10-K 1 y17970e10vk.txt EDO CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 --------------------- FORM 10-K (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED: DECEMBER 31, 2005 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-3985 --------------------- EDO CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) NEW YORK 11-0707740 (State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 60 EAST 42ND STREET, 42ND FLOOR 10165 NEW YORK, NEW YORK (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (212) 716-2000 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS: NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED: -------------------- ------------------------------------------ Common Shares, par value $1 per share New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X] If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates was $417,561,840 based on the reported last sale price of common stock on June 25, 2005 which is the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The number of shares of EDO common stock outstanding as of February 24, 2006 was 20,198,731 shares. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Certain portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement (filed pursuant to Reg. 14A) relating to its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDO CORPORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1 Business.................................................... 2 Introduction................................................ 2 Acquisitions................................................ 2 Segments.................................................... 2 Electronic Systems and Communications..................... 3 Engineered Systems and Services........................... 5 Research and Development.................................... 9 Marketing and International Sales........................... 10 Backlog..................................................... 10 Government Contracts........................................ 10 Competition and Other Factors............................... 11 Environmental............................................... 11 Employees................................................... 11 Risk Factors................................................ 11 Item 2 Properties.................................................. 17 Item 3 Legal Proceedings........................................... 18 Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 18 PART II Item 5 Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters......................................... 18 Item 6 Selected Financial Data..................................... 19 Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................... 20 Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk... 20 Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 33 Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.................................... 76 Item 9A Controls and Procedures..................................... 76 Item 9B Other Information........................................... 76 PART III Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 77 Item 11 Executive Compensation...................................... 78 Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.................. 78 Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 78 Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services...................... 78 PART IV Item 15 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K......................................................... 78 (a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits................................................ 78 1. Financial Statements..................................... 78 2. Financial Statement Schedules............................ 78 3. Exhibits................................................. 79 (b) Reports on Form 8-K..................................... 82 Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer........................ Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer........................ Signatures........................................................... 83
1 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS INTRODUCTION EDO Corporation was incorporated in New York in 1925 by Earl Dodge Osborn, from whose initials "EDO" is derived. EDO Corporation designs and manufactures a diverse range of products for defense, intelligence, and commercial markets, and provides related engineering and professional services. Major product groups include: defense electronics, communications, aircraft-armament systems, undersea warfare, and integrated composite structures. EDO's advanced systems are at the core of the transformation to lighter, faster, and smarter defense capabilities. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and the Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders are made available, free of charge, on its Web site www.edocorp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. ACQUISITIONS Acquisitions have been a primary driver of our growth in recent years. Since 1998, EDO has completed ten acquisitions which have added to or strengthened our capabilities in defense products and services, including aircraft electronic warfare systems, professional, engineering and information technology services, reconnaissance and surveillance systems, communications and countermeasures systems, defense communications and related services and aircraft armament systems. The following three acquisitions were completed in 2005: On May 2, 2005, we acquired for cash all of the units of EVI Technology, LLC (EVI), a privately-held company. EVI is a designer, manufacturer and integrator of classified intelligence systems. EVI has strengthened and expanded EDO's range of products and engineering expertise in a number of synergistic areas. On September 19, 2005, we acquired for cash all of the stock of Fiber Innovations, Inc., a privately-held company that is a designer and manufacturer of fiber reinforced-composites. This acquisition has added important complementary design and manufacturing capabilities to EDO's integrated-composite-structures business. On December 20, 2005, the Company acquired for cash all of the stock of NexGen Communications LLC, a privately-held company specializing in the design and production of communications systems for a diverse set of U.S. government organizations. The acquisition strengthened our fast-growing position in specialized communication products. SEGMENTS In 2005, EDO revised its reporting segments in line with the evolution of the business as a result of acquisitions in defense-related markets. Our reporting segments now reflect the two primary categories of products that we provide to the aerospace and defense industry: Electronic Systems and Communications; and Engineered Systems and Services. We set forth certain business segment information including information on revenues from external customers, operating earnings, assets and capital expenditures in Note 18 on pages 60 through 63 of this Report. 2 Each segment's percent of our consolidated net sales for the past three fiscal years was:
ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS AND ENGINEERED SYSTEMS COMMUNICATIONS AND SERVICES ----------------------- ------------------ 2005....................... 63% 37% 2004....................... 51% 49% 2003....................... 48% 52%
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATIONS The Electronic Systems and Communications segment includes products that serve the Electronic Warfare and the C4 (Command, Control, Communications and Computers) markets. Primary products include electronic force protection equipment, interference cancellation technology, airborne electronic warfare systems, reconnaissance and surveillance systems, other specialized electronic systems, C4 products and services and antenna products. ELECTRONIC FORCE PROTECTION Sales of electronic force protection products accounted for 22%, 7%, and 2% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These products are designed to protect troops by intercepting and jamming or modifying electronic signals used to trigger remotely controlled explosive devices, including improvised explosive devices, or IED's. One of EDO's highest priorities in 2005 was to quickly fill the U.S. Army's orders for our counter-IED equipment known as Warlock. Although we have been developing various versions of this technology for more than 15 years, the Army's primary emphasis has shifted to increasing production of the newest, most sophisticated versions. As a result, sales of this product increased substantially in 2005. Although a number of other organizations are developing competing products, we believe that we have the most advanced technology in our market. Our Shortstop program was initiated in 1990 by the U.S. Central Command as a quick-reaction response capability for Operation Desert Storm. The current production system is a modified version that, as described by the Army, provides a protective "electronic bubble for vehicles, dismounted operations in conjunction with vehicles, and for fixed sites." Because of the short-term nature of the Army's recent orders, it is difficult to predict the level of sales in 2006. However, we believe that there will be an ongoing need to protect people and vehicles from the threat of remotely controlled explosive devices. INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION EDO has been a world leader in interference-cancellation technology for more than 25 years. Our technology is used to eliminate interference in dense electromagnetic environments that can degrade the effectiveness of radios and other electronic equipment. Under a contract from the Boeing Company, EDO is currently developing an interference-cancellation system for the EA-18G aircraft. The EA-18G has been selected by the U.S. Navy to replace the EA-6B Prowler aircraft, which provides an umbrella of protection for strike aircraft, ground troops and ships by jamming enemy radar, electronic data links and communications. EDO's interference-cancellation equipment will allow clear communications during all mission scenarios. In addition, EDO is providing the interference-cancellation subsystem for the CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and the Coast Guard modernization project known as Deepwater. AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS Sales of airborne electronic warfare systems accounted for 7%, 9%, and 12% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 3 Our AN/ALQ-161 is the defensive avionics system that protects the U.S. Air Force's B-1B bomber from radar-guided and infrared-guided missile threats. Currently, we provide continued logistics support, sustaining engineering support and capability upgrades to the AN/ALQ-161 systems. This support includes software enhancements and hardware improvements to increase situation awareness and jamming effectiveness while decreasing costs. In 2005, EDO received numerous awards, totaling $39 million, to maintain the AN/ALQ-161 system and allow the B-1B bomber to perform its mission against ever changing threats. We were the original designer and integrator of the AN/ALQ-99 Tactical Support Jamming System for the EA-6B aircraft in the 1960s. We have been under contract for support and modifications for this aircraft's systems and subsystems since then. We continue to maintain and support the AN/ALQ-99 system, including the current on-board system hardware and the tactical jamming pods. The DoD currently expects EA-6B aircraft to be in operation through 2015 as the jamming pod migrates to the EA-18G Growler aircraft. RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS Sales of reconnaissance and surveillance systems accounted for 13%, 16%, and 17% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our reconnaissance and surveillance systems include state-of-the-art electronic systems, used primarily for Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) and Electronic Support Measure (ESM) systems. The primary purpose of an ELINT system is to determine what electronic signals are in the mission environment and accurately collect data. The analyzed data is stored in collection libraries for subsequent use in ESM systems that provide both situational awareness and warning of enemy threats. A key feature of EDO's ESM systems is precision direction-finding at long range, even in difficult electromagnetic environments. They can be integrated into any type of combat-system multi-function console and enables the rapid dissemination of radar threat intercept data. The ES-3601 and ES-3701 are leading international ESM systems for naval applications. More than 60 systems have been sold, many of which are already in operation providing effective at-sea performance. The ES-3701 was selected by the Royal Danish Navy for their new Flexible Support Ship. The ES-3601 has been selected by General Dynamics for the initial "Flight 0" Littoral Combat Ships. EDO is currently developing a next generation all-digital ESM system, to be known as the ES-3801. The ALR-95 ESM is currently operational on U.S. Navy maritime patrol aircraft and was selected by Lockheed Martin for the U.S. Coast Guard Deepwater program maritime patrol mission. SPECIALIZED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS As a result of two recent acquisitions, EDO has a growing presence in the design and production of specialized electronics systems for a diverse set of U.S. government organizations. In particular, we specialize in developing innovative solutions for intelligence and law-enforcement and special operations applications. These organizations turn to EDO for some of their most challenging, rapid-response wireless requirements. EDO's specialized services include research and development, product design, and manufacturing of wireless devices and systems for monitoring and managing data and physical assets. Nearly all of these systems are classified. C4 (COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS) Sales of C4 products and services accounted for 10%, 11%, and 8% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. One of EDO's leading C4 products is a tactical telecommunications system developed for the U.S Marine Corps known as JECCS (AN/TSQ-231 Joint Enhanced Core Communications System). JECCS provides the Marine Corps with a mobile, first-in system for network management, data and voice transmission, and switching services. Three "Block I" systems have been delivered and in 2006 we will complete the delivery of our current contract for 11 JECCS units in the Block II configuration. 4 In 2005 EDO was awarded a contract for a new generation of Marine Corps battlefield-communications equipment known as the Transition Switch Module. The Transition Switch Module will interface with all existing USMC telecommunications equipment to provide digital voice, data, and video communications to deployed Marine units. The indefinite-delivery/ indefinite-quantity contract has a maximum value of $240 million for the procurement of up to 476 units. Work is expected to be completed by May 2010. We provide engineering and C4 field services to U.S. Navy ships, shore sites and critical programs, through our Fleet Systems Engineering Teams (FSET) contract. FSETs are provided on a continuous basis to Carrier Strike Groups (CSGs), Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESGs), Network Operating Centers (NOCs) and Naval Computer and Telecommunications Area Master Stations (NCTAMS). Our technicians keep communications networks up, optimize the networks to meet changing mission requirements, and ensure connectivity between systems and across networks. Ancillary to our FSET activities, we also provide integration and training services for the US Navy, and we provide design, development, installation and training services for the Virginia-class submarine Exterior Communications System (ECS). EDO provides systems integration services for naval C4 systems wherein we integrate a ship's sensor systems, including radar and sonar, communications systems, navigation and integrated bridge systems, and aircraft control systems to provide situational awareness in a common display format for a ship's commander. We are currently completing a contract for Norwegian Coast Guard vessels. We also provide ongoing C4 services to USAID's Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) supporting the US response to worldwide disasters. We provide OFDA headquarters with network administration, communications field support, integrated logistics services, training, and equipment procurement, inventory and maintenance. EDO maintains a C4 lab for the Marine Corps that includes an array of circuit switching and technical control equipment procured by both the Marine Corps and EDO. This lab provides EDO the ability to test equipment for interoperability on-line with other U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD") and USMC laboratories as well as participate in DoD-wide interoperability exercises. The C4 lab is a key enabler for future developments and growth with military tactical communications customers. ANTENNA PRODUCTS We design and manufacture antenna systems for a wide variety of military and commercial applications including communications, electronic warfare, navigation, radar, and wireless Local Area Networks. Our antenna business is approximately 65% military and 35% commercial. Our military antennas are deployed on many different types of platforms and vehicles including fixed wing and rotary aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), satellites, surface ships, submarines, and ground vehicles. Our commercial antennas are used on commercial airliners, business jets, and general-aviation aircraft. We have been effective in establishing long term agreements with most of the prime aircraft manufacturers, Boeing being the most prominent. We have a broad customer and product base in this business. In 2005, we sold more than 39,000 antennas of 420 different types to more than 400 different original-equipment manufacturers and after-market customers. A large portion of our revenue results from spare part sales and repair services for an installed base of antennas in excess of 400,000 units. In addition, we produced antennas for our Warlock product. We continually work on the development of new antenna products via internally funded and customer-sponsored research and development. ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND SERVICES The Engineered Systems and Services segment addresses Integrated Systems and Structures, Undersea Warfare, and Professional Services markets. Primary products include aircraft armament systems, integrated composite structures, mine countermeasure systems, sonar systems and flight line products. We also offer a wide range of professional engineering services. 5 AIRCRAFT ARMAMENT Sales of aircraft armament systems accounted for 11%, 12%, and 13% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Aircraft armament systems include sophisticated devices that allow for the carriage and release of bombs, missiles, and other "stores" utilized by military aircraft. We also design and produce the logical and electrical interfaces between the weapon and the aircraft that allow for targeting and release of those weapons. Over the past two decades, EDO has made significant investments in aircraft-armament technology to meet the worldwide demand for smart, lightweight, high-performance weapons-interface systems. We have developed and manufactured bomb-release units (BRU) for the F-15E aircraft, ejection-release units (ERU) for the Tornado multi-role combat aircraft, jettison-release mechanisms for the F-14, pneumatic missile-eject launchers for the F/A-22, and smart-weapon, multiple-carriage systems for the F-18 and domestic and foreign F-16s. In 2005, we continued production of F-15E BRUs for the USAF and international customers and provided spare-parts support for Tornado ERUs and F-15 BRUs worldwide. Furthermore, we received "Lot 6" production orders for LAU-142/A missile launchers known as AVEL for an additional 24 F-22 aircraft. The AVEL carries and ejects missiles from internal bays employing a highly reliable pneumatic-ejection system controlled by the aircraft's stores-management system. We are under contract for depot support and anticipate that we will provide depot support through the life of the F-22. We also received a contract for the first production lot of 135 BRU-55 dual-carriage, "smart" bomb racks for the Navy's F/A-18 aircraft. The contract will extend for approximately 24 months and includes an option for additional production units. Also in 2005, we continued development and testing of the pneumatic suspension-and-release system for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. We are also under contract to design and develop a new electronic control unit for the AGM-65 Maverick missile. This control unit will enable the Maverick missile to be carried on aircraft currently not compatible with this weapon. Our control unit will interface with the aircraft through Raytheon's LAU-117 Dual Mode Launcher, whose electronics assembly was also designed and built by EDO. We were also selected by Boeing to design and develop the aircraft bomb-rack system and the sonobouy-launch system for the P-8A Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft. INTEGRATED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES Our capabilities in the area of fiber-reinforced advanced composite structures include product and system design, engineering analysis, process development, tooling design and fabrication, qualification testing and validation, production, and after-market support. The primary focus of our business-development effort is advanced composite structures for all types of platforms including manned and unmanned aircraft, missiles, ships and ground vehicles. EDO produces high performance integrated composite structures through innovative preforming technologies and liquid resin infusion processes. These include braiding, Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) and Vacuum assisted RTM (VaRTM) of composite structures. We are a subcontractor to Lockheed Martin for the JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile) stealthy cruise missile. We fabricate 90% of the composite components for the vehicle including the entire fuselage, wing spars and other smaller structures. JASSM is qualified to be carried on the B-1B and B-52. Qualification on the F-16 and B-2 is expected soon. In 2005 we secured a contract with GE Aircraft Engines to fabricate variable-bleed valve ducts for the GEnx engine. The GEnx engine is the primary engine on Boeing's 787, 747 advanced and Airbus' A350. We fabricate 11 ducts in total as a shipset for each engine. The contract includes the development/qualification effort and the initial production quantities through 2012. This is a significant breakthrough for EDO as we are now an approved production supplier for composite hardware on GE engines. We produce filament-wound launch canisters for the new Thales VT-1 missile program. We also continued production of composite tanks for the Boeing C-17 aircraft. We have been the sole supplier of these 6 tanks since production began, more than 12 years ago. We also design and fabricate composite structures for Northrop Grumman on military aircraft modification programs. We have been a provider to Boeing for composite tanks on commercial airliners for 38 years and our aftermarket support for these tanks to the commercial airlines remains strong. We produce our trademark "Fiberbond" line of composite piping for water and fire systems on oil rigs. This includes the fabrication and installation of topside piping systems for Gulf of Mexico deep-water oil platforms. We continue to invest in introducing our Fiberbond piping to the U.S. Navy due to its non- corrosive, lightweight and non-magnetic properties. MINE COUNTERMEASURE SYSTEMS We are the preeminent supplier of airborne naval-minesweeping equipment worldwide. The principal system of this type used by the U.S. Navy, the MK 105 helicopter-towed system, was designed and developed by us. We continue to provide spares and logistics support for these systems to the Navy and an international customer, and we continue to function as the Navy maintenance depot for the MK 105 systems. We won a competitive contract from the Navy for the next generation lightweight, helicopter-towed minesweeping system, called the Organic Airborne/Surface Influence Sweep (OASIS). Production is expected to start in 2008 and continue through 2015. We continued work on the Navy contract to demonstrate the feasibility of unmanned, surface-vessel mine warfare technology and the application of this technology for fleet integration. The Navy has selected EDO's Unmanned Surface Sweep System, named US3, and OASIS, as baseline sweep mission packages for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). In 2006, EDO will open a new facility in Panama City, FL near our primary mine-warfare customer, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Panama City (NSWC PC). This facility will support our existing mine-warfare systems and develop future systems. SONAR SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS We have been a supplier of sonar systems and components, including sonar sensors, underwater-communication systems, depth-sounding, and speed-measuring equipment for more than 50 years. We are one of North America's leading manufacturers of piezoelectric-ceramic components for defense applications, and we also provide material and related transducers to several commercial markets. Piezoelectric-ceramic elements convert acoustic energy to electrical energy and vice versa and form the basis of many defense and commercial products. We believe our ability to combine, manufacture and develop engineered active materials with state-of-practice mixed analog and digital electronics and software engineering makes us competitive in several niche markets. For example, we produce underwater acoustic transducers for use in all areas of undersea warfare and piezoelectric shapes for a variety of industries. In 2005, Lockheed Martin awarded EDO a contract valued at $30 million for sonar equipment on the new Spanish S-80A submarine's combat management system. This initial award covers outboard sonar arrays on four conventionally-powered submarines. This award positions the Lockheed Martin team, including EDO, to compete for other international submarine opportunities. During 2005, our newest and most capable towed-sonar system, the EDO Model 980 ALOFTS, which is designed to detect quiet submarines in littoral waters, was delivered to an international customer. Five more systems will be installed through 2008. We have also received an order from another international customer for one ALOFTS system with options for two additional systems expected to be procured in 2006 and 2007. Development continued in cooperation with Ultra Electronics, the UK-based aerospace and defense-electronics group, on our newest hull-mounted sonar, the MFS 7000. In 2005, this equipment was installed on 7 the United Kingdom's first new anti-air warfare destroyers, the Daring class. There will be a total of six ships of the Daring class with MFS-7000 sonar systems installed. EDO is also producing SQS-53C sonar arrays for the Arleigh Burke-class of guided-missile destroyer. If all options are exercised, deliveries will extend to approximately 2010. In addition to supplying these arrays for U.S. Navy ships, EDO also provides them to allied navies under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. In 2005, installation of two EDO Model 997 hull-mounted sonars to replace the earlier EDO Model 610 was also completed on two additional Brazilian Navy ships, bringing the total number of these new systems operating to six. We continued to support our legacy SQR-18 and SQS-35 towed sonars in their role as primary undersea-warfare systems for several international navies, most notably the Taiwanese Navy. PROFESSIONAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Professional and engineering services accounted for 13%, 17%, and 19% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our primary areas of services include four major areas of specialty: information technology; acquisition management; engineering; and technical services. Within these specialties, we provide a broad range of services, primarily to the DoD. We provide business transformation, analysis & information technology services including strategic business planning, human capital planning, benchmarking and metrics tracking and analysis, website development, and IT policy and planning. We provide surface-warfare services, including human-systems integration, configuration management, business & financial management, modernization planning, data management, and various engineering functions. We provide the Navy with in-service engineering support for marine-propulsion gas-turbine systems. We also provide systems-engineering services in areas such as test and evaluation, systems integration, performance modeling and computer-aided design to Navy, Coast Guard, and commercial clients. EDO supports the Marine Corps Joint Capabilities and Integration Office, Systems Command and Logistics Command by designing and executing concept-based experimentation, technology identification, wargaming, and modeling and simulation. We also provide acquisition and logistics support to the Marine Corps, including several logistic bases and systems-command centers. We provide aviation and logistics-support services, including integrated logistics support, systems engineering, systems integration, interactive technical manuals, training systems development, and reliability engineering. We support several of the Navy's program executive offices by providing logisticians, acquisition specialists, engineers and financial analysts who perform functions such as configuration management, budget analysis, analysis of ship casualty reports, ship-manning assessments, and review of training requirements. We have provided acquisition support to the Coast Guard's Deepwater program office as they create a transformational fleet of vessels. We support the Department of the Navy for in-service engineering and depot support for a mine-countermeasure program based in San Diego. This contract complements our continued support for the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Program Management Office (PMS-EOD), a contract we have successfully maintained since 1984. We perform engineering services under contracts to the Navy for threat-simulator-validation support at China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center, to the Air Force electronic warfare directorate at Edwards Air Force Base for F-22 and various other aircraft platforms, and provide technical and engineering support to various Boeing Satellite Systems programs. 8 We also provide a broad range of electronic-warfare-related engineering services to the Air Force, as well as aerospace and commercial businesses, to produce and support complex, high-technology solutions. Engineering specialties include software, radio-frequency, computer-aided design, and mechanical engineering. FLIGHT LINE PRODUCTS The provision of engineering services to the Air Force led to the development of portable radar-signal simulators designed to test the radar-warning receivers. Our first sale of this equipment was made in June 1998. The first significant contract was awarded by the Air Force in 2001 for 70 units. The primary product is the AN/PLM-4. The AN/PLM-4 tests the radar-warning systems and electronic countermeasures systems onboard fighter jets and other military aircraft before takeoff, as well as during routine maintenance. In addition to the flight-line version, the radar-signal simulator is available in configurations for laboratory, shipboard and vehicle testing. In 2005, we received orders for 143 AN/PLM-4 radar signal simulators from the USAF, US Navy and international customers. This brought the total number of systems ordered to 677. We are currently developing a smaller, lightweight, hand-held version of the radar signal simulator. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development is important to the success of our business, because we focus on niche markets where we have leading-edge technology. While research and development efforts are facilitated by a large portion of our staff, our research and development efforts involved the primary efforts of about 190 employees in 2005. Most of our research and development is funded by long-term development contracts with customers, with the remainder funded at our own expense. Expenditures under development contracts with customers vary in amount from year to year because of the timing of contract funding and other factors. Customer-funded research and development is principally related to military programs. Major customer-sponsored programs include the development of: mine-countermeasures systems; aircraft weapons-carriage technology; command-and-control software for combat-systems integration; shallow-water sonar; low-observable, anti-jam, GPS antennas; mobile-communications and data systems; and underwater-communications transducer products. Company-funded research and development is intended primarily to develop new products and extend the capabilities of existing products. Principal current company-funded research and development includes: next-generation electronic force protection systems; digital signal-processing technology for electronic intelligence and support systems; image and signal processing, computer software, and other improvements for combat systems; minesweeping technology; aircraft weapons-carriage systems; application of composites for structural uses; various types of communication equipment; electronic countermeasures; advanced antennas; sonar systems, including processing and detection enhancements; noise reduction and interference cancellation; piezoelectric and composite materials; and new capabilities for our radar-signal simulator products. The following table sets forth research and development expenditures for the years presented.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 2005 2004 2003 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Customer-sponsored...................................... $56,000 $61,600 $48,800 Company-funded.......................................... 17,100 11,600 8,600 ------- ------- ------- Total................................................. $73,100 $73,200 $57,400 ======= ======= =======
