XML 83 R33.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Fair Value Hierarchy Table for Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

We use a market approach for our recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to use the best information available. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy table for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2013 using:

 

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

Total
Carrying

Value as of

September 30,

2013

 

Trading securities held in the deferred compensation plans

$

  65,663

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

  65,663

 

Derivatives

 

–swaps

 

 

 

 

(2,320

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,320

)

 

 

–collars

 

 

 

 

  68,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

  68,313

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 using:

 

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other

Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

Total
Carrying

Value as of

December 31,

2012

 

Trading securities held in the deferred compensation plans

$

  57,776

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

  57,776

 

Derivatives

 

–swaps

 

 

 

 

  23,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

  23,326

 

 

 

–collars

 

 

 

 

  121,014

 

 

 

 

 

 

  121,014

 

 

 

–basis swaps

 

 

 

 

  993

 

 

 

 

 

 

  993

 

 

Value of Assets Measured at Fair Value on Non Recurring Basis

We review our long-lived assets to be held and used for impairment including proved natural gas and oil properties, whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. In third quarter 2013, we recognized an impairment expense of $7.0 million on certain of our oil and gas properties in South Texas due to reduction in reserves due to a failed well recompletion. Their fair value was measured using an income approach based upon internal estimates of future production levels, drilling and operating costs as well as discount rates, which are Level 3 inputs.  In second quarter 2013, we evaluated certain surface property we own which included consideration of the potential sale of the assets and recognized an impairment charge of $741,000. The following table presents the fair value of these assets at September 30, 2013 measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

Three Months Ended

September 30,

 

 

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Impairment

 

Natural gas and oil properties

$

  500

 

 

$

  7,012

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

  500

 

 

$

  7,012

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Surface property

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

  6,269

 

 

$

  1,281

 

 

$

 

 

$

  741

 

 

$

  6,269

 

 

$

  1,281

 

 

Carrying Amounts and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and the fair values of our financial instruments as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

 

September 30, 2013

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

Carrying
Value

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Carrying
Value

 

 

Fair

Value

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps and collars

$

  74,067

 

 

$

  74,067

 

 

$

  153,267

 

 

$

  153,267

 

Marketable securities(a)

 

  65,663

 

 

 

  65,663

 

 

 

  57,776

 

 

 

  57,776

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity swaps and collars

 

(8,074

)

 

 

(8,074

)

 

 

(7,934

)

 

 

(7,934

)

Bank credit facility(b)

 

(427,000

)

 

 

(427,000

)

 

 

(739,000

)

 

 

(739,000

)

Deferred compensation plan(c)

 

(207,404

)

 

 

(204,404

)

 

 

(187,604

)

 

 

(187,604

)

7.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018(b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(250,000

)

 

 

(262,500

)

8.00% senior subordinated notes due 2019(b)

 

(290,170

)

 

 

(322,125

)

 

 

(289,185

)

 

 

(332,250

)

6.75% senior subordinated notes due 2020(b)

 

(500,000

)

 

 

(538,750

)

 

 

(500,000

)

 

 

(542,500

)

5.75% senior subordinated notes due 2021(b)

 

(500,000

)

 

 

(525,000

)

 

 

(500,000

)

 

 

(535,000

)

5.00% senior subordinated notes due 2022(b)

 

(600,000

)

 

 

(580,500

)

 

 

(600,000

)

 

 

(627,000

)

5.00% senior subordinated notes due 2023(b)

 

(750,000

)

 

 

(720,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)              Marketable securities, which are held in our deferred compensation plans, are actively traded on major exchanges. Refer to Note 13 for additional information.

(b)              The book value of our bank debt approximates fair value because of its floating rate structure. The fair value of our senior subordinated notes is based on end of period market quotes which are Level 2 market values. Refer to Note 8 for additional information.

(c)              The fair value of our deferred compensation plan is updated on the closing price on the balance sheet date which is a Level 1 market value.