expense		(6,728	)		(1,574	)		(17,102	)		(4,526	)
Loss before income taxes		(4,192	)		(13,596	)		(42,538	)		(22,964	)
Income tax benefit		1,612			4,406			15,269			8,133
Net loss	$	(2,580	)	$	(9,190	)	$	(27,269	)	$	(14,831	)
Loss per common share—Basic	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.30	)
Loss per common share—Diluted	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.30	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—Basic		53,811			49,845			53,770			49,831
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—Diluted		53,811			49,845			53,770			49,831

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

PIONEER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(27,269	)	$	(14,831	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		89,275			78,467
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(76	)		(1,237	)
Gain on dispositions of property and equipment		(1,201	)		(84	)
Stock-based compensation expense		5,238			5,561
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount		1,870			498
Deferred income taxes		(14,339	)		7,292
Change in other assets		(2,004	)		563
Change in non-current liabilities		2,430			(1,169	)
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(14,361	)		42,208
Inventory		(3,048	)		(876	)
Prepaid expenses & other current assets		(1,643	)		5,651
Accounts payable		9,823			(2,553	)
Prepaid drilling contracts		3,260			(1,171	)
Accrued expenses		12,807			(8,253	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		60,762			110,066
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of Tiger Wireline, Inc.		(1,340	)		—
Purchases of property and equipment		(99,909	)		(67,058	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		2,199			608
Proceeds from insurance recoveries		—			36
Net cash used in investing activities		(99,050	)		(66,414	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Debt repayments		(246,606	)		(17,060	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt		266,375			—
Debt issuance costs		(4,844	)		(77	)
Proceeds from exercise of options		18			—
Purchase of treasury stock		(130	)		(31	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		14,813			(17,168	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(23,475	)		26,484
Beginning cash and cash equivalents		40,379			26,821
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	16,904		$	53,305
Supplementary disclosure:
Interest paid	$	16,604		$	5,426
Income tax refunded	$	(40,100	)	$	(8,852	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

PIONEER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business and Basis of Presentation

Pioneer Drilling Company and subsidiaries provide drilling and production services to our customers in select oil and natural gas exploration and production regions in the United States and Colombia. Our Drilling Services Division provides contract land drilling services with its fleet of 71 drilling rigs in the following locations:

Drilling Division Locations	Rig Count
South Texas	19
East Texas	16
North Dakota	9
North Texas	3
Utah	3
Oklahoma	6
Appalachia	7
Colombia	8

As of October 22, 2010, 48 drilling rigs are operating under drilling contracts. We have 17 drilling rigs that are idle and six drilling rigs have been placed in storage or “cold stacked” in our Oklahoma drilling division location due to low demand for drilling rigs in that region. We are actively marketing all our idle drilling rigs. During the second quarter of 2009, we established our Appalachia drilling division location and now have seven drilling rigs operating in the Marcellus Shale. We have eight drilling rigs operating under drilling contracts in Colombia. In addition to our drilling rigs, we provide the drilling crews and most of the ancillary equipment needed to operate our drilling rigs. We obtain our contracts for drilling oil and natural gas wells either through competitive bidding or through direct negotiations with customers. Our drilling contracts generally provide for compensation on either a daywork, turnkey or footage basis. Contract terms generally depend on the complexity and risk of operations, the on-site drilling conditions, the type of equipment used and the anticipated duration of the work to be performed.

Our Production Services Division provides a range of well services to exploration and production companies, including workover services, wireline services, and fishing and rental services. Our production services operations are managed through locations concentrated in the major United States onshore oil and gas producing regions in the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, Rocky Mountain and Appalachian states. We have a premium fleet of 74 workover rigs consisting of sixty-nine 550 horsepower rigs, four 600 horsepower rigs and one 400 horsepower rig. As of October 22, 2010, all our workover rigs are operating or are being actively marketed, with month to date utilization of approximately 90%. We provide wireline services with a fleet of 81 wireline units and rental services with approximately $13.2 million of fishing and rental tools.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pioneer Drilling Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. In preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we make various estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities we report as of the dates of the balance sheets and income and expenses we report for the periods shown in the income statements and statements of cash flows. Our actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near term relate to our recognition of revenues and costs for turnkey contracts, our estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts, our estimate of the liability relating to the self-insurance portion of our health and workers’ compensation insurance, our estimate of asset impairments, our estimate of deferred taxes and our determination of depreciation and amortization expense. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from our audited financial statements. We suggest that you read these condensed consolidated financial statements together with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

In preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we have reviewed events that have occurred after September 30, 2010, through the filing of this Form 10-Q, for inclusion as necessary.

5

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards update, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements – A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. We will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011; however, earlier application is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Drilling Contracts

Our drilling contracts generally provide for compensation on either a daywork, turnkey or footage basis. Contract terms generally depend on the complexity and risk of operations, the on-site drilling conditions, the type of equipment used, and the anticipated duration of the work to be performed. Generally, our contracts provide for the drilling of a single well and typically permit the customer to terminate on short notice. However, we have entered into more longer-term drilling contracts during periods of high rig demand. In addition, we have entered into longer-term drilling contracts for our newly constructed rigs. As of October 22, 2010, we had 31 contracts with terms of six months to three years in duration, of which 13 will expire by April 22, 2011, nine will expire by October 22, 2011, two will expire by April 22, 2012 and seven have a remaining term in excess of 18 months. In addition, we have one rig under contract that we expect will begin operating in late November 2010 with a six month term.

Foreign Currencies

Our functional currency for our foreign subsidiary in Colombia is the U.S. dollar. Nonmonetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates and monetary assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. Income statement accounts are translated at average rates for the period. Gains and losses from remeasurement of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars and from foreign currency transactions are included in other income or expense.

Restricted Cash

As of September 30, 2010, we had restricted cash in the amount of $2.0 million held in an escrow account to be used for future payments in connection with the acquisition of Prairie Investors d/b/a Competition Wireline (“Competition”). The former owner of Competition will receive annual installments of $0.7 million payable over the remaining three years from the escrow account. Restricted cash of $0.7 million and $1.3 million is recorded in other current assets and other long-term assets, respectively. The associated obligation of $0.7 million and $1.3 million is recorded in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories primarily consist of drilling rig replacement parts and supplies held for use by our Drilling Services Division’s operations and supplies held for use by our Production Services Division’s operations. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first in, first out or actual) or market value.

Investments

Other long-term assets include investments in tax exempt, auction rate preferred securities (ARPS). Our ARPSs are classified with other long-term assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 because of our inability to determine the recovery period of our investments.

At September 30, 2010, we held $15.9 million (par value) of ARPSs, which are variable-rate preferred securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest rate being reset through “Dutch auctions” that are held every 7 days. The ARPSs had historically traded at par because of the frequent interest rate resets and because they are callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is paid at the end of each auction period. Our ARPSs are AAA/Aaa rated securities, collateralized by municipal bonds and backed by assets that are equal to or greater than 200% of the liquidation preference. Until February 2008, the auction rate securities market was highly liquid. Beginning mid-February 2008, we experienced several “failed” auctions, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell all of the securities that holders desired to sell at auction. The immediate effect of a failed auction is that such holders cannot sell the securities at auction and the interest rate on the security resets to a maximum auction rate. We have continued to receive interest payments on our ARPSs in accordance with their terms. We may not be able to access the funds we invested in our ARPSs without a loss of principal, unless a future auction is successful or the issuer calls the security pursuant to redemption prior to maturity. We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying municipal securities that collateralize our ARPSs are presently at risk of default. We

6

believe we will ultimately recover the par value of the ARPSs without a loss, primarily due to the collateral securing the ARPSs and our estimate of the discounted cash flows that we expect to collect. We do not currently intend to sell our ARPSs at a loss. Also, we believe it is more-likely-than-not that we will not have to sell our ARPSs prior to recovery, as our liquidity needs are expected to be met with cash flows from operating activities and our senior secured revolving credit facility. See Note 3 “Long-term Debt” below regarding compliance with the covenants in our credit agreement.

Our ARPSs are reported at amounts that reflect our estimate of fair value. ASC Topic 820 (formerly SFAS No. 157), provides a hierarchal framework associated with the level of subjectivity used in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. To estimate the fair values of our ARPSs, we used inputs defined by ASC Topic 820 as level 3 inputs which are unobservable for the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. We estimate the fair value of our ARPSs based on discounted cash flow models and secondary market comparisons of similar securities. In addition, during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we adopted the new accounting guidance under ASC Topic 320 when we evaluated the fair value of our ARPSs and evaluated whether the fair value discount represented an other-than-temporary impairment.

Our ARPSs are designated as available-for-sale and are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, a component of shareholders’ equity. The estimated fair value of our ARPSs at September 30, 2010 was $12.6 million compared with a par value of $15.9 million. The $3.3 million difference represents a fair value discount due to the current lack of liquidity which is considered temporary and has been recorded as an unrealized loss, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). As of June 30, 2010, we had recorded a total fair value discount of $2.9 million, of which $2.7 million of this fair value discount was recognized during 2009 and 2008. During the three months ended September 30, 2010 we recorded an unrealized loss of $0.4 million. There was no portion of the fair value discount attributable to credit losses. We would recognize an impairment charge in our statement of operations if the fair value of our investments falls below the cost basis and is judged to be other-than-temporary.

Income Taxes

Pursuant to ASC Topic 740 (formerly SFAS No. 109), we follow the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, under which we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. We measure our deferred tax assets and liabilities by using the enacted tax rates we expect to apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect to recover or settle those temporary differences. Under ASC Topic 740, we reflect in income the effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities in the period during which the change occurs.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes the change in the fair value of our ARPSs, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive loss (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months  Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net loss	$	(2,580	)	$	(9,190	)	$	(27,269	)	$	(14,831	)
Other comprehensive loss—unrealized loss on ARPS securities		(241	)		(10	)		(360	)		(779	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(2,821	)	$	(9,200	)	$	(27,629	)	$	(15,610	)

Stock-based Compensation

Prior to 2010, we granted stock-based compensation in the form of stock option awards and restricted stock awards with vesting based solely on time of service conditions. In 2010, we continued to grant stock option awards with vesting based on time of service conditions and we began granting restricted stock unit awards with vesting based on time of service conditions, and in certain cases, performance conditions. We recognize compensation cost for stock option, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with ASC Topic 718 (formerly SFAS No. 123R), and utilizing the graded vesting method.

7

Stock Options

We grant stock option awards which generally become exercisable over three- to five-year periods, and expire 10 years after the date of grant. Our stock-based compensation plans provide that all stock option awards must have an exercise price not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. We issue shares of our common stock when vested stock option awards are exercised.

We estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes options-pricing model. The following table summarizes the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock option awards granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Weighted average expected volatility		64	%		61	%		62	%		58	%
Weighted-average risk-free interest rates		1.8	%		2.5	%		2.6	%		2.1	%
Weighted-average expected life in years		5.00			5.00			5.61			5.48
Options granted		53,000			42,000			787,200			1,526,550
Weighted-average grant-date fair value	$	3.28		$	2.84		$	4.91		$	2.09

The assumptions above are based on multiple factors, including historical exercise patterns of homogeneous groups with respect to exercise and post-vesting employment termination behaviors, expected future exercising patterns for these same homogeneous groups and volatility of our stock price. As we have not declared dividends since we became a public company, we did not use a dividend yield. In each case, the actual value that will be realized, if any, will depend on the future performance of our common stock and overall stock market conditions. There is no assurance the value an optionee actually realizes will be at or near the value we have estimated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, 1,500 and 4,600 options were exercised, respectively. There were no stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We receive a tax deduction for certain stock option exercises during the period the options are exercised, generally for the excess of the fair market value of our stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the options. In accordance with ASC Topic 718, we reported all excess tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as financing cash flows in our consolidated statement of cash flows.

The following table summarizes the compensation expense recognized for stock option awards during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months  Ended September 30,				Nine Months  Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	1,119	$	992	$	3,243	$	3,293
Operating costs		139		188		430		779
	$	1,258	$	1,180	$	3,673	$	4,072

Restricted Stock

We grant restricted stock awards that vest over a three-year period with a fair value based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant. When restricted stock awards are granted, shares of our common stock are considered issued, but subject to certain restrictions.