9 MARKETING AND INTERNATIONAL SALES We sell defense products to the U.S. DOD as a prime contractor and through subcontracts with other prime contractors. In addition, we also sell defense equipment to foreign governments directly, (including through Foreign Military Funded Programs) and through the U.S. Government under Foreign Military Sales programs. We also sell commercial products domestically and internationally. Sales of our defense products are usually made under long-term contracts or subcontracts covering one or more years of production. These contracts are obtained either through competitive bidding or contract negotiation. We believe that our long history of association with our military customers is an important factor in our overall business, and that the experience gained through this history has enhanced our ability to anticipate our customers' needs. Our approach to defense business is to anticipate specific customer needs and to develop systems to meet those needs either at our own expense or pursuant to research and development contracts. Many of our employees, including our chief executive officer and our vice president of Washington operations, are actively involved in the marketing of our defense products in the U.S. and abroad. We also have about 50 independent international sales representatives concentrating on the marketing of our defense products in foreign countries. Commercial products are sold in industrial and commercial markets. In foreign markets, piezoelectrics, antennas and electronic products are generally sold commercially through a network of sales representatives. Fiber-reinforced composite products are sold directly and through sales representatives. It is generally the policy of our U.S. business units to denominate all foreign contracts in U.S. dollars and seek not to incur significant costs in connection with long-term foreign contracts until we have received advance payments or letters-of-credit on amounts due under the contracts. EDO (UK) Ltd. generally denominates its contracts in British Pounds Sterling. International sales comprised 14% of consolidated net sales in 2005, 14% in 2004, and 18% in 2003. BACKLOG We define backlog as the funded value of contracts and orders that has not been recognized as sales. As of December 31, 2005 our total backlog was $558.7 million compared with $474.6 million as of December 31, 2004. Approximately 72% of the total backlog at December 31, 2005 is scheduled for delivery in 2006. Our backlog consists primarily of current orders under long-lived, mission-critical programs of key defense platforms on which we have a strong strategic position. A significant portion of our sales is to prime contractors, the U.S. DoD and foreign governments pursuant to long-term contracts. Accordingly, our backlog consists in large part of orders under these contracts. Backlog does not include portions of contracts for which the U.S. Government has not appropriated funds, nor does it include unexercised options in any contract. There is about $646.6 million in unfunded contracts and unexercised options at the end of 2005. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS Net sales to the U.S. Government, as a prime contractor and through subcontracts with other prime contractors, accounted for $528.6 million or 82% of our 2005 consolidated net sales compared with $425.6 million or 79% in 2004 and $348.3 million or 76% in 2003, and consisted primarily of sales to the DoD. Such sales include sales of military equipment to the U.S. Government for resale to foreign governments under the Foreign Military Sales program. Our business is not substantially dependent on any contract. Our defense business can be and has been significantly affected by changes in national-defense policy and spending. Our U.S. Government contracts and subcontracts and certain foreign-government contracts contain the usual required provisions permitting termination at any time for the convenience of the government with payment for work completed and committed along with associated profit at the time of termination. Our contracts with the DoD are made on either a fixed-price or cost-reimbursable basis. Both types may include incentive provisions. Fixed-price contracts provide fixed compensation for specified work. Cost- 10 reimbursable contracts require us to perform specified work in return for reimbursement of costs (to the extent allowable under U.S. Government regulations) plus a specified fee. Under both contract types, an incentive adjustment may be made to our fee based on attainment of performance, scheduling, cost, quality or other goals. In general, with fixed-price contracts we assume a greater risk of loss, but also have the potential for higher profit margins, compared to cost-reimbursable contracts. The distribution of our government contracts between fixed-price and cost-reimbursable contracts varies from time to time. COMPETITION AND OTHER FACTORS Some of our products are sold in markets containing a number of competitors substantially larger than we are and with greater financial resources. Direct sales of military products to the U.S. and foreign governments are based principally on product performance, cost and reliability. Such products are generally sold in competition with products of other manufacturers that may fulfill an equivalent function, but which are not direct substitutes. We purchase some materials and components used in our systems and equipment from independent suppliers. These materials and components are normally not purchased under long-term contracts unless a long-term sales contract with one of our customers so requires. We believe that most of the items we purchase are obtainable from a variety of suppliers. We normally seek to have alternative sources for major items, although we are sometimes dependent on a single supplier or a few suppliers for some items. It is difficult to state precisely our market position in all of our product lines because information as to the volume of sales of similar products by our competitors is not generally available and the relevant markets are often not precisely defined. However, we believe that we are a significant factor in the markets for stores-release mechanisms for military aircraft, military sonar systems, military data-links, helicopter-towed mine-countermeasures systems, piezoelectric ceramics, electronic-countermeasures systems, and antennas. Although we own a significant number of patents and have filed applications for additional patents, we do not believe that our businesses depend heavily upon our patents. In addition, most of our U.S. Government contracts license us to use patents owned by others. Similar provisions in the U.S. government contracts awarded to other companies make it impossible for us to prevent the use by other companies of our patents in most domestic defense work. ENVIRONMENTAL Refer to Note 17 on page 60 of this Report for information regarding the cost of compliance with environmental regulations. EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 2005, we employed 3,000 persons. RISK FACTORS REDUCTIONS IN GOVERNMENT SPENDING WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. A reduction in purchases of our products by domestic and foreign government agencies would have a material adverse effect on our business because a significant portion of our net sales are derived from contracts directly or indirectly with government agencies. In 2005, 2004 and 2003, we derived about 82%, 79% and 76%, respectively, of net sales from direct and indirect contracts with the U.S. Government and derived about 14%, 14% and 18%, respectively, of net sales from international sales to foreign governments. The development of our business will depend upon the continued willingness of the U.S. and foreign governments to fund existing and new defense programs and, in particular, to continue to purchase our products and services. Although defense spending in the United States has recently increased, further increases may not continue and any proposed budget or supplemental budget request may not be approved. In addition, the U.S. Department of Defense may not continue to focus its spending on technologies that we incorporate in our products. 11 THE U.S. GOVERNMENT MAY TERMINATE OR MODIFY OUR EXISTING CONTRACTS OR ITS CONTRACTS WITH THE PRIME CONTRACTORS FOR WHICH WE ARE A SUBCONTRACTOR, WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE. A significant portion of our revenues are derived from U.S. Government contracts, directly or indirectly. There are inherent risks in contracting with the U.S. Government, including risks peculiar to the defense industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Laws and regulations permit the U.S. Government to: - terminate contracts for its convenience; - reduce or modify contracts or subcontracts if its requirements or budgetary constraints change; - cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable; - adjust contract costs and fees on the basis of audits done by its agencies; and - control or prohibit the export of our products. If the U.S. Government terminates our contracts for convenience, we may only recover our costs incurred or committed for settlement expenses and profit on work completed before the termination. Additionally, most of our backlog could be adversely affected by any modification or termination of contracts with the U.S. Government or contracts the prime contractors have with the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government regularly reviews our costs and performance on its contracts, as well as our accounting and general business practices. The U.S. Government may reduce the reimbursement for our fees and contract-related costs as a result of an audit. OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO VARIOUS RESTRICTIVE LAWS AND REGULATIONS BECAUSE WE ARE A CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND BECAUSE WE PROVIDE MILITARY PRODUCTS TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. As a contractor and subcontractor to the U.S. Government, we are subject to various laws and regulations that are more restrictive than those applicable to non-government contractors. We are required to obtain and maintain material governmental authorizations and approvals to run our business as it is currently conducted. For example, we need a license to operate an FAA repair station. In addition, because we provide defense equipment and related services to foreign governments, we must obtain licenses from the U.S. State Department for our foreign exports. Our failure or inability to obtain these licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business. New or more stringent laws or government regulations concerning government contracts and defense exports, if adopted and enacted, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Responding to governmental audits, inquiries or investigations may involve significant expense and divert management attention from regular operations. Also, an adverse finding in any such audit, inquiry or investigation could involve debarment, fines, injunctions or other sanctions. IF WE FAIL TO WIN COMPETITIVELY AWARDED CONTRACTS IN THE FUTURE, WE MAY EXPERIENCE A REDUCTION IN OUR SALES, WHICH COULD NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR PROFITABILITY. We obtain many of our U.S. Government contracts through a competitive bidding process. We cannot assure you that we will continue to win competitively awarded contracts or that awarded contracts will generate sales sufficient to result in our profitability. We are also subject to risks associated with the following: - the frequent need to bid on programs in advance of the completion of their design (which may result in unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns); - the substantial time and effort, including the relatively unproductive design and development required to prepare bids and proposals, spent for competitively awarded contracts that may not be awarded to us; - design complexity and rapid technological obsolescence; and - the constant need for design improvement. 12 Our government contracts may be subject to protest or challenge by unsuccessful bidders or to termination, reduction or modification in the event of changes in government requirements, reductions in federal spending or other factors. In addition, failure to obtain a renewal or follow-on contract with respect to any significant contract or a number of lesser contracts with the U.S. Government or foreign governments would result in a loss of revenues. If revenues from the award of new contracts fail to offset this loss, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position. A LARGE MAJORITY OF OUR CONTRACTS ARE FIXED-PRICE, AND WE MAY FACE INCREASED RISKS OF COST OVERRUNS OR LOSSES ON OUR CONTRACTS. The majority of our government contracts and subcontracts are firm, fixed-price contracts providing for a predetermined fixed price for the products we make regardless of the costs we incur. At times, we must therefore make pricing commitments to our customers based on our expectation that we will achieve more cost-effective product designs and automate more of our manufacturing operations. The manufacture of our products requires a complex integration of demanding processes involving unique technical skill sets. In addition, the expense of producing products can rise due to increased costs of materials, components, labor, capital equipment or other factors. As a result, we face risks of cost overruns or order cancellations if we fail to achieve forecasted product design and manufacturing efficiencies or if products cost more to produce than expected. WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO REDUCE OUR PROFIT MARGINS ON CONTRACTS ON WHICH WE USE THE PERCENTAGE-OF-COMPLETION ACCOUNTING METHOD. We record sales and profits on many of our contracts using percentage-of-completion methods of accounting. As a result, revisions made to our estimates of sales and profits are recorded in the period in which the conditions that require such revisions become known and can be estimated. Although we believe that our profit margins are fairly stated and that adequate provisions for losses for our fixed price contracts are recorded in our financial statements, as required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we cannot assure you that our contract profit margins will not decrease or our loss provisions will not increase materially in the future. OUR PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS MAY BE RENDERED OBSOLETE BY OUR INABILITY TO ADAPT TO TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. The rapid change of technology continually affects our product applications and may directly impact the performance of our products. For our electronic warfare products, we are required to improve reliability and maintainability, extend frequency ranges and provide advanced jamming techniques. We can give you no assurances that we will successfully maintain or improve the effectiveness of our existing products, nor can we assure you that we will successfully identify new opportunities and continue to have the needed financial resources to develop new products in a timely or cost-effective manner. In addition, products manufactured by others may render our products and systems obsolete or non-competitive. If any of these events occur, our results of operations would be adversely affected. THE UNSUCCESSFUL INTEGRATION OF A BUSINESS OR BUSINESS SEGMENT WE ACQUIRE COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR OPERATING RESULTS. One of our key operating strategies is to pursue selective acquisitions. We review and actively pursue possible acquisitions on a continuous basis. Except as previously disclosed in our public filings, we do not currently have any commitments, agreements or understandings to acquire any specific businesses or other material assets. Our acquisition strategy may require additional debt or equity financing, resulting in additional leverage or dilution of ownership. We cannot assure you that any future acquisition will be consummated, or that if consummated, we will be able to integrate such acquisition successfully without a material adverse 13 effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Moreover, any acquisition could involve other risks, including: - diversion of management's attention from existing operations; - potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies; and - exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies. WE ARE DEPENDENT IN PART UPON OUR RELATIONSHIPS AND ALLIANCES WITH INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS IN ORDER TO GENERATE REVENUE. We rely on the strength of our relationships with other contractors to form strategic alliances. Some of our partners assist us in the development of some of our products through teaming arrangements. Under these teaming arrangements, our partners usually have borne a portion of the expenses associated with our research and development of new and existing products that are the subject of such agreements. We cannot assure you that our partners will continue to bear these expenses in the future. If any of our existing relationships with our partners were impaired or terminated, we could experience significant delays in the development of our new products ourselves, and we would incur additional development costs. We would need to fund these costs internally or identify new partners. Some of our partners are also potential competitors, which may impair the viability of new strategic relationships. While we must compete effectively in the marketplace, our future alliances may depend on our partners' perception of us. Our ability to win new and/or follow-on contracts may be dependent upon our relationships within the military industry. WE HAVE DEVELOPED OUTSOURCING ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF MANY OF THE COMPONENTS AND SUB-ASSEMBLIES OF OUR PRODUCTS. IF THIRD PARTIES FAIL TO DELIVER QUALITY PRODUCTS AND COMPONENTS AT REASONABLE PRICES ON A TIMELY BASIS, WE MAY ALIENATE SOME OF OUR CUSTOMERS AND OUR REVENUES, PROFITABILITY AND CASH FLOW MAY DECLINE. We use contract manufacturers as an alternative to our own manufacture of the components and sub-assemblies of our products. If these contract manufacturers are not willing to contract with us on competitive terms or devote adequate resources to fulfill their obligations to us, or we do not properly manage these relationships, our existing customer relationships may suffer. In addition, by undertaking these activities, we run the risks that - the reputation and competitiveness of our products and services may deteriorate as a result of the reduction of our control and quality and delivery schedules and the consequent risk that we will experience supply interruptions and be subject to escalating costs; and - our competitiveness may be harmed by the failure of our contract manufacturers to develop, implement or maintain manufacturing methods appropriate for our products and customers. WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO DEFEND LAWSUITS OR PAY DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ALLEGED OR ACTUAL HARM CAUSED BY OUR PRODUCTS. We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of some of our products is alleged to have resulted in unintended harm to others or to property. Although we maintain general liability and product liability insurance, we may incur significant liability if product liability lawsuits against us are successful. We cannot assure you that such coverage will be adequate to cover all claims that may arise or that it will continue to be available to us on acceptable terms. WE MAY INCUR SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY ARISING FROM OUR ACTIVITIES INVOLVING THE USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Our business is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and ordinances governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products. From time to time, our 14 operations have resulted or may result in noncompliance with environmental laws or liability for the costs of investigating and cleaning up, and certain damages resulting from, sites of past spills, disposals or other releases of hazardous materials. In addition, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party pursuant to the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or corresponding state environmental laws, for the cleanup of contamination resulting from past disposals of hazardous materials at some sites where we, along with others, sent waste in the past. We are a party to consent decrees as a result of our potential responsibility for contamination caused by the disposal of hazardous materials. We cannot assure you that such matters, or any similar liabilities that arise in the future, will not exceed our resources, nor can we completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC INSTABILITY IN FOREIGN MARKETS MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR OPERATING RESULTS. Foreign sales represented about 14% our total sales in 2005 and we intend to increase the amount of foreign sales we make in the future. Foreign sales are subject to numerous risks, including political and economic instability in foreign markets, restrictive trade policies of foreign governments, economic conditions in local markets, inconsistent product regulation by foreign agencies or governments, the imposition of product tariffs and the burdens of complying with a wide variety of international and U.S. export laws and differing regulatory requirements. If we fail to increase our foreign sales it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. CONCENTRATION OF VOTING POWER AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS COULD MAKE A MERGER, TENDER OFFER OR PROXY CONTEST DIFFICULT AND MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON SHARES. At December 31, 2005, the EDO Employee Stock Ownership Trust, or ESOT, owned 3,720,214 common shares (or about 18% of the outstanding common shares). The trustee of the plan has obligations under the trust agreement and its fiduciary duties when voting allocated shares under the plan. The procedure the trustee generally follows is to receive direction from each of the plan participants with respect to his or her allocated shares, and then to vote all shares in accordance with the direction received. The market may perceive that the concentration of voting power in the hands of a single employee stock ownership plan creates a potential barrier against another party acquiring us. This perception could result in lower market prices for our common shares. In addition, certain agreements to which we are a party, including loan and executive officer agreements, contain provisions that impose increased costs in the event of a change of control. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ADEQUATELY, THE VALUE OF OUR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS COULD BE DIMINISHED. The value of our commercial products is increased, in part, by obtaining, maintaining and enforcing our patents and other proprietary rights. While we take precautionary steps to protect our technological advantages and intellectual property and rely in part on patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright laws, we cannot assure you that the precautionary steps we have taken will completely protect our intellectual property rights. In the event a competitor successfully challenges our patents or licenses, we could incur substantial litigation costs that could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT'S RIGHT TO USE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED BY US LIMITS OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. We seek to protect the competitive benefits we derive from our patents, proprietary information and other intellectual property. However, we do not have the right to prohibit the U.S. Government from using certain technologies developed or acquired by us or to prohibit third party companies, including our competitors, from using those technologies in providing products and services to the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government has the right to royalty-free use of technologies that we have developed under U.S. Government contracts. We are free to commercially exploit those government-funded technologies and may assert our intellectual property rights to seek to block other non-government users thereof, but we cannot assure you we could successfully do so. 15 A FAILURE TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL COULD REDUCE OUR REVENUES AND OUR OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS. There is a continuing demand for qualified technical personnel, and we believe that our future growth and success will depend upon our ability to attract, train and retain such personnel. Competition for personnel in the military industry is intense, and there are a limited number of persons with knowledge of, and experience in, this industry. Although we currently experience relatively low rates of turnover for our technical personnel, the rate of turnover may increase in the future. An inability to attract or maintain a sufficient number of technical personnel could have a material adverse effect on our contract performance or on our ability to capitalize on market opportunities. INCREASED SCRUTINY OF FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT INVESTOR CONFIDENCE, AND ANY RESTATEMENT OF EARNINGS COULD INCREASE LITIGATION RISKS AND LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO ACCESS THE CAPITAL MARKETS. Congress, the SEC, other regulatory authorities and the media are intensely scrutinizing a number of financial reporting issues and practices. Although all businesses face uncertainty with respect to how the U.S. financial disclosure regime may be affected by this process, particular attention has been focused recently on companies' interpretations of generally accepted accounting principles. If we are required to restate our financial statements as a result of a determination that we had incorrectly applied generally accepted accounting principles, that restatement could adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets or the trading price of our securities. The recent scrutiny regarding financial reporting may also result in an increase in litigation involving companies with publicly traded securities, such as us. There can be no assurance that any such litigation against us would not materially adversely affect our business or the trading price of our securities. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH THE RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS IN OUR DEBT AGREEMENTS, THERE WOULD BE A DEFAULT UNDER THE TERMS OF THOSE AGREEMENTS, AND THIS COULD RESULT IN AN ACCELERATION OF PAYMENT OF FUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN BORROWED. If we are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants in our debt agreements, there would be a default under the terms of these agreements. Some of the debt agreements also require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy financial tests. Our ability to meet these financial ratios and tests may be affected by events beyond our control, including, without limitation, sales levels, contract terminations and potential acquisitions. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to meet these tests. In the event of a default under these agreements, the lenders could terminate their commitments to lend or accelerate the loans and declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. Borrowings under other debt instruments that contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions may also be accelerated and become due and payable. If any of these events occur, there can be no assurance that we would be able to make necessary payments to the lenders or that we would be able to find alternative financing. Even if we are able to obtain alternative financing, it may not be on terms that are acceptable to us. RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS IN OUR DEBT AGREEMENTS LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS AND COULD PREVENT US FROM OBTAINING NEEDED FUNDS IN THE FUTURE. Our debt and financing arrangements contain a number of significant limitations that restrict our ability to, among other things: - borrow additional money or issue guarantees; - pay dividends or other distributions to shareholders; - make investments; - create liens on assets; - sell assets; - enter into transactions with affiliates; and - engage in mergers or consolidations. 16 These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain future financing, fund needed capital expenditures or withstand a future downturn in business or the economy. WE CURRENTLY DERIVE A SIGNIFICANT PERCENTAGE OF OUR TOTAL SALES FROM OUR WARLOCK FORCE PROTECTION SYSTEMS. IF SALES OF THE WARLOCK FORCE PROTECTION SYSTEMS DECREASE, OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. Currently, sales of our Warlock force protection systems to the United States Army constitute a significant percentage of our total sales. Sales of Warlock force protection systems accounted for 22% of our total sales for fiscal 2005. Due to the immediate need for the systems, the United States Army places expedited, short term orders with us for these products from time to time. Consequently, the termination, reduction or postponement of purchases by the United States Army, which could happen at any time, may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES All of our operating facilities are leased except a Wando, SC facility obtained in the Darlington acquisition. In 2003, we sold our facility in Deer Park, NY. We believe our facilities are adequate for our present purposes. All facilities in the following listing are suitable for expansion by using available but unused space, leasing additional available space, or by physical expansion of leased buildings. We believe that, with respect to leases which expire during 2006 we will be able to either extend the lease or lease other facilities on reasonable terms. Our obligations under the various leases are set forth in Note 16 on pages 59 and 60 of this Report. Set forth below is a listing of our principal plants and other materially important physical properties.
