XML 43 R32.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies and New Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies

Significant Accounting Policies

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its consolidated condensed financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10‑K for 2017 under the caption “Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements” in Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” a discussion of the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those the Company believes to be the most important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Any changes in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is contemplated and prior to making such change.

Recently Adopted Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (the “revenue recognition standard”). Subsequent to the issuance of ASU 2014‑09, the FASB issued several additional accounting standards for revenue recognition to update the effective date of the revenue recognition guidance and to provide additional clarification on the updated standard. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted the revenue recognition standard in the first quarter of 2018, as discussed in Note 2.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which revises the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes in financial liabilities measured at fair value. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2017. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and there was no material impact to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01 “Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and there was no material impact to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, which measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount. Under the new guidance, entities should instead perform annual or interim goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the respective reporting unit. The new guidance is effective for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and there was no material impact to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017‑07 “Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” which requires that the service cost component of the Company’s net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost be included in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees, with the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit cost being classified outside of a subtotal of income from operations. Of the components of net periodic benefit cost, only the service cost component is eligible for asset capitalization. The new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 using the practical expedient which allows entities to use information previously disclosed in their pension and other postretirement benefit plans note as the estimation basis to apply the retrospective presentation requirements in ASU 2017-07.

 

With the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2018, the Company recorded the non-service cost component of net periodic benefit cost, which totaled $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2018 and $2.0 million in the first three quarters of 2018, to other income (expense), net in the consolidated condensed statements of operations. The Company reclassified $1.3 million from the third quarter of 2017 and $4.0 million from the first three quarters of 2017 of non-service cost components of net periodic benefit cost and other benefit plan charges from selling, delivery and administrative (“S,D&A”) expenses to other income (expense), net in the consolidated condensed statements of operations. The non-service cost component of net periodic benefit cost is included in the Nonalcoholic Beverages segment.

 

Recently Issued Pronouncements

Recently Issued Pronouncements

 

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑02 “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which provides the option to reclassify stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and can be early adopted. The Company is currently evaluating whether it will adopt this guidance.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases,” which requires lessees to recognize a right-to-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases (other than leases meeting the definition of a short-term lease). The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods beginning the following fiscal year. The Company anticipates adopting the new accounting standard on December 31, 2018, the first day of fiscal 2019, using the optional transition method, which was approved by the FASB in March 2018 and allows companies the option to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition and to not adjust comparative period financial information or make the new required disclosures for periods prior to the effective date.

 

The Company has formed a project team, which is in the process of reviewing its existing lease portfolio, including certain service contracts for embedded leases, to determine the size of the Company’s lease portfolio in order to evaluate the impact of this new guidance on the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements. The Company anticipates the impact of adopting this new guidance will be material to its consolidated condensed balance sheets. The impact on the Company’s consolidated condensed statements of operations is still being evaluated. As the impact of the new guidance is non-cash in nature, the Company does not anticipate the impact of adopting this new guidance will be material to its consolidated condensed statements of cash flows. Additionally, the Company is evaluating the impacts of ASU 2016‑02 beyond accounting, including system, data and process changes required to comply with this standard. The Company anticipates implementing new controls and utilizing a lease accounting software application with the adoption of this new guidance and on a go-forward basis in order to properly approve, track and account for its entire lease portfolio.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

The Company adopted the revenue recognition standard, including all relevant amendments and practical expedients, in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective approach for all contracts not completed at the date of initial adoption, considering materiality and applicability. Upon adoption of this guidance, there was no material impact to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

The Company’s contracts are derived from customer orders, including customer sales incentives, generated through an order processing and replenishment model. The Company has defined its performance obligations for its contracts as either at a point in time or over time.

 

The Company offers a range of nonalcoholic beverage products and flavors designed to meet the demands of its consumers, including both sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages and the Company’s principal sparkling beverage is Coca‑Cola. Still beverages include energy products and noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks.

 

The Company’s products are sold and distributed through various channels, which include selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts and vending machine outlets. During the first three quarters of 2018, approximately 66% of the Company’s bottle/can sales volume to retail customers was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can sales volume to retail customers was sold for immediate consumption. All the Company’s beverage sales were to customers in the United States. The Company typically collects payment from customers within 30 days from the date of sale.