We granted 66,224 restricted stock awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, with a weighted-average grant date price of $6.04. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we granted 326,748 restricted stock awards with a weighted-average grant date price of $4.23. There were no restricted stock awards granted during the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

8

The following table summarizes the compensation expense recognized for restricted stock awards during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months  Ended September 30,				Nine Months  Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	329	$	420	$	920	$	1,247
Operating costs		52		72		128		242
	$	381	$	492	$	1,048	$	1,489

Restricted Stock Units

We grant restricted stock unit awards with vesting based on time of service conditions only, and we grant restricted stock unit awards with vesting based on time of service and performance conditions. Shares of our common stock are issued to recipients of restricted stock units only when they have satisfied the applicable vesting conditions.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we granted restricted stock unit awards with vesting based on time of service conditions. These restricted stock unit awards vest over a three-year period and represent 72,120 shares of common stock. The fair value of these restricted stock unit awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we also granted restricted stock unit awards with vesting based on time of service and performance conditions. These restricted stock unit awards vest over a three-year period and represent 116,808 estimated shares of our common stock. The fair value of these restricted stock unit awards is computed based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and the estimated number of shares of common stock. The estimated number of shares of common stock will be adjusted based on our actual achievement levels that are measured against predetermined performance conditions. Compensation cost ultimately recognized is equal to the fair value of the restricted stock unit award based on the actual outcome of the service and performance conditions.

There were no restricted stock unit awards granted during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The restricted stock units awarded during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 represented common stock with a weighted-average grant date price of $8.86. We did not grant any restricted stock unit awards prior to 2010.

The following table summarizes the compensation expense recognized for restricted stock unit awards during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months  Ended September 30, 2010		Nine Months  Ended September 30, 2010
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	142	$	445
Operating costs		25		72
	$	167	$	517

Related-Party Transactions

Our Chief Executive Officer, President of Drilling Services Division, Senior Vice President of Drilling Services Division—Marketing, and a Vice President of Drilling Services Division—Operations occasionally own a 1% to 5% working interest in oil and gas wells that we drill for one of our customers. These individuals did not own a working interest in any wells that we drilled for this customer during either the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 or 2009.

In connection with the acquisitions of the production services businesses from WEDGE Group Incorporated (“WEDGE”) and Competition on March 1, 2008, we have leases for various operating and office facilities with entities that are owned by former WEDGE employees and Competition employees that are now employees of our company. Rent expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for these related party leases.

We also have non-compete agreements with several former WEDGE, Competition and Tiger Wireline, Inc. employees that are now employees of our company. These non-compete agreements are recorded as intangible assets with a cost, net of accumulated amortization, of $0.4 million and $0.7 million as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

We had aggregate purchases of $1.1 million and $0.4 million of goods and services during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, from ten and twelve vendors, respectively, that are owned by company employees or family members of company employees.

9

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

2. Acquisitions

On April 1, 2010, we acquired Tiger Wireline Services, Inc., which provided wireline services with two wireline units through its facilities in Kansas. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1.9 million, which we financed with $1.3 million in cash and a seller’s note of $0.6 million. The identifiable assets recorded in connection with this acquisition include fixed assets of $0.8 million and intangible assets of $1.1 million representing customer relationships and a non-competition agreement. We did not recognize any goodwill in conjunction with the acquisition and no contingent assets or liabilities were assumed. Our acquisition of Tiger Wireline Services, Inc. has been accounted for as an acquisition of a business in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations.

3. Long-term Debt

Long-term debt as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following (amounts in thousands):

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Senior secured revolving credit facility	$	39,750		$	257,500
Senior notes		239,850			—
Subordinated notes payable		3,246			4,387
Other		113			227
		282,959			262,114
Less current portion		(1,659	)		(4,041	)
	$	281,300		$	258,073

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility

We have a credit agreement, as amended, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and a syndicate of lenders which provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility, with sub-limits for letters of credit and swing-line loans, of up to an aggregate principal amount of $225 million, all of which matures on August 31, 2012 (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility contains customary mandatory prepayments in respect of asset dispositions, debt incurrence and equity issuances, which are applied to reduce outstanding revolving and swing-line loans and letter of credit exposure, but in no event will reduce the borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility to less than $225 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at the LIBOR rate or at the bank prime rate, plus an applicable per annum margin that ranges from 3.50% to 6.00% and 2.50% to 5.00%, respectively. The LIBOR margin and bank prime rate margin in effect at October 22, 2010 are 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively. The Revolving Credit Facility requires a commitment fee due quarterly based on the average daily unused amount of the commitments of the lenders, a fronting fee due for each letter of credit issued, and a quarterly letter of credit fee due based on the average undrawn amount of letters of credit outstanding during such period. Our obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our domestic assets (including equity interests in Pioneer Global Holdings, Inc. and 65% of the outstanding equity interests of any first-tier foreign subsidiaries owned by Pioneer Global Holdings, Inc., but excluding any equity interest in, and any assets of, Pioneer Services Holdings, LLC) and are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries, including Pioneer Global Holdings, Inc. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are available for acquisitions, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

10

In March 2010, we made a payment of $234.8 million to reduce the outstanding debt balance under the Revolving Credit Facility, using the net proceeds from the issuance of our Senior Notes which is described below. We may choose to make additional principal payments to reduce the outstanding debt balance prior to maturity on August 31, 2012 when cash and working capital is sufficient. At October 22, 2010, we had $47.8 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility and $9.2 million in committed letters of credit, which results in borrowing availability of $168.0 million under our Revolving Credit Facility. There are no limitations on our ability to access this borrowing capacity other than maintaining compliance with the covenants under the Revolving Credit Facility. At September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with our financial covenants. Our total consolidated leverage ratio was 3.44 to 1.0, our senior consolidated leverage ratio was 0.56 to 1.0, and our interest coverage ratio was 3.92 to 1.0. In order to remain in compliance with our financial covenants, our borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was limited to an additional $136.5 million as of September 30, 2010. The financial covenants contained in our Revolving Credit Facility include the following:

• A maximum total consolidated leverage ratio that cannot exceed:

• 5.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010 through June 30, 2011;

• 4.75 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2011;

• 4.50 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2011;

• 4.25 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012; and

• 4.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2012 and thereafter.

• A maximum senior consolidated leverage ratio, which excludes unsecured and subordinated debt, that cannot exceed:

• 4.75 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010;

• 4.50 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010;

• 4.25 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011;

• 4.00 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2011;

• 3.75 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2011;

• 3.50 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2011;

• 3.25 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012; and

• 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 and thereafter.

• A minimum interest coverage ratio that cannot be less than:

• 2.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010 through December 31, 2011; and

• 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012 and thereafter.

• If our senior consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 2.25 to 1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter, a minimum asset coverage ratio that cannot be less than 1.00 to 1.00 for any fiscal quarter ending on or before December 31, 2011, and 1.10 to 1.00 for any fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012 and thereafter (as provided in the Revolving Credit Facility). If our senior consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 2.25 to 1.00 and our asset coverage ratio is less than 1.00 to 1.00, then borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility will be limited to the sum of 80% of eligible accounts receivable, 80% of the orderly liquidation value of eligible equipment and 40% of the net book value of certain other fixed assets.

The Revolving Credit Facility restricts capital expenditures unless (a) after giving effect to such capital expenditure, no event of default would exist under the Revolving Credit Facility and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility would be equal to or greater than $25 million and (b) if the senior consolidated leverage ratio as of the last day of the most recent reported fiscal quarter was equal to or greater than 2.50 to 1.00, such capital expenditure would not cause the sum of all capital expenditures to exceed:

• $65 million for fiscal year 2010; and

• $80 million for each fiscal year thereafter.

The capital expenditure thresholds for each period noted above may be increased by:

• the first $25 million of any aggregate equity issuance proceeds received during such period and 25% of any equity issuance proceeds received in excess of $25 million during such period; and

• 25% of any debt incurrence proceeds received during such period.

11

In addition, any unused portion of the capital expenditure threshold up to $30 million can be carried over from the immediate preceding fiscal year.

At September 30, 2010, our senior consolidated leverage ratio was not greater than 2.50 to 1.00 and therefore, we were not subject to the capital expenditure threshold restrictions listed above.

The Revolving Credit Facility has additional restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional debt, investments, liens, dividends, acquisitions, redemptions of capital stock, prepayments of indebtedness, asset dispositions, mergers and consolidations, transactions with affiliates, hedging contracts, sale leasebacks and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain other material indebtedness in excess of specified amounts, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, judgment defaults in excess of specified amounts, failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the credit agreement and change of control.

Senior Notes

On March 11, 2010, we issued $250 million of unregistered Senior Notes with a coupon interest rate of 9.875% that are due in 2018 (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes were sold with an original issue discount of $10.6 million that was based on 95.75% of their face value, which will result in an effective yield to maturity of approximately 10.677%. On March 11, 2010, we received $234.8 million of net proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes after deductions were made for the $10.6 million of original issue discount and $4.6 million for underwriters’ fees and other debt offering costs. The net proceeds were used to repay a portion of the borrowings outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility.

In accordance with a registration rights agreement with the holders of our Senior Notes, we filed an exchange offer registration statement on Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission that became effective on September 2, 2010. This exchange offer registration statement enabled the holders of our Senior Notes to exchange their Senior Notes for publicly registered notes with substantially identical terms. References to the “Senior Notes” herein include the Senior Notes issued in the exchange offer.

The Senior Notes are reflected on our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010 with a carrying value of $239.9 million, which represents the $250 million face value net of the $10.1 million unamortized portion of original issue discount. The original issue discount is being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes based on the effective interest method. The Senior Notes will mature on March 15, 2018 with interest due semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2010. We have the option to redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after March 15, 2014 in each case at the redemption price specified in the Indenture dated March 11, 2010 (the “Indenture”) together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Prior to March 15, 2014, we may also redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at a “make-whole” redemption price specified in the Indenture, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, prior to March 15, 2013, we may, on one or more occasions, redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a redemption price of 109.875% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, if at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes remains outstanding after such redemption and the redemption occurs within 120 days of the closing of the equity offering.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, holders of the Senior Notes will have the right to require us to purchase all or a portion of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of each Senior Note, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. Under certain circumstances in connection with asset dispositions, we will be required to use the excess proceeds of asset dispositions to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of each Senior Note, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

The Indenture contains certain restrictions on our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to:

• pay dividends on stock;

• repurchase stock or redeem subordinated debt or make other restricted payments;

• incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified stock;

• create liens on our assets;

• enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

• restrict dividends, loans or other asset transfers from certain of our subsidiaries;

• consolidate with or merge with or into, or sell all or substantially all of our properties to another person;

• enter into transactions with affiliates; and

• enter into new lines of business.

These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications. We were in compliance with these covenants as of September 30, 2010. The Senior Notes are not subject to any sinking fund requirements. The Senior Notes are fully and

12

unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by certain of our existing domestic subsidiaries and by certain of our future domestic subsidiaries (see Note 9 “Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”).

Subordinated Notes Payable and Other

In addition to amounts outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Notes, long-term debt includes subordinated notes payable to certain employees that are former shareholders of the production services businesses that were acquired by WEDGE prior to our acquisition of WEDGE on March 1, 2008, a subordinated note payable to an employee that is a former shareholder of Competition and three subordinated notes payable to certain employees that are former shareholders of Paltec, Inc., Pettus Well Service and Tiger Wireline, Inc. These subordinated notes payable have interest rates ranging from 5.4% to 14%, require quarterly or annual payments of principal and interest and have final maturity dates ranging from November 2010 to April 2013. The aggregate outstanding balance of these subordinated notes payable was $3.2 million as of September 30, 2010.

Other debt represents a financing arrangement for computer software with an outstanding balance of $0.1 million at September 30, 2010.

Debt Issuance Costs

Costs incurred in connection with our Revolving Credit Facility were capitalized and are being amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility which matures in August 2012. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes were capitalized and are being amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the Senior Notes which mature in March 2018. Capitalized debt costs related to the issuance of our long-term debt were approximately $7.2 million and $3.8 million as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We recognized approximately $1.4 million and $0.5 million of associated amortization during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash, trade receivables, trade payables and long-term debt. The carrying value of cash, trade receivables and trade payables are considered to be representative of their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on rates that we believe we would currently pay for similar types of debt instruments. This discounted cash flow analysis based on observable inputs for similar types of debt instruments represents level 2 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820 (formerly SFAS No. 157). The following table presents the supplemental fair value information about long-term debt at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Total debt	$	282,959	$	301,284	$	262,114	$	262,429

5. Commitments and Contingencies

In connection with our expansion into international markets, our foreign subsidiaries have obtained bonds for bidding on drilling contracts, performing under drilling contracts, and remitting customs and importation duties. We have guaranteed payments of $54.0 million relating to our performance under these bonds.

The Colombian government enacted a tax reform act which, among other things, adopted a one-time, net-worth tax for all Colombian entities. The tax will be assessed on an entity’s net equity, measured on a Colombian tax basis as of January 1, 2011, and will be payable in eight semi-annual installments from 2011through 2014. Based on our estimate of our Colombian operations’ forecasted net equity, as defined, we believe our total net-worth tax obligation will be between $5.3 million and $6.3 million. In January 2011, the actual net-worth tax obligation will be determinable and recognized in full in other expense in our consolidated statement of operations and in other accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet.