APPROXIMATE FLOOR AREA SEGMENT LOCATION TYPE (IN SQ. FT.) ------- -------- ---- ------------ Electronic Systems and Communications/ Engineered Systems and Services....... North Amityville, NY Manufacturing/Assembly 225,000 Electronic Systems and Communications/Engineered Systems and Services....... Chesapeake, VA Assembly 46,000 Electronic Systems and Communications............. Morgan Hill, CA Manufacturing 160,000 Electronic Systems and Communications............. Thousand Oaks, CA Assembly 113,000 Electronic Systems and Communications............. Alexandria, VA & Wando, SC Manufacturing 105,000 Electronic Systems and Communications............. Bohemia, NY Manufacturing 94,000 Electronic Systems and Communications............. Columbia, MD Office/Assembly 77,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Salt Lake City, UT (2 facilities) Manufacturing 284,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Alexandria, VA Office 193,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Brighton, UK Manufacturing 56,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Walpole, MA Manufacturing 55,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Huntingdon, PA Assembly 40,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Lancaster, CA Office/Assembly 38,000 Engineered Systems and Services................... Baton Rouge, LA Manufacturing 29,000
17 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company and/or its subsidiaries are parties to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including various environmental actions described in Note 17 on page 60 of this Report. While litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, are not material to the business or financial condition of the Company. The following is a description of certain proceedings: U.S. v. EDO Corporation et al.; EDO Corporation et al. v. Elinco Associates L.P. et al. (United States District Court, District of Connecticut). The Company and three other companies entered into a consent decree in 1990 with the Federal government for the remediation of a Superfund site in Norwalk, CT. The Superfund site has been divided into three operable units. The consent decree relates to two of the operable units. The third operable unit has not been formally studied and the Company is unable to determine whether the EPA will address the third operable unit or, if it does, whether it will conclude that specific remedial response action will be required for it, and in such event, what the costs, if any, or the Company's degree of responsibility will be. As of December 31, 2005 the Company estimates that its discounted liability over the remainder of the twenty years related to the two operable units is approximately $1.6 million. See also Note 17 on page 60 of this Report. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information responsive to this item is set forth under the headings "Common Share Prices" and "Dividends" on pages 31 and 32, together with dividend information contained in the "Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity" on pages 35 and 36 and Note 8 on pages 47 and 48 of this Report. The information regarding equity compensation plans can be found in Note 1(k) on pages 42 and 43 and Note 13 on pages 51 and 52 of this Report. 18 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (NOT COVERED BY INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORTS)
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) STATEMENT OF EARNINGS DATA: Net sales......................................... $648,482 $536,173 $460,667 $328,876 $259,961 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales................................... 490,617 392,961 338,259 240,850 189,733 Selling, general and administrative............. 85,921 78,791 71,855 47,584 34,013 Research and development........................ 17,122 11,620 8,594 8,492 8,750 Environmental costs/impairment loss on Deer Park facility...................................... 1,543 -- 9,160 -- -- Other expenses(a)............................... -- -- 1,871 2,565 389 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 595,203 483,372 429,739 299,491 232,885 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Operating earnings................................ 53,279 52,801 30,928 29,385 27,076 Net interest expense(b)........................... (11,291) (7,848) (8,152) (4,956) (2,216) Other non-operating (expense) income, net......... (147) (319) 279 (95) (971) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- (11,438) (8,167) (7,873) (5,051) (3,187) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle............. 41,841 44,634 23,055 24,334 23,889 Income tax expense................................ (15,572) (15,566) (9,644) (10,342) (9,210) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle from: Continuing operations........................... 26,269 29,068 13,411 13,992 14,679 Discontinued operations......................... -- -- 1,398 -- 273 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle............................ 26,269 29,068 14,809 13,992 14,952 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax of $790(c)................ -- -- -- (3,363) -- Dividends on preferred shares(d).................. -- -- -- -- (194) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net earnings available for common shares.......... $ 26,269 $ 29,068 $ 14,809 $ 10,629 $ 14,758 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== PER COMMON SHARE DATA: Basic net earnings (loss): Continuing operations........................... $ 1.45 $ 1.64 $ 0.78 $ 0.82 $ 1.14 Discontinued operations......................... -- -- 0.08 -- 0.02 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Basic net earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.................. 1.45 1.64 0.86 0.82 1.16 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle....................................... -- -- -- (0.20) -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Basic net earnings................................ $ 1.45 $ 1.64 $ 0.86 $ 0.62 $ 1.16 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Diluted net earnings (loss): Continuing operations........................... $ 1.33 $ 1.49 $ 0.76 $ 0.81 $ 1.09 Discontinued operations......................... -- -- 0.08 -- 0.02 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Diluted net earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.................. 1.33 1.49 0.84 0.81 1.11 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle....................................... -- -- -- (0.20) -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Diluted net earnings.............................. $ 1.33 $ 1.49 $ 0.84 $ 0.61 $ 1.11 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Cash dividends per common share................... $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 Weighted-average common shares outstanding: Basic........................................... 18,081 17,695 17,308 17,080 12,776 Diluted(e)...................................... 23,001 22,377 17,561 17,379 14,254
19
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) OTHER DATA: Depreciation and amortization..................... $ 15,699 $ 16,040 $ 17,065 $ 11,321 $ 11,396 Capital expenditures.............................. 23,718 14,206 8,865 7,093 14,298 Backlog........................................... 558,685 474,605 462,327 375,029 294,812 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash................................. $108,731 $ 98,884 $ 86,632 $159,860 $ 58,031 Working capital................................... 244,862 226,708 175,715 204,382 105,177 Total assets...................................... 687,399 546,689 494,696 481,574 285,630 Total debt(f)..................................... 208,250 137,800 137,800 137,800 463 Shareholders' equity.............................. 239,893 211,928 190,332 168,273 174,498
--------------- (a) Reflects $0.9 million in 2003 and $0.6 million in 2002 for the write-off of purchased in-process research and development ("IPR&D") and other acquisition-related costs, respectively, associated with our acquisition of the assets of Condor Systems, Inc., as well as a $0.9 million curtailment loss in 2003 and a $2.0 million curtailment loss in 2002 associated with our benefit plans; a $0.9 million post-retirement curtailment gain in 2001; $1.3 million in 2001 for the write-off of IPR&D; and other EDO-AIL merger- related costs in 2001. (b) In 2005, includes $2.9 million of premium paid to redeem all of the outstanding $137.8 million principal amount of our 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes and $1.3 million of write-off of the remaining unamortized deferred finance costs associated with these Notes. (c) Upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," we recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle effective January 1, 2002. See Note 1(f) to the consolidated financial statements. (d) ESOP Convertible Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series A. On March 8, 2001, all outstanding preferred shares were converted into common shares. No preferred dividends were paid after March 8, 2001. (e) In 2005 and 2004, the 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes had a dilutive effect on the earnings per share calculation. In November 2005, the 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes were redeemed. Also in November 2005, 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes were issued which had a dilutive effect in 2005. Consequently, 4.7 million shares are included in the diluted shares outstanding in 2005 compared to 4.4 million shares in 2004. (f) Includes current portion of notes payable. ITEMS 7. AND 7A. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW EDO Corporation (the "Company") designs and manufactures a diverse range of products with core competencies in critical defense areas. We are a leading supplier of sophisticated, highly engineered products and systems for defense, aerospace and intelligence applications. We believe our advanced systems are mission-critical on a wide range of military programs and are at the core of transforming defense capabilities. We have two reporting segments: Electronic Systems and Communications and Engineered Systems and Services. Our Electronic Systems and Communications segment provides highly-engineered electronic systems and equipment including electronic warfare systems, reconnaissance and surveillance systems, and command, control, communications, and computers (C4) products and systems. Our Engineered Systems and Structures segment comprises aircraft armament systems, integrated composite structures, undersea warfare sonar systems, and professional engineering services. The Company has a disciplined acquisition program which is diversifying its base of major platforms and customers. 20 The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and the Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders are made available, free of charge, on its Web site www.edocorp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. ACQUISITIONS On December 20, 2005, the Company acquired for cash all of the stock of NexGen Communications LLC (NexGen), a privately-held company specializing in the design and production of communications systems for a diverse set of U.S. government organizations. The acquisition strengthened our fast-growing position in specialized communication products. The acquired company became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Consequently, the excess purchase price over the net assets acquired has been temporarily assigned to goodwill, and amounts recorded are subject to change. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to NexGen is not deductible for income tax purposes. On September 19, 2005, we acquired for cash all of the stock of Fiber Innovations, Inc., (Fiber Innovations) a privately-held company that is a designer and manufacturer of fiber reinforced-composites. This acquisition has added important complementary design and manufacturing capabilities to EDO's integrated-composite-structures business. The acquired company became part of the Company's Engineered Systems and Services segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to Fiber Innovations is not deductible for income tax purposes. On May 2, 2005, we acquired for cash all of the units of EVI Technology, LLC (EVI), a privately-held company. EVI is a designer, manufacturer and integrator of classified intelligence systems. EVI has strengthened and expanded EDO's range of products and engineering expertise in a number of synergistic areas. The acquired company became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to EVI recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. In June 2003, we acquired all of the stock of Emblem Group Ltd., a privately-held company based in England. Emblem, which has been renamed EDO (UK) Ltd., operated through its MBM Technology unit in England and Artisan Technologies Inc. subsidiary in the United States. EDO (UK) reinforces our position as a global leader in aircraft armament-release systems and broadens our customer base in Europe. Emblem became part of the Company's Engineered Systems and Services segment. In the second quarter of 2004 we received $0.3 million from an escrow account resulting in a decrease in purchase price and, therefore, goodwill. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill and other intangibles related to Emblem's units located in the UK is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes over 15 years. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to Artisan Technologies, Inc. is not deductible for income tax purposes. In March 2003, we acquired all of the stock of Darlington, Inc., a privately-held defense-communications company. This acquisition significantly expanded our capabilities in defense communications and related services. Darlington became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. In February 2003, we acquired all of the stock of Advanced Engineering & Research Associates, Inc. (AERA), a privately-held company which strengthened and expanded our range of professional services. AERA became part of the Company's Engineered Systems and Services segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. In July 2002, we acquired, in an auction under section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, substantially all of the assets of Condor Systems, Inc., a privately-held defense-electronics company and its subsidiary 21 (together, "Condor"). The acquisition of Condor's business has significantly expanded our defense-electronics capabilities in the areas of reconnaissance and surveillance systems and communications and countermeasures. The assets became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. Associated with the acquisition and included in operating earnings for 2003 is $0.9 million, of acquisition-related costs. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill, IPR&D and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. These acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, their operating results are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since their respective acquisition dates. SALE OF PROPERTY On June 24, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the decision to sell our 726,000 square foot facility in Deer Park, NY. This decision was based on a company-wide facility plan that evaluated potential uses for the property. We concluded that the Deer Park facility would not meet future requirements, and thus an outright sale was completed, freeing assets for more productive use, including acquisitions. A pre-tax impairment loss of $9.2 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2003, as the net book value of the assets exceeded the fair value less the costs to sell. The fair value was based on a $29.0 million sales price per the sales agreement entered into in July 2003. In 2005, we recorded $1.5 million of an additional cost provision to account for an environmental cleanup that was not discovered until after the sale. Of the $29.0 million sales price, $22.0 million was in cash and $7.0 million in the form of a purchase money mortgage and note. We closed on the sale in October 2003 and received the cash less closing payments. The due date of the note is October 9, 2005 or the date EDO achieves "Material Closure" defined as "the investigation, assessment and remediation of an Environmental Condition sufficient to not cause any material interference with the buyer's ability to develop, construct, finance or lease the Premises." The Company believes that the note is currently due and payable. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements on pages 45 and 46. DISCUSSION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES We make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations and which require our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The following is a brief discussion of the critical accounting policies employed by us. REVENUE RECOGNITION Sales under long-term, fixed-price contracts, including pro-rata profits, are generally recorded based on the relationship of costs incurred to date to total projected final costs or, alternatively, as deliveries and other milestones are achieved or services are provided. These projections are revised throughout the lives of the contracts. Adjustments to profits resulting from such revisions are made cumulative to the date of change and may affect current period earnings. Sales on other than long-term contract orders (principally commercial products) are recorded as shipments are made. Our gross profit is affected by a variety of factors, including the mix of products, systems and services sold, production efficiencies, price competition and general economic conditions. Estimated losses on long-term contracts are recorded when identified. INVENTORIES Inventories under long-term contracts and programs reflect all accumulated production costs, including factory overhead, initial tooling and other related costs (including general and administrative expenses relating to certain of our defense contracts), less the portion of such costs charged to cost of sales. All other inventories 22 are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventory costs in excess of amounts recoverable under contracts and which relate to a specific technology or application and which may not have alternative uses are charged to cost of sales when such circumstances are identified. From time to time, we manufacture certain products prior to receiving firm contracts in anticipation of future demand. Such costs are inventoried and are incurred to help maintain stable and efficient production schedules. Several factors may influence the sale and use of our inventories, including our decision to exit a product line, technological change, new product development and/or revised estimates of future product demand. If inventory is determined to be overvalued due to one or more of the above factors, we would be required to recognize such loss in value at the time of such determination. Under the contractual arrangements by which progress payments are received, the United States Government has a title to or a security interest in the inventories identified with related contracts. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND OTHER LONG-LIVED ASSETS Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or their respective lease periods. In those cases where we determine that the useful life of property, plant and equipment should be shortened, we depreciate the net book value in excess of salvage value over its revised remaining useful life thereby increasing depreciation expense. Factors such as technological advances, changes to our business model, changes in our capital strategy, changes in the planned use of equipment, fixtures, software or changes in the planned use of facilities could result in shortened useful lives. Long-lived assets, other than goodwill, are reviewed by us for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The estimate of cash flow, which is used to determine recoverability, is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about future operating performance. Our estimates of undiscounted cash flow may differ from actual cash flow due to such factors including technological advances, changes to our business model, or changes in our capital strategy or planned use of long-lived assets. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest, is less than the carrying value, we would recognize an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" goodwill must be tested at least annually for impairment at the reporting unit level. If an indication of impairment exists, we are required to determine if such goodwill's implied fair value is less than the unit carrying value in order to determine the amount, if any, of the impairment loss required to be recorded. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profits, adverse legal or regulatory developments, accumulation of costs significantly in excess of amounts originally expected to acquire the asset and/or a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. To determine the fair value of our reporting units, we generally use a present value technique (discounted cash flow) corroborated by market multiples when available and as appropriate, for all of the reporting units. The discounted cash flow method measures intrinsic value by reference to an enterprise's or an asset's expected annual free cash flows. We applied what we believe to be the most appropriate valuation methodology for each of the reporting units. If we had established different reporting units or utilized different valuation methodologies, the impairment test results could differ. PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS We sponsor defined benefit pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering all eligible employees. Several statistical and other factors which attempt to anticipate future events are used in 23 calculating the expense and liability related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate and expected return on plan assets within certain guidelines and in conjunction with our actuarial consultants. In addition, our actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate the expense and liability related to these plans. The actuarial assumptions used by us may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual results due to changing market, economic or regulatory conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. We use the building block approach to the estimation of the long-term rate of return on assets. Under this approach, we reviewed the publicly available common source data for the range of returns on basic types of equity and fixed income instruments and the differential to those rates provided by active investment management. In consultation with our actuarial and active asset management consultants and taking into account the funds' actual performance and expected asset allocation going forward, we selected an overall return rate within the resulting range. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Net sales for 2005 increased 20.9% to 648.5 million from $536.2 million for 2004 and included sales from the acquisitions of Fiber Innovations and EVI. For 2005, net earnings were $26.3 million or $1.33 per diluted share on 23.0 million shares compared to net earnings of $29.1 million or $1.49 per diluted share on 22.4 million shares in 2004. In 2005 and 2004, the 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes had a dilutive effect on the earnings per share calculation. In November 2005, the 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes were redeemed. Also in November 2005, 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes were issued which had a dilutive effect in 2005. Consequently, 4.7 million shares are included in the diluted shares outstanding in 2005 compared to 4.4 million shares in 2004. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. FAS123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in FAS123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, FAS123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. FAS123(R) must be adopted by the Company no later than January 1, 2006. As permitted by Statement 123, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options through December 31, 2005. The Company has adopted FAS123(R) on January 1, 2006, using the "modified prospective" method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of FAS123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of FAS123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. Accordingly, the adoption of FAS123(R)'s fair value method will have an impact on our result of operations. The impact of the adoption of FAS123(R) cannot be determined at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted FAS123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note (1)(k) to our consolidated financial statements. FAS123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after 24 adoption. The Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future, because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options and the fair value of the Company's stock on the date of exercise. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COMPARISON OF 2005 TO 2004 Net sales by segment were as follows:
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER INCREASE/(DECREASE) ---------------------- FROM SEGMENT 2005 2004 PRIOR PERIOD ------- --------- --------- ------------------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Electronic Systems and Communications............ $408.2 $273.3 49.4% Engineered Systems and Services.................. 240.3 262.9 (8.6)% ------ ------ Total............................................ $648.5 $536.2 20.9% ====== ======
The increase in sales in the Electronic Systems and Communications segment for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 is attributable to sales of Warlock force protection equipment to the U.S. Army. The Warlock program was a significant contributor to sales and margin in 2005, accounting for 22% of our total sales. In addition, the acquisition of EVI contributed sales for the eight months since its acquisition date. There were also increases in sales of C4 products and systems, including the Joint Enhanced Core Communication Systems ("JECCS") program for the Marine Corps and antennas. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in sales of electronic warfare systems due primarily to reduced efforts on the EA-6B aircraft and also to the completion of B1-B development efforts. The decrease in sales in the Engineered Systems and Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 is attributable to lower sales of professional services, mine countermeasures systems, and sonar systems, partially offset by three months of sales from the acquisition of Fiber Innovations since its acquisition date. The decrease in sales of professional services was due to lower levels of awards as well as timing of awards. The decrease in sales of mine countermeasures systems was due to the completion of various spares orders that followed the final deliveries of the MK-105 Mod 4 Upgrade program. The decrease in sales of sonar systems was due to several major programs nearing completion during 2005. Operating earnings were as follows:
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, INCREASE/(DECREASE) ------------- FROM SEGMENT 2005 2004 PRIOR PERIOD ------- ----- ----- ------------------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Electronic Systems and Communications............... $42.1 $26.5 58.9% Engineered Systems and Services..................... 12.7 26.3 (51.8)% Deer Park facility environmental cost provision..... (1.5) -- ----- ----- Total............................................... $53.3 $52.8 1.0% ===== =====
