XML 31 R55.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Summary of Purchase Price Allocation (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Apr. 07, 2011
Rikco International, LLC, D/B/A Dr. Comfort (Dr. Comfort)
Apr. 07, 2011
Rikco International, LLC, D/B/A Dr. Comfort (Dr. Comfort)
Customer Relationships
Apr. 07, 2011
Rikco International, LLC, D/B/A Dr. Comfort (Dr. Comfort)
Technology
Apr. 07, 2011
Rikco International, LLC, D/B/A Dr. Comfort (Dr. Comfort)
Noncompete Agreements
Apr. 07, 2011
Rikco International, LLC, D/B/A Dr. Comfort (Dr. Comfort)
Tradenames and Trademarks
Mar. 10, 2011
Circle City Medical, Inc. (Circle City)
Mar. 10, 2011
Circle City Medical, Inc. (Circle City)
Customer Relationships
Mar. 10, 2011
Circle City Medical, Inc. (Circle City)
Noncompete Agreements
Mar. 10, 2011
Circle City Medical, Inc. (Circle City)
Tradenames and Trademarks
Feb. 04, 2011
BetterBraces.com
Feb. 04, 2011
BetterBraces.com
Customer Relationships
Feb. 04, 2011
BetterBraces.com
Technology
Feb. 04, 2011
BetterBraces.com
Noncompete Agreements
Feb. 04, 2011
BetterBraces.com
Tradenames and Trademarks
Jan. 04, 2011
Elastic Therapy, Inc. (ETI)
Jan. 04, 2011
Elastic Therapy, Inc. (ETI)
Customer Relationships
Jan. 04, 2011
Elastic Therapy, Inc. (ETI)
Technology
Jan. 04, 2011
Elastic Therapy, Inc. (ETI)
Noncompete Agreements
Sep. 20, 2010
Independent South African distributor of DonJoy products
Sep. 20, 2010
Independent South African distributor of DonJoy products
Customer Relationships
Aug. 04, 2009
Chattanooga Group Inc. (Chattanooga Canada)
Aug. 04, 2009
Chattanooga Group Inc. (Chattanooga Canada)
Customer Relationships
Aug. 04, 2009
Chattanooga Group Inc. (Chattanooga Canada)
Noncompete Agreements
Aug. 04, 2009
Empi Canada Inc. (Empi Canada)
Aug. 04, 2009
Empi Canada Inc. (Empi Canada)
Customer Relationships
Aug. 04, 2009
Empi Canada Inc. (Empi Canada)
Noncompete Agreements
Feb. 03, 2009
DonJoy Orthopaedics Pty., Ltd. (DJO Australia)
Feb. 03, 2009
DonJoy Orthopaedics Pty., Ltd. (DJO Australia)
Customer Relationships
Schedule of Business Acquisitions, Purchase Price Allocation [Line Items]                                                        
Cash $ 59                           $ 817           $ 59     $ 29     $ 912  
Accounts receivable 9,187         572                 3,690           423     300     397  
Inventory 27,241         1,736                 2,133       435   261     536     725  
Other current assets 2,108                           1,542                 19     12  
Property and equipment 2,183                           7,230       310                  
Other non-current assets 1,607                           394                          
Liabilities assumed (25,965)         (406)                 (11,485)           (2,254)     (1,033)     (1,120)  
Identifiable intangible assets   72,100 [1] 7,000 [1] 1,200 [1] 22,200 [1]   3,700 [1] 200 [1] 1,400 [1]   75 [1] 1,120 [1] 185 [1] 50 [1]   13,400 [1] 6,000 [1] 1,600 [1]   1,103 [1]   5,058 [1] 253 [1]   2,512 [1] 174 [1]   1,614 [1]
Goodwill 138,548         4,469       1,570         21,085       64   3,354     4,902     899  
Total purchase price $ 257,468         $ 11,671       $ 3,000         $ 46,406       $ 1,912   $ 7,154     $ 7,439     $ 3,439  
[1] The fair value of customer relationships was assigned to relationships with major pharmaceutical, medical and home healthcare distributors and certain other customers existing on the acquisition date based upon an estimate of the future discounted cash flows that would be derived from those customers, after deducting contributory asset charges. The fair value of technology was determined primarily by estimating the present value of future royalty costs that will be avoided due to our ownership of the patents and technology acquired. The fair value of non-compete agreements was assigned to non-compete agreements entered into with certain executive officers and senior management. The values were determined by estimating the present value of the cash flows associated with having these agreements in place, less the present value of the cash flows assuming the non-compete agreements were not in place. The fair value of trademarks and trade names was determined primarily by estimating the present value of future royalty costs that will be avoided due to our ownership of the trade names and trademarks acquired. The useful lives of the intangible assets acquired were estimated based on the underlying agreements and/or the future economic benefit expected to be received from the assets.