Due to the nature of our business, we are, from time to time, involved in litigation or subject to disputes or claims related to our business activities, including workers’ compensation claims and employment-related disputes. Legal costs relating to these matters are expensed as incurred. In the opinion of our management, none of the pending litigation, disputes or claims against us will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow from operations.

13

6. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic loss per share and diluted loss per share computations (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Basic
Net loss	$	(2,580	)	$	(9,190	)		(27,269	)	$	(14,831	)
Weighted average shares		53,811			49,845			53,770			49,831
Loss per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.30	)
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Diluted
Net loss	$	(2,580	)	$	(9,190	)	$	(27,269	)	$	(14,831	)
Weighted average shares:
Outstanding		53,811			49,845			53,770			49,831
Diluted effect of stock options		—			—			—			—
		53,811			49,845			53,770			49,831
Loss per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.30	)

Outstanding stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards representing 644,866 and 780,472 shares of common stock were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, because the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive. Outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards representing a total of 254,115 shares of common stock were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculations for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, and outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards representing a total of 188,313 shares of common stock were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, because the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive.

7. Equity Transactions

Our employees exercised stock options for the purchase of 1,500 and 4,600 shares of common stock during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively. All stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 had a weighted-average exercise price of $3.84 per share. There were no stock options exercised during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009.

14

8. Segment Information

At September 30, 2010, we had two operating segments referred to as the Drilling Services Division and the Production Services Division which is the basis management uses for making operating decisions and assessing performance.

Drilling Services Division—Our Drilling Services Division provides contract land drilling services with its fleet of 71 drilling rigs that are assigned to the following locations:

Drilling Division Locations	Rig Count
South Texas	19
East Texas	16
North Dakota	9
North Texas	3
Utah	3
Oklahoma	6
Appalachia	7
Colombia	8

Production Services Division—Our Production Services Division provides a range of well services to oil and gas exploration and production companies, including workover services, wireline services, and fishing and rental services. Our production services operations are managed through locations concentrated in the major United States onshore oil and gas producing regions in the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, Rocky Mountain and Appalachian states. We have a premium fleet of 74 workover rigs consisting of sixty-nine 550 horsepower rigs, four 600 horsepower rigs and one 400 horsepower rig. We provide wireline services with a fleet of 81 wireline units and rental services with approximately $13.2 million of fishing and rental tools.

The following tables set forth certain financial information for our two operating segments and corporate for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,  2010
	Drilling Services Division		Production Services Division		Corporate		Total
Identifiable assets	$	577,899	$	253,867	$	25,310	$	857,076
Revenues	$	85,667	$	49,877	$	—	$	135,544
Operating costs		59,957		29,196		—		89,153
Segment margin	$	25,710	$	20,681	$	—	$	46,391
Depreciation and amortization	$	23,756	$	6,734	$	357	$	30,847
Capital expenditures	$	25,328	$	7,765	$	254	$	33,347

	As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,  2009
	Drilling Services Division		Production Services Division		Corporate		Total
Identifiable assets	$	540,413	$	228,832	$	29,748	$	798,993
Revenues	$	48,084	$	26,282	$	—	$	74,366
Operating costs		35,315		16,638		—		51,953
Segment margin	$	12,769	$	9,644	$	—	$	22,413
Depreciation and amortization	$	20,649	$	5,929	$	374	$	26,952
Capital expenditures	$	16,876	$	2,298	$	67	$	19,241

15

The following tables set forth certain financial information for our two operating segments and corporate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,  2010
	Drilling Services Division		Production Services Division		Corporate		Total
Identifiable assets	$	577,899	$	253,867	$	25,310	$	857,076
Revenues	$	217,580	$	121,012	$	—	$	338,592
Operating costs		164,409		73,688		—		238,097
Segment margin	$	53,171	$	47,324	$	—	$	100,495
Depreciation and amortization	$	68,805	$	19,423	$	1,047	$	89,275
Capital expenditures	$	95,794	$	20,766	$	418	$	116,978

	As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,  2009
	Drilling Services Division		Production Services Division		Corporate		Total
Identifiable assets	$	540,413	$	228,832	$	29,748	$	798,993
Revenues	$	165,170	$	79,156	$	—	$	244,326
Operating costs		107,880		50,260		—		158,140
Segment margin	$	57,290	$	28,896	$	—	$	86,186
Depreciation and amortization	$	59,774	$	17,556	$	1,137	$	78,467
Capital expenditures	$	53,867	$	9,929	$	665	$	64,461

The following table reconciles the segment profits reported above to income (loss) from operations as reported on the condensed consolidated statements of operations (amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Segment margin	$	46,391		$	22,413		$	100,495		$	86,186
Depreciation and amortization		(30,847	)		(26,952	)		(89,275	)		(78,467	)
Selling, general and administrative		(13,030	)		(8,892	)		(36,760	)		(27,870	)
Bad debt recovery (expense)		22			1,409			104			1,713
Income (loss) from operations	$	2,536		$	(12,022	)	$	(25,436	)	$	(18,438	)

The following table sets forth certain financial information for our international operations in Colombia which is included in our Drilling Services Division (amounts in thousands):

	As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,				As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Identifiable assets	$	162,464	$	113,605	$	162,464	$	113,605
Revenues	$	24,800	$	14,525	$	60,866	$	39,321

Identifiable assets as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 include five drilling rigs that are owned by our Colombia subsidiary. Identifiable assets as of September 30, 2010 include an additional three drilling rigs that are owned by one of our domestic subsidiaries and leased to our Colombia subsidiary.

16

9. Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Our Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by our existing domestic subsidiaries, except for Pioneer Services Holdings, LLC, and certain of our future domestic subsidiaries. The subsidiaries that generally operate our non-U.S. business concentrated in Colombia do not guarantee our Senior Notes. The non-guarantor subsidiaries do not have any payment obligations under the Senior Notes, the guarantees or the Indenture. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any non-guarantor subsidiary, such non-guarantor subsidiary will pay the holders of its debt and other liabilities, including its trade creditors, before it will be able to distribute any of its assets to us. In the future, any non-U.S. subsidiaries, immaterial subsidiaries and subsidiaries that we designate as unrestricted subsidiaries under the Indenture will not guarantee the Senior Notes. As of September 30, 2010, there were no restrictions on the ability of subsidiary guarantors to transfer funds to the parent company.

As a result of the guarantee arrangements, we are presenting the following condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of cash flows of the issuer, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
							(In thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	55,000		$	(43,516	)	$	5,420		$	—		$	16,904
Receivables		—			71,436			24,594			(845	)		95,185
Intercompany receivable (payable)		(117,414	)		127,362			(9,948	)		—			—
Deferred income taxes		—			5,808			6,635			—			12,443
Inventory		—			2,912			5,671			—			8,583
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,077			2,358			4,407			—			7,842
Total current assets		(61,337	)		166,360			36,779			(845	)		140,957
Net property and equipment		1,716			572,092			94,104			(750	)		667,162
Investment in subsidiaries		708,853			115,626			—			(824,479	)		—
Intangible assets, net of amortization		549			22,569			—			—			23,118
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		11,009			—			—			(11,009	)		—
Other long-term assets		21,143			1,560			3,136			—			25,839
Total assets	$	681,933		$	878,207		$	134,019		$	(837,083	)	$	857,076
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	420		$	34,511		$	7,337			(845	)	$	41,423
Current portion of long-term debt		113			1,546			—			—			1,659
Prepaid drilling contracts		—			999			2,669			—			3,668
Accrued expenses		2,433			34,069			4,616			—			41,118
Total current liabilities		2,966			71,125			14,622			(845	)		87,868
Long-term debt, less current portion		279,600			1,700			—						281,300
Other long-term liabilities		—			5,546			3,342			—			8,888
Deferred income taxes		—			90,983			429			(11,009	)		80,403
Total liabilities		282,566			169,354			18,393			(11,854	)		458,459
Total shareholders’ equity		399,367			708,853			115,626			(825,229	)		398,617
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	681,933		$	878,207		$	134,019		$	(837,083	)	$	857,076

17

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2009
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,958		$	20,678	$	9,743		$	—		$	40,379
Receivables		—			76,490		4,977			—			81,467
Intercompany receivable (payable)		(66,076	)		66,297		(221	)		—			—
Deferred income taxes		—			3,909		1,651			—			5,560
Inventory		—			1,791		3,744			—			5,535
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		874			3,358		1,967			—			6,199
Total current assets		(55,244	)		172,523		21,861			—			139,140
Net property and equipment		1,898			550,730		85,143			(749	)		637,022
Investment in subsidiaries		712,983			104,256		—			(817,239	)		—
Intangible assets, net of amortization		863			24,530		—			—			25,393
Noncurrent deferred income taxes		980			—		2,339			(980	)		2,339
Other long-term assets		18,957			1,611		493			—			21,061
Total assets	$	680,437		$	853,650	$	109,836		$	(818,968	)	$	824,955
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	286		$	12,277	$	2,761		$	—		$	15,324
Current portion of long-term debt		2,100			1,941		—			—			4,041
Prepaid drilling contracts		—			324		84			—			408
Accrued expenses		226			26,070		2,735			—			29,031
Total current liabilities		2,612			40,612		5,580			—			48,804
Long-term debt, less current portion		255,628			2,445		—			—			258,073
Other long-term liabilities		—			6,457		—			—			6,457
Deferred income taxes		—			91,153		—			(980	)		90,173
Total liabilities		258,240			140,667		5,580			(980	)		403,507
Total shareholders’ equity		422,197			712,983		104,256			(817,988	)		421,448
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	680,437		$	853,650	$	109,836		$	(818,968	)	$	824,955

18

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In thousands)
Revenues:	$	—		$	110,744		$	24,800		$	—		$	135,544
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs		—			70,423			18,730			—			89,153
Depreciation and amortization		357			28,175			2,315			—			30,847
Selling, general and administrative		3,815			8,700			605			(90	)		13,030
Intercompany leasing		—			(1,228	)		1,228			—			—
Bad debt recovery		—			(22	)		—			—			(22	)
Total costs and expenses		4,172			106,048			22,878			(90	)		133,008
Income (loss) from operations		(4,172	)		4,696			1,922			90			2,536
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(688	)		2,358			—			(1,670	)		—
Interest expense		(7,497	)		(98	)		(1	)		—			(7,596	)
Interest income		—			16			7			—			23
Other		—			200			735			(90	)		845
Total other income (expense)		(8,185	)		2,476			741			(1,760	)		(6,728	)
Loss before income taxes		(12,357	)		7,172			2,663			(1,670	)		(4,192	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		9,777			(7,860	)		(305	)		—			1,612
Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,580	)	$	(688	)	$	2,358		$	(1,670	)	$	(2,580	)
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In thousands)
Revenues:	$	—		$	59,841		$	14,525		$	—		$	74,366
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs		—			40,364			11,681			(92	)		51,953
Depreciation and amortization		367			24,646			1,939			—			26,952
Selling, general and administrative		2,922			5,987			337			(354	)		8,892
Bad debt recovery		—			(1,409	)		—			—			(1,409	)
Total costs and expenses		3,289			69,588			13,957			(446	)		86,388
Income (loss) from operations		(3,289	)		(9,747	)		568			446			(12,022	)
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(4,460	)		365			—			4,095			—
Interest expense		(1,705	)		(133	)		(1	)		—			(1,839	)
Interest income		—			21			22			—			43
Other		264			362			42			(446	)		222
Total other income (expense)		(5,901	)		615			63			3,649			(1,574	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(9,190	)		(9,132	)		631			4,095			(13,596	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		—			4,672			(266	)		—			4,406
Net earnings (loss)	$	(9,190	)	$	(4,460	)	$	365		$	4,095		$	(9,190	)

19

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In thousands)
Revenues:	$	—		$	277,726		$	60,866		$	—		$	338,592
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs		—			189,540			48,557			—			238,097
Depreciation and amortization		1,047			81,363			6,865			—			89,275
Selling, general and administrative		10,918			24,134			1,978			(270	)		36,760
Intercompany leasing		—			(3,108	)		3,108			—			—
Bad debt recovery		—			(104	)		—			—			(104	)
Total costs and expenses		11,965			291,825			60,508			(270	)		364,028
Income (loss) from operations		(11,965	)		(14,099	)		358			270			(25,436	)
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(6,600	)		2,452			—			4,148			—
Interest expense		(18,481	)		(311	)		(19	)		—			(18,811	)
Interest income		—			49			16			—			65
Other		—			581			1,333			(270	)		1,644
Total other income (expense)		(25,081	)		2,771			1,330			3,878			(17,102	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(37,046	)		(11,328	)		1,688			4,148			(42,538	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		9,777			4,728			764			—			15,269
Net earnings (loss)	$	(27,269	)	$	(6,600	)	$	2,452		$	4,148		$	(27,269	)
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(In thousands)
Revenues:	$	—		$	205,006		$	39,320		$	—		$	244,326
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs		—			129,670			28,749			(279	)		158,140
Depreciation and amortization		1,115			71,579			5,773			—			78,467
Selling, general and administrative		9,273			18,752			907			(1,062	)		27,870
Bad debt recovery		—			(1,713	)		—			—			(1,713	)
Total costs and expenses		10,388			218,288			35,429			(1,341	)		262,764
Income (loss) from operations		(10,388	)		(13,282	)		3,891			1,341			(18,438	)
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(112	)		3,556			—			(3,444	)		—
Interest expense		(5,124	)		(430	)		(38	)		37			(5,555	)
Interest income		1			91			127			(37	)		182
Other		792			1,092			304			(1,341	)		847
Total other income (expense)		(4,443	)		4,309			393			(4,785	)		(4,526	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(14,831	)		(8,973	)		4,284			(3,444	)		(22,964	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		—			8,861			(728	)		—			8,133
Net earnings (loss)	$	(14,831	)	$	(112	)	$	3,556		$	(3,444	)	$	(14,831	)