25 Items of note affecting operating earnings are summarized here to clarify the comparison of results.
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------- 2005 2004 ------ ------ (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Pension..................................................... $4,277 $2,183 ESOP Compensation expense................................... $4,952 $4,330 Intangible asset amortization............................... $5,931 $5,564
The increased pension expense in 2005 compared to 2004 is attributable to changes in actuarial assumptions, namely a reduction in the discount rate. The higher ESOP compensation expense in 2005 is attributable to our higher average stock price compared to 2004. Pension and ESOP compensation expense are allocated between cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense. The intangible asset amortization expense is associated with the acquisitions made in 2002, 2003 and 2005 and affects primarily the Electronic Systems and Communications segment. In 2005, we incurred a $1.5 million charge to provide for environmental cleanup efforts relating to our former Deer Park facility. Operating earnings in the Electronic Systems and Communications segment for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $42.1 million, or 10.3% of this segment's sales compared to $26.5 million, or 9.7% of this segment's sales for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in operating earnings is largely attributable to the increased sales of Warlock force protection systems and increased margins on sales of C4 products and systems, namely the aforementioned JECCS program. These increases were partially offset by cost growth of $2.4 million on an electronic warfare systems program. Additionally, as discussed in further detail below in the comparison of results of operations of 2004 compared to 2003, 2004 operating earnings were negatively impacted by a write-off of $2.6 million of Ku-band products inventory. Operating earnings in the Engineered Systems and Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $12.7 million, or 5.3% of this segment's sales compared to $26.3 million, or 10.0% of this segment's sales for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease in operating earnings was due largely to the aforementioned lower sales in our professional services business. In addition, there was cost growth of $1.4 million on several sonar array and depth sounder programs. The lower spares sales related to mine countermeasures systems also contributed to lower earnings. These negative impacts were partially offset by an adjustment of $1.6 million of the estimated costs to complete on an aircraft armament program. Operating earnings were also negatively affected by cost growth totaling $3.6 million on an undersea warfare systems program known as ALOFTS. Ongoing system testing identified various performance issues that required design and software modifications, which are continuing. We believe we have accounted for all costs for the modifications and future re-testing in our estimate-to-complete. The next significant tests for this program are currently scheduled to occur in 2006. In 2004, there was a $3.8 million negative impact to earnings on the same program. In 2004 there was a positive impact to operating earnings in this segment of approximately $3.4 million resulting from the release of a reserve which had been previously established for a potential issue on MK105-related contracts. The release of the reserve was triggered by final deliveries of MK105 systems made in 2003 and proven performance resulting from system utilization over the course of 2004. This increase in earnings was partially offset by a $1.6 million negative impact to operating earnings resulting from an increase in the estimate-to-complete on an aircraft armament program. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 of $85.9 million decreased as a percent of net sales to 13.2% from 14.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in sales is the primary driver of the decrease. Research and development expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased to $17.1 million or 2.6% of net sales from $11.6 million or 2.2% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase is attributable to increased spending on next generation force protection efforts. 26 Interest expense, net of interest income, for the year ended December 31, 2005 decreased to $7.1 million compared to $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to higher interest income resulting from higher average cash levels. Interest expense includes interest on the 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes through their redemption date in November 2005 as well as interest on the 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2025 issued in November 2005. Also included in interest expense is amortization of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the offering of the 4.0% notes and amortization of deferred financing costs associated with our credit facility. On November 29, 2005, we redeemed for cash all of our outstanding 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes. Associated with this redemption, we expensed $2.9 million representing a 2.1% premium paid on the $137.8 million principal amount of these 5.25% Notes, and wrote-off $1.3 million of the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs associated with these notes. Income tax expense reflects an effective rate of 37.2% for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 34.9% for the year ended December 21, 2004. The higher effective tax rate for 2005 as compared to 2004 is attributable to the following: higher non-deductible non-cash ESOP compensation; a reduction in the state tax expense due to state filing positions; additional tax benefit from the manufacturing exemption that became effective January 1, 2005 and lower net benefit recorded for the adjustment to tax reserves. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 due to the net adjustment for income tax contingencies of which $.7 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. This compares to an income tax benefit of $2.8 million that was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2005, net earnings were $26.3 million or $1.33 per diluted common share on 23.0 million diluted shares compared to net earnings of $29.1 million or $1.49 per diluted common share on 22.4 million diluted shares for the year ended December 31, 2004. The convertible notes had a dilutive effect for the years ended December 31, 2005, and 2004. COMPARISON OF 2004 TO 2003 Net sales by segment were as follows:
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, INCREASE ---------------------- FROM SEGMENT 2004 2003 PRIOR PERIOD ------- --------- --------- ------------ (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Electronic Systems and Communications................. $273.3 $221.6 23.3% Engineered Systems and Services....................... 262.9 239.1 10.0% ------ ------ Total................................................. $536.2 $460.7 16.4% ====== ======
The increase in sales in the Electronic Systems and Communications segment for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 is attributable to increases in sales of reconnaissance and surveillance systems, and command, control, communications and computers ("C4") systems, including antenna products. There was also an increase in sales due to deliveries on our contract with the U.S. Army for the new force protection systems. This "rapid response" program was a significant contributor to sales and margin for the year. These increases were partially offset by decreases in sales of electronic warfare equipment due to the completion of the UEU production program as well as completion of production deliveries of interference cancellation systems and the basic shortstop electronic protection systems ("SEPS") in 2003. In addition, in 2004 there were no sales of our space products related to commercial communication satellites due to a significant downturn in market demand. Entering into 2004 there was a forecast from our primary customer that indicated a demand for our product. As the year progressed, and as late as October, there was market potential, including our pursuit of secondary customers. However, as we continued to evaluate the market for our inventory of Ku-band products, we concluded that the market was shifting to 27 Ka-band systems and that there was no potential sale of our product for the foreseeable future. Consequently, we wrote-off our remaining $2.6 million of inventory in the fourth quarter. The increase in sales in the Engineered Systems and Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 is attributable in part to a full year of sales of Emblem Group Ltd. ("Emblem"), which was acquired on June 16, 2003. This accounted for approximately $12.7 million of the increase in sales. There were also increases in sales of aircraft armament systems, airborne mine countermeasure systems, and professional services. There also were increases in sales of electro-ceramic products utilized in sonar transducers and in sales of integrated composite structures including production and installation of our composite pipe for water and fire systems on offshore oil platforms. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in sales of $2.7 million in 2004 to reflect an increase to the estimate-to-complete of an undersea warfare systems program accounted for under the percentage of completion method. The increase in the estimate resulted in a decrease to the percent complete and therefore the decrease to sales. The revision to the estimate resulted from performance issues discovered during testing phases. Consequently, there was a reduction to operating earnings as discussed below. Operating earnings by segment were as follows:
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, INCREASE/(DECREASE) ------------- FROM SEGMENT 2004 2003 PRIOR PERIOD ------- ----- ----- ------------------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Electronic Systems and Communications............... $26.5 $18.5 43.3% Engineered Systems and Services..................... 26.3 22.5 16.9% Impairment loss on Deer Park Facility............... -- (9.2) Benefit plan curtailment loss....................... -- (0.9) ----- ----- Total............................................... $52.8 $30.9 70.9% ===== =====
The lower pension expense in 2004 compared to 2003 is attributable to the cash contribution we made to our defined benefit plan in 2003. The higher ESOP compensation expense in 2004 is attributable to our higher average stock price compared to 2003. Pension and ESOP compensation expense are allocated between cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense. The intangible asset amortization expense is associated with the acquisitions made in 2002 and 2003 and affects primarily the Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The $9.2 million impairment charge in 2003 related to our Deer Park facility which was sold. Operating earnings for 2004 were also affected by several contract-related items which are described in further detail below in the discussion of segment operating earnings. The Electronic Systems and Communications segment's operating earnings for the year ended December 31, 2004 were $26.5 million or 9.7% of this segment's net sales compared to $18.5 million or 8.3% of this segment's net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase in operating earnings was attributable to continuing higher-margin sales of reconnaissance and surveillance systems. In addition, operating results were positively affected by sales associated with the force protection systems program which was a significant contributor to operating earnings in this segment for the year. Partially offsetting these increases were operating losses related to adjustments to estimates-to-complete on development and start-up production phases on certain interference cancellation programs resulting from issues discovered in the first quarter during testing. In addition, there were losses in the antenna product line due to production inefficiencies that resulted in inventory adjustments as well as increases in estimates-to-complete. In the fourth quarter, there was the aforementioned write-off of space-products related inventory of $2.6 million. The Engineered Systems and Services segment's operating earnings for the year ended December 31, 2004 were $26.3 million or 10.0% of this segment's net sales compared to $22.5 million or 9.4% of this segment's net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase in operating earnings was attributable to higher-margin sales of radar signal simulators and fiber-composite structural products/spares. The higher 28 level of sales of aircraft armament systems, mine countermeasure systems, and professional services also contributed to the increase. In addition, there was a positive impact to operating earnings of approximately $3.4 million resulting from the release of a reserve which had been previously established for a potential issue on MK105-related contracts. The release of the reserve was triggered by final closeout of MK105 programs and proven performance resulting from system utilization over the course of the year. These increases were partially offset by the effect of increasing the estimate-to-complete on an aircraft armament program resulting in a $1.6 million negative impact to operating earnings and the aforementioned $3.8 million impact on an undersea warfare systems program. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 of $78.8 million decreased as a percent of net sales to 14.7% from 15.6% for the year ended December 31, 2003. This decrease was attributable primarily to facilities consolidations and other synergies achieved on the AERA and Darlington acquisitions. Included in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004 and 2003 were $2.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of external costs for compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley. We have not quantified the internal costs. Research and development expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased to $11.6 million or 2.2% of net sales from $8.6 million or 1.9% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase is attributable to expenditures in reconnaissance and surveillance systems and force protection systems. Interest expense, net of interest income, for the year ended December 31, 2004 decreased to $7.8 million compared to $8.2 for the year ended December 31, 2003, primarily due to higher interest income on a higher average cash balance. Interest expense is associated primarily with our $137.8 million principal amount of 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes ("Notes") issued in April 2002, amortization of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the offering of the Notes, and amortization of deferred financing costs associated with our credit facility. Income tax expense reflects an effective rate of 34.9% for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 41.8% for the year ended December 21, 2003. In 2004, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $2.8 million due to the reversal of income tax contingencies which were determined to be no longer needed during the fourth quarter of 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, net earnings were $29.1 million or $1.49 per diluted common share on 22.4 million diluted shares compared to net earnings from continuing operations of $13.4 million or $0.76 per diluted common share on 17.6 million diluted shares for the year ended December 31, 2003. The convertible notes had a dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2004, but not for the year ended December 31, 2003. In the year ended December 31, 2003, we received notification of final settlement of bankruptcy matters pertaining to our former energy business. Upon the discontinuance of such business in 1996, a liability was established pending final settlement of the bankruptcy. This liability was reversed as of December 31, 2003. Consequently, $1.4 million, which was net of income tax expense of $1.0 million, was reported as earnings from discontinued operations in the accompanying statement of earnings. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES BALANCE SHEET Our cash and cash equivalents increased 10.0% to $108.7 million at December 31, 2005 from $98.9 million at December 31, 2004. This increase was due to approximately $49.5 million received from financing activities comprised primarily of the issuance of 4.0% convertible subordinated notes and redemption of our 5.25% convertible subordinated notes. In addition, we generated $44.8 million from operations. These increases were offset by approximately $61.0 million used for acquisitions and $23.7 million for the purchase of capital equipment. Accounts receivable increased 23.0% to $189.2 million at December 31, 2005 from $153.8 million at December 31, 2004. This increase was due to the timing of collections of billed receivables, primarily on aircraft armament systems programs, and due to increased sales. At December 31, 2005, approximately 81% of billed receivables were in the under 60 days aging category compared to 83% at December 31, 2004. 29 Inventories increased 7.0% to $56.6 million at December 31, 2005 from $52.9 million at December 31, 2004 due primarily to the efforts expended on work-in-progress on major programs. The notes receivable of $7.1 million at December 31, 2005 and $7.2 million at December 31, 2004 are comprised of a note receivable from the sale of our facility in Deer Park in 2003 and a note receivable from the sale of our former College Point facility in January 1996. The outstanding amount of the College Point facility note was collected in January 2006. The Deer Park facility note is due on the later of October 9, 2005 or the date EDO achieves "Material Closure" defined as the investigation, assessment and remediation of an Environmental Condition sufficient to not cause any material interference with the Buyer's ability to develop, construct, finance or lease the Premises. EDO believes that this note is currently due, but it has not yet been collected; however, we see no reason to change its current classification. FINANCING ACTIVITIES Credit Facility In 2005, we entered into a $300 million credit facility which replaced our expiring $200 million credit facility. The new credit facility is a five-year facility with a consortium of banks, led by Citibank, N.A. as the administrative agent, Bank of America as the syndication agent and Wachovia Bank, N.A. as the documentation agent. The facility expires in November, 2010. The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount equal to $300 million which includes a swing loan facility with a sublimit of $20 million and a letter of credit facility with a sublimit of $100 million. The potential cash borrowing under the facility is reduced by the amount of outstanding letters of credit. The Company has the option to select Base Rate or Eurodollar Rate loans under the terms of the Credit Agreement. Any borrowings under the facility would be priced initially at LIBOR plus a predetermined amount depending on our consolidated leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. At December 31, 2005, LIBOR was approximately 4.39% and the applicable adjustment to LIBOR was 1.50%. The facility requires us to pay each lender in the consortium a commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of their respective commitment at a rate equal to 0.25%. There were no direct borrowings outstanding under any credit facility at December 31, 2005 or 2004. Letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2005, pertaining to the credit facility were $32.2 million, resulting in $267.8 million available for borrowings. In connection with the credit facility, the Company is required to maintain both financial and non-financial covenants and ratios, including, but not limited to, leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, and senior secured leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with its covenants. The credit facility is secured by the Company's accounts receivables, inventory and machinery and equipment. 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2025 ("4.0% Notes") In November 2005, we completed the offering of $201.2 million principal of 4.0% Notes and received proceeds of $195.7 million, net of $5.5 million of commissions. Interest payments are due May 15 and November 15 of each year commencing on May 15, 2006. Accrued interest payable was $0.9 million at December 31, 2005. The 4.0% Notes are convertible, unless previously redeemed or repurchased by the Company, at the option of the holder at any time prior to maturity, into the Company's common stock at an initial conversion price of $34.19 per share, subject to adjustment in certain events. As of December 31, 2005, there had been no such conversions. 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007("5.25% Notes") In April 2002, we completed the offering of the Notes and received proceeds of $133.7 million, net of $4.1 million of commissions paid. On November 29, 2005 these notes were redeemed for cash at a premium of 2.1% of the $137.8 million principal amount, or $2.9 million, which was expensed. As a result of the redemption, we also wrote-off $1.3 million of the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs associated with these notes. 30 Shelf Registration At December 31, 2005, our remaining capacity under the universal shelf registration statement that became effective in January 2004, was approximately $298.8 million. We believe that, for the foreseeable future, we have adequate liquidity and sufficient capital to fund our currently anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, including acquisitions, research and development expenditures, interest payments and funding of our pension and post-retirement benefit obligations. We continue to focus on positioning ourselves to be a significant player in the consolidation of first-tier defense suppliers and, to that end, have actively sought candidates for strategic acquisitions. Future acquisitions may be funded from any of the following sources: cash on hand; borrowings under our credit facility; issuance of our common stock or other equity securities; and/or convertible or other debt offerings. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES In order to aggregate all commitments and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005, we have included the following table. We are obligated under building and equipment leases expiring between 2006 and 2017. The aggregate future minimum lease commitments under those obligations with non-cancellable terms in excess of one year are shown below. Our commitments under letters of credit and advance payment and performance bonds relate primarily to advances received on foreign contracts should we fail to perform in accordance with the contract terms. We do not expect to have to make payments under these letters of credits or bonds since these obligations are removed as we perform under the related contracts. The amounts for letters of credit and performance bonds represent the amount of commitment expiration per period. Actual pension contributions may differ from amounts presented below and are contingent on cash flow and liquidity. Additionally, we are subject to certain legal actions that arise out of the normal course of business. It is our belief that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
PAYMENTS DUE IN: --------------------------------------------------------- 2011 AND COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: TOTAL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 BEYOND ---------------------------------------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------- (IN MILLIONS) Note Payable............................ $ 7.0 $ 2.0 $ 2.0 $ 3.0 $ -- $ -- $ -- 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2025.................................. 201.2 -- -- -- -- -- 201.2 Operating leases........................ 138.7 16.8 16.1 15.6 15.5 14.3 60.4 Letters of credit....................... 32.2 12.4 16.6 -- 3.2 -- -- Projected pension contributions......... 23.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 -- -- Advance payment and performance bonds... 1.9 0.2 -- -- 1.7 -- -- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ Total................................... $404.0 $37.4 $40.7 $24.6 $25.4 $14.3 $261.6 ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ======
CONCENTRATION OF SALES We conduct a significant amount of our business with the United States Government. Although there are currently no indications of a significant change in the status of government funding of certain programs, should this occur, our results of operations, financial position and liquidity could be materially affected. Such a change could have a significant impact on our profitability and our stock price. This could also affect our ability to acquire funds from our credit facility due to covenant restrictions or from other sources. BACKLOG The funded backlog of unfilled orders at December 31, 2005 increased to $558.7 million from $474.6 million at December 31, 2004. Our backlog consists primarily of current orders under long-lived, mission-critical programs on key defense platforms. COMMON SHARE PRICES EDO common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. As of February 21, 2006, there were 1,715 shareholders of record (brokers and nominees counted as one each). 31 The price range in 2005 and 2004 was as follows:
2005 2004 ----------------- ----------------- HIGH LOW HIGH LOW ------- ------- ------- ------- 1st Quarter.................................... 32.8700 27.1600 27.2000 23.1000 2nd Quarter.................................... 30.8900 26.5800 25.8900 20.7100 3rd Quarter.................................... 31.6300 26.8600 28.0100 22.3100 4th Quarter.................................... 30.3900 25.8000 32.4200 26.2400
DIVIDENDS During 2005 and 2004, the Board of Directors approved the payment of quarterly cash dividends of $0.03 per common share. The Company's credit facility places certain limits on the payment of cash dividends. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS None. "SAFE HARBOR" STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 The statements in this Annual Report and in oral statements that may be made by representatives of the Company relating to plans, strategies, economic performance and trends and other statements that are not descriptions of historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to the following for each of the types of information noted below. U.S. and international military program sales, follow-on procurement, contract continuance, and future program awards, upgrades and spares support are subject to: U.S. and international military budget constraints and determinations; U.S. congressional and international legislative body discretion; U.S. and international government administration policies and priorities; changing world military threats, strategies and missions; competition from foreign manufacturers of platforms and equipment; NATO country determinations regarding participation in common programs; changes in U.S. and international government procurement timing, strategies and practices, the general state of world military readiness and deployment; and the ability to obtain export licenses. Commercial satellite programs and equipment sales, follow-on procurement, contract continuance and future program awards, upgrades and spares support are subject to: establishment and continuance of various consortiums for satellite constellation programs; delay in launch dates due to equipment, weather or other factors beyond our control; and development of sufficient customer base to support a particular satellite constellation program. Commercial product sales are subject to: success of product development programs currently underway or planned; competitiveness of current and future production costs and prices and market and consumer base development of new product programs. Achievement of margins on sales, earnings and cash flow can be affected by: unanticipated technical problems; government termination of contracts for convenience; decline in expected levels of sales; underestimation of anticipated costs on specific programs; the ability to effect acquisitions; and risks inherent in integrating recent acquisitions into our overall structure. Expectations of future income tax rates can be affected by a variety of factors, including statutory changes in Federal and state tax rates, nondeductibility of goodwill amortization and IPR&D acquired in a stock purchase business combination and the nondeductibility of our noncash ESOP compensation expense. The Company has no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. 32 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------ 2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) CONTINUING OPERATIONS: NET SALES................................................. $648,482 $536,173 $460,667 COSTS AND EXPENSES Cost of sales........................................... 490,617 392,961 338,259 Selling, general and administrative..................... 85,921 78,791 71,855 Research and development................................ 17,122 11,620 8,594 Environmental cost provision on Deer Park facility...... 1,543 -- -- Impairment loss on Deer Park facility................... -- -- 9,160 Write-off of purchased in-process research and development and merger-related costs................. -- -- 929 Benefit plan curtailment loss........................... -- -- 942 -------- -------- -------- 595,203 483,372 429,739 -------- -------- -------- OPERATING EARNINGS........................................ 53,279 52,801 30,928 NON-OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE) Interest income......................................... 2,300 1,271 941 Interest expense........................................ (9,420) (9,119) (9,093) Loss on redemption of 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes................................................ (4,171) -- -- Other, net.............................................. (147) (319) 279 -------- -------- -------- (11,438) (8,167) (7,873) -------- -------- -------- Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes................................................ 41,841 44,634 23,055 Income tax expense.......................................... (15,572) (15,566) (9,644) -------- -------- -------- EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS....................... 26,269 29,068 13,411 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: Gain from discontinued operations, net of tax of $971..... -- -- 1,398 -------- -------- -------- EARNINGS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS..................... -- -- 1,398 -------- -------- -------- NET EARNINGS................................................ $ 26,269 $ 29,068 $ 14,809 ======== ======== ======== EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: Basic: Continuing operations................................... $ 1.45 $ 1.64 $ 0.78 Discontinued operations................................. -- -- 0.08 -------- -------- -------- NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE -- BASIC...................... $ 1.45 $ 1.64 $ 0.86 ======== ======== ======== Diluted: Continuing operations................................... $ 1.33 $ 1.49 $ 0.76 Discontinued operations................................. -- -- 0.08 -------- -------- -------- NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE -- DILUTED.................... $ 1.33 $ 1.49 $ 0.84 ======== ======== ======== Dividends declared per common share......................... $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 ======== ======== ========