 

The Company’s sales are divided into two main categories: (i) bottle/can sales and (ii) other sales. Bottle/can sales include products packaged primarily in plastic bottles and aluminum cans. Other sales include sales to other Coca‑Cola bottlers, “post-mix” products, transportation and equipment maintenance revenue. Post-mix products are dispensed through equipment that mixes fountain syrups with carbonated or still water, enabling fountain retailers to sell finished products to consumers in cups or glasses. Net sales by category were as follows:

 

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

First Three Quarters

 

(in thousands)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Bottle/can sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sparkling beverages (carbonated)

 

$

605,614

 

 

$

582,710

 

 

$

1,787,451

 

 

$

1,670,093

 

Still beverages (noncarbonated, including energy products)

 

 

413,282

 

 

 

384,495

 

 

 

1,142,764

 

 

 

1,009,508

 

Total bottle/can sales

 

 

1,018,896

 

 

 

967,205

 

 

 

2,930,215

 

 

 

2,679,601

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers

 

 

92,139

 

 

 

104,619

 

 

 

300,819

 

 

 

274,317

 

Post-mix and other

 

 

100,626

 

 

 

90,702

 

 

 

279,963

 

 

 

243,601

 

Total other sales

 

 

192,765

 

 

 

195,321

 

 

 

580,782

 

 

 

517,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total net sales

 

$

1,211,661

 

 

$

1,162,526

 

 

$

3,510,997

 

 

$

3,197,519

 

 

Bottle/can sales represented approximately 83% and 84% in the first three quarters of 2018 and the first three quarters of 2017, respectively. The sparkling beverage category represented approximately 61% and 62% of total bottle/can sales during the first three quarters of 2018 and the first three quarters of 2017, respectively.

 

Bottle/can sales, sales to other Coca‑Cola bottlers and post-mix sales are recognized when control transfers to a customer, which is generally upon delivery and is considered a single point in time (“point in time”). Point in time sales accounted for approximately 97% of the Company’s net sales in both the first three quarters of 2018 and the first three quarters of 2017. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is recognized at a point in time and is included in the Nonalcoholic Beverages segment.

 

Other sales, which include revenue for service fees related to the repair of cold drink equipment and delivery fees for freight hauling and brokerage services, are recognized over time (“over time”). Revenues related to cold drink equipment repair are recognized as the respective services are completed using a cost-to-cost input method. Repair services are generally completed in less than one day but can extend up to one month. Revenues related to freight hauling and brokerage services are recognized as the delivery occurs using a miles driven output method. Generally, delivery occurs and freight charges are recognized in the same day. Over time sales orders open at the end of a financial period are not considered material to the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

The Company participates in various sales programs with The Coca‑Cola Company, other beverage companies and customers to increase the sale of its products. Programs negotiated with customers include arrangements under which allowances can be earned for attaining agreed-upon sales levels. The cost of these various sales incentives are not considered a separate performance obligation and are included as deductions to net sales.

 

Revenues do not include sales or other taxes collected from customers.

 

The majority of the Company’s contracts include multiple performance obligations related to the delivery of specifically identifiable products, which generally have a duration of less than one year. For sales contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using stated contractual price, which represents the standalone selling price of each distinct good sold under the contract. Generally, the Company’s service contracts have a single performance obligation.

 

The following table represents a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers:

 

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

First Three Quarters

 

(in thousands)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Point in time net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonalcoholic - point in time

 

$

1,168,276

 

 

$

1,132,181

 

 

$

3,394,253

 

 

$

3,112,777

 

Total point in time net sales

 

$

1,168,276

 

 

$

1,132,181

 

 

$

3,394,253

 

 

$

3,112,777

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Over time net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonalcoholic - over time

 

$

11,936

 

 

$

10,057

 

 

$

33,239

 

 

$

27,197

 

Other - over time

 

 

31,449

 

 

 

20,288

 

 

 

83,505

 

 

 

57,545

 

Total over time net sales

 

$

43,385

 

 

$

30,345

 

 

$

116,744

 

 

$

84,742

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total net sales

 

$

1,211,661

 

 

$

1,162,526

 

 

$

3,510,997

 

 

$

3,197,519

 

 

The Company sells its products and extends credit, generally without requiring collateral, based on an ongoing evaluation of the customer’s business prospects and financial condition. The Company evaluates the collectability of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors, including the Company’s historic collections pattern and changes to a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations. The Company has established an allowance for doubtful accounts to adjust the recorded receivable to the estimated amount the Company believes will ultimately be collected.

 

The nature of the Company’s contracts gives rise to several types of variable consideration, including prospective and retrospective rebates. The Company accounts for its prospective and retrospective rebates using the expected value method, which estimates the net price to the customer based on the customer’s expected annual sales volume projections.

 

The Company experiences customer returns primarily as a result of damaged or out-of-date product. At any given time, the Company estimates less than 1% of bottle/can sales and post-mix sales could be at risk for return by customers. The Company’s reserve for customer returns was $2.3 million as of September 30, 2018 and was included in the allowance for doubtful accounts in the consolidated condensed balance sheet. Returned product is recognized as a reduction of net sales.