XML 20 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2021
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
Description of business. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Team, Inc.,” “Team,” “we,” “our” and “us” are used in this report to refer to Team, Inc., to one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries or to all of them taken as a whole.
We are a global leading provider of integrated, digitally-enabled asset performance assurance and optimization solutions. We deploy conventional to highly specialized inspection, condition assessment, maintenance and repair services that result in greater safety, reliability and operational efficiency for our client’s most critical assets. We conduct operations in three segments: Inspection and Heat Treating (“IHT”), Mechanical Services (“MS”) and Quest Integrity. Through the capabilities and resources in these three segments, we believe that Team is uniquely qualified to provide integrated solutions involving in their most basic form: inspection to assess condition; engineering assessment to determine fitness for purpose in the context of industry standards and regulatory codes; and mechanical services to repair, rerate or replace based upon the client’s election. In addition, we are capable of escalating with the client’s needs, as dictated by the severity of the damage found and the related operating conditions, from standard services to some of the most advanced services and integrated asset integrity and reliability management solutions available in the industry. We also believe that Team is unique in its ability to provide services in three distinct client demand profiles: (i) turnaround or project services, (ii) call-out services and (iii) nested or run-and-maintain services.
IHT provides integrity management and performance solutions, conventional and advanced non-destructive testing (“NDT”) services, heat treating and thermal services, tank management solutions, and pipeline integrity solutions, as well as associated engineering and condition assessment services. These services can be offered while facilities are running (on-stream), during facility turnarounds or during new construction or expansion activities.
MS provides machining, bolting, and vapor barrier weld testing services, hot tap and line intervention services, valve management solutions, and emission control services primarily as call-out and turnaround services under both on-stream and off-line/shut down circumstances. On-stream services offered by MS represent the services offered while plants are operating and under pressure. Turnaround services are project-related and demand is a function of the number and scope of scheduled and unscheduled facility turnarounds as well as new industrial facility construction or expansion activities.
Quest Integrity provides integrity and reliability management solutions for the process, pipeline and power sectors. These solutions encompass three broadly-defined disciplines including highly specialized in-line inspection services for historically unpiggable process piping and pipelines using proprietary in-line inspection tools and analytical software; advanced engineering and condition assessment services through a multi-disciplined engineering team and related lab support; and advanced digital imaging including remote digital video imaging, laser scanning and laser profilometry-enabled reformer care services.
We market our services to companies in a diverse array of industries which include:
Energy (refining, power, and nuclear);
Energy Transition (liquefied natural gas, hydrogen, carbon capture & sequestration, biofuels, and renewable power);
Manufacturing and Process (chemical, petrochemical, pulp and paper industries, manufacturing, automotive and mining);
Midstream and Others (valves, terminals and storage, pipeline and offshore oil and gas);
Public Infrastructure (amusement parks, bridges, ports, construction and building, roads, dams and railways); and
Aerospace and Defense.
Ongoing Effects of COVID.  The impact of the COVID pandemic continues to affect our workforce and operations, as well as the operations of our clients, suppliers and contractors. During this period, we have continued to focus on the following key priorities:
the health and safety of our employees and business continuity;
the alignment of our business to the near term market dynamics and demand for our services; and
our end market revenue diversification strategy.
Although the rollout of the vaccines is ongoing in the U.S., we believe that it will take more time before the vaccines are widely available globally. While the ultimate duration of the COVID pandemic remains unclear, we believe the increased availability and administration of COVID vaccines, easing of pandemic related restrictions, reopening of economies, and increasing commodity prices are positive signs of broader economic recovery.
The extent of COVID’s effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration, spread and intensity of the pandemic (including any resurgences), impact of the new COVID variants and the rollout of COVID vaccines, and the level of social and economic restrictions imposed in the United States and abroad in an effort to curb the spread of the virus, all of which are uncertain and difficult to predict considering the rapidly evolving landscape.
Basis for presentation. In the opinion of management, these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of results for such periods. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Certain disclosures have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements included in this report. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“the 2020 Form 10-K”).
Use of estimates. Our accounting policies conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported financial position and results of operations. We review significant estimates and judgments affecting our consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis and record the effect of any necessary adjustments prior to their publication. Estimates and judgments are based on information available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Adjustments made with respect to the use of these estimates and judgments often relate to information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and judgments are inherent in the preparation of financial statements. Estimates and judgments are used in, among other things, (1) aspects of revenue recognition, (2) valuation of acquisition related tangible and intangible assets and assessments of all long-lived assets for possible impairment, (3) estimating various factors used to accrue liabilities for contingencies, workers’ compensation, auto, medical, and general liability, (4) establishing an allowance for credit losses, (5) estimating the useful lives of our assets, (6) assessing future tax exposure and the realization of tax assets, (7) selecting assumptions used in the measurement of costs and liabilities associated with defined benefit pension plans, (8) assessments of fair value and (9) managing our foreign currency risk in foreign operations.
Fair value of financial instruments. As defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (“ASC 820”), fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best information available. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The use of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for fair value determinations in situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. We are able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy such that “Level 1” measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market, “Level 2” measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but are observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets, and “Level 3” measurements include those that are unobservable and of a highly subjective measure.
Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt obligations. The carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are representative of their respective fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of our ABL Facility and Term Loan (each defined in Note 10) is representative of the carrying value based upon the variable terms and management’s opinion that the current rates are available to us with the same maturity and security structure are equivalent to that of the debt. The fair value of our 5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (the “Notes”) as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 is $90.1 million and $91.9 million, respectively, (inclusive of the fair value of the conversion option) and is a “Level 2” measurement, determined based on the observed trading price of these instruments. For additional information regarding our ABL Facility, Term Loan and Notes, see Note 10.
Goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but are instead tested for impairment, and assessed for potential triggering events, at least annually in accordance with the provisions of the ASC 350 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). Intangible assets with estimated useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 350. We assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which we have determined to be the same as our operating segments.