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 33 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
DECEMBER 31, --------------------- 2005 2004 --------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents................................. $108,731 $ 98,884 Accounts receivable, net.................................. 189,190 153,810 Inventories............................................... 56,567 52,867 Deferred income tax asset, net............................ 8,946 5,046 Notes receivable.......................................... 7,100 7,202 Prepayments and other..................................... 3,809 3,493 -------- -------- Total current assets................................... 374,343 321,302 -------- -------- Property, plant and equipment, net.......................... 49,574 34,830 Goodwill.................................................... 152,347 91,651 Other intangible assets..................................... 55,925 50,356 Deferred income tax asset, net.............................. 29,637 30,241 Other assets................................................ 25,573 18,309 -------- -------- $687,399 $546,689 ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable.......................................... $ 33,111 $ 32,406 Accrued liabilities....................................... 52,126 48,492 Contract advances and deposits............................ 42,244 13,696 Note payable.............................................. 2,000 -- -------- -------- Total current liabilities.............................. 129,481 94,594 -------- -------- Income taxes payable........................................ 6,513 5,768 Note payable, long-term..................................... 5,000 -- Long-term debt.............................................. 201,250 137,800 Post-retirement benefits obligations........................ 103,815 94,936 Environmental obligation.................................... 1,392 1,663 Other long-term liabilities................................. 55 -- Shareholders' equity: Preferred shares, par value $1 per share, authorized 500,000 shares......................................... -- -- Common shares, par value $1 per share, authorized 50,000,000 shares, 20,305,815 issued in 2005 and 20,112,243 issued in 2004.............................. 20,306 20,112 Additional paid-in capital................................ 167,219 158,548 Retained earnings......................................... 120,103 96,004 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax benefit ($32,711 in 2005 and $29,617 in 2004).......... (47,072) (42,619) Treasury shares at cost (111,317 shares in 2005 and 94,585 shares in 2004)........................................ (1,868) (1,449) Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares............. (14,789) (16,039) Deferred compensation under Long-Term Incentive Plan...... (3,866) (2,408) Management group receivables.............................. (140) (221) -------- -------- Total shareholders' equity............................. 239,893 211,928 -------- -------- $687,399 $546,689 ======== ========
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 34 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2005 2004 2003 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (IN THOUSANDS) COMMON SHARES Balance at beginning of year.............................. 20,112 20,112 19,832 19,832 19,790 19,790 Exercise of stock options................................. 83 83 164 164 31 31 Shares used for Long-Term Incentive Plan.................. 111 111 116 116 11 11 -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ Balance at end of year.................................... 20,306 20,306 20,112 20,112 19,832 19,832 -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL Balance at beginning of year.............................. 158,548 150,097 147,091 Exercise of stock options................................. 792 1,371 150 Income tax benefit related to stock options and Long-Term Incentive Plan.......................................... 711 1,134 328 Shares used for payment of directors' fees................ 83 60 28 Shares used for Long-Term Incentive Plan.................. 3,347 2,807 178 Compensation expense on accelerated options............... 37 -- 292 Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares committed-to-be-released................................ 3,701 3,079 2,030 -------- -------- -------- Balance at end of year.................................... 167,219 158,548 150,097 -------- -------- -------- RETAINED EARNINGS Balance at beginning of year.............................. 96,004 69,059 56,325 Net earnings.............................................. 26,269 29,068 14,809 Common share dividends (12 cents per share)............... (2,170) (2,123) (2,075) -------- -------- -------- Balance at end of year.................................... 120,103 96,004 69,059 -------- -------- -------- ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS Balance at beginning of year.............................. (42,619) (29,281) (33,899) Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency, net of tax.... 8 (273) 50 Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax.......... (4,461) (13,065) 4,568 -------- -------- -------- Balance at end of year.................................... (47,072) (42,619) (29,281) -------- -------- -------- TREASURY SHARES AT COST Balance at beginning of year.............................. (1,449) (95) (1,255) (88) (1,321) (94) Shares used for exercise of stock Options................. -- 87 6 Shares used for payment of directors' fees................ 115 7 80 5 80 6 Shares (repurchased from) used for Long-Term Incentive Plan.................................................... (534) (23) (274) (12) (101) (6) -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ Balance at end of year.................................... (1,868) (111) (1,449) (95) (1,255) (88) -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ DEFERRED COMPENSATION UNDER LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN Balance at beginning of year.............................. (2,408) (479) (579) Shares used for Long-Term Incentive Plan.................. (3,136) (2,845) (189) Shares cancelled of Long-Term Incentive Plan.............. 17 Amortization of Long-Term Incentive Plan deferred compensation expense.................................... 1,661 916 289 -------- -------- -------- Balance at end of year.................................... (3,866) (2,408) (479) -------- -------- --------
35
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2005 2004 2003 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (IN THOUSANDS) UNEARNED EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMPENSATION Balance at beginning of year.............................. (16,039) (17,290) (18,541) Employee Stock Ownership Plan Shares committed-to-be-released................................ 1,250 1,251 1,251 -------- -------- -------- Balance at end of year.................................... (14,789) (16,039) (17,290) -------- -------- -------- MANAGEMENT GROUP RECEIVABLES Balance at beginning of year.............................. (221) (351) (593) Payments received on management loans..................... 81 130 242 -------- -------- -------- Balance at end of year.................................... (140) (221) (351) -------- -------- -------- TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY.................................. $239,893 $211,928 $190,332 ======== ======== ======== COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Net earnings.............................................. $ 26,269 $ 29,068 $ 14,809 Additional minimum pension liability, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $3,100 in 2005, 9,079 in 2004 and $(3,175) in 2003........................................ (4,461) (13,065) 4,568 Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency, net of tax.... 8 (273) 50 -------- -------- -------- Comprehensive income...................................... $ 21,816 $ 15,730 $ 19,427 ======== ======== ========
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 36 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------- 2005 2004 2003 --------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Earnings from operations.................................. $ 26,269 $ 29,068 $ 13,411 Adjustments to earnings to arrive at cash provided by operations: Depreciation........................................... 9,768 10,476 12,180 Amortization........................................... 5,931 5,564 4,885 Deferred tax benefit................................... (3,219) (660) (6,840) Bad debt expense....................................... 823 -- 568 Loss on sale of Deer Park facility..................... -- -- 9,160 Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment... 801 255 (131) Environmental cost provision, Deer Park facility....... 1,543 -- -- Deferred compensation expense.......................... 1,661 916 289 Non-cash Employee Stock Ownership Plan compensation expense.............................................. 4,952 4,330 3,281 Dividends on unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares............................................... 251 272 292 Non-cash compensation expense.......................... 37 -- 292 Common shares issued for directors' fees............... 198 140 108 Income tax benefit from stock options and Long-Term Incentive Plan....................................... 711 1,134 328 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: Accounts receivable.................................. (28,362) (19,507) (3,203) Inventories.......................................... (2,309) (18,134) 1,406 Prepayments and other assets......................... 4,554 3,588 4,032 Contribution to defined benefit pension plan......... (6,000) -- (5,000) Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other...... (905) 2,744 (5,402) Contract advances and deposits....................... 28,119 5,501 (12,082) --------- -------- -------- Cash provided by operations................................. 44,823 25,687 17,574 --------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by discontinued operations................ -- -- 79 --------- -------- -------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of plant and equipment........................... (23,718) (14,206) (8,865) Payments received on notes receivable..................... 300 1,200 1,385 Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment....... -- -- 21,304 Restricted cash........................................... -- -- 27,347 Cash (paid) received related to acquisitions, net of cash acquired............................................... (61,078) 301 (94,188) --------- -------- -------- Cash used by investing activities........................... (84,496) (12,705) (53,017) --------- -------- --------
37
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------- 2005 2004 2003 --------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Issuance of 4.0% convertible subordinated notes........... 195,716 -- -- Redemption of 5.25% convertible subordinated notes........ (137,800) -- -- Proceeds from exercise of stock options................... 875 1,535 268 Proceeds from management group receivables................ 81 130 242 Repayments of acquired debt............................... (6,931) -- (8,660) Payment of common share cash dividends.................... (2,421) (2,395) (2,367) --------- -------- -------- Cash provided (used) by financing activities................ 49,520 (730) (10,517) --------- -------- -------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents........ 9,847 12,252 (45,881) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.............. 98,884 86,632 132,513 --------- -------- -------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR.................... $ 108,731 $ 98,884 $ 86,632 ========= ======== ======== Supplemental disclosures: Cash paid for: Interest............................................... $ 8,119 $ 7,234 $ 7,234 ========= ======== ======== Income taxes........................................... $ 15,424 $ 16,278 $ 11,880 ========= ======== ========
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 38 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2004 AND 2003 (1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (A) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BUSINESS The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EDO Corporation and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Company"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company operates in two segments: Engineered Systems and Services and Electronic Systems and Communications. (B) CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all securities with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. (C) REVENUE RECOGNITION Sales under long-term, fixed-price contracts, including pro-rata profits, are generally recorded based on the relationship of costs incurred to date to total projected final costs or, alternatively, as deliveries and other milestones are achieved or services are provided. These projections are revised throughout the lives of the contracts. Adjustments to profits resulting from such revisions are made cumulative to the date of change and may affect current period earnings. Sales on other than long-term contract orders (principally commercial products) are recorded as shipments are made. Our gross profit is affected by a variety of factors, including the mix of products, systems and services sold, production efficiencies, price competition and general economic conditions. Estimated losses on long-term contracts are recorded when identified. (D) INVENTORIES Inventories under long-term contracts and programs reflect all accumulated production costs, including factory overhead, initial tooling and other related costs (including general and administrative expenses relating to certain of our defense contracts), less the portion of such costs charged to cost of sales. All other inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventory costs in excess of amounts recoverable under contracts and which relate to a specific technology or application and which may not have alternative uses are charged to cost of sales when such circumstances are identified. From time to time, we manufacture certain products prior to receiving firm contracts in anticipation of future demand. Such costs are inventoried and are incurred to help maintain stable and efficient production schedules. Several factors may influence the sale and use of our inventories, including our decision to exit a product line, technological change, new product development and/or revised estimates of future product demand. If inventory is determined to be overvalued due to one or more of the above factors, we would be required to recognize such loss in value at the time of such determination. Under the contractual arrangements by which progress payments are received, the United States Government has a title to or a security interest in the inventories identified with related contracts. (E) LONG-LIVED ASSETS, OTHER THAN GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and is generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the 39 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. In those cases where the Company determines that the useful life of property, plant and equipment should be shortened, the Company would depreciate the net book value in excess of salvage value over its revised remaining useful life thereby increasing depreciation expense. Factors such as technological advances, changes to the Company's business model, changes in the Company's capital strategy, changes in the planned use of equipment, fixtures, software or changes in the planned use of facilities could result in shortened useful lives. The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No. 144 requires the Company to review its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The estimate of cash flow, which is used to determine recoverability, is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about future operating performance. The Company's estimates of undiscounted cash flow may differ from actual cash flow due to such factors including technological advances, changes to the Company's business model, or changes in the Company's capital strategy or planned use of long-lived assets. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest, is less than the carrying value, we would recognize an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. Costs associated with the acquisition and development of software for internal use are recognized in accordance with Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." In 2005 and 2004, the Company capitalized approximately $2.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of such costs. These costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from two to five years. Deferred financing costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related financing. The unamortized balances of $7.5 million and $2.7 million are included in other assets at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in 2005 is attributable to the costs associated with the issuance of the 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes and the costs to enter into the new $300 million Credit Facility. (F) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill must be tested at least annually for impairment at the reporting unit level. If an indication of impairment exists, we are required to determine if such goodwill's implied fair value is less than the carrying value in order to determine the amount, if any, of the impairment loss required to be recorded. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profits, adverse legal or regulatory developments, accumulation of costs significantly in excess of amounts originally expected to acquire the asset and/or a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. The Company performs the required impairment tests of goodwill as of October 1 each year. There was no indication of impairment at December 31, 2005 and 2004. 40 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
ENGINEERED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND SYSTEMS AND SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL ----------- -------------- -------- Balance as of January 1, 2005............ $37,899 $ 53,752 $ 91,651 Acquisitions in 2005..................... 5,947 54,749 60,696 ------- -------- -------- Balance as of December 31, 2005.......... $43,846 $108,501 $152,347 ======= ======== ========
Summarized below are intangible assets as of December 31:
2005 2004 LIFE -------- -------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Intangible assets subject to amortization: Capitalized non-compete agreements related to acquisitions................................... $ 3,118 $ 3,118 1-5 years Purchased technologies related to acquisitions.... 21,103 17,003 8-25 years Customer contracts and relationships related to acquisitions................................... 45,698 39,198 6-20 years Tradename related to acquisitions................. 2,069 1,569 5-10 years Other intangible assets related to acquisitions..... 916 916 2 years -------- -------- 72,904 61,804 Less accumulated amortization.................. (17,379) (11,448) -------- -------- $ 55,525 $ 50,356 -------- -------- Intangible assets not subject to amortization: Tradename related to acquisitions.............. 400 -- -------- -------- Balance as of December 31........................... $ 55,925 $ 50,356 ======== ========
The amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $5.9 million, $5.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and thereafter related to these intangible assets is estimated to be $6.5 million, $6.4 million, $5.7 million, $5.7 million, $4.9 million and $26.3 million, respectively. (G) INCOME TAXES Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. (H) TREASURY SHARES Common shares held as treasury shares are recorded at cost, with issuances from treasury recorded at average cost. Treasury shares issued for directors' fees are recorded as an expense for an amount equal to the fair market value of the common shares on the issuance date. 41 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) (I) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The net carrying value of notes receivable approximates fair value based on current rates for comparable commercial mortgages. The fair value of the Company's new 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2025 (4.0% Notes) at December 31, 2005 was approximately $203.3 million based on recent market transactions compared to a carrying value of $201.2 million. The fair value of the environmental obligation approximates its carrying value since it has been discounted. The fair values of all other financial instruments approximate book values because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. (J) USE OF ESTIMATES Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates. (K) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, because the exercise price of the Company's stock options is set equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair market value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" whereby compensation expense would be recognized as incurred for stock-based employee compensation. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company did not issue any options during fiscal year 2005, other than to Directors, which when issued were 100% vested and the expense associated with the grants is reflected in the proformas in 2005. The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted was $13.06 and $10.63 in 2004 and 2003, respectively, on the dates of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 2004 -- expected dividend yield of 1%, risk free interest rate of 3.8%, expected volatility of 47%, and an expected option life of 6 years; 2003 -- expected dividend yield of 1%, risk free interest rate of 3.6%, expected stock volatility of 51%, and an expected option life of 7 1/2 years.
2005 2004 2003 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) Earnings: As reported........................................... $26,269 $29,068 $13,411 Deferred compensation expense, net of tax............... 1,002 540 171 Stock compensation expense based on fair value method, net of tax......................................... (2,377) (2,425) (1,797) ------- ------- ------- Pro forma............................................. $24,894 $27,183 $11,785 ======= ======= ======= Basic earnings per common share: As reported........................................... $ 1.45 $ 1.64 $ 0.78 Pro forma............................................. 1.38 1.54 0.68 Diluted earnings per common share: As reported........................................... $ 1.33 $ 1.49 $ 0.76 Pro forma............................................. 1.27 1.41 0.67 ======= ======= =======
42 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company issued 83,332 and 164,132 common shares for the exercise of stock options and 110,250 and 116,000 restricted common shares for long-term incentive awards. On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) (FAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. FAS123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in FAS123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, FAS123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. FAS123(R) must be adopted by the Company no later than January 1, 2006. As permitted by Statement 123, the Company accounted for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognized no compensation cost for employee stock options through December 31, 2005. The Company has adopted FAS123(R) on January 1, 2006, using the "modified prospective" method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of FAS123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of FAS123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. Accordingly, the adoption of FAS123(R)'s fair value method will have an impact on our result of operations. The impact of the adoption of FAS123(R)cannot be determined at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted FAS123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in this Note to our consolidated financial statements. FAS 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. The Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future, because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options and the fair value of the Company's stock on the date of exercise. (L) RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year presentations to conform to current year presentations. (2) ACQUISITIONS On December 20, 2005, the Company acquired for cash all of the stock of NexGen Communications LLC, a privately-held company specializing in the design and production of communications systems for a diverse set of U.S. government organizations. The acquisition strengthened our fast-growing position in specialized communication products. The acquired company became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Consequently, the excess purchase price over the net assets acquired has been temporarily assigned to goodwill, and amounts recorded are subject to change. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to NexGen is not deductible for income tax purposes. 43 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) On September 19, 2005, we acquired for cash all of the stock of Fiber Innovations, Inc., a privately-held company that is a designer and manufacturer of fiber reinforced-composites. This acquisition has added important complementary design and manufacturing capabilities to EDO's integrated-composite-structures business. The acquired company became part of the Company's Engineered Systems and Services segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to Fiber Innovations is not deductible for income tax purposes. On May 2, 2005, we acquired for cash all of the units of EVI Technology, LLC (EVI), a privately-held company. EVI is a designer, manufacturer and integrator of classified intelligence systems. EVI has strengthened and expanded EDO's range of products and engineering expertise in a number of synergistic areas. The acquired company became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to EVI recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. In June 2003, we acquired all of the stock of Emblem Group Ltd., a privately-held company based in England. Emblem became part of the Company's Engineered Systems and Services segment and reinforced our position as a global leader in aircraft armament-release systems. In the second quarter of 2004 we received $0.3 million from an escrow account resulting in a decrease in purchase price and, therefore, goodwill. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill and other intangibles related to Emblem's units located in the UK is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes over 15 years. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired related to Artisan Technologies, Inc. is not deductible for income tax purposes. In March 2003, we acquired all of the stock of Darlington, Inc., a privately-held defense-communications company. This acquisition significantly expanded our capabilities in defense communications and related services. Darlington became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. In February 2003, we acquired all of the stock of Advanced Engineering & Research Associates, Inc. (AERA), a privately-held company which strengthened and expanded our range of professional services. AERA became part of the Company's Engineered Systems and Services segment. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. In July 2002, we acquired, in an auction under section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, substantially all of the assets of Condor Systems, Inc., a privately-held defense-electronics company and its subsidiary (together, "Condor"). The acquisition of Condor's business has expanded our defense-electronics capabilities in the areas of reconnaissance and surveillance systems and communications and countermeasures. The assets became part of the Company's Electronic Systems and Communications segment. Associated with the acquisition and included in operating earnings for 2003 is $0.9 million, of acquisition-related costs. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill, IPR&D and other intangible assets is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years. These acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, their operating results are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since their respective acquisition dates. 44 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the dates of acquisition.