20

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:	$	28,905		$	21,197		$	10,660		$	—	$	60,762
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of Tiger Wireline, Inc.		—			(1,340	)		—			—		(1,340	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(418	)		(84,467	)		(15,024	)		—		(99,909	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—			2,158			41			—		2,199
Proceeds from insurance recoveries		—			—			—			—		—
		(418	)		(83,649	)		(14,983	)		—		(99,050	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Debt repayments		(244,864	)		(1,742	)		—			—		(246,606	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt		266,375			—			—			—		266,375
Debt issuance costs		(4,844	)		—			—			—		(4,844	)
Proceeds from exercise of options		18			—			—			—		18
Purchase of treasury stock		(130	)		—			—			—		(130	)
		16,555			(1,742	)		—			—		14,813
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		45,042			(64,194	)		(4,323	)		—		(23,475	)
Beginning cash and cash equivalents		9,958			20,678			9,743			—		40,379
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	55,000		$	(43,516	)	$	5,420		$	—	$	16,904
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:	$	5,848		$	100,632		$	3,586		$	—	$	110,066
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(665	)		(62,210	)		(4,183	)		—		(67,058	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		561			—			47			—		608
Proceeds from insurance recoveries		36			—			—			—		36
		(68	)		(62,210	)		(4,136	)		—		(66,414	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Debt repayments		(15,114	)		(1,946	)		—			—		(17,060	)
Debt issuance costs		(77	)		—			—			—		(77	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(31	)		—			—			—		(31	)
		(15,222	)		(1,946	)		—			—		(17,168	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(9,442	)		36,476			(550	)		—		26,484
Beginning cash and cash equivalents		858			13,896			12,067			—		26,821
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	(8,584	)	$	50,372		$	11,517		$	—	$	53,305

21

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements we make in the following discussion that express a belief, expectation or intention, as well as those that are not historical fact, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, could differ materially from those we express in the following discussion as a result of a variety of factors, including general economic and business conditions and industry trends, the continued strength or weakness of the contract land drilling industry in the geographic areas in which we operate, decisions about onshore exploration and development projects to be made by oil and gas companies, the highly competitive nature of our business, the availability, terms and deployment of capital, future compliance with covenants under our senior secured revolving credit facility and our senior notes, the availability of qualified personnel, and changes in, or our failure or inability to comply with, government regulations, including those relating to the environment. We have discussed many of these factors in more detail elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. These factors are not necessarily all the important factors that could affect us. Unpredictable or unknown factors we have not discussed in this report or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 or in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 could also have a material adverse effect on actual results of matters that are the subject of our forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as the date on which they are made and we undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements. We advise our shareholders that they should (1) be aware that important factors not referred to above could affect the accuracy of our forward-looking statements and (2) use caution and common sense when considering our forward-looking statements.

Company Overview

Pioneer Drilling Company provides drilling services and production services to independent and major oil and gas exploration and production companies throughout much of the onshore oil and gas producing regions of the United States and internationally in Colombia. Pioneer Drilling Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas in 1979 as the successor to a business that had been operating since 1968. Our business has grown through acquisitions and through organic growth. Over the last 10 years, we have significantly expanded our drilling rig fleet by adding 35 rigs through acquisitions and by adding 31 rigs through the construction of rigs from new and used components. We significantly expanded our service offerings in March 2008, when we acquired the production services businesses of WEDGE Group Incorporated (“WEDGE”) and Prairie Investors d/b/a Competition Wireline (“Competition”), which provide well services, wireline services and fishing and rental services. Drilling services and production services are fundamental to establishing and maintaining the flow of oil and natural gas throughout the productive life of a well site and enable us to meet the multiple service needs of our customers.

Business Segments

We currently conduct our operations through two operating segments: our Drilling Services Division and our Production Services Division. The following is a description of these two operating segments. Financial information about our operating segments is included in Note 8, Segment Information, of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I Item 1, Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

• Drilling Services Division—Our Drilling Services Division provides contract land drilling services with its fleet of 71 drilling rigs in the following locations:

Drilling Division Locations	Rig Count
South Texas	19
East Texas	16
North Dakota	9
North Texas	3
Utah	3
Oklahoma	6
Appalachia	7
Colombia	8

As of October 22, 2010, 48 drilling rigs are operating under drilling contracts. We have 17 drilling rigs that are idle and six drilling rigs have been placed in storage or “cold stacked” in our Oklahoma drilling division location due to low demand for drilling rigs in that region. We are actively marketing all our idle drilling rigs. During the second quarter of 2009, we established our Appalachia drilling division location and now have seven drilling rigs operating in the Marcellus Shale. We have eight drilling rigs operating under drilling contracts in Colombia. In addition to our drilling rigs, we provide the drilling crews and most of the ancillary equipment needed to operate our drilling rigs. We obtain our contracts for drilling oil and natural gas wells either through competitive bidding or through direct negotiations with customers. Our drilling

22

contracts generally provide for compensation on either a daywork, turnkey or footage basis. Contract terms generally depend on the complexity and risk of operations, the on-site drilling conditions, the type of equipment used, and the anticipated duration of the work to be performed.

• Production Services Division—Our Production Services Division provides a range of well services to oil and gas exploration and production companies, including workover services, wireline services, and fishing and rental services. Our production services operations are managed through locations concentrated in the major United States onshore oil and gas producing regions in the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, Rocky Mountain and Appalachian states. We provide our services to a diverse group of oil and gas exploration and production companies. The primary production services we offer are the following:

• Well Services. Existing and newly-drilled wells require a range of services to establish and maintain production over their useful lives. We use our fleet of 74 workover rigs in nine locations to provide these required services, including maintenance of existing wells, workover of existing wells, completion of newly-drilled wells, and plugging and abandonment of wells at the end of their useful lives. We have a premium workover rig fleet consisting of sixty-nine 550 horsepower rigs, four 600 horsepower rigs and one 400 horsepower rig. As of October 22, 2010, all our workover rigs are operating or are being actively marketed, with month to date utilization of approximately 90%.

• Wireline Services. In order for oil and gas companies to better understand the reservoirs they are drilling or producing, they require logging services to accurately characterize reservoir rocks and fluids. When a producing well is completed, they also must perforate the production casing to establish a flow path between the reservoir and the wellbore. We use our fleet of wireline units to provide these important logging and perforating services. We provide both open and cased-hole logging services, including the latest pulsed-neutron technology. In addition, we provide services which allow oil and gas companies to evaluate the integrity of wellbore casing, recover pipe, or install bridge plugs. During the current year, we have acquired 17 additional wireline units, resulting in a total of 81 wireline units in 20 locations, as of October 22, 2010.

• Fishing and Rental Services. During drilling operations, oil and gas companies frequently need to rent unique equipment such as power swivels, foam circulating units, blow-out preventers, air drilling equipment, pumps, tanks, pipe, tubing, and fishing tools. We provide rental services out of four locations in Texas and Oklahoma. As of September 30, 2010 our fishing and rental tools have a gross book value of $13.2 million.

Pioneer Drilling Company’s corporate office is located at 1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 1000, San Antonio, Texas 78209. Our phone number is (210) 828-7689 and our website address is www.pioneerdrlg.com. We make available free of charge though our website our Annual Reports on our Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Information on our website is not incorporated into this report or otherwise made part of this report.

Market Conditions in Our Industry

Demand for oilfield services offered by our industry is a function of our customers’ willingness to make operating expenditures and capital expenditures to explore for, develop and produce hydrocarbons, which in turn is affected by current and expected levels of oil and natural gas prices.

From 2004 through 2008, domestic exploration and production spending increased as oil and natural gas prices increased. Since late 2008, there has been substantial volatility and a decline in oil and natural gas prices due to the downturn in the global economic environment. In response, our customers curtailed their drilling programs and reduced their production activities, particularly in natural gas producing regions, which has resulted in a decrease in demand for certain of our drilling rigs and production services equipment and a reduction in revenue rates and utilization. In addition, there has been uncertainty in the capital markets and access to financing has been limited. These conditions have adversely affected our business environment. Certain of our customers could experience an inability to pay suppliers in the event they are unable to access the capital markets to fund their business operations. For additional information concerning the effects of the volatility in oil and gas prices and uncertainty in capital markets, see Item 1A—“Risk Factors” in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

With increasing oil and natural gas prices through 2010, exploration and production companies have modestly increased their exploration budgets for 2010 as compared to 2009. Industry rig utilization and revenue rates have improved during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and we expect modest increases for the remainder of 2010 as compared to 2009, particularly in oil-producing regions and in certain shale regions.

23

On October 22, 2010, the spot price for West Texas Intermediate crude oil was $81.16, the spot price for Henry Hub natural gas was $3.19 and the Baker Hughes land rig count was 1,630, a 63% increase from 1,003 on October 23, 2009. The average weekly spot prices of West Texas Intermediate crude oil and Henry Hub natural gas, the average weekly domestic land rig count per the Baker Hughes land rig count, and the average monthly domestic workover rig count for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the years ended September 30, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006 were:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010		Years ended September 30,
			2010		2009		2008		2007		2006
Oil (West Texas Intermediate)	$	77.31	$	76.82	$	57.38	$	108.31	$	64.87	$	66.19
Natural Gas (Henry Hub)	$	4.56	$	4.45	$	4.39	$	8.96	$	6.85	$	7.97
U.S. Land Rig Count		1,438		1,342		1,226		1,764		1,646		1,479
U.S. Workover Rig Count		1,816		1,768		1,965		2,499		2,383		2,334

As represented in the table above, increases in oil and natural gas prices from 2004 to late 2008 resulted in corresponding increases in the U.S. land rig counts and U.S. workover rig counts, while declines in prices from late 2008 to late 2009 led to decreases in the U.S. land rig counts and U.S. workover rig counts. Since late 2009, increases in oil and natural gas prices have caused modest increases in exploration and production spending and the corresponding increases in drilling and well services activities is reflected by increases in the U.S. land rig counts and the U.S. workover rig counts.

Our business is influenced substantially by both operating and capital expenditures by exploration and production companies. Exploration and production spending is generally categorized as either a capital expenditure or operating expenditure.

Capital expenditures by oil and gas companies tend to be relatively sensitive to volatility in oil or natural gas prices because project decisions are tied to a return on investment spanning a number of years. As such, capital expenditure economics often require the use of commodity price forecasts which may prove inaccurate in the amount of time required to plan and execute a capital expenditure project (such as the drilling of a deep well). When commodity prices are depressed for long periods of time, capital expenditure projects are routinely deferred until expected prices return to an acceptable level.

In contrast, both mandatory and discretionary operating expenditures are more stable than capital expenditures for exploration. Mandatory operating expenditure projects involve activities that cannot be avoided in the short term, such as regulatory compliance, safety, contractual obligations and certain projects to maintain the well and related infrastructure in operating condition. Discretionary operating expenditure projects may not be critical to the short-term viability of a lease or field, but these projects are less sensitive to commodity price volatility as compared to capital expenditures for exploration. Discretionary operating expenditure work is evaluated according to a simple short-term payout criterion which is far less dependent on commodity price forecasts.

Because existing oil and natural gas wells require ongoing spending to maintain production, expenditures by exploration and production companies for the maintenance of existing wells are relatively stable and predictable. In contrast, capital expenditures by exploration and production companies for exploration and drilling are more directly influenced by current and expected oil and natural gas prices and generally reflect the volatility of commodity prices.

In our continuing effort to monitor market conditions and industry developments, we are evaluating the impact of the recent oil spill incident in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico involving BP. At this time, we cannot predict the full impact of the incident on our customers or on the continuing demand for our services. In addition, we cannot predict how our customers and government regulatory agencies will respond to the incident. Any changes to laws and regulations that may result from the oil spill incident would more likely be directed primarily at offshore drilling operations, but could impact our land drilling and production services operations as well.

