XML 29 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company performs an impairment test for goodwill annually according to the Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Topic of the FASB ASC. On January 1, 2017, the Company also early adopted ASU 2017 No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, which eliminates step two of the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company first makes a qualitative assessment of the likelihood of goodwill impairment and if it concludes that it is more likely than not that the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater than its fair value, then it will be required to perform a quantitative impairment test. Otherwise, performing the impairment test is not required. Qualitative factors assessed at the reporting unit level include, but are not limited to, changes in industry and market structure, competitive environments, planned capacity and new product launches, cost factors such as raw material prices and financial performance of the reporting unit. The Company may also determine to skip the qualitative assessment in any year and move directly to the quantitative test.
The quantitative impairment test consists of estimating the fair value and comparing the estimated fair value with the carrying value of the reporting unit. Any goodwill impairment charge is determined by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. However, the loss should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The guidance requires goodwill to be reviewed annually at the same time every year or when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist. The Company selected December 31 as its annual testing date.
In 2017, the Company performed a qualitative assessment of its reporting units which included an evaluation of changes in industry, market and macroeconomic conditions as well as consideration of each reporting unit’s financial performance and any significant trends. The Company’s qualitative assessment indicated that it was not more likely that not that goodwill is impaired. Further, the Company noted no significant negative trends or decreases in its long-range plan that would indicate a different result compared to its 2016 quantitative analysis of its ultracapacitor reporting unit.
In 2016, the Company assessed the qualitative factors for one of its two reporting units and concluded that it was more likely than not that its fair value exceeded its carrying value and therefore did not perform quantitative testing for the reporting unit. For its other reporting unit, the Company determined to skip the qualitative assessment and moved directly to the quantitative test. The Company utilized a discounted cash flow methodology to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. Based on the fair value analysis, management concluded that fair value exceeded carrying value of the reporting unit and no additional quantitative testing was required. As a result of the Company’s annual assessments, no impairments were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill during 2016 and 2017 was as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2015
$
23,635

Foreign currency translation adjustments
(545
)
Disposition of microelectronics product line
(291
)
Balance at December 31, 2016
22,799

Foreign currency translation adjustments
1,638

Goodwill from Nesscap Acquisition
11,624

Balance at December 31, 2017
$
36,061


The composition of intangible assets subject to amortization was as follows (in thousands):
 
 
As of December 31, 2017
 
 
Useful Life
(in years)
 
Gross Initial Carrying Value
 
Cumulative Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net Carrying Value
Customer relationships - institutional
 
14
 
$
3,200

 
$
197

 
$
(156
)
 
$
3,241

Customer relationships - non-institutional
 
10
 
4,400

 
266

 
(304
)
 
4,362

Trademarks and trade names
 
10
 
1,500

 
90

 
(103
)
 
1,487

Developed technology
 
8
 
2,700

 
160

 
(235
)
 
2,625

Total intangible assets
 
 
 
$
11,800

 
$
713

 
$
(798
)
 
$
11,715


The useful life of intangible assets reflects the period the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. Intangible assets are amortized over the useful lives of the assets utilizing the straight-line method, which is materially consistent with the pattern in which the expected benefits will be consumed, calculated using undiscounted cash flows.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, amortization expense of $0.2 million was recorded to “cost of revenue” and $0.6 million was recorded to “selling, general and administrative.” Estimated amortization expense for the years 2018 through 2021 is $1.2 million each year. The expected amortization expense is an estimate and actual amounts could differ due to additional intangible asset acquisitions, changes in foreign currency rates or impairment of intangible assets.