2005 ACQUISITIONS ----------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Current assets.............................................. $ 12,332 Plant and equipment......................................... 1,594 Customer contracts and relationships........................ 6,500 Purchased technologies...................................... 4,100 Tradename................................................... 900 Goodwill.................................................... 60,696 Liabilities................................................. (15,617) -------- Total purchase price........................................ $ 70,505 ========
The allocation of the purchase price for two acquisitions have been finalized. There are outstanding amounts held in escrow which, when settled, may result in further adjustments to goodwill. Unaudited pro forma results of operations, assuming the acquisitions of Emblem, Darlington and AERA had been completed at the beginning of 2003 are summarized below. The results reflect adjustments to net sales, cost of sales, amortization expense, compensation expense, purchased in-process research and development costs, interest income and expense and income tax expense. The interest rate used in determining pro forma adjustments to interest income or expense was based on the average yield of the Company's invested cash and cash equivalents and approximated 1.0% for each of the respective periods presented below.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 --------------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) Net sales................................................... $489,531 Earnings available for common shares, before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle................................................. $ 15,995 Diluted earnings per common share........................... $ 0.91
The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had these acquisitions been completed at the beginning of the periods, or of the results which may occur in the future. On a proforma basis, had the three acquisitions made in 2005 taken place as of the beginning of each respective year, the results of operations would not have been materially affected for 2003, 2004 and 2005. (3) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS In 2003, we received notification of final settlement of bankruptcy matters pertaining to our former energy business. Upon the discontinuance of such business in 1996, a liability was established pending final settlement of the bankruptcy. This liability was reversed in the second quarter of 2003. Consequently, $1.4 million, net of income tax expense of $1.0 million, was reported as earnings from discontinued operations in the accompanying statement of earnings. (4) ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE Accounts receivable included $65.6 million and $51.8 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, of unbilled revenues. Substantially all of the unbilled balances at December 31, 2005 will be 45 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) billed and are expected to be collected during 2006. Total billed receivables due from the United States Government, either directly or as a subcontractor to a prime contractor with the Government, were $92.1 million and $70.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively. Billed accounts receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $1.0 million and $0.6 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Notes receivable consist of the following at December 31:
2005 2004 ------ ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Current: College Point............................................. $ 100 $ 400 Deer Park................................................. 7,000 6,802 ------ ------ Total....................................................... $7,100 $7,202 ====== ======
The original notes from the sale of the College Point facility in January 1996 were to be paid in full by December 31, 2004. One note was collected in full in 2004 and the other note was amended and extended to December 31, 2005. The latter note was due in equal quarterly amounts through September 2005 with a final payment of $0.1 million due on December 31, 2005 and bore interest at 7% per annum. The outstanding amount of $0.1 million was collected in January 2006. Also included in notes receivable is the note related to the sale of the Company's Deer Park facility in July 2003. Of the $29.0 million sales price, $22.0 million was in cash and $7.0 million was in the form of a purchase money mortgage and note. The outstanding amount of the College Point facility note was collected in January 2006. The Deer Park facility note is due on the later of October 9, 2005 or the date EDO achieves "Material Closure" defined as the investigation, assessment and remediation of an Environmental Condition sufficient to not cause any material interference with the Buyer's ability to develop, construct, finance or lease the Premises. The Company believes that this note is currently due, but it has not yet been collected. (5) INVENTORIES Inventories are summarized by major classification as follows at December 31:
2005 2004 ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Raw material and supplies................................... $11,976 $10,461 Work-in-process............................................. 49,829 44,752 Finished goods.............................................. 1,690 2,043 Less: Unliquidated progress payments...................... (6,928) (4,389) ------- ------- Total....................................................... $56,567 $52,867 ======= =======
46 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) (6) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET The Company's property, plant and equipment at December 31 and their related useful lives are summarized as follows:
2005 2004 LIFE -------- -------- --------------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Land........................................ $ 125 $ 125 Buildings and improvements.................. 161 1,017 10-30 years Machinery and equipment..................... 71,710 73,466 3-19 years Software.................................... 12,016 7,190 2-5 years Leasehold improvements...................... 28,379 16,816 Lesser of useful life or lease term -------- -------- 112,391 98,614 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization.............................. (62,817) (63,784) -------- -------- $ 49,574 $ 34,830 ======== ========
On June 24, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the decision to sell the Company's 726,000 square foot facility in Deer Park, NY. The Company recorded a pre-tax impairment loss of $9.2 million in 2003, as the net book value of the assets exceeded the fair value less the costs to sell. The fair value was based on a $29.0 million sales price per the sales agreement entered into in July 2003. (7) ACCRUED LIABILITIES Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at December 31:
2005 2004 ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Employee compensation and benefits.......................... $24,788 $20,066 Deferred revenue and accrual for future costs related to acquired contracts........................................ 2,520 8,857 Income taxes payable........................................ 5,141 2,950 Accrued rent................................................ 3,995 442 Accrued interest............................................ 904 1,579 Warranty.................................................... 1,481 1,354 Current portion of environmental obligation................. 1,070 280 Other....................................................... 12,227 12,964 ------- ------- $52,126 $48,492 ======= =======
(8) NOTE PAYABLE, LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITY NOTE PAYABLE As part of its acquisition of NexGen Communications LLC, the Company issued a $7.0 million note payable to the sellers. The note bears interest at approximately 4.40% and is payable in annual installments of $2.0 million, $2.0 million and $3.0 million due on December 20, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. 4.0% CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2025 In November 2005 the Company completed its offering of $201.2 million of 4.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes ("4.0% Notes") due 2025 and received $195.7 million, net of $5.5 million of 47 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) commissions. Interest payments are due May 15 and November 15 of each year, commencing on May 15, 2006. Accrued interest payable, included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, was $0.9 million at December 31, 2005. The Company used part of the proceeds to redeem its 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes that were due in 2007. The payments associated with the redemption were $137.8 million of principal, $2.9 million for a 2.1% premium on the principal amount, and $0.9 million in accrued interest from October 15 through the redemption date of November 29, 2005. Additionally, the Company expensed the remaining unamortized deferred charges in the amount of $1.3 million associated with the 5.25% Notes. In connection with the offering of the 4.0% Notes, there are $5.7 million of unamortized debt issuance costs at December 31, 2005, which are included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized through April 2025. The 4.0% Notes are convertible, unless previously redeemed or repurchased by the Company, at the option of the holder at any time prior to maturity, into the Company's common stock at an initial conversion price of $34.19 per share, subject to adjustment in certain events. As of December 31, 2005, there had been no such conversions. CREDIT FACILITY In November 2005, the Company entered into a $300 million revolving credit facility with a consortium of banks, led by Citibank, N.A. as the administrative agent, Fleet National Bank as the syndication agent and Wachovia Bank, N.A. as the documentation agent. This new facility replaced the Company's expiring $200 million facility. In connection with the new credit facility, $1.6 million of deferred finance costs are included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 are being amortized over the term of the agreement. The credit facility provides sub-limits of borrowing up to $100.0 million in standby letters of credit financing. The potential cash borrowing under the facility is reduced by the amount of outstanding letters of credit. Any borrowings under the facility would be priced initially at LIBOR plus a predetermined amount, ranging from 1.25% to 1.75%, depending on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. At December 31, 2005, LIBOR was approximately 4.39% and the applicable adjustment to LIBOR was 1.50%. The facility requires the Company to pay each lender in the consortium a commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of their respective commitment at a rate equal to 0.25%. There were no direct borrowings outstanding under the credit facility at December 31, 2005. Letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2005, pertaining to the credit facility were $32.2 million, resulting in $267.8 million available for borrowings. In connection with the credit facility, the Company is required to maintain both financial and non-financial covenants and ratios, including, but not limited to, leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, and senior secured leverage ratio. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with its covenants. The credit facility is secured by the Company's accounts receivables, inventory and machinery and equipment. (9) EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST The Company sponsors an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) which provides retirement benefits to substantially all employees. The ESOP has an indirect loan from the Company payable through December 31, 2017. As quarterly payments are made under the indirect loan, unallocated common shares in the ESOP are committed-to-be-released. The allocation to participants is based on (i) a match of 50% of the first 6% of the participants' 401(k) contributions; (ii) a special allocation for employees who meet certain service requirements (iii) a 48 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) fixed amount per participant chosen annually; and (iv) any remaining distribution is based on participants' relative compensation. The cost basis of the unearned/unallocated shares is initially recorded as a reduction to shareholders' equity. Compensation expense is recorded based on the market value of the Company's common shares as they are committed-to-be-released. The difference between the market value and the cost basis of the shares is recorded as additional paid-in capital. Dividends on unallocated shares are recorded as compensation expense. In 2005, 2004 and 2003, non-cash ESOP compensation expense recorded by the Company amounted to $5.0 million, $4.3 million, and $3.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2005, there are 1,991,676 unearned/unallocated shares which have an aggregate market value of $53.9 million and 1,728,538 allocated shares. Total principal and interest payments made in 2005, 2004, and 2003 under the ESOP indirect loan amounted to $1.7 million in each of the three years. (10) INCOME TAXES The 2005, 2004 and 2003 significant components of the provision for income taxes attributable to continuing operations are as follows:
2005 2004 2003 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Federal Current............................................... $16,711 $13,375 $12,927 Deferred.............................................. (2,926) (533) (5,900) ------- ------- ------- $13,785 $12,842 $ 7,027 ------- ------- ------- Foreign Current............................................... 135 (25) 207 Deferred.............................................. 213 77 82 ------- ------- ------- $ 348 $ 52 $ 289 ------- ------- ------- State Current............................................... $ 1,945 $ 2,876 $ 3,350 Deferred.............................................. (506) (204) (1,022) ------- ------- ------- $ 1,439 $ 2,672 $ 2,328 ------- ------- ------- Total................................................... $15,572 $15,566 $ 9,644 ======= ======= =======
49 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The reconciliation of income tax attributable to continuing operations computed at the U.S. Federal tax rate to income tax expense is:
PERCENT OF PRE-TAX EARNINGS ------------------ 2005 2004 2003 ---- ---- ---- Tax at statutory rate....................................... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% State taxes, net of Federal benefit......................... 2.9 4.7 5.0 Reserve adjustment.......................................... (3.5) (6.2) -- Non-cash ESOP compensation expense.......................... 3.4 1.9 2.0 Foreign sales benefit....................................... (1.0) (1.1) (1.3) Manufacturing exemption..................................... (1.0) -- -- Other, net.................................................. 1.4 0.6 1.1 ---- ---- ---- Effective income tax rate................................... 37.2% 34.9% 41.8% ==== ==== ====
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 are as follows:
2005 2004 ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) DEFERRED TAX ASSETS Retirement plans' additional minimum liability.............. $32,621 $29,521 Post-retirement benefits obligation other than pensions..... 5,512 5,507 Deferred revenue............................................ 743 1,185 Non-qualified plans......................................... 5,194 4,145 Inventory valuation......................................... 1,310 1,597 Vacation accrual............................................ 2,954 1,643 Rent accrual................................................ 1,732 181 Other....................................................... 3,595 1,518 ------- ------- Total deferred tax assets................................... 53,661 45,297 ------- ------- DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES Depreciation and amortization............................... 8,801 4,754 Prepaid pension asset....................................... 5,530 4,823 Other....................................................... 747 433 ------- ------- Total deferred tax liabilities.............................. 15,078 10,010 ------- ------- Net deferred tax asset...................................... $38,583 $35,287 ======= =======
The Company is subject to ongoing tax examinations in various jurisdictions, which may result in challenges to tax positions taken and, accordingly, the Company may record adjustments to provisions based on the probable outcomes of such matters. However, the Company believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.5 million and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, due to the reversal of income tax contingency reserves which were determined to be no longer needed. 50 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) (11) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY At various times beginning in 1983, the Board of Directors has authorized and subsequently increased by amendments, a plan to purchase an aggregate amount of 4,190,000 common shares. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had acquired approximately 4,091,000 common shares in open market transactions at prevailing market prices. Approximately 4,053,000 of these shares have been used for various purposes, including: conversion of preferred shares; contributions of common shares to the EDO ESOP; grants pursuant to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plans; payment of directors' fees; partial payment of a 50% stock dividend; and stock options exercised. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, the Company held 111,317 and 94,585 common shares in its treasury for future use. At December 31, 2005, the Company had reserved 7,389,522 authorized and unissued common shares for stock option and long-term incentive plans and conversion of the Notes. (12) EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
2005 2004 2003 ------- ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Numerator: Earnings from continuing operations for basic calculation........................................ $26,269 $29,068 $13,411 Effect of dilutive securities: Convertible notes.................................. 4,404 4,268 -- ------- ------- ------- Numerator for diluted calculation..................... $30,673 $33,336 $13,411 ======= ======= ======= Denominator: Denominator for basic calculation..................... 18,081 17,695 17,308 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options...................................... 264 274 253 Convertible notes.................................. 4,656 4,408 -- ------- ------- ------- Denominator for diluted calculation................... 23,001 22,377 17,561 ======= ======= =======
The assumed conversion of the convertible notes was dilutive for 2005 and 2004 and anti-dilutive for 2003. The following table summarizes, for each year presented, the number of shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, as their effect upon potential issuance was anti-dilutive.
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------- 2005 2004 2003 ---- ---- ----- (IN THOUSANDS) Convertible Subordinated Notes.............................. -- -- 4,408 Unexercised Stock Options................................... 74 2 311 -- -- ----- 74 2 4,719 == == =====
(13) STOCK PLANS The Company has granted nonqualified stock options to officers, directors and other key employees under plans approved by the shareholders in 2002 for the purchase of its common shares at the fair market value of 51 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) the common shares on the dates of grant. Options under the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") generally become exercisable on the third anniversary of the date of the grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of the grant. The 2002 LTIP will expire in 2012. Options under the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan ("NEDSOP"), which pertains only to non-employee directors, are immediately exercisable and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of the grant. The 2002 NEDSOP will also expire in 2012. Changes in options outstanding are as follows:
2005 2004 2003 ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- AVERAGE SHARES AVERAGE SHARES AVERAGE SHARES EXERCISE SUBJECT TO EXERCISE SUBJECT TO EXERCISE SUBJECT TO PRICE OPTION PRICE OPTION PRICE OPTION --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Beginning of year......... $15.86 1,083,811 $14.65 1,206,096 $13.59 1,057,143 Options granted........... 30.68 65,000 24.37 65,000 19.00 224,405 Options exercised......... 10.50 (83,322) 9.35 (164,135) 6.66 (37,327) Options expired/cancelled....... 13.76 (20,450) 23.05 (23,150) 18.53 (38,125) ------ --------- ------ --------- ------ --------- End of year............... $17.25 1,045,039 $15.86 1,083,811 $14.65 1,206,096 ====== ========= ====== ========= ====== ========= Exercisable at year end... $17.08 895,759 $12.33 732,956 $11.26 602,916 ====== ========= ====== ========= ====== =========
The options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 are summarized as follows:
WEIGHTED- NUMBER OF WEIGHTED- RANGE OF AVERAGE OPTIONS AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICES EXERCISE PRICE OUTSTANDING REMAINING LIFE --------------- -------------- ----------- -------------- $5.00......................................... $ 5.00 7,500 1 year or less $6.13-$9.60................................... $ 7.86 440,409 4 years $17.86-$25.01................................. $20.45 283,280 7 years $27.02-$31.44................................. $27.83 313,850 7 years --------- 1,045,039 =========
The 2002 LTIP also provides for restricted common share long-term incentive awards as defined under the plan. As of December 31, 2005 plan participants had been awarded 631,250 restricted common shares. Deferred compensation is recorded for the fair value of the restricted common share awards on the date of grant and is amortized over the five-year period the related services are provided. The fair value of a restricted common share award is calculated as the average of the high and low market values of our common shares on the grant date, as reported for such date on a national exchange or nationally recognized system of price quotation. The amount charged to operations in 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $1.7 million, $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The increase in the expense for 2005 compared to prior years is due to an increase in the amount of shares issued over the past two years compared to prior years. As of December 31, 2005, 458,061 shares are available for additional awards. (14) OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS The Company maintains a qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering less than one half of its employees. In November 2002, the plan was amended whereby participation and benefits accrued under the plan were frozen as of December 31, 2002. The Company's funding policy is to make annual 52 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) contributions to the extent such contributions are at least equal to the minimum required contribution and are tax deductible. In 2005, 2004 and 2003 the Company recorded pension expense of $4.3 million, $2.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively. A summary of the weighted-average rate assumptions as of December 31 used in pension calculations follows. (Since the Company froze the defined benefit plan in December 2002, there is no future compensation increase for subsequent years.)
2005 2004 2003 ---- ---- ---- Discount Rate (for obligations as of December 31)........... 5.50% 5.75% 6.25% Expected long-term return on plan assets.................... 8.25% 8.25% 8.75%
The Company uses the building block approach to the estimation of the long-term rate of return on assets. Under this approach, the Company reviewed the publicly available common source data for the range of returns on basic types of equity and fixed income instruments and the differential to those rates provided by active investment management. In consultation with the Company's actuarial and active asset management consultants and taking into account the funds' actual performance and expected asset allocation going forward, the Company selected an overall return rate within the resulting range. Plan asset investment decisions are made by the Pension Investment Committee of the Board of Directors. This committee utilizes the services of a financial advisor in the selection and monitoring of specific asset managers. At its periodic meetings the committee reviews the performance of various funds against benchmarks and makes investment decisions which are then carried out by the fund trustee. The target asset allocation is 70% equity instruments and 30% fixed income instruments. The assets are invested in a variety of both actively managed and passive funds chosen by the committee. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalizations. Our plan investments are diversified to mitigate any adverse results from one security class on the entire investment portfolio. A small amount of excess return is expected from active investment management. PLAN ASSETS The assets of the Company's defined benefit plans are managed on a commingled basis in a third party master trust. The investment policy and allocation of the assets in the master trust were approved by the Company's Pension Plans Investment Committee of the Board of Directors, which has oversight responsibility for the Company's retirement plans. The investment allocation for each major asset class as a percent of plan asset fair value as of December 31 is as follows:
2005 2004 2003 ----- ----- ----- Equity Securities........................................... 70.7% 73.7% 69.7% Debt Securities............................................. 28.7% 25.7% 29.7% Cash........................................................ 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% ----- ----- ----- Total....................................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ===== ===== =====
In 2005, the Company made a $6.0 million contribution to the plan compared to no contribution in 2004. 53 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) A summary of the components of net periodic pension expense follows:
2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Interest on projected benefit obligation............. (12,354) (12,151) (12,727) Expected return on plan assets....................... 12,722 12,705 12,250 Recognized net actuarial loss........................ (4,645) (2,737) (3,454) -------- -------- -------- Net pension expense.................................. $ (4,277) $ (2,183) $ (3,931) ======== ======== ========
The following sets forth the funded status of the plan as of December 31:
2005 2004 -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Change in projected benefit obligation: Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year........... $221,945 $204,439 Interest cost............................................... 12,354 12,151 Benefits paid............................................... (15,270) (18,959) Actuarial loss.............................................. 9,459 24,314 -------- -------- Projected benefit obligation at end of year................. $228,488 $221,945 -------- -------- Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year.............. $161,294 $164,024 Actual return on plan assets................................ 11,090 16,229 Employer contribution....................................... 6,000 -- Benefits paid............................................... (15,270) (18,959) -------- -------- Fair value of plan assets at end of year.................... $163,114 $161,294 -------- -------- Funded status............................................... (65,374) $(60,651) Unrecognized net loss....................................... 72,861 66,415 -------- -------- Prepaid pension cost........................................ $ 7,487 $ 5,764 ======== ========
Due to the lower discount rate, offset by positive fund performance, the accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2005 and 2004 exceeded the fair value of plan assets by $65.4 million and $60.7 million, respectively. The Company recorded an additional minimum liability of $72.9 million and $66.4 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Consequently, net of tax comprehensive loss of $3.8 and $10.7 million were charged against shareholders' equity in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31 are as follows:
2005 2004 -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Prepaid pension cost (included in other assets)............. $ 7,487 $ 5,764 ======== ======== Additional minimum liability (included in post-retirement benefits obligations)..................................... $(72,861) $(66,415) ======== ======== Accumulated other comprehensive loss (included in shareholders' equity)..................................... $ 72,861 $ 66,415 ======== ========
54 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS The following table presents estimated future benefit payments:
(IN THOUSANDS) 2006........................................................ $14,294 2007........................................................ $14,567 2008........................................................ $14,787 2009........................................................ $15,010 2010........................................................ $15,174 2011-2015................................................... $76,198
NON-QUALIFIED PLANS The Company has a supplemental retirement plan for officers and certain employees. Benefits are based on years of service and certain compensation that is excluded under the qualified plan. In November 2003 the plan was amended whereby benefits under the plan were frozen for all but two individuals as of December 31, 2003. The plan is unfunded and has no assets. A summary of the weighted-average assumptions as of December 31 used in pension calculations follows:
2005 2004 2003 ---- ---- ---- Discount Rate (for obligations as of December 31)........... 5.50% 5.75% 6.25% Rate of compensation increase............................... 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Total expenses under the non-qualified plans in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $2.3 million, $1.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively. A summary of the components of net periodic pension expense follows:
2005 2004 2003 ------ ------ ------ Service cost............................................... $ 302 $ 220 $ 372 Interest on projected benefit obligation................... 984 700 802 Amortization of transitional liability..................... 3 3 3 Amortization of prior service cost......................... 63 63 184 Recognized net actuarial loss.............................. 963 171 273 Effect of curtailment...................................... -- -- 942 ------ ------ ------ Net pension expense........................................ $2,315 $1,157 $2,576 ====== ====== ======
55 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Summarized below is the funded status of the combined supplemental plans as of December 31:
2005 2004 -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Change in projected benefit obligation: Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year........... $ 17,583 $ 11,641 Service cost................................................ 302 219 Interest cost............................................... 984 700 Benefits paid............................................... (944) (892) Actuarial loss.............................................. 352 5,915 -------- -------- Projected benefit obligation at end of year................. $ 18,277 $ 17,583 -------- -------- Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year.......... $ -- $ -- Employer contribution....................................... 944 892 Benefits paid............................................... (944) (892) -------- -------- Fair value of plan assets at end of year.................... $ -- $ -- -------- -------- Funded status............................................... $(18,277) $(17,583) Unrecognized net loss....................................... 7,470 8,081 Unrecognized prior service cost............................. 434 496 Unrecognized net obligation................................. -- 4 -------- -------- Accrued benefit cost........................................ $(10,373) $ (9,002) ======== ========
The accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2005 and 2004 exceeded the fair value of plan assets by $17.5 million and $15.1 million, respectively. The Company recorded an additional minimum liability of $7.1 million and $6.1 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Consequently, a net of tax comprehensive loss of $0.7 million and $2.4 million were charged against shareholders' equity in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31 are as follows:
2005 2004 -------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Accrued benefit cost (included in post-retirement benefits obligation)............................................... $(10,373) $(9,002) ======== ======= Intangible asset (included in other assets)................. 434 $ 500 ======== ======= Additional minimum liability (included in post-retirement benefits obligations)..................................... $ (7,137) $(6,088) ======== ======= Accumulated other comprehensive loss (included in shareholders' equity)..................................... $ 6,703 $ 5,588 ======== =======
56 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) ESTIMATED FUTURE PENSION BENEFIT PAYMENTS The following table presents estimated future benefit payments:
(IN THOUSANDS) 2006........................................................ $1,647 2007........................................................ $1,652 2008........................................................ $1,633 2009........................................................ $1,615 2010........................................................ $1,579 2011-2015................................................... $7,552
401(K) PLANS The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees which provides for a match by the Company of 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions. The match is provided in the Company's common stock under the ESOP plan. (15) POST-RETIREMENT HEALTH CARE AND LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS The Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits to qualified retired employees and dependents at certain locations. These benefits are funded as benefits are provided, with the retiree paying a portion of the cost through contributions, deductibles and coinsurance provisions. The Company has always retained the right to modify or terminate the plans providing these benefits. In accordance with SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions," the Company recognizes these benefit expenses on an accrual basis as the employees earn them during their employment rather than when they are actually paid. EDO POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN Post-retirement health care and life insurance expense included the following components:
2005 2004 2003 ---- ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS) Interest cost............................................... $124 $143 $126 Recognized actuarial loss................................... 58 53 -- ---- ---- ---- Total post-retirement health care and life insurance expense................................................... $182 $196 $126 ==== ==== ====
57 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The funded status of the EDO post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits plan is as follows as of December 31:
2005 2004 ------ ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Change in accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation: Accumulated benefit obligation at beginning of year....... $2,322 $2,441 Interest cost............................................. 124 143 Benefits paid............................................. (328) (353) Participant contributions................................. 35 29 Actuarial loss............................................ 81 62 ------ ------ Unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at end of year............................................... $2,234 $2,322 Unrecognized net loss....................................... (601) (578) ------ ------ Accrued post-retirement benefit cost........................ $1,633 $1,744 ====== ======
Actuarial assumptions used in determining the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation include a discount rate of 5.50% at December 31, 2005 and 5.75% at December 31, 2004, and estimated increases in health care costs. The Company has limited its increase in health care costs to 5% per year by requiring the retirees to absorb any costs in excess of 5% and has used such rate to measure its obligation. The effects of a one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have had the following effects increase/(decrease) in cost and/or obligation on the results for fiscal year 2005:
1% POINT 1% POINT INCREASE DECREASE -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Benefit obligation at end of year........................... $ 12 $ (11) Interest cost............................................... $0.7 $(0.7)
The above 1% increase/decrease trend is based primarily on the change in dental trend rates, since medical plan benefits are capped. AIL POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN Post-retirement expense included in the consolidated financial statements comprised the following:
2005 2004 2003 ----- ------ ------ (IN THOUSANDS) Service cost................................................ $ 201 $ 452 $ 453 Interest cost............................................... 446 741 765 Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss........................ (226) 12 40 ----- ------ ------ Total post-retirement expense............................... $ 421 $1,205 $1,258 ===== ====== ======
58 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The funded status of the AIL post-retirement benefit plan is as follows as of December 31:
2005 2004 ------- ------- (IN THOUSANDS) Change in accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation: Accumulated benefit obligation.............................. $ 8,213 $12,258 Service cost................................................ 201 452 Interest cost............................................... 446 741 Benefits paid............................................... (296) (381) Actuarial gain.............................................. (1,642) (4,857) ------- ------- Unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at end of year............................................... $ 6,922 $ 8,213 Unrecognized gain........................................... 4,890 3,474 ------- ------- Accrued post-retirement benefit cost........................ $11,812 $11,687 ======= =======
Actuarial assumptions used in determining the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation include a discount rate of 5.50% at December 31, 2005 and 5.75 at December 31, 2004. The accumulated benefit obligation would not be affected by increases in healthcare costs for retirees since such costs are funded by the participants. Healthcare trend costs will only affect the amounts related to disabled participants. The effects of a one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have had the following effects increase/(decrease) in cost and/or obligation on the results for fiscal year 2004:
1% POINT 1% POINT INCREASE DECREASE -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Benefit obligation at end of year........................... $289 $(269) Interest cost............................................... $ 24 $ (22)
(16) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES In order to aggregate all commitments and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005, the following table is included. The Company is obligated under building and equipment leases expiring between 2006 and 2019. The aggregate future minimum lease commitments under those obligations with noncancellable terms in excess of one year are shown below. The Company's commitments under letters of credit and advance payment and performance bonds relate primarily to advances received on foreign contracts which would be paid only if the Company failed to perform in accordance with the contract terms. The Company does not expect to have to make payments under these letters of credits or bonds since these obligations are removed as we perform under the related contracts. The amounts for letters of credit and performance bonds represent the 59 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) amount of commitment expiration per period. Actual pension contributions may differ from amounts presented below and are contingent on cash flow and liquidity.