24

Strategy

In past years, our strategy was to become a premier land drilling and production services company through steady and disciplined growth. We executed this strategy by acquiring and building a high quality drilling rig fleet and production services business that operates in active drilling markets in the United States and Colombia. Our long-term strategy is to maintain and leverage our position as a leading land drilling and production services company, continue to expand our relationships with existing customers, acquire new customers in the areas in which we currently operate and further enhance our geographic diversification through selective international expansion. The key elements of this long-term strategy include:

• Further Strengthen our Competitive Position in the Most Attractive Domestic Markets. Shale plays are expected to become increasingly important to domestic hydrocarbon production in the coming years and not all drilling rigs are capable of successfully drilling shale play opportunities. We estimate that more than 75% of our rigs are currently capable of shale drilling, and we intend to further develop our rig fleet to take advantage of the expected increase in shale activity, including furthering our investment in top drives and winterizing additional rigs in our fleet for markets such as the Marcellus Shale in the northeastern United States and the Bakken Shale in the upper mid-west United States. We also plan to invest in additional safety equipment, such as the installation of iron roughnecks on certain of our rigs. We also intend to selectively add capacity to our wireline and well servicing product offerings, which are well positioned to capitalize on increased shale development.

• Increase our Exposure to Oil-Driven Drilling Activity. We have intentionally increased our exposure to oil-related activities by redeploying certain of our assets into predominately oil-producing regions and actively seeking contracts with oil-focused producers. Currently, 58% of both our working drilling rigs and our workover rigs are operating on wells that are targeting or producing oil. We believe that by targeting a balanced mix of oil and natural gas oriented activities over time, we can lessen our exposure to fluctuations in capital spending associated with changes in any single commodity price. We believe that our flexible rig fleet and production services assets allow us to target both natural gas- and oil-focused opportunities.

• Selectively Expand our International Operations. In early 2007, we announced our intention to selectively expand internationally and began a relationship with Ecopetrol S.A. in Colombia after a comprehensive review of international opportunities wherein we determined that Colombia offered an attractive mix of favorable business conditions, political stability, and a long-term commitment to expanding national oil and gas production. We now have eight drilling rigs operating under term drilling contracts in Colombia. We are continuously evaluating additional international expansion opportunities and intend to target international markets that share the favorable characteristics of our Colombian operations and which would allow us to deploy sufficient assets in order to realize economies of scale.

• Continue Growth with Select Capital Deployment. We intend to invest in the growth of our business by continuing to strategically upgrade our existing assets, selectively engaging in new-build opportunities, and potentially making selective acquisitions. Our capital investment decisions are determined by an analysis of the projected return on capital employed. For significant capital expenditures, we have customarily identified the incremental revenue associated with the opportunity and secured use of the asset through contracts whenever possible. In addition to analyzing return on capital employed, we also require expenditures to be consistent with our strategic objectives. For example, we established our Appalachia drilling division location in 2009 to supply drilling rigs to the rapidly growing demand in the Marcellus Shale and began our operations in Colombia in 2007 to diversify our operations into the international market.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements have been for working capital needs, capital expenditures and acquisitions. Our principal sources of liquidity consist of: (i) cash and cash equivalents (which equaled $16.9 million as of September 30, 2010); (ii) cash generated from operations; and (iii) the unused portion of our senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). Our Revolving Credit Facility provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility, with sub-limits for letters of credit and swing-line loans, of up to an aggregate principal amount of $225 million, all of which matures on August 31, 2012. At October 22, 2010, we had $47.8 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility and $9.2 million in committed letters of credit, which results in borrowing availability of $168.0 million under our Revolving Credit Facility. There are no limitations on our ability to access the full borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility other than maintaining compliance with the covenants in the

25

Revolving Credit Facility. In order to remain in compliance with our financial covenants, our borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was limited to an additional $136.5 million as of September 30, 2010. Additional information regarding these covenants is provided in the Debt Requirements section below. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are available for acquisitions, working capital and other general corporate purposes. We presently expect that cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations and available borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility are adequate to cover our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months.

On March 11, 2010, we issued $250 million of 9.875% unregistered senior notes due 2018 (the “Senior Notes”), and received $234.8 million net proceeds, after deducting the original issue discount, underwriters’ fees and other debt offering costs, which were used to reduce the outstanding debt balance under our Revolving Credit Facility. The Senior Notes will mature on March 15, 2018 with interest due semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2010. We have the option to redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after March 15, 2014 in each case at the redemption price specified in the Indenture dated March 11, 2010 (the “Indenture”) together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Prior to March 15, 2014, we may also redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at a “make-whole” redemption price specified in the Indenture, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, prior to March 15, 2013, we may, on one or more occasions, redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a redemption price of 109.875% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, if at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes remains outstanding after such redemption and the redemption occurs within 120 days of the closing of the equity offering. In accordance with a registration rights agreement with the holders of our Senior Notes, we filed an exchange offer registration statement on Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission that became effective on September 2, 2010. This exchange offer registration statement enabled the holders of our Senior Notes to exchange their Senior Notes for publicly registered notes with substantially identical terms. References to the “Senior Notes” herein include the Senior Notes issued in the exchange offer.

In July 2009, we filed a shelf registration statement that permits us to sell equity or debt in one or more offerings up to a total dollar amount of $300 million. In November 2009, we obtained $24.0 million in net proceeds when we sold 3,820,000 shares of our common stock at $6.75 per share, less underwriters’ commissions, pursuant to a public offering under the $300 million shelf registration statement. The remaining availability under the $300 million shelf registration statement for equity or debt offerings is $274.2 million as of October 22, 2010. In the future, we may consider equity or debt offerings, as appropriate, to meet our liquidity needs.

At September 30, 2010, we held $15.9 million (par value) of investments comprised of tax exempt, auction rate preferred securities (ARPS), which are variable-rate preferred securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest rate being reset through “Dutch auctions” that are held every 7 days. The ARPSs had historically traded at par because of the frequent interest rate resets and because they are callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is paid at the end of each auction period. Our ARPSs are AAA/Aaa rated securities, collateralized by municipal bonds and backed by assets that are equal to or greater than 200% of the liquidation preference. Until February 2008, the auction rate securities market was highly liquid. Beginning mid-February 2008, we experienced several “failed” auctions, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell all of the securities that holders desired to sell at auction. The immediate effect of a failed auction is that such holders cannot sell the securities at auction and the interest rate on the security resets to a maximum auction rate. We have continued to receive interest payments on our ARPSs in accordance with their terms. Unless a future auction is successful or the issuer calls the security pursuant to redemption prior to maturity, we may not be able to access the funds we invested in our ARPSs without a loss of principal. We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying municipal securities that collateralize our ARPSs are presently at risk of default. We believe we will ultimately recover the par value of the ARPSs without loss, primarily due to the collateral securing the ARPSs and our estimate of the discounted cash flows that we expect to collect. We do not currently intend to sell our ARPSs at a loss. Also, we believe it is more-likely-than-not that we will not have to sell our ARPSs prior to recovery, as our liquidity needs are expected to be met with cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Our ARPSs are designated as available-for-sale and are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized gains or losses, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, a component of shareholders’ equity. The estimated fair value of our ARPSs at September 30, 2010 was $12.6 million compared with a par value of $15.9 million. The $3.3 million difference represents a fair value discount due to the current lack of liquidity which is considered temporary and has been recorded as an unrealized loss, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). There was no portion of the fair value discount attributable to credit losses. We would recognize an impairment charge in our statement of operations if the fair value of our investments falls below the cost basis and is judged to be other-than-temporary. Our ARPSs are classified with other long-term assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 because of our inability to determine the recovery period of our investments.

26

Uses of Capital Resources

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had $117.0 million of additions to our property and equipment. The remaining capital expenditure budget approved for fiscal year 2010 is approximately $43.6 million, comprised of routine capital expenditures of approximately $15.5 million, non-routine capital expenditures of approximately $27.5 million and approximately $0.6 million for previously approved capital expenditures from 2009. A portion of the 2010 approved capital expenditure budget will carryover for expenditure in fiscal year 2011. Capital expenditures for 2010 represent routine capital expenditures necessary to keep our equipment in safe and efficient working order and discretionary capital expenditures for new equipment or upgrades of existing equipment when necessary to obtain new contracts and customers. We expect to fund these capital expenditures primarily from operating cash flow in excess of our working capital and other normal cash flow requirements and availability under our Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, as appropriate, we may consider equity or debt offerings to meet our liquidity needs.

Working Capital

Our working capital was $53.1 million at September 30, 2010, compared to $90.3 million at December 31, 2009. Our current ratio, which we calculate by dividing our current assets by our current liabilities, was 1.6 at September 30, 2010 compared to 2.9 at December 31, 2009.

Our operations have historically generated cash flows sufficient to meet our requirements for debt service and normal capital expenditures. However, during periods when higher percentages of our drilling contracts are turnkey and footage contracts, our short-term working capital needs could increase.

The changes in the components of our working capital were as follows:

	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009		Change
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,904	$	40,379	$	(23,475	)
Receivables
Trade, net		67,745		26,648		41,097
Unbilled		20,089		8,586		11,503
Insurance recoveries		4,322		5,107		(785	)
Income taxes		3,029		41,126		(38,097	)
Deferred income taxes		12,443		5,560		6,883
Inventory		8,583		5,535		3,048
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,842		6,199		1,643
Current assets		140,957		139,140		1,817
Accounts payable		41,423		15,324		26,099
Current portion of long-term debt		1,659		4,041		(2,382	)
Prepaid drilling contracts		3,668		408		3,260
Accrued expenses:
Employee related employee costs		18,306		7,740		10,566
Insurance premiums and deductibles		9,110		8,615		495
Insurance claims and settlements		4,322		5,042		(720	)
Other		9,380		7,634		1,746
Current liabilities		87,868		48,804		39,064
Working capital	$	53,089	$	90,336	$	(37,247	)

The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to $99.9 million used for purchases of property and equipment, offset by cash provided by operations of $60.8 million and $17.0 million additional borrowing under our Revolving Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The increases in our trade receivables and unbilled revenues as of September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 were due to the increase in revenues of $54.3 million, or 67%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2009, and due to the timing of the billing and collection cycles for new long-term drilling contracts in Colombia.

27

Income taxes receivable as of December 31, 2009 primarily related to net operating losses recognized during 2009. We applied our net operating losses against taxable income that we recognized in prior years which resulted in a federal tax refund. Our income taxes receivable decreased at September 30, 2010, as we received a federal income tax refund of $40.6 million in April 2010 primarily related to the carry-back of our 2009 net operating losses.

The increase in deferred income taxes is due to the movement of our deferred tax assets related to net operating losses for our Colombian operations from long-term to current. We now expect to realize the deferred tax assets in the short-term due to the increase in our Colombian operations through 2010.

The increase in inventory at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 was primarily due to the expansion of our operations in Colombia. We maintain inventories of replacement parts and supplies for our drilling rigs operating in Colombia to ensure efficient operations in geographically remote areas. We exported our seventh and eighth drilling rigs to Colombia during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, accounting for $1.9 million of the increase in inventory. The remaining increase in inventory is due to the expansion of our domestic wireline services operations during 2010.

The increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 is primarily due to an increase in deferred mobilization costs for drilling rigs that began new long-term drilling contracts during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. These deferred mobilization costs will be amortized over the contract term. The overall increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets was partially offset by a decrease in prepaid insurance. We renew and prepay most of our insurance premiums in late October of each year and some in April of each year. As of September 30, 2010, we had amortization of eleven months of these October insurance premiums, as compared to two months of amortization as of December 31, 2009.

The increase in accounts payable at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 is due to the overall increase in the demand for drilling, workover, wireline and fishing and rental services during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Our operating costs increased $32.0 million, or 56%, during the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. In addition, our capital expenditures increased for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2009, accounting for $16.3 million of the increase in accounts payable. Both the increase in the demand for our services and the increase in capital expenditures led to an increase in purchases from our vendors.

The current portion of long-term debt at September 30, 2010 relates to $1.7 million of debt payments under our subordinated notes payable and other debt that are due within the next year.

Prepaid drilling contracts represent amounts billed for mobilization revenues in excess of revenue recognized for certain drilling contracts. Mobilization billings, and costs incurred for the mobilization, are deferred and recognized over the term of the related drilling contracts. The increase in prepaid drilling contracts at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 is primarily due to an increase in deferred mobilization revenues for four of the drilling rigs in Colombia that began new long-term drilling contracts during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The increase in accrued payroll and related employee costs was primarily due to workforce additions and increased accruals for potential higher bonuses anticipated for 2010, both of which are a result of higher demand for our drilling, workover, wireline and fishing and rental services during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Our employee count increased by approximately 775 people, or 45%, as of September 30, 2010, as compared to December 31, 2009.