If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we measure any goodwill impairment losses as the amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Our goodwill annual test date is December 1 of each year.

We performed our most recent annual impairment test as of December 1, 2020 and concluded that there was no impairment based upon a qualitative assessment to determine if it was more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair values of the reporting units were less than their respective carrying values as of the reporting date. There have been no events that have required an interim assessment of the carrying value of goodwill during 2021.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $191.8 million for the IHT operating segment. These charges were a result of an interim goodwill impairment test that was triggered due to certain impairment indicators that were present during the first quarter of 2020, primarily the decline in operating results due to COVID, lower oil prices and related impacts on the IHT operating segment.
Subsequent to June 30, 2021, our stock price saw declines continuing through early August 2021. We have determined that goodwill at our MS reporting unit is at risk for impairment should events or circumstances indicate that a decline in fair value is other than temporary. As such, we are currently estimating the projected timing of a recovery and whether or not a triggering event has occurred during the third quarter of 2021 on this reporting unit. The value of this business is dependent upon the timing and extent of the market recovery and our conclusions could result in an impairment of goodwill. The total carrying value of the net assets for the MS reporting unit was approximately $127 million as of June 30, 2021, including goodwill of $56 million.
There was $90.6 million of goodwill at June 30, 2021 and $91.4 million at December 31, 2020. The following table presents a rollforward of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2021 as follows (in thousands): 
 IHTMSQuest IntegrityConsolidated
 Goodwill, GrossAccumulated ImpairmentGoodwill, NetGoodwill, GrossAccumulated ImpairmentGoodwill, NetGoodwill, GrossAccumulated ImpairmentGoodwill, NetGoodwill, GrossAccumulated ImpairmentGoodwill, Net
Balance at December 31, 2020$212,928 $(212,928)$— $110,721 $(54,101)$56,620 $34,731 $— $34,731 $358,380 $(267,029)$91,351 
FX Adjustments— — — (420)— (420)(327)— (327)(747)— (747)
Balance at June 30, 2021$212,928 $(212,928)$— $110,301 $(54,101)$56,200 $34,404 $— $34,404 $357,633 $(267,029)$90,604 

Concentration of credit risk. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of consolidated revenues.
Earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and, if dilutive, the assumed exercise or conversion of (1) outstanding share-based compensation, (2) our Notes and (3) outstanding Warrants (defined in Note 9). The impact of share-based compensation, the Notes and warrants are calculated using the treasury stock method.
Our intent is to settle the principal amount of the Notes in cash upon conversion. If the conversion value exceeds the principal amount, we may elect to deliver shares of our common stock with respect to the remainder of our conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount.

Amounts used in basic and diluted earnings per share, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, are as follows (in thousands): 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2021202020212020
 (unaudited)(unaudited)(unaudited)(unaudited)
Weighted-average number of basic shares outstanding30,940 30,628 30,909 30,584 
Stock options, stock units and performance awards— — — — 
Notes— — — — 
Warrants— — — — 
Total shares and dilutive securities30,940 30,628 30,909 30,584 
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, all outstanding share-based compensation awards and the Warrants were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as their inclusion would be antidilutive due to the net loss in both periods. Also, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Notes were excluded from diluted EPS as the conversion price exceeded the average price of our common stock during those periods. For information on our Notes and Warrants, refer to Note 10. For information on our share-based compensation awards, refer to Note 13.
Newly Adopted Accounting Principles
ASU No. 2019-12. In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, that simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating some exceptions to the general approach in ASC 740, Income Taxes as well as clarifies aspects of existing guidance to promote more consistent application. The adoption of ASU No. 2019-12 had no impact on the current quarter.
Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted
ASU No. 2020-04. In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The guidance in ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope, which was issued in January 2021, provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria that reference LIBOR or another rate that is expected to be discontinued. The amendments in ASU 2020-04 are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. While we are currently determining whether we will elect the optional expedients, we do not expect our adoption of these ASU’s to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
ASU No. 2020-06. In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, which simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments by eliminating certain separation models and will generally be reported as a single liability at its amortized cost. In addition, ASU 2020-06 eliminates the treasury stock method to calculate diluted EPS for convertible instruments and requires the use of the if-converted method. We expect to adopt ASU 2020-06 beginning January 1, 2022, at which time we would utilize the if-converted method, which would require us to assume the Notes would be settled entirely in shares of common stock for purposes of calculating diluted EPS, if the effect would be dilutive. We are still evaluating the other impacts this ASU may have on our financial statements.