PAYMENTS DUE IN: --------------------------------------------------------- 2011 AND COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: TOTAL 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 BEYOND ---------------------------------------- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------- (IN MILLIONS) Note Payable............................ $ 7.0 $ 2.0 $ 2.0 $ 3.0 $ -- $ -- $ -- 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2025.................................. 201.2 -- -- -- -- -- 201.2 Operating leases........................ 138.7 16.8 16.1 15.6 15.5 14.3 60.4 Letters of credit....................... 32.2 12.4 16.6 -- 3.2 -- -- Projected pension contributions......... 23.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 -- -- Advance payment and performance bonds... 1.9 0.2 -- -- 1.7 -- -- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ Total................................... $404.0 $37.4 $40.7 $24.6 $25.4 $14.3 $261.6 ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ======
Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $16.5 million, $13.6 million and $10.7 million, respectively. (17) LEGAL MATTERS The Company and three other companies entered into a consent decree in 1990 with the Federal government for the remediation of a Superfund site. The Superfund site has been divided into three operable units. The consent decree relates to two of the operable units. The third operable unit has not been formally studied and, accordingly, no liability has been recorded by the Company. The Company believes that the aggregate amount of the obligation and timing of cash payments associated with the two operable units subject to the consent decree are reasonably fixed and determinable. Accordingly, the environmental obligation has been discounted at five percent. Management estimates that as of December 31, 2005, the discounted liability over the remainder of the twenty years related to these two operable units is approximately $1.6 million of which approximately $0.3 million has been classified as current and is included in accrued liabilities. Approximately $0.6 million of the $1.6 million liability will be incurred over the next five years. The Company is also involved in other environmental cleanup efforts, none of which management believes is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain legal actions that arise out of the normal course of business. It is management's belief that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. (18) BUSINESS SEGMENTS The Company determines its operating segments based upon an analysis of its products and services, production processes, types of customers, economic characteristics and the related regulatory environment, which is consistent with how management operates the Company. In 2005, the Company revised its reporting segments in line with the evolution of the business. The Company's continuing operations are reflected in two business segments: Engineered Systems and Services and Electronic Systems and Communications. The Company has a disciplined acquisition program which is diversifying its base of major platforms and customers. 60 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Principal products and services by segment are as follows: ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATIONS - ELECTRONIC FORCE PROTECTION SYSTEMS - INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION - AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS - RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS - SPECIALIZED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS - COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND COMPUTERS (C4) - ANTENNA PRODUCTS ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND SERVICES - AIRCRAFT ARMAMENT SYSTEMS - INTEGRATED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES - MINE COUNTERMEASURES SYSTEMS - UNDERSEA WARFARE SONAR SYSTEMS - PROFESSIONAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES - FLIGHT LINE PRODUCTS Domestic U.S. Government sales, which include sales to prime contractors of the U.S. Government, amounted to 82%, 79% and 76% of net sales, which were 73%, 72% and 72% of Engineered Systems and Services' net sales, 87%, 87% and 79% of Electronic Systems and Communications' net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. International sales comprised 14%, 14% and 18% of net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. 61 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Information by segment on sales, operating earnings, identifiable assets, depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures is as follows for each of the three years ended December 31:
2005 2004 2003 -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Net sales: Electronic Systems and Communications.............. $408,217 $273,306 $221,554 Engineered Systems and Services.................... 240,265 262,867 239,113 -------- -------- -------- $648,482 $536,173 $460,667 -------- -------- -------- Operating earnings: Electronic Systems and Communications.............. $ 42,071 $ 26,493 $ 18,476 Engineered Systems and Services.................... 12,751 26,308 22,554 Environmental cost provision-Deer Park facility.... (1,543) -- -- Impairment loss on Deer Park facility.............. -- -- (9,160) Curtailment loss................................... -- -- (942) -------- -------- -------- $ 53,279 $ 52,801 $ 30,928 Net interest expense................................. (11,291) (7,848) (8,152) Other (expense) income, net.......................... (147) (319) 279 -------- -------- -------- Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes.............................................. $ 41,841 $ 44,634 $ 23,055 -------- -------- -------- Identifiable assets: Electronic Systems and Communications.............. $296,294 $201,625 $182,968 Engineered Systems and Services.................... 215,121 191,890 186,079 Corporate.......................................... 175,984 153,174 125,649 -------- -------- -------- $687,399 $546,689 $494,696 -------- -------- -------- Depreciation and amortization: Electronic Systems and Communications.............. $ 7,180 $ 8,015 $ 10,358 Engineered Systems and Services.................... 7,975 7,648 6,421 Corporate.......................................... 544 377 286 -------- -------- -------- $ 15,699 $ 16,040 $ 17,065 -------- -------- -------- Capital expenditures: Electronic Systems and Communications.............. $ 14,316 $ 6,076 $ 2,878 Engineered Systems and Services.................... 6,664 7,490 4,733 Corporate.......................................... 2,738 640 1,254 -------- -------- -------- $ 23,718 $ 14,206 $ 8,865 ======== ======== ========
62 EDO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Acquisition-related costs in 2003, including IPR&D, attributable to the Condor acquisition are included in the segments as follows:
2005 2004 2003 ----- ----- ---- (IN THOUSANDS) Electronic Systems and Communications....................... $ -- $ -- $929 Engineered Systems and Services............................. -- -- -- ----- ----- ---- Total....................................................... $ -- $ -- $929 ===== ===== ====
(19) GUARANTOR AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES The Company may, from time to time, issue indebtedness, a condition of which would be the guarantee of this indebtedness by certain of its subsidiaries. Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for the Company and the contemplated subsidiary guarantors and non-guarantors at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Each contemplated subsidiary guarantor is 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. Any guarantees that may be issued will be full and unconditional, as well as joint and several. In connection with the Company's credit facility, the Company cannot declare or pay any dividend on its outstanding common stock in an amount that exceeds fifty percent of its consolidated net income for the immediately preceding quarter. On January 1, 2005 the Company merged into itself two wholly owned subsidiaries resulting in three operating units of the former subsidiaries becoming operating units of the Company. 63 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 2005
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents........ $ 99,067 $ 4,232 $ 5,432 -- $108,731 Accounts receivable, net......... 68,603 117,164 3,423 -- 189,190 Inventories...................... 17,288 36,147 3,132 -- 56,567 Deferred income tax asset, net... 8,946 -- -- -- 8,946 Notes receivable................. 7,358 (258) -- -- 7,100 Prepayments and other............ 2,037 1,438 334 -- 3,809 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total current assets............. 203,299 158,723 12,321 -- 374,343 Investment in subsidiaries....... 317,356 -- -- (317,356) -- Property, plant and equipment, net............................ 25,946 20,380 3,248 -- 49,574 Goodwill......................... -- 143,637 8,710 -- 152,347 Other intangible assets, net..... -- 44,308 11,617 -- 55,925 Deferred income tax asset, net... 29,637 -- -- -- 29,637 Other assets..................... 24,751 822 -- -- 25,573 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- $600,989 $367,870 $35,896 $(317,356) $687,399 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.................... $ 37,942 $ 43,729 $ 3,566 -- $ 85,237 Contract advances and deposits... 6,120 36,124 -- -- 42,244 Notes payable.................... 2,000 -- -- -- 2,000 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total current liabilities........ 46,062 79,853 3,566 -- 129,481 Long-term debt................... 201,250 -- -- -- 201,250 Income taxes payable............. 6,513 -- -- -- 6,513 Deferred income tax liabilities, net............................ (3,244) 2,891 353 -- -- Post retirement benefits obligations.................... 103,815 -- -- -- 103,815 Notes payable.................... 5,000 -- -- -- 5,000 Environmental obligation......... 1,392 -- -- -- 1,392 Other long-term liabilities...... 55 -- -- -- 55 Intercompany accounts............ -- 174,844 24,771 (199,615) -- Shareholders' equity: Preferred shares................. -- -- -- -- -- Common shares.................... 20,306 98 -- (98) 20,306 Additional paid-in capital....... 167,219 25,221 6,418 (31,639) 167,219 Retained earnings................ 120,103 89,103 953 (90,056) 120,103 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax benefit........................ (46,819) (88) (165) -- (47,072) Treasury shares.................. (1,868) (4,052) -- 4,052 (1,868) Unearned ESOP shares............. (14,789) -- -- -- (14,789) Management group receivables..... (140) -- -- -- (140) Deferred compensation under Long- Term Incentive Plan............ (3,866) -- -- -- (3,866) -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total shareholders' equity....... 240,146 110,282 7,206 (117,741) 239,893 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- $600,989 $367,870 $35,896 $(317,356) $687,399
64 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS DECEMBER 31, 2005
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ Continuing Operations: Net Sales........................ $188,521 $443,069 $29,820 $ (12,928) $648,482 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales.................... 153,307 329,640 20,598 (12,928) 490,617 Selling, general and administrative................. 16,484 62,816 6,621 -- 85,921 Research and development......... 4,940 11,097 1,085 -- 17,122 Environmental cost provision, Deer Park Facility............. 1,543 -- -- -- 1,543 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- 176,274 403,553 28,304 (12,928) 595,203 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Operating Earnings............... 12,247 39,516 1,516 -- 53,279 Non-operating income (expense) Interest income 2,006 146 148 -- 2,300 Interest expense................. (13,591) -- -- -- (13,591) Other, net....................... 134 (104) (177) -- (147) -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- (11,451) 42 (29) -- (11,438) Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes.......................... 796 39,558 1,487 -- 41,841 Income tax (benefit) expense..... (1,301) 15,991 882 -- 15,572 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Earnings from continuing operations..................... 2,097 23,567 605 -- 26,269 Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries................ 24,172 -- -- (24,172) -- -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- 26,269 23,567 605 (24,172) 26,269 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Net earnings..................... $ 26,269 $ 23,567 $ 605 $ (24,172) $ 26,269
65 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DECEMBER 31, 2005
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ Operating Activities: Earnings from operations.............. $ 26,269 $ 23,567 $ 605 $(24,172) $ 26,269 Adjustments to earnings to arrive at cash provided (used) by operations: Depreciation.......................... 4,100 4,991 677 -- 9,768 Amortization.......................... -- 4,929 1,002 -- 5,931 Deferred tax benefit.................. (3,446) 227 -- -- (3,219) Bad debt expense...................... 156 667 -- -- 823 Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment........................... 485 3 313 -- 801 Environmental cost provision - Deer Park................................ 1,543 -- -- -- 1,543 Deferred compensation expense......... 1,661 -- -- -- 1,661 Non-cash Employee Stock Ownership Plan compensation expense................ 4,952 -- -- -- 4,952 Non-cash accelerated vesting option expense............................. 37 -- -- -- 37 Dividends on unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares......... 251 -- -- -- 251 Common shares issued for directors' fees................................ 198 -- -- -- 198 Income tax benefit from stock options............................. 711 -- -- -- 711 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: Equity in earnings of subsidiaries.... (24,172) -- -- 24,172 -- Intercompany.......................... 36,376 (35,236) (1,140) -- -- Accounts receivable................... (17,438) (12,233) 1,309 -- (28,362) Inventories........................... (2,631) (1,020) 1,342 -- (2,309) Prepayments and other assets.......... 3,647 905 2 -- 4,554 Contribution to defined benefit pension plan........................ (6,000) -- -- -- (6,000) Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other........................... 3,211 (1,779) (2,337) -- (905) Contract advances and deposits........ 886 27,233 -- -- 28,119 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Cash provided by operations........... 30,796 12,254 1,773 -- 44,823 Investing Activities: Purchase of plant and equipment....... (13,600) (9,336) (782) -- (23,718) Payments received on notes receivable.......................... 300 -- -- -- 300 Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired....................... (61,078) -- -- -- (61,078) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Cash used by investing activities..... (74,378) (9,336) (782) -- (84,496) Financing Activities: Proceeds from exercise of stock options............................. 875 -- -- -- 875 Proceeds from management group receivables......................... 81 -- -- -- 81 Repayments of acquired debt........... (6,931) -- -- -- (6,931) Redemption of 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes.................. (137,800) -- -- -- (137,800) Issuance of 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes.................. 195,716 -- -- -- 195,716 Payment of common share cash dividends........................... (2,421) -- -- -- (2,421) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Cash provided by financing activities.......................... 49,520 -- -- -- 49,520 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents......................... 5,938 2,918 991 -- 9,847 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year............................. 93,129 1,314 4,441 -- 98,884 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year................................ $ 99,067 $ 4,232 $ 5,432 -- $108,731
66 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 2004
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY ONLY SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- --------------------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents............ $ 93,129 $ 1,314 $ 4,441 -- $ 98,884 Accounts receivable, net.................... 51,321 97,757 4,732 -- 153,810 Inventories.............. 14,657 33,736 4,474 -- 52,867 Deferred income tax asset, net............. 5,046 -- -- -- 5,046 Notes receivable......... 7,202 -- -- -- 7,202 Prepayments and other.... 2,029 1,128 336 -- 3,493 --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total current assets..... 173,384 133,935 13,983 -- 321,302 Investment in subsidiaries........... 254,311 -- -- (254,311) -- Property, plant and equipment, net......... 16,931 14,442 3,457 -- 34,830 Goodwill................. -- 82,941 8,710 -- 91,651 Other intangible assets, net.................... -- 37,737 12,619 -- 50,356 Deferred income tax asset, net............. 30,241 -- -- -- 30,241 Other assets............. 17,394 915 -- -- 18,309 --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- $ 492,261 $269,970 $38,769 $(254,311) $546,689 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.... $ 34,490 $ 40,676 $ 5,732 -- $ 80,898 Contract advances and deposits............... 5,234 8,462 -- -- 13,696 --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total current liabilities............ 39,724 49,138 5,732 -- 94,594 Long-term debt........... 137,800 -- -- -- 137,800 Income taxes payable, long-term.............. 5,768 -- -- -- 5,768 Deferred income tax liabilities, net....... (169) -- 169 -- -- Post retirement benefits obligations............ 94,936 -- -- -- 94,936 Environmental obligation............. 1,663 -- -- -- 1,663 Intercompany accounts.... -- 142,626 25,911 (168,537) -- Shareholders' equity: Preferred shares......... -- -- -- -- -- Common shares............ 20,112 98 -- (98) 20,112 Additional paid-in capital................ 158,548 25,221 6,418 (31,639) 158,548 Retained earnings........ 96,004 57,740 349 (58,089) 96,004 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax benefit................ (42,008) (801) 190 -- (42,619) Treasury shares.......... (1,449) (4,052) -- 4,052 (1,449) Unearned ESOP shares..... (16,039) -- -- -- (16,039) Management group receivables............ (221) -- -- -- (221) Deferred compensation under Long-Term Incentive Plan......... (2,408) -- -- -- (2,408) --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total shareholders' equity................. 212,539 78,206 6,957 (85,774) 211,928 --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- $ 492,261 $269,970 $38,769 $(254,311) $546,689 ========= ======== ======= ========= ========
67 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS DECEMBER 31, 2004
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED -------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ Continuing Operations: Net Sales..................... $206,778 $313,544 $29,062 $(13,211) $536,173 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales................. 159,885 225,225 21,062 (13,211) 392,961 Selling, general and administrative.............. 22,720 49,735 6,336 -- 78,791 Research and development...... 4,548 5,635 1,437 -- 11,620 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- 187,153 280,595 28,835 (13,211) 483,372 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- Operating Earnings............ 19,625 32,949 227 -- 52,801 Non-operating income (expense) Interest income............. 1,041 134 96 -- 1,271 Interest expense.............. (9,119) -- -- -- (9,119) Other, net.................... (55) 20 (284) -- (319) -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- (8,133) 154 (188) -- (8,167) Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes....................... 11,492 33,103 39 -- 44,634 Income tax expense............ 2,182 13,146 238 -- 15,566 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- (Loss) earnings from continuing operations....... 9,310 19,957 (199) -- 29,068 Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries.... 19,758 -- -- (19,758) -- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- 29,068 19,957 (199) (19,758) 29,068 Earnings from discontinued operations.................. -- -- -- -- -- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- Net earnings (loss)........... $ 29,068 $ 19,957 $ (199) $(19,758) $ 29,068 ======== ======== ======= ======== ========
68 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DECEMBER 31, 2004
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY ONLY SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED -------------- --------------------- -------------- ------------ ------------ Operating Activities: Earnings (loss) from continuing operations..................... $29,068 $19,957 $ (199) $(19,758) $29,068 Adjustments to earnings to arrive at cash provided (used) by continuing operations: Depreciation..................... 4,718 4,912 846 -- 10,476 Amortization..................... -- 4,561 1,003 -- 5,564 Deferred tax benefit............. (650) (10) -- -- (660) Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment............ 226 29 -- -- 255 Deferred compensation expense.... 916 -- -- -- 916 Non-cash Employee Stock Ownership Plan compensation expense...... 4,330 -- -- -- 4,330 Dividends on unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares.... 272 -- -- -- 272 Common shares issued for directors' fees................ 140 -- -- -- 140 Income tax benefit from stock options........................ 1,134 -- -- -- 1,134 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Equity in earnings of subsidiaries................... (19,758) -- -- 19,758 -- Intercompany..................... 5,992 (5,525) (467) -- -- Accounts receivable.............. (2,741) (16,018) (748) -- (19,507) Inventories...................... 2,769 (19,718) (1,185) -- (18,134) Prepayments and other assets..... 2,444 1,150 (6) -- 3,588 Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other.......... (1,733) 3,860 617 -- 2,744 Contract advances and deposits... (1,890) 7,391 -- -- 5,501 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Cash provided (used) by continuing operations.......... 25,237 589 (139) -- 25,687 Investing Activities: Purchase of plant and equipment...................... (6,713) (6,905) (588) -- (14,206) Payments received on notes receivable..................... 1,200 -- -- -- 1,200 Cash received from Emblem escrow settlement..................... 301 -- -- -- 301 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Cash used by investing activities..................... (5,212) (6,905) (588) -- (12,705) Financing Activities: Proceeds from exercise of stock options........................ 1,535 -- -- -- 1,535 Proceeds from management group receivables.................... 130 -- -- -- 130 Payment of common share cash dividends...................... (2,395) -- -- -- (2,395) ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Cash (used) provided by financing activities..................... (730) -- -- -- (730) ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents........... 19,295 (6,316) (727) -- 12,252 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.............. 73,834 7,630 5,168 -- 86,632 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year........................ $93,129 $ 1,314 $ 4,441 $ -- $98,884 ======= ======= ======= ======== =======
69 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 2003
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents........ $ 73,834 $ 7,630 $ 5,168 -- $ 86,632 Accounts receivable, net......... 48,580 81,740 3,984 (1) 134,303 Inventories...................... 17,426 14,018 3,289 -- 34,733 Deferred income tax asset, net... 4,836 -- -- -- 4,836 Notes receivable................. 1,600 -- -- -- 1,600 Prepayments and other............ 2,171 1,853 330 -- 4,354 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total current assets............. 148,447 105,241 12,771 (1) 266,458 Investment in subsidiaries....... 240,846 -- -- (240,846) -- Property, plant and equipment, net............................ 15,161 12,479 3,715 -- 31,355 Notes receivable................. 6,538 -- -- -- 6,538 Goodwill......................... -- 82,919 9,608 -- 92,527 Other intangible assets, net..... -- 42,276 13,622 -- 55,898 Deferred income tax asset, net... 20,532 -- -- 20,532 Other assets..................... 20,026 1,362 -- -- 21,388 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- $451,550 $244,277 $39,716 $(240,847) $494,696 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.................... $ 40,786 $ 35,759 $ 6,004 $ (1) 82,548 Contract advances and deposits... 7,124 1,071 -- -- 8,195 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total current liabilities........ 47,910 36,830 6,004 (1) 90,743 Income taxes payable, long-term...................... 2,195 -- -- -- 2,195 Long-term debt................... 137,800 -- -- -- 137,800 Deferred income tax liabilities, net............................ (82) -- 82 -- 0 Post retirement benefits obligations.................... 71,898 -- -- -- 71,898 Environmental obligation......... 1,728 -- -- -- 1,728 Intercompany accounts............ -- 105,222 26,611 (131,833) -- Shareholders' equity: Preferred shares................. -- -- -- -- -- Common shares.................... 19,832 99 (99) 19,832 Additional paid-in capital....... 150,097 25,221 6,486 (31,707) 150,097 Retained earnings................ 69,059 80,878 548 (81,426) 69,059 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax benefit........................ (29,512) 79 (15) 167 (29,281) Treasury shares.................. (1,255) (4,052) -- 4,052 (1,255) Unearned ESOP shares............. (17,290) -- -- -- (17,290) Management group receivables..... (351) -- -- -- (351) Deferred compensation under Long- Term Incentive Plan............ (479) -- -- -- (479) -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- Total shareholders' equity....... 190,101 102,225 7,019 (109,013) 190,332 -------- -------- ------- --------- -------- $451,550 $244,277 $39,716 $(240,847) $494,696