The increase in other accrued expenses is primarily due to an increase in accrued interest, which increased from $0.3 million at December 31, 2009 to $1.1 million at September 30, 2010. Accrued interest at September 30, 2010 primarily relates to the outstanding debt balance for our Senior Notes, while accrued interest at December 31, 2009 primarily related to the outstanding debt balance under our Revolving Credit Facility. On March 11, 2010, we issued $250 million of Senior Notes with a coupon interest rate of 9.875%. The Senior Notes were sold with an original issue discount that will result in an effective yield to maturity of approximately 10.677%. The proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes were immediately used to make a payment of $234.8 million to reduce the outstanding debt balance under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility had an interest rate of 3.74% as of December 31, 2009 which was based on the LIBOR rate plus a per annum margin, with interest payments due monthly. The Senior Notes have a higher interest rate as compared to the Revolving Credit Facility, with interest payments due semi-annually, which resulted in an increase in accrued interest as of September 30, 2010.

28

Long-Term Debt and Other Contractual Obligations

The following table includes all our contractual obligations of the types specified below at September 30, 2010 (amounts in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		2-3 years		4-5 years		More than 5 years
Long-term debt	$	293,109	$	1,659	$	41,450	$	—	$	250,000
Interest on long-term debt		190,041		27,273		51,674		49,375		61,719
Purchase obligations		13,649		13,649		—		—		—
Operating leases		7,025		2,480		3,441		1,104		—
Restricted cash obligation		1,950		650		1,300		—		—
Total	$	505,774	$	45,711	$	97,865	$	50,479	$	311,719

Long-term debt consists of $39.8 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility, $250 million face amount outstanding under our Senior Notes, $3.2 million outstanding under subordinated notes payable to certain employees that are former shareholders of previously acquired production services businesses, and other debt of $0.1 million. As of October 22, 2010, we have $47.8 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility, which is not due until maturity on August 31, 2012. However, we may make principal payments to reduce the outstanding debt balance prior to maturity when cash and working capital is sufficient. The outstanding balance under our Senior Notes has a carrying value of $239.9 million, which represents the $250 million face value net of the $10.1 million of original issue discount, net of amortization. The discount is being amortized over the term of the Senior Notes based on the effective interest method. The Senior Notes will mature on March 15, 2018. Our subordinated notes payable have final maturity dates ranging from November 2010 to April 2013.

Interest payment obligations on our Revolving Credit Facility are estimated based on (1) the 5.76 % interest rate that was in effect on October 22, 2010 and (2) the outstanding principal balance of $39.8 million to be paid at maturity in August 2012. Interest payment obligations on our Senior Notes are calculated based on the coupon interest rate of 9.875% due semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2010, through maturity. Interest payment obligations on our subordinated notes payable are based on interest rates ranging from 5.4% to 14%, with either quarterly or annual payments of principal and interest through maturity.

Purchase obligations primarily relate to equipment upgrades and purchases of new equipment.

Operating leases consist of lease agreements with terms in excess of one year for office space, operating facilities, equipment and personal property.

As of September 30, 2010, we had restricted cash in the amount of $2.0 million held in an escrow account to be used for future payments in connection with the acquisition of Competition. The former owner of Competition will receive annual installments of $0.7 million payable over the remaining three years from the escrow account.

29

Debt Requirements

The Revolving Credit Facility contains customary mandatory prepayments in respect of asset dispositions, debt incurrence and equity issuances, which are applied to reduce outstanding revolving and swing-line loans and letter of credit exposure. There are no limitations on our ability to access the $225 million borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility other than maintaining compliance with the covenants. At September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with our financial covenants. Our total consolidated leverage ratio was 3.44 to 1.0, our senior consolidated leverage ratio was 0.56 to 1.0, and our interest coverage ratio was 3.92 to 1.0. In order to remain in compliance with our financial covenants, our borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was limited to an additional $136.5 million as of September 30, 2010.

The financial covenants contained in our Revolving Credit Facility include the following:

• A maximum total consolidated leverage ratio that cannot exceed:

• 5.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010 through June 30, 2011;

• 4.75 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2011;

• 4.50 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2011;

• 4.25 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012; and

• 4.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2012 and thereafter.

• A maximum senior consolidated leverage ratio, which excludes unsecured and subordinated debt, that cannot exceed:

• 4.75 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010;

• 4.50 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010;

• 4.25 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011;

• 4.00 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2011;

• 3.75 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2011;

• 3.50 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2011;

• 3.25 to 1.00 as of the end of the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012; and

• 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 and thereafter.

• A minimum interest coverage ratio that cannot be less than:

• 2.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2010 through December 31, 2011; and

• 3.00 to 1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012 and thereafter.

• If our senior consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 2.25 to 1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter, a minimum asset coverage ratio that cannot be less than 1.00 to 1.00 for any fiscal quarter ending on or before December 31, 2011, and 1.10 to 1.00 for any fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2012 and thereafter (as provided in the Revolving Credit Facility). If our senior consolidated leverage ratio is greater than 2.25 to 1.00 and our asset coverage ratio is less than 1.00 to 1.00, then borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility will be limited to the sum of 80% of eligible accounts receivable, 80% of the orderly liquidation value of eligible equipment and 40% of the net book value of certain other fixed assets.

The Revolving Credit Facility restricts capital expenditures unless (a) after giving effect to such capital expenditure, no event of default would exist under the Revolving Credit Facility and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility would be equal to or greater than $25 million and (b) if the senior consolidated leverage ratio as of the last day of the most recent reported fiscal quarter was equal to or greater than 2.50 to 1.00, such capital expenditure would not cause the sum of all capital expenditures to exceed:

• $65 million for fiscal year 2010; and

• $80 million for each fiscal year thereafter.

The capital expenditure thresholds for each period noted above may be increased by:

• the first $25 million of any aggregate equity issuance proceeds received during such period and 25% of any equity issuance proceeds received in excess of $25 million during such period; and

• 25% of any debt incurrence proceeds received during such period.

In addition, any unused portion of the capital expenditure threshold up to $30 million can be carried over from the immediate preceding fiscal year.

30

At September 30, 2010, our senior consolidated leverage ratio was not greater than 2.50 to 1.00 and, therefore, we were not subject to the capital expenditure threshold restrictions listed above.

The Revolving Credit Facility has additional restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional debt, investments, liens, dividends, acquisitions, redemptions of capital stock, prepayments of indebtedness, asset dispositions, mergers and consolidations, transactions with affiliates, hedging contracts, sale leasebacks and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including without limitation, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain other material indebtedness in excess of specified amounts, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, judgment defaults in excess of specified amounts, failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the credit agreement and change of control.

Our obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our domestic assets (including equity interests in Pioneer Global Holdings, Inc. and 65% of the outstanding equity interests of any first-tier foreign subsidiaries owned by Pioneer Global Holdings, Inc., but excluding any equity interest in, and any assets of, Pioneer Services Holdings, LLC) and are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries, including Pioneer Global Holdings, Inc.

In addition to the financial covenants under our Revolving Credit Facility, the Indenture Agreement for our Senior Notes contains certain restrictions on our ability to:

• pay dividends on stock;

• repurchase stock or redeem subordinated debt or make other restricted payments;

• incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified stock;

• create liens on our assets;

• enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

• restrict dividends, loans or other asset transfers from certain of our subsidiaries;

• consolidate with or merge with or into, or sell all or substantially all of our properties to another person;

• enter into transactions with affiliates; and

• enter into new lines of business.

These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, holders of the Senior Notes will have the right to require us to purchase all or a portion of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of each Senior Note, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase. Under certain circumstances in connection with asset dispositions, we will be required to use the excess proceeds of asset dispositions to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of each Senior Note, together with any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase.

Our Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by our existing domestic subsidiaries, except for Pioneer Services Holdings, LLC, and by certain of our future domestic subsidiaries. The subsidiaries that generally operate our non-U.S. business concentrated in Colombia do not guarantee our Senior Notes. The non-guarantor subsidiaries do not have any payment obligations under the Senior Notes, the guarantees or the Indenture. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any non-guarantor subsidiary, such non-guarantor subsidiary will pay the holders of its debt and other liabilities, including its trade creditors, before it will be able to distribute any of its assets to us. In the future, any non-U.S. subsidiaries, immaterial subsidiaries and subsidiaries that we designate as unrestricted subsidiaries under the Indenture will not guarantee the Senior Notes.

Our Senior Notes are not subject to any sinking fund requirements. As of September 30, 2010, there were no restrictions on the ability of subsidiary guarantors to transfer funds to the parent company, and we were in compliance with all covenants pertaining to our Senior Notes.

31

Results of Operations

Statement of Operations Analysis

The following table provides information for our operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands, except average number of drilling rigs, utilization rate and per day information):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Drilling Services Division:
Revenues	$	85,667		$	48,084		$	217,580		$	165,170
Operating costs		59,957			35,315			164,409			107,880
Drilling Services Division margin	$	25,710		$	12,769		$	53,171		$	57,290
Average number of drilling rigs		71.0			71.0			71.0			70.6
Utilization rate		63	%		35	%		57	%		41	%
Revenue days		4,102			2,271			11,029			7,805
Average revenues per day	$	20,884		$	21,173		$	19,728		$	21,162
Average operating costs per day		14,617			15,550			14,907			13,822
Drilling Services Division margin per day	$	6,267		$	5,623		$	4,821		$	7,340
Production Services Division:
Revenues	$	49,877		$	26,282		$	121,012		$	79,156
Operating costs		29,196			16,638			73,688			50,260
Production Services Division margin	$	20,681		$	9,644		$	47,324		$	28,896
Combined
Revenues	$	135,544		$	74,366		$	338,592		$	244,326
Operating costs		89,153			51,953			238,097			158,140
Combined margin	$	46,391		$	22,413		$	100,495		$	86,186
EBITDA	$	34,228		$	15,152		$	65,483		$	60,876

We present Drilling Services Division margin, Production Services Division margin, combined margin and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) information because we believe it provides investors and our management additional information to assist them in assessing our business and performance in comparison to other companies in our industry. Since Drilling Services Division margin, Production Services Division margin, combined margin and EBITDA are “non-GAAP” financial measure under the rules and regulations of the SEC, we are providing the following reconciliation of combined margin and EBITDA to net (loss) earnings, which is the nearest comparable GAAP financial measure.

32

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(amounts in thousands)
Reconciliation of combined margin and
EBITDA to net loss:
Combined margin	$	46,391		$	22,413		$	100,495		$	86,186
Selling, general and administrative		(13,030	)		(8,892	)		(36,760	)		(27,870	)
Bad debt recovery		22			1,409			104			1,713
Other income		845			222			1,644			847
EBITDA		34,228			15,152			65,483			60,876
Depreciation and amortization		(30,847	)		(26,952	)		(89,275	)		(78,467	)
Interest expense, net		(7,573	)		(1,796	)		(18,746	)		(5,373	)
Income tax benefit		1,612			4,406			15,269			8,133
Net loss	$	(2,580	)	$	(9,190	)	$	(27,269	)	$	(14,831	)

Our Drilling Services Division’s revenues increased by $37.6 million, or 78%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2009, due to an 81% increase in revenue days that resulted from an increase in our rig utilization rate from 35% to 63%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our Drilling Services Division’s revenues increased by $52.4 million, or 32%, as compared to the corresponding period in 2009, due to a 41% increase in revenue days that resulted from an increase in our rig utilization rate from 41% to 57%. We have experienced an increase in the demand for drilling services in 2010 as our industry begins to recover from the downturn that bottomed in late 2009. Consequently, utilization rates and drilling revenue rates have improved in 2010 as compared to 2009. However, when compared to the corresponding periods in 2009, our Drilling Services Division’s average revenues decreased by $289 per day, or 1%, during the three months ended September 30, 2010, and decreased by $1,434 per day, or 7%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During 2009, a significant portion of our drilling rigs were still operating or were on standby under long-term drilling contracts that were entered into when drilling rig demand was high and drilling revenues per day were at historically high levels. The positive impact of the higher revenue rates for these long-term contracts had a diminishing affect on our average revenues per day as the contracts expired ratably during 2009. In addition, a larger percentage of our Drilling Services Division’s revenues were attributed to turnkey drilling contracts in 2009 when compared to 2010, and turnkey drilling contracts result in higher average revenues per day than daywork drilling contracts. The overall decreases in our average drilling revenues per day during 2010 as compared to 2009 was partially offset by an increase in our Colombian operations during 2010, as drilling contracts in Colombia have higher revenue rates per day when compared to domestic drilling contracts.

Demand for drilling rigs influences the types of drilling contracts we are able to obtain. As demand for drilling rigs decreases, daywork rates move down and we may switch to performing more turnkey drilling contracts to maintain higher utilization rates and improve our Drilling Services Division’s margins. Turnkey drilling contracts also result in higher average revenues per day and higher average operating costs per day when compared to daywork drilling contracts. We completed two and eight turnkey drilling contracts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to five and eight turnkey drilling contracts completed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. The shift to fewer turnkey drilling contracts is due to the increase in the demand for drilling services in 2010. The following table provides percentages of our drilling revenues by drilling contract type for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Daywork drilling contracts		99	%		74	%		94	%		90	%
Turnkey drilling contracts		1	%		26	%		6	%		10	%
Footage drilling contracts		—			—			—			—

Our Drilling Services Division’s operating costs increased by $24.6 million, or 70%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2009, primarily due to the increase in utilization which was partially offset by the decrease in our operating costs of $933 per day, or 6%. The decrease in operating costs per day during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2009, is primarily due to a smaller proportion of our drilling services attributable to turnkey drilling contracts in 2010.