70 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF EARNINGS DECEMBER 31, 2003
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ Continuing Operations: Net Sales.................... $205,517 $257,209 $16,047 $(18,106) $460,667 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales................ 158,501 189,567 8,297 (18,106) 338,259 Selling, general and administrative............. 21,112 44,440 6,303 -- 71,855 Research and development..... 4,967 3,213 414 -- 8,594 Acquisition-related costs.... 250 679 -- -- 929 Benefit plan curtailment loss....................... 942 -- -- -- 942 Impairment loss on Deer Park facility................... 9,160 -- -- -- 9,160 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- 194,932 237,899 15,014 (18,106) 429,739 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- Operating Earnings........... 10,585 19,310 1,033 -- 30,928 Non-operating income (expense) Interest income.............. 706 206 29 -- 941 Interest expense............. (9,093) -- -- -- (9,093) Other, net................... (11) 290 -- -- 279 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- (8,398) 496 29 -- (7,873) Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes...................... 2,187 19,806 1,062 -- 23,055 Income tax expense........... 1,523 7,607 514 -- 9,644 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- Earnings from continuing operations................. 664 12,199 548 -- 13,411 Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries... 12,747 -- -- (12,747) -- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- 13,411 12,199 548 (12,747) 13,411 Earnings from discontinued operations................. 1,398 -- -- -- 1,398 -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- Net earnings................. $ 14,809 $ 12,199 $ 548 $(12,747) $ 14,809
71 EDO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DECEMBER 31, 2003
EDO CORPORATION PARENT COMPANY SUBSIDIARY ONLY GUARANTORS NON-GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED --------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ Operating Activities: Earnings from continuing operations... $ 13,411 $ 12,199 $ 548 $(12,747) $ 13,411 Adjustments to earnings to arrive at cash provided (used) by continuing operations: Depreciation.......................... 6,122 5,708 350 -- 12,180 Amortization.......................... -- 4,466 419 -- 4,885 Deferred tax benefit.................. (6,095) (745) -- -- (6,840) Bad debt expense...................... -- 568 -- -- 568 Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment....................... 61 (192) -- -- (131) Impairment loss on assets held for sale................................ 9,160 -- -- -- 9,160 Deferred compensation expense......... 289 -- -- -- 289 Non-cash Employee Stock Ownership Plan compensation expense................ 3,281 -- -- -- 3,281 Non-cash stock option compensation expense............................. 292 -- -- -- 292 Dividends on unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares......... 292 -- -- -- 292 Common shares issued for directors' fees................................ 108 -- -- -- 108 Income tax benefit from stock options............................. 328 -- -- -- 328 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: Equity in earnings of subsidiaries.... (12,747) -- -- 12,747 -- Intercompany.......................... (3,240) 17 3,223 -- -- Accounts receivable................... (1,253) (3,030) 1,080 -- (3,203) Inventories........................... (2,691) 3,653 444 -- 1,406 Prepayments and other assets.......... 5,150 (1,111) (7) -- 4,032 Contribution to defined benefit pension plan........................ (5,000) -- -- -- (5,000) Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other........................... 10,328 (15,369) (361) -- (5,402) Contract advances and deposits........ (6,547) (5,535) -- -- (12,082) -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- Cash provided by continuing operations.......................... 11,249 629 5,696 -- 17,574 Net cash provided by discontinued operations.......................... 79 -- -- -- 79 Investing Activities: Purchase of plant and equipment....... (4,079) (4,258) (528) -- (8,865) Proceeds from sale of property, plant and Equipment....................... 21,304 -- -- -- 21,304 Payments received on notes receivable.......................... 300 1,085 -- -- 1,385 Restricted cash....................... 27,347 -- -- -- 27,347 Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired....................... (92,854) (1,334) -- -- (94,188) -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- Cash used by investing activities..... (47,982) (4,507) (528) -- (53,017) Financing Activities: Proceeds from exercise of stock options............................. 268 -- -- -- 268 Proceeds from management group receivables......................... 242 -- -- -- 242 Repayments of acquired debt........... (8,660) -- -- -- (8,660) Payment of common share cash dividends........................... (2,367) -- -- -- (2,367) -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- Cash used by financing activities..... (10,517) -- -- -- (10,517) -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents.................... (47,171) (3,878) 5,168 -- (45,881) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year............................. 121,005 11,508 -- -- 132,513 -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year................................ $ 73,834 $ 7,630 $5,168 $ -- $ 86,632 ======== ======== ====== ======== ========
72 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders of EDO Corporation Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EDO Corporation Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of EDO Corporation Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP New York, NY February 24, 2006 73 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders of EDO Corporation. We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that EDO Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). EDO Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. As indicated in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management's assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Nexgen, Fiber Innovations and EVI (the "acquisitions") which are included in the 2005 consolidated financial statements of EDO Corporation and Subsidiaries and constituted $87.4 million and $7.7 million of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2005 and $22.7 million of net sales for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of EDO Corporation Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal controls over financial reporting of the acquisitions. In our opinion, management's assessment that EDO Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, EDO Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of EDO Corporation Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and our report dated February 24, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP New York, NY February 24, 2006 74 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) The following table sets forth unaudited quarterly financial information for 2005 and 2004(in thousands, except per share amounts).
FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net sales................. $116,508 $110,877 $156,112 $126,290 $175,884 $129,875 $199,978 $169,131 Earnings.................. 2,908 3,857 6,089 4,176 9,841 6,874 7,431 14,161 Earnings per share: Basic:.................. 0.16 0.22 0.34 0.24 0.54 0.39 0.41 0.79 Earnings -- Basic..... 0.16 0.22 0.34 0.24 0.54 0.39 0.41 0.79 Diluted: Earnings -- Diluted... 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.23 0.48 0.35 0.38 0.68 ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
75 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as well as members of the Board of Directors, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. The Company's conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the acquisitions in 2005 of Nexgen Communications LLC, Fiber Innovations, Inc. and EVI Technology, LLC, (the "acquisitions") which are included in the 2005 consolidated financial statements of EDO Corporation and Subsidiaries. Based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING There were no changes in EDO's internal controls over financial reporting during EDO's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or likely to materially affect internal controls over financial reporting. MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005. We have excluded from this assessment the operations of EVI, Fiber Innovations and NexGen. These businesses were acquired during 2005 and constituted $87.4 million and $7.7 million of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2005 and $22.7 million of net sales for the year then ended. Management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by Ernst and Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 76 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The information called for by Item 10 (except to the extent set forth in this Item) is incorporated in this Report by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders anticipated to be held on April 25, 2006. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
NAME AGE POSITION, TERM OF OFFICE AND PRIOR POSITIONS ---- --- -------------------------------------------- James M. Smith............................ 64 Chairman of the Board (since May 2002) President and Chief Executive Officer (since April 2000). Jon A. Anderson........................... 63 Senior Vice President, Washington Operations (since October 2005); prior thereto, Vice President, Washington Operations (since April 2001); previously Director of Government Relations and Washington Regional Manager of AIL Systems, Inc. Frederic B. Bassett....................... 59 Senior Vice President-Finance, (since October 2005) Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (since January 2003); prior thereto, he was Vice President (since September 2002). From December 2000-July 2002 he was Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Condor Systems, Inc. Prior thereto, he was U.S. Operations Controller for the Howmet Division of Alcoa. Patricia D. Comiskey...................... 55 Senior Vice President-Human Resources (since October 2005) and Assistant Secretary; prior thereto, she was Vice President-Human Resources (since June 2001) and Assistant Secretary (since September 2000). Previously, she was Director - Corporate Human Resources. George Fox................................ 63 Vice President - Electronic Systems Group (since May 2000). Milo Hyde................................. 52 Vice President - Systems & Analysis Group (since April 2000). Frank Otto................................ 56 Senior Vice President, Strategic Development (since March 2005); prior thereto, Executive Vice President (since September 2002) and Chief Operating Officer (since February 2004); prior thereto, he was Vice President - Integrated Systems and Structures Group (since January 2001). Lisa M. Palumbo........................... 47 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (since October 2005); prior thereto, Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary (since April 2002). Previously, she was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Moore Corporation Ltd. (from March to September 2001), and prior thereto, Vice President and General Counsel of Rayonier, Inc.
Each officer is either elected by the board of directors or, as provided in our By-Laws, appointed by the Chief Executive Officer and holds office until the first meeting of the board following the next succeeding annual meeting of shareholders, and thereafter until a successor is appointed and qualified, unless the executive officer dies, is disqualified, resigns or is removed in accordance with our By-Laws. 77 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information called for by Item 11 is incorporated in this Report by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders anticipated to be held on April 25, 2006. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information called for by Item 12 is incorporated in this Report by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders anticipated to be held on April 25, 2006. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The information called for by Item 13 is incorporated in this Report by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders anticipated to be held on April 25, 2006. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Information appearing under the captions "Fees to Independent Registered Public Accountants for fiscal 2005 and 2004" in the 2006 Proxy Statement is hereby incorporated by reference. PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Ernst & Young LLP 2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. See Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts below. All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable. 78 SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO CHARGED TO NET BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF COSTS AND OTHER WRITE-OFFS/ END OF DESCRIPTION PERIOD EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS PERIOD ----------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Year ended December 31, 2005: Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $ 616 823 0 (469) $ 970 Year ended December 31, 2004: Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $1,359 0 0 (743) $ 616 Year ended December 31, 2003: Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $1,023 568 216(a) (448) $1,359
--------------- (a) Amounts acquired as a result of purchase of Emblem Group Ltd. on June 16, 2003, Darlington, Inc. on March 10, 2003, and Advanced Engineering & Research Associates, Inc. on February 5, 2003. 3. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT ------- ------- 2(a) Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement and Amendment 1 thereto, dated as of May 31, 2002, between EDO Acquisition IV Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as Buyer and Condor Systems Inc. and CEI Systems, Inc. as Seller (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 26, 2002, Exhibits 2.1 and 2.2). 2(b) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2003, between EDO Professional Services Inc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as Buyer and four individuals as Sellers (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 2003, Exhibit 2.1). 2(c) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2003, by the Company, as Buyer, and three individuals as Sellers (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2003, Exhibit 2.1). 3(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as amended May 10, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2004 Exhibit 3(a)(2)). 3(b) By-Laws of the Company as amended October 26, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2004 Exhibit 3(b)). 4(a) Form of 4.0% Convertible Senior Subordinate Notes due 2025 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 21, 2005 Exhibit 4(g)). 4(b) Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2005, by and between the Company and HSBC Bank, USA, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 21, 2005, Exhibit 4(e)). 4(b)(1) First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2005, by and between the Company and HSBC Bank, USA, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 21, 2005, Exhibit 4(f)). 10(a) Credit Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2005, by and among the Company, Citicorp U.S.A, Inc., Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A., et al. (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 10, 2005, Exhibit 10(a)(6)). 10(b) EDO Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, Exhibit 10(a)).
79
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT ------- ------- 10(c) EDO Corporation 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan as amended January 1, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10(c)). 10(d) Executive Life Insurance Plan Agreements, as amended through January 23, 1990, between the Company and 28 employees and retirees (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, Exhibit 10(g)). 10(e) Form of Directors' and Officers' Indemnity Agreements between the Company and 20 current Company directors and officers (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, Exhibit 10(d)). 10(f) EDO Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan I effective January 1, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2004, Exhibit 10(b)). 10(f)(1) EDO Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan II effective January 1, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2004, Exhibit 10(c)). 10(g) EDO Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-77865, dated May 6, 1999). 10(h) EDO Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(h)). 10(i) EDO Corporation Compensation Plan for Directors (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, Exhibit 10(g)). 10(j) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated July 1, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, Exhibit 10(i)). 10(k) Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2004, by and between EDO Corporation and James M. Smith (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 28, 2004, Exhibit 10). 10(l) Change in Control Agreement dated March 3, 2003 between the Company and Frederic B. Bassett (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(l)). 10(m) Change in Control Agreement dated March 21, 2003 between the Company and Patricia D. Comiskey (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(m)). 10(n) Change in Control Agreement dated March 25, 2003 between the Company and George P. Fox, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(n)). 10(o) Change in Control Agreement dated July 8, 2003 between the Company and Jon A. Anderson (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 1, 2006 Exhibit 10(b)). 10(p) Change in Control Agreement dated March 22, 2003 between the Company and Milo Hyde (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(p)). 10(q) Change in Control Agreement dated March 26, 2003 between the Company and Frank W. Otto (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(r)). 10(r) Change in Control Agreement dated May 1, 2003 between the Company and Lisa M. Palumbo (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10(s)).
80
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT ------- ------- 10(s) Form of Amendment to the Change in Control Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Exhibit 10(s)). 10(s)(1) Form of Amendment to the Change in Control Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 1, 2006, Exhibit 10(a)). 10(t)(1) 2004 Restricted Share and Retention Incentive Award Agreement between the Company and Frederic B. Bassett (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Exhibit 10(t)(1)). 10(t)(2) 2004 Restricted Share and Retention Incentive Award Agreement between the Company and Patricia D. Comiskey (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Exhibit 10(t)(2)). 10(t)(4) 2004 Restricted Share and Retention Incentive Award Agreement between the Company and Frank W. Otto (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Exhibit 10(t)(4)). 10(t)(5) 2004 Restricted Share and Retention Incentive Award Agreement between the Company and Lisa M. Palumbo (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Exhibit 10(t)(5)). 10(u) Form of 2003 Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10(v)). 10(v) Consent Decree, entered on November 25, 1992, amongst the United States, the Company, Plessey, Inc., Vernitron Corporation and Pitney Bowes, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998. 10(w) Agreement for Sale of Deer Park facility dated July 31, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Exhibit 10(w)). 10(x)* EDO Corporation Share Incentive Plan, dated July 6, 2005. 10(y) EDO Corporation 2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-129353, dated November 1, 2005). 14 EDO Corporation Standards Ethical Business Conduct for all EDO Employees (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 14). 21* List of Subsidiaries. 23* Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. 24* Powers of Attorney (included on the signature page). 31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
--------------- * Filed herewith. (b) Reports on 8-K 81 The following reports on 8-K were filed during the three months ended on December 31, 2005:
DATE OF REPORT ITEMS REPORTED -------------- -------------- October 27, 2005 Earnings Release dated October 27, 2005, announcing financial results for the quarter ended September 24, 2005. November 10, 2005 Entered into a $300 million credit facility by and among the Company, Citigroup USA, Wachovia Bank and Bank of America, N.A. November 14, 2005 In connection with the filing of a prospectus supplement, the Company is updating certain risk factors affecting its business and securities. November 15, 2005 On November 15, 2005, EDO Corporation (the "Company") entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement"), by and among the Company and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., acting for itself and as representative of Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC (the "Underwriters") in connection with the proposed underwritten public offering of $175 million principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2025 (the "Notes"). The Underwriters have an option to purchase up to an additional $26.25 million principal amount of the Notes to cover over-allotments.
82 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, thereunto duly authorized. EDO CORPORATION (REGISTRANT) By: /s/ JAMES M. SMITH -------------------------------------- James M. Smith President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT -------------------------------------- Frederic B. Bassett Sr. Vice President -- Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Dated: March 1, 2006 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints James M. Smith and Lisa M. Palumbo, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company's 2005 fiscal year, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below on February 20, 2006 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE --------- ----- /s/ JAMES M. SMITH Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and ------------------------------------------------ Director (principal executive officer) (James M. Smith) /s/ ROBERT E. ALLEN Director ------------------------------------------------ (Robert E. Allen) /s/ ROBERT ALVINE Director ------------------------------------------------ (Robert Alvine) /s/ DENNIS C. BLAIR Director ------------------------------------------------ (Dennis C. Blair)
83
SIGNATURE TITLE --------- ----- /s/ ROBERT M. HANISEE Director ------------------------------------------------ (Robert M. Hanisee) /s/ MICHAEL J. HEGARTY Director ------------------------------------------------ (Michael J. Hegarty) /s/ LESLIE F. KENNE Director ------------------------------------------------ (Leslie F. Kenne) /s/ PAUL J. KERN Director ------------------------------------------------ (Paul J. Kern) /s/ RONALD L. LEACH Director ------------------------------------------------ (Ronald L. Leach) /s/ JAMES ROTH Director ------------------------------------------------ (James Roth) /s/ ROBERT S. TYRER Director ------------------------------------------------ (Robert S. Tyrer) /s/ ROBERT WALMSLEY Director ------------------------------------------------ (Robert Walmsley)
84