33

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our Drilling Services Division’s operating costs increased $56.5 million, or 52%, as compared to the corresponding period in 2009, primarily due to the increase in utilization and the increase in our operating costs of $1,085 per day, or 8%. The increase in operating costs per day is due to higher average drilling costs per day for our domestic operations, as well as the increase in our Colombian operations during 2010 as compared to 2009, where we have a higher operating cost per day as compared to our domestic operations. We have seen an increase in the demand for our services during 2010 as our industry begins to recover from the downturn that bottomed in late 2009. As utilization rates began to increase in 2010, average operating costs per day increased due to higher wage rates and repair and maintenance expenses as drilling rigs come out of storage and begin operations. In addition, average operating costs per day in 2009 were lower due to a significant portion of our drilling rigs earning standby revenue rates under longer-term drilling contracts and incurring reduced operating costs. The overall increase in operating costs per day in 2010 was partially offset by a decrease in operating costs per day due to a smaller proportion of our drilling services attributable to turnkey contracts during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009.

Our Production Services Division’s revenues increased by $23.6 million, or 90%, while operating costs increased $12.6 million, or 75%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our Production Services Division’s revenue increased by $41.9 million, or 53%, while operating costs increased by $23.4 million, or 47%, as compared to the corresponding period in 2009. Our Production Services Division experienced increases in its revenue and operating cost due to higher demand for our wireline services, well services and fishing and rental services during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2009. The increase in our Production Services Division’s revenues is due primarily to higher utilization rates, especially in the wireline services operations, and to a lesser extent, higher revenue rates charged for these services during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2009. We have also expanded our operations in 2010 by adding 17 wireline units resulting in an increase in both revenues and operating costs.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, our selling, general and administrative expense increased by approximately $4.1 million and $8.9 million, or 47% and 32%, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2009. The increase is primarily due to increases in compensation related expenses. With the industry downturn during 2009, we experienced a decrease in the demand for our services and we responded with workforce reductions, elimination of wage rate increases and reduced bonus compensation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we have seen an increase in the demand for our services as our industry begins to recover from the industry downturn in 2009. Compensation related expenses increased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding quarters in 2009 as we have added employees in our corporate office and have accrued for potential higher bonuses anticipated for 2010.

Bad debt recovery decreased for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2009 primarily due to the collection of a customer’s past due account receivable balance in 2009 for which we had previously established a $1.3 million allowance for doubtful accounts in December 2008.

Our other income increased by $0.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2009, primarily due to the increase in foreign currency translation gains in excess of losses recognized in relation to our operations in Colombia.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, our depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $3.9 million and $10.8 million, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2009. This increase resulted primarily from capital expenditures made to upgrade certain drilling rigs to meet the needs of our customers and obtain new contracts as well as capital expenditures for the acquisition of new wireline units.

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily related to the outstanding debt balance for our Senior Notes, while interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 primarily related to the outstanding debt balance under our Revolving Credit Facility. On March 11, 2010, we issued $250 million of Senior Notes with a coupon interest rate of 9.875%. The Senior Notes were sold with an original issue discount that will result in an effective yield to maturity of approximately 10.677%. The proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes were immediately used to make a payment of $234.8 million to reduce the outstanding debt balance under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility had a relatively low interest rate of 2.25% as of September 30, 2009, which was based on the LIBOR rate plus a per annum margin. The Senior Notes have a higher interest rate when compared to the Revolving Credit Facility, which resulted in the increase in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. In addition, interest expense increased in 2010 as compared to 2009 due to an increase in total outstanding debt which was $283.0 million as of September 30, 2010 as compared to $262.4 million as of September 30, 2009.

Our effective income tax rates for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2010 differ from the federal statutory rate in the United States of 35% primarily due to a lower effective tax rate in foreign jurisdictions, state income taxes and other permanent differences.

34

Inflation

Wage rates for our operations personnel are impacted by inflationary pressures when the demand for drilling and production services increases and the availability of personnel is scarce. From early 2005 to late 2008, the increased rig count in each of our market areas resulted in increased wage rates for our drilling rig personnel. We were able to pass these wage rate increases on to our customers based on contract terms. Beginning in late 2008 and through late 2009, as the rig count in our market areas decreased, we reduced wage rates for drilling rig personnel. With the recent increase in rig counts, beginning in late 2009, we again saw a decreased availability of personnel to operate our rigs and therefore we had additional wage rate increases for drilling rig personnel of approximately 18% and 16% in February and July 2010, respectively.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, we experienced increases in costs for rig repairs and maintenance and costs of rig upgrades and new rig construction, due to the increased industry-wide demand for equipment, supplies and service. We estimate these costs increased by 10% to 15% during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008. We did not experience similar cost increases during 2009; however, to date we have experienced an increase of approximately 5% during 2010.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have any off balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Revenue and cost recognition—Our Drilling Services Division earns revenues by drilling oil and gas wells for our customers under daywork, turnkey or footage contracts, which usually provide for the drilling of a single well. We recognize revenues on daywork contracts for the days completed based on the dayrate each contract specifies. We recognize revenues from our turnkey and footage contracts on the percentage- of- completion method based on our estimate of the number of days to complete each contract. Individual contracts are usually completed in less than 60 days. The risks to us under a turnkey contract and, to a lesser extent, under footage contracts, are substantially greater than on a contract drilled on a daywork basis. Under a turnkey contract, we assume most of the risks associated with drilling operations that are generally assumed by the operator in a daywork contract, including the risks of blowout, loss of hole, stuck drill pipe, machinery breakdowns and abnormal drilling conditions, as well as risks associated with subcontractors’ services, supplies, cost escalations and personnel operations.

Our management has determined that it is appropriate to use the percentage- of- completion method, as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605 (formerly American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 81-1), to recognize revenue on our turnkey and footage contracts. Although our turnkey and footage contracts do not have express terms that provide us with rights to receive payment for the work that we perform prior to drilling wells to the agreed-on depth, we use this method because, as provided in applicable accounting literature, we believe we achieve a continuous sale for our work- in- progress and believe, under applicable state law, we ultimately could recover the fair value of our work- in- progress even in the event we were unable to drill to the agreed-on depth in breach of the applicable contract. However, in the event we were unable to drill to the agreed-on depth in breach of the contract, ultimate recovery of that value would be subject to negotiations with the customer and the possibility of litigation.

If a customer defaults on its payment obligation to us under a turnkey or footage contract, we would need to rely on applicable law to enforce our lien rights, because our turnkey and footage contracts do not expressly grant to us a security interest in the work we have completed under the contract and we have no ownership rights in the work- in- progress or completed drilling work, except any rights arising under the applicable lien statute on foreclosure. If we were unable to drill to the agreed-on depth in breach of the contract, we also would need to rely on equitable remedies outside of the contract available in applicable courts to recover the fair value of our work- in- progress under a turnkey or footage contract.

We accrue estimated contract costs on turnkey and footage contracts for each day of work completed based on our estimate of the total costs to complete the contract divided by our estimate of the number of days to complete the contract. Contract costs include labor, materials, supplies, repairs and maintenance, operating overhead allocations and allocations of depreciation and amortization expense. In addition, the occurrence of uninsured or under-insured losses or operating cost overruns on our turnkey and footage contracts could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. Therefore, our actual results for a contract could differ significantly if our cost estimates for that contract are later revised from our original cost estimates for a contract in progress at the end of a reporting period which was not completed prior to the release of our financial statements.

With most drilling contracts, we receive payments contractually designated for the mobilization of rigs and other equipment. Payments received, and costs incurred for the mobilization services are deferred and recognized on a straight line basis over the contract term of certain drilling contracts. Costs incurred to relocate rigs and other drilling equipment to areas in which a contract has not been secured are expensed as incurred. Reimbursements that we receive for out-of-pocket expenses are recorded as revenue and the out-of-pocket expenses for which they relate are recorded as operating costs.

35

The asset “unbilled receivables” represents revenues we have recognized in excess of amounts billed on drilling contracts and production services in progress. The assets “prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “other long-term assets” include the current and long-term portions of deferred mobilization costs for certain drilling contracts. The liabilities “prepaid drilling contracts” and “other long-term liabilities” include the current and long-term portions of deferred mobilization revenues for certain drilling contracts and amounts collected on contracts in excess of revenues recognized.

Our Production Services Division earns revenues for well services, wireline services and fishing and rental services pursuant to master services agreements based on purchase orders, contracts or other persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer that include fixed or determinable prices. Production service revenue is recognized when the service has been rendered and collectability is reasonably assured.

Long-lived Assets and Intangible Assets—We evaluate for potential impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets subject to amortization when indicators of impairment are present, as defined in ASC Topic 360 (formerly SFAS No. 144). Circumstances that could indicate a potential impairment include significant adverse changes in industry trends, economic climate, legal factors, and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. More specifically, significant adverse changes in industry trends include significant declines in revenue rates, utilization rates, oil and natural gas market prices and industry rig counts for drilling rigs and workover rigs. In performing the impairment evaluation, we estimate the future undiscounted net cash flows relating to long-lived assets and intangible assets grouped at the lowest level that cash flows can be identified. For our Production Services Division, our long-lived assets and intangible assets are grouped at the reporting unit level which is one level below the operating segment level. For our Drilling Services Division, we perform an impairment evaluation and estimate future undiscounted cash flows for individual drilling rig assets. If the sum of the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the long-lived assets and intangible assets for these asset grouping levels, then we would recognize an impairment charge. The amount of an impairment charge would be measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of these assets. The assumptions used in the impairment evaluation for long-lived assets and intangible assets are inherently uncertain and require management judgment.

Goodwill—Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of the net assets acquired. We account for goodwill and other intangible assets under the provisions of ASC Topic 350 (formerly SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of December 31 or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Circumstances that could indicate a potential impairment include a significant adverse change in the economic or business climate, a significant adverse change in legal factors, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, loss of key personnel and the likelihood that a reporting unit or significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of. These circumstances could lead to our net book value exceeding our market capitalization which is another indicator of a potential impairment in goodwill. ASC Topic 350 requires a two-step process for testing impairment. First, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an indication of impairment exists. Second, if impairment is indicated, then the fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is determined by allocating the unit’s fair value to its assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination on the impairment test date. The amount of impairment for goodwill is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit over its fair value. Goodwill of $118.6 million was initially recorded in connection with the acquisitions of the production services businesses from WEDGE, Competition, Pettus and Paltec, all of which occurred between March 1, 2008 and October 1, 2008, and was allocated to the three reporting units for our Production Services Division which are well services, wireline services and fishing and rental services. We recorded a full impairment of this goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2008. We had no goodwill additions during the year ended December 31, 2009, or during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Deferred taxes—We provide deferred taxes for the basis differences in our property and equipment between financial reporting and tax reporting purposes and other costs such as compensation, net operating loss carryforwards, employee benefit and other accrued liabilities which are deducted in different periods for financial reporting and tax reporting purposes. For property and equipment, basis differences arise from differences in depreciation periods and methods and the value of assets acquired in a business acquisition where we acquire an entity rather than just its assets. For financial reporting purposes, we depreciate the various components of our drilling rigs, workover rigs and wireline units over 2 to 25 years and refurbishments over 3 to 5 years, while federal income tax rules require that we depreciate drilling rigs, workover rigs and wireline units over 5 years. Therefore, in the first 5 years of our ownership of a drilling rig, workover rig or wireline unit, our tax depreciation exceeds our financial reporting depreciation, resulting in our providing deferred taxes on this depreciation difference. After 5 years, financial reporting depreciation exceeds tax depreciation, and the deferred tax liability begins to reverse.

36

Accounting estimates—We consider the recognition of revenues and costs on turnkey and footage contracts to be critical accounting estimates. On these types of contracts, we are required to estimate the number of days needed for us to complete the contract and our total cost to complete the contract. Our actual costs could substantially exceed our estimated costs if we encounter problems such as lost circulation, stuck drill pipe or an underground blowout on contracts still in progress subsequent to the release of the financial statements. We receive payment under turnkey and footage contracts when we deliver to our customer a well completed to the depth specified in the contract, unless the customer authorizes us to drill to a more shallow depth. Since 1995, we have completed all our turnkey or footage contracts. Although our initial cost estimates for turnkey and footage contracts do not include cost estimates for risks such as stuck drill pipe or loss of circulation, we believe that our experienced management team, our knowledge of geologic formations in our areas of operations, the condition of our drilling equipment and our experienced crews have previously enabled us to make reasonable cost estimates and complete contracts according to our drilling plan. While we do bear the risk of loss for cost overruns and other events that are not specifically provided for in our initial cost estimates, our pricing of turnkey and footage contracts takes such risks into consideration. When we encounter, during the course of our drilling operations, conditions unforeseen in the preparation of our original cost estimate, we increase our cost estimate to complete the contract. If we anticipate a loss on a contract in progress at the end of a reporting period due to a change in our cost estimate, we accrue the entire amount of the estimated loss, including all costs that are included in our revised estimated cost to complete that contract, in our consolidated statement of operations for that reporting period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we experienced a loss of $0.2 million on one turnkey contract. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not experience a loss on any turnkey or footage contracts completed. We are more likely to encounter losses on turnkey and footage contracts in periods in which revenue rates are lower for all types of contracts. During periods of reduced demand for drilling rigs, our overall profitability on turnkey and footage contracts has historically exceeded our profitability on daywork contracts.

Revenues and costs during a reporting period could be affected for contracts in progress at the end of a reporting period which have not been completed before our financial statements for that period are released. We had one turnkey and no footage contracts in progress at September 30, 2010. The turnkey contract was completed prior to the release of the financial statements included in this report. Our unbilled receivables totaled $20.1 million at September 30, 2010. Of that amount accrued, turnkey drilling contract revenues were $0.3 million. The remaining balance of unbilled receivables related to $18.5 million of the revenue recognized but not yet billed on daywork drilling contracts in progress at September 30, 2010 and $1.3 million related to unbilled receivables for our Production Services Division.

As of September 30, 2010, we had $22.1 million deferred tax assets relating to domestic and foreign net operating losses available to reduce future taxable income. In assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets, we only recognize a tax benefit to the extent of taxable income that we expect to earn in the jurisdiction in future periods. We estimate that our operations will result in taxable income in excess of our net operating losses and we expect to apply the net operating losses against the current year taxable income and taxable income that we have estimated in future periods. Therefore, as of September 30, 2010, we have not recorded a valuation allowance.

We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the creditworthiness of our customers as well as general economic conditions. We evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers based on commercial credit reports, trade references, bank references, financial information, production information and any past experience we have with the customer. Consequently, any change in those factors could affect our estimate of our allowance for doubtful accounts. In some instances, we require new customers to establish escrow accounts or make prepayments. We typically invoice our customers at 15-day intervals during the performance of daywork contracts and upon completion of the daywork contract. Turnkey and footage contracts are invoiced upon completion of the contract. Our typical contract provides for payment of invoices in 10 to 30 days. We generally do not extend payment terms beyond 30 days and have not extended payment terms beyond 90 days for any of our contracts in the last three fiscal years. We had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million at September 30, 2010 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2009.

Our determination of the useful lives of our depreciable assets, which directly affects our determination of depreciation expense and deferred taxes is also a critical accounting estimate. A decrease in the useful life of our property and equipment would increase depreciation expense and reduce deferred taxes. We provide for depreciation of our drilling, production, transportation and other equipment on a straight-line method over useful lives that we have estimated and that range from 2 to 25 years. We record the same depreciation expense whether a drilling rig, workover rig or wireline unit is idle or working. Our estimates of the useful lives of our drilling, production, transportation and other equipment are based on our more than 35 years of experience in the oilfield services industry with similar equipment.

37

Our accrued insurance premiums and deductibles as of September 30, 2010 include accruals for costs incurred under the self-insurance portion of our health insurance of approximately $1.2 million and our workers’ compensation, general liability and auto liability insurance of approximately $7.2 million. We have a deductible of $125,000 per covered individual per year under the health insurance. We have a deductible of $500,000 per occurrence under our workers’ compensation insurance, except in North Dakota, where we have a $100,000 deductible. We have deductibles of $250,000 and $100,000 per occurrence under our general liability insurance and auto liability insurance, respectively. We accrue for these costs as claims are incurred based on historical claim development data, and we accrue the costs of administrative services associated with claims processing. We also evaluate our workers’ compensation claim cost estimates based on estimates provided by a professional actuary.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards update, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements – A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. We will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011; however, earlier application is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Recently Enacted Regulation

The Colombian government enacted a tax reform act which, among other things, adopted a one-time, net-worth tax for all Colombian entities. The tax will be assessed on an entity’s net equity, measured on a Colombian tax basis as of January 1, 2011, and will be payable in eight semi-annual installments from 2011through 2014. Based on our estimate of our Colombian operations’ forecasted net equity, as defined, we believe our total net-worth tax obligation will be between $5.3 million and $6.3 million. In January 2011, the actual net-worth tax obligation will be determinable and recognized in full in other expense in our consolidated statement of operations and in other accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to interest rate market risk on our variable rate debt. As of September 30, 2010, we had $39.8 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility subject to variable interest rate risk. The impact of a 1% increase in interest rates on this amount of debt would result in increased interest expense of approximately $99,000 and a decrease in net income of approximately $65,000 during a quarterly period.

At September 30, 2010, we held $15.9 million (par value) of investments comprised of tax exempt, auction rate preferred securities (ARPS), which are variable-rate preferred securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest rate being reset through “Dutch auctions” that are held every 7 days. The ARPSs had historically traded at par because of the frequent interest rate resets and because they are callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is paid at the end of each auction period. Our ARPSs are AAA/Aaa rated securities, collateralized by municipal bonds and backed by assets that are equal to or greater than 200% of the liquidation preference. Until February 2008, the auction rate securities market was highly liquid. Beginning mid-February 2008, we experienced several “failed” auctions, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell all of the securities that holders desired to sell at auction. The immediate effect of a failed auction is that such holders cannot sell the securities at auction and the interest rate on the security resets to a maximum auction rate. We have continued to receive interest payments on our ARPSs in accordance with their terms. Unless a future auction is successful or the issuer calls the security pursuant to redemption prior to maturity, we may not be able to access the funds we invested in our ARPSs without a loss of principal. We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying municipal securities that collateralize our ARPSs are presently at risk of default. We believe we will ultimately recover the par value of the ARPSs without a loss, primarily due to the collateral securing the ARPSs and our estimate of the discounted cash flows that we expect to collect. We do not currently intend to sell our ARPSs at a loss. Also, we believe it is more- likely- than- not that we will not have to sell our ARPSs prior to recovery, as our liquidity needs are expected to be met with cash flows from operating activities and our Revolving Credit Facility. Our ARPSs are designated as available-for-sale and are reported at fair market value with the related unrealized gains or losses, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, a component of shareholders’ equity. The estimated fair value of our ARPSs at September 30, 2010 was $12.6 million compared with a par value of $15.9 million. The $3.3 million difference represents a fair value discount due to the current lack of liquidity which is considered temporary and has been recorded as an unrealized loss, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). There was no portion of the fair value discount attributable to credit losses. We would recognize an impairment charge in our statement of operations if the fair value of our investments falls below the cost basis and is judged to be other- than- temporary. Our ARPSs are classified with other long-term assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 because of our inability to determine the recovery period of our investments.

38

Foreign Currency Risk

While the U.S. dollar is the functional currency for reporting purposes for our Colombian operations, we enter into transactions denominated in Colombian pesos. Nonmonetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates and monetary assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. Income statement accounts are translated at average rates for the period. As a result, Colombian Peso denominated transactions are affected by changes in exchange rates. We generally accept the exposure to exchange rate movements without using derivative financial instruments to manage this risk. Therefore, both positive and negative movements in the Colombian Peso currency exchange rate against the U.S. dollar has and will continue to affect the reported amount of revenues, expenses, profit, and assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

39

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to these actions cannot be accurately predicted, in management’s opinion, any such liability will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Our operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations governing the protection of the environment and human health and safety.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently focused on citizen concerns about the risk of water contamination and public health problems from drilling and hydraulic fracturing activities. The EPA is conducting a comprehensive research study on the potential adverse effects that hydraulic fracturing may have on water quality and public health. It is possible that resulting federal, state and local laws and regulations might be imposed on fracturing activities. The potential adoption of federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing could result in operating restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and gas wells. A decline in the drilling of new wells and related well servicing activities caused by these initiatives could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2010, a deepwater drilling rig which was operated by another contractor in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico sank after an apparent blowout and fire, resulting in the loss of life and a significant oil spill. In our continuing effort to monitor market conditions and industry developments, we are evaluating the impact of this recent oil spill incident. At this time, we cannot predict the full impact of the incident on our customers or on the continuing demand for our services. In addition, we cannot predict how our customers and government regulatory agencies will respond to the incident. Any changes to laws and regulations that may result from the oil spill incident would more likely be directed primarily at offshore drilling operations, but could impact our land drilling and production services operations as well.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

We did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Period	Total Number  of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid  per Share (2)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 - July 31		—	$	—		—		—
August 1 - August 31		7,803	$	5.55		—		—
September 1 - September 30		197	$	5.85		—		—
Total		8,000	$	5.56		—		—

(1) The shares indicated consist of shares of our common stock tendered by employees to the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2010, to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting and release of restricted shares, which we repurchased based on the fair market value on the date the relevant transaction occurs.

(2) The calculation of the average price paid per share does not give effect to any fees, commissions or other costs associated with the repurchase of such shares.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

40

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or incorporated by reference herein:

Exhibit Number		Description
2.1*	-	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 31, 2008, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, WEDGE Group Incorporated, WEDGE Energy Holdings, L.L.C., WEDGE Oil & Gas Services, L.L.C., Timothy Daley, John Patterson and Patrick Grissom (Form 8-K dated February 1, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 2.1)).
2.2*	-	Letter Agreement, dated February 29, 2008, amending the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 31, 2008, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, WEDGE Group Incorporated, WEDGE Energy Holdings, L.L.C., WEDGE Oil & Gas Services, L.L.C., Timothy Daley, John Patterson and Patrick Grissom (Form 8-K dated March 3, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 2.1)).
3.1*	-	Restated Articles of Incorporation of Pioneer Drilling Company (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 3.1)).
3.2*	-	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Pioneer Drilling Company (Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 3.1)).
4.1*	-	Form of Certificate representing Common Stock of Pioneer Drilling Company (Form S-8 filed November 18, 2003 (Reg. No. 333-110569, Exhibit 4.3)).
4.2*	-	Indenture, dated March 11, 2010, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Form 8-K dated March 12, 2010, (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 4.1)).
4.3*	-	Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 11, 2010, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and the initial purchasers party thereto (Form 8-K dated March 12, 2010, (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 4.2)).
31.1**	-	Certification by Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2**	-	Certification by Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1#	-	Certification by Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
32.2#	-	Certification by Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

* Incorporated by reference to the filing indicated.

** Filed herewith.

# Furnished herewith.

41

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

PIONEER DRILLING COMPANY

/s/ Lorne E. Phillips        

Lorne E. Phillips

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Representative)

Dated: November 4, 2010

42

Index to Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description
2.1*	-	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 31, 2008, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, WEDGE Group Incorporated, WEDGE Energy Holdings, L.L.C., WEDGE Oil & Gas Services, L.L.C., Timothy Daley, John Patterson and Patrick Grissom (Form 8-K dated February 1, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 2.1)).
2.2*	-	Letter Agreement, dated February 29, 2008, amending the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 31, 2008, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, WEDGE Group Incorporated, WEDGE Energy Holdings, L.L.C., WEDGE Oil & Gas Services, L.L.C., Timothy Daley, John Patterson and Patrick Grissom (Form 8-K dated March 3, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 2.1)).
3.1*	-	Restated Articles of Incorporation of Pioneer Drilling Company (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 3.1)).
3.2*	-	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Pioneer Drilling Company (Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 3.1)).
4.1*	-	Form of Certificate representing Common Stock of Pioneer Drilling Company (Form S-8 filed November 18, 2003 (Reg. No. 333-110569, Exhibit 4.3)).
4.2*	-	Indenture, dated March 11, 2010, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (Form 8-K dated March 12, 2010 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 4.1)).
4.3*	-	Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 11, 2010, by and among Pioneer Drilling Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and the initial purchasers party thereto (Form 8-K dated March 12, 2010 (File No. 1-8182, Exhibit 4.2)).
31.1**	-	Certification by Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2**	-	Certification by Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1#	-	Certification by Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
32.2#	-	Certification by Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

* Incorporated by reference to the filing indicated.

** Filed herewith.

# Furnished herewith.

43

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Wm. Stacy Locke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 4, 2010

/s/ Wm. Stacy Locke

Wm. Stacy Locke

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Lorne E. Phillips, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 4, 2010

/s/ Lorne E. Phillips

Lorne E. Phillips

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

Officer’s Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation, (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 4, 2010	/s/ Wm. Stacy Locke
	Wm. Stacy Locke President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

Officer’s Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation, (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 4, 2010	/s/ Lorne E. Phillips
	Lorne E. Phillips Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer